WEBVTT - Fed Decision Looms Over Financial Community

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim stinebec from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 1>It's two day policy meeting, as you know, kicking off today.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>It's the first of the new year, and we will

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>hear from J. Powell tomorrow in that press conference. Policymakers

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>widely expected to raise rates by a quarter percentage point,

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>slowing from December's fifty basis point increase after four straight

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:38.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy basis point moves. But the big question is what

0:00:38.200 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>words do they take out of that statement and what

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>comes after this move. Well, to help us see into

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the crystal ball, look into the future, very please step

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>back with Dr Stephen Skanky, chief economic advisor at kiel Point.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>He's a member, a former member of the U. S.

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Treasury and White House National Security Council staff member. He's

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.760
<v Speaker 1>based in Washington, d C. Joining us today from there

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>via zoom. Dr Skanky, good to have you with us,

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:04.399
<v Speaker 1>How are you great? Thanks and it's great to be

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:07.959
<v Speaker 1>with you. Tim and Carol. There's always a fun time,

0:01:09.280 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and especially coming into this meeting today and tomorrow, there's

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>there's so much good news for the Fed to be

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>taking in UH. Their their conversations are likely to be

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot different than they were six weeks or

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>twelve weeks ago. There is so much good news, but

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>there's also some concerning news that could lead to UH

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>potentially rates staying higher for longer. And I point specifically

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to the jobs market and what we see with just

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly resilient jobs market. It's really good, make no

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>mistake for for for Americans. UH. It's not so good

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>for the Federal Reserve because they're concerned about a wage

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>price spiral. Well that's certainly on their their list of concerns.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>We did get some good news just the sporting with

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the Employment cost Index coming down again one percent for

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the fourth quarter, annualizes at four percent. Obviously it's not

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>where the Fed wants it to be, but it but

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it dropped from an annual rate annualized rate of four

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 1>point eight to UH to four percent. We do expect

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that the employment gains number coming out on Friday will

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>also be helpful, not negative, but but down for where

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it was even just in December. So I want to

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 1>go right to what I think is there could be

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a really important issue and if you think about it,

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>um and in one of our I think it was

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe our one of our newsletters that was out this morning,

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:38.959
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember which one, but it talked about made

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in China inflation. And this speaks to our Bloomberg big take,

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get to a little bit later on. But

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>back in September, then fed here Johnny Ellen mold the

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>feds first interest rate hike in almost a decade. China's

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.280
<v Speaker 1>economic and market wobbles were among the reasons she ended

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>up staying her hand. How does China, Steve complicate the

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>situation for j Well, China is really come on back,

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>come back online, and far more quickly, I think than

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone expected. They they ended their their COVID restraints, They're

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>putting monetary and fiscal stimulus into it. They're standing behind

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>their real estate sector, and so production in shadow will

0:03:19.160 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>be helpful. Uh not that has been a big negative

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>for inflation, but it certainly will be helpful and it

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>will be what helps, uh the global economy be less

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>likely to fall into recession. Probably the problem or the

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenge for the FED from China's increased activity is

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be increasing its demand for for

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>energy and that will just put upward pressure on energy prices. Uh.

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And so we're well, that's been a positive for inflation

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>coming down. Uh, that positive impact is going to go away. Yeah,

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I was just looking through our story because I think,

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, concerns about Chinese inflation essentially what it could

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>do in terms of kicking up inflation and the drag

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.440
<v Speaker 1>on the global economy. I think it's something like a

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>one percentage point difference. I mean, do we need to

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be worried that it is going to make Ultimately the

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>FED say, you know what, we don't quite know how

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 1>the China factor and it's reopening how much pick up

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and momentum we will see in how much draw down

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>on global commodities and pressure on those prices that they

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>might just stay higher for longer. Well, it certainly is

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be on their mind, and that certainly can

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 1>be a factor in their decision to stay higher for longer.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But in some respects time is really on their side.

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:47.839
<v Speaker 1>The core PC inflation to flator that came out last

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>week very good news for the Fed. It's annuallyzed over

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the last three months at the two point nine percent.

