WEBVTT - Colin Cowherd Podcast - Knicks STUN Pacers, KAT Explodes, Thunder VULNERABLE On The Road, Caitlin Clark Is A “Billion Dollar Athlete”

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>The Volume. At the end of the season, there's only

0:00:05.440 --> 0:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one team that can call themselves NBA Champs, only one

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>player that can call themselves the number one pick in

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the NFL draft. Well, there's only one electric suv worthy

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of the title, the Ultimate, the All Electric BMWIX. What

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I love about the IX is that it delivers legendary

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>BMW performance I've had several while its sleek design exudes

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>innovative style from the inside out, not to mention how

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>much space and utility it provides over seventy five cubic

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>feet of cargo space. The IX is completely changing the

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>game with an all electric suv. The greatest legends of

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:40.959
<v Speaker 1>sports never compromise any part of the game, So why

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>would you settle for anything less from your suv? After all,

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>there's only one ultimate, the BMWIX. Everything you love about

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate driving machine Electrified BMW.

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, welcome to hoops today here at the Volume

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Heavy Sunday. Everybody. Hope all of you guys are having

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 2>a great weekend. Well, Colin Coward was very kind to

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 2>join us tonight with his time, and this time two

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 2>days ago we were looking at a what looked like

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 2>the Indiana Pacers on their way to potentially a sweep

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>to go to the finals. We're talking about trading Karl

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Anthony Towns. Everyone's blowing a bunch of smoke about the

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Thunder and how they're the all time great team. And

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>now we're sitting here on Sunday evening and both series

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>are two to one and very very different Colin. My

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 2>initial read was just simply that this is more or

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 2>less where the Eastern Conference Finals should be at this

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>point in that I thought the Knicks looked like the

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 2>better team in Game one and they blew it, And

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>I thought the Pacers looked like the better team tonight

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that I thought they let their foot off the gas

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:44.959
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of ways. The Knicks did find some stuff,

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and we'll get into that, but Carl Anthony town steals

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>this game just like Aaron Nesmith stole Game one, and

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>it kind of feels like we're supposed to be two

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 2>to one Indie and here we are two to one Indie.

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, they are really different teams. At one point,

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Pacers had a sixteen to nothing fast break points advantage.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can tell Indiana always wants to push

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the pace, but tonight it was basically in the half

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>court Carl Anthony Towns with Jalen Brunson off the floor

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>for most of it. He had one of these Carl

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Towns games, and I think I've told you this before.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It was a weird thing. I swear to god. I

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>went to about six NBA games. He played in five

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of them. There was this stretch in LA. Every time

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I went to a game he was playing, and he's

0:02:28.000 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in all of them. He had a quarterway. He was

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the best player on the floor by long shot. And

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>he does this and you know for a guy his size,

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>like his first step for a guy his size, like

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he is quick and then he gets by you and

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:48.079
<v Speaker 1>he's long and he's angular and he's a handful. He's

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 1>a handful for a big and I've just seen him

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>do stuff like this before. But I thought with Brunson

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>off the floor, you know sometimes when you're when you're

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>a really gifted player and you play with a ball

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>centric great player. This was Brunson in Dallas, you know,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like he would be like it was Luca's show. And

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>then you put him in New York and this is

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>one of those were in a weird way. It was

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>like Karl Anthony Taw. The team was just looking for

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>him to lead, and we both know that he can

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>do this. He doesn't sustain it, he gets in foul trouble.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>He can be inefficient, he's flaky. But and then I think,

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to your point, I think I think they just they

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>had a series of really the Pacers had a series

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of really bad offensive possessions, and you look up and

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 1>you're like nine seven, four to two lead. So this

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is what happens in the NBA. This isn't college Like,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>there's just things happened quickly in the NBA, and you

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>looked up and you're like, oh, New York has total

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>control emotionally, they just felt like they were going to

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>win the game. With about four left, You're like, Indiana

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>can't get out of its own way here offensively.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, even when it was a two or three point

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 2>game with Indy still in the it kind of just

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 2>felt like New York was gonna win at that point.

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 2>Basketball is such a confidence and rhythm sport that, like,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>when the momentum shifts as dramatically as it does, it

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 2>can be difficult to reassert control of the situation. Very similarly,

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 2>that happened to New York. All of a sudden, their

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 2>offense bogs down. In Game one, other offense bogs down.

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Suddenly Aaron E. Smith's hitting every single three he takes.

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 2>It just kind of changes the psychology of the game.

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 2>I thought things really turned around in that late third quarter.

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:27.320
<v Speaker 2>It was so funny because stan Van Gundy goes like,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure I like this lineup. It's a bunch

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 2>of guys who can't score and they need to score.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>And then he goes He's like, who's gonna be the

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>guy who brings the offense for the Knicks and ended

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>up being deuced McBride and they went on like a

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 2>seven to zero run and it cut it down to

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 2>ten going into the fourth quarter, and that's what they

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 2>were talking about. They're like, they just need to get

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 2>it down to ten. And then as soon as they

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>got into the fourth quarter in striking distance, Karl Anthony

0:04:48.200 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 2>Towns gets going. It's the three point shooting. It's the

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 2>like you mentioned, the first step. And then once he

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.000
<v Speaker 2>gets that first step, the bigs all try to catch

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.120
<v Speaker 2>up to him, but he's just so good at powering

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.359
<v Speaker 2>through with that battering of a left arm as he

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 2>goes to the rim and once he got going, this

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 2>is the most interesting part you mentioned it, Colin, Indy's

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.359
<v Speaker 2>offense got shook. This is the first time in a

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 2>long time I've seen Indy's offense get their foundation shaken

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 2>the way that the Knicks did. And what it really

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>came down to is that stretch with Brunson out. You know,

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>it's been so fascinating, Colin, because it's different than the

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 2>Celtics series. In the Celtic series, Cat and Brunson were

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 2>asked to defend one on one, very different kind of idea.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 2>The Celtics succumbs to their switching and they just tried

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:36.320
<v Speaker 2>to attack Brunson and Cat one on one and they

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.919
<v Speaker 2>did a good job. But in this series, the job

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 2>for Brunson and Kat is much more sprinting in rotation,

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 2>getting back in transition defense. It's a lot of like

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 2>mental focus and energy related stuff, and those guys have

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.320
<v Speaker 2>been rough in this series in that department. But in

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 2>that fourth quarter stretch with Brunson off the floor for

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 2>most of it, it's Duce McBride out there, a substantially

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 2>better defensive player. Kat was giving the requisite effort in

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 2>rotation and one of the things with this Pacers team,

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.479
<v Speaker 2>Siakam and Halliburton can play one on one, but that's

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 2>not necessarily what they do at a superstar level, right,

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 2>And so if you rotate and you make them take

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.600
<v Speaker 2>contested shots, they might just go cold and miss them all.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:20.720
<v Speaker 2>And that's what happened in this game. They don't have

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 2>a Brunson, a guy who's just an indomitable one on

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 2>one force who can step in and get great shots,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:29.240
<v Speaker 2>and so like that, that really is the key if

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 2>there's any hope for New York in this series. And

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 2>I still feel pretty strongly that Indiana is gonna get

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 2>it done. But like, if there's any hope for New

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 2>York in this series, it's they gotta fly around and

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>rotate and they got they gotta match Indiana's speed and

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 2>pace and energy as much as they can in this series.

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it's it's one of the reasons Indiana

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>plays with pace is because Rick Carlisle knows that's when

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>they're at their best, because Turner can run, Siakam runs

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the floor really well. But they got into us, Indiana

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>got into about it, and it wasn't like two minutes,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it was like six minutes. So they got into a

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>six minute stretch where McConnell's getting He got one short

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 1>look and then he forced one and then you know

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>again they have like Nie Smith can get hot, but

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to beat people off the ball, and

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you're just watching it and you're like, oh, this is mud.

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't work at all. It's and you know it's

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the Pacers are a better team. I I

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 1>think there's certain things the Knicks need to do. I

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>think what happened to the Pacers tonight can happen to

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the next more often where they feel a little stock

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>if Brunson's not hitting. And if I recall, I think

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Halliburton was out for a little bit. He was out

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>of it when they got out of rhythm. Then he

0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>came back in and he was sort of asked to hey,

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>kickstart the rhythm, and it's like and he did hit

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a three, But it's weird when when he is whereas

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Brunson doesn't control the pace, he controls them scoring. Halliburton

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>can control scoring and the pace. So when you take

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>him out and then you insert him back and it's like, okay, now, guys,

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna change the pace of this, and he tried

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and he does, but it just didn't. It felt clunky

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and it felt like they were playing uphill. Yeah.

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I just.

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>This is a hard series to officiate. Just give me

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a minute on this. Siakam had a great block on McBride.

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>They call it, they called the foul in it, and

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh, good God, that's ridiculous. The Biggs, I

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>mean Turner and Cat and uh Siakam, especially Siakam and Cat.

0:08:33.120 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>They're aggressive offensive players with a nice touch. There was

0:08:38.640 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>so many calls going against the Knicks in the second half,

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>third quarter. I'm like, oh, this is this is They're

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna blow a gasket here. And then I thought a

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>couple went against the Pacers late. I think this is

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a hard series to officiate. New York's a good defensive team.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Indiana is an underrated defensive team. And the Bigs move

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and they collide and I don't know. As I watched

0:09:02.880 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>this game about and I'm not a guy that bangs

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>on officials, but I was like, man, there were a

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of calls going against the Necks for a stretch

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>in this game.

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 2>I thought, no, absolutely, That's why I wasn't upset about

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the Siaka one, Like Siaka block Deuce McBride clean. That

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 2>was a great defensive play, should not have been a foul.

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 2>But there were like three or four calls against against

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 2>the Knicks in that fourth quarter where I was like, yeah,

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 2>to the point you're making, what makes this series so

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>hard to officiate is on the one hand, you've got Brunson,

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.439
<v Speaker 2>who's one of the most gifted foul grifters in the NBA.

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 2>And then on the other side, the Pacers just play

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>so fast and there's so much running that you kind

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 2>of have to put your body in the way you

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>have to. If you don't, they're just gonna cut you

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 2>to pieces. And so there's a lot of these like

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of bang bang contact plays where a dude comes

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:48.679
<v Speaker 2>flying downhill or tries to turn the corner on a

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.320
<v Speaker 2>drive and you try to position yourself in front and

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 2>take the contact, and they're getting called for fouls in

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 2>a lot of those situations, and it is a very

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 2>difficult series to officiate. But what causes those fouls, to

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 2>your point, is the speed in the pace. And if

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>there's one thing to credit the Knicks for in this

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter that, like you said, there was a six

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 2>minute stretch there where You're like, why is Aaron Nesmith

0:10:09.960 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>trying to play bully ball against joshuar Ojananobi, Like o

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Jananoby's you know, four inches taller than you and at

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 2>least thirty pounds heavier, Like you're not gonna go through

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 2>his chest to get to the rim. And there was

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 2>a little bit too much of like siakam Iso, a

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 2>little too much of like Tyrese Halliburton dribbling out of

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 2>ball screens instead of passing out of ball screens like

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 2>he always does. I thought Indiana kind of lost their

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 2>identity for a minute in that fourth quarter. By the way,

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 2>like that's a credit to Karl Anthony Towns. I'm a

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 2>big believer in this colin I'm I think basketball is

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 2>more art than science. I think there is a lot

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:48.319
<v Speaker 2>of like psychological dynamics at play in any given moment.

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>And like when Luca rolls up into your building in

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 2>the first quarter in an elimination game and scorees seventeen

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 2>points and hits three logo threes, it just SAPs you

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 2>of all your energy. Like even I thought Brunson and

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:04.640
<v Speaker 2>kat both kind of were succumbing to that over the

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 2>course of this game. Brunson was having a rough night.

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Cat was having a rough night. What happened in that

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 2>fourth quarter was Kat threw one hell of a punch

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 2>and he's dunking on everybody and hitting step back threes,

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 2>and you could tell Indiana was just shaken at that.

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I mean there was a point in the first

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>half when Indiana and by twenty and they got into

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this like six or eight transition run where it was

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>like three fast rates, bang bang, and I'm like, all

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>the game's over. The series is over. I mean, I

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>would have bet my four oh one kid at that moment.

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Okay, the series is over. It's done. The

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>body language Brunson didn't seem engaged, and I'm like, okay,

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>this it's done. So i mean, you got to give

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the next credit. I you know, it's just it's I

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 1>think to your point, it's probably the series now probably

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>closer to what it should be. So you go back

0:11:56.559 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to Game one, the Knicks absolutely outplayed him, and and

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>going even into this game, I was with friends tonight

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in the in the first quarter, a little cookout at

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>their house. We were watching the game, and it was

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>like it was one of the people there was not

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>a basketball fan, and I said, oh, this series has

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>just come down to the last six minutes. I said,

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>one team's great defensively, one's very good offensively. There's about

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 1>six really good players combined. I said, it'll be close.

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.680
<v Speaker 1>It'll be a four point game. I thought Indiana would win.

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>But I also think one of the things that was

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>good for the NBA tonight is that you're seeing a

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of road teams win playoff games. They've been a

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>ton I mean Indiana obviously, my entire life, even as

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>an NBA fan, I always felt like the home team

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>got the whistle, and I just like seeing road teams win.

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it just I think it's just better for

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 1>basketball when the road team wins. I mean, I think

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just funny now that the Knicks can't win it

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>home and the Basers now are winning everywhere but home,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's just good. It makes the series captivating.

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested to watch the Pacers come out in Game

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>four because my take is they're gonna try to push

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the pace again because they they walked into that locker

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>room and they're like, we lost our way at home

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>in a game that could have clinched the series, Like

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>they just lost their way credit the next defense, But

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that was as bad as Indiana's looked offensively for a

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>six to eight minute stretch the entire series.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, the most interesting thing looking back at

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 2>this is the Celtics series looks so weird in retrospect

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 2>now with the Knicks having won that series and then

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 2>looking bad for you know, the majority of this series.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 2>Because I'm with you, like I think Indiana is. I

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 2>think Indiana is gonna come out in Game four and

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 2>throw their best punch, and I think it's gonna be

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a very difficult game for the Knicks to win. That

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Like the game I pointed to is the Calves Game four.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Calves went into Indiana in Game three and blew them out.

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's not a that's not that's a sixty four

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 2>when Leyden roster that went into Indy and suffered one

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 2>of the most humiliating blowouts that we've ever seen in

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 2>the NBA when they were trailing eighty to thirty nine

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the first half. So Indiana is

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna come out and they're going to throw their best punch.

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 2>What's fascinating to me is coming into this series. I

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 2>mentioned to you on your show that I thought the

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Pacers were better on offense and better on defense than

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 2>the Knicks, and that was why I thought that they

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>would win the series. But interestingly enough, this is a

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 2>Knicks team that's kind of had mediocre results for the

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 2>majority of this season, and they beat the Celtics. And

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>what's fascinating to me now as I look back on

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.880
<v Speaker 2>this all is there's kind of a range of outcomes

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>for all of these teams, and the Pacers are a

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>team that pretty consistently hits their ceiling. They're not like

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 2>what you saw tonight was very out of the out

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 2>of character for them. The Knicks, I've seen them a

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 2>half dozen times each in this postseason look like a

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 2>putrid defense and look like an awesome defense, like at

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 2>multiple different points in this postseason, they've kind of oscillated

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 2>back and forth between those two ideas. They just have

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>a wide range of outcomes. And so we've all known

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 2>that the Knicks can have defensive stretches like they had

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 2>in that fourth quarter tonight. They did it to Boston

0:15:11.840 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 2>multiple times. They can fly around in rotation and contest

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 2>shots and do all of that stuff. They just can't

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 2>sustain it. And so Ultimately, as you zoom out from

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>the series, the Pacers are up to one and they

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 2>are more likely to sustain their peak level of play.

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 2>Yes moving forward, and it makes some assaye for Bet

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>to win the series.

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>At this point, the NBA Finals are almost here and

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>every play could be the one that changes everything. This

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>is the NBA Playoffs. Heroes rise, Legacies are built. The

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>action never lets up. And with DraftKings Sportsbook and official

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>sports betting partner of the NBA, you don't just watch

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>them mad as you live it. I do back your

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>favorite team, ride with your clutch time killer bet and

0:15:50.400 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the buzzer beaters, the breakout performances, the game winning threes.

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>They have player props, same game parlays. It's how you

0:15:56.800 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>take your fandom to the next level. If you're new

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to the game, no sweat. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>takes ninety seconds. Bet five bucks, that's it, five bucks,

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's it. If your bet wins, you'll score three hundred

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets. Pretty easy. Download the app from

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Sportsbook. The code is Colin Cli N col I

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>N three hundred bucks and bonus bets. If a five dollars.

0:16:19.920 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Bet wins only on DraftKings. The Crown is yours.

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 3>called eight seven seven eight open wire text ope and

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>wy AT four six seven three six nine. In Connecticut,

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 3>help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 3>eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 3>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothill

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 3>ca acinawin Resorting, Kansas twenty one on over agent. Eligibility

0:16:41.760 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 3>varies by jurisdiction VOYD and Ontario. Bet must win to

0:16:44.440 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 3>receive reward. Bonus bets expire one hundred and sixty eight

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 3>hours after issue ins four. Additional terms and responsible gaming

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 3>resources see DKNG dot co slash audio.

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay Western Conference Game three pretty much unwatchable blowout and

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know there's a there's a way Minnesota has

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to play to beat Okay. See and they played it.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>They did a lot of It's what's funny is it's

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 1>hard to find anybody that likes watching OKAC play. You know,

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>they're they're kind of hovering defense where they kind of

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>they swarm on you. I think you said it's almost

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>collegiate looking the way they play defense, and then it's

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, drawing fouls s J. I

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're a fun watch. I just think they're

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>really athletic and really deep. Do I am I supposed

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to take anything beyond just a desperate, well coached team

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota ant crazy and it was just a young

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>team lessen really feeling their oats and just got overwhelmed

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and just packed it it. I mean, it is anything

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more than that.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 2>I think there was some more in the sense that

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that Oklahoma City's a better team than Minnesota,

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 2>but I also don't think they were the type of

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:12.440
<v Speaker 2>team that should blow them out multiple times in a

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 2>row the way they did in Game one. In Game two,

0:18:14.840 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Chris Finch was running what I thought was an extremely

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 2>foolish game plan through the first two games. The gist

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 2>of it is, if I asked you what Shae Gildes

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Alexander's strongest traits are as a basketball player, you'd say

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 2>he's probably the best driver of the basketball in the league,

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 2>and he's just like the best isolation player in the league.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 2>He was like of all isolation players who attempted at

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 2>least three hundred shots. He was number one by a

0:18:39.200 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 2>mile this year. And so what Chris Finch was doing

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 2>was picking up Shay at half court and letting him

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 2>play one on one, staying glued home to shooters. And

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it was just like gift wrapping Shae, the perfect environment

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 2>for him to thrive on. And it was hilarious juxtaposed

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>with a Denver series where we saw the exact opposite

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 2>game plan with lesser defense of personnel have a great

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 2>deal of success. Now they won by forty because yes,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 2>there was an urgency gap, and they shot a lot

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 2>better and there were a lot like Anthony Edwards was

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 2>hitting shots over triple teams in the second half, Like yeah,

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 2>that was what it caused it to manifest in a

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 2>destructive blowout. But right away to start that game, one

0:19:18.920 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons why they were able to quickly assert

0:19:21.720 --> 0:19:23.719
<v Speaker 2>control and hold Oklahoma City. I think they held him

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 2>to fifteen points in the first quarter. The reason why

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>was they immediately dropped back to Denver's game plan. They

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 2>had Jaden meet Shay inside the three point line because again,

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 2>if you ball pressure a player, it's the easiest time

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 2>to drive past them because you're being forward aggressive as

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 2>a defender, so of course she's going to go right

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 2>around you. He's literally the best. He drove to the

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 2>basket more than two hundred times more than the second

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 2>best driver in the league this year, Colin. That's like

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 2>almost four times a game. He's far and away the

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 2>best driver. You can't pick him up that far. He's

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna go right around you. Jaden sat back and then

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>they start pack in the paint off of shooters, and

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 2>so as a result, it looked like the Denver game,

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 2>and all of a sudden, it turned into Oklahoma City's

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 2>role players needing to knock down threes in Shae having

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 2>to make tougher decisions in the lane about whether or

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:15.679
<v Speaker 2>not he wanted to shoot over some double and triple

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 2>teams where he can have some shortcomings. Because if I

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 2>asked you what Shae's biggest weaknesses are, it's probably his

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 2>three point shooting, yeah, and his ability to process in

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 2>traffic in the lane. Now, he's still pretty good at

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 2>those things, but they're not his strengths. And in that

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 2>end of the first half, he was one for four

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:37.440
<v Speaker 2>from three, he had four turnovers. He finished the game

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:39.920
<v Speaker 2>I think four for fifteen from the field. Colin. Only

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>eight times all season did Shae shoot below forty percent

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:46.200
<v Speaker 2>from the field. He is one of the most consistently

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 2>efficient scorers in basketball. They held him to thirty one

0:20:49.280 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 2>percent in that game. So there definitely was a better

0:20:51.760 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 2>game plan and so as a result, I think Game

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 2>four will be a closer, more tightly contested game because

0:20:57.359 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 2>they're running the right game plan for this time well.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the vulnerabilities of OKAC is

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>young teams role players are generally not as good on

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the road in the playoffs, and that's exactly what you saw.

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Like we've talked about this before. Role players at home

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are just different players they play. They need that confidence,

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>they need the swagger of the crowd. Steph Curry doesn't

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and doesn't. And I think when you force Oklahoma City

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:22.479
<v Speaker 1>and you just say okay, okay, young guys, hit your

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>shots on the road, loud crowd, it's hard, there's a history,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like, really really hard. And I also think, and

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I also think when you're playing a team like Okay

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>See so much, I wonder about sometimes Okay See is

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.479
<v Speaker 1>so good defensively and so swarming and so frenetic. I

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 1>do wonder if Minnesota players tend to spend so much

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of their on court time thinking about that. So much

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of playing OKAC is deciphering their defense and figuring out

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you have to really be you have to

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>already be intentional when you play them defensively, because they

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>can trap you, they can make you look bad fast.

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I think sometimes when you play okay See,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't play like a lot of other teams. Nobody

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>quite plays like them, and I think they can get

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>into your headspace and it's why. And then you go

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road and they and now they lead by

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>six and SGA is getting the whistle. I do feel something,

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know what the numbers say, but I

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>do feel like OKAC is like Indiana. I get the

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>same team, the same team. I got enough veteran I

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 1>feel with Oklahoma City they're a vulnerable road team. I've

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>got a shot. You know, Denver. They didn't look quite

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the same at Denver. Now maybe it's altitude. Now, maybe

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong on this, and the splits don't say that,

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but I do feel like a Oka See is a

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.479
<v Speaker 1>vulnerable team on the road that you can win your

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>home games against them.

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 2>They're three and three Collins and their defense. Their offense

0:22:57.359 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 2>falls all the way down to a one oh four offensive, right,

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:03.400
<v Speaker 2>that's brutally bad, and their defense slides all the way

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.720
<v Speaker 2>up to one twelve, which is pretty bad for them.

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I mean, you're not what you're onto is

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 2>what's really been happening with them?

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, okay, yep, they're a different offense on the road.

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 1>They don't feel like the same team. And that doesn't

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>surprise us because they're young and they and they play

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>with huge energy at home. But when I watch them

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>on the road at Denver a couple of times, I'm like,

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't feel the same. It's a different I

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 1>honestly feel of all the teams left, I get the

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 1>exact same team with minutes with Indiana, except for six

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>minutes tonight. I feel like I get this exact same

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Pacer squad home and away. They want to run if

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:42.399
<v Speaker 1>they can't, you know, I just, okay, see, of all

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the four teams left, I feel like I get a

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>different OKAC team home and away.

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 2>To your point about adjusting to Okac's defense too, Like

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I thought, Aunt and Julius did a poor job in

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 2>the first two games of attacking their defense, like I

0:23:56.480 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 2>call in like because Oklahoma City's defense, I don't know

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 2>if you like just stare at any possession. Shay's ignoring

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 2>whoever he's guarding, just sitting in the basket. They've got three, four,

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 2>sometimes five guys in the paint on like every single drive.

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 2>They're daring Minnesota to take and make corner threes in

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 2>this series and in the like when after Game one

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 2>when Ant was like, I vowed to be more aggressive,

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm like, that's not the answer. They're like, you're gonna

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 2>just drive into the teeth of the defense and you're

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 2>gonna take bad shots. And by the way, in the

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 2>first half of Game two, he took eighteen shots and

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>had sixteen points to show for it. What was kind

0:24:31.280 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of fascinating about the flow of this series is to

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 2>your point, you start to get more comfortable as you adjust.

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Aunt and Julius were awesome in Game three, especially early

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 2>at making those corner kicks, and they were finally knocking

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 2>down those corner threes. They have had three games worth

0:24:47.280 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>of experience against Oklahoma City's base defensive scheme, and they're

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 2>starting to figure it out a little bit. Oklahoma City

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 2>saw that bad game plan for two games and then

0:24:57.800 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 2>Finch throws the appropriate game plan in game three, and

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 2>they looked like completely shell shocked by it. I mean, Colin,

0:25:03.880 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if you saw it. In Game one,

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 2>Oklahoma City only took like twenty threes and the reason

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 2>why is because they were staying glued off the ball

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and letting Shay play one on one. It's it's such

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.840
<v Speaker 2>a fundamentally different defensive game plan that Minnesota is rocking

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 2>from this point forward now. To be clear, in Game four,

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:23.320
<v Speaker 2>by the way, via DraftKings. All of our odds are

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 2>from DraftKings. Oklahoma City is a three point favorite in

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Game four, and that feels right to me. I think

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.520
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be a close game. They're gonna bring an

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 2>intense defensive effort right away out the gates. That's gonna

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 2>test Aunt and Julius's decision making again. And then you're

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 2>gonna see Oklahoma City, because they have seen this defense

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 2>before with Denver. You're gonna see them kind of come

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 2>into the game prepared for that game plan. That said,

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 2>and this is the one thing I'd say, like, I

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 2>think Minnesota has a much better chance of beating Oklahoma

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:53.359
<v Speaker 2>City from this point forward than the Knicks do with

0:25:53.400 --> 0:25:56.919
<v Speaker 2>the Pacers, because what Minnesota can bring to the table

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:02.120
<v Speaker 2>is Denver caut problems for OKC was some weak defensive personnel.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota's got a bunch of really good defenders out there,

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 2>and so if they properly execute this game plan, they

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>could potentially do some real damage. And as long as

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 2>they ride that momentum going forward in the series. There's

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 2>also a little bit of like a Aunt straight up

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>can be unguardable sometimes with some of the shots that

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 2>he can make, and like he was just better than

0:26:23.320 --> 0:26:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Shay in Game three, and if he can maintain that,

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 2>that would be the other thing that could swing things

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>back towards Minnesota.

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny segue back to the Knicks Pacers.

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.159
<v Speaker 1>And I was watching the Pacers when they took that

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty point first half lead, and they were just transition

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>basketball at its best. Just I mean, they score fast,

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and I was thinking, don't fall for it, Colin, don't

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>fall for it, because a couple of years ago Denver

0:26:48.440 --> 0:26:50.760
<v Speaker 1>won the title and I'm like, oh, they're gonna reel

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>off like three, and then Bruce Brown left and then

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>casep and they didn't. I mean, they didn't have a

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>great bench to begin with, and now it's a bad

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 1>bench and they become you know, Murray gets hurt. And

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I've never been a huge Michael Porter fan. I've always been.

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I always think Aaron Gordon's underrated Porter to me, just

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the nod fit and a bit overpaid.

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:13.399
<v Speaker 1>And then all of a sudden you look up and

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Denver just looks good. And I watched Indiana, I said,

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and I thought to myself, God, I love watching them play.

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 1>But as I watch all of these teams, even Oklahoma City,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and we've just stated it there, they're the one team

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that you get a different version on the road. They're

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as good as they are at home. Is

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:40.439
<v Speaker 1>that I feel like whoever wins this year will not

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>win the following year. And I first of all, there's

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be ay honest move. KD could go to the Knicks.

0:27:46.359 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>They could get another basket. You know, if they moved

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>off Karl Anthony Towns at his flakiness and just said

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna go get Durant. We'll let Carl go, We'll

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:56.719
<v Speaker 1>keep Robinson, he is what he is, but we'll have

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Durant at the in the game late, so we can

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we can live with them. I feel like the Pacers

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit like the Nuggets. I'm falling in love,

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.400
<v Speaker 1>like I fell in love with Jokic and Gordon. I'm like, God,

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I love this team, but it wasn't as sustainable. It

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was very Jokicic dominant. And Murray, you know, he's just

0:28:16.840 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>one of those players that I like a lot, I

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:21.520
<v Speaker 1>don't love, and I kind of feel like with Indiana,

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm falling for it because and I'm doing this because

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like confirmation bias. I love watching them play, and

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>so I'm talking myself into Indiana's great. But then I

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>watched them and I think to myself, no, they're not great.

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>What they have as a remarkable player in Halliburton, and

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>what Denver had is a remarkable player in Jokic, And

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what Minnesota has as a remarkable player in Ant and

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Brunson's one of the great small closers in the game

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>is I think this is what the NBA is going

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to be, is that everybody's going to have a great

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>player and a very good too. But the days of

0:28:56.920 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>having three guys that you can depend on I just think, Jason,

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's over. I just don't think that multiple aprons.

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they allow it. And so those teams

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>are just going to eventually get beat. They'll come in

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>as a favorite, they'll have it, they'll have an injury,

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>they'll lose a bench guy, and it's just funny watching

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Indiana tonight. I'm like, oh boy, this team, this team,

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>I thought, wait, put the brakes on Jesus. They can't

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>even get to the next tonight. What if I took

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>these four teams, all things considered, and I said, one

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of them will win multiple titles? Are you set on Okac?

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay, He's the only team that could theoretically keep

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 2>this kind of talent accumulated for long enough. Like Indiana

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 2>is already going to face some tough questions coming up, Like, Okay,

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Miles Turner is kind of very important to the way

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 2>we play offense. Are we going to pay because Miles,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 2>guess what call it? Starting center money in the NBA

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>now is like thirty million a year. Like that's like

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the baseline, Like we're starting the discussion at thirty million

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 2>a year. That's what Isaia Hartenstein got. And if I'm

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Miles Hard, Miles Turner's agent. I'm going to him like

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 2>thirty is the basement, Like, so are you gonna how

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 2>are you gonna continue to build around Nie Smith, who,

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 2>by the by the way, Nie Smith is a dude

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 2>who just stole you a playoff game, who's averaging fifteen

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 2>points a game in this playoff run is your primary

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 2>point of attack, defender and shooting forty five percent from three.

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 2>That's a twenty five million dollar player, Like Halliburton's a

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.240
<v Speaker 2>super Max player. Nemhard, you could argue as a twenty

0:30:22.280 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 2>million dollar player. Siakam is a forty million dollar player.

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Like It just gets really difficult to maintain the payrolls

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 2>in these In these situations, the thing with Oklahoma City

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 2>is they're going to run into that problem in a

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 2>couple of years. They can theoretically win this year, run

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 2>it back, win again, run it back, but it will

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 2>be a shorter window relative to previous entities like this

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 2>because of the fact that eventually they're gonna have to

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 2>pay j Dubb Cason. Wallace is looking a lot like

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 2>a twenty five million dollar player to me, right, like

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Jed Holmgren's a forty million dollar player. Ja Dub's gonna

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 2>be a forty million dollar play. Like, they're all just

0:30:58.200 --> 0:31:00.719
<v Speaker 2>so good that inevitably going to have to pay all

0:31:00.760 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 2>these dudes, and it's just going to become impossible to

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 2>maintain the roster. Now there's a second conversation to have

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 2>as it pertains to whether or not the league should

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 2>pivot from this structure because it penalizes smartly run NBA teams.

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, on the other three teams Indiana, New York, Minnesota,

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.920
<v Speaker 2>there's no chance to like sustain success because of just

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>how expensive it is to have. Like you talk about

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 2>a playoff rotation, you want six guys you can definitely

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.959
<v Speaker 2>trust and probably a seventh that you can kind of trust.

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 2>And it's like a playoff guy you can trust is

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a bare minimum twenty million in the open market. So like,

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 2>it's just very difficult to find the means with which

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 2>to maintain this. And Oklahoma City will have draft picks.

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 2>They can supplement it with draft picks, but a draft

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 2>pick isn't going to be able to impact winning at

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 2>a playoff level right away, And you can try trading them,

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 2>but it's just going to bring back expensive contracts. It's

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 2>just kind of the reality of the situation. I will

0:31:57.280 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 2>say with the Knicks, Colin I, I think there's a

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 2>lot of interesting Kevin Durant potential destinations. I think the

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Knicks are one. I also kind of think the Pacers

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 2>are one. One of the reasons why I like the

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 2>Pacers is like, I don't think the Pacers have much

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 2>of a chance at all to beat Oklahoma City. I

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 2>think it's a horrible matchup for them. Oklahoma City has

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 2>six lightning fast guards that can chase all their guards around,

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 2>and they could switch everything, and they also have im protection,

0:32:24.640 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 2>and they have all the offensive talent to be able

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 2>to score on them. I worry about the Pacers' ability

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.520
<v Speaker 2>to get a bucket against a team that can keep

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 2>them in front. And they're a team like if I

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>just had a better version of Siakam, I all of

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 2>a sudden view them as a more substantial title threat,

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 2>and so like, they're a team that I could see like, Okay,

0:32:43.080 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 2>we're a little older, Miles Turner's kind of older. We

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 2>need to make some sort of win now move to

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 2>capitalize on this before it gets too expensive. I could

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 2>see KD being that guy for them as well. There's

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 2>a bunch of teams where KD could immediately raise their ceiling.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, so we all make mistakes, but owning up to

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>them is the right thing to do. So you know

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Degree cool Rush deodorant right, Well, last year they changed

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the formula and it did not go over well with

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.480
<v Speaker 1>their fans. So Degrees whole thing is it turns up

0:33:12.520 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the sweat and odor protection when you turn up the effort,

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and good thing it does. Because cool Rush fans really

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>turned up the effort to bring the original formula back.

0:33:20.640 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>One guy even started an online petition and Degree listened.

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.040
<v Speaker 1>They admitted they fed up. They're bringing back the original

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 1>cool Rush scent. They're bringing it back and it's exactly

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>how you remember it, cool, crisp and fresh. It's back

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in Walmart, Target and other stores now for under four dollars.

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason that's been the number one men's anti

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:38.760
<v Speaker 1>persprint for the last decade. It's the same reason why

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>people were not happy when it changed. So if you've

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>never tried it, it might be a good time to

0:33:42.760 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>see what the fuss is about. Head to your local Walmart,

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Target and try the og degree cool Rush for yourself.

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>And now for our next segment, whiskey business. Yes, whiskey business,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by Green River Whiskey, the official whiskey

0:33:56.000 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Colin Coward Podcast. Okay, I want to bring

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>this up. We can close on this because I saw

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this today. It's fascinating. So a university professor in finance

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>looked up the value of Caitlin Clark for the WNBA.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 1>This is insane. So this year, last season in the WNBA,

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin Clark was twenty six and a half percent of

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>all economic activity as a rookie on the worst team

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in the league when she entered it. So now she

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>has an eight year, one hundred and twenty eight million

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 1>dollar deal with Nike, so you know she's she's gonna

0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>eat merchandise in the league. Went up off a rookie

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 1>from a Midwest based school on the worst team in

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the league two hundred and thirty four percent. But here

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.839
<v Speaker 1>was the one that struck me so before she got there,

0:35:00.160 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the Indiana Fever, the valuation of the franchise was ninety million.

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Remember they play a short season, it's not like the

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>NBA where it lasts like six months after playing what

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:16.839
<v Speaker 1>forty games. The valuation of that team now is three

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty million dollars. She is almost.

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 2>That's what NBA teams were selling for ten years ago.

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>She has quaged loop holes ago the valuation, and I

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was talking. I was with a group of friends tonight

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:35.839
<v Speaker 1>at dinner, and people that didn't know the WNBA were

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:39.279
<v Speaker 1>like asking, well, well, why, well what does she do?

0:35:39.400 --> 0:35:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And we said, well, she makes passes and take shots

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that nobody else in the sport does. So she's a

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of a It's like when Tiger Woods came on

0:35:47.000 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the tour, Like he drove it further, He's long, putting

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was better, he looked like a football player in the

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>red shirts, Like he just was different than every other

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>golfer you grew up with, and people like unique and different.

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Here my question to you is there's still no other

0:36:05.680 --> 0:36:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Like somebody said at the party, well there'd be another

0:36:07.880 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin Clark, and I'm like, well, there's not another Steph Curry.

0:36:11.360 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Like there's guys that can shoot threes. I don't think

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it's a game you duplicate. And I listen, let's just

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>be honest. There are more great male athletes in the

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:24.400
<v Speaker 1>world than female athletes. There is no second Steph Curry

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>there is no other player that plays like that. My

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:32.879
<v Speaker 1>take is she could be a billion dollar athlete. Are

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you are you surprised by it? Like when I see

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:40.839
<v Speaker 1>these numbers, I'm like, oh, this is Tiger in the tour.

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't this isn't even Jordan, this is totally different.

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:49.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think when you look at basketball, there are

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 2>two real kind of like ultimate show type of athletes

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 2>that you see, meaning like must see television. And it's

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the supreme vertical athlete, which think like young Lebron or

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 2>kind of like Anthony Edwards now Dominique. Yeah, like the

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 2>guy that does stuff in the air that is unlike

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 2>anything you see anywhere else j And then the second

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:17.480
<v Speaker 2>piece of it is just unbelievable shot making. Those are

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 2>the two things. Those are the two things that like

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 2>really bring eyes to television. To take it a step further,

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:27.919
<v Speaker 2>there are two types of basketball players that I think

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 2>are far and away the most winning impact in the

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:38.280
<v Speaker 2>current game of basketball. It's the big, strong playmaker think Lebron,

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Luka Jokic, And it's the indomitable shooter, which there's really

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:47.320
<v Speaker 2>only been Steph. I think those two types of players

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 2>are the players that give you the best chances to

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 2>win basketball games in the modern in the modern world. Now,

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 2>what makes it fascinating to me, because that's what Caitlyn

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Clark is. She's a different type of player, and she

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>can do a lot of different types of things, but

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 2>she's a essentially bringing a Steph Curry like basketball impact

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to the WNBA. It's really this simple. If you can

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 2>shoot the way that she shoots, so the way step shoots,

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 2>and you can perpetually be in motion running around, inevitably

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 2>there is an overreaction to your shooting ability. And we

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 2>see this all the time with Kaitlyn, just like you're

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:25.600
<v Speaker 2>gonna see you're gonna see Aliah Boston get NonStop easy

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:28.000
<v Speaker 2>buckets in the mid range or rolling to the basket,

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 2>because every time she sets a screen for Caitlin, her

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 2>defender is stepping up to guard Kaitlin because as she

0:38:34.520 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 2>comes off of that screen, if you're not there, she's

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna shoot it and she's gonna make it. And so

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 2>there's a reaction that invert spacing in brings a four

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.840
<v Speaker 2>on three because you bring multiple defenders away from the rim,

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a four on three with a vacated paint and

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 2>because of that, there's a lot of easy opportunities to

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:56.799
<v Speaker 2>score there. Like that's the thing with Steph Curry, Like,

0:38:56.800 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Steph Curry is not the same shot maker that he

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:02.000
<v Speaker 2>was for you years ago in twenty twenty one, but

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 2>just the simple threat of him running around gives the

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Warriors a chance to score. And that's the thing. Like

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Caitlyn hasn't even really started hitting shots yet this year

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.759
<v Speaker 2>or the way that she's capable of, but everyone knows

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 2>she can and they guard her in that fashion. And

0:39:15.200 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 2>so to me, it's kind of like a proof of

0:39:17.080 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 2>concept in that if you can shoot and you can

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 2>run around the way that Steph does, and you can

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 2>strike fear into a defense in that way, the trickle

0:39:26.000 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 2>down effects with the way that defenses guard you just

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 2>make everything so much easier for her. And like you

0:39:31.680 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 2>could argue she's already the best offensive engine in the

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:37.759
<v Speaker 2>WNBA and she's literally a second year player and like,

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 2>and she still has so much room to improve, Like

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>she still struggles with ball pressure, she still turns the

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 2>she turned the ball over too much against the Liberty

0:39:44.920 --> 0:39:47.520
<v Speaker 2>the other night. She still has a little bit of

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.719
<v Speaker 2>an issue where she kind of cross fires across her face,

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:51.760
<v Speaker 2>which makes it so she can only shoot going left.

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:53.440
<v Speaker 2>She needs to build it out so that she can

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 2>shoot running to her right as well. But like, judging

0:39:56.640 --> 0:40:00.080
<v Speaker 2>by her psycho competitive attitude, she's probably gonna figure that

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:01.880
<v Speaker 2>that stuff out in the next year or two and

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 2>then she'll be the best player in the league. And

0:40:03.680 --> 0:40:06.360
<v Speaker 2>so like, to me, it's just she fits the mold

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 2>of one of the most impactful types of basketball players

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 2>you can be today, which is the deadly movement shooter.

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 2>If you're a deadly movement shooter, it just opens up

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:18.840
<v Speaker 2>so many things for an offense. And and honestly, I

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 2>just think I think she's musty television Colin. I've watched

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 2>all four of her games, and and I'm in my

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 2>busy season, Like you think i'd be taking a break.

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 2>My wife said to me the other day, She's like,

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:29.839
<v Speaker 2>you're watching more basketball. I'm like, it's Katelyn Clark. We're

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:31.960
<v Speaker 2>watching more basketball. Come over here, let's watch this.

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Like she's incredible, and she's not getting she doesn't know

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:38.799
<v Speaker 1>what's get the consistent great star whistle she I mean,

0:40:38.800 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>there's I think they're still kind of figuring out how

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to officiate her right, Like like when you're when you know,

0:40:47.239 --> 0:40:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I've said this for years when I covered Shack and

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Shack got fouled more than anybody I've ever seen. I mean,

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it was insane. You just people bounced off Shack. Yolks

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 1>feel Yokic complains constantly like people are bouncing off me.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>She doesn't quite get as favorable a whistle as you think,

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>so I think.

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:07.359
<v Speaker 2>Neither does Staph too, That's the funny part.

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I think I will give the WNBA credit.

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>They they just didn't understand the tsunami ever popularity, like

0:41:16.719 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they didn't get the schedule, and you don't know what

0:41:20.120 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you don't know. They've done a much better job to

0:41:23.800 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, all her games are on television. Every time

0:41:26.120 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I turn on a WA every time I see a

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.320
<v Speaker 1>promote promotion for the WNBA, it's Caitlin Clark. So they're there.

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:34.640
<v Speaker 1>But I do think there's a process on. You know,

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you're an official. You don't want to give her too

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:38.919
<v Speaker 1>favorable a whistle because the players in the league will

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>resent her to some degree. She's getting all this attention

0:41:42.000 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and I don't. And I will say this, I've defended

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the w NBA with this baseball and the WNBA feel

0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:53.520
<v Speaker 1>ignored the NFL and the NBA. In college football they

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of press, and baseball always feels like, hey,

0:41:56.280 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>we're America's pastime. So they're very insular, sometimes very provincial.

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>And the WNBA, similarly, you don't pay attention to us.

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>So there's part of it, like I get like they

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of resent this one player. Nobody talks WNBA. They do,

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's all her, you know. I remember when Tiger

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.479
<v Speaker 1>was eighteen, nineteen, twenty years old, coming on of the tour.

0:42:17.560 --> 0:42:19.640
<v Speaker 1>There were a lot of people in golf that were like,

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:22.279
<v Speaker 1>could you guys show, could you talk in your sportscast

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:25.160
<v Speaker 1>about anybody other than Tiger Woods? So she's not. Bryce

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Harper came into baseball. He fought with an own teammate

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:30.399
<v Speaker 1>in the dugout because it was like, oh, everybody wants

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk to So I do defend the WNBA. Is

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>that I get if nobody paid attention to you for

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty six years and now they do, and they feign

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>interest in the rest of the league. What we all

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 1>care about is Caitlin. So the animosity built up by players,

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I give it a little bit of a pass, you know.

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think people are spending too much time on race.

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, it is what it is. There's a million platforms,

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>a million opinions, but I I don't know. My take

0:43:01.680 --> 0:43:04.839
<v Speaker 1>is they're still in the adjustment period with Caitlin. How

0:43:04.840 --> 0:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>to market, how to promote, how to officiate, how to defend,

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's just fluid. That's what it feels like to me.

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that like when I see the complaining, like

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I saw some players complain and some members of the

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 2>media complain that she was on TV so much, and

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.319
<v Speaker 2>let's just take us out, take fairness and just put

0:43:25.360 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 2>it to the side for a minute, like even with

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 2>Nike and giving Kaitlin a shoot like set that aside

0:43:29.440 --> 0:43:32.840
<v Speaker 2>for a minute and just focus on her being on television. Okay,

0:43:33.840 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 2>her being on television brought my eyes to it. I

0:43:35.920 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 2>didn't watch the WNBA. I have grown to really enjoy

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 2>watching WNBA basketball even when she's not on and they're

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 2>like Thenfista Collier became one of my favorite basketball players

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.840
<v Speaker 2>watching her in the finals run last year. And what

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 2>brought me to the television was Caitlin. So like, let's

0:43:54.239 --> 0:43:56.200
<v Speaker 2>say that the league came out there like every Caitlyn

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:58.920
<v Speaker 2>Clark games on national television, like, that's just what we're

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 2>going to do. Deal with it. That would be genius,

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 2>because the best way you can market the other WNBA

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 2>players is to have them play against Kaitlin Clark because

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.319
<v Speaker 2>we'll all be watching. Okay, well, no one's covering the

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:12.760
<v Speaker 2>rest of the league. Okay, but if you put Caitlin

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 2>on television and you get more people to watch, it

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 2>will create more WNBA fans. And we live in the

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.360
<v Speaker 2>most colin I started making NBA content out of my

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 2>guest bedroom. Okay, you create a bunch of WNBA fans,

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Passionate members of the media will originate from that mass

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.640
<v Speaker 2>and will cover the league better, and overall, the league

0:44:32.680 --> 0:44:35.400
<v Speaker 2>will gain in popularity and gain and impact, and it

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:39.160
<v Speaker 2>will become a momentous thing that carries forward and actually

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:42.120
<v Speaker 2>does shine a big flashlight on the rest of the WNBA.

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:46.279
<v Speaker 2>Caitlin Clark is the vehicle with which to microwave that,

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:50.800
<v Speaker 2>to accelerate it, and to move it into a fast

0:44:50.920 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 2>track towards what could be a bright future for the WNBA.

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 2>It's great basketball, It's genuinely great basketball. She's the best

0:44:59.120 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 2>vehicle with which tow to elevate the sport. I think

0:45:02.160 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 2>anything they can do to put her on TV and

0:45:03.800 --> 0:45:05.319
<v Speaker 2>promote her is the best thing they could do for

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:05.720
<v Speaker 2>the sport.

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's Connor McGregor UFC. You know, you knew it existed,

0:45:10.080 --> 0:45:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you'd seen fights, You started buying pay per view cards

0:45:13.440 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>and sitting through two and a half hours to get

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to his fight, and then all of a sudden, you

0:45:17.520 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>found yourself a year later hooked on two other fighters

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.239
<v Speaker 1>because Dana White would put the second most popular fighter

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:25.919
<v Speaker 1>in the undercards. So all of a sudden, it's John

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Jones into Connor McGregor and then they So it's just

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>basic marketing. And I've said before I do think the

0:45:34.080 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>WNBA women's basketball and I said this years ago in

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>FS one, probably five years ago. The sport was getting better.

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>The women were you know, several generations of women were

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>encouraged to play basketball and to be athletes, and nutritionists

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>came into the sport and better trainers. There was money

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.400
<v Speaker 1>in the league, so they had better training and the

0:45:53.400 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>players were getting better. But it takes this, Listen, it

0:45:57.760 --> 0:46:00.840
<v Speaker 1>took Magic and Bird in the NBA to take a

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.279
<v Speaker 1>league that there were some financial problems. So it's not

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like a gender issue. It's a I mean, I I

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:12.240
<v Speaker 1>think Connor McGregor's erosion as a fighter has hurt UFC.

0:46:12.480 --> 0:46:16.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't feel as urgent. And that's and that's already

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>established and so and we all know that Michael Jordan

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>left once Magic Bird and Michael had driven the league up,

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Michael left, the ratings dropped fifty percent. So this stuff

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 1>outside of the NFL, it's all cyclical, it's all market based,

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it's all star based, and it's just a WNBA. You know,

0:46:36.080 --> 0:46:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was waiting for its first Tiger, and golf's probably had

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>four in my life, you know, Jack Nicholson, Arnold Palmer, Tiger.

0:46:45.239 --> 0:46:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I think Rory's got a little bit of it, Phil Micholson.

0:46:48.280 --> 0:46:50.600
<v Speaker 1>So the history of golf, you know, if you modern

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 1>history has got like five guys that have done it.

0:46:53.920 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So there's no reason to be defensive about it. It

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:59.839
<v Speaker 1>just it's all these leagues. They all eventually, I mean,

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:04.319
<v Speaker 1>look at boxing, Ollie took it from whatever it was

0:47:04.400 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>to the next level. Then there were Sugar, Ray, Leonard

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and Hagler. But when Larry Holmes arrived, nobody wanted to

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>watch Larry Holmes. That took an old George Foreman and

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>telling a grill that you bake chicken on or cook

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>chicken on to I mean literally to get the casual

0:47:21.080 --> 0:47:25.399
<v Speaker 1>back into boxing. Was George Foreman's second tour. So this

0:47:25.440 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is the way sports works outside of football.

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 2>The cyclical thing is so fascinating because that's literally what

0:47:30.640 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 2>the NBA is about to go through. Lebron and Steph

0:47:32.600 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 2>won eight titles in eleven years and now there's not

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 2>really a big name yet. Now you could argue that

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 2>the parody might prevent the rise of a star, and

0:47:39.840 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 2>that's a separate conversation for another day, but it is

0:47:42.560 --> 0:47:44.440
<v Speaker 2>really fascinating. We're in one of those cycles right now

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:46.479
<v Speaker 2>with the NBA. The old guard's going out and there's

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 2>a new guard coming up.

0:47:48.360 --> 0:47:51.279
<v Speaker 1>When you want to enjoy life simpler pleasures, reach for

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Green River Whiskey, whether a dry whiskey or single barrel bourbon.

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You're getting over a century of craftsmanship packed into every botty.

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Hop on over to Greenriver Whiskey dot com and discover

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a legend in a bottle today.

0:48:07.160 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 2>But Colin, I sincerely appreciate you giving us your time tonight.

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:12.680
<v Speaker 2>This has been a super fun playoff runt. I'm sure

0:48:12.680 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 2>we'll be talking in about a week or so. Again, everyone,

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 2>thank you guys so much for supporting the show. No

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 2>playback tonight, just a heads up. We'll be back with

0:48:19.200 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 2>that tomorrow night, and then I will be live on

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 2>YouTube after the final buzzer of Game four of what

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 2>should be an incredible Western Conference Finals game tomorrow night.

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:26.279
<v Speaker 2>I will see you guys.

0:48:26.320 --> 0:48:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Then the volume