WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - August 16th, 2024

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.360 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:12.920 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 2>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>global business, finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:25.640
<v Speaker 2>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, Welcome to the Bloomberg Business Week Weekend podcast.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Acquired week with the back of US economic data released

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>as the warm up act to this coming week's annual

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>gathering of central bankers, policymakers, academics and economists at the

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Jackson Hole Economic Symposium. The main attraction at that event

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>fed Chair J. Powell's speech on Friday.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 3>We're going to be all Jackson Hole guests in the

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 3>upcoming presidential election and its outcome may come up, if

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 3>not with Jair J. Powell, perhaps with others our take

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 3>on the elections this week on how to raise a

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 3>citizen of all that in just a moment.

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Also this hour, what it's like when ozembic takes over

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>an entire town, or when Scarlett Johansson and Chris Evans

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>talked to US troops deployed overseas.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 3>All of that to come, We begin though, with something

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>that might freak you out just a little bit. But

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 3>it may not be all that surprising. According to the

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three Annenberg Constitution Day Civics Survey, nearly one

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 3>in five Americans can't name a single branch of government.

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>It's executive, legislative, and judicial.

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that's twenty percent. I know it's a lot,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>all right. Perhaps it's not surprising given the state of

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>civics education in the United States. According to the Committee

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for Economic Development that's the public policy center of the

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Conference Board, only seven states require a full year of

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>civics or government in schools, and thirteen states have no

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>civics course requirements. Tim, I say, I feel kind of lucky.

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>We talked about news, current events, politics at home sometimes

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>againable heated with my older siblings. Same for my daughter.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>She's born into it, being the child of parents who

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>are both in the news business. How about for you,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>what was it like grown up?

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we talked about it all the time growing up.

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>I'm trying to figure out what to do with my kids,

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 3>are you.

0:02:07.480 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 3>The thing is is they're at the age now where

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>you can't really listen to news in the morning when

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 3>they're around. Because there's so much disturbing stuff happening around

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.239
<v Speaker 3>the world, you don't want them to hear those things. Yeah,

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 3>so it's kind of a delicate balance. But let's just

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 3>say there are a lot of questions coming up about

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 3>the way society works.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>You have super smart kids, especially your older one, who

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>is really curious about things.

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 3>It is almost the younger one still can't talk about

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 3>she's coming.

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>She's going to be right behind them.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, with some thoughts on how to teach our children

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 3>about the government, we turned to Lindsay Kormack, Associate Professor

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 3>of Political Science and director of the Diplomacy Lab at

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>Steven's Institute of Technology. She's got a new book out

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 3>called How to Raise a Citizen and Why It's up

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 3>to You to do It.

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so you all are lucky, because that's that's atypical.

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 6>Most of our families don't have those sorts of discussions.

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:51.959
<v Speaker 6>In research that we did for the book, we found

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 6>that only twenty five percent of eighteen year olds report

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 6>that they ever had an intentional discussion about politics or

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 6>government with their parents. And my sort of stance on

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 6>this is you can't start it too early because kids

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 6>are just trying to make sense of the world around them.

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 6>They're soaking it up. So if they hear us talking,

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 6>you know, like saying like politicians are all bad or

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 6>they're negative, they're liars, they're cheaters, they're going to hear that.

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 6>And so it's not that not talking to them doesn't

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 6>give them a message. They sometimes just pick up the

0:03:15.480 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 6>negative pieces. So it's up to us to kind of

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:19.799
<v Speaker 6>recast the narrative around this in front of them.

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and I have a large family, a lot of

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>nieces and nephews. What do you do though, when a

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty something year old or an early thirties like, yeah,

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all the politicians they're really lousy. What's the right response?

0:03:31.639 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you deal with that where they're kind of

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>so set in their view.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So when I hear something like that, I usually

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 6>think that people are talking about federal politicians and I

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 6>try to change the conversation and think about who their

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 6>local and state representatives are. Yeah, because for the most part,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 6>the people who do this work at lower levels. They're

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 6>not bad, they're not out there to do ill. They're

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 6>really trying their best, and oftentimes they're not that well supported. Financially,

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 6>the jobs don't pay that well. People yell at them,

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 6>and so really, I think most of the people doing our

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 6>politics are trying their best.

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, we hear what you said. We hear a

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 3>lot from the mayors we talked to. We check in

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.040
<v Speaker 3>with mayors around the country quite a bit, and oftentimes

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 3>they are Democrats or Republicans. They're required to have a

0:04:10.720 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>party affiliation, but regardless of what party there in, they

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 3>don't really consider themselves members of a certain political party

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.159
<v Speaker 3>because their job is to come up with solutions to

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, fixing potholes and making sure that things are

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 3>running on time in a small city or in a

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 3>metropolitan area. And it's an interesting issue because there is

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 3>this separation between the local level versus what happens on

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 3>the federal level, and so much air is taken out

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 3>by national politics. And that's sort of the vibe that

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 3>people pick up on.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's absolutely true. You know, we talk about federal

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 6>politics more than anything else, despite the fact that local

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 6>politics is some of the most consequential for our quality

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 6>of life decisions.

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny my husband and I, as I said,

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>he's a news guy too, and it just said, you know,

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>when he was kind of and his way up, you

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>always went to the town hall meetings and local politics.

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And part of it is, you know, the demise of

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>local journalism, like there's just no reporting on it anymore.

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>And so it's all kind of the same stuff, as

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you said, a lot of it at the federal level,

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>but it's not really getting down to, you know, what's

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 1>happening on a different level. It is why I will

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>be Tim's right, like we love talking to mayors, We

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>love talking to governors, like what's going on in your state,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in your towns. It's really important.

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 7>All right.

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>So you've got a five year old, how do you

0:05:32.640 --> 0:05:33.679
<v Speaker 1>teach them about government?

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think if you have a five year old,

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:37.720
<v Speaker 6>the point is just to make sure that you are

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 6>comfortable doing it in front of them, have conversations around them,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 6>have conversations in front of them. We don't need to

0:05:42.120 --> 0:05:43.800
<v Speaker 6>raise like little government trivia experts.

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 8>You know.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 6>They don't need to know all the presidents, they don't

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 6>need to know how Bill becomes a lot at that age.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 6>But it's about giving them the vocabulary, letting them hear

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 6>these words so they can kind of start to make

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 6>sense of it. For every other subject, we start kindergarten

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 6>with little concepts, little vocap and we build. But for government,

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the times we wait until their own

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 6>eighteen and then say like, here, we're going to teach

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 6>you everything right now. And so it's just this idea

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 6>of scaffolding, like we do with every other skill and subject.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so parents can't always be the ones who are

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 3>doing this because they're not necessarily the ones who are

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 3>doing this. What's your view on how this should be

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 3>taught in schools?

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 6>So we do need to take an approach that prioritizes

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 6>things younger, like we do with everything else. Well, a

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 6>lot of the ways that we do this is very

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.160
<v Speaker 6>idiosyncratic because states will say here's how we think we

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 6>should do it, but then it gets further devolved down

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.159
<v Speaker 6>to school boards or it gets devolved down to counties,

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 6>and so we don't have a unified curriculum. We never

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 6>are going to. But the thing that we can do

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 6>is start earlier and start building over time instead of

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 6>just backloading everything in that second semester of senior year

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 6>when kids really aren't that receptive to new information anyhow.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.840
<v Speaker 3>You know what's interesting I'm getting some messages from a

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 3>member of our audience who says that the kids aren't

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:51.200
<v Speaker 3>necessarily the problem. It's the parents who seem to be

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:55.560
<v Speaker 3>the least educated, the most susceptible to misinformation.

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 9>Those grown up kids.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 1>What do we do with it?

0:06:57.320 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 3>What do we do with those grown ups?

0:06:59.320 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 8>Yes?

0:06:59.560 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 7>You know what.

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 6>That's one of the reasons I wrote this book in

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 6>the way I did. The first half is sort of like,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 6>here's the problem, here's what our kids need to know.

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 6>And the second half is a primer because I understand

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 6>that people who are parenting today, we are products of

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 6>systems that were deprioritizing civic education. A lot of times

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 6>we had parents who were not comfortable talking about these topics,

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 6>and so whoever's pointing that out to you, I share

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 6>that viewpoint with the parents. We need a little bit

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 6>more education here too, And that's sort of what this

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.000
<v Speaker 6>effort is about.

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>How do you you know? It's interesting because I think

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we've all had conversations with adults where it gets heated.

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>How do you have that conversation like, well, wait a minute,

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't really understand how this works, Like, how do

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you do that?

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'll tell you the strategy. I'm mostly talking with

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 6>college students I eighteen to twenty two year olds, and

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 6>they get heated too. But instead of asking someone what

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 6>they think or why they believe that, the first question

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 6>I always like to ask is what have you heard

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 6>about that? Because I think when you ask someone what

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 6>have you heard? It removes them from having the responsibility

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 6>of defending or justifying a position. They can say, oh,

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 6>I heard this on Twitter, Oh I heard this from

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 6>my uncle or whatever it is, and then you can

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 6>kind of work with that instead of putting it on

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 6>them to defend whatever it is. They're trying to think.

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Source matters, right. It's funny that, I mean, I find

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>myself doing that to a lot, like where did you

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>hear that?

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 5>It does?

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 3>But I think one challenge now is the polarization that

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 3>we see on these online platforms. So you have you know,

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 3>for example, the Elon Musk, the owner of X, has

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 3>endorsed Donald Trump and he has hosted a conversation with

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 3>him on the platform. He is in complete control of

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 3>that platform. Can you imagine the outrage that you'd hear

0:08:32.280 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 3>from folks out there if you saw the opposite, like

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 3>on Facebook or something like the CEO of.

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 6>Oh, like if Bluckerberg sat down with Kamala Harris.

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exclusively or endorses her.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, you know what that might be like a pulse

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 6>on current politics, because I imagine that that probably would

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 6>have more outrage than what happened with one point two

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 6>million people listening to Elon Musk and Donald Trump. But yeah,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 6>it's hard to know, but you're probably right. Your intuition

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 6>there kind of goes with what I would think too.

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Lids, we mentioned that you have got basically five rules

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>or five skills that you think kids ought to have.

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Can we go through them?

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 6>Sure? Thing, This is the things that you need to

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 6>go over with your kids before they leave your house,

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 6>so before they're gone for college or whatever awaits them after.

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 6>The first one is they need to know how to

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 6>have hard conversations. And one of the reasons that I

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.160
<v Speaker 6>note that that's true is as a college professor, I

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 6>have students who are afraid to upset anyone and they're

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 6>afraid to feel this discomfort themselves, and so that's like

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 6>a big skill that we need to make sure that

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 6>they have. The second one is parents need to make

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 6>sure their kids know how to register to vote. And

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 6>then they have to change it when they move. I

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 6>take our kids just to vote every year when we

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 6>have an election, and without fail, some of them are

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 6>turned away because they thought they were registered and they

0:09:42.160 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 6>don't realize that if you're registered in one county, it

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 6>doesn't transfer to the other. So make sure that they

0:09:46.320 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 6>understand how to do this and how they change that

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 6>when they move. The third one is they need to

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.719
<v Speaker 6>understand the difference between primaries and general elections. All too

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.079
<v Speaker 6>often we only focus on general elections when we talk

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 6>about this in schools, and so they really miss out

0:09:58.040 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 6>on this big piece of power, which is picking some

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 6>in a primary election. The third thing is they need

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 6>to have an understanding of federalism because we so are

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 6>the fourth thing. Rather, we oftentimes focus on the federal level,

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 6>and then they don't realize that state and local governments

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 6>control so many things. When we think about big policy

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 6>issues like gun licensing or healthcare or marijuana policy, things

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 6>that matter to young voters, this happens at the state

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 6>level for the most part, and so having an appreciation

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 6>of these different levels it's an important thing for them

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 6>to have. And the fifth one, and this is a

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 6>hard sell, but a lot of parents that I'm talking

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 6>to are pretty receptive to it. Your kids need to

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 6>have read the Constitution at least once before they leave

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 6>your house. It's our charter of government, is the rules

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 6>of the game, and once they have an understanding of it,

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 6>they can't be as suayed with bad information or misinformation

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 6>because they'll really just have a rooted understanding of what

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 6>our system is all about.

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And yes, you can start with Hamilton, like it'll get

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you really excited like that. No, seriously, Like I think

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>about something like that gets people interested, like, oh wait

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a minute, this is really our history in a fun form.

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>But there's a lot of information there. What is it

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:03.719
<v Speaker 1>that the kids that you teach eighteen to twenty one,

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty two? You've got a young daughter too. But I

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:09.480
<v Speaker 1>am curious about the questions that come up the most

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to government politics. What do they want

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to know? What is it that they're like, I don't

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 1>really understand this. I feel like when there's a piece

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of legislation going through Congress, we all are kind of like, wait,

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>where are we in this process? And where are we

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>and what vote is this and how does this work?

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Because there's still things I think the mechanics that don't

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>always make sense or don't you know, there's just it

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>feels like nuances do it. But anyway, what do kids

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>ask you the most?

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 6>I mean, I wish I could tell you that there

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 6>was this one thing that they didn't understand, but truly

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 6>they're lost. Like their understanding of the courts is based

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 6>on like courtroom drama TV. Their understanding of the presidency

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.280
<v Speaker 6>is sort of like whatever they've seen on Instagram or

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 6>TikTok that morning. And when it comes to like how

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 6>the legislature works, it's really hard and so it's not

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 6>something where we can fix it overnight. But I do

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:54.600
<v Speaker 6>think that if we start a little earlier, if we're

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 6>a little bit more intentional about it, and we recognize

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 6>that we have a role as families in writing this thing,

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 6>we can get to a lot of their questions because

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 6>they're kind of lost all over the place.

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Do the social platforms have a role too? You mentioned

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 3>Instagram and TikTok just now, how do you see them?

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 6>I mean, they're already here. They're going to be here

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 6>for good, I think, and so we have to understand

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 6>what they are. I think something that parents can do is,

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 6>you know, We're not going to see the same things

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 6>as our kids. We're algorithmically fed different things. We all

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 6>know this, and something that I argue in my book

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 6>is that take a little time with each other and say, like,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:27.719
<v Speaker 6>what is it that you're seeing and make sure that

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 6>you kind of have an understanding of what their algorithm

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 6>feeds them, and let them see what you're getting fed

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 6>as well. That way, you can talk about things with

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 6>a better understanding of the background inputs that either side has.

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 1>We talked about education, Tim, you asked earlier. I think

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>let's you some questions. But do we need to have

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>mandatory civics classes in school? Do we need to have

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a civics test before people vote?

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.559
<v Speaker 6>I don't think a civics test is necessarily the way

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 6>to do it. The people who study like education, the

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 6>people who are experts in this field, always come back

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 6>to this idea of action civics, which is like giving

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 6>kids a project so that they can really see how

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 6>the process works. You know, they find like a playground

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 6>and say, oh, our basketball courts are kind of cracked

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 6>and they don't really work. How can we figure out

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 6>how to fix that? And that process is, you know,

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 6>figuring out which branch of government is responsible, which level

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 6>is responsible, trying to figure out how you activate to

0:13:13.840 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 6>talk to those people, and even if you don't succeed

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 6>in getting better basketball courts, you understand a lot more

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 6>about the process. And so the people who study that

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 6>sort of like what can we do in schools, they

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 6>mostly point to action civics versus study for a test,

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 6>get ten answers right, and go on with your life.

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 1>The January sixth riot on the Capitol was that, I mean,

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about that in our political history?

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just thinking, like, does it make you nervous?

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Like those individuals did they think, well, this is democracy.

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I believe the vote was stolen. You know, like, how

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>do you kind of teach around that that those are

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>citizens to people who may have thought, listen, you know,

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we think things weren't democratic, and so we're protecting our state.

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's a really hard one, and I talk about

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 6>this a little bit in the book. I think one

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 6>of the things that's challenging there is my guess is

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 6>that people who are stormed in the Capitol on January

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 6>six I don't think many of them ever worked as

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 6>poll workers or election workers. Because I think if you had,

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 6>you would understand how difficult it is to actually steal

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 6>an election or how unlikely it is that enough people

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 6>would conspire to do that. And so this is all

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 6>sort of going back to the point of like, if

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 6>we understand our systems better, I think they operate in

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 6>better ways and we're less prone to things like misinformation

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 6>that could incite violence. So I think about January six

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 6>as an ultimate failure of political education more than anything else.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 3>But many Americans do still believe the twenty twenty election

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 3>was stolen and question and again I'm going to the

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 3>American Bar Association. They write that they question the integrity

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 3>of our election systems, and you actually hear the current

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:55.520
<v Speaker 3>front runner and Republican nominee still questioning the twenty twenty election.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 3>How do you view those in positions of power making

0:14:58.680 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 3>comments like that.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.480
<v Speaker 6>So I think it's easier to give Donald Trump a

0:15:02.520 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 6>pass versus season of politicians a past, because seasoned politicians,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 6>you know, they understand these systems, they've interacted with them

0:15:08.160 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 6>for a longer time. I think what Donald Trump kind

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 6>of brings is more of an infotainment style of things

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 6>and not a deep rooted understanding of how the processes

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 6>that underlie our systems work. I think it's kind of

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 6>dangerous for us to kind of take that as the

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 6>teaching versus going back to basics and saying, you know what,

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 6>maybe I'll go volunteer as a poll worker and go

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 6>see how that actually is. That would be the version

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 6>of doing like your own real research. And I think

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 6>when people do that, they realize it's very hard to

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 6>steal an election. It's very hard to do these sorts

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 6>of things because we have so much redundancy in place

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 6>in the US system.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey, lindsay one last question. We've got to wrap up,

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>but got about a minute. I think there are a

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks too there like this isn't my government,

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it's companies who do lobbying. You worked at a lobbyist

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>in Washington for about a year. They're like, why should

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I vote because it doesn't really matter, because my vote

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter because it's money that matters. What do you

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:55.280
<v Speaker 1>say to them? And again, we just got about forty

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>five seconds.

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I think I think that's a hard feeling, and

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 6>I understand it to think that you're inconsequential. So the

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 6>thing is, you're truly not at all the local and

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 6>state levels. Federal government, sure, you're a small piece of that,

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 6>but when you're doing things that are understand local level,

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 6>you are pivotal. We have elections that are decided in

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 6>fewer than hundreds of votes, So I understand that concern.

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 6>I think you should put it away and still exercise

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 6>the rights that you have here.

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>That was Lindsay Kormack, Associate Professor of Political Science and

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 3>director of the Diplomacy Lab at Steven's Institute of Technology,

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 3>her new book, How to Raise a Citizen and Why

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 3>It's up to You to Do.

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>It coming up. For more than eighty years, the USO

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>has been supporting members of the US Armed Forces and

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>their families. The CEO of the nonprofit joins us.

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 3>On the other side, you're listening to Bloomberg BusinessWeek. This

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 3>Catch us live weekday afternoons from two to five pm

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Easter Listen on Apple car Play and then brought auto

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 3>with a Bloomberg Business act or watch us Live on YouTube.

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Our next guest has quite the resume. He was Assistant

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor from March

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and five until June two thousand and seven,

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>he served as US Ambassador to Romania in the early

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>two thousands. He also served as Assistant Secretary of Defense

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for International Security Policy from two thousand and one to

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:10.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three.

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 3>From nineteen ninety to nineteen ninety two, he was the

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy,

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 3>and from nineteen eighty four to nineteen eighty six he

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 3>worked for the Assistant Director for Strategic Programs in the

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 3>US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency. He was also an

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 3>advisor to the US Delegation on Nuclear and space arms

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 3>talks with the former Soviet Union.

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, he also founded a tech company. We could

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely go on and on and on, but what we

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to do is talk to our next guest

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>about so much, including now running the organization that's been

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>serving the men and women in the US military since

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forty one.

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 2>JD.

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 3>Crouch, President and CEO at USO, also known as United

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.919
<v Speaker 3>Service Organizations, on why what they do today carries the

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 3>same significance as it did more than eighty years ago.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 5>The USO today is in many ways, it's a modernized

0:18:01.040 --> 0:18:03.919
<v Speaker 5>version right of what in a very relevant version of

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 5>what happened in nineteen forty one. We still have entertainment connections.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 5>It's not Bob Hope today, but it's Scarlett Jorhanssen, or

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 5>it's Chris Evans, or it's people like that who go

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 5>out and talk to the troops, spend time with the troops,

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 5>and the purpose is really the same. It's to really

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 5>give them a taste of home and make sure that

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 5>they understand that people back home are supporting them and

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 5>are thinking about them. But we also do it in

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 5>a million other ways, not just entertainers. You know, we

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 5>have two hundred and seventy five locations all around the world.

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 5>There's just as an example, there's over ten thousand American

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 5>troops in Eastern Europe right now as a result of

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:45.640
<v Speaker 5>the situation in Ukraine, and the USO is there with them,

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 5>providing support through centers that we've built on military basis,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 5>and all kinds of other programs like care packages and

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 5>things like that. So the USO is a multifaceted set

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 5>of programs. It's all designed to make sure that our

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 5>service members understand the gratitude of the American people.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 3>Can you remind everyone about the structure of the organization

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 3>where the funding comes from, because this is a it's

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 3>a nonprofit, terrible corporation that is chartered by Congress. Where

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 3>does the money come from?

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, the money largely comes from the American people.

0:19:20.560 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 5>We have, you know, donations that are as small as

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.479
<v Speaker 5>you know, five dollars or less from people who've been

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 5>supporting I've actually gotten I got a letter from a

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 5>little lady who's who met her husband at a USO

0:19:35.200 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 5>dance in nineteen forty four, and she sent me a

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 5>quarter that that was, you know, taped to the letter. Okay, wow,

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 5>all the way up to big corporations and companies that

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 5>we have strategic partnerships with. I know you've got a

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 5>lot of businesses that are watching this. You know, we

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.679
<v Speaker 5>have got some great strategic partners with fantastic brands that

0:19:55.760 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 5>go back a Coke back to nineteen forty one, the NFL, Kroger,

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 5>and lots of others. The Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin, people

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.919
<v Speaker 5>like that, Companies like that that really are leaning in

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 5>on supporting the troops. So there's all kinds of ways

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 5>to help support what we're doing at USO dot org.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>What about when you know, individuals come home. I always

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think about the support once they come back. How do

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you guys kind of continue the support there.

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, you know, when they are overseas, we're actually

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 5>back home supporting their families. I mentioned the Eastern European

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 5>deployments that those are unaccompanied tours. They're not going with

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 5>family members, so we're back home supporting them around the basis.

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 5>But when they do return, if you know, obviously we're

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 5>usually there with some kind of a welcome home for them.

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 5>We had a great welcome home for the aircraft carriers

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.360
<v Speaker 5>that have just deployed to the Middle East that came

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 5>home to Norfolk. But beyond that, as they're looking to

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 5>transition out of the military, the USO has a broad

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 5>range of services that help them smooth that transition so

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:01.400
<v Speaker 5>that they can get we had a good job, get

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 5>the educational benefits that they deserve, and integrate into their community.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:09.680
<v Speaker 5>So we really are there from the time they enter

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 5>the service and you know, raise their right hand all

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 5>the way to the time that they transition out.

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Jadie, you know what I always think about with an

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>organization like this is folks who might be listening to

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>this conversation right now, are just Americans in general, what

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>would surprise them about? I think we just forgive me,

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but I think take for granted that there's going to

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be people doing military service and protecting our nation, protecting

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, our allies. But what would they be surprised about,

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Like what you guys see on a regular basis, maybe

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 1>some of the folks that help you, whether it's going

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to entertain the troops, what would they be surprised that

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they might find or what that you guys find on

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a regular basis.

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, Well, the first thing I would say is, you know,

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 5>I think there's tremendous in some cases sympathy or certainly

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 5>pride in our military among most Americans. But that's different

0:22:03.720 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 5>than really understanding what it's like to wear the uniform.

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 5>And so part of this, you know, part of the

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 5>thing I think when they when they when they do

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 5>get an opportunity to see either what we do or

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 5>what they do, they're amazed by a lot of things.

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 5>One is they're just amazed at how, you know, really

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 5>how American people are that are serving. That is to

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 5>say they're like them. You know, we tend sometimes to

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 5>put our military on either on a pedestal or or

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 5>some people might tear them down, but but where they

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 5>might feel like they're victims or something. But that's not

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 5>the way they see themselves. They see themselves as just

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 5>patriotic Americans who are doing their job for the country.

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 5>And I think a lot of Americans would be surprised

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 5>at that. I mean, you know, we we tend to

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 5>get what we get from the movies and things like that,

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 5>so that's certainly one thing, you know, And in terms

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 5>of what the USO does, I think I think maybe

0:22:56.119 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 5>people would be surprised at how much we're supporting families,

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 5>you know. So this force is very different than the

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 5>World War II force. Sixty percent of them are married

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 5>and over half of them have children, and so it's

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:14.400
<v Speaker 5>a very different type of force. And consequently supporting their

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 5>families back home, I think is a critical part to

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.040
<v Speaker 5>getting future generations of Americans to raise their hand and

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 5>say they want to serve.

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 3>It's also interesting the way that technology has changed deployment

0:23:25.640 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 3>and keeping in touch with family. If you think about

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 3>it from the perspective of Okay, waiting months to get

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:36.000
<v Speaker 3>letters back in World War Two or even Vietnam to

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 3>getting emails in post war, during the War on Terror,

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 3>and now troops abroad being able to maybe do skype

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 3>or FaceTime with their families. How do you think about

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 3>the ways that families are able to keep in touch

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:55.120
<v Speaker 3>while folks are deployed.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 5>Well, as you know, this is the in touch generation.

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:02.359
<v Speaker 5>I mean most of most of the rank and file,

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 5>as we say and listed are actually gen Z now

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 5>and obviously gen Z and millennial and consequently they're used

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 5>to being in touch. So what's the most requested service

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 5>at USO centers everywhere? Internet? Wi Fi? Yeah, absolutely, it

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 5>brings them in. It's what keeps them connected. One of

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 5>our really exciting programs is our gaming program. And you know,

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:27.959
<v Speaker 5>gaming used to be kind of isolating, but now it's not.

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 5>It can be a fan activity, it can be a

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 5>friends activity, and so we host gaming competitions and things

0:24:34.600 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 5>like that, and a lot of times people just want

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:39.680
<v Speaker 5>to come into our center relax, game with their friends

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 5>who might be next door or they might be four

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 5>thousand miles away.

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:46.879
<v Speaker 1>You've been CEO for about a decade. How has the

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>organization changed and where do you think the USO needs

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to go in the next ten years.

0:24:52.000 --> 0:24:53.680
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, we have spent a lot of time

0:24:54.160 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 5>something you you wouldn't see you from an organizational stape,

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 5>but consolidating the organization and bringing it to together. When

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:04.400
<v Speaker 5>I first joined, we were nineteen independent five oh one

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 5>c threes. We're now one. And this has really helped

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 5>us to be able to not only raise more funds,

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 5>but also to move those resources where we need them

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 5>because the troops are moving in different places. Who would

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 5>have thought two years ago we would have had five

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:25.479
<v Speaker 5>or six centers in Eastern Europe, for example, And so

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 5>where it's going is always where they're going. And I

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 5>give you an example of the innovation that we're just now.

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 5>I think your earlier clip talked about the Abraham Lincoln

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 5>sailing to the Middle East. The USL is now putting

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 5>USO centers on aircraft carriers. Wow, very cool program. And

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.359
<v Speaker 5>again this is this is five thousand people on a

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 5>contained area with nothing to do except their jobs. And

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 5>so this is a little R in R center buried

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:59.439
<v Speaker 5>right in the middle of the aircraft carrier. We'll be

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 5>on nine carriers by the end of the year and

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 5>then hope to get on the other ones in twenty

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 5>twenty five. So it's those kinds of innovations that we

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 5>will always seek to make sure that we are with

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 5>our service members and their families wherever they go.

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned Eastern Europe, and you have a lot of

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 3>experience in Eastern Europe, as we mentioned before, you were

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 3>US Ambassador to Romania two thousand and four to two

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 3>thousand and five. You also were an advisor to the

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>US Delegation on Nuclear and space arms talks with the

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 3>former Soviet Union back in the nineteen eighties, I believe.

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 3>So I want to talk a little bit about what's

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 3>happening in Ukraine and in Eastern Europe right now and

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the different philosophies that are existing in the modern political environment,

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 3>because it does seem like there's increasingly a large number

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 3>of folks here in the US who are thinking about

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the United States and has taking a more isolationist approach,

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 3>and we're certainly seeing that in Congress each time a

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 3>funding bill comes up to support Ukraine and President Zelenski,

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 3>how do you think about the US's role around the

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 3>world right now?

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, you know, obviously the USO doesn't take positions

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 5>right on wars or political positions on things like that,

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 5>But I think, you know, personally, we do need to

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 5>recognize that it's a pretty dangerous world. We've got the

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 5>rise of China to become a global power. We have

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 5>a riventrous Russia which is really seeking to kind of

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 5>recreate and those are their words, not mine, recreate the

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 5>former Soviet Lands. And then we have a revolutionary Iran

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 5>in the Middle East. And not only are all these

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 5>things happening at the same time, but they're actually aligned,

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 5>they're working together, and so that presents the United States

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 5>and its allies with a lot of challenges, and it

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.439
<v Speaker 5>has an impact on our business because it means the

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 5>operational tempo of our military has gone up dramatically, and

0:27:58.080 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 5>you see it in the Middle East, to see it

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 5>in Eastern Europe and not so much, but it is

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 5>also there in the Far East, and it means that

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 5>the demand for our services is going up dramatically as

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 5>a result of that operational tempo. So it is a

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:14.399
<v Speaker 5>very dangerous world out there, and it's one that I

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 5>think we ignore it our own peril.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like it's more dangerous than some of

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the times where you were serving, whether it's George H. W.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Bush or different George W. Bush excuse me, other times

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 1>where you were helping out administrations. Does it feel more dangerous?

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:35.639
<v Speaker 5>Every generation has its challenge, Carroll, You know what I mean.

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 5>It is what it is. And obviously during two thousand

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 5>and one that was nine to eleven and the terrorist

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 5>attacks and things like that. But this does feel like

0:28:45.680 --> 0:28:50.000
<v Speaker 5>a return to kind of great power conflict and that

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 5>has obviously the risk of escalation and things like that.

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 5>So yes, I guess I would generally say it does

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 5>feel a little bit more dangerous, almost a little bit

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:01.000
<v Speaker 5>maybe like it felt back in the early late seventies

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:02.960
<v Speaker 5>and early eighties. Well, oh, go ahead, Carol.

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I wonder you know, the US and its

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>traditional allies in Europe. Do you think that comes undone

0:29:08.920 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>or do you think that survives?

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think we have very strong alliance relationships and

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, not some obviously the older traditional ones with

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 5>the United Kingdom as well as the other founding NATO members.

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 5>But also I will say just a shout out to

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 5>the polls and the Romanians who not only supported the

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 5>United States after nine to eleven, not only sent troops

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 5>to Iraq and Afghanistan, but who are actually investing in

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 5>their defense in a serious way. And consequently, are you know,

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 5>they're arm in arm with us as we're in Eastern

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:46.920
<v Speaker 5>Europe right now, we're not alone there.

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting to hear you say this just because we're

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 3>in this political environment right now where I think a

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of folks are saying, you know, it's okay for

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 3>us to ignore what's going on in other parts of

0:29:59.200 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 3>the world. The alliance as of old aren't necessarily the

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 3>alliances that we want to continue with. We hear criticism

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 3>of some of these alliances from one presidential candidate in particular,

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 3>what would you say to Americans who would say that

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.239
<v Speaker 3>they're critical of some of these alliances that have been

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 3>traditional post World War Two?

0:30:19.640 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, I actually think if you go back and

0:30:22.200 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 5>you look at the history of NATO, for example, even

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 5>going back into the nineteen fifties, there have been president

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 5>after president after president who said they need to do more,

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.440
<v Speaker 5>you know, they need to step up and invest more

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 5>in their defense. And so there's a you know, in

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 5>a way, it's I always say, it's a little bit

0:30:40.200 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 5>like deja vu all over again, you know, And yes,

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 5>these things wax and wane a little bit, but in particular,

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 5>when the demand on American resources is higher. Is not wrong.

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 5>I think for Americans to expect that our allies do more.

0:30:56.720 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 5>Sometimes we don't hear about what they're doing. We don't

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:03.120
<v Speaker 5>really how much they're doing, and some of them, frankly,

0:31:03.160 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 5>can do a lot more. So I think it's a balance.

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 5>But that doesn't mean we shouldn't have allies, you know.

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 5>In other words, we need to have allies I think

0:31:13.200 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 5>and support our way of life. I mean we're not

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 5>I don't think we're doing it for them or just

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 5>for them. We're doing it because it's something that's important

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 5>for us.

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Jad, just to wrap up, when someone mentions the USO,

0:31:27.240 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 1>what do you want people to think of? First?

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 5>I want them to think about a service member who

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 5>is out somewhere on the frontiers of freedom, who's alone

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 5>at Christmas, who is separated from their wives or their families.

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 5>And I want them to realize that that there's almost

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:49.959
<v Speaker 5>nothing like that in the world, and that they need

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 5>our continual support. And they need to know that Americans,

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 5>no matter what their views are on you know, the

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 5>political issues of the day. You know, they didn't make

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 5>the decision to get sent to Eastern Europe or to

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 5>the Middle East or someplace like that. Somebody else made

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 5>that decision. But that means Americans still have an obligation

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 5>to show them our gratitude and show them our support.

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 5>And of course I think the best way to do

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 5>that is supporting the USO, but there are other ways too,

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 5>But that's what I want them to think when they

0:32:21.000 --> 0:32:21.760
<v Speaker 5>think of the USO.

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 3>That was JD. Crouch, President and CEO at USO, also

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 3>known as United Service Organizations.

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week, All aboard the GLP

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>one train.

0:32:32.080 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 3>It's time to head on over to ozempic Town. That

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 3>story next.

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 2>Listen live each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 2>applecar Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:32:56.880 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 2>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:33:02.360 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>So. One of the stickier investment and business trends of

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>our world is the new class of diet drugs, the

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>GLP one medications. They are put up by Eli, Lilly, Novo, Nordisks,

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and some others. The recent earning season showed Eli Lilly

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>narrowed the gap with rival Novo in the race to

0:33:16.640 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>dominate the red hot obesity market as it expands its

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>supplies of weight loss drugs.

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 3>A little over one week ago, Lily lifted its twenty

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty four revenue outlook for the second time this year

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 3>on the strength of its weight loss drug sending the

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 3>stock soaring on the news.

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And before that, Novo had reported disappointing second quarter sales

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of we Govi, saying price concessions for companies that manage

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 1>prescription drug benefits in the United States cut into its performance.

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Novo shares sold off on the news, but if since bounce.

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Back bottom line industry competition continues to grow. For a gutcheck,

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 3>we turned to our GLP one guru, Bloomberg News health

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 3>reporter Madison Muller, who also took us to Ozempic Town,

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 3>also known as Bowling Green, Kentucky first stop though recent

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 3>earnings joining Carol Is Bloomberg's Matt Miller kickie it off

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 3>on the business of it all.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.959
<v Speaker 10>Oh, zempic and we go v same thing right and

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 10>is a higher dose? Okay? But Manjaro and zep bound

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 10>zet bound same thing Okay.

0:34:13.320 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's very nice.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'm just when we get these stats like zep

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 10>bound sold one point two billion dollars worth in the

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 10>second quarter, that does not count Munjaro.

0:34:23.719 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 11>Right, they're separated out. And it's interesting because Manjaro has

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 11>been on the market longer, but zep Bound has just

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 11>ramped up.

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 10>And it's also interesting because that's the one that people

0:34:32.520 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 10>talk about as the fat drug, and the same is

0:34:35.520 --> 0:34:39.880
<v Speaker 10>true with Novo. It's the non fat drug people talk about. Well,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 10>whatever you want to call it. I also think it's

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 10>interesting that Eli Lilly calls their weight loss drug Manjaro,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.839
<v Speaker 10>which is like, so where the Italian says for go

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:49.479
<v Speaker 10>eat your dinner.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 11>Right, Well, there's actually a story behind the name. What

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 11>is it Mount Kilimanjaro, like smushed together, and so if

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 11>you look at the label, you can see there's like

0:34:57.480 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 11>two little mountains.

0:34:58.840 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's interesting.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 7>Who knew?

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, fun fac So let's talk the nuts and

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 1>bolts of your world earnings Lily upby Novo not so much.

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Investors reacted accordingly, How are you thinking about the space

0:35:10.640 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and kind of the reporting that we're seeing.

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.759
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean we've been talking about supply and the

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 11>supply shortages for a long time, and that sort of

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:18.160
<v Speaker 11>continues to be the story.

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.600
<v Speaker 9>It's what we're seeing again with Novo and Lily.

0:35:20.640 --> 0:35:21.680
<v Speaker 7>I mean, Novo.

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 11>Struggled and missed sales estimates. Lily sort of smashed them

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:26.240
<v Speaker 11>out of the parks.

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So the business is good, it's just a matter of

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>if you can keep up.

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 9>Yes, exactly.

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 11>And Lily like had I mean, both companies have invested

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:37.239
<v Speaker 11>billions into ramping up manufacturing. It just seems like Lily's

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:41.440
<v Speaker 11>issues are starting to ease a little bit faster than Novo's.

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 10>Maybe are because they have way more money. So the

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 10>idea is you can make as much as you can sell, right, definitely,

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 10>and Eli Lilly is an eight hundred billion dollar company, right,

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 10>so they have more resources to boost production. Novo is

0:35:58.000 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 10>I don't know, like a ten bills million dollar company, right,

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:02.799
<v Speaker 10>I don't even know. It's less than ten.

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:04.240
<v Speaker 9>It's the biggest company in Europe.

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 10>It's worth three point eight billion damage kroner.

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a five hundred and sixty eight billion dollar market

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>cap company. The eighty rs at trade here.

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 10>Oh is that three point eight trillion? In any case,

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 10>it's worth less than Lily and it's done worse than Lily.

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:19.520
<v Speaker 10>Over the past five years. Eli Lilly shares are up

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 10>six hundred and forty three percent.

0:36:21.000 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, Novo's a small Lily's more diversified. They've

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 11>been at this for I mean both companies have been

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:29.719
<v Speaker 11>at this for a long time. But up until the

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 11>last few years, Novo's bread and butter was just diabetes like. So,

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 11>Lily has a slew of other drugs, cancer drugs, autoimmune drugs.

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 11>They know how to ramp up right, you know, production,

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 11>and they know how to do this and plan for

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 11>future demand. And this is all relatively new for Novo.

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:51.320
<v Speaker 11>I mean there, this market is crazy.

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We want to get into a story that's on the

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg that's a killer, But before we do that, we're

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>about one and a half years into talking about this

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>class drugs. You've been reporting so much, you know, I

0:37:03.160 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like every couple of weeks or something, there's like, hey,

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 1>look what else these drugs can do? Your view you're thinking,

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you're reporting, how does it continue to evolve and how

0:37:13.080 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>you think.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 9>About the future.

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:17.440
<v Speaker 11>On Eli Lilly's earnings call, they kind of like slipped

0:37:17.480 --> 0:37:19.959
<v Speaker 11>this into the call. It wasn't huge news but they're

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:24.360
<v Speaker 11>no longer calling their obesity and diabetes business unit just

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:28.600
<v Speaker 11>obesity and diabetes. Now it's like cardio metabolic health, which

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.479
<v Speaker 11>sort of signals this bigger thing that we've been talking

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.480
<v Speaker 11>about that these drugs, you know, aren't just weight loss drugs.

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 11>They have potential indications and are potentially able to help

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 11>with a lot of other conditions that are sort of

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 11>interrelated with heart disease and kidney disease and liver disease,

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.799
<v Speaker 11>and so like, I think that that is going to

0:37:45.840 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 11>be a huge theme going forward, and the fact that

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.879
<v Speaker 11>Lily kind of mentioned that on the earnings call today,

0:37:50.920 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 11>I was like, so they're thinking about it this way, brand.

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I want, you know, I want I want

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 10>to take this forever, as you both know, not just

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:00.640
<v Speaker 10>because I'm fat, because I only need to lose like

0:38:00.640 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 10>twenty pounds, but I want to have a healthy heart

0:38:03.960 --> 0:38:06.480
<v Speaker 10>so I don't die soon. And I'm pretty sure I'm

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.920
<v Speaker 10>going to get Alzheimer's disease. This may stop that as

0:38:09.960 --> 0:38:12.839
<v Speaker 10>well or slow it down. On the other hand, there

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 10>is so much optimism for mRNA as well, and that

0:38:17.600 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 10>didn't cure cancer yet, so maybe it's going to take

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 10>a while.

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean it's it's different, right, mRNA was amazing

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 11>for COVID.

0:38:25.160 --> 0:38:27.719
<v Speaker 10>It just was it that great for COVID because I

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:29.439
<v Speaker 10>took it and then kept getting COVID here.

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all right, to be fair, because I don't want

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to waste time, because I want to get.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.160
<v Speaker 10>To the story, to the Bowling Green story.

0:38:36.320 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about it. It's among the most read. Take

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>us to a ZEPK town.

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.920
<v Speaker 11>Yes, so we've I mean you've known about this story

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:43.839
<v Speaker 11>for a long time because I spent quite a bit

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 11>of time.

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 10>In Bowling Green, Kentucky.

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:47.440
<v Speaker 9>In Kentucky, yes, not.

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 11>Bowling Green, Ohio, because there is a Bowling Green, Ohio

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:54.240
<v Speaker 11>as Yeah, but has you know four percent of Bowling

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 11>Green and the surrounding area people are on weight loss

0:38:57.440 --> 0:39:00.120
<v Speaker 11>drugs and it's just changing the fabric of the the

0:39:00.160 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 11>area economically, culturally, but in sort of surprising ways. Like

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 11>I thought that I would go there and the restaurants

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:08.480
<v Speaker 11>would be empty and the gyms would be closing down.

0:39:08.520 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 11>But it's sort of the opposite. I mean, restaurants are

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 11>still full, the gyms are doing great. But what's happened

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 11>is this like side economy has sort of formed alongside

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 11>the drugs. So there's medical spas that are cropping up

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 11>everywhere to sell these compounded drugs. The GNC is doing,

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 11>you know, great business selling supplements that help with side effects,

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 11>and so it's like it's actually helping business, but in

0:39:31.280 --> 0:39:32.400
<v Speaker 11>sort of surprising ways.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I have a couple of listener questions, okaya time, as

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>long as they're pertinent to this story.

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.279
<v Speaker 10>Yes, so listener rights in related what happens if you

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:41.680
<v Speaker 10>take the pill and you're in shape, which is I

0:39:41.719 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 10>think a good question because a lot of people, especially

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 10>you know, like on the Upper east Side, Yeah, they

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:49.400
<v Speaker 10>are already skinny, but they want to take it anyway.

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 11>Well, I mean that's the thing, is like doctors shouldn't

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 11>be prescribing these drugs because it is a it's a

0:39:55.400 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 11>prescription drug.

0:39:56.239 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 10>But is it a problem to you stop eating and

0:39:57.840 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 10>then you become like anarexic.

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 11>Or I mean you that it could be dangerous, Like

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 11>if you don't need to lose that much weight and

0:40:04.680 --> 0:40:07.359
<v Speaker 11>you're on a weight loss drug that's really effective, probably not.

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 10>Leads into the second question, when did these become over

0:40:11.719 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 10>the counter and affordable?

0:40:13.600 --> 0:40:14.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, that's a good question.

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean they're probably never, I mean, I don't

0:40:18.040 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 11>want to say never, but they are prescription drugs, so

0:40:21.200 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 11>they're not over the counter. But generic drugs eventually will

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 11>come down the pipeline. We're already seeing like some of

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 11>the older GLP one drugs, the first sort of wave

0:40:31.280 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 11>of these, like sex Senda, which is a drug called

0:40:35.000 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 11>layer glue tide that's already on the way to becoming generics.

0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:44.120
<v Speaker 10>So it's a better name too, or sex starter.

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, all right, I'm gonna put you on the side

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 1>for a moment, so go back to your story because

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really cool.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 7>You guys.

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.640
<v Speaker 1>It was several reporters involved in it, and you really

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.120
<v Speaker 1>get into the specific specifics of the people there. How

0:40:55.120 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 1>did you find it though?

0:40:56.560 --> 0:40:58.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So, I mean we worked with the data team,

0:40:58.680 --> 0:41:01.479
<v Speaker 11>and we worked with this analy firm called Purple Lab,

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 11>and they gave us three zip code level data, which

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 11>you know kind of gives you like a city and

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.920
<v Speaker 11>then the surrounding area. So we looked all across the US.

0:41:10.160 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 11>We wanted to see what the ozembic hot spots were,

0:41:13.120 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 11>and you know, Bowling Green wasn't the only one that

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 11>came up in the data. There was Huntsville, Alabama. There

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 11>was like a few other areas, but Kentucky as a

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 11>state has the highest concentration of weight loss drug users.

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 11>So we were like, this is probably a good place

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:29.239
<v Speaker 11>to start. Clearly stands out in the data. And then

0:41:29.440 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 11>once we started talking to people in Bowling Green, it

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 11>was like, Okay, this is our spot because everyone here

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 11>is either on the drugs or nos like five other

0:41:37.000 --> 0:41:37.879
<v Speaker 11>people that are on them.

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can we make the assumption that's just an

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:43.240
<v Speaker 1>area where there's a fair amount of people that are overweight.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean the obesity rates are high there, the

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.360
<v Speaker 11>diabetes rates are high there, and in Kentucky across the board.

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 9>So it's actually a good thing.

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.799
<v Speaker 11>That there's a lot of people taking these drugs in

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.680
<v Speaker 11>that area because you know, it means hopefully it's helping.

0:41:55.400 --> 0:41:57.239
<v Speaker 10>With not just Kentucky. I mean you get off the

0:41:57.239 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 10>airplane at CMH and Columbus, Ohio, and you notice that

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:01.880
<v Speaker 10>immediately as well.

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen. I mean, I think it's been an incredible game

0:42:05.120 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 1>changer for a lot of people in their lives who

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:10.440
<v Speaker 1>struggle and there are people who struggle with being overweighted

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 1>and who've tried a bunch of different things, and I've

0:42:13.880 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>seen it firsthand with individuals and then they take this

0:42:16.120 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 1>drug and it's just unbelievable the difference.

0:42:18.520 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 11>Right, And I mean that's the big thing with these

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 11>drugs is there's also been this changing understanding of obesity

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 11>as you know, a biological health condition that's driven by

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:34.320
<v Speaker 11>someone's biology. That's not necessarily just because you know, these

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 11>tropes that have long been repeated that someone's lazy or

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 11>that they're eating too much. Like, there are biological mechanisms

0:42:40.760 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 11>driving this and the these drugs help with that. So

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.360
<v Speaker 11>it's it's for people who need them. It's an absolute

0:42:47.400 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 11>game changer.

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>What surprised you about like going there and talking to

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>these people?

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean, I that's a really good question.

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 11>I like didn't have a lot of I don't know

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:01.280
<v Speaker 11>understanding going in because that was my first time in Kentucky.

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:02.920
<v Speaker 11>So I was like, I don't know what this is

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:06.520
<v Speaker 11>going to be like. And everyone was so willing to

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:09.040
<v Speaker 11>talk to us and share their stories and like they

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 11>were so grateful for these drugs. But I think that

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 11>maybe this is the thing that surprised us is like

0:43:15.800 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 11>everyone had this great success at the beginning, and then

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 11>something happened either their insurance cut them off or they

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 11>couldn't find the drugs anymore because of supply shortages. And

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.680
<v Speaker 11>I guess that shouldn't have surprised me because those are

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 11>all themes that we've been reporting on for a long time.

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:34.239
<v Speaker 10>But you're saying if they stopped taking the drugs, they're

0:43:34.280 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 10>no longer successful.

0:43:35.560 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 11>Well no, not necessarily, but and like they have found

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 11>other ways to continue taking them. But I think I

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 11>was surprised to keep taking.

0:43:43.120 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 10>The drugs and they're still successful. Yeah, but if you

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.240
<v Speaker 10>stopped taking the drugs.

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 9>Then oftentimes you gain the weight back exactly.

0:43:50.440 --> 0:43:52.440
<v Speaker 11>I mean that's not something that we saw with the

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 11>people that we spoke to, because they all were able to,

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 11>like one guy switch to another drug, someone else started

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:01.120
<v Speaker 11>taking a compound of drugs. So, but I think it

0:44:01.200 --> 0:44:03.799
<v Speaker 11>was surprising to me that, like everyone across the board

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.839
<v Speaker 11>that we talked to encountered one of these issues with

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 11>accessibility or with you know, the supply shortages or price

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 11>or something like.

0:44:11.120 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 9>It really is just affecting people a lot.

0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Are most of these people though, is insurance paying or

0:44:15.920 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>how much was out of pocket?

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.920
<v Speaker 11>It was most of the people insurance was paying at

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 11>the beginning and then like six months in or once

0:44:23.880 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 11>they lost a certain amount of weight, insurance stopped paying

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:30.800
<v Speaker 11>for them. Some people went to these compounded off brand

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:33.799
<v Speaker 11>drugs that we've talked about before. Other people were able to,

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 11>like one guy switched from ozempic to manjarro because his

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 11>insurance would cover manjarro but not ozempic, right, So, like

0:44:40.160 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 11>everyone was able to continue taking the drugs for the

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 11>most part. But I mean Pat Stiff, who's one of

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:48.560
<v Speaker 11>the characters in this story, Like he switched from ozempic

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:52.919
<v Speaker 11>to Manjarro and then couldn't find his Manjaro anywhere because

0:44:52.920 --> 0:44:54.479
<v Speaker 11>the supply shortages were so bad.

0:44:54.560 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 9>So he was, you know, as we're like finishing up.

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:00.000
<v Speaker 11>This story, calling me and saying that, well, I'm just

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 11>gonna have to go off the drug and see what happens,

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:04.680
<v Speaker 11>and it'll be like an experiment. Hopefully I don't gain

0:45:04.719 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 11>the weight back. But yeah, it's it's a struggle I think.

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 9>For a lot of people.

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.759
<v Speaker 3>That's Bloomberg News health reporter Madison Miller her story in

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Business Week magazine. Bloomberg's Matt Miller there as well,

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:16.480
<v Speaker 3>And that.

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Wraps up our first hour of the weekend edition of

0:45:18.200 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Ahead in our next hour,

0:45:21.600 --> 0:45:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the billionaire nerd Savior King and his quest to shape

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>our world. You will definitely know this person, and by

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the way, he's also one of the richest out there.

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:33.640
<v Speaker 3>Plus how women became America's safety net, and well, no

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.279
<v Speaker 3>easy segue here, we're going to talk ready to drink

0:45:36.320 --> 0:45:39.719
<v Speaker 3>cocktails with the head of the family owned Jeloso group

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:40.360
<v Speaker 3>of companies.

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:41.919
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:44.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm Carol Messer and I'm Tim stenoveex Stay with us.

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 3>Today's top stories and global business headlines are coming up

0:45:47.239 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 3>right now.

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:55.080
<v Speaker 2>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:45:55.080 --> 0:45:57.279
<v Speaker 2>on Apple car Play and ed Broud Auto with a

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business at or want us live on YouTube tube.

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Plenty Ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition

0:46:03.800 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week, including the billionaire nerd Savior King

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>aka Bill Gates and his quest to shape our world

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 1>It's all in a new book.

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Plus women holding it all together and becoming our safety net.

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 3>And after all that heavy stuff, how about wrapping it

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 3>up with Aldo Jeloso, who runs the family owned Jeloso

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Group of companies.

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm there, I'm totally there, all right, First up

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.720
<v Speaker 1>this hour, the team here at Bloomberg News analyzed government

0:46:25.800 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>data and found that there's a gender divide in how

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 1>recent college graduates are responding to a cooling US job market.

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>While young college educated women are sticking with their job

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 1>search even as the number of vacancy shrinks, many of

0:46:38.400 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 1>their male peers are choosing to take a break, And

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>women still aren't earning as much as men. Last year,

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:47.320
<v Speaker 1>women's earnings were eighty three point six percent of men's.

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:49.799
<v Speaker 1>This is according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics.

0:46:50.280 --> 0:46:52.360
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, come on, Tim, this shouldn't be news to

0:46:52.400 --> 0:46:53.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's out there listening.

0:46:54.120 --> 0:46:56.279
<v Speaker 3>What's talked about less though, is all of the work

0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.440
<v Speaker 3>that women do that's unpaid. Think childcare, taking kids to

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the doctor, cooking for the family, managing the family budget,

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:06.400
<v Speaker 3>taking care of elderly family members, figuring out everything related

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 3>to school, and yes, what the kids are doing for

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 3>the summer. In a lot of ways, women are the

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 3>family safety net. They're holding it together. And that's the

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:18.960
<v Speaker 3>title of Jessica Calarco's book. She's a sociologist and associate

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.239
<v Speaker 3>professor at the University of Wisconsin Madison. Her book out

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 3>just a couple of months ago, Holding It Together, How

0:47:25.000 --> 0:47:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Women became America's Safety Net.

0:47:27.480 --> 0:47:31.160
<v Speaker 12>So essentially, women are the default caregivers for the children,

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:33.359
<v Speaker 12>for the sick, for the elderly, not only for kids,

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 12>but filling in those kinds of jobs that you mentioned before,

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 12>and essentially they are doing this work. This is actually

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.399
<v Speaker 12>related to the numbers that you mentioned before in terms

0:47:41.480 --> 0:47:43.680
<v Speaker 12>of you know, women's equal pay or the lack of

0:47:43.680 --> 0:47:45.680
<v Speaker 12>equal pay, in part because the kind of work that

0:47:45.719 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 12>women are doing behind the scenes is a big factor

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 12>in where that gender gap and pay comes from. That

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:54.080
<v Speaker 12>the more labor, the more unpaid labor, we heap onto women,

0:47:54.400 --> 0:47:57.320
<v Speaker 12>the harder it is for them to advance in their careers,

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 12>the harder it is for them to compete with men,

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.480
<v Speaker 12>and in ways that other countries don't. And research shows

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:06.200
<v Speaker 12>that one of the strongest predictors of our economic growth

0:48:06.239 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 12>in countries is the amount of money that we invest

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:11.239
<v Speaker 12>in providing the kinds of supports that helped to alleviate

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:14.160
<v Speaker 12>some of those gender gaps in both unpaid work and

0:48:14.239 --> 0:48:16.120
<v Speaker 12>also the kinds of gender gaps that show up and

0:48:16.120 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 12>paid work as well.

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Jessica, if the pandemic hadn't ha happened, would you ever

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>written this book?

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:21.880
<v Speaker 12>I don't think so.

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:23.040
<v Speaker 10>Certainly.

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 12>This book started as a project. I was interested in

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:27.359
<v Speaker 12>what I thought of at the time as the sort

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 12>of best laid plans of parenting, how you have ideas

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 12>about the kind of parent that you want to be,

0:48:32.080 --> 0:48:34.840
<v Speaker 12>and life intervenes, and life intervened in the sense of

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 12>a pandemic happened in the middle of my data collection

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 12>efforts and really pushed me to want to understand that

0:48:40.600 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 12>the interviews that we were doing in the surveys we

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:44.760
<v Speaker 12>were doing with families across the US at the time,

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:48.240
<v Speaker 12>really showed how much of an impact the pandemic was having,

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:51.720
<v Speaker 12>especially on families with children, and especially on the moms

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 12>within those families who were really trying to hold it

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 12>together in the midst of this crisis, which which led

0:48:56.840 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 12>me to want to understand, how did we get to

0:48:58.960 --> 0:49:01.200
<v Speaker 12>this point of really lying on women to be the

0:49:01.239 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 12>social safety net for us? And then, in the context

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 12>of the failure of build back better, you know, why

0:49:05.960 --> 0:49:08.399
<v Speaker 12>didn't we learn from the mistakes of the pandemic. Why

0:49:08.440 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 12>didn't we pursue those kinds of policies that might have

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 12>helped to put us on better footing, both genderwise and

0:49:15.160 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 12>in terms of economic parity with other types of countries

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 12>that have used those social safety nets for decades.

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:22.239
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So the simple question, with perhaps not a very

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 3>simple answer, how did we get here? How did we

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:27.399
<v Speaker 3>get to the point where women became America's safety net?

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:29.280
<v Speaker 12>In the book, I traced this back to the nineteen

0:49:29.320 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 12>thirties and to the pushback in the wake of Franklin

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:35.799
<v Speaker 12>Roosevelt's New Deal. Essentially, at the time, the National Association

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 12>of Manufacturers, a business lobbying agency, was looking for ways

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 12>to resist some of the higher corporate taxes and higher

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 12>taxes on wealthy people that were needed to pay for

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 12>these kinds of strong social safety net programs. And what

0:49:48.200 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 12>they found at the time I talked about in the

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 12>book where a group of neoliberal economists out of Austria

0:49:53.000 --> 0:49:56.160
<v Speaker 12>who were developing this theory that we don't actually need

0:49:56.200 --> 0:49:59.120
<v Speaker 12>social safety nets as a country because if we don't

0:49:59.160 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 12>have protection p people will take steps, make better choices

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:05.239
<v Speaker 12>to keep themselves safe from risk. And this theory has

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.080
<v Speaker 12>been debunked over time and showing that that's not actually

0:50:08.120 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 12>how people respond to risk, but they use this to

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:14.360
<v Speaker 12>fuel not only changes in policy in the US, but

0:50:14.400 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 12>also massive propaganda campaigns things like General Electric Theater, which

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 12>helped to create this perception of kind of pulling ourselves

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.959
<v Speaker 12>up by our bootstraps, this very American mentality, and also

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 12>reinforce traditional gender roles, which helped to lay the groundwork

0:50:28.640 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 12>for the kinds of policy decisions that we made after

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:34.480
<v Speaker 12>World War II. For example, of instead of trying to

0:50:34.520 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 12>take steps to allow women to stay in the workforce

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 12>to continue those rosy, the riveter jobs that they'd had,

0:50:40.160 --> 0:50:42.879
<v Speaker 12>we shuddered the childcare centers that we put in place

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 12>during the war, and we pushed women back home and

0:50:45.360 --> 0:50:49.520
<v Speaker 12>really embraced the nineteen fifties culture around gender and that

0:50:49.680 --> 0:50:51.799
<v Speaker 12>echoes of that still exist today and the way that

0:50:51.840 --> 0:50:53.320
<v Speaker 12>we treat women as a reserve.

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Lin I have to jump in because here we are

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:58.839
<v Speaker 1>seventy years later and we're still talking about the same

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>old problems. Teim. We talked about childcare, the costs, the juggling,

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 1>like why haven't right It's.

0:51:06.040 --> 0:51:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I can speak from personal experience. It's just

0:51:08.680 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 3>a daily struggle figuring out who's picking up what kid,

0:51:12.400 --> 0:51:13.320
<v Speaker 3>who's cooking dinner?

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And guys, I mean, and you guys have childcare.

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:16.400
<v Speaker 3>We have childcare.

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:16.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:18.480
<v Speaker 1>So I just feel like, why are we still having

0:51:18.520 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>these difficult conversations? Why haven't we figured out a better system?

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't it It's not a new thing, is it

0:51:24.880 --> 0:51:28.000
<v Speaker 1>policymakers at the federal level? Is it state level? Is

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it just a society so entrenched that we don't value

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 1>women as much?

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 7>What is it? I mean?

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:38.560
<v Speaker 12>Essentially, other countries use social safety nets to help people

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:42.280
<v Speaker 12>manage these challenges and manage these risks. They use taxes

0:51:42.320 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 12>and regulations to not only protect people from falling into poverty,

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.279
<v Speaker 12>but to help people manage the challenges of daily living

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 12>things like childcare, things like healthcare, and also to ensure

0:51:52.120 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 12>with things like limits on paid work hours, to ensure

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:57.120
<v Speaker 12>that people have the time and the energy to do

0:51:57.160 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 12>this work of taking care of their families, taking care

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:01.839
<v Speaker 12>of their commune, is taking care of their homes even

0:52:01.960 --> 0:52:05.239
<v Speaker 12>and in the US we instead try a DIY society.

0:52:05.280 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 12>We tell people that they should be able to manage

0:52:07.560 --> 0:52:10.279
<v Speaker 12>this risk on their own. But the reality is that

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:12.839
<v Speaker 12>that's not possible. And that's where women come in, in

0:52:12.880 --> 0:52:15.600
<v Speaker 12>the sense that they're tasked with holding it together, with

0:52:15.719 --> 0:52:19.240
<v Speaker 12>doing the unpaid and underpaid labor that makes it seem

0:52:19.400 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 12>like this DIY illusion is possible even when it's leaving

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:25.280
<v Speaker 12>us on the edge of collapse.

0:52:25.840 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Just give us an idea of how you were able

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 3>to gather these stories from so many women.

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 12>Sure, So we started by recruiting two hundred and fifty

0:52:32.400 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 12>pregnant women from prenatal clinics in Indiana, and this was

0:52:35.160 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 12>in twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen, and we were following

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 12>those same women over time with surveys and in depth

0:52:40.560 --> 0:52:43.719
<v Speaker 12>interviews every six months from the time that they were

0:52:43.719 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 12>pregnant through their first two years postpartum. And the pandemic

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 12>hit in the middle of this, so we did three

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:51.719
<v Speaker 12>additional waves of surveys and interviews with the mothers and

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.560
<v Speaker 12>their partners and some of their social network contacts. And then,

0:52:54.600 --> 0:52:57.040
<v Speaker 12>because this was mostly an Indiana based sample, we also

0:52:57.120 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 12>did two national surveys each with over two thousand pairs.

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:03.440
<v Speaker 12>It's from across the US to better understand how to

0:53:03.520 --> 0:53:07.120
<v Speaker 12>kind of contextualize the findings from our qualitative data. And

0:53:07.120 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 12>then I also dug into a lot of the historical

0:53:09.040 --> 0:53:11.359
<v Speaker 12>research and some media case studies for the book as

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 12>well to better understand, you know, how do we get here?

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:16.239
<v Speaker 12>And then what are some of the myths that are

0:53:16.280 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 12>helping to the cultural myths that are helping to keep

0:53:18.760 --> 0:53:20.480
<v Speaker 12>us from changing.

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go there, because that's where I want to go.

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Chapter six, The Mars Venus myth. I can't tell you

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>how many times we're having conversations and it's like, well,

0:53:28.239 --> 0:53:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, Mars Venus. We're different, we're wired differently,

0:53:31.920 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>so of course women are the caregivers. It's just the

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:37.000
<v Speaker 1>way it is. Go there because I love this.

0:53:38.080 --> 0:53:38.360
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:41.520
<v Speaker 12>So essentially there's this myth that is perpetuated by many

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:44.359
<v Speaker 12>parts of our culture that suggests that men and women

0:53:44.440 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 12>are just fundamentally different. Butgard the book women are the

0:53:47.400 --> 0:53:51.359
<v Speaker 12>book two exactly, so I mean it stems in part,

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:53.360
<v Speaker 12>and certainly these ideas are much older than that, but

0:53:53.400 --> 0:53:55.840
<v Speaker 12>it's echoed in this kind of John Gray's kind of

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.840
<v Speaker 12>classic Men are from Mars, women are from Venus, which almost,

0:53:58.920 --> 0:54:02.280
<v Speaker 12>you know, suggests that men and women are from different planets,

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:06.200
<v Speaker 12>not only different species even and it's echoes of this.

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:08.759
<v Speaker 12>You can hear this in you know, recent conversations, things

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 12>like Harrison Butker's commencement speech around this idea that women

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:14.480
<v Speaker 12>are just happier at home, that women are that that's

0:54:14.520 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 12>their natural duty or their natural responsibility to be in

0:54:18.160 --> 0:54:20.440
<v Speaker 12>the home. And what research shows is that belief in

0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:23.480
<v Speaker 12>these kinds of mythical ideas and that they are mythical,

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 12>That the gender is way more complicated than this sort

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:30.719
<v Speaker 12>of simple pink blue binary, and that socialization, early exposure,

0:54:30.760 --> 0:54:34.719
<v Speaker 12>that parents and adult caregivers treat children very differently on

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 12>the basis of perceived gender from very early on in

0:54:37.640 --> 0:54:39.880
<v Speaker 12>their lives, and that this lay is the groundwork. You know,

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:42.080
<v Speaker 12>we expect girls to be mothers from the time that

0:54:42.080 --> 0:54:44.000
<v Speaker 12>they're old enough to hold a baby doll in ways

0:54:44.040 --> 0:54:45.760
<v Speaker 12>that we simply don't expect for boys.

0:54:45.800 --> 0:54:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh what's interesting is you know, and I just want

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 1>to stop for a moment. There was an interview you did,

0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and Tim and I both like reading this. You know

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that Mars and Venus men and women are just fundamentally different,

0:54:56.840 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 1>both psychologically. Is explanation rights also very convenient you have

0:55:01.480 --> 0:55:03.960
<v Speaker 1>said in the past. It means though we don't need

0:55:04.000 --> 0:55:07.799
<v Speaker 1>big structural solutions. That's kind of the payoff, right, If

0:55:07.800 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>we believe that we are fundamentally different, it's not that

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:14.160
<v Speaker 1>there's something structurally wrong, and that is maybe why we

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:17.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to have this conversation decade after decade.

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:20.759
<v Speaker 12>Exactly what I find in the national surveys that I've

0:55:20.760 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 12>conducted with parents is that the majority of dads, for example,

0:55:23.480 --> 0:55:25.919
<v Speaker 12>believe that kids are better off with their mothers at home.

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:28.799
<v Speaker 12>And what I also find is that the dads who

0:55:28.880 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 12>believe in that myth, who believe that it's better for

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 12>kids to have a mother at home than to have

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 12>a mother who's engaged in paid work, is that those

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 12>are also disproportionately the dads who reject the need for

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:41.160
<v Speaker 12>a stronger social safety net, and essentially believing this myth,

0:55:41.239 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 12>believing that women are just happier at home or that

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 12>it's better for kids to have mom at home, allows

0:55:46.560 --> 0:55:48.200
<v Speaker 12>us to feel like, well, maybe we don't need to

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 12>invest in that stronger social safety net. Maybe we don't

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:54.400
<v Speaker 12>need paid parntal leave or universal affordable childcare because it

0:55:54.560 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 12>just works better for everyone if mom is at home

0:55:57.160 --> 0:55:58.680
<v Speaker 12>as opposed to in the paid work horse.

0:56:00.000 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 3>What are we right now as we head into the

0:56:02.520 --> 0:56:05.240
<v Speaker 3>election of twenty twenty four, because I was actually talking

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:08.840
<v Speaker 3>with I was talking with a guest early on our

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:11.200
<v Speaker 3>crypto show, and she she's big in the It was

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:12.880
<v Speaker 3>a crypto show, so she's big into crypto. And she

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:15.719
<v Speaker 3>sent a tweet out earlier this year, Jessica that talked

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:21.400
<v Speaker 3>about choosing between on the ballot women's bodies and the

0:56:21.480 --> 0:56:24.280
<v Speaker 3>right to have autonomy over your body versus your wallet,

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:28.040
<v Speaker 3>because she doesn't believe that the Biden administration is pro

0:56:28.120 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 3>crypto enough. And it was interesting to hear that juxtaposition

0:56:32.280 --> 0:56:34.480
<v Speaker 3>because and I asked her, is it actually that black

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 3>and that white for you? And she said, there are

0:56:35.960 --> 0:56:38.000
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people who are single issue voters when

0:56:38.000 --> 0:56:39.520
<v Speaker 3>it comes to crypto.

0:56:40.080 --> 0:56:41.080
<v Speaker 5>But here in.

0:56:41.000 --> 0:56:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Twenty twenty four, I think we're at a time when

0:56:42.560 --> 0:56:44.239
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people never thought that Roe v. Wade

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 3>would actually be overturned. How does the conversation in your

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:50.000
<v Speaker 3>world shift in an election.

0:56:49.760 --> 0:56:52.319
<v Speaker 12>Year like this, Yeah, I mean, I think we have

0:56:52.360 --> 0:56:55.840
<v Speaker 12>to think about the way that denying people bodily autonomy,

0:56:55.840 --> 0:57:00.480
<v Speaker 12>denying reproductive rights makes it easier to exploit women labor.

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:03.000
<v Speaker 12>It can push them into motherhood in ways that make

0:57:03.040 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 12>it difficult for them not only to have choices about

0:57:06.080 --> 0:57:09.160
<v Speaker 12>things like finishing college or investing in the kinds of

0:57:09.200 --> 0:57:11.640
<v Speaker 12>careers that they need to take time for, but can

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 12>also lead them pushed into the kinds of low wage

0:57:14.520 --> 0:57:17.600
<v Speaker 12>jobs that offer limited options for their families that make

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 12>it harder for them to get ahead. And so I

0:57:19.200 --> 0:57:21.200
<v Speaker 12>think we have to think about the way that these

0:57:21.320 --> 0:57:24.680
<v Speaker 12>kinds of attacks on reproductive freedom are attacks also on

0:57:25.160 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 12>women's economic opportunities and on their ability to take care

0:57:28.600 --> 0:57:31.200
<v Speaker 12>of themselves and their families financially as well.

0:57:32.440 --> 0:57:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You get into this idea, I don't want to end

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:37.640
<v Speaker 1>without thinking about, like, how do we fix this? You

0:57:37.680 --> 0:57:39.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about a union of care. So we've got about

0:57:39.960 --> 0:57:42.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of minutes left. How do we move forward

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:45.000
<v Speaker 1>so that in ten years from now you and I

0:57:45.000 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>aren't having this same conversation.

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:50.520
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely, I think we have to You mentioned before the

0:57:50.560 --> 0:57:53.320
<v Speaker 12>importance of valuing care work in the sense that we

0:57:53.360 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 12>know that women do twice as much unpaid care work

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:59.160
<v Speaker 12>in the US as women, and estimates suggests that that

0:57:59.320 --> 0:58:02.040
<v Speaker 12>unpaid care work done by women is valued at over

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 12>six hundred billion dollars a year. And so I think

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:06.960
<v Speaker 12>we can think about that the value that women are

0:58:07.000 --> 0:58:09.919
<v Speaker 12>adding to the economy, even if they're not themselves being

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:13.120
<v Speaker 12>compensated for it, and also recognize how that kind of

0:58:13.200 --> 0:58:15.720
<v Speaker 12>care work benefits all of us, and that if we

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 12>all had the kinds of policy protections in place, that

0:58:18.920 --> 0:58:21.920
<v Speaker 12>we could share that unpaid care work more equitably and

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:24.440
<v Speaker 12>also ensure that we have the time and energy to

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:25.640
<v Speaker 12>do it sustainably.

0:58:25.880 --> 0:58:29.120
<v Speaker 3>That was Jessica Klarko, sociologist and associate professor at the

0:58:29.200 --> 0:58:32.320
<v Speaker 3>University of Wisconsin Madison, her book, Holding It Together. How

0:58:32.320 --> 0:58:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Women Became America's Safety Nut.

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:36.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Coming up, the tech

0:58:36.520 --> 0:58:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Entrepreneur in Titan, the Philanthropist, the Billionaire, the Nerd, the Savior,

0:58:40.240 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the King.

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:43.320
<v Speaker 3>A new book on one of the few billionaires who

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:46.040
<v Speaker 3>has been in the public eye longer than most. This

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:46.960
<v Speaker 3>is Bloomberg.

0:58:52.920 --> 0:58:56.800
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:58:56.880 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 2>each weekday starting at two pm Easter I'll Applecar Player

0:59:00.120 --> 0:59:02.960
<v Speaker 2>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Ad. You can

0:59:03.000 --> 0:59:06.240
<v Speaker 2>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:59:06.320 --> 0:59:11.120
<v Speaker 2>York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty, a

0:59:11.120 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg exclusive.

0:59:12.120 --> 0:59:14.840
<v Speaker 1>This past week, The USED Department of Justice is mulling

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:17.680
<v Speaker 1>over a breakup of Alphabet's Google after a landmark court

0:59:17.760 --> 0:59:20.920
<v Speaker 1>ruling found that the company monopolized the online search market.

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:24.200
<v Speaker 1>According to people with knowledge of the deliberations, the move

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:27.400
<v Speaker 1>would be Washington's first push to dismantle a company for

0:59:27.520 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>illegal monopolization since unsuccessful efforts to break up Microsoft two

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>decades ago.

0:59:33.240 --> 0:59:36.520
<v Speaker 3>Bill Gates, co founder and former CEO of Microsoft, figured

0:59:36.560 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 3>prominently in the US government's anti trust case that time,

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:42.320
<v Speaker 3>along with many others. Included in a new book on

0:59:42.400 --> 0:59:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Gates by Anuprida Das, South Asia, correspondent for The New

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:50.160
<v Speaker 3>York Times. The book Billionaire Nerd Savior King Bill Gates

0:59:50.160 --> 0:59:53.040
<v Speaker 3>in his Quest to Shape Our World. Our Conversation starts

0:59:53.040 --> 0:59:55.960
<v Speaker 3>with the often talked and written about friendship between Gates

0:59:55.960 --> 0:59:59.320
<v Speaker 3>and Warren Buffett that, like many things changed over time,

1:00:00.120 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 3>spoke on the record.

1:00:01.120 --> 1:00:04.880
<v Speaker 8>You know he is in fact, you know I used

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 8>to cover Again, A lot of this goes back to

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:09.440
<v Speaker 8>the journal when I was a reporter. You know, I

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 8>used to write about Warren Buffett and Berkshire Hathaway. So

1:00:13.400 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 8>the relationship of the two men was also equally interesting.

1:00:16.560 --> 1:00:19.040
<v Speaker 8>The first time I saw them at the Berkshire Hathway meeting,

1:00:19.200 --> 1:00:22.600
<v Speaker 8>just kind of walking around, you know, talking to shareholders,

1:00:22.680 --> 1:00:25.480
<v Speaker 8>and it just struck me as kind of a you know,

1:00:25.520 --> 1:00:28.640
<v Speaker 8>a very casual but very intimate friendship. And then I

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:31.000
<v Speaker 8>began looking at it and seeing that, you know, they've

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:33.600
<v Speaker 8>talked about each has talked about the other and sort

1:00:33.640 --> 1:00:37.160
<v Speaker 8>of the magic of their friendship over the decades. And

1:00:37.200 --> 1:00:40.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, Bill Gates definitely has kind of advertised that

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:43.200
<v Speaker 8>piece of it. It's almost like part of his brand.

1:00:43.640 --> 1:00:47.040
<v Speaker 8>Every year, nearly every year on Gates Notes his blog,

1:00:47.440 --> 1:00:51.200
<v Speaker 8>he posts something like a goofy video or post dedicated

1:00:51.280 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 8>to Buffet, And so that's that was really interesting to me.

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 8>But in recent years, I think once Buffett decided that

1:00:59.120 --> 1:01:02.800
<v Speaker 8>he wasn't he had always said that he wasn't going.

1:01:02.720 --> 1:01:05.600
<v Speaker 7>To give his money to anyone.

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:07.600
<v Speaker 8>He hadn't decided who he was going to give his

1:01:07.600 --> 1:01:10.920
<v Speaker 8>money to after his death, but there was always like

1:01:10.960 --> 1:01:13.320
<v Speaker 8>an assumption that the Gates Foundation stood to get all

1:01:13.360 --> 1:01:16.440
<v Speaker 8>of the money. And when he eventually decided who was

1:01:16.480 --> 1:01:20.080
<v Speaker 8>going to get that money after he died, it was

1:01:20.160 --> 1:01:22.200
<v Speaker 8>not going to be the Gates foundation, and so I

1:01:22.200 --> 1:01:24.320
<v Speaker 8>think there was a little bit of tension there that

1:01:24.360 --> 1:01:28.919
<v Speaker 8>I tried to capture in that piece that The Times ran,

1:01:29.520 --> 1:01:32.120
<v Speaker 8>and it was you know, I think they have very

1:01:32.120 --> 1:01:35.760
<v Speaker 8>different lifestyles. Buffett, as I'm sure you guys know, is

1:01:35.840 --> 1:01:41.919
<v Speaker 8>a kind of more folksy, simple sort of person, very Midwestern,

1:01:42.400 --> 1:01:45.120
<v Speaker 8>and then Gates has more of the traditional trappings of

1:01:45.160 --> 1:01:49.040
<v Speaker 8>a billionaire. So it was interesting to see their divergent

1:01:49.160 --> 1:01:52.200
<v Speaker 8>paths but also examine the basis of their friendship.

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you said earlier about you know, you wanted

1:01:56.080 --> 1:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to kind of dig into the persona and the man.

1:01:59.040 --> 1:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Are they that different?

1:02:01.800 --> 1:02:03.920
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's that's a really interesting question.

1:02:04.120 --> 1:02:07.120
<v Speaker 8>I think that plays into a lot of what we

1:02:07.280 --> 1:02:09.840
<v Speaker 8>in the media, How we and what we write and

1:02:09.880 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 8>what we choose to write feeds into the image of

1:02:13.320 --> 1:02:16.040
<v Speaker 8>a person who's in the in you know, the public eye,

1:02:16.920 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 8>in the sense that you interact with someone, you see

1:02:20.560 --> 1:02:22.960
<v Speaker 8>him or her in a closed setting, you get more

1:02:23.000 --> 1:02:25.840
<v Speaker 8>of a sense of who they are based on interactions,

1:02:25.880 --> 1:02:29.240
<v Speaker 8>based on your sources. You start creating this image of

1:02:29.280 --> 1:02:32.480
<v Speaker 8>a person in the media. So it's true the persona

1:02:32.600 --> 1:02:36.320
<v Speaker 8>is based on many fundamental elements of who the person is,

1:02:36.680 --> 1:02:39.040
<v Speaker 8>but then it also takes on its own life. And

1:02:39.080 --> 1:02:40.880
<v Speaker 8>then if you're a billionaire or you have like a

1:02:40.880 --> 1:02:44.240
<v Speaker 8>lot of resources that you can dedicate to that, then

1:02:44.440 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 8>I think you're basically sustaining, nurturing, minimizing, you know, enhancing

1:02:50.400 --> 1:02:53.840
<v Speaker 8>certain aspects of that image to really suit your needs

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 8>and ends.

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:55.200
<v Speaker 7>And this isn't.

1:02:54.960 --> 1:02:58.880
<v Speaker 8>Necessarily nefarious, but it's just what image making can do.

1:02:59.280 --> 1:03:03.560
<v Speaker 8>And so I think their elements of a person's internal

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:07.120
<v Speaker 8>personality or like in closed settings, and then how that gets,

1:03:07.360 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 8>how that feeds into a persona, and how then people

1:03:10.160 --> 1:03:14.640
<v Speaker 8>kind of keep manufacturing and finessing it, which to me

1:03:14.800 --> 1:03:15.560
<v Speaker 8>was really interesting.

1:03:15.600 --> 1:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Budgates, did you like him as you did this process?

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:22.960
<v Speaker 8>Well, he didn't grant me an interview, so that you know,

1:03:23.280 --> 1:03:26.640
<v Speaker 8>I couldn't tell you any more than that, But.

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:27.919
<v Speaker 1>But you talk to a lot of people about him,

1:03:28.080 --> 1:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and we can get for a picture of someone maybe

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>clearer than the narrative that's out there publicly.

1:03:36.680 --> 1:03:37.360
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely.

1:03:37.480 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 8>I think what was most interesting to me is that

1:03:40.800 --> 1:03:43.560
<v Speaker 8>the essential person has not changed.

1:03:43.640 --> 1:03:43.800
<v Speaker 4>Right.

1:03:43.840 --> 1:03:46.400
<v Speaker 7>He's mellowed obviously over the decades, we all.

1:03:46.280 --> 1:03:53.640
<v Speaker 8>Do, but his essential personality the way he's obviously supremely smart,

1:03:53.680 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 8>but he can sometimes be abrasive, He can be impatient

1:03:56.720 --> 1:04:00.840
<v Speaker 8>with employees. He enjoys a you know, working in a

1:04:00.840 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 8>combative culture. And that was the case of Microsoft, and

1:04:04.040 --> 1:04:07.600
<v Speaker 8>that is also the case of the Gates Foundation, except

1:04:07.600 --> 1:04:11.440
<v Speaker 8>that what happens is that Microsoft rewarded that sort of competitive,

1:04:11.840 --> 1:04:15.200
<v Speaker 8>you know, culture, whereas the Gates Foundation. I think people

1:04:15.480 --> 1:04:21.920
<v Speaker 8>come from very different backgrounds. So it sat uncomfortably inside

1:04:21.960 --> 1:04:25.040
<v Speaker 8>the Gates Foundation. But it struck me as really interesting

1:04:25.160 --> 1:04:29.160
<v Speaker 8>that he was essentially the same person, but he had

1:04:29.200 --> 1:04:34.680
<v Speaker 8>also changed his image over the decades, you know, to

1:04:34.800 --> 1:04:38.640
<v Speaker 8>find that continuity, the consistency in so many ways, but

1:04:38.800 --> 1:04:41.640
<v Speaker 8>to then place it against how we looked at him

1:04:41.880 --> 1:04:45.120
<v Speaker 8>as a nerd, this sort of ruthless monopolist, this this

1:04:45.280 --> 1:04:47.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, philanthropist.

1:04:47.200 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Rockefeller, like Robert Baron kind of thing.

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:52.439
<v Speaker 7>As you're right about absolutely.

1:04:52.000 --> 1:04:57.760
<v Speaker 3>What was the anti trust? Was the anti trust issue

1:04:57.760 --> 1:05:00.640
<v Speaker 3>at Microsoft? Was that a pivotal turning point for him?

1:05:00.720 --> 1:05:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Or when do you think this metamorphosis or transformation began?

1:05:04.920 --> 1:05:05.680
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it did.

1:05:05.720 --> 1:05:07.880
<v Speaker 8>I think he had always said that he was going

1:05:07.960 --> 1:05:11.200
<v Speaker 8>to give the bulk of his fortune to philanthropy. I

1:05:11.240 --> 1:05:14.840
<v Speaker 8>think the time hadn't been decided. And you have to

1:05:14.840 --> 1:05:18.280
<v Speaker 8>remember that in the nineteen nineties there was only Microsoft.

1:05:18.320 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 8>Now we think about Google and Amazon and Facebook and

1:05:20.840 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 8>a lot of companies that are facing similar antitrust scrutiny.

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:26.960
<v Speaker 8>But in the nineteen nineties, the late the second half

1:05:27.000 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 8>of the nineties, Microsoft was it. It was the company.

1:05:29.960 --> 1:05:34.080
<v Speaker 8>It captured everyone's imagination. But also, and as a result

1:05:34.160 --> 1:05:37.360
<v Speaker 8>of that, I think Gates' performance, even though we didn't

1:05:37.360 --> 1:05:40.440
<v Speaker 8>have social media then and we didn't have viral moments,

1:05:40.560 --> 1:05:45.720
<v Speaker 8>Gates's performance riveted the nation and people realized that this

1:05:45.840 --> 1:05:50.200
<v Speaker 8>was a man who just who had become a distraction

1:05:50.280 --> 1:05:53.320
<v Speaker 8>from Microsoft. So I think it made sense for him

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:56.120
<v Speaker 8>to then step step down from the CEO role in

1:05:56.160 --> 1:05:59.440
<v Speaker 8>two thousand and Also, he was tired. I think he

1:05:59.640 --> 1:06:01.760
<v Speaker 8>just he said a source of mind told me that

1:06:01.840 --> 1:06:04.240
<v Speaker 8>he was tired, didn't nowhere else to go. And he

1:06:04.360 --> 1:06:08.000
<v Speaker 8>just also felt that Microsoft was a shiny example of

1:06:08.440 --> 1:06:12.000
<v Speaker 8>American innovation and why was the government going against him?

1:06:12.440 --> 1:06:14.680
<v Speaker 8>And so I think there was a lot of confusion

1:06:15.000 --> 1:06:17.400
<v Speaker 8>and a lot of pain. And then he turned to

1:06:17.400 --> 1:06:19.760
<v Speaker 8>philanthropy because it was there. It was something he had

1:06:19.760 --> 1:06:23.440
<v Speaker 8>always intended to do, and he found that he really

1:06:23.560 --> 1:06:25.720
<v Speaker 8>liked it, and then it was go big or go home,

1:06:25.800 --> 1:06:30.000
<v Speaker 8>because that's what Gates, that's who Gates is. He started Microsoft,

1:06:30.200 --> 1:06:34.080
<v Speaker 8>changed the personal computing world, and now he's changed philanthropy

1:06:34.320 --> 1:06:36.080
<v Speaker 8>with this Mammoth Foundation.

1:06:36.560 --> 1:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you find a lot of surprises in this process

1:06:40.640 --> 1:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of new things you learned about Bill Gates?

1:06:45.520 --> 1:06:47.920
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean, I think one of the things, Carol

1:06:48.200 --> 1:06:52.480
<v Speaker 8>is we didn't really understand and I think that despite

1:06:53.120 --> 1:06:57.400
<v Speaker 8>I think the entire world AID doesn't quite understand why

1:06:58.040 --> 1:07:01.560
<v Speaker 8>he met with Jeffrey Epstein times. And the question for

1:07:01.680 --> 1:07:06.120
<v Speaker 8>me that's been the most interesting to explore is that

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:09.080
<v Speaker 8>if your Gates, or if you're a billionaire, you have

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:12.720
<v Speaker 8>armies of people whose job it is to sustain and

1:07:12.720 --> 1:07:16.160
<v Speaker 8>polish and nurtery your image right. Building Bill's brand is

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:19.720
<v Speaker 8>something I examined in the book, and yet you have,

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:23.760
<v Speaker 8>despite having all these people, even a basic Google search

1:07:23.880 --> 1:07:27.680
<v Speaker 8>right would reveal that Epstein by then was a convicted

1:07:27.720 --> 1:07:31.439
<v Speaker 8>sex offender and someone who perhaps wasn't the best kind

1:07:31.480 --> 1:07:35.080
<v Speaker 8>of person from an optics standpoint for a billionaire with

1:07:36.320 --> 1:07:40.080
<v Speaker 8>what Gates was trying to do to interact. So that

1:07:40.160 --> 1:07:42.280
<v Speaker 8>was surprising to me. It was a failure lapse of

1:07:42.360 --> 1:07:45.960
<v Speaker 8>judgment that I wouldn't expect. But it also ties back

1:07:46.000 --> 1:07:47.919
<v Speaker 8>to the personality that Gates.

1:07:47.640 --> 1:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>Is pretty You were talking about Jeffrey Epstein just moments

1:07:51.440 --> 1:07:54.960
<v Speaker 3>ago and the relationship that Bill Gates had with Jeffrey Epstein,

1:07:55.640 --> 1:07:58.160
<v Speaker 3>and I got to tell you the parts in your

1:07:58.200 --> 1:07:59.800
<v Speaker 3>book that focus on that. I've gotten a lot of

1:07:59.840 --> 1:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>me attention over the last couple of weeks. Just explain

1:08:04.080 --> 1:08:06.600
<v Speaker 3>what you learned about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and

1:08:06.600 --> 1:08:09.680
<v Speaker 3>why they found themselves having a relationship.

1:08:10.280 --> 1:08:15.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So what happened. My best reconstruction, based on my

1:08:15.360 --> 1:08:18.800
<v Speaker 8>reporting and documents, is that in twenty ten you had

1:08:18.800 --> 1:08:22.360
<v Speaker 8>the Giving Pledge, which was this effort, essentially a get

1:08:22.360 --> 1:08:25.120
<v Speaker 8>out of the vote campaign by Gates, Warren Buffett, and

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:29.840
<v Speaker 8>Milliner French Gates to get other billionaires to commit to

1:08:29.960 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 8>pledge to commit half or more of their fortunes to charity.

1:08:34.680 --> 1:08:39.720
<v Speaker 8>And at that time a lot of billionaires were very

1:08:39.760 --> 1:08:43.439
<v Speaker 8>interested in finding a way to put their money to use.

1:08:43.520 --> 1:08:46.240
<v Speaker 8>Having the money is almost easier than figuring out how

1:08:46.320 --> 1:08:49.240
<v Speaker 8>to give it away wisely, and so the Gates Foundation

1:08:49.560 --> 1:08:53.360
<v Speaker 8>was very much set up to use billions of dollars

1:08:53.360 --> 1:08:56.800
<v Speaker 8>and Gates was in the middle of this massive push

1:08:57.000 --> 1:09:00.320
<v Speaker 8>toward polio eradication. He'd been the Foundation, being worked with

1:09:00.360 --> 1:09:04.240
<v Speaker 8>other entities, and it was one of those times when

1:09:04.280 --> 1:09:07.440
<v Speaker 8>Gates wanted to raise a lot of money. So Epstein

1:09:07.560 --> 1:09:10.320
<v Speaker 8>kind of being in these circles of influence and power,

1:09:10.439 --> 1:09:15.320
<v Speaker 8>he's someone who kind of collects, you know, collected bits

1:09:15.320 --> 1:09:19.200
<v Speaker 8>and pieces of information, used leverage wherever he could, and

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:22.479
<v Speaker 8>realized that there might be an opportunity for him to

1:09:22.640 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 8>pitch something called the donor advised fund, and he wrote

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:31.880
<v Speaker 8>in JP Morgan and Gibi Morgan had like another relationship

1:09:31.960 --> 1:09:35.479
<v Speaker 8>with the Gates Foundation, so he looked at all of this.

1:09:35.640 --> 1:09:38.840
<v Speaker 8>He began pitching this idea for a donor advised fund.

1:09:39.080 --> 1:09:41.880
<v Speaker 8>He reached out to people who he knew at the

1:09:41.880 --> 1:09:46.080
<v Speaker 8>Gates Foundation, who you know, had an overlap with Gates,

1:09:46.080 --> 1:09:50.920
<v Speaker 8>of course, and began seeking an introduction. Now Gates took

1:09:50.960 --> 1:09:51.680
<v Speaker 8>that introduction.

1:09:52.000 --> 1:09:53.160
<v Speaker 7>There was there.

1:09:53.360 --> 1:09:56.719
<v Speaker 8>He came and visited Epstein at his house the first time,

1:09:57.280 --> 1:10:01.080
<v Speaker 8>and then there was another meeting where there was a presentation.

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:06.320
<v Speaker 8>Epstein had slides and everything. So that until then perhaps

1:10:06.439 --> 1:10:09.960
<v Speaker 8>all well and good, but after that, the fact that

1:10:10.000 --> 1:10:15.120
<v Speaker 8>he kept meeting with Epstein several times, ostensibly to discuss philanthropy,

1:10:15.160 --> 1:10:17.240
<v Speaker 8>and Gates has always said that he hasn't That was

1:10:17.280 --> 1:10:19.000
<v Speaker 8>the only reason then that he was sorry for the

1:10:19.080 --> 1:10:19.960
<v Speaker 8>lapse in judgment.

1:10:20.680 --> 1:10:22.000
<v Speaker 7>But it's still.

1:10:23.240 --> 1:10:27.320
<v Speaker 8>Is a question for for Gates, essentially because he is

1:10:27.360 --> 1:10:29.880
<v Speaker 8>perhaps the only person who would know why he kept

1:10:30.960 --> 1:10:34.000
<v Speaker 8>going back and meeting with Epstein. There are people who

1:10:34.040 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 8>say that Gates was enamored of Epstein's lifestyle. He did

1:10:39.160 --> 1:10:42.519
<v Speaker 8>write to some employees and the Gates Foundation after saying

1:10:42.560 --> 1:10:44.919
<v Speaker 8>that you know, he does have an adventure's different lifestyle,

1:10:44.960 --> 1:10:47.760
<v Speaker 8>but it's not for me. I'm not putting words into

1:10:47.800 --> 1:10:51.000
<v Speaker 8>Gates's mouth, but that was essentially the point of what

1:10:51.120 --> 1:10:56.960
<v Speaker 8>he was saying, and so clearly there was maybe be amusement,

1:10:57.200 --> 1:11:03.519
<v Speaker 8>maybe surprise, maybe anticipation. It's hard to say. But again,

1:11:03.640 --> 1:11:05.680
<v Speaker 8>coming back to the point I was making earlier, it

1:11:05.720 --> 1:11:09.679
<v Speaker 8>is a surprising lapse in judgment for the people who

1:11:11.000 --> 1:11:14.320
<v Speaker 8>work for him, but for Gates himself it's actually not

1:11:14.439 --> 1:11:17.879
<v Speaker 8>that surprising, given that he does have a certain naivete

1:11:18.040 --> 1:11:20.280
<v Speaker 8>when it comes to personal relationships.

1:11:20.320 --> 1:11:22.559
<v Speaker 1>Now, you said you didn't get to talk to Bill Gates,

1:11:22.640 --> 1:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>right for the book.

1:11:24.320 --> 1:11:28.400
<v Speaker 8>No, I didn't. He turned down my request for an interview.

1:11:28.880 --> 1:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>Did he Were you able to ask him any questions

1:11:31.720 --> 1:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>like write and get responses or no?

1:11:33.560 --> 1:11:35.240
<v Speaker 7>Nothing at all. No.

1:11:35.680 --> 1:11:38.120
<v Speaker 8>So what happened was that it was interesting because I

1:11:38.200 --> 1:11:41.400
<v Speaker 8>sent them detailed fact checking lists, both at Gates Ventures,

1:11:41.439 --> 1:11:44.519
<v Speaker 8>which is a private firm, and the Gates Foundation back

1:11:44.560 --> 1:11:48.680
<v Speaker 8>in January or February, months months before. They stalled in

1:11:48.760 --> 1:11:53.200
<v Speaker 8>stonewalled and didn't acknowledge my emails, and at the end

1:11:53.200 --> 1:11:54.799
<v Speaker 8>when I said you have to give me a comment,

1:11:54.840 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 8>they said it was hearsay. And then just weeks before

1:11:59.360 --> 1:12:03.439
<v Speaker 8>we went to publication, they got back on some of

1:12:03.439 --> 1:12:06.880
<v Speaker 8>the Epstein related points and they refuted and said that

1:12:06.920 --> 1:12:11.280
<v Speaker 8>they could present documented evidence, and I asked for that audden.

1:12:11.360 --> 1:12:14.960
<v Speaker 8>They didn't provide anything, and the book went to print,

1:12:15.479 --> 1:12:18.880
<v Speaker 8>and then the Daily Mail, of all the Daily Mail

1:12:18.960 --> 1:12:22.280
<v Speaker 8>and the New York Post put out these tidbits from

1:12:22.280 --> 1:12:25.400
<v Speaker 8>my book and they were overblown, then not entirely accurate,

1:12:25.840 --> 1:12:28.320
<v Speaker 8>but the Gates found But then Gates is private firm,

1:12:28.400 --> 1:12:31.360
<v Speaker 8>then put out a statement saying that it was all

1:12:31.439 --> 1:12:36.240
<v Speaker 8>wild allegations and that they presented me with documented evidence

1:12:36.280 --> 1:12:37.719
<v Speaker 8>that I chose to ignore.

1:12:37.760 --> 1:12:45.160
<v Speaker 3>Which is not true speaking of wild things that potentially

1:12:45.160 --> 1:12:48.639
<v Speaker 3>could come up. I was joking at the top when

1:12:48.640 --> 1:12:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I said the microchip vaccine stuff, but only half joking

1:12:51.880 --> 1:12:55.040
<v Speaker 3>in the sense that these are real conspiracy theories about

1:12:55.080 --> 1:12:57.839
<v Speaker 3>Bill Gates. Can you talk a little bit about where

1:12:58.479 --> 1:13:00.960
<v Speaker 3>those come from and the idea of this quote unquote

1:13:01.000 --> 1:13:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Davos elite that wants to control the world.

1:13:04.880 --> 1:13:09.120
<v Speaker 8>I think the fact that Gates was so prominent suddenly

1:13:09.640 --> 1:13:13.840
<v Speaker 8>in everywhere he was suddenly everywhere. He was talking about vaccines,

1:13:13.840 --> 1:13:17.640
<v Speaker 8>He was sharing the stage with doctor Anthony Fauci, he

1:13:17.840 --> 1:13:20.920
<v Speaker 8>was advocating. He was kind of out there everywhere. He

1:13:20.960 --> 1:13:24.000
<v Speaker 8>couldn't miss him, which led a lot of people to wonder,

1:13:24.040 --> 1:13:27.640
<v Speaker 8>and I speak to I have one person in the

1:13:28.160 --> 1:13:31.120
<v Speaker 8>book who said, who made the point that you know,

1:13:31.320 --> 1:13:34.040
<v Speaker 8>I had always thought of Gates at the Microsoft co

1:13:34.240 --> 1:13:37.080
<v Speaker 8>founder and suddenly, why is this guy talking about vaccines?

1:13:37.439 --> 1:13:41.040
<v Speaker 8>And so I think if you are grown to conspiracy theories,

1:13:41.120 --> 1:13:43.960
<v Speaker 8>I think that was kind of the first signed for

1:13:44.000 --> 1:13:47.160
<v Speaker 8>a lot of people that maybe Gates has some kind

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:50.280
<v Speaker 8>of vested interest. And you know, conspiracy theories obviously take

1:13:50.360 --> 1:13:52.880
<v Speaker 8>on a life of their own, and I think there

1:13:52.920 --> 1:13:55.240
<v Speaker 8>was a study and don't quote me on this, but

1:13:55.280 --> 1:13:58.479
<v Speaker 8>I think there's a study looking at the feasibility of

1:13:59.240 --> 1:14:04.840
<v Speaker 8>having some information, you know, implanted into a person's under

1:14:04.880 --> 1:14:07.759
<v Speaker 8>a person's skin, and it was an mit feasibility study

1:14:07.800 --> 1:14:11.280
<v Speaker 8>and nothing came of it. But that led to this

1:14:11.360 --> 1:14:14.240
<v Speaker 8>kind of big idea that somehow Gates was trying to,

1:14:14.280 --> 1:14:18.160
<v Speaker 8>you know, implant chips and people and kind of all

1:14:18.240 --> 1:14:22.040
<v Speaker 8>manner of things now I think for the vaccines, and

1:14:22.120 --> 1:14:25.400
<v Speaker 8>you know, Gates was He's a rational guy. He's driven

1:14:25.439 --> 1:14:28.040
<v Speaker 8>by evidence and science and tech, and I think he

1:14:28.280 --> 1:14:33.040
<v Speaker 8>just didn't understand why there were people questioning what seemed

1:14:33.080 --> 1:14:36.280
<v Speaker 8>to him very obvious steps. He couldn't understand being a

1:14:36.320 --> 1:14:39.160
<v Speaker 8>personal target of the conspiracy theories.

1:14:39.880 --> 1:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>We just have about forty five seconds left here. Your

1:14:44.080 --> 1:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>title Billionaire, Nerd Savior King? Which is the most appropriate

1:14:50.080 --> 1:14:52.439
<v Speaker 1>as you finish your book in terms of which word

1:14:52.479 --> 1:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>really you would most closely identify with him, And as

1:14:56.280 --> 1:14:58.679
<v Speaker 1>I said, only got about forty seconds.

1:14:58.720 --> 1:14:59.840
<v Speaker 7>Today, it would be King.

1:15:00.080 --> 1:15:02.439
<v Speaker 8>He really kind of is on top of so many

1:15:03.439 --> 1:15:06.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, I would say Savior King. Perhaps the billionaire

1:15:06.320 --> 1:15:09.799
<v Speaker 8>is a fact the nerd is a version of him

1:15:10.320 --> 1:15:12.680
<v Speaker 8>back in the day, but today he's kind of on

1:15:12.720 --> 1:15:15.920
<v Speaker 8>top of the world, sharing the stage with heads of state,

1:15:16.640 --> 1:15:19.799
<v Speaker 8>and he is a savior of people in the global

1:15:19.840 --> 1:15:21.040
<v Speaker 8>South with the Gates Foundation.

1:15:21.320 --> 1:15:22.800
<v Speaker 7>So I would say Savior King.

1:15:23.479 --> 1:15:26.040
<v Speaker 3>That was on Uprida Das, South Asia, correspondent for The

1:15:26.040 --> 1:15:28.880
<v Speaker 3>New York Times her new book Billionaire Nerd Savior King

1:15:29.160 --> 1:15:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Bill Gates in his quest to Shape.

1:15:30.680 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Our World Still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week. Nothing like

1:15:33.439 --> 1:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>wrapping up the week with a ready to make cocktail?

1:15:36.240 --> 1:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Are you in?

1:15:37.080 --> 1:15:37.320
<v Speaker 5>Hey?

1:15:37.400 --> 1:15:39.559
<v Speaker 3>You know how I roll? If it's non alcoholic, maybe

1:15:39.640 --> 1:15:43.200
<v Speaker 3>has some bubbles, little fruit juice, not too much sugar.

1:15:43.240 --> 1:15:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Though I'm really not fun. You need to know something

1:15:46.240 --> 1:15:47.760
<v Speaker 3>about me. I'm not fun to hang out with.

1:15:48.360 --> 1:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You are fun to hang out with you, just not

1:15:50.479 --> 1:15:54.439
<v Speaker 1>necessarily with an alcoholic Where to come?

1:15:54.760 --> 1:15:55.880
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg.

1:15:56.479 --> 1:16:00.759
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast live weekday

1:16:00.800 --> 1:16:03.759
<v Speaker 2>afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen on Apple

1:16:03.800 --> 1:16:06.360
<v Speaker 2>car Play and and Broun Auto with a Bloomberg Business

1:16:06.439 --> 1:16:08.560
<v Speaker 2>act or wanted us live on YouTube.

1:16:10.120 --> 1:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>As a former colleague of ours used to say, it's

1:16:12.040 --> 1:16:14.439
<v Speaker 1>five o'clock summer, doesn't Jimmy Buffett didn't he used to

1:16:14.439 --> 1:16:15.599
<v Speaker 1>say that all the time too, ya.

1:16:15.520 --> 1:16:16.200
<v Speaker 10>A lot of people do.

1:16:16.479 --> 1:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the trends we are increasingly seeing from startups

1:16:19.080 --> 1:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and the establishment alike is pre mad cocktails, easy to buy,

1:16:22.280 --> 1:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>no shaking nor stirring necessary.

1:16:24.560 --> 1:16:27.080
<v Speaker 3>And that brings us to the family owned Jeloso Group

1:16:27.120 --> 1:16:30.080
<v Speaker 3>of Companies, whose parent company was founded nearly six decades

1:16:30.120 --> 1:16:33.479
<v Speaker 3>ago in Montreal, Canada, and now produces over one hundred

1:16:33.479 --> 1:16:36.479
<v Speaker 3>alcoholic beverage products in the US and Canada with over

1:16:36.520 --> 1:16:39.160
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and fifty employees and seven warehouses.

1:16:39.280 --> 1:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Although Jeloso runs the second generation of the family owned

1:16:42.040 --> 1:16:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Jelosa Group of Companies, which includes Jelosa Beverage Group USA.

1:16:45.840 --> 1:16:48.479
<v Speaker 1>He sat down in studio joining Bloomberg's Matt Miller and

1:16:48.520 --> 1:16:50.719
<v Speaker 1>me taking us back to how it all began.

1:16:51.520 --> 1:16:56.439
<v Speaker 4>We're a family owned business. Immigrant parents immigrated in nineteen

1:16:56.479 --> 1:16:59.519
<v Speaker 4>fifty seven, came here for a better life. We're from

1:16:59.520 --> 1:17:04.600
<v Speaker 4>the South of it and basically my father ventured into

1:17:06.360 --> 1:17:11.200
<v Speaker 4>importing grapes from California because in Canada you have liquor boards.

1:17:11.240 --> 1:17:15.800
<v Speaker 4>And my father realized that in Quebec you only drink beer,

1:17:15.880 --> 1:17:18.479
<v Speaker 4>and he said, we don't drink beer. As Italian so

1:17:19.200 --> 1:17:21.840
<v Speaker 4>basically there was no wines to be had, and the

1:17:21.880 --> 1:17:26.240
<v Speaker 4>wines that were available were very expensive, and being a farmer,

1:17:26.280 --> 1:17:28.000
<v Speaker 4>he said, you know what, let me bring in grapes

1:17:28.040 --> 1:17:31.479
<v Speaker 4>for the immigrant community. And then that's the story.

1:17:31.640 --> 1:17:33.479
<v Speaker 10>So he brought in grapes to make your own wine

1:17:33.560 --> 1:17:37.280
<v Speaker 10>in Quebec for immigrants exactly so, because you know, we're

1:17:37.320 --> 1:17:39.800
<v Speaker 10>a legislative state, so there's a lot of taxation.

1:17:40.320 --> 1:17:42.759
<v Speaker 4>It's not free market like it is here in the US.

1:17:42.960 --> 1:17:45.680
<v Speaker 4>So that's how we started. And basically from there it

1:17:45.760 --> 1:17:48.639
<v Speaker 4>went on and when people started hearing about my father

1:17:49.120 --> 1:17:51.800
<v Speaker 4>making wine, he was never really making wine. He was

1:17:51.920 --> 1:17:55.760
<v Speaker 4>crushing grapes and the must people would be bringing it

1:17:55.840 --> 1:17:59.400
<v Speaker 4>home to ferment it. And the local authorities got wind

1:17:59.400 --> 1:18:02.000
<v Speaker 4>of this and say, hey, this man is bootlegging.

1:18:02.360 --> 1:18:03.759
<v Speaker 10>He's actually making wine.

1:18:03.800 --> 1:18:08.559
<v Speaker 4>We're in control of the wine industry in Quebec, and

1:18:08.040 --> 1:18:11.559
<v Speaker 4>they sequestered all the liquids that were in my father's

1:18:11.640 --> 1:18:16.040
<v Speaker 4>warehouse and the liquids were then juice. Then six months later,

1:18:16.240 --> 1:18:19.600
<v Speaker 4>my father's lawyer contacts them says, by the way, mister Jeloso,

1:18:20.439 --> 1:18:22.720
<v Speaker 4>you know what, You're going to be charged with bootlegging.

1:18:22.760 --> 1:18:25.960
<v Speaker 4>He goes, what it. You know what, they did a

1:18:26.040 --> 1:18:28.640
<v Speaker 4>test and it's wine. He goes, but naturally it's going

1:18:28.680 --> 1:18:29.360
<v Speaker 4>to ferment.

1:18:29.160 --> 1:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It will turn into wine.

1:18:31.040 --> 1:18:34.519
<v Speaker 4>So basically, my father brought in an anologist from Europe

1:18:35.120 --> 1:18:37.840
<v Speaker 4>and my father won the case. And the lawyer asked

1:18:37.840 --> 1:18:40.320
<v Speaker 4>my father, listen, now's the time to sue the government.

1:18:40.360 --> 1:18:42.120
<v Speaker 4>My father said, I came here as an immigrant for

1:18:42.160 --> 1:18:44.840
<v Speaker 4>a better life. I want them to give me a

1:18:44.880 --> 1:18:47.880
<v Speaker 4>wine permit. That's why our family has the first wine

1:18:47.880 --> 1:18:48.639
<v Speaker 4>permit in Quebec.

1:18:48.760 --> 1:18:50.879
<v Speaker 10>Zero zero role, what a story.

1:18:51.960 --> 1:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So tell us about what you got, what it's grown in.

1:18:54.120 --> 1:18:56.400
<v Speaker 10>You've turned this into a company that does do you

1:18:56.600 --> 1:18:58.240
<v Speaker 10>deal with beer now as well?

1:18:58.439 --> 1:19:02.599
<v Speaker 4>We deal with beer, we deal with cider, we deal

1:19:02.800 --> 1:19:08.440
<v Speaker 4>with spirits. We represent Bacardi, we represent Boston Beer in Quebec.

1:19:08.560 --> 1:19:08.720
<v Speaker 11>Uh.

1:19:09.400 --> 1:19:12.280
<v Speaker 4>Basically we are a one stop shop.

1:19:13.000 --> 1:19:16.040
<v Speaker 10>And this is like one of the hottest growing areas

1:19:16.080 --> 1:19:20.320
<v Speaker 10>of the alcoholic beverage segment, right, I mean everything from

1:19:20.320 --> 1:19:24.280
<v Speaker 10>the from the lowest level to I mean there's really

1:19:24.360 --> 1:19:27.280
<v Speaker 10>uppity mixed cockte pre mixed cocktails that you can order

1:19:27.320 --> 1:19:28.080
<v Speaker 10>at a restaurant.

1:19:28.800 --> 1:19:31.200
<v Speaker 4>What you have to realize is that whenever you're drinking

1:19:31.200 --> 1:19:34.400
<v Speaker 4>a cocktail, at a restaurant, you'll never You'll never find

1:19:35.600 --> 1:19:40.680
<v Speaker 4>unisons and taste. Somebody will add one more ounce of cognac,

1:19:40.760 --> 1:19:44.000
<v Speaker 4>one more ounce of vodka. So what we ventured out

1:19:44.280 --> 1:19:48.639
<v Speaker 4>was basically creating a malt. Why malt because malt gives

1:19:48.720 --> 1:19:52.959
<v Speaker 4>us access to people, to markets, whereby spirits you're limited

1:19:53.000 --> 1:19:58.000
<v Speaker 4>in general. So we actually patented the process whereby we

1:19:58.080 --> 1:20:01.360
<v Speaker 4>cleaned the malt and we add the proper salts, the

1:20:01.439 --> 1:20:04.120
<v Speaker 4>proper sugar levels, so that at the end of the

1:20:04.240 --> 1:20:07.840
<v Speaker 4>day you can receive the natural flavors of whatever cocktail

1:20:08.160 --> 1:20:10.760
<v Speaker 4>you want to build on. And what you have here

1:20:10.920 --> 1:20:14.680
<v Speaker 4>cocktails being the first original cocktail and Sonny Margarita is

1:20:15.200 --> 1:20:20.479
<v Speaker 4>the number one selling cocktail in the usseving Wow, it

1:20:20.560 --> 1:20:26.040
<v Speaker 4>beats up every every other cocktail and this from Quebec.

1:20:26.160 --> 1:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Could you believe that it's pretty cool stuff. It's a

1:20:28.680 --> 1:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>crowded market though increasingly. How do you get yourself noticed

1:20:32.040 --> 1:20:33.799
<v Speaker 1>or how do you think about that? Because it feels

1:20:33.800 --> 1:20:35.360
<v Speaker 1>like we talk to a lot of folks in the

1:20:35.400 --> 1:20:37.559
<v Speaker 1>beverage in the alcohol space, and I just feel like

1:20:37.840 --> 1:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of startups, there's a lot of the

1:20:39.520 --> 1:20:41.880
<v Speaker 1>establishment that are coming out with different brands. So how

1:20:41.880 --> 1:20:43.759
<v Speaker 1>do you distinguish yourself or get noticed.

1:20:44.240 --> 1:20:47.680
<v Speaker 4>You need agility, you need flexibility. You have to address

1:20:48.240 --> 1:20:50.880
<v Speaker 4>not what the consumer wants, what you believe they want.

1:20:51.000 --> 1:20:53.720
<v Speaker 4>One of the things that we pride ourselves is having

1:20:53.800 --> 1:20:57.439
<v Speaker 4>the proper contacts with distributors, because, like you said, Carol,

1:20:57.720 --> 1:21:00.240
<v Speaker 4>there are so many people out there wanting to load

1:21:00.320 --> 1:21:03.240
<v Speaker 4>up the warehouses of all these distributors. Whereby, at the

1:21:03.320 --> 1:21:05.360
<v Speaker 4>end of the day, you saw it in the craft

1:21:05.439 --> 1:21:09.200
<v Speaker 4>beer business, whereby everybody got on board and everybody got

1:21:09.520 --> 1:21:13.040
<v Speaker 4>stinged by it because the craft beer business somehow sued.

1:21:13.240 --> 1:21:13.479
<v Speaker 8>Right.

1:21:13.880 --> 1:21:17.519
<v Speaker 4>So what we've done is we provide proper quantities, We

1:21:17.560 --> 1:21:22.280
<v Speaker 4>provide constant updates and flavor profiles. But at the same

1:21:22.320 --> 1:21:26.680
<v Speaker 4>time we are authentic in terms of flavor. There is

1:21:26.720 --> 1:21:29.960
<v Speaker 4>no nat there is no unnatural ingredients. And what we

1:21:30.080 --> 1:21:33.080
<v Speaker 4>do is Okay, that's the sunny margarita.

1:21:33.080 --> 1:21:33.720
<v Speaker 10>You're gonna enjoy it.

1:21:33.840 --> 1:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like a beer, guys, it's not.

1:21:36.160 --> 1:21:39.400
<v Speaker 4>It's not a beer like you know what. At the beginning,

1:21:39.439 --> 1:21:41.960
<v Speaker 4>everybody used to tell me, by the way, it's mold.

1:21:42.120 --> 1:21:44.080
<v Speaker 4>I go tell me something you like Scotch.

1:21:44.240 --> 1:21:45.120
<v Speaker 10>Scotch is malt.

1:21:45.560 --> 1:21:48.800
<v Speaker 4>So you have to get the people to understand that

1:21:48.920 --> 1:21:52.640
<v Speaker 4>it's only the alcohol stream that gives you access to

1:21:52.680 --> 1:21:56.400
<v Speaker 4>a network. So it tastes exactly like spirits because we

1:21:56.560 --> 1:21:57.960
<v Speaker 4>redesigned it as spirits.

1:21:58.160 --> 1:22:01.120
<v Speaker 10>All right, Carol is taking a sip now. Now you've

1:22:01.120 --> 1:22:04.120
<v Speaker 10>poured it into margarita and it's nice.

1:22:04.840 --> 1:22:06.120
<v Speaker 4>It has a hint of salt.

1:22:06.160 --> 1:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm picky about margarita's.

1:22:08.040 --> 1:22:10.080
<v Speaker 10>It does have a hint of salt. That's an important part.

1:22:10.080 --> 1:22:10.920
<v Speaker 10>So I haven't had a drink.

1:22:10.920 --> 1:22:11.960
<v Speaker 9>I'm not going to put it near you.

1:22:12.040 --> 1:22:14.000
<v Speaker 10>I haven't had a drink in two years, but I

1:22:14.280 --> 1:22:19.240
<v Speaker 10>did drink alcohol. I loved the salt in the Martin margarita.

1:22:19.360 --> 1:22:22.000
<v Speaker 9>Right, Yeah, that's incredible.

1:22:22.000 --> 1:22:26.920
<v Speaker 10>What does this cost into retail? Yeah, that's a good question.

1:22:29.760 --> 1:22:30.759
<v Speaker 4>I have no idea.

1:22:31.200 --> 1:22:32.799
<v Speaker 1>Look to go to your website.

1:22:34.479 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 10>It's like it's like I would say a thing about sorry,

1:22:37.200 --> 1:22:39.040
<v Speaker 10>I didn't mean to do that to a It's a

1:22:39.040 --> 1:22:41.240
<v Speaker 10>twenty two ounce can, so it's like a tall boy.

1:22:41.479 --> 1:22:41.639
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:22:41.760 --> 1:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think because I think about when you

1:22:43.240 --> 1:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>go to a bar, right, like a margarita is.

1:22:46.120 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 10>Like ten twelve dollars team yah, Depending on do you

1:22:50.200 --> 1:22:53.879
<v Speaker 10>make an alcohol free version or do you make alcohol

1:22:53.920 --> 1:22:55.120
<v Speaker 10>free cocktails as well.

1:22:55.520 --> 1:22:58.600
<v Speaker 4>We are the biggest producers of non alcoholic beverages. We

1:22:58.680 --> 1:23:01.800
<v Speaker 4>started in nineteen eighty nine with wine coolers and what

1:23:02.320 --> 1:23:05.479
<v Speaker 4>and what you have to realize we have we have

1:23:05.800 --> 1:23:10.679
<v Speaker 4>brands that are non alcoholic because the demographics, the population, age, aging,

1:23:11.120 --> 1:23:15.799
<v Speaker 4>better lifestyle. I say between now and twenty fifty, fifty

1:23:15.800 --> 1:23:17.919
<v Speaker 4>percent of the people won't be drinking alcohol.

1:23:18.080 --> 1:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Although I do wonder you know, Map brought up a

1:23:20.479 --> 1:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>great point about how a lot of people don't want

1:23:23.960 --> 1:23:28.080
<v Speaker 1>any alcohol anymore. There's that trend. There's also a wellness

1:23:28.120 --> 1:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>healthier trend, no sugars, that kind of thing that's a

1:23:31.000 --> 1:23:34.519
<v Speaker 1>real concern for a lot of individuals called bucha. How

1:23:34.560 --> 1:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>are you thinking about that in terms of how you

1:23:36.520 --> 1:23:39.519
<v Speaker 1>guys do things well? And are you seeing that in

1:23:40.080 --> 1:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>adaptation as.

1:23:40.840 --> 1:23:43.559
<v Speaker 4>A result, I mean, you see you when you see

1:23:43.600 --> 1:23:47.880
<v Speaker 4>players like Molsen Cores change their name to the Molten

1:23:47.920 --> 1:23:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Cores Beverage Company, they're starting to realize they have to

1:23:50.680 --> 1:23:53.880
<v Speaker 4>walk away from beers of certain staple items. So you

1:23:54.000 --> 1:23:58.040
<v Speaker 4>have non alcoholic was always considered zero point five because

1:23:58.080 --> 1:24:01.760
<v Speaker 4>of the changing demographics. Now everybody's focusing on zero point

1:24:01.920 --> 1:24:05.360
<v Speaker 4>zero because we have to attend certain other demographics or

1:24:05.360 --> 1:24:09.800
<v Speaker 4>religious beliefs going forward because the population is changing and

1:24:09.920 --> 1:24:17.559
<v Speaker 4>the wellness, I mean, there's hydration, there's longevity. You have

1:24:17.640 --> 1:24:20.200
<v Speaker 4>to address it today and how we do it. Also,

1:24:20.240 --> 1:24:24.200
<v Speaker 4>a non alcoholic and non acoholic is that we started

1:24:24.200 --> 1:24:28.120
<v Speaker 4>in the eighties for the simple reason that we knew

1:24:28.160 --> 1:24:34.400
<v Speaker 4>that people need an alternative and children. To make sure

1:24:34.439 --> 1:24:37.640
<v Speaker 4>that children don't drink, they have to have products that

1:24:37.720 --> 1:24:41.559
<v Speaker 4>are non alcoholic with a name that is alcoholic. So

1:24:41.600 --> 1:24:44.400
<v Speaker 4>it takes that stigma away from them and that pressure

1:24:44.560 --> 1:24:48.520
<v Speaker 4>because pure pressure is very strong. So we have non

1:24:48.600 --> 1:24:53.320
<v Speaker 4>alcoholic champagnes, non alcoholic cocktails, and yeah, when you look

1:24:53.360 --> 1:24:57.280
<v Speaker 4>at that, we offer that range across the board.

1:24:57.360 --> 1:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>You see a lot of growth in that area so.

1:25:00.280 --> 1:25:05.440
<v Speaker 4>Much, and especially when you see big players themselves like Heineken,

1:25:06.360 --> 1:25:07.599
<v Speaker 4>Budweis or and everybody.

1:25:07.680 --> 1:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what about for something like this where I think,

1:25:10.680 --> 1:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've actually you know, been either on a

1:25:12.680 --> 1:25:15.599
<v Speaker 1>vacation or I sail and like there's not a lot

1:25:15.640 --> 1:25:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of we don't keep a lot of stuff on the

1:25:17.040 --> 1:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>you know there and I've picked up these pre made

1:25:19.400 --> 1:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>cocktails and there it's really nice and convenient. So I

1:25:22.800 --> 1:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>am curious, what kind of growth are you seeing in

1:25:24.360 --> 1:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this area.

1:25:25.240 --> 1:25:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, we have grown double digits ready to drink Yeah,

1:25:29.120 --> 1:25:32.200
<v Speaker 4>last six years. Every month we control the category in

1:25:32.280 --> 1:25:36.160
<v Speaker 4>terms of margarita. We're the third largest in America and

1:25:36.400 --> 1:25:40.519
<v Speaker 4>we still do our runway is still is still there

1:25:40.560 --> 1:25:42.000
<v Speaker 4>because you know, it's like at the end of the day,

1:25:42.000 --> 1:25:46.200
<v Speaker 4>we're fighting big boys and like, like Matt was saying,

1:25:46.280 --> 1:25:48.840
<v Speaker 4>what makes us pertinent is the fact that we keep

1:25:48.880 --> 1:25:52.040
<v Speaker 4>our ear with the distributor. We may we attend to

1:25:52.080 --> 1:25:56.439
<v Speaker 4>their needs in terms of inventory levels. Uh. And at

1:25:56.439 --> 1:25:58.519
<v Speaker 4>the end of the day, people only come back for

1:25:58.600 --> 1:26:02.000
<v Speaker 4>only one simple reason, plaffability. It has to taste good.

1:26:02.600 --> 1:26:05.640
<v Speaker 4>People will adopt at once, but they have to.

1:26:05.800 --> 1:26:07.519
<v Speaker 1>I've had some non alcoholic stuff, and I have to

1:26:07.560 --> 1:26:08.840
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, I didn't like it.

1:26:09.040 --> 1:26:11.559
<v Speaker 10>That's probably beer, right, non alcoholic beer and wine is

1:26:11.600 --> 1:26:12.120
<v Speaker 10>no bueno.

1:26:12.360 --> 1:26:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Right.

1:26:13.280 --> 1:26:16.600
<v Speaker 10>But you can easily make a non alcoholic sex on

1:26:16.680 --> 1:26:20.599
<v Speaker 10>the beach, you know, because these cocktails. I'm looking through

1:26:21.320 --> 1:26:25.840
<v Speaker 10>what you got. Carol's drinking the margarita, you got the screwdriver.

1:26:26.000 --> 1:26:29.479
<v Speaker 10>Obviously you've got Alabama slammer.

1:26:29.600 --> 1:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Sex on the beach.

1:26:30.600 --> 1:26:32.880
<v Speaker 10>Yes, sex on the beach along islandized tea. Most of

1:26:32.920 --> 1:26:37.000
<v Speaker 10>these cocktails were mixed originally so that you couldn't taste

1:26:37.040 --> 1:26:39.960
<v Speaker 10>the alcohol in them, and I imagine that makes it

1:26:40.000 --> 1:26:44.120
<v Speaker 10>easy to make non alcoholic non alcoholic versions. How important

1:26:44.160 --> 1:26:47.040
<v Speaker 10>is your distributor relationship. You must get all your intel

1:26:47.080 --> 1:26:47.400
<v Speaker 10>that way.

1:26:47.640 --> 1:26:51.280
<v Speaker 4>Our intel comes from the fact that we know the industry.

1:26:51.520 --> 1:26:54.720
<v Speaker 4>Our distributor is our segue to the market. They have

1:26:54.840 --> 1:26:57.760
<v Speaker 4>to believe in us. So our intel comes from the

1:26:57.800 --> 1:27:01.639
<v Speaker 4>fact that we develop quaffable product and that are pure

1:27:01.880 --> 1:27:05.000
<v Speaker 4>and taste and have no sugars in them. The only

1:27:05.040 --> 1:27:10.040
<v Speaker 4>sugars are basically the alcohol itself, that is naturally sugar. Right.

1:27:10.280 --> 1:27:13.400
<v Speaker 3>That's Aldo Jeloso of the family owned Jeloso Group of companies,

1:27:13.400 --> 1:27:17.480
<v Speaker 3>which includes Jeloso Beverage Group USA along with Bloomberg's Matt Miller.

1:27:17.200 --> 1:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Who, like you, is also into non alcoholic beverages. Yeah,

1:27:20.280 --> 1:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>been like sober for or not sober. I shouldn't say that,

1:27:22.680 --> 1:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>but that's staining. You could say that was my word,

1:27:26.520 --> 1:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>not Mad's. He's just been, you know, he's been on

1:27:28.479 --> 1:27:29.559
<v Speaker 1>a healthier kind of kick.

1:27:29.640 --> 1:27:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:27:30.040 --> 1:27:32.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he's like one of many right now, I think.

1:27:32.680 --> 1:27:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I agree. I think a lot of people are

1:27:34.479 --> 1:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>rethinking this.

1:27:35.080 --> 1:27:35.320
<v Speaker 2>Also.

1:27:35.320 --> 1:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting to see research coming out rethinking you know,

1:27:38.560 --> 1:27:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a glass of wine or alcohol, you know the impact

1:27:40.760 --> 1:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it can have on your health longer term.

1:27:42.040 --> 1:27:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I think for Matt and me, I don't want to

1:27:43.560 --> 1:27:45.439
<v Speaker 3>speak for him, but he's got young kids too, Like

1:27:45.640 --> 1:27:48.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, Saturday morning, Sunday morning, you want to be

1:27:48.320 --> 1:27:50.160
<v Speaker 3>there to chase them around.

1:27:50.560 --> 1:27:51.160
<v Speaker 9>Did you love me?

1:27:51.200 --> 1:27:52.519
<v Speaker 1>They come over and they open up your eyes.

1:27:52.600 --> 1:27:53.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, that's great.

1:27:54.120 --> 1:27:54.400
<v Speaker 2>All right.

1:27:54.400 --> 1:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>That wraps up our weekend edition to Bloomberg Business Week

1:27:56.479 --> 1:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. Thank you so much for joining us.

1:27:58.520 --> 1:28:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business Monday through Friday

1:28:00.960 --> 1:28:03.200
<v Speaker 3>starting at two pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg TV,

1:28:03.280 --> 1:28:06.560
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Radio, and on SiriusXM Channel one twenty one. You

1:28:06.600 --> 1:28:08.479
<v Speaker 3>can also listen to us on Apple CarPlay and Android

1:28:08.520 --> 1:28:11.120
<v Speaker 3>Auto Free in the Apple app Store or on Google Play.

1:28:11.160 --> 1:28:13.559
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch our daily broadcast on YouTube search

1:28:13.560 --> 1:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News. We're a summlcast on Bloomberg Originals, available

1:28:17.600 --> 1:28:21.679
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, Slash Originals, and streaming platforms including Roku,

1:28:21.760 --> 1:28:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Amazon fireTV, Samsung TV Plus, and more.

1:28:24.640 --> 1:28:27.599
<v Speaker 3>Find our Bloomberg BusinessWeek podcast at Bloomberg dot com, Apple,

1:28:27.680 --> 1:28:30.160
<v Speaker 3>or wherever you get your podcasts, and the latest edition

1:28:30.200 --> 1:28:32.679
<v Speaker 3>of the magazine is available on newsstands now at Bloomberg

1:28:32.720 --> 1:28:34.719
<v Speaker 3>dot com and always on the Bloomberg Terminal.

1:28:35.000 --> 1:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tim Standebeck and I'm Krol Masser. Have a good

1:28:37.160 --> 1:28:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and safe weekend. Everyone, Stay with us. Today's top stories

1:28:39.840 --> 1:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>and global business headlines are coming up right now.

1:28:42.960 --> 1:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg BusinessWeek podcast, all available on Apple, Spotify,

1:28:47.760 --> 1:28:50.960
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you can get your podcasts. Listen live

1:28:51.040 --> 1:28:54.439
<v Speaker 2>weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern pud, Bloomberg

1:28:54.479 --> 1:28:57.800
<v Speaker 2>dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg

1:28:57.840 --> 1:29:00.759
<v Speaker 2>Business App. You can also watch us live every weekday

1:29:00.760 --> 1:29:10.760
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Terminal MHM