WEBVTT - HOW TO INVEST with the Feds Balance Sheets Exploding | with George Gammon

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everyone, welcome to another episode of the Market Disruptors Show.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I am sitting here today with George Gammon. He has

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>taken the internet, taken YouTube by storm recently with his

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>super cool videos with the white boards. If you haven't

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.240
<v Speaker 1>seen him, you need to, so I'll linked to it

0:00:29.280 --> 0:00:32.559
<v Speaker 1>down below. UM. Has this an amazing way to take

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 1>these complex subjects and make them very easy to understand,

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>especially with the graphics. And I'm super excited to have

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>you George, thanks for joining. Hey, thanks for having me.

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm excited to have a chat and a lot

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to talk about that for sure, so much to talk about.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I've been I've been doing that analysis

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and commentary for quite a long time and sometimes you

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>get these like boring patches, but not right now, there's

0:00:56.920 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>more than enough to go around. UM. I've been watching

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>your video those and the last several videos you've done.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>They're all, you know, talking about the topic of the moment,

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the bailouts, the stimulus, the unlimited you know,

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.959
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easy and etcetera. And uh, you've really been breaking

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 1>down like all these like acronyms that the FED keeps

0:01:17.040 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>coming up with. Alright, maybe tell us about some of

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>these acronyms and kind of what that means. Ah jeez. Well,

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line is they're just trying to buy everything

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in sight. So I think if you start from there,

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>it's much easier to understand any of the I call

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>them four letters solutions, but that you know, the news

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>changes so quickly. First it was all the four letter

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote solutions that they had back in two thousand

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and eight, but now they've added more and they're now

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>coming up with these five letter solutions that even the

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>letters are expanding, just like their balance sheet. So but

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>really what each program, let's call it, is all about

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is just giving the FED an excuse to either lend

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>money directly to corporations or to buy their equity or

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>buy their existing debt. It's really what it's all about.

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:19.240
<v Speaker 1>So the the endgame, I think is the FED is

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>going to have stocks, bonds that they're going to own

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the equity and debt of the S

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and P five hundred. So it's all going from the

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>private sector onto their balance sheet, if you think about

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it from their standpoint, makes sense because our economy is

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>really all about asset bubbles, debt, and confidence that's what

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.679
<v Speaker 1>our economy is built on. And the FED I think

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>knows that, and they won't admit it, but I think

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 1>they understand it well. So they understand they have to

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 1>keep those asset bubbles inflated at all costs. So if

0:02:59.400 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just thinking this through, like what would I do, Well,

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I want to take all of the assets that can

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>get a haircut, and I want to put them on

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.679
<v Speaker 1>my balance sheet because I never have to sell. Yeah,

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:13.359
<v Speaker 1>the FET doesn't have a profit and loss, so if

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they get let's let's not give away the punch line

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>before we build it up a little bit here. Well,

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I could go on for hours about that. But as

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>far as the specific programs that achieve this objective, you

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>want me to touch on that, No, we don't. I mean,

0:03:26.520 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we don't need to dig into each one. But it's

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>interesting because you're kind of showing how they've been adding

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 1>more and more and more. As you said, they're actually

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 1>getting the acronyms are getting longer. Yeah, it seems like

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>basically each one gives them more power, more leeway. Correct,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>At first, they were um allowing the primary dealers to

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>buy assets and they were kind of loaning them. Now

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>they're like, shoot, why go through them, Let's just buy

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it ourselves. Exactly. That's a great point. That's a great point.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the biggest difference from what I've seen between what

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>they first came out with and what they've come out

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.680
<v Speaker 1>with more recently. The first thing was just the primary

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>dealer credit facility, and that's just saying, okay, primary dealer,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.119
<v Speaker 1>whatever is on your balance sheet, will take it from

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you and we'll give you a quote unquote loan. But

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the the fine print, it's yeah,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it's alone, but it's at zero percent interest and most

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>likely they can roll it over indefinitely. So is that

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:30.680
<v Speaker 1>really alone? And then excuse me, so they say that's

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to support the primary dealers, but why couldn't the primary dealers?

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Was one point five trillion and access reserves actually be

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>proactive and go into the market by the stocks for

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the Federal reserve, and then the Fed gives them this

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>loan at zero percent interests that they can roll over, uh, indefinitely.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So that kind of gets them around the laws that

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>were set up. But to your point, the new abbreviations

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>or acronyms they've come up with, these five letter duties.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.919
<v Speaker 1>They just allow the FED to go straight into the

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>market and give credit, extend credit to a lot of entities,

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>not just corporations. But it gives them, uh like they

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>just call them investors, and I don't know who these

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>people are, but it gives financing to investors. And keep

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in mind, this is a nonrecourse loan. So again, is

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>this really alone here, So they're giving this financing to

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>investors for them to continue to buy asset and securities. Well,

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:40.000
<v Speaker 1>these asset back securities have student loan debt, credit card debt,

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they have subprime auto loans, they have SBA loans. So

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>in essence, although that's not technically going onto the FED

