WEBVTT - The Browns Come to Town | The Beatdown Podcast | Washington Commanders | NFL

0:00:09.400 --> 0:00:12.719
<v Speaker 1>What's going on? What's happened? Everybody? This is the Beatdown Podcast.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:14.840
<v Speaker 2>I am your host, Senior Wriyah for the Washington Commanders,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>Zach Shelby and the vibes out here are immaculate in

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 2>ways that really haven't been in about a decade. As

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 2>the Commanders thoroughly dismantled the Arizona Cardinals forty two to fourteen,

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 2>going to three to one for the first time in

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty eleven.

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 1>How about that. And after doing three.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>Of four road games to start the season, they are

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 2>coming back to Northwest Stadium to take on the Cleveland

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>Browns who are one in three, not necessarily the record

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>that they would want, but this is still a team

0:00:42.159 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 2>that's a little bit feistier than maybe some would think.

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>They've got a really strong defense to Shohn Watson is

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>still maybe not as maybe not now corback he was,

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:52.520
<v Speaker 2>but still has some flashes of it here and there.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 2>So the Commanders have a chance to go four and

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>one for the first time in two thousand and eight,

0:00:57.600 --> 0:01:00.440
<v Speaker 2>which would just be amazing for this French guys, for

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 2>this team as they get into the first year of

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Dan Clinton's regime, and how do they gonna be able

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>to do that. Well, that's what we're gonna be talking

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 2>about today. And with me we have Mitch Tisler of

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 2>Monumental Sports and the Beltwegh Football Pot and Bran Winstein

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and the voice of the Commanders and hosts of the

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Bran Wonstein Show Boys.

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:18.399
<v Speaker 1>How we do It Today?

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Immaculate.

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Mitch, this is a dream come true. I don't

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 4>think I've ever done a show with you. I am

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 4>very excited about this.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 3>I am very excited about this too. I can't wait

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 3>at the beat you a little bit, all right?

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>They all right, awesome, So they mentioned the debate this,

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna be really quick about it because guys, you

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 2>know how it goes now. I mean, these guys are

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna be debating questions, They're gonna they're gonna be given points,

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>and uh, there is gonna be a winner. Because it's

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.839
<v Speaker 2>my podcast. I can decide who wins the who wins

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>and who loses. But at the same time, you know,

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>what you should be more focused on is what these

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 2>guys takes are rather than who wins and who loses.

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Here because he's got some of the best of what

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>they do. Uh. And without further ado, let's go and

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 2>get started here starting with the Browns offense. And as

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:05.639
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned earlier, Deshaun Watson probably not the elite MVP

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 2>caliber quarterback that he was with the Houston Texans, but

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 2>you do still see flashes of the player that he

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 2>once was as he's gone through the first couple of

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 2>years in his tenure with the Browns. So, Bram, I

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 2>will start with you, because the quarterback is still the

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 2>most important position for this defensive stop.

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>What's the best approach to.

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Limiting him as they come to him to the Commander Stadium.

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.119
<v Speaker 4>So I think this is really interesting because they don't

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 4>know whether this is by design, or it's due to injuries,

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 4>or they don't trust Watson to make plays down the field.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I think only they can really answer this.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 4>But the vast majority of their offense is underneath. And

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 4>you'll see this in metrics, like he's like thirty first

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 4>in the league in pass yards per attempt, but they're

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 4>all dump offs to running backs or tight ends underneath.

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 4>There's very little plays that are thrown down the field. Obviously,

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 4>he can run and he can move, but he's not

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 4>apt to scramble all that much. He does to extend

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.399
<v Speaker 4>plays you know, he's been held under two hundred yards

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 4>passing in every single one of these games. I think,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, like this team is concerned about giving up

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 4>deep passes for good reason, right, like lack of a

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 4>consistent pass rush, which maybe has taken a turn over

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 4>the last week, which hopefully happened, and you know overall

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 4>cornerback play. Are they concerned with the matchups? And you know,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 4>the Browns do have legitimate, very good and potentially deep

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 4>threat wide receivers on this team, but they don't profile it.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 4>So I want to see how Joe and Dan Quinn

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 4>play this, Like are they going to be willing to

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 4>put more people up closer to the line in this game?

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Daring Cleveland to try to do something that they're not

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 4>doing right now at the risk of can you cover

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 4>Amari Cooper and Jerry Judy down the field because the

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 4>Browns aren't doing it. So that's the cat and mouse

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 4>for me here. But from what I see from Cleveland,

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 4>everything's underneath. So I think Washington on some level needs

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 4>to find out if they are willing to take shots

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 4>down the field.

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, you bring up a good point, because

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the Brands do have some some really solid receivers. I

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 2>would say probably one of the better groups that they've

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>faced so far this year. And Mitch, you know, brand

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 2>brought up, you know, bring the secondary close to the

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 2>line of screens, playing a little bit of press and

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 2>and this seems to be where Washington has gotten beaten

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 2>a lot over the last first, you know, first couple

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>of weeks of the season and honestly most of last year.

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 2>So you know, I'll kind of pit it a little

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 2>bit and kind of ask you this so about contained

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Sean Watson, like, do you feel comfortable enough with the

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.480
<v Speaker 2>secondary that they are able to go up against Jerry

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 2>Judy and Amari Cooper and some of these other receivers

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>that they have.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think you look at this Brown's offense

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 3>and it has a lot of big names on it.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we keep talking.

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>We've mentioned the receivers, the you know, you know about

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 3>the quarterback. But I think it's like a lot of

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 3>a lot of teams that we've seen here in Washington

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 3>going back however many years, some big names, but not

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 3>big production. And I think it starts with what Bram

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.359
<v Speaker 3>was talking about, the fact that they are scared to

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 3>go down the field Deshaun Watson's top five in the

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 3>league and dropbacks and bottom five in the league in

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 3>yards in yards per game, and it shows you kind

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 3>of what they're trying to do on offense. They're trying

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 3>to think and dunk it and run the ball a bunch.

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:21.360
<v Speaker 3>And even though they are trying to run the ball

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 3>a bunch, they aren't even that successful at it because

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 3>they're bottom half of the league in running the ball,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 3>and it starts up front for them. They have a

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 3>couple pretty key injuries. They haven't played a whole lot

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 3>this year with Jedrick Willis. Jack Conklin looks like he's

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 3>going to be out Wyatt Teller as well as a

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 3>All Pro guard for them, and they've gotten Deshaun Watson

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 3>hit a lot. He's been hit I think it was

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 3>seventeen times in two of the first four games, including

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 3>an eight sac performance in Week one. I think you're

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 3>gonna have an opportunity to put pressure on him, and

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be incumbent on the secondary to be able

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 3>to cover. We know that Joe Witt likes to play

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 3>single high d he likes to play press coverage on

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 3>the outside, and there have been you know some receivers

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 3>that have beat them with it. But if this d

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.400
<v Speaker 3>line and this you know, complimentary pass rush can get

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 3>to Deshaun Watson and pours them off his spot, he's

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 3>proven that he can't get the ball. He hasn't been

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 3>able to get the ball downfield, particularly when he breaks

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the pocket, and he's had, you know, amongst the lowest

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>time in the in the league drop back to past year.

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 3>So it's these guys shouldn't have to run around in

0:06:21.040 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 3>the secondary for five ten seconds like we've seen you know,

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 3>other years. Other teams have to have to try and do.

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 3>And so I do think they're going to be able

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.679
<v Speaker 3>to get up there and use Benjamin Saint Jus's size

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 3>and Jim Met the line of scrimmage a little bit.

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, yeah, that is a good point.

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I think Watson is really at his

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 2>most dangerous las in the games that I've seen, you know,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 2>over you know, when I watched it yesterday, is it

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 2>seems like he is at his most deadly whenever he's

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>outside of the pocket, whenever he's able.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>To extend plays.

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I know that the commanders only allowed

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Cali murder for one rush for three yards. But this

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.240
<v Speaker 2>is mobile quarterbacks are still I would say it's still

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 2>a bit of a challenge for this defense. So so

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 2>bram D and as good as they were able to

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 2>play against Calmber, do you think that's a little bit

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of a formula for how this the Stevens the line

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:08.719
<v Speaker 2>can contain Watson going into week five.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 4>Last week was by far and not close, their best

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 4>collective defensive performance, and I mean by a mile, like

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 4>by a mile. And I will say this, there were

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 4>multiple occasions where they had Murray confused the fact that

0:07:25.960 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 4>he took a sack on the fourth and one on

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 4>to tell you everything, you kind of really need to

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 4>know about where he was in reading what Washington was

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 4>doing to them. So I do hope that there's a carryover.

