WEBVTT - Inflation Data amid Equity Push Higher

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Surveillance Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at seven am Eastern

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple CarPlay or Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>We start strong her with special coverage and a Sizerowski

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.479
<v Speaker 2>joins us with Morgan Stanley. I mean, you got a

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 2>nominal GDP, Andrew, but you got a new mix of

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 2>lower GDP and persistent inflation. How does that change the

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.080
<v Speaker 2>application of new money into the bond market.

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think that when you look at what the

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 3>bond market's pricing in for Fed and Center bank policy,

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 3>you see the bond market's actually doing some of the

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 3>work for the Fed. They're tightening financial conditions a little bit.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 3>At the same time, obviously this stock markets rallying and

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 3>spreads are tightening and credit but those two things are

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of offsetting each other. I think one of the

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 3>reasons the Fed doesn't have to be too concerned with

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 3>inflation is you talked about that personal income number, which

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 3>was zero percent a month over month. If you look

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 3>at something like Atlanta FED Wage tracker, it's wages are

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 3>tracking three point six percent wage growth year over year.

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>We have three point eight percent uh per PCE price inflation,

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 3>so those are negative real wages. This is something that

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 3>price increases aren't sustainable on a real basis if either

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the consumer is going to have to tap their savings

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 3>or they're going to cut back on spending. And I

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 3>think that's why the one thing the Fed has going

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>for it right now.

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 2>It beautifully frames it. Folks. I can't say enough about

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.160
<v Speaker 2>that analysis of the Atlanta wage tracker and Sizeronski, thank

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 2>you for joining us here with this key economic data.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 2>With Mortgane standing like Paul on the data screen, what

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>do you see, I'm just like Themar's looking for Knicks tickets.

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, exactly, You're right pricing those out to your treasury

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 4>up a couple of basis points four point zero five

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 4>percent and then tenure up only about one basis point

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 4>four point four nine percent.

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 2>This is a treat, folks. Ira Jersey definitive a dominant

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.240
<v Speaker 2>constumment credit Swee years ago trying to guess out the

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>interest rate tendency he now holds court driving all of

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 2>credit at Bloomberg Intelligence. Iral, if you were in the

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 2>chair with Dominique like this morning, and you had to

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 2>guess out those inflate those guestimates, those forecast tales of

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 2>what yield would be. Is it a higher yield.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's a higher yield because basically this is old

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 5>data and old news. You know, the market this morning

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 5>at least is really concentrating on where is oil today?

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Right and oil is up a couple of bucks at

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 5>the moment because it the strikes overnight by the US.

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 5>So people are looking through this data and obviously there's

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 5>also so much data to digest here that you know,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:56.119
<v Speaker 5>we're all like quite full right now, so we're trying

0:02:56.160 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 5>to parse out what's the most important bits of this.

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 5>And you noted, Tom that the spending being flat a

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 5>month on month is actually, uh, excuse me. The income

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.839
<v Speaker 5>being flat month a month actually is not very good

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 5>because when now we have negative income in large part,

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 5>maybe it could drive the economy.

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:17.920
<v Speaker 2>A little bit weaker.

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 5>And you know, along with the weaker than expected GDP

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 5>number for the first quarter, you know that's not necessarily

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 5>a particularly good sign, even though the inflation data was

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 5>a little bit better than expected.

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 2>So just the.

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Headline, I'm a headline kind of person. Ira, You're the

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 4>one that digs twenty seven layers deep. But the headline

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 4>annualized three point eight percent PCE Price Index. I mean,

0:03:39.920 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 4>that's got to get the attention of folks, not just

0:03:42.560 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 4>the FED, but I don't know around Washington and policymakers

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 4>and things like that. How do you what's a three

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 4>point eight percent number mean to you?

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, well, it means for one thing, that it's going

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 5>to be really difficult for Kevin Worsh to increase to

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 5>lower interest rates, right, Like, how can you lower interest

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 5>rates when you know not only are you running above

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 5>target in terms of your favored your favorite inflation measure.

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 5>So even if you trim out some of the details

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 5>of this, and we haven't been able to do that

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 5>yet because it's obviously the number just came out, but

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 5>even if you trim it out, you're still going to

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 5>be above the two percent target that the FED set.

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:18.039
<v Speaker 5>So it's going to be hard for Kevin Worsh to

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:20.599
<v Speaker 5>convince other members of the FED to even think about

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 5>cutting interest rates. So I think for now, when it

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 5>comes to least interest rate policy, you're more likely to

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 5>see the Fed on hold until and unless one the

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 5>war ends. And then two if there's major changes to

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 5>the employment situation, which you know obviously we'll get more

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 5>of that next.

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.599
<v Speaker 2>Week this wall of data. And as I said before, folks,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean there's a dynamic here to nominal GDP in

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>its new territory. For Chairman worsh Ira Jersey, do you

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 2>have an historic analog he can plug in or is

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 2>he in new territory?

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 5>I think in many respects he's a new territory because

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 5>even though like you could argue, and some people have

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 5>argued that we're we're moving toward a stagflationary type environment

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 5>because real growth should slow given that you might have

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 5>a lot more of people's spending having to go to

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 5>fuels and gasoline. But then people then talk about electrification,

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 5>and then you know, we're not talking about you know,

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 5>ten percent inflation rates like we had back in the

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 5>nineteen seventies and early eighties. We're talking more about you know,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.280
<v Speaker 5>three or four percent inflation, right which historically speaking, when

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 5>you go back even to you know, earlier in my career,

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.799
<v Speaker 5>you go back thirty years when I started this business,

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 5>we were talking about you know, two point eight percent

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 5>three percent in a PC deflator that was fine, and

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 5>that was normal, right, So so that is more sustainable, right.

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 5>Inflation like we have today is somewhat more sustainable than

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 5>inflation at nine or ten percent like we had a

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 5>few years ago, just because you know, at least over

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 5>the last few years, you've seen wages growing at four percent,

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 5>so that means you still had real wages going up,

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 5>which is the reason why that personal income number I

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 5>think is a little bit disturbing to me, and I

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 5>want to dig into that a little bit more because

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.320
<v Speaker 5>if we do have negative real wages, that's when you

0:06:06.360 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 5>wind up seeing pretty aggressive slowing in the economy on

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 5>a forward basis. And so we want to see is

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 5>this the start of a trend or is this just

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 5>like a one off measure because you know, Social Security

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 5>payments were delayed or something like that. So we have

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 5>to dig into the details of some of this. So unfortunately, Paul,

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.599
<v Speaker 5>I do have to dig into those details to be

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 5>able to get you more information.

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 4>Again, I'm not a details guy. I'm right on the surface.

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 4>But I see personal income flat, I see my GDP

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 4>number come in below expectations.

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 2>Okay, it feels like segflation. This is brilliant Paul Ira,

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 2>all of us think, like Paul, it's ugly out there.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Does the bond market signal that so?

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, the bond market's signaling that it's really worried about inflation. Right,

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 5>So when you look at like that two year yield,

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 5>which we you know, we talk about being very sensitive

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 5>to policy rates, and of course it is. But when

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 5>you look at what's sold off and why it's sold

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 5>off so much, it's also because inflation expectations in the

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 5>short term have really gone up pretty significantly. They've gone

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 5>up forty ish basis points in terms of the two

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 5>year tips break even. So if we wind up getting

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 5>a situation where oil gets back down sustainably to eighty

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 5>dollars a barrel, you can wind up seeing two year

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 5>yields get back to kind of where the Fed funds

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:22.760
<v Speaker 5>rate is right now. While we get down below that,

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 5>I doubt it, because the market's still going to price

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 5>for the Fed to be on hold, probably for a

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 5>pretty long period of time. But you can easily get

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 5>a thirty basis point rally on just on inflation expectations

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 5>going down. Now, the long end of the curve is

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 5>not only worried about inflation and in fact, inflation expectations

0:07:41.560 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 5>longer term have barely moved. It's that what's going on

0:07:44.640 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 5>with the fiscal situation will budgets globally wind up getting

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 5>even worse because of either defense spending or social spending

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:58.040
<v Speaker 5>to kind of combat people's people having to spend more

0:07:58.080 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 5>on energy.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>And that's one of the reasons. While you've seen this global.

0:08:01.360 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 5>Bond sell off. So you know, we talk about US

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 5>thirty year being over five percent, Sure it is, but

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 5>this really is a global phenomena. You look at Japan

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 5>with you know, interest rates that haven't been this is

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 5>in decades. The UK is still having some of its

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:17.480
<v Speaker 5>own fiscal problems, so you wind up seeing all government

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 5>bond yields go up. And one of the triggers for that,

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 5>obviously was the warrant I ran, but I don't see

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 5>what makes what makes yields go down quickly over the

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 5>next couple of a couple of months in the long

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 5>end of the curve.

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 2>In particular, Paul, was that too much detail?

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 5>That was good?

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 2>He's always just killing me. He's going to staff of

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty five people, Yeah, Ira Jersey with US folks, and

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of course all of his expertise and fixed income is

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 2>noted particularly unreadable documents on the short space like the

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 2>trust market, commercial paper and libor ois or so for SOFR.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>We are pleased to announce it after negotiation with mister

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Jersey's representatives that Ira will join us in a new capacity.

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 2>He will be the surveillance World Cup reporter. Nice, this

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>is good. We got to staggered tot June eleventh, Mexico City,

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 2>South Africa as well. Ira first before we get to

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the World Cup. Psg Arsenal this weekend. Describe how big

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.839
<v Speaker 2>a game that is to the world except Americans who

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.320
<v Speaker 2>don't care. Well.

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 5>In many ways, it is the pinnacle of global soccer football,

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 5>if you want to call it that, which I do,

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 5>because the club game is much better in terms of

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 5>quality actually than the international game is. Even though you

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 5>wind up having the biggest stars on these teams that

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 5>go to the World Cup, they're only together for one month.

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 5>You know. They literally everyone just reported the camp except

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 5>for the guy who went PSC and Arsenal this week,

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 5>so it's not like they have a lot of time together.

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 5>Whereas you know PSG and Arsenal, they've been training since

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 5>last August for this very so so it is going

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 5>to be some of the best football.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 5>It is a final, so that tends to be a

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 5>little kg. But PSGA in particular, they just know how

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 5>to attack. Arsenal can be a little bit more tactical,

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 5>I think, and I do suspect that Arsenal probably has

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 5>the edge in this game, but it's it is going

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:17.320
<v Speaker 5>to be one to watch for sure.

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Was that a good, good first bout with our World

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Cup correspondent, Irish Jersey, Thank you so much. Driving all

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a fixed income can't say enough about his commitment to

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey youth soccer. His team's rocking it this year

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Irish Jersey and again going to came out to June eleven,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Mexico City Stadium, Mexico and South South Africa. I should

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 2>say here Matt Winmer has been more than patient portfolio

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>manager all spring and he joins us for too short

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 2>a visit this morning. Matt, is the American economy sluggish

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 2>at one point six percent GDP? Is that the new standard? Yeah,

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a it's a great question.

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 6>I mean, as bottom up portfolio managers, I think we're

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 6>really focused on what those fundamentals are doing right now,

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 6>and I think that really helps kind of separate the

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 6>noise from the signal. And if you if you look

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 6>at what's happening within the earning cycle right now, we've

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 6>seen some really strong growth projected even for you know,

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 6>for this year and for next year, and so we

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 6>really have a strong belief that that that true long

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 6>term value of a company is their future stream of

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 6>cash flows, and they still look really strong right now.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 4>So, Matt, we've seen, you know, the economic data today

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 4>suggests maybe this economy is entering some form of stagflation here,

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.600
<v Speaker 4>but boy, we don't see that in the earnings, do we.

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 4>What do you make of that?

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, look, I think that's I think that's important. There's

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 6>we just came out of COVID with a strong monetary

0:11:45.000 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 6>and fiscal response and now you're throwing on top of

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 6>that this this AI kind of cap X boom, and

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 6>I think that's really kind of elevating things right now.

0:11:53.040 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 6>And I think that's why the fundamentals continue to be

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 6>strong right now.

0:11:56.840 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Matt.

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 4>I know you guys, and we talked to An Lettis, Well,

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 4>you guys are bottoms up folks. You really roll up

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 4>the sleeves and do the work.

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Here.

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 4>What sectors or what factors are screening well for you

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 4>guys these days.

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, good question.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 6>I think a big part of what we're doing right

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 6>now is just focusing on diversification. I think that's going

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.439
<v Speaker 6>to be important going forward. I think concentration risk is

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 6>real at this point. It's important to take a holistic approach,

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 6>especially with the AI ecosystem. CAPEX dollars are going to

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:30.440
<v Speaker 6>start spreading across the value chain. Look, it's important to stay,

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 6>you know, involved in those big cap tech names like

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 6>the mag seven. They're going to continue to play an

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 6>important part of the buildout of AI, but it's important

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 6>to start allocating some of those investment dollars to other

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 6>areas of the market. So we're kind of thinking about

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 6>that AI ecosystem is how having five layers, you know,

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 6>That's something that Jensen introduced back at Davos earlier this year.

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 6>We're incorporating that into our investment kind of exposure across

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 6>the AI chain, and it's important to have exposure to

0:12:57.920 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 6>all five layers.

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 2>Mat One final question is a tendency here. Are you

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 2>owning fewer items in an equity portfolio? Are you concentrating

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 2>or are you going out to a more traditional one hundred,

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and even three hundred holdings.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, typically for our strategy, we tend to be a

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 6>little bit more concentrated. It's usually in that forty five

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 6>to fifty names.

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 2>We think that's enough.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 6>Exposure and diversification to allegate across to make sure that.

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>You don't get whips on.

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 6>But it also gives you an opportunity to be intentful

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 6>in your exposure and in your bets across the portfolio.

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Matt, thank you so much. Bett Whitmer with us with

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 2>all Spring this morning on the Equity at Market. Stay

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 2>with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us live

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern. Listen oncarplay

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app, or watch

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Well Nelson, you with us now head equities Alliance Bernstein.

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 2>What are you publishing or what are you planning a

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 2>tone into the weekend publishing? What are you thinking about?

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 7>I'm thinking about actually some of the things that you

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 7>just talked about. So you talk about these mixed prices,

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:24.280
<v Speaker 7>why are they so high? It's because of scarcity. But

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.680
<v Speaker 7>if you think about this economy, it really is a

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 7>scarcity economy. And so not only oil and the drivers

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 7>of inflation there, but AI and this Capex build out

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 7>that we've seen could really be a driver for inflation

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 7>going forward. And there's real scarcity there.

0:14:42.000 --> 0:14:43.720
<v Speaker 2>And on long ago, I believe is with us in

0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.640
<v Speaker 2>this hour would say the same thing. I mean, when

0:14:46.640 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 2>you were at Pennsylvania and you take that e concourse,

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 2>the first chapter is scarcity. So if prices up and

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 2>there's scarcity, new product comes in, do you anticipate that.

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 7>I think there's there is a very strong demand right now,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 7>and I do see that as we've seen over the

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 7>last few years. What we've seen is layer upon layer

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 7>of this AI supply chain getting bid up. As we

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 7>need to do this build out. I think there are

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 7>more layers to go. This supply chain is quite long.

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 4>The supply that supply chain is that include international and

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 4>emergent markets.

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 7>It does, and obviously Korean tae want to participate in

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 7>that by quite a bit, yep. But I think, look,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 7>you also have producers of like say print circuit boards,

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 7>and those are places that just have been in the

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 7>doldrooms for decades because there are such commoditized products, but

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 7>now they're very specialized because there's only so few of

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 7>them left.

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:51.800
<v Speaker 4>Can emerging in international markets, particularly emerging markets, work with

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 4>this energy. I'm not sure if it's a crisis a

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 4>challenge that we're seeing globally here with energy.

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 7>It certainly is going to put challenges on emerging markets

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 7>and definitely some of these economies that are dependent on energy.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 7>But I think there are also a lot of other

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 7>catalysts across emerging markets that are beyond just the energy story.

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 7>So if you think about emerging markets in Korea. In China,

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 7>we've got a lot of governance reform and you've got

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 7>regulatory reforms that are focused on improving corporate profitability. So

0:16:23.720 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 7>it's not just the technology companies and the semiconductors and

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 7>memory makers in Korea, but it's also the banks that

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 7>are returning more capital to shareholders.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 2>You were at Penn and they're hugely important engineering sequence.

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 2>I remember walking in the class from an aerospace going

0:16:40.040 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>systems analysis What a joke, and you're like two weeks

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 2>into it and you're going, oh, this is really hard

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>logic theory in all take your engineering classic systems analysis

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 2>and put it into the process that's coming down the pike.

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, it's funny that you say, you know

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 7>you thought about the gut course that was systems engineering.

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 7>It actually has turned out to be some of the

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 7>most important education.

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, there's the most important course I took, right, got

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 2>a quality see trust me continue.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 7>I do think actually in today's and age, when information

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.719
<v Speaker 7>is so readily available, that information edge that portfolio managers

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 7>used to have has just been compressed. I think the

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 7>next edge that we have to have as active managers

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 7>is the process edge, and I think of it as

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 7>you have to have a very robust process for being

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 7>able to create that durable and distinctive performance patterns that

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.719
<v Speaker 7>clients look for. That starts with a clear definition of

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 7>research excellence. What is the differentiated research that we're doing. Tom,

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 7>I'm gonna use one of your favorite words. We're going

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.360
<v Speaker 7>to use basing updating to.

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Do a podcast. Really, we're going to a basian theory.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.720
<v Speaker 2>They this is such a nerd patrol. Five people just

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>throw off the Garden State Parkway.

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 7>But then we have to guardrail it with systematic processes

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 7>make sure that we can repeat that process over and

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 7>over again, and then we have to reinforce it with

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 7>continuous learning, just tracking our data, keeping catalogs of what

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 7>decisions that we've made and what can we learn from that.

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 2>Paul, when you're the word guardrail, hold on to your

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 2>wallet exactly. Setting. So how has the AI.

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Investment theme changed for you guys? It used to be

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 4>we'll just throw money at Nvidia and the other chip companies.

0:18:24.000 --> 0:18:26.719
<v Speaker 4>Now it seems like the market's trying to look at

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 4>the different areas because it just feels like AI, if

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 4>it hasn't already, it's going to touch every part.

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Of our lives. That's right.

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 7>There's a real broadening going on. And I'd say the

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.919
<v Speaker 7>broadening happens in two ways. The first one is just

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 7>the capex spend that's happening. So you think about the

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 7>trillion dollars of capex that's coming on, that's going to

0:18:44.480 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 7>affect so many different industries. So that's in industrials, that's

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 7>in real estate, that's in utilities, that's in the energy grid.

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 7>But then you also think about your beneficiaries, and that's

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 7>in media, that's in healthcare. So we were looking at

0:19:01.520 --> 0:19:03.880
<v Speaker 7>a broad set of impacts for AI.

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 4>Have we had twenty six twenty seven percent earnings growth

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:08.679
<v Speaker 4>this past cycle?

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Was that ai?

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:12.119
<v Speaker 4>I mean, where did that come from? This is an

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 4>economy that's it's good, but it's not that good?

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Is it.

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 7>That the extra CAPEC spend has a multiplier effect and

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 7>it is hitting many many parts of the economy. And

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 7>there were there was a lot of good that was

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 7>already going on in the economy. We had the tax reforms,

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:29.880
<v Speaker 7>so so I think we came in with a lot

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 7>of strength this year.

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 2>Do you saw handle earning season the same way you

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 2>used to or with your Bayesian process? Is there a

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>new is there a new way to say Nelson? You alliance,

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>burstea great quarter.

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 7>The what we're looking for is really what are the

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 7>most important parts of our thesis and how are we

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 7>affirming and reaffirming or updating our thesis based off what's

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 7>being released, not just looking at the top line or

0:19:58.280 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 7>bottom line numbers.

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Nelson, thank you so much. You got to come back,

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 2>bring some basie and dip with you, and you can

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>stay with us. More from Bloomberg Surveillance coming up after this.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.879
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 1>Apple Karplay and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business app,

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:20:28.359 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 2>There's all sorts of good conversations forward today, but this

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 2>is the one if you want to listen to someone

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.640
<v Speaker 2>who had the courage to be in the market when

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 2>it was difficult. Paul. Right now, it's so easy to

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:42.679
<v Speaker 2>be in the market. It's every day. It's like, you know,

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 2>every mutual fund up ten cents fifteen. I know, it's crazy.

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Emily rolling with this co chief Investment Strategies. That's a

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 2>man your life in Boston so all John Hancock nineteen

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 2>forty six, New Johnny Hancock nineteen sixty nineteen seventy six.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>Which tower are you in in Boston? Well?

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 8>Me, personally, neither one go there very often. I'm usually

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.479
<v Speaker 8>on the road, but we are in the New nat

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 8>or the shorter one like Berkeley's two hundred Berkeley.

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Or John Hancock. Yeah, okay, very cool. You know it's

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 2>like this huge institution. This just said be in the market.

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.119
<v Speaker 2>Back to World War Two? How do you stay in

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the market now? Like the stress is staying in the market.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 2>The nifty to fifty in the sixties.

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:35.440
<v Speaker 8>It's all about earnings, earnings, earnings. So the number one

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 8>input to our work has always been about following the profit.

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:42.160
<v Speaker 8>Stop prices follow profits over time, and it's a key

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 8>reason that we've been overweight US versus international equities for

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 8>the last ten years because that's where the earnings engine

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 8>has been on and it continues to be today.

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 4>We did have a rotation, you know, when the tariffs

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 4>began last year out of the US and has that

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.200
<v Speaker 4>reversed itself. It's money coming back into the US versus

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 4>other markets.

0:22:02.000 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 8>It has started to this year. And there was this

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 8>idea that permeated the narrative last year, like the US

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 8>is no longer exceptional, and we saw those capital flows leave,

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 8>whether it was stocks, whether it was dollars. You saw

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.719
<v Speaker 8>that fall onto the shores over in Europe, and it

0:22:17.760 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 8>was really a sentiment thing. Yes, there was a modest

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 8>improvement in economic growth and an earnings growth, but Eurozone

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 8>GDP guess what it is right now? It just came

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 8>in atzero point one percent, and so clearly we're seeing

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 8>the US in a better place from an economic perspective

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 8>and from an earnings perspective, and you're starting to see

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 8>that reflected in the relative performance here as well.

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 2>How are you guys?

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 4>I guess one of the things we've seen just extraordinary

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 4>earnings growth, as you mentioned earlier here in the US.

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 4>What's driving that? I mean, we don't see those kinds

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty five percent plus earnings growth numbers in

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 4>the SMP of company.

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Is it AI?

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:54.360
<v Speaker 4>What's driving it?

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 8>It's AIAI AI and some fiscal support as well. So

0:22:59.040 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 8>one thing that's been talked about a lot is AI.

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 8>And it's not just this idea that semiconductors are just

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 8>seeing this massive explosion in demand. It's almost like they're

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 8>acting sold out right now, and we're seeing that reflected.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 8>We're also seeing companies do more with less with AI,

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 8>and that's actually helping margins expand it wasn't that long

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 8>ago that we were talking about margin compression. That's going

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 8>the other way as well. And then all the wealth impact.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 8>The wealth effect has helped the financial sector because companies

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.640
<v Speaker 8>are doing great with our wealth management businesses. So it's

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 8>really expanding around all sectors on the road.

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 2>How do you respond to someone who raises their hand

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 2>and says that's great, except it's not like John Carey's

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Pioneer fund of a million years ago with three hundred holdings.

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 2>My top ten stocks are forty five percent of my fund.

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 8>Discuss concentration risk is a major issue, and it's not

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 8>just in the United States. If you think about it

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 8>or merging market equities, it's three stocks.

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 2>So is it the norm that we don't understand? It's

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:05.399
<v Speaker 2>a normal and the three hundred stock diversification is an

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 2>academic construct.

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.000
<v Speaker 8>It's wild. But I would say to your point earlier,

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 8>the entire stock market's becoming an AI market. Like you

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 8>look down in market cap, it's more AI coming into

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 8>those indices. You look at tom value this year is

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 8>handily outperforming growth. Guess what's in value semiconductor stocks because

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 8>their earnings are so good. The global semiconductor indexes up

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 8>over one hundred percent over the past year. Guess what

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 8>their earnings are up over one hundred percent over the

0:24:35.880 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 8>past year. So the valuations have actually cheapened up a

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 8>little bit. So AI is really driving markets globally. We

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 8>have to be careful about diversification, and we're looking for

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 8>other areas to play the AI power demand story, whether

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 8>it's around utilities, whether it's around industrial companies, the picks

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 8>and shovels around AI. I think that trade has some legs.

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 4>We're going to get some inflation data today. I know

0:24:57.920 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 4>that Fed's going to be paying attention. I assume you

0:24:59.800 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 4>will as well. Are you surprised how well the equity

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 4>market's performing in the face of rising inflation.

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean nothing seems to be able to stop this

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:11.959
<v Speaker 8>equity market. That the dip buyings absolutely relentless. The things

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 8>that the market cares about are currency, so the dollar

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 8>higher and higher yields and higher oil prices. Those are

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 8>your three things. So if that inflation number comes in hot,

0:25:21.440 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 8>definitely the bond markets bracing for it this morning. If

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 8>that does result in a backup in yields, we could

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 8>have an issue.

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Well like your first lunch at John Hancock, did you

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>go to Lockovers?

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:33.719
<v Speaker 8>Of course I remember that place.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 2>What's knowing?

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 8>The lost was amazing, It was amazing, amazing.

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 2>But like you know, I missed Lockovers. I mean, Evan's

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 2>is wonderful, but it's not Lockovers. You know, it's like

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 2>way too Mohito. They don't have mohidos at Lockovers. No, no, no, no,

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 2>woke at school, Grandma used to take right there.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:56.880
<v Speaker 8>Nice Martine, Major.

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 2>Major John Hancock hang out in the day, nodding acquaintance.

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.360
<v Speaker 2>But this is wonderful, Emily, thank you for coming into

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 2>your studios. Wonderful to have you. It's one of the

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:09.719
<v Speaker 2>great calls. It's like Ben Laydler when he was at

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 2>HSBC now at Bradesco. It's easy to be in the

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 2>market right now. Where were you in twenty eighteen, Emily

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Rowland said, please invest stay with us. More from Bloomberg

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Surveillance coming up after this.

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Catch us Live

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>weekday afternoons from seven to ten am Eastern Listen on

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Applecarplay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app, or

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>watch us Live on YouTube.

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 2>It is the most talked about book right now across

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 2>the Transitlantic. Sami Kaynes is wonderful at the Financial Times

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.359
<v Speaker 2>and she's teamed up with Adam Polson's crew at the

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Peterson incident. Chad bound joins us. Chad has thought harder

0:26:57.040 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 2>about American trade over the last two to three decades,

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and anyone I know the book is how to Win

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 2>a Trade War? And because you know Chad wanted to

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 2>do eight hundred pages, and so Maya said, are you

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:13.959
<v Speaker 2>kidding me? It's readable, it's approachable, it's airplane ready. How

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.240
<v Speaker 2>to win a trade war? This isn't the trade economics

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.640
<v Speaker 2>chad of when you were a youngster at Bucknell, isn't it?

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 2>What does the new trade war look like? Well?

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 9>The new trade first. Thanks, it's great to see you, Tom.

0:27:28.359 --> 0:27:31.199
<v Speaker 9>The new world is all about trade wars, and the

0:27:31.240 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 9>world has fundamentally changed. Right We used to say, I,

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 9>as an economist, used to say, nobody wins from a

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 9>trade war, so you shouldn't even fight it. Well, unfortunately,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 9>that's not the world that we are living in right now.

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 9>We have to fight the trade war. President Trump likes

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 9>to use tariffs in the trade war, so that's one

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 9>thing that you have to use. But I think what

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 9>we try to do in this book, and you're right,

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 9>it is an airplane read, but it's not even a

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 9>transatlantic airplane read. Can you can get it, you know

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 9>much a couple of hours. Figure out what's going on here.

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 9>It's about much more than tariffs. It's about stockpiling, it's

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:09.479
<v Speaker 9>about using subsidies, it's about export restrictions, all these stuff.

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 2>Now making the headlines, and William Klein and the team,

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.399
<v Speaker 2>the old stirs at Peterson Institute were thinking about this.

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 2>We were giving textiles away from the Carolinas to China.

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 2>The distrust in America about the labor component is tangible.

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 2>How do we get the trust of American labor back

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 2>to do trade well?

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 9>I think the first thing that we have to do

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 9>is you have to be honest with them about what

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 9>the underlying problems are. Right, And yes, some of the

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 9>problems was the speed of the shock that the United

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 9>States faced with all these imports from China. But that's

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 9>sort of the old trade war. That was the thing

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 9>that we could have maybe should have dealt with twenty

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 9>years ago. But that's not the trade war that we

0:28:54.040 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 9>need to be fighting today. And so the first lesson

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 9>of the book is fight the right trade war. The

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.600
<v Speaker 9>right trade war today is recognizing that China is playing

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 9>a fundamentally different game than the United States and every

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 9>other major Western economy out there. China wants a world

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 9>where the world outside of China is dependent on China

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 9>for its supply chains. But China doesn't want to be

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 9>dependent on the rest of the world for its supply chains,

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 9>so that lack of interdependence, right, China wanting the rest

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 9>of the world to be dependent on it so that

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 9>it can weaponize it sometimes as we saw last year

0:29:26.560 --> 0:29:31.960
<v Speaker 9>with rare earths, permanent magnets, that Nexperia semiconductor story. I

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 9>think we have to be honest with the American people

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 9>that this is a trade war that actually we do

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 9>have to fight. It may be different from what they thought,

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 9>but it's the important sort of level set to getting

0:29:43.120 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 9>mistakes right.

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Chad.

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm probably like most of our listeners and viewers.

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I didn't even think about logistics and trade and all

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 4>that kind of stuff. Stuff just kind of showed up

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 4>on the shelves, and then the pandemic happened. Then then we're like, oh, yeah,

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 4>now I get it. We need to pay attention to

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 4>this stuff. Did we need tariffs and that tariff policy

0:30:02.560 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 4>to achieve maybe some of our strategic goals of onshoing

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 4>or near shoring.

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 9>So what we argue in the book is that tariffs

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 9>aren't a part of a part of the story. But really,

0:30:14.800 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 9>I think where the United States has not quite gotten

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 9>it right so far is the breadth of the tariffs.

0:30:20.520 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 9>You certainly don't need to have them on all products,

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 9>so strategically use them and the countries with which you

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 9>apply the tariffs. So if you're thinking about what's the

0:30:29.320 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 9>problem right, well, we've got excessive concentration of production of

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 9>certain goods, central products that American manufacturing needs, American consumers need,

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 9>and it's all in China. Well, then it might make

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 9>sense to use tariffs. It's part of some other policies

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 9>against China. But you don't simultaneously need to impose those

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 9>tariffs on Europe and Japan, especially if you want those

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 9>other friends and partners to be working with you, because

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 9>then you've got them fighting a trade war, a two

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 9>front trade war, dealing with China, but then also having

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 9>to deal with you, the United States, at the same time.

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Shed boring with This is the hottest book in economics

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 2>right now. How do when a trade work? Can't say

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 2>enough about it? We're going to continue here An optimistic

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 2>Guide to an anxious global economy, Chad, I got two

0:31:11.840 --> 0:31:14.239
<v Speaker 2>ways to go here on your back blurbs, you've got

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.960
<v Speaker 2>my book of the summer two three years ago, Chip

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 2>Wars by Chris Miller of Tufts and the Basic Idea

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:25.720
<v Speaker 2>of Technology semiconductors and such. How do we prosecute a

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 2>trade war wrapped around the technology of Taiwan in Korea?

0:31:31.400 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, that's that I think an important part of

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 9>the trade war story here, and I think there's at

0:31:35.800 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 9>least two different pieces of that that we have to confront.

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 9>One is and you're right, Chris's book is amazing. The

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 9>first is dealing with the challenge of Taiwan. Right, So

0:31:46.200 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 9>it is a little bit worrying that ninety plus percent

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 9>of global production of leading edge chips takes place in

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 9>one location. Right, It's not China, China, so it's not

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:58.280
<v Speaker 9>the same sort of problem as you know, are they

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 9>going to weaponize it against us? But having it all

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 9>there in the world that suffers from floods, earthquakes not good.

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 9>We've got to diversify. How do you do that? Industrial

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 9>policy a little bit, but it's got to be smarter

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 9>than the way we've done industrial policy in the past.

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 9>You've got to think about demand, what the United States

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 9>did with the Chips Act, but you also sorry supply,

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 9>but you also have to worry about demand. What we

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 9>didn't do necessarily with the Chips Act. All these fabs

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 9>in the United States great, we've got the production capacity now,

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 9>But why isn't it that in Nvidia and AMD and

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 9>all the chip design companies want to use them yet? Right,

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:33.719
<v Speaker 9>We've got to create some other incentives there too. But

0:32:33.760 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 9>then the second part is the AI challenge with China

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 9>and this race, right, and the use of export restrictions

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 9>and balancing those in the appropriate way to make sure

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 9>that the American side of this story does end up.

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I gotta squeeze this in. This is important, folks.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean he's doing this tour with Sami knes Paul.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.959
<v Speaker 2>She shows up with a ukulele. I mean she's playing

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.200
<v Speaker 2>ukulele at their book shows. Nice, it's too much. Yeah,

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 2>it's like, you know, a wallpaper. He's like hanging out chef.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 2>Nobody knows that you're the heritage of Fred Bergston, who

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.400
<v Speaker 2>is hugely supportive to my act, to Peter Peterson, who

0:33:11.440 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 2>is hugely supportive of my act, and Adam Posen, who's

0:33:14.720 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a bigger Red Sox fan than I am. Does your

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 2>shop the Peterson Institute after your book The Trade War?

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 2>Think we nudge back to the Washington consensus.

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 9>The beauty of the Peterson Institute where I work is

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 9>there is no institutional line. Everybody has their own views,

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 9>that does their own analysis, comes up with their own perspective.

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 9>So I will leave it to my boss, Adam Posen

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 9>to give his own views. But I agree. You know,

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.040
<v Speaker 9>we're going to have these debates about what's the right

0:33:45.080 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 9>way to tackle these sorts of problems, and it's great

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 9>that we're doing so. And I'm just super glad to

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 9>be able to bring not a ukulele but a copy

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 9>of the book and to show it here on your show.

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:55.000
<v Speaker 9>Thanks for having me, Tom.

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 2>John Tuck, Who's going to have a ukulele next time.

0:33:57.080 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 2>The book is How to Win a Trade War? Airplane

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 2>reading even not trans Atlanta to Richmond, New York to Richmond,

0:34:04.480 --> 0:34:07.440
<v Speaker 2>pretty good, to say the least. I can't say enough

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 2>about this. A lot of other people are on board.

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:13.239
<v Speaker 2>What Canes and Bone have done to really bring us

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 2>up to date. A lot going on in trade.

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:34:21.920 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 1>weekday seven to ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:34:29.680 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch US live every weekday on YouTube

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal