WEBVTT - Future of Wildlife Conservation

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, and welcome to Forward Thinking, the

0:00:14.680 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>podcast that looks at the future and says they call

0:00:17.480 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>me the hip Hopopotamus my lyrics or bottomless. I'm Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:22.800 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and I'm this is Forward Thinking. We talked about the

0:00:25.920 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>future of stuff, and today we wanted to talk about

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the future of something that's really near and dear to

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>my heart. Uh, specifically, it's it's wildlife conservation. And uh

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>it's important to talk about this because there's some some

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>rough data out there that suggests that lots of different

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>species maybe in some pretty particular danger. Right. Oh sure,

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>And and we can never say that species are in

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>no danger at all whatsoever. I mean, natural extinct extinction

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>happens all the time. Yes. Well as a great both

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>spirit who talks to me from the clouds once said,

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 1>death is just a part of life. It is, so

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you could never expect to live in a

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 1>world where no species of organisms ever dwindle or go extinct,

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>because extinctions are pretty straightforward consequence of evolution. You know,

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>some uh species are competing for resources. Sometimes some species

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to become ascendant, others are going to go

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on the decline. Sure, if a species fills a niche

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that another species was heading towards, then that other species

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>might be edged out of that ecosystem, right, may go extinct.

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So that there is throughout history, and we can sort

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of infer this from the fossil record and and different

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>clues we have about the history of life on Earth,

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that extinction has pretty much been steady, except there are

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>periods when it sort of goes into overdrive. Oh yeah,

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and these have been happening for a long time, a

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>long time before humans got hundreds of millions of years.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>So you've got the steady ground extinction right where some

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>small number of species on Earth just kind of go

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>extinct every year. But then there are periods where suddenly

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>lots of species go extinct. And these can be bad

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>for multiple reasons that we can get into in a minute.

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 1>But so, what causes these huge extinctions that are usually

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>referred to as mass extinctions. Typically, I think it's it's

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic environmental changes. A lot of cases we don't know

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:29.919
<v Speaker 1>exactly for sure what caused them. We have some pretty

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:34.959
<v Speaker 1>good ideas. Usually it's things like space impacts, geothermal activity

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>or volcanic eruptions or maybe even this is a weird

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:41.120
<v Speaker 1>idea coal fire eruptions. Have you heard about this? So

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just one hypothesis about what could have been partially

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:49.959
<v Speaker 1>responsible for some past extinctions if there were massive eruptions

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of of coal beds on Earth. And then of course

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>simply through climate change too, and climate change can be

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a result of those other things I just mentioned. We

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>should also point out, I mean, I'm sure most of

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>our listeners are aware of this, but mass extinctions. That

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that one day a ton of species just

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>suddenly died out. Mass extinctions can take course over hundreds

0:03:12.720 --> 0:03:15.519
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of years. Act. Yeah. Yeah, Still that that's

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>geologically pretty quick. Sure, geologically it's a blink of an eye.

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>But for you know, a human being, like, it's hard

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for us to to, uh, to reconcile those two things,

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of a bunch of species relatively suddenly

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>in the geological phase, uh going extinct, but in in

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>human life terms, it seems like a really long time. Yeah.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>And so unfortunately a lot of scientists have recently come

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion that we are actually in the middle

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of one of those periods right now what many have

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>referred to as the sixth mass extinction. There have been

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 1>five already and we're currently in another one. Yeah, if

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to hear a whole bunch about this topic,

0:03:56.440 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>our colleague Christian Sager did a video interview with the

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Gizmoto editor in chief Annale Knew It's all about it

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 1>last year at dragon Con, and it's up on the

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>house to works a YouTube channel. We'll try to remember

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to link it on social But but but a few

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of basic facts in brief here. Okay, Well, one

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things is the current extinction rate grossly exceeds

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>what has been referred to as the background extinction rate.

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>So you have this steady, ongoing background extinction rate. When

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>things are normal, you can expect x number of species

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to go extinct every year. According to a May study

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 1>published in the journal Science, the current extinction rates are

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>roughly one thousand times the background rate of extinction. Yeah.

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>That does seem like that's significant. Yeah. Yeah. So, according

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.839
<v Speaker 1>to a claim I found coming from the w WF,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>the Worldwide Fund for Nature or the World Wildlife Fund,

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>it goes by both names, has nothing to do with

0:04:56.880 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>wrestling it's a conservation group. According to their only fourteen

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Living Planet Report, vertebrate species on Earth, So that's going

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to be like, you know, tetrapods, mammals, fish, amphibians, birds

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:19.880
<v Speaker 1>had declined fifty two in the last forty years. What

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that's incredible. Yeah, it's not not a good kind of incredible. No,

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>So what would be a contributing factor to this? I mean, what,

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>what were there conclusions about what might be, you know,

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>causing this this extinction. Well, I think it is a

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:40.679
<v Speaker 1>very common conclusion reached by scientists who study this area

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>that the current mass extinction event is believed to be

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>largely related to human activity. There might be other factors,

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but human behavior is playing a huge role in it.

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>It might be the single most important driving force. And

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>it's not that we're just like eating all the animals,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>no that Yeah, it's not just wrecked extermination or capturing

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of wildlife that that does happen, Like poaching and hunting

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>can play a role. I think what's thought to be

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:13.119
<v Speaker 1>more commonly the problem is the unintended consequences of human

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 1>civilization and behavior, leading to things like humans bringing invasive

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>species and new habitats, or humans destroying habitats, converting converting

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>land into farmland, and you remove the ecosystem that supported

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the various species in that area, cutting down forests, draining swamps,

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>or creating factories that are going to have an impact

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>on the climate. Yeah, and so climate change is also

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be a huge one when you're talking about

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>changing the environmental conditions in the places where these animals live.

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You don't even have to destroy the place where they

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>live if you just maybe make it warmer, or make

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the water more acidic or something like this. These long

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>downstream changes that occur because of global warming that can

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>result in damage to wildlife too. All right, well, let's

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>let's take an example of somebody who doesn't see the

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>value of any particular species of animal. Let's say that.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's say there's uh, some sort of weird

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>amphibian that I'm just not really keen on. It's kind

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of ugly, it makes this loud noise at night. I

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't really mind if it just went away. What is

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the big deal? Yeah, that's a common expression you hear,

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>And I know that's not your feeling, Jonathan, but I

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people have this kind of Oh,

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you know these people trying to get upset over some

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>toad or why are people making such a big deal

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>about some owl? I've never even seen one of these?

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>What does it matter in my life? Even if you

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>are not an animal lover and you don't personally have

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>feelings about, you know, the spotted owl or whatever animal

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.120
<v Speaker 1>it is that's being threatened, this should matter to you

0:07:55.160 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>because loss of biodiversity can potentially cause unpredictable chain reaction

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>effects on ecosystems, which might come to have a great

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>impact on human life, even if you're not a nature lover.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So I just came up with a totally hypothetical, dreamed

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>up example and to show the kind of thing I mean. Okay,

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>let let me hear your example. Okay, So how about

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>let's imagine a bat. It is the strickland reticulated bat

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>like it already, and reticulated of course, meaning has little

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:33.559
<v Speaker 1>netting pattern on its wings. Right, So, strickland reticulated bat.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 1>It goes endangered because humans and its natural range set

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>up a football stadium, and the amplifier system of this

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>football stadium produces ultrasonic frequencies that interfere with the bats

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>echolocation hunting. Nope, the bats can't hunt. They starve and

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>they disappear from the area. So maybe they're either just

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>gone from their former range and they've had to move

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else, or maybe they're totally extinct. The primary food

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of the strickland reticulated bat happens to be insect prey

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>like mosquitoes. Without the bats to control the population of mosquitoes,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the mosquito populations almost immediately spiral out of control. As

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the mosquito populations boom, they expand their range and swarm

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in on the settled locations outside the area, and that

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>includes maybe the football stadium. So they swarm in on

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the sports fans and bite them, suck their blood. It's

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>delicious blood, and I normally I would say it serves

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>those rotten sports fans right for driving out this beautiful

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>creature from the region. However, that would be very shortsighted

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of me to say that, sure it would, because in

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>doing so, what if the mosquitoes happened to bring in

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:50.599
<v Speaker 1>a virus that was previously only present in some reservoir

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>species out in the wilderness where these mosquitoes were previously

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>confined to. Because they were being hunted effectively by the bats. Yeah,

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and this, and this happens a lot. There's a lot

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of animal disease that can transfer to humans from things

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like bats that don't get sick from that disease exactly.

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So imagine there is a mutant strain of hemorrhagic fever

0:10:11.320 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>virus that loves to live in skunks, the mosquitoes, previous

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite blood source. The mosquitoes drink the blood of the skunks,

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:21.599
<v Speaker 1>then they fly to the stadium, drink the blood of

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the humans, spread the skunk fever, and now we're all

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>bleeding out the eyes with skunk fever because we did

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>not care about the bats. So what you're saying is

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:34.559
<v Speaker 1>that by driving out the bats, we have inadvertently caused

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the zombie apocalypse to descend upon us, the bloody eyed

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>zombie apocalypse. Yes, I knew it. Now, I don't want

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to be pinned as a sensationalist, so let me remind

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you I just made this up, and I don't know

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>if that specific scenario could actually happen, but it illustrates

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the type of thing that can happen in ecosystems because

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:59.800
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems are incredibly complex. Even animals within ecosystems that don't

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>interact with one another directly or interdependent in complex ways

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 1>based on other intermediary creatures, and removing one species can

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>set off chain reactions that affect the others. Right. So

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I actually have another example that I can give very quickly.

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>This is when I mentioned in the video about about

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>shark conservation, which kind of served as the inspiration for

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>this more broad approach to the topic. And that is, Uh,

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>if you over fish sharks, and by the way, a

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred million sharks are caught every year in various fisheries,

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>So if you over fish sharks, then you reduce the

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>number of predators in various ecosystems. And in ecosystems that

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>have sea grass, for example, that means the foraging animals

0:11:45.520 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>will have nothing, no predators to to cull their numbers,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and so they'll eat all the sea grass, which is

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>great for one generation of animals, but then there's no

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>more sea grass, so no more generations of those animals

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>are going to be able to use that particular region

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to forage for food, and it's all gone. Yeah, and

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and nothing else that would normally live in that sea

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>grass is going to be able to live there an Yeah, right,

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 1>so you you know, that's why even something like a

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>predator is really important, because it does keep these systems

0:12:16.480 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>in balance. Of course, So the next time you hear

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody ask like, oh, why should I care about this

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:25.679
<v Speaker 1>one animal? It's just some dumb animal. You know, there

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.520
<v Speaker 1>are lots of other types of owls who who gives

0:12:28.559 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a care? Yeah, but remind them of the zombie apocalypse. Well, yeah,

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>what you can remind them is that every time an

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>animal goes in endangered or goes extinct, it's not just

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a threat to that species, it's a threat to system stability.

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like if you said, well, I'm riding

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>on a bus, and what if I removed at random

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:51.000
<v Speaker 1>one part from this bus. It might be a bolt somewhere,

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>it might be something like that. Maybe the bus could

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>keep going fine without that part. Maybe it wouldn't. You

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, right, And because these systems are so complex,

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 1>most of the time we would say, well, we know

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>something will happen, we just don't know to what extent,

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and it might be catastrophic. So that's one of the

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:10.640
<v Speaker 1>reasons why you should really care about conservation, even if

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.479
<v Speaker 1>for some reason you don't care about lovely cuttabool animals

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that are wonderful and need our love, so um one

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>of the we wanted to talk about what we might

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be doing in the future to help wildlife conservation. One

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things I wanted to cover very briefly because

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we don't always just talk about science and technology. I

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>know that that often is what we focus on the show,

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but really we look at all elements of the future.