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not a two percent, but it's it's come down

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>significantly from where it was. The tightening and higher interest

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>rates are slowing economic growth, the job vacancy gap, all

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>all that a plush and so so that the Fed

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is uh I think likely to increase twenty five basis

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>points tomorrow. Most believe that it will do another twenty

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>five basis points in mid March. UH, and before it

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>has to do anything after that, it will have a

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:34.479
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of information and many believe the consensus of

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.840
<v Speaker 1>economists is that will continue to see inflation fall really

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>back to where the FED wants it to be, notwithstanding

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the negative influence that higher energy prices I mean as

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 1>a result of China coming back online so strongly, could

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>also have Okay, so that's a wild card at this point.

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>That's something that we need to keep in mind. And remember,

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, oil supply is not something that the FED

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.119
<v Speaker 1>can control. Oil demand the FED can control, I guess

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent when it comes to raising rates

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>and tamping down demand. Uh dr Skanky, I want to

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>go back to your point about higher for longer. When

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think, how how long do you think the

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Fed will keep rates this high? I think they'll keep

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>them this high at least through the end of June. Uh.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Their rhetoric tomorrow is is going to be very much

0:06:27.480 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on track with their their higher for longer. That's surprising

0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>to hear only to June, though, because in December the

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Fed said they had no plans to cut this year. Well,

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:43.039
<v Speaker 1>that's right, and this is part of their forward guidance.

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They're there, They're they're sound being very hawkish on purpose,

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>notwithstanding what they're seeing internally with the slowing of the

0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>economy and some of the other achievements that that are

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.720
<v Speaker 1>coming forth. But rather than having to raise interest rates

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>further and to push the economy either into a recession

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 1>or deeper into a recession, they're they're trying to to

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>strip out some of the euphoria, enthusiasm, exuberants. They look

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>at the SNP up six percent for the year. How

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>how how is that not a frustration to them, and

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to use their rhetoric, their forward guidance to

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>tamp that out. But they're also looking at a very

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>much a weekending economy, and many now believe many many

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who who thought that it it certainly could just bounce

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>around flat and then maybe tip into a recession in

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:46.200
<v Speaker 1>second or third quarter, are now seen that perhaps even

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter, we're going to end up with

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>negative really economic growth. So, you know, it's an interesting time.

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And Steve, yesterday we were talking with our Steve Matthews

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and our team UM about a story about how Feed

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to clash with Wall Street once again, because

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you've got traders expecting a peak policy rate of around

0:08:04.200 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>four nine percent by May in June, falling to below

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent by the December meeting, further

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>cuts indicated during However, the latest you know dot plot

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>from uh the Central Bank forecast showed seventeen of nineteen

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>officials projecting rates about five this year, two of them

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 1>above five and a half percent. It's a bit of

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a gap, a bit of a disconnect. Um, let's play

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the arbitrage there. But it's just interesting to see that gap.

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously, the Fed's going to do what it's

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>got to do, but who usually has it right? Is it?

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Are you know traders right about this that that's a

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>very good question, and to be honest, it's absolutely fascinating

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the dot plot and you really

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>have yourself do they believe what they're saying or is

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this part of the hawk ish message they want to

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>send to to tamp out this enthusiasm. They're very frustrated

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:06.719
<v Speaker 1>with easy and financial markets. They're they're trying to ring

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>out inflation and financial markets. Wall Street are are acting

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>as though that job has already finished. In the second

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>half of the year, interest rates are going to decline

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and we'll we'll be back to a the old game.

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It will be the Fed pivot. The Fed absolutely does

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not want the market to believe that that's right. Reservations

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>are up at the pivot pivot. You know, bistro investors

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>are buying into it. They are So what could what

0:09:35.280 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>could j Powell say tomorrow? What what could the Fed

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>communicate tomorrow to really hammer home that this is not

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:46.439
<v Speaker 1>what they want to see? Well, they are going to

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>they are going to say they haven't seen anything that

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>tells them they can stop raising interest rates. They're going

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk about higher ongoing increases, plural in rates U

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it will be required, and the rate rates will remain

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at higher levels for some time. Um and uh. He

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>won't he won't let anyone press him to to say

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>what that exactly means. But higher rates, higher levels for

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:20.440
<v Speaker 1>some time, and that they're oh uh and it's it

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:23.440
<v Speaker 1>really is amazing to watch it. Their hope is that

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>at some point markets will will take a step back

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and uh stop this, uh, this this frenzy, and belief

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that the pivot has already happened, and that the FET

0:10:38.840 --> 0:10:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is happy where inflation is. It's not happy where inflation is,

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>and it will continue to operate until it gets it down.

