WEBVTT - Week in Tech: There's No Place Like AI

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of iHeart Podcasts and

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Kaleidoscope iMOS vloscan and carries out again this week. So

0:00:19.120 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>today I'll bring you the headlines, including what Google Search

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds like and why you're out of stock Cereal may

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be the result of a cyber attack on today's tech

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>support segment. Semaphor's read Albergotti casts AI companies in the

0:00:36.360 --> 0:00:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Wizard of Oz.

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 2>The funniest part of this whole thing, honestly, was reaching

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>out to all of these companies and explaining to them

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 2>why they are the Munchkins or the wicked Witch of

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 2>the East or the West.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>All of that in the Weekend Tech. It's Friday, June twentieth.

0:00:55.760 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>In summary, today's headlines are about Summary's perhaps the most

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>ubiquitous artifact of the age of AI, and today we

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:08.040
<v Speaker 1>have two stories about AI summaries, one about a new

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.680
<v Speaker 1>AI feature on Google Search and the other about Wikipedia's

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>turn away from AI. We'll start with Google. As you

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>might know, Google has this product called Notebook LM, which

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>allows users to feed their own research sources, PDFs, websites, spreadsheets,

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever it may be, and Notebook LM will analyze the

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>data in all kinds of different ways. One of these

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>ways is a quote audio overview, where users can generate

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 1>this two hander deep dive podcast where a male voice

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and a female voice talk each other through whatever the

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.759
<v Speaker 1>topic at hand is. Now, Google is bringing this feature

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to its search results. According to Ours Technica, the feature

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been fully rolled out yet. Users have to opt

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in by going to labs dot Google dot com slash

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>search and turning on audio overviews. There seems to be

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a wait list, but one of our producers was able

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to turn the future before news spread too far, and

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>here's what she found in the search results. Underneath the

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>section that says quote, people also ask, there's an oval

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:15.840
<v Speaker 1>button that says generate audio overview. When you click it,

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.079
<v Speaker 1>it starts working because even AI podcasts take a little

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>bit of time to cook. So while you wait, Google

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>tells you exactly what it's doing, which is quote, understanding

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the query intent, researching websites, generating transcript, and then in

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>less than a minute, an audio player appears. So our

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 1>producer searched in Google, what is two plus two? The

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>resulting audio overview was two and a half minutes long,

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>which already tickled her spidery senses. But before we listen

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to the audio, we checked out all the websites listed

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 1>underneath the clip as sources. They were a Reddit thread

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>asking why some people think two plus two equals five,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.639
<v Speaker 1>a link to study dot com, a Wikipedia page for

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>two plus two equals five, as well as a link

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to a TikTok meme around the question of two plus two,

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>which I couldn't really understand, let and explain. And underneath

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>all these links is another message quote generative AI is experimental.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So here's the beginning of that two and a half

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>minute audio overview for what's two plus two?

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 2>So?

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 3>What's two plus two? Seems like a no brainer, right four?

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 3>End of story.

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, that's what we learn in grade school at least.

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.239
<v Speaker 4>But the idea that two plus two could equal something

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 4>other than four pops up in some pretty interesting places,

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 4>like where.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm picturing some kind of crazy math equation.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Now it's less about complex math and more about, shall

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 4>we say, bending reality a little.

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>The podcast has then launched into a discussion of instances

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>where some people might say two plus two equals five,

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>like in All Wells dystopian novel nineteen eighty four, in

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>which he ponders a totalitarian government that might insist two

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>plus two equals five. It also includes a joke about

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it mathematician, an engineer, and a lawyer answering two plus

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>two questions two plus two will always before that. The

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>AI podcast hosts had this to say in conclusion, it's.

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 3>Kind of mind bending when you think about it. This

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.160
<v Speaker 3>simple little equation can represent so much more than just

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 3>basic addition.

0:04:17.279 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 4>It really does. It's a reminder to question things, to

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.480
<v Speaker 4>consider different viewpoints, and to be aware of how easily

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 4>fax can be twisted or manipulated.

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>My personal view is that the notebook LM product can

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be pretty great if you want to bring a bunch

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of your own narrowly bounded set of data or research

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>into one place and then here it played back to

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you in podcast form. More power to you. The last

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>time I use it myself was over the holidays when

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>I was going to go and see the Nutcracker Ballet,

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of wanted to know what to expect

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>so that I'd be able to enjoy it more. And

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I've fed Notebook LM the Wikipedia page about the Nutcracker,

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>some reviews, some other information, and it summarized all of

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that and turn it into a ten minute podcast which

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:01.920
<v Speaker 1>I listen to on the way to the ballet, and

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I honestly think that gave me a better enjoyment of

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the ballet because I knew the context, but I wouldn't

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>have actually done the work myself of reading all the materials.

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So that was kind of a cool use case. That said,

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think when I search for something like what's

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>two plus two, I need a audio conversational summary of

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the randomness of the Internet. It just doesn't really seem

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>very relevant, and it seems more than anything like a

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>solution in search of a problem, which brings us to

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>our next story. There's another Internet titan that tried out

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>an AI feature recently. Wikipedia. On June second, the organization

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that hosts and maintains Wikipedia, called the Wikimedia Foundation, announced

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it would run an experiment with AI. The project, called

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Simple Article Summaries, would provide AI writeups at the top

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of Wikipedia entries. It was an attempt to make the

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.279
<v Speaker 1>denser Wikipedia articles more accessible, and the experiment was set

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to last two weeks, with summaries generated by an NLM

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 1>called Aya by Coheer. Then came the criticism. According to

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a form media, the announcement was met with replies from

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia editors who warned that AI summaries were a very

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>bad idea. One editor pointed out that AI's ability to

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>get things wrong could damage the platform's reputation, which is

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.520
<v Speaker 1>something that editors and the organization have worked very hard

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>on for a very long time. Another editor said quote,

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 1>just because Google has rolled out it's AI summaries doesn't

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>mean we need to one up them. Some even threatened

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to quit if Wikipedia didn't roll back the summaries. And

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. Wikipedia relies on its editor's passion for

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the website to keep this participatory encyclopedia running. So after

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the editor upraw and just a day after the announcement

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of the experiment, Wikimedia said they would pause it, but

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that they were also still interested in AI summaries. It's

0:06:56.080 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>not clear when they might try them out again, but

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>it is clear how human editors feel about them. I'm

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 1>not somebody who's implacably opposed to AI summaries. In fact,

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I use them myself. But what was really important to

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>remember is that AI summaries rely on the input of

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>human work and ingenuity, and with that in mind, I

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>read this article in the financial time that I wanted

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>to share. It had the headline AI alone cannot solve

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>the productivity problem, and it talks about something I had

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>no idea about, which is the average scientist today produces

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>fewer breakthrough ideas per dollar spent than their counterpart in

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, and that despite all the headlines about progress,

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>progress is actually becoming more incremental. And here's the part

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of the article that really got me thinking. Quote, had

0:07:43.320 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the nineteenth century focused solely on better looms and plows,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>we would enjoy cheap cloth and abundant grain, but there

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>would be no antibiotics, jet engines, or rockets. Economic miracles

0:07:55.480 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>stem from discovery, not repeating tasks at greater speed. The

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>article went on to make the point that large language

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>models gravitate towards statistical consensus. So think about it. If

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:12.240
<v Speaker 1>there were NLMs back before the Wright Brothers, all the

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>data that the model was trained on would have suggested

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that human flight was absolutely impossible. Wikipedia is not going

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to solve the larger problem of fostering human ingenuity in

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>an age of statistical consensus, But at least for now,

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you can rest assured that the articles you read on

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it will be written and driven and created by humans.

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I've got a couple more headlines for you, including why

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you might be struggling to get your favorite box of cereal.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Tech Crunch reports that some grocery stores are reeling from

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the effects of a cyber attack. United Natural Foods or UNFI,

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>is a large food distribution company that provide it's fresh

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>produce and products to over thirty thousand stores across the US.

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Whole Foods uses the company as its primary distributor. Earlier

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>this month, UNFI experienced a cyber attack that caused them

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 1>to shut down their electronic ordering systems. The system is

0:09:16.720 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>now back online after more than ten days, but grocery

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 1>stores are still waiting on some of their stock. And

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>this isn't just an issue in the US. Cyber attacks

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>are also roiling UK supermarkets. The thing is, grocery chains

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 1>are a prime target for hackers because they have these large,

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>interconnected supply chains, which by definition have multiple failure points.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>They also have treasure trows with customer data, and of course,

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>when shoppers can't get what they want at the store,

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>angst and headlines are sure to follow. Finally, for today's headlines,

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>ads are a huge business for social media platforms, and

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is aiming to lower the cost of production for

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>its partners. According to The Verge, TikTok is adding new

0:10:00.480 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>capabilities to give advertisers the ability to upload images and

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:06.959
<v Speaker 1>give text prompts that can then be used to generate

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.959
<v Speaker 1>video advertisements. The videos can include virtual avatars holding or

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:15.920
<v Speaker 1>modeling different products, just like an influencer mine for brands

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that they partner with. TikTok has said that all this

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>content generated using AI will be labeled as such and

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>will go through quote multiple rounds of safety review. The

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest story is that influencer marketing transformed the ad industry

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade, and it will be interesting to

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>see what AI influencers can actually do because, unlike say,

0:10:36.679 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>fashion models, whose job it is to show what products

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 1>will look like when they're worn, influencers have thrived when

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>they make a case for a product based on their

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. After the break, we bring you a production

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of The Wizard of Oz starring your favorite tech giants.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Stay with us on this show. We've talked about tech

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>upstarts like open ai and its model, chatchipt Anthropic and

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>its model, Clawed at Length, and We've also talked about

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the numerous tech giants racing to gain or defend market

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>share with AI products of their own, including Meta, Google, Apple, Amazon,

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>and Microsoft. It's a crowded field, but also an open

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>one in terms of knowing who will ultimately prevail, and

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.719
<v Speaker 1>it can get quite dramatic their acquisitions, partnerships to get

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>contentious legal fights and hedge rolling at big tech companies

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>as they fight to stay in the game, and recently

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>there have been some big AI power moves. Meta has

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>just made its largest investments since acquiring WhatsApp, putting fourteen

0:11:55.040 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars into a company called Scale Ai. So we

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thought it'd be helpful to outline them many players the air,

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>current positions, and what might be on the horizon. And

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>here to walk us all through it is read Albagotti,

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 1>who's the tech editor Sema fool Read Welcome to tech Stuff.

0:12:09.800 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me. Good to be here.

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.199
<v Speaker 1>You came up with a very creative paradigm for helping

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>your readers make sense of all the different players in

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the AI race. Tell us a little bit about it.

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, it all started because, like you said, I mean,

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>there's this this huge race, and I was sort of

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>going back and forth with my colleague Rachel Jones, talking

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 2>about Okay, so like, what are the lanes that these

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 2>companies are starting to take and how do we sort

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 2>of define that? And I'm sort of writing this thing

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 2>and it's kind of it's a little dry, it's a

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 2>little heavy on the analysis, and Rachel's like, why don't

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 2>we just make them Wizard of Oz characters? And I

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 2>was like, that's a terrible idea. But then I thought

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 2>more about it, and I thought, that's actually kind of

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 2>a great idea. So you know, we decided to try

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:01.960
<v Speaker 2>to fit you know, each of the biggest players that

0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 2>we see in the field into these characters and the

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 2>Wizard of Oz and sort of explain why. And I think, look,

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean the funniest part of this whole thing, honestly,

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:13.839
<v Speaker 2>was was reaching out to all of these companies and

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>explaining to them why they are the Munchkins or the

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Wicked Witch of the East or the West, and you know,

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 2>getting their responses and I thought, you know, actually, kind

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>I kind of like this because the best part was

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.720
<v Speaker 2>when I got pushed back from these companies, right like,

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 2>we are we are not this, we are this character

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 2>just like, oh, actually I'm getting an insight now into

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 2>like how you see yourself as a company. And so

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 2>what I kind of hoped was, like, you know, we

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 2>would this was like people would write in and say

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 2>you're a complete idiot, like open Aye is not Dorothy,

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 2>They're you know, the tin man or something like that.

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Just get people talking about what are the lanes here

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.440
<v Speaker 2>and how and how should we think about these these players.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But that said, you did cast open Aiye as Dorothy.

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Why was that?

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, Dorothy is is kind of the main character. Right.

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 2>They are the Kleenex of chat bots, so to speak.

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.200
<v Speaker 2>They're the winner take all sort of consumer chat bot.

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 2>They get all the press, but you know, at the

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>same time, they require a lot of other you know,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 2>players in this space to make it possible. Right, So

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 2>you know they they've borrowed technology from Google, right, you know,

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 2>they're using the data centers or at Microsoft for such

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 2>a huge part of that. So it's this supporting cast

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 2>that kind of really makes them who they are. I think,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>so that was that was the justification there. Do you

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 2>agree or do you want to do you want to

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 2>fight me on that?

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think I'll you've thought about this more than

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I have. But I think I agree with you that

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>despite my name, I think that I agree with you

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that that that opening I definitely has the main character

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>energy in this story. But I have to ask you

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>about her cost of supporting characters the tin man, the

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>cowardly line, and the scarecrow. How do you assign each

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of these crucial pots?

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, so let's start with Let's start with with Google,

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 2>the cowardly lion. Google has, you know, all this power, right,

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 2>They've developed this technology for years. You know, the attention

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 2>is all you need paper, right like that. That's what

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 2>really laid the groundwork for CHATCHYPT. But they kind of

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 2>sat on it. And I think a lot of that

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 2>was out of fear. You know, these chatbots go off

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 2>the rails. They're crazy, Like, what are people going to

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 2>say if we just start releasing this stuff into the wild.

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 2>And so they didn't and they got beat right, chatchapt

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 2>came out. Google has had to completely reorient itself around

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 2>this race now.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So what you're saying is is Google could have had

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>market leadership here, and because of fears about cultural blowback

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or erosion of that cool business, they basically sat on

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the technology.

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's very well said. They're a big public company.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>They have to be sort of cautious, and you know,

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that's somewhat in there, has become part of

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 2>their DNA. But they've had to get really bold, right

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 2>and they started to release new products. The notebook LM

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.479
<v Speaker 2>is one of the big successes. They're throwing more spaghetti

0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 2>against the wall. They're finding that they actually do have courage, right,

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 2>which you know, of course, if you've watched The Wizard

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 2>of Oz, you know in the end they all kind

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 2>of have the thing they thought they were missing. So

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, tin Man is Microsoft this well oiled machine.

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 2>If you remember the tin Man was always putting oil

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 2>and oil can. They seem a bit rigid, right, but

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 2>in the end, like they kind of do have a heart.

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean I think they I had an interview with

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Satia Nadella recently and and Kevin Scott, the CTO, that

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 2>it's really clear they really do want to sort of

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 2>like enable these developers. I think they have sort of

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 2>a I think a less ego, a bit more of

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 2>a selfless kind of attitude around this stuff. They're building

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 2>the infrastructure for this industry and letting others kind of

0:16:55.920 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>use their creativity to benefit, so they really do have

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 2>a heart in the end. And then I think Amazon,

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, this the scarecrow, right, no, no brain. When

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 2>I think about the beginning of this race, you know,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 2>much like Google, people were really putting Amazon down and

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 2>they thought, oh my god, they've completely missed this, like

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:22.439
<v Speaker 2>Amazon's got nothing here, and totally ignored the fact that

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 2>actually they had been thinking about this for years. And

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 2>even though you know, maybe they're sort of fighting for

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.520
<v Speaker 2>market share in this new AI race, I think they're

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:38.679
<v Speaker 2>pretty well positioned to profit from the growth and you know,

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 2>just the the market demand for tokens for compute.

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Are they the market leaders in data centers Amazon today?

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, I mean for sure in the in the cloud,

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>in the cloud business. And I think that the question

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 2>though is, you know, can they remain the market leader

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 2>in the AI you know era right, they've been the

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 2>market leader in cloud in terms of just you know,

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 2>normal compute AI data centers is it's a whole new ballgame.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 2>AI runs on what we would call a GPU, right,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 2>and so everyone is now you know, racing to add

0:18:13.080 --> 0:18:16.120
<v Speaker 2>these GPUs or build new data centers that are built

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:19.320
<v Speaker 2>around these GPUs and it's a totally different business model

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 2>and concept, so it kind of restarts the race in

0:18:23.720 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 2>some ways.

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so we got Open Air as Dorothy, Microsoft as

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>the tin Man, Google's the cowardly line, Amazon is the scarecrow.

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>There are also some wizards and witches who need to

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 1>be accounted for Glinda, the Wicked Witch of the West,

0:18:38.760 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and of course my namesake, the Wizard of Oz. Who's

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 1>who in this cost.

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 2>So let's start with Perplexity being, you know, the wicked Witch.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.439
<v Speaker 2>As we found in Wicked. You know this, this witch

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 2>was kind of misunderstood, and I think that's sort of

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>how Perplexity became the absolute villain, especially in the media industry,

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:03.120
<v Speaker 2>because they, you know, were were I guess, republishing almost

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 2>like articles without proper citation. I think they very quickly

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:10.199
<v Speaker 2>changed I mean, it wasn't a policy. I think it

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 2>was a mistake and they very quickly changed them. And

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:14.880
<v Speaker 2>they're actually have all these media deals where there are

0:19:14.920 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 2>revenue sharing agreements between Perplexity and the media companies. And

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I think that Wicked image is starting to fade a

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 2>little bit from Perplexity. So I put them in the

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 2>role of the Wicked Witch, and Arvin strinovas the CEO Perplexity,

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>responded to me on Twitter with a I think AI

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 2>generated repurposing of the song from Wicked.

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got the final close my eyes and leap. It's

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>time to try to find Google. I think I'll try

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to find Google and you comple me down.

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Right, So they're disrupting Google. Therefore they're they're really the

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 2>good guys. So you know that was I thought that

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 2>was fun. That was a fun response from Arvind. I think,

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:03.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, we put Apple as the role of Glinda,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:06.440
<v Speaker 2>the good Witch, who you know sort of over over

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 2>promises and underdelivers. I think that's sort of the you know,

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 2>using a little bit of the old and the new

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Wicked version of that that character. Obviously, you know, that's

0:20:19.000 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>based on the fact that they, you know, they had

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:25.359
<v Speaker 2>this huge event where they promised the world around you know, AI,

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 2>they were going to do these amazing things with Siri

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 2>and your phone, and it turns out, oh, they hadn't

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>actually really built any of this, and it's not clear

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 2>that they can.

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>And what what's your reporting suggests? Why has it been

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:35.919
<v Speaker 1>such a bust?

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that was a train wreck that anybody who's

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 2>been following Apple has kind of seen for a long

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.360
<v Speaker 2>time because they just have ignored AI and you don't

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 2>see the Apple people are not really like mixing with

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 2>the rest of Silicon Valley, and I think they just

0:20:50.720 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't quite understand this whole AI thing. And and I've

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:56.919
<v Speaker 2>also written that, you know, I this is a bit

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 2>this is kind of my view, and I don't know,

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 2>I haven't heard that any people agree with me on this,

0:21:01.440 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 2>but I think they also, you know, because they position

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>themselves as this privacy focused company, they that they also

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 2>shied away from AI there because it does require gathering

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of data right on people and personalizing things

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 2>in ways that make people maybe feel like, oh, I'm

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 2>being tracked or what have you. And it turns out

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 2>that that's you know, that's now everything in the tech industry,

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:28.919
<v Speaker 2>and they're they're way behind.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>And then of course the Wizard, just by having a

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>movie named after him, is actually no very important character.

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:41.679
<v Speaker 2>Right exactly. So I cast x Ai in the in

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 2>the role of the Wizard. You know, I think x

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 2>Ai has this huge, you know, colossus data center, right,

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>and they've they've promised that, you know, it really kind

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 2>of made me think of them as that is the

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 2>fact that they're going to understand the secrets of the

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 2>universe with AI that theirs is the Is that literally?

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean this is like literally, you know. I mean

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I saw Elon Musk in a recent interview saying that

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 2>their model grock is based on basic physics and that's

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 2>where it gets its ground truth from. And so you know,

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 2>their effort is to actually ultimately figure out, like, you know,

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 2>a unifying theory of the universe. You know, I think

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:23.640
<v Speaker 2>that's a lot of it. It remains to be seen

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.000
<v Speaker 2>what's behind the curtain. There.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Two other companies we haven't spoken about yet are Meta

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>and Anthropy. Where do they fit in?

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well so Anthropic I cast as in the role

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 2>of the Munchkins. I felt a little bad doing that

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 2>because you know, I think there's the Munchkins have this

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 2>negative connotation. But actually I was reading about it and

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.080
<v Speaker 2>researching this article, reading about the Wizard of Oz and

0:22:47.119 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to understand the different characters on a more nuanced level.

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 2>And without the Munchkins, there is no Wizard of Oz. Right.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 2>They they they're the people, They're the ones who populate

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 2>this universe, right, And I think I think what Anthropic

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>is doing, and I think a lot of people don't

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 2>really realize this, is they have become the de facto

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 2>coding model for AI, and that is really what's driving

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 2>all this, you know, the excitement and AI right now,

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:19.200
<v Speaker 2>it's not so much chat GPT, even though I think

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 2>that's what the broad population sort of thinks of. But

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:25.920
<v Speaker 2>in the tech industry, what I think really excites people

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 2>is that this stuff, even if it never advances beyond

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 2>just being able to generate code with AI, that's going

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 2>to completely change the world because you know, code is

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 2>already so powerful and can automate so many things. The

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 2>reason that the whole world isn't running on code is

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 2>that it's too expensive, and so Anthropic is kind of

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 2>like bringing that power to the people.

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>So when I read about vibe coding, though I read

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>about CUSS or AI and stuff, But you're saying that

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Anthropic is a real big player in the world of

0:23:59.280 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>vibe coding.

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, I mean Cursor is running on Anthropics code

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 2>generation model, and so is Replet and you know a

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 2>lot of others.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's Anthropic, it's really underpending this vibe coding

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>revolution exactly what about Meta. It's a big week for them.

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you cost them in the in the movie

0:24:18.720 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>before their then news announcement, But who are they and

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 1>the Wizard of Alls? And did they did the news

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>announcement change you're thinking at all?

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:28.919
<v Speaker 2>Well, of course, of course I'm going to make an

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 2>argument that it didn't change my thinking.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>But I would I would.

0:24:32.600 --> 0:24:35.199
<v Speaker 2>Encourage people to totally disagree with me and argue with

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 2>me on this. But no, I mean Meta I cast

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>as the yellow brick road. They're they're open sourcing these

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 2>AI models, and similar to to Anthropic where it's like that,

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 2>it's an amplified effect. Many companies are using Meta models,

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 2>these Lama family of models to run their own custom

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.880
<v Speaker 2>software because you know, it's free and it could also

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.880
<v Speaker 2>be fine tuned, it can be run locally, so it's

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 2>actually you know, having this big impact that a lot

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of people don't really see. And then of course this

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 2>recent acquisition of Scale AI.

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we'll see whether or how does that You

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>don't talk about the.

0:25:17.440 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're right, I called it an acquisition, and it's not.

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's a it's a forty nine percent of

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the company takeover, but not an actual takeover and and

0:25:27.920 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 2>yes it's not an acquisition, but really kind of puts

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:36.560
<v Speaker 2>them in. The CEO, the co founder and CEO of

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Scale AI is now going to go work at Meta,

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 2>but Scale will still continue as an independent company. What

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 2>I think Meta is interested in them for is their

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 2>ability to generate a lot of data, you know, to

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:54.640
<v Speaker 2>train these models. So you know, these AI models trained

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.400
<v Speaker 2>on the entire Internet. I'm sure you've kind of heard

0:25:57.480 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 2>these people say that they sucked in all the data

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 2>and the entire Internet and train on it. Well that's

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 2>somewhat true. There are these huge databases that are free

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 2>that anybody can train on, and they've sort of tapped

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 2>that up, like using that data can has sort of

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 2>They've gotten as far as they can with that, and

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 2>now they have to generate more data and it's getting

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.040
<v Speaker 2>very expensive. And so companies like Scale have these huge

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 2>networks of contractors who can generate a ton of data.

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's actually like PhDs and like you know, high

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:34.920
<v Speaker 2>level business executives who are doing this I think kind

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 2>of for fun. I mean they're getting paid, but they

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 2>sit there and they do like very complex stuff that

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 2>can then be used by these models to learn and

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 2>become much more you know, specialized in certain areas. And

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 2>part of the deal with Meta is that Meta has

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 2>sort of pre paid for a bunch of Scale services

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 2>to get this data.

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>So this is really giving itself a competitive edge. The

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>New York Times ran a story saying though that this

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.359
<v Speaker 1>was like part of socker Bug's personal quest to build

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 1>a super intelligence lab. So I wasn't sure how to

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>balance that with Yeah, what I'd understood about Scale was

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was a company that sort of specialized in

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>creating this very high value data that's not available organically.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 2>This is sort of my my take on this. I mean,

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>it's easy to focus on, you know, the Scale CEO,

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Alexander Wang is going to run it, and it's all

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 2>this talent. I mean, Wang is not an AI researcher.

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 2>He knows a lot about the AI industry and he's

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 2>one of the world's most experts on you know, data

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 2>being used in AI. He was roommates with Sam Altman

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.760
<v Speaker 2>when basically the groundwork for chatch ept was being built,

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:46.960
<v Speaker 2>and that sort of brought him in. I mean, he

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 2>didn't and I've listened to interviews with him where he said,

0:27:49.920 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 2>like he didn't really understand what Opening Eye was doing,

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 2>but it was clearly like this great opportunity and so yeah,

0:27:58.400 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean that help them with recruiting, and it's it's great,

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:04.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's great for marketing and it all, it

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 2>all helps. But I think the bread and butter of

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 2>that deal is really about Metas saying, well, Okay, we

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 2>might not be the most cutting edge AI company right now,

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:16.679
<v Speaker 2>but we're putting a lot of money into having the

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 2>best data.

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>Read this the question that is normally a cache, but

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.479
<v Speaker 1>in this case, I think it's appropriate. How did this

0:28:23.520 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>movie end?

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, they all get to the Emerald City, which is Agi,

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 2>and it was all set in motion by this tornado

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 2>which is chatchbt. No, I don't think we know this

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 2>one hasn't This one hasn't ended yet. I think it's

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 2>I think there are many alternate endings, just like all

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 2>the Wicked and and and probably other fan fiction around

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 2>the Wizard of Oz.

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>But if you look looking at the landscape, maybe you

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>had to bet on you had to bet on one company.

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, who do you think is really positioning themselves

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in the smallest way for this immediate future of AI.

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you had to bet on one company that's

0:29:02.520 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 2>a that is a really that's a tough one. I mean,

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 2>because you know, I don't think this is a winner

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 2>take all race either. I think that if you look

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 2>at the compute layer, I mean, this is a growing

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 2>pie that will be divided up. I mean, Opening Eye

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>might be winner take all in the consumer chat bots space.

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I could see them becoming sort of the Google of

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>of of that era. But you know, I look at

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Google right now and I think they have there. It's

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:34.800
<v Speaker 2>interesting because I think, on the one hand, they have

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 2>so much promise. I mean, they have the best models

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>right now, they're applying them in the most diverse ways,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.240
<v Speaker 2>right they have because one is waymo right. They have robotaxis,

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 2>which are probably ultimately just gonna run on Gemini at

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.160
<v Speaker 2>some point in the future. They they're doing stuff in

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:56.200
<v Speaker 2>other you know, humanoid robotics as well. But they've also

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 2>got these, you know, they've got their own consumer chat bots,

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 2>They've got you know, a lot of consumer distribution in

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 2>the software space. So I think they're very they're set

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 2>up for success. The interesting part though, is that their

0:30:10.840 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 2>core business of search advertising is also It's like, it's

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 2>not even just that it's under threat, but like the

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 2>whole the whole concept of of like the Internet economy

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 2>running off of advertising dollars is up in the air,

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 2>like we don't even know if that's the future. So

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 2>they're challenged and they're having to completely change, like reorient

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>themselves as a company. But at the same time, they

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 2>have such promise, so I don't know, I mean, it

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 2>would be sort of it's sort of like a gamble

0:30:41.480 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 2>to put money on anything. But I mean, I think

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 2>they're just very well positioned. I think them in open AI,

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean open a eye, just what they've built is

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:54.600
<v Speaker 2>so is so valuable, and not because of their models,

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 2>not because they have the best AI, but because they're

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 2>just they've they've become this consumer products now and that

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.520
<v Speaker 2>is we've seen in history that like that is something

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 2>that you know just will be hugely valuable in the

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 2>long run. It's kind of like their game to lose there.

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 1>On that note, read, thank you so much for your time,

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much.

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 2>It was great.

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this week for tech stuff. I'mos Voloshin.

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Eliza Dennis and Victoria Domingez.

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>It was executive produced by me Karen Price and Kate

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Osborne for Kaleidoscope and Katrina Norvel for iHeart Podcasts. But

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>he Fraser is our engineer. Jack Insley makes this episode

0:31:51.880 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Murdoch wrote our theme song. Join us next

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday for text Stuff the Story, when we'll share an

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in depth conversation with Yasmin Green, the CEO of Jigsaw,

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 1>about the tech that could change town halls forever. Please rate, review,

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 1>and reach out to us at Tech Staff Podcast at

0:32:09.320 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>gmail dot com. We want to hear from you.