WEBVTT - Apple, Real Estate, Russia, and Carvana

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.400
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.959
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's talk about the

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>tech space PCs. People are still out there buying PCs,

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Apparently they bought a lot during the pandemic, and maybe

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>comps are getting a little tougher here. But let's figure out.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:32.440
<v Speaker 1>We got some news out there that PC shipments are

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>down pretty big. Anna rog Rana, senior tech an also

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, joins us, what's going on in the PC

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>market is just us tough comps. I'm seeing minus twenty,

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>minus thirty even Apple minus forty percent on PC deliveries,

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>even though, as Matt Riley points out, Apple doesn't sell PCs,

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>they sell max. But what's going on in that PC space? No? No,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I mean I think it tough. Comps is

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>one thing, but you know, the street already had MAC

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>revenue going down twenty two. But if the unit shipments

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>is down forty percent. I think those numbers need to

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>come down a little bit more, which to me tells

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>me that the consumer spending is actually worse than what

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.680
<v Speaker 1>we anticipated a quarter ago, and that should bleed into

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>other product categories as well. So I'm expecting a lot

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>more downward revision of consensus estimates over the next couple

0:01:20.240 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of weeks. So you expect down or revision of senses estimates,

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>meaning that you also expect the stock to drop, right.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>That depends on if you are renting it for a

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:34.479
<v Speaker 1>quarter or if you're buying it for the long run.

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's usually, you know, truly depends on who the

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>buyer is. But I don't expect the revenue numbers to

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:43.000
<v Speaker 1>come down now that that may mean that whoever is

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>taking those numbers down maybe increasing it the year from now,

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>because it's not as if you know the buyer of

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that particular MacBook Pro like yourself. You know, if you're

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>not buying it now, you're going to buy it six

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>months from now or twelve months from now. Okay, the

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>fact that I bought it twelve months ago because I

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>had some stimmies and and you know, I had to

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>work from home or had to do school from home.

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Now I can work in the office, I can go

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>back to school. And plus, why would I spend money

0:02:11.760 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on that kind of thing now that I don't have

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the government sending me checks. Well, if you know the

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>people who the government was sending the checks, we're not

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>buying MacBook pros in my view. So if you are

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>a gamer and you're looking for MacBook Pro with the

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>next M two chip, you know you will spend fifteen

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars or two thousand dollars to buy it. But again,

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a luxury product. That's not something that

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you know everybody can buy. All right, I just want

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:41.280
<v Speaker 1>to get the generic Apple call here. What do you

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>think they gets census calls for this stock? Right here?

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>It's up twenty four percent year to date, still about

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>five percent down on a trailing twelve month basis, So

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>stick at trying to dig itself out of that twenty

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty two hole. What's the when you talk to some

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>smart tech investors out there, what are they saying about Apple?

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:58.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, I think if you look at both Apple

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft, they have been a safe stock for the

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 1>past several weeks. As people are trying to figure out

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>where they go from here. The valuation has gone up

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for both these companies quite a bit in the last

0:03:09.040 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>two I would say, several weeks. Now the question is,

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, what happens to the rest of the tech portfolio.

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>If we do see some stabilization in other tech stocks,

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 1>then you would see some kind of I would say,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a sector reallocation from you know, these two safety stocks

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to some of the other ones. Now, having said that,

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>this is the first time I'm seeing a clear indication

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that Apple numbers needs to come down. You know, that

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the case. I would say in the last twelve months,

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about chip usage? I mean, the

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Samsung story and Taiwan Semiconductor as well, has really affected

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the US market. Today we see a jump at Micron.

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Does this mean that a lot of chip suppliers are

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>going to have fewer orders or have they bottomed at

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this point? You see, that's a very tough call to

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>make because a lot depends on you know, autos and

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>other industries. It's not so much always tied with PCs,

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>although consumer spending you know, in PCs is a big

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>portion of chips. But I don't think Apple has ever

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>had an issue with supply chain when it comes to

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they get it first before anybody else. I'm

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm less concerned on those factors. For my biggest concern

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point for Apple is, um, you know, what's

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>really going to happen on the on some of these

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>products and how bad it's going to get in twenty

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty three before we see a potential bounce back next year?

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Do they have do they have to introduce a killer

0:04:34.200 --> 0:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>new product? Are they going to make some kind of

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality aar eyeglasses. Are they going to come out

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>with new air pods that blow us away for this

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.719
<v Speaker 1>new function that we never knew headphones can have? Or

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>is the car coming soon? I don't know about the car,

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>but Mark German said that you know, they will launch

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the new mixed reality headset in the summer. You know

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 1>that is going to truly vibe the whole metaphors discussion.

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think mathematically it adds anything at least

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>for the next you know, this financial year. Next year,

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps it adds a few billion dollars, But you know

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the big thing for Apple is going to be the

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>iPhone fifteen launch by the end of this year and

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a revival potentially in the services division. So I think

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>comps are getting easier and easier for Apple for a

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>bounce back next year. But before that, I think we

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>need to have a take a step back on numbers

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>before we can jump back and say revenue growth is

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 1>going to get back again into that eight to ten

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.599
<v Speaker 1>percent range. So I'm looking at the PGeo function on

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg termo for Apple. I see about twenty percent

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of their sales are in Greater China. Are the Chinese

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>buying watches and phones and all that kind of stuff?

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>What's the market like? I think this, You know, that's

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>probably only going to be the one bright spot for

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple over the next six months, because you know, the

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>China reopening trade and the Chinese consumer really hasn't spent

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit over the last twelve months. You know,

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we could see some relief over there to offset the

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>other things that we are talking about. But you know, again,

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the big jump is going to come from

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>a new hardware design from the iPhone fifteen, which is

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>most likely going to be in the September October timeframe.

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, Now, Tim Cook was over there right in China,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>and what was she trying to do. It's trying to

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 1>be nice to them. That's where they you know, it's

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is the heart and lungs off Apple

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. If something happens to that, Apple's going to

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be in really tough time. So he's just kind of

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to smooth things out that otherwise it's getting worse. Frankly,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, you look great today. Hey, anybody wants the

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:43.200
<v Speaker 1>new iPhone? Isn't Taiwan yours anyway? Yes, exactly, So I

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>love to see about that. I don't know that's that's

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>still a huge risk there, but I guess trying to

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.679
<v Speaker 1>smooth it over a little bit. On agron I, senior

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>technology analyst with Bloomberg Intelligence, joining us on the phone

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>talking about Apple, mac shipment's PC shipment's across the industry.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Team Cancer Line program Bloomberg Markets

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:07:06.240 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I Heard Radio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>listen on demand wherever you get your podcast. Let's get

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to the next company, which I find really fascinating. I

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>was initially interested because it's called the Howard Hughes Corporation,

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and who isn't interested in Howard Hughes, right, But it's

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>actually got that name in a roundabout way. Howard Hughes

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>bought the property for one of their master planned communities.

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And now that's the business that they're in. But it's

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.600
<v Speaker 1>not all stuff they got from Howard Hughes, mostly general

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>growth properties. David O'Reilly joins as CEO of the company.

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 1>The ticker is HC. It's publicly traded on the New

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>York Stock Exchange. David, so talk to us first, give

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>us the overhead view of the Howard Hughes Corporation. You

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>have at least three master planned communities, right, These are big.

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not like a few thousands, like one hundred thousand

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 1>people live in them, and there are thousands of acres.

0:08:07.880 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So what's the business. It's the end of the day.

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>We play sim city. We're developing real estate to create

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the greatest places to live, to have the greatest and

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.679
<v Speaker 1>positive impact on our residents, tenants and visitors lives. Sell

0:08:21.760 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>land to home builders, take that capital to amenitize built office,

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>multi families, shopping within our communities, which in turn makes

0:08:28.720 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it better places to live where more people want to

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.840
<v Speaker 1>come live there, our land values go up, and that

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>self fulfilling cycle goes on and on. We essentially play

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>sim city. We decide where the roads go, where the

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 1>hospitals are, where the homes are, and create what we

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>think are the best communities to live in America. And

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>then they have then they hopefully you know, they have

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the best plumbing, the best WiFi, pickleball on demand yep.

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And they also had a good golf course then in Houston.

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>So all right, when I see a new company, I

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>got right to the board of directors. I see your

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>chairman of the boarders, Bill Ackman. Why is he the chairman?

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Then I go to the HDS screen gives you the

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.840
<v Speaker 1>shareholders and thirty two percent of your company. What's going

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.240
<v Speaker 1>on there? Wise? Persian there? Why are they big? Wise? Bill?

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>On your board? Well? Bill took over General Growth when

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it filed for bankruptcy. And when he went through the

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>assets of General Growth, he saw these communities, these great places,

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>these unique development opportunities that didn't belong in a public malread.

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>So the Howard used corporation is Bill's idea. He came

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>up with it. He spun us out into our own

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>entity about twelve years ago, and he's been an incredible

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>supporter and incredible chairman ever since day one. So what

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>do the numbers look like? I mean, how are you

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>doing on the top and bottom line and give us

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>your five year view. Things have been incredible. The pandemic

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>has been an incredible tail winds to our business. We've

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>sold more land to home builders, which is one of

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the three main areas of revenue for us, over the

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>past two years than we have ever before. And we

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>see that momentum, despite a rest bite in the fourth

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter of last year, coming right back very quickly this year,

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>despite higher mortgage rates. That's kind of where I wanted

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to go. We've seen that spike in mortgage rates. It's

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>scared a lot of people out of the market. Not me,

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>but it scared some people out of the market. What

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>are you seeing kind of in this spike in real

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 1>estate more mortgage rates. I don't think it's the spike

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>of rates that changes home builder demands. I think it's

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the change the volatility of rates forces homebuyers to pause.

0:10:22.880 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Once it settles in, they're right back to the market.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>We're looking out between a three and five million unit

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>shortfall of housing units needed to meet the household formation

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>of the past ten years. It doesn't exist today. People

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>need places to look. I'll tell you what exist is

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>all the McMansions everywhere. What doesn't exist is starter homes

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:44.360
<v Speaker 1>because those guys can't make the same margin on it.

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>How do we fix that problem? Do you think? Oh? Look,

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's tough for me to say that

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a magic wand to solve that. Across the country.

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Within our Masterplant communities, which are twenty thirty thousand acres plus,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>we're prescriptive in terms of what homes are being sold

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>for what price wear prescriptive in terms of the setbacks.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>That sizes the pricing so that we can meet affordability

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>across every price point within our community. Look over the

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>past year, we've seen home prices shoot up, and that

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>part of that material prices getting higher. Part of that's

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.400
<v Speaker 1>labor higher, part of that's my land has been more expensive,

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and part of that has been home builder margins. Home

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>building margins have been in that eighteen to twenty percent

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.079
<v Speaker 1>since I can remember, and last year they peaked at

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine percent. So there's room. We're seeing material prices

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>come down. We're seeing home builders except lower margins. We're

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:38.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing homes land sellers like ourselves, except slightly lower prices. Now,

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>where do you buy land, like when you decide I

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:44.240
<v Speaker 1>want to build another woodlands, where do you find How

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>do you identify our market that is worthy of your

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 1>investment of land? So for us, we belt We bought

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 1>our last master plane community at the end of last year.

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It's called Terra Vallis outside of Phoenix, thirty seven thousand

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>acres today, population zero. The characteristics that make that great

0:12:00.120 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's fully entitled fore hundred thousand homes in fifty five

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:06.319
<v Speaker 1>million square feet of commercial space. It is immediately adjacent

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to Phoenix, just north of the I ten that connects

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to Los Angeles. So great transportation, great access, lower tax,

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>business friendly community, warm or less expensive to live. Affordability

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:19.839
<v Speaker 1>helps drive our decision. Make is that only going to

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be you know, the older people like Paul and Tucker

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>or kind of young buck like Megan and on that

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I would tell you that we're going to see this community.

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to be more starter homes. I

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be more younger families coming into

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>the market. I think this is going to be not

0:12:38.679 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>your age restricted community. Will have age restricted communities within

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the overall thirty seven thousand acres, but the predominance is

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>starting here is going to be your young families moving

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.839
<v Speaker 1>into the area finding that quality of life that they

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>can't get in La Sanford. So you're so you're now

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a ground zero type of situation in

0:12:55.559 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>that community in Phoenix for that property. What's a lifespan

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>before you get to a Woodlands where it is built

0:13:01.760 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>out and it looks like it's been there forever. Well,

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the Woodlands is celebrating its fiftieth anterimursary next year, and

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we're out of residential land. All twenty twenty eight thousand

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 1>acres or of the residential side are gone. We're down

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to seven hundred acres of commercial space, which is another

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty or thirty years of commercial development. So the life

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 1>cycle of Tera Vallis and Phoenix could be forty or

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 1>fifty years. Wow, I think it'll be quicker this. And

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you have developers, did that you know you want to

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>work with to build the homes, to build the commercial space?

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that do you pick those? We are the commercial developer,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you're the career master planning. We're just signing where those

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>roads are gonna go. We're gonna build those office buildings,

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 1>so you build them as well. Okay, we're gonna own

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.959
<v Speaker 1>them forever. We'll sell the land to home builders, okay,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and they'll build a single family homes and got in

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the residence. So you can't help us up with a

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>good contractor. I mean I was going to ask you.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna see if you had a couple of records.

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Everybody wants to know because that kind of labor is

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>tough to come by. But I guess you outsourced the

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>home building process, so you're not as worried about, you know,

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>finding people to put it up. Our labor is horizontal development.

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>It is putting in the water, sewer, roads, curbs parks,

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and that labor is still very difficult to find. I

0:14:12.200 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>think our competitive advantage is that when we're spending a

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>billion and a half dollars a year, and we know

0:14:16.760 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>we're going to spend it for the next forty years,

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we can keep someone's attention real time, rather than have

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>them worry about moving to the next project in six months.

0:14:24.440 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So what are some of the big variables for your business?

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if your business can perform presumably you know

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, even at these levels of interest rates, what

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 1>are some of the big variables that kind of you

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have to manage as a CEO. I think some of

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing is there's two areas. One in the

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>residential land development. We're trying to develop lots just to

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>keep up with underlying home sales, right and underlying home

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>sales are very difficult to predict, but we're watching them

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>every day to see which size lots selling, which size

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>homes are selling, and making sure we have those lots

0:14:55.000 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>available for our home builders to get back into their inventory.

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And the other side of the equation is really just

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a pulse of our residence. We're most

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>successful when we're building the amenities that our residents want,

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>whether that's the Kirby Ice House in the Woodlands or

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>whether that's another multi family apartment building. Because we're full

0:15:14.200 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and rents are raised rising too quickly, we need to

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>be we make sure we have a finger on the

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 1>pulse of what our residents want and meet that demand.

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you it's pickaball. It's pickaball. Yeah, I don't

0:15:25.920 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>know it has been. It's been amazing how we've seen

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 1>parking garages and tennis courts being repurposed for pickaball and

0:15:33.040 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>it gets used. So I see a big drop in

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>revenue in twenty twenty. Was that just all pandemic driven?

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>You guys kind of had to shut down development? It is,

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But we also another part of our business is selling

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:46.480
<v Speaker 1>condominiums in Hawaii, where we have sixty acres on the

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>beach in an area known as Ward Village between Waikiki

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and alamo Ona Mall. If we don't have a condo

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>tower closed in a particular year, the revenue will drop off.

0:15:57.000 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, We're not running our business for next quarters earnings,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>running our business to drive value creation for the next one, three, five,

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>ten years. Fascinating stuff. I knew. I knew the Woodlands.

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been there a couple of times. I didn't know

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>as you guys, so very very cool Slumberland. Is it

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>called Summerlin outside Vegas? Yes, I played their tid. Hughes

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>has been gone for about fifty years as well. I

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>think he died in nineteen seventy three. Yeah, you fly

0:16:18.960 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>into Lax you see the Hughes aerospace, which is very cool.

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.080
<v Speaker 1>David O'Reilly, CEO of Howard Hughes Corporation, trades on the

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>NYC h HC talking about some planned communities, some commercial

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>real estate. You're listening to. The tape cans are our

0:16:32.800 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>live program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. You can also listen live on

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, Just say

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty twenty twenty two. There was

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>nowhere to hide really in the fixed income space. But

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I look at my i nd go function on the

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal for the Bloomberg Index browser, and I see

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg US Aggregate fixed Income Index is up three

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>point five percent this year. So a much much better

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 1>start to twenty twenty three. Let's see if there's more

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 1>life in the fixed income space. Jason Greenblath joins us.

0:17:12.160 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>He's a senior portfolio manager in American Century Investments, proud

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>alumnus from Penn State University, joining us here in our

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. So what do you do in

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>this year? Jason, I mean twenty twenty two, let's just

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>flush it. That's how bad it was for the fixed

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:30.119
<v Speaker 1>income folks. How'd you guys start this year and what

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think right now? Yeah, thanks for having me on.

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate it. Our highest conviction this year is duration,

0:17:36.400 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>belong duration coming in. We've certainly seen some evidence last month.

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.480
<v Speaker 1>We saw evidence back in September that higher rates are

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>starting to break things down in the economy. Last month

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:52.120
<v Speaker 1>was the banks back in September, with UK pension plans

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>having problems and so being long duration in our mind

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>is the economy's slowing is our highest conviction position. And

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 1>at the moment, yeah, we saw, well, there's a Bloomberg

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>story out overnight about one and a half trillion dollar

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>wall of maturity coming due in just commercial real estate

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 1>by twenty twenty five. So it started to kind of

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>freak me out. I was worried, as had nightmares as

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I read this last night, because these higher rates could

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>really break something. Right, We've already seen as you said,

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the banking crisis. Are are we giving up on the

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.239
<v Speaker 1>idea of a soft landing? Can the Fed not achieve that?

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>In our minds, it's a low probability. The probability recession

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>harder landing certainly has has grown the beginning of March

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:47.120
<v Speaker 1>with the banking crisis certainly illustrated that, Matt, you mentioned

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>series and what's going on with maturity walls. I think

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look inside the data, there are certain loans

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>even here in Manhattan that are being marked at fifty

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>cents on the dollar. You can certainly see that cap

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>rates have gone up substantially. Office vacancies, you know, are

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly playing into that, and I think you know higher

0:19:08.119 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>rates are also causing issues with refinancings A push that

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 1>blue button. Are you concerned about financial institutions banks and

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>their real estate portfolios, because I'm not sure. Some folks

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>are saying it had the big money center banks don't

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about it so much. It's more the

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>regional banks. How do you think about that? Yeah, I

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:32.199
<v Speaker 1>think the regional banks certainly for sure have the higher exposure. Right.

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:35.320
<v Speaker 1>It's something like forty percent of their U of small

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>business loans are coming out of these regional banks. So

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we need that part of the plumbing to certainly be

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>be flowing and working. And you know, you guys at

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg had a great story over the weekend on financial

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>conditions and loans coming down the last two weeks of March,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>there's clearer evidence. I think we'll see a little bit

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>more over the next one to two weeks with bank earnings,

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>but we also need one to two more quarters to

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:01.360
<v Speaker 1>see if this becomes a trend or not. We talk

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>about first of all, we're not great it running the

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>audio today. No, it was a weekend. True, it was

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>a long weekend too. It's a Monday. We talk about

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the world insurrate probability screen a lot. I'm sure you're

0:20:14.040 --> 0:20:16.399
<v Speaker 1>familiar with it on the Bloomberg terminal. It shows what

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the market is pricing in terms of the Fed moves right,

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and currently we're pricing in four rate cuts through January

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.199
<v Speaker 1>thirty first, twenty twenty four. Does that make sense to you?

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.359
<v Speaker 1>Do you buy it? Our thought is the Fed's going

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to raise one more time next month and early meg

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 1>and then pause. If something else breaks, then maybe they

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>will cut, but we think they're going to hold that

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>just to ensure that inflation is really under control. So

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>those four rate cuts probably don't happen in twenty five

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 1>bases point increments in our minds, they happen in hundred

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>or two hundred bases point increments when something really breaks. Well,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that's terrifying though it is it is, And so I

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>think the other element we talked about being long duration.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>The other element is being credit risk. Credit spreads, in

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>our mind do not reflect a recession, a hard landing.

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:08.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the mid to high four hundreds and

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>high yield credit spreads, it's kind of normal and average

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten years. What's not normal is eight

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent because treasury rate rates are higher.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So in our mind, credit spreads are not reflecting that

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hard landing. And we like being short here and waiting

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>for a better entry point. I know earlier in your

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>career you looked at the high yield space. That's distressed space.

0:21:30.240 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Do I take some risk here and go into the

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>high old market? If so, where can I go in

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>high yield? We like shorter duration, high qualities. So Doublebees

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a place that we think offers some value, some safety.

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 1>There's still some names out there that we think will

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>migrate up to investment grade, so there is total return potential.

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had the Citrics deal that that came

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>price what's happened to that? So that the second lean

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the priced at seventy nine cents, and we had some

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 1>banks unload off their balancy a leveraged buyout from last year. Now,

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is that something that you guys traffick in that kind

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of stuff? That really looks like the banks are just

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of, you know, chucking in on the market wherever

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>it landed. You know, I think at a price, certain

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>investments look interesting coming at at an oide of twenty

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one points. Pricing at seventy nine cents in the dollar.

0:22:22.560 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>The market certainly warmed up to it. It's it's up

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.399
<v Speaker 1>about four points since it priced last week. All right.

0:22:27.640 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I thought, I saw another interesting story

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.359
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal over the weekend, and I wonder

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>if I could put it to a genuine fixed income investor.

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you. Here. We see volatility just off

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the charts right in rates in the Western world. That

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:51.040
<v Speaker 1>moves are mind boggling, sixty seventy basis point moves in

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a day on the two year, And the Bloomberg story

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>is that that's driving some fixed income investors to China

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>where they have almost volatility. Do you find that believable.

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, going from a DM market to an

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 1>EM market and in a more esoteric, you know, less

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 1>regulated environment, to me, does not make a whole lot

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of sense. You know, we like transparency and being able

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to dig through financial statements and have a more substantial

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>regulatory body. I think the volatility here in the US

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>needs to settle down. Once that settles down, we certainly

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>will have more interest and inflos into the asset class,

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>but we need volatility to come down. So what are

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the sectors that you guys are doing work

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in these days? And maybe conversely, what are some of

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the sectors you just staying away from? Yeah, I think

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>to answer the latter first, I think CMBs and leverage

0:23:48.800 --> 0:23:52.119
<v Speaker 1>loans are parts of the market that we're most concerned about,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 1>probably like a lot of our competitors. The rising rates,

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the maturity walls that we mentioned before, those are certainly

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>areas of of concern. What do we like We like

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>We like short spread durations, so short maturities um particularly

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:11.199
<v Speaker 1>in parts of more esoteric areas in the securitized market,

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>in my space and corporate credit. You know, I think

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>there's haves and have nots in the banking sector. So

0:24:17.680 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>that's high quality investment grade. UM. I think that there

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>are disclocations there. The proverbial may be thrown out. With

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the bathwater certainly created some opportunities last month. We're expecting

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>more in the nearer term of these disclocations. I'm just

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>looking through historically the matchups between Penn State and the

0:24:38.040 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State University. Last year it was a loss for

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 1>your lions. The year before that, it was a loss.

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Before that, it was a loss. The year before that,

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 1>it was a loss. The year before that, you lost.

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 1>The year before that, we won. So when do you

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:56.800
<v Speaker 1>think Penn State can come back and beat the Buckeyes.

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 1>So so, Matt, You're you're talking like a true cynic

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the fixed income world, loss after loss after loss.

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you I visited Columbus, Ohio for the

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>first time in my life my career a month ago.

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Nice city, but glad to be back on the East coast,

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>all right. Jason Greenblatt, Senior portfolio manager, American Century Investments,

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>with a zinger at the end, This is Bloomberg. You're

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Team Cancer Line program Bloomberg Markets weekdays

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>at ten am, eas daring on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business app. We're

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>listening on demand wherever you get your podcast. I want

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>to get right to our next guest listening fascinating discussion

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Alexander Isakoff. He is the Russia and CEE economist at

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Economics based in the Middle East. Alexander, you are

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>out with a fascinating Bloomberg Economics column today story today

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about President Putin's to prioritize his twenty twenty four

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.920
<v Speaker 1>reelection over the war. How can me do that? Isn't

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the war front and center for everything and super popular

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>at home? Yeah, so that seems like it would be

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the center of his election re election platform exact. So

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>what are we seeing, Alexander H. We're seeing that Russian

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>government and Pussing were able to stabilize the economy in

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the past months. So you're looking at an economy with

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate of like three percent and unemployment which is

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just a bit north of three percent. Our call is

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that because the labor market is so tight, essentially a

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Pussin face the dilemma whether to try and mobilize more people,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>uh and take a cost of cost of this in

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of public support mobilization, I'm never too popular with people,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 1>or just try to model through until his elections XTA

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in March and just postpone mobilization. So I think our

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>call is that you will prefer the letter. So when

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you say mobilize, you mean draft people essentially force probably

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:19.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, young able bodied men to go to the

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>front lines where they risk their lives. That's something that

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Russia hasn't done yet. What are they doing, What are

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>they doing to you know, fill their ranks? Yeah, exactly.

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>So they've drafted around three hundred thousand people lost October.

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:42.880
<v Speaker 1>But this means that in six months most of those

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>people will be back at home and Russia would need

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to replenish its troops and it will not be easier.

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So Russia needs to find a way which will be

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.959
<v Speaker 1>less coversive but also very effective and finding another three

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand people which will be very very hard. So, Alexander,

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to what extent, if any, are the Western sanctions having

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a negative impact on the Russian economy just given some

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of the data you just recited, doesn't seem to be

0:28:16.240 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>hurting that badly. Yeah, I mean, the thing is that

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>most of the numbers we are used to look at

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>don't capture the pain, the economic pain that Russia undergoes.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.679
<v Speaker 1>For example, if you look at imports, which were like

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>down twenty percent, they reflect the quality of consumption and

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>quality of investment in Russia. These both are declined pretty

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>substantially last year. But from the GDP perspective, any decline

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in imports is actually neutral. Imports don't affect the GDP directly,

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't show the GDP numbers. But Alexander, from

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>an economic perspective perspective, given you your Russian background, do

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the Russian people is a Russian government prepared or the

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Russian people prepared to be what they are today, which

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>effectively sealed off most of the world from an economic perspective,

0:29:15.000 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>trading perspective, all the type of stuff. Are they prepared

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>to do this for the long term? I think dances

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>yes and no. If current continuitions, especially in the commodity markets, prevail,

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>if oil prices remain north of eighty percent, then I

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>think Russia can tellierate these functions a long time. But

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, because Russian international reserves have been frozen,

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the country is very, very sensitive to any drop in

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the oil prices. So if COMMITI prices remain high, the

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>country can't delierate that. But it's very fragile to any

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>downside shock for oil price and it must be very

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>fragile and lation situation because it's been relatively low. But

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>with this tight labor market, especially if they need to

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>draft more troops, that means wages are going to have

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to rise, are they not? Yeah? All correct? And in fact,

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we are looking at the data on the prestability of

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>private enterprises and the lost mobilization actually was pretty detrimental

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to that. We see that the private sector margins are

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>shrinking and I think, yeah, the labor costs will definitely

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>reduce growth in the coming year. So, Alexander, just from

0:30:38.520 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the consumer data, it seems like the war

0:30:41.880 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>is having little to no impact on the consumers at

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>home as at the case and B does it feel

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>like that can go on going forward? I think so.

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:01.320
<v Speaker 1>If you look at historically at the impacts of wars

0:31:01.400 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 1>on the labor markets, what they typically do is they

0:31:04.880 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>reduced the premiere for high skill labor, but actually increased

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the wages for those who don't. We're not earning as much,

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>so Essentially, they are reducing the inequality and labor incomes.

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>This is what actually is happening in Russia. So you

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>don't see much wage growth in the high pay success

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:33.479
<v Speaker 1>secious information technology or banking of finance, but actually you

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of growth in the manual labor, manufacturing

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and services, etcetera, etcetera. So what you see is that

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>consumption is being supported by growth in in those UH

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of sectors where wages were low previously. All right, Alexander,

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, Really appreciate your reporting here. Alexander Isakov.

0:31:56.040 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>He is the Russian UH and CEE economist Blomberg Economics.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>He's based in Dubai. We appreciate getting some of his

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>time there. You're listening to the tape cancer live program

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:32:11.160 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>from our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven thirty. Let's talk about Carvana. Yes, well, we

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>have my favorite headline writer in all of Bloomberg in

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the studio, right now, Joel Levington writes these headlines that

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>get me to click no matter what. Even now I

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>see them and I'm like, I know this is one

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of Joel's headlines. It's gonna be a bi credit report,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>but I'm still clicking because it's like Ferrari eats Maserati's lunch,

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you know. But so, Joel, thanks for coming to the studio.

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>You have a great story out about you know, barbarians

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 1>at the gate, except for they're not at the gate,

0:32:56.240 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>they're at the Carvanna. What do they have like vending

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:05.800
<v Speaker 1>vending machines? Um? This story has been amazing on the

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>stock side, right because just climbed so high during the

0:33:09.880 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and then came absolutely crashing down, paying stilly prices

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 1>for used vehicles and then apparently not selling them for

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>um similar amounts. What's the story on the debt side? Yeah,

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 1>well it's been equally crazy. You know, it's just a

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>few years ago that they were issuing bonds with you know,

0:33:28.920 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>like a five handle on it or a little over

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>five percent. Now those bonds are more like forty five percent.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's been a dramatic turn, and unfortunately for

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>for stakeholders. It hasn't been good a good run. So

0:33:40.680 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>where I mean there's they've not, they've not. They're just

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>proposing a debt exchange, right, right, So this is Carvana.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>They sell these cars market they don't or they don't

0:33:52.720 --> 0:33:54.920
<v Speaker 1>market kind of dried up. Now they've got problems with

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 1>their equity, but they really got problems with their debt.

0:33:58.040 --> 0:34:00.600
<v Speaker 1>They did too much debt going into this rough patch.

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>You're totally right, Paul, And this is one of those

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>cases where it's the balance sheet that's driving the equity

0:34:04.960 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 1>story as opposed to the opposite. In this case, they've

0:34:08.560 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 1>levered up. They have eight billion dollars worth of debt.

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.359
<v Speaker 1>They're not supposed to generate positive ebada until twenty twenty five,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, like, how do you make that lending

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.279
<v Speaker 1>on no cash flow? I mean, you were lending on

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 1>just the big equity cushion underneath, like a lot of

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:25.800
<v Speaker 1>tech companies will do. You know, yeah, exactly over the

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years, you could pick out any startup

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>tech company or in my area, Tesla where it was

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 1>issuing bonds also where the five percent handle on it,

0:34:34.360 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and people love the equity story, and they'll tell you like, hey,

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>there's billions of billions of dollars a cushion as opposed

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, like, what are the fundamentals and where

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>can this company go? In the case of Carvana, it's

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>in an industry where you have very thin margins and

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:51.279
<v Speaker 1>high capital intensity, and it really can't handle a lot

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of volatility. So when you put a lot of debt

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>on that, you're kind of setting the stage for problems.

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And unfortunately they've run into it. All right, the stock

0:34:58.520 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>on all thirteen twenty twenty one, three hundred and sixty

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars stocks training below nine? Isn't that guy? And so

0:35:06.840 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I can see. I can see buying debt when you've

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>got all this equity underneath me, even though I wouldn't

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>do because I only lend on cash flows. That's how

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was taught at the Chase Front and

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Bank Credit training class nineteen ninety one. Um, that's how

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you do it. But now what happens to these debthholders?

0:35:22.920 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>What are they trying to do here? From credit to

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.359
<v Speaker 1>star that's the way it goes bossweek Okay, yes, well

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>well really what what what Carvana is doing is trying

0:35:33.280 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>to set the stage four there's going to be an exchange,

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 1>or they're trying to make an exchange happen. Now this

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is if they do this, it's really the first of

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 1>many steps that they would have to do to change

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>their balance sheet because really here you're trying to exchange

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>about a billion three of debt for a new billion

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars offering, and essentially you're saving about three hundred million

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.720
<v Speaker 1>worth of debt and fifteen to twenty million of interest

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:59.840
<v Speaker 1>expense for a company that has as much debt and

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:02.480
<v Speaker 1>so little cash flow as they do. This is just

0:36:02.520 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 1>a beginning. It's really just a start to you know,

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>like get the barbarians, to get the Apollos and the

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Arias out there to come up with a deal where

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>they can restructure the balance sheet, but do it in

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a way where the Garcia family can we make in control.

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's really why family to remain in control. They

0:36:19.560 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>want to remain in control. Well, as a neutral independent party,

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say you would not want them in control

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>because they have made so many bad choices along the way,

0:36:27.280 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 1>including debt financing a two billion dollars acquisition of Edessa

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>at a time where where the industry was starting to

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>go down. They've missed earnings expectations for like nine of

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the past ten quarters. Really, what you need to do

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:45.040
<v Speaker 1>is strip out costs, reslate the balance sheet to have

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a clean balance sheet. We've estimated that it should be

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about ninety four percent of the debt needs to get

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 1>wiped out. Oh so really this is hit. I mean

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>your point is that debt holders may be happier in bankruptcy. Yeah, yeah, exactly, Matt,

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>because if you came out with a clean company and

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>a story of hey, let's get back to basics, let's

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>reduce our thirteen percent difference in SG and A, and

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.960
<v Speaker 1>here's a path to growth, that stock price can certainly

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>turn around. And our expectation is that if it was

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a clean balanty like bond holders might get seventy five

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 1>cents back on the dollar relatives to where bonds are,

0:37:20.640 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of more in the forty to fifty zone.

0:37:22.920 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>So let me ask. I look through your bank up

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 1>stories that you work on, and you cover the car

0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>industry very closely. Obviously, one that catches my eye is

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a concern I think that we have across markets, which

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:46.760
<v Speaker 1>is about refinancing. I think the point that you're making

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>here is Ford needs to refinance a ton of debt.

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Right as rates rise, Ford credit may face five hundred

0:37:55.160 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and seventy million dollars headwin and refinancing debt is the headline.

0:37:57.719 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>As rates rise, this is going to be a problem

0:37:59.400 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of the ending arms are the big

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>carmakers I think so, you know, and it becomes a

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.640
<v Speaker 1>game mat of where do you reduce the pain? Right

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 1>when you have a captive finance company like a Forward

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:11.479
<v Speaker 1>or a GM, you can do that in the form

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of incentives on the you know, MSRP on on the

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 1>price that you're paying for a car, so you could

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.920
<v Speaker 1>reduce that as a way to making things more affordable.

0:38:20.239 --> 0:38:22.680
<v Speaker 1>But really that's the issue is affordability. It's forty eight

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars for your average car, and when the average

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>American makes seventy thousand dollars a year, you can't afford

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a car. So how do you make that work and

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 1>keep the volume in your plant going? And it's either

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be through the finance company, in the finance

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>company eating the interest rates on it, or it's going

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to be through pricing on the cars. I hope it's

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.000
<v Speaker 1>through the finance company eating interest rates. Why just because

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to pay it. I don't want to

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:49.000
<v Speaker 1>pay that much. Our prices ever kind of come down

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in the card and Street or they resetting these new

0:38:51.680 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>highs because I mean, they've incredible inflation. I'm not sure

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:56.640
<v Speaker 1>with the numbers, but over the last three or four years,

0:38:56.719 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous increases in price. The monthly nut is just impossible

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to cover for the average shoe, right, It's ridiculous. And

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that's you know, it's it's a great question, Paul,

0:39:05.920 --> 0:39:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think it if you even if you asked internally,

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:09.879
<v Speaker 1>I think our equity analysts might have a different view

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 1>than I do. I personally believe that pricing has to

0:39:13.000 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>come down. I think you're seeing that with Tesla, right

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at any of their models are down

0:39:18.280 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty to twenty this year, and a Model three now

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is about thirty six thousand dollars or thirty seven thousand dollars.

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So if you're saying, hey, do I want the Model

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>three or the Honda CRV, like, that's a battle, and

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that's where Tesla is going to be picking up share.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think others are going to eventually have to

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>follow because economically, you know, they're they're they're very high

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of cost. I mean the four has followed

0:39:44.160 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>with them with the Mustang Maki in terms of price cuts,

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but not yet with the F one fifty Lightning that

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you drove. What was the sticker price four large ninety

0:39:54.080 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>four grand for a pickup truck, right, I mean, and

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what I mean, so honestly, I mean, I'm not

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>even joking. I mean, the American pickup truck buyers already

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:07.439
<v Speaker 1>used to laying out forty fifty sixty grand. I'm sure

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>that was you just can you do ninety I don't

0:40:10.080 --> 0:40:12.800
<v Speaker 1>know four thousand. I don't know what demand destruction is

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 1>going to look like there. And that's in addition to

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 1>all the software that they're trying to sell behind it,

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know, like there's a recurring revenue stream that

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to attach to the electric car. So you know,

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like something has to give, and I would think this

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>is a case where the companies are gonna wind up

0:40:27.160 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>having to give. And they're starting to see it, right,

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you see, GM, Ford, Mercedes, they're all announcing headcut plans

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>over the next years because they recognize, like you have

0:40:37.000 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to change your cost structure to be in a world

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 1>that can't afford these crazy, you know, high prices. Does

0:40:42.600 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Lucid survive? Does Rivian survive? Do these ev startups make it?

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I think they survive because you find over and over again,

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and maybe McLaren is a great example of it. You

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>find these companies that find people that are willing to

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>take a bet on a brand name, Investors in the

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Middle East, and in the case of Lucid, it might

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:03.440
<v Speaker 1>be an investor in the Middle East because they already

0:41:03.480 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>old and sixty percent of the company in the case

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:07.839
<v Speaker 1>of Review, and they have enough flexibility that they can

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>last at least a year or two before before you

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 1>have to worry about that good stuff as always Joe Levington,

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:16.880
<v Speaker 1>he is a director credit research Bloomberg Intelligence. He covers

0:41:16.880 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and his real day job he covers some autos and

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:21.759
<v Speaker 1>some industrial credits and things like that. The management is

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>just a ruse. He actually does a real job and

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.720
<v Speaker 1>he's a real analyst. But appreciate having come into studio.

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Take Cancer our live program Bloomberg

0:41:31.120 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.959
<v Speaker 1>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:40.839
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:46.040
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, Jo Say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk real estate. Now, let's talk commercial real estate.

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And we can do that with our next guest, Christine

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Mastandrea Coo of white Stone Reet. That's a publicly traded

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.560
<v Speaker 1>reet WSR as a ticker you can load into the

0:41:58.560 --> 0:42:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg terminal about four D thirty million dollars marketap. Christine,

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us live in the Bloomberg

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Broker Studio. So post pandemic, you get a gold

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>star for showing up live, not phoning it in. Talk

0:42:10.280 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to us about Whitestone. What type of real estate do

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you guys specialize in? Oh, I specialize in smaller center

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is basically focusing on community and convenience for our retail

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So you so okay? So not a technical term, kind

0:42:22.520 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>of like a strip mall type thing similar and all right,

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 1>So Amazon is a thing out there. I've actually become

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>very very depth on Amazon since the pandemic in the lockdown,

0:42:33.120 --> 0:42:34.919
<v Speaker 1>but I can't and I've heard this is not good

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for bricks and more to retail or retail. How do

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:39.880
<v Speaker 1>you guys approach that and deal with that? So we

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 1>saw that coming a long time back, especially with a

0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:46.160
<v Speaker 1>change of people in the workforce and time crunch consumers.

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon just solved a problem for people. So we focus

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>primarily on services. Okay, so I go to see one

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of your properties and it's not gonna be necessarily selling

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>goods that competing against Amazon. It's a services, whether it's

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:04.040
<v Speaker 1>a nail salon or something along those. So primarily around food, grocery,

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:08.920
<v Speaker 1>services such as health, wellness, medical. In addition to that,

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 1>there would be you know, your financial services, ups, logistics

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and so what kind of markets attract you guys? And

0:43:15.280 --> 0:43:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I know the answer, but go ahead. So

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we focused on the southern markets primarily. Yeah, what's going

0:43:20.719 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>on is the rest of this country. Everybody's abandoning us.

0:43:23.920 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead, So well, they came from Chicago, it is

0:43:26.120 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>happening there, and so focused on fast growing markets. So

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:33.759
<v Speaker 1>we started in Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, then moved into

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Austin and also in the Phoenix market, Scottsdale all the

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:39.279
<v Speaker 1>way down to Mesic over channel all winners certainly post

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:41.719
<v Speaker 1>pandemic winners, right those are you just listed to the

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>names of the cities. So when you go into a market,

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:45.879
<v Speaker 1>what do you I mean, do you look for population growth?

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:48.759
<v Speaker 1>Does that kind of a good job growth, job job growth,

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>job growth? Yeah, okayly mobile, really looking for good strong

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>secondary school systems as well. Okay, So I'm guessing you

0:43:57.239 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>guys are like most folks in real estate interest rates sensitive.

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the market today versus you know,

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.799
<v Speaker 1>a year or two ago. Yeah, that's great deal of change,

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:09.400
<v Speaker 1>as you can imagine. But this provides the opportunity of

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 1>people know how to operate real estate versus just financial engineering.

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So who were like, who were some of the people

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.279
<v Speaker 1>maybe you were competing against, you know, when rates were

0:44:17.360 --> 0:44:21.440
<v Speaker 1>low versus kind of today, Like what happened to Who

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:23.279
<v Speaker 1>were those people and what happened to them? Well, in

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:26.759
<v Speaker 1>most cases passive investors that just bought the properties. In

0:44:26.880 --> 0:44:30.280
<v Speaker 1>our case, we have smaller centers, so it'd be local owners.

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>But passive owners versus active owners like we are. So

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 1>they're getting squeezed out of the market. It gives us

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity. So we read a lot about or at

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:40.040
<v Speaker 1>least year in New York. You know, some of the

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>big private equity funds getting into real estate. What's been

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>your experience do you run into them at all? If so,

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.680
<v Speaker 1>are they how do you compete? They don't compete in

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>our space. That's why we stayed in smaller centers. So okay,

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 1>might be a little bit more of a hands on

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>operation than a larger center, but it's benefit is right.

0:44:56.719 --> 0:45:01.640
<v Speaker 1>So when you go look for new property, what do

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you guys look for? What does your team look for? Oh?

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:05.879
<v Speaker 1>In most cases and sticking us so we use place

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:08.360
<v Speaker 1>or AI and we also use as ray as digital

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.759
<v Speaker 1>platforms to understand the communities. So we really dive into

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>our users and who's the end end user and that

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 1>allows us to find to find the most attractive locations.

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:21.840
<v Speaker 1>So what type of I mean, do you like to

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have one or do your shopping center a retail space

0:45:24.680 --> 0:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>attend of like a big kind of anchor tenant and

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 1>then you build around it. How do you like that?

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't like taking a lot of risk in

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>bake anchors. I mean there's always a difficulty if you

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:38.440
<v Speaker 1>lose a big anchor to have to re fit somebody

0:45:38.520 --> 0:45:41.080
<v Speaker 1>moving into that space. So we have a tendency to

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:43.600
<v Speaker 1>stay in the smaller shout space. So we found that

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty five hundred square feet to about three thousand square

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 1>feet is about the most interchangeable use with the widest

0:45:49.960 --> 0:45:53.280
<v Speaker 1>amount of users. So who do you tend to compete

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.920
<v Speaker 1>against a lot? Like even now? Is it other rates?

0:45:57.239 --> 0:46:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Is it just local privately owned real estate development companies?

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Who are some of your competitors? So mostly local, privately owned,

0:46:04.400 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 1>although we're starting to see some other reeds move into

0:46:06.400 --> 0:46:09.319
<v Speaker 1>our space. So if it typically if I go up

0:46:09.320 --> 0:46:13.279
<v Speaker 1>against a private, local person, presumably that person has something

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:16.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe I don't, such as local knowledge. I mean, how

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:19.279
<v Speaker 1>do you guys build that? Do you buy like said,

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:21.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to develop Phoenix? Do you just send your

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 1>team into Phoenix or do you maybe buy a team

0:46:24.560 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that's already in Phoenix that knows how know? We usually

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:30.359
<v Speaker 1>build our teams in our markets. So and very much

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:34.960
<v Speaker 1>focusing on location again, using as much analysis as possible

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:37.880
<v Speaker 1>that we can that we're provided with our platforms to understand.

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So what was your business like during the pandemic, Like

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>how did it just impact you guys? Oh, we did great.

0:46:44.719 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's counterintuitive to a lot of the national tenants.

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:50.920
<v Speaker 1>In our case, we had the highest recovery rates and

0:46:51.120 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 1>also the highest collection rates in the industry. So what

0:46:54.640 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 1>why is that? I mean, I just I would think

0:46:56.760 --> 0:47:00.040
<v Speaker 1>like just Main Street USA, Talent I live in, and

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of vacancies, a lot of company businesses went

0:47:03.800 --> 0:47:05.719
<v Speaker 1>out of business. So it was almost every third or

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>fourth or fifth store was out of business. Now that's

0:47:09.239 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>literally Main Street USA, not at a shopping center. Did

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you experience that and if so, did you get people

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>back in there? No? I found, especially in our markets,

0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.320
<v Speaker 1>people were pretty active, and in addition to that we

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>had we were pretty I'm always amazed at you know,

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>American business and especially growing entrepreneurs. They're the ones that

0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.359
<v Speaker 1>flex the first. They caught the opportunity with a lot

0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of customer switching at that point, especially at the nationals

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 1>when they're closed because they're dictated by you know, their

0:47:37.560 --> 0:47:40.239
<v Speaker 1>home office. Right. The other thing that I found really

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:43.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting through this whole thing is kind of the resilience

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of our portfolio and also the resilience of the American

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:49.279
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneur yep as We've talked about that a lot on

0:47:49.360 --> 0:47:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the show. But if you go down to Electionton Avenue

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:54.600
<v Speaker 1>right there, a lot of empty retail between fifty eighth

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and fifty nine Street. It was once it was before

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. It was full Victoria's Secret and some other

0:48:00.640 --> 0:48:03.239
<v Speaker 1>box door or something I can remember. Now there's just

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:06.959
<v Speaker 1>a chocolate store that survived the pandemic. People bought chocolate

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 1>during a pandemic in the lockdown, and a bank just

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 1>opened up on the corner. But you see town cities

0:48:11.800 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>like this, you're probably like, boy, I'm glad I'm not

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in big cities. Right. Yeah, we've avoided the big central

0:48:17.040 --> 0:48:20.480
<v Speaker 1>business districts. Again, pretty tough. The rental rates, they are

0:48:20.560 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty difficult to size space, the ability to flex to

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the user. Most of those are goods. It's a little

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult to put in a service user in those type

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of locations as well. So yeah, interesting, all right, Last question,

0:48:33.320 --> 0:48:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what's what's the growth outlook for you guys over the

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>next one to two years. Oh, I think we're well possessioned.

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean already in our markets, were over ninety percent

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 1>occupantsy in all of our markets, and I think there's

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:45.880
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of retail being built because of what

0:48:46.000 --> 0:48:48.560
<v Speaker 1>happened in the past. So things look good to come.

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh interesting, good stuff, all right, Christine, thank you. So

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>much for joining a Christine at Most Andrea Coo of

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 1>white Stone reet again, that is a publicly traded company.

0:48:57.360 --> 0:49:02.280
<v Speaker 1>WSR is the ticker or the retail space, the commercial

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>retail space. Some weakness out there and a lot of

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>big markets, and we certainly see it here in New

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:09.279
<v Speaker 1>York City, certainly in Midtown, but a lot of the

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:12.480
<v Speaker 1>country doing very well and good for them. So it's

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:14.720
<v Speaker 1>good to see some good growth out there in retail.

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:17.239
<v Speaker 1>The consumer remains a very strong consumer has a job

0:49:17.320 --> 0:49:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that's good for all things retail. Thanks for listening to

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can subscribe and listen to

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:34.799
<v Speaker 1>seventy three and on Fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:39.160
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.