WEBVTT - The Masters: Odds, Bets PGA Bets & One-And-Done Picks (Ep. 690)

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Betting pros PGA Podcast presented by DraftKings.

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:08.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm Pat Fitzmorris here with Bau McBrayer.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>It's Masters Week, the first major of the year is

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>arguably the best major of the year, and today we

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>will give you a full betting preview of the Masters

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 1>Bow and I will let you know who we're betting.

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:22.159
<v Speaker 1>We'll make our one and done picks at the end

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of the show. We'll also do a very quick recap

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Valero Texas Open. In fact, let's cover the

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Valero right off the bat bow. Not a very interesting tournament.

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Brian Harmon wins the Valero Texas Open, finishing nine under par.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Harmon raced out to an early lead by shooting sixty

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>six in each of his first two rounds. Then the

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>win picked up on the weekend and Harmon hung on.

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 1>He shot a sporty seventy two Saturday in the blustery conditions.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>He shot a three over par seventy five on Sunday,

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>but still won by three shots over Ryan Girard and

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Maverick McNeely. No one ever seriously threatened Harmon on the weekend.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>Gerard surged into second place on the strength of a

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>final day sixty nine. He was one of only three

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>players to break seventy in the difficult scoring conditions. On

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Sunday at TPC San Antonio, Maverick McNeely was steady eddie

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>rounds of sixty eight, seventy two, seventy one and seventy two.

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>MAV is still on the come up, and I think

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>it's worth remembering how solidly he blamed the windy conditions

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend. I'm not sure what else to say

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>about the Valero Texas Open Bow. It was kind of

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>a tough watch. Honestly. Brian Harmon is, let's generously call

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>him deliberate as a player. There's some great songs that

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>are shorter than Brian Harmon's pre shot routine.

0:01:37.440 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 3>There's some tool songs that are shorter than his pre

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 3>shot routine.

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>The bigger names in the field, Jordan Speith, Patrick Cantley,

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Corey Connors just sort of lurked around and never made

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a serious run at Harmon got anything profound to say

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>about the Valero Texas Open Bow.

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 3>I kind of laid it out last week. It's not

0:01:56.400 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>a remarkable golf course. It's not usually a remarkable tournament.

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>It's more of a tune up than anything, unless your

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 3>name is Brian Harmon, who we actually time on a

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:08.519
<v Speaker 3>sun dial. There are because of global warming, glaciers actually

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 3>move faster than he does now. It was fine for

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>me because what I did bet were some placement bets.

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 3>I had three guys in the top five, so that

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 3>was nice. But not getting an outright when there. It's

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 3>not that into the world there because we are all

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:26.519
<v Speaker 3>kind of anticipating this week the Valero Texas Open. Afterthought

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 3>already out of my memory. Moving on, I don't want

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>to talk about Brian Harmon anymore than I have to.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just sort of a dull event.

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we talked about TPC San Antonio not

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>being a very exciting venue, although the wind gave it

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:43.119
<v Speaker 1>some teeth. I would much rather talk about Augustin National

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>And we will turn to the masters in just a moment.

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 3>But first download the free Betting pros app for iOS

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 3>and Android. With sportsbooks Sink, you can automatically track your

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 3>bets across all major sportsbooks in one spot. You can

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 3>easily monitor your bet performance by sport and bet type,

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 3>including game picks, props and parlays. Go ahead and create

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:09.519
<v Speaker 3>your custom betting systems to find winning trends and profitable opportunities.

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Get a free trial of betting Pros Premium by downloading

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 3>the app at bettingpros dot com slash apps and activating

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 3>your trial on the upgrade screen.

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the masters, and we have to start

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>with Augusta National, the shangri La of American golf. It's

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in the northeastern part of Georgia, near the border with

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. It's a par seventy two measuring seven five

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty five yards. It plays longer than its

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>yardage because of all the elevation changes. I've been lucky

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>enough to visit Augusta National. I don't think TV adequately

0:03:42.120 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>captures those elevation changes. Maybe you get a sense of

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it when you see players on the tenth t looking

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>down that ski slope of a fairway fairway that drops

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>more than one hundred feet off the tee. It's the

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>uphill climbs that you don't always get a sense of

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>when you're watching on television. Because of the rolling terrain,

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Augusta National constantly challenges players with uneven lies, much more

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>so than I think at any other tour venue. Congratulations

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>on putting your drive in the fairway. Now try to

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>hit a high fade with a five iron from a

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>hook with the ball a hook lie with the ball

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.960
<v Speaker 1>above your feet like that is a challenge players often

0:04:18.960 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>have to face on the par five to thirteenth hole,

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>or they look toward the green, you know all the

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>azaleas in bloom behind the back bunkers, and you know

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>they've got that tough lie. Or they might have to

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.799
<v Speaker 1>hit an approach shot off a downslope to an elevated green.

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the challenge of number nine, a very underrated par

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>four it Augusta. Shot shaping very important. There are some

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>t shots where you're asked to work the ball from

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 1>right to left, as on the thirteenth hall, where you

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>want to avoid that stand of pine trees on the

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>right side in order to have a go at the

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.320
<v Speaker 1>green in two. There are a lot of times when

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>players will want to work the ball from left to right. Now,

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the fairways are generally pretty wide at Augusta National, and

0:04:56.800 --> 0:05:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the rough range is from light to nonexistent. The big

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>hitters do have an advantage here. Distance helps conquer the

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>power fives and gives players an edge on some of

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the tougher par fours. Holes number ten and eleven jump

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to mind. But you don't need to be a big

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hitter to win the Masters, especially if conditions are firm

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and fast. We've seen bunters like Mike Weir and Zach

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Johnson wing green jackets. Now I mentioned the fairways are

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.839
<v Speaker 1>generally wide. There are some exceptions, no question, notably the

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>t shot on the eighteenth hole that has to be

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the most terrifying t shots players will hit

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>all year, with its narrow shoot between the trees to

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>an uphill fairway. They're well placed bunkers all over the course.

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>The only hole that doesn't have any bunkers is the

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>par four fourteenth. Greenside bunkers aren't necessarily the worst place

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in many instances, but the fairway bunkers that

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Augusta can be pretty punishing. They're deep, and the sand

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>at Augusta is soft. Can be pretty difficult to flush

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball out of a fairway bunker. And then bo

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>there are the greens. Their bent grass and they are

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>blazing fast. They're the toughest greens players are going to

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>face all year. Augusta Nationals greens are big and undulating,

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>with all sorts of complicated slopes. Puts can break severely

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>if you don't put your shot in the right spot

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>on the green. They're gonna be instances this week where

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>players are actually hitting their putts away from the hole

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>at more than one hundred and eighty degrees. They're gonna

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>be three putts galore. There'll be some four, maybe even

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>five putts. Ernie Elle's famously six putted the first hole

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:32.040
<v Speaker 1>from only three feet away in twenty sixteen. The greens

0:06:32.120 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>just they make shot placements so critical. Stay below the

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>hole and you'll be in great shape. Miss your target

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and end up above the hole, good luck to you.

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>But the undulations of the Augusta greens can actually be

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>friendly to players. Some greens will funnel well play shots

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>toward the hole, setting up short birdie puts. You'll see

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that on the tiered eighteenth green, for instance. Players use

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the backboard for a little spin down to the hole

0:06:56.960 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>when the pin is in the front of the green.

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll see it so on the sixteenth hole with that

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.520
<v Speaker 1>tricky left side pin placement on the lowest part of

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the green, and memorably we saw it on the par

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>five second hole in twenty twelve, when Louis Ustasen landed

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>his second shot on the front of the green and

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>let it chase some eighty feet to the back right

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 1>part of the green, it dropped in for a double eagle.

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>That was the year Usti lost a playoff to Bubba Watson.

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>It's very helpful to have experience with these greens. It's

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a big reason why it's rare for first timers to

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>contend a at Gosten, why we see some of the

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>same names on the leaderboard year after year. Ludwig Oberg

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>was kind of an exception last year, finishing second in

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>his Maden voyage at the Masters. You have to score

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>well on the par fives here, no question about it.

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>They are all very reachable in two. The thirteenth of

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the fifteenth holes are especially famous. I've talked about the thirteenth,

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>which is five hundred and forty five yards and technically

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the easiest hole in the course as far as scoring average.

0:07:57.600 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 2>Then there's the fifteenth.

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>It's five hundred and fifty yards with a generous fair way,

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>but you have to carry a pond with your approach

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>shot miss long and then you have a difficult chip

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>back with the green funneling balls toward that front pond.

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>The front nine par fives number two and number eight

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>are underrated gems. Number two presents a downhill approach shot

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to that crazy triangular green. Number eight gives you a

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>blind uphill approach to a green guarded by mounds on

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>either side, and negotiating the part threes is pretty critical too.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>The back nine has the famous twelfth hole, maybe the

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>best and most difficult short part three in the world.

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>It's only one hundred and fifty five yards to a

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>long but extremely shallow green. You have to clear Rays Creek,

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's a steep embankment on the far side of

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:43.559
<v Speaker 1>the creek that will bat balls back into the water.

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The wind is extremely hard to judge on the twelfth hole,

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and Jordan Speith came to the twelfth with a five

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>shot lead in the final round in twenty sixteen. His

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>t shot hit the bank on the far side of

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Rays Creek and bounce back into the water. He hit

0:08:57.520 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>his third shot fat from the drop area into the

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>creek again. He sailed his fifth shot into the back bunker.

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Speeth took a quadruple bogie seven on the twelfth he

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:10.079
<v Speaker 1>lost to Danny Willett by three shots after leading by

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>five with seven holes to play. Then there's the fame

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>sixteenth hole with the pond in front of the hole

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>into the left. It's this is the hole where Tiger

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Woods had the famous chip in during his duel with

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Chris DeMarco in two thousand and five. And the power

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 1>threes on the front nine both play downhill. Number four

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>is a two hundred and forty yard monster. You need

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to hit a great long iron to get the ball

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>close to the hole. Number six is one hundred and

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>eighty yards to one of the trickier greens on the course.

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 1>And let's not leave out the par fours. The tenth

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and the eleventh holes are both long downhill dog legs.

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Number ten it's the hardest hole on the course by

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>scoring average. Number eleven second hardest hole on the course.

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Number fourteen and number seventeen don't appear to be that

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 1>complicated until you get to the greens. The fourteenth and

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>seventeenth greens are both labby Corinthian. They might be the

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>two toughest greens on the course. We talked about the

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth hole with its narrow, little shoot off the tee

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and its uphill approach to a tiered green front. Nine

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>power fours are excellent too. I love number three. It's

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>only three hundred and sixty yards, but it's another hole

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with a demanding green. Putting your wedge in the right

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>spot is critical. Also a big fan of the four

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ninety five yard fifth hole with its big,

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 1>bumpy green bottom line. There is not a single pushover

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>hole at Augusta National. Every hole can yield a bow

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>gear worse if you play it sloppily, but not any

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:40.240
<v Speaker 1>hole at Augusta is unconquerable. Like every hole here will

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 1>yield a birdie or even an eagle if you play

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it artfully. The weather forecast for Augusta, Georgia this week

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty ideal, temperatures ranging from the low sixties to the

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>mid seventies, no rain in the forecast, wins of five

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to ten miles an hour, maybe a little breezier than

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that on Friday. Not enough wind to really punish the players,

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but enough to challenged them now. Scotti Scheffler is the

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>defending champion. He finished eleven under par last year, four

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>shots better than Ludwig Oberg. It was Scotty's second win

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Masters. He also won in twenty two twenty

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, finishing minus ten and beating Rory McElroy by

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>three shots. John Ram won in twenty twenty three. He

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.439
<v Speaker 1>was twelve under, four shots clear of Phil Mickelson and

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Brooks Koepka. Haadeki Matsuiama won in twenty twenty one. He

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>finished minus ten to beat will Zalatoris by one stroke,

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and Dustin Johnson won the twenty twenty Masters, which was

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>played in the fall that year due to COVID. DJ

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 1>went twenty under par to win by five shots. I

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>love this course, bo sprinkle my ashes here when I'm gone.

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Your thoughts on augustin Nashal.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 3>It's just it's perfect. It's perfect in every way. There's

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 3>not a blade of grass out of place. The hills

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:56.119
<v Speaker 3>are unruly, the lies are uneven, the golf is somehow

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 3>still incredibly fair. Good shots are rewarded with opportunities, and

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 3>bad shots are swatted away with draconian consequences. That's what

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 3>golf should be about. This is the measuring stick. This

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 3>is the barometer for all championship golfers. If you're in

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 3>this field, you want to be able to hold yourself

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 3>up to that standard of how did I do at

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 3>the Masters When the field is the strongest, it's the

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 3>most concentrated at the top. Every top golfer is here,

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 3>and every top golfer who's conquered Augusta in the past

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 3>that's able to is here. That's what is The majesty

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 3>of this tournament is unmistakable. It's unparalleled. You cannot beat

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 3>to the Masters in any way, shape or form. And

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>as for Gary Player who says it's not even in

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 3>his top fifty golf courses, hogwash. This is the best

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 3>golf course in the world. Maybe not the most famous,

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 3>it's up there in fame too, but it's the best

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 3>golf course in the world. And it's also the most exclusive.

0:12:57.240 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 3>It has the mystique, it has the allure, and it's like,

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 3>how often does a golfer want to venture into the

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 3>woods for an experience like that? Well, here you go,

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 3>tucked back into the woods is the crown jewel of

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:14.559
<v Speaker 3>championship golf. And it's just it's just the best. It's perfect.

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Augusta National not open to the public, but I would

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>pay far more money than I could reasonably afford to

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 1>play around at Augusta National.

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 3>I would sell my house right now to play it

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 3>at one time.

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>It is that magical a place. Care to guess at

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.079
<v Speaker 1>a winning score this week ball.

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.560
<v Speaker 3>The weather is going to be mild and gettable, so

0:13:36.679 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 3>it's probably going to be between fifteen and eighteen under part.

0:13:39.240 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 3>A little bit more favorable scoring conditions this year, not

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:44.960
<v Speaker 3>quite as favorable as it was when it was softened

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:49.040
<v Speaker 3>in November of twenty twenty during the pandemic. But I

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 3>do think that the field strength, how well the golfers

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 3>are playing coming in, and with the way we've seen

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 3>scoring trending is going low. So fifteen to eighteen under

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 3>part most likely.

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go a little a little higher than

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:06.679
<v Speaker 1>you for winning score BO as far as well, not

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>quite as high relative to under par. I'm gonna say

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:13.720
<v Speaker 1>minus twelve, minus thirteen. I think firm, Yeah, firm and

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>fast conditions. I think could could trick it up a little. Granted,

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>there's not going to be a lot of wind and

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the greens aren't going to be soft, but I without

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the soft greens.

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh it's brutally difficult. And so yeah, if you hear

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 3>anybody say that they could break eighty at Augusta their life. Yeah,

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 3>or they're delusional, or they're both. It's it's just who

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 3>are they lying to?

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 4>You?

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 3>Are themselves? This course is absolutely disgusting for an amateur

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 3>to even think about it.

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, with a masters setup, if you are a scratch golfer,

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you're breaking eighty quite honestly, No.

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Chance, No chance, maybe ninety.

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Now the battle for the jacket is heating up in Augusta,

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and there is no better place to sweat the action

0:14:56.720 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>than DraftKings Daily Fantasy, the ultimate destination fantasy golf fans,

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and for this year's first major, DraftKings is giving all

0:15:05.000 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>customers shot to play free for a one million dollars

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:11.680
<v Speaker 1>top prize with your next ten dollars deposit on the

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Fantasy app. It's simple to play, build your dream

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>lineup while staying under the salary cap, then sit back

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and watches your player's rack up points, every birdie, every bogie,

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>every clutch pot, feel the intensity of every shot. I

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>talked about wanting to get Patrick Reid into my Draft

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Kings DFS lineups last week. Bo I do indeed think

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>he's value priced at seventy three hundred, another bargain.

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Price to live to her player. How about Sergio Garcia.

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>He's only seventy one hundred, He's been playing well, and

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>he loves this course. Sergio is a green jacket in

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>his closet. I'm torn between Scotti, Scheffler and Rory McElroy

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as my anchor player, leaning a little toward the slightly

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>less expensive Rory. Does anyone stand out to you as

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>an especially good Draft Kings DFS play at the Masters Bow.

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you a couple at the top as my anchor.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to sue the top two guys completely because

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the number three golfer in the world behind Scotty and

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Rory is Xander Schoffley, and he's going for sub ten

0:16:10.600 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 3>k on DraftKings at ninety seven hundred. He's got four

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 3>top tens in his last five years at the Masters.

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I'm going to take the easy value with

0:16:20.360 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Xander Schaffley there and right in that same range where

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 3>you're finding Patrick Reid. I love that pick. But how

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 3>about a guy who's averaging eighty DraftKings points a week

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 3>this season, Sepstrack at seventy six hundred. That's a great

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 3>value one of the best approach players with short game

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>that we have in this field, and he just seems

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 3>to He seems to do well when the conditions get tough.

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 3>And guess what, It's not going to be easy this week.

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Not download the DraftKings Daily Fantasy app and use code

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>BP golf to play free for a shot at the

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>one million dollar top prize with just a ten dollars deposit.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>That's for all DraftKings customers. Just download the Daily Fantasy

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>app use code BP golf for your free shot today.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>The Crown is yours. Gambling problem call one eight hundred

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>gambler in New York Call one eight hundred gambler In

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>New York call eight seven seven eight hope enn why

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or text hope n why to four six seven three

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>six nine. In Connecticut, help is available for problem gambling

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Call eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>seven or visit CCPG dot org eighteen plus in most

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:35.320
<v Speaker 1>eligible states, but age varies by jurisdiction. Eligibility restrictions apply.

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Voidware prohibited new customers only, Minimum ten dollars deposit required.

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>One single use ten dollars ticket rewarded for Fantasy Golf

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Millionaire contest that expires on April tenth at seven am.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>See terms at DraftKings dot com Slash Promotions sponsored by

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings Now for the master's odds. These odds are courtesy

0:17:56.920 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>of the DraftKings Sportsbook as of Monday morning. Please know

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that some player odds will have changed slightly by the

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>time you consume this show. Scotty Scheffler is the favorite

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>at plus four hundred. Rory McElroy is plus six fifty

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>short odds for Rory to win his first Green Jacket

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. Big John Rahm is plus thirteen hundred. Bryce

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>and d Chambeau, Colin Morikawa and Xander Schoffley are plus

0:18:19.160 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred. Ludwig Oberg is plus two thousand, Justin Thomas

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>plus twenty five hundred, Brooks Koepka and Hideki Matsuyama are

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>plus three thousand, Jordan Spieth is plus thirty five hundred,

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and Victor Hovland, Tommy Fleetwood and Patrick Cantley our plus

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.920
<v Speaker 1>four thousand. Let's talk about this GROUPO, how do you

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>feel about Scotty at plus four hundred and Rory at

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>plus six fifty and do any of the other players

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>stand out to you?

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.640
<v Speaker 3>This is a horse for course type of course. And

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 3>that being said, I see two green jackets in Scotti

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 3>Scheffler's closet and zero in Rory McElroy's. Twenty eleven was

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 3>the year they had the big lead in completly fell

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:04.520
<v Speaker 3>apart on Sunday. Ever since then, Rory McElroy has been

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 3>cursed at Augusta National. And yes he is the only

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 3>multiple time winner on tour this season, I still think

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 3>he's cursed. I still think that these odds are an

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 3>insult to bookmaking because it's just a bunch of suckers

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>like us out there wanting to ride that Rory wave.

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 3>And yes it was very tempting, but to get the

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 3>number three ranked golfer in the world at plus eighteen

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred is ludicrous. Xanderschoffley is a better track record at

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 3>Augusta National than Rory does. He's playing decently well for

0:19:34.800 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 3>coming off an injury earlier this season, and I think

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 3>as far as it goes, he's a better horse for

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 3>this course than is Rory McElroy. I'm probably gonna withhold

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 3>my Scottie Scheffler betting unless I get a double digit

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 3>odds type of live bet setup where he's still within

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 3>striking distance with enough holes to play to catch up

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 3>and make that bet worth it. But I'm starting my

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 3>outright card with Xanderschoff, and I'm going to run right

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 3>into Ludwig Oberg at plus two thousand. Shaffley is the

0:20:05.280 --> 0:20:08.080
<v Speaker 3>longest odds I could ever predict, because I handicapped him

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 3>at plus eight hundred. So getting an extra ten to

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:12.560
<v Speaker 3>one odds for a guy that's number three in the

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:18.720
<v Speaker 3>world and a multiple major winner last year, defending PGA champion,

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 3>defending champion Golf of the Year last year, and we're

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 3>going to talk about this guy being rolled over into

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 3>plus eighteen hundred territory. It's ludicrous. And on the same token,

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm betting Ludwig Oberg at the absolute shortest odds I

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 3>would bet him at at plus two thousand. That's just

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 3>because his upside is unmistakable. This guy has more of

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 3>a killer instinct than you they would ever imagine. He's

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:42.520
<v Speaker 3>got a lot more brooks kept cut under the hood

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 3>than he does. Somebody meek and mild like his outside

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 3>persona very cheerful, very very calm and collected, but that

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 3>dude is an ice cold killer under the surface. Like

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 3>brooks Kepi. He's a big game hunter and he's got

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 3>the upside that could run away with the Masters tournament

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 3>like he almost did last year. He almost ran down

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Scotty Shuffler last year until he dunked one on eleven.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 3>And that is why I think that he could make

0:21:08.640 --> 0:21:11.919
<v Speaker 3>a Tiger esque run at a Masters in his career

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 3>where he just dominates the field by double digit strokes.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Lud Vic Oberg has that in his range of outcomes.

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think anybody outside of Scotty has that.

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So few players making their debut at Augusta seriously contend.

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>You have to pay attention when a player making his

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>debut finishes second. Solow second, and he was so calm

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>last year, bo Like, he looked like he was having

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>fun out there. Oberg has missed the cut in his

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.359
<v Speaker 1>last two events, though, like I can't think of the

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>last time a player missed a cut in his last

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>event before the Masters and won the green jacket. That's

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the only thing that scares me. I'm with you on

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>everything else with him. Xander top ten at the Masters

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>three of the last four years, hasn't quite gotten into

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the groove yet. In twenty twenty five, he had the

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>slow start, but you know, would it really be to

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>see him turn it on this week?

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 2>And of course he plays well.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, Scotty obviously has the strong recent track record

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Masters. But Scotty hasn't won in six starts

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:12.120
<v Speaker 1>this year.

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Bo.

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a runner up in Houston a few weeks ago,

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>but he's only been top ten and three of his

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>six events.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Oh how tragic.

0:22:19.119 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's.

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, like obviously the comedy of airs with Scotty Scheffler.

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>We can't expect him to win out of six tournaments.

0:22:27.280 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 3>What has he turned into?

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Grading on a curve, I guess we're giving Scotty a

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>C minus this season, but for anyone else that would

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 1>be an A minus. I'm going to follow the patented

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>bow mcbarar strategy for betting Scotty Scheffler. I'm not playing

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>him at plus four hundred against such a loaded field,

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a field that now includes all the studs from the

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Live Tour. But I'm looking for opportunities where Scotty's odds drifts.

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Maybe double Bogie's one of his first couple of holes,

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.120
<v Speaker 1>or maybe another player jumps out to a multi shot

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>lead and all of a sudden, Scotty goes to plus

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred. That's where I might look to pounce on

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a Scotty outright. I'm with young Rory bo like very

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>sharp this year, wins at Pebble Beach in the Players Championship,

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and man, you'd think he'd have at least one green

0:23:10.840 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>jacket by now. But ever since that faithful Sunday and

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty eleven when a twenty one year old Rory McElroy

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>took a five shot lead into the final round and

0:23:19.200 --> 0:23:21.919
<v Speaker 1>shot eighty that day, it has been one tail of

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>ball after another for Rory at augusta runner up in

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, but he's missed the cut in two

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:30.679
<v Speaker 1>of his last four Masters twenty second last year. He

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.080
<v Speaker 1>could absolutely win this week, and I'd love to see it.

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Not eager to jump on him at plus six fifty.

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>What about Ram at plus thirteen hundred bow He's won

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the Masters, hasn't won on the Live Tour yet this year,

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>but he's played pretty well a lot of top tens.

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It's got that great combination of power off the tee

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>and touch around the greens. Do you think there's any

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 1>value at plus thirteen hundred.

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.760
<v Speaker 3>He's a tricky one because as well as he's played,

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:57.080
<v Speaker 3>I haven't seen the peak form that we saw when

0:23:57.119 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 3>he won the Masters a couple of years ago. So

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 3>probably not gonna bet John Ram here unless he slips

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.720
<v Speaker 3>to more of a fifteen to sixteen number. It's still

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 3>all of these guys up here have very high likelihood

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 3>of winning or chasing that top of the leaderboard this week.

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 3>Wouldn't surprise me at Algy at Ram at double digits

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 3>and be happy about it. I'm just not as excited

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:21.959
<v Speaker 3>as some people are about him, because again, we haven't

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 3>seen him really have that killer instinct that he showed

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 3>a couple of years ago at Augusta to win. I

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 3>just don't. I don't see the win here. I don't

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 3>see the hunger it's required to win here this year.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 3>This field is loaded, and I just want to see

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.880
<v Speaker 3>that fire come back to John Ram. He's a Spaniard

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 3>for Gord's sake. We gotta see that fire comeback so

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 3>we can be eating pie at the Champions dinner next year.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>How about Colin Morikawa?

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Say odds as Xander Schaffley plus eighteen hundred not always

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:55.680
<v Speaker 1>great with the putter, but he is an elite ball striker.

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 1>He's finished top ten at Augusta in each of the

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>last three years, including a third last year, and he's

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>been playing well this year. What do you think about

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the value on Morikawa.

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 3>That's another guy that's been bet up a lot this

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 3>week because of his ball striking prowess, not just putting,

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 3>but clutch. Does he have the clutch gene? Does he

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 3>have the killer instinct that we've seen from other winners

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 3>calin more Kawa hasn't won since he won the US

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 3>Open a few years ago. He hasn't won in two years.

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:26.439
<v Speaker 3>And this is a world class player, top ten in

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 3>the world, one of the best ball strikers, iron players

0:25:29.800 --> 0:25:32.680
<v Speaker 3>in the world. You have to be able to putt,

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 3>you have to be able to make birdie putts, you

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.880
<v Speaker 3>have to be able to salvage two putts on Augusta

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 3>National and that's what's held calling back and the tale

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 3>of two guys who both dunked their approach shots on

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 3>number eleven last year down the stretch trying to chase

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 3>down Scotti Scheffler lud Vig Oeberg dunked it on eleven

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 3>and smiled a rise smile to his caddy saying, well,

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I guess that's it, folks, and he kept playing. Calin

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 3>more Kawa done his approach on eleven. It looked like

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 3>he shut down completely, absolutely devastated. You could see his

0:26:06.840 --> 0:26:12.199
<v Speaker 3>entire like focus cracked. It crumbled, like he crumbled like

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 3>a cracker, like a like a chocolate chip cookie. It's

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>been left out in the sun. He folded. That was

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 3>not what I want to see in a championship like

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 3>this one. He might not ever have the killer instinct

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 3>required to win a green jacket, and for him to

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 3>get bet up as inflated as he is, I just

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 3>don't see it. As much as I love watching him play,

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 3>I just don't see it. And I will not be

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 3>placing any bets on Colin Morikawa this year. We're ever

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 3>at the Masters.

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>There points Bryson d Chambeau got to talk about him.

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>He finished sixth here last year. But Augusta has not

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>been especially kind to Bryson. He famously said a few

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago that he was going to treat Augusta as

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a par sixty eight because of the short par fives.

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And yes, Bryson is a guy who could go ten

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>under par on the par fives this week, But does

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:01.959
<v Speaker 1>he have the needed touch around the greens. I think

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that's the big question, And really, will his distance off

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the t be a big advantage in a week when

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>the course is going to be pretty dry and firm,

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>Like I'd be much more intrigued if Bryson were playing

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of a saggy Augusta. I'd also be more intrigued

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't a YouTube superstar who's fame is probably

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 1>artificially lowering his odds. So are you with me that

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of value on Bryson at plus

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred.

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, Bryson and Ludvigger similar in that they both have

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 3>that upside of going really really low on a tough

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 3>golf course. We saw what Bryson can do on a

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:38.360
<v Speaker 3>tough track that challenges his short game at the US

0:27:38.400 --> 0:27:42.679
<v Speaker 3>Open last year. Pinehurst was the absolute test for Bryson

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 3>to Shambo, and Pinehurst and Augusta not that different. Really.

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of similarities in how they're laid out,

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 3>what kind of misses you can have, what kind of

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 3>misses you can't have. And Bryson impressed me, so I'm

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.399
<v Speaker 3>more likely to bet Bryson than I am Colin or Rory.

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Because of that, will I still feature him on my card?

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Probably not, because, again, the chipping and putting is such

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 3>a stressor on all these players that I'm going to

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 3>be leaning towards the guys who are not just adequate

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 3>in the short game but elite.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>Now, you're the Justin Thomas guy, bo, how do you

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>feel about JT? He is twenty five to one. He's

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>had a top five and a pair of top tens

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>here in recent years, but he also missed the cut

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>here in each of the last two years.

0:28:30.840 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, another guy who's struggling with the putter on occasion,

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 3>but his big bugaboo has been off the tee, and

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 3>as tough as it is to position yourself off the

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 3>tee here, I probably won't bet him at twenty five

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 3>to one. I was hoping to see him at thirty

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 3>or thirty five so I could make a bet that

0:28:49.080 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 3>made me want to watch the Masters even more that

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 3>just didn't pan out. Twenty five to one is fair.

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 3>It's just not that good of a line for Justin Thomas,

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 3>especially since he has missed the weekend here twice in

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 3>a row. This is a different Justin Thomas. It's good.

0:29:03.320 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 3>It's just a different style of play than we've seen

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 3>in the last couple of years. So I hope he

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 3>does well. I'm just not gonna be betting on it.

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's look at the odds for some of the mid

0:29:12.000 --> 0:29:15.760
<v Speaker 1>range options. Tyrrel Hatton and Shane Lowry are plus forty

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. Georgia native Russell Henley is plus fifty five hundred,

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Smith, Minwoo Lee and Robert McIntyre are plus six thousand.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Aksha Beatilla, will Zlatoris and Sergio Garcia are plus sixty

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. Corey Conners is plus seven thousand, Tory Finow,

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Day, and Sepstraca are plus seventy five hundred, and

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Wyndham Clark is plus eight thousand. Let's talk about these guys,

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:41.280
<v Speaker 1>but is there any betting value in this range?

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 3>There is with a couple guys. I will caution a

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of people on guys who have big holes in

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 3>their game. This course is going to test your entire bag.

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:54.280
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna test every amount of creativity you have in

0:29:54.320 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 3>your brain to make that bag work for you on

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 3>this golf course, and it's gonna do that for four

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 3>ruling days, we're walking up and down gigantic hills, and

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 3>you're going to be thinking your whole way around. So

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 3>in this mid range, I'm looking for the thinkers. I'm

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 3>looking for the guys who aren't going to crack under

0:30:12.280 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 3>the pressure and aren't going to be ruined by one

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:19.120
<v Speaker 3>bad hole. And so with that being said, I'm going

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 3>to actually look to see Hideki Matziyama, a prior champion,

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of slip into that mid tier. If he slips

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 3>to thirty five or forty to one, we're looking at

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 3>a huge, huge investment and ladder bet for me because

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 3>a is a prior champion. One of the best master's

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.959
<v Speaker 3>moments I've ever seen was him and his caddie turning

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:42.280
<v Speaker 3>towards the eighteenth fair we had bowing to the setting

0:30:42.320 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Georgian sun. This guy is playing outstanding golf right now,

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 3>and there's no telling how much more of a memory

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>he's going to create at this golf course when he's

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 3>a what twenty six years old. Hideki Matziama is still

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 3>in the prime of his career. He's playing great golf

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 3>and he's already got that good vibes going at Augusta National.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 3>That's a guy that I'm willing to throw a lot

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.000
<v Speaker 3>of money on, especially if he slips past thirty to

0:31:07.000 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 3>one to thirty five or forty. And then the other

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 3>guy is who doesn't like Cameron Smith at Augusta. This

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 3>guy just a He's a top ten machine at Augusta.

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 3>It's because he plays a timeless style of golf where

0:31:21.360 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 3>he's not that great off the tee. He's a short hitter.

0:31:23.800 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 3>He plays a more positional style. There is not a

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 3>more lethal golfer in the world with a wedge and

0:31:29.680 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 3>putter in his hand. There's just not. He's number one

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 3>in every short game metric, He's number one in every

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 3>putting metric. He's number one in every short game thing

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 3>you can even measure. And the proof is in the pudding.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 3>This guy is fun to watch. He scores on tough

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 3>golf courses. It's because he does not really he does

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:51.400
<v Speaker 3>not relent when a wedge or putter is in his hand.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 3>And I think that he breaks through this year in

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 3>a big way. At sixty to one, that's an insult.

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.240
<v Speaker 3>He's plus four hundred just to get a top ten,

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 3>which he's done every year, but one that he's been

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 3>at Augusta.

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh, the man is a machine van go with a

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>wedge in his hands. Boy, the short game always plays

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>up at Augusta for Cam Smith, and he's finished top

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 1>ten in four of the last six Masters. But Cam's

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>foreman lived tour this year not not real good, only

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>one top ten finish in five starts Bots. The top

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>ten finish just came this past week in Miami. It

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>was only a nine.

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 3>At a very tough golf course that challenges the shirt.

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, winning score was what minus six? So, yeah, Darrell

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 2>is tough.

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 3>I remember Durrell being on the PGA Tour and that's

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:43.240
<v Speaker 3>a really good barometer and warm up for Augusta's actually

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 3>at the Live Miami tournament there at Darrell.

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Agreed, good tune up. Russell Henley bow He's from Macon, Georgia.

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>He's a Georgia bulldog. I realized Henley is sort of

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a Bermuda green specialist and Augusta has bent grass greens.

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>But Henley finished fourth here two years ago and he's

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 1>been playing great this year. He's sixth in strokes gained

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 1>total twenty two in strokes gained on approach, nineteenth in

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 1>strokes gained putting. I guess what maybe scares me a

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:10.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit is that he's barely inside the top one

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and strokes gained scrambling. But at fifty five to one,

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm definitely interested. I'm also kind of interested in Robert McIntyre,

0:33:18.760 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like left handers might have an advantage here with the

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>way they shape the ball, especially the ones who play

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the fade and Phil Mickelson, Bubba Watson, Mike Weir all lefties,

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.920
<v Speaker 1>all pass champions multiple times for Phil and Bubba. McIntyre

0:33:34.920 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>has finished twelfth and twenty third and two previous Masters starts,

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and his recent form has been pretty solid eleventh, ninth,

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and ninth in his last three PGA Tour events. Will

0:33:44.960 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 1>v Xalatorus excuse me, looks like really good value great

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>ball striker hasn't had a top ten this year, but

0:33:52.160 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 1>he's had three straight top tens at the Masters. And

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>speaking of great ball strikers, bo, I'm kind of conflicted

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>on Corey Connors. He's pretty dialed in three top tens

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in his last four events. He was just eighteenth at

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Valero Counters was making a big move on Saturday

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>at the Valero. Then he three part of the par

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 1>five seventeenth for a bogie, And that is the concern

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>for Corey Connors at Augusta. He's not a good putter

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>by PJ Tour standards, short game. Can he pot well

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>enough to win at Augusta? But can he be a

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>VJ Singh a guy who's a great ball striker and

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a mediocre putter, but his putter gets hot for four days.

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what happened to VJ when he won the Masters.

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 3>So VJ is a mediocre petter. Corey Connors is an

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 3>atrocious putting point and he's an atrocious chipper too, So yeah,

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Corey Connor has better bet on like the most insane

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:51.439
<v Speaker 3>heater of approach proximity on the correct side of the hole,

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.439
<v Speaker 3>because if this guy gets short sighted or above the hole,

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 3>he's absolutely toast.

0:34:58.280 --> 0:34:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Very true.

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>He is a surgeon with the iron, so maybe you

0:35:01.160 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>can do that, but man to do that over seventy

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>two holes at Agasta is a pretty tall order. Granted,

0:35:07.440 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>what about long shots? Bo We don't see many long

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>shot winners at the Masters, but we do occasionally get

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>the on Hell Cabrera from two thousand and nine who

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 1>breaks through for a win at longer odds. So is

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>there anyone you like north of eighty.

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 3>To one as two guys I circled, Like you said,

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 3>the long shot bets of the Masters don't usually pan

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.279
<v Speaker 3>out because these these guys are all so good, and

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 3>you get a couple stragglers that barely qualify in the

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 3>last weeks before the tournament. I'm gonna go for long

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:41.320
<v Speaker 3>shots with experience. I'm gonna go with Keegan Bradley. Oh, captain,

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 3>my captain. He's gonna be He's gonna be leading us

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 3>the Red, White and Blue at Bethpage Black in September.

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:52.399
<v Speaker 3>This guy's playing great golf and he's he's just he's

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 3>so sharp on approach this year that I don't see

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:59.719
<v Speaker 3>his weaknesses really showing up. Because this guy's always been

0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 3>a great scrambler, always been a great grinder, and his

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of his tee to green game has put what's

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 3>held him back in the past. Well, guess what, He's

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 3>as sharp as he's ever been, top seven in this

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 3>field on approach, and he's one of the best par

0:36:13.080 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 3>five scorers in this field period. He's at one hundred

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 3>to one, and I can absolutely see Keegan Bradley going

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 3>on one of those miracle runs where he just gets

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 3>the crowd fired up and he goes out there and

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:29.200
<v Speaker 3>the patrons, as they call him at Augusta National, will

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.759
<v Speaker 3>definitely be behind the captain of TM USA for the

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Ryder Cup and the last one is two hundred and

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.160
<v Speaker 3>fifty to one. It's a yolo vet. It's just based

0:36:37.200 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 3>on short game. Christian Bizet Note of South Africa. He

0:36:41.400 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 3>hasn't won anything since twenty twenty, but he's playing his

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:46.600
<v Speaker 3>best golf of his career right now. He's got the

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 3>short game to stay in contention, make the cut his

0:36:50.239 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 3>top twenty bettest plus four hundred. I just think that

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 3>it's something that's just it's a feel bet for me

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.359
<v Speaker 3>where I'm just looking at the course setup and who

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:02.760
<v Speaker 3>might fit in a basis. But he's played the Masters

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.319
<v Speaker 3>three times, not in the last two years, but though

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 3>the three times he's played the Masters, he's made the

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 3>cut all three times. So I do like his fit here,

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 3>especially with the form he's carrying in.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.600
<v Speaker 1>You could talk me into a first round leader bet

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.839
<v Speaker 1>On Baz Oh oh yeah, interesting, Oh yeah, for sure,

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I could see it.

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure it's good. It's probably thirty or forty to

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 3>one at worst.

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Now now Patrick Reid at one hundred to one, Yes, please,

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:29.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the best short games in the world, A

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>magician's touch around the greens. Patrick Reid won the Green

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Jacket in twenty eighteen and has been top ten in

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:40.360
<v Speaker 1>three of his six Masters appearances since the victory. Firm

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>fast conditions would work in his favor. I believe, yes,

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm all over Patrick Reid at one hundred to one now.

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>If anyone could win the Masters at age fifty four ball,

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 1>it's Phil Michelson.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely.

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 1>He's won three Green jackets, he knows every inch of

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this course. His short game has made for the place,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and he has been in good form lately. Third a

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Live Hong Kong last month, six that Live Miami this

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>past week. He's one hundred and ten to one, and

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Young not great form this week long odds though,

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:13.360
<v Speaker 1>for a guy who's finished top ten in each of

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the last two years at the Masters and is strong

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>with the driver, So I'm not sure I can get

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you on board.

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 2>For that one bow. But just just throwing that out

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 2>there for the people.

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 3>It's the people. The people are gonna be fun. It's

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 3>gonna be fun. Watching Cam Young try to put on anything,

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.359
<v Speaker 3>let alone the toughest screens that we're gonna see all year.

0:38:32.480 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 3>It's it's gonna be entertainment at its finest. Yeah, watching

0:38:36.080 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Cam Young try to navigate these screens again.

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Oddly enough, I think he's in the just inside the

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>top fifty and strokes gained putting this year right around fifty.

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, you look at last year and

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it was one hundred and fifty fourth, So that's a

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty good reflection of what kind of putter he actually is. Yeah,

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so let's get to the early betting cards. Bo who

0:38:56.680 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>is on yours as of right now?

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:03.239
<v Speaker 3>So Xander Schaffley at plus eighteen hundred, Ludwig Oberg at

0:39:03.400 --> 0:39:06.800
<v Speaker 3>plus two thousand, and then I dropped down to Hideki

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:11.000
<v Speaker 3>Matsiyama currently at plus three thousand, Cam Smith at plus

0:39:11.040 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 3>six thousand, and then I'm gonna throw some darts at

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 3>Keegan Bradley at plus ten thousand, and Christian is a

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 3>newte at plus two twenty five two hundred fifty to one.

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'm not putting a lot on a John Ram outright,

0:39:25.520 --> 0:39:27.759
<v Speaker 1>but I do have a little something on Ram at

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.720
<v Speaker 1>plus thirteen hundred I'm gonna I'm gonna follow your Xander

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Schaffley advice BO, just the way he's been so steely

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in recent majors. I'm gonna take him at plus eighteen hundred,

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Russell Henley plus fifty five hundred with a top ten

0:39:41.080 --> 0:39:44.960
<v Speaker 1>kicker at plus three twenty, Will Zalatorus at plus sixty

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.840
<v Speaker 1>five hundred with a top five kicker at plus seven fifty.

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing Corey Connors for a top ten bow at

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>plus four hundred. I don't think he can win, but

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I think he can finish top ten as well as

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>he's been hitting the ball. Sergio Garcia for a top

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty at plus one seventy five. Mind you, at top twenty,

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Sergio has actually been playing pretty well lately. He's hitting

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball great. And Phil Mickelson for a top twenty

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 1>at plus three hundred and to make the cut at

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:15.720
<v Speaker 1>minus one fifteen. I think those are both really good bets.

0:40:15.920 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>And then my two biggest investments of the week Bow

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:22.239
<v Speaker 1>I am ladder betting Patrick Reid one hundred to one

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to win, eleven to one for a top five, plus

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>four fifty for a top ten, and plus one eighty

0:40:27.280 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>for a top twenty and I have a substantial wager

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 1>on Max Homa to miss the cut at even money

0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:38.239
<v Speaker 1>plus one hundred. Home has been utterly lost this year.

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:41.239
<v Speaker 1>He's missed five straight cuts. His best finish was a

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty third at Pebble Beach back in February. Maxhoma recently

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>changed caddies. He had one of his closest friends since

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>childhood on his bag. They've parted ways. I don't think

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.160
<v Speaker 1>there's any way Maxhoma makes the cut this week. Maxhoma

0:40:54.200 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>missing the cut is my favorite single bet of the week.

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I hate to be a grave dancer bow, but you know,

0:41:01.440 --> 0:41:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I just think that's a fantastic money making opportunity. Now

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>for our one and done picks. BO had Akshay Battia

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>last week at the Valero. He missed the cut. Bo's

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 1>very first miss cut of the year, ending a streak

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 1>of thirteen straight events in which Bo's player made the cuts.

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I had Corey Connors. He tied for eighteenth, good for

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirteen and fifty dollars. You are up

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:27.200
<v Speaker 1>first at the Masters Bow.

0:41:27.239 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 2>Who are you taking?

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm just gonna burn it right here.

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Scotty Scheffler, Oh, the big one there it is now

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for anyone in a one and done pool. I mean,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I can't argue with Scotty Scheffler as a play like

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I would hope not in.

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:43.200
<v Speaker 2>A big money event.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but I do think for most people, especially the

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>people who might have might be saving Scotty, might have

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>used Scotty somewhere else, I think the smart play is

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:54.839
<v Speaker 1>to take a live tour player this week. You only

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.399
<v Speaker 1>have four chances to use the stars of the Live Tour,

0:41:57.760 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the four Majors and a bunch of the tour guys

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:02.960
<v Speaker 1>have great track records at the Masters and games that

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>are well suited for this course. So I do think

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it's game theory optimal to use a live player this week.

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.919
<v Speaker 1>I am going to take Big Jon Rahm. And that

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:17.719
<v Speaker 1>is all for this week's Betting Pros PGA podcast sponsored

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:21.640
<v Speaker 1>by DraftKings. We'd like to thank DraftKings for their sponsorship.

0:42:21.960 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Please come join us again next week for our recap

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:27.719
<v Speaker 1>of the Masters and our betting preview of the RBC Heritage.

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Until then, so long everyone.

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:42:32.719 --> 0:42:35.080
<v Speaker 4>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:42:35.120 --> 0:42:38.520
<v Speaker 4>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at betting Pros NFL.

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:44.839
<v Speaker 3>Also subscribe to our

0:42:44.840 --> 0:42:59.000
<v Speaker 4>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros