WEBVTT - Best NFL Draft Props (Ep. 51)

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, everyone, and welcome back to another episode of

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the Betting Pros NFL Podcast. I'm your host, Dan Harris.

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>You can find me on Twitter at Dan Harris Adie.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>The NFL Draft is about to be here, thankfully we

0:00:20.040 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 1>will have something to focus on in this crazy world

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>that we're in. With me to break down some of

0:00:26.200 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>our favorite prop bets is my good friend Rich Ryan.

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:32.120
<v Speaker 1>You can find him over at the grid Iron Gamble

0:00:32.200 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>podcast and on Twitter at rich t Ryan.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Rich How are you gambling? It's something, right, are you?

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you going crazy on Madden simulations or anything like that?

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, I picked up NBA two K kind of

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 3>when this whole thing was starting, and I've been grinding

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 3>that a little bit. But no, the simulating, my favorite

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>is the folks that are simulating like old games. I'm

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 3>talking like NCAA basketball game, and I guess old is

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 3>a relative terms and sign. I'm in my young thirties,

0:01:05.400 --> 0:01:08.839
<v Speaker 3>but I'm talking like mid two thousands college basketball games

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 3>and just throwing it up. But yeah, you could tell

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 3>last night, recording this on a Monday morning, how thirsty

0:01:15.120 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 3>everybody was for just even a semblance of sports as

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 3>we all live. Tweeted the Michael Jordan documentary.

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty amazing though, right, I mean, I don't

0:01:25.160 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think they oversold it. It had so much hype coming

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>into it, but I think it pretty much delivered for

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the first two episodes.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 3>Oh and behind the scenes, the team that's doing this

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 3>or doing amazing work. This was supposed to be delivered

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 3>in June. Evidently the last five episodes haven't even been

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 3>completed yet in the editing bay. So the time and

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 3>effort that these guys are putting in to cut this

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 3>and something that you know, we're enjoying it now, but

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, this is gonna last, you know, many lifetimes

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 3>beyond this as kind of the the documentary about Michael Jordan.

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 3>For them to be under that time crunch is pretty incredible.

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're doing an amazing job. It really did deliver,

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>at least the first two episodes. I'm sure the rest

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>will be great. I'm excited to show it to my son,

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>who is obsessed with Lebron because he is obsessed with

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 1>all great athletes, he's pretty much a front runner. I'm

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>excited to show him, you know, teach him about Michael

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Jordan through this with you know, the the edited version

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of it, which doesn't have.

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 2>Version of I mean, he's six, so we have to

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 2>be careful.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, all of that was a nice little return

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to sports, shall we say. But now we've got something tangible,

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>We've got something real. We've got the NFL Draft.

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.239
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be weird. Okay, it's gonna be.

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Really really weird with everyone doing it remotely, everyone on

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>zoom and calls, and I'm really kind of secretly hoping

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to be various technical mishaps and stuff

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>like that, just because it'll be fun to watch. But

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>either way, everyone is going to be watching it, and

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone is finally going to have something real to gamble on.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's what we're going to do today. We're going

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about some of our favorite prop bets. We're

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be using the consensus lines as we always do.

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Over at bettingpros dot com. You can get the draft

0:03:08.600 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>props one at Bettingpros dot com slash Draft hyphen props.

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>You can see there's a whole range of things, as

0:03:14.480 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Rich will also be doing. You know, you

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>can do specific players or teams or whatever you want

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>to do. So we're gonna go through just a few

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of our favorite ones here and we'll see what happens

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>out of curiosity. Rich you correct me if I'm wrong,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>and please don't take this the wrong way. You've been

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:33.079
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast several times. You are a Jets van.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Correct?

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately, Yes, as am I. So I mean named after

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 3>the great Richard Todd. A lifetime of misery. Yeah, my

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 3>father is an insane person, somehow convincing my mom to

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.600
<v Speaker 3>name me Richard Todd Ryan. But yes, a lifetime of

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 3>misery thirty two years so far, and a lifetime beyond

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 3>this undoubtedly.

0:03:56.120 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Well I've got thirty nine, so I'm beating you there.

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, out of here, do any of your favorite

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>props have to do with the Jets.

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 4>I had to come on, I had to Jets.

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Then we'll save it. Then we'll save it. That's fine.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I was going to ask you whether or not you

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>had anything fun if they weren't one of your props,

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but I assumed you were going there.

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 2>So anyway, you can start us off Jets or not.

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>But what's your first one that you're looking at here?

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 3>So this part of draft season is very intriguing to

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 3>me because if you take the long view, if you

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 3>look at the predictability of the draft. At the beginning,

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 3>there's two axises, right, there's player evaluation and then they're sourcing.

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.359
<v Speaker 3>And as we progress through this process and get closer

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 3>to the draft, the sourcing element of this, in my opinion,

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 3>becomes more important than the player evaluation because these reporters,

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 3>these beat guys, they do a great job of talking

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:50.880
<v Speaker 3>to people within organizations. That's why sometimes you see betting

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 3>odds so high. I mean, just look at Burrow and

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Chase at the beginning of the draft, Chase Young. The

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 3>odds are astronomy that they're going to be selected in

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the places they are, and a lot of that has

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 3>to do with the fact that these organizations have tipped

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 3>their hand or they've been transparent to a reporter or

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 3>two throughout this process. And in the last couple of days,

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>it seems quite evident that the NFL is quite cold

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>on to a Taga Viola. And that's the last time

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I'll attempt his surname on this.

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Just to be clear, I'm very impressed that you did

0:05:28.800 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it even once, because I just I don't know, two

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>months ago. I mean, I can do it because I

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have to be able to do it, but I have

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.360
<v Speaker 1>just completely stopped lest I mess it up. So I've

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>just been to it so already. The fact that he

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>did it once, I'm impressed.

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 3>And it's it's not the wonderlick, right. That whole story

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 3>is a bit of a clown show. He took it

0:05:49.160 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen, got a thirteen. He just retook it.

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 3>He scored a nineteen. The average is a twenty. So

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.480
<v Speaker 3>let's get that crappy narrative out of here.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Also, by the way, just to be clear, I mean

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson. Realize that Lamar Jackson is primarily a runner,

0:06:04.000 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>but he also scored a thirteen. So even if that

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>were the case, I thought it was completely overblown personally.

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>But yes, it's either way, it's been essentially debunked.

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so let's get that out of here. It's more

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 3>to do with the hip and the medical and during

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:23.560
<v Speaker 3>these crazy times, how uncertain NFL teams are surrounding him. So,

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.760
<v Speaker 3>based upon the evidence that I'm seeing from reporters and

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 3>sourcing and not the player evaluation, the first prop bet

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 3>that I'm going to offer is Tua as the third

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 3>quarterback drafted at plus one point fifty. I think it's

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 3>quite clear that he is going to quote unquote fall now,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 3>whether that be to eighteen, which I saw one Detroit

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Free Press writer say yesterday their sources were alluding to.

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about that, but him falling to even six,

0:06:58.000 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 3>to that spot to the Chargers would be a precipitous

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>fall from where we thought two was going to be

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:06.359
<v Speaker 3>selected just a few weeks ago. So I'm going to

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 3>lead it off quarterback, the most sexy position, Tua going

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>third at plus one hundred.

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 2>So I do like it. I'm buying this.

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, everything that's coming out, and again you talked

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>about it, that's part of what we're doing. I mean,

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe with the Jets, but other than that, will probably

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 1>basically be breaking this down as a lot more sourcing

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to what we think maybe should happen or

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, who we think is the best and stuff

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 1>like that, because that's really irrelevant when you're talking about

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>draft props. What we want doesn't matter. But yeah, I'm

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>buying this. I don't think eighteen. I did see that

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 1>as well, that that tweet that came out. I'm not

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>buying that either, But I think as a third one

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just gonna point this out and believe me,

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>this is in no way faulting you whatsoever, because this

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.280
<v Speaker 1>has happened to me six times today to talk.

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>About where we are, which is why.

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You really need to move as soon as you get

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>an inkling on what you want to do. The consensus

0:07:57.480 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>odds right now have dropped to even on to A

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>being the third quarterback, and you had it at plus

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:05.520
<v Speaker 1>one fifty. I believe it's now even. I still see.

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at the various books. You can get it

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>at plus one fifteen at william Hill, plus one ten

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>at points Bet. But for the most part it's down

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to even because that's probably what's going to happen at

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this point.

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:16.960
<v Speaker 2>So I like it.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So I have a tuo prop as well. I'm going

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to throw it in here to get on with you.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I agree that'd be one that I would go at

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>for me if I'm going to get a little I

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Let's call it sexier to the extent you

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>can invoke sexier when you're talking about the Jaguars. I'm

0:08:32.080 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>going to go to to the Jaguars, which currently is

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.839
<v Speaker 1>at plus five hundred. It was at you right. You

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>can get it higher at various places. You can get

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 1>at plus seven hundred at a variety spots. But I'm

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>buying the talk of him sliding for sure. I think

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that that's true. And you know, I'm just not sure

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.839
<v Speaker 1>at this point that you really want to risk if

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you're the Dolphins, if you're the Chargers, if you really

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.079
<v Speaker 1>want to risk that spot. I mean, there are a

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of quarterbacks this draft. You know, they're varying levels

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>of confidence in how good their careers are going to be.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you're gonna take him at five, take him

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 1>at six, you've got to be really confident that this

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>guy is going to be able to succeed in the NFL.

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>And with all the stuff that's.

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Going on, especially in his short term but all the

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>reports going on about his health, I think he is

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna slide. And so that's why I do like your bet.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But where is he going to slide to? To me, man,

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>it is just hard to see him getting past the

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Jags at nine if he does, because the Jaguars are

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>not competing this year. If ever, there was essentially an

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>outright tank that's basically what they're doing. And I know

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they have minshoes, So he's certainly the quote unquote answer

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in the short term, but it's a splash. Man con

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>likes to make the splash. It's long term.

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 2>He can look that way.

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>It would you know, whether you know, bring fans, which

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 1>may not be happening this year, but it would garner

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>more interest in the team. So to me, at nine

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>with the jagsonding there, that's just where I think who

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>is gonna wind up going If he does fall now,

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, he still could go six to the Chargers.

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>The Chargers could trade up to get Herbert, and he

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>could go five to the Dolphins. You know, who knows

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>at this point. But for me, you know, if you're

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>getting you know, plus five hundred, it wasn't as great.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I got it when it was plus seven hundred, and

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you can still get that at some places. But at

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 1>plus five hundred to the Jags, that's still one and

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm willing to, you know, dip my toes in the

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:25.679
<v Speaker 1>water a little bit.

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:25.960 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Evan Silva, the famed Evan Silva, who I believe had

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 3>the third most accurate mock draft last year according to

0:10:31.880 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 3>you guys at Fantasy Pros, has this to a going

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 3>to the Jags at nine and logically, it makes sense

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 3>if you were to slip past that five and six

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 3>spot the Dolphins and Chargers respectively. Look the Panthers, It's

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 3>not like Teddy Bridgewater is the best, but they gave.

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Him a ton of money.

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think the Cardinals are going to Josh Rosen

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Kyler Murray. I think we can sidestep back. And then

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 3>you look at the Jags and it doesn't seem like

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 3>there's a consensus even between the sourced members of the

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 3>community as to what they're gonna do with that ninth pick.

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 3>And you mentioned Sead his son is a very analytical guy.

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 3>Runs Fulham Football club over in England as well. Loves

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 3>things like DVOA and football outsiders, which you might not

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:24.079
<v Speaker 3>think of when you think of the Jags, and now

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 3>they've performed as of late, but a very analytical team

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 3>running that football division. And it wouldn't shock me to

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 3>see them quote unquote punt on this year to rehab

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 3>somebody as talented as Tua Can.

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I throw another real curveball out at you and just

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>want to know what you think of this. Is there

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 1>any chance am I just being crazy? What about for

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Tua in this specific team? What about the Pats at

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 1>plus two thousand. I mean, look, they are, you know,

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>apparently going with Stidham, but they don't get the chance

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to draft one of these great quarterbacks. They did wind

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>up with Jimmy, who they of course traded away, and

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of course everybody knows how late they got Brady. But

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't get the chance to draft a guy like

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this if you're the Patriots, because unless you're willing to

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>forego all your draft capital, they probably would have to

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.079
<v Speaker 1>trade up to do it. You know, even with him

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sliding ta teen, they need to trade up. But you

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>can trade up. They have a lot of picks this here.

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>You can trade up without giving up that much any

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>chance there? Or is that something too crazy for you?

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 4>It just doesn't seem like something Bill would do. Trading back?

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Is this mantra He's He's understood faster than anybody that

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 3>the NFL draft is about darts, and as many darts

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.319
<v Speaker 3>as you can throw, the more successful you're going to

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.080
<v Speaker 3>be the king of trading back. And I just don't

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 3>see him packaging equity to move up. I also think,

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 3>and too Bill's credit all the success that he's had.

