WEBVTT - AT&T to Buy EchoStar Spectrum Licenses for About $23 Billion 

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Coarclay, and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.760 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so we have some big news. Echo Star Wars

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 2>agreed to sell spectrum licenses to AT and T for

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 2>about twenty three billion dollars. I'm looking at Echo Star

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:35.159
<v Speaker 2>shares right now, they're up seventy seven percent. So we

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk about this right so our producers are scrambling.

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 2>It's a mad dash. Who are we gonna get. We're

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 2>gonna pull in someone who's hanging in Nantucket. That's right,

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>it's John Butler, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior telecom atalysts.

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 3>John.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 2>We really appreciate you taking the tele for album.

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Good morning guys.

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Good morning. Yes, we pull on the big guns. So

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 2>explain to us right off the bat, what does this

0:00:57.840 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 2>deal mean.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 4>So obviously, given the price action, it is huge for EchoStar,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 4>and I think at issue for them is they've been

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 4>trying to build their own five G network to compete

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 4>with the big guys, and they have the spectrum to

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 4>do it, but they didn't have the capital to do it.

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.840
<v Speaker 4>They really have an outsized debtload that they've really been

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 4>struggling to service. And the FCC intervened here and they've

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 4>been pressuring on the head of EchoStar, Charlie Urgan, to

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:36.040
<v Speaker 4>either use the spectrum and start to fill those airwaves

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 4>or to sell it. And so I think this is

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 4>maybe the first of maybe even more moves to sell

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 4>more Spectrum on the part of the company. But given

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 4>the price tag, it alleviates that capital crunch, and so

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 4>any risk of default here I think is minimized now

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:58.640
<v Speaker 4>in the wake of this deal, And so investors are

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 4>breathing a big sire Leave talk.

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 5>To me a little bit, John about this price. Twenty

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:10.679
<v Speaker 5>three billion dollars, nine billion more than EchoStar paid for

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 5>the Spectrum, five billion more than the appraised value is

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.119
<v Speaker 5>at and t getting value out out of this twenty

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 5>three billion dollar deal? Are they grossly overpaying?

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 4>So I'll say Spectrum is like houses on Nantucket, you know,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 4>the price just continues to go up over the years,

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, particularly with the advent of AI now and

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 4>the need for more capacity to carry that added traffic.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 4>It's really not a concern on my part as to

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 4>whether or not AT and T is going to get

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 4>a good return on this investment. And again all kitting aside,

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 4>I go back to that analogy that really spectrum does increate,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 4>It tends to increase in value over time. It's a

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 4>very ill liquid market, so it's hard to really get

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 4>a good feel for their fair value of different frequencies.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 4>But I have no doubt that at the end of

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>the day, even expensive is going to prove cheap here

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 4>for them.

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Hey, John, can you take a little bit into how

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:15.919
<v Speaker 2>this is going to expand AT and T's network.

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 4>So if you look at the spectrum holdings of Verizon,

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 4>T Mobile and AT and T and spectrum, I'll just

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 4>take a step back for listeners that don't know, when

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 4>you're making a caller transmitting data over the area, you're

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 4>doing it using spectrum. And the more you have think

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 4>of it like the width of a pipe. The more

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 4>you have, the fatter the pipe, the faster the download speeds.

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 4>And so AT and T intends to put this spectrum

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 4>to use almost immediately to really enhance the download speeds

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 4>of the network. And so network quality gets better, word

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 4>gets around, people begin to say AT and T has

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>a better network. From a branding standpoint, there's a real

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 4>benefit here. And then longer term again, as AI continues

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 4>to scale up and ifrincing those queries that we make

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 4>and the answers we get back. Now, a lot of

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>that's going to be done at the edge of the

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 4>network where you need that big fat pipe to support

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 4>that traffic. So I think in their minds, those are

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 4>the two things there, after improving the network quality and

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 4>the brand image and having the pipes to move the

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 4>traffic that's coming down the road here and.

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 5>John yesterday, on a call with investors, AT and t's

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 5>CEO Stanky said that, you know, regulators shouldn't be concerned

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 5>that this transaction was going to put too much wireless spectrum,

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 5>I guess in the hands of one of the largest

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 5>telecom carriers. That's what he told investors. But do you

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 5>think regulators are going to bulk at this No.

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 4>I think regulators have been behind prompting the sale, if

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 4>that's the right way to put it. So again, the

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 4>FCC was really on Echo Star to sell some of

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 4>that spectrum. They're educated and well educated and wireless as

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 4>regulators to know that it was probably going to be

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 4>one of the big guys that would step up and

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 4>buy it. If I look at at and T spectrum

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 4>holdings the whole, they had a competitive disadvantage or less

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 4>holdings in the band or the frequencies that they purchased

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:37.440
<v Speaker 4>from Echo Star here. So I don't think there's any

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 4>sort of regulatory argument against the deal here, but I

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 4>would defer to our legislative analysts in Washington to really

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 4>make the call there. But I'm not concerned.

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us for more Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:57.799
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on album Barklay and Android

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 2>So a lot of headlines in the news. One of

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:12.559
<v Speaker 2>them that caught my eye this was Eli Lilly. Okay,

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 2>so their weight loss pill. It's moving a little bit closer,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:19.360
<v Speaker 2>one step closer to this potential approval. This came after

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 2>results from its latest trial. So what we want to

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 2>do is get more details from that. Let's bring in

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Sam Fazzelli. He is Bloomberg Intelligence Director of Research for

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Global Industries and Senior Pharmaceuticals, joining us from London. Sam,

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 2>welcome back to the show. So this is the second

0:06:34.560 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 2>trial of the pill, I believe, So how is it

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 2>different this time around?

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 6>It is, Lisa, thank you for having me back.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 7>And I'm sorry that Paul is in here for me

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 7>to give him grief because he always tells me off

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:45.479
<v Speaker 7>the technia.

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 2>He always busts your.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 6>Job next time.

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 7>And so look, this is a large trial in dibet

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 7>diabetic patients, but it will be diabetic patients, so they're

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 7>looking at the impact in that population. That population tends

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 7>to have less of a weight loss for our variety

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 7>of reasons. But it's come out exactly where we thought

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 7>it would come out, actually maybe a little bit better

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 7>than people's lowered expectations after that first trial read out

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 7>a couple of weeks ago, if you remember when the

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 7>stock got hit severely Lily stock, and so we're see

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 7>about ten percent weight loss and still the same high

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 7>levels of discontinuations. This is a long trial, so you

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 7>even find a whole bunch of people and place would

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 7>discontinue because they get bored, they want to go and

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 7>get wed loss from another drug. So it's actually pretty

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:42.760
<v Speaker 7>decent data. And I think you can see that Nova

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 7>is sold off on the back of this because it's

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 7>a small molecular pill. It's a pilly can take, relatively

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 7>easily manufactured, and you can take without too much complications

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 7>in terms of don't eat to eat, take in the morning,

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 7>takeing the evening, that sort of stuff.

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 5>And that's the key, Sam. And I'm wondering how much

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 5>of a game changer this is because it's not an injection, right,

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 5>it's a pill. You're looking at an industry that by

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 5>twenty thirty is projected to be ninety five billion dollars.

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 5>So if this goes Eli Lilly's way, is it a

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 5>game changer for the company?

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean it has gone their way.

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 7>This is unless something shows up in the enormous number

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 7>of files that they file to the FDA, or side

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 7>effects or something.

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 6>This is a drug that's likely to get approved.

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>The question is how do you use it.

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 7>You've got the injectibles once a week, once a week,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 7>not a big ask, very fine needle. People even tell

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 7>me they don't even notice the needle going in and out,

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 7>but still you don't see the needle. So what is

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.920
<v Speaker 7>its it? Ten percent weight loss versus twenty percent weight loss?

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 7>So what is the right way forward here? Some people

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 7>are needlephobic, it's going to be helpful for those. Some

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 7>people can't get access to the drug because it's hard

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 7>to manufacture. The other ones that are injectibles sterile manufacturing.

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 7>So there's lots of room for this. And of course

0:09:02.400 --> 0:09:04.599
<v Speaker 7>there's this other thing that I think a lot of

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 7>people keep thinking about, is you've got your big weight

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 7>loss with your injectables six months, in nine months, in

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 7>twelve months, in switch to this and help you maintain

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 7>You might not even need the higher doses, which are

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.080
<v Speaker 7>causing some side effects. Maybe you can get away with

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 7>a lower dose and maintain that weight loss.

