WEBVTT - Stuff They Don’t Want YouTube Know, Chapter Two: A Narrative War

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:04.680
<v Speaker 1>From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:11.159
<v Speaker 1>learn the stuff they don't want you to know.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 2>A production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Hello, and welcome back to Netflix. My name is Matt,

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:31.080
<v Speaker 3>my name is Nol.

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 2>They called me Ben. We're joined as always with our

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>super producer, Dylan the Tennessee pal Fagan. Most importantly, you

0:00:39.000 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 2>are you You specifically you are you. You are also

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:46.920
<v Speaker 2>here right now, and that makes this the stuff they

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 2>don't want you to know. Previously on Stuff they don't

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 2>want you to know, we explored the origin and the

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 2>controversy surrounding the stuff they don't want you to know.

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 2>It's a pun that we're not giving up on. Please

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 2>check out chapter one before you continue to chapter two.

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 2>What do you say? Guys? Should we just drop in

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 2>and media arrests?

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 3>And before we do, reminder you have to watch on

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 3>YouTube reactions to Pete and Boss for the first time.

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.960
<v Speaker 3>It's one of the best things you can do on YouTube.

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 4>So here we go, joining us already in progress. The

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 4>absolute volume of content on YouTube is a feature, not

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>a bug, and there is no possible way that that

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 4>could be policed, so to speak, by YouTube themselves, except

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 4>when it kind of benefits them, right.

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, that was one of the main things YouTube was

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.000
<v Speaker 3>concerned with in the beginning, right, just like Facebook, just

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 3>like all these other social media platforms, about the terrible

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.639
<v Speaker 3>things that could be uploaded. If you give that tool

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>to everybody who can possibly make a video or put

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 3>video up, there's danger there, right, And is it their fault?

0:02:01.240 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 3>It might be their fault if it goes up and

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 3>everybody sees it. So we as a company have to

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 3>protect ourselves more than anyone for sure, that kind of stuff, right.

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 4>And I mean, obviously there are safeguards in place that

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 4>would prevent someone from, say uploading a video of like

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 4>murder or violent sticking place or something really horrific like that.

0:02:20.120 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 4>But then it gets a little more nuanced when it

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 4>comes to like ideological content and like what is and

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 4>is not okay and what is incentivized and de incentivized.

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 4>And I love then that you point on on the

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 4>outline here. That's when we start getting into Acts of

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.720
<v Speaker 4>Congress and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as well as

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 4>Communications Decency Act, and how those things kind of play

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.799
<v Speaker 4>into the way YouTube needs to approach this.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and thank you for shouting those out, because the

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:55.520
<v Speaker 2>YouTube initiative runs into specific acts of Congress. You mentioned DMCA,

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 2>which we are unfortunately quite well aware of, as well

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 2>as the CDA Communications Decency Act, specifically section two three

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 2>zero for anybody who wants to play along at home.

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 2>Pretty much like the YouTube okay created in two thousand

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 2>and five, they get into legal trouble as early as

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.120
<v Speaker 2>the next year. In two thousand and six, there is

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 2>something called the Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>and Publishers sent them a takedown request and they said, hey, YouTube,

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 2>you got more than thirty thousand things that you got

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 2>to take down. And Comedy Central, which is actually known

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>for being cool and comedic, also sued for copyright infringement.

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, those companies, those producers of content, right, the

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.200
<v Speaker 3>traditional ones, TV, radio, movies, all that kind of.

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Stuff, we call the legacy ones.

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the only way they make money is if you're

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 3>watching it through one of the channels that's been curated

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.760
<v Speaker 3>for you to watch stuff on, right, where there's huge

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>ad dollars.

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, of course, know, then they take on that. If

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.400
<v Speaker 4>you can't beat them, join them. Mentality where then, you know.

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Are vigorous, massively presence on YouTube.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 4>In fact, I think we could argue that they probably

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:19.480
<v Speaker 4>make just as much money off of viral YouTube clips

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 4>of like The Daily Show and stuff than they do

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 4>from people actually watching it on TV.

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's the old joke. It's the old joke. Good

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 2>friend of the show. John Stewart also pointed as how

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 2>years ago, it's weird that The Daily Show published DVD

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 2>collections and later Blu ray collections because it was such

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a topical show. And what we're seeing here is a

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:50.680
<v Speaker 2>paradigm shift, right, a deep sea change wherein people are

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>thinking less deeply about things. Right, I explain it to

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.320
<v Speaker 2>me in three minutes, Right, I just learned. I just

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 2>learned that maybe Syria and Jordan don't always get along.

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 2>But I've only got so long on my smoke breaks.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 2>So just explained it to me. Don't make me quote stuff,

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 2>give me some stats that make me sound smart. That

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 2>is what is happening.

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:19.480
<v Speaker 3>Let's think about the residual checks that got destroyed through

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>all of this. That was the way artists made money, right,

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 3>Bright Bright in two thousand and six, that's not that

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>long ago. Twenty years ago. But it this advent of

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 3>YouTube destroyed that entire way of making money, like just

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 3>killed it.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's a great point, Matt. And further, Okay, it

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:45.119
<v Speaker 2>gets stranger, folks, it gets more dangerous, the water gets

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:50.040
<v Speaker 2>ever deeper because we have been talking about corporations primarily.

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:53.719
<v Speaker 2>But around the same time, just within a year of

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 2>YouTube going public for the people, various state powers also

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 2>found YouTube problematic. This is when we see, you know,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 2>user generated content. I'm an activist, I'm a protester. I

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 2>want people to know that this school is getting bombed

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 2>by some world's military. I'm sharing news that my government

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't want out there. Right, I'm becoming part of things

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 2>like on the ground reporting of the Arab Spring for

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>a few years back. Right. This is a This is

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 2>a shift that is similar to American civilians seeing real

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 2>world footage from the Vietnam War, testimonies of political prisoners,

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 2>arguments against state suppression and their policies. By two thousand

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 2>and eight, again just three years or three if you

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 2>want it, in glorious bastard style, just three years after

0:06:55.960 --> 0:07:01.799
<v Speaker 2>YouTube debuted, multiple countries have blocked part of YouTube content

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 2>or block the platform entirely. And yes, of course this

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>includes problematic, you know, authoritarian countries like Syria and China

0:07:11.480 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 2>or Pakistan, but it also includes things like Brazil or

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Thailand or Turkey. YouTube was getting jammed up and their

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>boardroom decided to make some changes. They said, hey, what's

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 2>the point of making this if fewer and fewer people

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 2>can actually use it?

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 2>If we were global and people across the globe can't

0:07:32.480 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 2>use it, then what kind of weird don quixote stuff

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:41.760
<v Speaker 2>are we doing? So YouTube started suspending user accounts. One

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I think we all remember back in O seven, the

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>platform suspended the account of an Egyptian activist named Wail

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Abbas and part of my pronunciation there he was a

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 2>blogger or a vlogger with a V as we would

0:07:56.440 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 2>call them. He was an anti torture activist. And his

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 2>whole thing was like he wasn't trying to sell bone,

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>broth or gold. He said, hey, police in Egypt are

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 2>torturing people, including women and children. I've got clips of

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 2>this I could show you, and YouTube shut the guy down.

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 2>And still they're rumors. We're being very diplomatic calling them rumors.

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>There are sh as no ones say rumors that YouTube

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>bent the knee to the Egyptian government, but they said

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 2>their official stance has always been that no other users,

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 2>just like you, they're the ones who complained. That's why

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 2>we covered up these Egyptian war crimes.

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, and that's sort of the advent of the concept

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 4>of deplatforming. You know, this is really kind of the

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 4>early days of that, because I think that's one of

0:08:57.320 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 4>the first mass you know, reach platforms other than like

0:09:01.400 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 4>Facebook or whatever, which isn't really in the conversation so

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 4>much anymore in that respect. That's why Facebook had to

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 4>stay relevant by like buying Instagram. But we start to

0:09:11.000 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 4>see later even like people on the right being deplatformed,

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 4>and that kind of leading to radicalization on the on

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 4>the right, further radicalization because they had to start their

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 4>own companies like you know, truth Social and things like that,

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 4>because they were no longer allowed to be on these

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 4>more mass platforms like Instagram and YouTube specifically. So it's

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 4>a fascinating kind of beginning of this whole culture war stuff, right.

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So he did debate about censorship.

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and we saw the splintering occur in real time

0:09:46.160 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 3>in two thousand and six, two thousand and seven, when

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 3>places like Shock. Websites like Orgish turned or I think

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 3>it was Orgish Orgish, I can't remember, but they turned

0:09:57.840 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 3>into livelyek dot com in like two thousand and six,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 3>two thousand and seven, and that's where you could go

0:10:04.120 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 3>to you go to this new video channel place and

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.560
<v Speaker 3>watch Saddam Hussein get executed or if you wanted to

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 3>see actual live battle Warm.

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 2>World Star hip hop.

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and and some of it is like like Orgish

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 3>was gross, like Shock, like rotten dot com ference of

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 3>type stuff. Yeah, but places like Lively tried to step

0:10:25.679 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 3>up and say, hey, you can actually see what is

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 3>happening in you know, war torn areas. You can see

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 3>what's really happening on the ground in places, and you

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 3>can just see that while YouTube is kind of changing

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 3>and going towards the money and the advertiser happiness thing

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 3>and trying to get the content the DCMA and the

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.079
<v Speaker 3>content stuff right, all these other places are attempting to

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 3>fill in those spaces.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that happened with cable TV or you know, okay, no,

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 4>let me let me phrase it's the same thing that

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 4>happened to network TV when cable TV kind of swooped in.

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 4>It's just an extension of that to a degree, right,

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 4>because cable TV had a lot more freedom. Network TV

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.400
<v Speaker 4>had to play much nicer with the advertisers than eventually

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 4>so did cable TV, and it just kind of like

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 4>it just you know, kicks the can down the road.

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:14.079
<v Speaker 2>Right in the in the Abbas case in particular, YouTube

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 2>claimed and has always claimed that censorship was not the

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>end goal. The public, including by the way yours truly

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 2>was skeptical. Now there are countless allegations that are only

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 2>growing arguing that YouTube bends its own rules and will

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 2>act on behalf of powerful companies or powerful countries and

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 2>even authoritarian autocratic regimes and dictatorships. A lot of these

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 2>haven't been proven. But at the same time we also see.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 4>We of course they will like it just seems like

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 4>it's common sense that the degree to which they've become

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 4>the big guy, that it behooves them to do just

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 4>that they're no longer out there to spread quote unquote

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 4>truth and unfettered information. They have a lot more shareholders

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 4>to answer to. That's why you need the live leaks

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 4>and the more kind of underground versions of what YouTube

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 4>maybe used to be.

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting because at the same time, we see

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 2>that there are numerous videos and accounts that are not

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 2>publishing copyright infringement stuff, right, They're not publishing something that

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 2>hits the narrative of a bully regime, which is all

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 2>the bad guys are. They're just jerks who are bullies.

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 2>But they these accounts are putting out heinous things, depictions

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:46.440
<v Speaker 2>of illegal acts, calls to violence, racist material, gross sex stuff,

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>and so on. So now YouTube hit this Road to

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Damascus moment, right, they hit this moment of recognization, realization,

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>something we call had come to Jesus moment. In the

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 2>American South, they say, we're everywhere in the world. All

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:10.679
<v Speaker 2>these countries have different laws. Which laws of a given

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.559
<v Speaker 2>country do we as YouTube follow? And so in two

0:13:13.640 --> 0:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight they put out their rules for what

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 2>they call violations of community guidelines, and it's a three

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 2>strike thing. You screw up once, in their opinion, you

0:13:26.640 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 2>get a warning. After six months you're back in the game.

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 2>So they give you a yellow card. You know, they

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 2>put you in time out. And I think everybody in

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the audience tonight is aware of the concept of time out,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 2>especially if you are a bad kid growing up. It's

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 2>nuts because then They also had again to the point

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 2>about power players. These are the real dangers for YouTube.

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Folks like Senator Joseph Lieberman called on YouTube to remove

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 2>any video that had a logo of Outida Right, a

0:14:01.640 --> 0:14:07.439
<v Speaker 2>terrorist group, and they said, also take away any videos

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 2>that have any depiction of a logo or a sigil

0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 2>associated with a known terrorist group. And then YouTube bucked

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 2>back and they said, look, these videos don't violate our

0:14:21.520 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 2>policies against violence or hate speech. We have people singing

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 2>songs a capella, or we have people who are talking

0:14:30.520 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 2>about Al Qaeda in an analytical way, so you can't

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 2>just automate taking that signal out. It's weird because you know,

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 2>I mentioned the Arab uprisings for the Arab Spring in particular,

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 2>this was another watershed moment. People around the world are

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 2>seeing self immolation, They're seeing massive acts of horrendous violence

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 2>and inspiring protests, and the company has to change its

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>approach to moderation. This is where we have pretty nasty

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 2>stuff happening.

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 3>We're also seeing leaked footage of things that at this

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 3>time twenty ten, around those time, things that active military

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 3>and like private military US troops are doing in Afghanistan

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 3>and Iraq in particular. We're seeing videos like that show

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 3>up on YouTube and get shared from it and then

0:15:30.480 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 3>get taken down.

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 3>That was happening rapidly in that time. Yes, so there's there,

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 3>really is. You can see why Lieberman and a bunch

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 3>of other appeal I heard that name in a long time,

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 3>just Y too, leabermen. But just you can see why

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:48.280
<v Speaker 3>there was a major push to censor the things that

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 3>could get published, right, and you want you want to

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 3>stop them before somebody has to take it.

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Down because you're powerful and you want to control the narrative.

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 4>For sure, but you also don't want to seem like

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 4>you're doing that, yes, exactly. So then it becomes a

0:16:03.840 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 4>matter of public relations. And then you found this great

0:16:07.080 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 4>comment from the manager of YouTube News, or YouTube's manager

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 4>of News, Olivia Maw who in twenty eleven, referring to

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 4>the kinds of content we're talking about, said, normally this

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 4>type of violence would violate our community guidelines in terms

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 4>of service, and we would remove them. But we have

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 4>a clause in our community guidelines that make an exception

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 4>for videos that are educational, documentary, or scientific in nature.

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 4>In these cases, we actually make an exception and say

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 4>we understand that these videos have real news value. That's

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 4>a great way of characterizing it. But it would seem

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 4>to your point earlier, Ben or I can't remember who

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 4>said this. They also have a way of bending their

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 4>own rules depending on what the footage in question is

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 4>and maybe what government is yelling at them about it.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we all know, folks, how rules are. When you're

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.280
<v Speaker 2>the one who makes the rules. It's a lot less

0:17:00.520 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 2>like saying thou shalt or thou shalt not. It's a

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 2>lot more like saying what do I feel like eating tonight?

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I know I said I was gonna get something vegan,

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 2>but it might be barbecue nite'. That's what often happens

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 2>when these these entities don't have an outside authority and

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 2>YouTube is doing its best right. YouTube is the Mickey

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:31.159
<v Speaker 2>Mouse sorcerer's apprentice who never knew there would be that

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 2>many mops or brooms or a flood. So at this point,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 2>YouTube has around eight hundred million users. At this point

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.680
<v Speaker 2>in time, it's the third most visited website on the

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 2>planet entire and Google has noted by this time that

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 2>a lot of those DCMA takedown requests are coming from

0:17:54.840 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 2>not private entities. They're coming directly from governments. So what

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 2>if we take a pause for a word from our

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 2>sponsors and dive even deeper into the water. We're back.

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 2>We've got to recommend a phenomenal journalist, Gillian c. York.

0:18:17.200 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Jillian c. York is writing for Vice back in the

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 2>day and says the company's decision making YouTube has become

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:35.040
<v Speaker 2>considerably more questionable. They went up against US intelligence agencies

0:18:35.720 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 2>who were claiming that a short film, though was quite Islamophobic,

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 2>called The Innocence of Muslims, was partially responsible for the

0:18:47.000 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 2>attacks in Benghazi. If everybody remembers when US facilities in

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 2>Magazi were attacked. YouTube had a call directly with the

0:18:55.800 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 2>White House. They blocked the video only in Libya and Egypt,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>and protests were already beginning to erupt because this film

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 2>had already been dead. To your point, Noe, this film

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:14.760
<v Speaker 2>had already been aired on Egyptian broadcast television. The Libyan

0:19:14.840 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 2>government and the Egyptian government civil organizations in either country.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 2>They were never in the conversation. It was from the

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 2>United States, half a world away, and YouTube, nobody else

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 2>on the ground is included. And other countries started demanding, hey,

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 2>remove this video. YouTube played along with some of those countries,

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 2>but they they iced out or stonewalled others. And one

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 2>country in particular, great example named by Yorke in their

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 2>article is Pakistan. Pakistan said, hey, you're not going to

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 2>respect us. Nobody gets YouTube, nobody about YouTube for you,

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 2>No YouTube for you. Yeah, it's weird because there are

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 2>it's always the bag of badgers of censorship. Right are

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 2>we inciting people to violence? Where we allow people to

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 2>speak their minds even if we know they're incorrect or

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 2>racist or evil. YouTube is trying at this point in

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 2>time to respond to these. Again, not corporations, state level actors,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 2>governments say take down this specific video and anything like it.

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 2>That's what YouTube was and is in such a tough spot.

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:48.440
<v Speaker 2>It's an economy of scale that incorporates, incorporates controversy as

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 2>well as profit. The company is under so much fire

0:20:52.520 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 2>because there are people who feel it is not doing

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 2>enough to curb the spread of hateful content. And there

0:20:59.000 --> 0:21:02.680
<v Speaker 2>are people who are saying, and you are going way

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:06.320
<v Speaker 2>too far. We don't have to get too much into

0:21:06.359 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 2>the weeds of this. It is a bag of badgers,

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:13.200
<v Speaker 2>chock full of controversy in the modern day. The main

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 2>thing you have to know is that powerful, very powerful

0:21:18.080 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 2>entities want to be able to control this platform. They

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>have contradictory demands. They also have they got int a

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Kobyashi Maru. For any Star Trek fan, there is a

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>a no win situation. You cannot please all your customers

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 2>and all your masters. And maybe here guys at the end,

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>because we have so much, because we do have personal experience,

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 2>we can talk about demonetization. This is on the ground

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 2>threat well for.

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 4>Sure, and I think we haven't really mentioned the whole

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 4>idea of how you Tube became an economy of scale

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 4>for a home new class of creators who would come

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 4>to rely on the income that their video is generated.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 4>So when you have this potential for depriving these individuals

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 4>of their ability to earn a living based on the

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 4>nature of the content that they've been making for however long,

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden those guidelines change and they're demonetizing,

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.400
<v Speaker 4>aka pulling ads from your videos.

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 2>You then are being.

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:31.479
<v Speaker 4>Threatened essentially, and it's a form of censorship kind of

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 4>like shadow bands on Instagram, where you're not outright told

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 4>necessarily that if you say this we won't promote your

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 4>stuff as much. Just all of a sudden, you are

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 4>noticing that your reach has been diminished significantly, and you're

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 4>not really told why.

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, demonetization is one of those fancy words that sounds

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 2>good in a boardroom. It's a corporate term for, like

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 2>you said, the removing ad revenue, in this case from

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 2>YouTube creators. Host anything you want, but we may bury

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>it in the algorithm. We won't allow you to make

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>money even your little you're laughably small percentage of whatever

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 2>an ad is, and a lot of frustrated video creators

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 2>to your point, recognize what I would call the near

0:23:20.760 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 2>hominem here. So a homonym is two different words that

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 2>sound the same but mean different things. They feel like

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 2>demonetization is really demonization, right and patently unfair, especially when

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>regarding sensitive issues. Now, in the interest of full disclosure, folks,

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 2>you need to know that we have you know, we

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 2>have a crow in the game here because we have

0:23:48.320 --> 0:23:56.439
<v Speaker 2>personally encountered automated demonetization when we created video essays on

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>certain sensitive subjects, and you can appeal that. Guys.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 4>I'd love for you to speak more to that on

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 4>the YouTube side of it, maybe even talk about some analytics.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.360
<v Speaker 4>You can appeal that, but by the time you've appealed that,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 4>as we know, YouTube videos only really hit in a

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 4>certain window of when they're dropped, and then if you've

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 4>lost out on that window to make money off of

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 4>those hits, it ain't coming back even if your appeal

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 4>is successful.

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Yep, it's all a big algorithm. It's all about the

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 3>first twelve twenty four hours. That's every video that drops

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>on YouTube.

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 2>It started in twenty twelve, the automated demonetization.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Which is exactly well, it's around the same time when

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 3>we started our channel, Conspiracy Stuff. We used to make

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 3>stuff on how stuff works on their main channel, and

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 3>then we started posting on our brand new channel, which

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 3>was YouTube dot com slash Conspiracy Stuff October twenty twelve.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 3>And just to give you an example of these things,

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 3>because we encountered it almost immediately as we were making shows.

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 3>Here's one of the earliest videos we ever put on

0:24:55.920 --> 0:25:00.840
<v Speaker 3>our channel, Edward Burne's three colon the Legacy November thirtieth,

0:25:00.920 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 3>twenty twelve, had ninety two thousand views. As of today,

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.119
<v Speaker 3>it has ninety two thousand views. It was almost immediately

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 3>switched to limited ad earnings. Content not suitable for advertisers.

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:15.200
<v Speaker 4>What about it isn't suitable? That's wild Edward Brenees was

0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 4>a marketing dude.

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 3>That's like, yeah, well, you also know that's not many

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 3>views at all. So here's something to also keep in mind.

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 3>The number of views you get on a particular video

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 3>has a lot to do with the number of subscribers

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 3>you have that are active, that have notifications turned on.

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Has to do with discoverability of like a video that's

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 3>chosen for suitability to be discoverable by others. It has

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 3>all it's this huge algorithm that has to do with right.

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:42.879
<v Speaker 3>And if you do really good and you make the

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 3>type of video with the right words in your description

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and your title, and with your metadata correct, with your image,

0:25:49.440 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 3>your thumbnail, and it doesn't have any profanity, doesn't have

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:55.000
<v Speaker 3>any sexual imagery, doesn't have all these other things in

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.160
<v Speaker 3>it has the right number of human faces, then you're

0:25:58.200 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 3>gonna you know, you're getting like plus one every time

0:26:01.320 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 3>you do these things right. And then inside your video,

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 3>if your host, your person talking, your AI generated thing,

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 3>whatever it is, as long as it says the right

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 3>things and doesn't say the wrong things, you're getting more

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:17.600
<v Speaker 3>plus ones plus ones plus ones in our case, guys,

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's I think we only have metrics for money.

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 3>Since April of twenty twenty four, That's what I can

0:26:24.840 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 3>see on our creator page right now. Since April of

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four, that video has earned thirty two cents. Now, No,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 3>but seriously, think about that. A video that we cared

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 3>a lot about made in twenty twelve, it's been around

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 3>since then. It's only got ninety two thousand views, but

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 3>thirty two cents.

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I mean we talk.

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 4>About like your average is run of the mill, like

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 4>a new big content creator.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Ninety two thousand views is a lot.

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 4>And I was always understood that the metric was like

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 4>a million views you make about.

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:56.840
<v Speaker 2>One thousand bucks.

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if that hold is true today, but

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 4>that still seems insane and the product of this unsuitability factor.

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 3>We give you a few more videos so we can

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 3>really like think about some of this stuff. Ben, you'll

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 3>remember this one March sixth twenty thirteen, Libya, The Fall

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 3>of Gadaffi two hundred and forty two thousand views, nine cents.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:22.439
<v Speaker 3>Since April twenty twenty four, we've made on that again

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 3>said content's not suitable.

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 2>What are some other videos you'd like to mention?

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm just trying to give everybody versions of like,

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 3>here's the type of content that we found important and

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 3>important enough to spend all of our time on these

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 3>things put them out. It was once a week at

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:41.880
<v Speaker 3>this time, once or twice a week at this time

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 3>that we were making videos. Danny Casileiro in the Octopus

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 3>May tenth, twenty twenty four, one hundred and fifty seven

0:27:47.960 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 3>thousand views twenty four cents that we've made on that video.

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 4>My question though, is like, do they not have any

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 4>ruberg for what qualifies as suitable?

0:27:57.080 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Is it a black box? Oh? Yes, No, I'd

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 2>love to get to that. Yeah, for sure, for sure.

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 4>No, No, we must that's the next logical step I

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.160
<v Speaker 4>think if it's The answer is yes.

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Just the simple answer to that question is YouTube does

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 3>not have a list of words you can't say and

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that. But there are all of these guidelines

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 3>that you can find. They're a little morphous, a little confusing,

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.880
<v Speaker 3>because it's a nice little mixture, right man, of humans

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.680
<v Speaker 3>and automated algorithms and things that are scanning videos. It's

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 3>a nice little mixture, so you never really know who's

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 3>going to be or what's going to be looking at

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 3>your stuff, and it's a bit of a crapshoot every

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 3>once in a while.

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, for instance, we were demonetized on things that forced

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 2>us to read some tea leaves right to your point

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 2>to go back, you guys and say, well, what was

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 2>it that made you also persnicty. We know that YouTube

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 2>began demonetizing videos in one T twelve based on advertising

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 2>guidelines you can and based on some surveys they have

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 2>with advertisers. Put honestly, you can read a great article

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 2>about that from The Daily Dot back in twenty sixteen.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 2>That's a good primer to the point about the automation.

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 2>That's the real devil's bargain here, because the first wave

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 2>of demonization or demonetization is not done by humans meatmechs.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 2>It is automated. It is algorithmic. It looks at metadata

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>of videos as well as other factors like which videos

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 2>naturally linked to yours, which I think was a big

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 2>deal in the Libya exploration. And it also says their

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>question is not is this dangerous to society? Their question

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 2>is is this something an advertiser would or would not

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 2>want to be associated with. So you can imagine easily, folks,

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>how this affected show those that explored conspiracy theories, especially

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>as the term conspiracy theory became once again weaponized in

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 2>the US. This it's a shadow band, like you were saying, no,

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 2>it's not, it's not to and we don't want to

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 2>come off bitter. We're grateful to YouTube. It was not to.

0:30:20.080 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 2>It was not meant to stamp down information, at least

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 2>the way they wrote this stuff. It was meant to

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:36.440
<v Speaker 2>stamp out disinformation and to satisfy advertising partners. It also

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 2>in the in the big days, like in the original days,

0:30:39.640 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 2>it was very difficult to know that your video had

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 2>been demonetized. You could you could notice if you took

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:51.479
<v Speaker 2>a granular look at analytics like we always did. You

0:30:51.520 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 2>could ask you to what happened, and we did. You

0:30:55.800 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>could appeal, and we did in several cases, but other

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 2>than that, there's not much else you could do with it.

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, and you've missed that window again, like even if

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 4>you win your appeal, like you've totally missed the crucial

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 4>time for views that would then create monetization if you

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 4>get it approved after the fact you're not getting that

0:31:16.200 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 4>time back right.

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to which point my question now evolves from uh,

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 2>from is YouTube democratizing stuff? The answer was yes for

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 2>a while and still is yes to a degree. But

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 2>now has YouTube become similar to the same oppressive forces

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 2>that it was originally invented to circumvent. These claims can

0:31:42.040 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 2>be treated on a case by case basis, but they

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:48.440
<v Speaker 2>all have their own bag of badgers. It's it's very difficult.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying YouTube is automatically now the bad guys,

0:31:52.480 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 2>but I am saying, you know, you stay at a

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 2>barbershop long enough, you get a haircut.

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 3>We're a whole for one second, so you can like

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 3>subscribe and hit that little bell so you never miss

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 3>a new video. Wait, what are we doing? Ad break?

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 3>We'll be right back. I'm gonna make the argument that

0:32:16.640 --> 0:32:20.120
<v Speaker 3>what YouTube and Alphabet and Google and everybody they are

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 3>actively participating in stepped thought control. I think that's what

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:28.560
<v Speaker 3>they're doing. That's my argument. It's my opinion here. Think

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 3>about Ben, take yourself back to the number of hours

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 3>you would spend making a single YouTube video, really, like

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.240
<v Speaker 3>back to twenty twelve. Just how much time you would

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 3>spend writing, being in front of the camera in the studio,

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 3>recording audio. The amount of time I would spend behind

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 3>the camera with you shooting stuff, The amount of time

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I would spend it at an editing bay, and then

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, writing all the meta, getting all the stuff together,

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and then putting out a single video. Just how much

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:02.200
<v Speaker 3>time that is. Now, if you can't, if you can't

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 3>make money for that time right that you are spending,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 3>that's not a job. And if you can't make it

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 3>your job, then this has to be your pastime, the

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 3>thing you do for fun, And that's a ton of

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 3>time and hours that you're spending making this stuff. So

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 3>what they are doing by demonetizing these videos is forcing

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.960
<v Speaker 3>people to not have a job making stuff that is

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 3>not suitable for advertisers. Because we were paid, We were

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 3>paid salaries to make these videos, and that's why we

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 3>could make them, right, that's the only reason why we

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 3>could put this content out is because somebody thought to

0:33:42.400 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 3>pay us a salary to make this kind of stuff,

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 3>to pursue the things that we thought were interesting and

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:51.719
<v Speaker 3>important for people. But if as an independent creator, you can't,

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 3>you can't make money doing this because all your stuff

0:33:55.320 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 3>gets demonetized, then you have to fall in line and

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 3>make videos only about the stuff that YouTube wants you

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 3>to make videos about.

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.080
<v Speaker 4>That's true to a point, Matt, I just want to

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 4>push back slightly that there are other ways now more

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 4>than ever. You know Patreon, for example, where you're getting

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 4>paid directly by the folks that are consuming your stuff,

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 4>and they're paying your salary in that way to allow

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 4>you Because at the very least YouTube isn't straight up

0:34:23.440 --> 0:34:26.759
<v Speaker 4>kicking people off for doing stuff they don't like. They're

0:34:26.800 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 4>just not letting them make money on their built in

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 4>ad sales monetization system. You can also advertise directly in

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 4>the content of your video and have relationships with advertising

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 4>agencies that allow you to get money from episodes by

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.480
<v Speaker 4>having those direct sales, let's call it. So it's the

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 4>very least you could I'm not trying to I'm just

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 4>be Devil's advocate here. They're not kicking people off for

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.479
<v Speaker 4>saying things that they don't like. They're just excluding them

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 4>from a built in way of making money. And it

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.319
<v Speaker 4>doesn't mean there aren't other ways to do it so

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 4>that you can still We'll capture that audience and then

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 4>have that audience pay you directly.

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 3>It just means you have to have a Patreon or

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 3>an OnlyFans or whatever it is that you use to

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 3>actually make money with the stuff you put onto this platform.

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 3>Just to give one more metric, guys, the watch time

0:35:18.360 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 3>on our channel watch time lifetime watch time is five million,

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and eight thousand, seven hundred and twenty eight

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 3>point nine hours that people have spent watching our videos.

0:35:32.120 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 3>Since April of twenty twenty four, our channel, which has

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 3>five hundred and ninety four thousand subscribers, has made six thousand,

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and sixty six dollars and eighty one cents.

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Think about this, I'll see you at Dave and Busters.

0:35:45.200 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 3>No, but but think about that divided on a monthly basis,

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 3>divided on the money, the number of people that make

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:52.319
<v Speaker 3>this show. Think about that.

0:35:52.480 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 2>It's nothing.

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 4>But if you have people it's like two hundred something dollars,

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 4>you will have people that make that every day on Patreon.

0:36:00.040 --> 0:36:01.640
<v Speaker 4>You know that'll make one hundred and grand a month

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:04.319
<v Speaker 4>on Patreon and that is their bread and butter. So

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 4>I'm just saying the world has it is a little

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 4>bit different, and it's not like you rely exclusively on

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:13.040
<v Speaker 4>YouTube to pay for your existence. There are other ways.

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not saying that that's okay.

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.319
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying that YouTube to your appointment, isn't participating

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:21.120
<v Speaker 4>in some level of minor thought control or whatever however

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 4>you want to put it. I just think that at

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 4>the very least, they're not like completely wholesale deplatforming people

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:29.400
<v Speaker 4>for saying things that they don't like.

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 3>I get it, But Ben, what was that number you

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:35.240
<v Speaker 3>gave us early on about the amount of money YouTube

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 3>is gonna probably.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Make sure yeap again? YouTube is projected to hit sixty

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 2>two billion dollars worth of that revenue here in twenty

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 2>twenty six. Folks, Just just.

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 3>Really think about that, the amount of money that corporation

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 3>makes versus if you don't do the things that you're

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 3>supposed to do, you're gonna make that two hundred dollars

0:36:56.719 --> 0:36:57.000
<v Speaker 3>a month.

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe right, Unless you're mister beast, unless you're you're

0:37:02.280 --> 0:37:05.279
<v Speaker 2>towing a line hitting lightning in a bottle a zeitgeist,

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 2>we have nothing but nothing but an attaboy and respect

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 2>for people who are who are playing the game. As

0:37:16.120 --> 0:37:20.319
<v Speaker 2>long as you are being intellectually sincere, as long as

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 2>you are not lying to people are hurting them for money.

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 2>We don't have time to get into the quote unquote AI.

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 2>I hate that term, but you do need to know

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:37.200
<v Speaker 2>that as of twenty twenty five, roughly twenty percent of

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 2>the content on YouTube has especially in YouTube shorts, has

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.200
<v Speaker 2>been found to be AI slop. I have a pitch

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 2>for you, guys. This is my personal opinion and I

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.879
<v Speaker 2>usually don't like injecting these, but see, I would love

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to hear your thoughts. I see right now YouTube at

0:37:57.680 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 2>a crossroads because it's getting again a kobyashi maru and

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 2>no win scenario from so many stakeholders as they call

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 2>them in boardrooms. It's also at a situation where, just

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:21.240
<v Speaker 2>to its gigantic Leviathan nature, someone outside of YouTube, many players,

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.799
<v Speaker 2>want to get a hold of it. And if those

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:28.840
<v Speaker 2>extremely powerful forces who want to gaslight their narratives to

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 2>the world at large, if one of those outsiders gets

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 2>too too much control over YouTube, things are going to

0:38:36.880 --> 0:38:41.680
<v Speaker 2>be bad for everyone involved, and it will happen. I

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 2>think it is at this point, you know, when we

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 2>originally wanted to do this episode. I think we're pulled

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 2>back for a number of reasons. But now it is

0:38:54.200 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 2>quite possible that something outside of YouTube, probably a state actor,

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 2>a large corporation that controls a state actor, will get

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.279
<v Speaker 2>a hold of it and will push the narrative. We

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:14.360
<v Speaker 2>have so much more to talk about. We know that also,

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 2>YouTube's important. That's the other point I have to make. Ah,

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 2>we didn't even talk about this. YouTube is not a

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 2>video platform anymore. It is kind of right in your

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:25.359
<v Speaker 2>day to day But at this point in twenty twenty six,

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 2>fellow conspiracy realist want you to know and admit this

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:35.399
<v Speaker 2>is a library. It is a global library of human experience,

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:39.719
<v Speaker 2>of ephemera of like you know, you go to the

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.920
<v Speaker 2>redwood forest and you see a redwood that has been

0:39:43.000 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 2>cut down and you practice dendo chronology. You learn about

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the world when that redwood was growing. You can learn

0:39:50.040 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 2>about the world and history for now via YouTube stuff

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 2>from you know, just a few decades ago. And it's

0:39:59.000 --> 0:40:04.680
<v Speaker 2>not even a matter of access other than Internet access, right,

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 2>That's why you got to check out awesome stuff. I'd

0:40:07.080 --> 0:40:10.879
<v Speaker 2>love to recommend preserve tube spelled like it sounds.

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:13.160
<v Speaker 4>For sure, And I mean, you know, early days of YouTube,

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 4>especially as pertains to some of that copyright strike stuff

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 4>and the digital Millennium Copyright Act, like that library aspect

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 4>of it.

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 2>All involve copyright infringement. You know.

0:40:23.920 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 4>It was like, okay, I could upload this contents of

0:40:26.400 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 4>this VHS that you can't find anymore, and then that

0:40:29.840 --> 0:40:32.319
<v Speaker 4>aspect of it, Ben, I would argue, is also under

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:35.840
<v Speaker 4>threat because of the coziness that they have, the platform

0:40:35.880 --> 0:40:39.000
<v Speaker 4>has with advertisements. They don't want to be controversial and

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 4>allow some of this kind of more archival stuff to

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:47.440
<v Speaker 4>be uploaded unfettered. You might have like an MTV concert,

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, from the nineties that's up there, and in theory,

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.919
<v Speaker 4>if it is uploaded by a user and not through

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 4>MTV's official channel, that might not be long for this world.

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there was a video of my mother singing

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:02.920
<v Speaker 4>in the opera that was on YouTube for years and I'm.

0:41:02.760 --> 0:41:04.840
<v Speaker 2>So grateful that I screen grabbed the.

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Video and the audio of it because it went away

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 4>and I didn't think it was ever going to but

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.960
<v Speaker 4>for whatever reason, it went away. And I don't know why.

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 2>Global Library of Ephemera. You know, I think there's something

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to hold on to here. I think this matters. Do

0:41:20.239 --> 0:41:22.480
<v Speaker 2>check out preserve toob Matt what's on your mind? Oh?

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 3>Nothing, I I just think you should look up reasons

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 3>for demonetization after this, you should look up the profanity guidelines.

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 3>There's an update in June or July of last year

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 3>on some of the things that you can and can't say. Again,

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 3>there's no official list of like blacklisted words or something

0:41:43.960 --> 0:41:48.720
<v Speaker 3>that YouTube has out there, but the number of human

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.319
<v Speaker 3>beings that use YouTube on a daily basis to kind

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:54.960
<v Speaker 3>of stay up to date on things, especially when people

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:59.000
<v Speaker 3>have to pay for news nowadays. You know, if you

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 3>might have to pay for YouTube premium if you don't

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:02.640
<v Speaker 3>want the ads, but people just kind of go through

0:42:02.680 --> 0:42:05.879
<v Speaker 3>it because it's what they can afford. Our thoughts are

0:42:05.920 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 3>generated from the things we're exposed to, and when the

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 3>only things that we're exposed to are the things that

0:42:13.080 --> 0:42:16.319
<v Speaker 3>are advertiser friendly, is just painting a picture of what

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.719
<v Speaker 3>the future could be, right and what we can think

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 3>about and how we're going to view the world. And

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 3>I think it. Brockness sent an email while I was away.

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 3>They said, like, what is this guy on about? Why

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 3>is he Why is Matt so frustrated by things? It's

0:42:30.800 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 3>because I personally see a view of the world that

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 3>is shaping in a way that is very uncomfortable in

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.399
<v Speaker 3>draconian and bad and YouTube is a part of it.

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.919
<v Speaker 3>And it doesn't mean that's right, that's what I see.

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you, man, But it is also beautiful, Ben,

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:48.359
<v Speaker 3>as you were saying, it's also a beautiful thing.

0:42:48.560 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, no, and Ben, I mean, I'm completely agreeing with

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:53.319
<v Speaker 4>your archival perspective of it. I think there is still

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:54.680
<v Speaker 4>some of that out there, but a lot of the

0:42:54.680 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 4>stuff that's most important to an archival aspect sort of

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:01.359
<v Speaker 4>flies under the radar. And just you know, my case

0:43:01.440 --> 0:43:04.319
<v Speaker 4>study of this one clip of my mother, you know

0:43:04.480 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 4>of a VHS that was uploaded by some random user

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 4>from a thing that was put out in the eighties

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 4>all of a sudden disappeared. I just think because of

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.640
<v Speaker 4>that cozy advertiser centric relationship that YouTube has, some of

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 4>that archival aspect of it could be under threat on

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 4>a long enough timeline, you know, as those things are

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 4>maybe filtered out because they don't want to deal with

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:27.919
<v Speaker 4>the hassle of having to you know, have advertisers worried

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.280
<v Speaker 4>about being served up in copywritten content.

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 2>And we've got so much more to get to folks,

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 2>we didn't really get a chance to explore the AI stuff,

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:42.840
<v Speaker 2>the supposed brain rot. We are in full disclosure overall

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 2>fans of YouTube. This platform has been integral to our show.

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 2>It has provided immense learning opportunities. Definitely helped me out

0:43:52.000 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of couple of situations. As we said,

0:43:56.080 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 2>you can find a ton of our work on YouTube

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:04.399
<v Speaker 2>and multiple formats, and I just gotta say go humanity,

0:44:04.760 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 2>Go human beings from me at the zoo to billions

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of dollars and billions of people. I do think YouTube

0:44:17.560 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 2>will get heavily compromised in the horizon, but we want

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 2>to know your thoughts and also just to keep it

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.799
<v Speaker 2>positive instead of a random fact in email, Folks, why

0:44:26.840 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 2>don't you share with us the weirdest or funniest stuff

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:33.439
<v Speaker 2>you've seen on YouTube? Shout out to everybody who gets

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:36.799
<v Speaker 2>the reference. Not my chair, not my problem, you know

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:40.200
<v Speaker 2>the drill smash that like button subscribe. We want to

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:42.279
<v Speaker 2>hear your thoughts. There are a number of ways to

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:43.759
<v Speaker 2>get in touch with us, that's right.

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:45.360
<v Speaker 4>If you would like, you can reach out to the

0:44:45.400 --> 0:44:48.919
<v Speaker 4>handles Conspiracy Stuff or Conspiracy Stuff Show on whichever social

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 4>media platform you enjoy. You'll find us on one of them.

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 3>Hey, are you watching us on YouTube. Don't forget there's

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 3>an audio feed. You can find it. It's all over

0:44:58.680 --> 0:45:01.440
<v Speaker 3>the place, in various place you just look for it.

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 3>You can find our episode from when was it October nineteenth,

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:10.919
<v Speaker 3>twenty eighteen, thought Control? What's up with YouTube's algorithm? That's

0:45:10.920 --> 0:45:13.799
<v Speaker 3>when we looked at this along like what almost ten

0:45:13.840 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 3>years ago, and we were talking about some of these things.

0:45:17.160 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 3>It has changed shape a lot. We would love to

0:45:19.600 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 3>hear you, hear your voice and your thoughts, so call us.

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Our number is one eight three three std WYTK. When

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 3>you call in, give yourself a cool nickname and let

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 3>us know within the message if we can use your

0:45:31.200 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 3>name and message on one of our listener mail episodes

0:45:33.680 --> 0:45:36.600
<v Speaker 3>that show up in the audio feeds. Hey, you can

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 3>also email us.

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:40.400
<v Speaker 2>That's right, this is one of the best ways to

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:44.040
<v Speaker 2>contact us. Twenty four hours a night, seven evenings a week.

0:45:44.400 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 2>You can send us the links. We'll all see it immediately.

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 2>We can all respond. You will take us to the

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 2>edge of the rabbit hole. We will do the rest.

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Send us your favorite random, weirdest, coolest YouTube video from

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the past. We'll see you out here in the dark.

0:46:00.360 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 2>Conspiracy at iHeartRadio dot com.

0:46:21.640 --> 0:46:23.680
<v Speaker 3>Stuff They Don't Want You to Know is a production

0:46:23.800 --> 0:46:28.319
<v Speaker 3>of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:46:28.400 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.