WEBVTT - West Virginia Is Giving Texas a Run for Its Money on Climate Obstruction

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks ago, we had on Jesse Coleman was

0:00:11.920 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>documented to walk through how the same dark money network

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that once funded climate denial is now funding state treasurers

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to push back against so called woke

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>capital or woke capitalism.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>The reference to Environmental, Social and Governance Guidelines in the

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 2>finance space or ESG, which if anything, has mostly been

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 2>a pretty handy greenwashing tool for a lot of polluting

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 2>industries over the years. That was until the Securities and

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Exchange Commission announced that the next phase of its ESG

0:00:54.080 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 2>plan was to require companies to disclose climate risk. Seems

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 2>logical enough. Climate impacts could definitely have a financial impact

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 2>as well, both in terms of extreme weather events and

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 2>in terms of legislative changes, not to mention the massive

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>amount of litigation currently facing many companies that are the

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>drivers of climate change. But remember Coleman told us the

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>anti ESG crowd, they're reaching way back into the vault

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:33.040
<v Speaker 2>of climate change denial, claiming not only that climate change

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>isn't happening, but that actually more CO two in the

0:01:36.040 --> 0:01:38.039
<v Speaker 2>atmosphere is a net gain.

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.839
<v Speaker 3>You know, CO two isn't bad for you. It's causing

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:43.040
<v Speaker 3>a great greeting of the Earth.

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.920
<v Speaker 2>Coleman also told us about one state treasurer in.

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Particular, Riley Moore, the treasure of West Virginia, who's a

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>real leader of all of this. Was actually on a

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 3>podcast with the head of SFOF and he was talking

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 3>about why the state treasures are so perfect as a

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 3>weapon against climb policy, and he said, the attorney's generals

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>they have to work through the courts. I speak with

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 3>the taxpayer's money with the stroke of my pen. I

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>can change things and it doesn't have to go through

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:11.320
<v Speaker 3>the court system.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 2>That podcast is called Gallantly Streaming, by the way, who

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 2>knows why, it's the State Financial Officers Foundation podcast. Here's

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:27.400
<v Speaker 2>really Moore speaking with them in February twenty twenty two.

0:02:27.840 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 4>We're able to kind of speak with the taxpayer dollars,

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 4>is what I'd say. And because you're not just a

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 4>bureaucrat in here.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 5>You are an.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Elected official, and you are there to represent the equities

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:46.639
<v Speaker 4>and interests of your constituents, and you can do that

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 4>in a way that's uniquely different than say attorney generals do,

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 4>where they might sue over a certain issue or something

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 4>like that. This has more of an immediate effect, and

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:03.480
<v Speaker 4>the end of the day, day citizens are paying taxes,

0:03:03.600 --> 0:03:07.320
<v Speaker 4>industries are paying taxes to the state in which you

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 4>manage those dollars, and so there is, I believe, a

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 4>responsibility to have those dollars invested in a manner that

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 4>reflects the interest and equity of your constituents.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 2>Moore became a real hero of the anti ESG right

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>when he kicked Blackrock out of West Virginia in January

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two. That was shortly after CEO Larry Fink

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 2>encouraged American companies to commit to carbon neutrality. It's interesting

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 2>that more specifically notes there how much more treasures can

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 2>do than attorneys general because guess who else is getting

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 2>in on the anti ESG action.

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 6>This is not a case about climate change. This is

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 6>a case about separational powers and ensuring that the legislative branch,

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 6>sception at an unelected bureaucrats don't try to weigh in

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 6>when they don't have power to act.

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right. It's Patrick Morrissey, Attorney General of West Virginia,

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the man who brought us West Virginia versus EPA. The

0:04:14.960 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court ruling in that case doubled down on a

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>convention entirely manufactured by Supreme Court justices in recent years,

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:28.520
<v Speaker 2>something they call the Major Questions doctrine. Don't be fooled

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 2>by the doctrine part. It's only been around since the

0:04:31.279 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 2>early eighties. There's nothing established or original about this idea.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.359
<v Speaker 2>It's just a very handy tool that conservative justices like

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 2>to use. We've explained Major Questions doctrine on this podcast

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:48.720
<v Speaker 2>a few times, but here's NYU law professor Richard Rivez

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 2>defining it for us back when West Virginia versus EPA

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.200
<v Speaker 2>was being argued at the Supreme Court earlier this year.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 7>The Major Question doctrine is a doctrine that was used

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 7>in the past extremely rarely. I mean the Supreme Court

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.080
<v Speaker 7>maybe invoked it once every five years, only five times

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 7>before this past year in its whole history, starting around

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 7>nineteen eighty in cases that were actually quite exceptional for

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 7>some reason or other. But in the last couple of years,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 7>it's a doctrine that's been invoked promiscuously by opponents of regulation,

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 7>and the Court has shown great interest in embracing it.

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it basically says that if an agency decision

0:05:34.880 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 7>is going to have vast economic or political significance. It

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:43.919
<v Speaker 7>needs to be authorized explicitly by Congress, and that the

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 7>agents shouldn't be doing it under kind of delegate authority

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 7>in a somewhat open ended statute. This term, the Court

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 7>has already invoked it in striking down the Osha vaccine

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 7>and testing mandate, in bicking down the eviction moratorium, and

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 7>it obviously played a big role in the argument yesterday.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 7>So it's become you know, it's gone from something quite

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 7>extraordinary that happens where the Court really only deals with

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 7>her every several years, every five years, so something that

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 7>ends up like as a central issue in the Supreme

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 7>Court multiple times a year. And this whole transformation has

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 7>happened very quickly, i'd say, in the last couple of years.

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>And now West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrissey is injecting

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>major questions doctrine into guessed at the ANTIESG debate. We'll

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 2>be back with more on that right after this quick break.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm a new Westervelt and this is drilled. Earlier this year,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 2>the Security is an Exchange Commission released its proposed climate rule.

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Here's SEC head Gary Ginsler announcing and explaining that rule

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>on CNBC.

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 5>We've had this regime for ninety years where investors get

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 5>to decide on what risk they want to take. Companies

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 5>make full and fair disclosure, and increasingly companies are disclosing

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 5>climate risk. And so we're stepping in to help bring

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 5>some consistency, some standardization with regard to those disclosures, some

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 5>qualitative disclosures around strategy and governance and the like, but

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 5>also yes, some metrics as well with regard to their

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 5>greenhouse gas emissions and the financial effects on their current financials.

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 2>And let's just say industry was not a fan.

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 8>Your predecessor has a pretty stark warning in the Wall

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.200
<v Speaker 8>Street Journal today about the path that you're going down,

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.840
<v Speaker 8>where he worries that it would draw legal challenges, that

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:04.120
<v Speaker 8>it's a matter that should be left up to Congress,

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 8>that perhaps no single agency should be responsible for setting

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 8>climate policy, which requires so much more input than just

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 8>a single agencies determinations. What's your response to those criticisms

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 8>and to those who feel that this puts at risk

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 8>your central task of safeguarding capital allocation, Well.

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 5>Kelly, I'm sorry, I don't accept the premise we at

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 5>the SEC are just narrowly focused on disclosure and investor

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 5>protection on one side, and capital formation on the other side,

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 5>efficiency of the market in the middle. So this is

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 5>trying to bring some standardization, some consistency to what's already happening.

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 5>We had our first environmental disclosures in the nineteen seventies.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 5>We have a climate risk guidance from twenty ten, so

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 5>this is trying to build upon that and bring some

0:08:55.640 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 5>consistency in this one area. This is so investors are

0:09:00.720 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 5>better and for more consistently informed, and so companies on

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 5>the other side also get the benefit of consistently sort

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 5>of knowing how to kind of have that conversation with investors.

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 5>This is not about, with all respect, what some people

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 5>have said a broader bit about climate policy. It's about

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 5>disclosure and time tested rules of materiality around disclosure.

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:27.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's a freak coincidence that the fossil

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 2>fuel industry's love affair with ESG ended really ended in

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one, just about the time the SEC began

0:09:37.600 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>talking seriously about requiring climate disclosure as opposed to just

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.559
<v Speaker 2>continuing with the voluntary disclosures that had been in place

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 2>since twenty ten. In other words, as soon as it

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 2>looked like ESG might actually mean less money, not more.

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 2>The industry branded it as won't capital and began looking

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 2>for ways to get rid of it now. In addition

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 2>to the dark money funded state treasures pushing policies that

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 2>borrow their states from doing business with banks or investment

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 2>firms that are anti fossil fuel, or as they put it,

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 2>part of the war on energy, Mister Major Questions himself,

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Patrick Morrissey has filed formal comments about the SEC's proposed

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 2>climber rule. It includes a whole section entitled Major Questions Doctrine.

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Even if the relevant statues were ambiguous, the SEC's view

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 2>of its authority in the proposed rule would violate the

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Major Questions Doctrine. It reads, an unelected body like the

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:42.440
<v Speaker 2>SEC cannot answer major questions like those in the proposed rule.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Then it cites West Virginia versus EPA as President, quoting

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.079
<v Speaker 2>the ruling as saying that the Major Questions Doctrine recognizes

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 2>that quote in certain extraordinary cases. Both separation of powers

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 2>principles and a practical understanding of legislative intent and make

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:06.319
<v Speaker 2>courts reluctant to read into ambiguous statutory text. The delegation

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 2>to an agency claimed to be lurking there. And yes,

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Morrissey's formal comment to the SEC is co signed by

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 2>a long list of other Republican attorneys general, so we

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>know he's sending out the bat signal to RAGA.

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 9>Again.

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>That's the Republican Attorney's General Association, which regular listeners of

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>this podcast are probably tired of hearing about already. Morrissey

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 2>is a member, of course, these leadership positions both in

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 2>RAGA and its fundraising arm, the Rule of Law Defense Fund.

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 2>In twenty twenty, those organizations ponied up close to two

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 2>million dollars for Morrissey's re election campaign. Here's Lisa Graves's

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 2>former Senate investigator and the head of True North research

0:11:55.160 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 2>on RAGA and the push for structural change.

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.959
<v Speaker 9>Has had enormously distorting effect on US law. It provides

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 9>a mechanism for corporations to pass money through to help

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 9>attorneys general in ways that they would not be able

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 9>to individually solicit for their own campaigns given their role,

0:12:16.120 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 9>their regulatory role over those very industries. And that's been

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 9>going on since RAGA was created back more than twenty

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 9>years ago now, and it has accelerated under some of

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 9>the attorneys general who have led it, like Scott Krewitt,

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 9>who was, in my view, another corrupt individual, someone who

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:38.000
<v Speaker 9>was selaxed on ethical rules to say the least, and

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 9>who was willing to do the bidding of the oil

0:12:41.160 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 9>industry in attacking climate legislation and climate rules, even the

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 9>very modest clean Power Plan to advance the interests of

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 9>the funders of RAGA.

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 2>And now here they are pushing back on the pretty

0:12:55.120 --> 0:12:58.559
<v Speaker 2>minimal requirements of the SEC. So you've got the age

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 2>of West Virginia going after the EPA and the SEC,

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 2>the same state's treasure banning any investment firm or bank

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 2>that's not pro coal all while Joe Manchin, west Virginia's Senator,

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 2>is trying to ram a pro pipeline's permitting deal through Congress.

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 2>Here's State treasurer. Riley Moore encapsulating it all in one

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 2>big dad joke.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 4>I'd say here in West Virginia, the only kind of

0:13:26.679 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 4>black rock that we like is cold.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this time, Thanks for joining us, and

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 2>we'll see you back here next week. Drilled is an

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 2>original Critical Frequency production. The show was created and reported

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 2>by me Amy Westerveld. Original music and mixing and mastering

0:13:57.440 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 2>for this episode by Peter Duff. Artwork is by Matthew Fleming.

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 2>You can find us online at Drilled podcast dot com.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.679
<v Speaker 2>You can also find us on Twitter at We Are Drilled.

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 2>For ad free episodes and bonus content, you can sign

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 2>up for our newsletter at drilled podcast dot com or

0:14:17.320 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 2>our Patreon at patreon dot com slash drilled