WEBVTT - The State of Consumer Tech with Lisa Eadicicco

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Enter the twisted mind of ed Zitron. This is better offline.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:22.600
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>We're here in New York City, New York State, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:28.360
<v Speaker 2>we've got a great guest, Lisa Atichico from CNN. Thank

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 2>you so much for joining us, Lisa on this horrible

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 2>wet day, truly truly one of the ugliest days in

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 2>New York history. But nevertheless, we're going to talk about

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>consumer tech to then and everyone says, oh, Ed, you've

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 2>got to be nicey, you've got to be like things more.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 2>But what's a gadget you've actually liked this year? Like,

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:45.599
<v Speaker 2>what's what's the stuff you've been enjoying?

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And it's it's kind of funny because I feel

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 4>like when I think about gadgets, I think about them

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 4>two ways. There's one like the gadgets I would actually

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 4>buy and that I actually use every day, and then

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 4>two the ones that are I think interesting for what

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 4>they say about the industry or that have been fun

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 4>to write about and fun to cover, and for the

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.839
<v Speaker 4>things that I have enjoyed using this year.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I would say it's a lot of the.

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 4>Things you'd expect, like the Nintendo Switch to is a

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 4>fun one. This year, the new Apple Watch, because I'm

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 4>a big Apple Watch user, things like that, And then

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 4>there's the other category of things that I think have

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 4>been really fun to write about, and for that, I

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 4>would say the Galaxy x are definitely stands out.

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 2>So what is the Galaxy So that's the Vision prone too, right, Yes,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 2>So how comfortable is it? Stop there?

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 4>I would say, I mean, none of these things are

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 4>super comfortable, to be honest. It's still this thing that's

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 4>bigger than a pair of glasses, bigger than something you're

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 4>used to wearing on your face, so it's always going

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 4>to be a little bit uncomfortable. I do think the

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 4>Galaxy XR was like very easy to adjust and get

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 4>to fit correctly for me. I feel like a lot

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 4>of these headsets usually are a little too big for

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 4>me or might like fall off my head.

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>The Vision Crow I have a giant Bonce, giant giant

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 2>head and that thing. Try to get that thing on

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 2>was like balancing a cup of tea on.

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>My head exactly. It's never it's never that comfortable. It's

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of weird. Yeah, I do feel like it was

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>easy to adjust.

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't the most comfortable thing to wear, but I only,

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 4>and I only wore it for like maybe about twenty

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 4>minutes at a time, So I do feel like wearing

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 4>it for extended use cases, the kinds of things that

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 4>Samsung and Google think you'll use it for, like productivity

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 4>and entertainment. I think that's I don't know how comfortable

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 4>it would be to wear it for, like, you know,

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 4>if I'm working on a project or watching a movie

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 4>or something.

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:34.560
<v Speaker 2>To say, you wouldn't do like your actual work inside it, I.

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Would try it.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 4>I think it would just take some time to get

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 4>used to, you know, wearing that thing for like an

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 4>hour or longer.

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 2>Because as like a vision pro truth and I think

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned this in person previously, but I can't use

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 2>my vision pro right now. I can use it, but

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 2>I can't update it unless you keep it on your

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 2>head during the update, which is one of the most

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 2>insane ideas ever. But I genuinely like that. When I

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 2>was trying it, I was so tall because eighty five

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 2>percent of the time, I fucking hate it. I just

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I really I was just like mad at it because

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 2>like it would something would like my cat would brush

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 2>my head and that it would be out of focus.

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 2>But there were these times on getting it and be like,

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 2>this is actually really cool. I'm like writing, I wrote

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 2>a whole thing on it, like it was back in

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>the earlier days of the show. I was like, I

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 2>really like, this's got some music in the background. And

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 2>then again like Babu my cat would knock me in

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 2>the head because he's very affectionate cat to do now

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:30.080
<v Speaker 2>he's a lovely affectionate cat, massive part of the show.

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 2>And then I'd need to readjust it and then I

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>would start to get a headache. Did you did you

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>find that the software was good on the Galaxy one?

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>Like how was it in comparison?

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So there's a couple of big things that stand

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.040
<v Speaker 4>out to me. I think the Gemini integration is really good,

0:03:44.040 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 4>and it should be because that's the one thing that

0:03:46.200 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Google and Samsung are kind of pitching as setting this

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 4>apart from the Vision Pro and previous attempts at mixed

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 4>reality and VR, but the idea that you can just

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 4>look at something and ask a question about it. Like

0:03:56.640 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 4>in my demo from October, I was looking at photos

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 4>and Google photos, and yes, it's cool that you can

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 4>look at them on a giant screen and everything, But

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 4>for me, what felt like the new thing that this

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.320
<v Speaker 4>is bringing to the table is being able to look

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 4>at that photo and be like, oh, where in the

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 4>world those types of trees usually grow and can like

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 4>that combination of like knowing what you're looking at without

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 4>having to really specify. I do think the vision Pro

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 4>is better at certain things like media for example, right,

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean some of the like spatial videos that have

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 4>been created for the vision Pro are.

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>Just like breathtaking when you look at them.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 4>But I don't I don't know that I would buy

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 4>a vision Pro for that reason, but it is very impressive.

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 2>It is the thing like even with both of them,

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 2>they have the same problem where it's like this is

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 2>a cool idea, like oh, I know where that tree

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>is now, like great, but it's like practically within my

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.120
<v Speaker 2>life when am I sitting down being like when where's

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 2>that tree from? Like where is the Yeah, where's the

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.920
<v Speaker 2>practical uses in With the vision Pro, it's like great,

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:55.919
<v Speaker 2>I can put this on my head and walk around

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 2>with it. I can kind of see who is this for?

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's the big question.

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 4>And I feel like that's kind of at least for

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 4>me when I try to look at Okay, what new

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 4>products have been successful and did actually start a category

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 4>and catch on with consumers, and.

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Which ones haven't.

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 4>And the thing that I've kind of noticed is the

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 4>ones I haven't or when you really try to kind

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 4>of force a user behavior that isn't there. And sometimes

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 4>I feel like that's what's happening with these headsets, is

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 4>that the technology is very, very cool, it's very advanced,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 4>but it always feels like it's a step towards something

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 4>more natural that we haven't gotten to yet. And you

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 4>could say that about the Oculis Drift that came out

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 4>more than ten years ago. In some cases, even the

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.480
<v Speaker 4>headsets today. I still feel that way about.

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:40.720
<v Speaker 2>And the Steam. Have you seen the Steam frame? We

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:42.840
<v Speaker 2>just add the valve.

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I haven't tried it. I've seen I don't think.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I think I just had stay from games.

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Next is on and he tried it a bit. But

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 2>it's with all these things, it's like I wish that

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:55.799
<v Speaker 2>have waited four years. Yeah, I wish that wait because

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.120
<v Speaker 2>there are those moments like you mentioned with the special video,

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 2>where it's like, holy shit, like this is actually really cool.

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Like I watched like a basketball game on the Vision

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 2>promo I'm like, this is this is actually.

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>Hard until you try it right.

0:06:07.279 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 4>And that's the things I don't feel like that many

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 4>people are gonna have the opportunity to really try it

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 4>at length, to work it into their lives. But yeah,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 4>the idea of like, oh my god, it really does

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.679
<v Speaker 4>feel like I'm sitting courtside right, Yeah, that's very cool.

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is that even if it's just

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 2>a big TV, that is cool. The problem is is

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 2>you can just sit down and watch a television. He

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 2>just turned the bloody thing on. I have. I have

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>this Nebular X one projector, which I fucking like. It's

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 2>like Anchor, It's so good soundpoll now, and I just

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 2>got like a nice screen I pull up and that

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 2>just even that it's like two or three minutes to

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 2>diddling around. But I now have one hundred inch screen

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 2>in my apartment. That's so much less work than the

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 2>vision Pro because the vision pro is like constant maintenance,

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>and I feel like if they waited, I don't know,

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 2>it may in case a friend of the show, he

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 2>suggests that this will just never happen. I honestly don't

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 2>necessarily know if I disagree with him on this one,

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 2>but it's like, I really hope it does. If it

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 2>was just something like maybe out no, like a hat

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 2>that just worked, that would be cool. But we're like, no,

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 2>not even.

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Close right exactly.

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's kind of why a lot of

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 4>these companies are kind of working towards these smart glasses instead.

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Because they are natural.

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 4>They do feel like something you would wear, whether there

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 4>was tech in them or not. But again, I feel

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 4>like convincing people that this is something that's actually going

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 4>to be more convenient might be difficult.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Although I don't know.

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, people who wear glasses might say, hey, I

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 4>need new glasses anyway, and that looks cool.

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'll try it.

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 2>The thing is with the smart glasses is I just

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>have to wonder about the social problem because I know

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 2>if one of my friends other than like Victoria Suga,

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 2>came on wearing them, if someone was wearing them when

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 2>I was like at a bar, I wouldn't want to

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>look at them. I have to wonder how most people

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 2>would feel about that.

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 4>I think there's that that's an important part. I also

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 4>feel like the interaction element is going to be weird

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 4>socially because you're out, let's say, we're sitting here talking

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 4>or we're at a cafe and we're talking about something

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:06.760
<v Speaker 4>and I'm like, oh, let me go look that up

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 4>on my phone. If instead I were to say, I

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 4>can just ask gem and I in my glasses.

0:08:10.720 --> 0:08:14.679
<v Speaker 2>We're just staring dead eye right exactly. Well that Victoria's

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 2>some from the virtual Tradition was showing, It's like when

0:08:17.400 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 2>you're looking, it is this weird kind of dead eye,

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 2>this dead eyed step, because you're just your eye is

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 2>staring at the corner. And I just wonder, like, as

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 2>cool as it is, what's the point of the smart

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 2>glasses as well? Like I can I see the Vision

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 2>pro as a more and even the Galaxy one as

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:38.080
<v Speaker 2>a more fundamentally sound idea than the glasses, because at

0:08:38.120 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 2>some point it's like, okay, if I'm wearing glasses, like

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 2>I need guidance where I'm going, I guess that's useful,

0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>But like, am I just putting this on versus Okay,

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I'll put on a helmet and watch a sports game.

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 4>I think the way that icy glasses, if they do

0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 4>take off, the reason why I would almost think of

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.040
<v Speaker 4>them as like kind of like the way you think

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 4>of AirPods and wireless earbuds like some that's on you.

0:09:00.960 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 4>You can use it to listen to music, to take

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 4>calls as you're walking, and then it also has that

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:09.440
<v Speaker 4>optional displays you can, you know, see where you're going

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 4>or look at directions or whatever you might want to

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 4>look at, like the time whatever. So kind of like

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 4>bridging together like what you would use a smart watch

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 4>for and what you would use wireless ear buds for.

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I see that, and I just wonder as well,

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>will Apple even bother will Google even like actually, if

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Google does it again, I have to respect them. After

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 2>the whole Google Glass debacle, are they still around Google Glass?

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 2>I want, I can't remember.

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where the latest on Google Glass stands.

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't think they are. I know they kind of

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 4>pivoted to enterprise.

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's why I wasn't That's why I wasn't sure

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 2>if they'd done away, because I know Microsoft is basically

0:09:55.679 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 2>killed HoloLens, but they have a very small enterprise division. Yeah.

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 4>I mean at this point with I feel like I

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 4>don't know for sure. I can't speak for Google, but

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.320
<v Speaker 4>it would make sense for them to I feel like

0:10:06.360 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 4>focus more on Android x are and the future of

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:11.840
<v Speaker 4>that platform at this point, well, for me, take.

0:10:11.720 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>It a slight change. The one thing I will say

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 2>is this is an unpopular opinion. That can have my

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 2>house for this one. I love the iPhone AS and

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I heard that they're delaying the next one to like

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty thirty seven. I'm very disapoint I'm very upset by this.

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 2>I love the iPhone A.

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I do like it to me for it, no, I

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:29.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good phone.

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 4>And for Apple, I feel like they don't you know,

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 4>that's all they need is a good iPhone.

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 1>People will buy it right.

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 4>It doesn't have to reinvent the wheel every single time

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 4>they come out with a new phone. I do think

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 4>where Apple can struggle sometimes is when you have these

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 4>in between models that are like not too different in

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 4>price from whatever. The cheapest iPhone and the most expensive

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 4>iPhone is like that. For whatever reason, this is just

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 4>again my own observation, Apple's audience has a hard time

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 4>latching onto like whatever that like in between models, whether

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.240
<v Speaker 4>it's the Plus or the Mini Air, it seems like

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 4>it's hard for them to generate demand.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 2>It does kind of feel like a weird if I wonder.

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I hope, because the whole thing. It feels like I

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 2>didn't think of it as an in between as well,

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 2>because you're right, it feels like they would naturally try

0:11:13.080 --> 0:11:15.199
<v Speaker 2>and make the main ones this thing, because that's the

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>whole reason I like it. It feels like a smaller It

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>feels like an in between between an iPad madia and

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 2>an iPad. But I love I love the iPad Pro.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 2>I love having a very thin device, and every phone's

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 2>getting fatter. It feels like, yeah.

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 4>And I think we're at the point also where people

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 4>aren't super wowed by how thin technology can get because

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.160
<v Speaker 4>we've been there for a while. So I don't think

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 4>this premise of an iPhone Air really hit the same

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 4>way the iPad Air did the way the MacBook Air did,

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:44.839
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's just kind of for that reason

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:48.040
<v Speaker 4>that we're desensitized to it. And I think Apple shoppers

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>tend to fall into two categories. Either I had an

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 4>iPhone for years and I'm not even thinking about what

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:55.679
<v Speaker 4>phone I have. I'm just going to get the next

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 4>iPhone whenever my current one dies. And then you have

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 4>the people that do get except about new iPhones, and

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 4>those people do care about things like maybe not having

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 4>an extra camera or you know, the best battery life

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 4>or whatever.

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 2>It's source of the camera's pretty bad. It's I've gotten

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:12.920
<v Speaker 2>around it, but yeah, it sucks.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's I mean like I'm not I'm the person

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 4>that takes casual photos all the time, and I think

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 4>the camera's fine. I haven't been blown away by it

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.200
<v Speaker 4>in my own just you know, usage here and there.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 2>It does feel like we're approaching peak phone, though.

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh I feel like we've been there for a while.

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Like the iPhone seventeen, PROMACX whatever, it's just it's the

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 2>same phone exactly.

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.640
<v Speaker 4>I feel like we've been at peak phone for a while.

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 4>And I do feel like that's part of what Apple's

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 4>trying to do here with the iPhone, airs show that

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 4>it can make something that's different, that's unexpected, that's not

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 4>just the same phone repackaged, and then.

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 2>People hate it so now that now they don't know

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>what to do.

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I do feel like, and this is a common argument,

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 4>but I do feel like it's a step towards a foldable.

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>iPhone, at least in my what I want. The technology

0:12:58.840 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>needs to be.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 4>They need to engineer the phone differently for it to

0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 4>be foldable. It's not just about the crease and all that,

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.959
<v Speaker 4>but you have to think about the battery, the components

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 4>and that, Like engineering wise, that was a big step

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 4>forward with the iPhone error.

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>I have to wonder as well if the reason they've

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 2>jumped on the foldables is they're still very experimental Jerry

0:13:17.240 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Riggs everything. There was someone who did a review of

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 2>a foldable and they made it like one of the

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 2>Google ones that set on fire, and it just from

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 2>like bending it too much. It's like, if we're still there,

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Apple doesn't want to touch this with a fifty foot pall.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I feel like foldables have gotten really good.

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 4>I feel like Samsungs in particular, like because they have

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 4>been doing this for so long, it's finally gotten to

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 4>the point where the fold feels like a regular phone

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 4>and that's really cool. But I do feel like it's

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 4>still a subset of the phone market.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Most people just want a new phone.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 4>But I agree, I feel like the minute there is

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 4>a foldable iPhone, I'm going to buy one, mostly out

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 4>of curiosity, but also because I really do enjoy using

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.200
<v Speaker 4>foldable phones and it does make the experience feel a

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.559
<v Speaker 4>little different. And this like the iPhone Air to me

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 4>as soon as I picked it up, I was like,

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:05.560
<v Speaker 4>this just feels like a z flip that doesn't fold

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 4>in half the shape the Galaxy Oh yeah, that's like

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 4>the Galaxy flip phone one.

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>And then of course Motorola has one as well.

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I know Michael Fisher missed Mauvel himself loves those things,

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 2>and that's like the trifold ones as well. I love

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>these crazy Chinese phones where it's like three giant things

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 2>that you unfold probably breaks me.

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Just announced there was like last night.

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yes, I want more weird phone me too.

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I want phones to be weird again.

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 4>I had a Microsoft Kin back in the day, like

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 4>the Samsung Juke.

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I had all these weird phones.

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about what what is the Microsoft Kin? I

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 2>remember the name, but I don't remember what it was.

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 4>So this was and this was like way before I

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 4>was writing about phones. I was just like, this thing's weird.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 4>I want it. It was their social media phone.

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god.

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so like your front screen now look at it.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Yes, that was like peak weird phone.

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 4>It like had this cover screen that would look like

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 4>your Facebook and then you would open it up and

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 4>there would be a keyboard on the inside. Yeah.

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I had the second generation one, so that one looked

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 2>More like every one that looks like an egg.

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>No, not the egg one, the other one that yeah

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that first time.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they so they had one one that looked like

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 2>a palm pre it looks like, and then one that

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of looked like a normal phone twenty ten as well. Yeah,

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 2>what a what a classic twenty ten decision?

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. I loved it. I thought it was so cool,

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>but it was so glitchy. And that's why I ended

0:15:28.160 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>up getting rid of it.

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 4>Was that, like the operating system just crashed one day

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 4>and I just couldn't use it anymore. And this is

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 4>before I really knew how to like troubleshoot things, and

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 4>before I was really even interested in technology, and I

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 4>just got it. I think at that point I finally

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 4>switched to a smartphone. But yeah, I mean phones were

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 4>weird back then and it was really cool and I

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 4>kind of missed that. But I feel like foldable phones,

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 4>to your point, are filling that void because if you

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 4>look at the common thread between weird phones is that

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 4>they're all trying to be some kind of like hybrid device. Yeah,

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 4>like those phones of the twenty tens were like, oh,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 4>you still kind of want to use your keyboard, but

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 4>you also want something that feels like a smartphone.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>And you know, my favorite was so I definitely the

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 2>BlackBerry Storm. I don't know if you remember that as

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 2>far as there was that weird generation when everyone was

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 2>just trying something weird and there was this horrible, horrible

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 2>BlackBerry where it was like haptic but it just felt

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 2>like pressing into fudge. Yeah, so cool. But I just

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 2>looked this up Samsung Juke What the looked like a

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 2>key ring.

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it was supposed to be like an MP three

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 4>player slash phone. It was weird, but also it came

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 4>out at the point where you could already store your

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 4>music on a regular phone. But I don't know, I

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 4>thought it was cool and weird and it was so tiny.

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it was so kind.

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Of love how small it is. It looks like a

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 2>chocolate bar. Yeah, yeah, it like swings open. I I

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 2>miss when we were doing weird shit with Fun. There

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 2>was that weird there were.

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Just everyone Everything just looks like this now.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah everything's a brick, yes, And it's a shame. It

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 2>feels like everything is just kind of normalizing around it

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 2>when we need more weird shit. But I guess we've

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 2>now seen what happens when you're actually, no, the iPhone

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 2>at wasn't weird enough. That's the problem exactly.

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 4>I think that that's you know, when I talk about

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 4>those like in between phones, and I think what makes

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 4>it hard to kind of really create a lot of

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 4>demand for those phones is that they're not different enough.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>They're just in between, and they're not that different in price.

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:24.719
<v Speaker 4>And I think that's you know, a big part of

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 4>what can make it difficult to kind of sell somebody

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 4>on that it's not that much less expensive than the Pro,

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 4>but it's thinner, so like do you it's and.

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Also there's still like one thousand dollars. These are not.

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Cheap, No, not at all.

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 4>No, it's meant to be like a Pro that's thinner,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:42.399
<v Speaker 4>I think, except you know, hardware is different obviously, and

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 4>it's pretty fast.

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I like it a lot. It's just I'm annoyed because

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>the camera is it's just shit enough. It's not that

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.119
<v Speaker 2>it's bad, it's like just a little bit worse. Like

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it can't really zoom. You have to digital zoom.

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:55.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it doesn't have a lot of zoom even digitally,

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't zoom in that far.

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's weird how little has happened with Apple in

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 2>the last year as well, because they tried the Vision

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Pro and then they just went, uh.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 4>I feel like the Vision Pro is one of those

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 4>things that it's gonna I don't know. I feel like

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 4>people were expecting it for a long time. The expectations

0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 4>were really high, and I think for Apple there especially

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 4>high because they have this history of creating not necessarily

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:23.760
<v Speaker 4>being the first, but being the first to get people

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 4>excited about a new category and show yeah yeah, and

0:18:26.840 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 4>like show how this should be done, like with the

0:18:28.800 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 4>smart watch, Like the Apple Watch was not the first

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 4>smart watch by any means, but it.

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Was the first one that got kind of popular or

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>popular enough.

0:18:35.640 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 2>And they were smart enough to treat as a fashion item, which.

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Right, although that's not what it is at all now

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 4>and it's so funny to see how that's not that

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 4>they don't hear.

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, the Multure was like a Vanity Vogue spread and

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 2>they were really there was a ten thousand dollars Amaze one.

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>Yes, Oh my god, I repect that.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 2>But I love that they tried that and they just

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 2>walked away, just like, yeah, that's the sports thing now.

0:18:57.640 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 4>And that's the thing is like, when you create a

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 4>new category, it's really hard to predict to what people

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 4>are actually going to use it for or what they're

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 4>going to gravitate towards.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 2>I think they were doing it just for the marketing.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it was literally just to get people to

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 2>write about it.

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But also smart watches were so ugly back then.

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 4>That's the other thing, is that the reason why there

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 4>was the Pebble which I loved so much. Honestly, it looked, yes,

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 4>they are back, you know. The original Pebble watch didn't

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 4>look like anything special, but it was like yeah, yeah,

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 4>it was.

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Like funky and weird.

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 4>It was like had a monochrome display and I just

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 4>loved And it's funny because I'm not usually this person

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 4>like that cares about customizing things. But you could customize

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 4>the watch face to be like literally anything you want

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 4>and talk about like weird gadgets like I feel like

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 4>that was also like not weird, but they had such

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 4>a fun community around it that would develop all these

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 4>custom watch faces and things like that, and it was

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 4>just really it was a cool little device.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that era was great. I realized there

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of fraud on Indiegogo and Kickstarter, but

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 2>there was also just weird shit. And now that's all

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 2>in China. Yeah, it's just GP you play with any

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 2>GPD stuff You ever seen them? No, they just make

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 2>gaming PCs, but the handhelds and they all cost they

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 2>have one. It's cool, but it's also your like, you

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>wacky sons of bitch. They're doing a handheld one where

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 2>you have an external battery. It's just like, sure, why not,

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 2>It's at that point why not? And they always make

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.600
<v Speaker 2>four million dollars on Kickstarter. I hope all of that

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 2>money is not from criminal enterprises, and not suggesting it is,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.360
<v Speaker 2>but every time. But it's just I wish that there

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 2>was I'm sure that there are economic reasons. For sure.

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Someone was to shoot me an email about this. I

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 2>wish we had more American firms willing to try share

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 2>because it's toll right now. It's boring out.

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's things have looked the same for a long time,

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 4>and you had like a brief moment in like the

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 4>mid twenty tens, like twenty sixteen, twenty seventeen, when Alexa

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 4>was just starting to become really popular, and then everyone thought.

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>The smart home was going to take off in a

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>way that it never did.

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>That yeah, that I'm thinking about like these.

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 4>Different phases of like everyone's like, oh, this is gonna

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 4>be the next big thing after phones, and like we

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 4>still have not reached them.

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Well don't you haven't it? I mean to the point

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 2>of everything being the same as well, it's like you

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 2>buy you buy a Google device, it's called Gemini on it.

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>You buy an Apple device, it's called Apple Intelligence. You

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 2>immediately turn it off. It's just everything kind of feels

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 2>and looks the same. And yeah, you watch a commercial,

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 2>it's just more fucking Gemini. I don't know if you

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 2>use Gemen. I still don't know why Gemini three has

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:42.400
<v Speaker 2>caused so much.

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.400
<v Speaker 4>It's the same, yeah, I mean it's like a sure,

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 4>it's like a better version of the same.

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I've used it here and there. You know, I don't.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.679
<v Speaker 4>I use AI a lot in like my like personal

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 4>life or whatever, just to get things done. But it's

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.920
<v Speaker 4>not like I don't think we're at the point yet where,

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 4>at least in my personal usage, I don't see that

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 4>much of a difference between chat, GPT and Gemini in

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 4>terms of what.

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I use them for.

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:09.639
<v Speaker 4>And I think it's that's one interesting thing I feel

0:22:09.640 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 4>like about AI compared to a lot of the other

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 4>products in our lives. Like when you have a phone

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 4>or a computer, you're like, okay, I'm a Mac or

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 4>a PC person, I'm iOS or Android. I feel like

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 4>with AI, people do use different models for different things.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.440
<v Speaker 4>I don't feel like people are loyal to just one

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 4>all the time.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I also think that it's the you know how I

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:29.439
<v Speaker 2>feel about AI, But it's also it's not clear what

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 2>makes one different from the other, like with A I

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 2>guess that's the case with phones as well, except phones

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 2>don't just burn money every time you turn them on.

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 2>But it's it's strange because this Gemini thing has really

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 2>taken off stock market. You got people right, and you

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 2>wrote this piece about like Google is the new leader

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 2>in AI. No, it's good, but it's just like why,

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 2>And I think it comes down to they mostly do

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.639
<v Speaker 2>the same. It makes me think people gonna love this.

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that like the only company that will even

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 2>do llm's long term is Google, and then they'll just

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 2>make it. They'll pull back the prices. But it's like, no,

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 2>one can really explain what the difference is, and thus

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 2>no one actually has any brand power.

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 4>I think for Google it's an extension of like their

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 4>business model. Naturally, like people use Google Search to find

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 4>information and do things, and now people have started using

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 4>llms for that, so of course it makes sense for

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 4>them to do that, and they have an advantage in

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 4>that sense. I think Google has that advantage, right that

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 4>you have all these people that don't even know about

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 4>AI are just going to naturally start using their product

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 4>because it's Gemini and their models are now baked into

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 4>almost everything, right, AI mode, everything else, you know, Open AI.

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 4>I think their advantage has been that they were, you know,

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 4>chatchipt kind of became a household name pretty quickly, so

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to kind of once any brand has that

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 4>kind of like has made that kind of impression, I

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 4>feel like it's hard to compete with that, or you know.

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's why I see so.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Much consolidation in the tech industry in particulars, because it's

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 4>really hard to be that third, right, you have like

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 4>one or two that are really big, and then being

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 4>that third is really challenging.

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 2>It's also there's little I feel like there's not really

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 2>much reward for being first with this is what or

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 2>even being the household name. You just burn a bunch

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:16.479
<v Speaker 2>of money. There was a story in the information that

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 2>came out this week who this will run now a

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 2>week after that, but where it's like open ay zone

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 2>code read because of Gemini. It's like, and you read

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:27.360
<v Speaker 2>the article, it's really funny because there's a bit where

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 2>it's just like step one, make Chad GPT's ans as better,

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 2>Step two, make it able to do more, Step three

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>make people like it. It's like, what have you been doing?

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 2>What have you been doing the last six months? Honestly

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 2>that maybe what Gemini three is. It's just that they said,

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 2>I went what would make people use this more?

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, what's interesting is like you have kind of the

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 4>opposite Like open ai and Google are in the opposite scenarios.

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 4>They're like the inverse of each other. Like Google is

0:24:55.400 --> 0:24:59.199
<v Speaker 4>already playing in so many different areas from search to

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 4>owns to all these other products that shopping right, all

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 4>of these things that we do every day online, and

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 4>because they have that in place already, they can just

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 4>kind of sprinkle AI into things as they go along.

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 4>Open Ai had the opposite where they had this one

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 4>like breakout AI service and now they're you know, kind

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:20.239
<v Speaker 4>of in this mode where they're like, hey, we're not

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 4>just this one thing, We're the next big Internet company. Right.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 4>That's kind of what they're projecting based on all of

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:26.640
<v Speaker 4>these areas that they're trying.

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:28.680
<v Speaker 1>To expand into. So I think it's kind of interesting.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 4>Back years ago, the New York Times had that piece

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 4>where Google was saying, we're in a code es GPT

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 4>and now open AI, according to that article, is you know,

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 4>facing that moment of its own.

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 2>I just I also think that no one knows what

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 2>to do with large language, but I just don't. I

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:46.439
<v Speaker 2>think at this point, so much money's going and you

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 2>can't get a straight answer about out of any of

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:50.959
<v Speaker 2>them as to why you're using them, like in your

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 2>personal life. I imagine brainstorming stuff or like looking stuff up.

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:57.119
<v Speaker 1>Like right, like stuff that I would probably use Google

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 1>for exactly.

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. And it's like if this ends with just Google

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 2>managers to pull in the customers the open A I

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>had and then ends up probably making it putting some

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 2>of this away because it's too expensive, it's just like,

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 2>of course, if this is that actually is probably how

0:26:12.040 --> 0:26:14.679
<v Speaker 2>it ends with just like a large company destroying a

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 2>startup and nothing happening. I hope so the sooner the better.

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:23.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's it is three years and we've not

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 2>really had a proper use case beyond better search. It's strange,

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 2>it's everywhere.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I would agree in that, Like I do think

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 4>it's moving fast in terms of like it started out,

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, the shift from just being able to answer

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 4>simple questions to being able to like reason and whatever

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:45.400
<v Speaker 4>and think of these questions more.

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>But to your point, that's not the use case. That's

0:26:47.119 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the technology.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 2>It's also just it's also just more search, Like it

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 2>really is just knowledge search on instead of web search, right,

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>And sometimes it gets it well, I'm.

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Sure, I'm sure you've heard this term more times than

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 4>you would like. I even hate saying it because I

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 4>feel like it's become such a nonsense buzzword.

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>You could probably guess what I'm going to say.

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 4>But AI agents are supposedly going to be the next

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 4>step whenever this AI.

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>I love this. Well, It's funny when you go and

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 2>look at the term agent, it just means like chat.

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.240
<v Speaker 2>It really does just mean chato. Oh. Even you go

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:20.879
<v Speaker 2>back to twenty twenty three. That's so open a I

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 2>defined it, yeah, but I loved I saw the statistics

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 2>just like eleven percent it was AI agents. It's like, no,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't. If you're just considering AI search agent, that's

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>just search engines and that. I keep reading about these

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 2>shopping integrations as well, but I can never make them

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 2>work because I come and try, I go and try

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 2>the Walmart with work. I managed to make it do

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:44.600
<v Speaker 2>something in Canva right, but it's like I could have

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 2>just done that in Canva right.

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 4>And that's the thing that's I think for me where

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the skepticism comes in is that I

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 4>feel like we've been talking about these agents for years,

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 4>two points since chat gipt came out.

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:58.240
<v Speaker 1>They're like, this is what it's going to These things

0:27:58.240 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>are going to go and do stuff right.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 4>These things are going to do stuff for you, And

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:04.199
<v Speaker 4>I do think that could be really helpful, honestly, But

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 4>I also have a lot of skepticism and concerns about,

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 4>like I don't know, handing over anything that I remotely

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 4>care about being done the right way to an AI agent,

0:28:13.440 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 4>Like I'm skeptical that people are going to trust it

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 4>enough to handle things well.

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 2>It's also it doesn't seem to be able to do

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.680
<v Speaker 2>it is my big thing. But even when you looked

0:28:21.680 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 2>at like the AI browsers from like, yeah, there's was

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 2>a comment from perplexity in Atlas from open ai or whatever.

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 2>When you look there's like this thing of the prompt

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 2>injection attacks. I don't know if you've seen this. Yes,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 2>I could just get with just the website. If you

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.399
<v Speaker 2>use them on a website, the website could attack you.

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 2>What I love, though, is the people who are innovating

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:43.400
<v Speaker 2>appear to just be criminals. The people who are like

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:48.360
<v Speaker 2>actually finding AI innovations are like Cambodian pig butchering operations.

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>North I was North Korean. I heard this story the

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 2>other day from a mate where it's North Korean people

0:28:57.000 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 2>are using like in like hacker groups are applying to

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 2>and getting American jobs. Oh really use and using deep

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 2>called deep fakes for the know your customer stuff and

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 2>like it's really fucking grow.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 2>It's just like no, everything I read is just like, man,

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 2>there is innovation crime. Well, actually, Robert Evans of cool

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Zone Meter in twenty twenty four said that was the

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 2>actual innovation. We're walkingto a restaurant. He said, no, that's

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.719
<v Speaker 2>where it is. It's like fraud, massive fraud.

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean, and I feel like anytime you have

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 4>a new technology, the bad guys always find a way

0:29:30.280 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 4>to make use of it before, you know, faster than

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 4>the good guys.

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they are the only ones? Yeah, they're

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>making I will say North Korean hacker groups, I'm pretty

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 2>sure are making more profit than open Ai, which is cool.

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's cool. I think I think that

0:29:43.800 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 2>that's the world we deserve, honestly, and I think that's

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 2>where we're heading towards. Because when you create a technology

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 2>that you're not really sure what it does, of course

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 2>somebody malign is going to use it to your own point, right,

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 2>It's like, of course they're going to find a way

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 2>around it. All right, As we wrap up, is there

0:29:59.080 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 2>anything you're actually looking forward to in the tech industry though?

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Is there anything you're anything on the on the horizon?

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 2>It's okay if there isn't.

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Honestly, there isn't really just one thing right now. I

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 4>feel like, you know, all of this AI stuff is

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 4>a little dizzying, and there's a lot of skepticism about it.

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 4>But I will say, as someone who's been covering this

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 4>industry for like a little more than ten years and

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of that just being the same, I feel

0:30:23.680 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 4>like it's been fun to write about something that it

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 4>does feel new, whether for better or for worse, it

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 4>is something that feels new and different. What am I

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.480
<v Speaker 4>looking forward to? I want weird phones again, That's what

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm looking forward to. I hope that phones get weird

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 4>to get.

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 2>I want things with hand cranks some. I mean, that's

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 2>the play Date console, but I mean even the Nintendo

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Switch To was kind of safe.

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 3>It's good.

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 4>I like it a lot, but it's weird for Nintendo

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 4>to do that. I feel like like doing.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 4>No, I have like almost every Nintendo console, but yeah,

0:30:57.200 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 4>I feel like coming out with more of the same

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 4>is not usually in their playbook. But the switch was

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 4>so successful that they kind of had to people. Could

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 4>you imagine if the Switch Too was entirely different and

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 4>wasn't a better version of the same console.

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 2>I feel like I do wonder if we're going to

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 2>get a pushback on this eventually though, if people are

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 2>just gonna we need some weird shit again, that's what

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 2>That's what the energy I'm putting into the universe today.

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, me too.

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 2>So where do people find you?

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:23.920
<v Speaker 4>You can find me on I'm on X Blue Sky

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.400
<v Speaker 4>and threads at least said Chico, and you can also

0:31:26.440 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 4>find my work of course at CNN dot.

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Com wonderful, and you can find me at Better Offline

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.880
<v Speaker 2>dot com. Subscribe to the newsletter, email me on my

0:31:33.920 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 2>web verse. Thank you for listening, Love you.

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 3>All, Thank you for listening to Better Offline.

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 5>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 5>is Metasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 5>and audio projects at Matasowski dot com, M A T

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 5>T O S O W s ki dot com. You

0:31:59.840 --> 0:32:02.400
<v Speaker 5>can email me at easy at Better Offline dot com,

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 5>or visit Better Offline dot com to find more podcast

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 5>links and of course, my newsletter. I also really recommend

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 5>you go to chat dot where'soead dot at to visit

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 5>the discord, and go to our slash Better Offline to

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 5>check out I'll Reddit.

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for listening.

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 3>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 5>For more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Zonemedia dot com or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 5>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.