WEBVTT - The Power of Thorium

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, everyone, and welcome to Forward Thinking,

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that looks at the future and says I

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>can see behind your eyes the things that I don't know.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm La I'm Joe McCormick. Okay, guys,

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know I'm feeling I'm feeling kind of powerful today.

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:28.920
<v Speaker 1>For one thing, I've got the mystical acts in my hand.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the sound of the misqu Okay, on a scale

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of like one to Genghis Khan, how powerful I'm gonna

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>go with Alexander the Great, So that's like a seven

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 1>or an eight? It's eight nine? Yeah, how many kill

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>A lots of power? Is that? Well, you'd have to

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.599
<v Speaker 1>melt him down first, but then you could put him

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 1>through some nuclear reactions and thus gain power, and hey,

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power. You know, I was gonna talk about the

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>future of sneakers, but now I think I want to

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>talk about the future of nuclear power. You know, when

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I look at your head sometimes I just think facile material?

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you Yeah? Not fast stile? I know. Okay, So

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the material. What does fission? Right? Right,

0:01:15.160 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>material that you know, it shoots off neutrons, things that

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>cause heat and energy and power. Right, So we really

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about the future of nuclear power. Obviously

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>our listeners would like us to talk about that as well,

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:36.039
<v Speaker 1>and we're not talking specifically about uranium nuclear power, although

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we will address that in this episode as well. We

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>wanted to talk about thorium. Thorium. This is a user

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>requested topic, So we had a user ask us to

0:01:46.040 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>do an episode on thorium. So you should take that

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as a note of encouragement. If you want to hear

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>us do a topic in the future right on end,

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>tell us what it is and it may end up

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>becoming a topic on the show. But what's the deal

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with thorium? Well, first let's talk about what's the deal

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>with nuclear power in general? That should be a good

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>place to start. Why nuclear power plants? So you know

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>coal power plants, right, You know how we're getting power

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.639
<v Speaker 1>from that? We essentially we burn coal and we use

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that heat to uh create steam. You know, we turn

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>water into steam and steam turns turbine, which creates entirely

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:28.200
<v Speaker 1>excellent works of fiction about dirigibles. Yes, yes, it always,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly turns turbines. Yes, it more importantly turns turbine.

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Steam powers many things, including the imagination. But but one

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>of the problematic byproducts of this process I got a

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>little alliterated of there is that coal creates greenhouse gasses,

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>lots of them. When you burn coal, you get a

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of greenhouse gases and other toxins, and that is

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>bad for the environment. Yeah, it's significantly a contributor to

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>global warming and climate change. And so a lot of people,

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of course have been looking into clean energy. But you

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 1>are ready know this. You've heard this. So you've heard

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>about solar, you've heard about wind power. But there is

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 1>another energy that a lot of people think of as

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the sort of big elephant in the room when it

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to clean energy, which is nuclear. Right. It was

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of the clean energy of the nineteen fifties, and

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and nuclear power is clean ish, right right, well cleaner,

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I want to make a distinction here. No

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>power source is without any greenhouse gas emissions, because even

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>nuclear you have to say, mine uranium and transport that

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>uranium to the size so that it's never gonna have

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like zero carbon emissions. But when you can look at

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it you can say basically, nuclear power is mostly carbon

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>free and there are no direct carbon emissions from the

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>reactor itself. Yeah, so you've got that. You also know

0:03:57.600 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that it's very it's I mean, it is quite powerful.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You can power you can supply a whole power bread

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>with it. A single a single nuclear reaction like a

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>single atom splitting. You know, we hear about the splitting

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of the atom and how powerful it is in actuality.

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking about one individual reaction, it's like two millivolts.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It's really really small. But the thing is it happens

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>an aggregate. You've got not just one atom represented here,

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you have billions of atoms represented. So when those when

0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you have that many reactions happening, that adds up really quickly.

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So they are very powerful reactions. It's it's efficient, and

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>it's reliable. Yeah, assuming everything is working properly in the facility,

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 1>everything is reliable. And thus we turn to the cons. Right,

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>so the cons of nuclear power. Okay, so, um, you

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit of some leftovers, right, You've got

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>nuclear waste. This is material that nobody should go putting

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>their hands in or letting their kids play in. Yeah,

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to end up being like the teenage

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 1>mutant ninja turtles, You'll end up getting very sick. Right,

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It's stuff that you need to go something very safe with,

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 1>put it away where nobody can get to it, ideally

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.960
<v Speaker 1>like bury it in assault mine under the earth, encased

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in a big thing of graphite, so that nobody gets

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>anywhere near it. And you you might need to keep

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>facilities like that secure because if you happen to get

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>your hands on some of this material, it's possible that

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you could use it for nefarious purposes. Sure. Yeah, this

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous, dangerous stuff, and so and it stays dangerous

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>for a really long time, like well beyond your your lifespan. Yeah,

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and we'll talk about that a little bit more later on, um,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but but more presently, this is assuming I mean, these

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>are these are the normal operational cons to nuclear power.

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>What happens when stuff goes wrong. Well, we've got a

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:46.919
<v Speaker 1>couple of examples of that, right, I mean, there's some

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that we can point to that that range from range

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>of severity from this was bad too. We still don't

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>know how bad this is. Yeah, the things like Chernobyl

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and Fukushima, those those would be in the latter category

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>when there is a meltdown, and it's not just that

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a local, timely disaster, but it's a disaster

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that lingers and can have significant effects for years afterwards.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And even a disaster like Three Mile Island, which wasn't

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a meltdown, it was more it was a leak of

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>steam where there was a worry that it had released

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>radioactive steam into the environment. Uh and I mean, in fact,

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>that was what happened. It wasn't as severe as a

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>full meltdown, but still was an incredibly yea, it at

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>least caused a lot of worry. Yes, well, yeah, exactly.

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>So these are you know, there's some real concerns that

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>go with it, which is what kind of brings us

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 1>to thorium, because thorium, at least the proponents of thorium

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have a very different story they'd like to tell about

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>using that as a nuclear fuel as opposed to what

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>we usually use, which is uranium or sometimes a mixture

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of uranium and plutonium. Uh So, what's the story on thorium.

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>It's an element on the periodic to able right, Yep,

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that's an actinied, Yes, it is an actinid. It's very dense.

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 1>It's one of those that if you look towards the

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>bomb of the elemental table, that's where you're gonna find it.

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>It was discovered by Yawn's Jacob Berzelius. Yawn's Jacob Berzelius,

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I love it, okay. Uh, he was a swell guy

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>back in He discovered thorium, and he named it that

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>after the great god of thor god of should have

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>probably he probably is he? Actually, I'm sure, I'm sure

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:38.559
<v Speaker 1>after a long day of fighting giants he gets pretty

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>thor Yeah you agreed before he moaned, alright, so at

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>any rate? Uh puns and and and slips of the

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 1>tongue aside. Yes, he named it after the god thor So.

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Thorium is mildly radioactive. Yes, it is radioactive, but not

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>so much that it would you know, it's it's not

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the kind of stuff that in the movies you come

0:08:00.680 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in contact with it and then and then moments later

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you're you're dead or you're dying. Right, I mean, you

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>still don't want to use it to make a face moisturizer,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>but probably not. It's found most often in nature, is

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>part of a rare earth phosphate mineral called monosite. And

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>we've been using thorium for a while, not in a

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power use, but in other uses as an alloying

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 1>agent to strengthen magnesium at high temperatures and also to

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>coat tungsten filaments in television sets and other electronics. So

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>if you have an old TV, you may just have

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 1>yourself a little miniature thorium nuclear power plant. But not really,

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>because that's not what's really going on. Okay, so you're

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear us throughout this podcast saying something with isotope notation.

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's going to be the name of an element

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>followed by a number. The name of the element tells

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you how many protons it has, so it's something like uranium,

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and then the number after that is the mass number,

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>which will tell you not just how many protons, but

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>also how many neutrons, as so protons and neutrons added

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>together gives you that number. Different isotopes of the same

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>element have different properties and can have vastly different properties

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>in fact, especially for radioactive materials, so like uh for

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>simple example, carbon twelve has six protons and six neutrons

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and carbon thirteen has six protons and seven neutrons. So really,

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>what the larger numbers tell you is how many more

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>neutrons it has than the base level of the elements,

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>because if I had a different number of protons, would

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>be a different exactly. Yeah, if you change the number

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of protons, you've got a different element on your hands.

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, that's kind of what happens in a

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in a way with this this fission. You have elements

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that decay into other more stable elements when something happens. So,

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>for example, in a regular nuclear reactor, you have uranium

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that will change into isotopes of plutonium. Yeah. Yeah, In fact,

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>uranium will spontaneously undergo fission on its own, but you

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:57.480
<v Speaker 1>can actually induce it to happen by bombarding it with neutrons. So, uh,

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a great uh visual zation. I read about this,

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, I want to say, this was in

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.479
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works and how nuclear power works. So imagine

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that you have a pool table and you've got a racked.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 1>You've got a rack of pool balls that are tightly

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>packed together, and you hit it with a cue ball

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and they scatter around. Okay, well, now imagine that instead

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of it being this two dimensional pool table, it's a

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>three dimensional space where you have little packs of these

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>racked cuball or pool balls, and you hit it with

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the cue ball that represents the neutron. You bombard this

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this atom with those different balls split apart, and then

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:39.000
<v Speaker 1>they hit other clusters of racked pool balls that are nearby,

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and those split apart and they hit other clusters. That's

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>what we talk about when we say a nuclear reaction.

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>This it is in fact, yeah, And if you are

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>able to have enough of the reactive material packed together,

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>once you start this reaction, it'll just perpetuate itself as

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>long as there's enough of that nuclear material in the

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>right the right configuration. Right. So, with a uranium based

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power plant, the way this works is they pack

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that uranium and it's uranium two thirty five I believe,

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and it has to be enriched to two or three

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.920
<v Speaker 1>percent uranium two thirty five. Uh. It's packed into little

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>little pellets and those pellets are arranged in rods. So

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you've got these rods of uranium two thirty five and

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you then submerge them into water and you allow this

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>reaction to start and it begins to perpetuate itself and

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it gives off this little bit of energy per reaction,

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>but there are millions of reactions happening which immediately starts

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to heat up the water and after that it's a

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>lot like the coal plant. Actually, yeah, you're really using

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that energy to heat water, to preferably water that's in

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>a closed system that's not connected to the uh to

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the fusion core at all, so it's a separate water.

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>You have a heat exchange where you exchange the heat

0:11:55.480 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with this uh this this tube of water that's essentially

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 1>going around that then turns it too steam turns turbines, right,

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>because you're also using water to keep the system at

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>an appropriate temperature so that you don't have meltdown exactly.

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>And a meltdown is when you get this uncontrolled nuclear

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:13.840
<v Speaker 1>reaction where the material just gets hotter and hotter, and

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>since you're not able to cool it off, it literally

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>melts into a pool of extremely dangerous stuff, which is

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>what happened at Chernobyl and it's what happened at Fukushima.

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And because they were unable to monitor and maintain that

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>temperature because all of their systems failed and uh, that's

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the drawbacks to uranium based nuclear power plants,

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.199
<v Speaker 1>that that that opponents will bring up They say that

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>if the factory was to lose all power, like everything,

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>all backup systems, kind of like what happened at Fukushima,

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>then you would no longer be able to circulate water

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and continue to cool down the core, and it would

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>just keep heating up until it had a meltdown. That

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to maintain power in order to keep it safe,

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.199
<v Speaker 1>and that one of the things that the people who

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>who propose a specific implementation of thorium nuclear power say

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't a problem with their approach. Okay, so we've talked

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.960
<v Speaker 1>about how a standard uranium reactor works. How does a

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>thorium based nuclear reactor work. A couple different ways You

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>could do it. You could do it essentially the same

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>way as the uranium power plant. Yeah. Yeah, you can

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>put thorium straight into a water cooled well, not straight

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 1>into you would need to make a few changes. Yeah,

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>but but but into into a water cool nuclear reactor.

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:33.839
<v Speaker 1>But um. But the thing about thorium is that although

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it will not undergo this change all on its own

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the way that uranium will if you've bombarded with neutrons

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>um it uh will or if you bombard thorium two

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, which is the operative type of thorium I

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>believe in these discussions with neutrons, it turns into thorium

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>two thirty three and then eventually decays into uranium, uranium

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>two thirty three to be specific. Right, that's the sweet spot. Now,

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're actually doing is you're using the uranium in

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>a thorium reactor, the uranium that the thorium turns into

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>when you bombard it with neutrons. Yeah, yeah, that's exactly it.

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people say, look, when you're calling

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:17.320
<v Speaker 1>these thorium nuclear power plants, they're really uranium nuclear power plants. Well,

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>but you do need a you don't need a little

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>starter bit of uranium and and that will kick off

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this this nuclear reaction and then uh and then every

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit of uranium that is created out of that

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>forgers the nuclear reaction. Right. So there, But there there's

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>another way you can do this which still has this

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:42.720
<v Speaker 1>this process of thorium decaying into uranium and then uranium

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>undergoing fission. It's still that same process, but it's a

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>different implementation, which involves liquid fluoride. Right, liquid fluoride thorium

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>reactors or lifter reactors. Yeah, and I'd say this is

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>right now the most interesting thorium technology. It's certainly the

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>one that's getting a most attention, I would say, based

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>upon all the research I was doing, because it winds

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>up being safer from meltdown certainly, and and and a

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>couple other things. Okay, but so so how does how

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>does this whole salt thing work out? Well, you gotta

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>dissolve the thorium into these this fluoride salts. You also

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>dissolve the uranium into the fluoride salts. And so imagine

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that you've got a chamber. UH. This chamber does not

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have water in it, so you don't worry about using

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>water to cool it down. It doesn't have any active

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>cooling system. It's all. It's all UH incorporated directly into

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the implementation here of this reactor core. You've got a

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>graphite core that inside of it, you've got this this

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>UH salt and uranium mixture. And on the outside of

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the graphite core, you've got it surrounded by thorium. All right. Now,

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>when the uranium starts to undergo fission and starts to

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>release these high energy neutrons, they will pass through this

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>graphite core, encounter thorium on the other side, convert that

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>into uranium, which through a mechanism that I have no

0:16:03.520 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>idea how it works. I'm just gonna be perfectly honest,

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>because I couldn't find any explanation of how the mechanism worked.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>That uranium will then go into the core to keep

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:15.840
<v Speaker 1>perpetuating this, uh, this reaction. It generates the heat. You

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>still use a heat exchanger to do this whole water

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to steam to turbine approach that we've been talking about

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this whole time, but instead of using water to cool

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>down the system, the molten salts themselves actually act as

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a coolant. They keep it under control because the boiling

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>point of this these molten salts is higher than the

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>operating temperature of the reactor itself, way higher, like almost

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>a thousand degrees higher. Yeah, and because the salts are molten,

0:16:43.960 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really make any sense for them to melt down.

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>They already melted. It's already melted. So the ideas that

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you've already built a chamber that's able to withstand all this,

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>now that's part of the the considerations we have to

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about. The will will address those in a second,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I thought the neatest thing about this is that it

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>can have a passive UH safety system. So you know,

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned in the other one that in order to

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>prevent a meltdown you have to continuously circulate water to

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>keep the reactor cool. But this approach, you don't do that. Instead,

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they have essentially what's called a frozen salt plug. So

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got these liquid salts that have been frozen by

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>having a specific tube where you are putting a special

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 1>blower on it to lower the temperature. Right, So you

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>still need energy to to keep this this frozen plug

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 1>frozen exactly. But if the power goes out, the frozen

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>plug melts, and then all of that molten material will

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>go funnel through into another chamber, a specific holding chamber,

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>where it will rapidly, according to thorium proponents, cool and

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>solidify and thus even possibly be ready to be used

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>at a future date. So even in a worst case scenario,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>again according to the people who are really behind thorium UH,

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>then you just end up with a big solid lump

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.399
<v Speaker 1>of fuel that you can still use in the future.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>And hypothetically, this entire lifter process takes place at normal

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>atmospheric pressure near to normal atmospheric pressure. One of the

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>great dangers of of the water cooled nuclear systems is

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that they are under extremely high pressure. Right when you

0:18:18.080 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>increase pressure, you also increase the boiling point of any

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 1>given material. So the more more pressure a material is under,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the higher it's boiling points going to be. And that

0:18:29.000 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you're exactly right, Lauren, that those nuclear power plants have

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>systems that are under extreme pressure, and that's one of

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the things that makes them so potentially dangerous. If there

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is a failure in the system to contain that pressure,

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you can have explosive results. And we're talking about steam escaping,

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 1>like steam that's been pressurized to great levels and and

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 1>heated to incredible temperatures. Obviously, that would be very dangerous

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>to anyone in the immediate vicinity. And if that steam

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact carries with it radioactive material, obviously that would

0:18:57.280 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>have greater concerns for an even larger area. Okay, So,

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>so all of this so far sounds like it's a

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty good benefits of thorium or at least

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of of lifter reactor systems over traditional water reactor systems.

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the I mean is is thorium itself?

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Does that have any particular benefits? Yeah? Well, uh so,

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the things is that thorium is much more

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>abundant in nature than uranium. Uh And there are a

0:19:24.560 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of different figures because it's hard to know exactly

0:19:26.800 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>how much of a mineral we have on Earth. But

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>uh what that What most people say is that thorium

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is about three to four times more plentiful on Earth

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>than uranium is. And according to the International Atomic Energy

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Association slash Nuclear Energy Agency Red Book, the planet Earth

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>has an estimated four point four million tons of total

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>known and estimated thorium, and if you want to go

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:53.359
<v Speaker 1>with a more optimistic figure, according to the World Nuclear Association,

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.280
<v Speaker 1>it might be something more like five point four million.

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, why does this matter? Are we about to

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:03.919
<v Speaker 1>run out of uranium? Well not exactly, and it seems

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.640
<v Speaker 1>unlikely actually that will ever completely run out of uranium.

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is cost um As it becomes more

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>difficult to locate and extract new reserves of uranium, that

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>leads to an increase in price. So relative abundance and

0:20:19.560 --> 0:20:22.640
<v Speaker 1>ease of extraction actually does matter. Yeah, obviously, Like if

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>you if you get to a point where you could say, well,

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>technically we still have x amount of this fuel out there,

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's going to require you know, a hundred and

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of the effort that we put forth in

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the past. You have to offset that some way. So

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>there's like another return on investment question here, that is

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>it is it worth to go and get that fuel?

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.959
<v Speaker 1>If getting the fuel itself, is that difficult to do?

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>And thorium it gives us an alternative. Yeah, Thorium, as

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned before, it's found in the natural rare earth

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>mineral monocite, and there's like I read about there's some

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:57.120
<v Speaker 1>big vein of that up in Idaho or something. It's

0:20:57.200 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>it's apparently not that hard to come by. Yeah, there

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:01.840
<v Speaker 1>was one guy. I saw a YouTube video where a

0:21:01.880 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>guy was talking about the person was a strong advocate

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:09.159
<v Speaker 1>for thorium power plants, and I I was about how a

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>front of his had a rare Earth mind in the

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 1>United States and he estimated that he would be able

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to get enough thorium out of his one mind, which

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>he said was not particularly special, uh, to power the

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>entire globe for a year. Well, whether that's true, we

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but I don't. I wouldn't rule that out. Yeah,

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if that's if that is true, then obviously

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that would be a big boon. I mean, that would

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 1>be one of the big pros of thorium. Sure. What

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>about the waist it produces, Yeah, that's a big one. Uh.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>And so it's gonna be really difficult to nail down

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:51.440
<v Speaker 1>actual numbers about the comparative advantage thorium lifter technology offers

0:21:51.560 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>over a regular nuclear power reactor in terms of the waste.

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>But pretty much everybody's in agreement that it's gonna be

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>better some degree. Right. A lot of people are saying

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that it will produce a hugely smaller amount of waste

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>just in terms of huge a much smaller amount of

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>waste just in terms of volume. I saw a figure

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>saying between a thousand to ten thousand times less nuclear waste.

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>That's pretty incredible. Yeah. Another another figure I saw it

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.760
<v Speaker 1>was an advocate saying that it would be tents of

0:22:26.800 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a percent of the volume. That's um I mean, and

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that could very well be true. The counter arguments I've

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>heard on that, by the way, are mostly uh mostly

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this is all conjecture, obviously, but they're mostly centered around

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea that if these nuclear power plants end up

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>being uh like, if we end up making lots more

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of them, that in aggregate they will end up producing

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>at least maybe not the same amount, but enough nuclear

0:22:55.520 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 1>waste for it to still be a considerable problem. Though,

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.199
<v Speaker 1>just to put that in perspective, let's not pretend that

0:23:04.200 --> 0:23:07.199
<v Speaker 1>the waste by products produced by something like coal or

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing to really worry it. Right, So if if you're

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna say something like that, oh, well, you know, if

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>cleaner and more efficient nuclear took up a much larger

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:22.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of our energy consumption profile or our energy production profile, actually,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>um that that would be just as bad. Well, you

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.879
<v Speaker 1>could compare that to actually the fact that coal lash

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>as radioactivity effect, isn't it. So yeah, we can certainly

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>look at that. There's another aspect to the waste question,

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 1>which is how long the radioactive waste remains dangerous, right,

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>and how dangerous it is. Another aspect to the question

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of the waste by product is not just how much

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it produces, but how long it remains dangerous. So, of course,

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 1>radioactive material has a half life, which means that you know,

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it takes this much time for half of it to

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>decay into another mint um, And so that is a

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 1>factor when you're looking at how long this byproduct is

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>going to remain radio toxic enough to hurt somebody. Generally,

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>people are saying that the byproducts of a thorium based

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>reactor are going to remain dangerous for a lot less time.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>But again, this is one of those things where I've

0:24:19.680 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of different figures and I don't feel

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 1>confident enough to cite any one of them. Right, Yeah,

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>none of us here are nuclear physicists. We are going

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>largely by what a lot of other people have said,

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and most of the people who are saying things about

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 1>this have pretty high stakes in the issue one way

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>or another. So, Um, I would say the length of

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 1>time that it remains radio toxic, at least to my mind,

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>remains something that's debatable. Um, But I it could be

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually true that this stuff is good within

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred years, whereas most you know, nuclear byproducts take

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot longer to become safe. Right, Okay, Um, but

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so we've talked about the waste, what about the actual

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>energy yield before we get to the waste. That's also

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>a big advantage, they say, which is they say that

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>thorium has a much greater energy yield per unit of fuel.

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>One estimate is that the yield of thorium is two

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred times greater than the yield of uranium, So like

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.880
<v Speaker 1>one pound of thorium produces as much electricity as two

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred pounds of uranium. Right. And really, when you're talking

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about water cooled reactors and uranium fuel rods, you're only

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.240
<v Speaker 1>getting some three to five percent of the potential energy

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>out of that once you've converted it to steam and

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>turbines like that. Right, Yeah, the the efficiency number is abysmal.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>You're generating lots of energy, but you're wasting a lot

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of potential energy in the process, or at least you're

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:53.360
<v Speaker 1>not able to useful work. Right. We've already mentioned this

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>some of the safety advantages, right, Yeah, the fact that

0:25:56.560 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it has a passive system as opposed to an active system,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>so it's one that could work even when you lose

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>all power to the facility. Uh, that would actually technically

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.199
<v Speaker 1>turn on the safety system because it would make the

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>blower stop blowing. Then that frozen plug of salts could melt,

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and you would end up having the reactor drain into

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a containment vessel. And of course, since it's already melted,

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Joe, you can't have a melt down, right,

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's that. Okay, so all of this sounds really good. Um.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>We also mentioned earlier in the podcast about um about

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the byproducts of uranium water cooled processes being plutonium,

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>which can be used in weapons. Yeah. Right, And this

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is a big thing also that proponents of thorium have

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>latched onto, which is the idea that a thorium reactor

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>could be a very strong impediment to nuclear proliferation, which

0:26:52.800 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>means spreading of nuclear materials that people could use as

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>a weapon. Right, Okay, So a thorium reactor still would

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 1>produce material els that you could use to make a weapon.

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>It would produce uranium two thirty three, which is something

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that could potentially be used to create a nuclear bomb.

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's the material that's that's primary in the reactor.

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>It's the facile material, that's it's the chemical workhourse of

0:27:18.400 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 1>your thorium reactor. But when thorium is irradiated and it

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and it produces uranium two thirty three, it also produces

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this highly radioactive, highly dangerous isotope, which is uranium two

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 1>thirty two different. So if you want to retrieve the

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 1>uranium two thirty three, you've got this horrible, horrible, nasty

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff mixed in and you need really sophisticated technology and

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>facilities to harvest it without irradiating yourself. So, in other words,

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why one of the arguments are

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>saying that thorium is good to prevent proliferation is just

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>that it's too darn hard to get the stuff that

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>would have been useful in a nuclear bomb without you know,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>putting yourself. UH had a great risk of risk than

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the people that you'd want to bomb, So that is true.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is also a good opportunity for

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>us to transition to talking about some of the potential

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:18.080
<v Speaker 1>drawbacks to thorium, or at least some of the main

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>questions that have been asked about the supposed benefits of it.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 1>And one of them is a criticism of this UH

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>statement that thorium reactors would not be liable to allow

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>proliferation UM and it was a comment piece published in

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Nature in two thousand and twelve, and basically it explained

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>how it might be possible to get around this problem

0:28:40.400 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>of the uranium two thirty two preventing you from getting

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>bomb materials out of these reactors. Basically, what they mentioned

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is there's a totally separate process you could go around

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to create some uranium two thirty three from thorium, and

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be you separate from thorium the pro tactinium

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 1>two thirty three, and then you allow that by product

0:29:02.800 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to decay into uranium two thirty three, which is good

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for bombs and that has little radio toxic byproduct. They said, Okay,

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>so all this doesn't mean that thorium is bad. I mean,

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we know that uranium can be used to produce nuclear weapons.

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>So the authors of the common piece in Nature, they

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>just simply wanted to point out that thorium is not

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>completely free of proliferation risks. Right. Well, and another drawback

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is when it comes down to the fact that you know,

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about creating a brand new type of nuclear

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>power plant on a commercial scale. You're talking about a

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of investment, financial investment, right and we're not just

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about the investment it takes to say get the

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.640
<v Speaker 1>fuel or build the facilities. We're talking about research. I mean,

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of back to the drawing board, because

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>today's uranium based nuclear power plants owe a whole lot

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to money that was originally dedicated to mill terry and

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>weapons research around the time of World War two and so,

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>governments were putting money into bombs and we happen to

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>get some clean power as a result. But you might

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>ask the question, well, can the peaceful pursuit of cleaner,

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>safer energy provide the same incentive that war does well,

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:21.840
<v Speaker 1>especially since you know, the even the Cold War, you

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>had the United States and the Soviet Union both pursuing

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power as also a means of generating nuclear material

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that could be used in nuclear weapons, right, So, I

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>mean that was that was one of the ideas, was

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that not only do we get power out of this,

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>but we could in theory makes as a byproduct of

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>this terrific clean power, we can blow people up. Yeah. Yeah,

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>so I mean that was you know, that's that's something

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that was an ongoing consideration even after the end of

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>World War two, and yeah, convincing people to spend billions

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of dollars for the research and development and then the

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 1>construction and maintenance of a new type of power infrastructure

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is that's a big deal. When you want to think

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>about costs, think not just about the amount of money

0:31:07.640 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that goes into building it, not just in researching how

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but also in researching how to regulate it,

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>which is a huge concern. Actually, you have to before

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you do this on a large scale, you have to

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>create a regulatory framework like we already have for light

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>water reactors. We don't have that for thorium based reactors.

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And we don't know how long that would take, how

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>much it would cost. And it's something that you actually

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>do need. I mean, you can't just have like unregulated

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>nuclear power plants. Sure, even estimating all of those costs

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is really pretty tricky. Yeah, pretty much is impossible to estimate,

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to give a meaningful estimation. And there's there's some factors

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>we just don't know yet. For example, Uh, these salts

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>can be corrosive, and what happens if they are corrosive

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to the point where you have to consistently replace elements

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of your of your reactor so that you can, you know,

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:05.480
<v Speaker 1>operate it safely. And uh, you know, we don't really

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>know the answer to that because we haven't had a

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>case study that's lasted long enough on a commercial scale. Certainly,

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.640
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had one of those to really see what

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the effects are and how how concerning they should be.

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot of uncertainty which has fueled opponents

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of thorium to really say, look, this isn't we shouldn't

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>be spending time or money on this approach because of

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 1>these arguments. Yeah, well, there there are several uh different

0:32:36.120 --> 0:32:38.960
<v Speaker 1>types of arguments that a lot of these opponents take,

0:32:39.000 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and one of them is something I'm kind of sympathetic to,

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:45.400
<v Speaker 1>which is that, Okay, if we think about how much

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>money it would take and how much time it would

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 1>take to invest in all this um, what if we

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just put all that into the renewables we already have,

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>like solar and wind. I mean, if we could create

0:32:56.240 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>offshore wind turbines and more efficient photovoltaics with all of

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that money, would we actually kind of like offset the

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>benefit that would be gained from thorium in the first place. Well,

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I I don't know if that's true, but just the

0:33:09.720 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's possible is enough to make you think.

0:33:14.520 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a similar argument that says that by the time

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we would reach a point where thorium nuclear power plants

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>would be commercially viable. We may have already reached the

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>height of the renewable energy approaches, and it would be

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a moot point anyway, So that even if you did

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.120
<v Speaker 1>spend the money on this and you directed it toward

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>thorium research, by the time it was actually something we

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>could take advantage of, it would be it would be meaningless,

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>would be obsolete. Yeah. Another sentiment I often encountered when

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I was reading about this was just that I think

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of anti nuclear activists who sort

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of see this as it's just a distraction. You know,

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like an excuse to keep pressurized water reactors online

0:33:58.160 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>while the powers that be, quote researching thorium is placating people.

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>That sounds kind of like conspiracy thinking. To me, That's okay.

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.439
<v Speaker 1>It's on the other side too, the conspiracy thinking that's

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>saying that it's the nuclear lobby that's against thorium, not

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:18.839
<v Speaker 1>they're not investigating it in order to maintain the stas quo.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.319
<v Speaker 1>They're actively opposing thorium because they've got too much of

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a steak in the uranium based power. That doesn't really matter.

0:34:25.440 --> 0:34:27.880
<v Speaker 1>It turns out that that if you are if you

0:34:27.960 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>are of this particular mindset. You're convinced that the other

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>side is working clandestine lee against you in some matter, uh,

0:34:36.360 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>even if the two different ways that it's working against

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you are complete opposites. Although it is certainly true that

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>many people have a huge monetary steak in keeping the

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>status quo as it stands, I mean, you know, I'm

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that that's kind of the insidious base of

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>many conspiracy theories, but that doesn't make it untrue. Oh no,

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean people who have money actually do spend that

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 1>money to further their interests. Yeah, and that's not a

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>not ada. And if you thought that perhaps that that

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in some points of this conversation we were overly critical,

0:35:13.040 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not so much that I'm critical of the technology.

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not at all. In fact, I'm very curious to

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.560
<v Speaker 1>see this technology go further into uh, to to be

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 1>tested and find out what the results are. I actually

0:35:24.800 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>really hope that they turn out to be positive and

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>are something that we can take advantage of in the future.

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.040
<v Speaker 1>The reason why we get a little kg and a

0:35:33.040 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>little skeptical is because a lot of the reports that

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 1>are out there are written by people who clearly have

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>a vested interest in one side or the other of

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>this argument, and thus it's very difficult to get unbiased information.

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:49.839
<v Speaker 1>And until we have more lifter reactor testing or that's

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:52.279
<v Speaker 1>one of those a t M machine kind of things, apologies,

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Until we have more lifter testing in firmly in place,

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to say what the outcome of a

0:35:57.640 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of these questions that we've brought up. It's to

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be yeah, well, especially at the commercial levels, making it

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:07.080
<v Speaker 1>viable enough financially to be widespread. But if I can

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.280
<v Speaker 1>say one thing at the in sort of in favor

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of thorium, it's that I can't find any convincing arguments

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 1>that thorium based nuclear power would be worse than current

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>uranium based reactors. The criticisms that I see either boil

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 1>down to a blanket rejection of all nuclear energy, or

0:36:26.480 --> 0:36:30.360
<v Speaker 1>an argument may be correct, maybe incorrect, that thorium isn't

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>so much better that it's worth it, right, so, in

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>other words, that the improvements we would see would be

0:36:36.880 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so small that it would take too long for us

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to see any kind of return on that investment in

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the technology in the first place, right, or even that

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I I think that one of the biggest benefits here

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>is the safety issue, and safety isn't monetize herble. Yeah,

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.759
<v Speaker 1>that's a good point. I mean, it's that's a really

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:56.759
<v Speaker 1>dire outlooks. It's tough to it to say this, but

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these things really do end up depend

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>heavily on how expensive is it going to be to implement,

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and if you end up you know, it's just the

0:37:06.000 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>world we live in. Until we reach that magical Star

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Trek future where money is no longer a concern, then

0:37:12.400 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to take that into consideration. Well, let's get

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>practical for a second. What's actually going on today. Are

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there thorium based reactors currently online or online in the past,

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and how is this working in practice? I want to

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>start with one interesting fact that you all might not know,

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>but that there were actually lifter experiments at oak Ridge

0:37:33.400 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 1>National Laboratory in Tennessee half a century ago. You just

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>bringing this up because you're from Tennessee. I am from Tennessee.

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Uh uh yeah. From the fifties through the seventies, scientists

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 1>at oak Ridge pursued lifter or research. They built a

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>molten salt reactor that went online in the sixties. I

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:53.160
<v Speaker 1>think it was sixty four. Uh, and it didn't actually

0:37:53.239 --> 0:37:55.640
<v Speaker 1>run on thorium, but they were sort of proving the

0:37:55.760 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>concept viable by running it on uranium two thirty three,

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>which the isotope that thorium produces in fission. Right when

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you bombard it with a neutron, that's what thorium, yeah,

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:09.000
<v Speaker 1>decays into. So they were sort of in effect running it,

0:38:09.080 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>but just without actually starting with thorium. And this went

0:38:12.680 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>on until it was shut down by the Nicks administration

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:18.719
<v Speaker 1>in seventy three. So that's the end of that, right.

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.359
<v Speaker 1>And there are companies that are working on this, and

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>some of them have have thorium reactors. They're not commercial

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 1>reactors now, Uh, some of the researcher There's a thor

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Energy out of Norway. I like their name, Lightbridge Corps

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of the United States. Uh, there's there's one as far

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:38.760
<v Speaker 1>as I know that is still an operation in India,

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the Kakra par One. It might be the world's only

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>operational thorium reactor. In fact, it was built in and

0:38:45.719 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a pressurized water reactor. I mean it's it's a

0:38:48.640 --> 0:38:52.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not one of these lifters, but it is redesigned

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:55.880
<v Speaker 1>to run on thorium. Um and and I think I

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:59.320
<v Speaker 1>think that that might be a really good potential immediate future,

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 1>especially for for thorium. Yeah, we're not talking about creating

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a brand new style of power facility. You're repurposing your

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of retrofitting, yeah, or or refitting rather um And

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've seen it suggested that even a blend

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>of thorium and uranium in in a redesigned water reactor

0:39:17.160 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>could reduce the the uranium fuel input and the waste

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:25.919
<v Speaker 1>output and also decrease this potential for proliferation. Yeah. They're

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:32.200
<v Speaker 1>actually also thorium reactors undergoing research in China, So the

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Academy of Sciences is running a thorium based research

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.879
<v Speaker 1>project and they're actually partnering with oak Ridge yet again,

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>this episode brought to you by the Great State of Tennessee.

0:39:44.120 --> 0:39:46.360
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, no, this is that I actually do find

0:39:46.360 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>this technology really interesting. And I mean obviously anything that

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>any sort of research that goes toward meeting our energy needs,

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>which is obviously that's incredibly important to us. Uh, I

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:03.240
<v Speaker 1>find citing and I hope it works out. It's certainly

0:40:03.280 --> 0:40:05.880
<v Speaker 1>got a long way to go in the testing phase.

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And also just you know, making enough people have to

0:40:10.239 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 1>prove to enough folks with money that this is worth

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the investment. That's the that's really the bottom line is

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>what we're getting to and then they have to prove

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that it works. So step one is proving to the

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>people who have the money, hey, this is something that

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>deserves funding so that we can make working, commercially viable

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>power plants. And then to actually make it happen, and

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to prove that it's it's a safe method of generating power.

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>It's um I mean, it's a long road ahead, but

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it's something that's got some promise to it, whether or

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.279
<v Speaker 1>not we ever see it come to fruition or some

0:40:43.400 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>other technology ends up taking its place. I mean, maybe

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it'll be renewable sources. I'm a little skeptical of that too,

0:40:51.040 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>just based upon the history of how inefficient those tend

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:56.239
<v Speaker 1>to be. I would love to see a world where

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we're running on solar power. I would love to see that.

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 1>The big question there is can't it meet the need? Yeah? Exactly,

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the big one. A lot of conservationists that suggest

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that what you should do is cut down your energy

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 1>consumption in the first place, rather than to try and

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>find new ways of generating energy, but to make sense

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that that doesn't seem to be the way human race

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>has um progressed since it's started settling down and making farms.

0:41:19.160 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>But maybe we can make that conscious decision. That would

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:26.600
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see people on moss doing that. Or

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:30.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll see, you know, fusion reactors become a thing

0:41:30.800 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and make this whole discussion moot. Uh, that would be awesome.

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about fusion reactors at some point again, I'm

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sure anyway, that wraps up this discussion about using thorium

0:41:42.360 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>as a fuel source. If you have suggestions for topics

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we should tackle in future episodes of Forward Thinking, you

0:41:48.080 --> 0:41:50.480
<v Speaker 1>should let us know about it, because shouting it into

0:41:50.520 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>the air is not nearly as effective as you seem

0:41:52.800 --> 0:41:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to think it is. Send us an email our addresses

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>FW thinking at discovery dot com, or drop us a

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 1>line on the social networks we frequently, which include Facebook, Twitter,

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and Google Plus. You can find us with the handle

0:42:04.040 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>f W thinking and we'll talk to you again really sing.

0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.279
<v Speaker 1>For more on this topic and the future of technology,

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:28.239
<v Speaker 1>visit forward thinking dot com, brought to you by Toyota.

0:42:28.680 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's go places