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 4>There was a deficiency on the right side of their line.

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 4>Calvin Beacham played, but he was coming off the hamstring.

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 4>They didn't really have backups, and Doriance Armstrong had his

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 4>best game, you know, as a commander. Off of this.

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 4>To Mitch's point, this is a this is a really

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 4>great offensive line when they have their players together. They

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 4>don't they're missing two or three of their starters. They're

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 4>playing a ton of backups I think they're doing. Go

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 4>watch Chelsea. You want to go watch something interesting on

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the film, Go watch on the outside. Their receivers they

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 4>barely release when they're running the ball, like I think

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 4>that they just they have kind of come into this

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 4>position of they are what they are based on the injuries,

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:19.160
<v Speaker 4>and I think maybe what the coaches think the capabilities

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 4>of this offense are so they're to me in lies

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 4>a couple of things. One, are they a competent group? Right?

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 4>And if they're not, if Washington get on top of them,

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 4>maybe you can get a couple of sacks. The most

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 4>sacked quarterback in the NFL. I think there's an opportunity

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 4>here to limit them. They're having a hard time scoring points.

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 4>It's partially by design. They're trying to go small chunks

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 4>at a time. So if I'm Washington, you know, I

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 4>think I'm loading up the box a little bit here

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:49.480
<v Speaker 4>and I'm daring them to throw the ball a little

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.360
<v Speaker 4>bit and see if maybe we can get even bigger

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 4>mistakes than what you're getting now, which is they're not

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 4>turning the ball over a time, they're just not scoring

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 4>and they're not moving the ball in chunks. Can we

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 4>get a couple turnovers here, because that seems overdue and

0:09:04.720 --> 0:09:06.440
<v Speaker 4>that seems to be kind of heading in that direction.

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 4>If that's what's happening here, then I think it gives

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 4>your offense a better shot here because this is and

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 4>I know we haven't gotten another side of the ball yet,

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 4>this is gonna be arguably the best defense they have

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 4>faced up to this point in the season. Maybe maybe Tampa's,

0:09:21.160 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 4>but like this, in my opinion, this is, across the board,

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 4>probably the best defense they have faced. And therefore I

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 4>think they're gonna need a couple more breaks than what

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 4>they've gotten in previous weeks.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 2>And before we get to this side of the ball,

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 2>and you're right about that, Mitche, Like, you know, do

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 2>you think, as Brams said, that they're going to try

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 2>to load the box a little bit and try to

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 2>put some more pressure on Watson to make some of

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 2>these more difficult decisions.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I think they need to, but it's not necessarily related

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 3>to Watson's quick decision making. It's related to stopping this

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 3>run game. If you can make this Browns team one dimensional,

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 3>especially if the offense is able to continue scoring points,

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 3>and you know that Deshaun's going to be dropping back,

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 3>then you're gonna be able to to really get after him.

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 3>But the middle of this defensive line has struggled against

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>the run. In the middle of this defense across the

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 3>hole has struggled against the run. And if you allow

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 3>this Browns team to get comfortable and start moving the

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 3>ball easily on the ground, then things are going to

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 3>open up for Deshaun because you're gonna have to start,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, packing it in on that side. And so

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I expect that we're going to see a more concerted

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 3>effort in the middle of that defense. Like Bram said,

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 3>last week was the best defensive performance we've seen in

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 3>a wild year in Washington, and it was awesome to watch.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 3>But if you there's one criticism we have of it

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 3>is that they're able to run the ball for almost

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:36.079
<v Speaker 3>one hundred yards directly up the middle, and a lot

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 3>of that was at kind of the end of the

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.960
<v Speaker 3>third quarter start of the fourth quarter, where you would

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 3>think that teams would be more apt to be throwing

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 3>the ball as they're trying to catch up. And so

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.560
<v Speaker 3>I think you know Deron and John obviously we know

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 3>all there is to know about them. I like last

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 3>week that you started seeing some combos of Johnny Newton

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 3>and Frederian mathis playing there in the middle, and I

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 3>think Fiderian in particular, with his size and his strength,

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 3>can help them, especially as the Browns keep trying to

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:03.400
<v Speaker 3>pound the ball twin tackles.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm really interested to see how this this

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Commanders defensive line goes up against this Browns group, because, yeah,

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 2>if they do have the reputation for running the ball

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>really well, although they haven't necessarily done that so far

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 2>this year, probably because they don't have Nick Chubb and

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:18.439
<v Speaker 2>and they're off of the line speed up, but their

0:11:18.480 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 2>averaging I think it's like ninety four yards per game

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 2>on the ground right now. But at the same time,

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 2>to your point, like they are still capable of busting

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 2>a long especially against a group that is really you know,

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.319
<v Speaker 2>I would say struggled with quite a bit to contain

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.239
<v Speaker 2>the run, which is I think it's a little bit surprising.

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 2>But either way, we're gonna go on to the next question.

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>But before we do that score update, it was todd

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>three to three. We miss.

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 2>I really liked the point about about the stack of

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 2>the box to south of run game, So you are

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 2>up four to three as as we get into question

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 2>two here, but it's yeah, you know, the fellow, the

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 2>fellow off the line. We got to stick together at

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 2>some point. But going into the off inside of the ball,

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 2>you know, Braymy mentioned that this is the biggest test

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 2>for the for for Washington offense that that they've faced

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:06.640
<v Speaker 2>all year.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I would also argue that this is.

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 2>Cleveland's defense, that the biggest test for the Cleveland defense

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 2>that they've faced all year two because this, this Washington

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 2>offense has been historically great over the special blast three

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 2>weeks or so, they're leading the league in third down

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>success rate and I forget what the exact percentage is,

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 2>but it's over I'd say it's about two thirds their

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 2>their third Act of conversion percentage. But at the same time, this,

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 2>this Cleveland defense is seventh right now, So Mitchell start

0:12:34.600 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>off with you, like, what do you think Washington do

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 2>to continue that third down success against the Cleveland defense?

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 2>Who is you know, has been has a reputation being

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 2>very solid and has some of the numbers to back

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>it up as well.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, you hate to be too generic here,

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 3>but Jade Daniels has done such a good job of

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 3>keeping them a third and short or third and manageable,

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 3>and they've shown different ways of being multiple in those

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 3>short third downs. And I think that kind of the

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 3>combination of Jaden the so uh so accurate and so

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 3>quick getting rid of the ball and Cliff Kingsberry kind

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 3>of having a little bit of fun on that on

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 3>that offense. I mean, I think we've seen a couple

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 3>of kind of different types of plays from from Cliff

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 3>in this offense. A double pass to uh in Week

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 3>one against the Bucks, and then obviously the touchdown pass

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 3>against the Trent Scott against the Bengals were you know,

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 3>two that kind of stick out. But I think their

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 3>their ability to kind of keep the keep the defense

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.559
<v Speaker 3>off there on their heels goes a long way. That's

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 3>the end of the game against the Cardinals where they

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.840
<v Speaker 3>had Elamind's the Keys kind of motioned into the backfield

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:35.839
<v Speaker 3>and then motioned back to kind of where he came

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 3>from and caught a quick little screen and took it

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 3>for you know, eight yards and a first down. I

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 3>just think their ability to to kind of keep the

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 3>defense on their heels with a lot of different looks,

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 3>particularly I'm third and down is going to be something

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 3>that helps them a lot.

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 2>No, I really do like how creative Cliff Kingsberry has

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>been with this offense. You're right, he does look like

0:13:52.880 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 2>he's having a lot of fun out there, just kind

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 2>of like some of the players that he's had are.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 2>You know, they're so creative and so innovative in ways

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 2>that really highlights what these players do best.

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh, brand I'll turn over to.

0:14:03.320 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>You because I know, I know you really love Brian Robinson,

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:07.679
<v Speaker 2>but like, what role did Brian Robinson is he going

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to have? Do you think on Sunday kind of convert

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 2>converting these third downs.

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:13.520
<v Speaker 4>I was surprised to see his name on the injury list,

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 4>so like, let's just start with like assuming he's available, right,

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 4>Like that was a surprise, like seeing that on Wednesday.

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 4>So I'll kind of reiterate with what Mitch just said.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 4>I really think one of the most impressive things this

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 4>team is doing here is how they're starting their drives.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 4>They're getting Jayden in company in second and six or

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 4>shorter situations, and they're going to live good in that way.

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 4>Because of Jayden's ability to run, I think it keeps

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 4>a defense off balance and he opens up the playbook

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 4>immensely for them to play out of that. The one

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 4>time they punted last week, which is the one time

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 4>they punted in three weeks, was the one time that

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 4>on first down they were stunted for nothing and ended

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 4>up in a second and ten. And then oddly, I

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 4>thought they made an incredible call on this play. No

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 4>one's remember this one because one of the million scoring

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 4>drives that they had, they did a delayed draw to

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 4>Brian Robinson, which I haven't even seen them do, right,

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 4>I haven't really seen them do, And it just happened

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 4>that Arizona ran a double twist stunt with their two

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:18.040
<v Speaker 4>defensive tackles, and I'm not even sure that they made

0:15:18.040 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the right call. They just happened to have the right

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 4>thing on for this play at that moment, and he

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 4>ends up sliding away from one three hundred and fifty

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 4>pounds dude and running into another one. But it was,

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.680
<v Speaker 4>honestly like it was the right play call at the

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 4>right time, which I think his timing has been on.

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't mean they all work, but like he's just had

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 4>a feel for this. He's gotten them into very comfortable positions.

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 4>I think it's helped the comfort level of Daniels. This

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 4>is a team that blitzes among the top five in

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 4>the league. They will play a ton of man because

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 4>this is the best set of corners that Washington's going

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 4>to face up to this point in the season. Are

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 4>very comfortable blitzing and hopefully getting an advantage matchup with

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 4>Miles Garrett. So this is one where third and long

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 4>is death for you. I think you're going to see

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 4>a very different outcome this weekend if it's third and

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 4>eight or longer, over and over and over because of

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 4>the personnel that they're facing this weekend. So if they

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 4>can keep this model of whether it's be rob or

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 4>not be rob of getting into these second just four

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 4>yards on first down, second and six or shorter, this

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 4>is where they eat. And I think that that's where

0:16:24.280 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 4>they can continue. Maybe not to the degree that they

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 4>have over the last few weeks because it's historic and unprecedented,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 4>but like, could they still be extremely effective possessing the ball,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 4>scoring points and having a lead on a team like this.

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 4>For everything we talked about earlier about the Browns offense,

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 4>seems like the right path to a win this weekend.

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, Brian Robinson being on the Ajor report

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 2>was surprising to me as well, because we had just

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 2>got done hearing from Dan Quinn about how reliably is

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 2>how tough he is, and how he really doesn't really

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 2>ever need that much time to recover and get back

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 2>and back healthy. Mitch, like, I mean saying, saying Brian

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Robinson maybe not wouldn't play is kind of a big

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 2>deal for this offense because he's by far one of

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:10.640
<v Speaker 2>the most consistent weapons. I mean, he has the most

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 2>scrimmage jars for them. I think he's I think behind

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>Jane Danis's park downs produced. So you know, say, god forbid,

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 2>he's avail, he's not, he's not too badly hurt and everything.

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He is available.

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 2>But like, what if you know Brian Robinson is ruled

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 2>out on Friday, Like, do you think this is gonna

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 2>have the dramatic effect on the offense and how do

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 2>you think they recover from that?

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 3>I do think it would have a pretty dramatic effect

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 3>because it was one thing when Austin Eckler went out,

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Because Jeremy McNichols is a similar type player in terms

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 3>of you know, catching the ball to the backfield and

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 3>being able to help him pass. Bro they don't really

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 3>have a second Brian Robinson. I guess Chris Rodriguez would

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 3>probably get called up and get a fair amount of

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 3>a fair amount of carries there. But I do think

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 3>that he's a very important part of this team. I

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 3>think you also have to remember that, you know, this

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 3>is week four. There by week is in what another

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 3>ten weeks from now, You're gonna start seeing some veteran

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 3>days here as we go through, and generally when those

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 3>guys sit out of practice, they don't get the designation

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 3>of vetter in days. It's a you know, an ankle

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 3>injury and the injury it did not practice for one

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 3>of those reasons. But regardless, I think the commanders often

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 3>should have a lot of success, particularly in the running game,

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 3>but kind of across the board. Last week against the

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 3>ram against the Raiders, the Browns defense had twenty miss tackles.

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 3>It was a most in a single game in the

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 3>NFL this year. The Raiders came in averaging fifty yards

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:36.480
<v Speaker 3>on the ground. They ran for a buck fifty five

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 3>or something like that.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Last week.

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there's a lot of opportunity to run the

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 3>ball here. And as impressive as Jayden Daniels has been

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 3>in the past game it's been Brian Robbins and Austin

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 3>eckler Jeremy mcnichol's on the ground, you know, opening up

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 3>things and not allowing teams to play this deep cloud

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 3>cover two that we've seen all over the NFL that

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 3>all the all the analysts are complaining about. And so

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 3>getting somebody who's gonna be able to get those tough

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 3>yards of the middle and turn those three four yard

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 3>runs into eight nine ten yard runs like Brian Robinson

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 3>does kind of regularly is certainly a very important part.

0:19:09.040 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, Brandon, before we move on to the last question,

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 2>here another commander running back who is still a little

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:17.399
<v Speaker 2>who was on the injury port, Austin Ecklery with the

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:18.199
<v Speaker 2>cushion partival.

0:19:18.280 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 1>He was limited, you know on Wednesday.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Seems like he's like maybe on track to to be

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.120
<v Speaker 2>available for Sunday if he is able able to play.

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 2>You know, as much as we love the way Jeremy

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 2>McNichols played and everything, like, how big is that going

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to be for this for this offense to get a

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 2>player like that back?

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, either way with Robinson, whether he plays

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 4>or not, and I'm not I don't have any information

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 4>he's not gonna play.

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 3>I was just.

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Surprised on the injury list, like he's really the lead

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 4>running back on the team. I don't think Eckler steps

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.239
<v Speaker 4>up and becomes that for this I think he can.

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 4>He maintains his role, and it's obvious it's a big

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 4>deal if he comes back and plays by the way

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 4>that he's played. But I don't think you're turning around

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.960
<v Speaker 4>and giving him seventeen to twenty carries like you have

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 4>b Robs. So it does change the dynamic of the offense.

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Maybe it limits the amount of carries that you give

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 4>to Robinson, and I think that would be sounds like

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 4>should be trending in that direction anyway at this point.

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 4>And I will say this just largely, and I think

0:20:11.400 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 4>really there's a couple of things to the success and

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 4>number five is a big part of it, obviously, and

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 4>Cliff Kingsbury's play calling is a big part of it.

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 4>But the buy in and overall physicality of this team

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 4>across the board is it's surprising just because of how

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.159
<v Speaker 4>new it all is, and you hear coach speak and

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 4>cliches and all these things, and like we're going to

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:35.360
<v Speaker 4>do this and we're going to do that, and everybody's

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.040
<v Speaker 4>got their slogans and this team's living up to it.

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 4>And just go watch Ben Sinnett or Sam Cosmy or

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 4>a big time rejuvenated Andrew Wiley specifically in a run

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 4>heavy type offense. Now go watch Brandon Coleman all the

0:20:49.040 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 4>things they were saying about him, like in the summer

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 4>that they're like, you're going to see how athletic and

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 4>how aggressive he is. You're seeing this like Terry mclaurin's

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 4>blocks on the edge. Go watch Daniel's touchdown run and

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 4>where he rides his own you know, offensive lineman and

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 4>points out where they're almost like he was navigating to

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 4>Kentucky Derby. I mean, it's pretty wild. Like what you're saying,

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Baddish is he should be in the Pro Bowl for

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 4>the way that he's played so far through four games

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 4>for them as well, like largely and I know this

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 4>is a Commander show, but like go watch them and

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 4>you will be it is. It's shocked how efficient they are,

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 4>how aggressive they are play to play to play to

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 4>play to play. And while you know, I think every

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 4>all the gushing over Daniels is completely deserved because what

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 4>he's doing is literally unprecedented, but everything that's happening around

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 4>him is allowing it to happen at the same time,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 4>and it's really it's it's amazing. And you know, they

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 4>got a one to three team that at some points,

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, and in some groups, doesn't look like that

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 4>they're as locked in as this group is. I think

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 4>if Washington gets on top of them, this is a

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 4>team that could fold. They could fold. And that's what

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm hoping to kind of see on.

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 3>Sunday, Bram when your point is so good because the

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 3>running that the offensive line gets credit for the first

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 3>three to five yards of a run, then the secondary

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 3>group of blockers, your tight ends, your wide receivers, your fullbacks,

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 3>whatever they get kind of the next couple of yards,

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 3>and then the running backs are get credit for the

0:22:18.560 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 3>rest of it. And the blocking that we've seen from

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 3>the non o line has been so impressive. You mentioned

0:22:23.640 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Ben Sennett, Yeah, the German Jeremy McNichols first touchdown against

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the against the Cardinals, you had Terry McLaurin lead blocking.

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 3>There the buy in that you see across the board

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 3>from these guys, particularly when you compare it to what's

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 3>happening in Cleveland. Braham talked about the wide receivers not

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 3>looking too interested on running plays getting out there the

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 3>mistackles last week. This feels like a team that is

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 3>that you know, is prying to be to to crush

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 3>their souls early in the game and get out to

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 3>a lead and not have to look back.

0:22:51.359 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 2>You know, if there's one thing I've I've come to

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 2>appreciate over the last five weeks or so, it's the

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 2>power of the buy in. Because, yeah, you hear a lot,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 2>like you're a coach speak things and you're like, we've

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:03.959
<v Speaker 2>all heard it, you know, like oh yeah, like you

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>know the cliches that every coach says for whatever is.

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:09.719
<v Speaker 2>But like this, these players really believe in it. And

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that's just as big of a of a

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 2>reason why they're three and one are now as you know,

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.719
<v Speaker 2>the way Jaye Daniel is playing with offenses playing like

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 2>they really truly believe like the messages that DQ and

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 2>his staff have have implemented and that it's just that

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:25.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it just makes it that much more fun.

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.440
<v Speaker 2>But final question, you guys are tied, so there's a

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.960
<v Speaker 2>lot of stakes heading into this third question here, and

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, there are a lot of really big matchups

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 2>across the game that's gonna happen on Sunday. We kind

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of talked about a couple of them already. Uh, you know,

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 2>with the Browns receivers versus the Commanders secondary, but the

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 2>Commanders off the line for Miles Garrett and the Browns

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 2>deefsive line. I mean, that's probably gonna be I think

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 2>one of the more important ones, especially considered Miles Garrett

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 2>and then the reputation he has and the pedigree he's

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 2>been able to accumulate over his career. Uh So, Bram,

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 2>start with you, what will the more important matchup for

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.159
<v Speaker 2>the Commanders to win on Sunday? The Commanders off the

0:24:04.160 --> 0:24:06.520
<v Speaker 2>line versus Mouth Garrett, and that even the line or

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 2>the Browns receivers versus the Commander's secondary.

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 4>Oooh god, I want to pass because this team plays

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 4>man more than most teams do, and they will blitz

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.679
<v Speaker 4>a lot. And I and assuming, unlike Arizona, who I

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 4>think tried to switch things up on Jayden to see

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 4>how he would react to it, and they forty two

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 4>points later probably regret that, I'm going to assume that,

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 4>like Cleveland is going to play to their core, which

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 4>is they do bring a lot of heat. They will blitz.

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 4>They're top by blitz team. They're kind of like Tampa,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.199
<v Speaker 4>so they'll put their corners on an island. And for

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 4>good reason, this is the best set of corners Washington's

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 4>face this year, like across the board collectively, So you know,

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 4>the blitz pick up is everything here again to give

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Jade the time. And then do they have the receivers?

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 4>We've asked this a million times. Do they have the

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 4>receivers to win one on one? And not? Do they

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 4>have the receivers to win one on one just in general?

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 4>But do they against one's a pro bowler and the

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 4>other one's really really good. So let's see where they are.

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 4>To answer your question directly, I am more inclined to

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 4>believe because of the physical nature of the play and

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 4>how kind of in lockstep they've been with one another,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 4>that there's not gonna be a lot of breakdowns. So

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 4>Jaden's gonna have the time to make the play. So

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with the receivers against the corners because

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 4>I think that is, to me, is the matchup of

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 4>the day, and that is a massive strength of Cleveland,

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 4>And I still think it's semi and open question about Washington.

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:37.120
<v Speaker 4>Do they have the level of receivers to beat top

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 4>tier corners like this regularly, So that to me would

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 4>be probably the way I would lean. But it's close

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:44.920
<v Speaker 4>because Miles Garrett might be the best defensive end in

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 4>the NFL. So you know, like it's close, all.

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 2>Right, Mitch, I a feeling you might go the direction

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 2>I think you're gonna go.

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>But what do you got for me?

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm actually gonna agree with Brim and I think it's

0:25:56.400 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 3>wide receivers versus dbs there because I've been so impressed

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.400
<v Speaker 3>with what you've seen upfront from this Washington offensive line.

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Two weeks ago, they played Trey Hendrickson, who was the

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 3>second leading sacker in the NFL last year, and held

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 3>him to one late sack that was a little bit

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.479
<v Speaker 3>of a miscommunication, but for the most part handled them

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 3>almost one on one exclusively with Brandon Coleman and Cornelius.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Lucas out there.

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.119
<v Speaker 3>And yes, we're gonna see the Browns bring a lot

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 3>of pressure, which I think is you know, in their DNA.

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 3>But the let's pick up from this running back group

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 3>so far this season has been so impressive. You think

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 3>about that touchdown pass, the Terry and Jeremy Nichols, you know,

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 3>body slamming whoever the linebacker was that was blitzing up

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the middle. Austin Eckler has been an absolute beast in

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:41.480
<v Speaker 3>the backfield, particularly in pass pro, and I think that's

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of what's helped him in those kind of quick

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 3>screen games is that these teams are now recognizing they

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 3>have to put pass rush moves on a running back

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 3>to try and get to your QB. And so to me,

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 3>I think it's gonna be about making this Browns offense

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 3>one dimensional. I want to see them pack the box

0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and not let the Browns run the ball in them.

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.560
<v Speaker 3>Quite frankly, I'm not too scared that Deshaun Watson's going

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.560
<v Speaker 3>to beat them over the top. But obviously if you're

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 3>throwing the wide open receivers thirty yards downfield, that can

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 3>be the case. So I do want to see what

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Emmanuel Forbes and and Mikey Sanders still and Benjamin Saint

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 3>just can do. Because last week those guys had a

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 3>pretty you know, had a pretty good day. Sander's still

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 3>got beat for the touchdown early and then they kind

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 3>of locked it down on that Cardinals receiving cores and

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 3>they didn't get open deep and Marvin Harrison Junior ended

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 3>up with you know, very few yards. Obviously, you know

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 3>there are two guys here in uh in Cleveland who

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 3>can beat them deep, but they haven't done it so

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:36.399
<v Speaker 3>far this season. So I want to see these corners

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 3>continue to step up, you know, get a little more

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 3>confidence and be able to cover these guys one on one.

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, the commons of the corners is going to be

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 2>is going to be massive, Yeah, because I think you've

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 2>seen the Stevens slowly grow a little increments by increments

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 2>over the last two weeks, and they really took a

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 2>big step forward against the Cardinals. And you're right, Jim Schwartz,

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 2>He's been known for bringing the heat throughout his career

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 2>and I think he's probably going to continue to do

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 2>that again. But after much, after all hearing all the

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 2>pontification that from both these guys, the final decision is

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 2>rested upon my shoulders, and I determined that Bram coming

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 2>back from down two points, you are now the winner

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 2>of this episode of the Beatdown Podcast.

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you have any parting words of victory for us.

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Like I said, this thing is rigged, like there's always

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 4>sing the whole thing was gonna be rigged. I was

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 4>gonna get the comeback the whole time. Sorry, Mitch, its

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.040
<v Speaker 4>stacked against you.

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You called it the Beatdown Podcast.

0:28:30.040 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 3>I'll see both of you guys in the media room

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 3>and you better believe I'll be ready for it.

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh god, well, I think we sitting next to each other, Mitch.

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 2>I might just sit on the other end of the

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 2>room today. But guys, I really appreciate you guys doing this.

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 2>We'll see what happens on Sunday. Should be a really

0:28:45.400 --> 0:28:48.720
<v Speaker 2>exciting game. And for everyone listening, please you should to rate, review, subscribe,

0:28:48.760 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 2>and this has been the Beatdown Podcast.