1 00:00:05,120 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Along 2 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:13,200 Speaker 1: with Jonathan Ferroll and Lisa Brownwitz Jaily, we bring you 3 00:00:13,320 --> 00:00:18,600 Speaker 1: insight from the best and economics, finance, investment, and international relations. 4 00:00:18,960 --> 00:00:23,840 Speaker 1: Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcast, Suncloud, Bloomberg dot Com, 5 00:00:23,920 --> 00:00:30,280 Speaker 1: and of course on the Bloomberg terminal. Right now, our 6 00:00:30,320 --> 00:00:33,840 Speaker 1: conversation of the day, John and Lisa on economics. Peter 7 00:00:33,880 --> 00:00:36,400 Speaker 1: Hooper joins us, of course with Deutsche Bank. His deck 8 00:00:36,520 --> 00:00:40,559 Speaker 1: on economics hugely anticipated on Wall Street. Peter, I want 9 00:00:40,560 --> 00:00:42,600 Speaker 1: to go to the heart and soul of your must read, 10 00:00:43,000 --> 00:00:45,720 Speaker 1: and that is simply you look for upside risk to 11 00:00:45,880 --> 00:00:49,320 Speaker 1: g d P and an unemployment rate that drives us 12 00:00:49,360 --> 00:00:54,560 Speaker 1: down to a fully employed America. Balance that forest right now? 13 00:00:54,800 --> 00:01:01,320 Speaker 1: Will that occur within market stability and national stability? Tom? 14 00:01:01,400 --> 00:01:04,080 Speaker 1: That's uh, that could be a tall order. But look, 15 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:07,800 Speaker 1: there's an awful lot driving growth at this parent point. 16 00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:11,920 Speaker 1: We have the course, the normalization of demand coming out 17 00:01:11,920 --> 00:01:15,600 Speaker 1: of COVID as people are being vaccinated. We have we 18 00:01:15,600 --> 00:01:19,440 Speaker 1: have a tremendous fiscal support both behind us and ahead 19 00:01:19,440 --> 00:01:22,720 Speaker 1: of us. Here. Uh. We we think that we're probably 20 00:01:22,720 --> 00:01:25,480 Speaker 1: at least a half percentage point out of GDP on GDP, 21 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:30,160 Speaker 1: out of what's still to come. But but the the 22 00:01:30,400 --> 00:01:34,280 Speaker 1: household income support that we've gotten so far, building up 23 00:01:34,280 --> 00:01:37,760 Speaker 1: a war chest of household saving that's going to get 24 00:01:37,760 --> 00:01:41,120 Speaker 1: to something like ten percent of g d P waiting 25 00:01:41,160 --> 00:01:44,960 Speaker 1: in the wings to be spent um. There's there's no 26 00:01:45,040 --> 00:01:49,360 Speaker 1: way we're going to see less than six seven percent 27 00:01:49,480 --> 00:01:53,000 Speaker 1: growth this year. Our own forecast is above the census 28 00:01:53,000 --> 00:01:56,240 Speaker 1: at seven and a half percent, so that that that's 29 00:01:56,240 --> 00:02:00,240 Speaker 1: certainly enough to get the labor market by that can 30 00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:02,600 Speaker 1: happen next year back down to the three and a 31 00:02:02,640 --> 00:02:05,920 Speaker 1: half percent unemployment rate that we saw pre crisis. In 32 00:02:05,960 --> 00:02:09,519 Speaker 1: the dynamics that Matthew Lozetti work through for you. You 33 00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:13,240 Speaker 1: took your coin of phrase and you talk about the 34 00:02:13,280 --> 00:02:18,040 Speaker 1: amazon Ization. I hope I got that right, the Amazonization 35 00:02:18,720 --> 00:02:23,600 Speaker 1: of the American economy. Do we underestimate the cardboard boxes 36 00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:28,320 Speaker 1: and the cloud that's out there from Mr Bezos? Well, 37 00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:32,560 Speaker 1: I mean the good thing. Amazonization has a number of facets, 38 00:02:32,560 --> 00:02:36,560 Speaker 1: but one very important for the FED is despite this 39 00:02:36,760 --> 00:02:40,800 Speaker 1: very rapid growth and a tightening of the labor market, 40 00:02:41,080 --> 00:02:45,600 Speaker 1: unlikely what we've seen for quite some time Amazonization is 41 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:48,640 Speaker 1: a factor that we think is going to keep inflation 42 00:02:48,720 --> 00:02:54,160 Speaker 1: from getting out of control. Uh. Certainly, the vast increase 43 00:02:54,240 --> 00:02:59,840 Speaker 1: improvement in information flow about about supply and demand of 44 00:03:00,000 --> 00:03:05,080 Speaker 1: all kinds of commodities and services price information now globally 45 00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:09,960 Speaker 1: is going to keep we think after some some initial 46 00:03:10,440 --> 00:03:17,360 Speaker 1: disruptions as as bottlenecks appeared during this normalization process, amazonization 47 00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:21,760 Speaker 1: working in the background is certainly going to be there. Uh, Peter, great, 48 00:03:21,760 --> 00:03:23,280 Speaker 1: to catch up, he said, Let's just run things out 49 00:03:23,280 --> 00:03:25,160 Speaker 1: with a couple of thoughts on this for the Federal 50 00:03:25,160 --> 00:03:28,600 Speaker 1: Reserve at the moment, the difference between transitory and persistent. 51 00:03:28,960 --> 00:03:31,160 Speaker 1: You know, we talk and Joe call morning about this 52 00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:33,359 Speaker 1: and Tom has a drink because the drinking game we play, 53 00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:36,280 Speaker 1: and I think vice check cloud had joined in recently too. 54 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 1: What is the difference for you? What defines that as 55 00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:42,640 Speaker 1: the year goes on? Okay, Well, one thing the feeds 56 00:03:42,680 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 1: been wanting to see is a string of good information 57 00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:48,200 Speaker 1: on the labor market. I think that's four or five 58 00:03:48,280 --> 00:03:52,560 Speaker 1: months of something approaching a million on on payrolls before 59 00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:56,080 Speaker 1: before they give us any indication they're going to be 60 00:03:56,400 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 1: uh giving us a hint about apring to come. Uh, 61 00:04:03,520 --> 00:04:08,080 Speaker 1: there's another another issue here is transitory versus persistent on inflation. Yes, 62 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:09,840 Speaker 1: we're gonna get some We are going to get a 63 00:04:10,400 --> 00:04:13,400 Speaker 1: bulge in in price increases the middle of this year 64 00:04:13,480 --> 00:04:17,800 Speaker 1: as growth normalizes, as the economy normalizes. But another thing 65 00:04:17,800 --> 00:04:20,480 Speaker 1: to keep in mind here, going back to this amazonization 66 00:04:21,279 --> 00:04:26,760 Speaker 1: is we've been above well above trend in consumption of goods. 67 00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:31,560 Speaker 1: Uh COVID meant people who dropped back sharply on their 68 00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:35,000 Speaker 1: demands or services. I think as things normalize, you're gonna 69 00:04:35,000 --> 00:04:38,200 Speaker 1: see a shift back towards services, and that means taking 70 00:04:38,279 --> 00:04:41,159 Speaker 1: some of the pressure off the good sector. So, yes, 71 00:04:41,200 --> 00:04:43,480 Speaker 1: we're seeing a lot of shortages. Yes, we're gonna see 72 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:48,039 Speaker 1: some some real disruptions as these demand patterns shift and 73 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:52,320 Speaker 1: things normalized. But we've been encouraged by the extent to 74 00:04:52,440 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 1: which labor supply in in the hospitality sector for example, 75 00:04:57,160 --> 00:05:00,200 Speaker 1: has picked up. Hiring is picked up, there's a lot 76 00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:03,120 Speaker 1: of there's an awful lot of unemployed people that need 77 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:06,279 Speaker 1: to get jobs. Still, so um, there'll be some disruption, 78 00:05:07,279 --> 00:05:13,080 Speaker 1: we will see some transitory price increases, but our expectation 79 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:15,480 Speaker 1: is on inflation, which could get to two and a 80 00:05:15,520 --> 00:05:17,200 Speaker 1: half percent in the middle of this year, maybe a 81 00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:20,280 Speaker 1: little higher. We'll be back to or below two percent 82 00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:24,799 Speaker 1: by next year. That's not a persistent problem, Peter, what's 83 00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:30,080 Speaker 1: the economic effect of higher taxes? Economics? So, I mean, 84 00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:33,640 Speaker 1: looking looking ahead at what we're what we we might get. 85 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:36,760 Speaker 1: Obviously from listening to semi earlier discussion, a lot of 86 00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:39,120 Speaker 1: uncertainty about just what's going to go through Congress here. 87 00:05:39,160 --> 00:05:42,720 Speaker 1: But if Biden gets the program, if we get if 88 00:05:42,760 --> 00:05:46,640 Speaker 1: we get this UH to and a quarter trillion UH 89 00:05:46,960 --> 00:05:52,680 Speaker 1: jobs plan with the corporate texts um UH package to 90 00:05:52,720 --> 00:05:56,680 Speaker 1: go with it, UH, that's worth about one percent. I mean, 91 00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:00,440 Speaker 1: assuming roughly ten percent is the SPA then comes in 92 00:06:00,520 --> 00:06:03,360 Speaker 1: the first year, and that the tax program goes through 93 00:06:03,440 --> 00:06:07,919 Speaker 1: as planned, we're seeing about a percentage point of GDP 94 00:06:08,040 --> 00:06:11,119 Speaker 1: growth out of the spending side, and roughly a half 95 00:06:11,120 --> 00:06:15,159 Speaker 1: a percentage point offset from tax increases. The total tax 96 00:06:15,200 --> 00:06:17,120 Speaker 1: increase over the next year something on the order of 97 00:06:17,839 --> 00:06:20,960 Speaker 1: by next year or something on or of nine billion dollars, 98 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:24,800 Speaker 1: a little little lesson half a percentage GDP. So yes, 99 00:06:25,080 --> 00:06:27,599 Speaker 1: it's I mean, there are all kinds of questions about 100 00:06:28,320 --> 00:06:34,440 Speaker 1: what impacts the particular form at tax has across different 101 00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:39,120 Speaker 1: parts of the of the corporate sectors as well as households. 102 00:06:40,080 --> 00:06:43,960 Speaker 1: But but the broad the broad view macro view is 103 00:06:44,040 --> 00:06:48,240 Speaker 1: we're looking at something like overall half percentage point stimulus 104 00:06:48,279 --> 00:06:50,960 Speaker 1: to growth would be more if it weren't for this 105 00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:53,839 Speaker 1: half point dragged from from the from the tax side. 106 00:06:53,960 --> 00:06:55,800 Speaker 1: You know, Tom, it just strikes me the degree of 107 00:06:55,839 --> 00:06:59,120 Speaker 1: policy uncertainty right now for economists to factor in. You 108 00:06:59,240 --> 00:07:01,680 Speaker 1: got that two point three trillion dollar stimulus plan that 109 00:07:01,720 --> 00:07:03,599 Speaker 1: may or may not see the light of day, followed 110 00:07:03,600 --> 00:07:05,679 Speaker 1: by a one and a half trillion dollar plan expected 111 00:07:05,680 --> 00:07:09,000 Speaker 1: to be announced this week, followed by potentially tax hikes 112 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:11,760 Speaker 1: that could have a negative impact. How do you game 113 00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:13,840 Speaker 1: this all out? I think you game it out with 114 00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:17,280 Speaker 1: five seats in the House come November of two thousand 115 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:20,480 Speaker 1: and twenty two, I would suggest, Lisa, the politics is 116 00:07:20,480 --> 00:07:22,520 Speaker 1: going to take it over. Peter Hooper, You've got a 117 00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:26,200 Speaker 1: fifty five page deck, and there is one page which 118 00:07:26,280 --> 00:07:30,960 Speaker 1: describes the foolishness of this all. It is stunning how 119 00:07:31,000 --> 00:07:35,960 Speaker 1: the savings of this fiscal strategy has gone to the wealthy. 120 00:07:36,040 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 1: It's absolutely a breathtaking chart. Folks, We protect the copyright. 121 00:07:40,480 --> 00:07:43,600 Speaker 1: Go to Deutsche Bank to get the chart, Peter, how 122 00:07:43,600 --> 00:07:48,600 Speaker 1: how far apart are the two America's right now? Uh? Tom, 123 00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:52,480 Speaker 1: They've obviously grown ever further apart, certainly over the last 124 00:07:52,480 --> 00:07:56,760 Speaker 1: decade and accelerating over the last four years with tax 125 00:07:56,800 --> 00:07:59,640 Speaker 1: cuts with with into the last year with the asset 126 00:08:00,840 --> 00:08:06,640 Speaker 1: very asset gains and stock and housing markets. So um, 127 00:08:06,640 --> 00:08:10,520 Speaker 1: no question. Uh. Politically, something's got to be done about this. 128 00:08:11,200 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 1: It's going to be painful when it comes, but that 129 00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:18,800 Speaker 1: is certainly one reason to be considering taxes more heavily 130 00:08:18,880 --> 00:08:21,320 Speaker 1: at the at the upper income levels at this point 131 00:08:21,320 --> 00:08:23,160 Speaker 1: going forward, Peter, We've got to leave it there, have 132 00:08:23,240 --> 00:08:25,440 Speaker 1: Peter Hope of that Doute Bank globe ahead of economic 133 00:08:25,480 --> 00:08:33,920 Speaker 1: research and chief economist. You want to bring in, James 134 00:08:33,960 --> 00:08:38,439 Speaker 1: pev CL investment officer, James, you like the minus right 135 00:08:38,440 --> 00:08:41,600 Speaker 1: now in Europe? Sure, I absolutely do. I think there 136 00:08:41,600 --> 00:08:45,359 Speaker 1: are some great quality opportunities. And what I was interesting 137 00:08:45,440 --> 00:08:48,480 Speaker 1: me is the ratio between the copper price and the 138 00:08:48,520 --> 00:08:51,600 Speaker 1: gold price suggests to me that ten U s treasury 139 00:08:51,679 --> 00:08:54,400 Speaker 1: yield should now be it around two and a half cent. 140 00:08:54,480 --> 00:08:57,880 Speaker 1: Now we know it's not that principally because Japanese investors 141 00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:01,840 Speaker 1: have been buying fantasy almost r yields within their own market. 142 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:04,960 Speaker 1: But I would have a side bet with you that 143 00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:08,560 Speaker 1: we will see the tenure yield at two by the 144 00:09:08,679 --> 00:09:11,920 Speaker 1: end of the calendar year. And that's a reglisively big move, 145 00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:14,880 Speaker 1: given that we only got through one on the first 146 00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:17,040 Speaker 1: trading day of the current calendar year. Is that a 147 00:09:17,080 --> 00:09:18,839 Speaker 1: move that looks like the movie saw in Q one? 148 00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:22,920 Speaker 1: A move that's accompanied by better banks, better bank stock performance, 149 00:09:23,120 --> 00:09:26,319 Speaker 1: better cyclical performance, better small camp performance. To the cygnicals 150 00:09:26,360 --> 00:09:28,440 Speaker 1: perform in line with that move higher on two on 151 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:31,160 Speaker 1: tens to too during I don't think they do. I 152 00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:35,040 Speaker 1: think interesting and have a very difficult time. I would 153 00:09:35,040 --> 00:09:38,959 Speaker 1: observe that the banks are now awash with overnight deposits. 154 00:09:39,040 --> 00:09:43,199 Speaker 1: That's extremely bad news. The banks seeking to lend on 155 00:09:43,600 --> 00:09:47,160 Speaker 1: what they want our time deposits. They want long term deposits. 156 00:09:47,160 --> 00:09:50,160 Speaker 1: They don't want all the money, and I think therefore 157 00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:52,280 Speaker 1: that the banks have had their day in the side. 158 00:09:52,440 --> 00:09:54,680 Speaker 1: I would only in the case of the States, wants 159 00:09:54,720 --> 00:09:57,440 Speaker 1: to be invested in JPMorgan and Bank America, both of 160 00:09:57,480 --> 00:10:01,720 Speaker 1: which I think have excellent opportunity cut off support long 161 00:10:01,840 --> 00:10:05,559 Speaker 1: term returns. The middle bank ranking banks However, again a 162 00:10:05,720 --> 00:10:08,600 Speaker 1: really struggle, and that I would say is going to 163 00:10:08,640 --> 00:10:12,640 Speaker 1: be one of the challenges for fixnicals writ large, they 164 00:10:12,760 --> 00:10:15,400 Speaker 1: discount a lot of bad news. When I'm looking at 165 00:10:15,440 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 1: circles today, I'm looking at the better quality, defensive circles 166 00:10:19,720 --> 00:10:22,720 Speaker 1: to some of the telecommunication companies, some of the drinks 167 00:10:22,760 --> 00:10:25,520 Speaker 1: companies like the Age, which I still think looks too cheap. 168 00:10:26,960 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: James Bevan, I want you to rationalize thirty five times earnings. 169 00:10:31,520 --> 00:10:35,240 Speaker 1: My one estimate of Microsoft is the twelve months forward 170 00:10:35,320 --> 00:10:41,240 Speaker 1: view is thirty five times earnings. Justify owning Microsoft right now. 171 00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:45,280 Speaker 1: Let's let me rationalize it by talking about the earning 172 00:10:45,360 --> 00:10:48,640 Speaker 1: zeald rather than the price earnings multiple, because of course, 173 00:10:48,679 --> 00:10:52,280 Speaker 1: the earning zeal is the price ownings multiple reversed, and 174 00:10:52,400 --> 00:10:55,959 Speaker 1: an earning zeal of three percent needs to be considered 175 00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:59,160 Speaker 1: in the context of where cash rates currently are exter 176 00:10:59,320 --> 00:11:03,839 Speaker 1: risk premier payment for taking everty risk relative to to 177 00:11:04,040 --> 00:11:08,119 Speaker 1: cash as the three race of return does remain relatively elevated, 178 00:11:08,160 --> 00:11:10,640 Speaker 1: and that puts all of the focus on whether or 179 00:11:10,679 --> 00:11:13,720 Speaker 1: not we are going to get real growth. And I 180 00:11:13,760 --> 00:11:16,000 Speaker 1: am in the camp that says we will get a 181 00:11:16,120 --> 00:11:20,319 Speaker 1: short term acceleration and inflation that seems for me absolutely 182 00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:22,839 Speaker 1: baked in the cake. Nothing we can do that. But 183 00:11:23,000 --> 00:11:25,800 Speaker 1: I do also believe that inflation is going to come 184 00:11:25,840 --> 00:11:28,840 Speaker 1: down again, and I would say that that is driven 185 00:11:28,880 --> 00:11:35,320 Speaker 1: by the demographic changes, disruptive technologies, high levels of embedded indebtedness, 186 00:11:35,360 --> 00:11:40,480 Speaker 1: and the continuing globalization and notwithstanding the trade tensions does 187 00:11:40,559 --> 00:11:43,439 Speaker 1: mean that there is a lid put on the capacity 188 00:11:43,480 --> 00:11:48,240 Speaker 1: for domestic businesses to raise costs and prices generally. And 189 00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:51,720 Speaker 1: that allows me to believe that a three and earning 190 00:11:51,840 --> 00:11:56,199 Speaker 1: zeal coupled with long term growth still leaves a company 191 00:11:56,240 --> 00:12:01,320 Speaker 1: like Microsoft offering premium returns to corporate and also very 192 00:12:01,400 --> 00:12:04,920 Speaker 1: much to government. That if you're listening to markets, though, James, 193 00:12:05,160 --> 00:12:08,679 Speaker 1: I'm looking right now at earnings that have beaten expectations 194 00:12:08,800 --> 00:12:12,520 Speaker 1: by twenty six percent, even if you strip out financials 195 00:12:12,600 --> 00:12:15,240 Speaker 1: versus the average of five percent during earning seasons. This 196 00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:18,440 Speaker 1: from UBS is Mark Hathlet. How do you explain the 197 00:12:18,480 --> 00:12:21,720 Speaker 1: fact that you have not seen a cheer from equity traders. 198 00:12:21,720 --> 00:12:24,960 Speaker 1: You haven't seen this excitement about this growth that's beating 199 00:12:25,080 --> 00:12:28,439 Speaker 1: expectations in what is expected to be a low rate 200 00:12:28,480 --> 00:12:32,600 Speaker 1: world for a long time because of what you just said, Lisa. 201 00:12:32,640 --> 00:12:34,040 Speaker 1: I think that one of the problems we have with 202 00:12:34,080 --> 00:12:37,839 Speaker 1: earnings numbers is year on your comparisons are flattered by 203 00:12:37,880 --> 00:12:40,640 Speaker 1: the extraordinary down draft that we saw in March and 204 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:44,680 Speaker 1: April last year, and what investors are looking at is 205 00:12:44,720 --> 00:12:49,360 Speaker 1: the trend growth rather than the one off growth for 206 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:52,480 Speaker 1: the period. And looking forward, I think that we are 207 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:55,560 Speaker 1: going to see well over a hundred and eighty dollars 208 00:12:55,600 --> 00:12:58,800 Speaker 1: of earnings for the SMP five hundreds. That allows me 209 00:12:58,880 --> 00:13:03,199 Speaker 1: to project and in X will stoundints by the end 210 00:13:03,480 --> 00:13:06,280 Speaker 1: of this year. And my greater concern is we get 211 00:13:06,320 --> 00:13:10,480 Speaker 1: to that level earlier on the back of this extraordinary 212 00:13:10,640 --> 00:13:15,720 Speaker 1: liquiditcy environment engineered by the Federal Reserve and Treasury, and 213 00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 1: that would be the moment to take money off the table. 214 00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,360 Speaker 1: But now I think that index earnings on trend our 215 00:13:21,440 --> 00:13:24,280 Speaker 1: game well, I think the year on your comparisons, so 216 00:13:24,360 --> 00:13:26,559 Speaker 1: that will get to be ignored. James, it's gonna see 217 00:13:26,559 --> 00:13:29,120 Speaker 1: You're gonna catch up as always, Thank you, mate, James. 218 00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:36,600 Speaker 1: Bob and c C l A Chief Investment Officer. Right 219 00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:39,480 Speaker 1: now on the President's speech on infrastructure, John Lieber joins 220 00:13:39,559 --> 00:13:42,199 Speaker 1: us with your RAISIA group and his important experience with 221 00:13:42,280 --> 00:13:45,679 Speaker 1: Senator McConnell in Kentucky. John, I want to go down 222 00:13:45,760 --> 00:13:48,160 Speaker 1: to the reality which I'm sure you faced years ago 223 00:13:48,240 --> 00:13:52,320 Speaker 1: a Senator McConnell, which is a bridge over the Ohio River. 224 00:13:52,520 --> 00:13:56,840 Speaker 1: It is the Brent Spence Bridge, and it says all 225 00:13:56,880 --> 00:14:01,840 Speaker 1: about how we can't fix our infrastructure in America. How 226 00:14:01,840 --> 00:14:05,840 Speaker 1: do we fix the Brent Spence the Brent Spence Bridge 227 00:14:06,320 --> 00:14:10,520 Speaker 1: given the President's initiative. Yeah, that's a great example of 228 00:14:11,000 --> 00:14:15,720 Speaker 1: really important piece of interstate of infrastructure that carries quite 229 00:14:15,760 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 1: a bit of interstate commerce and should be oppressing national 230 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:21,960 Speaker 1: issue that Congress wants to try to fix that's really 231 00:14:21,960 --> 00:14:24,400 Speaker 1: non neglected for far too long. So, you know, I 232 00:14:24,440 --> 00:14:27,360 Speaker 1: think the reality is Biden's guts the party in the alignment, 233 00:14:27,400 --> 00:14:31,960 Speaker 1: he needs to pass a very large infrastructure bill. UM. 234 00:14:32,400 --> 00:14:35,200 Speaker 1: One of the biggest challenging challenges of the last ten 235 00:14:35,280 --> 00:14:38,080 Speaker 1: years has been the declining revenues in the Highway Trust Fund. 236 00:14:38,440 --> 00:14:41,560 Speaker 1: That's made paying for these types of repairs extremely difficult. 237 00:14:41,920 --> 00:14:44,480 Speaker 1: But right now we're in an environment where the Democrats 238 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:48,040 Speaker 1: are basically united and around increasing taxes on corporations and 239 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:51,200 Speaker 1: wealthy Americans to get this stuff done. And probably by 240 00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:52,800 Speaker 1: the end of the year, you know they're going to 241 00:14:52,880 --> 00:14:54,760 Speaker 1: have the authority to start the money flowing over the 242 00:14:54,800 --> 00:14:57,120 Speaker 1: next five to ten years to fix these kind of things. 243 00:14:57,280 --> 00:15:00,600 Speaker 1: Do you look for a compromise of focuses on projects 244 00:15:00,640 --> 00:15:03,280 Speaker 1: like the Brent Spence Bridge or are we going to 245 00:15:03,400 --> 00:15:07,360 Speaker 1: look for a more omnibus bill. I'd be surprised to 246 00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:11,080 Speaker 1: see Republicans even being really relevant in this process. Frankly, 247 00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:13,440 Speaker 1: I think that they have. You know, the Democrats have 248 00:15:13,480 --> 00:15:17,120 Speaker 1: the votes probably to do most of the infrastructure projects. 249 00:15:17,120 --> 00:15:21,000 Speaker 1: They've got big ambitions beyond physical infrastructure with this human 250 00:15:21,040 --> 00:15:25,520 Speaker 1: infrastructure side, focused on childcare and subsidies for education and healthcare. 251 00:15:26,160 --> 00:15:28,040 Speaker 1: And you know, Republicans just aren't going to play ball 252 00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:30,240 Speaker 1: for that. And most importantly, they don't want to raise 253 00:15:30,280 --> 00:15:31,800 Speaker 1: taxes to pay for it, and that's going to be 254 00:15:31,840 --> 00:15:34,280 Speaker 1: the biggest stumbling block. I think that makes this a 255 00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:37,240 Speaker 1: basically a partisan exercise, and I want to go a 256 00:15:37,280 --> 00:15:39,320 Speaker 1: little bit deeper into that. Given your work with Senate 257 00:15:39,360 --> 00:15:42,760 Speaker 1: Majority Leader Mitch McConnell or a former Senate Majority leader, 258 00:15:42,960 --> 00:15:45,240 Speaker 1: there is a question of whether they would be open 259 00:15:45,320 --> 00:15:48,320 Speaker 1: the Republicans to any tax hikes. When you were working 260 00:15:48,400 --> 00:15:50,920 Speaker 1: for him. Did he talk about the necessity for paying 261 00:15:50,960 --> 00:15:53,800 Speaker 1: for different projects or did he believe that things would 262 00:15:53,800 --> 00:15:57,720 Speaker 1: pay for themselves if you had the right projects. I 263 00:15:58,320 --> 00:16:00,400 Speaker 1: think I'd say that the kind of your your average 264 00:16:00,400 --> 00:16:04,080 Speaker 1: Republican manager member believes in the in the user pay 265 00:16:04,280 --> 00:16:06,960 Speaker 1: no shan when it comes to infrastructure. So for a 266 00:16:07,000 --> 00:16:11,600 Speaker 1: long time, that user pay idea was embodied in the 267 00:16:11,680 --> 00:16:14,640 Speaker 1: Highway Trust Fund, where gas tax fueled the Highway Trust 268 00:16:14,640 --> 00:16:16,400 Speaker 1: Fund and then the highly trust pumps used to pay 269 00:16:16,400 --> 00:16:19,920 Speaker 1: for service transportation projects. And now you've got people driving 270 00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:22,680 Speaker 1: less cars and coming more fuel efficient, and the gas 271 00:16:22,680 --> 00:16:26,800 Speaker 1: bax hasn't gone up in in generation, so those revenues 272 00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:29,800 Speaker 1: are declining. But if you ask, you know, your average 273 00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:32,920 Speaker 1: Republican if they want to raise taxes on incorporations there 274 00:16:33,040 --> 00:16:35,560 Speaker 1: or a small business owner to pay for infrastructure, the 275 00:16:35,560 --> 00:16:38,400 Speaker 1: answer is going to be no um. And this dynamic 276 00:16:38,480 --> 00:16:40,560 Speaker 1: is just making it really difficult to get even done. 277 00:16:41,040 --> 00:16:44,080 Speaker 1: Given your experience in Washington, d C does a nine 278 00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:47,360 Speaker 1: hundred billion dollar skinny infrastructure bill, and it is funny 279 00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:49,760 Speaker 1: that we're calling a nine hundred billion dollar plan skinny. 280 00:16:49,960 --> 00:16:52,480 Speaker 1: Does it seem feasible and likely to be the outcome 281 00:16:52,520 --> 00:16:55,920 Speaker 1: of some of these negotiations. Yeah, you raised a good point. 282 00:16:55,960 --> 00:17:00,040 Speaker 1: I mean it's absolutely while. Um, two years ago, the 283 00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:02,800 Speaker 1: Senate Committee the Deals with Infrastructure put together a bipartis 284 00:17:02,920 --> 00:17:05,520 Speaker 1: bill that was around four a billion dollars and it 285 00:17:05,600 --> 00:17:09,320 Speaker 1: was considered historic achievement. And now many of the Democrats 286 00:17:09,359 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 1: that were involved in that process basically rolled their eyes 287 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:14,480 Speaker 1: at the Republicans six d billion dollar proposal. And it 288 00:17:14,560 --> 00:17:17,280 Speaker 1: just shows you how how far the goalposts have moved. Um. 289 00:17:17,359 --> 00:17:19,160 Speaker 1: But no, I think the challenge you're at the House 290 00:17:19,560 --> 00:17:21,679 Speaker 1: and that even if there were a Senate compromise that 291 00:17:21,760 --> 00:17:24,159 Speaker 1: ended up around nine under billion dollars, which I'm extremely 292 00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:27,159 Speaker 1: skeptical because of that. You know, the House sensers an 293 00:17:27,160 --> 00:17:30,280 Speaker 1: opportunity here and Joe Biden sensers an opportunity here to 294 00:17:30,359 --> 00:17:32,680 Speaker 1: go much much bigger in a in a way that's 295 00:17:32,720 --> 00:17:35,960 Speaker 1: going to be really transformative for American's anti poverty programs 296 00:17:36,280 --> 00:17:38,280 Speaker 1: and really change the game when it comes to green 297 00:17:38,359 --> 00:17:40,679 Speaker 1: energy and sentence. And that's really what this is about. 298 00:17:40,720 --> 00:17:44,000 Speaker 1: This isn't about repairing potholes, fixing the Branch Spence Bridge 299 00:17:44,200 --> 00:17:46,680 Speaker 1: and doing a couple of projects on infrastructure. This is 300 00:17:46,720 --> 00:17:49,840 Speaker 1: about doing big things to accomplish the Biden agenda. It's 301 00:17:49,840 --> 00:17:52,400 Speaker 1: why he ran, that's why he was. They think that's 302 00:17:52,440 --> 00:17:55,760 Speaker 1: why he wants and that's their goal. How does the 303 00:17:55,960 --> 00:18:00,359 Speaker 1: big thing's tone sold into the beginning of the run 304 00:18:00,400 --> 00:18:06,040 Speaker 1: to November of two thousand twenty two. Well, remember two 305 00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:08,760 Speaker 1: is an interesting year. I mean, the president, the president, 306 00:18:08,800 --> 00:18:11,919 Speaker 1: the party in power almost always loses seats, really always. 307 00:18:11,920 --> 00:18:14,159 Speaker 1: I mean there's very few exceptions as this rule that 308 00:18:14,240 --> 00:18:16,840 Speaker 1: the party in power loses seats in the mid terms. 309 00:18:17,320 --> 00:18:20,119 Speaker 1: It's possible this cycle is a little different because the 310 00:18:20,119 --> 00:18:22,840 Speaker 1: fact that Biden didn't have any cotails. So this isn't 311 00:18:22,880 --> 00:18:26,320 Speaker 1: like the Democrats have an extra members in the House 312 00:18:26,640 --> 00:18:30,359 Speaker 1: as some majorities do. But you know, the odds are 313 00:18:30,440 --> 00:18:32,879 Speaker 1: and the historical trend would be that the Democrats lose 314 00:18:33,040 --> 00:18:35,680 Speaker 1: probably the House and potentially the Senate as well, which 315 00:18:35,680 --> 00:18:38,639 Speaker 1: means that Biden, like Obama and Trump, is going to 316 00:18:38,760 --> 00:18:41,880 Speaker 1: lose his ability to do any legislation after his first 317 00:18:41,880 --> 00:18:44,879 Speaker 1: two years. So if you think that your elect came 318 00:18:44,920 --> 00:18:47,320 Speaker 1: to Washington to get things done, this is your window 319 00:18:47,400 --> 00:18:49,400 Speaker 1: to do it as a Democrat, and I think ultimately 320 00:18:49,440 --> 00:18:52,720 Speaker 1: that drives them to a partisan deal by the end 321 00:18:52,760 --> 00:18:54,760 Speaker 1: of the year, John, it's gonna say you're gonna hear 322 00:18:54,800 --> 00:19:02,919 Speaker 1: from you John Labor there. So let's bring in Jennifer Lea. 323 00:19:02,960 --> 00:19:05,840 Speaker 1: Shall we beat my capital market sen economists? Jen, can 324 00:19:05,920 --> 00:19:08,399 Speaker 1: we start right there just on how you're reading some 325 00:19:08,480 --> 00:19:14,159 Speaker 1: of the corporate guidance around cost pressures around the labor market. Well, 326 00:19:14,200 --> 00:19:17,320 Speaker 1: good morning everyone. So this is where as they're all saying, 327 00:19:17,359 --> 00:19:20,680 Speaker 1: the the incertainty is lying how much inflation is really 328 00:19:20,720 --> 00:19:22,800 Speaker 1: building built up through the system. Like if we were 329 00:19:22,800 --> 00:19:25,320 Speaker 1: talking about this like say nine months ago, you know 330 00:19:25,359 --> 00:19:27,320 Speaker 1: a lot of people were saying that inflation is going 331 00:19:27,320 --> 00:19:29,280 Speaker 1: to be very slow to come back, but we all 332 00:19:29,280 --> 00:19:31,679 Speaker 1: know that at some point when things open up, and 333 00:19:31,720 --> 00:19:34,680 Speaker 1: they are opening up clearly, Um, it's difficult as some 334 00:19:34,680 --> 00:19:37,400 Speaker 1: some companies are having it, but they are opening up. 335 00:19:37,720 --> 00:19:39,680 Speaker 1: Price pressures are turning to rise. And this is why 336 00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:41,720 Speaker 1: I'm always interested in watching things like the I s 337 00:19:41,840 --> 00:19:45,800 Speaker 1: M surveys. Data are obviously clearly important, but what people 338 00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:47,720 Speaker 1: are saying, what companies are saying out of the ground 339 00:19:47,720 --> 00:19:50,720 Speaker 1: are is very key. Um. So again, one of the 340 00:19:50,760 --> 00:19:53,159 Speaker 1: I SEN surveys, like the manufacturing ones that have always 341 00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:55,880 Speaker 1: been talking about what the respondents have always been referring 342 00:19:55,920 --> 00:19:59,560 Speaker 1: to higher price pressures and finding how labor is difficult 343 00:19:59,600 --> 00:20:01,480 Speaker 1: to come by these days, and they're paying more for 344 00:20:01,560 --> 00:20:04,840 Speaker 1: wages and all that. So those sorts of UM commented 345 00:20:04,960 --> 00:20:08,000 Speaker 1: those sorts of comments, Um, what companies are saying. I 346 00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:11,000 Speaker 1: think it's very critical to our the inflation outlook, and 347 00:20:11,000 --> 00:20:14,399 Speaker 1: we do see inflation inflation perking higher in the months ahead. 348 00:20:14,600 --> 00:20:18,480 Speaker 1: Do you model in wage inflation is part of that 349 00:20:18,640 --> 00:20:23,160 Speaker 1: new inflation we do? I mean, wage inflation is obviously 350 00:20:23,480 --> 00:20:26,560 Speaker 1: part of the entire inflation picture, not just goods and 351 00:20:26,600 --> 00:20:29,680 Speaker 1: services which are also on the rise, but with labor 352 00:20:29,720 --> 00:20:34,760 Speaker 1: shortages and people or companies struggling to meet this newfound demand, 353 00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:37,359 Speaker 1: they need people to create these you know, to create 354 00:20:37,400 --> 00:20:39,600 Speaker 1: these witches, to be on the factory floor for example, 355 00:20:39,840 --> 00:20:41,640 Speaker 1: to be at the restaurant floor. And so in order 356 00:20:41,680 --> 00:20:45,680 Speaker 1: to get more people, obviously they're gonna have to start hiking, um, 357 00:20:46,040 --> 00:20:49,280 Speaker 1: hiking wages and bringing in and introducing more benefits to 358 00:20:49,440 --> 00:20:51,520 Speaker 1: lure people back into the labor force. Does it still 359 00:20:51,520 --> 00:20:56,160 Speaker 1: feel transitory, Jennifer Um A little bit, yes, because they're 360 00:20:56,160 --> 00:20:59,560 Speaker 1: not always there yet. UM. You know, this pandemic is 361 00:20:59,600 --> 00:21:02,679 Speaker 1: still you know, front and foremost on everyone's minds and 362 00:21:02,720 --> 00:21:05,359 Speaker 1: everywhere in the world. So things are moving forward, but 363 00:21:05,440 --> 00:21:07,719 Speaker 1: you know, obviously it's doing depend on what you know, 364 00:21:08,000 --> 00:21:10,080 Speaker 1: which area, which country we're talking about. In the in 365 00:21:10,119 --> 00:21:13,080 Speaker 1: the US has been you know, at the at the 366 00:21:13,119 --> 00:21:15,960 Speaker 1: forefront and has been moving for very quickly thanks to 367 00:21:16,000 --> 00:21:18,960 Speaker 1: the fast piece of vaccinations you know, the UK as well, 368 00:21:19,000 --> 00:21:21,560 Speaker 1: So things are opening up. So it's it's looking better. 369 00:21:21,600 --> 00:21:24,520 Speaker 1: It's it's definitely looking a lot better, uh, this year 370 00:21:24,600 --> 00:21:27,040 Speaker 1: than you have other countries who are not who are 371 00:21:27,040 --> 00:21:29,639 Speaker 1: still struggling on vaccinages, like in Europe and an India 372 00:21:29,680 --> 00:21:32,080 Speaker 1: of course, and that's where things are still you know, 373 00:21:32,600 --> 00:21:35,159 Speaker 1: although thin were transitory yet we're still at the beginning stages. 374 00:21:35,320 --> 00:21:36,880 Speaker 1: It's got to be the word of the year already. 375 00:21:36,960 --> 00:21:40,000 Speaker 1: Jennifer A. Thank you be mal Capital Market Senior economists. 376 00:21:40,160 --> 00:21:43,880 Speaker 1: This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Thanks for listening. Join 377 00:21:44,000 --> 00:21:47,320 Speaker 1: us live weekdays from seven to ten am Eastern on 378 00:21:47,440 --> 00:21:51,679 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Radio and on Bloomberg Television each day from six 379 00:21:51,760 --> 00:21:56,639 Speaker 1: to nine am for insight from the best in economics, finance, investment, 380 00:21:56,800 --> 00:22:01,800 Speaker 1: and international relations. And subscribe to the Surveillance Podcast on 381 00:22:01,880 --> 00:22:05,680 Speaker 1: Apple Podcast SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course, on 382 00:22:05,800 --> 00:22:17,320 Speaker 1: the terminal. I'm Tom keene In. This is Bloomberg m