WEBVTT - STBYM Listener Mail: La Muerte

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey you welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind Listener mail.

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 2>My name is Robert Lamb.

0:00:14.800 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick, and hey folks. I know

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 3>we don't usually do a preamble on our show before

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 3>every episode, but I thought it'd be good in case

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 3>there are some new listeners out there, to kind of

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 3>remind you who we are if you're new to the show.

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Stuff to Blow Your Mind has been an audio podcast

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 3>for like fifteen years or sixteen Rob and when did

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 3>it actually start?

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>We've always been here, it's been a while.

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Our core episodes published on Tuesdays and Thursdays of every week,

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 3>and those are about diverse topics that we get interested in.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Usually they have something to do with science or culture

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.480
<v Speaker 3>in some way. Most Wednesdays we publish a short form

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 3>scripted episode, and then on Fridays we do a sub

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>show called Weird House Cinema where we just talk about

0:00:56.080 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 3>a strange film. You can find all of those episodes

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 3>in the Stuff to Blow your Mind podcast feed wherever

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 3>you get your podcasts. In today's episode, this is a

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>recurring segment we do called Listener mail where we're going

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 3>to read and respond to some email from listeners. We

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 3>do this at variable intervals now, usually maybe once every

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 3>month or month and a half. And I'll go ahead

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 3>and give you the email address in case you would

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 3>like to get in touch and send us a message

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 3>that could be featured on a show like this in

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 3>the future. That email address is contact at stuff to

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Blow your Mind dot com. Also, we just wanted to

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 3>check in about the fact that just within the past

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 3>month we started recording a video version of the show

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>that you can find on Netflix. It's the exact same content,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>it's just with the cameras turned on, and so we're

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 3>still relatively new at this. I think we're kind of

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 3>getting used to the merciless unblinking eye. But we have

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 3>gotten some encouraging emails from listeners saying they're enjoying the

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 3>video version, So thank you for that. The kind words

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 3>really do mean a lot to us. If you happen

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>to be watching us on Netflix now and you want

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 3>to subscribe, you can click the remind me buttons so

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 3>future episodes will pop up when they publish. And please listeners,

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.520
<v Speaker 3>if your game, we encourage you to just leap wantonly

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 3>from one platform to another and consume the show however

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 3>you like best. So if you found us on Netflix, please, yes,

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 3>go subscribe to our audio format wherever you get your podcasts.

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.760
<v Speaker 3>And if you're an audio listener, please look us up

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 3>on Netflix if you're so inclined.

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, if you're listening to us, if you're watching us,

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.399
<v Speaker 2>whatever you're comfortable with, we're just pleased that you took

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 2>time out of your day to listen to our content,

0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and we're grateful.

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, Rob, are you ready to get right into

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 3>the messages.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, A lot of these, or at least the ones

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 2>at the top, are gonna have to do with our

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:51.119
<v Speaker 2>recent series on personifications of death. Anthropomorphic personification, so death

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:54.520
<v Speaker 2>like the grim Reaper certainly in Western traditions, but other

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>related figures. We weren't able to cover everything out there

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 2>because this is a sort of figure that occurs just

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 2>throughout human cultures, and there's so many different varieties and

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 2>yet at the same time, there are certain aspects, certain

0:03:10.240 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 2>tropes that you'll find again and again, and so we

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 2>reached out to listeners because we knew that people would

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 2>have all sorts of personal but also cultural details to

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 2>fill in for us. Right.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 3>So, Rob, if it's okay with you, I'm going to

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>do this message from Maya. Yeah, Maya, says dear Robin, Joe.

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 3>What a fascinating discussion about the personification of death and

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 3>grammatical gender. As a speaker of Mexican Spanish as my

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>first language, I found it especially compelling given my country's

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>fascination with death and its many representations. Curiously enough, every

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 3>name we give to death, and there are hundreds I looked,

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 3>is a feminine noun. La morte death is feminine, but

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 3>so are Laparca, one of the fates in Greek myth,

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and Laflaca, the skinny one. Folk images of death seem

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 3>to be divided. A very well known representation of death

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:12.040
<v Speaker 3>is Lakatrina, an image created first created by the engraver

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Jose Guadalupe Posada, that depicts death as a high class lady.

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Its name means something like the well dressed one. And Rob,

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I went and looked up this image. I pulled it

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 3>into our outline. So this is Lakatrina by Jose Guadalupe Pasada.

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a figure of a skeleton who seems to be

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I don't know what these kind of fluffy things around

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.040
<v Speaker 3>its shoulders are maybe they're bushes or clouds. I guess

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 3>clouds would make sense. But it's wearing this big, elaborate,

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.600
<v Speaker 3>beautiful hat. It's like a gently sloping kind of domed

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 3>hat with flowers on the top and big, you know,

0:04:47.480 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>dangling feathers coming off, and then also something seemingly tucked

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:54.840
<v Speaker 3>into the skeleton's ear, though of course a skull wouldn't

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:56.720
<v Speaker 3>have an ear. But what are those things down there?

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 3>Are those like tassels or flowers?

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, the overall appearances yet death in a festive hat.

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 2>And this this image was discussed in some of the

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 2>sources that I was using for those episodes, but I

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:12.960
<v Speaker 2>I didn't get to it, but it is quite an

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 2>important one, I'm to understand.

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 3>Maya's email goes on to say the Maschika deities of

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 3>death were a male and female skeletal figure. Mictlandakoutli was

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 3>the lord of mik Dlan the underworld, and mik Takasi

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Watt was his wife. And Maya this you may have

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 3>written this email before we discussed them on the show,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 3>but these figures did come up, I think in part

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 3>four of our discussion there, where we were talking about

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 3>a paper about what were the cultural inputs on the

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 3>creation of Santa Marte, which does come up in this email.

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 3>By the way, Maya says, in many other visual traditions,

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 3>death is a male figure. Rob will be happy to

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 3>note that there was a Lucha libre character known as

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 3>La Parca, although he tragically died as a result of

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.680
<v Speaker 3>injuries sustained in a match. Rob, I think you've got

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 3>some stuff on Laparca.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Later I do, and we have another listener male that

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>will also fill in some of the blanks for us.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, Maya says. Punk and heavy metal depictions of

0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:15.000
<v Speaker 3>death as a male, devilish figure coexist with the controversial

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>La Santa Morte the Holy Death, a folk cult figure

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that appears as a female skeletal deity who personifies death

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 3>and is venerated by people from all walks of life,

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 3>and Argentinian equivalent, in contrast is a male figure San

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 3>la Morte. And of course, during Da da Mortos, the

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 3>Day of the Dead, you can write your name on

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.800
<v Speaker 3>the forehead of a sugar skull and add it to

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 3>the altar or afrienda, and in doing so you turn

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:45.120
<v Speaker 3>a neutral, genderless confection into your own gendered alter ego.

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Ah, that's a nice, nice tidbit to mentioned. Yeah, there's

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 2>an excellent Day of the Dead celebration here in Atlanta.

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Every year. They hold it at the historic Cokeland Cemetery,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and we generally try to go.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>As somebody who didn't grow up with Day of the

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 3>Dead celebrations. I for a long time, I think I

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 3>had the wrong idea that it was only it was

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 3>like Mardi Gras, that it was only like this big

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 3>public festival kind of thing. But I realized more recently, Yeah,

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 3>that you know, you can have private celebrations. And I

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 3>actually went to one that was hosted by some family

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 3>of ours this past fall. It was beautiful and the

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.280
<v Speaker 3>afriendo was I don't know, I found it very touching.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh nice, coming back to Maya's email. As for grammatical gender,

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 3>its influence on our perception of external objects is still

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 3>up for debate. Some studies have found that we tend

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 3>to think of feminine inanimate objects such as table mesa,

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 3>as having more feminine attributes than masculine objects, but other

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 3>research has found these effects to be more subtle or

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.760
<v Speaker 3>even non existent. Yeah, we talked about that in the

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 3>episodes too. There's kind of a mixed research picture on

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:55.679
<v Speaker 3>to what extent this is really happening. But Maya says,

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 3>in the case of death, nothing seems to prevent us

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 3>from thinking about it as both the mascular and feminine figure.

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 3>Despite the grammatical gender of the noun, we used to

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 3>refer to it a wonderful series. Keep up the great

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 3>work and know that you have many non native English

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>speakers as fans all over the world. Maya. Well, thank you, Maya,

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 3>very nice, wonderful. It warms my heart. And then also

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>Maya had a follow up email just to share a

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 3>picture with us, She says, Dear Joe and rob By

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 3>the way, here you have a picture of the Santa

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>Morte van that makes the rounds in my brother's neighborhood,

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 3>so her devotees can worship her from the comfort of

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:36.479
<v Speaker 3>their own homes. All the best, Maya, And this is wonderful.

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a Santa Morte figure enthroned on a big chair,

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 3>draped in looks like gold satin or something kind of

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 3>a gold leaf texture, sitting in the bed of a

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 3>trailer or the back of a pickup truck, or it

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 3>might be like one of those small three wheel pickup trucks,

0:08:54.000 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 3>and so she's a very dry skeleton. As we talked

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 3>about she usually, you know, she's very parched. But she's

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 3>wearing a pink floral gown and a mantle like a

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:06.320
<v Speaker 3>hood over the top of her head. In her right hand,

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 3>she's holding a scythe. In her left hand a golden

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 3>ball which I think could be the earth. It's like

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 3>a globe. And then she has an owl perched over

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 3>either shoulder. Do you see the two owls.

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Rob Oh, yeah, I didn't see them at first, but

0:09:20.240 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 2>now I see.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Them hiding in the ruffles of the gold on the chair.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 2>That's great.

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 3>And then also in the same hand as the scythe,

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 3>she's got some kind of foliage. I don't know exactly

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 3>what that is. I was wondering, could that be a

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>palm leaf?

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>It does kind of look like a palm leaf.

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I can't say for sure what that is,

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 3>but this is great. Thank you so much for sending Maya.

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes, indeed, all right, I said, we're going to have

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 2>more about La Parca the Lucha Door, and indeed we're

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 2>going to read this next one from Angelo Angela, says Hi,

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Robert and Joe. While listening to your podcast series about

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:02.599
<v Speaker 2>the Personifications of death, mention of the Mexican Laparca immediately

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 2>got me thinking about professional wrestling, the WCW promotion. This

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>some of you may not be aware that this promotion

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 2>used to exist heyday during the nineties.

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 3>Wait, what's it called now? It's not that anymore.

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't exist. It was, yeah, it went away. It

0:10:21.400 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>was purchased by WWE, and it is now part of

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 2>that conglonerate anyway, Angelo writes the WCW promotion showcased luchadors

0:10:33.679 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 2>in the mid to late nineties, including one named Laparca.

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 2>He wore a skeletal mask and costume to look like

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 2>a reaper, but instead of a scythe he always carried

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 2>a steel chair to the ring. He would, of course

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 2>use it on his opponents during matches, but he would

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 2>also play guitar air guitar on it during his entrances

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 2>and post match celebrations. He used the chair so much

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:59.359
<v Speaker 2>that announcers gave him the nickname the Chairman of WCW.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 2>He did well. He did use the Mexican grim reaper costume.

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 2>The gimmick never really went with the subject of death

0:11:08.080 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 2>in the same way that another wrestler, the Undertaker, did

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 2>in his earlier days. Other wrestlers would take on the

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>Laparca mantle, with the character making an appearance in this

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 2>year's WWE Royal Rumble. Anyway, the series was great and

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>I really learned a lot from it. Please keep up

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the great work. Thanks Angela. So yes Laparka. Believe me.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 2>When Laparca came up in our death episodes, I did

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>have to fight the urge to bring him up, but

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 2>I was like, we can save this for later. Somebody

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 2>will write in about this and we can follow up.

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think anybody would have minded if you'd, oh, we.

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Had a lot of ground to cover. It was hard

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 2>to argue that we needed a side trip to louchal

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 2>Libra at that point, and I knew we'd come back

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 2>to it. Yes, Angelo did a I think a great

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.319
<v Speaker 2>job here summarizing the Laparca that wrestling fans of the

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 2>nineties in the US likely remember. Tied to the Triple

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.199
<v Speaker 2>A promotion in Mexico at the time, and then I

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 2>think he was full time with WCW for a spell

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 2>there too, and he was played by a wrestler named

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Adolfo Ibarra born nineteen sixty five. And yeah, I believe

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 2>his real name, this character, this luchador, has never been unmasked,

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.760
<v Speaker 2>but I believe his name and age are of public records,

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 2>so we're not spoiling anything there. But when he left

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 2>that promotion Triple A, Triple A retained the rights to

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 2>the costume and the gimmick, and so they handed the

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 2>gimmick over to Jesus Escoboza, who lived nineteen sixty six

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 2>through twenty twenty. This is the Laparca that was mentioned

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 2>earlier that died in twenty twenty. So but this handoff

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:47.679
<v Speaker 2>was occurring in the late nineties, and I believe there

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of like legal back and forth about

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the gimmick. But certainly by around two thousand and three, Abarra,

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>the first Laparka, ended up altering his costume to look

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 2>like a combination of Darth Maul and the Laparca skeleton

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 2>costume that he had been wearing in order to perform

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 2>in televise matches for CMLL. That's Mexico's biggest lush promotion

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 2>and arch rival of Triple A. At this point, he

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.839
<v Speaker 2>changed his name to what as an English speaker, I

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 2>always read as La park but I'm to understand in

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>Spanish it is pronounced la Parka, so it still sounds

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:30.800
<v Speaker 2>like Laparca, but is spelled differently for legal regas. I see. Yeah,

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>so he did some great work for CML during that timeframe.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 2>I watched some of his CML matches back in the day,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:40.319
<v Speaker 2>and since then, the Laparca legacy has continued, with a

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 2>third Laparka. In Triple A there was and then at

0:13:43.280 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 2>different times there were various family members of Agvarres that

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 2>ended up taking on some sort of Laparca gimmick. So

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 2>there was a super Parka, various sons of Laparca. There

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 2>was also a lark There were some La Parkitas, more

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 2>than one, like many Laparca's, and for a short while

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:04.199
<v Speaker 2>there was a female Laparka as well. So it just

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 2>goes to show, you know, once you've established a great gimmick,

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 2>you just can't keep it down. People are gonna wear

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 2>the hood no matter what.

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.599
<v Speaker 3>Wait, do you know how did Darth Maul get wrapped in?

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Was that just zeitgeist?

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it was just yeah, in the zeitgeist at

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the time, and I don't know for certain, but I'm

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 2>assuming he just realized he needed to mix up the

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 2>look a little bit, and so it made sense for

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>him to do this. He might have actually done it

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit before he became La Park, if you will,

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 2>just because it was fun, you know, like sometimes costume

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 2>wrestlers in Mexico, the Lucitos, will do this where they'll

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 2>they'll take their existing costume and they'll tweak it a

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 2>little bit, maybe a'le align it with something in pop

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 2>culture beyond what they have going on. But yeah, I'm

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>mostly familiar with the guy who would become La Park,

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>and I generally describe him as a brawling, wild man

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>luchador that could still bust out some really sweet maneuvers

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 2>here and there. But yeah, one does not get much

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of a traditional mainstream grim reprovibe from him though, you know,

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 2>especially the WCW days he was dancing, he was playing

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 2>at your guitar. He wasn't coming for people's souls or

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 2>anything like that. He was doing spin kicks. Yeah. Well, Angela,

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>thanks for writing in about all that. It was nice

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 2>to dive in on a little Laparka history. And then

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 2>there's so many other lugadors that have skull motifs incorporated

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 2>into their look, you know, the whole army of them.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thank you Angelo. Okay, are you ready if I

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 3>do this message from Luisa? Yeah, Luisa says, Hi, guys,

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 3>I hope this twenty twenty six is a great year

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 3>for you and yours. I've been fascinated by your Death series.

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 3>You always give such an interesting, deep analysis of obscure information.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Louisa, is what we hope for. We try. However,

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 3>I had hoped you would mention Las Intermittensias de la

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 3>Morte by Sarah Mago and that title is usually translated

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 3>Death with Interruptions. Luisa says, if you haven't read it yet,

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 3>I can't recommend it enough. It is elegantly written, with

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 3>a mysterious plot and a beautiful ending. Please consider it

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:23.840
<v Speaker 3>in your reading list for this year. And if you

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 3>do happen to talk about it further on the series.

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 3>My apologies as always, thank you so much for your

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 3>wonderful podcast, Luisa. Oh, and then Luisa says, ps, every

0:16:34.560 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 3>time you go over the weekly schedule, when you say

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 3>and on Fridays, we're going to say we do weird

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 3>house cinema. But she says, when you say and on Fridays,

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 3>I expect you to say, I'm in love pop culture

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 3>and printing.

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's the cure, right, Yeah, yeah, that's the cure.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 2>That's a great song.

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 3>So this novel is by the Portuguese author Jose Saramago.

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I have not read it, but Luisa, I looked it

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 3>up on your suggestion and I they genuinely ended up

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 3>ordering a copy of the English translation. This is the

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 3>translation by Margaret Joel Costa. And just to give you

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 3>a taste, the opening sentence of the book is the

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 3>following day no one died. So it's a pretty cool premise.

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to spoil too much about the book,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 3>though I did kind of read ahead about what the

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 3>plot is, and that got me hooked on wanting to

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 3>actually read the book, but just to sort of sketch

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>it out. The premise is that one day, in one country,

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 3>death just stops. People become unexpectedly and suddenly immortal. And

0:17:35.720 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 3>while this seems like a great blessing, actually it is horrible.

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.680
<v Speaker 3>It turns into a crisis because it doesn't mean that

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 3>people are now eternally well, it just means they don't die.

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 3>So people with fatal injuries and terminal illnesses do not

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 3>get better. They just don't die, which is actually a nightmare,

0:17:56.040 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 3>and so that happens. I was reading about some interesting

0:18:00.920 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 3>plots in the middle of the book where the government

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 3>is trying to figure out like workarounds, like what can

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 3>we do with the people who are like basically.

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Dead but not dying.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 3>And then there is another part in the book where

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 3>apparently the character of Death decides to resume allowing people

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 3>to die, but she gives them a warning a week

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 3>ahead of time so they can prepare and like prepare

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and use their final day as well, and this also

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 3>seems to go disastrously. It increases dread and obsession. So

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 3>it seems like the story is going to be about

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 3>paradoxes in how we think about death, Like a lot

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 3>of things that we want with respect to death, like

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 3>knowing when it will happen or avoiding it entirely, would

0:18:42.640 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 3>be absolute curses if they were to really happen. And finally,

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 3>the story does seem to involve death falling in love

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 3>with immortal, which we were just talking about stories like that,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 3>weren't we.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, Well, actually several aspects of this story match

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 2>up with some much older tellings, you know, being taken

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 2>out of commission to what extent death is going to

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 2>give you a heads up on his or her arrival.

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, this sounds very interesting, like taking all these

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 2>ideas and these literary motifs that we've been ruminating on

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 2>and sort of updating it for a twenty first century

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 2>literary treatment.

0:19:20.880 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so anyway, thank you for the recommendation, Luisa, and

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 3>I am gonna my copies on the way and I'm

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 3>going to be trying to read it this year.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 2>All right, This next one comes to us from Albert.

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Albert is the name of the human who assists death

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>in Terry Pratchett's Discworld books. But I think this is

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a different Albert.

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 3>This is not a pseudonym Albert has written to us before.

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, or it could be a different Albert, or could

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.480
<v Speaker 2>be the fictional character from the Discworld. Now we're about

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 2>to find out. We're about to find out Albert. Right,

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 2>sin and says dear Robin Joe. I have been thoroughly

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.120
<v Speaker 2>enjoying your exploration of the anthropomorphic p sionifications of death.

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm writing this after listening to part three. There have

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 2>been many depictions of death in various media over the years.

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 2>Some of my favorites are from the films, and we

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 2>get a short list here, The Seventh Seal, you know,

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 2>classic Monty Python in the Meaning of Life. Yes, that's

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:21.320
<v Speaker 2>another great one. And meet Joe Black. I haven't seen

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 2>meet cho Blake who plays death in that?

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that?

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Is that Brad Pitt?

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Is Is he death in that? Is he Joe Black?

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 3>I think so?

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Or?

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Or is he he ages backwards in this one? Towards Death?

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't remember. I can't keep it.

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 3>This is one from the nineties. In my brain, I merged.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 3>I used to merge Meet Joe Black and City of

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 3>Angels the American remake of Wings of Desire into one movie.

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 3>But they're different movies.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, Meet chob Blake. Maybe I should give it,

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>give it a go on the small screen. The Hitchhiker

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 2>episode from the Twilight Zone was quite memorable, and in

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 2>the various comics and graphic novels. Death of the Endless

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 2>in the Sandman series is my favorite. And we can't

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 2>forget about death the Pale Rider in the Book of Revelations.

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Although side note apparently the original word describing death is

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 2>not pale, but a light green, indicating that it's actually

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the color of rotting flesh. Anyway, in both Meet Joe

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Black and in Sad Sandman, death is shown to be

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 2>a comforting presence, fulfilling the role of psychopomp that you mentioned.

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 3>That's right, So the distinction there is that the psychopomp

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 3>is the figure, like the way Hermes is sometimes depicted

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 3>in Greek mythology, the guide of the soul to the

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 3>afterlife takes you from one place to the next.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Albert continues, I also looked into Japanese culture's depiction

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of death. When I do a search on Shinigami, which

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 2>literally means death god, the search shows either the soul

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 2>reapers from the anime Bleach or Western depictions of the

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 2>grim Reaper. As far as I know, there is a

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 2>judge of the dead in the Dio who is derived

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 2>from Yama of the Hindu pantheon. This judge of the

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 2>dead is present in many Buddhist cultures, but a death god,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.479
<v Speaker 2>a reaper, a harvester of souls seems to be absent. Anyway,

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 2>looking forward to part four, impossibly part five, thanks Albert, Oh.

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 3>That is interesting, So that would be if you're correct here, Albert,

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 3>this would be the case of a culture that doesn't

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 3>really have anything quite like a grim reaper figure like

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 3>in Japanese culture. There's maybe just not a native equivalent

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 3>of the figure that appears at your death.

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Hmm. Yeah, I haven't researched this for myself yet. One

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 2>of the main sources, as I mentioned in our series,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 2>definitely focused on more on Western models, but you know,

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I love looking into Eastern cultures as well, so maybe

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 2>in the future we'll come back and look at some

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 2>of these models from Buddhism and Hinduism as well.

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Ready for me to do this one for Matt?

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what does Matt have to say?

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Matt says, good day, Fellas, Happy New Year. Very much

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 3>enjoyed the series on personifications of death. It's a subject

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 3>I've often thought about and had a couple of thoughts

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.119
<v Speaker 3>based on my own cultural interest. Being a Knuk with

0:23:13.240 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Scott's Irish Scotch Irish ancestry, and a general fascination with

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 3>Gaelic culture. I've long been interested in the myth and

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 3>stories of those cultures and how they can bleed into

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 3>the modern day. Halloween and various other holiday traditions being

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 3>easy examples. One I was attracted to from an early

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 3>age was the Banshee and the Morgan. I've written to

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 3>you previously on some explorations I've done into Morigan lore,

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:42.879
<v Speaker 3>and then parenthetically a place called rath Krogan and the

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 3>cave of Oafnagot, for example, I vaguely recall that, don't

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 3>recall what we said about them. Is there something about

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 3>a cat at that cave that sounds.

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Failing that sounded maybe a rabbit?

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Matt says, What what I find interesting about the Morgan

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 3>is that she, while not exclusively a death figure, is

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 3>a death figure which seems to both mock and take

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 3>delight in trickery, while one who also acts on savage

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 3>impulses less in the tradition of the reaper, who gets

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 3>closer over time, and more in the chaotic neutral vein

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:23.679
<v Speaker 3>where anything can propel her can propel you to her

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 3>cold embraces if you're not careful. So sort of like

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 3>the deceiver figure we were talking about, it's a common

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>image of death, the one who embodies a fatal irony.

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 3>So Matt says, I've only listened to part one of

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the series at this point. So perhaps you mentioned this

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 3>in part two, but I find the Morgan to be

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:46.480
<v Speaker 3>a wonderful embodiment of both the malevolence and randomness of

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 3>physical danger in our lives. To me, it's a quote,

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 3>nothing personal, but you are going to die now because

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you screwed up, and the universe has little sympathy mentality.

0:24:56.760 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 3>Then there's the banshee, the ghostly version of a keening

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 3>woman at a funeral, which many a person is said

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:04.800
<v Speaker 3>to see or at least here before someone they know

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 3>or they themselves die. I learned of the banshee when

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>I was about fourteen years old and had just started

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 3>getting interested in my family's history, culture, and stories. We

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 3>didn't have much, if anything from the old Country, but

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 3>a few funny sayings about not being out in bad

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 3>weather and shutting ears to strange voices. I always found

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 3>that strange. Then I came to know about the banshee.

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 3>And if you saw a piece of clothing, shoe, etc.

0:25:31.560 --> 0:25:34.879
<v Speaker 3>In the road at night, you may want to walk elsewhere.

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 3>Not sure if that's a real thing or not, but

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.199
<v Speaker 3>that is what I thought at the time. I remember

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:42.359
<v Speaker 3>being out hunting one night near the family farm and

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 3>coming across a child's dress caught on a bush from

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 3>the wind. Ugh Was it a sign? Of course it wasn't,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 3>and was likely just caught on some foliage after some

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 3>critter ripped open a garbage bag during the previous pickup day,

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 3>it being blown by strong winds common to my homemade

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 3>home area. Regardless, it freaked me right out and I

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 3>went home immediately. I'm not a religious or superstitious person generally,

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 3>but must admit I still get a chill thinking about

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 3>that particular evening. Anyway, I suppose the lesson, as you

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 3>both put it so well, is that the personification of

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.480
<v Speaker 3>death is in a way a very individual process defining

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 3>what we each fear, expect, and want to a degree personally.

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 3>If I have to go with the Morgan cackling at

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 3>me telling me how stupid a decision I had made, was,

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 3>that's all right with me. As always, love the show

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.719
<v Speaker 3>and do keep it up. All the best from Ontario, Matt.

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, thanks, Matt. I'm gonna have to say no thank

0:26:40.800 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 2>you to the Morgan with the whole death blaming thing.

0:26:44.200 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, come on, have a little bedside matter. Send

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 2>in Joe Black instead. I guess, yeah, all right, This

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 2>next one comes to us from Stephanie titled Death Listens. Hi,

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Robert and Joe, thanks for the episodes entitled Oh Death.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 2>This has been among my favorite series from the show.

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 2>I've had a lot of fun reflecting on what I

0:27:04.640 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 2>think death looks like. When you mentioned the Death Listens artwork,

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I looked it up since I found it interesting that

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 2>one of you thought the figure looked a bit awkward

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>or similar just hanging out. I noticed that Death was

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 2>holding flowers and almost contemplating the figure playing the violin.

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 2>To me, this figure is one of the comforting deaths.

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 2>She knows this is hard for the humans, so she

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 2>takes time to enjoy the song of the young Man

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 2>before she goes about her duties. This thought was confirmed

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 2>for me when I realized Seinberg also painted the Garden

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>of Death, which features three figures tending a garden with care.

0:27:41.720 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 2>One is particularly enraptured with the flowers, which is impressive

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 2>to convey on a skull. Thanks again for such a

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 2>fun and interesting series on this subject. It's so neat

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 2>to learn about the cultural and historical differences of how

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 2>death is personified. Thank you, Stephanie.

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:02.119
<v Speaker 3>So Rob four reference, I put both of the artworks

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 3>that Stephanie mentions in our outline here, so first you

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 3>can look at that. This is the one we were

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 3>actually talking about in the series, the painting Death Listens

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 3>by Hugo. I was saying, Simberg, did you say Seinberg?

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 2>I might have said Seinberg here, but at the top

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 2>of my head, I'm not sure which one is correct.

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know either, Okay, So Hugo, Simberg or Seinberg.

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:22.480
<v Speaker 3>This was painted in eighteen ninety seven. This is the

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.880
<v Speaker 3>one we talked about where there is an old woman

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 3>lying in a bed in the background, looking very frail.

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 3>And then the weird thing is that death is not

0:28:31.320 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 3>oriented toward the dying woman. She is standing there draped

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 3>in black. It's a skeletal figure draped in black holding

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 3>flowers across from a young man playing a violin. So

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 3>it's like she's listening to the violin, just kind of

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 3>ignoring the dying woman, and we were wondering what to

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 3>make of that. It is very curious. But then yeah,

0:28:51.160 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 3>so Robi also pulled in the Garden of Death, which

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Stephanie brought up, and I see what you're saying, Stephanie.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 3>It's hard to convey expressions on skeletons because it's expressions

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 3>are movements of the soft tissue of the face. But yeah,

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:07.080
<v Speaker 3>this one skeleton in the middle here, So the main

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 3>layout is three skeletons are tending two plants in a

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 3>garden with raised beds, and then also pots that are

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 3>down on the ground. And there they're just one of

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 3>them is watering plants. One of them is bent over

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 3>looking away from us, probably looking at plants, and then

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 3>one of them is just clutching a flower, almost as

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 3>in like the way a child clutches their stuffy Just

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:30.120
<v Speaker 3>I love it. I'm, you know, a happy little embrace

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 3>of an inanimate object clutching this flower, and it does

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 3>have a big grin on its face. I think the

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 3>way Simberg did this is by like curling the the

0:29:41.280 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 3>mouth into like a U shape so that it looks

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 3>like a smile, even though I think you would actually

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 3>to convey that, you would have to move the lips,

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 3>which the scale the skull does not have. So it's

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 3>a bit of trickery here.

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think I get a real sense of

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>sadness off of that. That middle skeleton here, they fill

0:29:57.920 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 2>a closeness to human That's what I get from this

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 2>and that there's a there's there's sorrow in their work,

0:30:06.120 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 2>and they have mixed feelings about it, but it's part

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 2>of the process, you know, it's part of the garden. Yeah.

0:30:13.760 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 3>In both of these paintings, there is a mix of

0:30:16.160 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 3>imagery because of course, a comforting death figure is not

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:23.920
<v Speaker 3>all that unusual. In fact, in the American psychology studies

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:25.840
<v Speaker 3>we looked at, it was the most common type of

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 3>death figure. People imagine some sort of a soothing comforter,

0:30:30.040 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 3>but that the comforter was usually depicted as more human,

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, fully fleshed and maybe like an old man

0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 3>or a woman or you know, somebody somebody coming to

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.760
<v Speaker 3>you with the flesh still on. Here, we're combining like

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 3>the imagery of the monstrous, rotten, decayed death figure who's

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>skeletal in nature, with the posture and the emotional tone

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 3>of the comforter.

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah, it's it's quite a feat to pull off

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 2>visually here, but you know they managed to. I'll go

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 2>ahead and ad you know, we're always referencing paintings and

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 2>works of art and visual media in these episodes, and

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 2>we generally cannot show it to you. So if there's

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 2>ever an opportunity to look something up that we've talked about,

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 2>and you know, and analyze it for yourself right in

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and give us your feedback. You know, that's always fair game,

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:31.479
<v Speaker 2>always fun to talk about these images more. All right,

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.080
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna go ahead and skip out of the Death

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Zone here and we're gonna talk about the Twilight Zone

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. This one comes to us from Paul.

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Paul says, hey, guys, you were talking about high end

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 2>aluminum wears during the episode on the Twilight Zone episode.

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 2>This is the Rip Van Winkle Caper.

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 3>I guess we should re establish the context. The story

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 3>of the Rip Van Winkle Caper is about some guys

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 3>who steal a bunch of goal and then they go

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 3>into cryo sleep for one hundred years so they can

0:32:03.400 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 3>get away with the crime. And then they come out

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 3>and then there's a bunch of drama in the middle

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 3>where they're betraying each other, stabbing each other in the

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 3>back and stuff. But the twist at the end of

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 3>the episode is that in the future where they have

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 3>emerged to finally take advantage of their ill gotten gains,

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.400
<v Speaker 3>the gold they still has become worthless because now we

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.440
<v Speaker 3>have the technology to just manufacture gold, so it's you know,

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:29.880
<v Speaker 3>it has lost all value. In the episode, we talked

0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 3>about how it's unlikely that in any real time frame

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 3>we would be able to manufacture gold in enough quantities

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 3>that something like this could happen. You know, it might

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 3>be a byproduct of fusion technology or something, but it

0:32:44.160 --> 0:32:49.240
<v Speaker 3>probably would not be manufactured in mass quantities. However, we

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 3>did come up with a historical analogy, which was aluminum,

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 3>which over the course of a few decades in the

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 3>eighteen hundreds, in the late eighteen hundreds, went from extremely

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 3>precious and rare because of how difficult it was to

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 3>extract from the ore form in which it occurs on Earth,

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:08.640
<v Speaker 3>to much much cheaper. I mean, like, if you had

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 3>stolen a bunch of aluminum in eighteen sixty and then

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 3>waited one hundred years, you would be severely disappointed and

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 3>your returns.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Absolutely, And so that's what Paul's following up on here.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Paul says, I have a very old aluminium bread basket

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of piece that is a sheet with cutouts to

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 2>mimic lace, then scrunched to form a ten inch scalloped

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 2>bowl shape with textured A fourth of an inch wire

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 2>coiled into disks and attached as handles. Okay, kind of

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 2>hard for me to picture all that, but I'm just

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 2>gonna imagine it's ornate, it's scrunchy, and it's made out

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 2>of aluminum. He continues, based on the workmanship, it is

0:33:47.960 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 2>probably from shortly after aluminum became more available, but before

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 2>it became cheap, because the handles are clearly just cut

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 2>wire bolted on. I got it at least third hand,

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 2>so no origins. Now this is where Paul gets into

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 2>fantasy territory, and I love it. Paul says, aluminum is mythriel,

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 2>or at least that is my head canon. Mythriel is

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:15.080
<v Speaker 2>a whitish silver metal that is light, extremely hard, magically scarce,

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 2>and doesn't corrode. Aluminum is a whitish silver metal that

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 2>is light, extra hard at the surface, magically scarce as metal,

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 2>and doesn't visibly corrode. Therefore, Mithriel is aluminum. I like

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a sacred metal from Lord of the Rings.

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Aluminum is that what Bilbo's male is made out of?

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, I believe so, Okay, all right, I applaud

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 2>all of that, Paul. But then Paul switches over to

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 2>another past episode and he says, I'm sure you've gotten

0:34:44.880 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 2>this a bunch already. But in the licking episodes, you

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 2>left out the movie trope of licking a blade, sometimes bloody,

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 2>or licking the hostage or victim's face as a threat. Hmm,

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 2>this is true. You do see the licking of the blade,

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess. I instantly think of Bromstoker's Dracula, Francisca Coppola's.

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 3>Same here, Gary Oldman, it's the the shaving razor there

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 3>where he's shaving, he's giving him a shave, and then he's.

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think of that. Every time I lick peanut

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 2>butter off of a butter knife, I think of I

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:21.240
<v Speaker 2>think of Dracula.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 3>Even a butter knife. That creeps me out.

0:35:23.560 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 2>If you know what you're doing like I do, it's

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 2>never an issue.

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 3>Don't tell the people that we're gonna get sued. Don't

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 3>look a knife.

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, be careful out there, everyone. You're not a vampire.

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:38.279
<v Speaker 2>You can't regrow your tongue. You don't know how many

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 2>tongues Gary Oldman's Dracula lost over the years perfecting that

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 2>little trick. So yes, the good point that is a

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 2>common trope, especially the blade licking. Sometimes the face lick.

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, the face licking sometimes is a bit much.

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Paul continues, I sent you a suggestion for content a

0:35:55.760 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 2>while back on the theme of you Are what You Eat,

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 2>citing several animals that concentrate poisons from their food, and

0:36:02.200 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 2>wanted to expand on that idea microplastics, mercurial tuna see

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 2>fourteen dating land reclamation using heavy metal, sequestering plants, flamingo, feathers,

0:36:13.880 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Sam and fletch. I forget a couple, lol. Keep up

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:17.959
<v Speaker 2>the good work, Paul.

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Paul.

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Now that's that's a good that's a good topic idea. Yeah, yeah,

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 2>you are what you eat?

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay. Another response to that episode comes from Brian.

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 3>This is subject line death from gold Happy New Year, Robert,

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Joe and JJ loved your Twilight Zone question can you

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 3>die from being painted gold We didn't actually answer that

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 3>question in the episode. It just came up because we

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 3>were talking about Goldfinger and m is that is that?

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 3>What is from Goldfinger?

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Yes? I think I mentioned that. Growing up everything I

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 2>knew about gold I learned from Goldfinger that you could

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 2>paint somebody to death with it and that if you

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 2>radiated a large supply of gold, then your supply of

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 2>gold would be worth more.

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Gold Finger science. Well, so we talked in the episode

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 3>about whether that's actually true, that you can be painted

0:37:12.760 --> 0:37:14.720
<v Speaker 3>gold or not, but we didn't research it for the episode.

0:37:14.719 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 3>It just kind of came up in passing, so we

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.360
<v Speaker 3>didn't know the answer. Brian says, believe it or not,

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 3>someone did it, as in, killed someone by painting them gold.

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:28.239
<v Speaker 3>His example is Pope Leo the tenth, a Medici and

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 3>arguably the worst pope of all time, had a boy

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:35.320
<v Speaker 3>fully painted gold to celebrate the Pope's return to Florence.

0:37:35.760 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 3>The boy died mere days later. I'm sure paint in

0:37:38.719 --> 0:37:41.840
<v Speaker 3>the sixteenth century was highly questionable in and of itself,

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 3>so presumably any of the substances in the paint could

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 3>have been the cause. But yes, we do have death

0:37:48.280 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 3>by gold paint, and maybe also Ian Fleming's inspiration for

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 3>the Goldfinger Woman. All the best, Brian, Well, Brian, I

0:37:56.120 --> 0:38:00.080
<v Speaker 3>looked this up. So obviously with stories like this you

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.800
<v Speaker 3>never know how much faith to put in. But I

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 3>did look this up, and this is a real historical

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 3>anecdote that part of this big festival in whatever year

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:13.920
<v Speaker 3>this was, this was the sixteenth or seventeenth century that

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 3>whatever year this was, there was a big parade, a

0:38:17.440 --> 0:38:20.880
<v Speaker 3>big festival, and yeah it was. A baker's son was

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:24.080
<v Speaker 3>painted gold as one of the dancers at this festival,

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 3>and it is said that he died later and it

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 3>gives the measly sum of money that was paid to

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 3>his family. As I was saying, you never know for

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:39.480
<v Speaker 3>sure how much accuracy stories like that have from that

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 3>far back in history, but I guess it does seem plausible.

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.800
<v Speaker 3>The commonly given interpretation is the one they talk about

0:38:46.840 --> 0:38:50.080
<v Speaker 3>in Goldfinger, where you have to breathe through your skin

0:38:51.000 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 3>and painting your skin gold prevents you from breathing. That,

0:38:54.880 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 3>from what I can tell, is not true. I mean,

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 3>as we talked about a bit in the Twilight Zone episode,

0:39:01.280 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 3>you breathe with your lungs, not significantly through your skin,

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 3>but painting your skin could still be dangerous for other

0:39:07.800 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 3>reasons not related to preventing you from getting oxygen. You

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 3>can breathe through you lungs, but you need to say

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.480
<v Speaker 3>sweat and you know, exchange heat with the environment through

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:20.000
<v Speaker 3>your skin. So painting the whole body, not just gold,

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:24.280
<v Speaker 3>but painting the whole body any color could quite possibly

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 3>prevent you from getting heat out of your body and

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:30.680
<v Speaker 3>could lead to overheating and heat stroke, which, if this

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 3>story is true, could be the more likely cause. Or

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 3>what Brian is saying, since we don't know what was

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 3>in the paint, could also be the paint was fairly toxic.

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, it's harder to do this on MythBusters. I

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 2>guess right, all right, we'll probably hear from them. Maybe

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:47.719
<v Speaker 2>they did. They'll be like, yeah, they did it on MythBusters.

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:49.000
<v Speaker 2>Multiple people died.

0:39:49.400 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 3>I don't know they painted Jamie Gold, so I would

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 3>say questions remain there, but yes, thank you, Brian.

0:39:57.600 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 2>All right, here's a quick one. This one comes to

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 2>us from Zach. This is a response to a Vault

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:05.120
<v Speaker 2>episode about the Rowan Tree. Zach says, greetings, Robert and Joe.

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:07.839
<v Speaker 2>During the episode on lightning struck trees in the Rowan Tree,

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.480
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned using Rowan sticks to protect milk. This reminded

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:13.800
<v Speaker 2>me of a practice continuing until as late as the

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 2>early twentieth century, of putting frogs in fresh milk to

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:21.520
<v Speaker 2>keep it fresh. Researchers recently have found that anti microbials

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 2>on the frog's skin probably helped in this. It also

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 2>harkens back to the protective properties of frogs in magic

0:40:28.160 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 2>mentioned in the Heart episodes. Thanks for the wonderful content, Zach.

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.920
<v Speaker 2>Huh, yeah, let's try this out too. Let's get some

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:39.479
<v Speaker 2>frogs in our milk. Does it work with oat milk?

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 2>Do I have to use a different frog? Maybe I'm slift.

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 2>He's a toad in that case, or a newt I'm

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:44.959
<v Speaker 2>not sure.

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, next message, David got in touch with an email

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 3>that does not seem to be related to a particular episode.

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:58.400
<v Speaker 3>I think he just wanted to share something that he

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:02.120
<v Speaker 3>thought would appeal to us. He attached a photo he

0:41:02.280 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 3>took from Visalia, California. It's a bit of graffiti on

0:41:06.320 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 3>the side of a building that just says one word,

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 3>and the word is Cthulhu. Scene. So the word play

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 3>here seems to be on the names of geological epics

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:21.160
<v Speaker 3>like the Pleistocene or the Holocene. And I originally interpreted

0:41:21.239 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 3>this to just be a joke, meaning that we live

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 3>in a particularly wretched and monstrous time. It is the

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 3>cursed era. At the time of Cthulhu. We are being

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 3>We're living under the reign of a wretched, hateful, monstrous being,

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 3>and maybe that is it. But I decided to look

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 3>up this word to see if it's actually from something,

0:41:42.520 --> 0:41:45.799
<v Speaker 3>and it is. So I found references to this term

0:41:45.960 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 3>used by an American scholar and critical theorist named Donna Harroway,

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:54.760
<v Speaker 3>who is a professor emeritus at University of California, Santa Cruz.

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 3>She wrote a famous essay from the nineteen eighties called

0:41:57.080 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 3>the Cyborg Manifesto. Did you ever talk about this on

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:00.640
<v Speaker 3>the show, Rob?

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:03.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah. This has been discussed in the show

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 2>in the past and much older episodes, so certainly something

0:42:06.040 --> 0:42:07.359
<v Speaker 2>we could come back to. Yeah.

0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 3>So I was trying to understand what she means by

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.719
<v Speaker 3>the term Cuthulhu scene I looked at Obviously, I haven't

0:42:13.760 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 3>read the book that is mainly about this idea, and

0:42:16.560 --> 0:42:19.920
<v Speaker 3>I was trying to understand it by reading some summaries.

0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I think I apologize if I'm misunderstanding this in any way,

0:42:24.719 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 3>but I think she is proposing it as an alternative

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 3>to the term. Some people have used the term entroposcene

0:42:31.320 --> 0:42:34.760
<v Speaker 3>to describe our current age. The entroposcene is the idea

0:42:34.880 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 3>that the age we live in now is the geological

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 3>age that will be defined by human influence. So it's

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:44.240
<v Speaker 3>our influence on the climate, on geology, on the environment,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:50.200
<v Speaker 3>and ecology. Again, this is my best attempt to understand

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:51.479
<v Speaker 3>what her work means.

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 3>It's that anthroposcene is too human centric a term, and

0:42:56.680 --> 0:43:00.359
<v Speaker 3>so she uses Cuthulhu scene as the name for an

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:04.319
<v Speaker 3>age in which the illusion that humankind is separate from

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 3>and dominant over nature will no longer be sustainable, and

0:43:08.840 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 3>it will become obvious that we are not discrete individuals,

0:43:12.640 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 3>that we are not separate from the natural world, that

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:18.960
<v Speaker 3>everything has its tentacles in everything else, us in nature,

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 3>nature in us, because we're not actually separate, we're just

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 3>fully entangled. Again, apologies to Hairway if I've mischaracterized this

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 3>in any way, but that is my understanding of this word,

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and so I feel like I understand it less as

0:43:33.280 --> 0:43:36.719
<v Speaker 3>a as a graffito with that meaning, though I don't know,

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's just trying to bring awareness of this concept.

0:43:40.520 --> 0:43:43.360
<v Speaker 3>I can't rule out that it's just a coincidence and

0:43:43.440 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 3>somebody independently came up with this word to mean like

0:43:46.239 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 3>we live in the age of monsters.

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 2>M yeah, yeah, I don't have to read more about

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.440
<v Speaker 2>this Cuthus scene idea. It does kind of feel like

0:43:54.520 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 2>a shoehorning of Cthulhu into something that didn't require Cthulhu.

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, or know, the general idea sounds really fascinating.

0:44:04.640 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll come back to it. All right, here's another one.

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:17.920
<v Speaker 2>This one comes to us from Lawrence subject line flower

0:44:18.000 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 2>to Disappear.

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 3>And I guess we should establish the context in which

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:24.320
<v Speaker 3>this came up. I was looking back and trying to

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.359
<v Speaker 3>figure it out. I think it was we were talking

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:29.920
<v Speaker 3>about Star Trek and the question was does the Flower

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:33.360
<v Speaker 3>to Disappear from the Mexican Santa Claus movie have the

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:37.080
<v Speaker 3>same philosophical problem as the Star Trek Transporter, where we

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:39.120
<v Speaker 3>can't know that it doesn't just kill you every time.

0:44:39.440 --> 0:44:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I think this was I think this connection specific connection

0:44:43.840 --> 0:44:45.400
<v Speaker 2>was brought up by a listener. I think maybe this

0:44:45.520 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 2>is this is a listener mail response to another listener mail,

0:44:48.840 --> 0:44:51.239
<v Speaker 2>which is totally fine, Oh okay for folks to do.

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 2>I thought we brought that up, but maybe I'm totally wrong.

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 2>We ended up talking about it.

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Lawrence gets in touch with an email that kind of

0:44:58.719 --> 0:44:59.760
<v Speaker 3>obviates that debate.

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he says, hey, guys, just a quick correction of

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.799
<v Speaker 2>what I think is a mistaken conclusion from your last

0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 2>mailback episode. You consider that Santa in the nineteen fifty

0:45:09.600 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 2>nine Santa Claus dies when he uses the flower to

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:15.720
<v Speaker 2>disappear and is recreated when he reappears. I just rewatched

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the film this past Christmas. If you're not familiar with

0:45:18.440 --> 0:45:20.080
<v Speaker 2>this film, look it up. We also did a past

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Weird House Cinema episode about it. It's one of our favorites,

0:45:22.640 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and MSD three K fans are well aware of it

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 2>as well. But Lawrence says it's pretty clear. The Flower

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 2>to Disappear is not teleportation. Is not a teleportation device.

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:40.080
<v Speaker 2>It's an invisibility device. Santa sniffs it once and once

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 2>when visible to become invisible, and sniffs it again while

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:48.799
<v Speaker 2>invisible to reappear. He doesn't demateialize. He can see here,

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:52.120
<v Speaker 2>think and act while invisible. This is made pretty clear

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:55.279
<v Speaker 2>in his dialogue with Merlin. Yes, if you're nothing here

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 2>with this movie, Merlin is also in the picture. Thanks guys, Lawrence.

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Thank you Lawrence. Now that you say this, I think

0:46:03.080 --> 0:46:05.839
<v Speaker 3>you're exactly right. I remember scenes like this in the movie.

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 3>But is it not actually both ways I thought I

0:46:08.200 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 3>remembered teleportation as well. Doesn't Santa sniff the flower to

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 3>disappear and then like appear on the roof above or something.

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna have to watch it again now I'm blanking

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 2>as well. What is the sense of it?

0:46:21.080 --> 0:46:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:46:21.560 --> 0:46:21.759
<v Speaker 2>Rob?

0:46:21.920 --> 0:46:24.479
<v Speaker 3>Should we skip ahead to some messages for about Weird

0:46:24.480 --> 0:46:25.000
<v Speaker 3>House Cinema?

0:46:25.520 --> 0:46:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's do it.

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm gonna read this one from Hannah. Hannah says,

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 3>subject line, Happy New Year, Justice for Kiefer.

0:46:38.160 --> 0:46:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I thought this was going to be about the drink,

0:46:40.480 --> 0:46:41.479
<v Speaker 2>but it's about the actor.

0:46:41.800 --> 0:46:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Kiefer Sutherland. Yes, yeah, Hannah says, Hi to your hosts,

0:46:46.280 --> 0:46:48.719
<v Speaker 3>I had a sort of potpourrie of remarks to share

0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 3>this time, but I wanted to start with heartfelt gratitude

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 3>again for the companionship and brain candy your show provides.

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Spotify tells me I'm in the top zero point five

0:46:57.680 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 3>percent of listeners this year, which was delightful but unsurprising

0:47:01.440 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 3>since in addition to keeping up with new episodes, I

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:06.720
<v Speaker 3>frequently re listen to old ones when there's an idea

0:47:06.760 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 3>I want to return to and nibble upon, like a

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:11.400
<v Speaker 3>squirrel knowing on an unsuspecting tourist.

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 2>I like it. I support it that, thank you, Hannah.

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:18.719
<v Speaker 3>Hannah says, Plus, there were a couple of weird house

0:47:18.719 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 3>selections this year that made me audibly squeal with delight

0:47:21.760 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 3>when I saw their titles in my feed. On that topic,

0:47:24.920 --> 0:47:29.279
<v Speaker 3>Dark City controversial opinion, perhaps, but I don't totally hate

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Key for Sutherland's performance. I speculate the intention might have

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:35.600
<v Speaker 3>been to imply that he was a polio survivor with

0:47:35.719 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 3>the breathless speech plus the limp. Just a thought interesting.

0:47:40.120 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't have even had the background knowledge to understand

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:43.040
<v Speaker 3>that reference.

0:47:43.239 --> 0:47:46.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that that that could make sense. Yeah, I mean,

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:50.359
<v Speaker 2>obviously it's It's often the case where actors will will

0:47:50.440 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 2>make their specific choices based on things that are maybe

0:47:54.800 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 2>no longer in the actual of shooting script or it's

0:47:59.360 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 2>just outside research something that they need to do to

0:48:02.440 --> 0:48:05.280
<v Speaker 2>stitch together their approach to the performance internally.

0:48:07.000 --> 0:48:10.919
<v Speaker 3>Hannah goes on next topic, Crabs. Last year, or maybe

0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 3>the year before, you read my letter about Crabs in

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:18.240
<v Speaker 3>a Werner Herzog voice, which has indelibly associated Herzog with crabs.

0:48:18.320 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 3>In my mind, imagine the end scene of his nose

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Ferratu with the rider galloping into the mist, but instead

0:48:24.520 --> 0:48:29.920
<v Speaker 3>it's a crab. Okay Anyway, I was driving to work

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:32.879
<v Speaker 3>in the breaking dawn the other day after an ice

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:34.920
<v Speaker 3>storm took down the last of the leaves, and I

0:48:35.000 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 3>thought it's I thought, it's getting pretty bleak out here.

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 3>Makes me think about crabs. I am not demanding a

0:48:42.160 --> 0:48:44.799
<v Speaker 3>crab episode by any means, because it's much more fun

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:47.839
<v Speaker 3>to hear about whatever y'all are y'all feel inspired to cover.

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 3>But I did ponder the idea that, just like the

0:48:50.680 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 3>process of carsonization, all podcasts may eventually become about crabs. Finally,

0:48:56.760 --> 0:49:00.839
<v Speaker 3>a weird House cinema recommendation Delicatessen, the nineteen ninety one

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 3>French dystopian romantic comedy about cannibalism, warmly Hannah. Well, thank you, Hannah.

0:49:08.320 --> 0:49:11.360
<v Speaker 3>By total coincidence, it was not because of your message.

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 3>Just last night I was looking into, like, is there

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:16.320
<v Speaker 3>any really good crab stuff we haven't covered yet? I

0:49:16.440 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 3>just feel an itching to come back to crabs. I

0:49:19.880 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 3>was coming across a few things. I was having to

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:25.000
<v Speaker 3>get deeper into the more obscure corners of crab science

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 3>and crab history. But I was getting some good stuff,

0:49:27.440 --> 0:49:29.040
<v Speaker 3>so Rob, we may go there in the future.

0:49:29.280 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I think tomorrow's weird hat. I'm sorry,

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:35.520
<v Speaker 2>tomorrow's Monster Fact episode is going to deal with a

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:40.359
<v Speaker 2>fictional crab. Just happens to be the case. And I'm

0:49:40.400 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 2>not one dred percent certain, but i think there's like

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:47.799
<v Speaker 2>a thirty forty percent chance of crabs in the next

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Core episode that'll publish this Thursday. Don't hold me to that,

0:49:51.719 --> 0:49:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, just just a thirty to forty percent chance.

0:49:53.640 --> 0:49:56.719
<v Speaker 2>So there may be no crabs. Don't blame don't blame

0:49:56.760 --> 0:50:01.239
<v Speaker 2>the forecast if that is the case. But yeah, thanks

0:50:01.280 --> 0:50:05.279
<v Speaker 2>for this this email. I I appreciate the insight on

0:50:06.080 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 2>on Keefer's performance in Dark City. Always always open to

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 2>discussion on that sort of thing. And as far as

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Delicatessen goes, Yeah, I've thought about doing a Geneau film

0:50:18.680 --> 0:50:21.800
<v Speaker 2>at some point. Maybe this or City of Lost Children

0:50:21.840 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 2>would be appropriate. Amilae even that one's that one's still

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 2>plenty weird and very very visual. Used to be one

0:50:29.840 --> 0:50:31.440
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite films. I haven't seen it in a

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 2>long time though, And of course there's Alien Resurrection.

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 3>Wait. Sorry, I just had to look this up because

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking, Wait, Jean Pierre Jine did I I

0:50:42.280 --> 0:50:44.239
<v Speaker 3>was sure that we're mixing up two people here, but

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 3>you're right. All of those are City of Lost Children,

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Amile Delicatessen.

0:50:48.920 --> 0:50:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Alien Resurrection, Yeah, I mean Alien re Resurrection is definitely

0:50:53.520 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 2>one of his films. I mean it's the visual fingerprints

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 2>are all over it. Say what you will about it.

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:04.120
<v Speaker 2>It has a distinctive visual style. All right, here's another one.

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:11.120
<v Speaker 2>This when it comes to us from Scott. Scott says,

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 2>I look forward to each Friday when the latest Weird

0:51:13.800 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 2>House episode drops. It is always interesting to hear your

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 2>take on those with which I'm already familiar and have

0:51:20.600 --> 0:51:23.319
<v Speaker 2>added several to my to watch list based on your

0:51:23.360 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 2>reviews and dissection. It recently occurred to me that Ralph

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Bakshi's Wizards would fit nicely as a Weird House candidate.

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 2>I was rather surprised on checking the past episode lift

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 2>on Letterbox to see that you haven't covered any of

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Boxshi's work. While his films can be somewhat uneven in

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:45.000
<v Speaker 2>terms of quality, they almost universally tick the weird checkbox.

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 2>I'd love for you to cover any of his work. Granted,

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:50.600
<v Speaker 2>several of them aren't exactly conducive to being covered in

0:51:50.680 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 2>a family friendly podcast, But there are several very good ones,

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:55.840
<v Speaker 2>including my favorite Wizards.

0:51:56.640 --> 0:51:59.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I mean, we shure we one day do Lord

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:01.319
<v Speaker 3>of the Ring, but then it's like, oh no, it's

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:01.799
<v Speaker 3>this one.

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, that has greatness in it. But it

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 2>is a very very uneven film. But there are some

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 2>great stretches. There's some weird choices, and you know, it

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:17.279
<v Speaker 2>feels rather unfinished for a number of reasons. But we

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 2>very well could.

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Isn't it the one that after the Battle of Helm's Deep,

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 3>it's like and thus concludes the tail.

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Of the Ring?

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:29.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and well you also have the Wizard. They call

0:52:29.360 --> 0:52:31.919
<v Speaker 2>him Araman in that instead of Sorrowmon because they didn't

0:52:31.960 --> 0:52:35.160
<v Speaker 2>want the son Sorrowmon confusion to take it.

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:36.440
<v Speaker 3>It looks like Santa Claus.

0:52:37.040 --> 0:52:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well you know they do. Look he does look

0:52:40.040 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 2>like a wizard.

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh I thought maybe I'm misremembering. I thought he was

0:52:43.360 --> 0:52:45.920
<v Speaker 3>wearing a red robe on the white is wearing a

0:52:46.000 --> 0:52:46.479
<v Speaker 3>red robe.

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But like I say, I still have a lot

0:52:51.520 --> 0:52:55.040
<v Speaker 2>of love for that picture, but it is very uneven.

0:52:55.840 --> 0:52:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Scott continues the classic good versus evil theme mixes well

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.680
<v Speaker 2>talking about wizards here with a magical natural lifestyle struggling

0:53:02.719 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 2>against corrupting technology conflict premise. The movie is mostly classical

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:11.279
<v Speaker 2>predigital animation, mixed with rotoscope snippets from classic war movies

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:14.640
<v Speaker 2>such as Zulu, The Battle of the Bulge, and Alexander Nevsky.

0:53:15.040 --> 0:53:17.920
<v Speaker 2>Some of the animation is stunningly beautiful. The movie combines

0:53:17.960 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 2>a generous amount of humor with an examination of some

0:53:20.480 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 2>disturbing aspects of human nature and history. There are lots

0:53:23.719 --> 0:53:28.360
<v Speaker 2>of nods to underground comic legends Robert Crumb and Von Bode.

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:33.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm not familiar with this latter figure anyway, Scott concludes here,

0:53:33.440 --> 0:53:36.240
<v Speaker 2>if you haven't seen Wizards, I highly recommend it. As always,

0:53:36.400 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 2>thanks for all the content you provide. Great stuff.

0:53:39.160 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I've never seen it. I've seen images from it

0:53:42.120 --> 0:53:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and it always looks interesting, but never seen it.

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:46.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we'll put it on the list, all right.

0:53:46.640 --> 0:53:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Do we need to call it there for today?

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's go ahead and call it. This will be an

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:54.879
<v Speaker 2>end to this episode of Stuff to Blidmind listener mail,

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 2>but there will be another one in the future, so

0:53:56.680 --> 0:54:00.799
<v Speaker 2>continue to write in. Write in about new episodes, episodes

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 2>episodes from the Vault, episodes you would like to hear

0:54:04.600 --> 0:54:07.560
<v Speaker 2>in the future, weird house cinema selections you would like

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 2>to gleefully discover that are coming to fruition. All of

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 2>it is fair game. Just right into say hi if

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 2>you want just a reminder to everyone out there that

0:54:17.280 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is primarily a science and

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 2>culture podcast, with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays, a

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:26.920
<v Speaker 2>short form episode on Wednesdays, and on Fridays. I'm in love.

0:54:28.320 --> 0:54:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:33.880
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:36.320
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:54:36.400 --> 0:54:38.480
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hi,

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:41.520
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to blow

0:54:41.560 --> 0:54:42.520
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:54:50.600 --> 0:54:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:54:53.640 --> 0:54:56.399
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:54:56.600 --> 0:54:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.