Speaker 1: There's so much chaos right now, whether it's the f
Speaker 1: A ordering all of flights grounded for the first time
Speaker 1: since nine eleven, what you see at the southern border,
Speaker 1: or even the societal cultural chaos that we're saying. The
Speaker 1: Chicago Board of Education's Office of Inspector General at this
Speaker 1: annual report found hundreds of Chicago Public school teachers were
Speaker 1: accused of adult to students sexual misconduct and the two
Speaker 1: thousand one to two thousand twenty two school year. So
Speaker 1: what's behind this chaos, this intentional chaos? What's driving it?
Speaker 1: What's the motive of the left. We're gonna get my
Speaker 1: friends take Liz Wheeler, hosted The Liz Wheeler Show on
Speaker 1: all of it. Also get into the fact that Joe
Speaker 1: Biden mishandled classified information. What does that mean for him
Speaker 1: and what does that mean for this investigation into former
Speaker 1: President Trump. Also, as a new mom, what does she
Speaker 1: think of that Chicago report? What does she think on
Speaker 1: this attack that is happening on children, this grooming of children?
Speaker 1: But more importantly, what does all of this mean? That
Speaker 1: conversation with Liz Wheeler, my friend, the host of the
Speaker 1: Liz Wheeler Show, Stay with us Liz Wheeler. I've had
Speaker 1: the pleasure of getting to know you better over really
Speaker 1: over the past few months. It's so great to have
Speaker 1: you on the show, and it's nice to be able
Speaker 1: to call you a friend. Thank you, Thank you for
Speaker 1: having me in ditto. It's it's been You are a
Speaker 1: delightful in person. Your audience doesn't need you to say this,
Speaker 1: but you're a delightful in person off camera as you
Speaker 1: are on camera. Well, I feel the same way about you.
Speaker 1: And and Liz, I was thinking about, you know, what
Speaker 1: should we talk about today? Because there's so much going
Speaker 1: on in the country and it's sad, you know. I mean,
Speaker 1: you've got everything from the border to the f A
Speaker 1: grounding planes, to a nationwide egg shortage to the grooming
Speaker 1: of children. I mean, the list goes on and on
Speaker 1: and on. What worries you the most about where we
Speaker 1: are as a society today? Oh my goodness, this is
Speaker 1: like the most depressing question in kind of a sorry,
Speaker 1: I love you. Um, you know what worries me the
Speaker 1: most is what's happening to our children. For a couple
Speaker 1: of reasons. As a mom, it scares me to think
Speaker 1: of allowing my daughter, who turns to next week to
Speaker 1: be exposed to almost anything that exists outside of our home.
Speaker 1: And I know that sounds over protectionist, but think about
Speaker 1: all the queer theory stuff, all the critical race theory stuff,
Speaker 1: all the your parents are domestic terrorists stuff. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is this is really nasty, insiduous stuff. It's the
Speaker 1: first time, I think, at least in my lifetime I'm
Speaker 1: thirty three, that I can say without hesitation that the
Speaker 1: radical left, or the progressives, or the Marxists, whatever you
Speaker 1: want to call them, it's all the same thing that
Speaker 1: they are assaulting children on per this in order to
Speaker 1: try to topple the civil institution of the family. They've
Speaker 1: already come for marriage itself, They've already come for gender
Speaker 1: and for sex, and their their sites are now set
Speaker 1: on children. And that really terrifies me, not only as
Speaker 1: a mom protecting my individual child, but because that really
Speaker 1: is a way to It's a strategy from the left,
Speaker 1: and it's an effective strategy to co opt the next generation,
Speaker 1: to transform these children into ideological minions of their of
Speaker 1: their of their Marxism. And that's not something I like
Speaker 1: to see in this country. And I think that that's
Speaker 1: the most important thing that we fight back again. Well,
Speaker 1: and I also worry. You know, obviously there's the internal
Speaker 1: threat about what the left is doing to children here
Speaker 1: in the United States, but I also worry externally when
Speaker 1: you look at things like TikTok and China's hand in
Speaker 1: that if you know, with intention, they're indoctrinating an entire
Speaker 1: generation of young people and what that means for for
Speaker 1: future generations and what it means for our country. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: So this is funny that you brought this up because
Speaker 1: is my youngest sister is thirteen years younger than me,
Speaker 1: So I'm thirty three, she's twenty. She's a junior in college,
Speaker 1: and she has TikTok. She has TikTok because all the
Speaker 1: gen z ears have TikTok. And I kind of jokingly
Speaker 1: harassed her about this because I may be one of
Speaker 1: the only millennials even that doesn't have TikTok. But I
Speaker 1: did an episode on my show about the It was
Speaker 1: actually about a Reddit post from an engineer who had
Speaker 1: reverse engineered the code behind behind TikTok. What what is
Speaker 1: written into the algorithm of TikTok, what's the intent? And
Speaker 1: what this engineer found is that it's an influence operation.
Speaker 1: It is it's not just propaganda, it's not just garbage.
Speaker 1: It is those things, but it also tracks everybody's um
Speaker 1: key strokes, not because they're just trying to collect a
Speaker 1: data on you, but because they're trying to get to
Speaker 1: know each and every user so that they can feed
Speaker 1: you things on um On TikTok whatever the homepage is
Speaker 1: called on TikTok. I'm gonna date myself as a millennial
Speaker 1: by not even knowing what it's called the four You
Speaker 1: part um and so that they can get to know
Speaker 1: you and serve you things that interest you, but also
Speaker 1: know exactly how to drop certain content that will slowly
Speaker 1: trickle by trickle change your mind on pivotal cultural issues.
Speaker 1: It is actually an operation to change the entire mindset
Speaker 1: of this young generation of Americans, and it's being run
Speaker 1: by the Chinese Communist Party. This is not a conspiracy theory.
Speaker 1: It's a conspiracy. It's happening, and you can see the
Speaker 1: effects of this. I told my sister, I was like, listen,
Speaker 1: I know that you think that um that politics is
Speaker 1: for mint per boomers and a certain extent, But I
Speaker 1: was like, you don't have to listen to my episode
Speaker 1: if you don't want, but you've got to get off
Speaker 1: the tick that well, don't feel old because well, I
Speaker 1: guess you know, I'm a I'm a millennial technically about
Speaker 1: to be thirty eight. So it's like I I always
Speaker 1: add the caveat of like young ish because it's like
Speaker 1: I'm not really I'm leaving the young category and you know,
Speaker 1: getting old their here. But I'm not on TikTok either,
Speaker 1: for the reasons you just stated, and knowing that it's
Speaker 1: a Chinese up and and you know, and and also
Speaker 1: just not needing to be involved in any of that stuff.
Speaker 1: But you know, to your point, these young people are
Speaker 1: easily being braidwashed with it. And we we look at
Speaker 1: the gen Z turnout for Democrats in the mid term elections,
Speaker 1: and yeah, I don't know how we rate that ship
Speaker 1: as a country and try to change these minds that
Speaker 1: have already been poisoned. I think it's a Congressman Mike
Speaker 1: Gallagher and Senator Marco Rubio introduced to build a band
Speaker 1: TikTok in the United States, and I'm completely on board
Speaker 1: with us. I think that we absolutely should ban TikTok
Speaker 1: if it's owned So the parent company of TikTok is
Speaker 1: called Byte Dance b y t e Bite Dance, and
Speaker 1: that company is based in China. They have ties to
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party, as all companies in China do it.
Speaker 1: It's essentially just a tool of the Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 1: I see no reason why we shouldn't declare that to
Speaker 1: be a national security risk when the there've been employees
Speaker 1: of byte Dance and TikTok in China that admit that
Speaker 1: all of this data, all of this data that's being
Speaker 1: collected on Americans who use the up here in this
Speaker 1: country can be accessed by employees of TikTok at any time,
Speaker 1: which means the Chinese coming as parties obviously using it.
Speaker 1: I mean, the the Chinese know that TikTok is dangerous
Speaker 1: because the version of TikTok in China, which has a
Speaker 1: different name but it's the same app. They don't allow
Speaker 1: twerking and queer theory to go viral on TikTok all
Speaker 1: the time like they do here in the United States.
Speaker 1: I mean, they promote like mathematics and engineering and respect
Speaker 1: for your elders in China because they and they limit
Speaker 1: it to certain ages of people in certain amount of
Speaker 1: hours of day that children in China are allowed to
Speaker 1: be on this app because they fully understand the destructive
Speaker 1: for us. So, I mean, I don't think we have
Speaker 1: to sit here and just bemoaned that young people are
Speaker 1: addicted to this. We should we should ban it. I
Speaker 1: agree with you. I do think it needs to be
Speaker 1: banned as well. You know, you look at like, there's
Speaker 1: the recent report that you know, the Chicago Board of
Speaker 1: Educations Office of Inspector General and Annual report found hundreds
Speaker 1: of Chicago Public school teachers were accused of adult to
Speaker 1: students sexual misconduct from two thousand twenty two school year.
Speaker 1: I think they opened something like four cases investigating teachers
Speaker 1: for grooming, sexual assaulting, or raping students. You know, I
Speaker 1: always ask myself sometimes when we cover these things, has
Speaker 1: this been going on and we're just now paying attention
Speaker 1: to it, or or all these things getting worse? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I think that's a valid question because my inclination to
Speaker 1: answer this, on my speculation, I guess, would be that
Speaker 1: to a certain extent, it's always happened because this has
Speaker 1: always been part of this has always been sins, has
Speaker 1: always been evil. That's always existed. I think that it's
Speaker 1: gotten worse because of the culture that we've allowed to
Speaker 1: take root in our country. Right, We've allowed perverted sex
Speaker 1: to become not just normalized, but celebrated. We've allowed this
Speaker 1: idea that public school teachers are not just there to
Speaker 1: teach reading, writing, and arithmetic, but are there to ideologically
Speaker 1: groom children into neo Marxist sexual identities. I mean that's
Speaker 1: of course, that's going to lead to more crimes being
Speaker 1: committed in more creeps wanting to enter that field. So
Speaker 1: I might, like said, I don't have the day, I
Speaker 1: don't have the data in front of me, but my
Speaker 1: speculation would be that it's always existed, but it's escalating.
Speaker 1: Quick commercial break more with Liz Wheeler. I'm not a
Speaker 1: mom yet, I guarantee you're an amazing momb um. How
Speaker 1: do we protect children in this environment? You know how
Speaker 1: scary is it to be a mom in today's society. Well,
Speaker 1: my daughter hasn't turned two yet, so I may not
Speaker 1: be the expert in answering this question. Yes, maybe you
Speaker 1: should check back with me in like twenty years to
Speaker 1: see if she turned out well. But I can tell
Speaker 1: you what I'm doing we'll do it, but we'll put
Speaker 1: it on the calendar list exactly. Checkup, checkup. Gosh, that's
Speaker 1: so much pressure for me. Um, what I'm doing is
Speaker 1: I'm just I'm I'm treating my husband and I. It's
Speaker 1: not just me, of course, I'm I'm treating our home
Speaker 1: as shelter from evil. That the environment in our home,
Speaker 1: our nuclear family, is the place where my daughter can
Speaker 1: feel safe, the place where my daughter learns right from wrong,
Speaker 1: the place where my daughter is grounded in faith, the
Speaker 1: place where my daughter learns to trust adults that should
Speaker 1: be trusted. To create this bond between she and you know,
Speaker 1: her father and I, and my hope is to equip
Speaker 1: her so that when she does go out into the world,
Speaker 1: she already has an understanding of what is right and
Speaker 1: what is wrong. So when she encounters wrong, when she
Speaker 1: encounters evil, even if that evil is targeting her, even
Speaker 1: if somebody is trying to groom her and evil, she
Speaker 1: recognizes that something is not right, and she is then
Speaker 1: able to come to her dad and me and say, hey, mom, Dad,
Speaker 1: something is not right, and we are then able to
Speaker 1: explain it to her. Because it's unrealistic to think that
Speaker 1: you're not going to be able or that you're going
Speaker 1: to be able to shelter your child from everything you
Speaker 1: You simply can't. But what you can do is you
Speaker 1: can give them shelter from evil while you form them
Speaker 1: into the moral beings that you want. And so that's
Speaker 1: the philosophical part of it. The practical part of it is,
Speaker 1: at least I'm on a homeschooler, I am not. There
Speaker 1: is over my dead body will she ever set foot
Speaker 1: in a public school in in this culture? And I
Speaker 1: think I I mean I was homeschooled, so I'm already
Speaker 1: familiar with that, comfortable with it, confident in it, and
Speaker 1: biased towards it. But particularly given what's happening in public
Speaker 1: schools that you walk in too, I mean even primary
Speaker 1: grade classrooms and you see Black Lives Matter flags on
Speaker 1: the wall, you see Ukraine flags on the wall, you
Speaker 1: see you know, pronoun friendly posters and and Pride Pride
Speaker 1: UH stickers and all this kind of stuff that's supposed
Speaker 1: to signal the students that it's a LGBTQ friendly zone.
Speaker 1: I'm not going to put her in that environment because
Speaker 1: it is unrealistic to think that you could send a
Speaker 1: child to be indoctrinated in that environment and that they
Speaker 1: won't turn out to be a leftist that I am
Speaker 1: going to keep her away from. You know, I probably
Speaker 1: wouldn't have thought about homeschooling, uh, you know before until
Speaker 1: everything we've learned about the school systems as of late
Speaker 1: in recent years and really just seeing the direction in
Speaker 1: the country is heading, and now it would definitely be
Speaker 1: something that I would consider for my hypothetical children that
Speaker 1: don't exist. You uh, but you know, it does seem like,
Speaker 1: you know, naming all those things that you just did,
Speaker 1: that there's this intentional chaos that's happening in society, both
Speaker 1: from a cultural front and then just really on all
Speaker 1: this other stuff, whether it's the border, whether it's you know,
Speaker 1: it's supply chain crisis, whether it's what's happening with gas
Speaker 1: prices and energy. I mean, it's all just this intentional
Speaker 1: chaos that they seem to be creating. I agree, And
Speaker 1: this is a one of the things that I try
Speaker 1: to do on my show because there's I feel like
Speaker 1: there's so it's it's so obvious to so many of
Speaker 1: us that things are going wrong. Right. It's not like
Speaker 1: you and I need to sit here and be like, dang,
Speaker 1: this is the environment here is terrible. Our children under assault,
Speaker 1: and we can all see that that's happening. And so
Speaker 1: one of the things that I've tried to do in
Speaker 1: the last year on my show, it's take a step
Speaker 1: back or zoom out and be like, Okay, we acknowledge
Speaker 1: that what it is is of what's happening. Now let's
Speaker 1: look at the why it's happening, the who is behind this,
Speaker 1: what is the agenda, what what is this ideology that's
Speaker 1: causing this intentional chaos, because we can we can sit
Speaker 1: here and we can say, well, it's really bad that
Speaker 1: the borders are open. It's really bad that, you know,
Speaker 1: these civil institutions like the education system and a family
Speaker 1: are under assault. But I have found it very helpful
Speaker 1: in ordering my response to these things to understand um
Speaker 1: the ideology behind it. So, for example, when I'm talking
Speaker 1: about assault on children or assault on the family, it
Speaker 1: was very It's been very helpful for me to read
Speaker 1: this old Marxist from the nineteen thirties named Antonio Grumsey,
Speaker 1: who probably your listeners are very familiar with his name,
Speaker 1: but he was the one who essentially morphed twentieth century
Speaker 1: communism or Marxism into twenty one century Marxism, meaning he
Speaker 1: shifted Karl Marx's original vision for a worker led revelueation
Speaker 1: where the working class um stages of revolution and overthrows
Speaker 1: this this ruling class based on economic dissatisfaction. Drum See said, Okay, well,
Speaker 1: we can see for a fact that that's not going
Speaker 1: to happen anymore, right, that we're not going to have
Speaker 1: a working class based on economic discomfort that are going
Speaker 1: to overthrow these these these horrible villains of capitalists. And
Speaker 1: he said, the way to actually overthrow these Western capitalist
Speaker 1: government institutions is actually to come for the cultural institutions first,
Speaker 1: the civil institutions, the education system, and marriage and women
Speaker 1: and men and their traditional roles and um religion and
Speaker 1: faith and all of these things that are not of
Speaker 1: the government, but they underpin our society in a way
Speaker 1: that props up our American version of government. And what
Speaker 1: I mean by that is this idea that we have
Speaker 1: a government with enumerating powers that has that is a
Speaker 1: limited government it's supposed to infringe on our lives as
Speaker 1: little as possible. That actually can't work unless you have
Speaker 1: these strong cultural institutions on which people rely because if
Speaker 1: you don't have people relying on their own families, their spouses,
Speaker 1: their parents, their children, even their communities, their churches, then
Speaker 1: they what do they rely on? Then they need to
Speaker 1: rely on the government. And you cannot have a limited
Speaker 1: government when people are relying and maths on the government.
Speaker 1: So it's this, it's this new this this modern Marxism
Speaker 1: that we're seeing right now being on leash in our country.
Speaker 1: And it's been very helpful for me in properly ordering
Speaker 1: my response to I like your phrase that intentional chaosks
Speaker 1: to understand exactly what's behind it. I totally agree with you.
Speaker 1: You know, they're trying to remove the anchors that hold
Speaker 1: us down as human beings and give us independence from
Speaker 1: the government, because you know, the attended purposes obviously to
Speaker 1: drive us oh to the government. And you know, we
Speaker 1: talk about the grooming of children, but there's almost but
Speaker 1: there's also this larger grooming of society that's happened ato
Speaker 1: and we saw that during COVID it was more pronounced
Speaker 1: than perhaps ever or with just this you know, shutting
Speaker 1: out of businesses, this force of vaccinations, this paying people
Speaker 1: to stay home, and become reliant upon the government. And
Speaker 1: I there's been this reshaping of I think society's viewpoint
Speaker 1: on the role of government. And that's concerning to me
Speaker 1: as well, of that sort of grooming that's happened totally.
Speaker 1: I call it conditioning society because they're they're that's exactly
Speaker 1: what it is. They're grooming, And the definition of grooming
Speaker 1: is conditioning somebody to do something. In this case, they're
Speaker 1: conditioning society to accept a more Marxist form of government.
Speaker 1: And I mean this has been a long time coming,
Speaker 1: even towards even aimed at adults in our society. It
Speaker 1: accelerated during COVID, when all of a sudden in the
Speaker 1: past two three or four years, we see all these
Speaker 1: d e I programs, the diversity equity and inclusion programs
Speaker 1: um emerge, not just in schools but in the workplace.
Speaker 1: These phrases became very common to people. Most people are like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: we do have a diversity equity and inclusion officer at
Speaker 1: you know, my job, or we had this diversity training
Speaker 1: or whatever it might be. That's conditioned society to to
Speaker 1: view the world in actually what the Marxist qualities is
Speaker 1: critical thought to view the world through this lens of
Speaker 1: the critical theories that emerged from the Marxist Frankfurt School
Speaker 1: in Germany a hundred years ago, almost a hundred years ago,
Speaker 1: and the d e I programs that are just about
Speaker 1: universal right now, are are anchored in these institutions. You
Speaker 1: and I as consumers, whether we send our children to schools,
Speaker 1: or whether you know we went to colleges where this existed,
Speaker 1: whether this is in our workplace wherever it might be.
Speaker 1: We can't just use our money or our voices and say,
Speaker 1: waitch a second, we're protesting against this. We don't want
Speaker 1: to shop here if you have this, If you have
Speaker 1: this policy, we don't want to set our kids here,
Speaker 1: if your school teaching this, we don't want to work here.
Speaker 1: If you're going to force this on us in the workplace,
Speaker 1: we've lost our power negotiating power because of the E
Speaker 1: s G stuff, because of the Environmental, Social and Governance metrics,
Speaker 1: which is essentially a so show credit score system that
Speaker 1: rewards all of these different types of institutions, schools and
Speaker 1: workplaces and businesses rewards them with a higher rating on
Speaker 1: this on this metric. If they push d e I,
Speaker 1: if they push diversity, equity, and inclusion, and the punishment
Speaker 1: if they don't. It's not just this positive reinforcement with
Speaker 1: high rating, the punishment if they don't, if they lose
Speaker 1: access to capital in the market. They're not able to
Speaker 1: run their business if they don't obtain this higher E.
Speaker 1: S G score rating. So it really is deeply infiltrated
Speaker 1: into our society right now. And so we're I mean, yes,
Speaker 1: it's it's conditioning the American population to accept, at some
Speaker 1: point in the nearer and nearer future, the fact that
Speaker 1: the left does not like the American system of government.
Speaker 1: The Left is not like our country. They want to
Speaker 1: fundamentally transform it. And when we ask the question, well,
Speaker 1: transform it into what the answer is a nation that
Speaker 1: is not free. Well, and we're seeing some of that
Speaker 1: play out even within the Biden administration. I mean, you
Speaker 1: have various people and positions of power, whether it's Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: Pete Buddha Judge who had been put there for you know,
Speaker 1: checking box sake, and that's not worked out because these
Speaker 1: people are not competent enough to hold their positions. And
Speaker 1: we even just look at what happened recently with the
Speaker 1: first you know, the f A ordering all flights grounded
Speaker 1: for the first time since nine eleven. Uh, in the
Speaker 1: incompetency at the Department of Transportation. So, I mean we
Speaker 1: can see in real time, even just looking at the
Speaker 1: Biden administration, how when you get away from a merit
Speaker 1: based system, Uh, it leads to to failure and incompetency. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's terrible what happened with the The worst
Speaker 1: example of this actually, or maybe maybe not the worst
Speaker 1: from a policy standpoint, but the most egregious pr example
Speaker 1: of this is Sam Brenton, right, the luggage thief that
Speaker 1: was formerly employed by Biden's Department of Education. That's that's
Speaker 1: weird o, creepo, sicko who cross stressed constantly called himself
Speaker 1: a pop handler, which is some weird bondage term for
Speaker 1: liking to walk other men around with leathered chains around
Speaker 1: their necks. Some some really sick, sexual, twisted fantasy that
Speaker 1: he had in this That was hired obviously because he
Speaker 1: was non binary, because he was um, because he checked
Speaker 1: those lgbt Q privilege points boxes. But look at what happened,
Speaker 1: ended up stealing people's luggage at the airport like a derange,
Speaker 1: like the deranged individual that he was. That's the outcome
Speaker 1: of it. Um, Like I said, maybe that's maybe that's
Speaker 1: not Maybe didn't didn't have the biggest effect on policy.
Speaker 1: Maybe Pete Buddha Judge has had the worst effect on policy.
Speaker 1: But it actually scares me as a frequent traveler. You
Speaker 1: travel a lot, Lisa, I travel a lot. It scares
Speaker 1: me to think that our f a it's computer system
Speaker 1: is so outdated there's been no updates, very little maintenance
Speaker 1: on it that Pete Buddah Judge is supposed to be overseeing,
Speaker 1: Like what happens when this actually impacts flights when they're
Speaker 1: in the air. That terrifies me. Well. And also to
Speaker 1: worry about the vulnerability with potential cyber attacks, right because
Speaker 1: we don't know what the root cause of this actually
Speaker 1: it was, and so you know, I think it's fair
Speaker 1: to also be concerned about potential cyber but just the
Speaker 1: vulnerability and just the failure on so many parts with
Speaker 1: Pete Boodha Judge, whether it was the you know, the
Speaker 1: rail strike or supply global supply chain issues, the Southwest chaos,
Speaker 1: and you know, the list goes on. Uh. You know, Liz,
Speaker 1: I wanted to to get your take on this new
Speaker 1: development with Joe Biden having classified documents. Let's take a
Speaker 1: listen to an interview that he did with Scott Kelly
Speaker 1: from sixty minutes, and then I want to get your
Speaker 1: take on all of this. On the other side, when
Speaker 1: you saw the photograph of the top secret documents laid
Speaker 1: out on the floor of mar Lago, what did you
Speaker 1: think to yourself looking at that image, how that could
Speaker 1: possibly happen? How want anyone could be that a response
Speaker 1: of all? And I thought, what data was in there
Speaker 1: that may compromise sources and methods. By that, I mean
Speaker 1: names of people who helped there, et cetera. And it
Speaker 1: just totally irresponsible. And you don't know what was in
Speaker 1: those documents. I have not asked for the specifics of
Speaker 1: those documents because I don't want to get myself in
Speaker 1: the middle of whether or not the Just Department should
Speaker 1: move or not move on certain actions they can take.
Speaker 1: I agreed, I would not tell them what to do,
Speaker 1: and not in fact engage in telling them how to
Speaker 1: prosecute or not. So, Liz, point being is that you
Speaker 1: know Joe Biden sat there criticizing President Trump for holding
Speaker 1: classified information. Turns out that he had classified information still
Speaker 1: hanging on from his time being a vice president, included
Speaker 1: briefing materials about Ukraine, Iran, and the United Kingdom, along
Speaker 1: with some other documents as well. What are your thoughts
Speaker 1: and uh, you know, hearing this news, I think, well,
Speaker 1: first of all, it's so funny, like what kind of
Speaker 1: doddering idiot of a president sits in the National Interview
Speaker 1: and goes, no, I know nothing about the biggest story
Speaker 1: that's happening in the United States right now. Like, come on, man,
Speaker 1: at least at least pretend that you know what's going
Speaker 1: on here. It's just showmanship, Lisa. I mean, he said
Speaker 1: he hadn't been brief in these documents, so how does
Speaker 1: he know exactly what these documents are. President Trump claims
Speaker 1: that this is just a dispute over ownership um of
Speaker 1: documents that he claimed where his personal documents, and the
Speaker 1: National Archives said nope, this belongs to the government. It's
Speaker 1: it's Here's the thing. A lot of people are saying, oh,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is a hypocrite because now that he's been
Speaker 1: found to have mishandled clots fight information, they are just
Speaker 1: painting it as an accident and they did the right thing,
Speaker 1: and they cooperated with the National Archives. But it's not
Speaker 1: actually hypocrisy, because the hypocrite is someone who thinks that
Speaker 1: if they break the rules, they will just get away
Speaker 1: with it. That's not what Joe Biden believes. Joe Biden
Speaker 1: is an elitist. He believes that he deserves to play
Speaker 1: by a different set of rules than President Trump, or
Speaker 1: than you or me. That's a very very different thing.
Speaker 1: And that's what we're seeing pervasively on the left right now.
Speaker 1: If they don't, they don't they don't think that we
Speaker 1: should play by the same rules. They think that we
Speaker 1: deserve to be prosecuted, we deserve to be silence, we
Speaker 1: deserve to be canceled because we either dare to support
Speaker 1: Trump or were conservatives or a Christian, or we simply
Speaker 1: dissent from the radical leftist ideology. Well, and it's also
Speaker 1: you know, President Trump, Presidents have the ultimate authority. It's
Speaker 1: a classified documents. The vice president does not, So you know,
Speaker 1: him him being in possession or his team being a
Speaker 1: possession of these documents is you know, actually criminal compared
Speaker 1: to you know, President Trump, who can to classify whatever
Speaker 1: he wants. But it's also weird eat. I think we
Speaker 1: need to learn more about this. Uh. The penn Biden
Speaker 1: Center for Diplomacy and Global Engagement, which opened during the
Speaker 1: Trump administration. It's a Washington based think tank with the
Speaker 1: University of Pennsylvania. But apparently Biden had an office at
Speaker 1: the center from mid two seventeen to the start of
Speaker 1: the presidential campaign, and they paid them more than nine
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars. There's just always these sketchy connections with
Speaker 1: Joe Biden on the foreign policy front, and either he's
Speaker 1: profiting or his family's profiting from it. Nobody for one
Speaker 1: second believes that Biden was in charge of a think tank.
Speaker 1: I mean, come on, this is just one of those
Speaker 1: that all politicians do this, or many politicians do this,
Speaker 1: especially the highest level politicians. Between when they run for office,
Speaker 1: they create these organizations or think tanks, and uh portray
Speaker 1: themselves as being very productive and and and adding adding
Speaker 1: I don't know, thoughts and research to the ongoing conversation
Speaker 1: about whatever topic they pretend to be an expert in.
Speaker 1: But we all know that it's just them setting themselves
Speaker 1: up for their next presidential run. There's no way that
Speaker 1: anything productive happened at this so called think tank of
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's. And here's the other. Here's the other difference
Speaker 1: between mar Lago and the Penn Biden Center Lisa. That is,
Speaker 1: mar Lago is the residence of a former president. It
Speaker 1: is locked down by Secret Service. So Trump's office, which
Speaker 1: is his office at mar Lago, was more or less secure.
Speaker 1: There wasn't going to be people that were just wandering
Speaker 1: into this office the Secret Service in addition to to
Speaker 1: Trump's security, because Marlago is a is a club, a
Speaker 1: private club. This this is a relatively secure, if not
Speaker 1: very secure facility. The pen, the Penn Biden or the
Speaker 1: Biden Pen Center, uh is not secured. This was in
Speaker 1: a box, in a closet, in an unsecured location. What
Speaker 1: do you think this means for the investigation into former
Speaker 1: President Trump? Does it make it harder for them to
Speaker 1: try to pursue charges against him? If they were honest people, yes,
Speaker 1: if they believed that we should all play by the
Speaker 1: same rules, then yes. But the Democrats are so desperate
Speaker 1: to stop Trump from running in any way possible that
Speaker 1: I don't think that it's going to make a difference.
Speaker 1: The other thing about this and I'm kind of sad
Speaker 1: to say this because I wish that it was a
Speaker 1: bigger deal. But I think that for the vast majority
Speaker 1: of the American public, even even the voting electorate, I
Speaker 1: don't think the vast majority of people care about this.
Speaker 1: Is my just you care about this, and as much
Speaker 1: as I care about this, because we care about this,
Speaker 1: because we're we're obsessed with politics. This is what we
Speaker 1: do for a living. This is what we do for
Speaker 1: a hobby. This is this is our thing. But most people,
Speaker 1: that's not going to change the way that they cast
Speaker 1: their vote. They're not going to clutch their pearls and
Speaker 1: be like, oh no, Trump and A handled classified information.
Speaker 1: But Biden did too. Therefore, the Democrats are hypocrites and
Speaker 1: I'm going to become Republican because of that. I wish
Speaker 1: that were the case, but I guess my cynical view
Speaker 1: is I don't think that it's going to change anything.
Speaker 1: And I think in this case, democrats realize that Democrats
Speaker 1: oftentimes gauge the temperature of the political environment better than
Speaker 1: Republicans do. They realize that they can, in the eyes
Speaker 1: of voter, get away with some of this stuff, and
Speaker 1: they can in the eyes of the voter get away
Speaker 1: with still leveraging or levying this, this investigation against Trump,
Speaker 1: because the only people who are going to be really
Speaker 1: really annoyed about it, really angry and indignant about it,
Speaker 1: are going to be those of us who UH already
Speaker 1: think of the left is dishonest and corrupt. Do you
Speaker 1: think it's that Democrats gauge it better or do you
Speaker 1: think it's just that they control the process because they
Speaker 1: controlled the media. Probably both. I think that they're just
Speaker 1: they're more sad, they're more savage fighters, right like they're
Speaker 1: they're based in their own way. They like what what happened?
Speaker 1: Let me give him a zoomed out example of this.
Speaker 1: So what happened with the Speaker of the House election
Speaker 1: this past week when we had these twenty Republican rebels
Speaker 1: who just held Kevin McCarthy hostage until he gave them
Speaker 1: what they demanded from the House of Rules package. It was.
Speaker 1: I found it so delightful and entertaining and funny and
Speaker 1: great to watch. I was so proud of them. Was
Speaker 1: the first time that I UH felt a positive feeling
Speaker 1: about a member in Congress in a really long time.
Speaker 1: That the way that they fought is the way that
Speaker 1: Democrats usually fight. Democrats are usually the one. It's usually
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi and her her ilk who are holding Republicans
Speaker 1: hostage and refusing to bend me even when everyone else
Speaker 1: is pressuring them, people in their own party, people in
Speaker 1: the media, people even voters. But that kind of fighting
Speaker 1: from Republicans, that's the first time I can remember Republicans
Speaker 1: fighting that way. Usually we see that from Democrats. So
Speaker 1: I think they do have a better understanding of how
Speaker 1: to play not play dirty, but play dirty in politics
Speaker 1: better than Republicans do. And then, of course they have
Speaker 1: the added advantage of they're not going to get the
Speaker 1: same kind of pushback because they controlled the media apparatus
Speaker 1: and the big text combody. Well, I do worry about
Speaker 1: the reaction to it, because I agree with you. I
Speaker 1: think what they did was noble and needed. I mean,
Speaker 1: it wasn't really about McCarthy. Was a process fight, you know,
Speaker 1: in trying to change the way that the House does business,
Speaker 1: because Nancy Pelosi had really changed the rules to give
Speaker 1: the Speaker of the House more authority and you know,
Speaker 1: basically like a dictatorship, which is what the left does.
Speaker 1: But the but the response to it concerned me because
Speaker 1: to your point, you know, we need fighters, right, We've
Speaker 1: got a big but we saw what happened during COVID.
Speaker 1: We we know what their objective is for the country.
Speaker 1: We know what direction the country is head egg and
Speaker 1: so we need people with a stomach for it for
Speaker 1: the fight ahead. And you know, we didn't see that
Speaker 1: as much as I think we we should have should
Speaker 1: have hoped for in terms of the response to to
Speaker 1: that small group of Republicans putting up a fight. No,
Speaker 1: there were a lot of Republicans who were opposed to that.
Speaker 1: And this is republicans in elected office, This is republicans
Speaker 1: in in commentary, this is voters. And I view this.
Speaker 1: I view this in a positive way, not because it's
Speaker 1: not because it's a good thing, but I viewed this
Speaker 1: in a positive way because it's better that we know
Speaker 1: who are the fighters on our side. It's better that
Speaker 1: we know who has that fire in their belly to
Speaker 1: stand strong in their principles, and it's better that we
Speaker 1: know who not to trust. I mean, there were there
Speaker 1: are actually some players even in the United States Congress,
Speaker 1: who portrayed themselves to be fighters and took the wrong
Speaker 1: side on this and it's good to know. It's good
Speaker 1: for us to know who we can trust and who
Speaker 1: we can count on and who we can't. So if that,
Speaker 1: if that's all part of the purifying process, and I
Speaker 1: say that as a Catholic meaning like the purgatory type
Speaker 1: process that I'm okay with us quick break more worthless.
Speaker 1: What do you think it means for the fight ahead
Speaker 1: in the House? You know, I mean, look at the
Speaker 1: powers that Republicans in a small majority are going to have.
Speaker 1: It's essentially power of the purse and then also oversight
Speaker 1: an investigative authority. Uh, you know, what do you want
Speaker 1: to see from them and using those powers? I want
Speaker 1: to see investigations. I want to see committees, the committees
Speaker 1: like the Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Government. And I
Speaker 1: was talking about this on I showed the other day
Speaker 1: because I said, there's something from this committee that I
Speaker 1: don't want to see. We have we have an experience
Speaker 1: even with Republicans in Congress, where they hold these people
Speaker 1: who we assume or accused of being corrupt in front
Speaker 1: of them, and they interviewed them. And sometimes these interviews
Speaker 1: or even brutal, sometimes they get really viral. Good informative
Speaker 1: clips that show um that show the subject who was
Speaker 1: being interviewed to be a bad person, to be a liar,
Speaker 1: to to be corrupt, and that's oftentimes where they leave it.
Speaker 1: They leave it with a viral Twitter video. They leave
Speaker 1: it with oh, look I I did. I let me
Speaker 1: this incredible SmackDown against somebody. And I don't want to
Speaker 1: see that from this Congress. I don't want them just
Speaker 1: to use this as an opportunity to to increase their
Speaker 1: own influence or to fundraise what I want to see
Speaker 1: as a mechanism of accountability. I want them to do
Speaker 1: again what the Democrats do. I want them to pursue
Speaker 1: these investigations with the goal in their mind of either
Speaker 1: referring for prosecution or finding that there wasn't anything to
Speaker 1: refer for prosecution. I don't want them just to be like, ha,
Speaker 1: we told you, and like pound their fist on the
Speaker 1: table and be like that was a stupid answer. Democrats
Speaker 1: are idiots. No, No, I want people who have violated
Speaker 1: the law to be held accountable and to be prosecuted
Speaker 1: for it. The House of Representatives is controlled by Republicans.
Speaker 1: Now Republicans seat the seat who they want on committees
Speaker 1: right now, we should be mercilessly investigating everything from the
Speaker 1: FBI's um role in January six to the FBI's role
Speaker 1: in the Gretchen with Ore fed napping, to the raid
Speaker 1: on maur A Longo. We should go back and zoom
Speaker 1: out on the Department of Justice, on the weaponization of
Speaker 1: the Department of Homeland Security against parents who opposed critical
Speaker 1: race theory and schools, the Department of Education and their
Speaker 1: collusion with teachers unions who are corrupt entities themselves. We
Speaker 1: should lay there the corruption, the Fauci, corruption with Big Pharma,
Speaker 1: all of this stuff, and the goal should be referral
Speaker 1: for prosecution if we believe what we say, what we
Speaker 1: constantly say that these people don't just hold a different opinion.
Speaker 1: They're not just pushing different policies than we support, but
Speaker 1: they've committed actual crimes against our country. I mean, the
Speaker 1: frustrating part is, you know, Merrick Garland's not going to
Speaker 1: do anything with you know, the referrals. But I totally
Speaker 1: agree with you and the fact that you know, we
Speaker 1: need to bring this information today and I hope to
Speaker 1: like I would, what I'd love to see from them
Speaker 1: is actually put forth some reforms, you know, to to
Speaker 1: to get to the wide to get to what happened.
Speaker 1: But then also you know, what should we do about it? Right?
Speaker 1: How do you make government better? And you know, I
Speaker 1: mean even in the fight with Kevin McCarthy and you know,
Speaker 1: getting to the fifteenth ballot, Congress has approval rating. I
Speaker 1: actually think the American people would be receptive two Republicans
Speaker 1: putting forth changes. Right, you know, how do we how
Speaker 1: do we make Congress work better for the people? Answer
Speaker 1: to the people, more accountable? How do we make government
Speaker 1: more accountable? So, you know, I hope they put forward
Speaker 1: some reforms and changes, even if they're not going to
Speaker 1: get implemented right now, but just putting it forward to
Speaker 1: the people to see. One of the things that I
Speaker 1: think the new Rules Package is going to give the
Speaker 1: Congress the opportunity to do. And this is something that
Speaker 1: I've long advocated that whenever Republicans are in charge of
Speaker 1: either the Senate or the House, that we should be
Speaker 1: doing this constantly is bringing every single issue in a
Speaker 1: very simplistic form to a vote. And Republicans actually avoid
Speaker 1: this the same as Democrats do, which annoys me a
Speaker 1: lot um. But one of the things that even if
Speaker 1: you have like this Republican Congress has no opportunity to
Speaker 1: actually pass legislation, right, it's going to be immediately immediately,
Speaker 1: it's going to immediately die in the Senate. Even if
Speaker 1: it passed the Senate, it would be vetoed by by Biden.
Speaker 1: So the legislative power of this Congress is not it's
Speaker 1: not great, it's very minimal. But what they have the
Speaker 1: opportunity to do is they have the opportunity to expose
Speaker 1: the Democrats for the radical positions that they hold. So
Speaker 1: it takes school choice for example, we all know that
Speaker 1: across the country, most parents support school choice. Most Democrat
Speaker 1: parents support school choice, Most Republican parents supports school choice.
Speaker 1: White parents, Black parents, Hispanic parents. The majority of people
Speaker 1: support school choice. The only people that don't support school
Speaker 1: choice are the Democrats in Congress. These these white liberals
Speaker 1: for the most part, that run the Democratic Party and
Speaker 1: the Republican Party in the House. Right now is an
Speaker 1: incredible opportunity to get these Democrat members of Congress on
Speaker 1: the wreck heard saying that they oppose a policy that
Speaker 1: their constituents actually support. So it's an opportunity to create
Speaker 1: that wedge between Democrat constituents and Democrat members of Congress.
Speaker 1: That's a hugely important role for this Congress to play
Speaker 1: since they do have a minimal legislative ability, given the
Speaker 1: fact that you know, they don't have the Senate or
Speaker 1: the House. There's any number of issues that they could
Speaker 1: put to a vote and see that the Democrats are
Speaker 1: out of step with the American people, and then use
Speaker 1: that to try to actually invite people who might not
Speaker 1: be the traditional Republican voter to vote for members, to
Speaker 1: vote for members of Congress, to vote for a politician
Speaker 1: in the Republican party who better suits their interest. Totally
Speaker 1: agree on that. And then also, you know, we have
Speaker 1: seen some slight movement in terms of you know, you've
Speaker 1: got Joe Biden visiting the border, although it was you know,
Speaker 1: a fake visit, but he at least made the trip.
Speaker 1: Uh you know, yeah, totally fake, but you know, at
Speaker 1: least he went there, right, but not giving him any
Speaker 1: credit whatsoever, but he did this obviously as republic Cans
Speaker 1: take the helm of the House, knowing that he's going
Speaker 1: to be investigated, as border policies are going to be investigated. Uh.
Speaker 1: And then we have the Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin formally
Speaker 1: rescinding his August two thousand, twenty one vaccine mandate as well. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, and this is because of basically Congress pushing
Speaker 1: him on it over the National Defense Authorization Act, So
Speaker 1: you know, a slight movement, right, And then you know,
Speaker 1: there's also caveats with that in the sense that everyone
Speaker 1: who's kicked out is not being reinstated, and and you know,
Speaker 1: it's still up to the discretion of people in the
Speaker 1: authority of you know, kind of giving these individuals assignments
Speaker 1: and whatnot. But anyways, point bang is, there has been
Speaker 1: some you know movement, right at least some positioning and
Speaker 1: pushing the Biden administration a little bit in a better direction, definitely,
Speaker 1: and it's it's largely thanks to the Republicans who have
Speaker 1: that fire in their belly, who don't just say, well, shrug,
Speaker 1: I'm here in Congress, but since we're since we don't
Speaker 1: have any legislative power, I guess I'll just get coffee
Speaker 1: here and kind of trying to make friends with these
Speaker 1: people that hate me on the other side. No, no,
Speaker 1: these are people that said, listen, minority, even if you're
Speaker 1: in a minority coalition. We still are a minority party.
Speaker 1: We still have some power, and we should use that
Speaker 1: to to the fullest extent. I mean, when I talk
Speaker 1: about what I want Congress, what I want McCarthy to
Speaker 1: bring to the floor to vote on, I'm talking about
Speaker 1: every issue like he should have. He should get all
Speaker 1: the Democrats on the record on abortion. Will they will
Speaker 1: they all refuse to ban later an abortion because the
Speaker 1: majority of the American people opposed that. Will they all
Speaker 1: vote in favor of vaccine mandates because the majority of
Speaker 1: the American people opposed that. Will they all vote to
Speaker 1: send more of our money to Ukraine for endless wars,
Speaker 1: which I know they're doing in real life. It doesn't
Speaker 1: have to be hypothetical because the majority of American people
Speaker 1: opposed that. I mean, there there's all kinds of things
Speaker 1: related to what these kitchen table economic issues as well
Speaker 1: as cultural or social issues. I mean, talk about queer
Speaker 1: theory and critical race theory. Parents again across the aisle
Speaker 1: don't want their children being indoctrinated in those neo Marxist
Speaker 1: theory reason in school. And yet these Democrats in Congress
Speaker 1: want that support that push, that advocate for that and
Speaker 1: Republicans have an opportunity to reach out to these voters saying, hey, look,
Speaker 1: this is what your democrat wants your This democrat wants
Speaker 1: to groom your child in transgender ideology. You don't want that.
Speaker 1: Maybe something to think about for the next election. Well,
Speaker 1: and I agree where I think the American people need
Speaker 1: to know where we stand. And and you look at
Speaker 1: where bold leadership has worked, whether it's Florida or even
Speaker 1: Brian Kempt getting reelected by you know, significant numbers, Greg Abbott,
Speaker 1: you know, com Renolds. The list goes on. When you
Speaker 1: lay a marker down and people know where your stand, uh,
Speaker 1: it works, right, And I think Republicans kind of failed
Speaker 1: to do that because we haven't had strong leadership at
Speaker 1: least in Congress on on the you know, the federal level,
Speaker 1: not necessarily what's going on in the states. But before
Speaker 1: we go, I wanted to get your take on uh,
Speaker 1: you know, I know you stood strong against the vaccine
Speaker 1: mandates and and getting the vaccine as well. What do
Speaker 1: you think was behind that massive push to get shots
Speaker 1: and everyone's arms The push I think was was a
Speaker 1: couple of things. I mean, we know how influential Dr Fauci.
Speaker 1: His name has been almost overused in this conversation. But
Speaker 1: because of the tremendous power that he had, he stood
Speaker 1: to profit both financially, but he also stood to profit
Speaker 1: in in power and this incredible amount of power that
Speaker 1: he has amassed. Um, the Big Farmer companies have completely
Speaker 1: corrupted our public health apparatus, whether that's the FDA, whether
Speaker 1: that's the CDC. The CDC and FDA are completely in
Speaker 1: the pocket of Big Farman. Big Farmer had their most
Speaker 1: profitable year ever by orders of magnitude, because they convinced
Speaker 1: governments around the world, but primarily led by the U.
Speaker 1: S Government, to actually mandate these these vaccines. I mean
Speaker 1: back when the Ocean mandate was in effect, before that
Speaker 1: was overturned by the court. Every employee at every company
Speaker 1: was going to be forced to take this otherwise they
Speaker 1: were going to lose their jobs. My own husband lost
Speaker 1: his job. He's a medical provider, and he declined to
Speaker 1: get the vaccine and he lost his job and in
Speaker 1: the health care system because because of that mandate. Um,
Speaker 1: it's it's truly truly awful. But when you have this
Speaker 1: toxic combination of of ideology, meaning these these these people.
Speaker 1: This ruling class, the Democrats, are the elitist and big
Speaker 1: farm They believe they know better than we know. They
Speaker 1: believe that we are stupid and they are smart. They
Speaker 1: believe that they should be um, they should be treated
Speaker 1: as the experts. They believe in technocracy. They don't believe
Speaker 1: that we should have a choice about our own bodies
Speaker 1: and our own lives and our own medical decisions. They
Speaker 1: believe that if they recommend it, then we should just
Speaker 1: dothily say okay, yes sir, and do what they say.
Speaker 1: They don't believe that we should be equal partners in
Speaker 1: our healthcare. So when you marry that toxic ideology to
Speaker 1: their Marxist political ideology, which again doesn't respect the rights,
Speaker 1: the individual rights of people, and marry that to profit
Speaker 1: motive and power motive, well you get this. You get
Speaker 1: exactly what we experienced during COVID nineteen. You get um
Speaker 1: polo titians that for profit and power are willing to
Speaker 1: to try to force people to take a dangerous, a
Speaker 1: an unsafe and ineffective vaccine that they didn't want to
Speaker 1: take in the first place. And COVID just provided this opportunity.
Speaker 1: This this wasn't new. There have been battles over UM,
Speaker 1: vaccine mandates and medical freedom before UM. Any parent with
Speaker 1: a child sending a child to school can tell you
Speaker 1: about that UM. But COVID just accelerated it and brought
Speaker 1: it to light. And the people, the American people, unfortunately,
Speaker 1: were very easily conditioned into accepting this because of the
Speaker 1: lies that they were told about COVID nineteen itself. They
Speaker 1: were told that this was going to just raise our population.
Speaker 1: It was going to cause millions of deaths children and
Speaker 1: your children and your parents and yourself, and this was
Speaker 1: the only thing to do, and people were were paralyzed
Speaker 1: by fear. I found it, honestly, at least that kind
Speaker 1: of eye opening because I didn't realize our population would
Speaker 1: be that easily manipulated. Well and scary because of that
Speaker 1: as well. And in total respect for you, my friend,
Speaker 1: for for standing up against all of this, you know,
Speaker 1: I think omicron was probably the best thing that had happened,
Speaker 1: because you at all these people who are pushing lockdowns,
Speaker 1: pushing mandates, pushing all these things. It almost deprogrammed them
Speaker 1: to a certain degree because they thought they could outrun
Speaker 1: getting COVID, and then once everyone got it, they're like, okay, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, we got to move on to another topic,
Speaker 1: you know, like it's sort of a deprogrammed them. But
Speaker 1: leetle Liz anything else. I've loved this conversation with you,
Speaker 1: host of the Liz Wheeler Show. Everyone go check out
Speaker 1: Liz's show. Is there anything you want to leave us
Speaker 1: with before we go? Listen? A lot of the stuff
Speaker 1: that we have talked about today, a lot of stuff
Speaker 1: that I talked about on my show too. It's heavy stuff,
Speaker 1: it's deep stuff. It's not like this walk in the
Speaker 1: park butterflies and sunshine and I I I just want
Speaker 1: to share with everyone that's listening that I'm not cynical
Speaker 1: and I'm not um I don't lack hope. I actually
Speaker 1: feel incredibly energized for the future fighting this fight, because
Speaker 1: at least if we have proved any thing in the
Speaker 1: last three years, we have proved that the American people,
Speaker 1: for all of what I just said, maybe this contradicts
Speaker 1: what I just said, that so much of the population
Speaker 1: was willing to succumb to the fear and the conditioning
Speaker 1: and um and and not push back against masks and
Speaker 1: vaccines and lockdowns, etcetera. There's also an incredible number of
Speaker 1: the American people whose eyes have been opened to the
Speaker 1: true agenda of the radical left. And we have we
Speaker 1: have fought back against us. I mean, we've essentially won
Speaker 1: the critical race theory fight. We're on the verge of
Speaker 1: winning the fight against queer theory. We can do this.
Speaker 1: As long as we acknowledge the reality of the political
Speaker 1: enemy that we face, then we will be able to
Speaker 1: fight back well against it. And if we fight back well,
Speaker 1: we will win. I'm confident of that. Yeah, I agree.
Speaker 1: My eyes have certainly been open. I I you know,
Speaker 1: I hope our fellow Americans eyes have as well. Uh.
Speaker 1: Liz wheel are glad to know you, my friend. Appreciate
Speaker 1: the work you do and I appreciate you taking the
Speaker 1: time to come on the show. Thank you so much.
Speaker 1: It was delightful to be here. I really appreciate it. Awesome.
Speaker 1: Go check out the Liz Wheeler Show. Thanks so much, Liz.
Speaker 1: I hope to see you soon. Talk soon. M Yeah,
Speaker 1: So that was Liz Wheeler, host of The Liz Wheeler Show.
Speaker 1: I appreciate you guys taking the time to listen to
Speaker 1: the show every Monday and Thursday, but you can listen
Speaker 1: throughout the week. I want to thank John Cassio, my producer,
Speaker 1: for putting the show together. I'll feel free to leave
Speaker 1: us review, give us a rating on Apple Podcasts. Until
Speaker 1: next time, Thanks for listening.