WEBVTT - Berkshire Hathaway Slashes Amazon Stake 

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Coarcklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:26.599
<v Speaker 2>All right, we got to Scarlet Foot Paul Sweeney live

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 2>here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio or streaming live

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 2>on YouTube and at Bloomberg dot com. Buffett goes out

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:37.479
<v Speaker 2>like a bear with five billion dollars in Q four sales.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 2>That's according to the thirteen f's Matthew Palizola Joints is

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>here senior alys who covers the insurance companies, including Berkshire

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Hathaway for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's covered that company for decades.

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 2>Here was this the last quarter where Warren Buffett was

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>actively managing maybe I guess the account along with his

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>co managers there. So this is maybe the last time

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 2>we can say Warren Buffett sold this or bought this.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Yes it is.

0:01:01.320 --> 0:01:04.039
<v Speaker 4>So he was the CEO as of the fourth quarter.

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 4>So these moves that were looking at in the thirteen

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.280
<v Speaker 4>F took place in the fourth quarter. Of last year.

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 4>To be totally fair, he's been stepping back. He probably

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 4>wasn't behind a lot of this anyway, but this is

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 4>actually the last quarter that you could even attribute these

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 4>things to him. He remains chairman, so you never know

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 4>he'd be looming behind the scenes, but his last quarter

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 4>is CEO.

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 5>And the thing about his husband in Apple was that

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 5>he famously said he was only investing in things that

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 5>he understood in that typically did not include technology companies.

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:35.880
<v Speaker 5>But Apple, I guess he saw more as a consumer

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:37.120
<v Speaker 5>company than anything else.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think so.

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 4>And I think the you know, his thing was motes,

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 4>right and probably still is, but the iPhone mote and

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 4>the infrastructure built in I think those were appealing things.

0:01:48.160 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 4>They have been pairing that that investment, as we know,

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 4>part of that, and you know, it's it's kind of

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 4>a twist because he had said this said of the

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 4>annual meeting a couple of meetings ago, that it was

0:01:59.760 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 4>a kind of tax reasons that they had these huge

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>unrealized gains in there, and he thought taxes.

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Would be going up.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 4>Now they're certainly not going to go up under the

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 4>current administration kind of anytime soon. But Buffett is always

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 4>long term thinking, so I think that's what he was

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 4>looking at as we've got, you know, tens of billions

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 4>of dollars of unrealized gains that will be taxed. And

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 4>I think it does still hold true that in ten

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 4>years from now, probably the corporate tax rate could be higher,

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 4>and I think that was his concern and part of

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 4>the reason they were taking down those those big gains

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 4>in those big positions.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>The Conglomberate also cut its Amazon steak by seventy five percent.

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 4>They so Amazon. They initially got into Amazon him in

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 4>twenty nineteen. That was one of his investment deputies, I

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 4>think brought it to him. Then again also like tech,

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 4>but a retailer. Right that position we calculated was up

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 4>about one hundred and thirty to one hundred and forty

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 4>percent over the time. They hold it nice but kind

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 4>of in line with the S and P five hundred,

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 4>So it didn't really outperform. So I think it was

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 4>kind of taking some money off the table.

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>I sold.

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 4>I believe like one point seven billion worth of that

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 4>stock cut, cutting most of the position, so that one

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.000
<v Speaker 4>I think was probably a company specific didn't really outperform. They

0:03:13.040 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 4>bought four billion of Alphabet last quarter, so you know,

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 4>the kind of tech aversion you know may be changing

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 4>over time.

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 6>What did he increase takes in?

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 4>So two big ones, Chevron and Chubb. So Chevron is

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 4>they their fifth biggest holding. I think they interestingly, I

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 4>don't know if they were kind of betting on US

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 4>intervention in Venezuela, which happened kind of after the quarter,

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 4>so you can't say that like murderer got taken out

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 4>and this stuff happened, and they did it and reaction

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 4>they did it before. But maybe they were reading the

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 4>tea leaves there. I don't know. It's a big holding

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 4>for them. I think the the kind of geopolitical energy

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 4>play makes total sense. The other one is Chubb, which

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, I don't want to get too excited thinking

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 4>about insurance mega deal here, but they are now the

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 4>second well they've been the second largest holder of Chub stock.

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Chub makes total sense.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 4>It is, in our view, BI a cream of the

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 4>crop insurance company, Global reach, still growing nicely, great management.

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a company that Berkshire would want to own.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Now Berkshire's got their own massive insurance business.

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 3>Yes.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 4>The interesting thing is you've got two massive insurance businesses.

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 3>They're actually quite.

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 4>Complimentary if one were to want to put them together.

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:33.800
<v Speaker 4>So the Berkshire business very big personal atto in Geico,

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 4>very big reinsurance, kind of global global reinsurance. Those are

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 4>two businesses that Chubb is not really in. There's some

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 4>overlap in the kind of US specialty businesses that they're

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 4>both in, but it would be phenomenally complementary of those

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 4>two businesses. I think there's probably a lot of hurdles

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 4>to some sort of you know, total deal there Chubb's

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Chubb's market cap is one hundred thirty billion. Berkshire has

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 4>three hundred billion of cash, so they theoretically could buy

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Chubb in cash if they wanted to. But I think

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 4>it's probably some cultural issues and would Shubb really want

0:05:09.880 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 4>to sell as the other thing? But you know, it

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 4>is something as a stock something Berkshire would want on.

0:05:15.600 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 5>Is that a strategy that Berkshire actually follows through on

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 5>where it starts off with a steak and then eventually decides,

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 5>you know what, we're just going to buy.

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 7>The whole thing.

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Scarlett, Yeah, they do do that.

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 4>So I think with Burlington Northern, which is a little

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 4>bit before time when they bought it. They did things

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 4>like that where they acquire the public steak and then

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 4>they build it over time. That's why there was a

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 4>lot of speculation about occidental. Buffett then came out and

0:05:35.960 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 4>threw cold water on it, saying that, but it seemed

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 4>like it was going along with their playbook of huge

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:41.799
<v Speaker 4>acquisitions that they made before.

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>So now that warns out, can we have a serious

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>discussion about a dividend?

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 3>We can? I think, you know, we'll get you on

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 3>the phone, grig Able. Let's see what he says.

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think our take has been in the

0:05:54.680 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 4>early years. Able will probably adhere to the ethel of Berkshire.

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 4>And I don't think he's going to come in and

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 4>start breaking down walls. I don't think anyone would like

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:08.840
<v Speaker 4>to see that, especially Buffet's still there. I mean, they

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 4>have tremendous excess capital. Buffett is praised Able as being

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 4>a great capital allocator, great capital manager, and they've also

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 4>said we literally can't there's so much money, we can't

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 4>put it to work in a reasonable way. So it

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 4>would make sense to see something happen there. And I think, look,

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 4>the other thesis is they're not going to be as

0:06:28.360 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 4>good as anything anymore. Right, there's no better investor than Buffett.

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Give a g.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 4>Jayne, who is the head of the insurance operations. He's

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 4>been selling a lot of stock. Perhaps he's getting close

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 4>to retirement, so not going to be good at any

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 4>of these things anymore. Some sort of capital which are

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 4>gonna be a big catalyst.

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you get your or watch us live on YouTube.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Apple's correlation to the Nasdaq one hundred in next has

0:07:06.000 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 2>tumbled to zero point two to one, it's lowest since

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and six, as the company's decision to mostly

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 2>sit out the AI arms race has turned it into

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 2>an outlier. Ryan of Lastelka, he's an equities reporter for

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg NewCity Space out there in Chicago. Ryan, is this

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 2>a good thing for Apple? A bad thing? Because historically

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 2>it's been like, Hey, Apple, when are you guys going

0:07:28.720 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 2>to get on this AI bandwagon? And then maybe now

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 2>it's kind of working out to their benefit that they're

0:07:33.600 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 2>not so much on that.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, So in this market, obviously, there has been a

0:07:38.320 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 7>lot of AI related volatility. There's been a lot of

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 7>concern about the amount of money that big tech companies

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 7>are spending on AI, but Apple isn't really spending on

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 7>AI in that way. There's been a lot of concern

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 7>about AI disrupting software companies. Apple isn't really software. There's

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 7>a lot of concerns about AI disrupting all parts of

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 7>the market, whether it's financial services, legal services, data, all

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 7>these kinds of things, none of which really involve Apple.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 7>But at the same time, Apple is probably going to

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 7>be the major way that people access AI services on

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 7>their phones, on their computers, on their tablets, so on,

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 7>and so forth, which means it has a certain amount

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 7>of upside potential related to the technology without having to

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 7>spend on it the way companies like Microsoft or Alphabet

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 7>or Meta are. So it's kind of perfectly positioned in

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 7>this current environment when there's concern about both AI spending

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 7>but also AI disruption.

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 5>So it kind of worked out that Apple hasn't made

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 5>very much progress on AI, but on overall, the fact

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 5>that it didn't do a lot on AI was kind

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 5>of falling behind. In fact, losing talent was something that

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 5>was a drag on the stock, say a year ago.

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, people were concerned about this. But a few weeks

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 7>ago it announced a multi year partnership with Alphabet, where

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 7>Google is going to be providing the technology behind Apple's AI,

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 7>including Siri. That was seen as a way for the

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 7>people to feel really relieved that they are going to

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 7>be involved with a I have some kind of offering

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 7>from a highly respected, you know, AI lab model provider

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 7>in Alphabet without having to you know, pay for it

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 7>or have developed their own in house stuff, which is

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 7>obviously an area of huge competition, heavy expenses. I think

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 7>the four major spenders this year are spending six hundred

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 7>and fifty billions, so they are stepping out of that

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 7>and they don't have to worry about that.

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up after this.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 5>What the big gainers today and it happened even before

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 5>the market open. Paul is MSG s MSG Sports. It

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 5>is the owner of the Knicks and the Rangers, not

0:09:52.360 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 5>the owner of MSG Networks because that's another business. Yes,

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 5>so there's a whole bunch of businesses within MSG. I

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.240
<v Speaker 5>mean it's difficult to follow.

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and after they sold their cable business years ago,

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>so now they just focus on their entertainment.

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 5>And then there's Sphere Entertainment, which is the big spere

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:10.280
<v Speaker 5>in Las Vegas. Awesome, So all of James Dolan's media

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 5>properties and assets in this suite of publicly traded companies.

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 6>Let's bring in Randall Williams.

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 5>He is our business of sports reporter here at Bloomberg

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 5>and Randall, you have been following this story about this

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 5>potential split of the New York Knicks and the New

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 5>York Rangers within MSG Sports. This is something that a

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 5>lot of people have been calling for for a long time.

0:10:29.960 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 8>You look at the enterprise value of the Knicks and

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 8>Rangers and what they're traded at its seven billion dollars.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 8>But you look at what the Lakers sold for a

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 8>loan ten billion dollars, and I think the Knicks obviously

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 8>are in a larger market than New York. The Lakers

0:10:41.800 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 8>have won more titles, but New York is New York,

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 8>and so both the Knicks and the Rangers I think

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 8>would carry a tremendous value, maybe twelve billion dollars combined,

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 8>and that's on the low end.

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 2>So is this maybe a first step for selling one

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 2>of the teams? Selling a piece of one of them?

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 8>Get to speculatative territory with James Dolan, that's always a

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 8>fun place. Look, I mean Silver Lake owns a piece

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 8>of MSG Sports, so that's five percent. It's a ten

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 8>percent stake, but probably five percent each. And when you

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 8>think about someone wanting to buy into that, you would

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 8>want to know how much each individually is worth. If not,

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 8>you're buying into something and it's like you could be

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 8>buying in at a supreme price or maybe something that's

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.440
<v Speaker 8>a little bit lower. And I think buyers who are

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 8>interested in there have been several over the years, want

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 8>want a more precise price, and so do the shareholders

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 8>of MSG Sports.

0:11:37.720 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 5>So what's held up the company from being split up

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 5>up until now because there's been a lot of calls

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 5>for the enterprise value trading at a discount to the

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 5>actual value of each franchise has been there for a while.

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 2>I know the answer for voting stock is from the

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Dolan control.

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think that James Dolan has long been the

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 8>controlling person for all of these companies. He decides where

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.840
<v Speaker 8>for worse, yes, exactly, he decides, you know what he

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 8>wants to do. And there is a board of directors

0:12:06.679 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 8>that voted on this. But this would have never been

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.400
<v Speaker 8>up been up for a vote had James Dolan and said,

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.839
<v Speaker 8>you know what, maybe we should consider this, and then

0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 8>from there on, you know, things happen.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 2>And then they vote on this. Madison Square Garden, James Stone,

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 2>did they own the garden itself? The building? I believe so, yeah,

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 2>because that's always a big that's always a big part

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 2>of it too. Do you own the arena they plan or.

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Yes, a different publicly traded company. Exactly, the exactly.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 8>And I had a Bloomberg terminal reader and the original

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 8>copy that I wrote this morning. I said Madison Square

0:12:33.840 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 8>Garden was one of the most famous in the world,

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 8>and someone quickly, someone quickly replied and said, no, it

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 8>is the most famous arena in the world. So Madison

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 8>Square Garden is a huge you know, attraction. When you

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 8>think about arenas in New York. There's the Barclay Center,

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 8>of course, which is newer, but the legacy of New

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 8>York is often rooted in MSG and the events that

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 8>it's held over many many years.

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, first of all, and they also put

0:12:57.760 --> 0:12:59.959
<v Speaker 2>in I think close to a billion dollars in renov

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 2>several years ago, so they've really upgraded the garden. What's

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 2>one of the many great things about going to the

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 2>garden is they have the photos on the wall, the concourses,

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 2>all the great events, whether it's a concert, a game, whatever,

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 2>and there's thousands of them.

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 8>There's no there's no venue that has a greater history,

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 8>I would argue than Madison Square Garden that is still

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 8>you know, open and operational. And that's that's part of this.

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:25.439
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you think about the Knicks playoff end last year.

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 8>You think about the Rangers and what they've done not

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 8>the past coming the past two seasons, but in the

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 8>seasons before that, all of these things. When they eventually win,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 8>you know, God willing, it isn't MSG. It isn't one

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:38.719
<v Speaker 8>of the deals where you know they're in away game

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 8>and then they have to come back. If it happens

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 8>in MSG that will probably be the biggest moment in

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 8>that arena in the last twenty five years, and so

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.160
<v Speaker 8>whoever wants to buy into that potentially is going to

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:49.199
<v Speaker 8>want a good value at it.

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 5>There is also a note from light Shed that pointed

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 5>out that there's a new tax law that goes into

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 5>effect for the twenty twenty eight fiscal year that were

0:13:56.360 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 5>public companies limits deductions on one million dollars two one

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 5>million dollars per covered employees.

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 6>For sports teams, it's easy.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 5>To find a lot of employees that make at least

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 5>a million dollars a year. So once this goes through

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 5>in twenty twenty eight, that's going to put the company

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 5>in a negative free cash flow situation unless the Knicks,

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 5>for instance, go deep into a playoff run or the

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 5>Rangers go deep into a playoff run. So it also

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 5>allows the company, you know, for tax reasons, to be

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 5>in a better position.

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely absolutely.

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 8>I mean there's not a lot of publicly traded sports

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 8>companies out there for this reason in particular, and you

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 8>think about all of the big ones. You think about

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 8>the Cranky Sports and Entertainment which houses the Rams, the Nuggets,

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 8>I believe another soccer team and so many more. It's private,

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 8>and that's that's for a reason. But this one is unique,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 8>and Madison's Square Garden is Madison Square Garden. The Knicks

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 8>to the Knicks and the Rangers of the Rangers.

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Another big trade that a lot of people are thinking

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 2>about in professional sports is in the NFL with the

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Seattle Seahawks. Yes, what's the status to that? Because that

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the NFL teams don't come along very often.

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 8>Sure, so, the NFL's finance committee has been talking about

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 8>this for over a year, and I think things just

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 8>are at a point now where the ownership group in Seattle,

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 8>the trust of Paul Allen, the former co founder of Microsoft,

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 8>is at a point where they're ready to sell.

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 6>Hired some lawyers, right they have.

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 8>That's reported by SBJ. I don't believe the paperwork is

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 8>signed just yet, but I trust beneficher, and you know,

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 8>I think that that will happen later this year, whether

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 8>that's at the NFL league meetings and Phoenix around the

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 8>end of March and April, and then I think NFL

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 8>owners would like to have a new owner by the

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 8>time the new season starts.

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 5>How much of a stake do they own in the Seahawks.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, is this, you know, like super stake or

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 5>is it.

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Just you know, it's a control stake in the team.

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 8>And that wouldn't have happened in you know, since the

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 8>Commanders are sold for six billion dollars. So whoever buys

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 8>the Seahawks shots? Yeah, exactly.

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 2>And is it any sense whether it's going to be

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>a billionaire financing group?

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 3>Look, there's so many The.

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 8>NFL's finance structure sees that a controlling owner has to

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 8>have thirty percent of a team upfront. So it is

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 8>in a situation where you know, you can take on

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:05.000
<v Speaker 8>some debt, but not a lot and thirty percent.

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:05.760
<v Speaker 3>I would imagine.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 8>I said this earlier, I think the Seahawks will trade

0:16:08.160 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 8>for at minimum eight billion dollars. Thirty percent of that

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 8>is going to be around two and a half in cash.

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 8>There's not a lot of people who are willing to

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 8>just write a two and a half billion dollar check

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 8>in cash and then raise the money around it, because

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 8>it isn't just raising the money, it's communicating to those

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 8>people that you're trying to bring in your ownership group. Today,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 8>I run this, but you're welcome to come on board

0:16:27.080 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 8>the ship, so long as you understand that you're not

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 8>the captain. And that's tough for a lot of people.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.840
<v Speaker 8>Josh Harris did it, but he did it without private equity.

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 8>Private equity is an option now. And so whoever buys this,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 8>whether it be you know, Jeff Bezos or whoever who

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 8>Jeff Bezos considered buying the commanders, is going to have

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 8>to write they have to check.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us. More from Bloomberg Intelligence coming up here

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 2>for this.

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple cor Play and

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk a little technology here. I got the SMP.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean I get the Nasdaq, which is where you

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 2>find a lot of the tech names. It's up one

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 2>point four percent today, so that's a nice move. And

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 2>there's always news in the text sector, which is why

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>we have to chat with men deep Singing and on

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 2>around run and all the folks at Bloomberg Intelligence to

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 2>cover the tech space. So often. Meta platforms agreed to

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 2>deploy millions of Nvidia processes over the next few years. Mandy,

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 2>what does this mean? Is it new? What's going on here?

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:38.719
<v Speaker 9>Well, I mean it's not really new because Meta is

0:17:39.040 --> 0:17:43.120
<v Speaker 9>among the top two customers for Invidia chips. So it's

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 9>more to do with the fact that not only are

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 9>they using the GPUs from Nvidia, they're also using the

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 9>CPUs now and Intel and MD used to own that

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 9>market off server CPUs, and what Nvidia is saying is

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 9>give you a better throughput, a better performance if you

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 9>end up using our GPU cluster complement CPUs. And I

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 9>think overall, I mean that's Meta's way of making sure

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 9>they get the supply from Nvidia, because we heard that

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 9>at least ten times from Jensen this year. The demand

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 9>is really strong, and you know, they get to decide

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 9>who they allocate their chips to. So this is one

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 9>way that Meta is making sure they have the upline.

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, all makes a lot of sense.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 5>So again the hyperscalers spending more and you know, striking

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 5>up new deals. Let's talk a little bit about uber

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 5>It's planning to spend more than one hundred million to

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 5>really supercharges robotaxi charging stations. How do you think about

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 5>whether This changes the profile of what Uber is as

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 5>a company.

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.920
<v Speaker 9>I think for Uber, given the scale of their rides,

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 9>you know, they do over thirteen billion rides a year.

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 9>Compare that to a Weveimo that just did twenty million

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 9>rides year.

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, let's go back, yeah, sales numbers again.

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 9>Thirteen billion rides for Uber and just to put it

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 9>in context, that equates to maybe ten million rides a

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 9>day and Vemo day twenty million rides in the whole

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 9>year the past twelve months, which was phenomenal growth, you know,

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:23.040
<v Speaker 9>compare for them. But that's the scale that Uber is

0:19:23.080 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 9>operating at, and that's their pitch that you know, if

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 9>you've got two robot taxi players, they will eventually have

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 9>to tap our network. If you've got five players, then

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 9>there's all the more reason to use Uber as the

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.920
<v Speaker 9>network to deploy your robot taxi fleet, because the hard

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 9>part in this business is managing the way times. You

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 9>can have a fleet of Wemo cars, but people don't

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:49.119
<v Speaker 9>have the patience to wait for ten minutes, you know,

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 9>for a Vemo. So that's the scale of which Uber operates.

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 9>It allows them to keep the ETAs really low, which

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 9>is why people use these services.

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 2>And that's I think we're giving very dimensions of my

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 2>lifetime the home ride sharing thing. Think about how it's

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:06.200
<v Speaker 2>changed your life, I.

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:08.119
<v Speaker 6>Know, I mean back in the day, what did you

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 6>have to do?

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 9>Right?

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you know we have with our kids, we

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:13.360
<v Speaker 2>have this thing. You know, don't drink and drive. Don't

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 2>drink and dry. Feel like nobody drinks.

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, I know they look at you like you're crazy,

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 5>because there's a solution for that.

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 6>Actually the people who drink and drive are full grown adults. Yes, yes,

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 6>that's who does that. It's gen X.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 2>And you can actually get parking on college campuses now

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 2>and that was a huge problem with Duke. You can

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 2>never get parking space. Now they're like, yeah, we got

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 2>parking all over the place because the kids are ubering everywhere.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely so uber technology.

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 4>What's it?

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Are they fully globally penetrated right now? Or is there

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>some big part of the world where like China, where

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 2>they're just not a player.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, they're not a player in China. And the big

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 9>tread is what the Chinese autonomous driving companies are trying

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 9>to do is they're trying to roll out their fleet

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 9>not only in China, but outside in Europe as well,

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 9>And that's the next leg of the competition is if

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 9>you've got you know, Chinese companies that are in robotaxis

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 9>that don't end up using Uber and you know, we

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 9>know dd is a big right sharing company that's a

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.200
<v Speaker 9>similar size Tuber.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 6>So that's the thread.

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 9>But so far, I mean, outside of except for China,

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 9>Uber does has the scale when it comes to all

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 9>the other markets. So I think it's a hard business

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 9>to disrupt unless you've got scale.

0:21:28.119 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>weekday ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:21:40.359 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.