WEBVTT -   Not So Fast Episode 2

0:00:05.140 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Not So Fast. I'm Andrew Perloff. He's Paul Pabst.

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:11.180
<v Speaker 1>We're here at Not So Fast. We've got a show

0:00:11.220 --> 0:00:11.660
<v Speaker 1>in the books.

0:00:11.820 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Day two, Pearl. I promise it's going to be our

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.300
<v Speaker 2>best show ever. And I just heard NBC management said

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:19.510
<v Speaker 2>they are extending us for a second week.

0:00:19.610 --> 0:00:21.209
<v Speaker 1>Wow. What kind of feedback did you get on our

0:00:21.230 --> 0:00:21.570
<v Speaker 1>first show?

0:00:21.590 --> 0:00:25.009
<v Speaker 2>A lot of feedback. My mom, ironically or oddly, my

0:00:25.050 --> 0:00:26.850
<v Speaker 2>mom said, you look good, your hair look good, and

0:00:26.870 --> 0:00:28.410
<v Speaker 2>she liked your sport coat. She asked me why I

0:00:28.430 --> 0:00:29.330
<v Speaker 2>don't wear a sport coat.

0:00:29.850 --> 0:00:32.339
<v Speaker 1>Mixed reviews on the socials about the sports coat.

0:00:32.580 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>You look good, like a substitute teacher-ish, but it's not

0:00:34.740 --> 0:00:35.020
<v Speaker 2>a brand.

0:00:35.140 --> 0:00:37.500
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, everyone keeps saying substitute teacher, but I don't think

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:38.620
<v Speaker 1>they meant that as a compliment.

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 2>We'll take it.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:42.500
<v Speaker 1>Okay. One thing we love here on Not So Fast

0:00:42.740 --> 0:00:44.980
<v Speaker 1>is we need a bad guy, especially in college football,

0:00:45.020 --> 0:00:47.410
<v Speaker 1>such an emotional sport. I think we have one, Paul.

0:00:47.780 --> 0:00:50.010
<v Speaker 1>Lane Kiffin. What's going on down there in the bayou?

0:00:50.090 --> 0:00:53.110
<v Speaker 2>So the Lane Kiffin story with the SEC and letting

0:00:53.210 --> 0:00:56.010
<v Speaker 2>pros go from pro rosters back to the SEC is

0:00:56.070 --> 0:00:58.530
<v Speaker 2>in week three. It's a perfect August story. And if

0:00:58.550 --> 0:01:00.590
<v Speaker 2>you think about it, you know, it's perfect because it's

0:01:00.630 --> 0:01:03.430
<v Speaker 2>Lane Kiffin, and he's This SEC last week gave some

0:01:03.710 --> 0:01:06.810
<v Speaker 2>rules about not letting him back, and Lane Kevin's like, yeah,

0:01:07.270 --> 0:01:08.690
<v Speaker 2>I heard your rules, and I'm going to keep talking

0:01:08.709 --> 0:01:09.330
<v Speaker 2>about it. I don't care.

0:01:09.630 --> 0:01:12.900
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love that Lane is not backing down. He

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.580
<v Speaker 1>actually talked about this and explained his process about how

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he's going about this with the current team.

0:01:20.520 --> 0:01:24.069
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of factors into it and different things,

0:01:24.150 --> 0:01:28.069
<v Speaker 3>and one that I struggled too was, okay, this late,

0:01:28.709 --> 0:01:30.820
<v Speaker 3>even though that's what you do in the NFL— And

0:01:30.900 --> 0:01:33.660
<v Speaker 3>there's an argument these players are paid like that. And

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.060
<v Speaker 3>it's what happened yesterday in the NFL. New players come

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.410
<v Speaker 3>in and take people's spots and added to rosters. And

0:01:39.420 --> 0:01:43.290
<v Speaker 3>other guys have been there working. So I met with

0:01:43.450 --> 0:01:47.030
<v Speaker 3>our leadership committee of our players. And I asked them,

0:01:47.209 --> 0:01:51.190
<v Speaker 3>it's your team. What do you want to do? If

0:01:51.230 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 3>these players are allowed to be added to rosters, what

0:01:55.700 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 3>do you want to do? And every one of them

0:01:57.820 --> 0:02:01.590
<v Speaker 3>was emphatic about– They can help us win, bring them.

0:02:03.850 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Man, you're jumping out of your skin there during Lane talking.

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:08.660
<v Speaker 1>You don't exactly buy that, Paul?

0:02:09.060 --> 0:02:10.900
<v Speaker 2>That was the first time seeing that. I heard it,

0:02:10.940 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 2>but that felt very heartfelt by Lane Kiffin. You know,

0:02:13.419 --> 0:02:16.980
<v Speaker 2>he's very, you know, I'm struggling with this decision. I'm

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:18.780
<v Speaker 2>going to throw the BS flag on this because a

0:02:18.820 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 2>couple things. If Lane Kiffin, the boss of LSU football,

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.620
<v Speaker 2>walks in the locker room and says, guys, are you

0:02:23.660 --> 0:02:25.940
<v Speaker 2>okay with me bringing guys in from play rosters? Is

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 2>some freshman four-string tight end going to go, yeah, coach,

0:02:28.740 --> 0:02:30.460
<v Speaker 2>I got a problem with it? No, you've got to say,

0:02:31.270 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's go Tigers. You've got to back whatever the coach does.

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.019
<v Speaker 2>But someone's losing a roster spot or someone's losing their

0:02:36.060 --> 0:02:38.430
<v Speaker 2>place in line for whenever he brings people back. And

0:02:38.450 --> 0:02:41.540
<v Speaker 2>I think he's using his players agreeing with this to

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.460
<v Speaker 2>back his... I guess not his decision, but staying with

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 2>this course of action.

0:02:45.340 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's interesting. You actually believe that he actually did

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:48.870
<v Speaker 1>talk to players? I think he might have talked to

0:02:48.910 --> 0:02:50.610
<v Speaker 1>Sam Leavitt, the quarterback. Hey, do you want me to

0:02:50.630 --> 0:02:53.870
<v Speaker 1>bring back this really good tight end? Sam's like, yes. Yeah, sure.

0:02:53.930 --> 0:02:55.889
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he went to the four-string tight end. But, Paul,

0:02:56.130 --> 0:02:58.490
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this whole issue is going to change

0:02:58.510 --> 0:03:00.330
<v Speaker 1>the face of college football maybe as much as we're

0:03:00.370 --> 0:03:00.890
<v Speaker 1>talking about it.

0:03:00.889 --> 0:03:01.530
<v Speaker 2>It's a big story.

0:03:01.790 --> 0:03:03.510
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge story. But let me give you some

0:03:03.550 --> 0:03:06.470
<v Speaker 1>numbers on how many guys will actually be playing college football.

0:03:06.910 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The other day, the NFL cut from 90 to 53.

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>That means 1,184 players became available, theoretically. But most of

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>them are not eligible to go back. And a lot

0:03:16.900 --> 0:03:18.900
<v Speaker 1>of them actually were picked up by practice squads or

0:03:18.940 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>still trying to get in the NFL. I think a

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>fair number is 20 guys at most are going to

0:03:24.020 --> 0:03:25.660
<v Speaker 1>go from NFL camp to the college game.

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:27.700
<v Speaker 2>So this is more about the concept and people being

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 2>bothered by the concept of a pro going back to college.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.650
<v Speaker 2>But it's a perfect August story because it's Lane Kiffin.

0:03:32.730 --> 0:03:36.350
<v Speaker 2>It's the SEC. It's professionalism and amateurism. But Lane Kiffin

0:03:36.370 --> 0:03:38.470
<v Speaker 2>continued to talk about it. And he has a game

0:03:38.530 --> 0:03:40.420
<v Speaker 2>against Clemson this weekend and he has to turn in

0:03:40.440 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 2>a roster. He talked about that.

0:03:44.540 --> 0:03:47.060
<v Speaker 3>I feel like my decision should always be made in

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.410
<v Speaker 3>the best interest of the players that sit in this

0:03:49.450 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 3>team room and not. but for my reputation and how

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.940
<v Speaker 3>the decisions play in the national media or other fan bases.

0:03:58.190 --> 0:04:00.010
<v Speaker 3>I've never been that way, and that could be wrong.

0:04:00.030 --> 0:04:02.010
<v Speaker 3>It's probably part of my story why it is the

0:04:02.050 --> 0:04:04.970
<v Speaker 3>way it is. But those players and the people that

0:04:05.010 --> 0:04:07.510
<v Speaker 3>hire me always know he's constantly trying to do the

0:04:07.550 --> 0:04:11.780
<v Speaker 3>best thing for them. So I struggled with it a lot.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.180
<v Speaker 2>He struggled with it a lot. All right, so here's

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.460
<v Speaker 2>the thing. SEC rules say that Lane Kiffin has to

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 2>turn in a roster by Friday. Like, you know, injuries,

0:04:20.700 --> 0:04:23.510
<v Speaker 2>who's active, who's not active. They have a game against

0:04:23.550 --> 0:04:25.670
<v Speaker 2>Clemson on Saturday. It's probably the most competitive game of

0:04:25.690 --> 0:04:28.289
<v Speaker 2>this college weekend. Week one, by the way. They're a

0:04:28.310 --> 0:04:32.130
<v Speaker 2>10-point favorite. This sets up as an absolute disaster possibility

0:04:32.150 --> 0:04:34.300
<v Speaker 2>for Lane Kiffin because if somehow they lose to Clemson,

0:04:34.580 --> 0:04:36.860
<v Speaker 2>who most people think is not the Clemson of five

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.830
<v Speaker 2>years ago, which they're not. If somehow he, it's going

0:04:39.850 --> 0:04:41.690
<v Speaker 2>to be like, ha, ha, we told you so. You've

0:04:41.710 --> 0:04:43.070
<v Speaker 2>been focused on all the wrong things.

0:04:43.350 --> 0:04:46.070
<v Speaker 1>That's funny. So you think that maybe the national media

0:04:46.110 --> 0:04:49.380
<v Speaker 1>or just national fans are rooting against Lane? That's probably true.

0:04:49.450 --> 0:04:51.480
<v Speaker 1>He is the bad guy. You know, it's funny. Brian

0:04:51.500 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Kelly was the same way. I think a lot of

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>people did not want to see Brian Kelly succeed in LSU.

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.020
<v Speaker 2>Oh, a lot of people were bothered by Brian Kelly.

0:04:58.520 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 4>He felt like Mr.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:04:59.419
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame.

0:04:59.460 --> 0:05:01.480
<v Speaker 2>His last name is Kelly, for God's sakes. And he said,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.419
<v Speaker 2>I left Notre Dame to compete for national championships at LSU.

0:05:05.310 --> 0:05:07.370
<v Speaker 2>And look where late Brian Kelly is. He's on CBS

0:05:07.390 --> 0:05:10.170
<v Speaker 2>doing second-tier games while Marcus Freeman is probably going to

0:05:10.190 --> 0:05:10.730
<v Speaker 2>the playoffs again.

0:05:11.070 --> 0:05:12.630
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing Wayne said, he said, I don't

0:05:12.670 --> 0:05:15.210
<v Speaker 1>care what others think about me. I actually think that

0:05:15.250 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>might be true because... He better not. He better not.

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.659
<v Speaker 1>I mean, going back, remember when he was the Raiders coach?

0:05:20.980 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Remember when he was fired on the tarmac at USC?

0:05:23.980 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this guy's been through a lot already. He's

0:05:25.580 --> 0:05:28.020
<v Speaker 1>not that old, but I feel like he's a little impervious.

0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.350
<v Speaker 2>Remember after he got fired at USC, the phrase tarmac

0:05:30.390 --> 0:05:32.150
<v Speaker 2>became a way to get fired, like if he got

0:05:32.190 --> 0:05:32.890
<v Speaker 2>fired after the jet?

0:05:32.910 --> 0:05:33.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:05:33.170 --> 0:05:34.980
<v Speaker 2>Here's Lane Kiffin, I think, in the locker room. It's

0:05:35.020 --> 0:05:38.830
<v Speaker 2>not play like a champion today. When at the highest level,

0:05:38.850 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 2>you have to become a villain in someone else's story.

0:05:41.710 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>LSU football, he's embracing it.

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:45.859
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be pro Lane Kiffin here. I

0:05:45.900 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>think we're going to embrace Lane Kiffin.

0:05:47.300 --> 0:05:50.539
<v Speaker 2>I love villains in football. I mean, Steve Spurrier was

0:05:50.580 --> 0:05:52.660
<v Speaker 2>a button pusher back in the day at South Carolina,

0:05:52.700 --> 0:05:53.930
<v Speaker 2>back at Florida. You love guys.

0:05:53.940 --> 0:05:56.229
<v Speaker 1>So if they lose to Clemson, we should say we're

0:05:56.250 --> 0:05:58.090
<v Speaker 1>not going to rip Lane Kiffin. Let's just promise right

0:05:58.150 --> 0:05:59.170
<v Speaker 1>now that we're going to be nice.

0:05:59.510 --> 0:06:01.570
<v Speaker 2>Right, and if you love college football like we do,

0:06:01.670 --> 0:06:03.950
<v Speaker 2>you want Lane Kiffin to be undefeated going back to

0:06:03.990 --> 0:06:05.860
<v Speaker 2>play Ole Miss in a few weeks. That's what you want.

0:06:06.010 --> 0:06:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we get great quotes.

0:06:07.250 --> 0:06:09.219
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to some pro football here. We

0:06:09.260 --> 0:06:12.060
<v Speaker 2>have some pending situations in football, and there's a bunch

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 2>of them. But, you know, the quarterback situations, there's some

0:06:14.779 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 2>cuts here. There's some people being released. Your boy Joe Milton,

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.060
<v Speaker 2>no longer a cowboy. But let's start with the Atlanta Falcons.

0:06:20.500 --> 0:06:22.180
<v Speaker 2>A lot of mixed reports about what the Falcons are

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 2>going to do, and Tua plays a lot in the

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.460
<v Speaker 2>last game. Michael Penix, is he healthy? If he's healthy,

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:29.750
<v Speaker 2>will he start? If you were running the Falcons and

0:06:29.790 --> 0:06:32.270
<v Speaker 2>Penix was declared ready to go, what would you do

0:06:32.510 --> 0:06:33.210
<v Speaker 2>and what will they do?