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 6>They would have to do a trial to prove that though.

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 2>So, Sam, as you're talking, a question kind of popped

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 2>into my head. You're talking about all the different advantages

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to it. What about has there been any talk about price,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 2>like how much could this pill cost compare to an injection?

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it would be an error for these companies

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 7>to start competing with themselves on price with their products.

0:09:47.320 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 7>If you find that actually you can go with the

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 7>lower dose of this. Your margins are a bit better,

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 7>definitely because there's no device involved. But I don't know

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 7>what the small molecule manufacturing because they're not all small

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.080
<v Speaker 7>malley ques are easy to make, right, and it may

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 7>be small discount perhaps, I don't know, but but I

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.079
<v Speaker 7>doubt that this will come out at a.

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 6>Level that's significantly lower.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 7>On the other hand, it does have lower weight loss,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 7>so maybe maybe there is an opportunity to kind of

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 7>I see pari pass whu if whatever, If that's the

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 7>right phrase, in line with its weight loss that you're getting.

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 5>I want to branch out and talk just biotech on

0:10:26.840 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 5>a bigger scale for a moment because M and A

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 5>hass you know, been pretty active right and in the

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 5>sector we had Merk buying Verona Pharma I think it

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.520
<v Speaker 5>was for their respiratory treatment recently. What's the outlook for

0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:40.679
<v Speaker 5>M and A there? And I know one of the

0:10:40.760 --> 0:10:42.959
<v Speaker 5>hurdles for biotech, and it's sort of an ongoing hurdle

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:46.120
<v Speaker 5>is changes to regulatory framework, So talk to us a

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 5>little bit about that.

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, did that those changes if you're talking about perhaps

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 7>the from an FTC perspective, those those have not hindered

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 7>and ideals. When we counted a whole bunch of deals

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 7>in the first half of this year, and it looked

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 7>like a pretty strong year for deals, and that's not

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 7>even including.

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 6>The Verona one. The thing here is a lot of

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 6>executives in the biotech boord I'll still looking at their

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 6>share price charts thinking back to those beautiful days of

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 6>two or three years ago where the share prices were

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.319
<v Speaker 6>seventy eighty percent higher and thinking is it the right

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 6>thing for them to do?

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 3>To sell?

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 7>Clearly some have got to the point of accepting that,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 7>and some have done it from a position of strength.

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.319
<v Speaker 7>Verona was rocketing up before they got taken out at whatever,

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 7>over one hundred dollars a share, so Farmer is definitely interested.

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 7>Maybe if the interest rate environment, going back to what

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 7>we were just hearing earlier, does go in favor of

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 7>cost of capital coming down, maybe you'll start seeing some

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 7>more deals, and of course that would also help biotech

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 7>valuations potentially in general. So maybe there would be an

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.360
<v Speaker 7>interesting time to look out to in the next six

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 7>to twelve months.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 6>All right, Sam, and.

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 2>The last minute, do you have here another article caught

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.720
<v Speaker 2>my eye. President from Health and Human Services Secretary Robert

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Kennedy Junior. There there are leslie funny to ban the

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 2>COVID vaccine within months. Did this surprise you at all?

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, yes, no.

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 7>The thing is it's rumor, and I think the HS

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.800
<v Speaker 7>has said, look, there's no nothing that we can tell

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 7>you today that we're back this. I think that would

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 7>be a mistake. And choice is what Americans have always

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 7>valued in the freedom that the US has.

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 6>Let's just leave the choice there, give.

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 7>People all the information, do the scientific work that the

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.040
<v Speaker 7>HS wants to do, and just leave it open and

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 7>give it to the discussion between physicians and patients and

0:12:42.080 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 7>subjects and people.

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 6>I think that's the right way.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 7>Whether that will happen or not, but if it does happen,

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 7>we've got a bad time for Biontic and Moderna because

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 7>that's the only source of revenue.

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us for more Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg and Intelligence podcast. Catch us

0:13:01.920 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Corplay and

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Blueberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 2>What's also a piece of America are eyewear. Right, you

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 2>go out and it's like you're styling, You're wearing your

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>fancy sunglasses. It's a nice day out. You know, you

0:13:22.640 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 2>have to look good when you're going out. So this

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 2>is taking us to the competitive eyewear space.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 5>We're saying.

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Sources are saying that the maker of ray Band sunglasses,

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 2>I have my own pair, as the Lord looks out again,

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 2>they're considering increasing their steak in Nikon.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 2>The company has really been pushing ahead with these smart

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 2>glasses initiative, so we want to find out more about it, right,

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 2>so let's go to Diana Gomez. She is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 2>senior equity research analyst. Diana, thanks for joining us up.

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 2>So how much they want to boost their steak? And

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 2>I kinda and what's the current holding at.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 8>Hi, Yes, thank you for having me. So at the moment,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 8>it's uh about a nine percent stake, and the reports

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 8>we are getting is that there is a potential interest

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 8>to increase that to about twenty percent, which would be

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 8>in the order working at the current market cap maybe

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 8>a three hundred million dollars or so, which given a

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 8>se or Euxotica's cash position would not be quite material,

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 8>but still quite a sizable stake in Nikon from a

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 8>few years of quite a long experience as in their

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.240
<v Speaker 8>joint venture Connectending that.

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 5>Connect the dots for us though, because what does Nikon

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.080
<v Speaker 5>have that Luxotica wants.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 8>Besides the brand name that is quite well known to

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 8>even the consumer side outside the professional sector, there is

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 8>the technology and the know how that can be utilized

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 8>and leveraged by both companies. So we are talking about

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 8>the distribution of SLR combined with nohow and brand a

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 8>strong brand name of a company like Nikan. And they

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 8>have been partnering in different areas. One of them which

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 8>is quite an emerging ones is the myopia control which

0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 8>is which are these lenses that are meant to solve

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 8>the progression of myopia in children, which is quite important

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 8>given that forecasts are that's by twenty fifty about half

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 8>of the world population could be suffering from myopia. So

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 8>it's it's quite an interesting area as an example of

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 8>those where they are collaborating, particularly in China where they

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:51.600
<v Speaker 8>are selling already some of these myopia controllances. With the

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 8>FDA approval for the SEL or auxosticasles still being in

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 8>the pipeline as well.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 2>And in quick thirty seconds, Diana, what are who are

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 2>some of Nikon's competitors in there in the space and

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 2>who does it supply.

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 8>So they would be competing with other wcees and also

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 8>even photographic kind of equipment, and the space is quite

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 8>diverse at the moment because even with so or Auxotic

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 8>at this partnership just potential extended partnership just shows how

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 8>the company is going more into the medical technology and

0:16:33.480 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 8>medical devices filled in terms of trying to also find

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.120
<v Speaker 8>medical issues just looking at the eye. So that's a

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 8>new area where companies within the optomological and visual space

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 8>are looking at and WNCES companies that are potentially with

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 8>the consumer more known for the photo cameras also play

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 8>a role with So it's all quite well integrated and

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.200
<v Speaker 8>in the world of smart classes.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us for more Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.920
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple Corplay and Android

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 2>All right, I want to move on to this story.

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 2>We heard it yesterday or Sted right the management now

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to reassure their investors. This is after the

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration while they block construction of its almost finished

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Rhode Island wind farm. So we want to dig more

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.240
<v Speaker 2>into this story. Let's bring in Patricio Alvarez, Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 2>equity research analysts, power and gas utilities. Who better to

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 2>talk to them than this. So what does this mean

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 2>for Orsad's plan share sale? That's what I wanted to

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 2>start right.

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 9>There, absolutely, So let's begin where Oristed's management NA went

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 9>ahead with a plan for inequity increase.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:01.200
<v Speaker 3>That's quite substantial.

0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 9>So that's sixty billion kroner that they announced on August eleventh.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 9>That was nearly forty six percent of their market cap

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 9>back then, So it is a significant size of an

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 9>equity increase. And that was mainly to cover the construction

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:19.639
<v Speaker 9>of Revolution Wind and that was because the company was

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 9>not able to sell a stake in that project. That's

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 9>mainly like, that's really their their key funding strategy is

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 9>to sell stake selles in there in the projects that

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 9>they're building. They were not able to do so, so

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 9>they needed to go for this massive equity increase. Now

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 9>that the stop work order that you just mentioned, I

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 9>think most of the market did not see that coming,

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 9>given that the project was already eighty percent of the way.

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 9>Forty five out of sixty five wind blades were already

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 9>on the ground. So this is you know, this is unprecedented.

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 9>I think the Empire Wind stop work order and then

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 9>restart is different in the way that the project was

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 9>not as as far in advance as this one. So

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 9>it will dampen investor confidence ahead of the ahead of

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:07.360
<v Speaker 9>the plan that could increase. But we do know that

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.280
<v Speaker 9>the backing of the Danish government, which has committed a

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 9>fifty fifty percent pro rata share of that it could increase. Well,

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:19.760
<v Speaker 9>we'll give some reassurance and will probably help secure those funds.

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 5>I know the stock took a big hit, fell to

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 5>a record low, but it bounced back again. I believe

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 5>it started trading again right overseas and rallied. And why

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 5>is that more? That was it over sold?

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>It?

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 5>Investors think it was over sold, you.

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 9>Think, I think I think there was a big mix

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.919
<v Speaker 9>of boats. So the stop work order came came in

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 9>Friday after market and I think markets didn't have time

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 9>to digest the implications to the equity increase after you know,

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 9>we had a bank holiday in the UK, so markets

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 9>open up this morning and that was mainly because of

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 9>these reassurance of Oysted. So the company came out with

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 9>a statement saying that the Danish government has actually reached

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 9>rated or reaffirmed their intent to participate at least in

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 9>fifty point one percent of that equity increase, with the

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 9>remaining set to be underwritten. So the company, the company

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 9>tried to instill some confidence, you know, reta into the plan.

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.159
<v Speaker 9>And as we know, we think that the backing of

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 9>the Danish government is a big endorsement for this equity increase.

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 9>So we do think it will go ahead, but perhaps

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 9>we will have to wait into early September where there

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 9>will be an a GM and see where the share

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 9>price is trading at them.

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:34.919
<v Speaker 2>Can you walk us through the president's arguments against offshore

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 2>wind and then and then what supporters are saying, the

0:20:38.040 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 2>pros and the hans against it?

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 9>So, yeah, the administration has flagged that there are several

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 9>issues with wind development in general. Firstly that it could

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 9>impact the environment for whales, so that it could actually

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 9>hurt whales, that birds could fly into the wind blades,

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.000
<v Speaker 9>and and then on the other on the other side

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 9>of or on shore, there's also a community resistance. There's

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 9>been there's been a few protests actually saying that that

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 9>the offshore wind doesn't look good on the horizon. So

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 9>these are these are several things. But but again or

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.200
<v Speaker 9>State actually had all the permits for for for this,

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.360
<v Speaker 9>for this farm to go ahead, and several studies actually

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 9>you know, countering the impact of these of this offshore

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 9>wind farms versus their benefit. Offshore wind has been a

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.880
<v Speaker 9>niche technology in in the US is still a nascent industry.

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 9>It's a bit more advanced in Europe, but in the

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 9>US we still have only a handful of megawats.

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 3>But still it's it's an important part of the energy mix.

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 9>It will help uh decarbonize the economy, will help add

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 9>more electrons into the grid and avoid using more expensive gas.

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.879
<v Speaker 5>And in the time we have left, Patricio, can you

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 5>talk to us a little bit about Orsted's competition, their

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 5>rivals in this space and what this possible setback for

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 5>them might mean for the competition. Is this, you know,

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:08.640
<v Speaker 5>actually an advantage does it give them an advantage in some.

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 9>Way, So perhaps outside of the US, I would say

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 9>there there will be you know, there's possibly some silver

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 9>linings for other competitors. We cover other companies like RWE,

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 9>which is heavily invested in European offshore wind. So the

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 9>company is still moving ahead with plans in Germany. That look,

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 9>you know, clear that there's more regulatory certain to hear

0:22:31.040 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 9>in Europe, but conditions are still I would say not

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 9>straightforward for offshore wind development in Europe. A few auctions

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 9>here have been unsuccessful. We've only tendered a handful of

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 9>megawatts in the past.

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Two or three years. So that said, there is a silver.

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 9>Lining for them, but I wouldn't say that the outlook

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 9>changes materially.

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts live each weekday

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal