WEBVTT - Overtimes = Good Times | NFL Divisional Round Recap

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, what did we just witness?

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.640
<v Speaker 2>Sunday's divisional round all wrapped up? The divisional round period

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 2>is wrapped up. We've got conference title games set, massive

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 2>injuries to discuss. Welcome to the Favorites, presented by DraftKings.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm your host, Brandon Kravitz, joined by my fellow NFL

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 2>cappers Kendra Middleton and Stuckey. We've got our goats and

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 2>votes queued up. Our biggest takeaways from this round in

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the NFL postseason. A very brief parlay recap. We were

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 2>toast before we ever even got to Sunday. Broncos Bills

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>flew over the total we had the under Rams Bears

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>then flew under the total Bears plus four and a half.

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>That one did come through, so shout out to Kendra

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 2>for that. We're gonna do a quick reaction of what

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 2>we just witnessed. We've got AFC title game news and

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 2>some Josh Allen opinions to get out there. The Bears

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 2>were down seven in the final two minutes, ball at midfield.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 2>They make it down to the fourteen, fourth and four.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.400
<v Speaker 2>Caleb's backpedaling heaves the ball. I thought he was just

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 2>chucking the ball. Into space wide open Cole Comet back

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 2>of the end zone, and what was deemed a fourteen

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 2>yard touchdown pass obviously was much greater than that game

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 2>goes to overtime. Caleb then throws a pick just completely

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 2>inexplicable to force the ball down the field. In that situation,

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the Rams then work the ball down the field. Harrison

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>MeVis with the walk off field goal and rip to

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:44.919
<v Speaker 2>the Chicago Bears, who were the best watch in the postseason, Kendra,

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 2>your initial reaction to what we just witnessed with the

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 2>Rams walk off.

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 3>I thought Caleb was so screwed on that play, I

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 3>really did.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 4>I thought he was going to get sacked. Thought he

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 4>was just chucking the ball up for somebody.

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>He's just the that he plays when the entire world

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 3>is on his shoulders makes me feel like that is

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 3>like his preferred place to be and he plays his

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>best football that way, which I don't know if that

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 3>bodes well or not for the rest of his career,

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 3>if he continues to kind of need to rely on

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 3>this final fourth quarter, last second drive heroics, but damn

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.880
<v Speaker 3>does he do it better than anybody else. And but

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 3>then that pick that was that was tough so I

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know, I'm not excited for the potential of another

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Seahawks Patriots Super Bowl.

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 4>But I was gonna save this from my goats and woats.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 3>But Nick Foles really kind of giving us some hope

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 3>after trolling the Patriots today saying maybe backups are really

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 3>the key to beat them.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 4>So hey, if it gets there, that would be kind

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 4>of funny.

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they backup had some time to marinate in the offense.

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>This one might feel a little different for the Denver Broncos.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Stuck he arey being too harsh on Caleb with that,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I int because DJ Moore wasn't exactly where he needed

0:02:58.040 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>to be either.

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I don't know. I can't put that

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 5>pick all on Kale. But they did have three turnovers

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 5>in the game. The Rams didn't have any, which might

0:03:07.120 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 5>have been the difference. But I thought it was two

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 5>poorly coached teams today. I mean, I was so excited

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 5>to watch McVeigh versus Ben Johnson. I mean, how many

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 5>how many dives are you gonna run on third and

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 5>fourth and one and fail? Then? I mean that was

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 5>it was some I thought the Bears were better on

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 5>a down to down basis in the game. They just

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:27.920
<v Speaker 5>they had three failed fourth downs, a lot of them

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 5>were awful calls. So I'm not sure what Ben Johnson

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 5>was doing that. I don't know what McVay was doing.

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, at one point they had like thirty six

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 5>dropbacks and twelve rushes even though they had a fifty

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 5>five percent rush success right against one of the worst

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 5>run defenses in the league. Abandoned his thirteen the heavy personnel,

0:03:44.080 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 5>which should have worked all day against the Bears. So yeah,

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 5>and McVeigh to sum up how bad the coaches were

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 5>in this game. Two thirty eight to go or too yeah,

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 5>two forty seven to go. Ben Johnson doesn't call a

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 5>time now, which is a brain dead because you could

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 5>run it down to you know, seven seconds two oh seven.

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 5>You can run onceid a clock out on a two

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 5>o seven, You could run a passing play and end

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 5>the game without a penalty. And then McVeigh decides to

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 5>run a surrender run and the only time they say

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 5>by doing that is the time that it takes on

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 5>the shank punt that they had. That was horrendous in

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 5>game coaching, you you have a veteran quarterback you can

0:04:27.839 --> 0:04:29.720
<v Speaker 5>throw to end the game. And then you have the

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.359
<v Speaker 5>Cardiac Bears come down and score on one of the

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 5>craziest so that won't really be remembered now. But I

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 5>thought both coaches were really bad. I also thought McDermott

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:43.719
<v Speaker 5>was really bad at the end of the first half.

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:45.480
<v Speaker 5>We talked about this last week. At the end of

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 5>first halves. It cost teams games. What were you going

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 5>to get out of Josh Allen scramming there with no

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 5>timeouts ends up a fluky fumble field goal which ended

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 5>up being the difference in the game, and uh, the

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 5>Bills losing overtime up break City again for Buffalo.

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the Bears defense was better today than I thought

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 3>they would be, too.

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 4>I will say that.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:09.719
<v Speaker 5>Brisker played really well. The Rams also weren't prepared for

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 5>like a slot blitz, like what did you watch the

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 5>second half last week? So I don't I don't know.

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:16.599
<v Speaker 5>Maybe they were just were too cold after all. But

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.719
<v Speaker 5>the Bears defense did play a lot better than I

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 5>expected them to today, So had to to Dennis Allen

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 5>in that group.

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 2>I did think the Bears were the better team today,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 2>but Ben Johnson doing what I mean, We've seen this

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 2>from Sean McVay Sean McVay and Stuck.

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned it. We saw it a little bit today.

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 2>These offensive geniuses that end up in these big game situations,

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 2>they just end up frozen hard in the pun with

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 2>the weather out there, but they just they don't call

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 2>their traditional game. I mean, you had how many fourth

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>and short, third and short situations where you have a

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 2>chance to get creative and instead they're calling the most

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>obvious plays in.

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 1>The middle of the field.

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we had one where Caleb Williams was throwing

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:03.359
<v Speaker 2>the ball just into traffic down by the goal line,

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 2>absolutely inexplicable.

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>One thing I will say.

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 5>Is sometimes the ball like it's not that it's not

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 5>that difficult. The two times they did it, they got it.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 5>The two times they didn't, they didn't get it.

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>The reverse game that we've seen, the trickeration that we've

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 2>seen from the Ben Johnson offense, it was just not

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 2>there at all in these critical situations. I do agree

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 2>with his self awareness though the decision, and obviously in hindsight,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 2>they lost the game. So maybe people are going to

0:06:31.880 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 2>pick at this, the decision to kick the extra point

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the game, with how much he

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 2>had zapped his own creativity in these short yarded situations.

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think they were going to convert that two

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 2>point conversion. So to go to overtime where you had

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 2>been out playing the Rams put the game essentially on

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the home field advantage that you have in that situation.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>I had no problem with him kicking the extra either.

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 4>I absolutely agree with you.

0:06:56.839 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 3>I he was actually texting my friend group about that

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 3>because we all we have a Bears fan in our group,

0:07:01.640 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 3>so we've been silently kind of cheering for him, and.

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 4>We all texted each other.

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I wholeheartedly expected him to go for two just there,

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 3>and I'm so glad that he didn't.

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I agree, I agree. I think if you're on

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 5>the road as the underdog, or if you're at home

0:07:14.920 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 5>like getting clearly outplayed, I didn't mind them kicking extra

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 5>point there and then you know, look to add the

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 5>ball with a chance to win at midfield. So yeah,

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 5>I don't think he I don't think he watched that

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 5>call at all.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 2>So that sets up a Rams Seahawks NFC championship game.

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.960
<v Speaker 2>We'll talk about that in a bit, but we got

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 2>to get to the biggest news of the weekend.

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the injury to bo Nicks.

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Like it or not, we are getting Jared Stidham in

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 2>a conference championship game.

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuck.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 2>He'd we can talk about the Bills aspect of it,

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's probably where we'll end up spending

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>most of our time. Do you give the Broncos any

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 2>shot here against New England with Stidham at quarterback?

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Uh? Sure, it's I mean it's one it's one football game.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh so.

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 5>Uh like they they're they're gonna need to force turnovers.

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Peyton's gonna have to be super creative with his play calls.

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 5>But you know, there's still a lot of uncertainty with

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 5>this Patriots team, Like, can we see them play a

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:19.800
<v Speaker 5>team like that has any starters available? I mean, even today,

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 5>you get Nico Collins out Schultz I thought had the

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 5>biggest matchup advantage of all uh and this game gets

0:08:25.640 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 5>hurt in the first quarter after he has fifty yards.

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 5>They were without their right tackle. I mean, like, can

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:33.719
<v Speaker 5>we see them play any team with stars? We're not

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 5>gonna win. The Broncos have offensive line and wide receiver

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 5>injuries too that have to be monitored, and you're gonna

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 5>have Trevor Simon in there. So I I just say,

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 5>Trevor Simon, I'm getting flashbacks for the un today. Yeah,

0:08:51.040 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 5>they still signed Ben de Nucci, but uh Stidham. Yeah,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.199
<v Speaker 5>I mean, we don't have a huge sample size on Steadham.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 5>He had that one huge game randomly against like a good,

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 5>good forty Niners defense. I think I think that was

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 5>like late in the year and a meaningless start. But

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 5>I got to dig in.

0:09:05.640 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I started, by the way, in over seven hundred days.

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 2>JAHI has not started a game in over seven hundred days.

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 5>I do think that we've seen, Like the other thing

0:09:15.000 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 5>is that the Patriots have faced nothing but backups the

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 5>entire year. But they've also they didn't face any good

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.839
<v Speaker 5>defenses the entire season, and we've seen them play two

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 5>good defenses in the playoffs so far. And Drake May

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 5>has not looked great. I mean he has what six

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 5>fumbles and two interceptions in two games. They were pretty

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 5>lucky to get that one fumble, which maybe the game

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 5>is different. I mean, Stroud was just so bad it

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 5>probably wouldn't have mattered. But May and that offensive line

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 5>are vulnerable and that Benito own company. They're gonna have

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 5>to get pressure and they're gonna have to force turnovers

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 5>may his pocket presence has been really bad. So that's

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 5>how Denver is gonna have to win this game. Peyton's

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 5>gonna have to be creative. Yeah, they have a chance.

0:09:59.440 --> 0:10:02.560
<v Speaker 5>I think this it's gone it's out to like five

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 5>and a half. I think it's gone too far now,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 5>like it could end in disaster like that. Clearly, there's

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 5>still a lot of uncertainty with this Patriots team. But

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 5>like this is now assuming that bo Nix is worth

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.719
<v Speaker 5>like a touchdown, come on, like.

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I would have Yeah, I probably would have had him

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 2>prior to watching him orchestrated game winning drive against the Bills,

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:26.760
<v Speaker 2>probably would have had him closer to three three and

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>a half.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think four is like a four to four

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 5>and a half. You know, maybe like given the circumstances,

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 5>like with some of the other injuries, you could maybe

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 5>stretch it to five five and a half, I think.

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 5>But you know, it's not like bow Nicks lights the

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 5>world on fire on a weekly basis and is one

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 5>of the elite quarterbacks in the league. So yeah, I

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 5>think Denver has a chance. But other injuries to monitor.

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Patriots are still hardened not to crack because we just

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 5>don't the data set that we have, and we won't.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 5>If they win this game, they're gonna going to the

0:11:00.559 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 5>super Bowl with the easiest stretch in the in playoff

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 5>history and the easiest stretch in regular season history that

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 5>we've ever seen. So but yeah, the Broncos have a chance.

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 5>It's it's one football game with an oblong ball, and

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 5>they're gonna be playing at home against still a young team.

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I was gonna say, I agree, I think that their

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 3>chances aren't great, but historically playing in Denver in the

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 3>postseason has given the Patriots fits. And I also feel

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 3>a little bit better that he's like the jar. It's

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 3>not going to be traveling to Mile High.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:33.640
<v Speaker 4>He lives there.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 3>It's not something that he doesn't deal with every day.

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 3>The Patriots are going there. If like it was the

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.600
<v Speaker 3>other way around and I was a backup quarterback who

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.199
<v Speaker 3>hasn't been training in altitude going to play a playoff

0:11:44.240 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 3>game essentially off the couch, I'd probably have a.

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Few more worries. But history kind of likes Denver here regardless.

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 5>I will also say it's like a so two things

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 5>you have. Now all of the pressure is on New England, right, Yeah,

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 5>so before for you were going on the road, they

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 5>would have been underdogs, and you're like, all right, if

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 5>we win this game, we're going to the Super b

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 5>It's not that much pressure on the Patriots. But now

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 5>you're playing Jared Stidham like, if you lose this game,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 5>so all the pressure.

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:20.559
<v Speaker 4>Number two, Jared said him in the Super Bowl.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 5>This is a kitchen sink. Kitchen sink game. Yeah right,

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 5>So number one. You see this when in other sports,

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:32.320
<v Speaker 5>when like your star player, your point guard is out,

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:36.199
<v Speaker 5>everyone else, you know, tends to rise up. But more importantly,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 5>from a play from a play calling perspective, from a

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.560
<v Speaker 5>schematic perspective, like you're going to get they have to

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 5>be super creative, everything that you've ever thought of, from

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 5>Peyton's perspective, Joseph's perspective, you're going to get here. So

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 5>from a you know, Patriots perspective, trying to prepare for

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 5>what they're going to see, you know that it might

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 5>be proved a little bit more difficult. So we'll see

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 5>if Denver can use that uncertainty to their advantage. Now,

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:06.840
<v Speaker 5>the Patriots defense, I have to give them credit. Now,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:10.199
<v Speaker 5>they played Stroud in an injured Texans offense and then

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 5>you know a Chargers offense with the no offensive line,

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 5>but you have to give them credit for some of

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 5>the plays that they've made. The looks they do change

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 5>up their looks very well disguised things. And now their

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 5>run defense is much better now that they're healthier at

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 5>linebacker with Milton Williams. I mean, the Houston can do

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 5>anything on the ground. The Chargers can do anything on

0:13:34.800 --> 0:13:36.719
<v Speaker 5>the ground. And you just saw the splits early in

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 5>the season. Their run defense was dominant late in the

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 5>season it created with the injuries. Well, now they're healthy again,

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 5>I do think so. I'm not sure that the reason

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 5>I bring that up is you have a backup quarterback

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 5>and a good defense at home, so you might say, like,

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 5>let's lean on the run game. But that might be

0:13:55.080 --> 0:13:57.200
<v Speaker 5>a little bit difficult here, which could throw another wrench

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 5>into it.

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 4>I have a way too big of a look ahead.

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 3>But if Sean Peyton wins a Super Bowl with Drew

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Brees and wins a Super Bowl with Jared Stidham, does

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 3>he become one of the goats?

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Can we table that until we have two weeks to talk.

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 3>About Jared I said, I said it was too big

0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 3>of a look ahead, But what.

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 5>Well, there is Sam Donald has an oblique injury, so

0:14:24.280 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 5>there is an outside chance that he injures that more

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:35.160
<v Speaker 5>and we get Donald Super Bowl, Drew Locke revenge game

0:14:35.400 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 5>against Jared Stidham. Yeah, and we'll talk about that for

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 5>two weeks.

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 4>That would be So America twenty during.

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Those two weeks.

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 2>The last time, I recall, I mean, one of one

0:14:47.560 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>of my fondest memories as a sports better was betting

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 2>against Jared Stidham when he was in the Peach Bowl

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 2>against UCF. They were ten point favorites. Fire recall correctly

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>in that game. Obviously, I went to UCF total homer bet.

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>I bet the point spread and the money line, and

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 2>he folded like a lawn chair.

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>And now we get an opportunity to fade him again.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So full circle moment.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 4>You're not pet of or anything at all.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that was that was the claimed National Championship season.

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>One thing that I that I did that I feel like,

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, was perhaps the best way to bet into this.

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know if I'm gonna bet this game.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 2>I took the second the bon Knicks news came out.

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.200
<v Speaker 2>I bet the Patriots a plus four to twenty five

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to win the Super Bowl, and I'll just take my

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 2>chances with whoever they end up against. And we've seen

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 2>that number beat up now it's it's been sliced in half.

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So that might just be the way that I look

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>at this is.

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 5>Let's I'll just say one.

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, this was.

0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 4>He literally just said that.

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Okay, yeah, but I mean they were they were also

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 2>favored going in.

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 5>But so they won that game. So obviously the odds

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 5>are gonna come down. Yeah, so I'm excited for Ram

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 5>Sahawks again, Like I want what I'm going to spend

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 5>most of my week doing this week, Like I feel

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 5>like Denver, New England, you just have to take a stick.

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 5>You could you just like, look I'm passing. I don't know,

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 5>or you're just like this is too much of an

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 5>overreaction to Bonix being out. I lean the ladder, but uh,

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 5>you know, we have all week to dive into two

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 5>games the other I really want to dive into Ram Seahawks.

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 5>We have two games to golf of. But how the

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 5>Rams that last Rams Seahawks meeting where the Rams look

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 5>like I bet the Seahawks has got extremely lucky. The

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 5>Rams look like the clearly better team in target and

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 5>they put up what six hundred yards on that defense

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 5>without DeVante Adams. I think Vonta Adams missed that game,

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 5>if I recall. So that's what I want to spend

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:01.640
<v Speaker 5>my time diving into that Rams offense versus Seattle's defense.

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 5>So at least that game should be pretty good.

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 2>What we need to dive into right now is what

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 2>happened with the Buffalo Bills and the Denver Broncos. So

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 2>he talked about the Broncos moving forward and whether or

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 2>not they still have a chance and the awful two

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:24.119
<v Speaker 2>week look ahead of Jared Stidham potentially in the Super Bowl.

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 2>How much of this is on Josh Allen because he

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 2>turned the ball over way too much in this game.

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 2>Down the stretch, he put on the cape as he's

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>been doing the last couple of years. We now have

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>seen the Bills first team in NFL history to lose

0:17:38.280 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 2>by three points or less in the playoffs in three

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:45.639
<v Speaker 2>straight seasons. And then of course you have the controversial

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 2>was it a catch? Was it not a catch? With

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 2>ja Kwan, McMillan, and Brandon Cook.

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of.

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Different ways to dissect this. Kendra, how much of this

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.640
<v Speaker 2>loss do you put on Josh Allen? Do you view

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 2>him differently because of the way that this went down.

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:05.639
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot of it's on Josh Allen, but

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 3>it also just kind of comes down to the fact

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 3>that when they started this season, they weren't expecting it

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 3>to turn out the way that it did.

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 4>So it was kind of a little bit.

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 3>Of a rebuild situation for them. As much as you

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 3>can rebuild when you have a team like they do,

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.879
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that they really expect it to be

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 3>in the position that they were in, and there was

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 3>a lot of pressure on Josh and he just folded

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 3>once again, and I kind of do look at him

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 3>a little bit different because it was never going to

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 3>be any easier for him. It's not like he had

0:18:35.400 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the best team in the world this season, but nobody

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:41.359
<v Speaker 3>really has the AFC Like there is no AFC team

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 3>that is just so much better than everybody else right

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 3>now that I can discount the loss that they had yesterday.

0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Denver gave them the opportunity to beat them time and

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 3>time again, and he just really, for lack of a

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 3>better term at the moment, fumbled it away. And I

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 3>do look at him a little bit differently. I don't

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 3>look at it differently for crying because people are being

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:03.719
<v Speaker 3>way too mean to him about that.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 4>I would cry as well, So let the boy cry.

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>But I don't look at him differently for that, just

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 3>for how he really kind of seems to crumble in

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 3>these big moments.

0:19:13.160 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't blame him for crying either.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.920
<v Speaker 2>He goes through this every year, and now he's got

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 2>to wait another year to probably go through it again

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 2>next year. It's like, this guy, as rich as he is,

0:19:23.359 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 2>as beautiful as his wife is, and as much as

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 2>he'll be entering the Hall of Fame one day, his

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 2>career could end up tormented by this the same way

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 2>that Dan Marino's was this legendary quarterback that could just

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 2>never really get to the mountaintop.

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Was it a catch? Wasn't it a catch? Stucky? And

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:48.320
<v Speaker 1>how much of this do you put on Josh Allen?

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.360
<v Speaker 5>No, it was not definitely not a catch. I mean,

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't know why people are so confused by it.

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.560
<v Speaker 5>There was one clear view where he didn't Here's the

0:19:56.600 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 5>all you have to ask yourself. If he came down

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:00.479
<v Speaker 5>the way that he did with the ball and then

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:02.840
<v Speaker 5>it hit the ground, it was not going to be

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 5>a catch, and it came down into the defender's hands,

0:20:07.160 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 5>so that was clearly one not a catch. I don't

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 5>know why people are so confused, although maybe because no

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 5>one knows what it catches in the NFL, and they

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 5>have different rules all the time, Like there was a

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:20.280
<v Speaker 5>raven Steelers game which ended up costing that could have

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 5>cost the Ravens a division earlier this year with Rogers

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 5>where they called that same play differently. But no, that

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 5>wasn't a catch. I lowann to take some of the

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 5>blame he, you know, for some of the turnovers, but

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 5>he scored thirty points on the Broncos in Denver, like

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 5>it's the every single every year. By by the way,

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 5>the last the previous six playoff games, oun didn't have

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 5>any turnovers and they scored thirty. It's the coaching talked

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 5>to him McDermot at the end of the half. Some

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 5>other decisions in that game were very questionable. And it's

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 5>the defense all the time that lets them down these

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:56.640
<v Speaker 5>games and go back and all the Josh Allen playoff losses,

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 5>they're always scoring into the thirties. The offense has never

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 5>been the issue. It's always the defense and it once

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.440
<v Speaker 5>again burned them here. I mean, look who he also

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 5>number one, He was banged up a lot of injuries

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 5>on a shore week. He's thrown them a cole hardon

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 5>and Brandon Cooks like, come on, like, it's how much

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 5>anything Coleman he put it? Yeah, keon Coleman like, it's

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 5>been a healthy scratch scoring touchdowns like that. I can't

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 5>put too much of the blame on Al and obviously

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.720
<v Speaker 5>has to take some for the turnovers, but the defense

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 5>has to you're playing the look. I think you have

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 5>to give credit to the Broncos too, and you have

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 5>to give credit to the bo Nicks and Peyton I

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 5>thought had a really good game. I mean they scored

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 5>two touchdowns on the two plays that the backups were

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 5>in there, and they targeted them right away. And I

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.560
<v Speaker 5>mean Darnold Savage shouldn't be in an NFL playoff game,

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 5>but the Bills had no other options at one point,

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 5>they target him right away, scored a touchdown, backup corner

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 5>came in, targeted them late touchdown. So you got to

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 5>give credit to Bonnicks. You got to give credit to

0:22:02.880 --> 0:22:05.920
<v Speaker 5>Sean Payton and the Broncos offense as well, but a

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.359
<v Speaker 5>lot of these losses, it's the coaching and it's the

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 5>defense to let the Bills down. I think that was

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 5>the case again. But in fairness to be real, you

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 5>got to give Alan some some blame for the turnovers

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 5>that he has. Yeah, I mean the guy who never

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 5>never turns it over in any of his playoff losses before.

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 5>So to just put it all on Alan and say

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 5>he choked, I don't think he's right.

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he choked.

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 2>I think it was more of a first half meltdown

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 2>with the turnovers, and then we saw vintage Josh Allen.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 2>He did miss that it was Dawson Knox over the

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.399
<v Speaker 2>middle at one point late in the game. But he

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 2>does so much right that it's hard to place too

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 2>much of the blame on him. I don't view him

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 2>as a guy that shrinks in the playoffs. And I

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 2>think that's the way the conversation for a lot of

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 2>people is being is being shaped right now, is that

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 2>this is a guy.

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:56.640
<v Speaker 1>That just can't win the big one.

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 2>It's not that he can't, it's that he hasn't and

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 2>there's always some weird shit that goes on in the playoffs.

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you, on the catch itself or the non

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 2>catch the interception. I thought it was clearly an I

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 2>int I do wish they had looked at it longer.

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.199
<v Speaker 2>I agree with Sean McDermott's complaint that for all the

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 2>things that we spend ten minutes in the review booth four,

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 2>it was like.

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, no, that's clearly an interception.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's move on with our lives and the biggest moment

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 2>of the season for both of these teams. But there's

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a clear difference between what we saw in that situation

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and on a lot of folks on social media are

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 2>trying to compare it to DeVante Adams and and him

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 2>having possession and then having the ball ripped away by

0:23:38.520 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>the Chicago Bears today.

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:43.199
<v Speaker 1>I think the sas.

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Adams caught him was down is and he hit the

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 5>ground like yeah, I don't people are get I don't

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 5>know why people are so confiused comparing those two.

0:23:50.000 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's an easy still shot to compare. But

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 2>I just my only complaint is that they should have

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 2>looked at the Brandon Cook situation longer. They were way

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.000
<v Speaker 2>too fast to just breeze passed it and then and

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 2>let's keep the game going. And I'm usually anti review,

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:08.399
<v Speaker 2>but in this situation, I felt like they expedited that

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 2>situation in a way that they should have not. Uh,

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 2>you guys want to get to some goats and wats, Kendra, who.

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 3>You got I'm actually going to do? We talked about

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 3>most of my goats. Josh Allen and the Texans being

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.120
<v Speaker 3>on their way to Cancun was my goat. But as

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 3>we were sitting here, I just remembered that my fantasy

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 3>football group put down a thousand We won like a

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 3>gift card for a thousand dollars worth of a spread

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.240
<v Speaker 3>at Hooters in Saugust, Massachusetts for the AFC Championship game

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 3>like four months ago, having.

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 4>No idea that it would be the Patriots. So I'm

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 4>going to.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Watch the Patriots Broncos game Hooters and Saugus, Massachusetts.

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 4>So that's my goat.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 6>We have a thousand dollars where the wings booze all

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 6>the stuff.

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to eat so many freaking chicken wings. So

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 4>that's my goat. Because we talked about my other goats.

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>How many people are in on that bill?

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Twelve? They capped us off at twelve.

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you guys are gonna know how much Hooters.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 2>That is, that's that's a lot of that's a lot

0:25:09.440 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 2>of chicken wings, that's a lot of nuggets.

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 4>So much Hooters.

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know.

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know that you're gonna be uh, I don't

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 2>know that you're actually going to be available for uh.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna have to put me in a wheelchair after

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 3>that much chicken. I mighted in buffalo sauce and having

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 3>the meat sweats for sure.

0:25:25.800 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>What about you, stucky goat?

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.720
<v Speaker 5>Dalton Schultz had is over and he got there despite

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 5>playing less than a quarter, So shout out Schultz. I

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 5>thought that he was a huge loss for the Texans

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:43.720
<v Speaker 5>offense after that point. And then my wote is Ben

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:47.200
<v Speaker 5>Johnson for all those the short yardage play calling just

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 5>killed that game in the flow of it.

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 6>Uh.

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:51.639
<v Speaker 5>Luckily it ended up being a great game, but for

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 5>most of that game, I mean Bears rams and it

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 5>was like a snoozer for most of the game. So, uh, yeah,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 5>those are my my goats and wotes, and I guess

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 5>I should say, actually my wote will be the forty

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:12.119
<v Speaker 5>nine ers special teams. I mean that that game was

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 5>over on the opening kick and we just had a

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 5>game that was unwatchable from that point on after she

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 5>took the opening kickback. I didn't even I didn't watch

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 5>the fourth quarter. I can't remember the Las playoff game.

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 5>I didn't watch every minute of I think.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 2>We all had a sneaky suspicion that that was going

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 2>to be when the corpse officially rotted for the San

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Francisco forty nine ers. That spread was just Kyle Shanahan respect.

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 2>That's all that was.

0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 5>But you also have did Darnald uncertainty all week with

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.959
<v Speaker 5>Dale Bleak, which but the Niners just couldn't come up

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 5>with anything. But once you fall behind against that Seattle defense,

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 5>its lights out.

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>My goat is bo Nicks.

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, he played great and do and he did

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 2>the walk off interview still on one foot. Nobody caught

0:26:59.880 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 2>that until after the fact, adrenaline, probably knowing that his

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 2>season was done, and he didn't mention it, talked about

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 2>his teammates, talked about the situation, and then hobbled off

0:27:12.119 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 2>the field. I thought that was a really cool look

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>by bo Nix, A lot of respect for him.

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 5>He honestly might not have known it and just thought

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 5>he was saying down though, because well, now, yeah, he

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:23.159
<v Speaker 5>knew that he got banned up, but he wouldn't He

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 5>might not have known aw sears wasn't. I mean adrenaline,

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm sure in that situation end of the Games is

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 5>high for an athlete as you'll ever see.

0:27:32.840 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 3>So I broke my ankle and didn't know for like,

0:27:35.920 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 3>like I thought that I had just rolled it for

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 3>a couple of hours and in the middle of the

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 3>night it like doubled up in size. It like took

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:42.719
<v Speaker 3>a while for me to feel it. I'm not an athlete.

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I didn't break my ankle the same way he did.

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 3>I'm just saying it took me a while to feel it.

0:27:46.920 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 3>So I with the adrenaline and everything, I wouldn't be

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 3>surprised because I woke up at three o'clock in the

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 3>morning and like was like, I need to go to

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the hospital right now.

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I've tore my acls, but both my acls ripped

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 5>a part of me and actually it didn't hurt the time.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 5>As weird as that is, but after different story. But yeah,

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 5>I mean, how of a perform Knicks deserves a ton

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:10.400
<v Speaker 5>of credit for his performance.

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well I would have been in tears, so go

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>for me.

0:28:14.440 --> 0:28:17.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm gonna. I guess, I mean c J. Stroud

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 2>third time in the divisional round. He has a grand

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 2>total of one touchdown pass and four interceptions. And by

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the way, that entire stat accumulation all occurred today, hadn't

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 2>done anything prior to this average margin of defeat fifteen

0:28:31.359 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 2>points for CJ. Stroud. I mean, he's he was so

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 2>bad in these last two games. I know that it's

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.280
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of like hot take talk radio stuff. I

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 2>would seriously be questioning is this the guy that we

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 2>need to be moving forward with? With how bad he

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 2>has been awful in these situations? Just a complete meltdown.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, they had serious conversations about if they want what

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 5>they want to do a quarterback, I have a championship

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 5>caliber defense. And mean, I get that they had the

0:29:00.800 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 5>injuries on offense too, but Stroud did not play anywhere

0:29:04.840 --> 0:29:10.400
<v Speaker 5>close to good enough today. And look, Drake may should

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 5>say he's got to send gift baskets to Herbert and

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Stroud because Drake may is not I mean, he has

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 5>six fumbles in two games, but the quarterbacks have been

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 5>so bad against him. There's just no talk about Drake

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 5>may So but Stroud. It was ugly like some of

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 5>the throws he was missing were bad to throw where

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 5>he just threw it up in the air to nobody.

0:29:38.280 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 5>I mean, you can't make that throw in the.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Playoffs, Josh Allen like toss back weird, like flick yesterday.

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 4>I needed to talk about that. What the hell was that?

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's part of the reason why he's not blamed

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 2>free And while that didn't necessarily go on the.

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 3>War, maybe one of the worst decisions I've seen in

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:03.520
<v Speaker 3>the postseason, like recency bias maybe, but that was I

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 3>literally said out loud, what the fuck was that?

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 5>No, the worst decision is was strout today and then

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:13.720
<v Speaker 5>to pick to pick six like that that throw had

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 5>he just said that's it and just threw it up

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 5>in the air like down, like take the sat there.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 3>You're gonna watch all of these games back tomorrow.

0:30:24.400 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 5>I will never watch that Texans Patriots game.

0:30:28.400 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 4>I can't wait. I'm gonna hate watch the ship out

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 4>of that fact of.

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 5>That game went over. Both teams average like three and

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 5>a half yards per play, neither got the two hundred

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 5>and fifty.

0:30:35.560 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Yards turnovers turnovers.

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 2>I feel bad for Kendra that she has to do

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 2>sports talk in the town that's gonna pretend like schedules

0:30:43.880 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 2>don't matter.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 4>It has been a calling point all week long.

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 3>People, you know, the old guys from like Medford or like,

0:30:51.440 --> 0:30:56.280
<v Speaker 3>you play the schedule that's in front, Like.

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 5>Who cares? You an easy schedule? That's the dream. I

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 5>would love for my team to have the easiest schedule

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 5>in the NFL. Play nobody, go to the super Bowl?

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>People?

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:08.360
<v Speaker 5>Why are people so offended that you don't play anyone?

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 5>That should be the goal, play backup quarterbacks every week?

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 5>Just win, go to the super Bowl? Who cares? No

0:31:12.840 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 5>one's going to remember fifteen years from now they played

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 5>nothing but backups all year. But it's okay for people, Well,

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 5>like what do you Yeah, you'll definitely point out that

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 5>you played nobody. It's statistical fact that you played the

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 5>easiest schedule of any team over the past twenty five years.

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 5>And it's also an undeniable fact that you play nothing

0:31:30.880 --> 0:31:34.160
<v Speaker 5>but backups every single week. So like, it's okay to

0:31:34.200 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 5>point it out. But if I was a Patriots fan,

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 5>who cares? And why do you care? If other people

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 5>are pointing it out.

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna keep it rolling in a moment, But first

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna toss it to Kendra for a word about

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 2>our partners at DraftKings.

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 6>The Favorites podcast is sponsored by DraftKings sportsbook and in

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 6>partnership with DraftKings, our listeners get a great off for

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 6>right now. New customers can bet five dollars and get

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 6>three hundred dollars back in bonus bets if your bet wins.

0:31:57.800 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 6>Love the thrill of live betting, DraftKings got you covered.

0:32:00.920 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 6>Bet live on star player props and in progress games

0:32:04.200 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 6>right as they happen. To get started, use promo code Favorites.

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 4>When signing up with DraftKings.

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.600
<v Speaker 6>That's called Favorites when signing up with DraftKings for three

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 6>hundred dollars back in bonus bets. If your bet wins,

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 6>the crown is yours.

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Both conference title games are set.

0:32:19.160 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 2>The Patriots are road favorites five and a half points

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 2>against the Denver Broncos with Jared Stidham at quarterback, and

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 2>the Rams are at Seattle Seattle laying a point and

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 2>a half. The Broncos are the largest home underdog in

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 2>a conference championship game since then nineteen seventy Merger, the

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 2>largest that we've seen since Brown's cults. That's the Baltimore

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Cults back in nineteen sixty eight. It's Jared Sidam's first

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 2>start in seven hundred and forty nine days. Stuckey, I

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:51.960
<v Speaker 2>saw you ask the question on Twitter, will this be

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the worst conference championship game? Or I believe you asked,

0:32:56.800 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 2>what was the worst conference championship game that we've ever seen?

0:33:00.200 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps in the lead up to it? I went back

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>to dig through see if I could come up with

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 2>an answer for you. How about nineteen ninety six the

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Pittsburgh Steelers taking on the Indianapolis Colts. It was Neil

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 2>O'Donnell versus Jim Harbaugh. It wound up being a great game,

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of the lead up to it, very

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 2>similar to what we're getting here.

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 5>Well, we had Foles Keenum not too long ago. I

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 5>will I will say if you're looking for yeah, I

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 5>mean this AFC Championship game. I was saying that it

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 5>should be on like ESPN News, Nickelodeon, Flying Game, the

0:33:42.360 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 5>if you're looking for a long time, I don't even

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 5>know if there'll be a number out there. But going

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:50.000
<v Speaker 5>back to the Patriots playing backups Rams beat the Seahawks,

0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 5>Stafford tears his knee on the kneeling the ball down

0:33:56.240 --> 0:33:59.360
<v Speaker 5>at the end of the game. Jimmy g super Bowl MVP.

0:34:00.640 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 5>If I could find a number on it, I'll look

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 5>at it. But in all seriousness, Patriotson, you'll have a

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 5>chance to prove it, I think against starters in the

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 5>Super Bowl. And then you can shut everyone up.

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 3>If I saw you go viral yesterday, hate it on

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.439
<v Speaker 3>the Patriots schedule, stucky, don't you worry here.

0:34:21.600 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 5>It's it just pointing out facts. I don't know why

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.879
<v Speaker 5>people get so upset about it, Like it's it's it's

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 5>okay to be the soft schedule.

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 4>Done that to me, and I was like, this is awesome.

0:34:32.880 --> 0:34:35.880
<v Speaker 5>If you don't like teams drew, if you're not gonna

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:37.880
<v Speaker 5>like win your division, you're not gonna make the playoffs.

0:34:38.640 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 5>If you're a fan of the team you want to

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 5>finish in the last you can get a fourth place schedule,

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 5>improve your odds of getting a better record, improving your

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.800
<v Speaker 5>playoff positioning. The goal should be to have an easy schedule.

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 5>And like, if you're think about it, you bet on

0:34:51.160 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 5>a team and then it comes out that their quarterback

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 5>is out, you're happy. You should be happy that you're

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.280
<v Speaker 5>playing backups. It's crazy.

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, especially when you've already won a million Super Bowls.

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess you know. It's not like you're trying to

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 2>prove yourself.

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 4>Never enough here, it's never enough.

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm still sick that Mike Turrico welcomed people to the

0:35:12.000 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 2>broadcasts in the wild card round and said the Patriots

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 2>back in the playoffs, as the kids say, it's been

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 2>a minute, Like fuck you.

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 4>The people here are so entitled.

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Like there's some three year old right now who's only

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 3>experienced one title and it was the Celtics.

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:32.680
<v Speaker 4>Like, oh no, oh, seven.

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.919
<v Speaker 3>Year olds have had like three titles since I've been here.

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 3>That's insane.

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, highly entitled.

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 2>All Right, we're gonna spend a lot of time on

0:35:40.960 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 2>these games on Tuesday and Thursday, so let's just quick

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 2>read on either one. On either one of these games,

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 2>are either of you rushing to the window to bet

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks, Rams Pats or Broncos. Kendra, we'll start with you.

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 2>The ans or no is acceptable in this particular situation.

0:36:03.719 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I kind of like the Broncos to cover this

0:36:05.960 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 3>number for reasons that I kind of that I already said,

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 3>just because if that we saw what the Patriots did

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 3>today and struggling against a good defense. I think if

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos can attack them in a similar way and

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 3>make Drake May uncomfortable and make him turn the ball

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 3>over like that, and they can get a little bit

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 3>more lucky.

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 4>I expect them to probably run.

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 3>The ball a lot more op be as dangerous as C. J.

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Stroud was at times today. Maybe they could keep that

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 3>a little bit closer.

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:35.719
<v Speaker 4>So the five and a half I don't hate.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 3>And then the total for the Seahawks game, there's a

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 3>forty seven and a half out there, forty eight and

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:42.120
<v Speaker 3>a half. I feel like there's probably gonna be points

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 3>scored in this game because the Seahawks have a great defense,

0:36:45.280 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 3>but we know that the Rams can score, and we

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 3>know that the Seahawks can put up points.

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Well about you stuck.

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 5>On the number, I lean Broncos right now, but running

0:36:57.560 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 5>to bet at no, it's a five and a half,

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.840
<v Speaker 5>You're in like a dead zey And so where I

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 5>don't know where this number is going to go? I

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.640
<v Speaker 5>really don't. So like this's there's a lot of uncertainty.

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 5>So and like it's a huge game. Public can have

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.399
<v Speaker 5>a say in these on like a regular season game,

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:17.120
<v Speaker 5>just because the volume is so big, and if there's

0:37:17.160 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 5>not you know, especially if there's not like strong sharp

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 5>money opinions, I don't know, it's just going to be

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 5>a wave of this is the Pats who cover all

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 5>the time against backups playing another backup and uh you

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.800
<v Speaker 5>know Stidham stinks and then could we get a six?

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 5>Like there's no downside of waiting and then this ticks down?

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Uh so, like I think it's worth just seeing where

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 5>this line goes. So but I definitely would lean Broncos

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 5>at the current price. And what's Seahawks two.

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>That, Yeah, that's I'm.

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 5>Not running yet. I got to dive into that in

0:37:57.200 --> 0:37:57.880
<v Speaker 5>the RAMS.

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 2>I I was gonna say Seattle minus one and a

0:38:01.040 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 2>half early bird got the worm. I did not, So

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I will have to reassess that as we jump around

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>some key numbers there. But I don't know how you

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 2>could look at Seattle this weekend and not come away

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 2>from the weekend saying that that looks like your Super

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Bowl sixty champion. I know that San Francisco is all

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 2>sorts of banged up, but when you look at all

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 2>three levels offense, they can kill you. In the past

0:38:27.160 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 2>game with JSN run game. They've got two studs special teams.

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:37.760
<v Speaker 2>Shaheed is playing at a high level defense. They've got

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 2>probably the best left right there with the Denver Broncos.

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>So it in terms of.

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Who I see as the best team that is still around,

0:38:47.640 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 2>it's the Super Bowl favorite right now in the Seattle Seahawks.

0:38:50.920 --> 0:38:54.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'll have to see if that one settles back down.

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:57.520
<v Speaker 5>I will say your special teams no is no, no,

0:38:57.640 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 5>The Seattle special teams are elite. The Jets, I'm out

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 5>of the best special teams in the league this year

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:03.759
<v Speaker 5>the only they did well, but Seattle was right there.

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 5>Big special teams advantaged for Seattle in this game. But teams, remember,

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.240
<v Speaker 5>teams are never as good as they look the week before.

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 5>So they had a really good matchup against the forty

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 5>nine ers and everything just snowballed on San Francisco. The

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 5>Seattle offense has sneakily been broken for two months, and

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 5>they've had games where they're able to mask it because

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 5>they get a bunch of defensive touchdowns special teams touchdowns.

0:39:30.080 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean, Darnold threw for one hundred and ten yards

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 5>against the Niners. So it's not like we saw this

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 5>offense magically fixed. I think even like twelve or seventeen,

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 5>like one hundred and fifteen yards or something. So and look,

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.320
<v Speaker 5>we saw Seattle beat the Rams recently, but the Rams

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:48.480
<v Speaker 5>dominated that game, but of like six hundred yards offense

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 5>didn't even have their full compliment of weapons, So I

0:39:50.840 --> 0:39:53.439
<v Speaker 5>think at three i'd have to look at their rams.

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 5>But I really want to spend a lot of time

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 5>in that game.

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.440
<v Speaker 2>And we will do that as a collective coming up

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 2>on Tuesday. Before we get out of here, let's toss

0:40:02.200 --> 0:40:04.719
<v Speaker 2>it over to Brandon Anderson for the hot read for

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 2>conference Championships next week.

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Hot Wraps who sevent day on ice Rights? Ice Cream?

0:40:12.080 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>How Real.

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 7>Championships Sunday? Hot Reid can't say these are the four

0:40:21.320 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 7>teams or quarterbacks we expected heading into the season. A

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 7>little different today on the Hot Red than usual. Only

0:40:28.080 --> 0:40:30.720
<v Speaker 7>four teams left, So you gotta get a little creative

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 7>with the picks here today. And I'll tell you from

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:35.239
<v Speaker 7>I give you my pick, but I also tell you

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 7>why this time you might want to wait just a

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 7>bit to place your bet, and that is because we're

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 7>going to the AFC, and I mentioned the quarterbacks we

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 7>are riding with Jared Stidham and the Denver Broncos plus

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 7>five and a half in the AFC Championship game. What

0:40:50.840 --> 0:40:54.280
<v Speaker 7>a sentence. I can't believe we're here. Bonneck's broken ankle

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 7>in overtime, Stidham's gonna make his fifth start over Who

0:40:57.400 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 7>in the world wants to Backstidham here? Of course, if

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 7>you've been betting a while, you know that is exactly

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.920
<v Speaker 7>when you got to make the play. Start with the line.

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:09.360
<v Speaker 7>The look ahead on this game heading into the weekend

0:41:09.920 --> 0:41:13.080
<v Speaker 7>was Denver minus one and a half. That means this

0:41:13.160 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 7>is a seven point swing from Knicks to Stidham, and

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 7>that is insane to me. There's no way this is

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 7>a seven point drop off at quarterback. That is Josh Allen,

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:26.480
<v Speaker 7>that is Patrick Mahomes type level.

0:41:26.960 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Stidham.

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:29.040
<v Speaker 7>We don't know a lot about him, but it's not

0:41:29.080 --> 0:41:32.080
<v Speaker 7>like Knicks is anywhere near that company. I was already

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:35.440
<v Speaker 7>pretty low on Knicks anyways. I personally make this maybe

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 7>two points, maybe a field goal, something in that range.

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 7>Nothing even remotely close to seven. Even crazier is I

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 7>actually thought about betting Denver before this weekend on this line.

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.359
<v Speaker 7>I had Denver overfield goal before the Knicks injury, so

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:53.960
<v Speaker 7>Zoo might have been on the matchup. Both teams a

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 7>bit unproven as we know, both teams maybe a bit

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 7>fraudulent on this season, but it doesn't matter. They're here

0:41:59.160 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 7>and now you beat who's in front of you. Denver

0:42:01.920 --> 0:42:04.920
<v Speaker 7>does have the unit I trust the most, its defense,

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 7>and I like the matchup here some things for Denver

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 7>to watch for all the focus will be on Stidham,

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 7>but look at that defense, elite, elite pass pressure, one

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:16.440
<v Speaker 7>of the best in the league. And we've seen Patriots

0:42:16.480 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 7>young offensive line really struggle both against the Texans and

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 7>the Chargers. That offense has not been that great and

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 7>either these matchups not super impressive. Denver's corners are really

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 7>good and importantly, Denver is the number one defense limiting explosives.

0:42:32.480 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 7>That is where the Patriots live. They have not been

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 7>as good matriculating up and down the field, especially in

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:40.680
<v Speaker 7>the playoffs. They rely on those big plays number one

0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 7>explosive in the league, number one explosive passing. If Denver

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.080
<v Speaker 7>can take away those big plays or limit them, keep

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:50.720
<v Speaker 7>things close, that's your underdog formula to give you a shot.

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 7>Patriots defense, I know they have looked good but here's

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:56.520
<v Speaker 7>a big swing for them. Look at the Chargers, look

0:42:56.560 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 7>at the Texans. What do they have in common? Offensively?

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 7>Terror offensive line, Denver is one of the best offensive

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 7>lines in the entire league. So that's a huge swing.

0:43:05.880 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 7>I'm gonna make things look a lot different on that

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 7>side of the ball. And an important stat here, Patriots

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:12.880
<v Speaker 7>have been one of the worst teams in the league

0:43:12.960 --> 0:43:16.000
<v Speaker 7>in the red zone offense and defense both bottom five,

0:43:16.480 --> 0:43:19.720
<v Speaker 7>Denver top five there. So again, that is a spot

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 7>where if you're the underdog, one big stop, one big

0:43:23.160 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 7>score when it's unexpected, can really swing things. Conference Championship weekend,

0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:30.800
<v Speaker 7>you want to back the one seed since two thousand

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 7>and six, twenty one and five straight up are the

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:37.359
<v Speaker 7>one seeds by over ten points a game, twenty four

0:43:37.440 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 7>percent of the money line. And here's a few more

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:43.400
<v Speaker 7>stats for you among those games twelve and three straight

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 7>up against the two seed. Both of our matchups are sorry,

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 7>the AFC matchup obviously features that one and five in

0:43:51.040 --> 0:43:54.000
<v Speaker 7>one straight up as anything under a field goal favorite.

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 7>Obviously well underfield goal favorite here, huge underdogs at home,

0:43:59.400 --> 0:44:04.479
<v Speaker 7>think about this, Jared's didham to me? Instead of bone nicks?

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:09.240
<v Speaker 7>You're looking at Denver being more like Pittsburgh now, worse offense,

0:44:09.360 --> 0:44:11.760
<v Speaker 7>not great I don't want to back Pittsburgh too much.

0:44:11.840 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 7>But great defense, great coaching at home, underdog script, chance

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.879
<v Speaker 7>to win. That's what we're looking at. Here did them

0:44:20.880 --> 0:44:23.359
<v Speaker 7>in the Broncos plus five and a half at home? Now,

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 7>I said at the top, you may want to wait.

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:28.880
<v Speaker 7>So here's the spot for that four points. Five points

0:44:28.960 --> 0:44:30.680
<v Speaker 7>kind of a dead zone for the most part in

0:44:30.680 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 7>this range. So if you wait and the line moves

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.440
<v Speaker 7>a half a point or a point, you're probably not

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:39.959
<v Speaker 7>losing much. But this is slowly moving up already. And look,

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:42.560
<v Speaker 7>everyone's gonna want to bet the Patriots. People think this

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 7>is a fate accompany. I think we probably hit six.

0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 7>We could even push six and a half or seven.

0:44:48.040 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 7>Those are key numbers. You definitely want to wait and

0:44:50.160 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 7>grab that if you can. So we're making the hot

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.719
<v Speaker 7>red pick. I'm giving you Denver. They're the side. I

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 7>will be ond because this is an insane number, but

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.600
<v Speaker 7>you may get a better number if you wait just

0:44:59.640 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 7>a bit into the week. On the other side of

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:06.760
<v Speaker 7>the bracket, NFC Awesome Division, a rematch between the league's

0:45:06.760 --> 0:45:09.880
<v Speaker 7>two best teams, both games we've saw this season were great.

0:45:10.280 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 7>I don't know yet who wins that one, but here's

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:14.319
<v Speaker 7>what I do know. I'm gonna like whoever wins that

0:45:14.360 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 7>one in the Super Bowl. So last couple of months,

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.560
<v Speaker 7>I've had these two teams Rams and Seahawks first or

0:45:19.640 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 7>second in either order in my power ratings, lapping the

0:45:22.320 --> 0:45:25.680
<v Speaker 7>field multiple tiers ahead of the field. I have them

0:45:25.719 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 7>at least three points better than any other team on

0:45:27.760 --> 0:45:30.680
<v Speaker 7>a neutral and I don't exactly have Denver or New

0:45:30.719 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 7>England third in my power ratings. I actually make either

0:45:34.320 --> 0:45:37.280
<v Speaker 7>NFC team at this point at least a seven point

0:45:37.320 --> 0:45:41.000
<v Speaker 7>favorite against Denver and about six against New England as well.

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:44.319
<v Speaker 7>So all the better here on this bet. If we

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 7>think Denver is live at home, you get to face

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 7>Jared's did them in a super Bowl in that case,

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.680
<v Speaker 7>But I'm gonna like the NFC team in the Super Bowl,

0:45:52.800 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 7>And at most books you can just bet that NFC

0:45:55.040 --> 0:45:57.440
<v Speaker 7>to win the Super Bowl minus two twenty. At our

0:45:57.440 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 7>sponsored DraftKings, that's the bet here. My math makes the

0:46:01.360 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 7>NFC about a six and a half point favorite right now.

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:06.440
<v Speaker 7>Given the teams we've got left, that would be around

0:46:06.440 --> 0:46:09.400
<v Speaker 7>a minus three hundred money line about seventy five percent

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.360
<v Speaker 7>minus two twenty. We're getting about sixty nine percent, so

0:46:13.560 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 7>a little bit of edge in our favor there. Hopefully

0:46:17.000 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 7>you played this this weekend. My bet we gave out

0:46:19.360 --> 0:46:22.760
<v Speaker 7>on the podcast Seattle money Line, Rams money line plus NFC.

0:46:23.200 --> 0:46:25.840
<v Speaker 7>We got this at plus two twenty. Now we're getting

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 7>it out at minus two twenty, still odds in our

0:46:28.239 --> 0:46:30.600
<v Speaker 7>favorite And if your book doesn't have this, you can

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:33.000
<v Speaker 7>build this by yourself. Take your bet split in a

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:35.720
<v Speaker 7>half Seattle to win the Super Bowl plus one sixty

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 7>Rams plus two twenty five. You just bet both of

0:46:38.480 --> 0:46:41.560
<v Speaker 7>those together. You've built this bet at about minus two

0:46:41.640 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 7>twenty five and you're really not losing much on the

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:47.200
<v Speaker 7>bet there. So that is today's hot read NFC to

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:50.640
<v Speaker 7>win the Super Bowl minus two twenty in part because

0:46:50.640 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 7>Denver is live. Jared Stidham plus five and a half

0:46:53.719 --> 0:46:58.040
<v Speaker 7>home with the Broncos. That is our championship game hot read.

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:00.920
<v Speaker 2>That'll do it for us here this evening. If you

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.239
<v Speaker 2>want to keep up with everything we've got going on

0:47:03.280 --> 0:47:06.759
<v Speaker 2>this week Tuesday episode Thursday episode found on the Action

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Network YouTube page. When we talk Conference title weekend in

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 2>the NFL we'll.

0:47:13.440 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 1>See you next time.

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 2>Here on the Favorites presented by DraftKings, I'm Brandon Kravitz,

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:18.320
<v Speaker 2>She's Kendri Middleton.

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He's Stucky or Out.

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 4>Action Network reminds you please gamble responsibly. If you or

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:37.400
<v Speaker 4>someone you care about has a gambling problem, help is

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:40.560
<v Speaker 4>available twenty four to seven at one eight hundred Gambler