WEBVTT - Weirdhouse Cinema Rewind: Black Sabbath

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Hey, you welcome to Weird House Cinema. Rewinder. This is

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Rob Lamb and we have a much older episode to

0:00:09.480 --> 0:00:11.240
<v Speaker 1>share with you here today. This one is from ten

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty to twenty twenty one. I partially picked this one

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because we lost Ozzy Osbourne fairly recently. This is going

0:00:19.560 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to be the classic Mario Bava horror anthology film Black Sabbath. Enjoy.

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Weird House Cinema. My name is Rob Lamb.

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.479
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe McCormick. And today it's that old anthology

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 3>feeling once again. Rob. I know you're a horror anthology man.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 3>What is it about you that makes you gravitate towards

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 3>the anthology?

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean you're talking about two different things, of course,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about horror anthologies on TV and those

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in the film, Because on TVs it's like it's a

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>different generally, it's a different story every week. And with

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>anthology films like the one we're gonna be talking about today,

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you instead of getting one complete film, you get like

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>three or four shorter pieces that are stitched together and

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>been presented to you so I guess maybe part of

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.600
<v Speaker 1>it is just out of love for creepy short stories

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that that short stories don't have to

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>obey the same rules as novels, and therefore and also

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>short films don't have to obey the same rules as

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>complete films. I guess it's also nice that they're only

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be They're only going to feel so long.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're going to get to the point they

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>can only be so drawn out. And it's also like

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a little sampler box. Like if an anthology film is

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>coming at you and you know it's going to present

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you with, say three to four tales, Well you can

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.639
<v Speaker 1>figure there's going to be maybe one dud in the bunch,

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>but at the very least you'll have one that's pretty good. Right,

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>there's got to be like one central pillar holding up

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the roof of the thing.

0:02:07.920 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, another way I would come at it is that

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:13.679
<v Speaker 3>even if they're all bad, it's more fun to have

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>bad variety than bad monotony.

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I would say so, like you're into the

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>badness and then you're out again, and then you're into

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>some fresh badness.

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think I would really come back to what

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 3>you were saying about the comparison to the lengths of

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 3>horror fiction. This came up in a recent episode where

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 3>we were talking I think it was in the Thing

0:02:33.240 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 3>from Another World, where we were talking about how it's

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.280
<v Speaker 3>hard to survey to be sure about this, but my

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 3>feeling is that horror novels tend to gravitate more towards

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 3>some semblance of a quote happy ending, maybe not happy,

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 3>but some way in which the protagonist is at least

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 3>partially victorious or escapes or something, whereas horror short stories

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 3>tend more toward bleak and cruel endings or endings that

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 3>are that are a really a mean and ironic twist

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:06.520
<v Speaker 3>of fate. And obviously I think there are a lot

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 3>of reasons why people who enjoy horror fiction are drawn

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 3>to endings of that sort, but they're harder to pull

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 3>off at the end of a really long narrative where

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>you're more invested with the characters, You've spent more time

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 3>with them, and it hurts more to see them just

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 3>sort of like ruined at the end.

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think another thing that you certainly see

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>in short fiction is that sometimes short fiction exists in

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a space where it doesn't have to concern itself with

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the ins and outs of a complex plot or some

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of fantastic character arc. You know, our characters don't

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have to evolve and change and learn lessons about themselves.

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>It can be more about trotting out an interesting idea

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>or you know, or or or in the in the

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>case of horror, just a just a fun monster or

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>some you know, diabolical scenario, that sort of thing, right.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 3>I think you're correct. I think that the horror genre

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 3>especially really does lend itself well to the anthology format.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I mean, there are plenty of movies that are not

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 3>horror that you could argue you are, in one way

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.119
<v Speaker 3>or another anthology films of a sort. I think one

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 3>thing I've read is that is that pulp fiction was

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 3>actually the concept for pulp fiction was partially inspired by

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 3>the movie that we're going to talk about today. Of course,

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 3>pulp fiction is not horror, but today's movie is today's

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 3>selection for weird house cinema is the Mario Bava nineteen

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 3>sixty three Italian anthology horror series Black Sabbath, or in

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Italian it's called e tre volti di la Pora. I

0:04:34.240 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 3>had to look up what that means. It means the

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 3>three Faces of Fear.

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Which is a more accurate title because if you're checking

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>out Black Sabbath expecting witchcraft and you know, Satan worshippers

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>dancing around a fire or some sort of like pagan

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>ordeal or something going on, you're going to be disappointed

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>because there is no actual Black Sabbath, real or imagined

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>in this picture.

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 3>No, I would say the closest we come to that,

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 3>it still doesn't really get there. There's sort of that

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 3>vibe in the middle segment of this movie, and by

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 3>far my favorite the Wordulac, which is I think just

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.479
<v Speaker 3>an absolutely tremendous segment and I can't wait to talk

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 3>about it. But yeah, at least the other two really

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 3>don't have anything to do with that at all.

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Now, another interesting thing about the title for this film

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is that this is said to be where the band

0:05:22.880 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Black Sabbath got their name.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.039
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, And I think I could be wrong about this,

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>but I remember hearing It's not even from them necessarily

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 3>seeing the movie. I think it was like they walked

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 3>past a movie theater and this was on the Marquee

0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:36.920
<v Speaker 3>and they're like.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, I think there's another version of the tale

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know how much. This sounds almost too perfect,

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 1>so it sounds like maybe it was embellished. But I

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>read a version where they were playing at a theater

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and then across the street Black Sabbath was playing and

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the line was far longer to get in to see

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>the movie as opposed to getting in to see them play.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>And they're like, well, we need to do has changed

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>our name. We need to be Black Sabbath, and then

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the people will line up for us.

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 3>It's like when Patty and Selma proposed changing the name

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 3>of Springfield the Seinfeld. You just look at what's popular

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 3>now and try to leach off that.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So, I mean, I don't know which of those

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>stories is true and to what extent, but certainly it

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>would be. It's hard to imagine the band Black Sabbath

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>without the name Black Sabbath because the theme runs so

0:06:26.279 --> 0:06:27.840
<v Speaker 1>deep through all of their music.

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 3>And before they were called Black Sabbath they were called Earth.

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 3>That was not very convenient because I think there was

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 3>another band at the time in that area called Earth.

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>It has a different taste on the tongue. Initially, Yeah,

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're thinking about going to hear Earth, you have

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>totally different expectations versus Black Sabbath.

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Well as a huge fan of the at least like

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>the first six Black Sabbath albums. I don't really get

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 3>into the d years very much, but like the first

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.720
<v Speaker 3>six Sabbath albums, I think are they're a mega You know,

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 3>they're like one of those stone monuments from the ancient

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 3>world and it's really hard to get under them. But

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine how I would feel about them if

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 3>they weren't by a band called Black Sabbath that's so

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 3>wrapped up in the feeling.

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, can you imagine Nativity and Black by Earth? It

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>just doesn't make sense war Pigs by Earth.

0:07:22.040 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 3>However, I could propose an alternative, which is that if

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 3>they wanted to drill in and get to the heart

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 3>of what makes Mario Bava's Black Sabbath really great, they

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 3>could have changed the name of their band to the

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 3>word Youlaxe.

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah, that's a fun name for a band.

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>And it would imply that they've been in the mountains

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 3>for five days and come back in a state of

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 3>God knows what.

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, let's go ahead and give everyone a

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:49.320
<v Speaker 1>taste of the trailer on this one. Because this is

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good trailer. I love the narration here.

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 4>Do you believe in ghosts? This is the night twent

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 4>Fear and horror walk hand in hand. This is Black Sabbath,

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 4>starring the incomparable Boris Karloff, the personable Mark Damon, and

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 4>lush and lovely women, even though one is from the

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 4>nether world, a vampire of Bourdelac, a Black Sabbath as

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 4>ancient as superstition, as modern as the telephone.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 3>So it's obvious from the trailer, but I don't think

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.599
<v Speaker 3>we mentioned that this movie has Boris Karloff in multiple capacities,

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 3>so he is not only the star of one of

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 3>the three segments in the anthology, but he's also sort

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 3>of the pitchman. He is the company spokesperson at the

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:55.880
<v Speaker 3>beginning and end of the film, And.

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Of course this is perfect because in later years he

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>also served as a horror host on televis you show

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>such as Thriller and Out of This World. As I

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>think we've often driven home though, like, there's such a

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>wealth of TV horror anthologies out there, So, for instance,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>if you just glance at listings for Boris Karloff's Thriller,

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll see Oh it only went two seasons, but it

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>went two seasons in the nineteen sixties, So those two

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>seasons consist of sixty seven episodes.

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow, yeah, it gets crazy, And man, I thought it

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 3>was long seasons. When you go back and watch a

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.200
<v Speaker 3>show from the nineties or something where there's like twenty

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.439
<v Speaker 3>episodes in the season, that seems like a huge amount.

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 3>But wow yeah.

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>Now, to be clear, Thriller aired sixty one I mean sorry,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:44.800
<v Speaker 1>sixty through sixty one and sixty one through sixty two,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so it actually aired in America at least before Black

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Sabbath came out, so that might have been part of

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the rationale here. It's like, well, audiences are used to

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Boris Karloff presenting material to them. He's already in it.

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's also get him up on the screen introducing this

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff for us.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:03.439
<v Speaker 3>Well, you can hear it right in the narration of

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 3>the trailer. There's the part where it says like starring

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the incomparable Boris Karloff. I guess he is incomparable. But

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.640
<v Speaker 3>then the other cast members they introduce are the personable

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>Mark Damon, which I thought was hilarious, And then they

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 3>say and lush and lovely women gone unnamed.

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Come on, dudes, and we will list to some of

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>their names here in a bit. There are some nice

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>performances in here.

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh wait, wait, I left off, though I think the

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:33.199
<v Speaker 3>trailer qualifies it says, so the women in this movie, Hey,

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 3>we got beautiful women, even though one of them is

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.079
<v Speaker 3>from the nether world. I was trying to think back

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 3>after having seen it, which woman is it talking about.

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not even sure.

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's not really one that's definitely from the nether world.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of bad, supernatural things happen to

0:10:48.800 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>people and to some women in this motion picture, but

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of them are from the nether world.

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, Well, I guess before we talk anymore about

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 3>the actual contents of the movie, we should discuss some

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 3>of the the connections. And obviously the place to start

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 3>is with the director, Mario Bava.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Mario Bava who lived nineteen fourteen through nineteen eighty. He

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.720
<v Speaker 1>was the director, but also collaborated on the screenplay. He

0:11:13.840 --> 0:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>was the cinematographer, He did matt paintings, he did special effects.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the legendary Italian director with an unmistakable obsessive

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>and phantasmagorical emphasis on visual composition. So you can just

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>look up stills from his movies and I feel like,

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>once you've gotten a taste of how Bava directs and

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>how he composes a shot, a strong still from any

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 1>of his films is just instantly identifiable. It just pops

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:48.199
<v Speaker 1>with a certain It's not only the color hue, because

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to stress it's not just a matter of oh, well,

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Mariobava used some cool gels here and there, like, No,

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.599
<v Speaker 1>it's the complete it's his use of light and reflections

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and just the overall composition of every every shot in

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the film.

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 3>You ever see one of those animated movies in which

0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:09.000
<v Speaker 3>there is a magical gem or artifact that glows with

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 3>magic power, Mario Bava's movies are like that. There's something

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 3>about the way they look that the frames from the

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.680
<v Speaker 3>movie glow with magic power.

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, even when there's less of a reason for it

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to be glowing. So like I was thinking as I

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>was watching this particular picture that it's it's like an

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>alien civilization that communicates through like synesthesia is trying to

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:39.160
<v Speaker 1>speak through the picture.

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's that obsessive, like the colors are clearly

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of great importance to Bava and all.

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:51.439
<v Speaker 3>Of this, though I will say that I totally agree

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 3>with you. Color is a big part of it, and

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Bava frequently used sort of expressive colorful lighting, colored lighting

0:12:59.880 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 3>in his movies that is not strictly realistic, meaning it's

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 3>not reflecting a color you would actually expect to see

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 3>if this scene were taking place in the real world,

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 3>but rather colors that sort of reflect feelings coming through

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>and reflect sort of other worldly, unseen influences. But there

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.920
<v Speaker 3>are also visual sensibilities he has where that kind of

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 3>glowing comes through even when it's not in color. Like

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 3>the example that comes to my mind is his earlier

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 3>movie Black Sunday, which is in black and white and

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>yet it still glows with magic power.

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that one was from nineteen sixty and it is

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting to imagine this leap from black and white to

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>color for Mario Bava, where they're like, oh, by the way,

0:13:40.679 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you can shoot in color now, and you can imagine

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>his excitement at being able to do so.

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Bava's background is interesting. He was the son of early

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 1>Italian cinematographer Eugenio Bava, and Mario trained as a painter,

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>venturing into the world of cinematography as well in the

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>late thirties in the early forties, but then he eventually

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>started directing as well. It began with some documentary shorts

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>and some uncredited directing work on some various genre films.

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But then in nineteen sixty that's when Black Sunday came out.

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>He directed that, and that was a very well regarded

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and financially successful film, and so Black Sabbath is very

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>much the color follow up to that. Thus the similar

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.560
<v Speaker 1>release title again kind of coming back to the studio

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>thought here, it's like, well, Black Sunday did pretty good.

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome we call the next one. Let's call it a

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Black Sabbath.

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 3>There we go, Well, this may be if that is

0:14:42.840 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 3>indeed where the title comes from. I got to say,

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 3>this is the rare case where I would go with

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 3>the marketing over the original because once again the three

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 3>faces of fear, that may be more literally descriptive of

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 3>what you're getting with the movie, but it doesn't really

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 3>have the same punch to it.

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So Mario Baba directed into thenineteen seventies. Initially he retired,

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>then he came back at the behest of a new

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>generation of Italian horror filmmakers, including his own son, director

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of Lomberto Bava. He came back to direct nineteen seventy

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>five Shock, and this would prove to be his last

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>feature film, as he then died in nineteen eighty. But

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>he directed a number of pictures, so we're not going

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to touch on them all, but I thought we might

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about a few of them here. One of them

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is Planet of the Vampires from nineteen sixty.

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 3>Five, Rob, Can you see the Planet of the Vampire's

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 3>poster right behind me on the wall?

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I do? I see that you have it right there

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>up on the wall behind you, so you know obviously

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you're a fan. I finally got around to watching this

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>in full this year, and I have to say it

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the most enthralling motion picture when it came to

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>acting and the plot, but such a gorgeous science fiction

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>film to watch. Like all of the visuals in it,

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>he does an amazing job and devotes the vast majority

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of the film's energy and limited budget, I have to

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:11.520
<v Speaker 1>add to create highly effective and colorful alien landscapes Haunted

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>spaceship Hallways also has just some incredible costumes.

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely so I love Planet of the Vampires, but I

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 3>usually watch it without sound. It's a movie that I

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 3>love to put on, like in the background while I'm

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 3>hanging out with friends and listening to music. That's the

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 3>ideal Planet of the Vampires experience for me, because it's

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 3>one of those movies. It's a rub the fur movie.

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a movie that's not really about the plot or

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 3>what happens in it. It is about the visual textures

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 3>on screen, and that includes everything from like you single

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 3>out the costumes. The spacefarers in the movie are wearing

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 3>these bizarre black leather space suits with these leather helmets,

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and yeah, the lighting and the sets are just absolutely wonderful.

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it reminds me of a quote that I

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 1>ran across from Mario Bava where he said that horror

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>films are seventy percent lighting. And I think he has

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a strong point. I mean, you definitely see that in

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>his work. But we've talked about various examples on the

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:15.199
<v Speaker 1>show before where we say things like, oh, well, the

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>monster costume wasn't great, but in this scene, the lighting's amazing,

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>so it absolutely works well.

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.199
<v Speaker 3>Like in the Thing from Another World, Yeah, there was

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:28.120
<v Speaker 3>like if you look at the costume James Arness's wearing like, actually,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 3>in full lighting, it doesn't look very impressive, but they've

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 3>found a way to make it look good within the

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 3>narrative by either keeping him in silhouette backlits so you

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 3>can't really see him, so he's just a frame, and

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 3>or just by giving you quick glimpses of him where

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.440
<v Speaker 3>you can't really understand what's going on. Like, they make

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 3>do in a very effective manner with some limitations in

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:50.440
<v Speaker 3>terms of costuming and makeup effects.

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Of course, Planet of the Vampires was highly influential. It's

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.959
<v Speaker 1>sometimes been asked, would we even have Alien and all

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the films that came after Alien had it not been

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for Planet of the Vampires, And perhaps not, you know,

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly Bava was a very influential filmmaker. Yeah.

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean one of the big things I think that's

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:14.959
<v Speaker 3>called out with respect to Alien is there's a scene

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 3>in Planet of the Vampires, and Planet of the Vampires

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 3>came much before it was nineteen sixty five, Is that right?

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sixty five.

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 3>There's a scene where the astronauts are on this desolate

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 3>planet and they go into a cave and they find

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:32.000
<v Speaker 3>a giant alien skeleton stretched out on this surface in there,

0:18:32.640 --> 0:18:35.880
<v Speaker 3>very much like with the discovery of the Derylic spacecraft

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 3>with the bizarre sort of alien skeleton fuse to the

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:41.200
<v Speaker 3>chair in Alien.

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So ultimately I think Black Sabbath moves along a lot,

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot better. It has better pacing than Planet of

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the Vampires. But there were still times in this film,

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>as within as in Planet of the Vampires, where I

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>felt myself disconnected from whatever was happening or supposed to

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>be happening in the plot, but I was still completely

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>drawn in to the visual world presented on the film.

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean? Yeah, totally. I mean I

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.360
<v Speaker 3>really appreciated the plot, especially in the word you lack,

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 3>but through and through it looks pretty great.

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Another Bava film that I'm a fond of is Danger

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Diabolique from nineteen sixty eight. This is a stunning, stylish

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:28.280
<v Speaker 1>spy crime yarn starring John Philip Law and Adolfo Selly.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>People might remember him as the villain from Thunderball. The

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>James Bond film. Terry Thomas is also in it. This

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>was featured on Mystery Science Theater three thousand back in

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the day, and it is indeed quite ridiculous, but stunning

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>from a visual perspective. Basically, it has that sixties bond vibe,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>focused all on comic book crime and then turned up

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to about a thousand Bava style.

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it was actually the very last episode of

0:19:54.760 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 3>the main run of Mystery Science Theater. That's right, it was,

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 3>and kind of a strange choice there, because I don't know,

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 3>I would actually argue that movie is not all that bad.

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's silly in a way that a lot

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 3>of these movies would be silly, but it's also I

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 3>don't know, it's stylishly executed in a very pleasing way.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the best films on Mystery Science Theater three

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>thousand and often that the best episodes of Mystery Science

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>three thousand revolve around movies that are on their own

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>very watchable.

0:20:24.480 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 3>I know you're thinking about Jack Frost.

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I think that's a great example. There are

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple example. I think when I think of my favorite episodes,

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>there are often films that that I can and sometimes

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>have watched on on my own, you know, without without

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>the riffing. Now, Mario Bava was again highly influential, and

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.239
<v Speaker 1>one of his most famous students was Dario Argento. If

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:50.360
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen Argento's nineteen seventy seven classic Suspiria, then

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you've certainly bathed your eyeballs in a very Bava inspired

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>color scheme.

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's it's pretty much unquestionable that Argento

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 3>picked up where Bava left off with the expressive, colorful lighting,

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 3>especially for his Jallo films.

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>And I mentioned Mario's son, Lamberto Bava, he directed such

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>films that went on to direct such films as nineteen

0:21:13.560 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty five's Demons, which is excellent, along with a couple

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of sequels to that, nineteen eighty four's Devilfish, which is

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.000
<v Speaker 1>not so excellent. It's basically a Jaws cash in, one

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of many. But Lamberto Bava is still making movies. He

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>had a horror movie starring Gerard Depardieu come out this year.

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Really yeah, okay.

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Called Twins, I believe, and I had to check. It

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.439
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with the Arnold movie.

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:43.199
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I gotta look that up.

0:21:51.880 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, Let's see a few other people involved in

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:59.199
<v Speaker 1>this film. Marcelo Fondato has a screenplay credit lived nineteen

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four through two, an eight Italian screenwriter and direct

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>and director. Though I don't really know any of their films.

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Then there's Alberto Bivillakua, who lived nineteen thirty four through

0:22:10.480 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirteen, has a screenplay collaboration credit. Also was a

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.959
<v Speaker 1>screenwriter on Planet of the Vampires, as well as the

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>satanic Panic documentary Witchcraft seventy, which was narrated by Jack Palance.

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Now the film, and certainly this comes out in the trailer.

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>The film claims that the three stories in it are

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>based upon fictions by Chekov, Tolstoy, and Snyder, and specifically

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's supposed to break down like this, the Drop of

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.359
<v Speaker 1>Water by Ivan Chekhov, though seemingly connected to a story

0:22:44.400 --> 0:22:49.480
<v Speaker 1>by Franco Lucentini, and then the Telephone by F. G. Snyder,

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>And then a story not by Leo Tolstoy as that

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>might lead you to belief, but won by Alexei Tolstoy.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 3>And this would be the one allegedly by Alexei Tolstoy,

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 3>would be the wordlac, the one that is the one

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:07.240
<v Speaker 3>with Boris Karloff in it.

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, let's talk about Boris Karloff. Then Boris Karloff

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>plays Gorka in this and he's also the host. He

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>lived eighteen eighty seven through nineteen sixty nine, A bona

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>fide cinema legend, going beyond genre films and horror films

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and weird films. I mean, he's just one of these

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:28.280
<v Speaker 1>icons of cinema.

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 3>His horror charisma is unmeasurable in this it's just off

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 3>the screen.

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Absolutely. Karloff was a British actor, born William Henry Pratt,

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>so you know, this is very much his stage name.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Boris Karloff probably is just going to be forever associated

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>with Frankenstein because he played the monster in James Wales's

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirty two adaptation of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, and then

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 1>he went on to play the role in other pictures

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>as well, including the excellent nighteen thirty five film The

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Bride of Frankenstein. Other key horror films from Karloff include

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty two's The Mummy, thirty four's The Black Cat, nineteen

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.440
<v Speaker 1>forties Black Friday, and much more.

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 3>The Black Cat he actually stars opposite Bella Lagosi, and

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 3>I think that was the first movie where they had

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 3>both done that. And I actually haven't seen that one,

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.320
<v Speaker 3>but I've been meaning to see it for a long

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 3>time and apparently it's a lot of fun.

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I've heard great things about it. I've heard that it

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>holds up really well, so I have checked that out now.

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Karloff was also famously the non singing voice of The

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Grinch in the nineteen sixty six animated version from Chuck Jones.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So the thing about Karloff is that he worked a lot.

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>And even though he's best remembered for his horror roles today,

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>he acted in a wide variety of films. He worked

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>stage and screen, he did television. We already mentioned his

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>horror host gigs.

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.679
<v Speaker 3>He did a lot, yes, and I will say that.

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 3>So I just saw this movie Black Sabbath for the

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 3>first time this week, and I gotta say this is

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 3>a new favorite Karloff role for me. We'll discuss the

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 3>details of the word Olac in a little bit, but

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:16.879
<v Speaker 3>he plays this wild, hairy, wind blown patriarch of the

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 3>Carpathian Mountains who has this demonic energy and it's so

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 3>so powerful. I don't know exactly how he's doing it,

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 3>but in every line he feels so at home, truly,

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 3>like a man just hardened by the wilderness who has

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 3>met something unspeakable upon the Mountaintop.

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's really able to channel a lot of energy

0:25:36.000 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>through this role. And it's especially interesting considering that this,

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>again is late career Karloff. He was seventy five or

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>seventy six at the time when they filmed this. But

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:49.159
<v Speaker 1>he's still incredible and apparently it was just always a

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>pleasure to work with. I noticed that that Bava singled

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>him out as being just a great guy to work with. Now,

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>another interesting late Karloff film. I don't know if you've

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.919
<v Speaker 1>seen this one. Joe. Peter Bogdanovitch did a film in

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty eight called Targets.

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I have seen this one, in which Karloff essentially

0:26:07.800 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 3>plays himself. I mean, he plays a character, but the

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 3>character he plays is named like named like Doris Orlock

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 3>or something, and he's an aging horror film star and

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 3>he has to go up against like a crazed mass murderer.

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like he ends up confronting an active shooter at

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a drive in movie theater. It's it's a serious, serious

0:26:30.080 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>film from a young Peter Bogdanovitch would of course go

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>on to direct The Last Picture Show, but he was

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>one of Roger Corman's crew at the time, and for

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.239
<v Speaker 1>this film, Corman apparently told Bogdanovitch that he could make

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>any kind of film he wanted to. There were just

0:26:46.520 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 1>two things he needed to make sure off. One he

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>had to use stock footage from nineteen sixty three's The Terror,

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and he had to use Boris Karloff for the two

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:02.640
<v Speaker 1>days of filming that he still owed Corman. But as

0:27:02.680 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it was, it worked out. Karloff loved the script and

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>shot a total of five days and refused additional pay.

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's a fun story man. But also I remembered

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it as being a good movie. I haven't seen it

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>in a long time, but I remember being impressed with it.

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 3>A good friend of mine showed me this movie many

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 3>many years ago, back before I really was in the

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 3>weird house cinema mode. I think I didn't know who

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 3>Roger Corman was at the time or anything, but I

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 3>remember being very enthralled and impressed by it. It's a

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 3>very stark, scary, realistic kind of movie, different than, very

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 3>different than the stylish fantasy horror that Woris Karloff did

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 3>for most of his career.

0:27:44.600 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, should we talk about the personal mark Damon? Oh?

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, as he's introduced in the trailer The Personable Mark Damon.

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 3>I'd say he's a seven or eight on the personability scale.

0:27:57.400 --> 0:27:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he's I guess he's the closest that we have

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>to like a male hero character in the whole picture

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>plays the carried what Vladimir drf Durfe.

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 3>He plays a count or some kind of aristocrat who

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 3>rides through this village in the word you Lac Again.

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:15.919
<v Speaker 3>I guess we'll discuss more of the plot details of

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 3>that in a bit, But yeah, he's the closest thing

0:28:18.000 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 3>the movie has to sort of a dashing leading man.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.200
<v Speaker 3>But even in that story, I don't know if he's

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.919
<v Speaker 3>exactly that, because he comes off to me is in

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:28.919
<v Speaker 3>that story is kind of glib, callow and confused, not

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 3>really recognizing the weight of the supernatural power he's up against.

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's doomed, this guy. But Mark Damon is interesting though,

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the first all. I was born nineteen thirty three,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>still alive as of this recording, and still active. Not

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>as an actor though at least not since I think

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>he retired in the late seventies or I'm not sure

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about the late say, at some point in the seventies,

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he retired from acting, and I think did a few

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.840
<v Speaker 1>little bits here and there, the most recent being in

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety seven, but he's continued to produce. He's been

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a producer or an executive producer on sixty seven pictures

0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in counting, and those titles that he has a credit

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>on include Dos Boot, The Never Ending Story, Clam The

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Cave Bear, Nine and a half Weeks, Short Circuit, Flight

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Navigator, The Lost Boys, Beastmaster two, not one,

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>but two different Universal Soldier sequels, and then just a

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>bunch else. So seems kind of like a big money

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>player in Hollywood.

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Maybe he's the producer who came in and demanded that

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 3>The Lost Boys feature more footage of that saxophone guy.

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 3>It could be like, I want ten minutes a saxophone guy,

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 3>at least.

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Now. Acting wise, Damon was also in Roger Corman's nineteen

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:50.479
<v Speaker 1>sixty film House of Usher, which starred Vincent Price, and

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>he has one writing credit. And I found it interesting

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's The Devil's Wedding Night from nineteen seventy three,

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>on which Joe Diamato apparently did some uncredited directing, which

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is always a great sign. And then Damon plays not one,

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>but two different roles in it. So I looked it up.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 1>The poster looks fabulous. It looks very nineteen seventies international horror.

0:30:17.840 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, featuring the personable George Eastman.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>No, there's no George Eastman in this one, though, I

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.480
<v Speaker 1>will say that Mario Bava directed at least one film

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that had George Eastman. I can confirm at least one

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 1>George Eastman project.

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Was he in Bay of Blood?

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 1>No, he was in What Rabid Dogs? He might have

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>been in Bay of Blood. There's a little Eastman just

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>sprinkled throughout the cinematic universe. All right, let's talk about

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>some of the other players in these three different segments. Now,

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these are actors that I'm not really

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>familiar with, and there aren't a lot of titles that

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they were in that really connected with me. So there's

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>not a lot to really to go through here. But

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>let's start with her. Susie Anderson, who played what's the

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what's his character's name, Stenka.

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Stink, which no offense to people who actually have that name,

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 3>but in English, that name does sound funny because it

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 3>sounds like stinker.

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but this is a. This is I guess, our

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>gorgeous love interest for Damon's character. She was born nineteen

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 1>forty Croatian actor who worked during the nineteen sixties. And

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>then there's Rika Deliana who plays Maria born in nineteen

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>thirty four. Greek actor with extremely expressive eyes, or at

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 1>least Mario Blava was able to shoot her in many

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>scenes where she has really expressive eyes. She's the mother

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe in these sequences, and we'll discuss her in

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit, But she had a long career, mostly in

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Greek cinema and TV.

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Now these are all actors who are in the word

0:31:52.960 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 3>lax segment, but there are a couple of other segments

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 3>of the movie that I guess we've been focusing on lust.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 3>Do we want to mention some of the actors in

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 3>these segments before coming back to describe them.

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So the Telephone, which we'll discuss, has a very

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>small cast. The main character is Rosy played by Michelle Mercier,

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>who is a French actor who worked across multiple decades,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>born nineteen thirty nine, still alive as of this recording.

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And then the other major character in that is Mary

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>played by Lydia Alphonsi, who was born in nineteen twenty eight,

0:32:24.160 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>also still alive as of this recording Italian actor who

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>was active well into the nineteen nineties. Her last film

0:32:31.080 --> 0:32:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was the much acclaimed Life Is Beautiful from nineteen ninety seven,

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and she also appeared in a Steve Reeves Hercules movie

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty eight.

0:32:39.480 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 3>So I don't really love the Telephone. We can explain

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 3>more about our feelings about the individual segments in a bit.

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 3>The Telephone was definitely my least favorite of the three,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 3>but I do really like Lydia Alphonsi in it because

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 3>she does a very good job of acting creepy.

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Yes, all right. And then finally we have the segment

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the Drop of Water. I'm going to highlight three different

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>actors in this. There's Jacqueline Peru, who lived nineteen twenty

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>three through two thousand and five, plays Helen Chester, so

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>she was a French actor active from the early forties

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>through the nineteen seventies. And she's the mother of French

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>actor and director Jean Pierre Lude, who starred in The

0:33:22.080 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Four Hundred Blows. There's also a character in this that

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 1>is referred to as the Maid, and it's played by

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Milli no last name Milli, who lived nineteen oh five

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>through nineteen eighty was an Italian singer, actress, and cabaret

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>performer and apparently something of a pop star of the day.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 3>So she's older when this movie was made. So she

0:33:44.400 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 3>plays a maid who sort of comes and goes while

0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 3>the main character, played by Jacqueline Peru, is sort of

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 3>contemplating doing something very ill advised with respect to the

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 3>spirit world. But the maid is this kind of mundane

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 3>in floats, flitting in and out of the room while

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 3>this deliberation goes on.

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And then finally there is a neighbor character in this

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:11.839
<v Speaker 1>played by Harriet Medine who lived nineteen fourteen through two

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand and five, an American actor who relocated to Italy

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>with the USO after World War Two. She has a

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:22.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty great filmography, with such titles as Death Race two thousand,

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>which is a fun flick we've talked about that before,

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 1>The Witches of Eastwick, Schlock and The Terminator, in which

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>she plays the role of customer customer where I was

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure I was looking around, you know, short

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.839
<v Speaker 1>of actually watching Terminator again, I'm not sure. I can't

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:40.560
<v Speaker 1>imagine she's in the gun. She's probably in one of

0:34:40.600 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>those sequences where the terminator steals a bunch of stuff,

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of the Terminator is just him robbing

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>places so he can have robbing people in places so

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he can have closed guns.

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 3>They weren't the good guy played by Michael Bean robbing people.

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a whole sequence. It's just naked dudes committing

0:34:57.760 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>various crimes and robberies.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.719
<v Speaker 3>Maybe she's walking out of Dick Miller's gun store when

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Arnold Schwarzenegger's walking in that possibility.

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:08.360
<v Speaker 1>She wrote, she bought the last plasma rifle.

0:35:08.680 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I was just remembering the part in Terminator. That's actually

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:14.520
<v Speaker 3>really great when Schwarzenegger rips that guy out of the

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 3>phone booth and he doesn't really harm him. It's just

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:20.000
<v Speaker 3>a guy on a phone at a phone booth and

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:23.400
<v Speaker 3>the terminator grabs him by the shoulder and sort of

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 3>throws him down on the sidewalk so he can use

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 3>the telephone book.

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's pretty good. I mean, why would would the

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>terminator a machine use any more force or effort than

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>was necessary in any given task.

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you can hear the guy going, you got

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:37.880
<v Speaker 3>a serious attitude problem.

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Man, that's good, all right. Finally, the music on this

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.680
<v Speaker 1>film is interesting because from one thing, you have two

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:49.560
<v Speaker 1>different scores. The original score was by Italian jazz band

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>leader Roberto Nicolossi, but American International Pictures replaced his score

0:35:55.880 --> 0:35:58.960
<v Speaker 1>with one by Less Baxter, who is, of course the

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 1>king of exotica, and also later did the minimal electronic

0:36:03.120 --> 0:36:04.880
<v Speaker 1>score for Frogs.

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh I remember that now?

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean it's it's I guess it's

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a memorable score, but it's it's not very It's not

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.400
<v Speaker 1>an exotica score for frogs. And this also is not

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:21.279
<v Speaker 1>particularly exotica music either. It's certainly not electronic. But I

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>liked it well enough because I could pick up on

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 1>some Baxter sensibilities in it. But it made I was

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>curious after that, because I'm thinking, well, what did it replace?

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Because we can all think of examples where a score

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.839
<v Speaker 1>has been replaced by something superior and also cases where

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a score has been replaced by something maybe less effective,

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, for a different audience. So I was listening

0:36:43.400 --> 0:36:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to the Nickelosi score a bit and it sounded good

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. I don't know, I liked I liked them both.

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Baxter score is a little bit more dramatic and

0:36:52.120 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more you know, American.

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, you know, to be honest, I just

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 3>did not really notice the music much at all, So

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't have much of a comment on it.

0:37:00.600 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know if I would have really looked

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>at it that closely had had it not been for

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the Less Baxter connection. Uh, because I have I do

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.359
<v Speaker 1>listen to a fair amount of like Less Baxter and

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>some like Bostonova music. Uh, generally like very late afternoon.

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a point in the late afternoon where where you know,

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to put aside the synth music and the

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and the rock music, and only Exotica or Bostonova will do.

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:27.479
<v Speaker 3>The tiki drink hour.

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I guess, even though generally I'm not I'm not

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>actually having a tea drink. I'm generally like cooking supper

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:45.239
<v Speaker 1>or something. But it feels right, it feels appropriate. All right,

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Now that we've got all that out of the way,

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.040
<v Speaker 1>let's get back into the plot of these three horror

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>stories that look fabulous, have great people in them, but

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately have some interesting ideas as well.

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:59.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, so I would say, and you have you

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 3>and I may have had some different reactions to these,

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 3>but I would say that this is an interesting movie

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:09.759
<v Speaker 3>to recommend because while there are three segments, and in

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 3>my opinion, one of them is astonishingly good, another is

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 3>quite good, and the third for me, I found kind

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 3>of boring and unpleasant. But there's still I think some

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.640
<v Speaker 3>interesting things to talk about with it. And while I

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 3>think that there were different releases of this movie that

0:38:26.960 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 3>put them in different orders, the version I saw starts

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 3>with the one of the three that was for me

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 3>by far the weakest. So this would be The Telephone.

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Ah, yes, the Telephone.

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 3>So the Telephone, unlike the other two, is a more

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:44.960
<v Speaker 3>realistic story and the basic premise is pretty simple. It

0:38:45.080 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 3>is a psychological thriller about a young woman who is

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 3>terrorized by a threatening, voyeuristic creep who won't stop calling

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 3>her on the phone. And so I gotta say this

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 3>is the one I didn't really super enjoy. I like

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.880
<v Speaker 3>it picked way up with the second one for me

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.040
<v Speaker 3>when you get to the word to lact This one

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of has a lot of things I don't really

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 3>love about Italian horror movies of this period, and not

0:39:08.440 --> 0:39:10.280
<v Speaker 3>as much of the stuff that I do love.

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:13.200
<v Speaker 1>It's weird because, especially from the trailer, you get the

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:16.719
<v Speaker 1>impression that they moved the telephone to the opening because

0:39:16.719 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>they thought it would connect with audiences more like maybe

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they thought audiences didn't want this gothic horror tale. Instead

0:39:23.440 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>they would want something that's tied into technology and you know,

0:39:26.760 --> 0:39:29.920
<v Speaker 1>feels more cutting edge and dangerous. And yet at the

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>same time I was reading it, sounds like American International

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Pictures they asked them to cut down on some of

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the what they would have probably thought of it as

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:45.799
<v Speaker 1>dangerous aspects of that opening segment. Supposedly AIP asks for

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lesbian romance aspects of the segment to be reduced and

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:54.319
<v Speaker 1>that a supernatural element be sort of implied. But I

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>have to say, at least in the version I watched,

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I still got this that there was some

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of past romantic connection between the two female characters,

0:40:03.760 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 1>and I don't remember anything supernatural in this segment. It

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:09.120
<v Speaker 1>seemed very based in the real world, though of course

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>through that fabulous Bava lens.

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Well, to be honest, now that I think about it,

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure which version of the movie it was

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 3>that I saw. One thing I've seen comparing them is

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:21.880
<v Speaker 3>that the I think it was the original Italian version

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:24.920
<v Speaker 3>had the more beautiful colors, and that the American release

0:40:25.040 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 3>might have had some more muted colors. The version I

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 3>saw had very beautiful colors, so I'm thinking. And the

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 3>version I saw, of course was in Italian with subtitles.

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't the same here.

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't know if there is a dubbed version

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:36.959
<v Speaker 3>of the movie.

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there is, but I didn't I wasn't able

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to find when I rented it. I rented it through Well,

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I went into to Apple, and then I did a

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>like a seven day trial of AMC Plus and that's

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>how I got to watch it. And then when I

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>pulled it up, I was expecting it to be dubbed,

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:56.440
<v Speaker 1>but then I saw that as oh it's in Italian

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>with no option for other audio channels and it just

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>sub titles. But I greatly enjoyed it. But I see

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 1>examples of people saying that they grew up watching a

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>version in which they hear Boris Karloff's actual voice, So

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that makes me think there is a dubbed version of it,

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>but this was not it. So with the telephone, I'd

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>say that I guess I kind of like the simplicity

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 1>of it. It does proceeded a very slow pace, but

0:41:21.400 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 1>then it has some very nice twists in it. It

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 1>does not have that gothic feel that the second segment has,

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't have that supernatural sense of other worldliness.

0:41:33.920 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The interiors in the segment are, at first glance a

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 1>lot more muted. We spend a lot of time with

0:41:40.000 --> 0:41:43.480
<v Speaker 1>beautiful women with perfect skin and kind of porcelain colored

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 1>garments moving through wedding cake colored apartments. But even this

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is very finely crafted and wonderfully punctuated by various colorful

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 1>items in the background. I don't know if you noticed

0:41:56.120 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this or not, Joe, but it'll be like, you know,

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>everything's this kind of wedding cake porcelain world, and then

0:42:00.520 --> 0:42:03.719
<v Speaker 1>there'll be like one jade statuette on a shelf in

0:42:03.760 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the background, and somehow, like through that Mario Bava magic,

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it makes the whole thing pop. And I don't even

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>notice that I'm that the pp plot is moving along

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.840
<v Speaker 1>so slowly because I'm just admiring.

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.400
<v Speaker 3>The shot or the red telephone.

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Red telephone, And then you know, it moves at a

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>slow pace, and then alarming things will happen. There's a

0:42:23.360 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>great creepy eyes peering in through the window of the

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>apartment that that scene really shook me when I saw it.

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 3>Oh, this movie is all about windows.

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, windows, mirrors as well, but certainly windows. And I

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 1>think I think you see that in other Bava films

0:42:40.400 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 1>as well, lots of mirrors, people looking through class and

0:42:43.600 --> 0:42:48.600
<v Speaker 1>it makes sense given his his focus on the visual medium.

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 3>So I think you sort of raised the idea that

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 3>this segment is kind of a proto Jallo film, and

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to explore that idea a little more so

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 3>for people who are familiar. Jallo films are a particular

0:43:03.239 --> 0:43:07.719
<v Speaker 3>subgenre of Italian murder mystery thrillers that were popular in

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.560
<v Speaker 3>the sixties through the eighties. And some of the big

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:15.400
<v Speaker 3>name directors of jallo you might recognize our Dario Argento.

0:43:15.600 --> 0:43:20.920
<v Speaker 3>Usually his supernatural movies like Suspiria are not usually considered

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Jallo films that they share a lot in common with them. Stylistically,

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 3>usually Jello films are thought to be to have basically

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:32.320
<v Speaker 3>realistic causation. They're not like about witchcraft and magic and stuff.

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 3>They're about like a murderer who wields a Razor Blade

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:36.200
<v Speaker 3>or something.

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Like what the woman with a crystal Wait, is it

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bird with a crystal plumage?

0:43:40.920 --> 0:43:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Bird with the crystal plumage. I mean, Argento made

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:46.040
<v Speaker 3>these naturalistic Jello films as well, Bird with a Crystal Plumage,

0:43:46.560 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Deep Red, Cat of Nine Tales, Tenebrae. These are all

0:43:50.840 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 3>Jallo films he did. But other big names in Jello

0:43:54.719 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 3>or Sergio Martino, Luccio Fulci, and the director of the

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 3>movie we're talking about today, Mario Bava. Bava was the

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 3>director of Blood and Black Lace from nineteen sixty four,

0:44:05.719 --> 0:44:08.880
<v Speaker 3>just one year after Black Sabbath, and I think Blood

0:44:08.880 --> 0:44:10.840
<v Speaker 3>and Black Lace, I think is often considered sort of

0:44:10.880 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 3>the archetype of the early Jallo movie that a lot

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 3>of Jallo descends from. Blood and Black Lace.

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to watch that one someday because I'd noticed

0:44:19.200 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>just today that it has Cameron Mitchell in it.

0:44:21.440 --> 0:44:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Oh, that's right, it does. It's been a little while

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 3>since I've seen it, so I don't remember much in

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:28.440
<v Speaker 3>particular about what he does in it. But yeah, anyway,

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 3>one of the things I noticed is that Blood and

0:44:30.600 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 3>Black Lace I think has a lot of stylistic similarity

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:38.800
<v Speaker 3>with the telephone segment in this movie, except the stylization

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.319
<v Speaker 3>is turned way up, so I'll get back to that

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:44.040
<v Speaker 3>in just a minute. But to discuss some of the

0:44:44.040 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 3>main characteristics of jallo movies, They very often feature a

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 3>murderer who strikes again and again, whose identity is unknown,

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 3>often masked or with their face hidden in shadow, and

0:44:56.239 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 3>they will very often wear a similar outfit like a

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:03.799
<v Speaker 3>long trench and black gloves and maybe a hat. In

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 3>jallo movies, the murders are usually sort of creative or grizzly,

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 3>or of a creepy and squeamish nature, so they're usually

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 3>not just going to be like the killer shoots somebody

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 3>with a gun. They might kill somebody with a barber's

0:45:16.520 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 3>razor or a needle or something. Jeala movies also tend

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to be kind of voyeuristic and sexually charged, off in

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 3>mixing sexuality and violence in an unsettling way, and to

0:45:27.880 --> 0:45:32.399
<v Speaker 3>varying extents, they tend to be highly stylized. Not all

0:45:32.440 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 3>of the directors or like this, but a lot of

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 3>them are. They'll use these lurid colors and creative cinematography.

0:45:40.040 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 3>This is typically the opposite by the way of what

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I would say, are the dominant trends in murder mystery films,

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 3>say in the United States, which I think are overwhelmingly

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 3>They tend toward a gritty, realistic or muted look with

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.120
<v Speaker 3>kind of matter of fact camera work. It's like they're

0:45:56.160 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 3>trying to make it look like real life, whereas Italian

0:45:59.640 --> 0:46:02.919
<v Speaker 3>jello films tend to love these you know, weird red

0:46:02.960 --> 0:46:06.480
<v Speaker 3>and purple gel lights and tilted camera angles and shots

0:46:06.520 --> 0:46:08.839
<v Speaker 3>reflected in a mirror and all kinds of stuff like that.

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, to say nothing of the music, Yeah.

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah. Famously, like the Argento Jallo movies have had

0:46:14.480 --> 0:46:18.840
<v Speaker 3>wonderful scores, usually that you know, involve Goblin or Argento

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 3>himself in some way. There's another strange recurring detail that

0:46:22.800 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 3>I notice in a lot of Italian jella movies, especially

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:30.360
<v Speaker 3>the movies of Dario Argento. But a really common recurring

0:46:30.360 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 3>thing is that the protagonist will witness an image or

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 3>a scene early on in the movie that contains some

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 3>clue that would serve as the master key to solving

0:46:43.560 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 3>the mystery. And this, this scene or this memory keeps

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 3>replaying in their mind, but they're unable to recall or

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:55.360
<v Speaker 3>figure out what that key detail is until the final resolution.

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 3>So I think about the museum murder scene and the

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 3>bird with the crystal plumage, the face in the hallway

0:47:01.160 --> 0:47:02.720
<v Speaker 3>in deep red, and so forth.

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Interesting.

0:47:04.680 --> 0:47:07.759
<v Speaker 3>So looking back through this lens, is the telephone sort

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.560
<v Speaker 3>of a short form proto Jallo in a way. I

0:47:11.600 --> 0:47:13.920
<v Speaker 3>think it kind of is. It has some of that

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:20.120
<v Speaker 3>same naturalistic terror mystery sensibility. It has a clue detail

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 3>in the room except the protagonist. I don't know if

0:47:22.719 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 3>she sees it. I don't think she does. But I'm

0:47:24.560 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the zoom in on the eyes in the

0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:29.680
<v Speaker 3>window looking through the blinds, which is very creepy. It

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:34.120
<v Speaker 3>does have that creepy, voyeuristic and sexually charged sensibility, which

0:47:34.120 --> 0:47:36.760
<v Speaker 3>I do not always enjoy in these movies, to be honest,

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:39.799
<v Speaker 3>though it is not as stylized as a lot of

0:47:39.920 --> 0:47:42.400
<v Speaker 3>later Jallo, which I would have enjoyed more. I mean,

0:47:42.440 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 3>I kind of wish Baba had played up his visual

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:48.879
<v Speaker 3>sense more in this segment. But with blood and black

0:47:48.960 --> 0:47:52.359
<v Speaker 3>lace that comes later, I almost wonder if Bava sort

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:55.800
<v Speaker 3>of cross fertilized different parts of his own creative process

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 3>after Black Sabbath, like if he started thinking Okay, what

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 3>if I did a store that was more like this

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 3>set in the modern world. It's sort of a naturalistic

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:08.680
<v Speaker 3>mystery terror like the telephone, but I filmed it with

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 3>that otherworldly visual sensibility that I used in the Wordillac,

0:48:13.239 --> 0:48:15.280
<v Speaker 3>where everything glows with magic power.

0:48:15.760 --> 0:48:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Interesting, Well let's talk about the word of lock

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 1>or the Vertilac here?

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, are we gonna? Are we gonna war? Are

0:48:22.040 --> 0:48:22.640
<v Speaker 3>we gonna va?

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 1>What did? What should they use in the film? I

0:48:25.200 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>thought I was hearing a v but but we could

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>go either way. I don't think the monster's mind.

0:48:30.360 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna go VA. Let's let's let's assume that's authentic

0:48:34.160 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 3>and then try it. We could be wrong, but yeah,

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:41.280
<v Speaker 3>how about the Vertillac. So the Vertilac I think, picking

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 3>up after the first segment, which I which I didn't

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:48.719
<v Speaker 3>especially love, the Vertillac I think is extraordinary. It's this

0:48:48.800 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Carpathian Gothic tale where these auroras of weird color just

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.680
<v Speaker 3>dripped from the crags. Like I said earlier, it's a

0:48:56.760 --> 0:48:59.120
<v Speaker 3>new you know. It goes on my list of favorite

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Boris karlaf for roles. He plays this shaggy, wild purple

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Kurt Vonnegut type you notice he looks like. And this

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 3>whole segment is just full of awesome Slavic twang and

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:19.440
<v Speaker 3>this Menace of the Hills absolutely wonderful.

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:23.839
<v Speaker 1>The visual world that Bava creates in here that maybe

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:29.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't noticeable right at first, but then just really leeches in.

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>He creates this dark domain that is occupied entirely by

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>fog and ruins and desolate farmhouses, multiple just absolutely creepy

0:49:40.120 --> 0:49:44.399
<v Speaker 1>scenes and sequences. Yeah, I absolutely loved it. In fact,

0:49:44.480 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>if you have never watched this film and you're going

0:49:46.400 --> 0:49:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to pick it up, I give you I think you

0:49:49.000 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 1>should watch it in its entirety. But if you need to,

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you can go ahead and skip the telephone and go

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:55.920
<v Speaker 1>straight to this, straight to the Verdelac.

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 3>So to do a very quick plot description on it,

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to spoil it everything about it, but

0:50:01.320 --> 0:50:05.920
<v Speaker 3>it begins with the personable Mark Damon, who is he

0:50:05.960 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 3>plays an aristocrat, he's a counter something. I don't recall

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:13.120
<v Speaker 3>exactly what he is, but he's riding through the mountains

0:50:13.560 --> 0:50:17.360
<v Speaker 3>and he's clearly in a rural, rustic area and he

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:21.319
<v Speaker 3>comes across a corpse just lying there by a riverside.

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:23.839
<v Speaker 3>And so this is a corpse that's had its head

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 3>removed and it has been stabbed through the heart with

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 3>a very distinctive dagger, and so he's like, oh, I

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 3>guess I gotta do something about this. So he picks

0:50:32.200 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 3>up the corpse and he carries it with him to

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:38.879
<v Speaker 3>a nearby village. Or I don't know if it's even

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:41.120
<v Speaker 3>a village. It might just sort of be the compound

0:50:41.200 --> 0:50:43.880
<v Speaker 3>of one family, you know, under the heading of this

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:45.920
<v Speaker 3>one patriarch in his house.

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think so.

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:49.239
<v Speaker 3>So, Yeah, he comes to this house out in the

0:50:49.280 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 3>mountains and he goes in to meet the people who

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:54.760
<v Speaker 3>live there, and he says, hey, I found this corpse,

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 3>and immediately they know what's going on. They're like, oh, yes,

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.399
<v Speaker 3>that is our father's dagger you found through the heart

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:05.240
<v Speaker 3>of this corpse, and that's because our father has gone

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:08.680
<v Speaker 3>out to kill the Wordillac. Or well, let's see, do

0:51:08.760 --> 0:51:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I remember did they establish that the being he was

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:14.680
<v Speaker 3>trying to kill they knew was a Wordillac or did

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 3>they just think it was a local highwayman and murderer

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:19.160
<v Speaker 3>that their father was going out to kill. There was

0:51:19.200 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 3>sort of blurring of the lines.

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:23.920
<v Speaker 1>There, Yeah, there was both, because there clearly this region

0:51:24.000 --> 0:51:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is dealing with a serious vertilac problem. But then the

0:51:27.160 --> 0:51:30.960
<v Speaker 1>verdilac has also been identified as a particular individual who

0:51:31.080 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 1>is also a notorious highwayman.

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, so from this they conclude, Oh, okay, our father

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:38.080
<v Speaker 3>succeeded in his quest. You know, he went out into

0:51:38.120 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 3>the mountains to find this criminal, this highwayman and kill him.

0:51:41.960 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 3>And here's his body. But where's Pop. You know, you

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:48.640
<v Speaker 3>would think you would have come back by now. And

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:52.280
<v Speaker 3>so the family members here they include the I believe,

0:51:52.360 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 3>the two sons and the daughter of Boris Karloff's character,

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 3>and then the oldest son's wife and child as well,

0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:01.839
<v Speaker 3>And so they tell the story while our father went

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:04.920
<v Speaker 3>out into the mountains to hunt down this this brigand

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:10.200
<v Speaker 3>and possible supernatural menace, the vertiloc and and kill him.

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 3>And then he but they but he warned us, if

0:52:13.200 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 3>I come back after five days, don't let me in

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:19.640
<v Speaker 3>because then I'm going to be a word of lo

0:52:19.680 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 3>act probably by that time. And there's a great plot

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 3>device of ambiguity, because when does Boris Karloff show up

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:30.799
<v Speaker 3>right at the toll of midnight on the fifth day,

0:52:31.280 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 3>So he's like coming in right on the line and

0:52:33.760 --> 0:52:35.360
<v Speaker 3>you don't know one way or another.

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, though, I mean, I think one of the one

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the messages of this, this whole sequence here is

0:52:42.440 --> 0:52:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that if Grandpa says he he might be a VERTI

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:47.360
<v Speaker 1>loac just go ahead and assume he's a vertiloc, because

0:52:48.000 --> 0:52:58.719
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be the safe assumption. Some of you

0:52:58.800 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>might be wondering, is is a vertilock really a thing? Well?

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I did look it up, and according to folkloris Carol Rose,

0:53:04.600 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>who I often refer to with my monster career, is here,

0:53:08.719 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's actually more werewolf than vampire. But in the Slavic

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 1>tradition the two concepts are kind of interlocked. One version

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.600
<v Speaker 1>at least was that when a were wolf is killed,

0:53:18.600 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>it transforms into a vampire that could then reassume the

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:26.160
<v Speaker 1>form of a wolf, and vdiloch apparently means wolf's hair.

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But in this movie what we see is essentially a

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 1>take on the vampire legend with a fun twist. Well,

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it's fun depending on which end

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. If you're just enjoying the horror of it,

0:53:38.480 --> 0:53:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's I guess it's fun. If you're a character in

0:53:40.680 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the story, not so fun. And that is that the

0:53:43.560 --> 0:53:46.120
<v Speaker 1>monster when it comes back, when it takes on the

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:48.799
<v Speaker 1>form of those that is killed, it's going to be

0:53:48.920 --> 0:53:52.400
<v Speaker 1>drawn most to those that it loved in life. Those

0:53:52.440 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be the ones that it focuses all

0:53:54.640 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 1>of its monstrous intensity on.

0:53:56.800 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this is a vampire as betrayer of trust. Not

0:54:01.520 --> 0:54:04.359
<v Speaker 3>just a vampire that needs blood anybody's blood, just got

0:54:04.400 --> 0:54:06.360
<v Speaker 3>to have a meal of blood. This is a vampire

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:09.240
<v Speaker 3>that specifically comes for its loved ones.

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Which I was thinking about this a little bit

0:54:13.920 --> 0:54:16.280
<v Speaker 1>because again, the pacing of the film I think invites

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:20.360
<v Speaker 1>contemplation and also an enjoyment of the visuals. But like,

0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:24.600
<v Speaker 1>what is wonder what the sequence and what this this

0:54:24.719 --> 0:54:27.959
<v Speaker 1>legend is, Like what does it say about like love

0:54:28.040 --> 0:54:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and bereavement, you know, the twisted way that our strongest

0:54:32.000 --> 0:54:36.719
<v Speaker 1>positive emotions can become negative emotions. And then ultimately, is

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this story advising us not to love anybody because because

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 1>that alone would protect us from monsters?

0:54:43.600 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's a good question. And then I want to

0:54:45.960 --> 0:54:49.160
<v Speaker 3>take that a step further. A lot of horror movies

0:54:49.280 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 3>have very weakly earned love stories, where you know, the

0:54:55.960 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 3>characters fall in love with each other, you don't really

0:54:58.600 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 3>see a lot of reason for them to. You know,

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:03.160
<v Speaker 3>you don't see a lot of like scenes of chemistry

0:55:03.239 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 3>of them, you know, finding things they like about one another.

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:08.719
<v Speaker 3>It just kind of happens because the script says so

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:13.759
<v Speaker 3>this story, the Vertiloc has a couple of characters who

0:55:14.200 --> 0:55:16.960
<v Speaker 3>seem to fall in love with each other very quickly

0:55:17.000 --> 0:55:20.080
<v Speaker 3>and in this sort of weakly justified way. But I

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:24.680
<v Speaker 3>wonder if that's not intentional in this case, saying something

0:55:24.680 --> 0:55:27.799
<v Speaker 3>about like falling you know, loving too easily, and there

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:29.319
<v Speaker 3>being a kind of danger in that.

0:55:29.920 --> 0:55:33.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, the character that Damon plays, you do kind

0:55:33.840 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 1>of feel that, right. It's like, like, what do you do.

0:55:35.640 --> 0:55:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You're so in you're in love. You just met her,

0:55:38.280 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and you're so in love with her that you are

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:43.360
<v Speaker 1>going to risk incurring the wrath of her you know,

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>undead transformed family. Uh it seems it seems foolish, and

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, uh, as a fool in a short

0:55:51.120 --> 0:55:54.959
<v Speaker 1>horror work, you are going to be punished for this foolishness.

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, and it also says something about family. I think,

0:55:58.000 --> 0:56:00.960
<v Speaker 3>because again this will be a minor spoiler, I don't

0:56:00.960 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 3>think it'll ruin your enjoyment of the segment, which you

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:05.000
<v Speaker 3>can enjoy even if you read the whole plot ahead

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:08.319
<v Speaker 3>of time, but warning to spoil the ending. So I

0:56:08.360 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 3>think it is basically the fact that Mark Damon's character,

0:56:11.080 --> 0:56:14.840
<v Speaker 3>he comes in, he very quickly and maybe unjustifiedly falls

0:56:14.840 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 3>in love with Stenka, and then Sedenka apparently sort of reciprocates,

0:56:19.320 --> 0:56:22.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, she likes him too, and you get the

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:26.160
<v Speaker 3>impression that it's interesting that at first Mark Damon's character

0:56:26.239 --> 0:56:28.719
<v Speaker 3>is not really threatened by the Verdilac because he's not

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:30.920
<v Speaker 3>a member of the family and it only wants its

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:35.080
<v Speaker 3>own family. But it's once she reciprocates his feelings and

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.800
<v Speaker 3>they fall in love with each other that then he

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:41.160
<v Speaker 3>is also subject to the threat of having his blood drank,

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:44.400
<v Speaker 3>drink and drunk, you know, of being attacked by this

0:56:44.480 --> 0:56:47.879
<v Speaker 3>supernatural creature. It's once there is a bond of love

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 3>between him and her that now he is fair game

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 3>for this monster.

0:56:52.160 --> 0:56:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean it's there's probably something telling in

0:56:55.960 --> 0:56:59.160
<v Speaker 1>there about attachments, but at the same time, it's like

0:56:59.239 --> 0:57:04.280
<v Speaker 1>he's he clearly is loving strongly and loving deeply, albeit

0:57:04.520 --> 0:57:07.680
<v Speaker 1>very briefly. So maybe it's all worth it. It's worth

0:57:07.719 --> 0:57:11.920
<v Speaker 1>all the anguish and death because the love was that strong.

0:57:13.080 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 1>It seems to have there is a sort of a

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:19.200
<v Speaker 1>bittersweet romantic element to the to the way this this

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:19.800
<v Speaker 1>wraps up.

0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, but I mean, overall every everything else we've

0:57:23.160 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 3>said about the Verdiloc, the atmosphere is just amazing, and

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:30.840
<v Speaker 3>there are such wonderful scenes of looking out the window

0:57:31.040 --> 0:57:34.360
<v Speaker 3>and maybe seeing Boris Karloff in his in his purple

0:57:34.440 --> 0:57:39.200
<v Speaker 3>Kurt Vonnegut with the with the shaggy furry hood. Oh god,

0:57:39.240 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 3>it's just so so good.

0:57:41.240 --> 0:57:43.959
<v Speaker 1>Oh. The sequence with the child crying for the mother,

0:57:44.280 --> 0:57:47.720
<v Speaker 1>well that's super creepy. That one gave me the shivers. Yeah.

0:57:47.880 --> 0:57:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

0:57:48.080 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Another great thing about this sequence is it has a

0:57:50.720 --> 0:57:54.600
<v Speaker 1>great decapitated head. So at this point in my life

0:57:54.600 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and my film film Going Life, and I imagine you're

0:57:57.200 --> 0:58:00.400
<v Speaker 1>much the same, Joe, I've seen a vast spec of

0:58:00.400 --> 0:58:04.040
<v Speaker 1>decapitated head effects, ranging from just the laughable to the

0:58:04.160 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, at times shockingly realistic. Though it's interesting to

0:58:09.000 --> 0:58:12.000
<v Speaker 1>think of like realistic and non realistic decapitated head effects

0:58:12.360 --> 0:58:15.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think most all of us don't have anything

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to judge it against, you know, And I think that's

0:58:17.880 --> 0:58:20.400
<v Speaker 1>ultimately a good thing. We can't really we don't look

0:58:20.440 --> 0:58:22.480
<v Speaker 1>at a decapitated head and go like, wait a minute,

0:58:22.560 --> 0:58:25.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not what a decapitated head looks like. I saw

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a decapitated head this morning.

0:58:27.920 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 3>To get out my faces of death videos.

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but at any rate, I love even a hokey

0:58:35.120 --> 0:58:39.080
<v Speaker 1>beheading effect. But this film has has not one, but

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:44.280
<v Speaker 1>two beautifully disturbing corpse head sculpts. And these were actually

0:58:44.320 --> 0:58:49.200
<v Speaker 1>created by Mario Baba's father, Eugenio Bava, which I thought

0:58:49.240 --> 0:58:54.320
<v Speaker 1>was interesting. They're both absolutely beautiful and of course terrifying.

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:58.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, speaking of beautiful and terrifying corpses, we got to

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:01.360
<v Speaker 3>also mention the third segment in this movie, A Drop

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 3>of Water, which for me, the Vertiloc is the standout.

0:59:04.680 --> 0:59:06.680
<v Speaker 3>But a Drop of Water I thought was also very,

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:09.640
<v Speaker 3>very good, and it has, I got to say, one

0:59:09.640 --> 0:59:12.720
<v Speaker 3>of the creepiest movie corpses I have ever seen, along

0:59:12.720 --> 0:59:15.960
<v Speaker 3>with a wonderful twist and some really great set and

0:59:16.040 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 3>lighting choices.

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this one again. The telephone things are a little

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe more subdued, but still pretty brilliant. But subdued for Bava,

0:59:25.720 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Vertiloc colorful and wonderful and out there. This one too,

0:59:29.880 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is just just absolutely touching your eyeballs with its color scheme.

0:59:36.200 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 3>Specifically, the thing that stuck with me most about the

0:59:38.920 --> 0:59:41.520
<v Speaker 3>Drop of Water. There were two things. One is that

0:59:41.600 --> 0:59:47.439
<v Speaker 3>it has this marvelous, creepy corpse design, but the other

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:51.200
<v Speaker 3>was that the main character in this plays a nurse

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 3>who lives in an apartment that has this oval shaped window,

0:59:55.000 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 3>and outside the window is a constantly gently seeing green light.

1:00:02.560 --> 1:00:04.840
<v Speaker 3>And I don't know what exactly that was supposed to

1:00:04.880 --> 1:00:06.840
<v Speaker 3>be in terms of realism. I think there's a quick

1:00:06.880 --> 1:00:09.280
<v Speaker 3>shot from outside at first where it's raining out, and

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:11.840
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's supposed to be some kind of rotating sign

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:15.080
<v Speaker 3>or something. I'm not quite positive, but the effect within

1:00:15.120 --> 1:00:19.920
<v Speaker 3>the apartment is these pulses of green that are I

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:21.880
<v Speaker 3>just love it. I love it. I want to live

1:00:21.960 --> 1:00:22.280
<v Speaker 3>in that.

1:00:22.800 --> 1:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. That window is absolutely amazing. It's like a horizontal

1:00:28.320 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>oval shape and it has this kind of like iron

1:00:32.960 --> 1:00:37.120
<v Speaker 1>lattice work cross in the middle of it. I have

1:00:37.240 --> 1:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>never seen anything quite like it. And yeah, and then

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this pulsating light. So this was very much a sequence

1:00:42.600 --> 1:00:44.919
<v Speaker 1>in the film where I think I was a little

1:00:45.000 --> 1:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>uncertain about like what was supposed to be happening. And

1:00:47.560 --> 1:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you know what's supposed to be pulling me along character

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>wise or plot wise. But I could not look away

1:00:52.280 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>from that window, and it was reminding me of something too,

1:00:56.200 --> 1:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And I realized it was reminding me of a scene

1:00:59.360 --> 1:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>from the ninth, teen ninety seven sci fi film Event Horizon,

1:01:04.120 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>which which I know you've seen as well, Joe. There's

1:01:07.760 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a sequence where there is a corpse floating aboard the

1:01:10.800 --> 1:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Event Horizon spaceship, and it's floating in front of this

1:01:14.360 --> 1:01:18.720
<v Speaker 1>cross shaped window that has kind of bluish greenish space

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>lights pulsating behind it.

1:01:20.560 --> 1:01:22.720
<v Speaker 3>And you think it was influenced by this short.

1:01:23.560 --> 1:01:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if it was, because, for starters, Event Horizon

1:01:26.880 --> 1:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is a film that is not shy about taking inspiration

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>from other films. I love it, but like you, like,

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you see the DNA of these other films in it.

1:01:36.440 --> 1:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>It's all about that, And so yeah, I'm wondering if

1:01:40.120 --> 1:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the cinematographer on Event Horizon, an individual by the name

1:01:42.920 --> 1:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>of Adrian Biddle, who worked on Aliens and Judge Dread

1:01:46.240 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and various other films. I wonder if this particular scene

1:01:50.440 --> 1:01:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a nod to Bava, because it feels

1:01:54.160 --> 1:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Bava esque you know, it feels it feels like it

1:01:57.200 --> 1:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>might be a slight tip of the hat.

1:01:59.280 --> 1:02:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Event Horizon could be an interesting movie to come back

1:02:01.640 --> 1:02:05.240
<v Speaker 3>to because I find it to be a very, very strange,

1:02:05.760 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 3>an unusual combination of very inspired and very hack.

1:02:10.680 --> 1:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I know what you mean. Yeah, there's a there.

1:02:13.280 --> 1:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I loved Event Horizon when it came out, and then

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>when I rewatched it several years ago, there were still

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>things I absolutely loved about it, but some things were

1:02:22.560 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of sighed and groaned at. But still it

1:02:25.160 --> 1:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>has a place in my heart.

1:02:26.480 --> 1:02:28.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, I guess you could say, much like The Telephone.

1:02:28.520 --> 1:02:32.480
<v Speaker 3>The plot of A Drop of Water is pretty straightforward.

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:37.160
<v Speaker 3>So a nurse is called out to the apartment of

1:02:37.240 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 3>a woman that she has been taken care of who

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:43.000
<v Speaker 3>has just died. And this woman apparently was involved in

1:02:43.040 --> 1:02:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the occult. I think they say that she died during

1:02:45.680 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>a seance. Yeah, And so then the nurse must go

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:51.680
<v Speaker 3>into the room where her dead body is laying and

1:02:51.760 --> 1:02:54.760
<v Speaker 3>help prepare the corpse. But when she goes into the room,

1:02:54.840 --> 1:02:59.360
<v Speaker 3>she notices that the kidaver here has a splendid, very

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>expensive looking piece of jewelry on it, a beautiful ring

1:03:03.160 --> 1:03:06.560
<v Speaker 3>that has maybe a sapphire in it or something, and

1:03:06.640 --> 1:03:08.240
<v Speaker 3>she looks at it and it's like, well, is this

1:03:08.440 --> 1:03:10.040
<v Speaker 3>just you know, is this ring going to go to waste?

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 3>Is this expensive piece of jewelry just gonna go into

1:03:12.440 --> 1:03:14.680
<v Speaker 3>a coffin and then rot in the ground. I could

1:03:14.760 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 3>grab that thing and take it with me. And then

1:03:17.760 --> 1:03:20.160
<v Speaker 3>you get the sense that the nurse is sort of

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:22.600
<v Speaker 3>living in poverty like that she could she could use

1:03:23.160 --> 1:03:25.160
<v Speaker 3>a big cash in at the pawn shop.

1:03:25.960 --> 1:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>She needs buy some curtains to put over that creepy window.

1:03:28.600 --> 1:03:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly to.

1:03:29.600 --> 1:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Sleep at night.

1:03:31.880 --> 1:03:35.640
<v Speaker 3>So she grabs the ring, but of course I don't

1:03:35.680 --> 1:03:37.320
<v Speaker 3>know if you want to grab the ring off the

1:03:37.320 --> 1:03:39.640
<v Speaker 3>corpse of a lady who just died while being involved

1:03:39.680 --> 1:03:43.000
<v Speaker 3>with the occult right, And so the rest of this

1:03:43.040 --> 1:03:47.240
<v Speaker 3>segment has some wonderful scenes of the haunting of a

1:03:47.280 --> 1:03:50.680
<v Speaker 3>guilty conscience, and then there's also an excellent twist at

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the ending of this segment.

1:03:52.600 --> 1:03:52.760
<v Speaker 4>Two.

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, i've kind of downplayed the like the plotting of

1:03:56.720 --> 1:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Bava films, I guess in general here, but but but yeah,

1:04:00.280 --> 1:04:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I think all three sequences have some fun, some some

1:04:04.400 --> 1:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>fun plot twists, and some fun developments. You know that

1:04:07.560 --> 1:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you don't really know where everything's going to go, and

1:04:09.800 --> 1:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>things don't follow a clearly defined path, which which is

1:04:14.160 --> 1:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>rather pleasurable.

1:04:15.240 --> 1:04:17.560
<v Speaker 3>I agree. So I mean, as we were saying at

1:04:17.600 --> 1:04:21.760
<v Speaker 3>the beginning, horror anthologies are often kind of you know,

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:24.520
<v Speaker 3>your different segments are going to be of different quality.

1:04:24.560 --> 1:04:27.240
<v Speaker 3>But I would say, after, I guess if we're wrapping

1:04:27.280 --> 1:04:29.560
<v Speaker 3>up here at the end, I really enjoyed two out

1:04:29.600 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>of three segments. But if you only check out one

1:04:31.840 --> 1:04:34.560
<v Speaker 3>of the segments from this movie, definitely I would say

1:04:34.600 --> 1:04:36.680
<v Speaker 3>the Vertillac, the Vertillac, the vertill Act.

1:04:36.960 --> 1:04:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, come for the Vertillac, stay for the drop of water,

1:04:42.000 --> 1:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and find something to love in the telephone. Oh but

1:04:44.800 --> 1:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>then also we should we have to come back to

1:04:46.920 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>our host here because one of the fun things about

1:04:49.360 --> 1:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the American International Pictures A release of it is that, yeah,

1:04:53.800 --> 1:04:57.320
<v Speaker 1>we added us this intro bit from Boris Karloth, and

1:04:57.360 --> 1:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>apparently they filmed some segments of Orris Karloff that would

1:05:01.600 --> 1:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>have gone between each of the segments, but they didn't

1:05:05.120 --> 1:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>use those. So we just go from segment one to

1:05:07.600 --> 1:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>segment two to segment three. But then when segment three ends,

1:05:11.120 --> 1:05:15.040
<v Speaker 1>we come back to Boris Karloff, and weirdly enough, he's

1:05:15.080 --> 1:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>he's like in his he seems to be in costume

1:05:18.080 --> 1:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>from the vertiloc He's riding a horse, but he has

1:05:21.480 --> 1:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>this kind of almost crip keeper esque, you know, javial

1:05:27.040 --> 1:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>atmosphere about him. And I can't even remember what he's

1:05:29.800 --> 1:05:32.480
<v Speaker 1>telling us because as he's saying, you know, wrapping up

1:05:32.480 --> 1:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>for everybody, we pan out and we have this kind

1:05:35.680 --> 1:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of holy Mountain moment where we pan out and we

1:05:42.160 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>see that it's a set. We see a camera man,

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we see people holding up these bushes that are supposed

1:05:47.680 --> 1:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, rushing past him as he rides

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>this horse, and we see that the horse itself is

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>just a saddle on, like a fake horse rump that's

1:05:56.920 --> 1:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's being put into motion. And it's such a weird ending.

1:06:00.520 --> 1:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about it. It's like, why did we

1:06:02.800 --> 1:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>punctuate this film Black Sabbath, this trio of horrifying tales,

1:06:07.480 --> 1:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>each with a dark ending. And I was wondering if

1:06:10.240 --> 1:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it was because they thought, well, you know, nineteen sixty

1:06:12.840 --> 1:06:15.840
<v Speaker 1>three audiences don't want to go home feeling depressed. They

1:06:15.840 --> 1:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>need to go home with a smile on their face,

1:06:17.640 --> 1:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>so we need this, we need a fund in ending,

1:06:20.440 --> 1:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we need Boris Karloff reminding them that it's all just

1:06:23.480 --> 1:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>a movie. It's no, none of this is real. It's

1:06:27.360 --> 1:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it was weird.

1:06:28.280 --> 1:06:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm not really sure what motivated that ending. Maybe

1:06:30.800 --> 1:06:32.720
<v Speaker 3>just yeah, like you're saying, send them home with a

1:06:32.720 --> 1:06:35.240
<v Speaker 3>smile on their face. But I loved it. Rachel and

1:06:35.280 --> 1:06:39.320
<v Speaker 3>I both really appreciated the pulling back to see especially.

1:06:39.400 --> 1:06:41.440
<v Speaker 3>The best part of it for me was the people

1:06:41.520 --> 1:06:43.800
<v Speaker 3>running around with the potted plants to move them in

1:06:43.800 --> 1:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>front of the camera to simulate the horse actually traveling

1:06:47.040 --> 1:06:48.280
<v Speaker 3>through stuff in the foreground.

1:06:48.680 --> 1:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's something I guess thinking to other horror host environments,

1:06:55.200 --> 1:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>like you need to do one of two things. Either

1:06:56.880 --> 1:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>you have the horror host punctuate the terror or this

1:07:00.040 --> 1:07:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Cerebriel nature of it, you know, like the voiceover for

1:07:03.400 --> 1:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the Outer Limits is all about really driving home the

1:07:06.080 --> 1:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>serious message of the piece, you know, or if you're

1:07:09.600 --> 1:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>watching Twilight Zone, it's all about reminding you of how

1:07:12.760 --> 1:07:15.880
<v Speaker 1>dark and mysterious things really are. But the Cryptkeeper, he

1:07:16.040 --> 1:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>just comes back to make several punny jokes, and so

1:07:21.120 --> 1:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, what Cora Karloff is doing here is very

1:07:23.240 --> 1:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>much in the cryptkeeper mode of lightning the mood. I feel,

1:07:27.800 --> 1:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, we're gonna go ahead and close this

1:07:30.040 --> 1:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>one out, but we recommend everybody. Yeah, this is the

1:07:32.520 --> 1:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Halloween season, so if you need a nice gothic atmospheric

1:07:35.440 --> 1:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>film to watch, check out Black Sabbath. This is also

1:07:39.680 --> 1:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a fine one, you know, just to play visually in

1:07:41.600 --> 1:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the background. If you just want some really strong visuals,

1:07:44.680 --> 1:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this one's This one's good to go. Black Sabbath is

1:07:47.960 --> 1:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>widely available for digital rental or purchase. Again, I watched

1:07:51.400 --> 1:07:53.360
<v Speaker 1>it on Apple TV by doing a free preview of

1:07:53.400 --> 1:07:56.920
<v Speaker 1>AMC Plus, but it's also widely available on disc and

1:07:56.960 --> 1:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>clean it, including Keino Classics. They have a blu ray

1:07:59.680 --> 1:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of it, though. I guess we'll leave the research to

1:08:03.080 --> 1:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you figuring out what version you're about to purchase or rent,

1:08:06.720 --> 1:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, we both watch the Italian language version subtitled,

1:08:10.240 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but I think there is a dubbed version as well.

1:08:12.720 --> 1:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the availability on that is. I

1:08:14.840 --> 1:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>can't speak to it.

1:08:15.600 --> 1:08:18.439
<v Speaker 3>Personally, I can't comment on that, but I do think

1:08:18.479 --> 1:08:21.160
<v Speaker 3>there are different versions that have different levels of sort

1:08:21.200 --> 1:08:24.519
<v Speaker 3>of color saturation and all that. Try to find one

1:08:24.600 --> 1:08:26.439
<v Speaker 3>with the really intense colors.

1:08:26.800 --> 1:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's the most important thing.

1:08:28.520 --> 1:08:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:08:28.760 --> 1:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>The colors speak volumes. The colors speak in ways that

1:08:33.280 --> 1:08:36.559
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue and the subtitles are going to are going

1:08:36.640 --> 1:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to pale in comparison to all Right, Well, we'll be

1:08:39.439 --> 1:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>back next week with another I think thoroughly halloweeny selection.

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:45.479
<v Speaker 1>But in the meantime, you can listen to Weird House

1:08:45.520 --> 1:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Cinema every Friday and the Stuff to Blow your Mind

1:08:48.320 --> 1:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast feed We're primarily a science podcast with core episodes

1:08:52.000 --> 1:08:55.879
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesdays and Thursdays, Artifact on Wednesday, listener mail on Monday,

1:08:56.080 --> 1:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>but on Fridays we take a little time to just

1:08:58.680 --> 1:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>discuss a weird film like Black Sabbath.

1:09:02.080 --> 1:09:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our wonderful audio producer Seth

1:09:05.040 --> 1:09:07.519
<v Speaker 3>Nicholas Johnson. If you would like to get in touch

1:09:07.560 --> 1:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>with us with feedback on this episode or any other,

1:09:09.800 --> 1:09:11.840
<v Speaker 3>to suggest a topic for the future, or just to

1:09:11.840 --> 1:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>say hello, you can email us at contact at stuff

1:09:15.000 --> 1:09:23.599
<v Speaker 3>to Blow your Mind dot com.

1:09:23.720 --> 1:09:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

1:09:26.760 --> 1:09:29.559
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

1:09:29.720 --> 1:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.