WEBVTT - Surveillance: Aramco Has Built-In Resiliency, Wald Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and of course on the Bloomberg. You know,

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>we've got a guest here that he's done forensic accounting

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>on all these unicorns. We can bring in, Michael Holland

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Holland and Company, Cham and Michael. Great to have you

0:00:36.280 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>with us in New York. Let's begin with the I

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>p O that Watson and may not be for a

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>long long time. What's your takeaway from this whole SANKA

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>over the last few months. It started Jonathan before then,

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>first of all, thank you for having me on. It

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>started well before the we Works budding fiasco. Zoom and

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Slack have been crucified in the market recently. These are

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>two companies that came out of private equity. Venture capital

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>had treated it historically crazy numbers relative to their sales,

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.919
<v Speaker 1>which had been growing rapidly. But as we saw with Uber,

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Uber I think may have been the genesis of some

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of this U S German drying because people were projecting

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the growth in revenues to be something that would somehow

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>relate to growth and earnings, which never occurred. There are

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>no earnings, and when companies like Slack and Zoom should

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>know show no indication of earnings in our lifetimes, people

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>begin to question the valuations at thirty times revenues. What's

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>been interesting about this drama as we focused almost exclusively

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>over the last couple of weeks on the governance issues.

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.199
<v Speaker 1>But this guy's way beyond government's issues, isn't it? Michael.

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 1>You don't go from a forty seven billion dollar evaluation

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to ten to fifty in a number of months just

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because of governance issues. So you're right, you're absolutely right.

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Now we're talking mania. Go ahead, town, thank you, you're

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>running the show now. Um cricket. Cricket took three minutes

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 1>from Michael to appreciate what I got through exactly. Michael,

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>where are the bankers on this? These these I gotta

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>be careful here, these good people, these young turks doing

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:19.920
<v Speaker 1>financial innovation and unicorn nous. They're supposed to have advisors

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that give counsel on pricing. What was the one the

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>other day's Smile Dental Dental smile, smile, direct, that's it.

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So do I need it? What do you think you do?

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>But where are the bankers here? Where are the Goldmen, Sects, Morgan, Stanleys,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan to lend advice? So these embarrassments don't happen.

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's listening to them, from what I can tell, correct

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 1>and think the nineties where the bankers are. Unfortunately for

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>too many of them, they're in the line collecting fees

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's their job. And when they have no earnings

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to price things from, they can just use comparable. So

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>if some if if one company is trading it twenty

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>five times of the news, you can praise at a

0:03:01.720 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>three and say it's cheap at the praise. Meanwhile, Microsoft

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>is it seven times revenues? What's new about all of this?

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>You're a banker, You go to a company, the private

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.079
<v Speaker 1>they want to go public. You look at the last

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 1>funding ground, you make up the story to get the feet,

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>turn around and say, you know what, I think we

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>can take this a sixty. You give us the fee,

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll take the Did you see cutting in Illinois coming?

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Actually knew? I knew George Baker, Yeah I know, But

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.679
<v Speaker 1>did you see the debacco coming, And the answer is no,

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty ugly. It was ugly, But did we

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>see the reason it was so ugly because no inside coming.

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's in our collective memory. That's a deep

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>misty past, John. It was like Northern Rock, frankly, I mean,

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>did anybody no? And perhaps we should have done, because

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>looking back, all the signs were there. Let's focus on

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in private markets. That's the concern for many people.

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>How did we ever get to evaluation of forty seven

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars for this company? And Michael, how distorted is

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that market still distorted, Jonathan, because you have you have

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>companies still trading at extreme valuations. Albeit the prices are

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 1>down in the friend the public market, but anyone who

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>owns a private firm is now looking at very suspect

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>valuations for their home portfolio. Do you own Amazon? You

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>own Amazon? Everybody wants to be Amazon. I think the root,

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the root, the root. Yeah, And Doug has written beautifully,

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thank God, about the long term. He's out in a a

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Holland time frame on that don't like as his usual

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>date trading that he does. Michael Holland on Amazon. The

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>root caused John of this UNICORNUS and we dog is.

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:37.120
<v Speaker 1>They all want to be Amazon, right, but you can't

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>rationalize the actual business plan of cardboard boxes in a

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>lobby was some of these other unicorn this products right? Correct.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Software in the case of Zoom and slack is is

0:04:50.360 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>very different because you have Microsoft there. Amazon never had

0:04:54.200 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a Microsoft. They became Microsoft. What's really going on here?

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.680
<v Speaker 1>His kids told him, Dad, lone up, load up on

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>slack out. Kids got into this whenever Michael comes by,

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:10.840
<v Speaker 1>But I want to just talk about single names. I'd

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:13.479
<v Speaker 1>like to lean on his experience in China as well.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>Let's just get the macro back drop ready as well, Michael,

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the dates when China is really not improving. This stimulus

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>effort so far has been targeted and gradual, and I

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>just wonder whether it stays that way as they try

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and stabilize the situation, or whether we're about to get

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>something new, something different. What's your reading? What's happening there

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>right now? Michael Jonathan that you've watch says as I

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>have this current regime, UH doesn't like to be bullied

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>into doing things, so they don't want to appear that

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>they're being frantic. And what they do read that Hong

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Kong or what's going on with Trump in the case

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>of Mr she and I think that when you get

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 1>the reserve ratio requirement residuced a little bit and you

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>get different things going on, those are minor things that

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. I think they are very concerned about as

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>they always are, about unemployment and the economy. They that's

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a big problem for them and if they if they

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>can't get this economy moving better. And they say they

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have lots of tools, and they have some, but I

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>don't think they've used a lot of them yet. I

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>think they have to do what you're talking about. I

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 1>think we will see sometimes then they're not too distant future. Uh,

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>if they don't do a deal with Trump, which I

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think they're gonna do, but if they do. Um,

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>if they don't do it, they're gonna have to come

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:28.920
<v Speaker 1>up with a lot of things. Final theme, banks banks

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for John Can we say banks for disappointment for two

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eighteen. In the last couple of weeks, banks,

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean the American financial institutions prospered out of the crisis,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.239
<v Speaker 1>unlike the European banks. Do you buy the value trap

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>or the value of deeply discounted Europe or do you

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>climb on board the existing American banking structure. Europe's a

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>big stretch for me, Tom, I don't really understand the

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>problems and how when it can solve them over there.

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the US banks, led by Jamie diamond are

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 1>where I want to be, and Jamie Diamonds Bank is

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>one of my larger holdings. So and and once again,

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>as we were talking a little bit earlier this morning,

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:10.080
<v Speaker 1>very reasonably priced twelve times runnings and two and a

0:07:10.120 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>half times, how do you respond to the actual assumption

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of four point one percent the United Kingdom annuities right now?

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It just keeps coming down, down down. Do you have

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>single digit gloom about equities or they can they do

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>better than that? I don't know, but I think we

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>would be foolish to presume we're going to have the

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>next ten years like the last TURS. Doesn't make any

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>sense to me. It could happen, but I don't think so. Yeah,

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Muhamma Hilarian just uh emailed and he says, say please

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>say hello to Michael holl And. He wants to know

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>could you be a quarterback for the New York Jets.

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Who it's too bad. Odell Beckham Jr. Did a number

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>last night. They went through Michael Barr. Would they go

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>through four or five quarterbacks? Oh? That that was awful.

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>First you have and then then the I mean the mono,

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>then you have the injury to the back up and

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>for the third string. Monday. Miss you missed, missed this

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 1>You miss jeffs Browns. Lucky you miss Jeff Browns. I'm sorry.

0:08:05.280 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>What do we go on? Michael Holland, thank you very much.

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Tom a word on the banks just quickly, Jp Morgan.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>This year City City up. So it might feel bad,

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's actually been pretty deep. So drinks around. Michael

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:37.360
<v Speaker 1>definitely on Michael and Michael get to see you. Thank you.

0:08:39.920 --> 0:08:42.840
<v Speaker 1>It's an important book, John Ferrell diving into it cover

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to cover, and it's on a set of narratives. He

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>joins us. Now the author of that book, Robert Shillen

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>University Professor, Bold Prize winner and the author of Narrative Economics,

0:08:55.040 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>How Stories Go viral and drive major economic events. Professor,

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>let's just begin with how important this field is, and

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>how relatively new it is, and how much work still

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>needs to be done. Just talk to us about it. Well,

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a revolution going on in economics starting

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>with the new UH data on. You can now search

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you can search everything, newspapers, magazines, shows, um diaries, sermons

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.319
<v Speaker 1>all over, and so we we we can now get

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>closer to reality than before when we just had aggregates

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>like GDP to to study. Now we can get into

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>what I think really drives the economy. It's changing patterns

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>of thinking and changing narratives that interpret the events for

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>us and also give an emotional color to it and

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 1>can shape the events as well. And I think that's

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>what's crucial to the to the field you're talking about

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. Talk to me about how this is

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>different to say, the theory of reflexivity that George Sorice

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>has really pushed along for markets, that markets can influence

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and shape the events they anticipate this feedback leak. There's

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>two way loops. Why is this different and how does

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>this build on that work in any way shape or form. Well,

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I read Sorrows book years ago and I thought that

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it was uh, it was intuitive and on target. I

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>thought he wasn't good at citing earlier people who said

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>similar things. It goes back to For example, in the

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forties, Robert K. Merton, sociologist, invented the term self

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.959
<v Speaker 1>fulfilling prophecy. So it goes it goes back to the

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth century if you searched properly. This is my habit.