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet, it's going onto a balance sheet of an

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.839
<v Speaker 1>entity that really doesn't have to sell and prior and

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>things change so quickly. If you would have said last

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:03.400
<v Speaker 1>week the FED would go directly and buy the corporate

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>bond market or something like that, people would have said, no, no, no,

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they can't do that because of this stipulation or this

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>law or this regulation and have to be an act

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of Congress or the government would have to change something. Well,

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they pretty much just ignored that and said, yeah, it's

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the law, but whatever, we don't care. And then

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>just no one calls him out on it because the

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>talking heads at CNBC or the quote unquote market, they

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>want the FED to come in and prop things up

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>because they're taking a fifty haircut in their portfolio in

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty days. And you got Acmin coming out

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>on CNBC and basically crying, trying to beg people to

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>buy stocks. And I have nothing against him. I think

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>he's a brilliant guy and I'd love to interview him.

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>But well, I'll just say that he is emotional and

0:06:56.360 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>really pleading with people to get out there and not

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>only stay home, but also to kind of buy stocks,

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Like Okay, well, why why is he doing this? He's

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.040
<v Speaker 1>got to be talking his book. And I'd be pretty

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>emotional too if I ran ten billion dollars and I

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just lost five billion of it in the last thirty days.

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, the bottom line is every week, every day

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that we move forward into this crisis, we're seeing the

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:29.400
<v Speaker 1>FED take end the government for that matter, taking more

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and more measures that really just ignore the law, and

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the bottom lines, are just gonna do whatever they think

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>they need to do in order to keep the bubbles inflated. Now, Um,

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we kind of jumped right into thick of it because

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where we are. Um. But if we

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>want to just rewind the clock a little bit, this

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is not new. This is not because of the virus.

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>This is been going on for a long period of time.

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you've been talking about this well before. So

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.520
<v Speaker 1>this is um, this isn't something like, oh, we have

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this crisis, let's do this. They've been doing this right

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that this is only accelerating it or is this completely new. Well,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of programs that are completely new, but

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>it's still the same. It's a continuation, right, it's in

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the continuation and acceleration. Uh yeah, with it, with this

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with some of them. Right, with some of these programs,

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe, if I'm not mistaken, that they are new

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and they are to get around having to go through

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the primary dealers, and the primary dealers make decisions or

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>take action in order for those reserves that the FED

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>has to get out into the system. But as far

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as UM, the majority of the acronyms, they used them

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight. But you know, to be clear,

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>quantitative easing started off in the end of two thousand

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>eight and was supposed to be a quote unquote temporary measure.

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Remember Ben Bernanke came out promised everyone that wasn't monetizing

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the debt, because the definition of monetizing the debt would

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be if they kept it on the Fed's balance sheet. No, no, no,

0:09:03.440 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>just bringing these treasuries onto the balance sheet temporarily. We're

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna unwind as soon as we're out of the crisis.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And who yelling said it's just gonna be just like uh,

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>watching paint dry. Yeah, I think we're her words or someone.

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And so we found that it's not going to be

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like watching paint dry because they try to unwind the

0:09:22.160 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. And by the way, after q E one,

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.320
<v Speaker 1>now I have q E two, have q E three,

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:30.079
<v Speaker 1>we try to unwind. That doesn't work. We have the

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>not que, which was them bailing out the repo market

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>back in September sevent And so my point is we've

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>had this quote unquote temporary stimulus from QE that's now

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>not only permanent but growing exponentially. And then you combine

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that everything that they do has the same type of effect.

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Why because it goes back to what I was saying earlier,

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 1>with the entire economy being built on asset bubbles, you

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>continually have to more and more and more money. You

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>have to be more interventionist to make sure that those

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bubbles aren't collapsing. So let's look at the stimulus. They

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>just came out with two trillion dollars. Okay, but we

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>had a stimulus package back into nine but that was

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>only roughly eight billion. So you see the amount of

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>queue that they're having to do, the amount of stimulus,

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the amount of the deficits that the government has to

0:10:26.480 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>run in order to profit these bubbles just gets more, more,

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>more and more. So the point is any temporary program

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they come up with, whether it's in RIPO, whether it's

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>in I think now with these four letter acronyms, I

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think these are gonna go away anytime soon. I

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think they'll be more permanent. And it just gets to

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:52.439
<v Speaker 1>a point where you're almost like Japan, where the Fed

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>owns the bond market and they own whatever E T s.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>If it gets bad enough off, I think they just

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ignore that and buy stocks directly or bonds directly. But

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not temporary, it just it keeps growing and

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>growing and growing. And right now, let's remember too, the

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>FED did this originally to give confidence to the market,

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>so they had kind of this Fed put and so

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that means the Fed is kind of back stopping the market.

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>What we know right now that's gone, that's expired, because

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>every time the Fed came out with a bigger bazuka

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of weeks, the markets just shaking

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it off. It goes up for the next hour and

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:39.280
<v Speaker 1>then just tanks. The only thing that's um kind of

0:11:39.520 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>propelled this market higher is this stimulus package that the

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>government has come out with. But what happens when the

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>sugar high from the stimulut from the stimulus package wears

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>off and all of a sudden people go back to

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>reality and say, oh wait, the job report or the

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>unemployment numbers went up by three point three million. Right

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>then what happens next week when the there's another three

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>million jobs that are lost And and generally, if you

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.000
<v Speaker 1>look through history, you'll find that the tipping point for

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.239
<v Speaker 1>the United States going into a recession is always about

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate. Right, so when the unemployment rate starts

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>to spike, that's when things get bad. And not only

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>are we spiking now from an all time low. But

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>we're just I mean, it's a it's a a parabolic

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 1>move when you look at a chart. And I'd also

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like to remind people that are comparing this to two thousand,

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 1>eight thousand nine that back then the jobless claims the

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>number we receive today at its height was maybe six

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand, SI, there you go, and then today it's

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's three point two or three point three millions. So

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the previous high was I think and it was seven

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hundred and two thousand, six and fifty thousand, and now

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>now millions. Yeah, So this this seems like um to me.

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, if we trace this back to the break

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>from the gold standard, if that's nine, nine seventy one,

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:18.439
<v Speaker 1>wherever number you want to start looking at. We've started

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>building up the debt and it seems like two eight seven,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>two thousand, two thousand and eight, two thousand and eleven.

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.840
<v Speaker 1>It keeps trying to de leverage that debt, right, and

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the Fed just keeps, no, don't, let's just pump more

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>debt in. But there's so much bad debt out there,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>as you say, all this junk that's out there, and

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just it just it just goes away in the

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>blink of an eye. And and and that's what they're doing.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>They just keep trying to like reinflate it with more

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>debt and then each time it just takes more and

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more and more. Yeah, that's exactly what happens. And it's

0:13:49.880 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>just like taking a drug or uh, you know, drinking

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>or anything that the more of the drug that you take,

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the more you need to get high, the lot of

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>diminishing returns. Yeah, exactly. So I think that's what's going

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>on right now. We know that the FED is now

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing on a string, and at what point do we

0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>get where the government stimulus package has the same type

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>of effect. And that's when you've really got problems because

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.600
<v Speaker 1>if you can't inflate a bubble through monetary policy, and

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if you can't do it through fiscal policy, then what's

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>left other than the FED doing what I think they've

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>set themselves up to do now, and that's just to

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 1>buy and take the private sector balance sheet onto the

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet of the Fed. You know, it's a it's

0:14:40.520 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a scary thought thinking about that. And before we dive

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>into that, I'm just curious. You know, we talked about

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the law of diminishing returns, and so we can see that, right,

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it was fifteen trillion, thirty trillion, I mean, what's it

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be this time? Right? Each time it gets

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>more and more, and it almost seems like more money

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>is being put out than the economic growth that we're

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 1>getting back in return. Or we're almost at that point?

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that so like we're spending more than we're getting

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>are we? I mean there yet? Yeah, There's been several

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.200
<v Speaker 1>studies done that show once the debt to GDP gets

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>up to a certain level in a country, that every

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>single dollar or every single um uh yeah, I guess

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>every dollar or the government spends, they get back less

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>in return. So there's an opposite money multiplier in fact,

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're there. I think the number that

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they came out with, I wish I could remember the

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>specific study. It's very famous, but they said about a

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred to a hundred and ten percent of g d P.

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And I want to make sure that people are are

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>clear that because a lot of people in the market

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or on Twitter, they say, well, yeah, we could be

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>like Japan where they're buying all of these e t

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>f s and the bonds, like we talked about earlier,

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and they're printing all of this money and it really

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 1>hasn't created inflation. It's more created kind of a zombie

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>economy where they just have very low deflation for for

0:16:08.000 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>decades on end. And although that is a possibility, I

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>think in the United States, it's not a probability. The

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>probability is very low that we see that because of

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the dynamics with the reserve currency, the dollar, and how

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>much the FED will have to print, and the fact

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that we're that we're seeing the supply chains being disrupted

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>within the United States. And I think with what's going

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>on with the the the illness will call it. I

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you're gonna put this on YouTube, but

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll say will say the illness. Everyone knows what I'm

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>talking about. There you go, There you go. I think

0:16:45.280 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you could see a situation where there's a lot less

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>goods and services that are imported, and if there are

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>fewer goods and services being imported, there's more dollars or

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>there's fewer dollars being exported, so more dollars are staying

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 1>within the demand stick economy. And if you combine that

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:05.440
<v Speaker 1>with mm T, which is a part of the stimulus package,

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>and you combine that with the FED creating all of

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:11.720
<v Speaker 1>these additional deposits, because as I'm sure you know, what,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>what most people don't understand is when the FED creates

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>money and they just we call it print money, they're

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 1>they're not really printing the money that you that most

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>people think of. It's it's not it is kind of dollars,

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's more it's it's it's bank money. It's just

0:17:28.040 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 1>reserves for the for the banks and the primary dealers

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>that are under the Fed's umbrella. So in order for

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the money that the FED prints to get out into

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the real economy, well before it took uh an action

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of the primary deal they would have to do something.