0:06:33.650 --> 0:06:35.150
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if two is going to play at all

0:06:35.190 --> 0:06:38.170
<v Speaker 1>this year, Paul, it's as a placeholder. This has to

0:06:38.210 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be Michael Penix's job. Not only is he the more

0:06:40.940 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>talented quarterback physically and probably all around physically, He's coming

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:47.330
<v Speaker 1>up on his contract. At some point, you have to

0:06:47.370 --> 0:06:49.470
<v Speaker 1>make a decision on Michael Penix. Are you going to

0:06:49.510 --> 0:06:51.250
<v Speaker 1>build around this guy, or are you going to draft

0:06:51.290 --> 0:06:54.830
<v Speaker 1>another quarterback moving forward? That time is now, honestly, and

0:06:54.850 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think most importantly, Penix gives him a better chance

0:06:57.820 --> 0:07:00.940
<v Speaker 1>to win immediately. Now, the issue is he can't stay healthy.

0:07:01.020 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's never been a judgment of audibility. I'll go

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:05.860
<v Speaker 2>back with the Atlanta Falcons to the decision to take

0:07:05.940 --> 0:07:08.060
<v Speaker 2>Penix out of the draft. When he got drafted, you

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.090
<v Speaker 2>and I were at that draft like, what are they doing?

0:07:10.490 --> 0:07:12.940
<v Speaker 2>They took Penix out. And he fell to them, or

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:14.820
<v Speaker 2>whatever you want to say, but they already had Kirk

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Cousins under a big contract. They said, well, we'll draft Penix.

0:07:17.620 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 2>He'll be the future. Let him rest with that knee

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.370
<v Speaker 2>injury at Washington. And now it's like, let him play

0:07:22.390 --> 0:07:24.670
<v Speaker 2>a full season. See what you got. He was a

0:07:24.770 --> 0:07:27.170
<v Speaker 2>very competitive, I mean, a competitor in college.

0:07:27.190 --> 0:07:29.370
<v Speaker 1>No, he's got a hammer for an arm. He really

0:07:29.390 --> 0:07:33.050
<v Speaker 1>throws the ball well. I like Michael Penix a lot. Honestly,

0:07:33.630 --> 0:07:35.460
<v Speaker 1>if you play him 17 games, the odds of him

0:07:35.500 --> 0:07:37.300
<v Speaker 1>getting to Week 18, what do you think?

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 2>But let it happen. Let it play out. It's like

0:07:39.940 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the Deshaun Watson thing. Let it happen one time, and

0:07:42.340 --> 0:07:43.300
<v Speaker 2>then if you're going to move on, you're going to

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:45.570
<v Speaker 2>move on. Let's get to the next quarterback situation. We

0:07:45.590 --> 0:07:48.530
<v Speaker 2>already talked about this on Not So Fast. Mendoza will

0:07:48.570 --> 0:07:51.670
<v Speaker 2>probably be not the starter, as we said with the Raiders.

0:07:51.990 --> 0:07:54.370
<v Speaker 2>It's probably going to be Kirk Cousins. Any chance there's

0:07:54.410 --> 0:07:56.170
<v Speaker 2>a curveball, and how do you see this playing out?

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a curveball because Mendoza did struggle

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason. Obviously, he doesn't really know how to

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>read defenses yet, but I think we're going to see

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.940
<v Speaker 1>Fernando Mendoza sooner rather than later, in part because the Raiders'

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.630
<v Speaker 1>schedule is a little light on the start, and then

0:08:09.690 --> 0:08:12.330
<v Speaker 1>it gets really, really hard. October's brutal. And I do

0:08:12.410 --> 0:08:16.190
<v Speaker 1>generally feel that quarterbacks might learn better under fire. If

0:08:16.230 --> 0:08:19.610
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about year two for Fernando Mendoza, is he

0:08:19.630 --> 0:08:21.510
<v Speaker 1>going to be better off like Patrick Mahomes not playing

0:08:21.550 --> 0:08:23.430
<v Speaker 1>at all? Or will he be better off getting a

0:08:23.470 --> 0:08:26.830
<v Speaker 1>little bit of action? I'm of the school that you

0:08:26.850 --> 0:08:28.430
<v Speaker 1>throw him in, let him learn on the job.

0:08:28.450 --> 0:08:30.530
<v Speaker 2>You know, while I agree with you that he's not

0:08:30.590 --> 0:08:33.290
<v Speaker 2>the flappable type, you can be unflappable. Can you be flappable?

0:08:34.250 --> 0:08:36.460
<v Speaker 2>Fernando Mendoza seems like a cool customer who would take

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.220
<v Speaker 2>a rough week in stride. and just crush the press conference.

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.339
<v Speaker 1>But by the way, it's funny because right now it

0:08:41.380 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>seems like it's Kirk Cousins. Didn't we say the same

0:08:43.300 --> 0:08:45.420
<v Speaker 1>thing about Kurt Warner with the Giants? Didn't we say

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the same thing about Kirk Cousins with Michael Pettis behind

0:08:47.950 --> 0:08:50.610
<v Speaker 1>him in Atlanta? Again and again and again, the veteran

0:08:50.790 --> 0:08:52.050
<v Speaker 1>always loses the job.

0:08:52.170 --> 0:08:54.770
<v Speaker 2>Could you see them putting Mendoza for week one as

0:08:54.830 --> 0:08:55.770
<v Speaker 2>the third string?

0:08:56.050 --> 0:08:56.209
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:08:56.450 --> 0:08:58.790
<v Speaker 2>Because Aiden O'Connell out of Purdue, he's had some nice

0:08:58.830 --> 0:09:01.910
<v Speaker 2>days there. You put Aiden O'Connell second string. Then if

0:09:01.990 --> 0:09:04.390
<v Speaker 2>somehow Kirk Cousins gets hurt in the first quarter of

0:09:04.429 --> 0:09:07.060
<v Speaker 2>week one, like an Aaron Rodgers situation, You don't have

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:09.110
<v Speaker 2>to bring in Mendoza and blow your whole plan up.

0:09:09.370 --> 0:09:11.590
<v Speaker 1>No, that makes perfect sense. Aiden O'Connell's played a lot

0:09:11.630 --> 0:09:14.790
<v Speaker 1>of football. That's actually against the Dolphins, I believe. That's

0:09:14.830 --> 0:09:16.730
<v Speaker 1>a game. If I'm Mendoza, I want to play against

0:09:16.770 --> 0:09:18.380
<v Speaker 1>my hometown team because you can win that one.

0:09:18.450 --> 0:09:21.660
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to a couple more situations. Now, C.J. Stroud,

0:09:21.700 --> 0:09:24.059
<v Speaker 2>he's not in danger of losing his job. That playoff

0:09:24.080 --> 0:09:26.400
<v Speaker 2>game last year, it looked like he had gloves on

0:09:26.420 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 2>his hands. But C.J. Stroud, this is a decision year

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 2>for him. It's a contract year for him. They did

0:09:31.040 --> 0:09:34.370
<v Speaker 2>not give him the big deal after year three. When

0:09:34.410 --> 0:09:36.110
<v Speaker 2>you look at C.J. Stroud and how they're going to

0:09:36.130 --> 0:09:38.260
<v Speaker 2>handle him this season, do you think it's like full

0:09:38.300 --> 0:09:41.140
<v Speaker 2>speed ahead, great defense, last year was an anomaly, or

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:43.300
<v Speaker 2>they may look at C.J. Stroud and say, we have

0:09:43.340 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>a winning team here on defense. If you don't step up,

0:09:46.420 --> 0:09:48.340
<v Speaker 2>we may have to make a decision now.

0:09:48.860 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I don't think they're going to pull

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>him for backups.

0:09:51.179 --> 0:09:51.730
<v Speaker 2>No chance.

0:09:52.170 --> 0:09:54.209
<v Speaker 1>No, in my mind, no chance. Now, I think it

0:09:54.250 --> 0:09:56.550
<v Speaker 1>was him who cost the team in the playoffs. He

0:09:56.610 --> 0:09:58.490
<v Speaker 1>used to be able to say, oh, the O-line's terrible,

0:09:58.790 --> 0:10:01.580
<v Speaker 1>but now C.J. Stroud, it's all on him. You're right,

0:10:01.620 --> 0:10:03.780
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have to be great. A lot of people

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>are picking them for the Super Bowl. I do not

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>trust C.J. Stroud. I really don't. I thought he panicked

0:10:08.950 --> 0:10:11.569
<v Speaker 1>in a big moment last year in the divisional playoffs.

0:10:12.190 --> 0:10:14.030
<v Speaker 1>I loved him as a rookie. I loved him at

0:10:14.090 --> 0:10:16.010
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State. He has a lot to prove to me.

0:10:16.070 --> 0:10:18.570
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it's like a body-switching movie from year one to

0:10:18.630 --> 0:10:20.750
<v Speaker 2>year three. That guy, his first year in the league,

0:10:21.030 --> 0:10:22.470
<v Speaker 2>remember Jayden Daniels' rookie year?

0:10:22.790 --> 0:10:23.110
<v Speaker 1>C.J.

0:10:23.130 --> 0:10:25.010
<v Speaker 2>Stroud did that a year before, and there was a

0:10:25.050 --> 0:10:27.030
<v Speaker 2>time where, who are you going to start your team with?

0:10:27.130 --> 0:10:27.510
<v Speaker 1>C.J.

0:10:27.530 --> 0:10:30.610
<v Speaker 2>Stroud after his rookie year, but it's like Davis Mills,

0:10:30.770 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 2>not a household name, but a high-end backup for the Texans,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:37.980
<v Speaker 2>if they are somehow one and three, and C.J. Stroud

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.990
<v Speaker 2>is underwhelming, I could see that Let's throw Davis Mills

0:10:41.030 --> 0:10:42.620
<v Speaker 2>in there and see if we can right the ship

0:10:42.860 --> 0:10:45.839
<v Speaker 2>in October and bring back the starter or let it

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 2>play out. Hey, I know it was an injury situation,

0:10:48.420 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 2>but Nick Foles pulled it off.

0:10:49.820 --> 0:10:52.829
<v Speaker 1>That 3-0 was a thin 3-0. That was the defense

0:10:52.890 --> 0:10:54.590
<v Speaker 1>work right there. I watched those games.

0:10:54.670 --> 0:10:56.090
<v Speaker 2>Only you could poo-poo a 3-0.

0:10:56.690 --> 0:10:58.730
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's Davis Mills. We've seen them for a

0:10:58.790 --> 0:11:01.220
<v Speaker 1>long time now. They need Stroud. I mean, what's the

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.969
<v Speaker 1>goal here if you're Houston? It's not about making the playoffs.

0:11:03.990 --> 0:11:05.500
<v Speaker 1>They've proven they can do that. They have to win

0:11:05.510 --> 0:11:07.559
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, and that means great quarterback play. They've

0:11:07.580 --> 0:11:10.859
<v Speaker 1>got to ride with Stroud, but it makes me nervous

0:11:10.900 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>because that defense is so good, Paul.

0:11:13.059 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 2>All right, we got up against a break, but I

0:11:14.380 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 2>want to ask you about the Steelers. Let's say the

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Steelers somehow, and they never do, start out 1-4, and

0:11:19.370 --> 0:11:21.929
<v Speaker 2>Rodgers is playing C-level football. What happens there?

0:11:22.690 --> 0:11:25.620
<v Speaker 1>See, with Aaron Rodgers, there's no way the backup's coming in. A,

0:11:25.929 --> 0:11:27.699
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Mike McCarthy could do that to him,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:28.300
<v Speaker 1>the new coach.

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:29.100
<v Speaker 2>Not in the first two months.

0:11:29.580 --> 0:11:32.140
<v Speaker 1>And Rodgers, even when he's bad, his numbers are pretty good.

0:11:32.220 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>He was really bad with the Jets, and he ended

0:11:34.580 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>up having one of the best passer ratings in the league.

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.380
<v Speaker 1>So I think the ceiling is pretty high with Rodgers.

0:11:38.700 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>He's not going anywhere.

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Got it.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:43.670
<v Speaker 1>Got it. All right, coming up, we have a warm

0:11:43.730 --> 0:11:46.730
<v Speaker 1>take segment on Jackson Dart and the Giants. Has Jackson

0:11:46.890 --> 0:11:49.270
<v Speaker 1>finally learned how to take care of himself? Paul is skeptical.

0:11:49.470 --> 0:11:53.179
<v Speaker 1>We'll do that next. Not so fast. All right.

0:11:53.300 --> 0:11:53.939
<v Speaker 2>Crush that throw.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Jackson Dart. I don't know if that's going to work, Paul.

0:11:58.700 --> 0:12:02.030
<v Speaker 2>How many quarterbacks have X in their first name?

0:12:02.090 --> 0:12:02.790
<v Speaker 1>Max Brosberg.

0:12:08.510 --> 0:12:12.630
<v Speaker 2>Pick me up. This is your boy. Orioles center fielder

0:12:13.130 --> 0:12:17.579
<v Speaker 2>Colton Couser. He does this for a living. Robbing a

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:22.050
<v Speaker 2>possible walk-off home run. against the padding, against your Rockies.

0:12:22.110 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>That's my favorite play in baseball, robbing a home run,

0:12:24.390 --> 0:12:27.339
<v Speaker 1>and this was such a critical situation. I thought he

0:12:27.380 --> 0:12:28.940
<v Speaker 1>had given up on it, and all of a sudden, boom,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>he's there. What a play.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Now, we have the term walk-off, home run, walk-off hit.

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:35.340
<v Speaker 2>Should that be a rob-off?

0:12:36.260 --> 0:12:38.220
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That doesn't sound right. A rob-off?

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:39.579
<v Speaker 2>I don't think a rob-off works, but it was a

0:12:39.610 --> 0:12:42.110
<v Speaker 2>rob-off for Colton Couser last night. All right, welcome back

0:12:42.130 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 2>to day two of the Up after Pearl. Here we are.

0:12:44.860 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 2>Not so fast. Let's get to it. Warm takes. That's

0:12:47.300 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 2>what we do here on the show. Sweeping the country.

0:12:49.860 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 2>My daughter said it's already taken over her high school.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.540
<v Speaker 2>All the kids are warm taking each other. Let's get

0:12:54.580 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 2>to it, Pearl. I'm going to go first.

0:12:56.140 --> 0:12:56.540
<v Speaker 4>Here we go.

0:12:57.179 --> 0:12:58.750
<v Speaker 2>The New York Giants this year have a little bit

0:12:58.770 --> 0:13:00.970
<v Speaker 2>of new hope. If they could get Malik Nabors back

0:13:01.230 --> 0:13:04.270
<v Speaker 2>from injury, he's fantastic. John Harbaugh's there. It feels like

0:13:04.309 --> 0:13:06.550
<v Speaker 2>a new version of them. Jackson Dart had a very

0:13:06.590 --> 0:13:08.949
<v Speaker 2>good season, their quarterback, last year. Now, he was in

0:13:08.970 --> 0:13:10.580
<v Speaker 2>the blue tent a lot last year, but you kind

0:13:10.620 --> 0:13:12.490
<v Speaker 2>of like... You look at that rookie year and say, okay,

0:13:12.570 --> 0:13:14.830
<v Speaker 2>hopefully I'll learn from that. But even in the preseason

0:13:14.850 --> 0:13:16.069
<v Speaker 2>this year, you got hurt and ended up in the

0:13:16.110 --> 0:13:18.410
<v Speaker 2>blue tent in the preseason game. You can't have that.

0:13:19.130 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 2>So my thing for Jackson Dart is stop being a

0:13:21.890 --> 0:13:24.020
<v Speaker 2>tough guy. I think you are a tough guy. I

0:13:24.059 --> 0:13:26.500
<v Speaker 2>think you're a very tough quarterback. But there's only one

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.140
<v Speaker 2>guy in the league who'd run without thinking about his health,

0:13:29.179 --> 0:13:31.339
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's Josh Allen. It didn't really work

0:13:31.380 --> 0:13:34.020
<v Speaker 2>for Cam Newton after a certain point. But Jackson Dart,

0:13:34.300 --> 0:13:37.610
<v Speaker 2>you're too good at what you do to not protect yourself.

0:13:37.870 --> 0:13:39.130
<v Speaker 2>You have to think of yourself like the President of

0:13:39.150 --> 0:13:42.010
<v Speaker 2>the United States. You can't risk yourself. Don't take shots

0:13:42.030 --> 0:13:44.589
<v Speaker 2>you don't need. Go back to like prime Russell Wilson

0:13:44.610 --> 0:13:46.660
<v Speaker 2>when he would run. He would run and then he'd slide.

0:13:47.020 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 2>He'd run, then he'd get out of bounds. You never

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.700
<v Speaker 2>remember any Russell Wilson runs, but I remember him playing

0:13:51.700 --> 0:13:55.260
<v Speaker 2>16 games every year. So if you're Jackson Dart, slide.

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.320
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing. His dad played for Utah Ute football

0:13:58.380 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 2>back in the day in the 90s. His dad was

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 2>a defensive back. He has DB mentality in a quarterback's body.

0:14:03.460 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 2>You've got to get rid of it, man. We know

0:14:05.059 --> 0:14:06.870
<v Speaker 2>you're tough. You want to be tough, be tough in

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:09.030
<v Speaker 2>January during a playoff game. But if they're going to

0:14:09.090 --> 0:14:11.530
<v Speaker 2>live to see a good season, a great season, if

0:14:11.550 --> 0:14:13.350
<v Speaker 2>Jackson Dart's going to live to see a second contract,

0:14:13.970 --> 0:14:15.450
<v Speaker 2>slide a little bit, run out of bounds a little bit.

0:14:15.530 --> 0:14:16.990
<v Speaker 2>No one's going to call you soft. They'll call you smart.

0:14:17.330 --> 0:14:19.620
<v Speaker 1>You know, I remember that time where the NFL tried

0:14:19.630 --> 0:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to tell a mobile quarterback not to run. Every time?

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.140
<v Speaker 1>And guess how many times it's worked? None times? You

0:14:25.180 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>can't change a quarterback's mentality about running the football ball.

0:14:28.260 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 2>How about the last two yards? How about eight yards

0:14:30.500 --> 0:14:31.020
<v Speaker 2>instead of ten?

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.940
<v Speaker 1>I know what you're saying. And by the way, it's funny,

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.660
<v Speaker 1>he gets hit in the pocket as well. You never

0:14:36.700 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>know about the Giants' offensive line. I just think he's

0:14:39.570 --> 0:14:41.690
<v Speaker 1>wired that way. When a guy's wired that way, it's

0:14:41.770 --> 0:14:45.590
<v Speaker 1>not that simple. All right. My first warm take also

0:14:45.630 --> 0:14:48.930
<v Speaker 1>involves Jackson Dart. Let's talk about quarterbacks on rookie deals.

0:14:49.310 --> 0:14:52.730
<v Speaker 1>Since 2018... Seven of eight Super Bowls have featured a

0:14:52.770 --> 0:14:55.350
<v Speaker 1>quarterback who's on a rookie deal. People forget it's the

0:14:55.570 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>ultimate NFL cheat code because you can build a roster

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.700
<v Speaker 1>around them. And I think we're taking some teams with

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>rookie deal quarterbacks a little lightly this year. No one

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 1>saw New England coming last year, so you have to wonder, Paul,

0:15:06.660 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>who is this year's New England? Here are some of

0:15:09.060 --> 0:15:12.430
<v Speaker 1>the quarterbacks on rookie deals. Bo Nix, to me, is

0:15:12.450 --> 0:15:15.229
<v Speaker 1>the most obvious rookie deal quarterback to go to the

0:15:15.270 --> 0:15:17.290
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl. Frankly, they should have been in the Super

0:15:17.310 --> 0:15:19.050
<v Speaker 1>Bowl last year. I think if Bo Nix was healthy

0:15:19.070 --> 0:15:21.900
<v Speaker 1>for the AFC title game, they're there. They beat New England.

0:15:22.220 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>But they have a lot of talent around him. They

0:15:25.100 --> 0:15:27.340
<v Speaker 1>added Jalen Waddell in Denver. But let me throw a

0:15:27.380 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of dark horses at you. Guys on rookie deals,

0:15:30.820 --> 0:15:34.390
<v Speaker 1>possible out of nowheres. Jackson Dart, who you mentioned in

0:15:34.430 --> 0:15:36.540
<v Speaker 1>New York, they do have a Super Bowl winning coach

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in John Harbaugh, and they have some talent and some

0:15:39.140 --> 0:15:44.330
<v Speaker 1>veterans around him. And one more, Tyler Shuck. The Saints

0:15:44.370 --> 0:15:47.510
<v Speaker 1>have the second easiest schedule in the NFL and in

0:15:47.530 --> 0:15:50.270
<v Speaker 1>their NFC South. They could win that division. Now, Super

0:15:50.310 --> 0:15:52.830
<v Speaker 1>Bowl seems way, way too rich. But then again, we

0:15:52.870 --> 0:15:54.910
<v Speaker 1>would never have even dreamt of Super Bowl last year

0:15:54.930 --> 0:15:56.890
<v Speaker 1>for New England. I think an easy schedule and a

0:15:56.910 --> 0:15:58.870
<v Speaker 1>quarterback on a rookie deal is a great combination.

0:15:59.010 --> 0:16:00.210
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm going to give you your credit here

0:16:00.250 --> 0:16:02.030
<v Speaker 2>because you've been saying this for over a decade. You've

0:16:02.050 --> 0:16:04.550
<v Speaker 2>written stories like on the Sports Illustrated back in the day.

0:16:04.610 --> 0:16:06.310
<v Speaker 2>You talked about this on the Dan Patrick show against

0:16:06.350 --> 0:16:09.690
<v Speaker 2>the great. You always draft the next quarterback because it's

0:16:09.710 --> 0:16:12.260
<v Speaker 2>a luxury item. If it doesn't work out, you still

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>had that rookie contract that sets up the rest of

0:16:14.180 --> 0:16:15.780
<v Speaker 2>your team. So you've been beating this drum for years

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.650
<v Speaker 2>that you must have a high-end rookie quarterback. And if

0:16:18.690 --> 0:16:19.710
<v Speaker 2>you don't get them, get another one.

0:16:19.990 --> 0:16:22.229
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it also puts pressure. A team like

0:16:22.290 --> 0:16:24.730
<v Speaker 1>your team, the Bears, Caleb Williams is still in his

0:16:24.750 --> 0:16:25.410
<v Speaker 1>rookie deal.

0:16:25.590 --> 0:16:26.050
<v Speaker 2>Not for long.

0:16:26.690 --> 0:16:28.580
<v Speaker 1>I know, but this year they have a lot of

0:16:28.620 --> 0:16:30.420
<v Speaker 1>talent around them. I think that they need to make

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:32.460
<v Speaker 1>some moves. So the clock is ticking.

0:16:32.780 --> 0:16:35.020
<v Speaker 2>All right, speaking of quarterbacks, let's get down to college football,

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and I love this. I saw that Tommy Carr, the

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.979
<v Speaker 2>son of legendary Lloyd Carr, the former Michigan coach.

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:40.100
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:16:40.530 --> 0:16:42.950
<v Speaker 2>Is the second-string quarterback now at Michigan. Not a surprise.

0:16:42.970 --> 0:16:46.310
<v Speaker 2>He's a legacy. His grandfather coached there. What is a

0:16:46.350 --> 0:16:48.470
<v Speaker 2>surprise is that his older brother, C.J. Carr, did not

0:16:48.490 --> 0:16:50.010
<v Speaker 2>go to Michigan. Now, I know we're a couple years

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 2>into this, but it still amazes me.

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>C.J.

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Carr is now a Heisman candidate for Notre Dame. They

0:16:54.940 --> 0:16:55.500
<v Speaker 2>are in play.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:55.900
<v Speaker 1>There he is.

0:16:55.940 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 2>There's little Tommy Carr getting some run this year for Michigan.

0:16:59.700 --> 0:17:00.040
<v Speaker 1>C.J.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.260
<v Speaker 2>Carr is looking at a Heisman. He's looking at the playoffs.

0:17:03.660 --> 0:17:05.810
<v Speaker 2>And somehow Michigan let him escape. I don't know how

0:17:05.830 --> 0:17:08.050
<v Speaker 2>this happened. I read back some stories that Tommy Reese,

0:17:08.109 --> 0:17:11.419
<v Speaker 2>the recruiter, and Marcus Freeman just... Never let up. They

0:17:11.460 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>didn't take no for an answer. They didn't let that

0:17:13.420 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 2>legacy thing stop them from recruiting the heck out of C.J.

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:17.550
<v Speaker 1>Carr. And it worked.

0:17:18.770 --> 0:17:20.530
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if Michigan took him for granted or

0:17:20.570 --> 0:17:22.790
<v Speaker 2>expected him to be there because of the legacy, but

0:17:22.830 --> 0:17:25.649
<v Speaker 2>it's a big win. Now, luckily for Michigan, Michigan and

0:17:25.670 --> 0:17:27.729
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame aren't playing right now. That series is on hold, which,

0:17:27.750 --> 0:17:31.350
<v Speaker 2>by the way, stinks for college football. But if somehow C.J.

0:17:31.390 --> 0:17:33.590
<v Speaker 2>Carr wins a Heisman or goes to the national title

0:17:33.609 --> 0:17:36.990
<v Speaker 2>game or both, Michigan fans will be extra, extra sold.

0:17:37.190 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know. It's funny. I remember when CJ Carr

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.139
<v Speaker 1>got to Notre Dame, I'm like, that's funny. He has

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the same last name as Lloyd Carr from Michigan. I

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:44.300
<v Speaker 1>wonder why he's at Notre Dame.

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:46.219
<v Speaker 2>You actually texted me and said that he can't be

0:17:46.260 --> 0:17:47.379
<v Speaker 2>related to Lloyd Carr, right?

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:49.420
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah. Because if you have the same last name

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.379
<v Speaker 1>as an iconic coach, I think you're required federally to

0:17:52.420 --> 0:17:54.500
<v Speaker 1>go to that school. CJ was being the rebel.

0:17:54.740 --> 0:17:56.300
<v Speaker 2>It's like me drinking some other beer.

0:17:56.580 --> 0:18:00.350
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you got to obviously drink Pabst. Although I'm not

0:18:00.410 --> 0:18:01.650
<v Speaker 1>sure you do drink Pabst.

0:18:01.850 --> 0:18:02.670
<v Speaker 2>Oh, not yet today.

0:18:03.190 --> 0:18:05.490
<v Speaker 1>All right, I'm going to shift gears for my warm take.

0:18:05.770 --> 0:18:08.990
<v Speaker 1>The other day Djokovic lost his first round match in

0:18:09.010 --> 0:18:11.830
<v Speaker 1>the U.S. Open. Now he's 38 years old and it

0:18:11.890 --> 0:18:14.540
<v Speaker 1>dawned on me he is not going to win another major.

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:17.300
<v Speaker 1>He might not even reach the semifinals of another major.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Now I have high expectations. I'm a tennis fan. I

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:22.140
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see him kind of go out on top.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:26.070
<v Speaker 1>It was a reminder that hardly anyone goes out on top.

0:18:26.910 --> 0:18:30.590
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's Joker, whether it's Tiger Woods, the end is

0:18:30.750 --> 0:18:33.430
<v Speaker 1>always kind of ugly. And that makes me think about

0:18:33.450 --> 0:18:36.790
<v Speaker 1>a couple guys playing this year. Aaron Rodgers in Pittsburgh.

0:18:36.869 --> 0:18:39.949
<v Speaker 1>He might be okay. They might make the playoffs. The

0:18:40.109 --> 0:18:42.590
<v Speaker 1>odds are it's not going to look great, Paul. And

0:18:42.609 --> 0:18:44.970
<v Speaker 1>it also reminds me of another guy. I'm a 76ers fan.

0:18:45.970 --> 0:18:49.230
<v Speaker 1>LeBron James. I mean, listen, there's a lot of talent

0:18:49.290 --> 0:18:51.469
<v Speaker 1>in Philly, and he can help all the young players.

0:18:51.770 --> 0:18:53.070
<v Speaker 1>But to think that he's going to be the real

0:18:53.090 --> 0:18:55.270
<v Speaker 1>LeBron James, it's kind of like the Joker. It's a

0:18:55.300 --> 0:18:58.850
<v Speaker 1>bit of fantasy. And once again, we're reminded, old stars

0:18:59.109 --> 0:19:03.210
<v Speaker 1>don't go out on top. You know, there's one John Elway. 95%

0:19:03.210 --> 0:19:05.389
<v Speaker 1>of the time, they go out struggling. And it's a

0:19:05.450 --> 0:19:06.770
<v Speaker 1>sad reality, but it might be the truth.

0:19:06.869 --> 0:19:08.379
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's a couple guys I'd like to mention here.

0:19:08.390 --> 0:19:10.710
<v Speaker 2>I think LeBron will go out pretty well because the

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 2>team he built around him takes less pressure off him.

0:19:12.700 --> 0:19:14.159
<v Speaker 2>I would say he's in a better position than I

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:16.700
<v Speaker 2>expected him to be for the next team. I would

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.220
<v Speaker 2>say that Tom Brady is a guy that jumps out

0:19:18.260 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to me. When he won that Super Bowl in Tampa,

0:19:20.280 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 2>he should have ran to retire. And he did for

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:22.980
<v Speaker 2>five weeks.

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.060
<v Speaker 1>But he still had the bad last year, though.

0:19:25.100 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm saying.

0:19:25.780 --> 0:19:26.820
<v Speaker 1>You've got to get out of your system.

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 2>That bad last year. Brady will remember that forever. I

0:19:30.180 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 2>wish Brady got that Super Bowl. Peyton Manning. He limped

0:19:33.300 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 2>to the finish and ran for retirement when he got

0:19:35.380 --> 0:19:35.820
<v Speaker 2>that Super Bowl.

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.590
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's funny because he went out with a ring.

0:19:37.770 --> 0:19:39.910
<v Speaker 1>But do we really remember it as going out on top?

0:19:40.030 --> 0:19:42.150
<v Speaker 2>It wasn't pretty, but it was a ring. Brady should

0:19:42.170 --> 0:19:43.919
<v Speaker 2>have got that ring and just wrapped it up.

0:19:44.270 --> 0:19:47.189
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll see. I think that the end's always bad.

0:19:48.830 --> 0:19:51.140
<v Speaker 1>After watching Djokovic, believe it or not, I'm going to

0:19:51.380 --> 0:19:53.620
<v Speaker 1>lower my expectations on the Steelers. Does that make any sense,

0:19:53.660 --> 0:19:55.940
<v Speaker 1>watching a tennis match and affecting your football bets?

0:19:56.140 --> 0:19:57.740
<v Speaker 2>That's what we do on Not So Fast. We work

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 2>in Djokovic to Aaron Rodgers in one step. We don't

0:20:00.340 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 2>have to do Kevin Bacon game. All right, let's do

0:20:01.900 --> 0:20:05.300
<v Speaker 2>a little NFL preview time here. Now, usually on these shows,

0:20:05.380 --> 0:20:07.419
<v Speaker 2>not on Not So Fast, They always start on these

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:10.459
<v Speaker 2>shows with the AFC East first. And it's like that

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 2>East Coast bias thing. We are going to go way

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 2>out West.

0:20:13.510 --> 0:20:15.590
<v Speaker 1>That's not East Coast bias. That's the way the standings

0:20:15.650 --> 0:20:17.429
<v Speaker 1>are ordered, Paul. We argue about this all the time.

0:20:17.450 --> 0:20:19.369
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but are you an alphabetist? Are you saying we

0:20:19.390 --> 0:20:21.290
<v Speaker 2>got to go alphabetical on the show? Because that's even

0:20:21.530 --> 0:20:21.990
<v Speaker 2>more bothersome.

0:20:22.010 --> 0:20:24.150
<v Speaker 1>When people break down the NFL, you start with either

0:20:24.310 --> 0:20:27.210
<v Speaker 1>NFC East or AFC East. You don't start in another division.

0:20:27.390 --> 0:20:30.020
<v Speaker 2>That's why this show is special. We go Mountain Time Zone,

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.140
<v Speaker 2>Pacific Time Zone. We embrace the men of the people.

0:20:32.160 --> 0:20:34.420
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's do a little NFC West. We're talking

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 2>about that a lot. The Seahawks lose Clint Kubiak in

0:20:36.820 --> 0:20:40.420
<v Speaker 2>the offense quarter. They lose running back Kenneth Walker, who

0:20:40.859 --> 0:20:42.830
<v Speaker 2>I actually like that move. Instead of spending a lot

0:20:42.869 --> 0:20:45.109
<v Speaker 2>on the running back position, they move on and get

0:20:45.150 --> 0:20:48.190
<v Speaker 2>Jadarian Price. Seahawks not getting a lot of coverage. Any

0:20:48.250 --> 0:20:49.150
<v Speaker 2>chance for a drop-off?

0:20:49.900 --> 0:20:51.780
<v Speaker 1>Oh, of course there's a chance for a drop-off. I mean,

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the rule is you don't really repeat in the NFL. But, man,

0:20:55.300 --> 0:20:57.889
<v Speaker 1>I think people are underestimating them big time. Plus 210

0:20:57.890 --> 0:21:00.710
<v Speaker 1>to win the NFC West. They're the defending champion. And

0:21:00.750 --> 0:21:02.910
<v Speaker 1>there aren't any real losses. They almost have the whole

0:21:02.950 --> 0:21:05.210
<v Speaker 1>defense back. They lost a guy named Reek Wolin, who

0:21:05.290 --> 0:21:08.710
<v Speaker 1>actually ended up costing them with dumb penalties. So I

0:21:08.710 --> 0:21:11.260
<v Speaker 1>think Seattle is being underestimated right now.

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, we're going to get to the Rams in

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 2>a second. But what's interesting about the Seahawks and the Rams,

0:21:14.940 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 2>they play in Week 16 and Week 18. They jam

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:21.150
<v Speaker 2>those games together. The division will be decided those days,

0:21:21.410 --> 0:21:24.070
<v Speaker 2>and also probably home field advantage for the entire NFC playoffs.

0:21:24.150 --> 0:21:26.270
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember last year there was that crazy night

0:21:26.290 --> 0:21:29.090
<v Speaker 1>game with the two-point conversion. I think Charbonnet picked up

0:21:29.130 --> 0:21:31.629
<v Speaker 1>the ball, and the Seahawks winning that game gave them

0:21:31.670 --> 0:21:34.500
<v Speaker 1>home field, which I think was critical in the playoffs.

0:21:34.740 --> 0:21:37.619
<v Speaker 1>So that week 16 and week 18 could decide the

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:38.379
<v Speaker 1>whole NFC.

0:21:38.619 --> 0:21:40.300
<v Speaker 2>We talked a little bit about this yesterday. If you

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:43.859
<v Speaker 2>look at the Rams, everyone is just bowing at the Rams' altar.

0:21:44.859 --> 0:21:47.050
<v Speaker 2>The chance for them to have an issue, besides Matt

0:21:47.070 --> 0:21:48.429
<v Speaker 2>Stafford's health, the chance for them to have an.

0:21:48.430 --> 0:21:51.910
<v Speaker 1>Issue, a hiccup. Yeah, they're thin. They're thin and they're old,

0:21:51.970 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's a long NFL season.

0:21:53.180 --> 0:21:54.220
<v Speaker 2>That's like us, thin and old.

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what happened to Matthew Stafford's back injury, Paul?

0:21:57.760 --> 0:21:58.660
<v Speaker 2>It's all better.

0:22:00.100 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 1>We know backs. And he had a shoulder a couple

0:22:02.660 --> 0:22:04.649
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Yeah, I know. I think there's a lot

0:22:04.730 --> 0:22:08.170
<v Speaker 1>on the line here. We still got suspensions. I think

0:22:08.190 --> 0:22:10.850
<v Speaker 1>the plus 500 number to win the Super Bowl is ridiculous.

0:22:10.950 --> 0:22:13.169
<v Speaker 1>First of all, the team that's plus 500, 5-1 to

0:22:13.470 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>win the whole thing never wins. So I'm actually fading

0:22:16.980 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams despite logic because that D-line is incredible. I mean,

0:22:20.660 --> 0:22:22.980
<v Speaker 1>no one's arguing against Myles Garrett. And Aaron Donald is

0:22:23.020 --> 0:22:25.310
<v Speaker 1>just arguing that anybody can be that strong a favorite

0:22:25.330 --> 0:22:26.010
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL.

0:22:26.030 --> 0:22:28.510
<v Speaker 2>Two more teams, the 49ers. Can you picture the 49ers

0:22:28.550 --> 0:22:31.710
<v Speaker 2>with six wins or 11 wins? Because I can picture both.

0:22:32.470 --> 0:22:34.690
<v Speaker 1>I can picture them with 11 wins. Even if they

0:22:34.730 --> 0:22:37.300
<v Speaker 1>have another rash of injuries, Kyle Shanahan is such a

0:22:37.340 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>good coach. And I think he runs the offense so well.

0:22:40.430 --> 0:22:42.510
<v Speaker 1>It kind of doesn't matter who's there. I mean, the

0:22:42.570 --> 0:22:44.970
<v Speaker 1>fact that they won so many games without Nick Bosa

0:22:45.030 --> 0:22:47.170
<v Speaker 1>last year was a good sign to me. I think

0:22:47.190 --> 0:22:49.070
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks, I'm sorry, the Niners are going to be

0:22:49.090 --> 0:22:52.890
<v Speaker 1>at least a wildcard team, but they're not dangerous, threatening

0:22:52.910 --> 0:22:53.910
<v Speaker 1>like the Seahawks and the Rams.

0:22:53.930 --> 0:22:56.030
<v Speaker 2>Let's finish with the Cardinals on brand. Now, is that

0:22:56.090 --> 0:22:58.950
<v Speaker 2>plus 1 million to win the title? It looks like 10,000,

0:22:58.930 --> 0:23:01.170
<v Speaker 2>a million, whatever. Add some zeros there if you want.

0:23:01.630 --> 0:23:04.550
<v Speaker 2>The Cardinals, I like that they're kind of in tank

0:23:04.590 --> 0:23:06.409
<v Speaker 2>mode because there's a lot of quarterbacks for next year.

0:23:06.770 --> 0:23:10.869
<v Speaker 2>But they didn't go full tank mode. They drafted Jeremiah Love,

0:23:11.070 --> 0:23:12.810
<v Speaker 2>the great running back out of Notre Dame, and they're

0:23:12.830 --> 0:23:15.169
<v Speaker 2>spending $ 50 million on him. That bothers me. If you're

0:23:15.190 --> 0:23:17.570
<v Speaker 2>going to tank, tank. Don't draft a guy who's ready

0:23:17.590 --> 0:23:19.930
<v Speaker 2>to play now, ready to dominate now, on a team

0:23:19.950 --> 0:23:21.030
<v Speaker 2>that's not ready to host him.

0:23:21.530 --> 0:23:23.010
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know when I knew the Cardinals didn't know

0:23:23.030 --> 0:23:25.670
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing? Week one of preseason. They let

0:23:25.730 --> 0:23:29.209
<v Speaker 1>Love carry the ball 13 times. What are you doing?

0:23:29.300 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 1>It's week one of the preseason. Of course he gets hurt.

0:23:31.940 --> 0:23:34.540
<v Speaker 1>I would put him in bubble wrap. I'd play him maybe. Yeah,

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>because you're waiting for it. Next year's quarterback is in

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:39.619
<v Speaker 1>the college ranks right now. Do not overuse Jeremiah Love.

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 2>If you're tanking, don't take a running back. That's what

0:23:41.619 --> 0:23:43.180
<v Speaker 2>Winston Churchill said that year.

0:23:43.220 --> 0:23:44.030
<v Speaker 1>Was it Churchill?

0:23:44.270 --> 0:23:46.149
<v Speaker 2>I think it was. All right, coming up next, our

0:23:46.190 --> 0:23:48.730
<v Speaker 2>buddy Dan Katz, Big Cat from Barstool Sports. He's an

0:23:48.810 --> 0:23:50.850
<v Speaker 2>author now, and he hangs out with us. Look at

0:23:50.930 --> 0:23:53.990
<v Speaker 2>us guys there back in the day. Dan Katz, Barstool Sports,

0:23:54.150 --> 0:23:55.950
<v Speaker 2>Big Cat. Next on Not So Fast.

0:23:58.020 --> 0:23:58.460
<v Speaker 1>That was fun.

0:23:59.940 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Plus 10 million?

0:24:00.740 --> 0:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Big Katz. I'm so excited for this.

0:24:02.460 --> 0:24:05.950
<v Speaker 2>I like that sport coat he had. That's on brand.

0:24:07.130 --> 0:24:07.869
<v Speaker 2>He's a sport coat guy.

0:24:13.980 --> 0:24:16.220
<v Speaker 1>All right, welcome back to Not So Fast. I'm Perloff.

0:24:16.260 --> 0:24:19.619
<v Speaker 1>He's Pabst. Now, Paul, when we first started ideating on

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:21.660
<v Speaker 1>the show, who was the first guest that we wanted?

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:23.010
<v Speaker 2>Oh, PFT commenter.

0:24:23.070 --> 0:24:27.369
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we totally wanted PFT. He was unavailable, so then

0:24:27.410 --> 0:24:29.310
<v Speaker 1>we went to Hank Lockwood from the Part of My

0:24:29.330 --> 0:24:29.950
<v Speaker 1>Take podcast.

0:24:29.990 --> 0:24:30.390
<v Speaker 2>Hard no.

0:24:30.570 --> 0:24:33.810
<v Speaker 1>He was playing golf. He couldn't do it. So, fortunately,

0:24:33.970 --> 0:24:37.750
<v Speaker 1>our friend Dan Katz, Big Cat, was available. He is,

0:24:37.990 --> 0:24:39.850
<v Speaker 1>of course, the host of Part of My Take and

0:24:39.890 --> 0:24:45.260
<v Speaker 1>the best-selling author of Part of My Book. Dan, this

0:24:45.300 --> 0:24:47.530
<v Speaker 1>book is incredible. Congratulations.

0:24:48.790 --> 0:24:51.620
<v Speaker 5>So thank you, boys. Great to see you both. Love

0:24:51.670 --> 0:24:53.820
<v Speaker 5>both of you. So happy you guys are back together.

0:24:54.940 --> 0:24:57.940
<v Speaker 5>Before we started, Pearl, you said that you read the book.

0:24:58.420 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 5>Then you just said the book is incredible. Now I

0:25:00.760 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 5>know you didn't read the book.

0:25:02.340 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no. No, this strategically placed typos, unbelievable. I

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.460
<v Speaker 1>think I caught four of them. You said there were seven,

0:25:09.500 --> 0:25:09.859
<v Speaker 1>I believe.

0:25:10.420 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh, there's more than that.

0:25:11.540 --> 0:25:16.050
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I opened up a parentheses on page nine,

0:25:16.109 --> 0:25:16.730
<v Speaker 5>never closed it.

0:25:17.150 --> 0:25:18.020
<v Speaker 4>Never, ever closed it.

0:25:18.310 --> 0:25:22.370
<v Speaker 5>So the last 300 pages of the book are just

0:25:22.410 --> 0:25:24.910
<v Speaker 5>a clarification on the first eight pages.

0:25:24.590 --> 0:25:25.070
<v Speaker 4>Of the book.

0:25:25.390 --> 0:25:27.510
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, football guys don't use grammar, Dan.

0:25:28.170 --> 0:25:29.490
<v Speaker 4>No, no, and we did.

0:25:29.530 --> 0:25:32.010
<v Speaker 5>We actually, in true football guy fashion, we broke it

0:25:32.130 --> 0:25:35.810
<v Speaker 5>up in four quarters so that our fans could understand

0:25:35.850 --> 0:25:38.580
<v Speaker 5>what was going on, and that's how the book is

0:25:38.630 --> 0:25:43.980
<v Speaker 5>broken up. And it wasn't easy to write, I'll say that, because–

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 5>I'm just out of my experience of blogging and writing,

0:25:48.470 --> 0:25:50.330
<v Speaker 5>but I'm happy we did it, and I think people

0:25:50.369 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 5>enjoy it, and it's true to form in the fact

0:25:52.780 --> 0:25:55.540
<v Speaker 5>that If we had put out a book that was

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.380
<v Speaker 5>very well written and perfect prose.

0:25:58.540 --> 0:26:00.300
<v Speaker 4>I think people would be like, who did this?

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:06.060
<v Speaker 5>Instead, it's a lot of grammatical errors and nonsensical repetition

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 5>of words. I think people understand that we actually did

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:08.820
<v Speaker 5>write this.

0:26:09.140 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, Big Cat, one part I loved was the

0:26:11.220 --> 0:26:15.659
<v Speaker 1>section on Barstool Van Talk and Dan Patrick. Now, Dan,

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.290
<v Speaker 1>people might not know, was your last interview on Barstool

0:26:18.310 --> 0:26:18.610
<v Speaker 1>Van Talk.

0:26:18.660 --> 0:26:19.450
<v Speaker 2>Second and last.

0:26:19.530 --> 0:26:21.190
<v Speaker 1>Second and last. And I read you were going to

0:26:21.250 --> 0:26:23.260
<v Speaker 1>light him on fire for the interview. Yes.

0:26:23.810 --> 0:26:27.969
<v Speaker 5>Yes, so we had an actual conversation with our showrunner,

0:26:28.550 --> 0:26:30.310
<v Speaker 5>this guy named Ziggs, who was a great guy, and

0:26:30.330 --> 0:26:30.930
<v Speaker 5>he tried.

0:26:30.730 --> 0:26:31.670
<v Speaker 4>His absolute best.

0:26:32.190 --> 0:26:34.889
<v Speaker 5>But we were like, hey, we're going to do a

0:26:34.930 --> 0:26:39.010
<v Speaker 5>playoff of En Fuego from Dan Patrick's SportsCenter days, and

0:26:39.410 --> 0:26:40.990
<v Speaker 5>let's just light him on fire.

0:26:42.230 --> 0:26:44.949
<v Speaker 4>We'll have a fire department there.

0:26:44.970 --> 0:26:47.710
<v Speaker 5>It will just be a small fire, and we'll just

0:26:47.750 --> 0:26:49.890
<v Speaker 5>do it really quickly, and no one will get hurt.

0:26:50.550 --> 0:26:53.220
<v Speaker 5>And I remember he, he actually like, you know, took

0:26:53.260 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 5>the idea and brought it to everyone and he came

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.950
<v Speaker 5>back to us and he so earnestly and like disappointed

0:26:59.970 --> 0:27:03.470
<v Speaker 5>in himself was like, Hey fellas, listen, I talked to everyone.

0:27:04.180 --> 0:27:05.699
<v Speaker 4>We're not going to be able to light Dan Patrick

0:27:05.740 --> 0:27:07.310
<v Speaker 4>on fire. And we're just like, what?

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:08.220
<v Speaker 1>Come on.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:09.530
<v Speaker 4>What do you mean?

0:27:09.550 --> 0:27:12.210
<v Speaker 2>That's a hit. And the tough part was to protect

0:27:12.230 --> 0:27:14.310
<v Speaker 2>Dan's hair as part of our job, my job as

0:27:14.330 --> 0:27:16.090
<v Speaker 2>the producer. I would have had to jump on him

0:27:16.109 --> 0:27:16.889
<v Speaker 2>and smother it out.

0:27:17.430 --> 0:27:20.290
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and the amount of hairspray he uses, that thing

0:27:20.330 --> 0:27:22.010
<v Speaker 5>would have blown up so fast.

0:27:22.090 --> 0:27:24.870
<v Speaker 4>So, yeah. Yeah, it's good.

0:27:25.410 --> 0:27:27.450
<v Speaker 5>But that's how long we've known each other and being

0:27:27.490 --> 0:27:30.430
<v Speaker 5>able to go back into the history of Pardon My Take.

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.219
<v Speaker 4>It was a fun exercise to remember some of these things.

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:34.219
<v Speaker 2>You know, I want to stay with the book for

0:27:34.260 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 2>a second. When you go back to Pardon My Take,

0:27:36.380 --> 0:27:38.740
<v Speaker 2>I always go back to maybe a couple months in,

0:27:38.780 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 2>you guys had Mark Schlereth on and you guys forced

0:27:41.780 --> 0:27:44.010
<v Speaker 2>yourself to urinate on yourselves.

0:27:44.190 --> 0:27:44.590
<v Speaker 1>As a bit.

0:27:44.810 --> 0:27:47.370
<v Speaker 2>I really believe that that is the turning point where

0:27:47.750 --> 0:27:50.090
<v Speaker 2>if you hadn't heard of that show yet, which you started,

0:27:50.130 --> 0:27:52.610
<v Speaker 2>you guys were cooking, you couldn't miss that clip.

0:27:53.410 --> 0:27:55.929
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, that was definitely, there was a few in

0:27:55.970 --> 0:27:59.290
<v Speaker 5>that first year, six months to a year, that were

0:27:59.330 --> 0:28:02.869
<v Speaker 5>really like seminal moments. We had ESPN sue us immediately,

0:28:03.170 --> 0:28:05.700
<v Speaker 5>which was the greatest thing that could have ever happened

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 5>to us, because let's be honest, we did completely rip

0:28:09.380 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 5>off their logo, but PFT immediately sent them a cease

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 5>and desist back to cease and desist, cease and desisting us.

0:28:15.420 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:18.110
<v Speaker 5>We had Joe Buck on. We had Scott Van Pelt.

0:28:18.420 --> 0:28:20.689
<v Speaker 5>Kyle Wilcher came on and said that Adam Morrison had

0:28:20.710 --> 0:28:24.050
<v Speaker 5>an apocalypse bunker, which was huge for us. And then

0:28:24.070 --> 0:28:28.209
<v Speaker 5>the Mark Schlereth interview, urinating our pants. I agree with you.

0:28:28.250 --> 0:28:29.860
<v Speaker 5>I think that was a moment where everyone was like,

0:28:29.950 --> 0:28:32.900
<v Speaker 5>what are these guys doing? And it's really like going

0:28:32.940 --> 0:28:36.060
<v Speaker 5>back and through it all, it's really time and place.

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 4>We got very, very lucky.

0:28:37.300 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 5>And I think that anyone who writes a book and

0:28:40.100 --> 0:28:43.270
<v Speaker 5>tries to tell you that they're incredible and it's their

0:28:43.330 --> 0:28:45.820
<v Speaker 5>hard work– No, no, we had a lot of luck involved.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.660
<v Speaker 5>And there's these moments along the road that you're like, yeah,

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:49.500
<v Speaker 5>that was really lucky.

0:28:49.540 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 4>That was really lucky.

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:54.090
<v Speaker 5>So we're very grateful and understand how humble we should

0:28:54.110 --> 0:28:55.450
<v Speaker 5>be in the success we've had.

0:28:55.470 --> 0:28:57.330
<v Speaker 1>All right, Big Cat, I want to jump right into

0:28:57.370 --> 0:29:00.350
<v Speaker 1>this season. I noticed a trend on the podcast recently,

0:29:00.370 --> 0:29:03.700
<v Speaker 1>and you know I listen. Dallas Cowboys, you seem to

0:29:03.780 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>love them.

0:29:05.190 --> 0:29:07.610
<v Speaker 4>I'm buying. I don't know. I don't know what happened

0:29:07.630 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 4>to me, Pearl.

0:29:08.100 --> 0:29:11.820
<v Speaker 5>It's actually bothered me that the fact that I have

0:29:11.940 --> 0:29:14.910
<v Speaker 5>given actual thought to the Texans and Cowboys playing in.

0:29:14.870 --> 0:29:15.450
<v Speaker 4>The Super Bowl.

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 5>Look, their team, their offense was electric when healthy last year.

0:29:21.260 --> 0:29:22.780
<v Speaker 4>And if their.

0:29:22.620 --> 0:29:26.290
<v Speaker 5>Defense, they don't have to be, I always look in the,

0:29:26.610 --> 0:29:29.010
<v Speaker 5>before the season, I've looked for the teams that like,

0:29:29.050 --> 0:29:31.750
<v Speaker 5>they don't have to make this huge jump. They just

0:29:31.790 --> 0:29:33.690
<v Speaker 5>have to get a little bit better in some piece.

0:29:33.990 --> 0:29:36.370
<v Speaker 5>And they like, if the Cowboys are a top, let's

0:29:36.410 --> 0:29:38.390
<v Speaker 5>call it 15 defense, top 12 defense, that's going to be.

0:29:38.290 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 4>A really good team. The Texans, if C.J.

0:29:42.440 --> 0:29:46.310
<v Speaker 5>Stroud plays B-level football, he doesn't have to be A +.

0:29:46.500 --> 0:29:48.520
<v Speaker 5>He doesn't have to be Josh Allen. He doesn't have

0:29:48.540 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 5>to be Lamar Jackson or Patrick Rose. He has to

0:29:50.780 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 5>be like the... 12th or 15th best quarterback, and that

0:29:55.420 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 5>defense can carry them. So I'm looking for those type

0:29:57.760 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 5>of teams.

0:29:58.060 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 2>But also, you root for counter-narratives. I think the Cowboys

0:30:00.860 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 2>winning a Super Bowl would actually turn the media on

0:30:02.820 --> 0:30:04.870
<v Speaker 2>its head because they wouldn't know how to cover the

0:30:04.910 --> 0:30:08.650
<v Speaker 2>Cowboys going forward without the they-haven't-won-in-three-decades type thing.

0:30:09.230 --> 0:30:09.550
<v Speaker 1>True.

0:30:09.650 --> 0:30:11.950
<v Speaker 5>That would confuse a lot of people. Yeah, I'm not

0:30:12.010 --> 0:30:14.150
<v Speaker 5>rooting for it. I'm not rooting for the Cowboys. I'm

0:30:14.170 --> 0:30:16.020
<v Speaker 5>just looking at teams and I'm like, hey, who am

0:30:16.100 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 5>I high on? I also should say that if you

0:30:18.660 --> 0:30:21.860
<v Speaker 5>had me write down everyone's record right now and I

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:24.860
<v Speaker 5>didn't know how, I'm not a math guy. I think

0:30:24.900 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 5>I'd have like 75% of the league going 11-7.

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 4>And the math wouldn't work out. Right, so it doesn't

0:30:31.660 --> 0:30:33.550
<v Speaker 4>work out. I'm high on all these teams.

0:30:33.890 --> 0:30:38.229
<v Speaker 5>I did the exercise earlier yesterday, and I listed off

0:30:38.270 --> 0:30:40.630
<v Speaker 5>all these teams, and I think I had... 10 playoff

0:30:40.650 --> 0:30:43.410
<v Speaker 5>teams in the NFC. So I understand that none of

0:30:43.450 --> 0:30:45.070
<v Speaker 5>this makes sense and none of this works out.

0:30:45.090 --> 0:30:45.450
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:30:45.530 --> 0:30:48.430
<v Speaker 2>Staying in the NFC, you watched the Bears all last year.

0:30:48.490 --> 0:30:50.290
<v Speaker 2>I came back to town. We watched the Bears that

0:30:50.370 --> 0:30:53.530
<v Speaker 2>one night. And the Bears last season was the most

0:30:53.710 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 2>entertaining football season that didn't result in a Super Bowl

0:30:56.390 --> 0:31:00.660
<v Speaker 2>in sports history. Is it sustainable, the last second stuff,

0:31:00.740 --> 0:31:03.260
<v Speaker 2>the defense takeaways? It feels lightly sustainable.

0:31:04.660 --> 0:31:06.940
<v Speaker 5>I think the offense is going to be better and

0:31:07.020 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 5>more sustainable this year because I have full trust in

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 5>Ben Johnson and Cale Williams.

0:31:11.220 --> 0:31:13.780
<v Speaker 4>I unfortunately think the defense might be worse somehow, which

0:31:13.860 --> 0:31:14.880
<v Speaker 4>is crazy to say.

0:31:14.900 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 5>And that's going to be the real problem for the

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.310
<v Speaker 5>Bears this year. If you look at what they did

0:31:20.350 --> 0:31:23.490
<v Speaker 5>in the offseason, the defensive line did not get markedly

0:31:23.590 --> 0:31:26.730
<v Speaker 5>better in the draft or the free agency. Now you

0:31:26.770 --> 0:31:30.210
<v Speaker 5>can say they did take a couple guys like Jordan Vandenberg,

0:31:30.510 --> 0:31:32.550
<v Speaker 5>who if he pops as a rookie, that could be

0:31:32.590 --> 0:31:36.470
<v Speaker 5>a big addition on the defensive line. They added someone

0:31:36.510 --> 0:31:40.230
<v Speaker 5>in the secondary, Kobe Bryant, who got hurt, and it stinks.

0:31:40.430 --> 0:31:43.050
<v Speaker 5>So I don't know where this defense is getting better,

0:31:43.810 --> 0:31:45.590
<v Speaker 5>and they're going to be in a lot of shootouts.

0:31:45.770 --> 0:31:46.910
<v Speaker 4>I think the offense is going to be great.

0:31:47.150 --> 0:31:48.490
<v Speaker 5>I think we're going to have kind of a similar

0:31:48.510 --> 0:31:52.390
<v Speaker 5>season where we're going to be last-second games and comebacks

0:31:52.510 --> 0:31:55.070
<v Speaker 5>and trying to scratch and claw our way to 10-11 wins.

0:31:56.630 --> 0:31:59.030
<v Speaker 1>Dan, I was working on an against the grain take.

0:31:59.130 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Tyson Badgen is the best quarterback in Chicago. How would

0:32:01.890 --> 0:32:03.060
<v Speaker 1>that work? Anybody into that?

0:32:03.780 --> 0:32:05.780
<v Speaker 5>Oh, no, there was a little bit of that. Okay,

0:32:05.820 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 5>so last year before the season, there was a brief. Obviously,

0:32:09.780 --> 0:32:13.710
<v Speaker 5>that happens, especially in a city like Chicago, where it's

0:32:13.730 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 5>like the backup quarterback gets a lot of love. I

0:32:16.300 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 5>still text all the time with Frank Kaminsky where he

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 5>says that Josh McCown could have taken us to a

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:22.220
<v Speaker 5>Super Bowl.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:23.860
<v Speaker 4>So there's always that.

0:32:24.540 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 5>I think Tyson Pagin is a good– I think he–

0:32:26.850 --> 0:32:28.890
<v Speaker 5>what I would say about him is he might be

0:32:28.970 --> 0:32:32.550
<v Speaker 5>one of the best backups in the NFL. And having

0:32:32.590 --> 0:32:35.510
<v Speaker 5>a guy like that on your roster, like he probably

0:32:35.570 --> 0:32:37.790
<v Speaker 5>could have gone somewhere else. He signed a two-year deal.

0:32:37.870 --> 0:32:40.670
<v Speaker 5>He's with Ben Johnson. I think having a guy that

0:32:40.790 --> 0:32:44.300
<v Speaker 5>if Caleb, God forbid, gets hurt, you have someone that

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.180
<v Speaker 5>could maybe run the offense is a really good bonus

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 5>that a lot of teams don't have.

0:32:48.420 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 2>There is no better job in sports than being a good,

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:54.510
<v Speaker 2>respected backup quarterback who never plays. You get nice money.

0:32:54.770 --> 0:32:57.110
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to shower. Remember like Billy Volek? He

0:32:57.130 --> 0:32:59.970
<v Speaker 2>was a pure backup. I think Chase Daniel had nine

0:33:00.010 --> 0:33:00.970
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns in his career.

0:33:01.420 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Jim Sorge.

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 5>Jim Sorge, Badger, who was the backup for Peyton Manning

0:33:05.180 --> 0:33:06.090
<v Speaker 5>for like a decade.

0:33:06.310 --> 0:33:07.150
<v Speaker 4>He never had to play.

0:33:07.170 --> 0:33:08.750
<v Speaker 2>All right, I want to go back to the book

0:33:08.790 --> 0:33:11.070
<v Speaker 2>for a second. When you're researching the book and looking

0:33:11.110 --> 0:33:13.410
<v Speaker 2>back at part of my take, is there a guest

0:33:13.470 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 2>where you said to yourself, man, I would like a do-over,

0:33:16.130 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>a second shot at that guy, that person?

0:33:18.660 --> 0:33:19.230
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there's a few.

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.690
<v Speaker 5>There's a couple interviews that have not gone well. Chris Paul,

0:33:25.710 --> 0:33:28.910
<v Speaker 5>we never aired it. Dak Prescott, he didn't like us,

0:33:29.300 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 5>and he actually stayed on the line with his publicist.

0:33:33.310 --> 0:33:35.870
<v Speaker 5>like hot Mike situation was like, those guys were weird.

0:33:35.890 --> 0:33:37.630
<v Speaker 5>And we're like, Oh, Dak, we're still here. We can

0:33:37.670 --> 0:33:41.580
<v Speaker 5>hear you. Um, so it's like Dan Marino was a

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 5>tough one. There's definitely some ones that, that we'd like.

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:44.860
<v Speaker 4>To have back.

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:48.100
<v Speaker 5>But I think that when we look back at it, uh,

0:33:48.340 --> 0:33:52.060
<v Speaker 5>doing this for 10 years, doing three episodes a week

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.330
<v Speaker 5>for 10 years, uh, Our hit rate is really high still.

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 5>It's 99.5%. So yeah, there's a couple that we could

0:33:58.980 --> 0:34:00.860
<v Speaker 5>all remember, but really at the end of the day,

0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:01.860
<v Speaker 5>we've done a pretty good job.

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:05.010
<v Speaker 1>Who do you want to interview? I think Dajon Love,

0:34:05.050 --> 0:34:06.550
<v Speaker 1>you said, is at the top of your list.

0:34:07.130 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Oh my God. I need him. I need him.

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>And you're going to interview him as if he's a

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>real NFL player, is that correct? Yes.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 4>Oh, absolutely. Have to.

0:34:16.900 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 5>I think, you know, obviously LeBron James would be incredible.

0:34:20.140 --> 0:34:22.259
<v Speaker 5>I don't think he'll ever come on. I think Kevin

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 5>Durant would be awesome. I don't think he'll ever come on.

0:34:25.060 --> 0:34:27.090
<v Speaker 5>So there's some guys like that, but we've gotten a

0:34:27.710 --> 0:34:31.670
<v Speaker 5>lot of these interviews, these white whale interviews done. So yeah,

0:34:31.690 --> 0:34:33.730
<v Speaker 5>I'll say Dajon Love. We would love to have Dajon

0:34:33.750 --> 0:34:34.070
<v Speaker 5>Love on.

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:37.739
<v Speaker 1>Remember when Kevin Durant actually tweeted about you and me

0:34:38.100 --> 0:34:38.940
<v Speaker 1>playing basketball?

0:34:39.380 --> 0:34:39.660
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:34:40.050 --> 0:34:41.220
<v Speaker 1>And he said how bad we were.

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.850
<v Speaker 4>He said, get this trash off my court.

0:34:44.870 --> 0:34:46.969
<v Speaker 5>He used to troll me in my own DMs all

0:34:46.989 --> 0:34:49.489
<v Speaker 5>the time on our Saturday morning run that Pearl and

0:34:49.530 --> 0:34:50.470
<v Speaker 5>I would have in Manhattan.

0:34:50.530 --> 0:34:52.469
<v Speaker 2>You guys were doing yeoman's work down at those courts.

0:34:52.690 --> 0:34:56.350
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Katie genuinely dislikes you, it seemed like. Or is

0:34:56.390 --> 0:34:57.589
<v Speaker 1>that just an act by him?

0:34:57.810 --> 0:34:58.270
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:34:58.330 --> 0:35:00.410
<v Speaker 5>I think there was a moment where he disliked me,

0:35:00.450 --> 0:35:03.129
<v Speaker 5>and that was totally justified because I definitely said some

0:35:03.170 --> 0:35:07.090
<v Speaker 5>things that I wouldn't expect him to. And then I

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 5>think slowly he was like, these guys are kind of funny,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:14.940
<v Speaker 5>and they're just busting each other's chops, which is what

0:35:15.340 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 5>Katie loves to do.

0:35:16.219 --> 0:35:18.540
<v Speaker 4>He's online all the time. I think he likes that

0:35:18.580 --> 0:35:19.280
<v Speaker 4>type of discourse.

0:35:19.300 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, we want to get you out of here,

0:35:20.500 --> 0:35:22.480
<v Speaker 2>but a couple more things. One of my favorite moments

0:35:22.620 --> 0:35:24.460
<v Speaker 2>in your career and Barstool's career, I think it was

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 2>you and PFT, We were all at the Super Bowl

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:29.650
<v Speaker 2>in San Francisco, you, me, Perloff, we were chatting, and

0:35:29.690 --> 0:35:32.410
<v Speaker 2>you were walking over to interview Terrell Owens, and I

0:35:32.450 --> 0:35:33.989
<v Speaker 2>think the sponsor was Butterfinger.

0:35:34.410 --> 0:35:34.589
<v Speaker 1>Yes.

0:35:34.660 --> 0:35:36.540
<v Speaker 2>And you walked over, and I kind of was in

0:35:36.580 --> 0:35:38.140
<v Speaker 2>the background. I was like, let's see how this goes.

0:35:38.810 --> 0:35:41.549
<v Speaker 2>And you guys asked him 15 questions about Butterfinger and

0:35:41.670 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 2>nothing about football. And I said to Pearl, I go,

0:35:45.320 --> 0:35:46.940
<v Speaker 2>I admire that. I admire what you did.

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:50.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was our guy, Caleb Presley. So that was, yeah,

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:54.130
<v Speaker 5>it was a situation where it was actually pre-PMT, but

0:35:55.170 --> 0:35:57.589
<v Speaker 5>it was a situation where Butterfinger asked us to do

0:35:57.630 --> 0:36:00.430
<v Speaker 5>an interview. They I'm talking to them. They're like, we

0:36:00.450 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 5>have them for 10 minutes. I was like, this is ridiculous.

0:36:02.600 --> 0:36:04.739
<v Speaker 5>You guys know this. Like when you try to do

0:36:04.820 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 5>a sponsored interview for 10 minutes of the Super Bowl,

0:36:07.440 --> 0:36:09.609
<v Speaker 5>there's just a pretty good chance that it's not going

0:36:09.630 --> 0:36:12.009
<v Speaker 5>to go well. So I told Caleb, I was like,

0:36:12.030 --> 0:36:14.750
<v Speaker 5>let's just do this. Let's just only ask about Butterfingers.

0:36:14.830 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 5>Like never anything. Like, I think he was asking him

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 5>questions like, what's your favorite Butterfingers? So, you know, just

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.219
<v Speaker 5>just kind of making a mockery of the whole thing.

0:36:23.239 --> 0:36:26.020
<v Speaker 5>And it is that is very similar to what part

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:28.580
<v Speaker 5>of my take has been where you have the sports

0:36:28.660 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 5>media world. People take themselves way too seriously. None of

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.969
<v Speaker 5>this should be taken seriously. We're all just watching sports

0:36:36.190 --> 0:36:38.710
<v Speaker 5>and messing around at the end of the day. And

0:36:39.030 --> 0:36:42.190
<v Speaker 5>that's where we've excelled versus a lot of the competition.

0:36:42.750 --> 0:36:44.150
<v Speaker 4>We never take ourselves too seriously.

0:36:44.170 --> 0:36:45.350
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things we do here in Not

0:36:45.390 --> 0:36:47.650
<v Speaker 2>So Fast, a tradition almost two days in the making,

0:36:47.710 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 2>is we have a thing called Such Thing is a

0:36:49.700 --> 0:36:53.180
<v Speaker 2>Dumb Question. And we're not going to hesitate. Did you ever,

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.750
<v Speaker 2>as a football guy, get to September... And think to yourself,

0:36:57.110 --> 0:36:59.170
<v Speaker 2>what did I do with my free time in the

0:36:59.270 --> 0:37:01.330
<v Speaker 2>spring and summer? Because now I have none because I'm

0:37:01.370 --> 0:37:02.310
<v Speaker 2>watching so much football.

0:37:02.910 --> 0:37:04.070
<v Speaker 4>Oh, yeah.

0:37:04.390 --> 0:37:08.069
<v Speaker 5>I actually get, like, I don't want to say anxiety, but, like,

0:37:08.590 --> 0:37:10.770
<v Speaker 5>this time of year I do have a little bit

0:37:10.790 --> 0:37:12.370
<v Speaker 5>of trepidation being like, man.

0:37:12.410 --> 0:37:15.450
<v Speaker 4>There's a lot of work coming up in the next

0:37:15.489 --> 0:37:18.350
<v Speaker 4>few months. Now, I shouldn't be complaining. I'm not complaining

0:37:18.410 --> 0:37:20.209
<v Speaker 4>because it is the best job in the world.

0:37:20.710 --> 0:37:24.690
<v Speaker 5>But, yeah, I actually once sat at a dinner– I

0:37:24.730 --> 0:37:28.930
<v Speaker 5>was sitting next to the composer of the, of a succession,

0:37:28.989 --> 0:37:32.250
<v Speaker 5>the music, uh, like famous guy and very nice guy.

0:37:32.390 --> 0:37:34.180
<v Speaker 5>And I asked him, I was like, do you watch

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.259
<v Speaker 5>any sports? He's like, not a single sport. And I

0:37:37.280 --> 0:37:39.660
<v Speaker 5>was like, what do you do on Sundays? He's like,

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:42.819
<v Speaker 5>I do grocery shopping. I go to the park. I

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:44.980
<v Speaker 5>do my laundry. I'm like, oh my God, that's like,

0:37:45.020 --> 0:37:47.170
<v Speaker 5>what a world to live in. You have an extra

0:37:47.230 --> 0:37:49.209
<v Speaker 5>day of your life that you can get things done.

0:37:50.050 --> 0:37:52.210
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll let you go, Big Cat. Real quick,

0:37:52.370 --> 0:37:54.589
<v Speaker 1>any advice for doing a two-person show? I don't know

0:37:54.660 --> 0:37:57.020
<v Speaker 1>who's the Big Cat and who's the PFT of the

0:37:57.080 --> 0:37:59.259
<v Speaker 1>two of us, but it seems like you guys have

0:37:59.300 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of figured it out.

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.100
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I would say the real advice is get a

0:38:03.160 --> 0:38:05.319
<v Speaker 5>third guy that you can both go after, so that

0:38:05.340 --> 0:38:07.540
<v Speaker 5>way you don't fight each other. That's where Hank comes

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 5>into play. So yeah, get that third guy and then

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:12.620
<v Speaker 5>attack that third guy so you guys never fight.

0:38:12.860 --> 0:38:14.500
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Thank you so much for your time.

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:15.500
<v Speaker 1>I really love the book.

0:38:15.540 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 2>See you soon, bud.

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:17.660
<v Speaker 1>If you like the podcast, you'll love the book. Dan,

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>talk soon.

0:38:18.750 --> 0:38:19.980
<v Speaker 4>Thank you, guys. Appreciate it.

0:38:20.430 --> 0:38:22.410
<v Speaker 1>Wow. I love Big Cat. We've known him for a

0:38:22.450 --> 0:38:25.379
<v Speaker 1>long time, Paul. You knew him first through the Chicago Connection. Yep.

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:25.779
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:38:25.820 --> 0:38:26.340
<v Speaker 1>Good guy.

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin guy. Chicago guy.

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:29.500
<v Speaker 1>Big eater.

0:38:29.580 --> 0:38:32.900
<v Speaker 2>Good guy to eat with because he will order multiple

0:38:33.060 --> 0:38:33.980
<v Speaker 2>apps and let it play out.

0:38:34.860 --> 0:38:37.190
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. We love Big Cat. And again, the book is

0:38:37.230 --> 0:38:40.810
<v Speaker 1>really fun. All right. Coming up next, Michigan coach Kyle

0:38:40.850 --> 0:38:44.609
<v Speaker 1>Whittingham talks about his comments on Ohio State. I don't

0:38:44.650 --> 0:38:46.509
<v Speaker 1>know he convinced me that he really hates them. We'll

0:38:46.530 --> 0:38:50.290
<v Speaker 1>do that next. Not so fast. I don't know if

0:38:50.310 --> 0:38:52.990
<v Speaker 1>it was enough, Paul. Enough? Yeah, from Kyle Whittingham.

0:38:53.150 --> 0:38:54.549
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I thought you were talking about wings.

0:38:54.590 --> 0:38:56.010
<v Speaker 1>We'll see. Wow, there's never enough wings.

0:39:01.219 --> 0:39:04.779
<v Speaker 4>People want to hear you say you hate Ohio State, right?

0:39:07.020 --> 0:39:08.020
<v Speaker 6>I guess that's what they want.

0:39:08.100 --> 0:39:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:39:08.580 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 6>I want to beat them as bad as anybody, probably worse.

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 6>How about this? I guess we could hate them all

0:39:16.500 --> 0:39:17.100
<v Speaker 6>one day a year.

0:39:17.260 --> 0:39:17.660
<v Speaker 4>How about that?

0:39:18.219 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 6>To me, it's got to happen organically and you, you know,

0:39:20.660 --> 0:39:23.660
<v Speaker 6>it's tough to manufacture that. And so, uh, but just

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:26.050
<v Speaker 6>the competitive nature of the game. I mean, it's the

0:39:26.530 --> 0:39:29.630
<v Speaker 6>rivalry game the premier rivalry game in the country. And,

0:39:32.200 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, everybody knows that. I'm fully aware of that.

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:38.450
<v Speaker 6>And by no means am I trying to downplay the game.

0:39:38.489 --> 0:39:39.890
<v Speaker 6>And the game is huge. I mean, it's a huge

0:39:39.930 --> 0:39:41.190
<v Speaker 6>game year in and year out.

0:39:42.170 --> 0:39:44.770
<v Speaker 2>Back on Not So Fast, Paps and Perloff here, NBC

0:39:44.790 --> 0:39:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Sports Now. Kyle Whittingham. Former Utah coach, now the Michigan coach.

0:39:48.540 --> 0:39:50.580
<v Speaker 2>Still getting asked questions about the whole I don't hate

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:51.359
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Day thing.

0:39:51.570 --> 0:39:54.650
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe he's sticking to this, i.e. treating it

0:39:54.670 --> 0:39:56.290
<v Speaker 1>like any other game. What is he doing, Paul?

0:39:56.370 --> 0:39:58.990
<v Speaker 2>Okay, here's my theory. This guy's been around a long time.

0:39:59.070 --> 0:40:01.010
<v Speaker 2>He did not grow up in the Michigan-Ohio State rivalry.

0:40:01.030 --> 0:40:03.770
<v Speaker 2>He's aware of it, but he's at the age right now,

0:40:04.010 --> 0:40:06.069
<v Speaker 2>despite him looking like a guy in a Cialis ad

0:40:06.110 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 2>who's jacked and has his own plane. He's like, I'm

0:40:09.820 --> 0:40:11.420
<v Speaker 2>not going to fake it for you guys. I'm at

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:12.759
<v Speaker 2>the age now where I'm not going to fake it.

0:40:12.860 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Of course I want to beat them, but I'm not

0:40:14.060 --> 0:40:15.799
<v Speaker 2>going to do the I will not drive through that

0:40:15.860 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 2>state thing.

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>But is he setting up a must-win situation? I mean,

0:40:18.780 --> 0:40:20.990
<v Speaker 1>I know Michigan and Ohio State is always a must-win,

0:40:21.260 --> 0:40:23.669
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that he's been downplaying this game, they

0:40:23.690 --> 0:40:25.069
<v Speaker 1>better show up for that game, Paul.

0:40:25.130 --> 0:40:26.509
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all you got to do is win, and no

0:40:26.550 --> 0:40:28.270
<v Speaker 2>one will talk about this topic again, but it really

0:40:28.330 --> 0:40:29.430
<v Speaker 2>is kind of a fun back and forth.

0:40:29.489 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Can we give a shout-out to his glasses, too? Oh, strong, glassy.

0:40:33.180 --> 0:40:34.839
<v Speaker 2>He's like one of those old guys you would not

0:40:34.900 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 2>want to get in a fight with.

0:40:35.800 --> 0:40:37.860
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my gosh. He's such a man. He makes me

0:40:37.900 --> 0:40:39.660
<v Speaker 1>feel like less of a man, which is not that

0:40:39.700 --> 0:40:42.500
<v Speaker 1>hard to do. But he's really cool. Fun interview with DP.

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to our guy. Luke Keekly was

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:47.870
<v Speaker 2>also on the Dan Patrick. Luke Keekly, he's a former linebacker,

0:40:48.210 --> 0:40:50.590
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Famer, Luke Keekly. And Dan asked him a

0:40:50.590 --> 0:40:52.930
<v Speaker 2>little bit about being recruited out of high school in Ohio.

0:40:52.950 --> 0:40:55.489
<v Speaker 2>He went to BC, but who else recruited him? But

0:40:55.530 --> 0:40:59.070
<v Speaker 2>growing up, you know, in Cincinnati, Ohio State recruit you?

0:41:00.310 --> 0:41:02.630
<v Speaker 4>Not really. You know, I was, when I was being recruited,

0:41:02.730 --> 0:41:06.270
<v Speaker 4>I was, I was small, I was skinny. I wasn't

0:41:06.310 --> 0:41:06.930
<v Speaker 4>very big.

0:41:06.950 --> 0:41:11.380
<v Speaker 1>Um, and quite frankly, if I was recruiting people out

0:41:11.410 --> 0:41:13.859
<v Speaker 1>of Cincinnati, I probably wouldn't have recruited me if I.

0:41:13.820 --> 0:41:14.739
<v Speaker 4>Was Ohio state either.

0:41:14.780 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 5>So really now I was a little, I was a

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:24.219
<v Speaker 5>200 pound linebacker that, uh, that was taking biology class and.

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.300
<v Speaker 4>Chemistry class, carried a lunchbox around.

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:32.700
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really blame anybody for not recruiting me. Man,

0:41:33.060 --> 0:41:36.690
<v Speaker 1>I weighed about 150, and I was 6'4, my senior

0:41:36.710 --> 0:41:39.089
<v Speaker 1>year of basketball. I relate to that. And I was

0:41:39.130 --> 0:41:41.549
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a nerd, too. Didn't have a lunchbox,

0:41:41.650 --> 0:41:44.489
<v Speaker 1>but that surprises me. But I feel a real camaraderie

0:41:44.550 --> 0:41:45.750
<v Speaker 1>with Luke Kuechly now.

0:41:45.830 --> 0:41:48.029
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, more than that, though, not so fast. Your hosts,

0:41:48.050 --> 0:41:50.250
<v Speaker 2>Pabst and Perloff, have history with Luke Kuechly. Here is

0:41:50.290 --> 0:41:53.470
<v Speaker 2>the Arizona Super Bowl... I got the ball, Luke Kuechly

0:41:53.510 --> 0:41:56.730
<v Speaker 2>in his prime, and I went at it. Not going

0:41:56.750 --> 0:41:57.850
<v Speaker 2>to work out well for me, Pearl.

0:41:59.700 --> 0:41:59.990
<v Speaker 1>Oh, boy.

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:00.960
<v Speaker 4>Oh, no.

0:42:02.820 --> 0:42:04.759
<v Speaker 2>And he was going one-quarter speed.

0:42:07.190 --> 0:42:09.330
<v Speaker 1>You got up. That's one of my favorite Dan Patrick

0:42:09.370 --> 0:42:11.110
<v Speaker 1>Show bits is when you get beat up by people.

0:42:11.150 --> 0:42:11.489
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:42:11.690 --> 0:42:13.029
<v Speaker 1>Who are some of the names? If you're new to

0:42:13.070 --> 0:42:15.700
<v Speaker 1>Not So Fast, Paul loves to take hits from NFL players.

0:42:16.020 --> 0:42:17.380
<v Speaker 1>Who's got to you before?

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Unfortunately, because Adrian Peterson put me in the protocol, I

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:21.520
<v Speaker 2>don't remember all of them. And we've got to get

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:23.879
<v Speaker 2>to this one. You're trying to delay this. When Luke

0:42:23.900 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Keekly was coming out of college out of BC, everyone's like,

0:42:26.140 --> 0:42:28.690
<v Speaker 2>you've got to draft Luke Keekly, middle linebacker. And, you know,

0:42:28.710 --> 0:42:31.190
<v Speaker 2>people argue, middle linebackers, are they value picks in the

0:42:31.230 --> 0:42:33.810
<v Speaker 2>first round? And here's a tweet by one Andrew Perloff

0:42:34.210 --> 0:42:36.270
<v Speaker 2>that is an all-time cold take.

0:42:36.830 --> 0:42:39.810
<v Speaker 1>Oof. Luke Heakley at number 10. Panthers is not going

0:42:39.830 --> 0:42:42.410
<v Speaker 1>to work out well. Tacklers are easy to find. I

0:42:42.450 --> 0:42:45.040
<v Speaker 1>know he can cover tight ends, but come on. I mean,

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:46.419
<v Speaker 1>my logic is rock solid.

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 2>You're standing by this tweet.

0:42:47.660 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm standing by this tweet. Little did I know he

0:42:49.660 --> 0:42:51.339
<v Speaker 1>was going to become a Hall of Famer. The guy

0:42:51.360 --> 0:42:53.330
<v Speaker 1>weighed 200 pounds coming out of high school, Paul. I

0:42:53.370 --> 0:42:54.470
<v Speaker 1>think my point was valid.

0:42:54.570 --> 0:42:57.609
<v Speaker 2>This is an all-timer. It actually made Fred Siegel's book

0:42:57.650 --> 0:42:59.370
<v Speaker 2>of all-time old takes exposed.

0:42:59.450 --> 0:43:02.190
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, for many years, old takes exposed led off the

0:43:02.270 --> 0:43:06.090
<v Speaker 1>NFL draft by showing that tweet. Just showing, like, nobody

0:43:06.130 --> 0:43:08.089
<v Speaker 1>knows what's going to happen to these players. I mean,

0:43:08.110 --> 0:43:09.790
<v Speaker 1>did you know Luke Kuechly was going to be that good?

0:43:10.110 --> 0:43:12.009
<v Speaker 2>No, but I really hope that Luke Kuechly at his

0:43:12.050 --> 0:43:13.859
<v Speaker 2>Hall of Fame speech would have worked out your tweet,

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 2>put it on the big board behind him. All right,

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:18.380
<v Speaker 2>let's do a little thing here we got. This is

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.569
<v Speaker 2>called Why My Team May Stink. We're going to look

0:43:21.590 --> 0:43:24.020
<v Speaker 2>at a team every week, every day on That's So

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.299
<v Speaker 2>Fast and why they may not work out. Now, it's

0:43:26.320 --> 0:43:27.580
<v Speaker 2>got to be a decent team. It can't be a

0:43:27.620 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 2>bad team that stinks. Okay. I'm going to start. You

0:43:29.739 --> 0:43:32.900
<v Speaker 2>don't know what's coming here. Why my team may stink,

0:43:33.620 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:37.629
<v Speaker 1>Oh. This is a good one because a few years ago,

0:43:37.670 --> 0:43:39.669
<v Speaker 1>this would have been impossible. But now I think there's

0:43:39.710 --> 0:43:41.549
<v Speaker 1>a clear path for Kansas City not to be good.

0:43:41.890 --> 0:43:44.649
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes coming off an ACL. We don't even know

0:43:44.710 --> 0:43:46.930
<v Speaker 1>when he's going to be full strength. And the O-line

0:43:46.950 --> 0:43:49.710
<v Speaker 1>in front of him is in turmoil. So they have

0:43:49.730 --> 0:43:52.340
<v Speaker 1>to protect him. That's what worries me the most. Now, listen,

0:43:52.380 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 1>he's been Superman before. But, Paul, do you really have

0:43:54.780 --> 0:43:56.940
<v Speaker 1>faith in Mahomes being the old Patrick Mahomes?

0:43:57.100 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I have faith in him. I don't have faith in

0:43:58.660 --> 0:44:02.140
<v Speaker 2>the people around him. Xavier Worthy is okay. Rasheed Rice,

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:05.790
<v Speaker 2>when available, is really good. Travis Kelsey is a nice

0:44:05.850 --> 0:44:07.969
<v Speaker 2>player now. They've got a good running back. I just

0:44:07.989 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 2>don't think there are a lot of threatening people around them.

0:44:10.140 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 2>There's no Tyree Kill in the building. There's no Tyree

0:44:12.100 --> 0:44:14.259
<v Speaker 2>Kill in the building. Xavier Worthy was drafted to be that.

0:44:14.620 --> 0:44:16.879
<v Speaker 1>And they've lost some defensive players. Their defense has been

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:20.990
<v Speaker 1>underrated through the years. You know, listen, all that being said, yes,

0:44:21.219 --> 0:44:23.330
<v Speaker 1>there is a scenario where they're like last year, a

0:44:23.390 --> 0:44:26.370
<v Speaker 1>losing team. It is hard to let go of them. Like,

0:44:26.390 --> 0:44:28.230
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do our Super Bowl picks, and they're

0:44:28.390 --> 0:44:31.569
<v Speaker 1>on our mind. They're on my mind. But, again, the

0:44:31.690 --> 0:44:34.629
<v Speaker 1>offensive line and the quarterback health, huge issues a team

0:44:34.650 --> 0:44:35.109
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want.

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:37.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so that's why your team may stink. I don't

0:44:37.260 --> 0:44:38.939
<v Speaker 2>know what team's going to be tomorrow. It might be yours,

0:44:38.980 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 2>but tune in. All right, coming up next, constructive criticism.

0:44:42.780 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 2>We've got a lot more to come. We've got the

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:45.830
<v Speaker 2>freezing cold takes. We've got everything coming up.

0:44:46.380 --> 0:44:46.739
<v Speaker 1>Stick around.

0:44:46.900 --> 0:44:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Not so fast.

0:44:48.500 --> 0:44:50.060
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I want constructive criticism.

0:44:50.610 --> 0:44:51.759
<v Speaker 2>There's some nice stuff about you.

0:44:52.590 --> 0:44:52.810
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:44:53.170 --> 0:44:54.069
<v Speaker 2>Why my team may stink.

0:44:54.860 --> 0:44:58.100
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's going to catch on. It's all going to

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>catch on. Welcome back to Not So Fast. All right, Paul,

0:45:04.020 --> 0:45:05.739
<v Speaker 1>as we said yesterday, we're not the only new show

0:45:05.780 --> 0:45:09.640
<v Speaker 1>on NBC Sports Now. John Fanta debuted last night. Did

0:45:09.660 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you get to watch?

0:45:10.380 --> 0:45:12.580
<v Speaker 2>I watched all of it. He takes messages from the fans,

0:45:12.620 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 2>and he riffs back, and he doesn't know what's coming.

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 2>It's really fun.

0:45:14.860 --> 0:45:17.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was super fun. And, of course, our buddy

0:45:17.050 --> 0:45:21.050
<v Speaker 1>John Fanta sent us a note with a really interesting question, Paul.

0:45:21.670 --> 0:45:24.549
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to know which NFL team do you think

0:45:24.750 --> 0:45:28.290
<v Speaker 1>everybody is underestimating this season? You want to jump in,

0:45:28.330 --> 0:45:28.729
<v Speaker 1>go first?

0:45:28.750 --> 0:45:31.049
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it is an easy one, the Vikings. No one

0:45:31.090 --> 0:45:33.450
<v Speaker 2>really likes them that much. And I think it's about

0:45:33.489 --> 0:45:35.700
<v Speaker 2>the Kyler Murray thing. He's not the most beloved quarterback

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:38.980
<v Speaker 2>of all time. But Kevin O'Connell and Kyler Murray together,

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 2>very tough division. They're off the radar. That's a surprising team.

0:45:43.350 --> 0:45:45.689
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I am going to sort of have a weird

0:45:45.770 --> 0:45:48.280
<v Speaker 1>one here. I think the team that's off everyone's radar

0:45:48.340 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 1>is the Super Bowl champion Seattle Seahawks. Bravo. I mean,

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 1>why are we talking about the Seahawks? We're talking about

0:45:53.760 --> 0:45:57.759
<v Speaker 1>the Rams. Miles Garrett this, Aaron Donald that. Guess what?

0:45:57.960 --> 0:46:00.750
<v Speaker 1>The Seahawks won the Super Bowl. I think Mike McDonald's

0:46:00.770 --> 0:46:02.270
<v Speaker 1>a great coach. I fell in love with him after

0:46:02.310 --> 0:46:05.190
<v Speaker 1>I saw him on DP's show at Tahoe. He's very good,

0:46:05.230 --> 0:46:08.029
<v Speaker 1>and they brought back most of their defense performance. I

0:46:08.050 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>think they are the underestimated team in the entire NFL.

0:46:10.420 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 2>That's a little meta by you. I like that. Why

0:46:12.380 --> 0:46:14.940
<v Speaker 2>don't we stay with constructive criticism because we have some comments.

0:46:15.020 --> 0:46:17.340
<v Speaker 2>Our first show was yesterday right here on NBC Sports.

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:21.620
<v Speaker 2>Let's get to constructive criticism, good, bad, and ugly, not

0:46:21.660 --> 0:46:24.520
<v Speaker 2>pointing any fingers. Here we go, Perloff. Here are some

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:26.140
<v Speaker 2>tweets coming in from you, the fans.

0:46:27.790 --> 0:46:28.089
<v Speaker 1>Here we go.

0:46:28.270 --> 0:46:30.810
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Not So Fast with Pastor Perloff. Hey, Paul,

0:46:30.850 --> 0:46:34.009
<v Speaker 2>who is that substitute teacher you're talking to? I was

0:46:34.030 --> 0:46:35.710
<v Speaker 2>going to say you're very becoming in the sport code.

0:46:36.330 --> 0:46:37.870
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that reminded me. The first time I was ever

0:46:37.930 --> 0:46:42.250
<v Speaker 1>on TV, Paul, I was on with Craig Carton of

0:46:42.410 --> 0:46:45.570
<v Speaker 1>Carton and Boomer. Wow. On local news. And the next day,

0:46:45.670 --> 0:46:48.969
<v Speaker 1>Boomer Sison took 20 minutes making fun of why an

0:46:49.010 --> 0:46:52.150
<v Speaker 1>accountant was talking football. I got back a little bit. Yeah,

0:46:52.390 --> 0:46:54.150
<v Speaker 1>I might not look like an NFL player, but that

0:46:54.170 --> 0:46:56.210
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean I can be like Howie Roseman, the GM.

0:46:56.489 --> 0:46:57.470
<v Speaker 1>I know my football.

0:46:57.650 --> 0:46:59.969
<v Speaker 2>You were elbow patches away from being a professor. Let's

0:46:59.989 --> 0:47:02.110
<v Speaker 2>get to the next one here. Constructive criticism.

0:47:02.489 --> 0:47:02.770
<v Speaker 1>Here we go.

0:47:03.390 --> 0:47:06.339
<v Speaker 2>Should quarterbacks be excluded from the NFL salary cap? Oh, man,

0:47:06.360 --> 0:47:08.319
<v Speaker 2>this is on a T for me. I've been saying

0:47:08.340 --> 0:47:09.600
<v Speaker 2>this for years. You've got to give me this.

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:10.609
<v Speaker 1>This is a Paul take.

0:47:10.700 --> 0:47:12.950
<v Speaker 2>I think there should be a separate quarterback cap, and

0:47:12.989 --> 0:47:15.470
<v Speaker 2>you get $ 50 million to spend on the position of quarterback.

0:47:15.880 --> 0:47:18.020
<v Speaker 2>And blank million, $ 200 to spend on the rest of

0:47:18.040 --> 0:47:20.420
<v Speaker 2>your team. Then when you sign Josh Allen, you don't

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:22.950
<v Speaker 2>have to get rid of all your linebackers. Yes, yes, yes.

0:47:23.090 --> 0:47:24.930
<v Speaker 1>But that will kill parity because if you have a

0:47:25.130 --> 0:47:28.009
<v Speaker 1>quality quarterback of $ 50 million, then you have a big

0:47:28.050 --> 0:47:31.390
<v Speaker 1>advantage over, say, the Cardinals who don't have that $ 50

0:47:31.330 --> 0:47:33.330
<v Speaker 1>million quarterback and just have the same roster.

0:47:33.370 --> 0:47:34.330
<v Speaker 2>Easy with the logic there.

0:47:34.350 --> 0:47:36.689
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're like the NFL. You're like the commissioner Roger Goodell.

0:47:36.710 --> 0:47:39.380
<v Speaker 1>You never think of what the actual consequences are.

0:47:39.750 --> 0:47:41.310
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's get to a little bit of leftovers.

0:47:41.489 --> 0:47:44.610
<v Speaker 2>More constructive criticism tomorrow, but here's a leftover. Red Sox

0:47:44.700 --> 0:47:46.020
<v Speaker 2>pitcher Peyton Tolley.

0:47:47.140 --> 0:47:47.620
<v Speaker 1>I love this.

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:51.299
<v Speaker 2>He hugs Dominic Maison of the Mariners while tagging him out.

0:47:51.660 --> 0:47:53.239
<v Speaker 2>He actually gives him a hug. Watch this clip.

0:47:54.300 --> 0:47:56.319
<v Speaker 1>All right. All right.

0:47:56.780 --> 0:48:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Done a line. Easy out. And hey, bro. How you doing?

0:48:01.940 --> 0:48:04.660
<v Speaker 1>That is friendly competition. That is right up Not So

0:48:04.700 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Fast's alley. Keep it friendly, bud.

0:48:06.620 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 4>I love that.

0:48:07.080 --> 0:48:10.299
<v Speaker 2>Keep it friendly. Nothing personal. Nice mustache. He looks like

0:48:10.340 --> 0:48:11.220
<v Speaker 2>your neighborhood barber.

0:48:11.500 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. You know one thing I get jealous of baseball players?

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:15.489
<v Speaker 1>When you get down to first base, they always have

0:48:15.530 --> 0:48:17.629
<v Speaker 1>a lovely chat with the base runner and the first base.

0:48:17.670 --> 0:48:19.870
<v Speaker 2>You'd be perfect at first base. You're long, you're rangy,

0:48:19.910 --> 0:48:20.490
<v Speaker 2>and you're affable.

0:48:20.730 --> 0:48:23.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, conversationalist. I can't actually play baseball.

0:48:24.130 --> 0:48:24.609
<v Speaker 2>That would help.

0:48:24.630 --> 0:48:24.989
<v Speaker 1>All right.

0:48:25.050 --> 0:48:26.730
<v Speaker 2>It's time for the feel good. Want to feel good

0:48:26.770 --> 0:48:28.150
<v Speaker 2>before you wrap it up for the day on Not

0:48:28.170 --> 0:48:28.650
<v Speaker 2>So Fast?

0:48:28.710 --> 0:48:29.020
<v Speaker 1>Here we go.

0:48:30.570 --> 0:48:33.930
<v Speaker 2>Tennessee Volunteer Football Program and Dolly Parton. You had me

0:48:33.969 --> 0:48:37.180
<v Speaker 2>at that. Dolly Parton, always big in Tennessee, no pun intended.

0:48:37.739 --> 0:48:41.100
<v Speaker 2>They are going to use the ultimate SEC honor, Dolly

0:48:41.120 --> 0:48:42.780
<v Speaker 2>Parton helmet stickers for the players.

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh, wow. That's so nice.

0:48:44.760 --> 0:48:46.640
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome. I also heard they're going to name the

0:48:46.739 --> 0:48:48.460
<v Speaker 2>airport after her down in Nashville.

0:48:49.219 --> 0:48:52.450
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Does this mean they're going to be better at football? Hopefully.

0:48:52.510 --> 0:48:54.270
<v Speaker 2>I think Tennessee is in good place right now. Their

0:48:54.570 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 2>uniforms are great. But the fact is, like, imagine running

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:59.340
<v Speaker 2>out week two after you had, like, a 200-yard performance,

0:48:59.580 --> 0:49:01.259
<v Speaker 2>and you got a couple of Dolly stickers on your helmet.

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 2>That's cool.

0:49:02.020 --> 0:49:04.100
<v Speaker 1>That is very cool. And then, obviously, have a music

0:49:04.140 --> 0:49:05.180
<v Speaker 1>blasting through the stadium.

0:49:05.280 --> 0:49:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Music blasting through the stadium.

0:49:06.420 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. All right.

0:49:07.050 --> 0:49:09.450
<v Speaker 2>That is it for us. Not so fast. Day two.

0:49:09.570 --> 0:49:10.810
<v Speaker 2>Our buddy Big Cat, great to have him.

0:49:10.830 --> 0:49:12.870
<v Speaker 1>On the show. Ah, Big Cat was awesome. Luckily, he

0:49:12.910 --> 0:49:14.430
<v Speaker 1>did not light Dan Patrick on fire.

0:49:14.450 --> 0:49:16.089
<v Speaker 2>That would have been bad for us and bad for

0:49:16.150 --> 0:49:16.630
<v Speaker 2>our careers.

0:49:16.650 --> 0:49:16.870
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:49:17.150 --> 0:49:19.250
<v Speaker 2>Tune in tomorrow. Not so fast. Every day at noon,

0:49:19.270 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Dan Patrick Show. every day at 9 o'clock a.m. Eastern

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.280
<v Speaker 2>right here on NBC Sports Now. That's it for us. Paps, Perloff,

0:49:25.600 --> 0:49:26.940
<v Speaker 2>talk to you tomorrow. Have a good

0:49:31.320 --> 0:49:34.090
<v Speaker 5>Night.