WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: March 26, 2024

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. Jenny and Manuel of

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>evercret I I right in this The phrase it is

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>different this time is being heard everywhere, especially since the

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 2>FED has promised the cut raids from a position where

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 2>the economy is not slowing. We do think that Friday's

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 2>core PC number could surprise to the upside and a

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 2>cut would get quickly priced out and the market would

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 2>respond with stock weakness. Judian and place to say with

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:00.319
<v Speaker 2>us for more. Julian, good morning, good morning to see

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you said in the exuberance zone. Can you describe what

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 2>that zone is irrational or not?

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 3>It is not irrational, okay, because I think when we

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.119
<v Speaker 3>as investors think about history. We have to go back

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 3>to the time where, frankly, having run money during that time,

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 3>you knew there was irrationality. In year two thousand that

0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 3>was twenty eight times earnings. We are at twenty three

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 3>times earnings.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.120
<v Speaker 4>Now. The S and P and rview.

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Would have to get a lot closer to six thousand

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 3>to get to irrational. However, we are seeing signs of

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 3>the wall of warri having given completely dissolved, very barrant

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 3>behavior in the options markets. Betting on stocks doubling in

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the course of three or four days, incredible betting on

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 3>the Nasdaq rallying a further thirty three percent out to

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:57.480
<v Speaker 3>June after already rallying thirty percent since the October low.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 4>All of these.

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Signs you see short interest being a decade lows. All

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 3>these things say that there is a feeling that the

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 3>market isn't invincible. And when you think about the narrative

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 3>of the last several months where we walk back from

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 3>six rate cuts to three rate cuts without the market

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 3>you know, pausing for even a moment, Yeah, you can

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 3>understand why we're there. We think that the reaction to

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 3>hotter inflation may be different.

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, what the comeback might be. Just because you

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>found someone playing blackjack doesn't mean we're in Las Vegas, right,

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, you can always find something like that. You

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:37.640
<v Speaker 2>find it, you can find the gambling going on somewhere.

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>That stuff always exists. What's new about this?

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 3>So what's new about this is that this phenomenon known

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 3>as zero daised expiration options really in a lot of

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.240
<v Speaker 3>ways is the equivalent of what we saw back in

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 3>the late nineteen nineties.

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 4>It was called day trading then.

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Obviously it's called high frequency quantitative trading now.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 4>But the speculation that.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 3>You can really cause to happen every single day, and

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 3>we saw it in this earning season, this last earning season,

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 3>and we're likely to see it again this earning season,

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>where you have these stocks that have enormous gaps to

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 3>the upside and the downside because of the exuberance that

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>really has no precedent in the options market.

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Which race is a question where is the reality check?

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Where is the gut check?

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 2>You say it.

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 5>Comes from in some ways the inflation data, It comes

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 5>from FED expectations, it comes from the bond market. What's

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 5>the trigger though, at a time where the market is

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 5>hearing what the FED is saying, and then some they're

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.560
<v Speaker 5>hearing the rosiest picture that the Fed's going to let

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 5>inflation come down very slowly, but that they will get

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 5>an under control.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 3>So, when you have momentum of this kind of strength,

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 3>and we have to acknowledge that this is among the

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 3>most record scenting periods of momentum that we've seen, there

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 3>tends not to be a discrete trigger.

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 4>The one thing we would point to.

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Is when you think about it, actually the month of

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 3>April is sort of an outlier in that what you

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 3>tend to see is sort of momentum reversals, and what

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 3>we've looked at over the month of March is some

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 3>of these momentum names have stalled.

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 4>They haven't reversed, they've stalled.

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 3>But when you are trying to feed that sort of exuberance,

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>stalling is something that we take note of. And again

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 3>with this tendency, turning the page to the second quarter,

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 3>there is a potential in our view of momentum really

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 3>taking a backseat.

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 5>How do some of the retail investors, the traders that

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 5>use these options contracts that you were talking about fit

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 5>into the picture of how this will develop. Do you

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 5>think that they increase the fragility of markets, or do

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 5>you think that essentially they're just a feature of the

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 5>moment we're in.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, actually, and we said this when zero disted

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 3>expiration options first became quote unquote a thing that we

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 3>felt very highly convicted that it would suppress volatility because

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 3>think about it, the casino is open from nine point

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 3>thirty to four and then you cast your chips in

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 3>and there's no overnight risk, okay. And actually, as a

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 3>professional investor, that gives you opportunities that you might not

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>normally have because when you're pushing the action on a

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 3>day to day basis in this way and you get

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 3>these gap moves. If you're a disciplined buyer and seller

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>of stocks, you get these opportunities to add.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 4>To positions, to trim positions.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 3>That actually increase the alpha and make this it really

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 3>The environment that we're in of stock selection is also

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 3>unlike anything we've seen, But a lot of this is

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 3>driven by this constant exuberance that we see on the

0:05:43.520 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 3>part of the public.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Can you talk to us about opportunities right now? Then

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 2>what are they?

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 3>So we continue to think that there's a likelihood of

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.599
<v Speaker 3>the economy slowing in the second half and into twenty

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. And when you think about it, some of

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 3>these more defensive sectors that actually tend to do well

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 3>in the period from the last hike to the first

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 3>cut it have lagged. They've had idiosyncratic issues. Healthcare, consumer

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 3>staples really sort of working off the GLP one phenomenon.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 3>We think there's a lot of value there. And there's

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 3>also this entire subset of names whose valuations haven't moved

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 3>out in the way the index has that still have

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>strong earnings.

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 4>It's a cross sector.

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Now, can we get to healthcare on place? You put

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:31.799
<v Speaker 2>it out, what am I buying? Going to buy healthcare?

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it just the JLP well semantic story and some

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 2>people might point to that as a zuber and well

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 2>am I buying well?

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 3>So that's what held the rest of the sector back

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 3>for the majority of last year. But when you look

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:48.359
<v Speaker 3>at it right, there's this whole notion that we've started

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 3>to CM and a activity come back because financing conditions

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 3>have remained as favorable as they have and that really

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.919
<v Speaker 3>points to, you know, the future. In terms of biotech,

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 3>small cap biotech has done pretty well this year. We

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 3>think there's a broadening, and of course, in this environment

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 3>where the likelihood is that you know it with a

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 3>yield on some of these names four or five six percent,

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 3>bar belling into some of the safer names, cash flow

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 3>generators makes sense to us as well.

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, Julian, thank you. It's good to see you as always.

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 2>Thank you saying Jenny and Monnuwether of Evercore in the

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>Exuberance Zone. Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Nettania, who's office canceling

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 2>a planned visit by senior aide to Washington. The decision

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 2>coming after the US abstained from voting a UN resolution

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>demanding an immediate cease far in Gaza. One of the

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>eighth scheduled to visit the US was Ron Dermer. These

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>Arareel Strategic Affairs Minister. He joined us now from Jerusalem. Minister,

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 2>wonderful to catch with you once again, Sir. I want

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 2>to begin our conversation if we can, with a quote

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>from John Kirby, the spokesperson for the UST National Security Council,

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 2>and Minister. This is what he had to say. There's

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>no reason for this to be seen as some sort

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 2>of escalation. Nothing has changed about our policy. Nothing. We

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>still want to see a ceasefire, we still want to

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 2>get hostages out. Minister, Can we just begin with that

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 2>line coming from the administration, What exactly do you believe

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 2>has changed as they turn around and say nothing has.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, I believe there are policy that has been pretty consistent, John,

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 6>since the beginning of the war about six months ago,

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 6>was to not accept the cease fire. That would be

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 6>unconditional and it would have to be connected to an

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 6>agreement to release hostages. Unfortunately, in this text there was passed.

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 6>Those two issues were separated for the first time. In fact,

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 6>five days before there was a resolution that the United

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 6>States put forward that was vetoed by a China and Russia.

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 6>And one of the reasons why they vetoed it is

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.080
<v Speaker 6>because it connected those two issues. And if you look

0:08:59.120 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 6>at the text, and everyone can go see it on

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 6>the UN website, and you look at the resolution five

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 6>days ago and you look at the resolution that passed yesterday,

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 6>you'll see a huge difference. And unfortunately, that's a change

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 6>in US policy.

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 6>I'm glad to hear that John Kirby said, it's not

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 6>a change in US policy, and I hope that they

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 6>will continue to connect those two issues. But that's not

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:23.719
<v Speaker 6>the text of the resolution, and that's why Tamas celebrated

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 6>the resolution and welcomed it.

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why Iran welcomed it.

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 6>Believe me, any resolution by the UN Security Council that

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 6>Kamas welcomes is not a good resolution for Israel.

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 2>A minister, you would you to travel yesterday evening. Could

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 2>you share with us what you said to the administration

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 2>directly after that decision?

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I spoke to them.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 6>I haven't spoken to them after that decision. I spoke

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 6>to them before that decision. When we first learned about

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 6>which direction this was going. I did on I think

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 6>it was Sunday night, and when I heard what was happening,

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 6>I said, look, you're going to have it's the wrong

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 6>message at the wrong time. I explained to you, why

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:01.839
<v Speaker 6>was the wrong message because it's not connecting the issue

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 6>of a ceasefire with the return of the hostages.

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And why is it such bad timing.

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 6>Because we had negotiators in Doha trying to get an

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 6>agreement to release hostages. And it's not surprising that Hamas

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 6>decided to reject the latest proposal that was put forward

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 6>by the Americans, because why should they not reject it?

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:22.720
<v Speaker 6>They think they're going to get a ceasefire without giving

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 6>up the hostages, because that's what the resolution said. And

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 6>I understand and I appreciate that the United States has

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 6>said that's not our policy, but that's not the text

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 6>of the resolution.

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's the problem.

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 6>I told them before if this would be the case,

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 6>I would find it very difficult to believe that the

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 6>Prime Minister would send a delegation to Washington. Why because

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 6>the purpose of us going to Washington was to discuss

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 6>and to actually listen to American ideas of how we

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 6>should go into Rafa the other ideas that they said

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 6>they had without a major military operation in Rafa. What

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 6>message John is going to send to hamas that the

0:10:56.320 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 6>day after that the Americans separate these two issues. Hey,

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.079
<v Speaker 6>you know what, you could have a ceasefire without a

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:05.199
<v Speaker 6>hostage negotiations, and then the United States is presenting its

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 6>proposal how we should not go into Rafa.

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>That's a real big problem.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 6>And that's why the Prime Minister made the right decision,

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 6>made the right decision to stop the delegation which I

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 6>was leading to go to Washington.

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.400
<v Speaker 7>Okay, so this trip was suspended. Is there any plans

0:11:19.440 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 7>for you to come to Washington then in the future.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:11:23.559 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 6>We'll have to discuss it with the US administration. We

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 6>haven't had those discussions yet. I think the context here

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 6>was particularly problematic. Obviously, the US has ideas, and I'm

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 6>sure they'll share it with us. I don't know if

0:11:34.800 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 6>it'll be in a delegation in Washington's people coming here

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 6>us speaking over the phone, but they have ideas that

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 6>they won't want to present to us. The President asked

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 6>the Prime Minister of Israel to send the delegation so

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 6>that we can hear their ideas. We have our Defense

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 6>minister in Washington now. I'm sure he's discussing.

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>This with them.

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 6>But I think that timing was particularly problematic because of

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 6>the message that this UN Security Council resolution was sending.

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 6>It was a very very bad message, both for the

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 6>hostage negotiations and also we have to be very clear

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 6>with Hamas. We have to be very clear that we're

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 6>going to fight this war until the end. And the

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 6>last thing we want them to believe that the international

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 6>pressure on Israel will get us to simply not finish

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 6>the war. That's not going to happen now. I don't

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 6>decide what the United States will do or won't do.

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 6>They're a sovereign government, they'll have to make their own decisions.

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 6>But Israel has to make clear to Hamas did we

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 6>intend to fight this fight till the very end, and

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.760
<v Speaker 6>hopefully that pressure they're understanding that we're going to fight

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 6>this to the end will enable us to get to

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 6>a hostage deal.

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, these really defense minister, as you say, is in Washington.

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 7>We have Benjamin Ettiaho, the Prime Minister, approving a Rafa operation.

0:12:46.679 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 7>But the Israeli Defense minister said he had a good

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 7>meeting with officials in Washington. Did anyone convince anyone on

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 7>other side to change?

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, we've been in discussions with the US administration

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 6>for a long time. The initial US policy was essentially

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:05.679
<v Speaker 6>not that they're against an operation in Rafa full stop.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 6>What they said initially was that Israel has to make

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 6>efforts to get the civilians out of harms way and

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 6>to ensure that humanitarian assistants can get to them. And

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 6>guess what, we agree, and we've been working on a

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 6>plan to get the civilians out of harms way and

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 6>to get ramp up humanitarian assistance to them. So this

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 6>is something where the two governments should be able to

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:28.000
<v Speaker 6>get to common ground and should be able to get on.

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>The same page.

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 6>Now, if the position of the United States is there

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 6>should not be a major military operation in Gaza, then

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 6>we're not going to be on the same page because

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 6>we have to go in to Rafa, we have to

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 6>finish the job. We have to take care of these

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 6>four battalions. We can lead, leave twenty percent or twenty

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:46.679
<v Speaker 6>five percent of the Hamas force in Gaza so they

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:51.479
<v Speaker 6>can simply reorganize and comeback. And Israel's major military operations

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 6>actually have enabled us to do much smaller operations and

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 6>achieve great success. Look at what happened in Shifa Hospital.

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 6>I don't know if you're following that, in the northern

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 6>part of the Gaza strip.

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:02.680
<v Speaker 1>We were there a few months.

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 6>Ago and we did a major operation just now. We

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 6>went back last week and we have done one of

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 6>the most successful operations in Shifa Hospital in our history.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 6>Nearly two hundred terrorists were killed there, over eight hundred

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 6>terrorists were captured, and there have been zero civilian casualties.

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 6>In fact, there have been more Israeli soldiers too who

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 6>have died in that operation. Than civilian casualties. Why can't

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 6>we do that? And I think this is a very

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 6>important point for your viewers to understand, because once you

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 6>do the major military operations, once you crush these battalions

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 6>and defeat them, Israel has to.

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Come in with a much smaller force, much more.

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 6>Careful military operations, and achieved great success. That's why it's

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 6>so important for us to go to Rafah and to

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 6>finish the job.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 5>You keep saying, fight this until the end. People have

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 5>already talked about when you have people living in dire situations,

0:14:53.240 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 5>people who've seen their loved ones being killed, that breeds extremist.

0:14:59.000 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 2>Type of behavior.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 5>You're already seeing that in certain places that even if

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 5>you kill Hamas, something else will come in its place

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 5>because there isn't leadership and there isn't a sense of

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 5>what the future is. How do you counter those types

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 5>of discussions? How do you say there is an end

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 5>that you have in sight?

0:15:16.280 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, first of all, understand what we're trying to achieve.

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 6>We're trying to destroy Kamas's military in Gaza. They're not

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 6>a terror organization in Gaza. They're a military terror organization

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 6>in Gaza, and we have to crush their military and

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 6>it's divided up into battalions, and we're doing that I

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 6>think very well. But what you just said about it

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 6>breeds extremism. I'd ask you, do you think that the

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 6>action of the United States against the Nazis in Germany?

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that bred extremism among Germans? Do you

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 1>think the.

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 6>Actions of the United States in Japan bred extremism? I mean,

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 6>you were smart enough to first of all finish the

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.160
<v Speaker 6>job and win the war, and you demanded unconditional surrender

0:15:53.200 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 6>to achieve it, and then you were smart enough to

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.800
<v Speaker 6>be magnanimous in victory and provide a different path for

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 6>the future. Have to finish the job is what if

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 6>you not finish the job, the situation will actually be worse.

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 6>You have to finish the job, defeat them, and then

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 6>you can talk about a day after. Then we can

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 6>talk about how we can expand peace in the region,

0:16:13.200 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 6>what we should do in the long term prospects of

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 6>Israelis and Paal sittings. But there will be no day

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 6>after Hamas if Ramas is still there.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>That's why we have to finish the job.

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 5>I guess that one of the key questions that has

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 5>been kind of hanging over this is we don't have

0:16:25.320 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 5>a clear sense of how you provide that type of

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 5>structure in any way when you don't have that being

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 5>provided with respect to who's going to be the leader,

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 5>with respect to who's going to provide the financing, with

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 5>respect to even whether there'll be two states and what

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 5>that will look like with a certain land in the

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 5>West Bank being seized. So how do you address those

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 5>kinds of questions that do need to be put into

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 5>place before you finish the job.

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 6>I don't believe they have to be put in place

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 6>before you finish the job.

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think just the opposite.

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 6>I think if you try to put the that in

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 6>place now, you can actually undermine the effort to get

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 6>to a real good day after plan afterwards, because first

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.120
<v Speaker 6>everybody has to understand that Hamas and Gaza is finished.

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 6>Until they understand that, no one will step forward. So

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 6>you're going to actually have a plan that's going to

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 6>be stillborn the second you win. That's the time when

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 6>the international community, obviously led by the United States, Israel,

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 6>Ara partners in the region, have to come in and say, Okay,

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.320
<v Speaker 6>what do we do now? Now Hamas is defeated, in Gaza.

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 6>What is the next step to think that anyone is

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 6>going to emerge now when you have four terrorist battalions

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 6>of Hamas and Gaza, maybe around fifteen thousand terrorists fighting there,

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 6>and that somebody is going to step forward kidding themselves.

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 6>We saw what happened in the northern part of the

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 6>Gaza strip when we try to work with local actors.

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 6>Hamas took them out and executed them. That's what's going

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 6>to happen until we finish the job. That's why I

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 6>think it is in the interest of all countries who

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 6>not only are interested in israel security, but interested in

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 6>a better future for the Palestinians to get Israel to

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 6>finish the job as quickly as possible so we can

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 6>move on to a day after. And the truth is,

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 6>we have real partners in the region for that day after.

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>I think the are a partner.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 6>I think the Amarades are a partner. I think they

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 6>are starting and they've worked to deradicalize their own societies.

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 6>I think we need to look for them into their

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 6>leadership to see what we can do in a day after,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 6>and then we can talk about all of those political issues.

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 6>But first we have to get to a day after.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 6>We have to finish the job. You cannot leave that

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 6>force in Gaza. It would be like, as one Israeli

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 6>minister said, Minister against He said, it would be like

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 6>fighting eighty percent of a fire, leaving twenty percent of

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 6>the fire and simply hoping that it's.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Not going to come back. Of course it'll come back.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.719
<v Speaker 6>We have to douse these flames and then we can

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:35.680
<v Speaker 6>talk about the day after.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Minista, I know we only have a few minutes left

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:39.360
<v Speaker 2>with you. I had a few direct questions to work

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 2>through with you, if I may. The Vice President of

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 2>the United States spoke over the weekend. Here's a quote

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>from her. Any major military operation in Rafa would be

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:50.320
<v Speaker 2>a huge mistake. I'm not trying to understand from your

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 2>site why you think that's not a mistake. I'm trying

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 2>to understand now what the consequences would be if you

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 2>cross that perceived red line. Now, have they communicated what

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:01.399
<v Speaker 2>the consequences would be for Israel and the relationship between

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 2>you and the United States? Have you heard anything whatsoever?

0:19:05.680 --> 0:19:08.239
<v Speaker 6>No, they haven't communicated that with this, But I can

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 6>tell you, John, what the consequences will be if we

0:19:10.200 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 6>don't go in and finish the job. It'll be that

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 6>October seventh will happen again and again and again. People

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 6>in the United States have to understand that the people

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:20.800
<v Speaker 6>of Israel see what happened on October seventh as an extent,

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 6>as an existential threat to the country.

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'll explain to you what I mean. It's not

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 6>Hamas can destroy the State of Israel. They cannot. But

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.160
<v Speaker 6>if we do not destroy the terror organization that did

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 6>that on October seventh, if we do not take them

0:19:35.720 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 6>out as a military organization in Gaza, then I truly

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 6>believe that this country has no future Because all the

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 6>buzzards who are circling around Israel and are looking to

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 6>see what's going to happen to Hamas after they perpetrated

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 6>that attack, they have to understand that Hamas is a

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 6>terror organization in Gaza, as a military is finished. You know,

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 6>they are American officials. This happened a couple months ago.

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 6>A senior official came and he said, you know, Hamas

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 6>is an idea, and you can't destroy idea. And I

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 6>countered by saying, you know, Nazism is an idea and

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 6>there are Nazis in Charlottesville walking around with tiki torches

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 6>that they bought at bed Bath and beyond.

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>But they don't have a state called Germany.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 6>ISIS is an idea, and there are people who follow ISIS.

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:17.200
<v Speaker 6>You saw the attack in Moscow just a few days ago,

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 6>and there are black flags that are in bedrooms, probably

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 6>not just in the Middle East, but in Europe and

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 6>even places in.

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>The United States. But they don't have a state.

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 6>They don't control the territory of a caliphate between Iraq

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 6>and Syria. It is one thing to deal with a

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 6>terror organization is It's another thing to deal with a

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 6>military that is a terror group. That's a total different story.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 6>And we're going to dismantle comases military regime in Gaza.

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 6>It's gonna happen, and I would like to have the

0:20:46.200 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 6>United States by our side. They've been there for the

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 6>last five months, five and a half months, with critical

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 6>support out of the gate. The moral clarity of the

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.919
<v Speaker 6>President calling a hamas sheher evil. Worse than isis the

0:20:57.960 --> 0:21:00.880
<v Speaker 6>fact that they send aircraft carriers here that the President

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.440
<v Speaker 6>himself visited ten days into the war, where we could

0:21:03.440 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 6>have had an escalation in the northern part with Hezbella.

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>So they've done very important things.

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 6>And what I would and what I have implored them,

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 6>is to stand with Israel until the end, because we're

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 6>going to achieve this victory. And I think it's not

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 6>only an Israel's interest to achieve that victory. I think

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 6>it's an America's interest to achieve that victory because they've

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 6>been part of this through the prom They've been part

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 6>of this victory up until now, and now we're down

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 6>the home stretch. I think, stand with us. Let us

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 6>finish the job and let's get to a day after

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 6>where we could actually have a real peace process that

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 6>can give hope not just to Israelis but also to Palestinians.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Minister, this is a conversation that you and I will

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 2>have to continue the requires a. Heck, have a lot

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 2>more time than the ten minutes we just had. Run Tom,

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 2>thank you, sir for joining us today. The Israel Strategics

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 2>minista more upside surprises in America, Let's get said the

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 2>chafe US economist Andrew Haldenhoe to break down some of this. Andrew,

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 2>you listen to my mcase breakdown of it as your

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 2>first reaction to it.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 8>Please yeah, I mean, I think, like Mike, I would

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 8>emphasize that these numbers have really been bounced around by aircraft,

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 8>by autos. You want to kind of look at the

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 8>core of it, and what are we seeing at the core?

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 8>Is week not too exciting, not too positive on the

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.439
<v Speaker 8>shipment side. We saw that this morning.

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 4>Again.

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 8>I think if you look at the various manufacturing diffusion indices,

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 8>they've bottomed, they've come off of the bottom, but they're

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 8>still sitting close to contractionary territory or in contractionary territory.

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 8>So I don't think we're really changing the narrative around

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 8>CAPEX here.

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 2>We're all super familiar with your research. One thing that's

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 2>come up throughout this year, and I keep sing in

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 2>every single note that you send down this economy is

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 2>going to slow down, slow down by such an amount

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 2>that this federal Reserve is going to need to cut

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 2>interest rates. You're still thinking about endcycle type stuff, dynamics

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 2>that are going to become more apparent and obvious through

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 2>the year. What's leading to that conclusion for you?

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 8>It's really the labor market. It's really what we're seeing

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 8>in the labor market where you're seeing things like ours

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 8>work that are coming down, a hiring rate that's coming down.

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 8>I think that's why we heard share Powell saying in

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 8>his evaluation of the data, it's not that we're weakening yet,

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 8>and I would agree with that, but the labor market

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 8>is his emphasis. In terms of a point of concern,

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 8>it would be mine also.

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 5>So do you think that at this point he had

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 5>the right message? The market's gotten it and it's only

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 5>us it's kind of trying to understand and freak out

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 5>around him.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 8>I mean, I think one thing that was probably constructive

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 8>that Shair Powell tried to do and that the Committee

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 8>is trying to do, is to get away from responding

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 8>to each individual data point as it comes in. That's

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 8>a very difficult way to set policy. They're kind of

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 8>trying to tell us that we're on a path to

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 8>get to rate cuts now inflation has come down enough

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 8>that they think that they can be cutting interest rates. Now,

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 8>it's not all clear that inflation's returned to two percent

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 8>with some of these supply side disruptions. It's a good

0:23:45.200 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 8>reminder of why they're still upside risks to inflation.

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 5>Let's sit on that for a minute, because really this

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 5>is really dominating my thoughts right now is the Baltimore

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 5>Bridge and what that means for infrastructure spending. What that

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 5>means for some of the importance right now of getting

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 5>more spending has tried to us at a time with

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.160
<v Speaker 5>the deficit, as John Righty said, is like having fifteen

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 5>big mac So at what point do you see this

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 5>as an inflationary type of impulse where the US has

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 5>to keep borrowing to keep investing to prop up certain

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 5>industries at the expense potentially of bond heels and inflation.

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, this comes back to the idea of fiscal space.

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 8>Right We usually don't really worry too much about fiscal

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 8>space in the US because politically there always seems to

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 8>be more space to do more spending. But when you've

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.760
<v Speaker 8>already done a lot of spending, when you've already put

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:31.960
<v Speaker 8>a lot of stimulus into the economy, then when you

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 8>have real shocks to the economy, clearly no one would

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 8>disagree that we should be rebuilding this bridge, that we

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 8>should be investing in infrastructure, But that spending, to John's point,

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 8>is going to come on top of a large deficit

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 8>that we're already running. So I think that's where you

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 8>really get into difficulties potentially politically but also economically. Is

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 8>that also increasing price pressures in the short term and

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.960
<v Speaker 8>the long term investing in infrastructure is going to be

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 8>deflationary positive for productivity, but in the short term you

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 8>need to hire people, you need to source material and inputs,

0:25:00.880 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 8>and that puts upward pressure on prices.

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 7>Public debt situation. Most urgent I can ever remember is

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 7>from Larry Fink this morning. What do you think this

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 7>does in terms of the impact.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Of a dollar.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think that that is something that's increasingly in focus.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 8>I think we saw a bit of that last year.

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 8>We saw it maybe less in currencies, we saw it

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 8>more in treasury yields, where you had the tenure yield

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 8>there was upwards of five percent, And I think that

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 8>was some foreign investor concern that is this a country

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 8>that is going to run sustainable deficits. They certainly do

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 8>not look sustainable right now. That's ultimately an issue for

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:35.199
<v Speaker 8>the currency.

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Also, I want to build on on LEAs this line

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 2>of questioning around this port in Baltimore and what could

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 2>develop in the East Coast in the weeks and months

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 2>to come. Can you help us understand just frame briefly,

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.800
<v Speaker 2>how strong the tail winds are that disinflation retail winds

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 2>in goods at the moment in America, because there was

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 2>some sign in the last few months and maybe that's fading,

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 2>And I just wonder how vulnerable we are to maybe

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 2>a reacceleration in goods prices off the back of a

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>development like this one this morning.

0:25:57.680 --> 0:25:59.239
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think it's a really important thing to draw

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 8>attention to because a lot of the disinflation that we've

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 8>had has been that goods price disinflation, and that was

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:06.480
<v Speaker 8>energy prices coming down.

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 2>That was supply.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 8>Constraints that had been constraining supply and boosting prices that

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 8>were relaxing.

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Look at where we are now.

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 8>We have gasoline prices that are rising, that are projected

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.320
<v Speaker 8>to rize further into the summer. We now have this

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.960
<v Speaker 8>supply side disruption related to the port in Baltimore that

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 8>would also indicate that, if anything, goods prices.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 4>Could be higher.

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 8>We already know about the Panama Canal, we know about

0:26:30.240 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 8>the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, and we saw

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 8>on the last inflation report. To your point, core goods

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.119
<v Speaker 8>prices came up. They've been coming down. They came up

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 8>in the last report. It doesn't mean they're going to

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 8>come up in every report. But this period of deflation

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 8>and goods that we've been in for the last six

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 8>months or so, we're probably coming out of that now.

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Do you think services can do the heavy lifting as

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>that develops on the good side?

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 8>So I think that's what you need to happen. Have

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 8>happened to bring inflation down, So in some ways, this

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 8>kind of idea that the labor market is softening, you

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 8>really need to see that continue to bring inflation overall down,

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:04.919
<v Speaker 8>which is a very unfortunate scenario. We'd like to have

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 8>a strong labor market and we like to have inflation

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 8>come down. There's a reason it hasn't happened historically. If

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 8>goods are going to be less disinflationary, less deflationary, then

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 8>services needed to pick up for that, and that has

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 8>to be through a software labor mark.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 2>What I hear from you is different to what I

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 2>heard from the chairman. Is that fair?

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 8>I think that's fair.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 2>So basically you're saying to get inflation back to target,

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 2>we need a recession.

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 8>That's still the most likely way you bring inflation back

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 8>to target. Is there some probability that you get a

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 8>true soft landing. Sure, there's some probability, but I think

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 8>what we're seeing is just consistent with the idea that

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 8>wage growth is kind of stalled out around four to

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 8>five percent by various different measures. If you want wage

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.679
<v Speaker 8>growth to discelerate further, the labor market probably needs to soften.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 5>From you disruptions like what we're going to see inevitably,

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 5>either on a very small term or potentially medium term

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 5>with respect to the Baltimore Bridge and shipping passages, we've

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 5>seen shipping disrupted in general. Does that make it more

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 5>or less likely we'll get the recession that you're talking

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:03.640
<v Speaker 5>about to bring inflation under control.

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:05.959
<v Speaker 8>So the worst thing that can happen for the economy

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 8>of the worst thing that can happen for the FED

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 8>are these kind of supply side shocks, because what they

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 8>do is they reduce the productive capacity of the US

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 8>economy and they boost inflation at the same time. So

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 8>it's negative for growth and it means you get higher inflation.

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.199
<v Speaker 8>That's different than a demand shock, where you get stronger

0:28:22.240 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 8>growth and you get higher inflation. That's kind of been

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:24.880
<v Speaker 8>where we've been.

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:26.919
<v Speaker 5>But this goes to something that John was talking about

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.800
<v Speaker 5>if we get that kind of stagflationary shock, which is

0:28:29.880 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 5>essentially what you're describing, are the FEDS hands tied or

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:35.479
<v Speaker 5>have they made it clear that they're going to air

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 5>on the side of supporting the economy and the labor

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 5>market over continuing the.

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Fight for inflation.

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 8>I think they're in a transition here. But what they're

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 8>transitioning to is this increased emphasis on the labor market

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:49.959
<v Speaker 8>on the economy, the idea which we saw in their

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.200
<v Speaker 8>summary of economic projections, inflation can run closer to three

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 8>percent than two percent, and they still plant to cut rates.

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 8>That's what they have in their projections.

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 8>If that number sneaks up a little bit higher on

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 8>core inflation at the end of this year, and I

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 8>suspect it will over the course of the year, I

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 8>think they'll still be cutting.

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Some debate this morning about whether the Federer serve is

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 2>basically saying they've got a high tolerance for inflation. I'd

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 2>love your response to that. We caught it with Barclay's

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 2>earlier this morning and kind of push back against that view.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Others have endorsed it. Mohammadd Aaron said this could be

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of a long story, but the beginning of

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 2>a story that suggests this FED is now targeting a

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.479
<v Speaker 2>range and not a point target. Can I get your

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 2>view on that?

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think implicitly that's true. Explicitly, are we going

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 8>to hear FED officials come out and say, you know what,

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.560
<v Speaker 8>we've got uncomfortable being away from target to the upside?

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 8>I don't think we're going to hear that in the

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 8>near term. But this idea that they can accept somewhat

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.479
<v Speaker 8>stronger inflation, I think everybody would basically say, yeah, two

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 8>and a half percent inflation, that's close enough to two

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 8>percent inflation. Now the problem that you get to is, well,

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 8>is three percent close enough to two and a half percent?

0:29:46.840 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 8>Is four percent close enough to three percent? And we're

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 8>kind of in that region now. I think it is

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 8>a transition though, where they're moving more towards this kind

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 8>of labor market concern, economy concern, and the reality is

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 8>that they will accept higher inflation.

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 2>The issue with that, and you know it well, once

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.520
<v Speaker 2>you begin to give signs, even if you don't say

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it explicitly, doesn't that make it harder to get back

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:08.040
<v Speaker 2>down it even more?

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, this can easily lock US into not just a

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 8>short period, but but really a new regime where inflation

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 8>is higher, more elevated, or more volatile.

0:30:17.560 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 2>This switch in Bianco of Bianca Research was talking about yesterday.

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 2>In fact, I'd go back almost a full twelve months.

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Richard Clarender in a second outlook for Pimco coming out

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 2>and saying this FED is going to be accept two

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>points somethink, which sounded controversial at the time, and it's

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 2>almost consensus now on Wall Street.

0:30:32.560 --> 0:30:34.959
<v Speaker 5>And it's led to this incredible euphoria that people are

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 5>pointing to in markets because you're basically having the FED

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 5>that's got your back and you can eat your cake

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 5>and have it too. What is the consequence of that?

0:30:42.240 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 5>Is it inflation that's not two point something but it's

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:47.000
<v Speaker 5>three points something to Andrew's point, And then at what

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 5>point does the FED have to say bastard enough, like

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 5>we got to actually do something and hold raise higher.

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Need to put an Italian on the FMC, don't we? Andrew?

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Andrew hartenhaus A City. This is the Bloomberg

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Seventans podcast, bringing you the best in markets, economics, and

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 2>geo politics. You can watch the show live on Bloomberg

0:31:05.680 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 2>TV weekday mornings from six am to nine am Eastern.

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 2>you listen, and as always, on the Bloomberg Terminal and

0:31:15.240 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Business app.