WEBVTT - Musk's Political Ambitions, CoreWeave's Big Purchase

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.160 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hide in New York

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in San Francisco.

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.279
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Musk's political aspirations in

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 2>focus after the Tesla CEO says he's formed a new

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.600
<v Speaker 2>political party.

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Plus more tariff warnings from President Trump. Today, as countries

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.199
<v Speaker 3>rush to negotiate trade deals, we bring the tech.

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.199
<v Speaker 2>Angles and Cory've agrees to buy Core Scientific in a

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 2>nine billion dollar all stock transaction. We'll discuss that and

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.240
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the tech m and a landscape.

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 3>But first we get to these markets that come off

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>of record highs, anxiety building around the trade announcements, and

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 3>indeed where the negotiations will go down to the wire

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.600
<v Speaker 3>come July ninth. I'm looking at the NaSTA one hundred

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 3>of by three quarters of percent at the moment ed

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 3>we're seeing stocks down, bonds down, dollar higher. But there

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 3>is one key company that drags from a points perspective,

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>and you've got it.

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's our top story, and that is Tesla. The

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 2>stock down more than seven percent in the session, now

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 2>down more than twenty seven percent year to date, Musk

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.840
<v Speaker 2>says he's formed the America Party. The concern from the

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Cell side, in particular is that this is just more

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>distraction that must won't be as focused on Tesla as

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>he pursues these political ambitions. There's also the factor weighing

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 2>on the stock that is President Trump over the weekend,

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 2>commenting on the news of Musk setting up his own

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 2>political party.

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 4>It's always been a two party system, and I think

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 4>starting a third party just hands to confusion. It really

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.039
<v Speaker 4>seems to have been developed for two parties. Third parties

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 4>have never worked, so he can have fun with it.

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 5>But I think it's ridiculous.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 3>Let's get it straight to Bluemeg's Max Chrafck and the

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 3>President thinks it's ridiculous. Big investors, analyst notes out today,

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 3>think it's really worrying.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and you know President Trunk's Trump's political observation that

0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, third party candidates have generally not done well.

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 4>That is true historically, And of course there's there's also

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.799
<v Speaker 4>just the risk that you know, having a poor relationship

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 4>with the you know, the president of the United States,

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.640
<v Speaker 4>with the party that's in power. As Musk is trending

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 4>towards is going to have negative consequences, not just for Tesla,

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 4>which of course does have you know, areas of exposure,

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 4>regulatory exposure as well as benefiting from these EV tax

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.920
<v Speaker 4>credits that are about to go away, but also for

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 4>Musk's other companies, you know, SpaceX, massive government contractor some

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 4>of these other companies also depend on sort of regulatory

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, good relations with regulators. So so lots and

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 4>lots of risk here for investors.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's what we're seeing in the stock

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 2>We're showing some of Musk's posts on X over the weekend,

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 2>as well as the president's response on True Social but

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 2>the catalyst was the big beautiful bill Max. I think

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 2>it'd be really helpful if you just exp lane this

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 2>basically difference in fiscal policy opinion here between elam Mosque

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>and the President of the United States.

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's a question of fiscal policy opinion, whether or

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 4>not you agree that these tax cuts should have been

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 4>extended or I think from Musk's point of view, maybe

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 4>there should be more cuts to pay for them. But

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 4>then there's also the sort of vibes thing. You know,

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Musk spent a lot of time and and you know,

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 4>hurt his popularity through doge you know, comes away cutting

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.959
<v Speaker 4>you know, a little less than two hundred billion dollars

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 4>maybe best case from the deficit. And now he's reading

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 4>these headlines talking about trillions of dollars being added to

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 4>the deficit, you know, over a decade. And so so

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 4>I think I think there's a sort of personal affront.

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 4>And I also think it's important we not missed the

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 4>fact and Trump brought this up in his post that

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 4>there are aspects of this tax bill that are going

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 4>to affect the bottom line of Musk's companies. Now, it's

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 4>possible that as Tesla you know, pivots to Robotaxi, these

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 4>hits won't matter as much. But we're talking about significant money,

0:04:04.400 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 4>significant money that's going to make Tesla's cars more expensive

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 4>for consumers, and that's going to cut into Tesla's margins,

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 4>which we've already seen under pressure, you know, over the

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 4>last few quarters.

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 3>And that's exactly why Annasov William Bair Blair actually downgraded

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>the stock today. JP Morgan said about forty percent hit

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 3>to profitability on the back of these regulatory changes. There

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 3>is one note of optimism, though, coming from Ralliant Global

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>advisors Jason Sue, who had said, look, this is kind

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 3>of the only option left to Elo Musk actually is

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>a savvy political move. What did you make of that nomax?

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think there's always obviously always, you know,

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 4>different interpretations and so on. You know what we saw

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 4>from investors when Musk and Donald Trump had their sort

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.359
<v Speaker 4>of first blow up at the beginning of June, and

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 4>then then they kind of like seem to be patching

0:04:53.520 --> 0:04:55.119
<v Speaker 4>things up the stock started going better.

0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 6>I don't really I think you really.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 4>Have to squint to see how you starting some kind

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 4>of quicksotic third party is kind of a brilliant political move.

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 4>I think you know the consensus, you talk to Wall

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 4>Street investors, you talk to balls and bears. This is

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 4>not going to help the company. This is a drag

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 4>on the company. You know, no matter what your point

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 4>of view. Obviously there are some exceptions, and you know,

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 4>who knows that Elon Musk has has pulled stranger things

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 4>off before, So maybe this will turn out to be

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 4>some kind of brilliant political gambit.

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Max Chafkin, thank you very much. Let's continue the conversation.

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:33.240
<v Speaker 2>James fishback from Azoria partners. He is a former advisor

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 2>to the Department of Government Efficiency or DOGE, and he's

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 2>written an open letter to Tesla's board of directors calling

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 2>on them to meet with Elon Musk and seek clarity

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 2>over his political ambitions. Azoria is also postponing the listing

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 2>of its Azoria Tesla Convexity ETF. After Musk said he

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.960
<v Speaker 2>was forming a new political party. James Fishback joins us, Now,

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I think we just start with the basics, James, if

0:05:58.120 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>we can, Why did you write open letter to Tesla's

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>board and why do you think they need to understand

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the formation of the America Party in the context of

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.920
<v Speaker 2>whether or not is a net benefit to the company

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 2>and Tesla's future goals.

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, good morning, Ed.

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 7>The truth is that when you have a full time

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 7>CEO and Elon Musk, who has been an extraordinary CEO,

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 7>his time and energy needs to go to Tesla and

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 7>synergistic companies like Xai or SpaceX.

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 6>A political party.

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 7>Regardless of how I might feel or the President might

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 7>feel about how ridiculous this stunt is, it does not

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 7>help Tesla in any way, shape or form. I wrote

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 7>the Tesla board this weekend asking for one thing clarity.

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 7>Sit down with Elon Musk this week and clarify what

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:52.119
<v Speaker 7>his full time obligation to Tesla will be in light

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 7>of this new political party. If he cannot, If he

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 7>cannot be Tesla's full time CEO, the boord what it

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.839
<v Speaker 7>needs to take into that into account and needs to

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:03.960
<v Speaker 7>hold him accountable.

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 2>Has Tesla's Bullard responded to Aleta James.

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 7>I have not heard back from Tesla's board yet. I'm

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 7>confident that this week they are going to have this

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 7>conversation with mister Musk. Let's just remind everyone listening. Elon

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 7>Musk is free to burn his own money in a

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 7>political party. He is not free to bring shareholders like

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 7>us along with him. He does not own Tesla.

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 8>We do.

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:31.240
<v Speaker 6>And if Elon Musk does not want.

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 7>To be the full time CEO of Tesla, he should

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 7>tell us now, because starting a new political party, with

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 7>the travel, the candidate recruitment, the training and the organizing

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 7>that comes with that is not a wise use of

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 7>his time.

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 9>Ed.

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 7>He has been an extraordinary engineer and visionary leader for

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 7>Tesla and for SpaceX. I have FSD in my car.

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 7>I know you do as well. It is a magical technology.

0:07:53.520 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 7>Robotaxi is brilliant. It's rolling out right now in Austin.

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 7>That's what his time and energy should be focused on,

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 7>not trying to sabotage the President of the United States, James.

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 3>Can you remind our audience your exact exposure to Tesla,

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 3>how much you own? How that is the scale within

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:12.440
<v Speaker 3>assets under management of Azoria.

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, absolutely so. This Tesla Convexity ETF very simply was

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 7>designed to combine the power of owning an asymmetric stock

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 7>like Tesla with asymmetric call options on an asymmetric stock

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 7>like Tesla.

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 6>And so this was.

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 7>Upwards of a billion dollar investment we were going to

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 7>make on behalf of retail and institutional investors over the

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 7>next few months in Tesla. We can't do that in

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 7>good faith right now because you have a CEO who

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 7>is putting personal political ambitions ahead of his obligations and medicaid,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 7>the detriment of shareholders and Caroline, there's a much bigger

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 7>story at play here in America. We have seen CEOs

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 7>who have pursued and imposed a political agenda at the

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.080
<v Speaker 7>moral and financial detriment to their companies, which is why

0:08:56.120 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 7>tomorrow we are still publicly listing or Azoria five hundred

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 7>Meritocracy ETF, which invests in the top five hundred companies

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 7>in America and excludes any company with a political DEI

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 7>hiring target. Those are moral failures and their financial ones

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 7>as well.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Will that exclude Tesla? And what of the ETF future

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 3>plans If you don't hear back from the board.

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 7>Well, look, we have to hear what the board is

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 7>going to say.

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:23.680
<v Speaker 9>First.

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 7>My biggest concern now is that mister Musk, who have

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 7>a lot of respect for that, he is going to

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 7>use his position at Tesla and resources and time and

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 7>energy that could be better spent on optimist robots, on robotaxi,

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 7>on the new model. Why rollout that he's going to

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 7>use that time and energy on this new political party.

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 7>Whether you agree with it or not, the truth is

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 7>the CEO of a company has a full time obligation

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 7>to that company's employees and shareholders, and so we need

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 7>to see clarity if we are going to revive the

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 7>Asoria Tesla Convexity ETF. I hope we get that clarity

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 7>care line, because Tesla is the best AI investment that

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.320
<v Speaker 7>investors can and make right now. Between the energy business,

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 7>Humanoid robot's full self driving and robotaxi. This is a

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 7>compelling stock to invest in, but we can't do that

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 7>right now when his political ambitions or front center.

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>James Tesla is the only publicly traded name in Elon Inc.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 2>Across many companies, but he is also CEO of SpaceX

0:10:20.760 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 2>and of Xai and has leadership role at Neuralink. And

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 2>what I hear all the time from investors in XAI

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 2>is actually they feel that's his primary focus. XAI in

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the run up to the November election, Musk was the

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>biggest donor. What he wants to do with the America

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Party is back candidates for House and Senate seats. So

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 2>how does that work. He's already stretched across multiple companies.

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 2>What difference does it make if he's putting his own

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 2>wealth towards a political endeavor. He's basically continuing with something

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 2>he's been doing eight or nine months anyway.

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, that's a great point. So his work at XAI

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 7>or SpaceX directly complements his work at Tesla. So when

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 7>you talk about the technologies, the GPUs, the dojo models

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:10.960
<v Speaker 7>it's being used at Tesla, those are also carrying over

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:15.359
<v Speaker 7>to XAI. The synergies, the physical materials, the engineering breakthroughs

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 7>at SpaceX have carried over into the cyber truck, for example.

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 7>So there's obvious synergies between his work at Tesla and

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 7>at SpaceX and at XAI. No synergies exist between Tesla

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 7>and its AI efforts. And starting a political party that

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 7>seeks to sabotage the President of the United States who

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 7>just delivered one point two trillion dollars in spending cuts

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 7>over the next ten years.

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 10>I don't get Elon.

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 7>With all due respect to Elon, he promised a trillion

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:45.839
<v Speaker 7>dollars in spending cuts over the last six months, didn't

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 7>come anywhere close to delivering that, and now he wants

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 7>to start a political party. Meanwhile, President Trump just signed

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 7>in the big beautiful bill this past weekend that actually

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 7>delivered not just one trillion dollars in spending cuts, but

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 7>a record investment in our border security. Companies like Matroid

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.000
<v Speaker 7>benefiting from that deploying AI vision technology at the border

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 7>to stop human trafficking and drug smugglers. And then second,

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 7>record tax relief for working families who for under the

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 7>Biden Harris administration, we're getting the very short end of

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 7>the day.

0:12:16.440 --> 0:12:19.160
<v Speaker 3>Bringing it back to the Tesla perspective here, though in

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 3>particular rather than political one. What about Musk's own pay package?

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 3>What about potentially thinking of succession planning here? How is

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 3>the board likely to respond to that? How are your

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.920
<v Speaker 3>retail investors that you've been building an ETF for going

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 3>to respond to that? To think, that's a great question.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.360
<v Speaker 7>Elon deserves to get paid for the extraordinary work he

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 7>has done at Tesla. What that judge in Delaware did

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 7>is nothing short of political lawfare, and Tesla shareholders, including Azoria,

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 7>want him to be paid and paid hugely for the

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 7>contributions he's made and the wealth that he's generated.

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 2>For all of us.

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 7>So that is a separate issue. Of course, anytime you

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 7>have a CEO as big and as bold and as

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 7>visionary as Elon, you have to think about succession plans.

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 7>I trust Robin, I trust the board to have this

0:13:09.480 --> 0:13:13.760
<v Speaker 7>conversation with Elon this week to clarify his new America Party,

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 7>not on the merits of what the party stands for,

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.760
<v Speaker 7>but what it means for his full time obligations to's

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 7>Tesla as.

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 3>CEO Zoria, CEO James fishback. Thanks for joining us today.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 3>Appreciate it. President Trump is said to announce more trade

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 3>deals and deliver tariff warnings today. It's ahead of the

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Wednesday deadline. This comes as US officials actually signal that

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 3>trading partners will have potentially until August first before tarif's

0:13:46.160 --> 0:13:49.120
<v Speaker 3>actually kick in. For more Bluebergs, Tyler Kendall is joining

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 3>us now. So the clock is ticking less than an hour.

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 3>What do we expect to hear?

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, hey, Caroline, as you said, we're almost two twelve

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 11>pm Eastern, which is when President Trump said that we

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 11>could expect the first round of his tariff letters to

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 11>be sent down. He said to expect twelve to fifteen

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 11>countries to receive them, but at the moment, it really

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 11>is unclear which ones are going to and how they're

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:11.439
<v Speaker 11>out ultimately going to respond.

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:12.920
<v Speaker 12>Now, our understanding is.

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 11>The letters are going to be out in the next

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 11>coming days, but really the tariffs aren't going to be

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.280
<v Speaker 11>enacted for about three weeks time August first, which would

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 11>suggest that the administration is open to negotiating further here

0:14:25.040 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 11>despite the July ninth deadline coming up on Wednesday, and

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 11>we heard the Treasury Secretary Scott Vessont basically say as

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 11>much in an interview over the weekend, saying that the

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.400
<v Speaker 11>playbook from the administration is what they would like to

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 11>call maximum pressure. They're going to send out these letters

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 11>in a bid to get our trading partners to put

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 11>their best offer on the table. Now, I'll quickly point

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 11>out one development that we've been tracking, which is really

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 11>sort of a reversal in which countries seem to be

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 11>getting priority here when it comes to talks. The administration

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 11>has expressed frustration when it comes to Japan, for example,

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 11>And you had President Trump this morning threatening an additional

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 11>ten percent tariff on any country that aligns with the

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 11>bricks after those that group of nations held the summit

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 11>over the weekend, which could spell trouble for India, of course.

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 11>But Caroline and Ed pair that with the confirmation this

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 11>morning that the European Union's arsenal On Vonderlin had a

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.600
<v Speaker 11>phone call with President Trump just yesterday, and what really

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 11>does feel like a reversal of favor for the trading block,

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 11>which we had been, our understanding had been was really

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 11>at the end of the negotiating line.

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 6>Boo Books.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Kendall from Washington, DC. Thank you very much. Let's

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>get more on global tariffs in their impact join us now.

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Is Liza Tobeing Ghano, Global managing director, your trade lies

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>there is advising on geopolitical risk. You heard Tyler's reporting there.

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 2>How much is this about managing expectations versus getting something

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 2>definitive from this administration today on what has been agreed

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 2>and what will be agreed in the weeks to come.

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 12>Right, Good morning, ed in Caroline, It's nice to be

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 12>on with you.

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 12>Secretary Scott Bessett has messaged this as a maximum pressure

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.280
<v Speaker 12>can so they're trying to ratchet up the pressure and

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 12>get more concessions from US trading partners. It does seem

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 12>that by kicking the deadline back to August first, they

0:16:10.560 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 12>are needing more political wins. They need more deals in

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 12>order to make this look like more of a success.

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 12>But what I think markets may be missing at the

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.280
<v Speaker 12>moment is that there is another big chapter in President

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 12>Trump's trade agenda looming in the background, and that's the

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 12>sectoral terriffs. So of course what we're all obsessing about

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 12>right now is the reciprocal tariffs, and there's a lot

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 12>of uncertainty the uncertainty keeps extending, and the US courts

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 12>are raising more questions about the legality of these reciprocal tariffs.

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 12>But by contrast, the Department of Commerce meanwhile is undertaking

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 12>these investigations to lay the groundwork for sectoral tariffs. These

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 12>are the Section two thirty two investigations into things like

0:16:56.200 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 12>semiconductors and pharma and various medals and a whole host

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 12>of other key things. And if you'll recall this investigation,

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 12>Commerce has this authority in terms of looking at the

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 12>national security vulnerability. So that's still looming. It's been delayed

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.439
<v Speaker 12>by these trade negotiations, but it's still coming, and it's

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 12>arguably a lot more consequential than za we'recal tariffs.

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>A lot of that directly relates to China, right, And

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 2>the latest headline is the President warning an additional ten

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 2>percent tariff in response to anti American policies, as he

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 2>calls them from bricks nations. But if you consider the

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 2>bricks nations and where this administration is focused, all of

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 2>these different negotiations happen in parallel. Do you think China

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.479
<v Speaker 2>gets more time and is more of a priority than

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:44.160
<v Speaker 2>anyone else.

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, there's a few trade partners that are sort of

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 12>on a separate track and they're not really part of

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 12>these ongoing reciprocal tariff negotiations. China, Canada, and Mexico. You

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 12>know Canada and Mexico of course, because they're USMCA trade partners,

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 12>and they're on a separate track. But China, because the

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 12>President has been saying that he has a deal already

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 12>with China, this is coming out of the London trade talks.

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:13.320
<v Speaker 12>What you really have there is more of just a

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:18.480
<v Speaker 12>fragile truce that centered around rare earths and export controls,

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 12>and so it's very fragile. I think the administration would

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.479
<v Speaker 12>like to keep the door open to further trade talks

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 12>and maybe some kind of a phase two with China.

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.399
<v Speaker 12>They would like to see China open up more, but

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 12>of course it takes two to tango, and China has

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:40.960
<v Speaker 12>consistently disappointed US trade negotiators, and what Washington may try

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 12>to offer towards Beijing as concessions or conciliatory diplomatic moves

0:18:46.520 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 12>will be read in Beijing as softness and weakness, and

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 12>they will push harder for more concessions. So I think

0:18:54.119 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 12>there's a lot of fragility here, and either side could

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 12>tip over this Apple car in terms of this kind

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.520
<v Speaker 12>of fragile US China truth, Oh.

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Apple cart takes me exactly where I want to go

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 3>because for us in the world of technology, Apple has

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.199
<v Speaker 3>been the front line of fire when it comes to

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 3>tariff exposure. We also think of the chip the semiconductor names,

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 3>and you mentioned section two thirty two. All of this

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 3>give us the advice you're giving leadership at Corporate America

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:24.840
<v Speaker 3>right now. Do you navigate tariff's like this or do

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 3>you ultimately take the takeaway is build more in America

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 3>and signal more rather than see the realities of where

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 3>tariffs go in the next month or week.

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 12>I think with China, you have to have a China strategy,

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 12>and that has to take the medium and long term

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.040
<v Speaker 12>into account. It has to take into account China's track

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 12>record and the track record over decades really of US

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:52.680
<v Speaker 12>China trade negotiations eventually disappointing and breaking down.

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 6>So I think you kind of have to bake that in.

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 12>What remains to be seen is how seriously the administration

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 12>will back up President Trump's desire to reindustrialize here in

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.840
<v Speaker 12>the United States. There's some areas where this sort of

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 12>conflict among goals is quite striking. For one thing, the

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 12>US needs a strategy on rare earth. I think the

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 12>US dependency on China for rare earth and permanent magnets

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 12>has become really a hot topic that everyone's tracking now,

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:28.920
<v Speaker 12>but we still don't have the US still doesn't have

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 12>a strategy to deal with the lack of demand. Really,

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 12>and what you saw in the big beautiful Bill over

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 12>the weekend was there had been some measures in place

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 12>on the green energy side to put more funding towards

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.120
<v Speaker 12>solar and wind power that would have created more sustainable

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 12>demand for the off take of these nascent rare earth projects.

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 12>That was stripped out of the bill unfortunately. So I

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 12>think you need to see more, you know, an array

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 12>of support beyond terrors to strategies to reindustrializing in the

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 12>United States.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Lasotomin, I'm Gano Global. Great to catch up with you.

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Thank you now coming up TikTok maybe building a brand

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 3>new app for US users. That story is next in

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 3>talking tech. This is in berg tech. It's time now

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 3>for talking tech. And first up, Huawei's Ai Research Lab

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 3>is pushing back on allegations and relied on rival models

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 3>to develop its own platform now. The accusations come after

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 3>the company published a source code for its PANDU pro

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 3>e models. That was last week, where users on GitHub

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 3>debated its origins. While we're responding stating the use of

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>open source code is common practice and they strictly adhere

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 3>to licenses. Plus, China hits back at EU restrictions on

0:21:50.240 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 3>their medical device makers, announcing reciprocal curves. Beijing says it

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 3>will exclude EU based companies from Chinese government procurement on

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 3>certain medical devices. The move comes ahead of high stakes

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>and meetings between the EU and Chinese leaders. And TikTok

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 3>maybe building a new version of its.

0:22:06.720 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 6>App for US users.

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:10.159
<v Speaker 3>It's according to reports, and the company is planning to

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 3>launch the new app on September the fifth. TikTok users

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 3>would have to download the new app and migrate in

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 3>order to continue using the social media platform and the

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 3>existing app, but it's said to work only until March

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 3>of next year.

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 2>Ed Okay, Coming up, Core, We've agrees to buy Core

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 2>Scientific in a nine billion dollar also transactions, got the

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 2>details of some Monday m and a coming up next.

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. Welcome back to Bloomberg Tech. I'm

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 2>looking at a couple of big tech names moving to

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 2>the downside. And what's interesting about Apple and Alphabet both

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:57.919
<v Speaker 2>lower this Monday is news out of the EU. So

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.359
<v Speaker 2>starting with Apple, Apple is a pee that five hundred

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 2>million euro fine that was relating to the app store

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 2>saying that the requirements that you has for appstore changes

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 2>are unlawful. Maybe some pressure there. Similarly, Alphabet or Google

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 2>is saying that it's going to list the search results

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 2>of competitors right at the top of the page in

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 2>order to conform the Digital Markets Act. Again, a stock

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 2>that's down one percent. That news came out on July

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 2>fourth holiday here in America. Maybe it's having an impact.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Then there's the big one, Tesla, the biggest mover to

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 2>the downside in terms of the points drag on those

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 2>major industries. Elon Musk has founded the America Party. The

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 2>cell side are worried that it's going to be a

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 2>distraction away from Tesla his core obligation. And there's the

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 2>impact of the President of the United States commenting on that.

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Later in the program, we're going to go out to

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Crag Trudell. It's going to give us a lot more

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>of the market reaction in this story. Correct.

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Amid all of that, though, we've got some m

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:53.000
<v Speaker 3>and A news ed and that's a cap Gemini in

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.880
<v Speaker 3>France races to build Boulder AI offerings with the Transalactic deal.

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 3>And here in the US, Core Weave has agreed to

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 3>buy Course Scientific to expand its data center capacity. Again

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 3>it's capitalizing on AI demand. Leanna Baker's here with us.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Who leads the deal team? Leanna, Let's go to Core

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 3>We've and Core Scientific first, because this is all about

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.880
<v Speaker 3>the need for compute. They actually eyed the asset about

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 3>a year ago from a much less price point.

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 13>And since then Core Scientific shares have gone up a lot,

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 13>so I think patience has paid off for them. Although

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 13>you might see that shares are down today. That's something

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 13>we're following closely because you don't often see that in

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 13>M and A But because it's an all stock deal

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 13>and Core Weave is a pretty volatile stock that could

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 13>be weighing on shares.

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 6>Of course Scientific.

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 2>There's also this kind of broader m Anda Monday vibe.

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 2>Cap Gemini is doing something in the market to get

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 2>itself up to speed on AI. What do we know

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 2>about the backstory here. I've been reading reports about this

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 2>piece of M and A for some time.

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 13>Thanks Ed, We've been all over this story. So cap

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 13>Gemini first started talks with this company a couple months ago.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 13>They were in advanced negotiations and then we had dislocation

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 13>and market. You might remember all that tariff drama, so

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 13>talks sort of stalled there, but then it came back.

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 13>We've been hearing a few weeks ago that things were happening.

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 13>We were trying to get that final price. We didn't

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.480
<v Speaker 13>get there, unfortunately, but you saw it announced today. Since then,

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 13>since talks broke off, you know, the euro has strengthened

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 13>a bit. Maybe that came into play, but definitely there's

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 13>going to be consolidation among companies that consult other companies.

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 13>These B to B companies are being affected by AI

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 13>and that's going to be a trend that we're seeing.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.280
<v Speaker 13>So i'd say WS is looking to get stronger here

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 13>by getting with a bigger rival Bloomberg.

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Leanna Baker, who leads our deals team, thank you very much.

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's get back to today's big story, Tesla. After CEO

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk announce the formation of a new political party,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 2>how do investors feel about it. Let's bringing Michael Green,

0:25:47.640 --> 0:25:51.679
<v Speaker 2>portfolio manager and chrief strategists at Simplify Asset Management. I

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 2>was on the Bloomberg on the HDS function. I think

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.360
<v Speaker 2>you have a very small holding in Tesla, maybe thirteen

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 2>thousand shares or so to clarify that for us. But

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 2>your reaction is somebody that has exposed that name and

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk forming a political party.

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 6>How do you react, well, very quickly.

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:12.280
<v Speaker 14>So Simplify has a two x levered variant of the

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 14>Tesla fund that provides access to that. It is a

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 14>very small fund. As an investor in Tesla, however, I

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 14>would would argue that this is not so much a

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 14>choice that he has, but almost an inevitability. At this

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 14>point he is man. Tesla is very closely as his

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 14>SpaceX and related businesses from Elon Musk. They're very heavily

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.199
<v Speaker 14>tied into the political allocation machine, whether that is the

0:26:36.200 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 14>Department of Defense and NASA through SpaceX, whether that is

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 14>through the environmental credits associated with Tesla and Solar. You know,

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 14>this is a business that is deeply tied into the

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 14>political framework, and at the end of the day, unfortunately

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 14>Elon Musk has now managed to basically alienate both Democrats

0:26:56.880 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 14>and Republicans. Democrats by aligning with Trump initially in the

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 14>anti woke movement, and now of course Republicans by breaking

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 14>with Donald Trump and launching the American Party. I've drawn

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 14>the analogy that this is much more like William Randolph

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 14>Hurst than any form of traditional technologist. He's largely known

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 14>at this point for his political and communications empire in the.

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 6>Form of Twitter.

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 14>Is a town square that really seems to be setting

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 14>the tone here, whether he is established.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:30.639
<v Speaker 2>As opposed to as opposed to being the key inventor

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 2>or the technical brain himself.

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 9>Right.

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Like, the thing that we always go back to is

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 2>that in many annual regulatory filings in the boiler plate,

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 2>they will put Elon Musk is essential to this company

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and if anything were to happen to him, that would

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 2>be to Tesla's detriment. But as I know, I've reported

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot on it, right, there are many talented and influential,

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 2>impactful people at that company. Even so, there is an

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>element of key man risk from Tesla's own perspective. It's

0:27:58.720 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>in the filings.

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, at the end of the day, the Tesla buyer

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 14>is suffering from their car being keyed in a parking lot,

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 14>not because of the technologists, but because of the chief

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 14>executive officer and a leader of the company. That is

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 14>clearly a risk, both from a management standpoint and a

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 14>talent acquisition standpoint. He is a transformative figure to many

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 14>in the technology space who dared to actually build stuff

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 14>in a technology world that was largely focused around consumer apps.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 14>You but he is not the inventor, He is not

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 14>the key technologist. What he is is the key spokesperson,

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 14>and so the underlying behavior that is occurring here, it's

0:28:38.520 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 14>not entirely clear that he has a choice to back

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 14>away from the political sphere given the exposure that his

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 14>businesses have. Whether this is reckless or not is ultimately

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 14>going to be determined by the history books. We can't

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.480
<v Speaker 14>really know the influence, but with a deeply divided electorate,

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 14>the threat of a third party does have the potential

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:00.920
<v Speaker 14>to disrupt elections, primarily purting republics, much more than it

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 14>would likely hurt democrats.

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 3>This is a global company as well, and Michael, we've

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 3>seen the impact in Europe that Musk's political affiliations have had.

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 3>You then think about China, where real growth engine for them.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 3>But maybe China starts to look at the lessening in

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 3>political weight that Elon has had with the administration backs

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 3>away there, and then you've got competition. Do you remain

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 3>as exposed to this name as little as it is?

0:29:27.400 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 14>Well, ultimately, we have a fund that is dedicated to Tesla,

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 14>so we will buy that just based on whether shareholders

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 14>want exposure to that name or not through that fund.

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:38.239
<v Speaker 14>But at the end of the day, this is a

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 14>business that, for the very first time in history, is

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 14>actually looking at the potential for a sales decline. It

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.520
<v Speaker 14>has had extraordinary success in a few models. The model

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 14>Y was obviously a huge runaway success, but it has

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 14>an aging product mix. It has a significant new competition,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 14>particularly from Chinese companies coming in, and this is of

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 14>course creating conditions under which the business itself is very

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 14>much under threat. It has always been a bit of

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 14>a mystery from a valuation standpoint, and so it's very

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 14>hard to create a compelling argument for why you should

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 14>be aggressively buying Tesla and now, other than the desire

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 14>to gain exposure to a very high volatility, high beta name,

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.320
<v Speaker 14>which has been one of the key characteristics that have

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 14>attracted people to it over time.

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.719
<v Speaker 3>Yet, Michael, give us the signal that you're getting from

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 3>those that have wanted to get into your fund, that

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 3>have wanted the exposure, to the volatility or to the

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.960
<v Speaker 3>mystery around you know, Musk in and of itself, is

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 3>that waned in any way in the current political environment.

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 14>We haven't really seen it, weanhe in any meaningful way.

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 14>But the reality is is that most of these levered

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 14>ETFs are simply offering investors a tool to access lower

0:30:47.240 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 14>cost leverage than they could obtain through a margin account.

0:30:49.760 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 14>You can get a two x levered exposure at a

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.000
<v Speaker 14>fraction of the cost once you factor in management fees

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 14>and the costs of the leverage that can be obtained

0:30:56.800 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 14>in the institutional space. It's much less expensive than in

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.440
<v Speaker 14>trying to obtain that through margin or through options. And

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 14>so the argument is very compelling if you want that

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 14>levered exposure. The question is ultimately, do you want LeVert

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 14>exposure to a business that really has gone somewhat ex

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 14>growth and is now looking at the situation in which

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:20.239
<v Speaker 14>those political liabilities both in China where it's perceived as

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 14>an American company at a time period where that's probably

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 14>not particularly attractive. Europe similar phenomenon, and as I mentioned,

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 14>you know, growing competition in the United States as well

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 14>as the political headwinds make this a very challenging environment

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 14>for Elon Musk.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 3>Fascinating conversation, Michael Green, simplify asset management. Appreciate your time today.

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 6>Now coming up more.

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Crackdown on jips as the US where we're looking at

0:31:44.080 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 3>the White House saying to prepare more chip cubs in

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 3>an effort to combat smuggling into China. More on that next,

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 2>The White House is set to restrict shipments of AI

0:32:08.400 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 2>chips to Malaysia and Thailand and an efforts cracked down

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 2>on suspected chips smuggling into China. That's according to sources.

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 2>For more, let's got out to bloombergs Mike Sheppard in Washington, DC.

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a very clear story, right that the restriction is

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to prevent the flow of advanced semiconductors through a backdoor

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 2>third party into China.

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 8>What do we know, Well, what we're hearing from the

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 8>Commerce Department is that we may be seeing a move

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 8>soon to try to limit sales. It will require companies

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:43.280
<v Speaker 8>based in Malaysia or Thailand to obtain licenses to buy

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 8>these advanced AI chips. Pretty much, when you think about it,

0:32:47.600 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 8>it is Nvidia and also AMD that makes the most

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 8>advanced out there used for artificial intelligence purposes, and the

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 8>idea is to prevent those buyers in Malaysia and Thailand

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 8>from averting chips possibly to Thailand and to China. And

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 8>the concern that the US has articulated over and over again,

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 8>and it's not just the current administration, but the prior

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 8>administration too, was that other countries could be through their

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 8>prior relationships with China, a source of chips that China

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.680
<v Speaker 8>right now is prohibited from buying. The US is imposed

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 8>restriction after restrictions since the early part of the twenty

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 8>twenties aimed at keeping these advanced chips from China to

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 8>slow its position in the race to dominate artificial intelligence. Now,

0:33:38.480 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 8>what is unclear is where this rule is. It's still

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 8>in the draft stages. Things could still change, and it's

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 8>important to note that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 8>heading to the region. He'll be in Kuala Lumpur later

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.200
<v Speaker 8>this week for a regional meeting of Foreign policy chiefs

0:33:55.200 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 8>from various countries in the area. They obviously have a

0:33:58.360 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 8>lot at stake when it comes to the arrows that

0:34:00.560 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 8>the Trump administration is preparing to unleash on so many

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 8>of those countries, not just Malaysia and Thailand, but so

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 8>many others in the region. But they're also going to

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:14.719
<v Speaker 8>be concerned as well about export controls. This step is

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 8>also considered another glimpse of what would replace what the

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:23.600
<v Speaker 8>Biden administration had unveiled in its final days before leaving office,

0:34:23.640 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 8>the so called AI Diffusion Rule that restricted countries' access

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 8>on a three tiered basis. But it was an approach

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 8>that many in the industry and many allies around the

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 8>world had viewed as cumbersome and perhaps unfair to them.

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, said mag Shepphin appreciate the update. Look, let's get

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 3>an investor perspective on those potential chip curbs, and more broadly,

0:34:45.239 --> 0:34:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Beth kinniggers with us IO finally technology analysts. So, despite

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 3>all of this and the clear narrative the US wants

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.960
<v Speaker 3>to restrict access to technology to China, we still have

0:34:56.160 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Jensan Wong actually wanting to sell into China. More long term,

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Beth is that a fool stream.

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:05.520
<v Speaker 9>I think there are two sides to this. From in

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 9>video's perspective, they don't.

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 6>Want to lose that revenue. This is a massive country.

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.279
<v Speaker 9>But what the United States government is really communicating is

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 9>that the technology has too far reaching implications for this

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 9>to really be about the next consumer app, the next

0:35:21.280 --> 0:35:21.879
<v Speaker 9>enterprise app.

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 6>This is really a matter of national security.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:28.880
<v Speaker 9>From an investors standpoint, I love that demand signal. I

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.120
<v Speaker 9>love the signal that the United States government is doing

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 9>everything they can to control this technology.

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:37.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't have demand concerns.

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 9>I think this is bullish, regardless of if in video

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 9>sales into China or not.

0:35:45.600 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 3>What about supply concerns therefore, and whether or not we're

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 3>able to bring the manufacturing and the expertise into the

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 3>United States so that we're not so dependent to be

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 3>able to make that sophisticated technology abroad.

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:58.359
<v Speaker 9>I think a lot of this is hitting the news

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 9>buyers now and has been let's just say, the last

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 9>six months. But the United States has been preparing for

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 9>this for years. We know that because Taiwan Semiconductor has

0:36:09.560 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 9>built this sab in Arizona. This is not an overnight project.

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 9>It's been going on for years. As someone who's tracked

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 9>AI for many, many years. Therefore, I think we are

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 9>more prepared than what might be assumed right now to

0:36:23.680 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 9>onshore and to keep those supply chains fairly domestic.

0:36:29.040 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 2>But if we saw shares in Malaysia and Thailand drop

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.919
<v Speaker 2>overnight in those respective fields data center chips. But many

0:36:35.920 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 2>of the cell side notes point out that actually those

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:42.759
<v Speaker 2>most exposed to this potential initiative are American companies. Which

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 2>American companies do you worry about?

0:36:45.080 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 9>I will be quite bold and tell you I'm not

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.239
<v Speaker 9>too worried about this. I think if there was ever

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 9>a technology that has this outsized demand, and it goes

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:55.600
<v Speaker 9>back to is it.

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:56.920
<v Speaker 6>Going to be five hundred billion?

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 9>Is it going to be seven hundred billion in AI

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.239
<v Speaker 9>chip sales by the time we end.

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.440
<v Speaker 6>This decade, maybe even higher?

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:11.760
<v Speaker 9>And I have very little concern over what a China

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 9>impact would be specifically on this technology.

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 6>It is not a consumer technology.

0:37:17.719 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 9>Consumer technologies your Tesla, your Apple, they badly need China's population.

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:26.800
<v Speaker 6>This is not a consumer technology. It's primarily enterprise.

0:37:26.880 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 9>And then of course you have sovereign AI at the

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 9>government level.

0:37:30.760 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 6>We really do not.

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.320
<v Speaker 9>Need China the way we did on the consumer side

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:35.799
<v Speaker 9>with those other technologies.

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 6>Beth.

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned one demand signal. I follow you on social

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 2>which are the hard and soft data sets? Are you

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:45.840
<v Speaker 2>tracking right now to give you your demand signals that

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 2>inform your thesis.

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 9>What we probably track most closely is really those generation

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 9>of GPUs that product roadmap by Nvidia, and then of

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 9>course within that supply chain there are many partners that

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 9>will give you early signals. What I'm hearing and what

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.760
<v Speaker 9>I'm seeing is we will close this.

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 6>Year with Nvidia on top again.

0:38:06.600 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 9>Zero demand issues again twenty twenty three and twenty twenty

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 9>four combined is what we have for H two of

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:15.439
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty five.

0:38:15.520 --> 0:38:18.439
<v Speaker 6>That is a very big statement and it's so far,

0:38:18.960 --> 0:38:21.720
<v Speaker 6>so good. Green Light, green Light and video.

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:23.839
<v Speaker 3>Stay with it, Beth. It's interesting that maybe we think

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 3>about an Oracle and its exposure to trying to build

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 3>out it's cloud offering over in Malaysia, for example, and

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 3>maybe that has to be thought through a little bit

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 3>more and politically negotiated if there are limitations to access

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to the GPUs that it needs over there. Who are

0:38:37.640 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the other names that you do like that you is

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 3>it all just about in videos? A no one stop

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 3>shop or can you broaden it out.

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:49.399
<v Speaker 9>I'm still loving hardware quite a bit. When we look

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 9>at Nvidia, there are company sandwich between that custom silicon

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 9>which is going to see a resurgence off inference, and

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:02.200
<v Speaker 9>one stock that's in between Nvidia and something like Amazon's

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:03.719
<v Speaker 9>Tremium is a stere Labs.

0:39:03.880 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 2>Beeth Kendick, Biofund. Great to have you back on Bloomberg Tech.

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:39:14.080 --> 0:39:15.960
<v Speaker 3>I believe you've.

0:39:15.800 --> 0:39:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Now hit a point. I think the board's gonna have

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 5>to get involved because this is now over. I think

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 5>there's a line in the sand that he's now starting across,

0:39:25.880 --> 0:39:28.400
<v Speaker 5>and that's a frustration. There's someone's a huge supporter of

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 5>Tesla Autonomous, the Golden Age head. You cannot kind of

0:39:32.760 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 5>go down this path.

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 2>That was Wedbush analyst Dana Ives there earlier today weighing

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 2>in on Musk's pelistical aspirations, and here's what Jed Dolsheimer

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 2>from William Blair had to say as well.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 10>With Elon, it's a little bit of a double ed

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 10>sword where you know, I would argue what people are

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 10>paying for is his ability to innovate. Elon Musk is

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:58.239
<v Speaker 10>one of the great innovators of our modern day. So

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:01.960
<v Speaker 10>taking him out, does the board really would they would

0:40:02.000 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 10>they really want that? And I think, you know, when

0:40:05.280 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 10>you kind of asked that difficult question, I just don't

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 10>see them stepping in at this stage.

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Bloombek's crazed ol has he had to unpack the impact

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 2>of the news on Tesla shares. We got the cell

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:20.080
<v Speaker 2>side reaction in those sound bites, that investor sentiment mirrors

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 2>that as well.

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I think that's right. You know, I think Musk

0:40:24.640 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 15>may have had a point when he told us back

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 15>in May that you know, for every person on the

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:34.280
<v Speaker 15>political left that he was turning off with his actions

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 15>in Washington, he was, you know, perhaps opening some doors

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:42.040
<v Speaker 15>for Tesla on the political right. Now he's potentially getting

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.319
<v Speaker 15>himself on the wrong side of the GOP and on

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 15>the wrong side of President Trump. And you know, I

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:51.879
<v Speaker 15>think there's probably a fair number of consumers too who

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:55.040
<v Speaker 15>would just say, altogether, you know, I'd rather not have

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 15>my car sort of be wrapped up in the politics

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 15>of the world's rich person and you know, have what

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 15>I drive sort of send some political signal altogether that

0:41:07.000 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 15>that's not you know, a reason necessarily for people to

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:11.360
<v Speaker 15>go out and buy your car.

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.560
<v Speaker 3>And they haven't been. We saw the sales down thirteen

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.600
<v Speaker 3>percent in the previous quarter. Craig, We're also seeing the

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 3>impact on the stock. We're down another seventy one billion

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.800
<v Speaker 3>dollars in terms of market cap today. We're not actually

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:24.720
<v Speaker 3>at the depths that we saw in the previous feud

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 3>at the beginning of June. What does that tell us?

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, I mean I think this is still a stock

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:37.320
<v Speaker 15>that is pretty richly valued and maybe has some value

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 15>you know, ascribed to it left over from you know,

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 15>even if we think back to just where the shares

0:41:43.160 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 15>were trading before Trump won the election, right, the stock

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:51.160
<v Speaker 15>is still up from from those levels, and so, you know,

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 15>are are we going to see investors continue to rethink

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 15>and sort of reevaluate whether this you know, company has

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 15>a better shot with an Elon Musk who has gone

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 15>from you know, maybe being well positioned with the White

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.000
<v Speaker 15>House to now not being well positioned at all and

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:13.880
<v Speaker 15>perhaps even becoming something of a foe for for President Trump.

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Craig, I wrote to Tesla's board this morning. Through the

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:20.319
<v Speaker 2>avenues they're available to me, I wrote to Elon, As

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, I regularly ask him to come on the program.

0:42:23.600 --> 0:42:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Do we have any sense of like the test of

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 2>response at all? And if the answer is no, I

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:29.680
<v Speaker 2>think that's okay because it's pretty standard.

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.640
<v Speaker 15>I mean, I think this is a board that has

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:36.600
<v Speaker 15>been pretty you know, mums the word over the years

0:42:36.640 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 15>and really has only piped up in very you know,

0:42:40.080 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 15>rare circumstances. I think, you know, it's it's going to

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 15>be interesting in the months to come. You know what

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 15>exactly this board has planned for a compensation package for Musk.

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:54.239
<v Speaker 15>We know that Tesla disclosed earlier this year that it

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 15>had set up a special committee for compensation related matters.

0:42:58.960 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 15>And you know, so not only is there this question

0:43:01.880 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 15>of you know, just how much the board wants him around,

0:43:04.800 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 15>but also how are they going to keep him around?

0:43:07.280 --> 0:43:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Crad Dow, We appreciate it from London.

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 9>Now.

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.359
<v Speaker 3>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech d Yeah,

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 3>don't forget to check out the podcast.

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find it. It's on the Bloomberg

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:20.759
<v Speaker 2>terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify and on iHeart.

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 2>From New York City and San Francisco, this is Bloomberg

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Tech