WEBVTT - The Petrochemicals Shock That's Already Rippling Through Plastics

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the ad Thoughts podcast.

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:28.319
<v Speaker 2>Joe, I have a prop for today, prop episode, a

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 2>visual learning aid for a podcast. I'm going to hold

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 2>this up.

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, what is this? It looks like a magenta marker.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Magenta.

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's pink.

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>It's hot pink's it's like purplish pink. Really, Okay, color

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.000
<v Speaker 2>is beside the point. It is indeed a highlighter. But

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.560
<v Speaker 2>more importantly, it is a result of a complex petrochemicals

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>supply chain.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 3>You're right, it Isgenda is more purplish. I don't know.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I always thought it's a little bit more pinkish. But yes,

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>you're correct, you're you're correct, You're totally correct.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 2>I didn't intend your major takeaway from this conversation to

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the different maga.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but yes, you're right. And without advanced chemicals of

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 3>all sorts and oil and all that, you would never

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 3>have the plastic shell of the marker, and maybe even

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 3>some aspects of what gives it color when you draw

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 3>on something.

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, So what is this plastic casing actually made

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:20.039
<v Speaker 2>of this is a.

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 3>Pop quiz that I definitely have no idea. Okay.

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>It starts from.

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, crude oil, yeah that okay.

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so crude oil distilled into.

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Keep going naphtha, naphtha, right, naphtha.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 2>And then naphtha is this is a hint cracked into

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 2>ethylene or propylene. Yeah, we've actually done yeah, okay, and

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>then it gets polymerized, yeah, into polyethylene, right, and then

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>it gets chopped up into tiny little plastic pellets, which

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 2>are I know, you know this one. What are they

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>called the little plastic pellet? One of my favorite words.

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Go on, nerdles, nerdles. I remember all of this from

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 3>that episode that we did nerdle the.

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 2>Building blocks of highlighters and lots of other plastic products,

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 2>which isles. Okay. So the reason we bring this up

0:02:13.639 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>is obviously there's a situation in Iran. The Straight of

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Horror Moves is still closed. We're recording this on March

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty fourth, and we're starting to see a lot of

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the disruptions in the oil market start to I guess,

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 2>ripple out into other petrochemicals.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:02:30.800 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 3>And someone asked this on a twinter the other day,

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 3>and they were like Joe, or is the higher price

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>of oil gonna impact the price of plastics? And I

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:40.920
<v Speaker 3>was like, I would be very surprised if it didn't.

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I don't really know for sure, but it

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 3>would be very weird. It would be hard for me

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to imagine a scenario in which the key input doesn't.

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 3>The thing that I am very curious about, and you

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:55.720
<v Speaker 3>described a sort of sequential chain of industrial processes from

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the oil to the nerdles, and of course when we

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 3>did the episode, so one of the things that we've

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 3>talked about is that there is a gap between the

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 3>price of some of these end products and the implied

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 3>price of crude oil. So crude oil, I don't know

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 3>exactly where it is right now at this moment that

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 3>we're recording it, but it's shot up, but these end

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 3>products have shot up even more. And our guest Rory

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Johnson had a really good explanation, which is that the

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 3>refineries do not want to shut down, and so they're rationing.

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.119
<v Speaker 3>They're slowing their input, their input because it is very

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 3>costly to shut down and ever restart should they ever

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 3>run out, which is a prospect given that we're seeing

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 3>a volumetric decline and the amount of oil available in

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the world. What I'm curious about, in which I don't

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 3>know the answer, is whether this applies to all of

0:03:42.600 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 3>the different processing steps along the way, which is is

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 3>there this sort of even greater price impact because the

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 3>entities that do all these sequential industrial processes are slowing

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 3>down because the shutdown and restart process is costly for

0:03:58.760 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 3>them as well. Well.

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>I would say the added complication with a lot of

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 2>petrochemicals is we are in fact seeing some closures already.

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.839
<v Speaker 2>So in Asia, we've had a few crackers, as they're

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 2>called Asian crackers, start to shut down their production and

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 2>basically declare force measure, and so we are seeing fewer

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 2>petrochemicals get made in places like Japan and South Korea.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>I think the question we're kind of inching towards is

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:25.839
<v Speaker 2>whether or not this is just going to be a

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 2>question of price, you know, prices for plastics go up,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 2>or an actual supply shortage in the sense that maybe

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 2>you just can't get certain types of plastics or packaging.

0:04:36.800 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>And one other thing I would just add, I think

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 2>in the post COVID environment, an underappreciated driver of inflation

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.840
<v Speaker 2>at that time was the cost of packaging. That's right,

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 2>because we did see the cost of plastics go up.

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 2>And if you think about what you're buying at a

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 2>grocery store, like, Okay, it's a bunch of carrots, but

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 2>it's also a bunch of carrots in a plastic and.

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 3>A plastic bag completely or jar or whatever. And I

0:04:58.000 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 3>would say in a lot of the cases of food

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 3>stuffs in particular, you're mostly paying for the entire supply

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 3>chain and the packaging of it. The actual food value

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 3>is almost dirt cheap if nothing. And so yeah, and

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 3>are we just going to get outright shortages? What other

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.719
<v Speaker 3>ripple effects? I don't think we have any idea. Probably

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:19.000
<v Speaker 3>one of these things that compounds the longer this war

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 3>enclosure goes on.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Many questions that we have, all right, well, I am

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:24.839
<v Speaker 2>happy to say we do, in fact have the perfect

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>guests to talk all things petrochemicals. We're going to be

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:31.040
<v Speaker 2>speaking with Philip Gertz. He is the chemicals and oil

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>analyst over at BNEF and a guy who lives and

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 2>breathes polymers, hopefully not literally.

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 3>Not breathed, hopefully not breathes polymers.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:41.720
<v Speaker 2>All right, Philip, thank you so much for coming on

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 2>a lauds.

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much, Tracy and Joe and sounds are

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 4>we set introduce me with living and breathing polymers. But

0:05:47.960 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 4>I'll take it. I'll take it for sure.

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 2>We're all filled with microplastics now, right, So you're not

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 2>exactly right. So I'm tempted to begin just by asking

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 2>you to kind of list all the petrochemicals affected by

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the strait of hornes moose, sort of like Forest Gump

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 2>style ethylene, propylene, polyethylene. You go on and on and on,

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 2>but just broadly, why don't you tell us about the

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Gulf region and its role in the petrochemicals supply chain.

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.719
<v Speaker 4>Who right, Yeah, lot's to unpack here. So when it

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 4>comes to chemicals at large, let's maybe establish three different categories.

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 4>We have the feed stock, like you already pointed out, Tracy,

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 4>basically you almost don't need me here. But you have

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 4>the crude oil that's turned into NAFTA and liquefied petroleum gas,

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 4>which are butane and propane principally ethane. Those all the

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 4>feedstocks that go into the so called crackers, and the

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 4>crackers turn them in what we call base chemicals. There

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 4>are technically six major based chemicals that come out of this,

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.960
<v Speaker 4>but for the sake of today's discussion, the major focus

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 4>will probably be really around ethylene propylene. If we want

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 4>to get readyfins, we can talk about xylene's parasolline or butydyninge.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 4>But a lot of the really the majority of the

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 4>bulk plastic that we talk about really come from ethylene

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 4>and propylene, and some from parasylene. In terms of polyethylene,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 4>terreftolot or are also more commonly known as polyester. So ethylene, propylene,

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 4>xyolene are turned into polyethylene, polypropylene and into polyethylene terreftolot

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 4>or polyester. Now you have a wide range of really

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 4>different derivative chains. Even within polyethylene, you have a lot

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 4>of subcategories, and within those subcategories of other subcategories. In

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 4>very simple terms, you have a three way division into

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 4>high density polyethylene, low density polyethylene, and linear low density polyethylene.