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:50.840
<v Speaker 3>I think he's a bit arrogant as to who could

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 3>succeed on his team in this system. They really seem

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 3>to peoples that full steam ahead with this Stidham thing,

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 3>which any other of the thirty one organizations it would

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:02.960
<v Speaker 3>seem mind blowing.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 4>But right, could Bill do it? I don't know.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe Matt Castle in eleven and five.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>No, enough with the Matt Castle thing, all right, when

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you if you give Stidham, Randy Moss and Wes Welker,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about it. But right now, especially with what

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they have at wide receiver, you know, I always I

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 1>always think about that this year is gonna be fascinating

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with the Patriots anyway, just to see. But yeah, I

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and the inkling of of sort of maybe

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that could happen or something, because again I don't necessarily

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>think that it would require that much draft capital to

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>move up. I'm talking if he slips and if somehow

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 1>he slips past the Jags at nine, maybe they don't

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 1>want to do it.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe they love Minchu Mania, you know.

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>If he if he does slid it slip into the

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>late teens, I feel like it might not take all

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that much to move up. But again I'm trying to

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>have some fun. Okay, we've got you know, this the

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>one thing that we can really bet on. But anyway,

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>all right, so we've both got our Toua props out

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of the way, which he had to figure we'd both

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 1>have at least one.

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>What's your next one?

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 3>We yeah, just real quick, if you think we're both

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 3>way off base, if you think the player evaluation is

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 3>so strong that there's no oh shot that these teams

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 3>are going to pass up a talent like to despite

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 3>the hip injury and despite some of the confusion as

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 3>to his medical I think the pivot there is to

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 3>a going third at plus five hundred. If these teams

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:16.560
<v Speaker 3>are still in love with him, that trade is there

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 3>to be made with Detroit. So that's if you think

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 3>we're wrong. Value is probably there to a third overall

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 3>plus five hundred, but I'm going to go to another

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 3>player third overall. And this is kind of like when

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 3>you build your Super Bowl props. You think of a

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 3>story as to away the game is going to go,

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 3>and then you select your props based upon that to

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 3>try to get full leverage. And if I believe that

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 3>the to A market is cold and that he will

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 3>drop and no teams will be trading up for Justin

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 3>Herbert because the whole market's cold. There's no reason to

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 3>jump up to get Herbert. I'm gonna take Jeff Okuda

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 3>as the third player selected. Plus one twenty five is

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the consensus odds. It's plus one fifty on DraftKings. If

0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 3>you want to do a little price shopping the Detroit Lions.

0:15:02.800 --> 0:15:05.080
<v Speaker 2>It just moved, By the way, this is not a joke.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I looked at this because it's part of one of

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.880
<v Speaker 1>my recommendations, which I'll get into in a second. But

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it just moved back to one fifty the consensus line.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:13.440
<v Speaker 2>So there you go.

0:15:13.480 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>But it was at plus one twenty five an hour ago.

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that's a really great lesson in terms

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of trying to, you know, make sure a lot of

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this stuff as more information is coming out. By the way,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>this one maybe not because it's back and forth, but

0:15:26.560 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of you know, the bets that I'm gonna recommend,

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, three days ago, you know, the price was

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was much better that you could get them now because

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of all the intel that's coming out. But this is

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 1>one again that's not I don't think that's necessarily specific.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 2>The difference between one fifty and one twenty five.

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Not a huge deal here in this context, at least

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for for everything that you're hearing. But that is a

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>good lesson that you should always be shopping for the

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:53.320
<v Speaker 1>best line anyway, Go ahead, Okudah third plus one fifty.

0:15:53.360 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the lines tore apart their secondary. Traded Quandre Digs

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 3>mid season to the Seahawks last year, traded Darius Lays

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles in the off season. Here, from what scouts

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 3>are saying, this Ohio State kid is just a plug

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and play starting cornerback in the league. No worries sticking

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 3>him in as a starter right away, Patricia defensive guy.

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 3>The fit seems really appropriate for that team.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 3>And again this is all based upon nobody trading up

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 3>for a quarterback, which if two is sliding, I think

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 3>will happen. So yeah, give me Okudah thitter overall plus

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 3>one fifty now.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Yes, one fifty, even better than you were recommending. H Yeah,

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's probably gonna wind up being the pick.

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I think Okuda is gonna probably go to the Lions,

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's probably gonna be at three. But I will

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>say that I have another possibility here, and based on

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the price, I kind of like it, and that's Derek Brown.

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Now I've got I've got two here with Derek Brown. Okay,

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got him going at three, which is at plus

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>seven hundred. Although no, all right, so this is that

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>refrigitimate legitimately, this is probably what is happening, and this

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>probably explains why the odds on Okudah are better. Right

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:09.920
<v Speaker 1>before we went on this podcast, right before, I looked

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>at the odds to make sure I had the most

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>recent odds, and I did, and Derek Brown was at

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 1>plus seven hundred to go third overall.

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>He's now at.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Plus five hundred, and I think that that's probably why

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the corresponding move is to Okudah. Going from plus one

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty five to plus one fifty is necessarily although actually

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that might even not make it. But regardless that Brown

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is now at plus five hundred to go third overall,

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.879
<v Speaker 1>because I think there's some buzz about him potentially going

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to the lines.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:44.159
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look, they need a cornerback.

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>As you adequately laid out, but they have also not goodness,

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 1>please don't act like this is a comparison, but they

0:17:52.119 --> 0:17:54.639
<v Speaker 1>have Desmond Trufon. It's not like they just gave away Sleigh,

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so they did add somebody they need help on defense.

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>I know sacks last year twenty eight. I believe total

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they need somebody who can rush the rush of the passer.

0:18:02.000 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Brown is getting a lot of buzz right now going on.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So I could see, you know, in a in a

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>relatively deep cornerback draft, I could see the Lions basically saying,

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we're gonna not even training away themselves,

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>staying at three and taking Brown. It's at plus five hundred.

0:18:17.680 --> 0:18:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't love it quite as much with that. I

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>liked it when it was at plus seven hundred. But

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>the other Brown one, I'm gonna say, and I'm gonna

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>need to check to make sure this hasn't moved either,

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:27.160
<v Speaker 1>because this has been moving crazy.

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Is under pick eight and a half.

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So it was when I checked at minus one seventy seven.

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>That's still a pretty steep price, but a couple of

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>days ago it was at minus one thirty four, so

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you could have gotten it there in our consensus lines.

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.600
<v Speaker 1>But for me, I think there's a really good shot

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that the Lions take them at three. Even if they don't,

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just really hard to see him getting past pick eight.

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>You've got Carolina at seven, they obviously need to revamp

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 1>their defense. You've got Arizona at eight, and this is

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 1>moving on this number eight and a half pretty big

0:18:57.480 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>going on. So there's a lot of buzz around Brown,

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>whether be a three, whether it be at seven, whether

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>it be at eight. The line is at eight and

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a half. So for me, I would put some even

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 1>at plus five hundred, which is not nearly as good

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>on Brown going third overall, and I'd also put you know,

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a bigger bet. It's minus one seventy seven on Brown

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>going before pick eight and a half.

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the price isn't as great, but the move should

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 3>instill some confidence, right, The late move is always the

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 3>right move.

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. Hold on.

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna check as we talk right now, just to

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:30.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure because if this moved even more, I'm gonna

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be really upset. No, Okay, it's still minus one seventy seven,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>but the over has moved to plus one forty five,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a bigger move as well. So yeah, I mean,

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason that the juice moves the way it is,

0:19:41.520 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's because of the same intel that Rich and

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I are talking about. So anyway, so that's for me,

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I could see Brown going at three. I kind of

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 1>liking that right now. Though again, at plus five hundred,

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:52.959
<v Speaker 1>that's not good enough at this point unless something major

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>leaks out. But certainly under eight and a half is

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>something I feel confident. All right, what do you got next?

0:19:58.160 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 2>All right? Well?

0:19:58.760 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 4>He finished.

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 3>I reference this earlier the Fantasy Pro's mock draft rankings.

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 3>He finished in the fifties.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 4>A lot of people.

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Don't like him. He's got a good impersonation. But mel

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Kiper knows things about the New York Football Giants. He

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 3>had Daniel Jones going to them last year. Everybody thought

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 3>he was crazy. And once again, the Giants are selecting high.

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Once again, Dave Gettlman refuses to trade backwards because that's

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:31.600
<v Speaker 3>something that he will seemingly never do.

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>He's got the binder, though, Man, he's got that giant

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>binder on his desk. Why trade back you have all

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the information you need.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 3>And once again, mel Kiper's going off the board with

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 3>the Giants pick. Everybody thinks, and this is probably correct,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 3>they should go offensive lineman. Ye, he's got Isaiah Simmons,

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 3>the versatile linebacker from Clemson, do it all guy. He

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:57.160
<v Speaker 3>could even sneak back and play box safety. And right

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 3>now that price is plus three to fifty and as

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 3>we noted, while I was doing research this morning, it

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 3>was plus four hundred, So the market is moving in

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 3>the other direction. Why would the Giants not select an

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 3>offensive lineman when they have so much equity in Barkley

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 3>and Daniel Jones. I don't know, but mel Kiper seems

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 3>to have the finger on the pulse of Dave Gettlelman.

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 3>So give me Isaiah Simmons first Giants player selected.

0:21:21.480 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, that just blows a hole in my

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>next one, but you know whatever, that's fine, all right.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 1>So Kuiper has come out with it, and okay, he's

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>got his finger on.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 2>The pulse if you want to say that.

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Look I had You know, it doesn't have to be

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>the Giants, but I was thinking it would be the Giants.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't necessarily blow it up. But I was going

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to have the first offensive lineman drafted as Jedrick Wills

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>at minus one twenty. And to me, you know, you've

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.760
<v Speaker 1>got the four big offensive linemen right now, right, You've

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 1>got Wills, You've got Werfs, you've got Thomas, you've got

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Becken Beckden probably is going to be the last of

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the group, you assume now with his off the field issues,

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>you really got the big three.

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 2>You can go any which way with it.

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Wurfs's is plus one pint eighty right now,

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Thomas's plus four hundred. Unless I've missed something again in

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.479
<v Speaker 1>the last ten minutes. That's sort of changing these odds.

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was going to go to the Giants. Now, look,

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>mel Kuipers, there are a million mock drafts, and yeah,

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't that accurate last year or anything like that.

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>That's not going to change us early the way I feel.

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But the odds are moving. If the juice is moving,

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that that could indicate something. But to me, look, it

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as him as Will's going to the Giants.

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 2>They've got the whole Alabama, you know.

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Patriots jojud sort of connection which has always seemed to work.

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>You draft a franchise quarterback, you really need to protect them.

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, Simmons would do a lot for their team.

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 1>They need help pretty much everywhere, but you really need

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>help on the offensive line, and to me, Will's is

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>really the guy, and the odds again with the intel,

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 1>have been moving towards Wills lately. They really they've they've

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>just got to do something in the end, even if

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't, even if they don't. Okay, so we're talking

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's gonna go number four, not saying he's

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>necessarily going to go to the Giants, just that he's

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the first guy drafted. If the Giants do go to Simmons,

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the next one up would probably be.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 2>My guess is Arizona.

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>They'd probably be looking at something they really need to

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>shore up their right tackle. Right they've got Humphreys on

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the left. He could slide right in there. He wouldn't

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 1>need to learn a new position or anything like that.

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>He knows exactly how to play it. So for me,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I think he's going to be the first guy off

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the board. I'm still sticking with my prediction that it's

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.439
<v Speaker 1>going to be on the Giants. But even if not,

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I still think that he's going to go before Wurf's

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and Thomas, who I think will probably go two and three.

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 3>Look, everything you're saying makes a lot of sense. You know,

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.119
<v Speaker 3>if I was in that position, I would either be

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 3>trading back or securing that offensive line as well. When

0:23:47.320 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 3>I've got Daniel Jones and Saquon Barkley.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:55.959
<v Speaker 1>But you're not tave Gettleman, Gettleman. No, I get it,

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I get it, you know, and again you don't. You

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>don't need the Giants to take them to be right

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>on this pick. Right, I mean, I'm assuming that they're

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna but even if not, I think Wills is a

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>guy who look, they're all really really good. Okay, the

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>big four, they're all really good. Any one of them

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>can step right into the NFL and play probably an

0:24:14.560 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>elite level. But to me, I think Wills is you know,

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>whether you know Worf's may be a little more polished,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but especially you know, he can he can step right

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in at right tackle and be ready to go from

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>day one. So it's hard to see him getting past

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to me Arizona if he goes there, And I don't

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think somebody's gonna be selected before that. So I'm still

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>good with Will's first offensive linemen selected at minus one twenty.

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Let's keep it on the offensive lineman trained, okay, and

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I will take the over on six and a half's

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 3>offensive linemen selected in the first round. This is the

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 3>first bet that I'm offering where you're paying a little

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 3>bit of juice minus one p fifty five is the

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 3>consensus odds. But you brought up the first and most

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 3>important part of this to me is that not only

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 3>are those top four worfs Willis, Becton Thomas probably going

0:24:59.840 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 3>to in the first round, They're probably gonna go in

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.719
<v Speaker 3>the first half of the first round. So then we

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.399
<v Speaker 3>only need to sneak through three more guys in the

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 3>last sixteen picks. And there's a handful of offensive lineman

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 3>where you have to pay juice on DraftKings to bet

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 3>that they will be drafted in the first round. The

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 3>highest amounts of juice you're paying are minus five hundred

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.960
<v Speaker 3>for Austin Jackson and minus three thirty five for Josh Jones.

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 3>And then you have Caesar Ruiz, Ezra Cleveland and Isaiah

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 3>Wilson that you have to pay juice for, as well

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 3>a lot of offensive line needy teams in the middle

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 3>late selections of the first round, Dolphins, Vikings, Seahawks, and

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 3>I would even lump in the Titans and Ravens in there. Yeah,

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 3>who lost to Conklin to the Browns for the Titans

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 3>and then yonda to retirement for the Ravens. So offensive

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 3>line is so important even good teams. It always helps you.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Speaker 3>Look at the Eagles last year, if they went strength

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 3>on strength by selecting a leftie even though they already

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 3>had Jason Peters at the position. I think you can't

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>go wrong by selecting some of these guys. And yeah,

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I like the over round six and a half.

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't disagree with it. And I think you

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:14.840
<v Speaker 1>bring up a really good point, which has again the

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 1>big four. Yeah, they're all going to be gone in

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 1>the first half of the draft, so you really only

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>need three more. Everybody needs offensive lineman. It's a good

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.399
<v Speaker 1>draft for it. It's a deep draft, so I like it,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna be willing to pay so much more

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on this next one that I'm gonna go to. And again,

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you a little bit of an offshoot

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 1>for it, and that's under four and a half quarterbacks

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in the first round. Now you know the big three,

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about them already. You assume Jordan Love is

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna go in the first round, So then you've

0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:47.959
<v Speaker 1>got Easen You've got from I like Hurts personally, I mean,

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got a lot of upside, but they're

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to go in the first round. Now, look,

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows that, which is why the odds are astronomical.

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>It's minus five sixty for the under, so let's talk

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. You're winning eighteen dollars essentially on one hundred

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars bet, so that's not really something that's gonna wow anything.

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's as safe as they come. But

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna throw out another one because of that, and

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>that's Jordan Love over pick nineteen and a half.

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 2>That's at minus one seventy seven, So that's still just

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty good.

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't love Jordan Love, to put it frankly, and

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I again, I know this is much more about the

0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 1>intel that you know we're getting from teams, and there

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a little bit mixed here with Love.

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But for me, it just I cannot see him going

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that early. There's really one possibility absent somebody training up

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for him, which I really don't think, and that's the Raiders,

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>who would be at nineteen. And I just don't think

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that that's what the Raiders are gonna do right now.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I know they're not in love with car. They do

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have Mariota, but they're a competitive team right now. I

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>think they're over under a seven and a half. You

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>can obviously see them beating that pretty easily if things

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>go right.

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>They've got two.

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Picks, you know, in the time, so they can add

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 1>two real playmakers to help them this year. So I

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 1>really don't think that that's gonna happen. So after that,

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got the Jags at twenty if if

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't go with Tua and nine. In

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>my one of my earlier selections, you've maybe the Patriots

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is twenty three, but either way, all that's going to

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>be past pick twenty.

0:28:18.320 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 2>So it's really for me.

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't see a team training up to get Jordan Love,

0:28:21.880 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 1>so it's really for me whether or not the Raiders

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to take them in nineteen, and I just

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty confident given you know, the Raiders were,

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, somehow in playoff contention all last year. They're

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna and that was with Antonio Brown dropping out right

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>before the season started. So right now they get a

0:28:38.480 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>little more time to prep. Of course, they've already got

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Mariota as their backup or you know, whatever you want

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to call it.

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 2>QUB competition. You've got two top twenty picks.

0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's something where they're going to be able

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to possibly make some Nois this year, and I think

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that's where they're going to be focused on rather than

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>their quarterback.

0:28:53.800 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Of the future.

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>So for me, give me over nineteen and a half

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love and that is minus one seventy seven.

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I like both of these. I mean, in what

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 3>world are hurts or Easan going in the first round

0:29:06.360 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 3>just doesn't seem likely whatsoever. And but that juice is

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 3>it's grossy, it's crazy.

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're not you You're risking one hundred dollars

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to win eighteen. That's crazy. And again that's been getting worse.

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But I mean that it's a crazy bet. But still,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is something that it's pretty much as

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>much of a lock as you could have coming into this.

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 3>And with regards to Jordan Love, look, he's a project.

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 3>You know, he's he's got tools, but he misses layups.

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 3>And you cannot be a starting quarterback in the NFL

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 3>if you miss your layups. And which one of these

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 3>teams is positioned to take a project? We're in a

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 3>really weird space right now in the NFL. I think

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 3>the first time in my lifetime where the supply of

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 3>quarterbacks is outpacing the demand from these teams. Guys Jameis

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 3>Winston and Cam Newton don't have a job. Andy Dalton

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 3>is a lane duck quarterback who the Bengals are having

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 3>trouble giving away. So if you're going to take a

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 3>project like Jordan Love, you don't have to spend first

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 3>round equity on it. And I think these teams are

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 3>going to realize that.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that's the thing.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna go below nineteen and a half, I mean,

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>none of the teams who are picking at that spot

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 1>need a quarterback, you know, even if you go you know,

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you got you know, the Browns.

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 2>The Jets, You've got the Raiders.

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Of course, as we just said, the forty nine Ers,

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks, the Broncos, the Falcons, none of them is

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in the market at this point for a quarterback.

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 2>So I don't.

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>See any way that he's going to go, you know,

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>under twenty. So again, it's minus one seventy seven. It's

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>not like you're getting a particularly good price on it.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But I again, I feel pretty confident that that's how

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna it's gonna shake out. All right, what do

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>you got for your next one?

0:30:46.080 --> 0:30:47.800
<v Speaker 4>All right, let's go j Ets.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I've been waiting for it.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Their first pick is going to be an offensive lineman.

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 3>I've been going back and forth as a fan. Would

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I love to see Jerry Judy Ceee Lamb in a

0:30:58.240 --> 0:30:58.959
<v Speaker 3>Jets Jersey?

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely? I would.

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 3>We need to get Sam Darnold some weapons. But everybody's

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 3>been banging the drum for months that this is the

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 3>deepest wide receiver draft they've ever seen, So we can

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 3>probably and I say the Royal wee, we can probably

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 3>address the position later in the draft, even in the

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 3>second round, with guys like Denzel Mims, Chase Claypool. I mean,

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:28.280
<v Speaker 3>this wide receiver class is fantastic. Joe Douglas, former offensive

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 3>lineman GM understands the need to solidify the position. Connor McGovern,

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Greg Van Rotten, they're nice, but they're both interior linemen.

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 3>Greg fant He's not the answer at left tackle. So

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I like the Jets first pick offensive lineman plus one hundred,

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:48.959
<v Speaker 3>and I'll add to that that I like them getting

0:31:49.680 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Andrew Thomas. I like the price at plus six hundred.

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 3>My only worry is what you brought up about the

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.960
<v Speaker 3>off field issue for Beck, maybe Thomas going a little

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 3>abecton and Thomas going a little higher than people were

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 3>thinking right now. But I mean, the fit's perfect right

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 3>tackle early at Georgia had to flip when Isaiah Winn

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 3>was drafted. Two great seasons at left tackle. And people

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:18.200
<v Speaker 3>that play mad and think that you can just switch

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 3>tackle position that easily, but it's literally like going from

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 3>left handed to right handed. Your entire brain has to swap.

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 3>So versatile player, excellent player, and frankly, i'd love for

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 3>him to land with the Jets.

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's any chance about Worf's landing there

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 1>or what?

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Certainly, but I just Worf's wills. They all seem to

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:45.240
<v Speaker 3>be a little interchangeable, with Worf's being the preferred choice

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:51.360
<v Speaker 3>of the three. It probably comes down to Worf's and

0:32:52.480 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Thomas at this spot. But basically I'm just taking the

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 3>highest odds here. With Thomas getting plus six.

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 2>On the spot, well, Worfs is plus seven hundred.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, put a little on both, just hedge a

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit, just to make sure you're gonna get one

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>or the other.

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's actually an excellent hedge. Yeah, yeah, because it

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 3>seems you brought up the Willis pick earlier, and Willis

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 3>is steaming towards certainly being the first offensive lineman. Take

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 3>him and with the Beckton news, with him potentially dropping

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 3>yeah at plus seven hundred. Yeah, that's a that's a

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 3>that's a really good strategy to sprinkle a little bit

0:33:27.960 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 3>on both and hope that one of them lands with

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 3>the Jets.

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think if the Jets are gonna

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they are going to go offensive lineman.

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 2>I agree at this point.

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it would be exciting to get one of

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the wide receivers, but you mentioned it is a really,

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>really really deep class for wide receivers, so I think

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:45.200
<v Speaker 1>going offensive lineman again.

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, as you know, we'll see if Dave Gettleman understands.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 2>But you know, you need to protect your your franchise quarterbacks.

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 2>So I do like that. So I'm gonna go.

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, man, I hate to do this because it's

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be around one play. Everybody's gonna have to

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>hang on till the second day, but that's going to

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:07.080
<v Speaker 1>be the first tight end drafted. Now, the consensus pick

0:34:07.080 --> 0:34:10.000
<v Speaker 1>here is Comet, right, He's at minus two hundred for

0:34:10.160 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it and is over underpick is about I think it's

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:13.720
<v Speaker 1>forty four and a half.

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 2>So I mean that's fine.

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>But you know, once you get past the first round,

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just craziness. I don't think anybody can really predict

0:34:20.600 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen. I mean, nobody can predict the first round,

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but once you get past the first round, it's really

0:34:26.760 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a free for all.

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Comet's great, he's got a good future.

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:33.239
<v Speaker 1>He's young. I mean he's twenty one. He's not a

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>great blocker, and he probably is. And you know, the

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>odds are that he's going to be the number one,

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:41.239
<v Speaker 1>But for me, I kind of like the odds a

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:44.799
<v Speaker 1>little bit better. With Alberto going, I can try to

0:34:44.800 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>pronounce his last name Okuwei Bunham. I think everybody, you know,

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>even even the broadcasters, call him Albert. Oh, so I'm gonna, like,

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:55.239
<v Speaker 1>like Tua, I'm sticking with Alberto, just so I don't

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>have to mangle the name every time. So for Alberto

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to be the first Titan draft, and that's plus eight hundred,

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you can get that higher at a bunch of different books.

0:35:04.680 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>That's just the constant side of plus eight hundred. He's

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a complete frequent nature right six five two fifty eight.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 1>He ran a four forty nine forty at the combine

0:35:14.200 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>where he really kind of upped his stock. And again,

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been plagued by these shoulder injuries while

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>at Missouri and especially last year, which kind of dinged

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the stock. But you know, once you're past that first round,

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>no rookie tight ends really make that much of an

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>impact almost never, you know, occasionally Evan Ingram, of course,

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but for the most part they don't. And I think

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for the biggest upside, just you know,

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>he's so incredibly athletic that when you get there, he's

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the type of guy who I think teams are going

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:46.439
<v Speaker 1>to be looking for a little potentially more than comet. Again,

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the odds are comet. If you were saying the odds

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:51.479
<v Speaker 1>on on both words the same, of course, i'd lean commet.

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>But a plus eight hundred, and again that was a

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.160
<v Speaker 1>little higher, you know, a few days ago, so I

0:35:55.200 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>think there might be a little buzz. I'm gonna go

0:35:58.040 --> 0:35:59.960
<v Speaker 1>with Albert oh As the first tight end taken at

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 1>plus eight hundred.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not a lot of love for this tight end

0:36:03.480 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 3>class in general. You talked about that under four and

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 3>a half quarterback number, big juice on that zero tight

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 3>ends will be taken in the first round. I should

0:36:12.560 --> 0:36:17.480
<v Speaker 3>say under zero point five to be specific, minus eight thirty.

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 3>So another one that if you can stomach it, right,

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 3>if you're trying to cash in on something that seems

0:36:24.440 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 3>pretty clear.

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I haven't seen it tight mocked in like the top

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 4>forty even.

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I mean comet is the is the lowest,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.239
<v Speaker 1>and he's forty four and a half, and you know,

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably take the over on that, you know, But

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.440
<v Speaker 1>either way, there's no first round tight ends. It's almost

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:43.279
<v Speaker 1>a guarantee if there you know, if there is, I'm

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 1>just gonna throw my hands up. But for the most part,

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the safest bets that you can make.

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 2>All Right, what do you got next to?

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:49.799
<v Speaker 4>All Right?

0:36:50.520 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 3>So I mentioned it briefly in my Jets soliloquy that

0:36:55.680 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 3>this is one of the deepest wide receiver class or

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 3>so that's what we've been told, and I think we're

0:37:00.960 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 3>going to see that even depress the values of the

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:09.359
<v Speaker 3>higher end receivers. Couple that with some of the love

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 3>that Ruggs has been getting as of late for his

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 3>speed and athleticism, and I think that there's a chance

0:37:17.239 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 3>that Ceedee Lamb goes a little later than expected. I

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:26.880
<v Speaker 3>think he's a dynamic player, I mean, just unbelievably athletic

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 3>for his size, his ability to go up and get

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the ball.

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:33.640
<v Speaker 4>But I just with.

0:37:33.800 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 3>These teams knowing that there's going to be value in

0:37:36.400 --> 0:37:38.399
<v Speaker 3>the back end of the draft, I can see them

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:44.280
<v Speaker 3>talking themselves into addressing other areas instead of selecting receivers.

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 3>So I'll take the over on twelve and a half

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 3>at plus one point fifteen. Landing spots that look pretty

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.800
<v Speaker 3>good for him are the Broncos. I mean, if the

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 3>Niners go Galaxy Brain at thirteen, that would be pretty fantastic.

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.399
<v Speaker 3>And really the only team that worries me, if I'm

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.839
<v Speaker 3>going to be honest, is the Raiders at twelve. So

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 3>this feels like a coin flip to me. But at

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:07.799
<v Speaker 3>plus one fifteen, I'm getting a bit of a weight

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 3>at edge, So I'll take the weight at edge and

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 3>hope that Ceedee Lamb goes past the Raiders at twelve.

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.200
<v Speaker 2>So I know what that you're thinking.

0:38:17.239 --> 0:38:19.640
<v Speaker 1>The Jets are going to go offensive line, but obviously

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.319
<v Speaker 1>there's another position that the Jets have been rumored to

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 1>be in and that is wide receiver.

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, is that?

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you firmly convinced that the Jets are going offensive

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>line here? You don't think there's any way they go

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver? And if they do, do you think it's

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be another one other than Lamb or are

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:35.880
<v Speaker 1>you just basically saying no, forget it. The Jets at

0:38:36.200 --> 0:38:39.399
<v Speaker 1>eleven are not taking a wide receiver. They're going offensive line,

0:38:39.400 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not concerned about them.

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:44.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm fairly confident that the Jets are gonna go O line.

0:38:44.719 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 3>It's just the stars seem to be aligned in that

0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 3>direction and ahead of them. I think the only wild

0:38:52.480 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 3>card really is the Jags. And I honestly couldn't tell

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 3>you what the hell the Jags are doing, so I

0:38:59.640 --> 0:39:03.319
<v Speaker 3>don't no. Are they gonna address the fact that they

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 3>lost Kalais Campbell. They have so many holes on this

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 3>roster that Brown if you were to fall, and even

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:14.920
<v Speaker 3>Javon Kinlaw are good fits as well. Yeah, the Jags

0:39:15.680 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 3>could take anybody at nine, which is kind of why

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:18.799
<v Speaker 3>I love your two.

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, come on, they can do anything. Take two if

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:24.719
<v Speaker 2>he follows, come on, And that's the big one.

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.560
<v Speaker 3>And even if the Jets select receiver, I think there's

0:39:28.760 --> 0:39:32.520
<v Speaker 3>just as high a chance that they take Judy as Lamb.

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:36.000
<v Speaker 3>So if we're sweating really the Jets and Raiders, and

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 3>I think the Jets are going tackle with a slight

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 3>chance they take receiver, which could be another receiver, I

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 3>still think there's a pinch of value.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think the twelve and a half

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is you know, that's the reason, right, it's the Jets

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and the Raiders, and you know, but that is the

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:55.399
<v Speaker 1>other thing, like, not only do one, at least one,

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe both of those teams have to go receiver, but

0:39:57.600 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they've got to go Lamb. So you never really know

0:40:00.040 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>which way it's going to go. So I don't hate that. Personally,

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little less confident. I think that the Jets

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to go offensive line. They might but and

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 1>if I had to wager one or the other, I

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.240
<v Speaker 1>would think offensive line. But certainly, you know, with everything

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I've seen, nobody seems to know. You know, some mocks

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I've seen have them going to have them going receiver,

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 1>some have them going offensive line. So but either way,

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know which offensive lineman, so which wide receiver

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:30.960
<v Speaker 1>so I don't hate it. What I do like is

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of running backs taken in the first round.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.359
<v Speaker 1>The over under is half a running back, and I'm

0:40:37.400 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 1>going to go with the under, and it's at plus

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.719
<v Speaker 1>money here, it's at plus one sixty five at least

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:42.480
<v Speaker 1>last I checked.

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 2>May have changed in the last five minutes, as a

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 2>lot of these odds are.

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But you've obviously got Swift, You've got Taylor, You've got Domins,

0:40:51.480 --> 0:40:54.799
<v Speaker 1>You've got Edward Hilaire. So you've got, you know, at

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.399
<v Speaker 1>least for maybe more like pretty solid running backs. Guys,

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.440
<v Speaker 1>you can contribute right away. But you know already what

0:41:01.800 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>has happened with the NFL, which is essentially that running

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>backs are fungible for the most part, and that's the

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>way teams look at them. And you know, you get

0:41:10.680 --> 0:41:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to the back end of the first round, no idea,

0:41:13.000 --> 0:41:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what can happen? Right, anybody could basically decide, oh, you know,

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I really want Swift. I'm gonna you know, trade minor

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.359
<v Speaker 1>draft capital to be able to move up a couple

0:41:23.400 --> 0:41:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of spots. And then you get into the very back

0:41:25.760 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the first round and you take a running back.

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you've got the Ravens, the Titans, the Packers,

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.839
<v Speaker 1>the Niners, the Chiefs, none of them is necessarily.

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Teams of the clue.

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Teams with the clue that aren't gonna take a running back.

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>That's correct, and that that's a more direct way of

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:43.080
<v Speaker 1>saying what I'm trying to say. So for me, look again,

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.480
<v Speaker 1>you it's really difficult because you know, I think the

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>first running back that's gonna go is gonna go probably

0:41:50.000 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 1>early on in the second round, is what my guess is.

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>But so once you get to that spot, it's a

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 1>little up in the air. But you know, since they're

0:41:58.440 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 1>getting the plus money ongoing the under, I'd lean that way.

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>So I will take under half a running back being

0:42:03.320 --> 0:42:05.919
<v Speaker 1>selected in the first round at plus one sixty five.

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, love it.

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, these teams are sharp at the bottom

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:14.399
<v Speaker 3>of the first rounds. Even Pete Carroll can't ruin this

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 3>because it's so clear that they need to draft an

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 3>offensive lineman.

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't go that far. He could easily ruin this.

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:24.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna bet at this point that that he's

0:42:24.520 --> 0:42:27.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna you know, he's gonna stick with a normal draft

0:42:27.120 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 1>strategy and not and not screw it all up.

0:42:28.880 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's it's certainly possible.

0:42:30.200 --> 0:42:32.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, this is one again you never know, you know,

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>when you get to this, you know, especially as it

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.800
<v Speaker 1>gets later in the first round, teams things get crazy,

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:41.720
<v Speaker 1>so you never really know. But I feel pretty confident

0:42:41.800 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know, because and I personally this is you know,

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.759
<v Speaker 1>again we talk about the intel versus our evaluation.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't really see Swift.

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>That you know much better than Taylor or Edwards Hilaire,

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:58.279
<v Speaker 1>who you know, my guy Mike Tegler really loves. I

0:42:58.320 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>don't see that huge difference between them. So I don't

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>really see the need for a team to try to

0:43:02.920 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>trade out necessarily to go grab one of them as

0:43:05.520 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>opposed to waiting for another. So anyway, for me, again,

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it's plus money, so that makes it more enticing. But

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll take under half a running back at plus one

0:43:12.520 --> 0:43:13.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty five.

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's do you got one more for me?

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:17.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? One more?

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to take another over. And it's a position

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 3>that is kind of getting phased out right now. You

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:26.439
<v Speaker 3>speak talk about running back and how much they quote

0:43:26.480 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 3>unquote matter to an NFL team, and Patrick Queen currently

0:43:31.200 --> 0:43:35.160
<v Speaker 3>over twenty three and a half. It's basically even at

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 3>minus one ten. He's a run stopping inside linebacker. Some

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 3>of his traits are worrisome in terms of coverage, and

0:43:44.760 --> 0:43:46.919
<v Speaker 3>that position is slowly getting phased out of the game.

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:50.399
<v Speaker 3>If you're inside linebacker, if you're a predominantly run stopping guy,

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 3>your utility is not as impactful is as if you

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 3>are an edge linebacker that can get in there and

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 3>rush the passer or a great coverage guy. It seems

0:44:00.880 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 3>like if you were to do an inside linebacker comparison,

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 3>people tend to like Oklahoma's Kenneth Murray over Patrick Queen,

0:44:09.239 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 3>and like I said, the emphasis on edge is going

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 3>to push people to take guys like Chase on a

0:44:14.680 --> 0:44:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Penza and Gross Matteos over him. The most popular position

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 3>I am seeing, and this is kind of a running theme,

0:44:24.400 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 3>is that he's a good CJ. Moseley replacements with the Ravens,

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 3>which would be much later than twenty three and a half,

0:44:31.239 --> 0:44:33.160
<v Speaker 3>and just looking at some of these teams in the middle,

0:44:33.239 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that they would spend a middle of

0:44:36.480 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the first round pick on a position with such little

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 3>impact as inside linebacker. The Saints are pretty strong at

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:46.960
<v Speaker 3>this position. The Vikings are strong at this position. I

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:52.200
<v Speaker 3>cannot see the Patriots taking a standard inside linebackers, specifically

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 3>when they lost a lot of edge talent in Jamie

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 3>Collins last year. So yeah, give me Patrick Queen falling

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.520
<v Speaker 3>down twenty three and at past twenty three at minus

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 3>one ten.

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I love it. I think that's great. I do

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:10.160
<v Speaker 1>think that this has all the makings of the Ravens

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at twenty eight. I could see maybe at the Chiefs,

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you know that, you know, the last pick of the

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 1>first round or something like that.

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.399
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, I would really be surprised. That's a really good.

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:23.879
<v Speaker 1>One, and I'm a little annoyed that I didn't have

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it on my list, but I'm going to bet it

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.200
<v Speaker 1>as soon as we're dumb with this podcast, which will

0:45:28.200 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>be in two minutes. Yeah, that's a good one. I

0:45:30.800 --> 0:45:34.160
<v Speaker 1>just I don't see him going before twenty three and

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a half. And I must have missed it, honestly, because

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that is that is lower than I would have expected,

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>because I think the general consensus is, you know, the

0:45:42.800 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Ravens are kind of the earliest that I can see

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:47.399
<v Speaker 1>him going, so at that point and that's twenty eight,

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I believe. So that's a really good one. I like

0:45:49.880 --> 0:45:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it and not the most exciting one.

0:45:51.840 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, random linebacker, right.

0:45:54.280 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 2>I love it. No, it's actually it's actually very very good. Yeah,

0:45:57.520 --> 0:45:59.359
<v Speaker 2>that's good. All right.

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think we've given our listeners a bunch of different

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:04.640
<v Speaker 1>things to have fun with, some with really long odds,

0:46:04.680 --> 0:46:06.959
<v Speaker 1>some with plus money, but a lot of different things

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>going into Day one, maybe day two if you want

0:46:09.120 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>to get into the tight end pool a little bit.

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully Day two.

0:46:11.880 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 1>Goodness, let's not draft tight ends in round one and

0:46:16.120 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>this one. But either way, we're gonna have something to

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 1>focus on that is actual, something to gamble on which

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:23.479
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be really really fun.

0:46:23.520 --> 0:46:25.399
<v Speaker 2>But anyway, that is it for today's show.

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Rich as always, it was great having on to remind

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>everybody where they can find more of you and your work.

0:46:29.920 --> 0:46:32.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you can download the grid Iron Gamble podcast on

0:46:32.600 --> 0:46:37.320
<v Speaker 3>any podcatcher you use, Apple, Spotify, Stitcher. Catch us on

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:40.399
<v Speaker 3>Twitter at grid Iron Gamble. We'll be doing our own

0:46:41.040 --> 0:46:44.839
<v Speaker 3>NFL Draft props later today on Monday, so check that out.

0:46:45.000 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you'll be ready to go with all the draft props.

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I look forward to you sweat and your action for

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>three straight days as crazy as it's going to be.

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks again for coming on. Everybody.

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember don't forget to head over to bettingpros dot com

0:46:57.520 --> 0:47:00.839
<v Speaker 1>to check out our consensus draft props and you can

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.879
<v Speaker 1>bet on obviously NFL futures and all that stuff that's

0:47:03.880 --> 0:47:05.799
<v Speaker 1>over at betting pros dot com for the draft props

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Betting pros dot com slash draft hyphen props.

0:47:09.080 --> 0:47:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening. We're gonna be back next week talking

0:47:11.239 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 2>about some more NFL futures. I'll talk to you then