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I always try to find win an idea appeared, So

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Reflectivity wasn't. It was a good book because it was

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>written by a successful man who was writing it from

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the straight from the heart. He really believed this, and

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>I think he was on target. You focus on a

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>range of things. What I'd like to focus on with

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you this morning is how public confidence is shaped and

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>influenced and where we are now. For those of you

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that don't get hold of the book, there was a

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>great article of the weekend altered by you, I believe

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>in the New York Times, setting off a recession with

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.599
<v Speaker 1>words I believe that came out last week told to

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 1>me about how public opinion is right now, and used

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>that as an example to explain to our listeners why

0:11:10.360 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>this field is so important. It's an important new field.

0:11:14.440 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that I've conquered it. I think it

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>will take decades for research to really give us some

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of accounting of the impact of narrative. There's always

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>many narratives. A lot of them are not what I

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>call economic narratives. They don't have anything to do with

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 1>economic activity, but it's certain ones of them do have. So.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>For example, the best example of a narrative is our

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>president Donald Trump. He has captured the imagination of the

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>entire world. It's all over. Uh, And why is it

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating? This is this is Uh? Why is he

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so fascinating? Well, obviously he got elected president, but how

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>did he get there? I think that these things are

0:11:57.080 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 1>poorly understood. And also the direct impact act that he

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>has on economic confidence and on willingness to spend are

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>also complicated. But did we get President Trump in the

0:12:09.200 --> 0:12:12.840
<v Speaker 1>many new populisms that we have simply because of a

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>new damp and GDP growth and indeed possibly a generational

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>terminal value that's less than acceptable for society and for politicians.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>GDP growth first became popular in the nineteen thirties. That's

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a narrative, uh, and uh, it's a religion now Uh yeah, well, uh.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>I think narratives tap into our deep feelings. And you

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>might sometimes think of narratives as representing a religion. So

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the idea that GDP growth is the primal measurement of

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>success is obviously wrong because GDP growth is highest in wartime,

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>when we're generally not happy at all, or maybe some

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>people are happy in wartime. I don't know. I mentioned

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it increasingly polarized at times of war. Professor, Let's just

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>finish up by talking about a news event this week,

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve, and then fold in this field that

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to explore in a much deeper way, how

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:16.320
<v Speaker 1>policymakers can influence beliefs and shape outcomes. How the chairman

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal Reserve can identify what the popular narrative

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is right now in the public and then influence shape outcomes. Well,

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:29.199
<v Speaker 1>I think Federal Reserve chair people know that it's very

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>important not just what they do, but what they say,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>uh and uh and so the problem is they don't

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:42.199
<v Speaker 1>have a discipline. They don't have scholarly research that will

0:13:42.280 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>help them know what. In stense, you have to read history.

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people are a major in history

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in college because you learn examples, and if it's good history,

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>it gets into the narratives and the stories. So in

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the past, uh, people have made miss So I'll give

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>you an example of what might have been a mistake,

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is cutting the lower bound for the federal

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:11.720
<v Speaker 1>funds rate to zero uh in right after the financial crisis.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 1>That might have been considered as completing the job, but

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>it also brings on a scary narrative. It reminds us

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:22.160
<v Speaker 1>of Japan and it's lost decade, and the narrative might

0:14:22.160 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have been more. Maybe they shouldn't have cut it all

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the way to zero. We need to think about that.

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back Robert Schiller with this. We have another

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 1>conversation with him coming up in the weeks on negative

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>interest rates in Europe. John True and Tom Keenan, this

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is great. We love when our team goes out and

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>finds good conversation without hysterics on whatever the issue of

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the moment is. John, what was cool is years ago

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you were cool on campus if you walked around with

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 1>something Robert Lacey wrote, and then you were cool. And

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>this took forever where you had the prize by Daniel

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Jurgen and only twelve people read it because it was

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so thick. Let me tell you you were walking around

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>with that book, you were shredded that that waits so much. Yeah,

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really I was cutting chiseled back then, but aways you

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you carried around Jurgen's surprise. Recently the book is ellen

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 1>walled Saudi Inc. And it's just only like a year

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>two old, and it's just become definitive on the machinery

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of the oil combine in Saudi, the Arabian Kingdom's pursuit

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of profit and power. Place to say that anam world

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is with us here in the studio of the Atlantic

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Council Global Energy Center. Good Monituellen, Good morning. Let's just

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:49.120
<v Speaker 1>believe we'll have a look into this story right in

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>front of our face right now, which is what is

0:15:50.920 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>happening with Saudi Aramco and Saudi Arabian all production. There

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>was a little bit of daylight between what the Kingdom

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is towning us about the output and when it comes

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>back online and what a Ramco is town Guess it

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 1>does seem that we're getting some conflicting signals that the

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom is really talking about very severe damage possibly months

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to get back online. And then we're also hearing though

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>from the company that they see a production coming back

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>much more quickly and also potentially by the end of September,

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:24.160
<v Speaker 1>even most of production returning. Who's that is the question

0:16:24.200 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of the hour and in charge of the company. We've

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>got Amnoster who's the CEO. Very reliable, very very professional people.

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a very professional company. It's run like an

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>American company based on its its American roots. They really

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>pride themselves in working basically like like Exxon. But then

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>on the other side, you've got the Saudi royal family.

0:16:47.160 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>You've got the government, the monarchy, and of course Mohammad

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 1>bin Salman, who has other priorities in mind. Potentially you

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>nail it with your epilog page tune in fifty three.

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>For their sons, there's been this trance for a royal

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>power and royal prerogative. Do the son's in your book?

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Did they look at a Ramco and all that oil

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is ours? Or is there really any understanding of spinning

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it off to some public ownership. And this is the

0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 1>real question. And I actually addressed that in a new

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.440
<v Speaker 1>epilogue that has just been written and comes out with

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the paperback version of the book, which is that's the plunk,

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the um. It's actually available now in bookstores wherever

0:17:32.960 --> 0:17:36.119
<v Speaker 1>good books are sold. That's enough anyway. But but the

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>question is is really really gets a heart of the matter,

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>because for many years the Saudi royal family saw this

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>company as their life blood. Do they stage well, that

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>is the question. Do we know well? Prince Mohammed and

0:17:50.480 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Salma has said that he sees the company as an

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>asset to be sold, which is very different from how

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>his forefathers and forebears saw the company. When when you're

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>got a RAM call, what's your knowledge of the pipes

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of valves? I mean, have you been out there and

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>actually seen these refineries? Um, I've seen some of them. Yes,

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>they're all modern, state of the art, right. Oh, this

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.159
<v Speaker 1>is this is top of the line equipment. This is

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>top of the line stuff. If a RAM who is

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the best that? Why can't they fix this quickly? I mean,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I understand there was colossal damage and we don't know yet,

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>John Dewey, we really don't. But come on, I mean,

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, you bring in the U. S Military and

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the Kuwaiti Navy or whatever and you get this fixed, right.

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>So part of the issue is that they're very concerned

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:37.400
<v Speaker 1>about safety and the sites that were hit UM contained

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>very volatile material and so they had to shut down

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the entire facility in order to assess the damage. But

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>only some of the particular goosps the gas oil separation

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.679
<v Speaker 1>plans were damaged. Others are completely undamaged, and it's expected

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to bring that back online very quickly.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And then the other thing that a RAMCO does is

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:00.360
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of built in resiliency and they

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>know how to have the parts and bring the parts

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in and repair it, so we can I think we

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>can expect that they may bring production back online faster

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>than is expected. I've always found diplomacy within OPAQUE absolutely

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:16.360
<v Speaker 1>fascinating how countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran can get

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 1>along with each other within OPEC, and then obviously outside

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of OPEC there's major issues. I just wonder how much

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>more complicated it gets now Alpha has gone and he's

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>been replaced by Prince Amtulasie has been sellow. How complicated

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>there things now that someone a member of the family

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is running energy policy within OPEQ. And that's an entirely

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>new area to get into because the Saudis have never

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 1>had a royal family member running oil policy and oil diplomacy.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>They've always had a professional, either someone from a RAMCO

0:19:50.480 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>or really someone dedicated in the ministry who's not a

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:58.159
<v Speaker 1>family member. So that OPEC meeting in December in Vienna

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a big, big deal. Are seeing

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 1>how Iran and Saudi Arabia get along there? If you're

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just joining us, ellen Wald, with us out of Jacksonville University,

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and also with the Atlantic Council of course the important

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 1>book Saudi inc The Arabian Kingdom's pursuit of profit and power.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Thrilled that she could join John and uh Me this morning.

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>Your future is flat, allen Wald, if if we look

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>at the sum total of Saudi, there's always been and

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 1>this is where your Middle East history expertise really comes

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in a narrowness or separateness to their religious Islamic experiment

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>versus the adjacent Arab states. Is that at play here

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in their response or are they communicating with their adjacent

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>states in a new more modern way. Well, believe it

0:20:44.160 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or not, we just had news that this howdy government

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>is instructing the leaders in mosques to discuss what happened

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>with a Ramco in their Friday sermons and what is

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.199
<v Speaker 1>the symbolism of them. Well, it's a symbolism that you

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>really cannot totally disconnect one from the other, and that

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>the importance of the mosque and the importance of the

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship between the Saudi monarchy and the Islamic clerical establishment

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is really still key and plays a key role in

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.080
<v Speaker 1>how they communicate with their people. Explain, I'm going to

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 1>understand that the distance from Yemen to Saudi means it's

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.439
<v Speaker 1>clearly this was not an attack from Yemen. But explain

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 1>the triangulation of riod Yemen and Tehran, so they're clearly

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.479
<v Speaker 1>pretty close to each other. Um, Iran is across the Gulf,

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:32.919
<v Speaker 1>and Yemen is is now below. But there is this

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>association between the rebels and Yemen, the Hoothies and the Iranians,

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>and for a while that that connection was a bit suspect.

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But I've even heard of American military people have told

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.920
<v Speaker 1>me that when they were on tour in the Gulf,

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they saw the little boats ferrying things from Iran to

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Yemen right across across the Gulf and ferrying the supplise.

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's clear that, Um, you know that there

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>is an association between Iran and the rebels in Yemen,

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>and that there is coordination involved in these attacks on

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia. Why do you think we'll end up in

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the blame game? Just read the Ta Leaves force as

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>you see things right now. Yeah, this is this is

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a big question. The US is pretty firmly identifying Iran

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>as the culport here, but Saudi Arabia seems to be

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>taking a step back and saying, well, we think the

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>equipment came from Iran, but we're not going to go

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>ahead and blame them entirely. Let's bring in the U

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>n And I think that this is a recognition of

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that NBS doesn't want to go to war

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>against Iran, and if he comes out and says Iran

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>attacked us, he would be incumbent upon him to respond,

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>and he can't or he knows he doesn't want to

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>get into that. We mentioned the heritage here of all

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of our reading on air the Arab States, Robert Lacey

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and Daniel Jurgen and others. How far removed are we

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>from our myths and our stereotypes of our relationship and

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>oil in the Arab States. In Saudi Arabia, so oil

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:01.120
<v Speaker 1>has always operated kind of outside of a lot of

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the traditional issues in terms of say, Sunnisia conflict. Oil

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>has always been been kind of outside of that. And

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>like you said, Iran and Saudi Arabia can work together

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in oil, whereas in other respects they can't. But they

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't always get along in oil. The countries have different objectives,

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>so they are able to step step out of that

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>context at times. Okay, we we've learned that you're Our

0:23:28.440 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>entourage has learned that you're a New York Giants fan.

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I am. Here's Manning done. I don't think he's done yet.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got at least another season in him. Okay,

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:41.800
<v Speaker 1>there we go. Now we've got some real information we

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>can use. And then thank you. I'm getting them screaming

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>in my ass. She's got to go dr Wild. Thank

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you so much. Wonderful books. The Arabian Kingdom's pursuit of profits. Now,

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>don't they don't talk to me. They just talk to

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you and tell me anything. Oh, I think she's going

0:24:01.720 --> 0:24:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to the TV chat. Well it's good. I don't know.

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not distressed because in the studio is the right

0:24:23.000 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 1>guy to talk about oil supply and demand. Here is

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.439
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sanky with missol. Paul, I've got to ask you

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this question. I've got an Oxford Institute twenty one page

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>uh paper on the dynamics of supply and demand as

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>we go into Saudian and a Ramco. How tight was

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the market on Friday? On Friday, the market wasn't tight

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>at all. Everyone was worried about Actually we did see

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>inventory's drawing in the second half now um, but we

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>had a really significant non opaque, non US growth in

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>the market as well as the US growth, and that

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was looking overwhelming for all this happened. The thrust of

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>the paper is demand really matters? What's the backdrop of

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>global oil demand? Given what the shock that Saudi's head, well,

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the numbers were drifting as low as only

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>six hundred thousand barrels a day of demand growth next year.

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.160
<v Speaker 1>That was sort of the new paradigm of concerns about

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy. All the various indicators that we see slowing

0:25:20.840 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>down economically globally, the major agencies are still above a

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>million of growth next year. It is very obviously very

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>GDP sensitive, so we'll have to see. For example, these

0:25:32.080 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>attacks are obviously a challenge for China in terms of

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>their dependence on imported Middle Eastern oil so we'll have

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to see how things roll through. We're still at around

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a million barrels a day of growth for next year.

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 1>What we've done is we've aggressively cut our Saudi numbers obviously,

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>so Paul, it's in a sense getting a sense of

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>where to cut your Saudi numbers. It seems like the

0:25:51.400 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>news coming out of day out of the Kingdom is

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>this might be a little bit longer than a that

0:25:56.840 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe what we thought yesterday, This might be in terms

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of disruption to play a little bit longer. Yeah, the

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>new the new Oil Minister is doing a press conference

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.479
<v Speaker 1>at one fifteen Eastern New York time this afternoon, so

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:11.239
<v Speaker 1>presumably we'll get an update there. We're all struck by

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the accuracy of the attacks. Every tank was hit almost

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.399
<v Speaker 1>identical spot. Yeah. What we're also hearing is that some

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the missiles didn't make it. So they have the missiles,

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>so they're going to be able to do a lot

0:26:23.480 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>of intelligence on the ones that didn't explode. But everyone

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>right now is pointing towards the border of Iran Iraq

0:26:30.680 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>as the source of the missile, so we'll see if

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:34.879
<v Speaker 1>they have anything to add on that. When the All

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Minister speaks no doubt the all Minister given Saudi has

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>been very good at communicating to the market. We'll be

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>talking about the outage and how long it's going to last.

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>But as noted by Tom, it seems a sorry by you.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>It seems it seems that this outage is gonna Actually,

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>my anti missile defenses are up, Tom, whenever I come

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>on the radio with you, nervously waiting for you to

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>put a humbling around me. But no, you know, I

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 1>think the first reports were it's going to be back

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>by Monday were inexplicable, inexplicable, couldn't cann't work that out

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.359
<v Speaker 1>at all, And we were very skeptical were coming into

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>this particular issue. I had a kind of felt like

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>what was really driving oil? Talking to people like you

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>as more of the demand side of the equation, and

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and you know, thinking about maybe perhaps a global recession

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 1>coming and that's really pushing down oil prices. But now

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that you have to that's the supply side of the

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.200
<v Speaker 1>equation of your business comes much more into play now. Yeah,

0:27:26.280 --> 0:27:28.320
<v Speaker 1>all things being equal, and I'm thinking back to the

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>global financial crisis. But let's say a normal recession, there

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't that much range on demand. You know, let's say

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>it's between a half a million in a very bad

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>year this population pressure obviously, and then one one and

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a half you know, million of growth would be a

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>very good year. So there's only a one million range arguably.

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>And as you know, what we've seen here is a

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>five point seven million loss of supply from the Central

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Oil. You know, that's kind of far bigger

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>than anything that will happen on the demand side, although

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>demand can be weak too here of course on a

0:27:58.040 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>substitute basis. Can people at the margin just put it

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>on where we're in or Nigeria or Kuwait or Russia

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>or America put it on at the margins, so it's

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the gap evapiate evaporates quickly, No, because there's no spell capacity.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the only specupacity we have is in U

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>A E and Q eight right right around where the

0:28:18.440 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>action is. Because what we're all terrified and on tents

0:28:21.040 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hooks about here is what's the Saudi response is going

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to be. I mean, are they just going to sit

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 1>back and take this or is there going to be

0:28:25.680 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>some sort of military response? And what will the US

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:33.359
<v Speaker 1>do in that context? So there's no specpassion and Venezuela.

0:28:33.440 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>There is maybe some in Nigeria, but they've been producing

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>full on. There's none in One risk is Libya, which

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>is performing quite well right now, that could go down

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and then of course a doubt that sanctions are going

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to be alleviated on Iran given the current news play.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>What does Kuwait do to defend those fields? I mean,

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a Falklands work question. After the exercise missile

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:58.160
<v Speaker 1>took how does Kuwait defend themselves into this this Tuesday

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>evening into Wednesday? As a mayor, your question, if Saudi

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>has spent as much as Saudi has spent on defense, um,

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, puts towards a hundred billion dollars of spending

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on on we thought defense against this kind of attack,

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and it seems like there was zero defense when it hits.

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>So I'm sure the quwaities and others are all reviewing

0:29:16.920 --> 0:29:19.240
<v Speaker 1>everything that you know, everything that they're doing in terms

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>of safety because this was a totally shocking and very

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>dramatically impactful attack. Give us a sense for here in

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the US, we always hear about shale shale share. We

0:29:28.360 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>can flood the market with crewe, but that's not the issue.

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, it's just the refining capacity, it's just

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>not there. Is that also true here in the US,

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And well, we're okay. For the main problem in refining

0:29:39.360 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>at the moment is actually the type of crew that's available.

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So we've got too much light sweet basically and not

0:29:44.000 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>enough heavy sour and a big part of that sweet

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.640
<v Speaker 1>versus heavy sour. Yeah, So essentially the refining system in

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the US is optimized to use a harder to refine

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>higher sulfur barrel, which is typically cheaper than the US

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>shale growth, which is a it's easier to refine low

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>self for barrel. It's not the end of the world

0:30:03.880 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>because you can actually refine light sweet in a heavy

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.360
<v Speaker 1>sour refinery. It's just not optimal. But you can't refine

0:30:09.360 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>heavy sour and a light sweet refinery. So, you know,

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>we watched carefully for for for the capacity issues that

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we're facing. The capex of the industry in general refining

0:30:18.760 --> 0:30:22.320
<v Speaker 1>and e MP is constrained at the moment. It's a

0:30:22.320 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>new theme for e MP, and we're urging the companies

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>not to go out and chase the higher price, but

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to please finally generate free cash FLA I got twenty

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>seconds left. What will you listen for this one pm

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:39.040
<v Speaker 1>press conference? Well he's new, so that's interesting. We know him,

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but it is his first major announcement as energy minister.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>We want to know how long this stuff is out for,

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, how when are the when are what barrel's

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>coming back and what time frame. At the moment, we're

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.959
<v Speaker 1>forecasting seven million a day of Staudy production in Q four,

0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>so that's are over under For what we take away

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>from this definitive Paul Sanky, missour, we are thrilled you

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>could find time to come by to Mr Sank. He

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>has been doing this for a few years. It's far back.

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>I remember him and Adams Saminsky at Deutsche Bank. It

0:31:05.640 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>comes to just stopped. They had a spreadsheet on the back, Paul,

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and you read it like gosp Of course, the Saminsky

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Sanky brilliance here he is. You get lucky and we

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 1>do with the Natamadi. She's Parker Professor of Economics and

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Finance as Stanford University, squirming here uncontrollably listening to the

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>capitalist gates James Madison. If memory angels, no government would

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>be necessary. Is it necessary to break up the tech companies? Well,

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree with with the the gates here in the

0:31:53.360 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>sense that we have to see what it is we

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>don't like and we have to go at that. So

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>breaking up by itself, it's the same for banks. It's

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>just that sort of quickie SoundBite, but exactly what problem.

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>In other ways, the size becomes a symptom of the problem,

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and so treating just a symptom is not going to

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily take care of the underlying problem. So if the

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>underlying problem anti competitive behaviors or dark pattern use of

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:23.240
<v Speaker 1>contract or whatever, we have to outload that. Where are

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the shadows right now? In banking Even your harshest critics

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>hang on your every word so they can think smarter

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>about what's out there. Where are the shadows in two

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty, Well, I mean we have a lot of

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>places where fragilities can can hit the banking system. I

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:45.239
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a lot of rumbling in Europe, there's uh

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.080
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of trade wars going on, there's lots of

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there's cyber always there. There could be anything that could

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>hit a deck of cards that power um Tom. I

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>also to bring our viewers and of course the professor

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>up to date with what's going on right now in

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the nind Kingdom, which is Boris Johnson and his lawyers,

0:33:07.920 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>though he's not actually going there himself at the High Court,

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>but his strategy certainly is coming under scrutiny at the

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court of the UK. Hearings have become in London

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and they will laugh about three days. The court actually

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>has not given a ruling date, but of course we'll

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>continuing will be continuing to watch this live stream and

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>bring you up to date with anything that we're hearing.

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's get back to and at Mty the finance and

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>economics professor at Stanford and professor when you look at

0:33:36.040 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 1>some of the concerns right, it's basically that we still

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have a fragile and unhealthy financial system. What would make

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it better? What regulation would you look at so that

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we feel safer in the next crisis. Well, one thing

0:33:49.200 --> 0:33:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I've been arguing for is that we have to first

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>of all assess the level of fragility and indebtedness and

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>interconnectedness in this market, and then that we have to

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>act reduce it. Because the incentives in the system are

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to remain fragile. People within it benefit from that, and

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us are endangered. So a fragile system

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is sort of inherent in banking, but not for good reasons.

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.399
<v Speaker 1>So just basically, once you fragile, you want to just

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 1>basically live on debt all the time, and it just

0:34:20.840 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>gets ratcheted up and shortened maturities, and not all of

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:27.959
<v Speaker 1>it is for for for good. Everybody chasing yields now

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:31.359
<v Speaker 1>and and and going for their short term you know,

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>dividends or pay out on their co cot securities or

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, and so all of that ends up

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>building up more fragility in the system. So I think,

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but we need to take care of that. The professor

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is the right person to regulate this, right, because I

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:48.960
<v Speaker 1>keep on being told that actually, you know, no matter what,

0:34:49.120 --> 0:34:51.520
<v Speaker 1>bankers don't want to out of regulate themselves because they

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>always try and get away with as much as they can,

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and regulators, you know, probably don't understand as much as

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the complex issues as they should it. That's right. So

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:05.960
<v Speaker 1>so regulators are using all kinds of metrics for safety

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:08.840
<v Speaker 1>and stress tess and a lot of complicated things that

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:11.399
<v Speaker 1>involve a lot of assumptions. And we saw that before

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis, and I'm sorry to say that in principle.

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>They're using some of the same approaches to this system

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and the same structure of the flawed structure of the regulation,

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:27.479
<v Speaker 1>and that's that's kind of dismaying. Let's say negative interest rates.

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of smart people out of Stanford.

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We were talking to Professor Schulder of a school on

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the East coast earlier about this. How do you fold

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a not a body, the shadows in the dynamics of

0:35:40.239 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheets into this thing. You didn't study it

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Yale when you took your PhD. You're a negative interest rates,

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:48.919
<v Speaker 1>the negative interest it's not in our textbook. We're gonna

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>have to rewrite. That's a social extory, isn't it not?

0:35:52.320 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Clear markets? Right, it's upside down. Everything about negative interest

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>rate is kind of but on a hiacheon basis we

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.839
<v Speaker 1>have a fear of loss, don't we? Yes? I mean we.

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It's it's all like, you know, puts you in a

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>territory that we don't. I'm not sure you know your

0:36:11.239 --> 0:36:14.600
<v Speaker 1>next week title. Extend and pretend. That's what we're doing here, right,

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Very good one, because the kicking camps down road. Extending

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and pretending is just the name been the name of

0:36:20.480 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the game in in certainly in the financial sector for

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 1>forever alright, a professor does the next recession or is

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the next financial crisis? You know, is it around the corner?

0:36:31.760 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And is it because of what you've just laid out

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:38.280
<v Speaker 1>quite clearly, you know, a frangile system is just prone

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to to you know, something happening and triggering a collapse

0:36:43.560 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially or panic and runs. Uh. You know. Jamie Diamond

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:51.840
<v Speaker 1>told the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission that he told his

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>daughter around the time of the financial crisis um when

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>she asked him what that, what's a financial crisis? He said, Oh,

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just something that happens every know what he said,

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>five seven, ten years So by that count, we're kind

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of doful one since it was the big one ten

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:09.279
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and we are kind of uh extending and

0:37:09.320 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 1>pretending since then. So I now have in my slides,

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I take the latest headlines of where it's

0:37:16.040 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>going to come from, and you know, people are gonna

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>say it's gonna come from the same place as before,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 1>leverage loans or clos or something else. And you know,

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's not clear. Are you in New York to

0:37:25.600 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>see James Diamond that you came. He came to talk

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.279
<v Speaker 1>to Mr Diamond about the future banking. No, but but

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>there were there were bankers in a conference and to

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.439
<v Speaker 1>big to faime financial stability bodies. Professor, wonderful to catch

0:37:38.520 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 1>up in. Congratulations on your continuing research at Stanford, Professor

0:37:42.760 --> 0:37:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Body Partner, Professor at Stanford GSP. Thanks for listening to

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on Winter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You can

0:38:03.080 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio