WEBVTT - Warren Says Powell ‘Failed’ as Leader

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. A couple of headlines when

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it comes to COVID J and J leading or should say,

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>seeking US backing for booster dose if it's one shot

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>vaccine after data showed it provided strong protection. We've got

0:00:41.120 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that going on. We have JP Morgan Chase banning business

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.159
<v Speaker 1>travel and in person meetings for unvaccinated staff. So, as

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>always Tim, there is a lot going up. The sticks work,

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 1>do the carrots work, that's the question, or a combination

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>of both. Let's see though what our next leader has

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to say. You might recall we recently talked about billionaire

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>investor Leon Cooperman making a hundred theion dollar donation to St.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Barnabas Medical Center and Livingston, New Jersey, the largest gift

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to a hospital in the state. Well, Barry Ostrowski is

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>presidency you at r w J. Barnabas Health and so

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the recipient of that donation his organization. He's on the

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 1>phone in Livingston, New Jersey. Barry, nice to have you

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg Radio. How are you. I'm great pleasure

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>to be here and I thank you for the invitation. Well,

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it's great to have you here. First of all, we

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>do want to talk about the donation. But you know,

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>front and center, you guys have been dealing with COVID,

0:01:29.680 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like any healthcare institution. How are things going well? They

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>seemed to level off. You know, we really evaluate what's

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.399
<v Speaker 1>happening by based on how many people need to be

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>admitted to our hospitals. At the height of the pandemic,

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we had eighteen hundred in patients throughout our system. We're

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>now down to about a hundred and sixty, although we

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>were down far lower eight weeks ago. But most of

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>those people, while six don't require ventilator care and are

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>not in our I c use, and I must say

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that plus percent of them were unvaccinated, so I think

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the inpatient level off. We continue to get,

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of course, folks who convert to infection being treated with

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>monoclonal antibodies, or frankly with weak cases just staying home. UH.

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And we are, of course insisting that all of our

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>employees are vaccinated. We were the first in New Jersey

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to announce that requirement. UH. And I'm delighted and gratified

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>that we're well over of our employees vaccinated. Now there's

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>another two weeks in the in the duration of the

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 1>required time UH and I think we'll be in pretty

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>good shape at that point. What happens if you don't

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.120
<v Speaker 1>for the folks who for that three percent or the

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>last percentage of folks you vaccinated, I'm sorry. Yeah, Unfortunately,

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>they will have to be separated from the organization. I

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>don't expect it to be a big number. And frankly,

0:02:55.720 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in today's world, losing anybody is a burden. UH. And

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>I must say, well, we disagree perhaps with their policy

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 1>on vaccination UH and their personal choice on that. These

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>are people who have sacrificed UH in order to provide

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>care to our employees at every level, of our patients,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at every level of our organization. So it's it's really

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>an unfortunate set of circumstances, but we do need for

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the safety of everyone folks to be vaccinate. Hey, Verry,

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit about planning because

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.000
<v Speaker 1>as president and CEO of our w J. Barnabas Health,

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is something that you have to be

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>thinking about anticipating what happens this quarter, what happens in

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>two How do you plan for a capacity when it

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to COVID? I mean, what are you thinking a

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>realistic number of people who will be admitted is going

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to be are we getting Basically, it's another way of

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>me asking if we're actually turning a corner on the pandemic. Well,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we are, and it's a great question. I

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>think right now in our sites is a concern about

0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the period immediately after Thanksgiving. Uh, those are holiday events

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>where on for ginerally we would expect people to become

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>infected because of close proximity with many people, and so

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we may see that inpatient number tick up, but I

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's going to exceed the two mark in

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>our view, perhaps a couple more than that across our system. UH.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>And again for us and for our other patients, the

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>key is will we be able to operate by providing

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>services to non COVID patients and the worst of it,

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we had to cretel or frankly stop those services. We

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>don't see that happening again, at least, of course it's

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>our fervent hope, but we really don't project that. So

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 1>save that holiday period potential for slightly more folks in

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the in the institutions. I think we have reached the

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.920
<v Speaker 1>plateau and as you point out, perhaps turned the corners,

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 1>so that certainly Q one of next year, I think

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll start to see those numbers come down, uh and

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>get back to a more normal environment for our health

0:04:56.560 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>care facilities. Keeping my fingers cross, because I've been nice

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to be much more normal. Hey, listen, just got a

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:06.160
<v Speaker 1>couple of minutes left here, Barry Um. This donation from

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Leon Cooperman. Leon Cooperman obviously a very familiar uh individual

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to our Bloomberg audience. It's a big donation, a hundred

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>million dollars from the Cooperman Family Foundation. What does that

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>mean for your hospital and your organization. Well, well, of

0:05:20.720 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>course it's unbelievable. We're gratified by it. I couldn't be happier.

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>He's been a good friend for decades. I have to

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.600
<v Speaker 1>tell you. The money is important, no doubt about it.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that he's endorsed our plan for the

0:05:33.040 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>institution and our system in general, and he's reinforced our

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>commitment to the mission and now through this gift we

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>can accelerate that those mission objectives is very important to us.

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>He's a thought leader, and I know you believe the

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>same about him. Uh, And that being a thought leader

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of its impact on others who might become donors.

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:56.479
<v Speaker 1>But his endorsement of who we are and what we

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>do this way is just an incredible active philanthropy on

0:06:01.279 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>his part, and for us reinforcement beyond anything we can

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.279
<v Speaker 1>we can really describe. How much do you rely on

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>gifts like this in order to operate and also for

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>capital expenditure for the hospital, Well, we rely on it because,

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>of course, we we don't have the ability to raise

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>equity in terms of sharehold share sales. We do use

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded debt. We recently raised some money there and

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.119
<v Speaker 1>we have a strong operating cash flow, but in order

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to address all the capital needs of the organization in

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>a timely fashion, these gifts of philanthropy are critically important.

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Eventually we would be able to build a new facilities,

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>attract the new clinicians, put in the new technology, but

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it would take much longer and frankly be more expensive

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>by the time we got there. So philanthropy at any

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 1>level donorship in general, enables us to accomplish that which

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to UH in unaccelerated fashion. Well, thank you

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>so much for finding time for us, and it's really

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>great to check in with you. UH and be well

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and safe to your entire team. Barriot Ostrowski his presidency

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>at r w J Barnabas Health. On the phone from Livingston,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:14.720
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Masser

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. So Tim,

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the top are most read on the Bloomberg.

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>He talks about the FED under great greater scrutiny from

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>both inside and outside its walls. That's following revelations about

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>market trading by some senior officials that happened back in

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 1>UH Senator Elizabeth Warren. We're gonna hear from her a

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit later on on this Yeah, she'll be live

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio and television at four thirty five Wall

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Street time today, So in just a little while, Yeah, exactly,

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So let's get an update on the situation. Kind of

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 1>set the stage. Bloomberg News Federal Reserve reporter Matt Bosler

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>joins us right now on the phone in New York City. So, Matt,

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a headline that talks about, you know,

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>more scrutiny for the FED. Are they really under incredible pressure?

0:07:58.360 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And most importantly, is the FED chief really under pressure?

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And might his job be at risk? Yeah, it certainly

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>seems that way, Carol. I mean, it's kind of hard

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to disentangle everything that's going on right now with these

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>trading disclosures, from the ongoing question of what President Joe

0:08:16.280 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Biden is going to do in terms of the decision

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 1>he has to make about whether to renominate Jerome Powell

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for another four years of fedhair and so um, certainly

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that is one of the main reasons why this continues

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to grab big headlines. Obviously, with someone like Senator Elizabeth

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Warren gunning for Powell, trying to prevent him from being renominated.

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>She's really latching onto this um you know what's quickly

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>becoming a widening scandal related to some of these trading

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>activities that these beneficials were involved in last year. Well Man,

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>help us understand the structure of the Federal Reserve and

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 1>to what extent if you think about it, the FED

0:08:55.559 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 1>chair Powell sits the top. And indeed, like with another organization,

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a company, perhaps uh the person to top the company

0:09:03.080 --> 0:09:05.680
<v Speaker 1>would say, okay, yes, the buck does stop with me.

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I am responsible for the people who are below me,

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>at least on an organizational chart. Is it Is it

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>like that with with the Fed? In these officials it

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is um. You know. One interesting thing that we always

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about with the Federal Reserve in particular is that

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>it has this kind of quasi public private structure where

0:09:26.440 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>you've got the Board of Governors in Washington, d C.

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Which includes obviously FED Chair Jerome Powell and uh FED

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Vice Chair Richard Clarida, who is the latest to be

0:09:35.520 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>drawn into all of these questions surrounding his trading. And

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>then you've got the reserve banks around the country that

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>are somewhat set apart from uh, you know, the DC

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>operation and and that's of course where this whole story

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>got started a couple of weeks ago, and so um,

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it looked like uh Powell certainly had more

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>deniability a couple of weeks ago when this really seemed

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to be an issue related to the Reserve Bank presidents,

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the former presidents of the Dallas and Boston Feds. Now,

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about the vice chair whose office is

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>down the hall from the FED share right, it makes

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>it a little bit harder to um, perhaps distance yourself

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>from that than it was before. This is the first

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>time that this has been an issue with beneficials. Is

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly the first time I can remember, you know, in

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>my time in the ten years that I've been covering this. Now.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that people do uh like to recall

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>lately with this story is, um, you know, what happened

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in I think it was two thousand nine, um, after

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis, where you had a member of the

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve Bank of New York's board of directors who

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 1>got a waiver to trade in Goldman sax stock during

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the fall out of the financial crisis,

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, those boards of directors at the

0:11:05.600 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>reserve banks aren't actually involved in policymaking, right, they don't

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>attend the f C meetings, they're not, Um, they have

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>no say in what the Fed does with policy. But

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>even that situation was enough to um precipitate new rules

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 1>around that kind of trading that you know, then made

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>their way into the Dodd Frank legislation that was passed thereafter.

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And so um, certainly, you know the President would seem

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that there are going to be changes as

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a result of this whole thing. Yeah, I do feel

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like that there was a kind of untold rule of ethics. Um,

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to write to him, it just feels

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>like you're at the FED could be very careful. Yeah,

0:11:52.360 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it's surprising this all came out at one time too,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, It's not just one. It's been three cases

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.320
<v Speaker 1>now at this point. Matt, thank you so much for

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>getting us up to speed. Bloomberg News Federal Reserve reporter,

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Matt Bosler, you're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 1>So this story also among our most right on the

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Today. It's in the upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Week magazine out later this week. It's tim about Facebook,

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>HP nev artists, a few other big corporations who are

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>finding a very novel way to pressure outside council. Well.

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now to talk all about it is Ellen Milliken,

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>legal reporter at Bloomberg News. She joins us on the

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>phone now from London. Joel Weber is editor at Bloomberg

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. He's with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Joel. Uh,

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a problem when it comes to diversity at

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>elite law firms. Maybe this is like the other Facebook story.

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 1>There's this other one that's you know, clearly interesting, and

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>this one is as well, but for different reasons. Uh. So,

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows corporate America or even bigger than America, global

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>corporations have a ton of outside council. Uh. It tends

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to be fairly white and fairly male. And Facebook, uh,

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>HP novartists um are among companies that are trying to

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>put pressure on outside legal to diversify and have it

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>have different types of lawyers representing them and working on

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>their on their projects. And to do that, they're willing

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to maybe withhold some fees, which I think is a

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you want to get somebody's attention, like

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, withholding a paycheck will probably get them to

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>listen up, Ellen, how's that working out well? These companies

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>are definitely serious about this as well as withholding fees.

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>They have said that they will redirect their work away

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>from law funds you aren't up to scratch on their

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>diversity and give the work to UM law funds which

0:13:50.679 --> 0:13:53.920
<v Speaker 1>do have the adequate diversity. And their demands are quite high.

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.439
<v Speaker 1>FACEBOOK requires half of the lawyer to be diverse, and

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that's gender, race, UM, sextually urity and also disability as well.

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>UM and nevatism HPO also asking for this and and

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>there they are among quite a large Posit's actually increasing

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and law firms are taking this seriously. They have to

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>write like their profits UM hang on their relationships with

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>their clients and the works that they get UM and

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>especially when it hurts the partnership level. They take an

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>equity cut of the profits of the law fir profits teacher,

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>so it could it eats into the balance sheets of

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the law firm. That eats into the into the pay

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that the partners takes the end of the year. Yeah.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>You point out in your piece that last year Facebook

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>spent one point six billion dollars on legal fees, settlements

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>and fines, and I got a feeling like that perhaps

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>might go up after this week. Might be an opportunity here.

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Um So. So, there's a lot of companies that I mean,

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we we mentioned some big ones, but there has been

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to actually out this problem before. You mentioned

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in the story of hundred and seventy companies sent a

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>open letter to law firms criticizing that lack of diversity.

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious did that Did that work though, or do

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>they have to resort to, uh, you know, more painful methods. Yeah.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So those companies who signed up have taken a less

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>threatening approach than placement of artist and HP um there

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>approaches more that we will slap your hand and we

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>might redirect work, or or simply if they have ten

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>law firms for examples, saying we can we can carry

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>out this litigation or m and ada or whatever it is,

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>they will pick the law firm with the best diversity.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Um so. So, one one of the ducas instat your

0:15:40.360 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Anglo Americans said, it's more about encouraging law firms rather

0:15:43.760 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>than set them. Um. But I think everyone recognizes in

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the data that not much has changed over the past

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>five years. Partnership level still one in four partners of

0:15:56.440 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>women across the US UK UM one in ten partners

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>from an ethnic minority in the US. So people recognize

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is slow. Um, there are commitments in place,

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.880
<v Speaker 1>but I wouldn't be surprised if more companies follow with Facebook,

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Artist and HP if it's change doesn't have to do Yeah,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>And I find it interesting, as you say, the companies

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing change are they're not necessarily models of diversity. So

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to do as I say now as I do essentially,

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>which to me is like there's anyone better. We're gonna

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>hold your money because you need to be better and

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:32.359
<v Speaker 1>we're working on it. But you know, it's it's incredible.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>So as a result of this, though, however it may happen,

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is it bringing about changes in law firms global law firms. Yeah,

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>so the data we've seen, that's change happening in the

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>lower roungs of law firms, So trainees, new cohorts, and associates. Um.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Actually the gender split in those junior lawyers of fifty

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty um and almost fourty centers on the associates that

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>us um um, we're people of color last year. Um.

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>But as I said before, it just dramatically drops when

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you get to partnership level. And that's a really crucial

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>um essential data points because partners control the relationships with

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>the clients, they get an equity cut, um, and they

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>run the law firm. So um. It does take some

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>homes decades for lawyers to be in a law firm

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>before they get to into partnership level. But that's really

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the area where we haven't seen much moving over the

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>five years plus, and that's really the area that law

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:37.399
<v Speaker 1>firms really need to start pushing and promoting more people

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>have come color, more women into those more senior positions.

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>What about the other end of the pipeline, law school

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>and training, specifically, how law schools are doing with diversity

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and producing those lawyers who can then go and work

0:17:51.560 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 1>at these firms. Yeah, so that's actually they're doing much better. Um.

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.439
<v Speaker 1>The pipeline of young lawyers that she kind of gives

0:18:00.600 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>gives them hope to this whole situation. Um Um. The

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>diversity among those new cohorts is so much better. Um.

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 1>The unfortunate thing is that, um that before lawyer becomes

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>client placings, they will actually get higher up the law firm.

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>So even though a law firm might have good diverse

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>representation as a whole, what these fans facebook of architics,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>We really care about the lawyers on their matters. So

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the more senior lawyers who have come into the office

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 1>represent them and corps who helps them sign the M

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and a deal, that that's who they care about. That's

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>who they want to see more diverse representation in. So

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm also just curious is that how do the US

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>and the UK compare? And you have some numbers in

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the story, but it is one improving more than the other.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Um in in you know what what kind of country

0:18:55.640 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>dynamic is that play here? Yeah, so they're actually pretty

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and on gender split, as they said, it's fifty fifty

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>across the base markets. Um, the US does do better

0:19:05.960 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 1>on racial diversity. Um they have also the US has

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a big population of of black people for example, in

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the UK does Um, but um, it's it's pretty even

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>across I think looks firm. You know, huge UK law

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>firm will have quite a big presence in the US

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.719
<v Speaker 1>and vice versa, so I'm not surprised. And these companies

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>are European based on the US based, and they have

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>broaches all over the globe, so I'm not surprised that

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>it's actually quite a similar picture across this Well, let's

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>help us the pipelines improved. Maybe it will move all

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the way up the ladder. Hey, interesting story. Ellen Milligan,

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Legal reporter, Blomberg News, obviously joining us on the phone

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 1>from London. There. Check out that story in the upcoming

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>issue a Bloomberg Business Week, also online at Bloomberg dot com,

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Slash business Week and on the Bloomberg terminal, Chilweb or

0:19:56.080 --> 0:20:04.280
<v Speaker 1>editor Bloomberg business Week. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>All Right, I just heard an interesting fact, toy. This

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>is what I love about working with Tim because he's like, yeah,

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we talked with Kyle's Stock earlier about this story. He

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>worked on this story for a long time, doing other

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>things too, doing other things too, But this story is

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 1>a long time in the making. It's all about Rivan

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Rivvy and it's the maker of electric vehicles. It's backed

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>by Amazon dot Com and Ford. You know, it filed

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:30.160
<v Speaker 1>for an I p O. We got that news after

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the close on Friday. Let's bring in Kyle Stock. He's

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg new senior correspondent. Uh, and he's on the phone

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 1>in New Jersey. Nine months. It's a long time to

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>work on a story. Sorry, he told me. I should

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>have told you, Carol, He told me that off fair. Sorry.

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a straight nine months. It's just a little

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>bit every day. You know. It's like you're on baby, Kyle. Okay,

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>that's what I can think about exactly. It's been a

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.120
<v Speaker 1>messy road though, as you write, Um, tell us about

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>your reporting. Yeah, I mean what was really cool is, uh,

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this was start up and it was really startup. Bat.

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>You know, we hear about these billion dollar unicorns all

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 1>the time that seeing, you know, manifest destiny, that they

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 1>come into the world with this idea just set in

0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>stone and they just make it happen and everyone loves it.

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And this was not that. You know, this is a

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:23.199
<v Speaker 1>story of a brilliant engineer who had an idea and

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work out, and you know, he scrapped and

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>he pivoted and tweaked and stretched his team and laid

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>people off and almost went out of business, and then

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>tried to idea number two, idea number three, idea number four,

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, finally got a small investor, finally

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>got a little bit of a lifeline, and everything started clicking.

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:52.159
<v Speaker 1>And here we are expected potential I PO around Thanksgiving,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>which would value the company at eighty billion dollars. And

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to contextualize eighty billion dollars in terms of

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>market caps, specifically for a car company, a little company

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>called Ford that has been doing this for you know,

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 1>more than a century. Uh market tap about fifty some

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Kyle and Jim just and GM just under

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>eight billion, seventy nine billion and change. So that's a big,

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>big there's a big bet on the future, right Yeah.

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's about that, you know, they can have a

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>tesla like trajectory UM. Interestingly, you know, I think the

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.399
<v Speaker 1>founding team here is a lot in a lot of ways,

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, very different and maybe even smarter than Elon

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>was in the early days. UM. And they certainly gathered

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a war chest more quickly. You know, there's

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:48.600
<v Speaker 1>some there is uh, sort of some baked and success

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>with Jeff Bezos behind you. Um, but expectations are very

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>high and they are still just figuring out how to

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 1>build these things. But I mean they're literally just now

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>coming off the Lee line for the first time. So

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>as you say, you know, if we think about Tesla,

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of naysayers and there are a

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of things that he had to overcome and figure out.

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>But here we are. Is it fair to make the comparison,

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, could we potentially be looking at uh a

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>new car a car maker in the ilk of of

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and uh, I mean time will tell, obviously, But

0:23:21.440 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>what are you hearing from folks who follow this industry? Yeah, there's, um,

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.959
<v Speaker 1>the general consensuses this is still you know, a totally

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>new thing that no one's seen before, and an electric

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:39.640
<v Speaker 1>truck like a big rig that is also totally green. Um,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>so there is that kind of you know, sort of

0:23:43.760 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>wow moment to it. That said, the lane is getting

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>narrow really quickly, so they'll be first to market, but

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.160
<v Speaker 1>by a couple of months. You know, Ford is an

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.359
<v Speaker 1>electric pick up in the works. Jenal Mower says, this

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>GMC hummer, which is even more expensive. So the sort

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of strategic coup that Rivan had that RJ. Scrims had

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>four or five years ago was great. But um, you know,

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they were delayed in production, They're they're getting the market

0:24:12.320 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>later than they hoped, and their first mover advantages dwindling.

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>So it really comes down to whether they get this

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>cult status that Tesla has, um, and that is really

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>anyone's guests. Um. You know, they're very precious about the brand,

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>how they promoted it, about you know who they have

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>as a you know, Instagram influencers tied in and so

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>that it could happen. They're definitely being very careful about it. Um.

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's sort of the big question. Hey, Kyle,

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 1>take us back over the last decade, because I think

0:24:43.160 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>your thesis is is really important here the idea that

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the only reason Rivan isn't on the scrap heap of

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 1>automotive history and there look, there are many American car

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:57.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that that are is its adaptability. Uh, what were

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>some examples of earlier versions of Ribban autos that there

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>are no resemblance to what the company is going to

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>start offering soon. Yeah, So Scurrnge was he was a

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 1>car guy I talked to. Part of my exercise was

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>calling all his old M I T. Classmates and they

0:25:13.000 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>all said, you know, he was into driving. He was

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in the sports car. So it's first. His first baby

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>was this very small, very affordable, very efficient sports car.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>And his model was the Lotus a lease, which is

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of a driver's car. It's kind of Porsche like

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 1>car without the price tag. And that was his first idea. UM.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>There was talking about it being a hybrid or not hybrid. Um. Ultimately,

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.240
<v Speaker 1>when they built a prototype, they just put an engine

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>from a Mini Cooper in there just to get the

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>thing running. Um. So that was the first one. And

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>then he pivoted and said we should go up scale,

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:55.719
<v Speaker 1>which maybe do a more extensive sports car, and and

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and the pitch would change based on which investors he

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>was talking to, which potential investors um and what they

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>might like to hear. There was even sort of half

0:26:06.880 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>an idea to do a race car for the guy

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.479
<v Speaker 1>in Brazil, and then he ends up in the desert

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in Saudi Arabia through a contact at M I T.

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>A LJ coming to a streaming service near you very soon.

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's really it's kind of wild. Well, you

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 1>know what I want to ask you. I mean we

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 1>just got about thirty seconds. Is he a car guy?

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Is he an engineer? Is he a tech guy? Because

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>you know cars are increasingly about technology. Um, just thirty seconds?

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>What is he? You know, he's he's an engineer first,

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>he's a car guy second, and he's probably a better

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>tech guy than most tech guys out there. He's an

0:26:41.920 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>absolute poly map. Um. But he's everyone I talked to

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you said, he's primarily an engineer. He's just interested in

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea and the meritocracy of that, and that's what

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>may it work. We shall see. They filed for an

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I p O. So they're coming and the backing of

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>AMAS on, which I think is really significant. Yeah, exactly,

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Well nine months it was worth it. Thank you so much,

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Senior correspondent, Bloomberg News on the phone from New Jersey.

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Another new issue potentially, Yeah, exactly. Um. Check out this story.

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>It's available at Bloomberg dot com. Just a fantastic deep

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>dive into all things Rivian. I'm roa yeah, but you

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>let me drive? Oh no, no, no no, this is

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:29.360
<v Speaker 1>not a twin. All right, please, I'll do the dravel

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. Good question. This is the Drive

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Clothes on Bloomberg Radio. All Right, folks, we've

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>got jumped about ten minutes left in today's trading session.

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about it. Let's get to the drive to

0:27:52.119 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the close. And Miletti is back with us, head of

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Active Equity over at Wells Fargo Asset Management six hundred

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars in assets under management and total. She's

0:28:01.000 --> 0:28:03.400
<v Speaker 1>with us on the phone from Milwaukee, Wisconsin. And how

0:28:03.400 --> 0:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>are you. I'm good, Carol, How are you hanging in there?

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:09.399
<v Speaker 1>Hanging in there? Uh? Feel a little whipsade based on

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the market trade because depending on what day, you're either

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>up or you're down by more than one percent, especially

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>on the S and P. What does this tell you?

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, volatility is back, but is there something else

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>going on that we should be aware of as investors? Well,

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think we've gotten a little bit spoiled. Um. You know,

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I read someplace today that um, it's been more than

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 1>nine months since we've seen a five percent correction. So

0:28:38.280 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the longest time, the longest streak since nineteen seventy.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So I know it's I know it's been a long time,

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>but since nineteen seventy. That's UM. That was a surprise

0:28:50.840 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to me. UM. What does that tell you? What does

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that mean? Well, confidence really has been around, and it's

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>not surprising. Right. Economic strength has been UM. It has

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>been in place, with people back to work, people back

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to business. UM, business is reopening. We know Delta probably

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:22.960
<v Speaker 1>has peeked, so that while that brought a scare, kind

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>of a secondary scare into the market, it wasn't enough

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to really hamper consumer confidence in business confidence. So I

0:29:34.480 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>think what's changed, though, is the competence in global growth

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>UM with the challenges we see out of China. We

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>also know that we have the said likely to stop

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>asset purchases in November. And then we also know that

0:29:54.600 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there's some wavering on whether inflation is transitory or not

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>UM that coming directly from the side now to not

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:08.360
<v Speaker 1>just from investors, and so all of those things I

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think are creating more volatility in the market and more uncertainty.

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Although you know, the economy seems pretty strong, are still

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>UM in a good position to spend. Rates still remain low,

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>so there's a lot of positives, but there's there's more

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:26.440
<v Speaker 1>grace guys out there. I guess the days are getting

0:30:26.440 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit shorter, just much like we're seeing. Yeah, yeah,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>that is. That is certainly the case here in New

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>York as well. And I'm wondering though about something that

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Carol referred to. And it's sort of like the the

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>indecision of the market right up down, up down up, uh,

0:30:44.960 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the last five days with an excess

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>of one percent. It's it's sort of like if we

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>were talking about a single stock, we'd say the stock

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't know what direction to trade in. Are we

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing that on a market wide basis? And why? I

0:30:59.160 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>think it's not a usual for volatility to pick up.

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know, UM, market doesn't like to make it

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>easy on investors, right, I mean very often, you know,

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I get asked. It's not uncommon for people to ask

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>would you buy on the dip? And um, it's not

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>easy to do that. It's never easy to say, go

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>out and buy. And so the last couple of days

0:31:24.360 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't felt good to go and do that. But again,

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of the dynamics in the market being

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>so strong, with revenue growth being so strong, yes there's

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the supply train chain, but demand is incredibly strong.

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Yet there are things out there that investors want to buy.

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:47.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it's unusual to see this volatility.

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to continue to see more of

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it as you're going to see some good news flowed

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>by some news that's questionable and it feels like it's explainable,

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like when you say that revenue growth is strong and

0:31:59.160 --> 0:32:00.959
<v Speaker 1>our Gina Martin and and has talked talked a lot

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>about that too, that when you look at top line

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>growth expectations for companies, especially as we get ready for

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:09.320
<v Speaker 1>the next earning season, you know those are staying put?

0:32:09.400 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Are you know they're high or that we're seeing growth

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.760
<v Speaker 1>or they're being raised. It's when you start looking at

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet and you look at some of the

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>cost side of things. Um, but we can explain that

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>away and it will go away provided those supply chains,

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, rebalance. Can we assume that they will rebalance

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 1>or is there something much more structural going on in

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>our economy when it comes to supply chains that maybe

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we're missing. Yeah, I think that is a million dollar

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>question because if we were talking a year ago, Carol,

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I would have said we would have worked our way

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the supply chain issues by now. But you know, UM,

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>what we haven't seen is demand tapering off. Demain demand

0:32:55.440 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>remains strong, the consumer remains kind of relentless. Us they're

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in good shape, the balance, their balance sheet's remain in

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>great shape. And we continue to see shortages of labor

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in the supply chain, right so, you know, truck drivers

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 1>UM remain a huge challenge as well. So and certainly

0:33:18.840 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>on UM factory lines there's labor challenges as well. We

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>see that in the Midwest as well as other places.

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So there are things that are fixable, but I think

0:33:28.600 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>there are some structural challenges with the supply chain that

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>may not get fixed. What I'm most worried about is

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>how long will consumer confidence stay strong? Are there things

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>that are going to challenge consumer confidence? Right? So, while

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>their pocketbook might feel okay, that might get challenged if

0:33:50.280 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we continue to see the things like higher energy prices UM,

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's going to sting over time, if commodity prices and

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>other things continue to rise UM at a rapid rate. Hey,

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and just in the last thirty seconds that we have

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with you, how long do you see those challenges persisting?

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Lack of workers and look, um, you know, actually the

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>troubled getting workers the struct drivers you talked about. Yeah,

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I do think it is something that's going to take

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>a good part of next year to continue to fill.

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Um there are you know, there's no shortage of ways

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that companies are trying to bring those workers back, but

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't been that successful and so um it's going

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to take a good long time to do it, probably

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>through the end of next year. Okay. Griffin of Citadel

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 1>says that maybe it stid for the President to give

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>an address and it's time for America to get back

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to work. He certainly was pretty strong with his message.

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, and thank you so much. Ama. Letty, head

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 1>of Active Equity over at Wells Fargo Asset Management. Thanks

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes,

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>sound Out, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern on

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio or watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global

0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:09.160
<v Speaker 1>News m