WEBVTT - Mute might not be what you think on video chat apps

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk offers to buy Twitter. Are you really muted

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>on your video call? Netflix? Does the double thumbs up?

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Plus your tech questions answered? What's going on? I'm Rich

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Demiro and this is Rich on Tech, the podcast where

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I talk about the tech stuff I think you should

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>know about. It's also the place where I answer the

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>questions you sent me. I'm the tech reporter at KTLA

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Channel five in Los Angeles. It seems like there is

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.920
<v Speaker 1>never a dull moment in the tech industry these days.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.879
<v Speaker 1>We've got new phones, we've got new services, You've got

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of things happening, and the big news this week,

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and by the time you listen to this show, this

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>could have changed. Because this is such a dynamic situation.

0:00:56.120 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But Elon Musk has offered to buy Twitter outright forty

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollar deal fifty four dollars and twenty cents

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>per stock. He is, you know, sort of a this

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a controversial thing. I mean, the reaction

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>I've seen on Twitter has been fast, it's been furious,

0:01:17.920 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been you know, some people think it's going to

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 1>be a good thing. Some people think it's going to

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>be a bad thing. But the reality is it's a thing,

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:30.119
<v Speaker 1>and so again forty three billion dollar deal. Elon Musk

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>said that, you know, he wants to buy Twitter because

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he believes in its potential to be the platform for

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>free speech around the globe, and he thinks free speech

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is a societal imperative. But he thinks that the company

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>cannot survive or thrive. I guess, he says, I realized

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the company will neither thrive nor serve this imperative in

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>its current form and needs to be transformed as a

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>private company. So he is offering to one hundred percent

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter. Now, he says that this is his offer.

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Fifty four dollars and twenty cents is a fifty four

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>percent premium over the day he began investing in Twitter.

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he can look at the filings and see

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>when he started investing. I think that was at the

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>end of last year, and a thirty eight percent premium

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>over the day the investment was publicly announced. Twitter has

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:25.280
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary potential. I will unlock it. That's what Elon Musk said. Now,

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>this has been a roller coaster because we know that

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it was revealed that Elon Musk bought nine percent stock

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>in the company then the company offered him a board seat.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Then he said no, I'm not going to join the board.

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>And then he started asking weird questions on Twitter, like,

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, does Twitter protect free speech? You know, just

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>all these weird kind of odd things, and some things

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>got deleted. And it's interesting to watch his rise and

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>also the kind of transformation into a very polarizing, controversial person.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, obviously he has very successful company with with Tesla.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>He is doing really interesting things with SpaceX, and you know,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously he came from PayPal and made a whole bunch

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 1>of money there and did some interesting things there. He's

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>outspoken and he is a forward thinker. But should he

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>be in charge of Twitter? A lot of people say no.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm just reading the comments today on tech Meme, they

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>linked up a bunch of the tweets. I mean, I

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>think more tweets than I've ever seen from anyone or

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>any particular story. Just a lot of people, the good,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the bad, the ugly, and let's be honest, what a

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are concerned about is this idea of

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>free speech on Twitter. Twitter has blocked one of their

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>most prolific tweeters. You remember former President Trump and you know,

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Trump had I think he had about eighty million followers.

0:03:58.920 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And this was another thing that that Elon did. He

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>tweeted out a list of people and he said, is

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter dead? You know, these people rarely tweet and they're

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>like the top, you know, they have the top followers

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. So it's it's really controversial. It's really interesting,

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, should Twitter be handled or run by one person?

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Right now? Twitter is a publicly traded company. It's got

0:04:24.120 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>a board. And keep in mind this is a consumer podcast,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and to be quite honest, I don't talk about Twitter

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot in this podcast because I don't think

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is a very consumer oriented company. Like I don't

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>think average consumers are on Twitter. And it's clear that,

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at their user base, they've

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>got you know, over two hundred million active users daily,

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but only a portion of them are in US, maybe

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>something like fifty sixty million of them. So when you

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>look at that compared to something like Facebook and Instagram

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know these other places out there, you know,

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is just a blip, and so is Snapchat. Really

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the two big ones are Instagram and Facebook when it

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>comes to social media, and so Twitter is small. But

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the argument is should Twitter be bigger?

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Should Twitter have more of an impact in the US?

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Should it not just be the news folks and the

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:24.679
<v Speaker 1>entertainment folks. And now, of course TikTok is another huge

0:05:24.680 --> 0:05:29.479
<v Speaker 1>one and growing very fast, so we'll follow this. I

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>think that for the average person, I think it really

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the deciding factor if if Elon is in charge, I

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>think changes they're feeling about Twitter. There's a lot of

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>journalists on Twitter who may not want to support it

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>as much anymore. Or there's some people on Twitter, you

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>know that that kind of lean left or right that

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>may feel like Twitter would become much more of a

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>conservative place. So you know, I'm not giving you my

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>my feeling on whether that's right or wrong or what

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, people should think about. But I'm just giving

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>you all the facts and kind of what is what's

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>percolating around the community. And that's really what it is,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is what does this social media network want to be?

0:06:11.760 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Does it want to be a voice of the right,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Does it want to be a voice of the left.

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Does it want to be a voice somewhere in the middle.

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Should they be censoring people, should they be you know,

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just is it? What should Twitter be? And so those

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of questions that need to be answered.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.159
<v Speaker 1>Do I think that Elon Musk is going to finalize

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>purchase of Twitter. I'm not really sure. I think that

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this is is just kind of shaking

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>things up a little bit. We'll see. But Twitter's also

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a company they answer to shareholders. This is a lot

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of money, and so it's just kind of one of

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>those things that we will follow. And it's quite fun

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to watch. I'll be honest as a tech person, it's

0:06:48.320 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>quite fun to watch. It's fun to see the reactions.

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It's fun to see all of the different positioning of people.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>And anyway, so we'll see what happens. By the time

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>you listen to this. It could all be mute. It

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>could all be a moot point anyway, because Elon may

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>drop out of the contention for purchasing Twitter. He may

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>say nevermind, I changed my mind. All right, let's get

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to the first question of the show. Let's see where

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>are we? Gina says, I have a question about wi fi.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're at a Starbucks or McDonald's or any other

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>retail outlet on their WiFi, how susceptible are you to

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>being hacked? Can you safely use Wi Fi at a

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>hotel or on a ship? Several years ago, I was

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>on a cruise. When we landed, many people got off

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and access their phones through a Wi Fi connection at

0:07:32.520 --> 0:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the port. Later that day many were complaining their phones

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>had been hacked. So I never use outside Wi Fi.

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Just wondering if Wi Fi is safer. Thanks for responding, Gina. Well,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, everyone has a story of someone who something

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>happened to them. The fact that a bunch of these

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>people got off at a port and their phone was hacked,

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really sure that happened. It's kind of like

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this whole idea of you know, everyone has a story

0:07:59.520 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>about something thing, right, And I think that in general

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>public Wi Fi is quite safe and I think you'll

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>be okay. Starbucks, McDonald's, I mean those companies I think

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 1>are probably the most safe. I mean, the chances of

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>someone getting in and messing with McDonald's or Starbucks WiFi

0:08:18.920 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is pretty pretty low. Now, what I do my banking

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>on a Wi Fi network? And the answer is no,

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>would I check my email? Probably? I think it'll be fine.

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget that when you check these services most of

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>them are going through a secure layer to access that service,

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's not just like flying over the public internet

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to access your information. When you go from your phone

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to Gmail or something like that, it's using a secure

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of transmission socket to access that information, So it's

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.719
<v Speaker 1>not just kind of putting your information out there. And

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>if someone were to sniff that network, typically as long

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 1>as it's a secure as long as it's over a

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:04.679
<v Speaker 1>secure connection, you know, from you know, a Gmail or

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>encrypted or whatever, it will be fine. They're not gonna

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:09.439
<v Speaker 1>be able to see what you're doing. Now, are there

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a million and one ways that this could be a problem. Yes,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, someone could could set up a fake network

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and they could just log all the traffic that's happening

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>on that network. Someone could log all the unencrypted traffic

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>over a network and see what's happening there. But typically

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.240
<v Speaker 1>when you're exchanging passwords and you're logging into things, most

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of that is done over encrypted connections. So I think

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be okay. But again I would still err

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>on the side of what am I doing on this network?

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm just doing social media Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, watching YouTube, it's gonna be fine. But if

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing my banking, if I'm doing my budget, if

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing you know, something that's really really highly secure,

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I would not use a public network in general, but

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for vacation things like that. On a cruise ship, you'll

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>probably be fine. Now, if you want, you can step

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>up your connection to a VPN, it'll be a little

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>bit safer. There's a lot of them out there that

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>people like, you know. I would just google top rated

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>VPNs and see from a reputable source like Wirecutter or

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, PC mag or something like that, and see

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what they recommend. But I think that, you know, if

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to step it up to that, that'd be fine.

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>But in general, I would make sure that you are

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>accessing things over a secure connection when you're you're going

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to a website that requires that. I would also use

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>LTE if you can. Now, if you're on a cruise ship,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you probably can't use your cellular connection, so you're gonna

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>be on their Wi Fi. I would just be really

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the Wi Fi networks that I connect to,

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So typically I do not connect to a lot of

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>random Wi Fi networks. Typically I will connect to a

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>network if it's trusted, if it's from a place I know,

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>or if it's from a provider I know, I don't

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>just you know, find an open network. Remember the days

0:10:55.520 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>where you just find an open network and you connect

0:10:57.640 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to it and you'd be like, oh cool, I found

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.839
<v Speaker 1>free Wi Fi. I think that my privacy is much

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>more important than saving a few megabytes of data on

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>my plan, so I always default to cellular in general.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Now there's another whole thing that I think is actually

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>more important here, and that's the Wi Fi at your work.

0:11:17.400 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think that Wi Fi at work everyone connects

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to their Wi Fi at their employer, and a lot

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of times to connect to that Wi Fi, you may

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>have to download some sort of security profile to your

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 1>device to be able to get onto that network. And

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that that actually has more potential for issues

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>than a different network that doesn't require that, because when

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>you download one of these trust certificates to your phone

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>or to your computer, it's giving that Wi Fi network

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more free rain on your device than

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a network that doesn't require that. And so what can

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they do at your work, Well, you know, they may

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>be able to monitor the websites that you're going to

0:11:59.559 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they may able to see when you come and go.

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot they can do, actually, depending on what

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:05.719
<v Speaker 1>your company wants to do and how they want to

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 1>slice and dicee the data that they're collecting if they

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>collect that data. So I personally always am very very

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>cautious about when I connect to Wi Fi and why

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and how and for how long and the networks that

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I use. So, Gina, I think it's good that you're

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this stuff. I think that if you're just

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>casually using the Wi Fi network, you'll be fine. But

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>anytime that you are just a little bit more critical

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of the network, I think that's a smart thing in general. Well,

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>along those lines, let's talk about your video conferencing app. So,

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, what do we all do when we go

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on something like Zoom or teams or FaceTime or whatever.

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, you mute yourself when you don't want to

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.680
<v Speaker 1>be heard by the person on the other end. But

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>did you ever think that perhaps the video conferencing app

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>itself might still be listening to you. They're just not

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 1>transmitting that audio to the person on the other end. Interesting,

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So it turns out these video conferencing apps might still

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>be listening to you even when your mic is muted.

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:10.120
<v Speaker 1>This is a study from the University of Wisconsin. Students

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there took a look at how popular video chat apps

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:16.480
<v Speaker 1>collect data even when the mic is off, and in

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a majority of cases, when you press mute, the apps

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>still access your microphone and many still collect audio snippets.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>So to protect your privacy, experts recommend using what's called

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the double mute, and this means muting the app, so

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>pressing that mute button on the app, but also pressing

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a mute button on a piece of hardware like on

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>your headset or the settings on your computer, pressing mute there.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>So therefore you have muted both access to your microphone

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>from your computer at a system level and also through

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the app. Now, the study did not reveal specific app

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>names that may be coming later because they're going to

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>present these findings at a private conference later this summer.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>But this is one of those things that it's kind

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of like the stuff that you wonder about when you

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>use these apps, like, Okay, well I'm muted to the

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>person on the other side, but the app never said

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>that I was muted to them. And so with this

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>study found is that yeah, a lot of these apps

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are still collecting little snippets here and there. Some of

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>them are still collecting a bunch of information about your

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>audio even when you're muted. And so it's kind of

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>concerning that when you think your privacy is intact, it

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>may not be. And now this study actually took it

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a step step further. They analyzed some of the audio

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>using a pretty crude algorithm to see if they could

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out what you were doing in the background, like

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>washing dishes or watching TV or whatever. And their algorithm

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>was able to figure out what you were doing in many,

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>many cases. And so again when you think about someone

0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook or or you know, Zoom whatever, you know

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>they have very sophisticated systems and computers and people, and

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:08.560
<v Speaker 1>so what could they do with this audio? They could say, well,

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>we know that ninety seven percent of people are washing dishes,

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>that the audio sounds like this, so let's send them

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>some ads about dishwashing detergent. Who knows. I mean, look,

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>these programs are free in the majority of cases. If

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you're not paying for it, you know that you're the product.

0:15:24.400 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So I found this study to be really interesting. I

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's it needs They kind of threw it out

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>there without a ton of like background data. Like they

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't really say which apps this could be they test,

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean they said they tested, like, well, they test.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it said like two hundred apps they tested.

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, they asked two hundred and twenty three video

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>conferencing users. Okay, but they didn't say which apps. But

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>they tried out many different video conferencing apps on major

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 1>operating systems including iOS, Android, Windows, and Mac checking to

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>see if the app still access to microphone when it

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was muted. Now, if you have an eye iPhone or

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>an Android on Android, they now have a system wide

0:16:06.640 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>toggle in the settings to cut off access to your microphone,

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>which you know you can do by you know, dragging

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>down your notification bar. On iOS, it will tell you

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>when it's accessing your microphone, but it doesn't necessarily let

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you turn off access unless you go into the settings

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for the app. But that would be kind of a

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 1>problem because you'd never be able to use the app.

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>So I guess my advice if you're really, really truly

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>concerned about your privacy is to use a pair of

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>plug in headphones for your computer or your phone that

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:40.720
<v Speaker 1>has a physical mute button as well. That way you know,

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you're muting your audio at the source, at the microphone

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>and also through the app itself. All right, Kenneth writes

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in when I joined cal State Northridge Alumni Association, one

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>of the benefits was to allow me to have a

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>school related email addrect Thus at my CSUN dot edu.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I've had that as my primary email address for several years.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I have that as my identifying name on many different

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>providers like Walmart and Amazon. Yesterday, I was informed by

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it that SASUN by the end of June, the email

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>account will be terminated. As such, all alumni member accounts

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>will be terminated. Only current students and faculty will be

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 1>able to continue with those school accounts. This is due

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:28.159
<v Speaker 1>to a reduction in the storage space that Google is

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>allowing universities. Yes, Google, when it first arrived said free, free, free, forever,

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.880
<v Speaker 1>will continue to increase your storage space forever. And then

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:41.479
<v Speaker 1>forever came and they said, oh, never mind, let's not

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>do that anymore. Let's charge you after fifteen gigabytes. That

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 1>happened a couple years ago. As such, I wrote that

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>he didn't write that as such, that was just an aside.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>As such, he says, I'm going to have to jump

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>through a lot of hoops, get a new Gmail address,

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>download my stuff to that address, and then contact all

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the others with whom I use my former address. So

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Kenneth did not actually ask a question in here, You

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>just kind of left a comment. And I guess this

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a warning to other people that, yeah,

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you need to be careful when you choose your email address,

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>because if you're going with a provider that is maybe

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:17.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to be there in the future, you might

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>want to rethink. So the safest thing to do is

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.680
<v Speaker 1>probably to get your own domain and pay for email

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>through that because you can continually do that, and you

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>know kind of if you're paying for it, you're gonna

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to get that hosted. Obviously, I think Gmail

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 1>is pretty safe. I think Outlook is pretty safe. Yahoo

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and not so much. I probably wouldn't choose them at

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this point. But a lot of people also have similar

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>problems with their cable company. So they will use their

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.880
<v Speaker 1>cable company's email address, and next thing you know, they

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:55.840
<v Speaker 1>move or they switch providers, and now what do you

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>do Because you've got all your stuff linked in and

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the email addresses is that they are

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>your recovery email address for many many accounts, and so

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 1>if you forget your password, oh hey, let's just email

0:19:07.320 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you a password or your a temporary link to your

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>email address. And if that email address is not in

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:14.640
<v Speaker 1>use anymore, well now you're kind of out of luck.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Because some of the bigger companies give you alternative recovery methods,

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of the other ones just don't. It's

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 1>just your email. So I think that this is a

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>good kind of just warning to not use random email addresses,

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>as good as they may seem at the time, for

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.400
<v Speaker 1>future reference. So I know that I have an alumni

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 1>email address as well. I've used that. I did use

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>it pretty much exclusively is my email for a very

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>long time, and then the writing was kind of on

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the wall that I didn't really want to use that

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 1>anymore after Gmail came out. And of course I always

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>have my hesitation with Gmail, because you know, it is Google,

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and so you're kind of showing your allegiance to one

0:19:58.440 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>major corporation, and so I didn't like that idea. But

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Gmail seems to be a really good email provider. It's

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>worked for me for many years, so I do use

0:20:07.560 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 1>that one as well. As a couple others. I've I've

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>got some help self hosted emails as well. But at

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, I think that you go

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with a provider that's pretty big so that you don't

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 1>get stuck in one of these in one of these

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>situations where you kind of have to back yourself out.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>And so I think outlook, let's see largest email providers.

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think there's like proton Mail is a big one.

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what else do we have here? Oh gosh,

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>this is from twenty sixteen. Come on, you've got to

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>have a better provider than that, Google, Yahoo, Microsoft, Oh, AOL,

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh. I wouldn't have AOL, that's for sure. Let's

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 1>see what else is there. I remember when there was

0:20:51.880 --> 0:20:55.679
<v Speaker 1>an email called Juno, and this was back kind of

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>back in the day when I think AOL was king

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>and AOL cast money, and so if you had an

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>AOL account, fine, that was great. But Juno came along

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was free email and it had a little

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>tagline at the bottom, and I think ads on the

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.719
<v Speaker 1>web service, like the actual app that you downloaded your

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 1>computer had ads on it, and so Juno, I thought,

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>was like the best email in the world, because I

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, I get this for free. It works outside AOL,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>It's never gonna change. It's so great. I had like

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>an awesome email address because I was like one of

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.479
<v Speaker 1>the first users. So my email was like super easy,

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like richdat Juno dot com or something like that, and

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so I just loved it. And then of course that evolved.

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>It got bought by I think net zero. Do you

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>remember that name? Man, all these things net zero? I

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>think is that even around anymore? I don't know. Let's see,

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>no net zero brings you to Norton three sixty so

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>net zero is gone. Wow, just so wild? How all

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>these things? Oh my gosh, it brought me to the

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:09.199
<v Speaker 1>net zero search page, like a search But yeah, that

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>was there. I mean, there was a lot of stuff

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in the early days of the Internet that kind of

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>was available and then it went away. Another one that

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>actually have been quite impressed with over the years that's

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>been around forever is Google Voice. So I've had a

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.760
<v Speaker 1>phone number with them since day one when it was

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>called Oh my gosh, I'm trying to remember what Google

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Voice was before Google Voice previous name, Oh my gosh,

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>it was like Cloud grand Central, Grand Central, So I

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:39.640
<v Speaker 1>got grand Central. I was working at c NEET at

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the time, and I thought it was the coolest thing

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>ever to have this phone number that rang all of

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>your different devices. So I don't know why I needed that.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, back in the day, you had a landline,

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you had your cell phone, and you had your home phone,

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>so there were three places where someone could potentially reach you.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought Grand Central, the fact that you

0:22:57.320 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>could just give out one phone number and it reached

0:22:59.840 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>you had all these different phones at the same time

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>was so amazing. And I'm pretty sure the phone number

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 1>I have with that with Google Voice is the same

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>phone number I've had since Grand Central launched in two

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand and two thousand and six, and it, by the way,

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was not very it was it was not around very

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>long before Google purchased it. So Google purchased it in

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven for just a mere fifty million dollars.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So that's what became Google Voice, if you remember that.

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I love giving little history lessons because you kind of

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>forget about this stuff. I mean, I've been doing this

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for a while and I am I'm one of those

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>people that loves to sign up for stuff the day

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes out. I think, you know, it used to

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>be a lot. There used to be a lot more

0:23:46.840 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 1>services that came out that were really cutting edge and

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>really cool and just free and kind of changed your

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>life in a sign up and you're like, this is

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.479
<v Speaker 1>really cool and it's free. This is really cool and

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>it's free. This is really awesome and it's free. And

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>now I feel like that's not so much the case anymore.

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I think many, I mean things are still coming out

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that are really awesome. I think that many of these

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>companies have gotten hip to the either the freemium model

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>where you know you're gonna get a feature or two

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 1>for free, but the rest of it is going to

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>be pretty highly locked down and paid, or they just

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>come out and it's just like now we're just paid,

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've got to be because there's just no way

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we can do this without being paid. I remember Who's

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Sweet was another one. So Who's Sweet was this service

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that it just it linked up all of your different

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>social media networks and you can post one thing and

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>it would go to all the different networks. And I

0:24:42.160 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>thought that was so cool until I just Deine told me,

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll never forget this. We were hosting cs together and

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.359
<v Speaker 1>I just Deine. I was you know, asking, I was

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.040
<v Speaker 1>picking her brain. I'm like, Justine, how do you have

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>so many followers in so many places? And how do

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 1>you keep up with it? And this was, you know,

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you're going on ten years ago, so this was like

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the early days of social media. And she was like, Oh,

0:25:03.760 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever you do, do not cross post. Whatever you do,

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>don't cross posts. People want to build their own little

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>communities and their own little places, and so the post

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that you have in one place does not necessarily work

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in another place. And that really held with me for

0:25:19.240 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 1>so many years, and I would I would try to

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>be very unique and have a unique voice on all

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>my different social media platforms. And then flash flash forward

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 1>ten years. Justine and I hosted a CES couple of

0:25:31.800 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and I said, Justine, I don't know if

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>you remember telling me this, but you remember telling me that,

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we should be different on all these different

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>platforms and personalize the stuff. And she goes, oh, well, yeah,

0:25:42.800 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no way I can do that anymore. And yeah,

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that advice doesn't hold true anymore. And I was like, what,

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I've been following this advice for so long, but here's

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing. It's still good advice, and of course we

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 1>discussed it a little bit more. Of course, you want

0:25:58.080 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>to create the You can have similar content, but you

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>adapt it for the different social media network. So what

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people do when I see this all

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the time, they post an Instagram post on Facebook like

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the actual maybe a link to it, or they post

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a link to a YouTube video. And the reality is

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Facebook does not reward that. They reward what's called a

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 1>native upload of a video or a native link or

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, links these days on Facebook don't really do

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.400
<v Speaker 1>well at all. But you know, they want native content,

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>content that is uploaded through their system in their format.

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.439
<v Speaker 1>So if you look at something like Instagram when they

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>came out with their copycat of TikTok, they you know,

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>people are just downloading their tiktoks and uploading them to

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Instagram reels and they said, you know this is just

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>because I already make this piece of content. It's the

0:26:53.600 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 1>same format, it's vertical, it's the same timeframe. Let me

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>just upload it to Instagram, and Instagram sensing danger because

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>they didn't want people to just you didn't want reels

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a TikTok copycat. That it was and literally

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>just show TikTok videos. They got hip to that, and

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they ended up putting in their algorithm a filter that

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>would look for you know how when you download a

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>TikTok video, it puts your username and TikTok kind of

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>bounces around the screen like that DVD logo on the

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 1>TV screen. It kind of bounces around your TikTok video. Well,

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Instagram's algorithm searches for that, and if it sees that

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on your video that watermark, it says, Okay, we see

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>what this person's doing here. We're gonna demote that. And

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so they demote that video. So, yes, you'll still see

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:44.400
<v Speaker 1>those videos, and if it's a popular video, of course

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's still gonna go viral with that even on there

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>if a lot of people catch wind of it. But

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things that's built in because Instagram

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>wants to reward original content. Now, could you just upload

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the same exact video to both services? Yes, you can,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>but again and that's much more in a native format

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>because you're not just downloading something that you uploaded from

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and using TikTok, you know, editing functionality and all

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that stuff and then uploading it to Instagram. So again,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it's just this kind of stuff happens with all these

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 1>social networks. They want to be their own social network.

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 1>They want you to have your own kind of voice

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and your own you know, they want you to use

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>it the way that you engage with your viewers and

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.880
<v Speaker 1>not just sending stuff to ten different networks at once.

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think at the beginning, when we were trying

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to handle all these different things, that worked out great.

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>But as Justine realized and as I realized, as you

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>went along, like these these services became so different and

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of what people expected from them became different. Like

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram, you would post a picture, you know, it

0:28:48.000 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't you wouldn't necessarily just post a screenshot of your

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.600
<v Speaker 1>latest article that you posted to the website or whatever,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean. And so again, by by

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>putting those things in a format that the social media

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>network wanted, would help you in that social media network

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>gain viewers and followers and also interact with those followers.

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>And they rewarded that, and they still do in a

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>big way. I mean, this is very very apparent on

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook to me that when you test out some of

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the new things that Facebook is doing, like reels, they

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>are really really rewarding you with that by showing those

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to way more people. They're kind of over correcting for

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.600
<v Speaker 1>those things, and so they're sending your reels to a

0:29:32.640 --> 0:29:35.320
<v Speaker 1>lot more people than that would typically see them. But

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>as these things mature, the numbers go down and people

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>are like, hey, wait, hold on, how come I was

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>getting so many views at the beginning and now I'm

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>not getting those same views. I haven't really changed anything. Well,

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>what's changed is that Instagram got what they wanted. They

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>got everyone to get comfortable with using reels, to uploading

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to reels, to selecting reels, to watching reels, and now

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't need your help as much in uploading that

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff because the mass amounts of people are uploading stuff.

0:30:03.920 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>So they're like, all right, we're good now, so we'll

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>just now we'll just show your videos to a small

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>subset of people once again, like we were going to

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning. I don't know what that story was.

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know where how did I get on

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that tangent with that story? Oh? Email, Yes, that was

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the email question. So to answer your question, choose an

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 1>email that you can stick with all right, let's get

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to a story about Fitbit. Fitbit devices we'll soon be

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>able to tell their users about potential heart issues. Fitbit's

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>got an approval from the FDA to use an algorithm

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>came up with that identifies atrial fibrillation. This is a

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>fib that's a form of a regular heart rhythm that

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>affects more than thirty million people, and those people are

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>more susceptible to strokes. So the big challenge here is, yes,

0:30:47.600 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you might say, rich, dude, rich, come on, I listened

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>to the show. I know that the Apple Watch has

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>had this feature forever. Come on, Rich, Well, two things

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>on that. Number one, I don't think that the Apple

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Watch does this in the background. I believe that you

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 1>still have to trigger a manual. If I'm looking at

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this watch here and I go to heart or ECG,

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't necessarily take a reading in the background. You

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>have to put your fingers and complete kind of this

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>circuit on your watch for it to take a reading.

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>And if you have a heart issue, maybe people do that,

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple times a day. But the kind

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of idealized version of this is that you would you're wearable,

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>would be doing this in the background all the time.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think the problem with that is that it

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>uses a lot of battery, it uses a lot of resources,

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and that has been a challenge until now. And that's

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>when Google or I should say Alphabet that owns Fitbit,

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>they have come up with this algorithm that kind of

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>looks at the data that your watch is collecting all

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the time and analyzes that data for signs of a

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 1>FIB and then they will notify you if there is

0:32:02.440 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>something unusual. This does not replace a doctor, doesn't replace

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the equipment you would typically use to do a real

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>reading or a thorough reading. But it is a really

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>really good start and the fact that this gotten FDA

0:32:15.600 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 1>approval is huge. Basically, it gives the wearers of fitbit

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>specific models of Fitbit, this is not all of them,

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and it gives them, you know, another way to track

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.040
<v Speaker 1>their health. And I think that is a really really

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>good thing. So the Apple Watch, I think is fantastic.

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's amazing. I think it's saved a lot

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:39.239
<v Speaker 1>of lives. I think that it is telling people when

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>their heart rate is low, when their heart rate is high,

0:32:42.080 --> 0:32:45.239
<v Speaker 1>when they're breathing, is having an issue. I think it

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>does that but also it can do these manual heart

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>rate readings. So I think that this is a really

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>good thing the fact that Apple users are enjoying. Oh yeah,

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it also tells you, you know, if you fall, it

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>can call for help. So I think that these wearables

0:33:01.240 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>are getting to a place where they are going to

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>become so commonplace. And it's like, why would you not

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have one of these things on your wrist? I get

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the privacy implication, sure, but I feel like the security

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 1>blanket that they offer is starting to outweigh any sort

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of privacy concerns you may have about these devices. And

0:33:25.320 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>so to me, I mean, look at we've got Google

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with their They've got things that can I mean, there's

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 1>just so much of this going on. I tested the

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Google Home that can you know, measure your respiration at

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:39.920
<v Speaker 1>night without even touching you. I mean it just looks

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>at the waves like it uses like micro micro radar

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to like sense the up and down of your lungs,

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and it can it can figure out issues there and

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you how you slept. I mean, we've got the

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Aura ring that does a whole bunch of stuff. I'd

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>still like to test that one out. That's the one

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>wearable that i'd really like to try out that I

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have not tried, and it just seems like it'd be

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a really cool thing. But I will say, I think

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>this is great. I'm so glad that Phippit got this.

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:13.440
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be coming to certain models of the Sense,

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the Versa, the Charge, and the Inspire. My only problem

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 1>with fitbit is that they seem to take a lot

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>longer to introduce software features on their devices versus the

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Watch. Apple Watch has this nice cadence of regular

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 1>software updates with watch os, kind of like iOS. It

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>just comes out regularly and there's always something new and

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 1>things are always getting better. I feel like and maybe

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>I just haven't worn a fitbit in a while. I

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:42.240
<v Speaker 1>feel like the Fippit is just a little bit behind.

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Like they announce these things whenever the fitbit comes out.

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 1>They always say like, oh, we're gonna have a blood

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>oxygen sensor, but it takes like another six months to

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>a year to arrive on people's wrists. So I think

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that hopefully you know now that pipbit is getting much

0:34:56.560 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>more integrated with Google and I should say alphabet, I

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I guess hopefully there you know, there's more kind of

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>force behind them to work more closely in getting these

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:08.279
<v Speaker 1>things to people's wrists faster. But I am all for it.

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I really think that, uh. I mean one of the

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>reasons I wear the Apple Watch is that I really

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's like an almost like a safety blanket

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.280
<v Speaker 1>where you know, if you go out running and you fall,

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like imagine you're hiking in the middle of nowhere by yourself,

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 1>which you know you may do once in a while,

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:26.839
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you fall and your watch calls for help.

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's really really important, and it just doesn't

0:35:30.960 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you didn't it's it could be the

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>difference between life and death. I mean, it really really can.

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So let's get to another question. Let's see, Uh, Collette says,

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I am puzzled. Oh, it says you. I guess the

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 1>subject is USB thumb drives. Uh for photo, I guess photostick.

0:35:50.600 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I am puzzled. At one site the reviews oh for

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the above are great, and on another site I should

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>not buy. I have an Android tablet and HP Envy computer.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 1>My husband has a Tashiba laptop and an Android phone.

0:36:02.840 --> 0:36:04.759
<v Speaker 1>I would like to take all the photos from each

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and put them into one spot. What do you suggest

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to someone with minimal tech knowledge? Thank you, Collet collect well,

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest Google Photos. I mean that would be

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>my first choice in this situation. I think whenever someone

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>wants to consolidate their photos, I think Google Photos is

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the best. You can install it on every single one

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of those devices you just mentioned. You can also do

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>a family share account and so you can have the

0:36:30.480 --> 0:36:34.719
<v Speaker 1>photos from both your husband's devices and yours merge. It

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:38.400
<v Speaker 1>works great, It's slicing and dicing, and the search is

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 1>just unbelievable. The cloud backup is phenomenal. I would recommend,

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, having it on a different backup somewhere else,

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:47.400
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you can do that down the line.

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>But I think that Google Photos would definitely be the

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 1>best way to go. You originally asked about the photostick

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>by Omni. Now I don't know what the photostick by

0:36:57.400 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Omni is, but I have a guess, and I guess

0:37:01.160 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that I probably would not recommend that. So I'm searching

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for a photostick by Omni and yeah, let's gosh, let's see.

0:37:11.239 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>So just looking at the website. Immediately looking at the website,

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those websites that is just something I

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:22.800
<v Speaker 1>would not purchase something from. So it's it's got the

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>pop up that says someone from Lincoln, Kansas just purchased

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the photo stick. Omni. Oh my gosh. Just now, when

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I happen to go to your website, someone just purchased one,

0:37:32.200 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're telling me about that. Okay. Also you can

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>see the pricing. It's like retail is seventy four, this

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 1>is fifty nine ninety nine. Then you've got retail. So

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>basically they're selling a one and twenty eight gigabyte Oh

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.960
<v Speaker 1>someone else just bought one from Hagerman, Idaho. Huh. And

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they're selling a two hundred and fifty six gigabyte flash

0:37:55.040 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>storage drive that looks like a drive that I used

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to get at events giving out like candy for free

0:38:00.719 --> 0:38:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for one hundred and fifty dollars. Now, if their software

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>was like unbelievable, yeah, that would be amazing, so I

0:38:10.000 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>would I would recommend it. But it I just don't

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>think that any of this is good, So I'm not

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.680
<v Speaker 1>knocking them. I have not tested this. I don't know,

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.680
<v Speaker 1>but the reality is, uh oh, I just got a

0:38:21.719 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>special offer when I went to click away from the

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:26.919
<v Speaker 1>website they said, Okay, you can get an extra one

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for forty percent off. So it's just one of these

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>websites that is just I don't like it. I wouldn't

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>order from there, so if you want, if you want. Oh,

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:41.439
<v Speaker 1>and it also says okay, it says as featured on CBS,

0:38:41.560 --> 0:38:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Yahoo and Business Insider, so let's go to Yahoo or okay.

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>So interesting this. I just can't trust this. It's so weird.

0:38:54.840 --> 0:38:59.439
<v Speaker 1>They have this like report from a website and the

0:38:59.520 --> 0:39:02.160
<v Speaker 1>author you can't click on it, so this is like,

0:39:02.239 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it's a website. It's so interesting. It

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:10.240
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's a website from a TV station in Houston.

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.279
<v Speaker 1>But usually you could click on the author's name so

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that you can see all the things that this author wrote.

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And I can't seem to find that author. But you

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>know what, I don't you know what? Actually this author

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 1>does look legit. Let's see. Let me just try one

0:39:28.480 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 1>more thing. Weird, what our email address? Let's try one

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>more thing here? Okay, So it looks like this is

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a consumer author or a consumer reporter in Houston, so

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.319
<v Speaker 1>she may have she may have actually tested this for real,

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>so that could be legit let's see on on Okay,

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>on Yahoo they are using a press release, so they

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 1>are literally just linked up to a press release that

0:39:56.600 --> 0:40:00.160
<v Speaker 1>is not an actual news story. And then h on

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Business Insider, they are linking to a press release of

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:08.960
<v Speaker 1>their own writing. So for all these reasons, absolutely not

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:11.960
<v Speaker 1>what I purchase this. Now you can purchase it. It might

0:40:12.000 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 1>be just fine, but I'm giving my advice. You're tuned

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 1>into the rich On Tech Show. So this is why.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Those are all the reasons why when I research a product,

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I would not purchase it. So what I would purchase

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is something called the sand Disc sand Disk I expand

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and they make various versions. You will want the one

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that works with the Android phones, and so they have

0:40:36.120 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and I Expand. I think it's either the duel or

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>let's see they have the let's see shop. Oh come on,

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking for this thing portable drives. I'm trying to

0:40:46.920 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>find the sand disc I Expand that I would get,

0:40:50.080 --> 0:40:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and they have Anyway, if you just go to sand

0:40:53.040 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>Disc I Expand, they have a whole bunch of the

0:40:56.760 --> 0:41:00.960
<v Speaker 1>one that I featured on KTLA was really good. So

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I just search. Okay, here we go. Ktla USB Drives

0:41:04.520 --> 0:41:09.239
<v Speaker 1>and this one is called the sand Disc I expand

0:41:09.440 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Flash drive. Lucks ooh, lucks this is this is deluxe

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:15.880
<v Speaker 1>because it has Lucks in the name. And what I

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>like about this drive is that it's got iPhone on

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>one side, a connector for lightning, and then USB C

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 1>on the other. You may just need USB with those

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>different devices, but I'd recommend USBC because you both have

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Android phones and so you can plug that into the

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>bottom of both of those phones. But great question, I

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>would say, when it comes to the tech questions that

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I get, should I get a USB? These things must

0:41:41.239 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>advertise like like I can't believe, but the USB drive

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:49.440
<v Speaker 1>for backup photos is probably the top, if not the

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.600
<v Speaker 1>top question, one of the top three questions I get.

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's truly remarkable how these companies advertise because

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>these they're just everywhere, so many questions about them. So anyway,

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.239
<v Speaker 1>there you go. There's my answer. All right, Netflix introducing

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the double thumbs up for even better recommendation. So not

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a big story, not much time to spend on this,

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:14.080
<v Speaker 1>or I don't want to spend a bunch of time

0:42:14.120 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on this, but there will be a new option for

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>you when you're rating shows on Netflix, and it is

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the double thumbs up. Not to be confused with the

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.400
<v Speaker 1>two thumbs up. Two thumbs up is Ciskel and eber

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Late movie critics that pretty much defined the entire industry.

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>But this is the two thumbs up. Oh I just

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>got it on mine. Okay, so I just got it

0:42:36.560 --> 0:42:40.120
<v Speaker 1>on my Netflix app and you tap rate, and now

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it gives you a down, a thumbs up. A thumbs

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 1>down says not for me. One thumbs up is I

0:42:45.080 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like this. Two thumbs up is I love this, And

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>so when you click that two thumbs up, it will

0:42:50.640 --> 0:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>signify that you want more shows like that for your

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:56.120
<v Speaker 1>personalized recommendations, and that's what you are going to get.

0:42:56.200 --> 0:42:59.480
<v Speaker 1>So they just found that the one thumbs up was

0:42:59.520 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 1>just a little I'll lean in the ratings because you

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>might like something, but you're not like, oh my gosh,

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I love this. Like there are certain shows I like,

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:08.759
<v Speaker 1>but then there are shows that I love, love, love,

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and so actually I should go into Netflix. I never

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>really thought about this. I don't really use a whole

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:17.080
<v Speaker 1>bunch of Netflix, but I should go in and rate

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the shows that I do like so that I can

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>get really good like maybe I'll discover shows that I like.

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I never thought about doing that, but I'm gonna. I'm

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 1>actually gonna do that with some shows and movies because

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that way I can get stuff that I like. And

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>then maybe I'll watch more Netflix and get my twenty

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month worth. I know, everyone that's using my

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 1>account gets there, gets my money's worth, that's for sure. Uh.

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's see what do we want to go to next?

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:45.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, okay, let's go to Marylyn. Marilyn says, I'd

0:43:45.400 --> 0:43:48.240
<v Speaker 1>like to understand why developers need access to my personal

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:52.279
<v Speaker 1>information such as photos, contacts, media, ability to make and

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>or manage phone calls in order to play a game

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I've downloaded. Is it really necessary to give them access

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:02.320
<v Speaker 1>to my handset or tablet? Thanks anti cookie, anti cookie,

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>anti cookie, absolutely not. They do not need this personal information.

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:12.080
<v Speaker 1>This is a data grab. They are trying to get

0:44:12.120 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>as much information out of you as possible because they

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.799
<v Speaker 1>can sell more ads to you, or better yet, they

0:44:18.800 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 1>can collect information about you and then use that information

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>to sell your data to other people and make some

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 1>quick cash off of that as well sell that to

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>data brokers. So I love the fact that you are

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 1>actually aware of this. I love the fact that you

0:44:34.400 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>are cognizant of it and you are noticing this. But

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 1>when you download an app, be very very careful and

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:46.360
<v Speaker 1>methodical about the screens that follow the download. You're going

0:44:46.440 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to get questions about all kinds of stuff. Can we

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:52.560
<v Speaker 1>have access to your gpsqu have access to your precise location,

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 1>we have access to your contacts, we have access to

0:44:55.480 --> 0:44:59.759
<v Speaker 1>your calendar, we have access to your you know, can

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we track you across apps? All these different things? Location?

0:45:04.840 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, like she said, contacts, media, photos, And Apple

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>has gotten really good about letting you you know. It

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:14.879
<v Speaker 1>used to be on Android and Apple when you said yes,

0:45:14.920 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 1>it would just be like a blanket yes to like

0:45:16.560 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different things. Now they've definitely parsed it

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>out on both operating systems, and Android actually takes it

0:45:25.120 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a step further. So if you don't use an app

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:32.359
<v Speaker 1>for a while, they they revoke they're called permissions. They

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>actually revoke the permissions of that app. So let's say

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you downloaded some random game that is stopping up all

0:45:39.880 --> 0:45:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of the data it can because it's just kind of

0:45:41.880 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>one of those apps. Well, let's say don't play that

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>game in six months, Google in the background says we

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:50.000
<v Speaker 1>noticed that Rich hasn't been playing this game, and also,

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>why do you need access to all Virtus stuff in

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the background here, So we are just going to revoke

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that access until he opens up this app again, and

0:45:58.080 --> 0:45:59.960
<v Speaker 1>then we're going to ask him again if you want

0:45:59.960 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to give his location. And I think that is a

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:06.920
<v Speaker 1>huge win for the operating system. On Android and Apple,

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you can go ahead and revoke permissions and take them

0:46:10.640 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>back after the fact, but it doesn't do it automatically,

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.239
<v Speaker 1>but it'd be nice if it did, and maybe it

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:17.920
<v Speaker 1>will in a future update. Who knows. I mean, WWDC

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is just around the corner. And at this point, I

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like the features that Apple and Android keep adding

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>are like very similar on both ends. It's like, oh,

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>we have this, Oh we have this, we have that,

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.319
<v Speaker 1>we have this, and it's like they're just kind of

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:31.280
<v Speaker 1>like neck and neck at this point with the different

0:46:31.280 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 1>features they have. But with that said, always always be

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.640
<v Speaker 1>very critical about any of the permissions that you give,

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.680
<v Speaker 1>especially when it comes to your photos. If you're using

0:46:41.719 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like a photo editing app and it says allow access

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to all your photos, just say, hmm, does it need

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:48.080
<v Speaker 1>all my photos or can I just like, let's say

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you just wanted to download an app to like retouch

0:46:50.400 --> 0:46:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a picture once because you just need to do something,

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 1>just give it access to that one picture. That's why

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>it says on Apple allow access to all photos or

0:46:59.280 --> 0:47:01.680
<v Speaker 1>select media. That's what that means. You select that one

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>picture and say, okay, you can have this picture, but

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:05.839
<v Speaker 1>you can't have all the rest of my pictures because

0:47:06.520 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 1>these companies could, you know, kind of slurp up some

0:47:09.719 --> 0:47:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of the data from your the metadata from your other

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 1>pictures and kind of see where you take them and

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that gives an idea of where you go. So believe me,

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:20.560
<v Speaker 1>these these app developers can be very sneaky, sneaky and

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:23.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a lot of it is very legal. You know,

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>if they're if you're given access to your your location,

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know these apps will ping that access even when

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you're not using it. And so that's another question that

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Apple now asks. It says, do you want to give

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:37.880
<v Speaker 1>permission to use your location all the time or only

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.120
<v Speaker 1>when you're using the app? Now all the time is

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:42.759
<v Speaker 1>way more valuable to them because they can see all

0:47:42.800 --> 0:47:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the different places that you go, and they know that

0:47:45.160 --> 0:47:47.640
<v Speaker 1>if you go into that coffee shop every single morning

0:47:47.920 --> 0:47:50.799
<v Speaker 1>you pause there for two minutes. They know that you're frequenting,

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:55.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jim's Coffee on Second Street in Seattle. And

0:47:55.400 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>now they can have an advertiser that wants to advertise

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>against that and say, hey, why don't you come to

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Jones Coffee on Third Street and they can send you

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a coupon so or targeting ad or whatever they want

0:48:06.600 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to do. So there's a reason for all of this

0:48:09.000 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>stuff and why these apps want so much information. It

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.160
<v Speaker 1>is your job, as a consumer sad as it is,

0:48:15.200 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 1>to kind of sift through and think about, hmm, do

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 1>I need to give them this information? And I sit

0:48:20.800 --> 0:48:25.480
<v Speaker 1>here as a very as a smart tech person, and

0:48:25.520 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I sit there and I go, okay, now, what's the

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>implication of not letting ways have access to my information

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:34.680
<v Speaker 1>at all times? And the implication is now Ways doesn't

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:36.400
<v Speaker 1>know where I am and it can't send me a

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:40.280
<v Speaker 1>time to leave notification. So there are some reasons why

0:48:40.360 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you might want to give these apps certain access that

0:48:43.640 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 1>they are requesting. It's up to you to kind of

0:48:45.840 --> 0:48:47.799
<v Speaker 1>figure out and connect the dots as to why they

0:48:47.840 --> 0:48:50.400
<v Speaker 1>need that. The famous example, and I almost hate to

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:53.120
<v Speaker 1>use this because it's been so long. But the famous

0:48:53.160 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>example is that all the flashlight apps back in the

0:48:55.560 --> 0:48:58.280
<v Speaker 1>day that would ask for all the permissions and really

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:00.919
<v Speaker 1>it was a flashlight app which was probably built into

0:49:00.920 --> 0:49:04.680
<v Speaker 1>your phone, but it was just collecting so much data

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>while you had that app installed on your phone, because

0:49:07.200 --> 0:49:09.439
<v Speaker 1>then they were selling it to different companies. So same

0:49:09.440 --> 0:49:11.040
<v Speaker 1>thing with a lot of weather apps. They do that

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. So you just have to be very careful

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.439
<v Speaker 1>about what data you give up. And if you don't

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:18.240
<v Speaker 1>really care, then don't care. But I think you should

0:49:18.239 --> 0:49:21.719
<v Speaker 1>be concerned with any of the data that you are

0:49:21.920 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 1>willingly giving up on a daily basis. Good question, anti

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 1>cookie all right, Speaking of Google Photos, the unlimited Google

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Photos backup is coming back. I can't believe this, but

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:39.279
<v Speaker 1>just for T Mobile customers, ugh, this is according to

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:43.080
<v Speaker 1>nine to five Google, Google and T Mobile seem to

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:46.160
<v Speaker 1>have a pretty good partnership going. But soon T Mobile

0:49:46.160 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>customers will be able to pay fifteen dollars a month

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>for unlimited Google Photos backup. Now, fifteen dollars a month

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>might sound like a lot, but right now I'm paying

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty five dollars a month for I think five terribile

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:04.839
<v Speaker 1>of I guess Google Drive access. Now here's the thing,

0:50:05.480 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the unlimited Google Photos backup. I'm not exactly sure if

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 1>this would refer to new photos moving forward or all

0:50:13.840 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 1>of your photos in Google Like, once you activate this

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 1>fifteen dollars option, does it magically unlock all that space

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in your Google Drive that's being used by your Google Photos.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, and I don't really know. They don't

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>really explain it in here, but this new two So

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:32.320
<v Speaker 1>basically you get two terabytes of Google Drive storage plus

0:50:32.400 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>unlimited Google Photos. So that would be a really, really

0:50:36.280 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>big win. In fact, that'd be pretty compelling to me

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 1>because I would save ten dollars a month by switching

0:50:41.920 --> 0:50:44.719
<v Speaker 1>to T Mobile just to get this one feature. Now,

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I've been around the block long enough to know that

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>features come and go, so I would probably not base

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>my switching of a wireless carrier on this one feature

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:55.520
<v Speaker 1>because who knows how long this partnership is going to last.

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Who knows how long the unlimited photos deal is going

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to last, and then you got to switch again if

0:51:00.000 --> 0:51:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if something changes or they raise the price or it's

0:51:02.120 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>not as competitive. But I would say, if you have

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:09.360
<v Speaker 1>T Mobile and you have a lot of Google Photos.

0:51:09.560 --> 0:51:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You're paying fifteen dollars a month for Google Drive storage

0:51:12.600 --> 0:51:14.920
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. I would definitely look into this

0:51:15.080 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>because the ability to store photos and videos in full

0:51:19.120 --> 0:51:22.480
<v Speaker 1>resolution is pretty awesome, especially if you're like me and

0:51:22.520 --> 0:51:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you have over two I'm going on three terabytes of

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Google Photos, just Google Photos. Oh no, no, no, no,

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that's not true. That's not just Google Photos. Let me

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:33.719
<v Speaker 1>say how much I have in Google Photos. If you

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 1>want to check to see how much storage're using Google

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:39.680
<v Speaker 1>just go to one dot Google dot com and then

0:51:39.719 --> 0:51:43.440
<v Speaker 1>tap storage and I'm using two point three terabytes of

0:51:43.480 --> 0:51:46.320
<v Speaker 1>five gigs. That is one hundred and twenty one gigabytes

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in Google Drive, thirty five gigs in Gmail. How the

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:51.719
<v Speaker 1>heck do I have thirty five gigabytes of Gmail? I

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:55.080
<v Speaker 1>have no idea two point two terabytes of Google Photos,

0:51:55.719 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>and so yeah, I'd like to get that unlimited. That'd

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be amazing, because you know, the old pixels were unlimited,

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:05.200
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I still have the original Pixel

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>which was unlimited, and you can still use it for unlimited.

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So some people have kind of hacked together a system

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:14.479
<v Speaker 1>where you take a picture on your your current phone

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and it sends it to that that pixel, and then

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that pixel uploads it, so you still get to save

0:52:20.160 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that full resolution. If I was a little bit more

0:52:23.360 --> 0:52:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the old nerd that I was, I'd probably do that.

0:52:25.880 --> 0:52:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably set that up. But at this point I'm

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>more about convenience, and I don't really want to have

0:52:30.960 --> 0:52:33.799
<v Speaker 1>like a Google Pixel server sitting in my house just

0:52:33.840 --> 0:52:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to upload pictures. And I'd be like, because the problem is,

0:52:36.680 --> 0:52:39.719
<v Speaker 1>let's say you're out on vacation and this happens. You

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>take your the majority of your pictures on vacation, so

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:45.239
<v Speaker 1>now now you're waiting to get home to back up

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:48.040
<v Speaker 1>all these pictures that are on your phone, and I

0:52:48.080 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think that's very, very dangerous to not have those backed

0:52:50.560 --> 0:52:52.839
<v Speaker 1>up in real time when you're on vacation. By the way,

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:56.520
<v Speaker 1>when I'm on vacation, I typically will turn on my

0:52:57.280 --> 0:53:01.279
<v Speaker 1>I typically turn off this is this gets a little complicated,

0:53:01.280 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>but in Google Photos, you have the option to only

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:10.080
<v Speaker 1>upload over cellular and so are sorry only upload over

0:53:10.160 --> 0:53:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Wi Fi, And so typically to save battery, I will

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:16.799
<v Speaker 1>leave that turned on because most of the time I

0:53:16.840 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 1>will you know, I'll be I'll be in you know,

0:53:20.239 --> 0:53:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I'll be home at the end of the day, and

0:53:22.400 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll get into my Wi Fi zone and I will

0:53:24.960 --> 0:53:27.040
<v Speaker 1>have those photos that I took throughout the day uploaded. Now,

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.040
<v Speaker 1>when I'm on vacation, it's it's kind of tricky because

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I want my photos to be uploaded in real time,

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:35.000
<v Speaker 1>because when you're on vacation, you are doing a lot

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of things that you don't typically do. You're in a

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of places that you wouldn't be in. You're in

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:41.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of situations that you wouldn't be in. And

0:53:41.360 --> 0:53:46.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking like, you know, boats and flying on airplanes

0:53:46.360 --> 0:53:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and all these different things where you may lose your phone.

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:51.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you lose your phone, and let's say you

0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:53.399
<v Speaker 1>have all these photos set to back up on Wi

0:53:53.400 --> 0:53:55.759
<v Speaker 1>Fi only, you may not make it back to your

0:53:55.760 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>hotel room before these photos get uploaded, and now you've

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:01.200
<v Speaker 1>lost a day's worth of photos because you were taking

0:54:01.200 --> 0:54:04.280
<v Speaker 1>them all day. You drop your phone down an elevator

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>shaft at the hotel, and now it's gone and at

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, and now all those photos

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>are just locked on that phone forever. So typically I

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>will turn on the cellular uploads when I'm on vacation

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>because that's when those pictures are the most precious. The

0:54:18.400 --> 0:54:21.160
<v Speaker 1>downside of that is that you are now eating through

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 1>your phone's battery a lot faster because uploading your photos

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:28.120
<v Speaker 1>over cellular takes a lot more battery. And so it's

0:54:28.120 --> 0:54:30.239
<v Speaker 1>this kind of like this gentle dance that I have

0:54:30.320 --> 0:54:32.880
<v Speaker 1>when I'm on vacation that I want my photos to

0:54:32.880 --> 0:54:35.880
<v Speaker 1>be uploaded, but I also want to preserve my battery life.

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of sometimes do it in the middle

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:40.759
<v Speaker 1>where I'll let the photos go up over cellular, but

0:54:40.800 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>not the videos because the videos really eat up a

0:54:43.680 --> 0:54:45.919
<v Speaker 1>lot of the battery. And so it's just little things

0:54:45.920 --> 0:54:47.560
<v Speaker 1>to think about. I mean, this is I just tell

0:54:47.560 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you this stuff because it's this kind of stuff that

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:51.720
<v Speaker 1>keeps me up at night, and I kind of really

0:54:52.719 --> 0:54:54.880
<v Speaker 1>try to digest a lot of it and come up

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 1>with like good systems, but you know, it doesn't always work.

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:01.279
<v Speaker 1>But that's kind of like what my feeling is. So

0:55:01.640 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 1>get those pictures backed up, please, please, please please please.

0:55:05.080 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do one more question from Jan Hey, Rich,

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Bob and I are nearing seventy need a smart TV.

0:55:09.480 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 1>We like local news and weather. We're huge sports fans

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and have learned how to stream on Netflix. What featureshould

0:55:13.760 --> 0:55:17.800
<v Speaker 1>we look for in purchasing a fifty inch center stand.

0:55:17.960 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that just means fifty inch TV. Uh, Thanks

0:55:22.160 --> 0:55:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Jen so Jan. I would recommend the Roku TCL six

0:55:25.680 --> 0:55:28.480
<v Speaker 1>series Roku TV. I think that's going to give you

0:55:28.560 --> 0:55:32.120
<v Speaker 1>everything you need. It's gonna be a fantastic price, It's

0:55:32.160 --> 0:55:34.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna have Roku built in, and so you don't have

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to deal with like a third party kind of smart

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 1>TV situation. You don't have to deal with a not

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a very good smart TV situation. If I had my way,

0:55:43.280 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably recommend the Apple TV as an add on

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to any TV. So just find a good TV that

0:55:49.200 --> 0:55:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you like and then add the Apple TV. But that's expensive.

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:52.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you have an iPhone because you

0:55:52.719 --> 0:55:54.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't mention if you have an iPhone, but I think

0:55:54.719 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that the built in is probably the easiest way to go.

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 1>My second choice would probably be one of the Amazon

0:56:01.160 --> 0:56:05.200
<v Speaker 1>TVs that has the fire TV software built in, and

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:09.040
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps just getting a fire TV stick that you

0:56:09.040 --> 0:56:12.320
<v Speaker 1>can attach to a smart to a TV. This idea

0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:15.440
<v Speaker 1>of the smart TV I typically don't like because I

0:56:15.480 --> 0:56:18.880
<v Speaker 1>feel like the software is updated more frequently on the

0:56:18.880 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 1>standalone sticks and devices. But when it comes to like

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Roku and Fire, a lot of those TVs maybe not

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:29.320
<v Speaker 1>if they're from third parties or not updated, but the

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:33.800
<v Speaker 1>TCL is updated, I know. And also the Amazon TVs

0:56:33.880 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>are updated if they come from Amazon. So I think

0:56:36.040 --> 0:56:38.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the Omni series is the one that you want

0:56:38.960 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to look for. So those are the TVs that I'd

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:43.400
<v Speaker 1>recommend if you're going built in. Otherwise, I'd say just

0:56:43.480 --> 0:56:46.000
<v Speaker 1>get any old TV that you like at Costco and

0:56:46.040 --> 0:56:49.319
<v Speaker 1>then just get the add on, which is either the

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:55.439
<v Speaker 1>Fire TV stick or the Roku box or the Apple TV,

0:56:55.640 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and in my preference would probably be probably Apple TV

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and then maybe fireTV stick, the Max, and then the Roku,

0:57:06.840 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'd go with a Roku device not a stick

0:57:08.760 --> 0:57:12.879
<v Speaker 1>because the sticks are historically underpowered. I do like the Max.

0:57:12.920 --> 0:57:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that one's fine, but I think the Roku,

0:57:15.120 --> 0:57:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the really cheap Roku sticks like twenty five bucks, is

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be very underpowered, especially if you're cutting the

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:24.040
<v Speaker 1>cord and you're using that for everything. Oh wow, look

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:29.479
<v Speaker 1>at that. That audio means it's the end of the show.

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna do it for this episode, If you'd like

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to submit a question, for me to answer. Go to

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:35.000
<v Speaker 1>my Facebook page, Facebook dot com, slash rich on Tech,

0:57:35.080 --> 0:57:37.720
<v Speaker 1>hit the big blue send email button, or go to

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 1>richon Tech dot tv and hit the email icon. I

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 1>would love it if you would rate and review this podcast.

0:57:42.680 --> 0:57:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Go to the listening app of your choice. Write a

0:57:44.760 --> 0:57:46.880
<v Speaker 1>quick line about what you like about this show to

0:57:46.880 --> 0:57:49.560
<v Speaker 1>help other people understand why they should listen. You can

0:57:49.600 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 1>find me on social media. I am at rich on Tech,

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 1>and no matter where you live in the US, you

0:57:53.920 --> 0:57:58.000
<v Speaker 1>can download the free KTLA plus app on Apple TV, fireTV,

0:57:58.120 --> 0:58:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and Roku. Once you do, scroll the tech section and

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.920
<v Speaker 1>watch all of my TV segments on demand. My name

0:58:03.960 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>is rich Demiro. Thanks so much for listening. There are

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:08.040
<v Speaker 1>so many ways you can spend an hour of your time.

0:58:08.320 --> 0:58:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I do appreciate you spending it right here with me.

0:58:10.720 --> 0:58:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you real soon.