WEBVTT - Introvert or Extravert: Which are you? (Probably both)

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you Should Know, a production of I

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh,

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.079
<v Speaker 1>and there's Chuck and Jerry's not here, but we suspect

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>she'll be along shortly, and that makes this, of course

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:23.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. Yeah, it's funny. This one came

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>up from you. Why because semi recently we were hanging

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:32.880
<v Speaker 1>out with our friends and Emily, We're talking about introverts

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.199
<v Speaker 1>and extroverts and Emily said, someone said, yeah, you know,

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Chuck is obviously an extrovert, and uh, Emily said, no,

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>he's not. It's a lie. She said, Chuck is an

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>introvert because he loses energy and groups of people and

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>he recharges by being alone. And I had never really

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>heard that, but that's true. But then after doing all

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this research, like I am, uh, very much in the

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 1>middle of the spectrum, very and not I guess, not

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>quite an ambivert, and that what it's called. It really

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>is completely dependent for me on any situation, who the

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>people are, where I am at the time. It's very,

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:24.680
<v Speaker 1>very dependent on a host of factors. Yes, so that

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>means you are normal, uh, from from what I can tell.

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And I'm really excited about this one because it's like

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Christmas and Halloween and Easter all wrapped up together, because

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>we get the tea off on social psychology, on the

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 1>science press, um, all sorts of people and really kind

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of disassemble something I think most people walking around think

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>they understand, but from everything I can tell, misunderstand is

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a much better way to put it. Yeah. Absolutely, And

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this will get a lot of listener feedback

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>because I think a lot of people spend time thinking

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about this stuff. Yeah. Um, And it's like, I don't know,

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, it's very easy to put people in buckets.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think if we were to talk about yourself and myself,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.079
<v Speaker 1>people would say, well, Chucks an extrovert. Josh is an introvert.

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 1>We can tell by things they've said over the years.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>But it's just not that easy. No, No, but you're right,

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and I should say you weren't right. Emily was right.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>You recounted Emily being right. Usually the case if you

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>just kind of boil it down to that, that is,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it seems to be from what we can tell the UM.

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:32.640
<v Speaker 1>The one distinction between introverts and extroverts, like where you

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>gather your energy from? Is it from other people or

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is it from yourself not being around other people? Yeah,

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>but also it's like I think it's and we'll we'll

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 1>debunk a lot of this stuff, but um, it's not

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.839
<v Speaker 1>as easy as you know, the fact that you don't

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>want to be talked to on the Appalachian Trail or

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>meet other hikers, that doesn't mean you're an introvert. Because

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I've also seen you be the life of a party.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Well that's when you get a little Captain Morgan. But

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like I was thinking about just you know, work events

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and parties and things like that. If it's like a

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:11.520
<v Speaker 1>party with my friends, I'm usually all about it. But

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I could also be in the mood to not even

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 1>go or at a podcast conference. You know, I am

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>way more likely to just sit in my room than

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>go to the mixer unless I know that, like there's

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna be people at the mixer I would really want

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to get to know and meet, And then I'm all

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden all about it. So it really just depends.

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>That's me. I feel like I'm learning a lot about

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you right now because I just presumed you were always

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.839
<v Speaker 1>at those mixers. No, man, I'm in the room a lot.

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean you were always in the room, but many

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>times in the room. Well there's coffee in the room.

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So just so let's let's kind of um, let's talk

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about introverts and extroverts. There's a woman

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>named Susan Kane who wrote a book called Quiet, The

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Power of Introverts in a World that Can't Stop Talking,

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And she basically says it comes down to a preference

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of where you get your stimulation, like do you prefer

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lower stimulation environments do you prefer high stimulation environments? And

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that it is just a preference. And in a lot

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:07.720
<v Speaker 1>of ways she's right, But in a lot of ways

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>she's really wrong because it's not just a preference from

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>what from if you're a psychologist or even a neuroscientist, like,

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it's an actual, ingrained, possibly um brain based um biological

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 1>response that that people may or may not be born with. Yeah,

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna we're gonna throw a lot of studies

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.479
<v Speaker 1>out in this one and a lot of statistics. There

0:04:31.520 --> 0:04:35.919
<v Speaker 1>was a random sample of results in a Myers Briggs

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>personality inventory that said the introverts and I love this

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>stat They might as well have just called it fifty

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty Uh, Introverts made up fifty point seven and extroverts

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>for forty nine point three, with about forty six percent

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of men and fifty two percent of women being extroverted.

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>In fifty percent of men and forty seven percent of

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>women is introverted. But you can find a pretty wide

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>range if you go poking around the internet on how

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>many people they say are introverted or extroverted. Yeah, the

0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>one I I've seen all over the places somewhere between

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>sixteen and fifty percent of people, right, introverts? Right, sure, Well,

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>I bet you they're right. Well yeah, yeah, somewhere in

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>there they might be nailing it, unless it pans out

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the introverts don't actually exist. So those numbers you threw out,

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think the sixteen to fifty that I threw

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>out too, that's typically in the us UM. But the

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>thing is, it's not entirely clear, Chuck, if those numbers

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>hold steady, like if you did that same random sample

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>of Myers Briggs results, you know ten years on which

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you get similar numbers, and if you wouldn't, why is

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>that the case? Is it because somehow like populations are shifting,

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>or is it because you know, if you would sample

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>those exact same people from ten years later. Was if

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and they results were different? Would it be because people

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>act differently because of their moods? And then there's not

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like a lifelong bucket of introvert or extrovert that you

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>can actually label people with, right, or if people uh

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>really evolve? Uh, And I'd say evolve or devolved? I

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>guess in either direction. Um could do some people that

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>really used to be introverted. You know, you hear stories

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.200
<v Speaker 1>where people say, well, then I learned to come out

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 1>of my shell for these reasons, and now I'm a

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>completely different person. And I think it's just one of

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>these things where it is all wholly dependent on an individual.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.720
<v Speaker 1>They're like, now I go beat up introverts on Friday

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>nights with my friends. But like, this stuff is fun

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to talk about, but I just don't know that anyone

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>can bucket people. You can make some generalizations, but I

0:06:46.760 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's so specific to each person that it's uh,

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of some of your closing thoughts, which

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to at the end. Yeah, but but we

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have a problem here, then we can at least set

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.600
<v Speaker 1>it up right, because what psychology is trying to do

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is create a model that you can apply to every

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>single human being alive and and predict their behavior based

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on where they fall on the spectrum between extrovert and

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 1>introvert and some other stuff that we'll get into two.

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just a question of you know, people,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>people are people. Psychology is really trying to figure this

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>out in a really specific manner. Yeah, and I don't

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's like a waste of time or anything. I'm

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>not saying like they should just let people be who

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.440
<v Speaker 1>they are. But because it is interesting, um, at the

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>very least, it gives us something to talk about for

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>forty five minutes. So let's talk about, um, what makes

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>an introvert an introvert and an extrovert an extrovert? Because

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of misconceptions, but there's a lot of

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I think people assume that kind of fall

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>in line with psychology's view of the behavior patterns of

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>each right, but also a lot of overlapping patterns because

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I found myself in a lot of these from each list,

0:07:56.480 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So you're an ambivert, right, did were mainly introvert when

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to this list specifically, I don't know. Let's

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>let's go through it, okay. Uh. Introverts uh, and we'll

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>just go through these quickly. Need to need quiet to concentrate? Um,

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>for sure? Me. Are reflective, are self aware, take time

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>making decisions and consider them carefully. Uh. Feel comfortable being alone,

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>don't like group work, prefer to write rather than talk,

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>have few friendships, but are very close with those friends.

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Day dream or use their imaginations to work out a problem,

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Retreat into their own mind to rest, and feel drained

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>being around others, especially large groups. So I definitely check

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>every single one of those boxes, except for take time

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.800
<v Speaker 1>making decisions and consider things carefully like I I will often.

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I will consider things a lot. I do

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of times. But I also just kind

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of make impulsive decisions sometimes as well. Yeah, but you

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>also clearly don't need quiet to concentrate because you sent

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.079
<v Speaker 1>me Muse to listen to for the very first time

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen years. Did you listen to it? I did?

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny that this all came up. We'll tell

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>everyone what you sent. So I can't remember his name.

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I sent you a Ruichi Sakamoto album. I think it's

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>called Oh five, and it's really amazing it's great. I

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 1>loved it. But as soon as I put it on

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and Josh sent this to me just to say, hey,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll just be like of one mind if we

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>both listened to the same music. And obviously you're kidding around.

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But what I found was I and what I know

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>about myself is I can have music on if i'm

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and when you you know, when we're doing stuff. You

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>should know studying. It's my deepest study. But I gotta

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have it really quiet, really yeah, otherwise it distracts me.

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I understand the principle because I can't if

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>it has lyrics, I just can't. I can't do it

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's lyrics, Yeah, it's definitely lyrics for me.

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Or even an instrumental song of a song that has

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>lyrics that I know it will bring to mind the

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>lyrics so has to be straight up instrumental all the way.

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>What if it was just lyrics that over and over

0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>said concentrate, Josh, concentrate. That probably worked really well. I'll

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>have to try that sometime. Maybe I can just sit

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>on the phone with you and you can say that

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>over and over again while I'm studying. But for me,

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 1>that's only like really big, serious concentration. Like if I'm

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>working on a project, I love having podcasts or music playing. Definitely. Yeah,

0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that's another thing too. It's hard to listen to podcasts

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>or anything where people are talking too, for the exact

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>same reason for me for study. Yes, yeah, that's impossible. Yeah.

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're talking about the Right Brothers and the

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>invention of the airplane while you're trying to study extroverts

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and introverts. It doesn't really go very well. Alright, so

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, go over the extroverts behavioral patterns. I'm a

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>little nervous talking in public, but that's because you're an

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:54.679
<v Speaker 1>introvert extroverts And by the way, it's appropriate to write

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it with an A or an oh, So extroverts or extroverts,

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter, it's find either way. But they enjoy social settings.

0:11:02.080 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a big one. I've seen that their overall generally

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>more optimistic. They seek attention. I saw that that was

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a big one too. They're energized by being around other people,

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and as a result, they're friends with a lot of

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>different people. As a result, they're sociable and outgoing. They

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>tend to enjoy group work. That's the kind of work

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 1>that they thrive in. They prefer talking over writing, they

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>find it easy to express themselves, and they feel drained

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 1>when they're alone for extended periods. Yeah, I mean I

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>took most of those boxes, but I also took a

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of the introvert. I feel like you don't take

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>many of these boxes at all. I'm looking and I

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I'm pretty outgoing. I can be sociable. I mean,

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it really just depends on my mood. But if you

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 1>were going to take an overall picture of me, yes,

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 1>definitely way closer to them the introvert version end of

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum. What about this one, because I think this

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>one is kind of key and interesting. Is link drained

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>when alone for extended periods? I wouldn't say drained is

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the right word, but I don't prefer to be alone

0:12:07.960 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>for extended periods unless I feel like being alone. But

0:12:11.920 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in that case, does alone mean like just with your wife? Like?

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.679
<v Speaker 1>What does alone really mean? Does alone mean literally by yourself?

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think for extroverts they feel drained when they're

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>alone just by themselves. They don't have somebody else to

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>be an energy vampire on. Yeah, it's weird for me, man,

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>because I love being around people. But I could do

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a zombie apocalypse survival thing on my own, sure, and

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I'd be Okay. Yeah, you've got some good

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>good booze and some good food barbecue girl that works,

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>You'd be fine. It'd be awesome. Uh. It's also interesting

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 1>when you know, we haven't been in the office. Basically

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>our office environment is completely different now since the pandemic

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 1>moving forward, but we have an office still. Yeah, exactly.

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting that, like we I think before we

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>became a podcast network, it's interesting that we became a

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.119
<v Speaker 1>podcast network because we were in office really full of introverts,

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>would you agree, Yes, yeah, for sure. And a lot

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.959
<v Speaker 1>of those a lot of those people became public personalities

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 1>in the end, which is really strange despite themselves. Yeah,

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>it's odd. Um and and office is closing down for

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I think extroverts has probably been a problem. I didn't

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think I missed it until I went to our colleague,

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Pam Peacock, had an art opening that I went to

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in my neighborhood and I saw probably like twelve or

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>thirteen people from the office, and I had the best time,

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, I didn't realize I miss seeing

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody until I saw everybody. That was really sweet. Yeah,

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>but then I was fun. You know, I'm not seeing

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 1>him the next day. Yeah, it does sound like you

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:57.679
<v Speaker 1>are a pretty big ambervert. So the fact that there

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't as such a thing as an ambivert somebody who

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>really checks a lot of boxes on both sides, so

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they pretty much fall in the middle. The fact that

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they exist underscores a really important point that introverts and

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>extroverts are on a spectrum. You're not just one or

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the other. As a matter of fact, Carl Young, who

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.240
<v Speaker 1>actually came up with this whole idea in the twenties,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>said that if you were a full extrovert or a

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>full introvert, you would be a lunatic. Like, there's just

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>no such thing. But some people lean further towards one

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>side or the other. But it's a spectrum, and again

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not entirely clear if when you where you follow

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on that spectrum would be the same from one year

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to the other, one decade to the other, even you know,

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:44.520
<v Speaker 1>one week to the other. Yeah. Absolutely, Um, I feel

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>like this is a good break time, all right. I'm

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go sit quietly and think about what I've done

0:14:49.840 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and get energy. We'll be right back, Joshua, that's funny

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you threw in that Young comment because, uh, that quote,

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>because I found the same one and I thought it

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>was interesting because, as it turns out, Carl Young was

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a one of the kind of first big proponents of

0:15:32.680 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>studying introverts and extroverts, and a lot of his work

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>he's kind of known for it. I guess that is

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>what I'm trying to say. Yeah, I'm not sure that

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>he actually came up with it, but he certainly popularized it,

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 1>starting in his book Psychological Types. Yeah. And Young's whole

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>thing was um that the division between introverts and extroverts

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>is which which way they directed their focus or their energy,

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>was it inward or outward? And that that was the

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.440
<v Speaker 1>real distinction, And that was what people thought for a

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>very long time until um, as we'll see, people came

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 1>along and said, I think it's really kind of energy based,

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>like where did they get their stimulation? Is it inward

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>or outward? Um? And that seems to be the current idea.

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But Young really kicked the whole thing off in the twenties. Yeah,

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.080
<v Speaker 1>which is I think it's interesting that I don't know,

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen twenties to study something that seems very modern

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, personality types. There's also a dude, a German

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Young was Swiss, a German name Hans een

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>sinc I sink not een sync added an extra in somehow,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>but it sounded luscious, it did. Hans I sink Uh.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>He was a psychologist um from Germany who operated out

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of the University of London. He kind of took the

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>baton from Young. Uh. Did they work together or was

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>it just sort of a metaphorical passing of the baton?

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Think it was like standing on the shoulders of giants

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. I don't think they worked together, Okay,

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but he came along in like the nineties sixties and

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>developed a model of personality and he put a lot

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of focus on extroversion and neuroticism, which I think is

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 1>very interesting because oh, I guess let's just talk about

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the links between the two, Okay, So yeah, I think

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this whole whole jam was that that was the two boxes.

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>You were either an extrovert and or an introvert, and

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>you were either neurotic or not neurotic. And it wasn't

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>on a spectrum. He didn't see those on a spectrum

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>when he started working. I'm not sure if he ever did.

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>You were either one or the other. And when you

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>put these two things together, um, you had a full

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>picture of the human being. And it seems primitive to

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>us today. But the basis of what he was doing, um,

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's still carried on today. He like kind of

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>helped build these blocks that people have built on since then. Yeah,

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he worked with his wife Sybil and with

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>her ended up adding psychoticism as a personality trait, uh,

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to create what was called the Pen model, the pe

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>N model of personality. And I think, you know, psychology

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>or neuroscience would later kind of say that he was

0:18:14.440 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 1>right in a lot of ways. But later on psychology

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>they came up with their own Big five personality traits

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and didn't they dropped psychoticism as a specific category, but

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>they kind of took pieces of it and applied it

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>to the other five personality traits and came up with

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a acronym really too, just depending on if you're an

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>introvert on an extrovert, right, it could be a canoe

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>or an ocean. Yeah, So that's kind of where we're

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>at today the big five personality traits. As as far

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>as I can tell, the dominant model of of personality

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>descriptors and canoe is um Conscientiousness, which is your degree

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of impulse control or your ability to meet goals. Agree Ability,

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's your degree that you trust other people or that

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you're helpful or cooperative. Neuroticism, and this is the same

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that I think and uh, or I should say the

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I thinks considered neuroticism. It's your degree of emotional stability

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>or instability, like do you get emotional really quick or

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>are you kind of like solid and steady kind of thing. Um.

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also openness, which I saw described as

0:19:23.880 --> 0:19:28.479
<v Speaker 1>better better um written as imagination or intellect. So it's um,

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it's openness to new experiences, but internal experience, right. And

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>then there's an extra version. There's your can that's right,

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that's the canoe, or that's the ocean. I guess ocean

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.400
<v Speaker 1>would be in a different order. I can do that one.

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>And now in the oceanal that's okay, okay, uh. And

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>what's really interesting about all this is when you and

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of course this is what you're gonna do in a

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 1>social psychology way is to to consider, like, all right, well,

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 1>why are people like they are? Not just let's identify

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what people are are? But is and it's sort of

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 1>goes down to the old nature or nurture thing, which

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I've long been on record that kind of everything is

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a mixture of both, and it seems to be in

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>this case. Although there have been some studies, including studies

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>from the I Sinks, the Screaming I Sinks, Great New bands,

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>where it seems in certain cases that nature has a

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>bit of a nudge over nurture. In one study in particular,

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty six of twins found that extra version

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:42.880
<v Speaker 1>was correlated most amongst identical twins rather than fraternal twins,

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>which would really put a check in the box of nature. Yeah,

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think um went on in a nineteen seventy

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:56.119
<v Speaker 1>nine study to basically identify the size of your your cortex,

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>your cerebral cortex as directly related did to whether you

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>were an introvert extrovert. And this is ninety nine. I

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>think the Wonder Machine was maybe had just debuted and

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.919
<v Speaker 1>they were probably a billion dollars a piece. So this

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>guy was doing this, I don't know, he might have

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>been dissecting people after they died or something. But he

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>from what neuroscience went on to kind of they went

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>on and through in their own two cents on this

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, and they really showed that I think was

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 1>seemed to have been onto something. Yeah, so one thing

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>that we do know for sure, and there's there's so

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>much haziness with all this it can be a little frustrating.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that they have really established is there

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is a supreme connection between being an extrovert and seeking

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>reward behaviors that seek rewards, and there is a pretty

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.800
<v Speaker 1>clear demarcation between introverts and extroverts when it comes to

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the I guess we can say the fact that extroverts

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are much more likely to seek rewards than introverts are. Yes,

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and and if you take that as correct, then that

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>explains every other behavior in those behavior patterns that extroverts

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>are looking outward for some sort of stimulation, and you

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>can see everything they do is reward seeking behavior. Not

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>reward like somebody gives them a TwixT or something for

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>saying a joke. All of that might happen, and I'm

0:22:19.680 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>sure an extrovert would love that, but more like by

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>talking to somebody they have a they get a positive

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>feeling from that, so they get a pop of dopamine.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>That means that going and socializing with people is reward

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:34.239
<v Speaker 1>seeking behavior. They're seeking that pop of dopamine, which is

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>as in brain terms, the reward. So that is the

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:42.560
<v Speaker 1>central why to all of this. It depends, as we'll see,

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it depends. So they have shown that there are people

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that correlate with extra version as we understand them psychologically today,

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.680
<v Speaker 1>that that do that do have like this larger cortex

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that is linked to greater reward seeking. But it's also

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>possible that these these buckets that we've create an extrovert

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 1>an introvert don't really apply. So at the end of

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>the day, what we have is some neurological findings that

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>were not quite sure. We can't say really confidently that

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they fit our model of extroverts and introverts, but it

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is it is a pretty good place to start, yeah,

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.600
<v Speaker 1>because they the one example they gave kind of makes

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>sense in that when thinking along those lines, which is

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>an introvert um, there may be an introvert who really

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>loves going on thrill rides and roller coasters or bungee

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>jumping or big adventuests like that. But they say that

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>extroverts getting more like more of a rush out of

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.360
<v Speaker 1>something like that than an introvert might. Yeah, so anything

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>that could give you dopamine. It's not to say that

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 1>introverts don't experience that, it's just to say that extroverts

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>experience it more. Right, So it doesn't matter what they're

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>deriving pleasure from. They're getting a bigger kick or a

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.199
<v Speaker 1>bigger thrill or a bigger whatever out of it. And

0:23:56.240 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that this actually leads extroverts into later danger

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>than introverts, like they're because they need Yeah, so they're

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>likelier to go do weird stuff that could get them

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>hospitalized for an injury. They're more prone to accident to

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>being hospitalized for him they're being they're more prone to

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>being arrested for crime or anti social behavior. Um. And

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>when you understand it is there, it's a reward seeking behavior,

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it makes a lot of sense. Yeah, And then you know,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on the nurture side, there's gonna be a lot of

0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>research obviously into everything from what your family is generally like, uh,

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and the cues that you pick up from them on

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 1>how to live life to what really interests me, which

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>is going back to being a baby, because you know,

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 1>you're you're sponging it up from the time you pop

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 1>out and your breathing oxygen. Uh. And I think like

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the pandemic, And they talked about this

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>COVID generation, not necessarily generation because you know, maybe a

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, but I think there was a lot

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 1>of focus on like grade school kids and teens and

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that and how it behaviorally affects will affect them.

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>But I think there's gonna be a lot of stuff

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:17.199
<v Speaker 1>many years from now about COVID babies that didn't go

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>outside for their first two years. Uh. And this two

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand six study they found that, Um, there's a few

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 1>studies here that kind of I think play into that.

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>One one was from two thousand six where they found

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>that mother child relationships can really have an effect on

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>extra version and that if you are a mother and

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 1>child who are really attached during very early stages of development,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that the kid will end up being more likely to

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:45.439
<v Speaker 1>be extroverted later in life. Yeah, if they have what

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>psychologists call a secure attachment style to their mom, which

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.359
<v Speaker 1>means that they know that at the end of the

0:25:51.440 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>day and they can run home to mom if something

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 1>goes wrong and Mom's going to be there for them,

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>which gives them the confidence to go out and explore more.

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:02.239
<v Speaker 1>That makes sense, and it's one of those things that

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it makes so much sense that you should have a

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>little alarm going off in your head because it's it's

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.479
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that like has like somebody had

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 1>a study that that showed that. But it doesn't necessarily

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.800
<v Speaker 1>mean Okay, if you have a secure attachment, you're definitely

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be an extrovert. It's also not clear our

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>kids who are born extroverts likelier to form a secure

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>attachment to your mom's you know. So we're back to

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>like a chicken and the egg kind of thing, and

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we just don't have an answer to that. So it's

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>really important to be careful when you're interpreting some of

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 1>the data that psychologists and the science press like the

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>throw at you is basically settled. Yeah, and it also

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean, um, you know, sometimes one of the effects

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of postpartum depression can be trouble forming an attachment for

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a while. Uh, that doesn't necessarily mean that that baby

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to grow up to be an introvert because

0:26:53.119 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>mom had a harder time bonding with that child early

0:26:56.359 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>on because of postpartum depression. UM and I I think

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>we should do one on attachment styles. Like there's a

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>big bunch of UM stuff that's associated with it, and

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it seems really it's really interesting. It does seem pretty

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>predictive of behavior for sure. Yeah. Absolutely, Uh, I love

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. Anything about like early childhood development is

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 1>just fascinating to me. I love it too, Chuck, let's

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>love it together. Another study in Japan, and this is

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>what I was kind of talking about with UM, perhaps

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>COVID babies playing in was they found that children of

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 1>overprotective or just let's just say protective parents have lower

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>levels of extraversion. And that's what I was talking about

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>with Like, if there were parents that were just did

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not let their baby leave the house for two years

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>because of COVID, like what that would probably mean they're

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>probably protective and you know, maybe overly protective as opposed

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to uh what Thankfully we were able to do because

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>there was no code, but we had our daughter out

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>very early and thought it was very important to just

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>get her out in the world in places where there

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:10.159
<v Speaker 1>are lots of people, you know, even as a baby,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 1>I just think, I don't know, I think all that

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff really sort of matters. Well, yeah, they say socialization,

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the more contact with other humans, it's the better off

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the kid is. That's the presumption, right right. The thing

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is this this uh, this Japanese study. What it seems

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to have turned up is that, um, it's not lower

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:33.920
<v Speaker 1>levels of extraversion. It sounds like it's um, greater neuroticism. Interesting,

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like they're they're um, what

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think of as introversion, like social anxiety, um,

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a desire to not be around people because they don't

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>feel comfortable. That's not introversion. That's a part of the

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Big five though, And it's neuroticism, that's what that counts.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>So like a neurotic neurotic parents are more likely to

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>have neurotic kids. Yeah, and it makes sense like that

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you would pass that on that that could be a

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>learned behavior, you know, that you adopt for yourself, especially

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>after years of being raised that way certainly makes sense absolutely.

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>What about discipline? Uh, yeah, you spank you thank them

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>for being an introvert. That's the that's the phrase that

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 1>psychologists use. Those T shirts did not sell well. Got

0:29:17.520 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a box of them at the pops I convention, right right, Yeah,

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they're just sitting moth eaton in the attic. Uh No,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>what it said was a sixty six nineteen sixty six

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>study found that sons who were punished by their parents

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>would exhibit more introverted behavior. Uh. This to me, especially

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it was nineteen sixty six, is I

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm just a leary of this one, because

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>what does punishment mean in that case in nineteen sixty six. Yeah,

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know what's weird is there's a lot of like

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.120
<v Speaker 1>tendency to cite really old studies when it comes to

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>extra vision and int introversion, despite there being so much

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>work being done on it. So it popped up all

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>over the place. Yeah, it's a lot harder to punish

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:08.080
<v Speaker 1>kids these days. I think, um, you know, and hit

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 1>him anymore. So you gotta do things like take things

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>away or have time out. And I don't I don't know.

0:30:15.040 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess every kid is different. But when I when

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I put my daughter in her room for any various reason,

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like I go in there a minute later and she's

0:30:21.600 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>just happy as a clam and they're doing her thing

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>like this isn't a punishment, or if I take something away,

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 1>she's like, fine, I'll just go do this. Yeah. Like

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't found a punishment that really works. That's

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome. I wonder how how she's going to turn

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>out in that result, you know, like, because even if

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you don't spank your kid, if you use guilt or shame,

0:30:40.320 --> 0:30:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna screw them up possibly spanking. So like being

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a parent, no thank you. Yeah, And that's something I

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 1>have to consider a lot because I have passive aggressive

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 1>tendencies and I had those foisted on me, and I

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>do not want to pass that trade along. You know. Yes,

0:30:56.960 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 1>for sure, we like to think we're raising a good

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>future adult. Yeah, I think you guys. I really think

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you guys are I think I hope so you seem

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to be doing a really good job of it. So

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess we'll see. Um, let's take a break and

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>then we'll come back and answer a really important question

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I think is on everyone's mind. Who's happier learning stop

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:44.320
<v Speaker 1>with Joshua. Uh So we're back and we're talking about

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a question, um that you just can't not think of

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>it when you start talking about introverts and extroverts, especially

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>when you learn that extroverts are just getting more of

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a thrill and high from life, Like, who's happier? Does

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that mean that they're happier? And the truck right, the

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>answer it's it's yes, they are happier. No, it's not.

0:32:08.280 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It is too. I mean, study after study shows that

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they have They report a greater subjective well being than

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>than people who scores introverts on these personality tests. I

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>just don't want to believe this. I mean, I think,

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to me, this is a little bit of a chicken

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or the egg thing. Are they happier because they ah

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>go to more parties? You know, that's a very basic

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 1>way to look at it, uh, and go to more

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.680
<v Speaker 1>concerts and public events and things that are more fun

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>like don't to me, that's a very narrow view of

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what happiness is though. So, but that seems to be

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>like one of the big explanations for why they would

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be happier is it presumes that social functions and being

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>around other people is rewarding in a positive experience, and

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>so since they're doing that more, there of course going

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>to be happier. I don't. I mean, if you're an introvert,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that's just absolutely not true. Being around people is not

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a more rewarding experience, That's my point. Might be

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>happier at your book club, you know, right, or painting

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>your figurines all alone listening to us, for sure. But

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:20.959
<v Speaker 1>from what I've seen, study after study turns up that extroverts,

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>at least in our current understanding of what what subjective

0:33:26.320 --> 0:33:29.960
<v Speaker 1>well being is a k A happiness that like, they

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>score higher in that. But again, it doesn't mean that

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>we've we've captured happiness kind of like what you were saying, Yeah, like, hey,

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:38.680
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be happy, if you want to

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>kick depression, go to more public events. Yeah. Well, what's weird, Chuck,

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:47.680
<v Speaker 1>is there are there's some evidence that that's kind of

0:33:47.720 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the case, UM, and it's found in UM like world leaders.

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>There are some world leaders who UM will out themselves

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>as as introverts. I think Justin Trudeau's the most recent one,

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>but apparently Barack Obama some other like really like well liked,

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>generally well liked leaders UM said later that they feel

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 1>like they were introverts and everybody like you lie and

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:13.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, they really were introverts, but what they did

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:18.279
<v Speaker 1>was they pushed themselves to engage in extrovert behavior and

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.960
<v Speaker 1>as a result, they were richly rewarded for that. I

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:25.520
<v Speaker 1>wonder if Clinton was like, not me, baby, I'm name Bevert.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I was all about it, right. I think Nixon was

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the last US president that was sort of an admitted introvert.

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Case closed. Yeah, it is a profession though, where uh

0:34:41.200 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>boy talk about being around people, like campaigning for public

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>office is a slog of meeting strangers, um And the

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:56.919
<v Speaker 1>only experience we have with that is live shows, which

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting because as an introvert, you do very

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>well on stage and it's probably something that you push

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>yourself to to eventually do. It didn't come naturally to

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 1>meet either, so I had to kind of work through

0:35:08.520 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>jitters and stuff as well. But uh I found a

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>distinct difference in my energy levels when we were sort

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of meeting and greeting before and after shows that we

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>did for a long time, because as much as I

0:35:22.840 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>really enjoyed every single interaction, it is a very draining

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>thing to have to be on because when you meet

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 1>someone who's meeting you, they're really up and on. So

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like someone can't come up and say, oh man, I'm

0:35:35.120 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>such a big listener for years and years, and you

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:41.239
<v Speaker 1>can't just go, I'm really tired right now, so you

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta be up to and like what we did times

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a gazillion is a politician running for office, right exactly

0:35:47.880 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 1>because you really want something from those people, which is

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the yeah, you know, so you gotta be on. I

0:35:54.520 --> 0:35:57.200
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what you mean, but I can imagine that drain.

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>The fact is, though you and I do push ourselves

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to go out on stage, and we can both report

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that is really really rewarding to do that. There are

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a few things that make you feel as good as

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>coming off off stage after like a show that you

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 1>just knew was a good show. Right, So there is,

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at least anecdotally from our perspective, there is evidence that

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>pushing yourself to do extroverted activities is rewarding could increase

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>your happiness. But the reason why it doesn't necessarily mean okay,

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to be an extrovert to be happy is

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>that it's possible our society is really ignoring a lot

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:38.879
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff that that would make anybody happy that's

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 1>associated with introverted behavior. To because our society places a

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>tremendous amount of value on extroverted traits basically, yeah, and

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>on the live show thing like, and I've heard this

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 1>from touring musicians. It's there's definitely an energy exchange that

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>leaves you, like I have a hard time going to

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.839
<v Speaker 1>sleep after in the hotel. But when we were going

0:37:02.880 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>out for like, you know, six or seven shows in

0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a row, I would find in the week after I

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>got home it was a challenge for me. Oh yeah,

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>And I've heard that from touring musicians that you know,

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>you got on these big rock and roll tours or

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>what rock and roll tours? So square uh and then afterwards,

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 1>like you go back home to your family and like

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that's why a lot of those marriages and families break up,

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>because it's just really a stark difference. Can be kind

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>of depressed. Even I think, why can't you be more

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like the group? He's right, I'm sure that doesn't fare

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>very well. They'll do anything. So um. So, the thing is,

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>if you look at how at least I should say

0:37:46.360 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Western society. I think I said society before, but Western

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>society really places a lot of value on extroverted behaviors,

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 1>being outgoing, being friendly, being sociable, being um a leader,

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>being unafraid, you know, Captain of Indo Street kind of stuff. Like,

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>look at our movie stars. We don't have introverted movie

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>stars typically. I don't agree with that. Actually, I think

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:09.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of introverted movie stars. Okay, but do

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:13.439
<v Speaker 1>they behave introverted on screen? Well, no, that's my point.

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all the act. And I think as

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>real personality goes, I think there are many introverted movie stars, right,

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So if they just acted like their own introverted selves,

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:26.560
<v Speaker 1>society wouldn't place any sort of value on that. It

0:38:26.600 --> 0:38:29.560
<v Speaker 1>would be movie starting, right exactly. They place an emphasis

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on the extroverted behavior they're engaging in. You see what

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. Yeah, yeah, So I think that's the point. Like,

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.440
<v Speaker 1>if you are in our society, if you act extroverted,

0:38:38.480 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of course you're going to be happy. But I think

0:38:40.040 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>we're also missing all of the things that can make

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>an introverted person happy that apply as well. Yeah, and

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you you can see this in the sort of early

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.360
<v Speaker 1>mid two thousand's when like every office in the world

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>became this big, huge open warehouse space, which was again

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.279
<v Speaker 1>for us for an office of introverts was just a

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:06.799
<v Speaker 1>nightmare for so many people. But I think career advancement

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 1>in those situations. You know, the boss, he's like, you know,

0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>so and so is always just bopping around generating ideas,

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.400
<v Speaker 1>talking to people like they're going to get more attention

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 1>than someone who was like where did my cubicle go? Yeah,

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.320
<v Speaker 1>which isn't fair, you know, to have done to everyone,

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But that's I mean, that's that at Western emphasis on

0:39:28.840 --> 0:39:33.400
<v Speaker 1>on extroverted behavior. Same with like brainstorming sessions. That's the

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:35.800
<v Speaker 1>opposite of what introverts want to do, and it's also

0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the opposite of of what research shows that an introverted

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:42.400
<v Speaker 1>person um is going to thrive in. They're gonna not

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna come up with their best ideas in that setting.

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:45.920
<v Speaker 1>They're going to come up with their best ideas like

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>alone on a walk or something. Yeah, you know what

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.160
<v Speaker 1>they should do. It's interesting. Like a really good boss

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.239
<v Speaker 1>I think would gather the people for the meeting and say,

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, so coming up next, we need to solve

0:39:56.120 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 1>this problem. We're gonna have a big brainstorming session for

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone who wants to stay. But if you want to

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>go back to your office and really have some alone

0:40:04.200 --> 0:40:07.280
<v Speaker 1>time to think about this, then do that, like offer

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>up both alternatives. Yes, exactly. I think that's great. The

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>ambivert way up with the ambiverts. As far as the

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of who is healthier, that's a big one too.

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:22.919
<v Speaker 1>It's really easy to say that, like, well here, let's

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.200
<v Speaker 1>just say this. What's happened with all of the information

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>that we found is there's been a lot of misinterpretation

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 1>of studies and data where the press will basically say, like,

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're an introvert, you're more prone to anxiety. And

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>people that are more prone to anxiety or more prone

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to have heart attacks, So introverts are more prone to

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:45.200
<v Speaker 1>have heart attacks, right precisely. And what they're doing is

0:40:45.280 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're talking about a study, but they're uh, they're

0:40:48.440 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>more often than not trying to put a scientific gloss

0:40:52.239 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 1>on just a popular myth. Right, Yeah, and that's it.

0:40:55.840 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>That happens a lot. There was another study that looked

0:40:58.040 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>at people who have like really negat of outlooks on

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 1>life and have heart disease and compared them to people

0:41:03.080 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 1>who are less negative and um have heart disease, and

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>looked at health outcomes and of course, the more negative

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>people had worse health outcomes, and of course the headline

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was introverts experience more health problems. Studies suggests kind of thing,

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and that introverts was nowhere in the study anywhere. They

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:23.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't use it anywhere, but that got converted to introverts.

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.279
<v Speaker 1>That is a huge problem at the very least it

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>is in public opinion. But the bigger problem is, like

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we as the public, can be forgiven, does this kind

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of just take that up. It's not our job. We're

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>just kind of interested in that kind of thing, and

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we can be forgiven for making those mistakes. What shouldn't

0:41:41.160 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 1>be forgiven is when psychologists and other people working in

0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>these fields do that same thing, make those mistakes, use

0:41:49.040 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that shorthand and take this as anything more than just

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>a model that is a work in progress at best

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 1>right now right And also the notion that we've we've

0:41:59.239 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 1>got it all figured out when it comes to connecting

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:06.600
<v Speaker 1>health with personality, um that that is like a lot

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of hubris to suggest that. So there's still so much

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>more I think that's going to be uncovered when connecting

0:42:12.760 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>things like heart disease and depression and and stuff like that.

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.840
<v Speaker 1>We just don't know. Yeah, we just don't know. And

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a good thing to remember when it comes to

0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>introversion and extroversion. Um. And there's people out there that say,

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think a lot of this is just

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>basically bunk, if not all of it together. That their

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>their their premise is basically what we've been talking about,

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that people are just too complex to put into a

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 1>set of categories. And yeah, the Big five Personality Traits

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:48.400
<v Speaker 1>is probably the most complex and robust personality inventory that

0:42:48.440 --> 0:42:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we've come up with yet. But it's still five different

0:42:51.280 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>categories that you kind of that interact with one another.

0:42:54.719 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 1>And it seems really primitive when you step back and

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>look at that, when you consider just how complex not

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:03.480
<v Speaker 1>just people are, but the experiences people have on a

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>moment to moment basis that influence our moods and our

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>decisions and our behavior too. Yeah, and there are people

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:16.359
<v Speaker 1>who can solidly be like oh no, I'm well young

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:18.560
<v Speaker 1>said that's not possible, you know what I mean, that

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>would consider themselves like I'm an introvert, Like trust me,

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm an introvert, or someone who is clearly an extrovert.

0:43:25.480 --> 0:43:28.800
<v Speaker 1>There are those people that have maybe very very little

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>overlap with the other. Um, but with anything on a spectrum,

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just I don't know, it's very personal. I think

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it's super interesting to think about for yourself because I

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:42.319
<v Speaker 1>think it helps you navigate the world if you kind

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of think about it. But I also think you can

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>overthink that stuff. Yeah, some people say that what you

0:43:47.120 --> 0:43:50.120
<v Speaker 1>just described is actually harmful, that people will start to

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 1>act to type if they are like, well, I'm an introvert.

0:43:55.960 --> 0:43:57.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess I might as well not go to that

0:43:57.360 --> 0:43:59.720
<v Speaker 1>party and they miss meeting you know, a new friend,

0:43:59.840 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or that you don't take on that project at work

0:44:02.080 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that would open a new door for him. Like, some

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>people say this kind of stuff is harmful labeling people

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:09.919
<v Speaker 1>like that rather than giving everybody like, hey, some people

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.479
<v Speaker 1>are like this, there's this behavior, there's that behavior, and

0:44:12.800 --> 0:44:16.160
<v Speaker 1>just letting people be as they are. UM that that

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a much better idea. Yeah, I think I agree

0:44:20.080 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>with that. Yeah. And then lastly, the other thing, Chuck

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is okay, So let's say the Big five personality inventory.

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 1>It becomes just more and more robust, and it becomes

0:44:29.840 --> 0:44:32.239
<v Speaker 1>clear that yes, this thing is absolutely accurate and you

0:44:32.320 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can use it to predict the behavior of anybody, like,

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 1>would we want to even have that in existence? Do

0:44:38.800 --> 0:44:41.520
<v Speaker 1>we want to know people like that? And like if

0:44:41.560 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we did have something that was that accurate, like what

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 1>ends would it be used to? You know, it's just

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a question to chew on, especially if you're an introvert. Yeah,

0:44:52.080 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 1>these are my favorite ones. I like the ones where

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>we can just dish, you know. Yeah, I love dishing

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:00.719
<v Speaker 1>with you. Uh, let's see you got anything else? I

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>got nothing else. I don't have anything else either. And

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:04.960
<v Speaker 1>since both of us said that, of course, it means

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's time for listener mayo. I'm going to call this

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>pronunciation support, not in the way that you might think. Hey, guys,

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:16.839
<v Speaker 1>love the show writing to urge you to be less

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:20.960
<v Speaker 1>hard on yourselves and less accepting of criticism from listeners

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>about so called language mistakes. For example, in the recent

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Roe v Waite episode, Chuck at first pronounced substantive with

0:45:29.480 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the accident on the second syllable and instead of substantive,

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and it made such an impression on him that he

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 1>made fun of himself later in the episode. I tend

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Uh, Yetsi is from Yetzi by the way, Well,

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:45.840
<v Speaker 1>as it happens, both Oxford and Miriam Webster document Chuck's

0:45:45.880 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>pronunciation of the word as such, and Josh check out

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>what some dictionaries have come to say about contemporary versus contemporaneous.

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, I'm excited about this one. The truth is

0:45:57.160 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that even dictionaries are nothing more than snapshots in time

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.160
<v Speaker 1>of how language is used, and in perfect ones at that,

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I might recommend doing an episode on linguistic descriptivism. Uh.

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:09.880
<v Speaker 1>In short, language is basically a game in which the

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>object is communicate. It's pretty rare for you guys his

0:46:12.960 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 1>native English speakers to use English in a way that could,

0:46:15.840 --> 0:46:20.040
<v Speaker 1>by any meaningful metric, be considered a mistake. Maybe a

0:46:20.120 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 1>linguistic descriptivism episode would be would put to bed some

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of the more pedantic criticisms you seem to get from listeners.

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a great idea. Nah, who am I kidding that? Yeah,

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>so with many fondness, I'm sure if that's correct. Uh.

0:46:37.280 --> 0:46:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But when they got the point across exactly uh, and

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that's from yet Sie Lindenbaum, my new favorite listener. And

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>then when I told yet See that I was reading this,

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.080
<v Speaker 1>they're back and said, yes, yes, I'm going to be

0:46:50.120 --> 0:46:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the coolest member of my descriptive Ist Linguistics Club this week.

0:46:55.239 --> 0:46:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I love that that's a club man, Yets. He's great.

0:46:57.560 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take Yetsi's advice and really unlow on the

0:47:00.320 --> 0:47:02.279
<v Speaker 1>next person who writes in to tell us where you've

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:06.440
<v Speaker 1>mispronounced something. Yeah, tell him, sick him, that's right, tell

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>him sent you. Um. Well, if you want to be

0:47:09.280 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like Yets and just be totally great, you can take

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:14.239
<v Speaker 1>a shot at it in an email. Send it off

0:47:14.280 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to stuff podcast at iHeart radio dot com. Stuff you

0:47:20.480 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Should Know is a production of I Heart Radio. For

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts my heart Radio, visit the iHeart Radio app,

0:47:26.280 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.