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't matter too much, but it's good to be aware

0:07:42.080 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 4>of that. When we talk about, well in analyst terms,

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 4>about where the market is moving, we typically look at

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 4>high density polyethylene. What's the supply demand there? Same goes

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.119
<v Speaker 4>for low density. Obviously they have different applications. And also

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 4>within those larger buckets there are a lot of subcategories.

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 4>Now you circle back to the major theme here of

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 4>what's the position of the Middle East Gulf. So within

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 4>those three categories, firstly, the Middle East itself is a

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 4>major ex border of polyethylene, polypropylene, et cetera, et cetera,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 4>especially of polyethylene. And when I say major, let's be

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 4>specific in need polyethylene polyethylene varieties. That's about twelve percent

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 4>of global capacity. Production will be slightly higher thirteen fourteen percent,

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 4>quite a significant chunk. To make that even more explicit,

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 4>if you take those volumes, we're talking about eighteen million

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 4>tons one eighth of production capacity, and Middle Eastern crack

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 4>or Middle Eastern facilities typically run at very high rates

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 4>ninety two hundred percent, so roughly an equivalent amount of production.

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 4>If you take all of that, that's basically as much

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 4>as Europe slash slightly more consumes. So it's a lot right.

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 4>You have those volumes firstly being taken off the market directly,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 4>although a couple of asterisks here because technically polymers are

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 4>export it differently than fuel. They're exported in a solid state,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 4>which means theoretically there should be the possibility of diversion.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 4>That's slightly easier than for oil NAFTA or oil products

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 4>in general. It's big asterisk there. But if you take

0:09:14.640 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 4>all of that off the market, you basically have the

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 4>entirety of what Europe consumes all of the sudden disappearing.

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 4>So that's step number one. Emphasis here on this goes

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 4>especially again for poly ethylene varieties. Polypropylene is slightly lower.

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 4>We're talking about seven ish percent of global production PVC

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 4>polyvinyl chloride, which is used heavily in infrastructure, even lower.

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 4>That's three to four percent styrene, which is another major

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 4>value chain we're talking about against six to seven percent,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 4>so the Middle East in terms of polymers, that's really

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 4>really a poly ethylene story, but not exclusively. So that's

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 4>step number one, the direct polymer exports. Step number two

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 4>is and that I would argue is really where you

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 4>see the biggest impact is on the feed stock side. Again,

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 4>this is something you can subdi into three categories. You

0:10:01.400 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 4>have direct NAFTA exports. You have crude oil exports that

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 4>are then turned into NAFTA amongst others, so the refineries

0:10:07.240 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 4>run on it, and obviously if you have to cut

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 4>refinery rates, you're also going to lose NAFTA output. And

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 4>you have what's again called LPG liquified per toilum gas,

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 4>which I'll just allude to well as LPG from now on,

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 4>but that means probaane buttane. So we have those three

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.839
<v Speaker 4>they almost exclusively go to Asia. And when I say Asia,

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 4>we can go into the nitty gritty details of how

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 4>dependent each individual producer is exactly in those feedstock extremes,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 4>because there are quite huge differences there. But in very

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 4>broad terms, polymer exports, that's twelve percent. If we take

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 4>the NAFTA enough to exports and the crude oil exports,

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 4>and we translate that into how much does ethylene and

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 4>consequently polyethylene production would have to be cut in Asia?

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 4>That's probably around fifteen to seventeen percent of global production.

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 4>So that's really where the predominant hit comes from.

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Now it's fantastic. First of all, quick question on NAFTA,

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 3>is that typically produced where the oil comes from? How

0:11:05.000 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 3>like tight is that it is derived from crude oil?

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it typically right there? Or they're parts of the

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 3>value chain where the oil gets shipped a long way

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:14.839
<v Speaker 3>and then the nafta is produced somewhere else.

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 4>It's basically the latter, or rather it just depends right, Okay,

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 4>the same as as for refineries at large, it just

0:11:20.760 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 4>depends on where your refineries are located. So if you

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 4>look at the Middle East for example, or let's take

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 4>Saudi Saudi produces around ten to eleven million barrels of

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:30.120
<v Speaker 4>crude oil per day. But if I'm not mistaken, it's

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 4>refining capacity is around anywhere betweenty three and four million

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.719
<v Speaker 4>barrels per day. So in that case, it refines a

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.680
<v Speaker 4>relatively small amount of its total production capacity.

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 2>So to Joe's point, why do places like Japan and

0:11:42.600 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 2>South Korea, why do they have, you know, crackers who

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 2>are refining naptha into other polymers at all? Why does

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 2>that make sense for them or is strategically important?

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, history plays a huge role. Japan, next to Europe

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 4>and the US, was really one of the front runners

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 4>of the petrochemical industry. And that's also why at the

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 4>same time, even before all of this happened, Japan was

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 4>also on the front line of losing its chemical industry.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 4>That's another topic we can get into later. But basically

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 4>your question would also be, then why aren't those products

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 4>exclusively produced in the Middle East and den ship the story?

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 2>Why not just import them? Why even bother refining them domestically?

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean it's not only a question of enough

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 4>to per se, right, but Japan also needs jet fuel, diesel, gasoline, etcetera.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 4>So all of those come into one supply chain and

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 4>another asterisk here is the Middle East. Again, the Middle

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 4>East is also a major producer of chemicals. If you

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 4>look at ethylene, for example, the largest by far, Surprisingly

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't need to turn this into a pop quiz,

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:44.199
<v Speaker 4>that's China. That's sixty one million tons of ethylene twenty

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 4>five percent of global capacity then comes to US forty

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 4>four million tons a data by the way, as of

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 4>January twenty twenty six. Provisionally, then you have Saudi Arabia

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 4>seventeen million tons, right, so you already have a huge

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 4>step down here, But Saudi Arabia is the third largest

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 4>producer or in terms of chemical ethylene capacity at least

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 4>then you have Self Korea have thirteen million tons. So

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 4>what I'm getting at here is to midd least already

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 4>Saudi as an example, producers a lot has a lot

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 4>of capacity. But because there are such extraordinary oil producers

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.960
<v Speaker 4>next to chemical producers, and the chemicals they produce locally,

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 4>by the way, are largely gas derived. We can get

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 4>also get into that later. But they do both right

0:13:21.400 --> 0:13:23.720
<v Speaker 4>to export a lot of polymers, a lot of chemicals,

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 4>but they also export a lot of products. It's probably

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 4>a bigger question in terms of the overall oil supply

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 4>chain why companies have chosen to also build out the

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 4>refineries in Japan soft Korea a wether than all in

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East itself.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 3>So Tracy obviously started the conversation showing her hot pink highlight.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 2>How you learned something.

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 3>But like you know, if we have to go for

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 3>a while without making highlighters, or maybe we reduce the

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 3>colors of the highlighters, not the end of the world.

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 3>The world isn't going to come to a screeching end,

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. But I imagine sometimes are a little bit

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 3>higher on the value chain. And so when we talk

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 3>about now, though we talk about some of these other things,

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 3>what end uses would you be most worried about now?

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 3>Because the volume or the capacity numbers that you mentioned

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 3>are pretty substantial. So again, I'm not too worried if

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 3>we go for a few months without making highlighters. What

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 3>are the end use cases that you're watching right now?

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 3>They're like, oh, this could be a real problem.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh you guys had podcasts on fertilizers on this stay. Yeah,

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 4>that's right, it's a very similar story. My main concern,

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 4>without a doubt, would be food packaging. I am not

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 4>aware of any fungible products for polyethylene to be used

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 4>at the same scale for food packaging as well polyethylene,

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 4>so I do not know whether it is a viable alternative.

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Maybe there is, and I'm just ignorant about it, But

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 4>to me, without a doubt, food package and packaging at large.

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 4>It's very cliche to take your own topic and talk

0:15:04.160 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 4>about how incredibly important it is to modern day society.

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 3>But I mean, this is the complexity of modern day society.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 3>This is actually a very important point. Is a joke,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 3>and it's like everyone jokes is like, oh, what I

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>do is the chase is the key thing holding modern

0:15:20.360 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 3>day society together. They're not wrong. They're okay, podcasting, maybe not,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 3>but like they're not wrong, Like any one of these

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 3>things go and the whole thing goes that was the

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 3>less absolute COVID. So you're not absolutely so take the

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 3>take the credit. You're at the center of the world

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 3>right now. So yeah, all right, talk about food packaging

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and what you're worried about.

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, food packaging, packaging at large. I'm less worried about,

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 4>let's say, infrastructure projects, right because if you take let's

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 4>say high density poly ethylene and polyvinyl chloride, a lot

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 4>of them go into infrastructure projects. Hence why you could

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 4>see in India, for example, since twenty eighteen twenty nineteen,

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 4>huge search in those chemicals demand, especially high density poly ethylene,

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 4>because they were incredibly large infrastructure projects, especially on water pipelines,

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 4>if I'm not mistaken, goes into that still incredibly important.

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 4>But if we talk about meeting really the urgent tasks

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 4>of the day, which is making sure that everybody has

0:16:06.840 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 4>access to their basic needs, I find it very hard

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 4>to see how value chains can be constructed or how

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 4>a shortage of polyethylene or other plastics can be circumvented,

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 4>especially poly ethylene near I'm concerned about because of the

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 4>disproportioned impact. And we briefly touched upon Hey, if twelve

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:28.840
<v Speaker 4>percent of polymers are cut off, polymer exports from the

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Middle East and the feed stocks are cut off. But

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 4>that's only a part of the story. There are many

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 4>angles here to take overall impact obviously, without a doubt,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 4>will be sizeable. How sizable time will tell. But I

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.320
<v Speaker 4>cannot think of alternatives to the problem we would be facing,

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 4>which is packaging, getting stuff from A to B, making

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 4>sure that stuff is conserved. So if anybody knows in

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 4>the audience, please let us know in the commons. Yeah

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 4>to learn.

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 2>So okay, on that note, what are we seeing now

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 2>in terms of poly ethylene availability? So I mentioned that

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 2>we have seen some crackers in Asia who have had

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to reduce their refining output. Are we seeing prices start

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 2>to rise? Are we seeing outright shortages? What are you

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 2>observing in the market so far?

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 4>So I would kick this off by saying that everything

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 4>happens with a significant delay, and especially now, voyages from

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East Gulf to South Korea Japan take about

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.159
<v Speaker 4>eighteen to twenty five days, and while we're kind of

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 4>now entering that period. So if you look at crude

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 4>oil imports that went to South Korea, for example, you

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 4>could see them still spiking in the second week of March,

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 4>just because a lot of ships departed in late February,

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 4>whether or not in anticipation of this happening, but there

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 4>is a spike in the second week of March, so

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 4>on a physical side, to me, it seems we have

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 4>seen comparatively little impact yet I think most of this

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 4>will really materialize around early April, and from there on

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 4>it gets worse pretty quickly. Also one importance note here,

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 4>and people can again pitch in in the comments, but

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 4>polyethylene markets are relatively opaque when it comes to the

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.640
<v Speaker 4>exact availability. So we talk a lot about run rates

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 4>even demand. Right, One very cliche topic that's regurgitated a

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 4>lot is demand in Europe is lookwarm. But if you

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 4>look at apparent demand, which is trade plus some production

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 4>run rate assumptions that are reasonable and based on company statements,

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 4>you see that demand is pretty stable. So my point

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:27.960
<v Speaker 4>here is that demand, how much is consumed in the

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.640
<v Speaker 4>first place, is a relatively obscure topic in the world

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 4>of polyethylene and plastics, because if you look at what

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 4>polyethylene consumption means, you have a lot hundreds thousands per

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 4>market of small plastic converters. They take those pellets and

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.680
<v Speaker 4>they turn them into usable plastics. And to me, it

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 4>seems that data collection there may not be as well

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 4>developed as for let's say, oil refiners. Or maybe I'm

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 4>just ignorant about it, but that's been my observation so

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 4>far in the industry that demand numbers are hard to

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 4>get by. So, circling this back to where we're at

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:02.399
<v Speaker 4>right now, three four weeks into this scenario, i'd be

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 4>careful with any concrete data points you're seeing, or any

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 4>general statements about demand being down, about supply being cut

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 4>force measures. For sure, we've seen an incredible high amount

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 4>of statements of production being cut. We can also get

0:19:14.960 --> 0:19:17.959
<v Speaker 4>into the details of which markets how much. But if

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 4>you look at across Asia, you've had about thirty to

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 4>forty crackers probably that have made statements in one way,

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 4>shape or form quite often though that just pertains to

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 4>production curtailments and not per se a full shutdown or

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 4>force measures, meaning that they cannot guarantee that they can

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 4>supply their contractors with whatever the contract stipulates. Very long story,

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 4>slightly less long. So far, my take is the impact

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 4>has been relatively limited on the material front, we have

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.240
<v Speaker 4>seen price increases by the way, especially on the NAFTA

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 4>front in Asia, but I would be very surprised if

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 4>this does not deteriorate very significantly over the next two

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 4>to three weeks.

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 3>By the way, I genuinely wasn't sure about this. There

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 3>is polyethylene futures the trade on the dally On Commodity Exchange.

0:20:04.600 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 3>We have quotes on this. You could see they're traded

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 3>in lots of five metric tons so in USD and

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 3>in the beginning of the year it looks like they

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 3>were trading at around nine hundred and twenty five dollars

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 3>for five metric tons of polyethylene. Now around thirteen hundred dollars,

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 3>so the price has already surged massively. I'm curious though,

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:33.480
<v Speaker 3>like when we think about the market for some of

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.960
<v Speaker 3>these chemicals that you track, how much is it sort

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 3>of open liquid markets versus long term contracts, et cetera,

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 3>that you know, sort of dark prices that the public

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 3>would never see because it's an arrangement between a producer

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 3>and a specific buyer, et cetera, versus more clearing house model.

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 3>Like talk to us about pricing transparency that we have

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 3>in this market.

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Ooh yeah, I love it. Just quick disclaimer here, there's

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 4>subtopics that I know more of and our topics that

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:03.720
<v Speaker 4>I know less about. This falls into the category of

0:21:03.800 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 4>the latter. But to my understanding, when it comes to

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 4>prices and contracts in the polymer markets, the vast majority

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 4>is stipulated by our contracts, although they're typically relatively short

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 4>lived on a monthly quarterly basis. That's observation. I may

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 4>be wrong, and in terms of the spot market, they're

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 4>relatively small, but the spot market is real. But the

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 4>spot market is usually where you see those price distortions

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 4>firstly showing up right, And when it comes to the

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.719
<v Speaker 4>first three to four weeks, especially, this week has been

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 4>relatively This week actually had quite a phenomenon because I

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 4>just checked the prices an hour ago and I was

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 4>surprised by polyethylene in East Asia apparently stagnating over the

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 4>past week, which to me, either something is wrong with

0:21:47.480 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 4>the prices that I was looking at or some of

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 4>my theoretical underpinnings are slightly off. So I'm curious about

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 4>that for the next couple of days.

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 2>Last weeks, didn't that happen during COVID as well? Wasn't

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.679
<v Speaker 2>there a big arbitrage between like polyethylene prices in Europe

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and the US versus Asia. There seem to be these

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 2>regional differences one hundred percent.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 4>It depends on which part of the value chain you

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 4>look at and whether you're looking at margins, which is

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.119
<v Speaker 4>what most companies are really curious about, right, how much

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 4>profit can I actually make out of this versus prices. So,

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.919
<v Speaker 4>if you talk about polyethylene prices, for example, they're comparatively

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 4>low in Asia compared to Europe. The US is also low,

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 4>but the US also only pays a fraction of deproduction

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.720
<v Speaker 4>costs because US is ethane or gas based, Asia and

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 4>Europe are largely NAFTA based. And the reason, by the way,

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 4>it is an important asterisk, almost going into a side tentionineer,

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 4>but it's very common within our industry to talk about

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 4>how ethane gas based production is more competitive, is cheaper.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 4>But one of the principal reasons why this is the

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 4>case is because you only need one point two tons

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 4>of ethane to produce one ton of ethylene, whereas if

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 4>you produce ethylene vi enofta, you need about three point

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.239
<v Speaker 4>two tons of nafta. So you just need a lot

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 4>more feed stock, and obviously you get a lot of byproducts.

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:01.400
<v Speaker 4>But then for NEFTA ranking in Europe and Asia, their

0:23:01.440 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 4>competitiveness also hinges a lot on what the price movements

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 4>are of those byproducts.

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Just as a side note, by the way, I'm looking

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 3>at the European naphtha swap of this trades in the

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:17.240
<v Speaker 3>NYMEX that is at eight hundred and forty two dollars

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 3>per metric ton right now, but that was around four

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.439
<v Speaker 3>hundred and ninety six at the beginning of the year.

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 3>So all of these different chemical polymers that you're talking

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 3>about massive spikes obviously in the Big spike obviously since

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 3>the start of the war. What does it mean when

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 3>force measure is declared? What is that actually entail?

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 4>You tell me, no, it depends a lot. Usually, again,

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 4>we like to talk a lot in certain terms. I

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.560
<v Speaker 4>think a force measure colloquially is implied to mean, oh,

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 4>production is fully cut. It kind of depends. So to

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 4>give you one concrete example, OK, one, what chemicals in

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 4>China has, amongst otter is two very large crackers two

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 4>point two million tons in two total in Yuantai, Shandong region,

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 4>hopefully not butchering the pronunciation too much. They declared force

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.560
<v Speaker 4>measure for their supplies to the Middle East. So I

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 4>looked at this and I was what does this mean?

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 4>So you dig further, try to find something specific. The

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 4>only thing I could find publicly announced is they're declaring

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 4>force measure on their supplies to the Middle East, which

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 4>to me was very interesting because in the first place,

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 4>very few Chinese producers are suppliers to the Middle East

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 4>of certain chemicals in the first place. So the bottom

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:28.679
<v Speaker 4>line here being that when you read force mature, at

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 4>least that's what I'm doing. If I don't find anything specific,

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 4>it's a big question mark, and I usually assume it

0:24:35.720 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 4>means reduced run rates. Question is then also by how

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 4>much kind of a floor for a lot of crackers

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 4>is fifty to sixty percent of their total capacity? Below that,

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 4>it quite often is said it gets uneconomical. But it

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 4>is a big question mark to me at least.

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 3>So this came up in the context of jet fuel.

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 3>But the sort of the implied barrel price of jet

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 3>fuel is higher than what a barrel of oil is

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:59.840
<v Speaker 3>trading for right now because of this dynamic where there

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 3>are finers are running slow because it's costly to actually

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 3>have to straight up shut down. Can you talk about

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 3>that in the context of some of these chemicals. Does

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 3>the same phenomenon apply that it is a very costly

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 3>business choice to actually shut down the refinery? And do

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 3>we see a widening spread between where the price of

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 3>oil is right now in the implied price of oil

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 3>by the end product price.

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's a great question. If I'm not mistaken. The

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.280
<v Speaker 4>spread has increased a lot over the past three weeks. Okay,

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:31.520
<v Speaker 4>both in Europe and in Asia, but especially NAFTA price

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 4>in Asia have searched. So here the following hypothesis. To me,

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 4>it seems based on what we've talked about earlier, how

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 4>chemicals are used, with a lot of it going into packaging.

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 4>And let's define actually how much. So polyethylene consumes about

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 4>sixty to seventy percent of ethylene, which again is the

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 4>main product that we're getting from NAFTA cranking. So let's

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 4>just say close to more than a half of NAFTA

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 4>in one way, shape or form is used for polyethylene

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 4>and those type of chemicals that are used for hankeraging.

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 4>So half of it is pretty much dictated ish by

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 4>the packaging sector own reality is more complicated than maybe

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 4>we can cut it to one third or so. It's

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 4>a huge chunk right away. And to me, again, dead

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 4>sector seems pretty non fungible. It's very hard to really

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 4>destroy a lot of demand within an industry. If we

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 4>talk about jet field des on gasoline, on the other hand,

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 4>we can introduce Carlos Sundays, we can introduce or people well,

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.680
<v Speaker 4>at the end of the day, if flight tickets just

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 4>become too expensive.

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Side to another flights this period.

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 4>So to me, it seems that diesel gasoline and jet

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 4>fuel have more wiggle room for demand destruction. Thanta, That's

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 4>my current hypothesis. And again maybe I may be proven

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 4>wrong on that, because it's also the first time for

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:44.680
<v Speaker 4>me being in such a scenario, and I mean for

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 4>all of us in a way. But so when it

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 4>comes to the spread between crude oil and AFTA for

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 4>both Asia and Europe, my expectation is that, well, the

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 4>argument seems to be very strong that death will increase

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 4>over the next week's potentially months enough. A big question

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 4>also that I'm just throwing into the room is how

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:07.320
<v Speaker 4>viable is it for refiners to actually shift more toward

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 4>NAFTA production, both from an economical and just engineering perspective, right,

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 4>because within the industry we often talk about those things

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 4>as a given NAFTA production is kind of fixed, which

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 4>to an extent is true, but also not true at

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 4>a certain point. And maybe there are some chemical engineers

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 4>here that note is better than I do. But at

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 4>a certain point, it may even become feasible to switch

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 4>some road fuel production toward NAFTA production if in the

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 4>demand destruction on gasoline becomes stronger.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 2>Enough to I want to go back to you mentioned

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 2>China for a second, and I remember seeing headlines about

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 2>China's petrochemical boom and worries about a glut in the market,

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 2>and I think some of those headlines were like two

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 2>months ago, Yeah, can China pick up some of this production?

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I assume it's getting some naphtha from I would guess

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Russia or Iran at this point, Like what's going on there?

0:27:57.600 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Big question? Short term? No, short term minus if you

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 4>would have a lot of production within refined be shifting

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 4>away from gasoline to NAFTA minus de scenario, And again

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:11.879
<v Speaker 4>I don't know how technically feasible that is. Or economically

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 4>for a lot of refiners. But other than that, I

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 4>don't see any possible way where you could compensate for that, right,

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 4>because let's be specific, So we're talking about again assuming

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 4>a full disruption here we talk about roughly seventeen to

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 4>eighteen million tons disappearing from the Middle East. We talk

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 4>about South Korea, Japan, so major Asian players, to be specific,

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 4>we have South Korea first, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, India, Thailand

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:43.560
<v Speaker 4>and Malaysia and Indonesia. Those I think should be eight. Now,

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 4>if you take them together, they probably have an ethlene

0:28:47.240 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 4>production capacity of around forty five million tons ISH. So

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 4>China and them together is about one hundred million tons,

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>China sixty million, those others about forty million together. Out

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 4>of this forty million depending on again what happens, but

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 4>probably weren't thirty million. You could potentially discard is it.

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Don't quote me on that exact number, but just to

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 4>give a ballpark, right, I don't see any possible way

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 4>how you could compensate for that. You have some wiggle

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 4>room because some cracking facilities were operating at lower rates.

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.719
<v Speaker 4>You can compensate there in the US especially, But if

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 4>you assume, for example, that the US was running at

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 4>about eighty five percent before and they would go all

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 4>the way up to ninety five hundred percent now, so

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 4>ten to fifteen percent difference. That's about four to six

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 4>million tons added. So that's basically one tenth of what

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 4>more one eighth of what would be lost in the

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 4>most extreme scenario. And when it comes to China, the

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 4>thing is that those crackers are large projects. They take time,

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 4>and the world at large had an incredible, incredibly large

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 4>pipeline for twenty twenty six, which is ironic and which

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 4>is why I emphasized polyethlene so much, because the amount

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.640
<v Speaker 4>of projects like World Skill projects that are very well

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 4>covered and no uncertainty about whether they would come online

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 4>or not until now there were set to come and

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 4>now they seem largely either off the table or a

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 4>big question mark. So I don't see anyway in the

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 4>short term to compensate for such an extreme shortfall if

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 4>that were really to manifest to the utmost extent.

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 2>That's a really good example of how these short term

0:30:15.560 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 2>disruptions can linger for years and years and years. Okay,

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:20.400
<v Speaker 2>one other question on trying to fill the gap in

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 2>supply what about recycling existing plastics. I mean, we've been

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>told for years and years and years the world is

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 2>a wash in plastics. Like, okay, let's do something with that.

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's an excellent question. I don't see why recycling

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 4>should not get a major boost from this. If this

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 4>persists to me, that seems like a very reasonable solution.

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 4>There are obviously a lot of asterisks where recycling as

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 4>its own fair share of complications in terms of having

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 4>to firstly distill the different types of streams. You also

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 4>need production facilities for this, which also again needs time

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 4>to be built. I'm oddly unaware of the existing utilization

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.160
<v Speaker 4>rate or of the utilization rates of existing recycling facilities, but.

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 2>Which tells you something about the importance of recycling intromic

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 2>chemical analyst career.

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 4>But yeah, exactly right, it's very much under fringes. I

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 4>very peripherally aware of it. But when I think about

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 4>recycling facilities that I read on more anecdotally, they're usually

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 4>in the range of a couple of tens of thousands

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 4>to maybe one hundred thousand tons per year of production capacity,

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 4>which compares to a world scale cracker that's usually one

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 4>to two million tons. Right, so that's an order of

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 4>magnude lower. That's said, if you look at the total

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:34.040
<v Speaker 4>share of global polymers that are in circulation that come

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 4>from recycling, I find it hard to give an exact number,

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 4>but maybe one tenth or so because it depends on

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 4>the substream. And again it's not my forte per se.

0:31:42.880 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 4>It's a reasonable amount, and I could definitely see, especially

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 4>within the timeframe of a couple of months, that this

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 4>would gather a lot of speed or it would become

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.480
<v Speaker 4>priority to fill some gaps somewhere. But again it probably

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 4>falls short very significantly from really fixing the problem.

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 3>When we did a recent episode about natural gas, one

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 3>of the winners, at least in the short term was coal,

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 3>and that contries that can't get natural gas, they're gonna

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 3>turn to coal for energy, And you see coal prices

0:32:29.600 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 3>creeping up. What about cold liquefaction? And in the short

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 3>or medium term, I mean, you could turn coal into oil.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 3>The Germans did that during World War Two and that's

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 3>still a thing. Can that in the medium term be uh,

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 3>just derive our plastics from coal?

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Medium term? Sure, but I don't think medium term is

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 4>the problem here. Yeah, if we define medium.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:51.959
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I guess right, right, that's not gonna help us,

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.120
<v Speaker 3>right if we but like you know, if we say,

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 3>like you know, this is gonna re shape, like you know,

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 3>like the longer that this goes on, and we don't

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 3>know how long that this is going to go on,

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 3>could call at some point in the short to medium

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 3>term be part of the solution for the origin of

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 3>our plastic beautiful question.

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 4>I think the bigger questionnaire is well twofold. Firstly, if

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 4>this continues, will it reshape how the global chemical industry works?

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 4>And the second part is maybe have you already reached

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.520
<v Speaker 4>that point? Because I think even if things were to

0:33:26.640 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 4>quote unquote normalize, whatever that may mean right now, I

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 4>think one major problem that we face is that the

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.080
<v Speaker 4>perceived risk of passing through the strait of hormoos has changed,

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 4>and a lot of Asian producers were already on the

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 4>cusp of closing their business, and by a lot of

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 4>means South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, especially if you take

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 4>them together we talk about soufth Korea has thirty million tons,

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Japan six million tons, Singapore and Taiwan both three to

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 4>four million tons, so collectively close to thirty million tons.

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 4>It's a lot. Not all of it was said to

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 4>be closed, but to me, if I looked at the fundamentals,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 4>it seemed reasonable to assumed that by twenty thirty, about

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 4>thirty to fifty percent of this could disappear.

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 3>So wait, sorry, why very long story short?

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Because the overcapacity that was in the pipeline, especially for polyethylene,

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 4>was so severe that the case was very hard to

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 4>make for some units to stay in business.

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 4>My hypothesis here is that what's happening currently their increased

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 4>perception of risk through the strait of harmons for an

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.359
<v Speaker 4>industry in a market that was already perceived to be well,

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 4>really going downhill pretty much could really lead a lot

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 4>of facilities to just close down over the next couple

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 4>of months quiet, and I would be very surprised if

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 4>that does not happen. Then the question becomes what happened? Well,

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 4>two questions here, firstly, what happens afterward if things indeed normalize,

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 4>and then secondly, for the entire pipeline that exists for

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the next four to five years, A lot of it

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 4>was also in Asia or the Middle East and hinged

0:34:50.880 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 4>on feedstocks coming from the Middle East, what happens to

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 4>that and to go full circle here into your cold quest,

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:02.800
<v Speaker 4>that's something I looked into and that I wondered. So

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 4>to put it into perspective, China right now has sixty

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 4>million tons of ethylene capacity. Roughly fifty million tons of

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 4>this is oil or gas based, so it comes from cracking.

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:17.200
<v Speaker 4>Ten million tons comes from coal okay slash methanol. Side

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:20.360
<v Speaker 4>note here also that because how it works is that

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 4>coal is converted to methanol, which is then converted to

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 4>ethylene or propylene. Methanol is also imported from the Middle East,

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 4>so that could also cut into that production there. But

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 4>when it comes to coal, it would need a really

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.800
<v Speaker 4>huge push. So now we have ten million tons of ethylene,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 4>we have another roughly three to four million tons in

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 4>the pipeline because China has been revitalizing that already before

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 4>the war. But the push again would be extremely significant.

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.759
<v Speaker 4>You would be talking about basically three to four fold

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.520
<v Speaker 4>quadrupling the sector over the next couple of years, right,

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:54.839
<v Speaker 4>which in theory could happen, especially for a country such

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 4>as China, which has proven in the past time and

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 4>time again that it's very much capable of completely reva

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.800
<v Speaker 4>being industries. But it would be a big push. I

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 4>think what's more likely to happen is three things. So firstly,

0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:12.120
<v Speaker 4>renewed again also depends obviously on how long the supplying

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 4>disruption is, but I think we're well on our way.

0:36:14.200 --> 0:36:18.520
<v Speaker 4>I think one renewed interest in the Western hemisphere, using

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 4>Western hemisphere here more broadly, because I would say for

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 4>the US there's also a couple of asterisks in terms

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 4>of the political environment where that is not considered to

0:36:26.400 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 4>be too volatile. That out of the way, though, if

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:32.840
<v Speaker 4>you talk about chemicals and the potential there, there was

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 4>a significant slowdown because of this overcapacity. But US producers

0:36:37.000 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 4>right now are having a heyday, and even if this

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 4>does not continue for a long time, I think again

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 4>that this heightened risk, or this heightened perception of risk

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 4>at hormos, really shifts a lot of production potentially to

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.320
<v Speaker 4>the US. So I'd be surprised if you would not

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 4>see a lot of renewed interest in US ethane, in

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:55.920
<v Speaker 4>US chemicals.

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:58.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this was going to be my next question. Actually,

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 2>So I'm looking at a chart right. This is going

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 2>back to the beginning of our conversation. So this is

0:37:05.080 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 2>a chart of sensitivity of different oil or fuel products

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:11.120
<v Speaker 2>to demand destruction.

0:37:11.520 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm cheating, like on an exam. You can't see it.

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm in the studio. I'm leaning over and looking at

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Tracy's Lovetimes like I needed to get a look at it.

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>So it actually it has now, JP Morgan, Yeah, so

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 2>it has. You know, jet fuel is pretty sensitive because,

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 2>as we were talking about earlier, if the price of

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 2>jet fuel goes up, flights tend to get curtailed. It

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 2>also says that NAPA is pretty sensitive. And one of

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the reasons NAPA apparently is sensitive is because if prices

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 2>for NAP that go up, then petrochemical plants can substitute ethane,

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:47.040
<v Speaker 2>which it seems we're starting to see. I'm also reading

0:37:47.040 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 2>a Bloomberg sty I'm doing my research for this episode. Wow,

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 2>we're in the middle of the episode. But regardless of that,

0:37:52.560 --> 0:37:55.960
<v Speaker 2>there's a Bloomberg story that saying that US producers of

0:37:56.000 --> 0:38:00.800
<v Speaker 2>polyethylene are buying more ethylene to make plastics. What's the

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 2>substitutability of ethane versus naphtha? Because you touched on this earlier,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 2>but I really want to drill down on this point.

0:38:09.360 --> 0:38:13.120
<v Speaker 4>Not very high. Okay, So two things here I realized

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I like making a lot of lists without completing them.

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:16.719
<v Speaker 4>But maybe you can get full circle on the other

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 4>topics later. But on this two things. So first is

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 4>just technical substitution. So the furnaces that are used for

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.759
<v Speaker 4>ethane and NAFTA, they're pretty different in a lot of

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 4>ways that they're configured, So switching between those two is

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.399
<v Speaker 4>pretty difficult, very specifically. One major problem is the type

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 4>of products that you get from both, right, So if

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 4>you crack ethane, you principally only get ethylene in notable amounts,

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 4>Whereas if you crack n after you get ethylene, you probolene,

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 4>you get butted eye, and you get.

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Benzy byproducts you mentioned earlier.

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:47.319
<v Speaker 4>Exactly right, and they need to be separated. And there

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 4>is a whole post this cracking section for that that

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 4>just vastly differs for enough to cracker versus ethane. I

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 4>think one common point of confusion is, so you have

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 4>three major oil or gas EATUX streams, you have NOFTA,

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.400
<v Speaker 4>you have LPG and ethane, And I would group LPG

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 4>and ENOUGHTA as being more together than alpg and ethane,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 4>despite the fact that LPG and ethane are colloquially kind

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 4>of referred to as being gas based, but LPG also

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:17.839
<v Speaker 4>gives a lot of byproducts, so the substitution possibility there

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 4>is higher than for ethane. And also if you just

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 4>look at the practicality of it, they're comparatively outside of

0:39:24.040 --> 0:39:26.319
<v Speaker 4>the US and the Middle East, they're not that many

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.960
<v Speaker 4>crackers that use ethane, and if they use ethane, they

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 4>typically fully use ethane, not exclusively. There are some exceptions,

0:39:32.360 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 4>such as I think the one Hua Chemical Untie cracker

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 4>that I mentioned earlier one of those actually runs partially

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 4>on ethane partially on NOFTA. But typically if a cracker

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:43.240
<v Speaker 4>fully runs on ethane, it fully runs on ethane, whereas

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 4>for a lot of NAFTA crackers they play around with

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:47.880
<v Speaker 4>the LPG share depending on the price movements.

0:39:48.360 --> 0:39:51.239
<v Speaker 3>I've learned a lot from this conversation. I would be

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.719
<v Speaker 3>lying if I didn't say that. You know, I'm gonna

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 3>have to go back and look at what some of

0:39:57.280 --> 0:40:00.040
<v Speaker 3>these things are whatever, But just to help me we

0:40:00.320 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 3>conceptualized with some of these things are. I remember from

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:07.399
<v Speaker 3>a Liberation day the trade fights in twenty twenty five.

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 3>One of the few things that the US exports to

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 3>China in mass other than soybeans, is ethane. I don't

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 3>know what is it? Can you just explain that? Why

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 3>do we have a lot of extra ethane? Why does

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 3>China need to get it from a lot of US?

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 3>And what does it go into?

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.319
<v Speaker 4>It all depends on what we mean by a lot.

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:27.839
<v Speaker 4>That's a very relative term.

0:40:28.719 --> 0:40:32.080
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't know that about half of all US exports

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 3>of ethane, which is extracted from US shell guests, which

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 3>probably explains why we have a lot head to China.

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 3>So they what's the deal with that?

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? So firstly, that mainly comes because the US is

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 4>a very large producer of shell gas, which yields a

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of ethane LPG. And because the US has will

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:53.759
<v Speaker 4>basically exceed it in its LPG ethane production what it

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 4>domestically needs, it has started to export a lot and

0:40:57.200 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 4>that's still ongoing. We still have some new terminals coming

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 4>up in twenty twenty six and beyond it will increase

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 4>the capacity for LPG and ethane to be exported. But

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 4>the reason why I answered this question skeptically initially is

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 4>because if you look at a total volumes you talk

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 4>about China, if I'm not mistaken, in twenty twenty five

0:41:14.760 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 4>imported around five or six million tons of ethane and

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:21.520
<v Speaker 4>you can make one around five to six million tons

0:41:21.560 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 4>of ethylene from that, which is about ten percent of

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 4>China's production capacity, right, So is that a lot kind

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:27.120
<v Speaker 4>of ishi?

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 3>So there's kind of a lot relative to US industry,

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 3>but it's not really a lot of the grand scheme

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:36.920
<v Speaker 3>of how much China is using and produced.

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:39.560
<v Speaker 4>And even for the US, this is probably if we

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 4>convert this into into barrels per day, it's probably around

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.959
<v Speaker 4>two hundred to three hundred thousand barrels per day, which

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 4>is which.

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:48.759
<v Speaker 3>Even this article I'm saying says about half of all

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 3>US exports of ethane go to China, which means this

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:55.600
<v Speaker 3>is just a fraction of total ethane production.

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 4>In the US exactly. Okay, So that's I think the

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.440
<v Speaker 4>entire ethane story is relatively if I can use the

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 4>word over hyped, because I think if you just re

0:42:04.200 --> 0:42:07.280
<v Speaker 4>read the articles, it seems like there's a huge wave

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.479
<v Speaker 4>of new ethane crackers in Europe and in Asia, et cetera.

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 4>But if you really double down on which facilities they are,

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:14.560
<v Speaker 4>and in Europe it's one, it's project.

0:42:20.080 --> 0:42:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the ethane hype ends now.

0:42:22.120 --> 0:42:23.640
<v Speaker 4>I think, by the way, by the way, you guys

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:25.239
<v Speaker 4>to actually finish one of my lists. Because I was

0:42:25.280 --> 0:42:27.880
<v Speaker 4>mentioned earlier how there are two points on us and

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:30.719
<v Speaker 4>ethane and how much flexibility there is there. I think

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:33.600
<v Speaker 4>another thing is just production volumes dead goes up, but

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:36.760
<v Speaker 4>it goes up steadily. To me, it seems very unlikely

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 4>that production could search by that much that you could

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 4>really substitute for any notable amounts. So that's the second

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 4>point on ethane substituting for NEFTA. There's just there are

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.879
<v Speaker 4>limited supplies for now that can go up, but also

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:49.640
<v Speaker 4>that takes time.

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I have an informal gauge of how bad things are,

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 2>and it's the sort of cocktail party question type thing.

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 2>But you know, when we're going out and speaking to

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 2>people now as a petrochemicals analyst, how many people are

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 2>starting to actually get very interested in the future of

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 2>plastics and maybe get very worried when they talk to you.

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:13.439
<v Speaker 4>Both To assume I go out and speak to people,

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.640
<v Speaker 4>we'll stop there, no pooh, I think the conversations have changed.

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean more on an informal note here, right, because

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 4>I've been in the industry for four years, Like I

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:26.799
<v Speaker 4>mentioned oil more broadly, two years in petrochemicals, two years

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:29.919
<v Speaker 4>during the first two years, and maybe that was also

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.439
<v Speaker 4>more than sidegeist. Back then twenty twenty two to twenty

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty three, a lot of the conversations were about the

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:39.680
<v Speaker 4>morality of working as an oil analyst. But now a

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 4>lot of that has dissipated, Or maybe I just don't

0:43:42.000 --> 0:43:45.000
<v Speaker 4>talk to those people anymore. I'm not sure, but I

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 4>think nowadays, people, to my observation, approach those questions a

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 4>lot more practically, and a lot of people are well

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 4>about petrochemicals. I think a lot of people are more

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.360
<v Speaker 4>curious about the baseline understanding of how the industry works,

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.280
<v Speaker 4>if they're curious at all, right, because I mean, quite frankly,

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 4>for a lot I strugg I talk to people from

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.320
<v Speaker 4>time to time, but very rarely actually about petroc chemicals.

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Also because it takes kind of a baseline denominator to

0:44:12.560 --> 0:44:17.840
<v Speaker 4>get into it, and I feel that you need to

0:44:17.880 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 4>bombard the counterparty with a lot of baseline information to

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 4>kind of get to an interesting point, to which I'm like,

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:24.480
<v Speaker 4>they're probably also not that interested in.

0:44:24.600 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Then well, I have one last question, which is just

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 3>tell us about the next several weeks and what are

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:33.680
<v Speaker 3>you looking out for and how bad could it get?

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:35.520
<v Speaker 3>And what is the time frame for that? Give us

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 3>your sort of outlook and telling clients they ask how bad?

0:44:38.480 --> 0:44:41.640
<v Speaker 3>What's going on? And let's suppose we none of us

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 3>know when the war's going to end. It could we're

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.480
<v Speaker 3>recording this March twenty four at nine fifty three am.

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 3>It could end by the time this episode comes out.

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:50.919
<v Speaker 3>But let's just say we don't know the war's going

0:44:50.960 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 3>on in a month. Supposed how what are.

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 4>We looking at? Still one asterisk there, whether the war

0:44:55.840 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 4>continues or not, which we talk about and buyingary terms.

0:44:58.120 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 4>It does not mean that the strait of her moves

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:03.239
<v Speaker 4>will become accessible again. That's just important to So that's

0:45:03.320 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 4>when I look over the next weeks or months. Again,

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:08.400
<v Speaker 4>I usually abstain from giving any political commentary, but to me,

0:45:08.480 --> 0:45:10.880
<v Speaker 4>as an analyst, just looking at baseline assumptions over next

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 4>weeks or months, the assumption that the strait of her

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:15.640
<v Speaker 4>moves will become passable again, to me is very hard

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.560
<v Speaker 4>to make. So that's my first really major takeaway, at

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:22.239
<v Speaker 4>least when I look at my own forecast outlooks, which

0:45:22.280 --> 0:45:26.560
<v Speaker 4>partially have become completely obsolete, I need to overhaul, but

0:45:26.719 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm very inclined to make that assumption, still waiting for

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 4>a couple of days weeks to see how things develop.

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:36.320
<v Speaker 4>But that's my first really major thing that I just

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.000
<v Speaker 4>find the argument that the strait of her moves that

0:45:39.160 --> 0:45:41.759
<v Speaker 4>things returned to normal in terms of shipping incredibly hard

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 4>to make. So point number one. Now, when it comes

0:45:43.719 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 4>to chemicals, firstly spread between NAFTA and crude oil, especially

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 4>in Asia, I expect to search, especially to search in

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 4>early April. The reason being because Asia still has to

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 4>tap into its inventories naught to inventories. They're not a lot,

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:01.200
<v Speaker 4>but they can can cover a little bit of ground.

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 4>We again still have to see the impact of the voyages.

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 4>I think we've just bought that time. We're now entering

0:46:06.640 --> 0:46:09.719
<v Speaker 4>the phase where you really see more material shortages. I

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 4>think all of that will peak in early April, and

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:14.439
<v Speaker 4>then again technically depends on what happens next. That's point

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 4>number one. Point number two, what I'm really looking out

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:20.000
<v Speaker 4>for is any announcements on projects that we're in the

0:46:20.040 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 4>pipeline from China and technically the Middle East, but the

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:26.800
<v Speaker 4>Middle East I have already kind of provisionally done away

0:46:26.920 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 4>with with well, that's probably not going to work out

0:46:29.280 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 4>in twenty twenty six, twenty twenty seven, any projects for

0:46:32.880 --> 0:46:35.839
<v Speaker 4>planned for twenty twenty six. What happens there? Point number three,

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 4>what is China's strategy here at large going forward? Because

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.080
<v Speaker 4>China has in a very interesting position. It's not as

0:46:41.160 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 4>badly affected as Self Creer or Japan, but it still

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:47.640
<v Speaker 4>changes a lot of things because well for a lot

0:46:47.640 --> 0:46:50.480
<v Speaker 4>of new facilities. For example, so China had about twenty

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 4>million tons of new athlete capacity in a pipeline, almost

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 4>all of which coming from cranking, almost all of which

0:46:55.200 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 4>coming from after a lot of which hinging on crude

0:46:58.080 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 4>oil coming from the Middle East. What happens to that?

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 4>That's a big question mark to me, and I'm curious

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:05.280
<v Speaker 4>to see indeed, whether we're going to see a shift

0:47:05.400 --> 0:47:08.439
<v Speaker 4>more toward new call based facilities. I think that would

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:10.279
<v Speaker 4>take a couple of months rather than weeks, but that's

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:12.919
<v Speaker 4>something I'm looking out for. And in the same vein

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 4>two more points, one being Western Hemisphere US where we

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 4>see a research interest in investments, and Western Hemisphere Latin

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 4>America and Bolivia, Peru, Venezuela, which had a lot of

0:47:24.239 --> 0:47:26.320
<v Speaker 4>interest in the chemical industries in the past, but it

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 4>was dropped again. Well, we see a renewed interest there

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 4>and potentially in Argentina with a lot of shell guess.

0:47:32.320 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 4>And then lastly Europe. Europe is very interesting because up

0:47:36.120 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 4>until recently I've been going on and on about how

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 4>your chemical industry is in decline and it was now ironically,

0:47:43.640 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 4>and this is a big topic of debate, but I

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 4>take the stance that all of this is happening very

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 4>much more likely than not is a net benefit for

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:52.880
<v Speaker 4>a lot of chemical producing Europe. And this is a

0:47:52.880 --> 0:47:56.320
<v Speaker 4>big topic to unpack, maybe for another time, but I

0:47:56.360 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 4>would definitely be watching indeed whether this turns out this

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 4>way for European producer.

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Philip Gratz, thank you so much for coming on all thoughts.

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 2>Really enjoyed the conversation. That was a lot of fun than.

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:19.960
<v Speaker 4>Two guys, Joe.

0:48:20.120 --> 0:48:22.880
<v Speaker 2>That was a lot of fun. I always appreciate analysts

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 2>who come with the numbers just memorized right, and just

0:48:26.080 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 2>rattle off like, well there's a difference between production versus capacity, all.

0:48:29.600 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Of that, right, Or there's like okay, South Korea, Malaysia, Japan, Indonesia,

0:48:36.040 --> 0:48:39.200
<v Speaker 3>all right, Singapore, That gets you to forty four million. That. Yeah, Now,

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:42.000
<v Speaker 3>people who can do that, those are the people that

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:45.319
<v Speaker 3>always know their stuff and details matter.

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 2>But the last question you asked about, you know what

0:48:48.520 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Philip is looking out for and his answer. I wrote

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:53.880
<v Speaker 2>about this in the Authoughts News yater yesterday, which is

0:48:53.920 --> 0:48:55.879
<v Speaker 2>why it's on my mind. But like when we're talking

0:48:55.880 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 2>about the closure of the straight of war moves, we're

0:48:58.000 --> 0:49:01.239
<v Speaker 2>basically talking about like the choke point of all choke

0:49:01.320 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 2>points in the global economy, right, And obviously oil is

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:07.719
<v Speaker 2>a big part of that, but as we just learned

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 2>in this episode, so is petrochemicals, so as fertilizer. We've

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:15.279
<v Speaker 2>done previous episodes on that, and so it strikes me

0:49:15.360 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 2>as almost inevitable that people are going to come away

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:20.520
<v Speaker 2>from this experience, no matter how long it goes on

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 2>for with the intention to build out their own capacity

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:28.000
<v Speaker 2>or secure their own supply. And it was interesting even

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:30.719
<v Speaker 2>in a place like Europe, which we tend to think

0:49:30.760 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 2>of sometimes as in structural decline, certainly in terms of

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 2>its chemicals industry, even there, like you could see a

0:49:38.480 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 2>revival as a result of this, even you know, three

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:42.840
<v Speaker 2>weeks worth of disruption.

0:49:43.160 --> 0:49:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I really think this is the main story. It

0:49:45.800 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 3>was the main story before the start of the Iran War,

0:49:48.640 --> 0:49:51.560
<v Speaker 3>and now clearly an accelerant to this story, which is

0:49:51.840 --> 0:49:57.560
<v Speaker 3>just every country wanting to have greater capacity domestically and

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:00.600
<v Speaker 3>to be less reliant on choke point. Look, if we

0:50:00.760 --> 0:50:03.880
<v Speaker 3>knew for a fact that the straight ofform moves was

0:50:03.960 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 3>a going to reopen just as it was a month

0:50:07.040 --> 0:50:10.760
<v Speaker 3>ago in b never close again, how would you possibly

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 3>know that? He's like, oh, we don't need to do anything,

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:15.120
<v Speaker 3>but like, we're in a state we know now that

0:50:15.320 --> 0:50:17.839
<v Speaker 3>like it is closable, we know it's closed. Not only

0:50:17.920 --> 0:50:20.520
<v Speaker 3>do we know that it's closable, we know that it's

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:25.399
<v Speaker 3>closable without a particularly large military effort. That you fire

0:50:25.480 --> 0:50:29.160
<v Speaker 3>a few drones or missiles a day, not even in

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:32.959
<v Speaker 3>a particularly costly effort, and you can bring so many

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:36.719
<v Speaker 3>industries and so many countries and so much activity basically

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 3>to a halt, that fact can never be unknown again. Basically,

0:50:42.080 --> 0:50:45.360
<v Speaker 3>that's sort of what Teleb talks about when he that

0:50:45.480 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 3>is sort of the significant of a black swan. That

0:50:48.600 --> 0:50:51.359
<v Speaker 3>word gets abused a lot because every time an event

0:50:51.440 --> 0:50:54.200
<v Speaker 3>has a black swan. But the key insight where I

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 3>find it actually to be a useful phrase is if

0:50:57.200 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 3>you think all swans are white, and you see a

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.319
<v Speaker 3>black swan, then you know for the rest of your

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 3>life exists. Then you know that they exist. And so

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 3>it is a black swan in the sense that if

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 3>the straight of horror moves can be closed, which is

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 3>something that people have contemplated before with relatively little effort,

0:51:12.960 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 3>you're going to know that the rest of your life.

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 3>And that's going to change planning for the rest of

0:51:16.440 --> 0:51:19.040
<v Speaker 3>your life, and it'll be really interesting to see. It's

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 3>also just interesting, I think his point about how because

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:27.920
<v Speaker 3>of Chinese supply, so many of these Korean, Japanese, et cetera.

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Crackers were already in trouble. Yeah, and now what's going

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 3>to happen there? I mean that is also a really

0:51:34.640 --> 0:51:38.800
<v Speaker 3>big structural shortage, this sort of the milkshake of economic

0:51:38.880 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 3>activity pouring into China relative to everywhere else, So lots

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 3>of things going on at once. Well.

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:49.920
<v Speaker 2>Also the non substitutability of polyethylene, especially package like the

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:52.320
<v Speaker 2>idea that we're not all suddenly going to switch to

0:51:52.840 --> 0:51:56.080
<v Speaker 2>burlap bags and bring our own like wooden crates to

0:51:56.560 --> 0:51:59.640
<v Speaker 2>pick up like beams from the Yeah, I could see

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.040
<v Speaker 2>that being an esthetic choice, but that's not to keep

0:52:02.640 --> 0:52:04.759
<v Speaker 2>so not scalable. All right, shall we leave it there?

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:08.000
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 3>And I'm joll Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:52:14.280 --> 0:52:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand desh O

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.400
<v Speaker 3>Bennett at Dashbot and kill Brooks at Kale Brooks. And

0:52:20.480 --> 0:52:22.839
<v Speaker 3>for more odd Lots content, go to Bloomberg dot com

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:25.320
<v Speaker 3>slash odd Lots for the daily newsletter and all of

0:52:25.360 --> 0:52:27.399
<v Speaker 3>our episodes, and you can chout about all of these

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 3>topics twenty four seven in our discord Discord dot gg

0:52:30.880 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 3>slash od Lots.

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 2>when we talk about nerdles and other followers, then please

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:40.080
<v Speaker 2>leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:52:40.360 --> 0:52:43.000
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:52:43.040 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:52:46.200 --> 0:52:48.239
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is find the Bloomberg channel on

0:52:48.320 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts then follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Bead