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we need to think about is policy.

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And there are a lot of countries out there that

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>have various types of policies about conservation or agencies or

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 1>organizations that oversee that within that country. And then there's

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations, which has its own group called the

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>United Nations Environment Program, and within that they had the

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>World Conservation Monitoring Center, which helps coordinate studies and promote

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>projects that support biodiversity in the protection of ecosystem around

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the world. And in fact, they have a very ambitious project.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>They're looking to create a global connectivity conservation strategy. So

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>when we talk about this complex web that all these

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>different species end up being part of, they're trying to

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of map some of that out, and that's a

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>herculean task. I mean, that's what biology has been doing

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for for since there's been biologists. But they're looking to

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 1>identify fragmented habitats of various species as well. So let's

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>say that there is a region within a country where

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there are two different populations of the same species that

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>used to coexist in the same general geographic region, but

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>because the way humans have moved in, it's divided that up. Now.

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>They're looking at ways where they might be able to

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>reconnect these habitats to help make these populations more healthy

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so that it can be greater genetic diversity and biodiversity

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. So they're looking at as to support governments

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and stakeholders to protect ecological systems. Stakeholders being anyone who

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>would be affected by these sort of policies. How can

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you turn it into an incentive as opposed to something

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that people are going to oppose because it could impact

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 1>their plans on either making a profit or expansion or

0:15:18.960 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be. Because these are delicate matters. I mean,

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not always a cut and dry case like we

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>like to simplify the narrative, like it's it's the evil

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>developer who wants to ruin a swamp in order to

0:15:33.880 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>create a multimillion dollar complex. That's not always it's the

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>last rainforest. No, I mean, I think in a lot

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of cases, these are just people who are trying to

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>make a living and they're not thinking about it and

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is not even aware of what the risks are. In

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>some cases, it's balancing things and maybe like, no, we

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wanted to turn that into a state of the art hospital,

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which our citizens have never had in the history of ever.

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's hard to say to people like you can't

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have that, you can't have a really awesome neononatal wing

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>because of a toad. Yeah, and it is difficult. It

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>does mean that. That's why this group is looking to

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>find ways and strategies to help governments so that they

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 1>can accomplish the goals they need to accomplish without also

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>impacting the environment in a negative way. So they're looking

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to establish sound scientific foundation upon which they can build

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.239
<v Speaker 1>this collection of policy and legislative tools, plus the incentives

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to use those tools that governments can use to promote conservation.

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's a really forward thinking approach. Actually,

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to yeah, I know, right, Hey, you

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>said the title of the podcast um to the Future,

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>right right, So I think it really is is a

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>very smart way of moving forward, because it's it's establishing that, yes,

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>we need to make sure that the decisions we make

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 1>are evidence based, that they are science, they're not they're

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>not just knee jerk reactions, but in fact have have

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>research behind them to show that this is in fact

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the best option. Sure, and there's a real need for

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>that in these types of cases, because when animals are threatened.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:20.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, your little cuddling monologue earlier was a good

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>indication of the fact that these topics are likely to

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>involve our feelings, Yes, to excite our emotions and to

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>make us feel empathy and stuff like that, and and

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it can be tough then to make a rational

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>decision if you don't systematize your decision making process. Yes,

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the goal is to remove by us as much as possible,

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 1>so that the decisions that you arrive at are are

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>ones that that do make sense and are not again,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>just an emotional reaction to something. Not to say that

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the emotional reaction would necessarily be the wrong one, but

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>this way, this way you can at least say no, no no, no,

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>this demonstrably is the right way to go. Also, even

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:01.400
<v Speaker 1>just just getting all of that information and just sharing

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it amongst different researchers and scientists and uh, geological services

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and all of that stuff is really difficult to do

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and of course getting easier thanks to the Internet and

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, spreadsheets and stuff like that, but uh, classically

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.679
<v Speaker 1>it's been very difficult to pulp to pool all of

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that information in a useful way. Yeah, you would have

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>these these these concentrated areas where research would be really

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 1>amazing and deep and broad, but not necessarily connected to

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 1>another region that might be geologically quite close, but as

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>far as research is concerned, could be you know, decades away.

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>It's this is actually very promising, and there are other

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>policies that could point out, like there are a lot

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of places around the world they're setting up various types

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.159
<v Speaker 1>of refugees, not just not just for land animals, but

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.719
<v Speaker 1>also for sharks. I mean there are areas that are

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically says aside that are protected waters for all different

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>species or maybe not all, but most species of sharks.

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>And uh, that's also very very promising. And beyond policy,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we do have some kind of interesting technology approaches that

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>are helping people in efforts to conserve wildlife. And one

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:15.200
<v Speaker 1>of those is a your smartphone. Sure, and whether it's

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 1>your smartphone or somebody else's smartphone, the basic idea here

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>is apps, software and technology that help enable citizen science

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and citizen participation in the scientific data gathering that we

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>need to help protect species. That right. The first example

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we have is an e Naturalist, and that's actually it's

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>it's broader than just an app. It actually it's it's

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>an online social network that's made up of biologists and

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>naturalists as well as citizen scientists, and they're really looking

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to map bio diversity. And it's a platform upon which

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>people can share observation. So you can have an app

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on your phone and when you are out in nature

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>and you see, you know, evidence of various types of animals,

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you might use it to say, hey, I saw this

0:20:01.400 --> 0:20:05.639
<v Speaker 1>this type of creature at this place. And this gives

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 1>biologists an incredible tool, an ability to really kind of

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>see in real time what the various density populations are,

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>but based upon the number of reports they might see.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:20.440
<v Speaker 1>So as more people use it and as more people

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>report on the animals they see, you can see either

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:28.440
<v Speaker 1>an increase in reports might show that there's a population

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that's on the rise. A decrease could show that perhaps

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a population that's in trouble. Could also show the

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence of of encroaching species, invasive species. So we're really interesting.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>It could just give you a better idea about what

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the natural range of a species is. I mean in

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.480
<v Speaker 1>some races when you think about it, like, how do

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you determine the range of a species? I mean that's

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not as easy to do as you might think. Can

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>you go out and walk over every square foot of

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 1>ground and say, okay, don't see anymore here, so I

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>guess this is the end, right? Yeah. It makes me

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>think of whenever you look up a particular species and

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you see where it's range tends to be, and it

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>will give it like here in the United States, you'll

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>usually get a list of states that that animal can

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>be found in, and then you just think, well, what

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>would happen if I were in a neighboring state and

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>saw this When I just say, hey, you don't belong here.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 1>You need to pick up and move twenty miles to

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the east. Buddy. These ground reclusives in my house fighting

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>meed to be here, I think we found the next

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>sci fi channel. We have a xenophobia, so but but yeah,

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this this means that biologists would have we'll be able

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to leverage a tool that a lot of different industries

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>have been leveraging. The fact that using crowd generated data

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.399
<v Speaker 1>to help get a better understanding of what's going on.

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>We talk about this all the time with the Internet

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of things, and usually we're talking about understanding system so

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that you can build more efficient infrastructure or tools or

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be. In this case, we're actually talking

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 1>about expanding our knowledge of a particular science. That's pretty cool.

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Another one that we can talk about is oh Search,

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>which is uh one I referred to in the shark

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>conservation video. It's pretty cool. This is an app that

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>lets you track tagged sharks. So there are shark tagging

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>expeditions where people will go out, catch, catch a shark,

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.639
<v Speaker 1>bring it on board, tag it with essentially a beacon

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>that lets you know where that shark is, release it,

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 1>and then they track where the shark goes in order

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to learn more about shark migratory patterns and predatory patterns

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>where it tends to go at any given time year,

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and these guys get around. So there are a lot

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of examples of sharks that were captured off the coast

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>of like uh, New England and then released and then

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>later on in the year end up in the Bahamas,

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:51.879
<v Speaker 1>which tells us that the plot to Jaws for is

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>a little more realistic than I had anticipated. Much. It

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 1>does have you know, any movie that has Michael Kaine

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and you have to, you know, figure, well, maybe there's

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 1>more legitimacy than I originally thought. Did it explain Michael

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Caine's instant clothing drying technology? It did not, nor did

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it go into detail about how you could ram a

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sailboat through a Great White shark. But at any rate

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>spoiler alert by the way, um at any rate, it

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 1>is really neat, and you can actually track lots of

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>different sharks. You can see all of them at once.

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, essentially they're all like these dots in the ocean.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Or you can focus on a specific shark and then

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>even set a parameter on there to say, well, let

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>me see everywhere this shark has been over the last

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>six months, and it'll give you kind of like that

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Indiana Jones travel line where the shark has been throughout

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that time. It's really cool. And um, I'm hopeful that

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a buddy of mine who is a shark marine biologist,

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he does these. He goes out and does these shark

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>tagging expeditions and and he has told me at d

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>agon Con that if I'm interested, I should get in

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>touch with him and I could go on one. So

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>if you guys want to go on a shark tagging expedition,

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Dragon Cons coming up again, and I believe he's a guest,

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'll talk to him and see if we can

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>wrangle ourselves a a three person shark tagging trip. I

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>want that indescribably much. Okay, I'll talk to him. I'll

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>see what we can do. So is his boat called

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the Orca, because I think I saw one of these

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:31.919
<v Speaker 1>three person expeditions. He did come up to me and

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>he said he said, I said, could I go? And

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:35.920
<v Speaker 1>he said, I'm talking about work and for a living,

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about sharking, right. He wanted two cases of

0:24:39.119 --> 0:24:43.960
<v Speaker 1>apricot brandy, yeah, and dollars um. No, he has not

0:24:44.119 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>spoken to me about such things, but I'll try and

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>see if we can we can actually arrange something. Because

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.639
<v Speaker 1>he he was very much of the opinion that the

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>more people who participate in this, the more they learn

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>about how important sharks are in their various ecosystems, and

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the US they are prone to being afraid of them. So,

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, there are plenty more conservation apps than the

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>ones we just mentioned. Yeah, there's some that are specifically

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>meant to help curtail poaching and trafficking and animals or

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>animal parts. There's one called Wildlife Guardian. That's that's just

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>one example that's a smartphone app that's specifically meant to

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>help curtail that in China. Yeah, I feel like I've

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>read that some of these are designed to let people

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:33.439
<v Speaker 1>anonymously report things so they don't feel like fear of reprisal.

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially kind of filing it with law enforcement so

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that the law enforcement officials can make a point to

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>to follow up on that. And it takes the responsibility

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.320
<v Speaker 1>off the shoulder of the person who witnesses this, and

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>it puts it onto the law enforcement agencies, so hopefully

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>if they are doing their duty, they can then go

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in and make sure that this operation stops. Yeah, and

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.199
<v Speaker 1>of course another great technological frontier and conservation is going

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to be stuff like satellite imaging and geographic information systems

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>or g i S. Have you ever heard about the

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>g i S field. No, but I imagine it has

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>something to do with tracking changes to environments. Well, it

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>could be changes or it could be static data, but

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it it can definitely help us monitor changes to environments

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 1>because the basic idea behind g i S is that

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you're combining maps and geospatial representations with data. So it's

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like data augmented map systems. It's for cataloging, analyzing, tracking,

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and updating data about geographic areas. So you might have

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.440
<v Speaker 1>a g i S system that looks at a certain

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>area and then looks at the terrain and then looks

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>at how you know the watershed in the area works,

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>or maybe the borders of a jungle might change over time,

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>or whether there's been erosion or and you can combine

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>data layers with maps like these, So if you're you're

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to track relationships between different types of data points

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>with relation to the geography, you can combine your data

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, that's weird. Now we can look at,

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, lightning strikes happening in this area, and how

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that corresponds to the number of toads that begin flying. Wow. Okay.

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And then there are other efforts too, right, I mean

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>there's other ways of using technology in conservation efforts, some

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of which would get really hands on. Yeah sure, and

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>are also using that kind of satellite connection, but in

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.119
<v Speaker 1>a slightly different way. There are some efforts that are

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>outfitting animals like mountain lions and bears and coyotes and

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>wolves with smart collars which are you know, kind of

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>like your fitness tracker, but you know a little bit

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:58.679
<v Speaker 1>bigger um and for and for wolves, and you know,

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and equipped with a GPS trackers and accelerometers and sometimes

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>even cameras so that they can help conservationists learn about

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>these animals behaviors and their movements and their sleeping patterns,

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 1>and their interactions with other animals up to and including humans.

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>The hope here is to learn enough to prevent human

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 1>encroachment on really important animal territories and even to begin

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>predicting behavior and sending out warnings like for example, uh,

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>if a mountain lion is ranging really close to a town,

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they could warn locals to keep their pets inside and

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>also you know, gently remind them about hunting loss. Yeah.

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>This would also be great to Uh. Honestly, one of

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the things that I love about technology is that it

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>gives us so many more opportunities to capture wonderful moments

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in our lives. But one of the things I hate

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>about technology is sometimes it gives us these opportunities to

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>capture wonderful moments in our lives to the point where

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>we will put ourselves in danger in order to capture

0:28:58.440 --> 0:29:01.239
<v Speaker 1>that moment. And by this, of course, referring to the

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>numerous stories we have seen of people attempting to take

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a selfie with a wild animal in the background of

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>that of that photo, and we've heard more than enough

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 1>stories of people being hurt or worse in these sort

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of encounters. And my hope would be this sort of

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.440
<v Speaker 1>thing would also be in a way of reminding people, Hey,

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there are times where sometimes wildlife and human settlements are

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>coming into like they're overlapping because of various reasons. Uh,

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this is not an opportunity for you to go out

0:29:32.280 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 1>and get that amazing picture of you with this wild animal.

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>They are wild animals, and we will try and deal

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>with this in a way that preserves the safety of

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>both the people and the animals as much as we can,

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>but in order to do that, we have to have

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you play a part in that and not try and

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>rush out and get your bare selfie. There's so many

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>animals that you shouldn't try to get selfie. Yeah. I

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>just googled running of the bull selfie. Yeah, Yeah, there's plenty. Yeah,

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's I mean, and that's a well, I have

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of feelings about the running of the bulls,

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but I won't I won't go into them here. Um,

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean, like I I've heard of ones

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>about people who wanted to get their picture taken when

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 1>they see a bear or when they see uh bison.

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>There was a recent one, there was a ram that

0:30:23.280 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that injured somebody. Yeah. So these are just reminders, right

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that that we need to have these systems in place

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>so that we can try to protect everyone involved, not

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously not just the animals. That's another thing I often

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>see that people are like, well, why don't you care

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>about people? No, No, we we care about people too.

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not an either or thing, you know, this

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is an end thing. Um. So one of the other

0:30:47.280 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>technologies we can talk about our drones. Those are being

0:30:50.720 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 1>used by a few different organizations to help with conservation efforts,

0:30:54.880 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>both to just keep an eye on populations and see

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>how they're doing, monitor their health without getting too close

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to them. Also, you might be able to access areas

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that otherwise would be very difficult to get to through

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>other means, and without having to use larger aircraft like

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>helicopters or planes, because often you have to fly pretty

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>low altitudes in order to get an eye on these

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>populations and with something like a helicopter. One of the

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>points that people were making is that with a with

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a drone, you can fly at these low altitudes and

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>not risk human life if something goes wrong, whereas with

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a helicopter, if something goes wrong because you're flying at

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a low altitude, you have very little time to recover.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So this would be one way of keeping an eye

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:40.840
<v Speaker 1>on animals without putting human lives at danger, and you

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>could do it from a remote location. Uh It's still

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>obviously takes a lot of training to be able to

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 1>fly a drone effectively. Not all of these drones are

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.440
<v Speaker 1>rotor drones. Some of them are look more like an

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>airplane than they do a helicopter. Um And also you

0:31:57.400 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>can use them not just to keep an eye on

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the populations, but also to look out for poachers. So

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in areas where poaching is a problem, you might be

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>able to use drones to locate and identify poachers and

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in that way alert whatever regulatory agency is in charge

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of keeping a lid on that to go and investigate. Yeah,

0:32:19.880 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>there's also some material science technology that's going into decreasing

0:32:25.200 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>poaching wild populations. Yeah, this is really kind of interesting.

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>You may have heard about this story about how essentially

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>there are people who are three D printing rhinoceros horns

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and they're creating synthetic rhinoceros horns, uh, using some rhino

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>d NA as part of it, and they are physically

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 1>identical to actual rhino horns, Like if you were to

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>test them, that would be a rhino horn. It's just

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>it's synthetic. And so there's some people who are hoping

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to use synthetic rhino horn to flood markets that value

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.959
<v Speaker 1>the rhino a horn. I mean, I think it's like

0:33:02.160 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars a graham in some Chinese markets. So

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>if you were able to flood the markets with synthetic

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 1>rhino horn, you would devalue the horns. And if you

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>devalue it enough, then there's no incentive to go and

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 1>hunt a gigantic rhinoceros because you're not going to get

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>any money back, you know, Comparatively speaking, However, there are

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>critics who point out that this could have negative consequences

0:33:30.840 --> 0:33:34.880
<v Speaker 1>as well. It could be that synthetic rhinoceros horn ends

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>up driving up the price of real, actual rhinoceros horn,

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>so that could end up creating an even greater incentive

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to hunt rhinoceros. And you mean, if people can tell

0:33:46.400 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the difference between people are able to if people are

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>able to know that this is an actual rhino horn

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>versus synthetic, I mean, you could argue that it might

0:33:54.240 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>just create a market for people to create synthetic rhinoceros

0:33:57.080 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>horns and call them real rhinoceros horns, which would be okay,

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess, compared to yeah, compared to killing. But the

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>other element of this, though, is the one that is

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy for you to say, like, yeah, that's not

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>so great. It does it does nothing to weaken this.

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.120
<v Speaker 1>It does nothing to create a stigma against the use

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>of rhino horn, right. It reinforces the idea that rhinal

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>horn should be used for these cases. Yeah, and this

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>is a broader issue in conservation because you know, it's

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's clear that something needs to be done, but figuring

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>out what exactly that is is way more difficult than

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>just collecting the data. Yeah, there there's a lot of

0:34:38.760 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is a very complex thing, and it's

0:34:40.760 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 1>not like a one size fits all approach is going

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>to work in every case. Right. There are going to

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>be lots of different cases where very specific pathways need

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to be taken in order for us to be effective

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>in conservation efforts, and those may not apply in other cases. Uh.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And there's also just kind of a general this agreement

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:03.680
<v Speaker 1>on some very basic things. For example, the idea of

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>naming wild animals that oh search app I was talking about,

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the sharks that you can follow have

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>been given names, and it makes it really easy to

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 1>refer to the specific shark, right, Like you're like, oh,

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it's Mary Lee, it's Flipper, Yeah, whatever it may be,

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:24.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's easy to refer to them. A lot of

0:35:24.360 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>them even have Twitter accounts which were not made by

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:29.200
<v Speaker 1>oh search, by the way, they were made by other people,

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>but they end up tweeting based upon where the shark

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is kind of what that shark is probably experiencing on

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>any given day, because because apparently, according to the O search,

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>folks like, no, we didn't make this Twitter account. We're

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>fine with them using it to talk about, you know,

0:35:47.480 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>where the shark is and what's going on, but we

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't make it um which you know, that's the thing

0:35:52.000 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 1>is that you anyone can make a Twitter account. Well,

0:35:55.400 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>there's their pro and con arguments about naming wild animals.

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So on the pro side, the you would argue that

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>naming the animals makes us think of them as individuals,

0:36:07.000 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to thinking of the problem of poaching of

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:14.440
<v Speaker 1>lions in one space. If we name the lions, then

0:36:14.480 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>we can we We we assign them an identity, we

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>think of them as an individual, and we tend to

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>get more emotionally invested in them as opposed to thinking

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:31.239
<v Speaker 1>about them as a larger We're not great at handling

0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. On the concite, however, first of all,

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>naming them does create a psychological effect, right, it's but

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>we do get that emotional investment, and like we were

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about earlier, this could create a bias for research. Right,

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have the opportunity to I don't know. If

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to pick between saving two different lions from

0:36:54.760 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>poachers and one has a name and the other one doesn't,

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>you're probably going to pick the one with the aim,

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.320
<v Speaker 1>even if that's not necessarily the most you know, I

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know why you would need to pick one versus another,

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>but still you need to make Yeah, but it could

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>be that, you know, the argument you make is that, well,

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the one that we didn't name actually represents a different

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 1>genetic uh makeup than the other one and would have

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:25.399
<v Speaker 1>created better diversity within the population of lines. However, we

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 1>concentrate the one that had the name, and you know

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that it is a weird example, but it's a perfectly

0:37:31.280 --> 0:37:34.440
<v Speaker 1>chromulent one. Yeah, yeah, I know, But bias and science

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>is bad. Why did we only say Flipper the lion? Right? So? Uh.

0:37:39.120 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>The other part of this is that the animals are

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.120
<v Speaker 1>wild animals. They're not pets, when we shouldn't think of

0:37:44.160 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>them as pets. We should think of them as they

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are wild. They belong in the wild. Naming them takes

0:37:50.000 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 1>them a step away from that in our minds, and

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:55.239
<v Speaker 1>that can be a problem. It can give the suggestion

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that they belong to you, because like our pets belong

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to us, sure, or that you should take a selfie

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 1>with them, yeah, or that you're just anthropomorphizing them, which

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 1>is also a problem. You know, they're they're not human.

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>We often think of animals and human terms because we

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are most of us human, we're really species centric. Yeah.

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Just you know, until we get all those those uh

0:38:20.680 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>genetic modifications where we can all become cat people, this

0:38:24.120 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 1>is just gonna be a problem. So there there's definitely

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>some research that supports the idea that naming animals can

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>help build support. And that's because again going back to

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 1>that problem that we have with what what uh good

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>nature travel actually called the abstractions of catastrophe, This idea

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that when you hear about a big group thing happening,

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it's hard for us to to to process that information.

0:38:49.680 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Like we we have trouble thinking about any kind of

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 1>news event that involves large numbers, whether it's animals or humans.

0:38:57.120 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It these stories hit us in because we have trouble

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>processing it. We don't have that emotional impact. So when

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>you hear you know, ten thousand members of whatever species,

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>be an animal or maybe it's ten thousand people are

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:15.680
<v Speaker 1>affected negatively by something that's hard for us to process.

0:39:15.719 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>But if you focus on an individual story, we can

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>connect to that, and that's where we have that emotional response.

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And this is true whether it's animals or humans, whatever

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:27.799
<v Speaker 1>it may be. If you are able to frame the

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 1>plight of any group within an individual story, that's where

0:39:32.320 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we have the connection. And that's where we see people

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 1>willing to make a response, whether it's positive or negative,

0:39:38.520 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever the case may be. You know, it all depends

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>upon the scenario involved. Um and that then we might

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be more willing or able to participate in conservation efforts,

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>whether it's through direct support monetarily or by volunteering or

0:39:57.080 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>uh downloading one of these apps and participating in that

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we're respect whatever it might be, we'd be more willing

0:40:02.600 --> 0:40:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to do it because we have that emotional connection. It's

0:40:06.520 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just harder to do when it's a big group, because

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:12.560
<v Speaker 1>as humans, we just have trouble dealing with that kind

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of information. Yeah, well, I mean, and as you implied earlier,

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 1>that even applies when we're talking about humans. I mean,

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's pretty commonly accepted wisdom of psychology

0:40:23.440 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that you're more likely to give a dollar to help

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a single kid with one name than a group of

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:32.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty people in need who don't have names. One of

0:40:32.360 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 1>the examples I've seen is that when you when you

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 1>see a commercial about an organization that is dedicated to

0:40:40.400 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>helping people like children and developing countries, they always have

0:40:45.520 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a child. Yeah, help us, help Bruce, because we can

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>focus on that, we can identify with that, and we

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.839
<v Speaker 1>see the plight when you look at a big, one,

0:40:59.320 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>big group of people, either we have problems processing it

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>or the problem itself seems so huge that we were paralyzed.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:08.719
<v Speaker 1>We feel like nothing we would do would make a

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>dent at all, when that is not the case. So

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that the naming issue is a complicated one,

0:41:15.280 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and I certainly see both sides. So it's not like

0:41:18.760 --> 0:41:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm pro name that animal camp all the way, but

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:26.879
<v Speaker 1>I I think I lean a little more toward being

0:41:26.880 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>sympathetic towards that side, although I completely understand the concerns

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of the people who speak out against it. Along the

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>same lines as naming is, I think the idea of

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>adopting a particular animal. I'm sure you've seen campaigns like this, right,

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>like the Adopter Shark program, you know where they use

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that kind of language. What you're really doing is, you know,

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you make a donation or you you help support the

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>scientific research in some way, and you can have a

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:58.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, attract animal that is like your adopted animal.

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Now you don't actually have any like rights or powers

0:42:01.760 --> 0:42:03.960
<v Speaker 1>over it. Yeah, and you can't go out on a

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:05.960
<v Speaker 1>boat and like find it and pet it, or you

0:42:05.960 --> 0:42:08.479
<v Speaker 1>should not at any rate. Yeah, I don't know, maybe

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you could, but I agree with you on should not,

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:16.680
<v Speaker 1>depending on how accurate the geo data is GPS. But um,

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I mean that seems like it raises similar issues,

0:42:19.360 --> 0:42:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Like I can imagine how a campaign like adopt a

0:42:23.080 --> 0:42:25.799
<v Speaker 1>shark or adopt a you know, whatever the animal would

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 1>be could help get more people involved and raise more

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:32.440
<v Speaker 1>money for for the kinds of scientific research that could

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>help protect these populations. But it could also give people

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the wrong idea about their relationship with the animals, and

0:42:40.960 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this also kind of this conversation reminds

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>me a lot of the one we had about de

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>extincting creatures de extinction process and the concerns we have

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>about that technology as well. So if we if we

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>get to a point where we could reliably bring an

0:42:58.000 --> 0:43:02.080
<v Speaker 1>extinct species back. The fear. One of the fears is

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that it would remove our sense of urgency to preserve

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:10.239
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystems in which those creatures thrived. So, sure, you

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>might be able to bring a creature back, but if

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.799
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem it lived in no longer exists, then all

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you've done is given a death sentence again, possibly, or

0:43:19.120 --> 0:43:22.959
<v Speaker 1>you're creating an invasive species to some system it wasn't

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:25.640
<v Speaker 1>ever meant to be in. So I've got a weird

0:43:25.719 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 1>hypothetical question. Imagine we get some kind of Singularity type future,

0:43:32.120 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever you know, unimaginable levels of technological precision, do you

0:43:37.600 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think humans should take steps to prevent all current species

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:47.319
<v Speaker 1>from going extinct? It will be I think it will

0:43:47.360 --> 0:43:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be unimaginably difficult to make this determination. Sure, And that's

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.480
<v Speaker 1>why I said, you know, singular, I don't. I don't

0:43:54.480 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>mean like technologically it'll be difficult. I mean psychologically, it'll

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>be a very difficult thing. Because if you think that

0:44:02.239 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>you have the ability to prevent a creature from going extinct,

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think it'd be really hard to say no,

0:44:10.600 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let it go extinct. As even if it

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:17.560
<v Speaker 1>was something that you could pretty clearly say this is

0:44:17.600 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>going extinct, and it's not because of the actions we

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>humans have taken upon this. So if you think of

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:25.520
<v Speaker 1>it that way, like if you were able to somehow

0:44:25.719 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 1>was really high uh certainty say this creature is going extinct.

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:33.839
<v Speaker 1>We can tell from its numbers it is not due

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:39.760
<v Speaker 1>to human activity. We should probably let it have because

0:44:39.920 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that's just evolutions. But I don't know that we could

0:44:44.239 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. Well, there's there's also a likelihood I would

0:44:48.800 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I would think that if a species was going extinct

0:44:52.440 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>due to natural events, not due to human interaction, that

0:44:57.400 --> 0:45:01.120
<v Speaker 1>we probably wouldn't even know about it, because the things

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that we know about are generally the we just built

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>this apartment complex here, and now we have to assume

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:12.560
<v Speaker 1>now Flipper the toad is dying off. We have to

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.800
<v Speaker 1>assume that, Buddies, we're in a future where the Internet

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of things is so incredibly rich and robust that we

0:45:19.880 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>have a finger on the pulse of practically every ecosystem.

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>That that is hard to imagine because the Earth is

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>so incredible, and keep in mind, there's a lot of

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it we have not explored. The oceans are still largely

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:38.959
<v Speaker 1>mysterious to us. Is that we cannot breathe. We tend

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>to explore less thoroughly. No, I think that the best

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that we could do, and and the best that we

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>should be should look to do, in my personal opinion,

0:45:49.200 --> 0:45:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is just preventing, you know, shutting down the negative human

0:45:55.640 --> 0:45:59.640
<v Speaker 1>human interactions with our environment and and therefore preventing that

0:45:59.760 --> 0:46:03.239
<v Speaker 1>kind end of extinction. I'm of the same mind. I mean,

0:46:03.280 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be I'd hate to be the guy to

0:46:05.480 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>make that call, to be like, hey, this cute, fluffy

0:46:08.440 --> 0:46:11.719
<v Speaker 1>bunny that lives in this particular region is dying out,

0:46:11.760 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's completely due to natural, you know, the natural

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 1>progression of that ecosystem. It would still be hard for

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:22.480
<v Speaker 1>me to say, oh, let's let's let it go. Yeah,

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, let's let's let's rescue the bunny, and um,

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 1>let's uh, let's let's let's let's not make some make

0:46:31.120 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>some changes to that ecosystem so the bunny's okay. I

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 1>would that would be I would have to fight against that,

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:39.960
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly what we were talking about with the

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.000
<v Speaker 1>You'd make a safe space for the bunny at the

0:46:43.040 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 1>expense of the algae that was formerly thriving in the swamp,

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that you've transformed into a bunny friend and then consequences

0:46:53.000 --> 0:46:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and you'd have to see a commercial about Flipper the

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:58.240
<v Speaker 1>algae saying please help me. Either that or you'd suddenly

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 1>discover that that, you know, this other creature that depended

0:47:01.400 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 1>upon the algae is now dying out because you made

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>this this arbitrary decision to save one species over another.

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And thus we get back to these things are complicated.

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But I agree with you, Lauren completely that I think

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the best we could hope for is to try and

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>end the impact that humans are having directly or otherwise

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>on species populations and ecosystems. Uh, But to to mitigate

0:47:27.520 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that as much as we possibly can. Yeah, that's the trick, right,

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>as much as we can, because as we've said several

0:47:33.719 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>times now, I mean it's really difficult. I would say,

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>even with sci fi levels of technology, I think it

0:47:40.640 --> 0:47:44.160
<v Speaker 1>would be really hard to understand all the complex cause

0:47:44.200 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and effect chains. I mean, you can understand some more

0:47:47.160 --> 0:47:50.160
<v Speaker 1>easily than others. Sometimes you'll just say like, okay, this

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is pretty clearly, you know, because we've built X here,

0:47:54.120 --> 0:47:58.080
<v Speaker 1>we drove something out. But there are other things where

0:47:58.120 --> 0:48:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, okay, so there's this new species that

0:48:01.000 --> 0:48:04.880
<v Speaker 1>moved into this forest, and they're out competing the previous

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>species that filled the same niche, and now that species

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:10.920
<v Speaker 1>is dying. Why did that species move into the forest. Well,

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:12.959
<v Speaker 1>then you'd have to go one step back and figure

0:48:13.000 --> 0:48:16.280
<v Speaker 1>out what happened there. Ultimately, it might be human causes

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 1>or it might not. Yeah, I think, um, I mean, obviously,

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we can only do the best we can with the

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 1>information we have. And the problem as I see it

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 1>right now, is that we're not even doing the best

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>we can with the information that's currently available. And that's

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what we need to start start addressing, is to

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>let's let's let's make that our best as opposed to

0:48:37.880 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>having these these these islands where people are trying really hard,

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:44.239
<v Speaker 1>but there are large areas where that's either not a

0:48:44.239 --> 0:48:48.240
<v Speaker 1>priority or people are just unaware of it, whatever, whatever

0:48:48.280 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the reason, maybe and do our best to fix that. Um.

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 1>All this being said, I am generally speaking an optimist.

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are a lot of very well

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:01.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning people who are trying very hard to push the

0:49:02.000 --> 0:49:05.520
<v Speaker 1>message of conservation out there, and I think a lot

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of people are sympathetic to it. It's just that, uh,

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it can be again so overwhelming that it's difficult to

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.560
<v Speaker 1>know what you as an individual can do to make

0:49:15.600 --> 0:49:18.520
<v Speaker 1>a positive impact. But there are lots of different resources

0:49:18.560 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>out there, So I recommend people go out do a

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>little simple research, look into the different organizations and actually

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>do look into them. Don't just google to find out

0:49:28.880 --> 0:49:31.280
<v Speaker 1>which ones are active, but actually do research to see,

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, what sort of work do they do. Are

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they considered to be, uh, you know, an effective organization

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:41.360
<v Speaker 1>before you go any further, you know, putting your time

0:49:41.440 --> 0:49:46.400
<v Speaker 1>or money into that obviously, because not everyone is doing

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a great job. Some organizations are and some aren't. So

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I would definitely recommend doing that research for yourself so

0:49:53.320 --> 0:49:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can find one that's a good fit and

0:49:54.920 --> 0:49:56.839
<v Speaker 1>that you feel good about. If this is something that's

0:49:56.840 --> 0:50:00.439
<v Speaker 1>important to you, and if there's some other top that's

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>really important to you that we have never talked about,

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, something about the future that you really wanted

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to hear about, I recommend you, right and let's know,

0:50:08.160 --> 0:50:10.839
<v Speaker 1>send us an email that addresses FW thinking at how

0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com, or drop us a line on Facebook,

0:50:14.840 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter or Google Plus. While it lasts are our handle

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.920
<v Speaker 1>at Twitter and Google Plus. Is FW thinking just searchfw

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:24.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking and Facebook will pop right up. Leave us a

0:50:24.280 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>message and we'll talk to you again. Really sick. For

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:34.799
<v Speaker 1>more on this topic in the future of technology, visit

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>forward thinking dot com, brought to you by Toyota. Let's

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Go Places,