WEBVTT - MLB AL Win Totals (Ep. 78)

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>A what's up everybody. It's me Joey Pa Joe Pisapia

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to betting pros and we are here today

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>to take you through the American League. That's right, win totals, baby,

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it is me, it is Dan Harris, and it is

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you and Dan. We just did a very successful National

0:00:32.920 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>League pod. If people missed it, they can go back

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>and listen to it, obviously on demand wherever they get

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>their podcasts. But it's time to focus on the American

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:42.880
<v Speaker 1>League today and the win totals there where the d

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:46.319
<v Speaker 1>H still lives and breathes where eventually we'll come back

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>to the National League, I believe. But that's the big difference.

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And the differences too. We've got some teams, some juggernaut teams,

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 1>especially in the New York Yankees, and a few other

0:00:56.960 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ones as well. But this seems a little bit more

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe open to an interpretation with some of these win totals.

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there might be some more variance here as

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at the American League. So welcome to the

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>show today, my friend. How are you.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing well, I'm doing well, yeah, these totals.

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 3>Some of them are tough. I have a couple of

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 3>ones that I really really like.

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to be interested to hear what you have

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 2>to say about them, But a lot of them it's

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 2>kind of like, I don't know, like this easily could

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 2>be like ten games over, ten games under, and I

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 2>really have no idea, which Twyileen. So I'm excited to

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>talk about these today for sure, because you're right, there

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 2>are a lot of places that.

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 3>We really need to dive into the number.

0:01:32.200 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and if you're looking to dive into these numbers,

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>make sure you hit up Betting Pros because that's the

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 1>site for you. It's our extension of Fantasy Pros and

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's for all your betting information. They do a

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 1>fantastic job here of taking all the different sites, all

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the different win totals. You could see everything, look at

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>where the values are on the board, and make your

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 1>good informed decisions. And that's what we're about here, a

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>little entertainment, a little information, a lottle of this, a

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>little of that, and we got you covered here on

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.919
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros. So let's start. Let's start with the Yankees,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the team that is either loved or hated, depending on

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>what side of the aisle you're on. But the win

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 1>total for the Yankees big time expectations as always, And

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing with these big teams, whether it be

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in football, the Dallas Cowboys that have big followings, you know,

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>certain teams, the Yankees, you're always gonna have a premium

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because of the kind of team they are, the big

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>base fan base. So the aggregate here is ninety five

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half. That's about what you're getting at most

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:28.240
<v Speaker 1>spots for the New York Yankees. Now what's interesting about

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>this is you look at them on paper, you see

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the talent, it's the rotation. I think that's got more questions.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>You've got Garret Cole at the top, no questions about him,

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:37.919
<v Speaker 1>But after that, how many ing is his tie on

0:02:38.040 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you? Is Corey Kluber gonna bounce back and

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>give you two hundred innings? Again, that's a distinct question

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>mark Domingo Herman, will sever Reno come back? David Garcia,

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is he ready to kind of make that leap? Dan,

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of questions, and that ninety five and

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>a half is a very big number. So with all

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>that in there plus oh yeah, there's a bunch of

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 1>guys that get hurt every year on the Yankees named

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Judge and Stanton. Throwing all that in there is this

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>tempting you to look potentially at the under of this

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety five and a half.

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of a stay away for me. I wouldn't

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 3>go over.

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>I would say that I'm not going over with it

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 2>for the exact reasons that you said. Corey Klueber is

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the number two starter like you, that's not a rotation

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 2>that should be, you know, for a team that should

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>be expected to have ninety five and a half wins.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 2>It really is, with all the question marks in that rotation,

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.079
<v Speaker 2>just something where I can't go over it is the lineup,

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 2>but you mentioned it, man, you want a lineup where

0:03:29.360 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 2>guys are likely to miss time Between Judge and Stanton

0:03:32.600 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 2>and Aaron Hicks and everything like that.

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 3>It's really tough.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.960
<v Speaker 2>And the bullpen is good, but already they're dealing with

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>something we don't know the news. The news it just

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 2>broke this morning, but Britain is having an MRI. They're

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 2>a little worried about his UCL in his arm. That

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.400
<v Speaker 2>would be a big hit to the bullpen. So ninety

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>five and a half is a big number. There's no

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 2>way I would go over. But if they stay healthy,

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 2>if you get a bounce back really from either Tyne

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 2>or Kluber, they easily could.

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 3>D this number. So for me it's a stay.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 2>I lean slightly the under, but I'm basically not betting

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>it either way.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm not a big fan of the you know,

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I really like this number. Feels really good, But I

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>don't really like this number. It feels really good, it

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>feels right about where it should be, and the reason

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>is because of the variance of the pitchers. Even if

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 1>they get good innings out of those guys, my concern

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>is do they get enough of them and then the bullpen,

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>which is the strength. If they start having an injury

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>or two, then we're really into the weeds. And I

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>think when you're looking at the overall picture of the

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>East Den, it feels a little bit, at least to me,

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>like the Rays and Blue Jays are going to be

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>far more competitive than I think people realize even last year,

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that's going to enter into it now.

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 1>Going to those Rays who made it to the World Series.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 1>I went on record last year all over the place,

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and I said that this is a season that is

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>built for the race. It's sixty games. The Red Sox

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>are not competing this year. The Yankees are not gonna

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to go out there and acquire big ticket

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>items and they can absorb all these big salaries because

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.240
<v Speaker 1>they're the Yankees or they're the Red Sox. So the

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Rays are actually, for the first time competing on a

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>very level playing field. And when you know it, they

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>made it all the way to the World Series.

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But now we're back to one sixty two. So here's

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>the question. No Snell, No Morton. I know they have

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that whole little league pitching thing, which you're a big

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>fan of the little league pitching.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 3>I know that.

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I know you got lots of little league commitments going on.

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Eighty five and a half is the number four of

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the Rays, the reigning defending America League champs. So do

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>you think this is achievable with these losses in the

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>rotation and now the factor in that we're back to

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the one sixty two marathon.

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 2>I do, but I really just do because I just

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.799
<v Speaker 2>kind of with the Rays. I just kind of close

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 2>my eyes and say, I believe in whatever you want

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>me to believe, because when you look at this team,

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 2>you're like, how is this team even a five hundred team?

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean you look at the rotation, you know, I

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 2>mean when they lost Snell, you mentioned that lost Martin,

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 2>You're like, Okay, Chris Archer, Rich Hill, Michael waka Colin McHugh,

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean at got glass. But yeah, that rotation is

0:05:58.520 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>not something.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 3>That scares you.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Sure they're going to be doing like you throw three innings,

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 2>you throw three inngs, you throw three innings like that,

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 2>which is fine, and their.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Mountation sounds like a sleeper list from twenty eighteen.

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 3>Correct.

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>That's that is my favorite most hilarious rotation ever, the

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>way you just put them all together and maybe go

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>what year is it?

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.480
<v Speaker 3>That's what the rotation is. I didn't do anything, I legit,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>just read the rotation.

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.359
<v Speaker 2>And the lineup also is just like you're like, okay, Meadows,

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 2>I like you for a bounce back, Brandon Lao always

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 2>you know, developed power, Maybe buy into Randy a Rosarina maybe,

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 2>but then you're like, okay, who's your cleanup hitter? Ohg Manchoy,

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Like this is not a lineup that you're scared of.

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I do like the bullpen. I love Nick Anderson.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think what you saw from him during

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the season last year is closer to what you're gonna get.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 3>I know he fell apart in.

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 2>The postseason, but I do expect them to be back

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 2>to pretty much normal, which what he was.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 3>You know. I like Castillo and Fairbanks is fine.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So you know the last three years ninety ninety six

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 2>and then last year they were one hundred and eight

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 2>win pace at eighty five and a half. This sounds terrible,

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 2>but I lean the over, but only really because I'm like,

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:06.599
<v Speaker 2>they know what to do to get the most out

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 2>of their players, and I think that they are going

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to be competitive.

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 3>It's a good division. It's tough, but I lean slightly over.

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's all I have to close my eyes because

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 2>when you look at the actual parts, you're like, oh god,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 2>this is disgusting.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 3>So slightly over, but not not hammering it or anything

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>No, I'm not hammering this one either. I would also

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>lean the over. If I'm going to lean one way

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>on this one, it's because I think the addition at

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>some point in the time in this year of wander

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Franco to this offense is going to be a big boost.

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 2>And what do you always, by the way, with him,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 2>when do you expect him to come out?

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, sooner than later. I don't know if it's going

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>to break camp. But my goodness, he's got off to

0:07:40.920 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 1>a great start.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's like he's kind of forcing their hand. And

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I know he could play third base, they say, and

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and maybe you know he plays second base and low

0:07:48.320 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>move somewhere else. I know there's a lot of discussions

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, but I think last year you knew they

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>weren't going to push Wander Franco. They just weren't going

0:07:55.480 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>to do it.

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:07:56.880 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>This year, this is a totally different set of circumstances.

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>And what you can can't acquire big time guys like

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees can, like the Blue Jays probably can, like

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox can. What you can do is add

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>guys from within, which is what they did last year

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Rose Arena and which they can do this

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>year with Franco. So those are the difference maker guys.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they will go over. They will find a

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.119
<v Speaker 1>way because they always do, and they have a nose

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:19.520
<v Speaker 1>for getting the best out of these guys unless right, Chill.

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I know he's one hundred and ten years old, but

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a good signing. Like I actually

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>think that was a good pal for them, and it's

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>hard to replace Moreton end Snell. I think that's a lot.

0:08:28.480 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But they're gonna get creative they always do ye and

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna manage their way. I mean, you're looking at

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>basically four and a half games above five hundred. Are

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>the Rays a better than five hundred baseball team? In

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, I think they are, So that's why I

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>would go, are they five games better? Probably not much

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.559
<v Speaker 1>more the Blue Jays however, at eighty six and a half,

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 1>they're even higher in most spots than the Rays. And

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody's drinking the kool aid. And I love the Blue Jays.

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited about them. However, this is another team

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.959
<v Speaker 1>that after he hunred Reyu, there's questions in the rotation.

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like the theme right now with

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the American leagueast as we continue on here, there's a

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>guy at the top. It's cool, it's glass. Now it's uh,

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it's injured for you. And then after that, I don't know,

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we'll see what are the guys and the rest of

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>these rotations. So is the Springer addition enough for this

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 1>team to stay relevant over this time period and be

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in eighty six and a half above or do you

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>think maybe the hype is a little bit. I don't

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>know too much too soon for these Blue Jays.

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>I think it's enough to go over their rotation. You're right.

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean there is a lot of horrible rotations, which isn't.

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Good when you're in a division with a lot of

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>really good lineups.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 3>But the rotation is gross. I mean Robbie, Ray, Tanner, Roark.

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully Nate Pearson can stay healthy, but even if he does,

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be limited in innings. Matt Stephen Mattz,

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 2>which you and I both know well of course as

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Mets fans, and Ross Stripling had a terrible year last year.

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Maybe bounces back.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:50.400
<v Speaker 2>The rotation is bad, but they are going to score

0:09:50.480 --> 0:09:52.280
<v Speaker 2>so many runs, especially now they're going to be playing

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 2>in Dunnaedean. I think that's how it's pronounced, by the way,

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:56.680
<v Speaker 2>but that is an extreme Dunedin.

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:57.679
<v Speaker 3>Dunedin.

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, all right, it doesn't matter.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 2>Somebody tweeted us and figure out that has Adjo piece

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>be a seventy okay. But regardless of what it is,

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>it is an extreme hitters park. And you go to

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 2>that lineup and it's not just Springer. By the way,

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I kind of really liked the under the radar signing

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:16.760
<v Speaker 2>of Marcus Simeon too, because now you look at that,

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 2>look at that lineup, Joe go down from the top

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 2>to the bottom. It's Springer, Bashett, Semion, Tascar, Hernandez, Vlattie.

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Bugio Guriel. Like that is a lineup.

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they're gonna probably win a lot of twelve

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 2>ten games given everything like that. They don't have a

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 2>great bullpen. I do like Herbie Yates, but he's got

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 2>to bounce back and we need to see that and

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 2>everything like that. The thing is they have a farm system,

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 2>right They have a very solid farm system. So if

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 2>they're in contention, they're going to go for It's clear

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing. They are going for it right now.

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 2>So even though the pitching staff is weak, even though

0:10:47.720 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the bullpen is mediocre, unless Yates returns to top form,

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:53.199
<v Speaker 2>in which case they have one of the best closers

0:10:53.200 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 2>in the game, I think the lineup is so good

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>that they're going to be able to slightly surpass the

0:10:58.240 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 2>eighty six and a half wins. They strike me as

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 2>more of like an eighty eight twin team, So I

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 2>lean the over here. Again, not my favorite bet on

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>the board or anything like that, but I do like

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the over.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, we could also make it up and call

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>it Dunidin, which would sound a lot more like a

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Lord of the Rings place. Yeah, you know, I think

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>that's where you have to do. We give us take

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the ring to Dunidin, and when you go there find

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the three eyed pro And yeah, it sounds like that.

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like a big game of thronesy, sort of Lord

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>of the Rings. He kind of plays. You know, you

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>gotta watch out. You don't want to be caught in

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>after dark and Dunidin it's a very dangerous place. Boston

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox eighty and a half ugly. It's the only

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>way to discuss the Red Sox season last year. Eighty

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the number. So they're basically just saying, eh,

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>let's throw our hands up. It's a five hundred team,

0:11:41.360 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>another team that has a lot of questions in the

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 1>rotation now at Twardo Rodriguez looking good this spring. Yep,

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>perhaps you get a healthy Chris sailback at some point.

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think when you're looking at this injury to Xander Bogarts,

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 1>you're slightly concerned. It seems like it's going in the

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>right direction. However, sometimes things like that tend to linger.

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think it's a question of can they

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>score runs. I think we all know that they can.

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just a matter of the bullpen the back of

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the rotation. Yet again, here again, this is just what

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the East is right now. It's kind of you know,

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>you've got those front end pitchers and that's kind of

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>tough to figure things out. So in my opinion, I

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>think this is again another number whereas I feel good

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>about the Rays over the Blue Jays is another one

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>where I feel barely good about that. I would lean

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>towards the over. There the Red Sox, I'd actually lean

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 1>towards the under because I think they're still more I

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think basically this number is because they're the Red Sox,

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>And I know that sounds crazy, but I think you

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>can get people to wager on the over based on

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the brand instead of really paying attention to what the

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>roster looks like. Because I think the roster still has

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>enough holes that they're probably just slightly under a five

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:45.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred team.

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 3>Yep, I agree with that. I lean under.

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I think if you put them in another division, maybe

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you could see them getting to above five hundred. But

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 2>in this division we just talked about it, three very

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 2>very good teams, one not so good team, which we'll

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 2>talk about next. But with those teams, I feel like

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be really tough for this team to get there.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And again you mentioned the rotation. All the other teams,

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 2>they all have your one guy, right, they all have

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 2>all right, this is our guy. At least they don't

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 2>have a guy.

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, EDWARDO.

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Rodriguez is a fine pitcher and I'm really hoping that

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 2>he returns.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>To full health.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.719
<v Speaker 2>But that is not an ace pitcher, I mean, nor

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 2>is Nathan Devaldi. So their rotation is really not strong.

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 2>And their lineup, hopefully I mean, is Jadi Martinez. I'm

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 2>buying into the bounce back for Jadie Martinez, but we

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 2>still need to see it. And Xander Bogart's again is

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 2>already dealing with the shoulder thing. I don't think that

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 2>the lineup is going to be the red Sox lineup

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 2>of old and the bullpen is just mediocre. I mean,

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:41.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't trust Matt Barnes to close games or Adam

0:13:41.880 --> 0:13:43.920
<v Speaker 2>out of you know, whoever wins it. The rest of them,

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 2>braz Or, Sawamura, Hernandez, like, they're just not that impressive.

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.040
<v Speaker 3>So for me, again, I lean the under here.

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>This is not as strong this division. The numbers are

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 2>not strong. I don't get a stronglyan. There are other

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 2>spots where I have much stronger leans. I lean under

0:13:58.880 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 2>like you, I think we see this the same way

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 2>in another division, maybe over, but in the East, I'm

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 2>going under.

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I just think this is a carryover from last year.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>You know this, Yes, last year was ugly, but they

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have not fixed enough of the issues. Where are the

0:14:10.600 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>issues that they fixed? They're not there.

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think they're operating more like a small market team,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.840
<v Speaker 2>which is fine. I like I you know, the GM Bloom,

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we almost hired him for the Mets job

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 2>before we hired Brody van Wagon and that that's sort

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 2>of the way he operates, right Like, he comes from

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>a small market background, and its fine for them, that's

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing. But I think everybody kind of needs

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to understand that is what they're doing. They're not sort

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 2>of wasting things right now. They're fully content to not

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 2>be in contention this year. So it's a team that, again,

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 2>if it comes down to it, if they're not in contention,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>they'll be willing to sell off pieces that they can

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 2>and build up for next year.

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So I do lean the end I think they can make.

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll say what, I think you can make some money

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:49.760
<v Speaker 1>on the Red Sox under this year. I do. I

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>just think too many people are just buying into the

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>concept that it's it's the Red Sox They're going to

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be better. No, I think they're still in this transition,

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and they might even be into it in the first

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>half of twenty twenty two. All right, let's go into

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the next one. Here, the Baltimore Orioles close out the

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 1>East sixty four and a half. Not the greatest number,

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>sixty four and a half. You're gonna lose about one

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred games or so. So here's the idea. It's whether

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>or not you believe that they're just gonna get pummeled

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>by the rest of this division, which I think they

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>probably are. You know, the low numbers typically I see

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the low number and I like to go over. I

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>like to give some parts a little bit work. Of course,

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>now I have a hard time doing that here. I

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>just gonna be honest with you. Are you having the

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>same hard time?

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh, I'm under I'm character Ye.

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 2>It's such a low number, but yeah, this is one

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred lost team.

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 3>Like it just is. I mean, Joe, you and I

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.480
<v Speaker 3>do fantasy baseball.

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Obviously we are fantasy baseball, Quoe unquote experts and you

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 2>I like John.

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 3>Means like I do like them.

0:15:47.080 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>M I don't think before I kind of was really

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 2>digging into it, I could have named another Oriole starter.

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 3>Can people listening right now name another starter?

0:15:56.960 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Jim Palmer, Jim.

0:15:58.280 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Bomber was at one point start.

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Dylan Bundy was not a good starter for them before

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 2>he went to the Drews.

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 3>It's I mean Keegan Aiken.

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.320
<v Speaker 2>Dean Kramer or he Lopez, Like, this is not a

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 2>major leaguer talk about some rotations. This is not a

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 2>major league rotation. And their lineup is fine. You and

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 2>I are big tray man senior guys. I like Ryan Mountcastle,

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 2>but not good enough to compete with these other lineups. So,

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and the bullpend isn't great at all. So there's just

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 2>nothing about this that screams you're gonna be able to

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 2>like become a sixty five sixty six win team in

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>this division again, where every team, even the Red Sox

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 2>are not gonna be terrible. We're not like a seventy

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 2>six win team. They're gonna be a round five hundred.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 2>So for me, it's a low number. But yeah, this

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 2>is a team I'm fading. I will go under the

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 2>sixty four and a half here with the Orioles.

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I kind of worry because they're gonna play teams

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>from the central two and there's some better teams they

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>were gonna get into a second, and I think that's

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to be where I would lean the under as well.

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:52.520
<v Speaker 1>It's because of the rest of the league. Even when

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>they go play West Coast road trips and some of

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>those teams in the West that are gonna give them fits,

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the Angels are gonna give them a hard time. The

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>A's look, but let's let's move on to the White

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Sox here in the central because this is one where

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I am excited right now. Ninety one and a half

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>here we go. I'm finally excited. Why I always get

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>excited when it comes to the Central I don't know why.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a I'm just a Midwestern kind of guy.

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, are you excited for the over excited.

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Danny boy? I am excited for the over ninety one

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half going on? Have we seen this lineup?

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 1>They added Lance Lynn, he's a horse, Lint, Giolito, Kikeel,

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>They've got some other guys too. They've got Dylan cs

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and Lopez and who knows what Kopek can give them.

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>They fixed the ninth inning when they brought in a

0:17:34.760 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>shutdown closer. You have a lineup that doesn't quit. Oh

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, ninety one and a half. I saw this

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and I just wanted to immediately go and find all

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the places where I could go and wager on it,

0:17:44.240 --> 0:17:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because I do feel like this is something where they're

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not giving the White Sox enough credit, and I think

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it's time we do, because this is a team that

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is young, that is hungry, that already proved last year

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the concept and now they're just coming back for more

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and they've got the rating MVP on their team as well.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>In jse Bree, you, I just think this team is

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>much better than people realize and I also think this

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>whole division, you know, Minnesota and the Indians are going

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Cleveland baseball team, as it might be right now, it's.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Going to take are still the Indians, right? I think

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 3>they don't know all.

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Right anyway if they are changes either way either way,

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it's safe to just apologize. So White Sox

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:23.199
<v Speaker 1>for you ninety one and a half? What do you do?

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 3>I kind of stay away from it, But all right.

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Here run through the village on this one.

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 3>Let's point out a couple of things. Okay.

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.720
<v Speaker 2>Number one, there are books out there FanDuel, in particular

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.959
<v Speaker 2>ninety and a half, so if you like it, you

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 2>can get it even better at ninety one and a half,

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 2>which is a consensus ligne. Again, on our betting pros

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Consensus MLB Betting Pros dot Com slash MLB Wins, you

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 2>can look at the win totals for every team, the

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 2>consensus line, and the individual sports books.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 3>So you're looking at it.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 2>The consensus line is ninety one and a half, but

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 2>there are a couple of Fox bet fandel that are

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 2>at ninety and a half, seeing ge an even better

0:18:56.640 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 2>line if you like the over, if you're.

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Available to bet in those markets. Here it is You're right.

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Everything you said is right, and I've dug into this

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 3>team and I can't poke holes in it. Okay, it

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 3>really can't. Their lineup is extremely extremely strong. It just is.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 3>There really is no holes in it.

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>There are rotation you mentioned it, Linn, and especially a

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 2>year like this where you're coming off where you don't

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 2>know if you can count on the innings that you're

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 2>gonna get from most pictures, you can count on the

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 2>innings you're gonna get from Lynn.

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Gilido is great, of course, Kiko is very good.

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.639
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the back end of their rotation is a little weak,

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 2>but you mentioned it that got Copec waiting to come

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 2>add basically the best closer in the game, and Aaron

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 2>Bummer was probably okay to step in even if not.

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Here's what worries me, Joe, And it's probably silly to

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 2>give this this much credit because there are teams that

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>projection systems just kind of you know, they can't get

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 2>a hold of, like the A's and the Braves, right,

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the projection systems are always way below them. The projection

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Pakoda right, like one of the most well known projection

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 2>systems eighty two and a half wins.

0:19:55.520 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>That's what they had for the Braves too or something.

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I agree the break there are certain there are certain

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 2>teams historically, and they do it every single year. And

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 2>they also overvalue a couple of teams every year, which

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 2>we'll get to one of those teams we get to

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the West.

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 3>They undervalue certain teams every single year because.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I think they can't quantify certain parts of their team,

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 2>whether it's the deepense or you know with the Rays

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.200
<v Speaker 2>sometimes the way they're able to, you know, basically outmaneuver everybody.

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what it is with the White Sox,

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 2>and historically I don't think they go under on the

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 2>White Sox. So I've been thinking that that that makes

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 2>me extremely worried. When a projection system is nine wins

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 2>nine wins different than what the over under is, so

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 2>I nine times I you know, I'm just basically I

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 2>understand over. I'm not betting the under, but I'm staying

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 2>away from it.

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 3>And it's a simple thing. And people want to be like,

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 3>what do you mean.

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 2>So you like the team, you think they could go over,

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 2>but the projection system is so far down, so you're off.

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say it, but I am, because when

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>it's that big a difference, Joe, A nine win difference

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.199
<v Speaker 2>for me is enough for me to say, am I

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 2>missing something with this team? And I can't quantify it yet?

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>So for me, I'm staying away. But if there is

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 2>a way to go, it is over.

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I will agree with you that closer check, rotation check,

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I got you check, depth in the system check. I

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:11.160
<v Speaker 1>got more checks. I got more checks. I want to

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>checks check list. So power check, speed check, defense, big check.

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 1>A lot of good defenders too. Madrigal is a good

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>defender and over the app Now, honestly, it's gonna be

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>tricky with Vaughn playing d H what you do with

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the lay not the greatest defender, but he's gonna be

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>out there. But I think that's part of the acquisition there,

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>of bringing in the man. Meeting too is strewing up

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of the outfield defense. So all right,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:35.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you right now, I think they're closer to

0:21:35.920 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>one hundred win team than they are a ninety win team.

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, So you're you're really going over here. Maybe

0:21:41.560 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 3>maybe it's maybe for me, maybe what's holding me back.

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 3>In addition to Pakoda is Tony LaRussa, Like, what happens.

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.919
<v Speaker 1>The one check I did not check because I don't.

0:21:52.320 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 2>You you conspicuously forgot the manager. Yeah, I think for

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.119
<v Speaker 2>me again, you know, maybe it's gonna be anything. You're

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>going to see a bat flip Like this team is

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 2>young and cool and loose and.

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 3>Bat flippy, and I feel like you're gonna be like,

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 3>did you just bat flip your bench for three games?

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:08.879
<v Speaker 3>And stuff like that. You could feel like it's the.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 1>Same guy who manages the A's flipping bats and thy

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago.

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Man, another time, that was a whole nother time.

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Only the versa cares about one thing, winning. If they're winning,

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>they could do whatever the hell they want. If they're

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>using that's a different story.

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:25.159
<v Speaker 3>All right.

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you work for Pakoda and you are listening

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 2>to this podcast, mess m me on Twitter and explain

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 2>to me why you're saying.

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>When you say Pakoda, I always think of Bill Pakota

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>or like immediately and that shows my age.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 3>I just put that you're an old man.

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>All right. Minnesota Twins are next eighty eight and a half. Now,

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.359
<v Speaker 1>this number feels right to me. This is one that

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm running away from. Uh, the Twins, I could do

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the opposite checklist. Everything could break right, but Donaldson's health couldn't.

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>This could be finally the year Nelson Cruz, God forbid,

0:22:56.920 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>isn't Nelson Cruz, Sario is gone, still hasn't taken that

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>step forward. My Ada is coming off a career year,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>all these things. Buckston's always hurt, no strikes out every

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>five seconds. There's so many negatives. I can look at

0:23:10.119 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this team and I think that that's a sound way

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of looking at it. And if you could look at

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 1>all those negatives, it would tend towards an under But

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that not every negative is going to happen

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>for the Twins. So I think this is a good number.

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:22.719
<v Speaker 1>This is a stay away number for me. I'm bullish

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>on the white Sox. I am passive about the Twins.

0:23:25.720 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Minnesota this year? In that

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:28.200
<v Speaker 1>eighty eight and a half?

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 2>I agree with you that it's a pretty It seems

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 2>like a pretty sharp number to me. And again, you

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 2>know the last two years one hundred and one wins

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and then they were on a ninety seven win pace

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:37.239
<v Speaker 2>last year.

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.200
<v Speaker 3>It's a good team and not that much has changed.

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 2>But I agree with you like it is really easy

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 2>to see this falling off a cliff because again, Nelson

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Cruise is a thousand years old, and although everything looks

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 2>good and he continues to get it done, and he

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.440
<v Speaker 2>continues to be undervalue generally, like the wheels fall off

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 2>for every.

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 3>Time, eventually, eventually except that except it's true, not obviously,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:58.080
<v Speaker 3>but Buckston, you're right.

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean if Buckston, if I knew Buckston were gonna

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 2>be healthy the whole season, I would love it. But

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously never is Josh Donaldson feels like he's about to

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 2>break down. Is Miguel Snow gonna play to the eightyeh percent?

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 2>All of his possible outcomes are the twentieth?

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 3>You never know? But their team is like it's it's solid.

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean that the big you know, Brios, my Eta,

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:19.359
<v Speaker 2>and I like Pineda. I like adding Jay Happ at

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 2>the end of the rotation as well. I like adding

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 2>out Klome, who continues to get it done despite Miniogre

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.439
<v Speaker 2>stuff in the bullpen. So it does strike me as

0:24:26.480 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 2>a team that's gonna be above five hundred. But there's

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 2>enough downside for me if everything goes right that I

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>agree with you, I kind of want to stay away

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.640
<v Speaker 2>from the numbers, it's a solid number something I don't

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 2>really love.

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's better than five hundred team, but I don't

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 1>think they're a ninety win team in that stay away. Now,

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>this next one, I like the over two. It's the

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland baseball team, the Indians eighty one and a half.

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:49.640
<v Speaker 1>And the reason is they have pitching. You know, when

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we talk about all these other teams that go, oh,

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>what about the three and the four and the five, Well,

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>guess what this is. One goes all the way. You know,

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>you start with Bieber, who's probably the best pitcher in

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the American League besides Garret Cole. You can have that conversation.

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>But then after that, you've got Plisek, You've got Savale,

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:07.920
<v Speaker 1>who I think very highly of. You've got Tristan McKenzie.

0:25:07.920 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's always the sense that Cleveland will find

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a way, and they keep rereading these young pitchers and

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.160
<v Speaker 1>turning it over. And yes, they did lose lind Door,

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>but they did bring in Rosario and that's good. And

0:25:18.880 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like from the Indian standpoint, they have

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the manager, they have the pitching that's enough to be

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>more than a five hundred team, and they're just giving

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 1>them five hundred. Eighty one and a half is five hundred.

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>They're better than that. They're eighty four eighty five in

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, somewhere around there. So for me, I actually

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think Cleveland's gonna have a streak or two in the year.

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna put them over five hundred because that pitching

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 1>can be so dominant at times, and that is something

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.199
<v Speaker 1>that other teams don't all have. So when they go

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and play some of the lesser teams in the East

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>or in the West, they're gonna feast on those teams

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>with that pitching. That's my take on Cleveland. What's yours.

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm not like running to the over here just because

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Cleveland every single year. And again it's

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 2>we talked a little bit about it with the Rays.

0:25:57.880 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 2>It's like their whole is greater than the summer their parts.

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 2>They're somehow able to do it. They are masters at

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.120
<v Speaker 2>getting these guys like Poli, Sach and Savale who are

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 2>like command guys without the greatest stuff, and turning them

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>into borderline dominant pitchers. I don't know how they do

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 2>it every single year, but they are able to get

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that done. Obviously, Karen Tech if he's dominant in the bullpen.

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 2>I know he had a little bit of some control

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>issues and that you know, his first appearance there, and

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.600
<v Speaker 2>that might rear their ugly head.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Their lineup is not great.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 2>I think adding at A Rosario really helped a lot.

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 2>And you know fran Mill's there of course. Jose Ramirez,

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, man. I feel like when I look

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 2>at the parts, it's like a five hundred team and

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>they will it surprise me if they go over.

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 3>No, because they always find a way to be better

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 3>than I feel like they should be. But it strikes

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 3>me as a five hundred team.

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:52.040
<v Speaker 2>So I mean for me, I guess you know, if

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 2>I had to go one way or the other, i'd

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 2>go over.

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 3>But there's an over that I like in this division.

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:57.359
<v Speaker 3>We haven't gotten there yet.

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:00.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, maybe it's the Kansas City role. Let's

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>see what Dad thinks about them. Seventy three and a

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>half is the number. Now, this is I think a

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>very competitive team. My problem is competitive and wins don't

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.120
<v Speaker 1>always go hand in hand yep. So that's the tough

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.360
<v Speaker 1>selling point for me on the seventy three and a half. Now,

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I would lean towards the over here slightly because I

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>am actually going to go in the under and the

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>next team, and I think that's where the variance comes from.

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Royals are closer to the other group

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.879
<v Speaker 1>than they are the bottom tier. But what do you

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>think about the Royals, because I'm guessing that's the one

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about because there's only two left. And I

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's the Tigers.

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not smashing the over.

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Not a guy.

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:39.480
<v Speaker 3>It is the Royals.

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 2>It is the Royals in seventy three and a half.

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 2>They are my favorite one in the division and it's

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 2>over and I think again part of it is I

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 2>don't like the Indians.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 3>As much as you.

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I have some probably you know, unfounded concerns about the

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>White Sox.

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 3>The Twins might not be as good as they.

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Usually are, and I think the Royals are where they're

0:27:57.640 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 2>going to make up a little bit of the difference.

0:27:59.080 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about it. On the fantasy side. We really

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 2>like what they have done this offseason for that sneaky

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.400
<v Speaker 2>good offense, right like with Meryfield, Andrew Ben and Tenny

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 2>who you and I both think can bounce back with

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 2>the change of scenery sal Perez.

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Carlos Santana was a nice little just sneaky little ad jorgez.

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Sohilaire still has the power you've got at Albert Delmandesi

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna probably lead the league in steals.

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 3>Hunter Dozer we like as a bounce back who they

0:28:22.119 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>signed to an extension.

0:28:23.240 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Michael Taylor finally is gonna get some regular playing time

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 2>and he can do some damage.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 3>The lineup really from top to bottom.

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't blow you away. It doesn't have superstars, but

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 2>it's a long lineup. It's gonna be tough to get

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 2>through them.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 3>And I like the rotation.

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Not love the rotation, but I think they've got enough

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 2>quality arms that they're going to be able to put

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 2>out somebody pretty much each and every time through the rotation.

0:28:44.440 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be like, this guy should keep us

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 2>in the game, whether it's Duffy or Kelly Keller pardon me,

0:28:50.640 --> 0:28:53.040
<v Speaker 2>or minor or Singer. I mean, I think that those

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:55.080
<v Speaker 2>guys are gonna be able to do it. Greg Holland

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 2>like maybe the Wheels fall back off. I feel like

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 2>they fell off and came back on and they might

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 2>fall off again.

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>That's fine wheels anymore.

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 3>The eighth in a guy.

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:07.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh, guy's been on donuts. It's fuir, I'm pretty.

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Sure, or stomach. I forget how to pronounce them. Stalmont,

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 2>he's done it. He their reliever, the needed really throw.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 2>He throws gas so he can really step in again.

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that the fact that they signed Dozer to

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 2>the extension. I think this team sort of feels like

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>it might have arrived quote unquote a little earlier than

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 2>they expected, and they're willing to kind of play themselves

0:29:31.960 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 2>into contention. So this strikes me as like a high

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 2>seventies win team. I still think they'll probably be below

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 2>five hundred, but it strikes me as like seventy eight

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 2>seventy nine win team for me.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 3>So I really like the over. This is one of

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 3>my favorite bets of the season.

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Wood Junior is pushing the envelope a little bit too.

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I like me some Bobby Wood Junior. I was very

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>high on him when he was drafted. I thought that

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>was a great pick by the Royals, and he looks

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like he might force their hand at some point. I

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's a willing to do it.

0:29:56.280 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 3>But by the way, I will say, Joe, it was

0:29:59.000 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 3>seventy three and a half.

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That's what we had, will double check e seventy three

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 3>Correct, it just dropped to seventy two and a half.

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 3>So now I'm even going more because again.

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>In the middle of this conversation, wait, I checked before,

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 2>right before it was any that's what we do.

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>We moved here at ed Bruce.

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm going and again I you know, as I said,

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the consent assign now has moved to seventy two and

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 2>a half. There are seventy three and a half, so

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>it's basically right in between. But for me again, I'm

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 2>a New Hampshire DraftKings seventy two and a half, juiced

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.520
<v Speaker 2>a little bit towards the over, so I get it,

0:30:30.920 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>but I'm taking it with seventy th and a half

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 2>all day long, all.

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Right, last one here Detroit Tiger sixty eight and a

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>half spoiler alert under for me, yeah, I'm sorry, I'm

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>just not buying this like I'm just this is a

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>very competitive division. It's a deep division. Yeah, And I

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>actually feel better about this under than I feel about

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the Baltimore under by a long shot, because I'm getting

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:54.680
<v Speaker 1>four games difference here. So I'm gonna hammer an al

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>under on a terrible team. The Tigers are the one

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to me because this is one of the tougher divisions

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>where I think all the teams ahead of them are

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>just clearly a cut above. So that's my take, and

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think the rest of this team is

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to take over yet. They're gonna be a fun

0:31:08.200 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>team in a couple of years, and that sounds great,

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>but you know what, it's twenty one, so it's not

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>happening this year.

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 2>That is the correct answers. I used to like to

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:17.400
<v Speaker 2>say on the fantas side, I agree with you. I'm

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 2>under on this too. And I feel bad because like

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 2>it feels so easy to take these horrible teams and

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 2>they've got really low wind totals and you're just like.

0:31:24.560 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't care, it's not low enough. But I agree.

0:31:26.400 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 2>And again the Tigers, basically they've come out and said

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 3>They're like, we are lowing our payroll. We don't want

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 3>to you know, We're.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>We're slashing prices.

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 3>We are overloaded with the Migey contract. So we've got

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 3>these guys.

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 2>On one year deals. We will sell them all off

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.640
<v Speaker 2>at the deadline. We will wait for our young kids

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 2>to be here.

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 3>They have no.

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Interest in trying to be competitive this year. They have

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 2>very little talent on their team. So sixty eight and

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 2>a half they were at a sixty four win pace

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 2>I believe last year. So I agree with you. I

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 2>know it's the bottom feeders, but I will take the

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 2>under them both.

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on to the west here. The

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Houston Astros are at the time top of it. Theoretically

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>with eighty seven and a half. They just lost fran

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bervaldez probably for the season. I guess they probably were

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>still waiting to figure that out.

0:32:08.040 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Forrest Whitley, by the way, where a fractured finger takes

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 3>you out for the whole.

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Man, I saw that thing. I saw the fractured finger,

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>was like, oh, well he'll be behind. And then like

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty four hours later as he could miss the whole season,

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and I thought, what I can imagine if this was

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>in the sixties or the fifties, they would say like, well,

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 1>just just patch it back up and go pick pitch.

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Seven years with no thumb, how do you think he

0:32:28.280 --> 0:32:29.560
<v Speaker 1>did that? Let me tell you something good.

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh god, so old, I'm so sorry. Everybody.

0:32:33.320 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 1>A forward pitch, it's a. It's a baseball reference. But anyway,

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the rotations falling apart, and we haven't even started. Like

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Forrest Whitley has got the UCL so he's done.

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Forget that.

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Second opinion is gonna be the same as the first opinion,

0:32:45.240 --> 0:32:47.840
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna be Tommy John and I think the

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Astros are gonna be good. I just want to stay

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.480
<v Speaker 1>away from the Astros again. I see too many variables here,

0:32:52.520 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 1>and when I see lots of different outcomes with the team,

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and this could be a team that smashes this number.

0:32:57.800 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 1>They could win ninety four games this year. Yeah, I'm

0:32:59.640 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>telling you they have this kind of talent still on

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.959
<v Speaker 1>this roster. If Alvarez bounces back, if Altuve is right

0:33:05.000 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and plays one hundred and fifty games, if they get

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Zach Greenki to really lead this rotation, and maybe mccollor's

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>or somebody else steps up in that void. But there's

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 1>too many bots. And that's my problem with the Astro

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>so eighty seven and a half, Sorry, I'm out. I'm

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 1>not nearly as excited as I was about the White Sox.

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So your turn, Astros eighty seven and a half, What

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>are you doing?

0:33:24.040 --> 0:33:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Uh? Yeah, I'm going over.

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>I feel less happy about it after the Cramberg Valdez

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:34.280
<v Speaker 2>injury for sure, and obviously Whitley, but I'm still over again.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:36.360
<v Speaker 2>This is a Pakoda sort of variance, not that I

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 2>live and die by Pokoda or anything like that, but there.

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like you do I don't. I just think you've

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 1>got stock in Pakota after this show.

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't mind it.

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 2>But the bottom line is that when there's a huge

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 2>difference between Pakoda and the Window, like, there's a reason

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 2>that I try to sort of dig into why that is.

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 2>And again, sometime they undervalue the Braves all the time,

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 2>and the Rays too, so they're not the be all

0:33:58.080 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 2>in all. But I do like Houston and again the

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Imber Valdez like that. That's terrible. But that whole lineup

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 2>is going to bounce back, right like everybody like Bregman

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and altuvan krah And you saw even in the playoffs

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 2>how Altu van Kraa already did kind of bounce back.

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.680
<v Speaker 2>So I expect the lineup to be really good again

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:16.840
<v Speaker 2>if Alvarez is healthy.

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:18.879
<v Speaker 3>Finally Tucker is in there ready to go.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 2>So I like the lineup a lot and their ritation

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 2>again they immediately went out and signed Oderezi right like

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 2>immediately sort of did that to sort of say, okay,

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 2>well we've got to figure it out. And I don't

0:34:27.640 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 2>love Oderezy, but he'll give you innings. And then the

0:34:30.440 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 2>rest of it is finer. Kiati Is is not terrible,

0:34:33.239 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Javier is fine. I like mccullors as a bounce back, really,

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I do, and with Granky, So for me, this is

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:42.640
<v Speaker 2>a team who I realized, like there's no Verlander anymore,

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 2>of course, and then they lost Valdez and all that,

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 2>but it still strikes me as a team where the

0:34:46.840 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 2>lineup is good enough, the management is good enough. I

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 2>think actually Dusty Baker now has become from this guy

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 2>who burned out all his pitchers to a guy who

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 2>is kind of like listening to analytics at this point

0:34:57.640 --> 0:34:58.399
<v Speaker 2>from what I can tell.

0:34:58.640 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 3>So I like it.

0:34:59.200 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna go. I think they're more of

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 2>a ninety one team, so I will go with you

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 2>over here. Even with the Valdez injury.

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>My biggest disappointment is I don't get to sing my

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:09.480
<v Speaker 1>song about Franber Valdez because on the DFS show last year,

0:35:09.520 --> 0:35:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it was always Framber was the color of my energy

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time, and I would sing that song and

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.320
<v Speaker 1>every time he had a quality start, which was a lot,

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and I made a lot of money. What franber Valdez

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>last year? So Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim eighty three

0:35:24.320 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Ooh, another team. This is really whether

0:35:26.840 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 1>or not you believe in doing Bundy. I'm telling you

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>right now. If you believe in doing Bundy, then you

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.560
<v Speaker 1>like this over if you and show hey, O Tommy,

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>if you think those guys are going to throw I

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know, one hundred and let's say three hundred innings

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 1>between them, let's say one hundred and fifty for each

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>let's throw that out there, or one hundred and I

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like some combination one sixty one forty. I don't care

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 1>whatever you want to do. If you believe in those

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:51.239
<v Speaker 1>two guys, I think you liked the eighty three and

0:35:51.280 --> 0:35:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a half. Otherwise I think this is the same old Angels, like, yeah,

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it could be good. Maybe, but at

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, it's the pitching that said

0:35:58.239 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they're undoing.

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm happy I get to do this because we were

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 2>joking about me in Pokoda Pakoda has them at eighty

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 2>six wins and I love the under here okay.

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.959
<v Speaker 3>At eighty the eighty three, wow, I like the under

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot. I don't get it with this. I just don't.

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't get it. They haven't. I don't think they've

0:36:18.760 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 3>gone over this number.

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. All I know is Mike Trout has

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>three playoff appearances?

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.839
<v Speaker 3>What since fifteen? Twenty fifteen? I just looked it up.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Twenty fifteen was the last time that they have gone

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 2>over eighty three and a half wins. And I don't

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:36.000
<v Speaker 2>understand what is so exciting about this year where suddenly

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 2>we're like, look at this team, Okay, look at.

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 3>The improvements we had. What are the improvements?

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 2>Like, I like, Dylan, Buddy, there's no way I'm relying

0:36:42.200 --> 0:36:44.759
<v Speaker 2>on shoe Aotani by the way, There's just no way.

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 2>And like, okay, is this the year Andrew Heeney is

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 2>finally gonna stay healthy and really take that next step.

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 2>Hosea Jose Kintana, you know what he is at this point,

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.800
<v Speaker 2>he'll give you. It's like they were just I kudos

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 2>to them for basically being like, we are going to

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 2>make up for our lack of top end talent by

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.000
<v Speaker 2>just throwing a thousand pictures in there, and so like.

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 3>When we lose one, we can throw another mediocre start.

0:37:05.320 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 2>I like Griffin Canning, but I don't expect them necessarily

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 2>to stay healthy the whole year. And Cobb, I mean,

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 2>at this point, their rotation just isn't good. I like

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 2>that they added a Glaciers, but they're bullpen still as

0:37:14.560 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 2>a whole is not great. Defensively they are bad. They

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.359
<v Speaker 2>lost Andrelton Simmons as well. So really, I just don't

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 2>get this team. This is not a five hundred team.

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 2>To me, I don't understand it. And I again, I

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 2>think the A's are again going to be good, and

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 2>we'll talk about them in a minute. And I like

0:37:29.320 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 2>the Astros a lot more so. Maybe it's that, but

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 2>I do not understand that. I love the under end

0:37:35.320 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 2>this one. I'm not going near the eighty three and

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 2>a half wins under all that.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>I thought they should have signed Trevor Bower. I thought

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that was the thing.

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Why aren't they going out there and signing like a

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:47.680
<v Speaker 2>really really top end pitcher, you know what? Instead they

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 2>do they're like, let's just add a mediocre outfielderer like

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 2>that that's sort of there. You know, they have so

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 2>much money, go out and assign the top end of

0:37:56.080 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 2>the rotation starter Already.

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>It's puzzling, to say the least. The Oakland A is

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:04.440
<v Speaker 1>also always undervalued. Every year now a little less, so

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:06.320
<v Speaker 1>this year, eighty six and a half is the number

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:09.239
<v Speaker 1>this actually feels about right now. Here's the thing. If

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>you can find eighty five and a half somewhere or

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>even something lower, at some point, I would think about that.

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Here's what the A's for me is. If this young

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 1>pitching all clicks ye, if it's aj Puck, if it's

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Hazel's Lozardo, if Montas bounces back, they're gonna crush this.

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, they're gonna be probably fighting with Houston

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:27.919
<v Speaker 1>for the top of this division. If you're pitching does

0:38:27.960 --> 0:38:31.240
<v Speaker 1>what they're capable of? The question is innings. The question

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>is the war of attrition, and if the A's are

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>up to the task. So I'll ask you do you

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>think they are?

0:38:35.640 --> 0:38:36.880
<v Speaker 3>I think so, yeah.

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I mean I don't feel as strongly about it as

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I do on the Angels.

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:42.920
<v Speaker 3>And again, they're at eighty six. Everywhere. Every book is

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:44.520
<v Speaker 3>eighty six at this point. So this is eighty six

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 3>and a half. That's we're going to get it again.

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 2>This is one I'm just pointing it out because we

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:49.880
<v Speaker 2>were teasing about me that this is one where Pokoda

0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 2>is under, like significantly under. But again, this is one

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.239
<v Speaker 2>where I think they just don't whatever their projection system is,

0:38:55.600 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 2>they don't know how to capture what these teams are

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 2>that are so forward thinking. And yeah, I like again

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 2>another one where like the whole is greater than the

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 2>some of their parts, you know.

0:39:05.960 --> 0:39:06.480
<v Speaker 3>Their rotation.

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 2>As you mentioned, Bassett is kind of a sneaky, decent

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:13.080
<v Speaker 2>major league starter, right Lozardo who we like for the upside.

0:39:13.120 --> 0:39:15.359
<v Speaker 2>I really like Frankie Montass. Sounds like he's recovered from

0:39:15.400 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the COVID nineteen. Shan Manya obviously is there. Mike Fires

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:20.759
<v Speaker 2>is all there. They're all fine. They you know, they

0:39:20.800 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 2>lost Hendrix, but they've got Rosenthal. He's battling a groin

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 2>injury right now, but sounds like he'll be okay. The

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:28.080
<v Speaker 2>lineup as a whole is just solid. It doesn't blow

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 2>you away, but they find ways to sort of do it.

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 2>And they added Elvis Andris. It's basically been a ninety

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 2>seven win team. You give them their pace from last

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 2>year for three straight seasons, Like, this is just a

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 2>team that knows how to win games. They're well coached,

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:43.800
<v Speaker 2>they're well managed. So eighty six and a half, I

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 2>lean towards the over. I'm not as excited about it

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:47.920
<v Speaker 2>again as I am about the under on the Angels,

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 2>but this is the one where I lean definitely towards

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:50.239
<v Speaker 2>the over.

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, two other teams here before we close things out.

0:39:53.080 --> 0:39:55.720
<v Speaker 1>We got the Seattle Mariners at seventy two and a half.

0:39:56.360 --> 0:39:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Tricky one because we're excited about some of the young talent.

0:39:58.440 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 1>But this kind of sounds like something we saw about

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>before with some of these other teams, Like, Yeah, I'm

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.280
<v Speaker 1>excited about Detroit's youug talent, but where are the wins?

0:40:04.440 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Seventy two and a half once again? Kind of feels

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.600
<v Speaker 1>about right, Yeah, ten games under five hundred. Yeah, that

0:40:09.640 --> 0:40:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the Marinders to me.

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's a hard pass for me. How about for you?

0:40:13.880 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 3>Man?

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 2>I love it when we disagree on things, but I

0:40:17.200 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 2>do not disagree with you here.

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:20.239
<v Speaker 3>This is like a hard pass from me.

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 2>There's a line that I say to my wife when

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 2>we're joking, which is a line from Brooklyn nine nine,

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 2>which is after zero consideration, I can confidently say hard pass.

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:30.360
<v Speaker 3>And that's basically how I feel on this.

0:40:30.400 --> 0:40:31.839
<v Speaker 2>Like I looked at this and I was like, yeah,

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:35.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess it could all go really well, but no,

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 2>this is like ten games under five hundred.

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:38.279
<v Speaker 3>It's exactly what this team.

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, not ten games, but ten games you know,

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 2>over what it would take to get to five hundred.

0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what this team looks like to me, So

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.680
<v Speaker 2>hard pass, staying far away from it, no interest in

0:40:46.719 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 2>betting it either way.

0:40:47.760 --> 0:40:50.359
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a Texas Rangers sixty seven and a half,

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.960
<v Speaker 1>another one too, where I just don't see him mat

0:40:53.120 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, sometimes with a team, you want to see

0:40:55.200 --> 0:40:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a plan. I have no idea what the Rangers plan is.

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 1>The Rangers have no idea what their plan is. I

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>see Joey Gallo, I see some home runs. I see

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll probably win somewhere around I don't know. Sixty seven games.

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Once again, just hard passway because I don't I don't

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:11.640
<v Speaker 1>see how they get above it, and it's already too

0:41:11.719 --> 0:41:13.399
<v Speaker 1>low of a number where if I had to lean

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I probably lean slightly on the over here, just because like,

0:41:16.480 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if they're closer to losing one

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred games as this total is telling you. But then again,

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at the rest of this rotation, you go,

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>oh maybe, I mean, this is another rotation that is

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it's brutal. They are the pitching haves and have nots,

0:41:30.120 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and I just think over one sixty two this year

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:35.239
<v Speaker 1>off the COVID season, where people don't have any stamina,

0:41:35.480 --> 0:41:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it is going to be glaringly obvious, which is why

0:41:37.520 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I keep coming back to Cleveland because Cleveland does have that,

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that is a huge separator where if

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna give you a five hundred Cleveland team, you

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>take your shot on that one because it's a good

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:49.479
<v Speaker 1>chance that that pitching wins out over the long haul.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>But the Texas Rangers sixty seven and a half, I'm out,

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>where are you?

0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:55.200
<v Speaker 3>And it's a good point on Cleveland.

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I think that's try every now and

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>then something smart once everyone.

0:41:58.719 --> 0:42:02.879
<v Speaker 3>Show firshit, I look, this is something.

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Where I like you, this is not like one of

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 2>my favorite bets on the board, I actually have forced

0:42:06.440 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 2>to choose. I would lean under there are sixty six

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 2>and a half's out there, so if you know at

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.120
<v Speaker 2>that point, especially stay away. Sixty seven and a half,

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 2>I kind of lean under. Again, this is a team

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:18.080
<v Speaker 2>that a does not seem to have interest in competing

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 2>this year. The bullpen is really bad. Jose Leclerk, I

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.920
<v Speaker 2>guess will Close, and I Jonathan Hernandez now I just

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:26.720
<v Speaker 2>today has something apparently with his jucll and his elbow.

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 2>So the bullpen really is not going to be good.

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.760
<v Speaker 2>The offense, I like Willie Calhoun, and I like Joey.

0:42:32.560 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 3>Gallo, and that's about it.

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 2>And the rotation is just yeah, it's I mean, I

0:42:36.960 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 2>like Dane Dunning, you know, as a long term guy,

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:41.600
<v Speaker 2>and but yeah, Kyle Gibson is your number one.

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:42.440
<v Speaker 3>That's just not gonna work.

0:42:42.520 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>So, oh god, I.

0:42:45.480 --> 0:42:46.319
<v Speaker 3>Would lean under.

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 2>I would lean under, but I'm not nearly as strong

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:52.840
<v Speaker 2>as the Tigers and the Orioles, the bottom feeders of

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 2>those divisions. I like those much more so. Mostly a

0:42:55.120 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 2>stay away from me, but I had, if I had

0:42:57.080 --> 0:42:58.120
<v Speaker 2>to choose, I would lean under.

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>All I want to remind everybody hit us up at

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>bettingpros dot com, and of course you could check out

0:43:03.600 --> 0:43:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the MLB win totals at bettingpros dot Com, Slash MLB

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>wins Dan anything else going on fun and exciting in

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the world of VP.

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Uh these days, We've got so much March Madness stuff

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 2>that's about to drop.

0:43:16.440 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be awesome.

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna have this bracket optimizer, which I'm not even

0:43:19.680 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 2>gonna tell you about yet because I'm gonna wait till

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:25.200
<v Speaker 2>the launches where it is going to be spectacular. You

0:43:25.239 --> 0:43:27.760
<v Speaker 2>are going to be able to fill out a bracket

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:31.040
<v Speaker 2>depending on where your play and your your scoring system

0:43:31.080 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 2>that they warred points on it, depending on the size

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:34.320
<v Speaker 2>of your pool.

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:35.399
<v Speaker 3>You can start with a.

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Consensus sort of picks of people who have put in brackets.

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:40.400
<v Speaker 2>If you like, trust a bunch of people like we

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 2>do with consensus experts. It is going to be spectacular.

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 2>Be on the lookout for the bracket optimizer. We will

0:43:45.680 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 2>have more about that next week.

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I need a life optimizer. Let's let's get working on that.

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We get the life optimizer and then we're then we're

0:43:52.560 --> 0:43:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all set.

0:43:53.160 --> 0:43:55.600
<v Speaker 3>So we're in works for it for you. But it's

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 3>like forty years in development, so we got.

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I'm not going anywhere. I have a very long

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>term contract here Just to recap too, I am very

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 1>bullish on the White Sox and the Indians. That's where

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:10.920
<v Speaker 1>really I'm looking Dan. Final thoughts here as we close

0:44:11.000 --> 0:44:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the close the door on the American League win totals.

0:44:14.040 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I love the Royals over.

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I think this team is definitely going to be closer

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 2>to five hundred than people are giving them credit for.

0:44:20.360 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 2>At the same time, I really like the under on

0:44:22.960 --> 0:44:24.399
<v Speaker 2>the Angels because.

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:25.080
<v Speaker 3>I do not get it.

0:44:25.120 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 2>They are poor defensively, the rotation is mediocre at best.

0:44:28.480 --> 0:44:31.040
<v Speaker 2>The bullpen is just okay. So those are my two

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 2>favorite over on the Royals under on the Angels.

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:35.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, that'll do it for us, but the story

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of the game goes on. For Dan Harris, I'm Joe Pizzapia.

0:44:38.640 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time, kids,