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>They'd have to buy a financial asset, or they would

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>have to create a loan, and that creates an additional deposit,

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>which makes the money supply grow. So if you have

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the FED now going directly to the real economy to

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.719
<v Speaker 1>create deposits, the government is doing it as well with

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>MMT and all these other programs. And you have the

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that there's fewer dollars escaping the United States, then

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>you have just simple more dollars chasing the same amount

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>of goods or services, or I would argue actually fewer

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.840
<v Speaker 1>goods and services because if we start not only the

0:18:21.880 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 1>supply chains being broken down right now because of this illness,

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>but also in the future, if you have Trump or

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Biden or whomever come out and say, listen, we need

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to stop producing face masks in China. We can't be

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>reliant on uh India for our pharmaceuticals. We can't be

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>reliant on Taiwan for our ventilators. So we've got to

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:46.920
<v Speaker 1>do all these things in the United States. Well, that

0:18:46.960 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>takes time first and all. You can't just wave a

0:18:49.200 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>magic wand and have all these supply chains appear. So

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in the interim you have a reduced amount of supply,

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and even when that supply comes online, it's at a

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>much much higher ice because you're producing that in a

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>developed economy as opposed to a Vietnam something like that.

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>So the bottom line is you have less goods and services,

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you have more dollars chasing them and fewer dollars escaping.

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you have fewer dollars escaping, you can have

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a quote unquote strong dollar. And I talked about this

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 1>in a video this morning, but you can have a

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 1>strong dollar. So every single time the average Joe turns

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>on CNBC, it's the dollars strong, Holy cow, the dollars strong.

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>The d X y is at one ten, it's at

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>one dollars, uh, you know, crushing the euro, it's crushing

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the Aussie dollar or the yen, anything like this. While

0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.000
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, the average Joe is going down

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to whole Foods and the price of his apples are

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>going from a dollar to two dollars, to three dollars,

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.239
<v Speaker 1>to four dollars to five dollars. And so there's this

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>disconnect I think with people, and that's something that I'm

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to preach as much as I can that hey,

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>let's not let's understand that you have to compartmentalize your

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.679
<v Speaker 1>personal cp I with the strength or weakness of the

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>dollar that you hear on TV. And and this is why.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>It's because of what's going on with the FED, the

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>government and the the illness. And but I also I

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear too that the economy was extremely,

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>extremely weak, and it was built on a house of cards.

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>This at some point in time, we would have had

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>this happen, whether it was with this illness or something else,

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people say, oh, we can have

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:45.959
<v Speaker 1>this v shape recovery, which we might have due to liquidity,

0:20:45.960 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>but we won't have due to fundamentals, because they say, well,

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate was low, we had such a great

0:20:51.160 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>economy prior to this. My rebuttal to that is always

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>very simple. If we had such a great economy prior

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>to going into this crisis, why do we have interest

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>rates at zero? Right? Right? Like why did the economy

0:21:05.160 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>need interest rates solo? Why was it when Powell took

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 1>rates up to two or two point to five all

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden things started to implode? Right? If we

0:21:14.960 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>had such an awesome economy, If we had such an

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>amazing economy, don't you think we should be able to

0:21:20.800 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>normalize interest rates? And why can't the Fed unwind their

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet? Why do they have to do repo? Why

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>did they have to do que if we've got such

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 1>an amazing economy? Right? Yeah, it was definitely cracking up

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>well before the sickness. It was it was it was

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like I called it at first, I said

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>it was like the pin prick on a balloon, But

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>really it was like getting a nail and a tire

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that was already deflating. Yeah, so uh, one of those.

0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, yeah, you're right, everybody saying the dollars

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>too strong, the dollars too strong. I see lots of

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>people calling, you know, to let's weaken the dollar, weaken

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. Um. But of course the dollar is the strongest.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's flying to liquidity. Um. They're trying to do that

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>right by printing more and lowering rates and all these programs. UM.

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But I guess your last video you were kind of

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>saying that these limited, these unlimited billouts actually lead to

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the dollar going down. So right now it's the dollars

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>going up. But they're doing these bells to try to

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:21.439
<v Speaker 1>weaken them. But you think they overshoot the goal and

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe they just it just ends up making it two weeks. Well,

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got to define what we're talking about by a week.

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Dollar first and foremost. So if you're talking about the

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>dollar relative to foreign currencies, that would be one answer.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But if we're talking about the dollar relative to the

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>apples that you buy, the whole foods, that would be

0:22:40.680 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>a completely different answer. Or maybe the dollar compared to

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the bond market, or the dollar compared to a specific

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 1>stock or the SNP, so I I really want to

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to compartmentalize those So I could see a

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>situation because of what I explained before that the dollar

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>could definitely go up. Mean, I agree with Brent Johnson

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and well, I can totally see where he's coming from,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a guy like Brent or Jeff Snyder or

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's in that route Paul with that dollar bowl camp.

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>But what they're saying is isn't necessarily that the prices

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of goods and services, or the price of your healthcare

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>or the price of gasoline or your rent is going

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:24.919
<v Speaker 1>to go down. They're saying that the value of the

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar relative to the Euro is going to go up. Right,

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a totally different argument. And I do see a

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.879
<v Speaker 1>possibility where they'd have to come in with a Plaza

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>accord two point oh and artificially lower the value of

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. They meaning the FED in the foreign FX

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>markets to pump enough dollars out there. They've got the

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>swap lines going right now with the other central banks,

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>with the majority of central banks except for China, and

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that could ease the pressure. But even if you ease

0:23:57.240 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>that pressure, it's still kind of creating more dollar or

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 1>demand in the future. So and I don't it's it's

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>difficult because you've got them some countries that would really

0:24:10.320 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>like to see a dollar being devalued. Some countries would

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>not be too keen on that. So I don't think

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get a universal Hey, yeah, let's all

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>hold hands, kumbaya. Let's bring down the dollar like they

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>did in nineteen eighty five, I think it was. But there,

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the FED can just say, listen, we don't

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.120
<v Speaker 1>care what you want to do. We're just gonna take

0:24:33.240 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>five trillion dollars and pump it into the FX markets

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and just be like a currency manipulator, just like China

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>has done for so long, and they just bring it down. Now,

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that's not to say, now let me play devil's advocate here.

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say that even if they did that,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you would say you would see hyper inflation in the

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>United States. Let's remember that when they did plase accord

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>one point. Oh, we'll call it. The value view of

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the dollar in the FX markets, especially relative to the

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the German mark and the yen, went down over two

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>years by five zero. But if you look at inflation

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the United states. It's still only was up maybe

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>five or six percent per year, So again, completely completely

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>different buckets, right, Yeah. And and the way they measure

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that inflation, like you said, doesn't take everything new an account.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>So everyone knows the price of gas went up, and

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the price of homes went up, and you know, all

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the things that we need. The CPI doesn't measure those

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for some reason. Right. Uh, school went up, healthcare went up,

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, everything's gone up, right Yeah. And everyone's CPI

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>is different because of what they buy. So my cp

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I as an example, is completely different than some like

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 1>a school teacher that's making thirty dollars a year because

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>the prices of the stuff I buy is uh, it

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:00.439
<v Speaker 1>might be staying the same, or even if buying the

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>same types of items like food, let's call it, it's

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a much lower percentage of my overall income. Where if

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>you've got a school teacher making forty grand year, where

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the majority of her or his income is going to rent, healthcare, food, gas,

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>he or she could experience fiftcent inflation per year those

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>specific items that occupy of their paycheck. And um, all

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>while the dollar is getting strong or supposedly very strong,

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>so um it's uh, it's like watching a car crash. Right,

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>we're with witnessing this all in real time. It's an

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>it's an interesting time to be watching the markets. We

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>can see the development that is going down. We can

0:26:51.000 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>see uh you know models like you said, maybe Japan,

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's different, et cetera. What do you think I mean?

0:26:56.960 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>On your YouTube channel, you say helping you build wealth

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and thrive. So how do we take this information and

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>discern it in a way that we could try to

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>thrive from this um? Right? How do we decipher this?

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>What are we watching for and what are we trying

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to do? Well? First of all, I like to try

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to encourage people to compartmentalize their portfolio as well. So

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>what I do is I have ten percent for insurance

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.239
<v Speaker 1>for an investment, which I would define is something that

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>pays me to own it, and then ten percent for

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a speculation, which I define is just something I'm betting

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>on the price going up. His insurance is like gold,

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like precious metals, like absolutely would be gold, not even silver.

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>It would just be physical. Gold wouldn't be an e

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>t F. Just physical. And that you're I'm not trying

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>to get rich. I'm just trying to maintain the purchasing

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>power that I already have. So with I think oil

0:27:54.400 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>down a barrel, you see companies like Exxon, Chevron, Um, Shell,

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Dutch really really just tanking in price. And again it's

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not that they don't have problems. They definitely do, but

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>at a certain point, it's all a function of price.

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And if I can get a twelve percent dividend, let's say,

0:28:15.280 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on an Exxon, and I know they've got a lot

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of debts and they've they've got but I'm not too

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>worried about that long term. And I also realized that

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they could stop paying their dividend over the next one year,

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so it's very realistic. But listen, I'm not buying Exxon

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>right here to hold for three weeks or six weeks.

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm buying it to hold for ten years. And if

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you believe that cars are still going to run on

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>gas in call it ten years, then I think you've

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 1>got to believe the price of Exxon will most likely

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>increase above and beyond call it thirty five dollars, and

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>they'll be able to pay their divid an end, and

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>they might most likely be able to increase their dividend

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>after a year, after a year and a half, after

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>all of this is in the rear view mirror. Even

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>if the economy goes into a Japan type situation, that

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>still doesn't mean that oil is at twenty barrel. And

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not to say that can't go down to three

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>or ten. But what I like to advise people and

0:29:23.160 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>what I try to do myself, and psychologically it's actually

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>very hard to do, but I try to completely ignore

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>whether the price of x y z asset is going

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>up or down. I just forget about it. And I

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>just asked myself, is this cheap or is it expensive?

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And if it's cheap historically speaking, then I buy it.

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 1>If it's if it's expensive, then if it's in my portfolio,

0:29:46.760 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>then I go ahead and sell it. So I think

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got to look at the oil right now and say,

0:29:52.200 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>historically it's definitely very cheap. I'm not saying now is

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the time to go in. But what I'm doing is

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>just starting a watch list of stocks or assets that

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I would like to buy at a specific price, and

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 1>if they get down to that price, maybe I pulled

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the trigger a little bit. I think that's something proactive

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>everyone can do. Also, I think that the average Joe

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>or Jane can always go out and make sure, make sure,

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>make sure, make sure they've got a fixed rate mortgage.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>And I know the majority of people in the United

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>States do. But if you don't make that change, Yeah,

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>now is the time. You've got interest rates at at

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>five thousand year lows. Go ahead and lock them in

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>right now, because over the next ten twenty thirty years,

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>while you're paying off this mortgage, the chances are very

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>high that the rate of inflation exceeds your interest rate.

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>And if the rate of inflation exceeds your interest rate,

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a transfer of wealth from the lender to the borrower.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>In other words, it's a transfer of wealth from the

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>bank to you. And that's what you want. That's I

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>love that point. I'm like your thesis on you know,

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the fed by and everything que unlimited. The dollar goes

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to zero, crashing the system, the house of cards, as

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you said, crashes at some point, I mean, do we

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>start to look at like, Okay, well, shoot, maybe equities

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>won't be a good play. I mean, maybe they run

0:31:23.280 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>out of ammunition. Maybe the diminution returns get to it.

0:31:25.800 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's more about gold, Maybe it's about lifeboats, alternatives

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>outside of the dollar, or you don't think it gets

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that bad, No, I do. I don't know that the

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar goes to zero, and I definitely don't think it

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:41.280
<v Speaker 1>goes to zero short term. I think five years, ten years,

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>it could go not to zero, but it could lose

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>call it fifty of its value, could lose of its

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>value per year. But I think that in what I'm

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about is not only in the United States, but

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 1>outside the United States against the Euro or against all

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 1>these other currencies. So I could see I definitely could

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>see hyper inflation if you define it by the dollar

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>losing fifty of its value on an annual basis. Totally

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>could see that in five ten years. But I don't

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>see it in the next And what do you think

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>about f D. I see it was a pretty interesting

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>The head of f D I C put that video

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>out right and said, everything safe, don't be worried. Um,

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this tells you all you need to know. Why why

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>do they have to come out and do that? Right? Uh,

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>let me touch on your earlier point. Uh. I do

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>think long term you want to have hedges against the dollars.

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I like physical gold for a speculation,

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously you gotta throw a bitcoin in there. I think

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the asymmetry is definitely what you want. A lot of

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>people get on me because they like to be an

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>either or type person. Either your gung ho about gold

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:53.160
<v Speaker 1>and you think it should be a hundred percent of

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio, or your super gung ho about bitcoin and

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto and you think that should be a hundred percent

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of your pol I really don't understand that. I don't

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>understand the arguments going back and forth between the two

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>camps because to me, we're all on the same team

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and they're not even competing asset classes. In my book,

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.080
<v Speaker 1>they're totally They're not even apples and oranges. I always

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>say they're like apples, or they're like oranges and and

0:33:15.680 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Ford pickup trucks. That why would you not have both?

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But one is insurance and one is a speculation. So

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to touch on that. What was lost to

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:30.080
<v Speaker 1>check your I appreciate that that, and actually I was

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>just I talk about both. I've been a bitcoin guy,

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I am. I talk about gold, and I constantly get

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>hit with that. But look, our goal, our job is

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 1>not to pick the one asset. Our goal is to

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have an allocation and we met we we we do

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it based off of risk and reward, and I like both.

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's room for both and and for a

0:33:52.560 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the same reasons, but also for different reasons. Absolutely, yeah,

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you got. You gotta own different asset classes for different

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.360
<v Speaker 1>reasons and different objectives within your portfolio to have a

0:34:02.360 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>mathematical probability of you being ahead of the game in

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the long run. And I don't want to get into

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the boring nerdy stuff. Some of my videos I go

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>into binomial calculators and the Kelly criterion because before I

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>got into entrepreneurship way back in college, I counted cards

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at blackjack, So it always put me in that mindset

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of probabilities and money management. And so then we're watching

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the FED go into quei infinity, a lot of you know,

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>potential inflation deflation to watch for. So as investors, if

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>we want to kind of keep an eye on that,

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>try to hedge against the dollar inflation at some point

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>through gold, maybe through bitcoin um and then keep an

0:34:43.680 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>eye on the world dominator stocks I like to call them,

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>right the value stocks, and maybe look for good entry

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 1>points at some point because you think even though the

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:56.479
<v Speaker 1>Fed's gonna go full full crazy Bazuoka style. Um, those

0:34:56.520 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>stocks are gonna survive that. They're gonna prop them up

0:34:58.840 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>as long as they need to. Yeah, I think they're

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>going to try. So where's your entry point? I'd go

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:09.960
<v Speaker 1>back to just asking the question, is it cheap or

0:35:10.080 --> 0:35:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is it expensive? Like a lot of people are trying

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to call a bottom right now, it's like it's the

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom by the dip, by the dip. Well, I don't

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>do that because I look at the market cap to

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 1>GDP you want to call it the buffet indicator, and

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>or I look at a cape ratio and as even

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 1>though we've come down, um call it or so from

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the highs, it doesn't mean the market's cheap. But the

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>market is still extremely extremely overvalued. Of course their pockets

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of opportunity, that's true, But as a whole, the SMP

0:35:46.400 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is still up in the stratosphere. So I wouldn't be

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a buyer of the entire market until the cape ratio

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>at least comes down below fifteen, and i'd like it

0:35:57.400 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 1>even below ten. So that's kind of what I'm looking

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>at as far as your blue chips for an entry point.

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'd also encourage people to look outside the United States,

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>because there's stocks in other markets that are down way

0:36:15.640 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>below where they were even in two thousand nine, and

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these stocks are great dividend payers that

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>would be considered blue chips in that other country. Of course,

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.040
<v Speaker 1>you gotta worry about the exchange risk if your expenses

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 1>are denominated in dollars. But I think that people should

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe just start doing some research to see what opportunities exist,

0:36:38.480 --> 0:36:40.880
<v Speaker 1>not only in the United States, but potentially outside of

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States as well. Yeah, great, great advice. I

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.480
<v Speaker 1>like that. What about one last question? What do you

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>what do you think about the DOWT gold ratio? Do

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you do you look at that? Yeah, I've seen that.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>I know it's um I think it's a lot like

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the silver to gold ratio, and that I don't know.

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not good enough to know if that's an indicator

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 1>or if it's just something that's kind of interesting to

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>look at. So I try to kind of stay in

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>my lane, if you will, and just ask myself is cheaper?

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Is silver cheap compared to silver? And not necessarily is

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 1>silver cheap compared to gold? I didn't I did a

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>video titled silver is not what you think it is.

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>And I basically said, I don't believe in the gold

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to silver ratio. Silver isn't needed anymore, and and that

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>that ratio is broken a long time ago. Um, the

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>doubt of gold ratio, I still believe in that. So

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>that's something that I keep an eye on. But yeah,

0:37:38.040 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I know I've was regarding the silver to gold. I

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>interviewed Rick Rule the other day and he's in your camp.

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>He he doesn't. He thinks it's kind of cool to

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>look at, but it's not really an indicator. And uh,

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I know I interviewed Shift the other day and uh

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and Lynette Zang, and they're under the belief system that

0:37:57.480 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>and they're old school. They've been doing us a long

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 1>time time, and they believe there's going to be a

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:05.760
<v Speaker 1>one to one ratio again. Whether the whether that means

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the dows at twenty thousand and an ounce of gold

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is twenty thousand or five, it doesn't matter that. They

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.080
<v Speaker 1>just think that at some point in time in the

0:38:15.120 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years, we're going to be at a

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>one to one. If we have time for one more question, yeah, Um,

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so you did a video talking about Jim Rickards calling

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the revaluation to gold. I kind of copied off of

0:38:27.800 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>your video about that as well, and so I'm curious

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about that. I mean, if if you know, the unlimited

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:39.359
<v Speaker 1>bazooka cannons and the destruction of the dollar and all

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the current I mean, we already see the you know,

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I m F or the b I s calling for

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>digital currencies with their SDRs, which maybe like Chinese to

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:51.919
<v Speaker 1>people listening, But um, I'm curious based off that video.

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if this qui infinity and diminishing returns and

0:38:54.640 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it all fails, no confidence left in currencies. The argument

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:00.839
<v Speaker 1>is the only way to restore confidence is to go

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.439
<v Speaker 1>back to some gold standard, whether that's one percent or um.

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's a good probability of that happening,

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>a very low probability or no chance, or where do

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 1>you sit? I think there's a very good probability. That

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>will have to have a currency, and I have no

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:20.520
<v Speaker 1>idea what currency it will be. I don't know if

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it will be digital. I would assume it would be digital.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if that's a digital SDR or a

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>digital dollar or libra who knows something like that, but

0:39:30.600 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>or maybe a bitcoin, maybe hopefully. I mean that would

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. From a philosophical standpoint, There's nothing more that

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see than to have a decentralized currency

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:46.439
<v Speaker 1>is as what we use in the world to transact.

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>But I I don't think the governments would be too

0:39:49.960 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>uh too keen on that to say the least. Why

0:39:52.480 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>would why would they ever why would they ever vote

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to tie their hands behind their back? Right, Yeah, exactly exactly,

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And to have a government back digital currency, it gives

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 1>them so much control. I don't think most people understand.

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they've pulled back the layer of the

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>onion because I hear a lot of people on Twitter

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 1>or even in the comments of my videos, they say, wow,

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the dollar, are it already is a digital currency? I mean,

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't really use paper money. I just use electronic

0:40:20.880 --> 0:40:22.799
<v Speaker 1>digits on my bank account and I use an a

0:40:22.840 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>t M card. And what they're not understanding is if

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we had a true and you can correct me if

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong, but if we had a true digital currency

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 1>the way where they've each token let's call it has

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a serial number, and they track that it goes to

0:40:39.560 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 1>someone's electronic wallet, then the FED or the government could

0:40:44.960 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>control not only the supply, but they could control the demand,

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and most people don't realize that. As an example, they

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 1>could say, Okay, here's your worth of mm T everything

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:59.400
<v Speaker 1>for this month, but you've got to spend it in

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the next four eight hours. Yeah, yeah, exactly. It's programmable,

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it's specific, you have to spend in this timeframe. You

0:41:07.360 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>can only use it for these certain things, like it

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>can be stopped, sees man, you know whatever. So for

0:41:13.400 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>sure that's what they'd want um And I think that's

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of where it goes, is like a digital SDR

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>most likely, but I would think it maybe has to

0:41:20.440 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>have some goal backing. Maybe it's yeah, that's yeah, that's

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:24.680
<v Speaker 1>where I was going with that. For sure. It's a

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>great point. I think that eventually the Fiat system, the

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Fiat currency system that we've been trying out since nineteen

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy one is in kind of going back to Brenton Woods.

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>That's going to collapse, and I think you're gonna have

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:43.479
<v Speaker 1>a total loss of confidence, and not only the dollar

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 1>or the end the Euro, you name it. I don't

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:49.479
<v Speaker 1>think that's tomorrow, but I think ten years, fifteen years

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 1>down the road, that's where we're going to be. And

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>to your point, any currency is all about confidence, Any

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:01.799
<v Speaker 1>economy really is all about confidence. To instill the confidence,

0:42:02.160 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the government or the I M F

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>or whomever is issuing this currency is going to have

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a choice but to back it with something that people

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>have confidence in. And again going back to Twitter and

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:17.840
<v Speaker 1>in my comments, a lot of people say, oh, the

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>government would never back it with gold. That's crazy, that

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:23.839
<v Speaker 1>ties their hand. But they're implying that the government has

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a choice. I don't know that they would have a

0:42:27.560 --> 0:42:32.320
<v Speaker 1>choice now whether the digital SDR or the digital dollar

0:42:32.800 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is backed by one who knows. But and then, of

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>course I think what will happen. So in the short term,

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 1>I think you all have this digital fiat that gives

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>them total control. I think that blows up. They have

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to have something that's backed by gold. But I only

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:55.719
<v Speaker 1>think that last maybe ten twenty years, where everyone forgets

0:42:56.320 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what happened with the disaster of fiat currency and you

0:42:59.600 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>have all the politicians or economists start claiming that, oh yeah,

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>this this is our problem. Is this stupid gold standard.

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:09.879
<v Speaker 1>We've got to get off this gold standard. We could

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:13.000
<v Speaker 1>only have the ability and the control over the amount

0:43:13.040 --> 0:43:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of currency in the system, then we could just solve

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>all the problems and we could just print money, and

0:43:18.600 --> 0:43:22.919
<v Speaker 1>everyone's going to forget about what happened ten fifteen years ago,

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>just like everyone now or thirty days ago forgot what

0:43:27.640 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>happened in the GFC. They totally forgot. Oh yeah, that

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was the market can never go down. You hear all

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:40.000
<v Speaker 1>these things, the narrative is exact or was exactly like

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it was back in two thousand eight, two thousand and seven.

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's shocking that the recency bias of the notly

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the mainstream media, but the population at large, and that

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that they just have this kind of like a selective

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 1>amnesia where if if it's it's a cognitive dissonance type

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>of rationalizing, where if it makes them feel good about

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>their four oh one k or whatever they have invested

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:07.759
<v Speaker 1>in the market, if that's going to give them more

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 1>purchasing car in the future, then they just kind of

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 1>tend to forget things that are inconvenient, or make up

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:18.280
<v Speaker 1>things or cherry picked data points to make it easier

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to sleep at night, knowing that the stock market always

0:44:21.680 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>goes up, right, the dollar is always going to be

0:44:24.680 --> 0:44:29.839
<v Speaker 1>the world reserve currency. Well, I don't think so, right man.

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:31.719
<v Speaker 1>So much more to talk about. I'd love to get

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>into some more of like the bailouts and things like that.

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So many different angles we could go, but I know

0:44:35.960 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we're out of time, so so we'll go ahead and

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:40.480
<v Speaker 1>cut it off. But I appreciate you given the time

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was a great conversation, and uh, thank you.

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah for sure. Let's I love the conversation. Let's definitely

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:49.839
<v Speaker 1>do it again soon. Okay, thanks