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>But it's almost as though it doesn't matter so much

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>anymore how much the FET increases rates or or or

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>how long they keep them at higher levels. Inflation seems

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to be in the process of being wrung out as

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy cools the the employment sector is working itself out,

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Eddie goal gets back to some form of equilibrium. Right.

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't want to get fooled about. They want to see

0:11:15.240 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it happen, So they're not a trust that it will

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>happen on its own. All right, We've got to run,

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Steve good to check in with you. Be wells. Dr

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Steve Skanky, chief Economic advisor at Kiel Point, former U

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>s Treasury and White House National Security Council staff member

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.040
<v Speaker 1>showing us to be a zoom from Washington, d C.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:38.599
<v Speaker 1>live week days from two to five v m s

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>during Listen on Bloomberg dot com, the I Heart Radio app,

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business App, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember how we were all on a buying spree during

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, Well, are you still waiting for your couch?

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>Just a few things? Well, the same goes for those

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of the shipping industry who are looking to invest. Record

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>profits made during the pandemic contain annial lines man, They

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>went on a buying bins. Well, now all those new

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 1>vessels will start arriving, and they've got to be named,

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>just as the global economy is slowing. This story in

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming new issue of Bloomberg Business Week, on news

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>stands later this week, already online at Bloomberg dot com

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and on the Bloomberg terminal. With more We've got Bloomberg

0:12:16.400 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Business Week editor Joel Webber and Bloomberg News Trades are

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Murray, who joins us on the phone in London.

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Joel's here in our interactive broker's studio. So Joel, how

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>do you name a ship? Well, you you go, you

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>go to the Midwest and you sort of like throw

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it darted a map and sometimes it lands on a

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>on a place called may View, Missouri. Um, so Brendan,

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:42.319
<v Speaker 1>why why is Maresk who makes a lot of big vessels,

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>some of them uh bordering on fours even Uh, and

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 1>these are the style of both cargo vessels that that

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:54.360
<v Speaker 1>him alluded to that are going to be hopefully coming

0:12:54.360 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to mark coming to oceans near you. And nothing alleviate uh,

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but not too many problems, too many? But but why

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>did Mayor's you know, Copenhagen based company go to Mayview,

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Missouri to name one of its ships, which that name

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>will be the may View marisk That's right. So, so

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>marisk Is is a hundred and twenty year old company

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and they and they're very proud of their history. A

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>guy named Arnold Peter Mueller married a woman whose family

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>was from the tiny town of Mayview, Missouri. This was

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>about fifty miles east of Kansas City. Uh. You, I

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>tried to find a stoplight using Google Earth and I

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.599
<v Speaker 1>couldn't find one. Um, that's not to say it's the

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>folks that aren't proud of it. And I'm told there's

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>even a plaque commemorating the fact that they've gotten one

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the world's biggest ships named after the town. Okay,

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 1>so there you know names aside um, and maybe we

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:51.480
<v Speaker 1>can spend a little bit more time with that yet.

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>But Marisk isn't even the biggest buyer, right, Like who

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>are you know? NSC is one name that's come up

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>uh in some Bloomberg business we we week stories lately. Uh.

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It also happens to be a big buyer of ships,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right. So so that this industry is the container

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>shipping industry made record profits over the past two years,

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>basically because we all bought things for our backyards or

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>our home offices. Now that is starting to cool off,

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>but in the meantime, they've all uh these and there

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is dominated by about ten companies, of half in Europe,

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Path and Asia. Um MSc, as you mentioned, is the

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest one. It's a sort of uh fairly low key

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>company based in Switzerland owned by an Italian billionaire. Uh

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that and they are going full They're they're putting all

0:14:38.520 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>their cards in the ocean freight. Uh game Uh and

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>they are. They have something like a hundred and thirty

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>ships on order now at about hundred and fifty to

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million dollars per ship. Somebody do the master

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>me on that. But it's you know, it's a couple

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of a couple of billion dollars worth of ships they

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have on order. Um. So yeah. But but Marisk, on

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, is wants to be more of a

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>door to door kind of end to end logistics providers.

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>So they only have, you know, a couple of dozen

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>ships on order compared to probably ten times the amount

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that are that are ten times more that MSc has.

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, I keep thinking of a conversation Tim

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and I had recently with Mario Cordero, executive director at

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the Court of Long Beach, who talked about shipping containers

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>being canceled. You know, very different from what we saw

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic. There's no backup, prices are coming down.

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a very different environment. Are these guys do they

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>make some wrong bets? Well, they don't. They don't bet

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>on you know, a couple of hundred million dollars on

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>a container ship on what's happening over the next twelve

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen months. These are these are investments of you know,

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>years sometimes, but this is a very cyclical business. It

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>rises and falls with the with the economic tides. And

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we are you know, the the the economy, the global

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>economy it softening, and all these ships are going to

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>hit the market just exactly the time when they don't

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>need them. Container ships are kind of like hotels, and

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>if they're not filled, uh, they're not making money. And

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>if they're not making money, then the price comes down,

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>so that benefits consumers. You know, we're we're gonna we're

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna see UH and and companies like Walmart and akia

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that that use a lot of shipping services, you know,

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to see their rates come down and probably

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>stay down. As our Bloomberg Intelligence UH logistics analysts said,

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see low ocean freight rates. So well

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>into it time to talk about the names again, because

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you can talk about the names again. Why not talk

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>about the names again? Um, Britan, I'm curious, since um

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you did some dogged reporting here, what did you learn

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>about names that was you know, as somebody who follows

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 1>this stuff so closely, you know, what was the big

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>reveal for you? And in the naming of how we

0:16:55.840 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>get these uh, you know vessels that sometimes become iconic

0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and pop culture in the case of like saying the

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>ever given right, so the so well if you bring

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>up the ever Given so Evergreen Marine is the Taiwanese company.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And they like consistency. They like putting ever in front

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of the name of their ships. So they've got dozens

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and dozens of ships. That's the ever Early I think

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there was one the ever uh superb exactly just any

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>any any noun, you know, fill in the blank and

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.399
<v Speaker 1>put ever in front of it, and that's how they

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>named their ships. Um other companies that you know, it's

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's some some uh source of corporate pride. I

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 1>mean the MSc said that they named Mayor's after uh

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>family members of employees. So maybe it's you know, kind

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of a motivational thing. You know, you have a good

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>year and you know, you get a ship named after

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>your kid or something friended. I mean, you've done so

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>much reporting on this. Have any companies come to you

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and said, we want to name this one after the

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>trades are at Bloomberg? Well, you know I did lobby

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for that with with marrisk and they and the and

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.880
<v Speaker 1>the and the public relations guy who I talked to said,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got to get in mine behind me because I

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>won't say his name, but he he's you know, kind

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of quietly wants one named after him. Ever, Brendon has

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>a kind of nice thing to it. Don't get stuck.

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I agree, exactly. Well, there's nine hundred ships coming over

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the next three or four years, and so you know

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got to figure one of those, you know, uh

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>could uh you know, could be named after one of us.

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we didn't come back to may View, Missouri. Why

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe so maybe you stuck out to me because I'm

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>well number one, because I'm from St. Louis, and I

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to know how did this tiny little town literally,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>like I said, no spent you know, there any stoplights?

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>And fairly it's not even a suburb of Kansas City.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of just just an old farming community that

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.919
<v Speaker 1>has basically had two or three hundred residents for for

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>as long as I could see the census day to

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>go back, uh and and it was it meant something

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to the history of the company. I spoke to the

0:19:03.119 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>historian mcmay's cousin in house historian, and he said that

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the that the that there and there are uh family members,

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, descendants of the founder who still work for

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the company. And that's just been the tradition. If they

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>try to, uh, you know, keep that, keep that tradition going.

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Arnold Peter Mueller was married in may View. Go ahead,

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>go figure. Ever Murray works too, it does Ever Webber,

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>why not. I'll take that all right. Joel and Brendan,

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you. You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast.

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live week days from two to five p

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 1>m s during Listen on Bloomberg dot com, the I

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or watch

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube. It is time for plugged in

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>your weekly look at e VS. And I gotta say

0:19:53.920 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>tim lot's happening in the world always when it comes

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to electric vehicles, GM investing six fifty million developing the

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:03.440
<v Speaker 1>largest U S lithium deposit. And that's really a move

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to ramp up its efforts to secure supplies of the

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>key metal used in electric vehicle batters. I mean, it

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is all about getting those raw materials and components in

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>order to be able to meet demand and speaking of

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>demand and e vs GM CEO Mary Bara dismissing concerns

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>about those price cuts after Tesla and Ford cut their

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 1>EV sticker prices. Look at shares of GM today up

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>significantly after reporting results. Let's break it all down with

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology co host ed Ludlow, who's in the Bloomberg

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>nine sixties studio in San Francisco, And I want to

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 1>start with um the six fifty million dollar investment that

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 1>GM is going to make the largest U S lithium deposit.

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's a big headline. It is. It is a

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>big headline, But take us into the details of the

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just a headline? Is that what you say? What's the

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>story behind the story here? I mean the devil's in

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 1>the detail. This is for lithium supply starting from so

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>a few years away from now. But you know it's

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>all part of the widest story about concern for all

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>of these players. Test being the pure play market incumbent

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>GM and four being the legacy US names transitioning to

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.920
<v Speaker 1>e V making sure that they have access in their

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>supply chains to the raw materials for battery cells right

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>as they ramp up the volume of evs they produce,

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>they need more battery cells and therefore they need more

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>access to the metals that go into them. And you know,

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 1>in this case it's lithium. It's a partnership with Lithium

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>America's Corps. It's about a mine in Nevada, specifically the

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>factor past mine UM. And you know, I think that

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you know it meets GM's ambition, right because this is

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>a company that you know is aiming to build a

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>millionaivs a year eventually and they need to make sure

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.919
<v Speaker 1>they've got the raw materials to do that. Um, do

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>we have enough lithium to do what we need to

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>do to turn over everybody to trick question that is

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a trick question is what the conversation do you have

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>around this? Well? Do you know why it's a trick question,

0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 1>And it's because it's not about necessarily how much lithium

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>we have available to us, but also where it's coming from.

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Because remember the whole point of the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>which provides for a federal credit, a consumer incentive. Being

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>eligible for that incentive long term is dependent on where

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>you source your raw materials on in lithium's case, in particular,

0:22:21.720 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>China is such a massive player, and the whole point

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.919
<v Speaker 1>of the I r A is to make America's supply

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>chain more competitive. So it's not just about how much

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 1>lithium there is on the planet, it's about where it's

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>coming from and making the US more competitive. And again,

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this announcement that GM made Tuesday is for a mine

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in Nevada, so that would very much mean that any

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>battery packs with lithium from that mine were eligible going

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.520
<v Speaker 1>forward for the IRA credit. But also brings us back

0:22:47.520 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to the question about making different batteries or batteries that

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are that have different materials in them add and are

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>you betting on a component that's guaranteed to be used

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>for the next X number of years? Yeah, I mean

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>you have to look at the word that Tesla has

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>done right around changing the cell chemistry. Um Lithium is

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>one metal that is prominent in lithian ion batteries, right,

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>but also cobalt and nickel are important. You can use

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>different cell compositions, and cell chemistry is to boost the

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>proportion of one to the other. The end goal is

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to make sure that the battery or sell therefore pack

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>has the greatest energy density how much energy can you

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.720
<v Speaker 1>squeeze into that little cylinder and into that battery pack.

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:34.000
<v Speaker 1>That is the equation from an economics perspective of what

0:23:34.040 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to achieve, how expensively or cheaply. Conversing you

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>source your metals has a direct impact on that. So, UM,

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like, you know, it's interesting and I

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>was looking to put together some gainers for when we

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>do our cross platform. You know, market closed here today,

0:23:48.720 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting. You've got Tesla continuing, you know, to

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>move higher this year again rallying rythan UM I believe

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>was also among the top gainers in the NAZAC one.

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I just want to do allow check here. You know,

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing a lot of momentum into that space. UM.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>We know that there's a bit of a pricing were

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>going on on the GM saying and Mary bar saying,

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't necessarily need to to play in that price war.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So what are the bigger, broader trends that are going

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>on here when it comes to the space. I mean,

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I would love to tell you that the market dynamics

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>driving the market is about kind of the love back

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.239
<v Speaker 1>in love with evs. You have to remember these are

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>also some of the most downtrodden stocks there are out there.

0:24:28.440 --> 0:24:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Riving and Lucid the two worst performers on the NASDAC

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 1>one in two Tesla had its worst year I think

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:38.639
<v Speaker 1>on record. I was just checking my Bloomberg terminal in

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:42.360
<v Speaker 1>two right sixty decline and so you see a lot

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>of participants in the market look at how valuations have

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>come down and say, yeah, now's a good time to buy.

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.840
<v Speaker 1>The other side of the coin is that test zonings

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.440
<v Speaker 1>were great. You know, they showed that using the level

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of price cuts does induce demand. And Elon must talked

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about in the first early weeks of January of this year,

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the demand for their vehicles was twice what they're able

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to produce in that snapshot moment. So there is excitement

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>about what's possible, but still nervousness broadly about demand tapering

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>off this year. Were you surprised ed to hear GM

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO Mary Burrow dismissed concerns about price cuts give Tesla

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.679
<v Speaker 1>and Ford seemed to be in this the beginnings of

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a price war. Yes, I mean the general consensus across

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>sell side analysts at least was that Tesla cutting its

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>prices in the words of RBC would have a cascading effect,

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>so you know Ford went next. There was suspicion actually

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that we'll see the European automakers follow suit. GM's currently

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>bucking that trend. It's interesting because they had earnings right,

0:25:44.680 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and the numbers were very strong, particularly how bullish. Their

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>outlook for earnings this year would be the e BIT forecast,

0:25:51.280 --> 0:25:53.959
<v Speaker 1>in particular earnings per share of six to seven dollars

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>for the full year. But you have to remember that

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that is held up on a pillar of sustained demand

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for their expensive gas vehicles while they transition to electric vehicles.

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>The price cut comments were interesting though they're basically seem

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to be saying, we're not going to adjust the prices

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>of our electric vehicles for now. But remember GM has

0:26:12.960 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>done what many automakers do, first come to market with

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a very expensive e V and their models that are

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>more mass market, more affordable, those are still a little

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 1>way away from mass production. So that's part of the

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>equation too. Do we ever think about that in terms

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of the raw materials that we're going or that are

0:26:27.720 --> 0:26:29.879
<v Speaker 1>needed in order to make all of these electric vehicles.

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know the discussion has been out there.

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if there's more momentum that we're just

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of trading a fixed commodity with limitations on the

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>amount that are out there, meaning fossil fuels, just for

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>another basket of raw materials that are fixed as well.

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate the debate. I mean, at the end of

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the day, the fundamentally, what you have is a lot

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of demand, which is in the form of many automakers

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>with plans to ramp their output of electric vehicles, trying

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>to latch onto what is a relatively finite, immediately available

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>source of supply, you know. And it's no surprise that

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:11.359
<v Speaker 1>we saw GM make this announcement on lithium with Lithium

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>America's on Tuesday. Tesla has done very similar things in

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 1>invertically integrating its supply chain right and in other words,

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 1>cut out the middleman, go direct to the source and

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>use that to make yourselves. The thing is that those

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>legacy also makers GM and for their future proofing right,

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>so GM forecast making four hundred thousand vs from the

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>start of last year through to the middle of next year.

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Long term, their aim is to reach millions of units,

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>but they're not quite there yet. Ford is ramping up

0:27:37.680 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>the Marquee production from around seventy eight thousand units last

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>year to a hundred and thirty thousand this year, but

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>long term its ambitions are much greater, and it's that

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>long term that they're trying to secure that supply for

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>At the moment. As we spoke about yesterday, though, one

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:53.840
<v Speaker 1>of the challenges here is the margins on evs. For

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 1>margins on internal combustion engine vehicles. I mean, look no

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 1>further than GM's results for just how you know much

0:27:59.800 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>big or margins are when it comes to those old

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 1>school gas guzzlers. Um, just in thirty seconds because I

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about some other stuff here. What's to

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>watch for with that? Yeah, I mean, ultimately, if you

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.159
<v Speaker 1>build vehicles at greater volumes, you can buffer the margins,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and if you cut prices, that's clearly a headwind to margins,

0:28:17.640 --> 0:28:20.159
<v Speaker 1>and Forward are trying to get that equation right. The

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Marquees unprofitable, but what they're saying is as we grow

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>our footprint and produce greater volumes each year, there is

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>some protection to margins that comes with that. I remember

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand nineteen very quick Jim Hackett, former CEO.

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>The day they unveiled the Marquis A Driss Elbert was there.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>It was weird. He promised it would be profitable from

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>unit one, but then the world changed, you know, inflation,

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>rising commodities costs. Okay, this is what I wanted to

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 1>talk to you about. It's a hard pivot. It's Palanteer

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Technology is Tomorrow, You've got a big interview with Alex Carpets,

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO and co founder. Thirty seconds. What's on your agenda? Yeah, look,

0:28:51.880 --> 0:28:54.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting a rare invite down to one of their

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>facilities in Palo Alto. He's in town. Remember this is

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a company that pivoted and moved from California to Colorado.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And we're going to catch up. And you can catch

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the interview on Bloomberg Technology on Wednesday, two pm Pacific,

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>five pm Eastern. That's a great interview. Looking forward to it, Ed, Uh,

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and really appreciate you weighing in as you always do

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for us when it comes to the e V space,

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's kind of fast and furious sometimes. Ed Ludlow,

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:21.320
<v Speaker 1>co host of Bloomberg Technology at Bloomberg News, really wide

0:29:21.400 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>ranging conversation. I do think about these raw materials and

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>precious materials, if you will. Uh, and the access to them,

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's kind of another race. Yeah. I

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>think about a lot about how the technology has changed

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:35.640
<v Speaker 1>in just a few years for batteries, for batteries, Yeah, yeah, exactly.

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Catch us

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 1>live week days from two to five pm Eastern on

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty bloom

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>The Journal. Yeah, but you let me drive? Oh no,

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, all right, please, I'll do vel. I

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>want to drive. It's a good question. This is the

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Drive to the Clothes on Bluebird Radio. All right, everybody,

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just about seventeen minutes left in today's trading session. We've got,

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>as you heard from Chile, Charlie, a rally underway. We've

0:30:29.920 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>seen yields back off a bit. This lesson twenty four

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>hours away from the first FED decision of the new year,

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and coming up with a good guest to talk about

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the trade here. Yeah, very pleased

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>to have with us. This afternoon. Larry Patkowski, managing partner

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and portfolio manager at good Haven Capital Management, joining us

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Millbourne, New Jersey. Good to have

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you with us, Larry. Uh So, here we are at

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the best January in years. We're seeing

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>a rally just as the FED kicks off it's two

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>day policy meeting with the SPU by a full percentage point.

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh Does the FED rate on the frade tomorrow? Uh? Tim.

0:31:07.480 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>It's nice to be here, hello, Carroll. Tim. I appreciate

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:14.959
<v Speaker 1>you starting with an easy question, Okay, And it's an

0:31:14.960 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>easy question because I don't know. It is not the

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>type of thing that we try and make short term

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.920
<v Speaker 1>predictions about. And and my I don't know is not

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:29.080
<v Speaker 1>a flippant or dismissive. I don't know. It's a respectful

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and humble I don't know, because I do know. I

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>believe where a good Haven our circle of confidence as

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>investors ends, and we try very hard to develop a

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>varying perception about the handful of companies we have an

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>investment in, and we try and make those investments where

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we think we have marginal safety. But I don't think

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we have, uh, the ability to have a varying perception

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>about short term moves and Fed policy, interest rates and

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the g d P. So, uh, we understand what everybody

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>seems to be kind of expecting, you know, ah, you know,

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a quarter of a point and uh, the beginning of

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>some slow down in this. And we don't have a

0:32:11.640 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>very different view. And again we're not dismissive. I guess

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's more about commentary and less about a

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>singular move tomorrow. It's it's more about what A Powell

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>says about holding rates higher for longer and what he

0:32:23.480 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>says about financial conditions. Our view about the recent environment

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>is the following. I am not as young as I look.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>We're sound. I have seen periods. I have seen periods

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where there have been existential risks to the financial system

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and to the economy. I've been saying for the last

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>there's In other words, you understand that a zero interest

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>rate environment is abnormal, not normal. How you make a

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:55.480
<v Speaker 1>great point. And a few years ago we did say, like, look,

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>interest rates will go higher at some point, and we

0:32:58.760 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>try to add something to the portfolio that we thought

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 1>would benefit from somewhat higher rates, as some financial companies

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that could use more interest income, whether it be proper

0:33:08.400 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and casualty insurance companies or some aspects of the commercial

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>banking sector. But I don't think what we've been experiencing recently,

0:33:16.200 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>which is much higher interest rates and a slower economy,

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>is an existential economic risk compared to some things I

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have seen in my career. So we've been doing what

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we normally do. We get up earlier, go to sleep later,

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and keep looking for a handful of companies that we

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>think can do fine even in an imperfect economy. And

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been fortunate enough, you know, to be able to

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 1>find something well. And I'm looking at your fund, the

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Good Haven Fund UH year to day up more than

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>seven percent, putting it in the ninety third percentile according

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg data. Longer term three years on average annually

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.440
<v Speaker 1>again more than eleven putting it in a ninety percentile.

0:33:57.520 --> 0:34:01.080
<v Speaker 1>So you're making some good bets. UM a listener and

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>viewer a business week writing in and saying what went

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>into the decision to invest more in larger cap stocks

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to small to mid cap stocks. UH. First

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of all, Carol, thank you for noticing we have been

0:34:13.040 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>working quite hard, you know, to continue to drive long

0:34:15.920 --> 0:34:18.400
<v Speaker 1>term returns, you know, like that for us and our

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:21.920
<v Speaker 1>fellow shareholders, so thank you. We have a mix of

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>larger companies, some of them are that our household names.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>We have a mix of some mid sized companies, and

0:34:28.239 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we have some real below the radar screen companies. We

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.879
<v Speaker 1>are not you know, uh, myself uh and also ARTI

0:34:35.920 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>quack here who works with me. We are not waking

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>up every day saying, boy, we want to look for

0:34:41.040 --> 0:34:44.000
<v Speaker 1>another company of a certain size or you know, we're

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for the best bargains in companies. We feel that

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>we understand where they are going, We understand management teams.

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>We think we have an edge and understanding the business

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:57.319
<v Speaker 1>and where we're buying with a marginal stafty that we

0:34:57.360 --> 0:35:03.320
<v Speaker 1>can find and you know, one should find great things infrequently.

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>But we've been fortunate to have been i think positioned

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>reasonably well as the statistics you've called out have demonstrated

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 1>what what's been a newby as of late and not

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a whole new position or adding to a position. Well.

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:24.160
<v Speaker 1>We had kept our eye on for some years k

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>k R. In our minds, the movement of capital to

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the alternative asset managers over the last bunch of years

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 1>was a very interesting trend, and it was not a

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>trend we thought we was stopping any time soon. As

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, very recently, I think New York

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 1>has upped the percentage that they're going to going to

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>commit to alternatives from we ended up first. We we

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>looked at KKR and we admired what they had built.

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Distributable learnings had gone from like a buck sixties six

0:35:55.680 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen to recently like four and a half bucks

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>a share that's buck sixty six per shared to four

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half a share over the last trailing twelve months.

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And we bought some at the peak of the covid

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>UH in the spring of when you know, the world

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.120
<v Speaker 1>was going through a very difficult period. But we have

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>added to it in two kind of around these prices.

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>What I think has been interesting lately is some of

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the cloud from some of the issues surrounding UH, you know,

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the black Stone b read, I think has given perhaps

0:36:30.680 --> 0:36:35.000
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to look at the whole sector. And KKR

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>is the only one we own, and we think it's

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.360
<v Speaker 1>well managed. We think we understand where the business is going.

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>We think earnings management says they think earnings can be

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>seven bucks within a couple of years, and we think

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that's intriguing. Yeah, rallied big time higher one down about

0:36:52.880 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty almost thirty eight percent last year, but we're seeing

0:36:56.040 --> 0:36:59.239
<v Speaker 1>money move into KKR certainly this year. It's already up

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>almost here in Larry Pittkowski, thank you so much, Managing partner,

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:07.799
<v Speaker 1>portfolio manager, Goodhaven Capital Management, joining us on the phone

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 1>from Milburgh, New Jersey. This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast,

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:17.360
<v Speaker 1>available on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on

0:37:21.000 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the I Heart Radio app, tune In,

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and the Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>live every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal.