WEBVTT - Ed Yardeni Says It’s Not as Bad as You Think 

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Meron Talks Money, the podcast in which people

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 2>who know the markets explain the markets.

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm Merensumset Web. This week I'm speaking with Edir Danney,

0:00:25.360 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 3>President at Yadanney Research.

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Ed is the economists and investment strategist who coined the

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 2>term bond vigilantes in the nineteen eighties. It's made quite

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>a comeback since Donald Trump's reelection, most recently around the

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:39.919
<v Speaker 2>question of whether an extended bond sell off will make

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 2>it difficult for Trump and his allies in Congress to

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 2>push through their big, beautiful tax bill. We're going to

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 2>get into this talk about how the bond market is

0:00:47.320 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 2>pressuring governments across the board. We're going to talk about

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 2>equity markets. We're going to talk about gold, bitcoin, and

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 2>what Ed is writing about at the moment. Ed welcome

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 2>to Meron Talks Money. Thank you for joining us again,

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 2>very kind, Thank you very much. Now we should probably

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>start with exactly what I said in the introduction. We

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 2>should start with what is going on with developed world

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 2>bond markets.

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 3>Yields rising all over the place.

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 2>That was particularly in Japan, but quite a lot going

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:15.120
<v Speaker 2>on in the US as well.

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 4>The global bond market, particularly in developed countries, is seeing

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 4>some stress clearly. I think there's mounting concerns about fiscal accesses,

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 4>unsustainable fiscal policies that need to be addressed politically, and

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 4>there's not any confidence that the politicians have the willingness

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.880
<v Speaker 4>to tackle these things now. I think we're seeing it

0:01:37.319 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 4>most clearly and immediately in Japan right now, where the

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 4>twenty year bond auction went off rather poorly, the thirty

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 4>year and the forty year yields rose along with the

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.800
<v Speaker 4>twenty years, so that was kind of the beginning of

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:56.720
<v Speaker 4>the alarm bell being sounded in the Japanese credit markets.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.919
<v Speaker 4>The ratio of their debt to GDPs over two hundred percent.

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 4>The central Bank has purchase much of the bonds issued

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.679
<v Speaker 4>by the treasury in Japan, and now the Bank of

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Japan has recognized that they have an inflation problem, so

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 4>that policy basically terminated two years ago, and now it's

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:20.480
<v Speaker 4>all coming back to haunt them. Here in the United States,

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 4>things are still going relatively well. The ten year yield

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 4>has been remarkably stable around four and a half percent,

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 4>which seems to be fine. It's just that thirty year

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 4>treasury yield. The spread has widened over the tenure, and

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>we're getting closer to five percent, and so there is

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 4>an unease that the bond market. The bond vigilantes in

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 4>the United States are watching what's going on with the

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:47.640
<v Speaker 4>budget negotiations very closely, and if they're not happy with

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 4>what the results are, there's a potential here for something

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 4>similar to what's going on in Japan, kind of a protest,

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 4>if you will, by the bond vigilantes, and that raises

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 4>the question of whether the politicians will recognize that and

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 4>respond appropriately to it.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Pretty interesting, isn't it. This pops up periodically, doesn't it.

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 2>And it's obvious to everybody that levels of Japanese debt,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 2>levels of US debt, of course, they're not sustainable.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:15.119
<v Speaker 3>This is not sustainable long time.

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 2>You can't have one hundred percent of your debt GDP ratio,

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 2>you can't have two hundred percent. And sure, maybe you

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 2>can net out a little bit with what the central

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Bank holds, et cetera, but you've still got a major problem.

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 2>But it pops up and it goes away. It pops

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 2>up and it goes away. It's never actually dealt with,

0:03:31.800 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 2>and we know, there aren't really very many ways to

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 2>deal with it.

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:36.840
<v Speaker 3>So we just put it off, put it off. But

0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>is this time any different?

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question. I've been doing this for over

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 4>forty five years, and for that entire period on a

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 4>regular basis, naysayers, pessimists, doom sayers saying this time we're

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 4>finally going to have to pay the price for our sins.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, borrowing is sinful, and eventually you have to

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 4>pay the price for that. And yet here we are

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 4>with the stock market almost worldwide at a record high.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 4>Economy is still growing in the United States. It's slowed

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 4>down in Europe. It's had a little negative quarter in Japan,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 4>but all in all, the economies have done quite well.

0:04:16.080 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 4>You have some very smart people today like read Dalia,

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 4>walking around telling us that a debt crisis is imminent,

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 4>and well, it looks like he may be getting it right.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 4>In Japan. It really just hasn't happened yet. In the

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 4>United States. We had a glimpse of what it could

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 4>look like in twenty twenty three when the bond deal

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 4>went from four to five percent. We had a minor,

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.720
<v Speaker 4>little glimpse of it. On April eighth of this year

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five, when the bond yell rose from four

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 4>to four and a half percent on April eighth, and

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 4>that was basically in protest of Trump's tariff turmoil, and

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.720
<v Speaker 4>the response was very quick by the administration to postpone

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 4>the reciprocal tariffs anyway, So the bond vigilantes are still

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 4>out there. They're still interested in maintaining law and order.

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 4>They prefer that fiscal and monetary policies are disciplined so

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 4>that they don't have to take on that role, but

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 4>they're ready if they have to assert their concerns. The

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 4>only question is if they do, is whether the politicians

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 4>will respond. And of course this is a great opportunity

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 4>for the bond vigilantes to get the attentions of the

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 4>politicians in the United States because we are negotiating a budget.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's go back to Japan brief. Maybe there is

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 2>a genuine crisis brewing there there. I know I've written

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 2>that art call myself quite a lot of times over

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>the last couple of decades, but maybe it's real this time.

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 2>You do have this phenomenally high ratio and you have

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 2>very long time yield, well over three percent now when

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 2>we were used to them long term knocking around one

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:42.799
<v Speaker 2>percent or below.

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:44.359
<v Speaker 3>It is quite a big deal.

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Huge.

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, if that does develop into a genuine crisis, what

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 3>does that mean?

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 4>I tend to be an optimist at heart. So the

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 4>notion that the pessimists have been promoting that one day

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 4>they'll be auctions in the United States and now maybe

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 4>in Japan where nobody will show up, or the Japan

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 4>and the United States will default on their payments, I

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.479
<v Speaker 4>think that's nonsense. We saw in twenty twenty three a

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 4>mini debt crisis with a yield going for four to

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 4>five percent, as I mentioned, and at five percent there

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.480
<v Speaker 4>was just a ton of buying. So there's always going

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.960
<v Speaker 4>to be some yel at which there'll be investors saying,

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 4>you know what, this is pretty good. This will probably

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 4>slow the economy down and bring inflation down, and who knows,

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 4>maybe they'll even cause the politicians to get the message.

0:06:34.520 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 4>But the bond vigilantes are not the only players in

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 4>this game. The central banks are involved, the treasuries are involved.

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 4>In the United States, and November first, twenty twenty three,

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Treasury Secretary Jenny Yale and basically told the bond vigilantes.

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 4>If you don't like my bonds and my notes, you

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:53.440
<v Speaker 4>know what, I won't issue any additional ones. I'll just

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>issue the usual load, but I'll do what I need

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 4>extra in the bill market, and that like a charm.

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 4>There's ways that the central banks and the Treasury can

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 4>still buy time and to avoid a day of reckoning.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 4>But if there's a day of reckoning, the deficits are

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 4>a man and a woman made problem. They can be

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 4>easily fixed. All we have to do is slow down

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 4>the pace of outlays and increase the pace of receipts.

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 4>It's the political challenge of getting that accomplished that has

0:07:25.200 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 4>stymied any progress on deficits. It's just, you know, Americans

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 4>and maybe Japanese and Europeans and others don't do pain

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 4>very well. And we would just as soon pay for

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 4>entitlements by issuing debt rather than raising taxes. At some

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 4>point that could come back to haunt you, and it

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 4>may very well be at this point, but it doesn't

0:07:47.200 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 4>have to be doomsday, kind of like what happened in

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 4>two thousand and eight. There was a financial crisis, all

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 4>hands on deck, and we did respond to it. The

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 4>politicians responded to it. They came up with a program

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.239
<v Speaker 4>called TARP to bail out the banks. The first round,

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 4>the stock market hated and took a huge dive on it.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 4>One week later they came up with a new, improved

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 4>TARP that fixed things. So this could be a process

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 4>that last a few weeks. If we do, in fact

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 4>get something that feels very much like a dead crisis,

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have to be the end of the world, would it.

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 3>Maybe it not be such a bad thing. Get it

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 3>over with.

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 2>It's that thing we all know is coming right hanging

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 2>over us for decades. In a way, it'd be quite

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>nice to get it out of the way, have a

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 2>bit of a reset, force everyone to rethink their fiscal priorities,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 2>and just get moving again in a better way.

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 4>The way I've built with that uncertainty is I've said, look,

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 4>I'll worry about it when the bond market worries about it.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 4>And that's been a useful way to watch it because

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 4>people have been worrying about it all the time, have

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:46.920
<v Speaker 4>missed the great equity market. There was opportunities in the

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 4>bond market. You don't want to get too pessimistic about it,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 4>because there's pretty straightforward solutions. They just require some political will.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 2>And you're optimistic on the US economy as a whole. Right,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Lots of conversation about coming recession over the last few months,

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 2>and you now think it's about a thirty five percent Chanson.

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>I love the way you describe this recession. You call

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 2>it the gotto recession, the one that we're always waiting

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 2>for and never ever arrives. And you'll view that hasn't changed,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 2>has it?

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 4>The past three years We've had the most widely anticipated

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 4>recession of all times that never happened, as you said,

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 4>the goodeaux recession, the no show recession. And I bet

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>on the resilience of the consumer. I'm a baby boomer.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm still working for a living, but a lot of

0:09:29.679 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 4>my friends are retiring. And collectively the baby boomers have

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 4>eighty trillion dollars in net worth. That's half the net

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 4>worth of the household sector. The savings rate is probably

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 4>going to turn negative here because they're not earning money,

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 4>but they have a ton of assets and they are

0:09:45.440 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 4>spending that money. In addition, the fears that capital spending

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 4>was going to take a dive because of the uncertainty

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 4>with tariffs, now, and with monetary policy over the past

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 4>three years, I don't think that's playing out well. Some

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 4>capital spending is going to be postponed. More than fifty

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.359
<v Speaker 4>percent of capital spending is now in technology and technology

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 4>capital spending is something that's almost imperative. You have to

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 4>spend on technology in order to stay competitive. And to

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 4>give Trump some credit, because everybody focuses on the fact

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 4>that it's created a lot of turmoil, which you would

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 4>think is basically bad for capital spending. At the same time,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 4>you know, he keeps collecting these IOUs from foreign governments

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 4>and foreign companies saying that they intend to spend hundreds

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 4>of billions in the United States for on shoring. Imshoring

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.439
<v Speaker 4>has been going on over the past four years since

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Biden created some legislation that stimulated it, and I think

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 4>it will continue to go on.

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So relatively confident about the US economy and as

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 2>a result, still confident about the US market. And there's

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 2>one thing you said that it's the kind of thing

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 2>that makes me a niny bit nevs about the US

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 2>market is that you mentioned the savings rate going negative

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and the baby boom is moving very firmly from their

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 2>accumulation period into their decumulation period, and that changes the flows.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.599
<v Speaker 4>It does, But I'm also thinking that there's going to

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 4>be younger generations that are increasingly investing in the stock market.

0:11:22.360 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 4>As I said, the baby boomers are sitting on a

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:28.199
<v Speaker 4>record eighty trillion dollars of net worth. We've never had

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 4>a retiring generation this rich, but it's a nature of

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 4>the beast. Young folks don't have much in net worth

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 4>and over the years they accumulate it, and so the

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 4>younger ones are in that process now. And I don't

0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 4>think the baby boomers are going to be able to

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 4>spend eighty trillion dollars. I think there's going to be

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:53.600
<v Speaker 4>a lot of inheritances, and based on my own experience

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 4>and my discussions why a fellow baby boomers, I think

0:11:56.559 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 4>there's a lot of intra generational income and wealth chance

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 4>is going on right now. So I think that's what's

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 4>been missing in the discussion of the consumer. Everybody's been

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 4>talking about as though there's only kind of one kind

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 4>of consumer experience. In fact, there's many, And the baby

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 4>boomers are doing very well. The younger folks aren't doing

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 4>as well. That's where you're seeing delinquency ratios going up.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 4>But the parents are definitely helping out.

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 2>In my next life, Ed, I'm going to be the

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 2>child of an American baby boomer. That's what I'm aiming for.

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's a good position.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, everyone who believes in reincarnation should definitely be aiming

0:12:31.559 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 2>for exactly that. So you're one of what comes what

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.560
<v Speaker 2>backs up. What you say is that the buyers of

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 2>the dips all the way through this volatility of the

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 2>last few months, the buyers have been retail investors, ordinary

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.760
<v Speaker 2>people picking up on the dip, haven't they. I haven't

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 2>seen any of those U shaped dips that you might

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 2>have got maybe in the old days. Now everything is

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:53.320
<v Speaker 2>very the market goes down, retail buyers come in, market

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 2>goes up.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.199
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely. I mean the fun flows data that is available

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 4>showing that retail investor are the ones that are keeping

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 4>this market going. They're in a good position because I

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 4>think it seeped into their consciousness that stocks really have

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.959
<v Speaker 4>to be abled for the long run. Somehow, I think

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 4>they appreciate that more than the baby boomers really appreciated it,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 4>And I think that they're viewing sell offs as opportunities

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 4>to buy stocks. And I think they have a long

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 4>term mentality. Again, I may be generalizing from my kids

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 4>and some others that I've talked to, but with my

0:13:28.280 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 4>limited sample that I've talked to, I'm surprised by their

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 4>steadfastness and how they didn't freak out with the market

0:13:35.280 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 4>selling off, whereas my baby boom generation I remember lots

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 4>of freak out situations. As a matter of fact, I'm

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty proud of my forecasting record and calling bottoms, And

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 4>one of the reasons I'm so good at it is

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 4>I've got a relative who always calls me upright at

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 4>the bottom and says that he should I get out.

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 4>So I've witnessed more of that among my peers.

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, interestingly, I think we will got one of those,

0:13:58.080 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 2>one of those relatives. Maybe the rest of us recognize

0:14:00.600 --> 0:14:02.559
<v Speaker 2>it as well as you do. Yeah, so you think

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 2>they're right to be buying in now? There is still

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I would say, from the other side of the Atlantic,

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 2>you look across to the US and certainly we feel

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 2>a lot of concerns about the US market and evaluations

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 2>is still very high. There's an enormous amount of uncertainty.

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 2>Anything could happened from here. The idea that America is

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 2>permanently exceptional. That spell seems to have broken a bit,

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 2>and so we would wonder if those retail investors pouring

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 2>money into the US market might not be wiser to

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>be looking overseas.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 4>I've been promoting the idea of stay home rather than

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 4>go global since twenty ten. That doesn't mean I'm telling

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 4>people not to invest overseas. I've just been recommending over

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 4>waiting the United States, and I may overstay my welcome

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.480
<v Speaker 4>with that concept, but I'm sticking with it. We do

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 4>have seven exceptional companies here, the Magnificent seven, and this

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 4>recent correction was basically led by them. They had more

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 4>than just a correction, They had a bear market. They

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 4>were down like twenty five percent. The overall market was

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 4>down eighteen percent for the S and P five hundred,

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 4>and there was a lot of concern that they were

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 4>spending too much on AI and would never get a

0:15:12.440 --> 0:15:15.320
<v Speaker 4>return on that. And they came back and said, We're

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 4>still going to spend that kind of money because we'd

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 4>still think we're going to get a return on it.

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 4>You know, some of these are cloud companies, and the

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 4>demand for computing is only going to increase in this

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 4>what I call the digital revolution that started in the

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 4>mid sixties. If that's the case, these are continue to

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 4>be exceptional companies. Not much debt, a lot of cash flow,

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 4>tremendous innovations, and they are uniquely Americans. It doesn't mean

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 4>that there aren't great companies overseas, but everybody seems to

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 4>recognize the exceptionalism of these companies, which does reflect many

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 4>aspects of the exceptionalism of the US economy.

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 2>And are you worried about earnings in the near term.

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm reading a couple of your notes. I see that

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 2>you've been writing a bit about earning. Earning his consensus

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 2>focused softening slightly.

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, in the near term, there's certainly concerns. The Trump

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 4>tariff turmoil has been moderated somewhat, but there's still plenty

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 4>of it out There, still plenty of uncertainties related to

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 4>where this is all going to lead. The tariff itself, certainly,

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 4>the basic tariff of ten percent is in effect a

0:16:23.120 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 4>tax on corporation, so it's got to hurt. We recently

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 4>saw the President respond to a big retailer by saying,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 4>don't dare raise raise your prices, And if they do

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 4>raise don't raise their prices. That'll affect their profit margins.

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 4>And there's found to be some kind of stagflationary scenario

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 4>unfolding here the next few months, with higher inflation and

0:16:46.040 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 4>slower growth. But I think the market's looking past all that.

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 4>I think the market has come to conclude that the

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 4>president needs to get this behind him as soon as possible.

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 4>The midterm elections are coming next year. You can't really

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 4>afford to have a sesshould occur now or certainly not

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 4>early next year, and so I think the market perceives

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.159
<v Speaker 4>that he will continue to blink, and that along the

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 4>way he'll declare victory and move on to this big,

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 4>beautiful tax bill, which the jury is out on that

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 4>whether it's big and beautiful or big and ugly. I'm

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 4>waiting to see how the bond market votes on all that.

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 4>But it's a volatile time right here, and I think

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 4>retail investors are right to see his opportunities to buy,

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 4>let's say, buy on the dips. So I think that

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 4>will continue to work.

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 3>So a bit of a melt up into the end

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 3>of the year.

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 4>Maybe well, you know, I'm struggling with the question of

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 4>whether we're going to have a melt up in the

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 4>stock market or a melt down in the bond market. Obviously,

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:48.000
<v Speaker 4>if we have a melt down in the bond market,

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 4>we're not going to get a melt up in the

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 4>stock market. You know, I've told my accounts that I

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 4>reserve the right to change my forecast as often as

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 4>the President seems to change his mind. But I do

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 4>try to maintain some objectivity and stability in my forecasting.

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:07.479
<v Speaker 4>And I think the market's right. This too sholl pass.

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 4>And We've got a tremendous amount of technological innovations ahead

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 4>of us, whether it be humanoid robotics, more automation, autonomous driving,

0:18:18.520 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 4>artificial intelligence. All these technologies are are not pie in

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 4>the sky. They're here and they're being implemented. I think

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 4>they're going to have a tremendous impact on productivity. So

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 4>I've been talking since twenty nineteen that this decade could

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 4>be turned out to be the Roaring twenty twenties. First

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 4>half of the decade worked out great so far, you know.

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Then it looked like things started to slip up here

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 4>for a Roaring twenty twenty scenario, But I think it's

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 4>making a comeback here and it's based on the idea

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 4>that technological innovations will boost productivity because there are shortages

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 4>of skill labor, and productivity means better economic growth, lower inflation,

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 4>better profit margins, and higher real wages and makes everything better.

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 4>And so I'm still counting on that, and I'm trying

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:12.199
<v Speaker 4>to get positive feedback from the stock market, and I

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 4>have been until this correction, but we thought it would

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 4>be a correction. We didn't think it would be a

0:19:17.440 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 4>bear market. So far, so good, and within the market's

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 4>kind of back to signaling that the Roaring twenty twenty

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 4>scenario might still be very much intact.

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, although I suppose it is possible. In fact, history

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 2>shows us is over and over again. I'm a financial

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 2>walking tour of Edinburgh yesterday and we walked around the

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 2>railway station and all that kind of thing and talked

0:19:40.440 --> 0:19:43.119
<v Speaker 2>about the various booms and busts and how often it

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 2>is that you have an amazing technological revolution, Yeah, alongside

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 2>disastrous investing environment. These two very often go hand in hand.

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 2>So the assumption that because you have a decade or

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 2>two decades of astonishing technological advancement, it is not a

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.680
<v Speaker 2>even that alongside that an awful lot of people make money.

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Generally a lot of people lose money. And it's in

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 2>the second way when the productivity gains really come through

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.639
<v Speaker 2>that the next lot make the money.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I guess it's Schaumpater's notion.

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Of creative destruction.

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 4>Creative destruction for the help the idea that capitalism, by

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 4>its very nature is constantly innovating and coming up with solutions.

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, when I studied economics, it's like a lot

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 4>of first year students. I read Samuelson's book on economics,

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 4>and he defined economics as the study of how you

0:20:39.600 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 4>optimally allocate scarce resources. It sounds like a very depressing

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 4>concept that you, oh, my god, there's only so much

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.919
<v Speaker 4>and we have to figure out how to divvate up.

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.679
<v Speaker 4>And then you get into these debates of whether the

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 4>government should do it through Marxism or state run economies,

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 4>or should it be done by the marketplace. I think

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 4>economics is all about technology solving the problem of scarce resources.

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 4>The way we know scare resources are scarce is because

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.199
<v Speaker 4>the prices go up, and then some entrepreneurs says, I

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 4>can do this better cheaper with these kind of technologies,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.120
<v Speaker 4>and that's what makes it so exciting. But it's very dynamic,

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.959
<v Speaker 4>and while you're creating, you're also destroying, and that's where

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the tensions come in. But I think

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 4>we're very much in that kind of environment right now.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 2>I like the idea that economic should not be about

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 2>allocating scares resources. We've been talking about that a bit

0:21:31.520 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 2>on the podcast recently, saying that the whole aim should

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 2>be to find, create, offer more and more resource so

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 2>that we consume more and more, rather than constantly working

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 2>towards trying to consume less. We should be open to

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 2>the idea that we should always consume more energy, more resources,

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 2>more land, etc.

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 4>Just take autonomous driving. We're not going to have to

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 4>own cars anymore. We can own them and rent them out.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 4>But that'll make the whole auto industry much more efficient.

0:21:57.640 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 4>We're all driving to work in the car sitting there

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 4>for hours on end. We're all coming back home at

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 4>night and the car is sitting there and the driveway

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 4>or garage hours on and now, imagine if we actually

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 4>use these vehicles, these digital devices more efficiently, then we

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.440
<v Speaker 4>will be using a few resources, certainly in that area.

0:22:17.080 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, my car is almost an extension of

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 2>my house. I currently see myself giving it up. You're

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 2>very optimistic.

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:26.800
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate that.

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>We don't get it often on the Marin talks money podcasts,

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 2>particularly about the US market, So it's.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 3>Good to hear. But what would make you change your mind?

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 3>What would happen?

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:39.760
<v Speaker 2>What confluence of events or ideas or changes is it

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 2>that would make you say, actually, do you know what?

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I've got this wrong? There's going to be a recession.

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 2>This market's going to correct. It doesn't look good anymore.

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>What should we be looking out for?

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 4>I'd watch out for when the pessimists become optimists in

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 4>my country, and instincts will come out and say that

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 4>something's got to be wrong here. As you said, I

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 4>tend to be a loone around these podcasts. There aren't

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 4>too many of us optimists out there, so from a

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 4>contrarian's perspective, it works. I've been accused of being a permeable,

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:13.919
<v Speaker 4>which I've used as a compliment. I want my tombstone

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 4>to say it. Yard Denny was usually bullish and usually right,

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 4>and I'm not saying that bragging. I'm saying that stock

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 4>market's are permeable. It tends to go up. Technology tends

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 4>to solve the problems that people think are going to

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:29.399
<v Speaker 4>bring us down. The debt crisis. I welcome it. I

0:23:29.480 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 4>hope we get a debt crisis in the next few months,

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 4>because it will probably be resolved in the next few

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 4>months as we scare the living daylights out of the politicians.

0:23:38.400 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 4>I hope that bonvigil Ani showed that they're more powerful

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 4>than ever. After all, there's more debt than ever, so

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 4>they must be more powerful than ever. I do tend

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 4>to see things more optimistically, but that's a contrary instinct

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 4>because it's being a pessimist. Is it's just a conventional

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 4>It's so easy to say how things are going to

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 4>go wrong. So as long as the pessimists keep coming

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 4>up with ideas a way could go wrong, I don't

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 4>have to work as hard on that side. So I

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 4>keep looking at what they're saying could go wrong, and yeah,

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 4>I think, right now, you've got people like great Dally,

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 4>We're very credible. Is a billionaire. By the way, I

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 4>don't know what it is about these billionaires that make

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 4>some pessimists. A lot of these billionaires just keep telling

0:24:17.640 --> 0:24:20.880
<v Speaker 4>the masses that they can't be even billionaires because we're

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 4>going to have a crisis any day.

0:24:22.280 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 2>So it's interesting because you're right, we get that a

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.439
<v Speaker 2>lot that the miserable billionaires, the world's going to end,

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 2>everything's awful, et cetera, et cetera, And they must have

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 2>been optimistic on the way up, because it's not really

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 2>possible to become a billionaire by being a miserable or

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:35.919
<v Speaker 2>good is it.

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 4>That's the way I'm looking at it. But I would

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 4>say right now the most credible pessimistic scenario is that crisis.

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 4>But you can pretty much count on me and tell

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 4>you why this is not going to be the end

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 4>of the world as we know it, and why it

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 4>might actually be a good thing. It might be might

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 4>resolve this issue once and for all.

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, although it will break various things in the financial

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.200
<v Speaker 2>markets that we didn't even know that were to be broken, well,

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 2>not always happens. He'll be stuff that breaks Shelby, all

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 2>sorts of things that we wouldn't have expected would come

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 2>out of a proper day crisis.

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 4>I'll respond to that by saying that was very true

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 4>in two thousand and eight, but we've made a lot

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 4>of progress in creating all kinds of shock absorbers in

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 4>the capital markets. People were certain that the tightening of

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 4>monetary policy over the past three years was going to

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 4>cause a financial crisis in a recession, and it didn't happen.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 4>And now they're certain that the tariffs are going to

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 4>cause some sort of crisis and a recession. We have

0:25:32.359 --> 0:25:36.159
<v Speaker 4>a very resilient economy and a very resilient capital market

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 4>in America, so it is resilient. Maybe Japan will turn

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.400
<v Speaker 4>out to be the mean poster child for what happens

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 4>when you borrow too much and at some point it

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 4>comes back to haunt you.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Maybe, Okay.

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 2>So in this giant equity market that is the US

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 2>market obviously a very keen on big tech. But for

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 2>an order investor looking at the market, not wanting to

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.719
<v Speaker 2>buy a passive fund, where should they be, Like what

0:26:00.840 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 2>sectors are interesting?

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 4>You know? I've been recommending overweighting information technology, communication services, industrials, financials,

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 4>so all the good stuff, all the stuff that does

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>well during good times, growth kind of companies. Not cheap.

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 4>They were cheap on April eighth, not as cheap anymore,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 4>but I would stay with them. Not to say that

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 4>the defensive stocks are cheap They're also very expensive because

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 4>there are a lot of pessimists out there who still

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 4>want to be in the market, but they don't want

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 4>to be in the gamey stuff, which is what they

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 4>would say my recommendations are focusing on. But yeah, I

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.880
<v Speaker 4>would overweight those sectors, and I would continue to overweight

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 4>the United States. I don't think the US dollar is

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 4>going into a major decline. I don't see how that's

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 4>possible when we have the world's largest capital market and

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 4>the most liquid capital market. So I think that just

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:54.120
<v Speaker 4>doesn't make sense.

0:26:54.680 --> 0:26:57.120
<v Speaker 2>What about smaller companies in the US. We keep being

0:26:57.160 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 2>told that's where the value is.

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 4>Well, they've been frustrating the smid caps, the small cap

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 4>MidCap stocks, particularly small caps, they've been cheap for a

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 4>long time and they just can't seem to get a

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 4>sustainable rally. Going definitely look more attractive in evaluation basis.

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 4>But maybe the problem is in this small cap arena

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 4>is all the good stuff doesn't go public very quickly,

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 4>and before it does go public, it gets bought out

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 4>by the Magnificent seven or some other large cap company.

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:27.920
<v Speaker 4>And then the other frustrating thing is if you happen

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 4>to come up with the next Microsoft. Then you're sure

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 4>it's going to be the next Microsoft, and you buy it,

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:37.399
<v Speaker 4>and you see this thing going up double triple, and

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 4>then all of a sudden somebody comes in and buys

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:41.520
<v Speaker 4>it from you. Well, that's great, you're going to have

0:27:41.560 --> 0:27:45.400
<v Speaker 4>a good one day return on your money when the

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 4>takeover is announced. But then you've got to go back

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 4>to the drawing board and try to find the next Microsoft.

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.199
<v Speaker 4>So it's a very frustrating kind of game to be

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 4>playing right now because you're competing against the investment banking

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 4>department of some pretty big.

0:27:57.760 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Companies, which is very bad for said markets overall, isn't it. Yeah,

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 2>it's possible that another reason why small caps aren't getting

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 2>the traction that you might expect small and mid sized

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 2>companies because of the shift towards passive and of course

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 2>the bulk of passive money goes into index funds that

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:16.800
<v Speaker 2>float around the larger cap level.

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 4>Very good point. Yeah, Active managers are almost always limited

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.639
<v Speaker 4>by what percent of their portfolio they can put in

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 4>any particular stock. Sometimes it's two percent max, three percent maximum.

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 4>You've got to have a certain diversification in the numbers

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 4>of stocks you own. The ATFS there's no restraint. You know.

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 4>Whatever the magnificence seven are in the S and P

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 4>five hundred is what they're going to be in the

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>atfs attract the S and P.

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Now, I know you've said definitely that you've definitely favored

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 2>the US and everyone should really be overweight the US.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 2>And but are there any other markets that you look

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 2>at and you think a lead, you know, that looks

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of interesting. You know, there's lots of talk about

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 2>rebalancing towards Europe because of Germany's fiscal splurge, because of

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 2>rising spending across the board. There are lots of talk

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 2>about how China is no longer an uninvestable market and

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 2>one should be there as well.

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 4>I'm in the China's uninvestables camp.

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:12.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh you still why is that?

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 4>I still am. I don't think that's changed. It's still

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 4>authoritarian regime that can change the rule of business very quickly.

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 4>More fundamentally, the governments destroyed the demographic profile of China.

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 4>It's very geriatric. You know. I've described China as the

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 4>world's largest nursing home operated by maoists. Before that, I

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 4>used to call Japan the world's largest nursing home. Operated

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 4>by the mob. So I don't know that they let

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 4>me into China. I don't know that.

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean no, But that is the really interesting thing

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.520
<v Speaker 2>about China is that the population is actually falling by

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:48.720
<v Speaker 2>a million plus a year.

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 4>And the Japan and now we can see that Japan

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 4>has a lot of debt. China has a huge amount

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.600
<v Speaker 4>of debt. Their property market is a disaster. No, I've

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 4>got no interest in China. And for a while there

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 4>was a it's a great vehicle for trading, but I

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.440
<v Speaker 4>don't think you can India. I keep looking at with

0:30:07.600 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 4>saying I wish I'd thought about that one earlier, but

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 4>we just had to sell off there that now is

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 4>followed by a recovery. It seems to trade and tandem

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 4>with what happens in the United States. I would say

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 4>there's probably opportunities in India, particularly in the banking sector

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 4>and the retailing sector. I think there's certainly opportunities. Other

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 4>than that, it's catches catch can around the world. Mexico

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 4>has some opportunities, but it's a state with questionable political stability.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.920
<v Speaker 4>Brazil has some opportunities, clearly, but a lot of them

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:44.160
<v Speaker 4>it tend to depend on a strong global economy pushing

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.360
<v Speaker 4>up commodity prices, and that doesn't seem to be what's

0:30:47.400 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 4>happening right now.

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what about gold? Do you have a look at gold.

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 4>I've never been a proponent of gold.

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's not an optimist investment, is it.

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 4>It's not that it's got no income, it's got no dividend.

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.280
<v Speaker 4>I can't come up with the present discarded value of gold.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 4>I haven't really studied the market that carefully from a

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 4>supplied demand standpoint. But about a year ago I said,

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 4>you know what it looks like. We're crossing above two

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 4>thousand dollars an ounce. I think it looks like it's

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 4>got some upside here. And the explanation from a fundamental

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 4>standpoint was real simple. As long as foreign central banks

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 4>of countries that don't like us decide that they don't

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 4>want to see what happened to Russia happened to them

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.720
<v Speaker 4>when Russia invaded Ukraine, the United States froze the foreign

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:40.440
<v Speaker 4>exchange reserves of Russia, and so these central bankers have

0:31:40.480 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 4>decided they want to have more gold than dollars or

0:31:43.480 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 4>even euro or yen as reserve assets. Just go with

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 4>the flow. If that's what they're going to do. Then

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 4>that means gold's going to continue to move higher, and

0:31:52.600 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 4>to the extent that along the way there's more geopolitical concerns,

0:31:56.560 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 4>there's more debt concerns. That's all positive for gold. Oh yeah,

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 4>I would recommend actually holding gold and maybe overweighting gold

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 4>relative to whatever. You know, if you thought five percent

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:11.240
<v Speaker 4>was enough, maybe ten percent. So I'm actually a gold enthusiast.

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 3>That is not the answer I expected, but I like it.

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 3>I try to be open minded good and bitcoin.

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.600
<v Speaker 4>Oh bitcoin. I came up with an amazing insight a

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.600
<v Speaker 4>few years ago that I should have listened to, and

0:32:25.640 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 4>the insight was that bitcoin is kind of like digital tulips,

0:32:29.680 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 4>which sounds very critical, right, because then the implication is

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 4>that it's just a bubble in Holland. But I did

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:42.600
<v Speaker 4>point out that the difference is that the tulip bulb

0:32:42.840 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 4>was geographically just in a very tiny little town called

0:32:46.440 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 4>Holland many centuries ago, and that people did go to

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 4>sleep at night. It wasn't open twenty four by seven.

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Bitcoin is global. The market's open on a global basis

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty four by seven, so there's a lot more potential

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 4>buyer than there ever was in the Holland toolip market,

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 4>and at least for bitcoin, there does seem to be

0:33:06.280 --> 0:33:09.720
<v Speaker 4>a digital mechanism that's limiting the supply of these things.

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 4>So I have no problems owning bitcoin. I don't personally,

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 4>but I have no I'm not pounding the table and

0:33:16.560 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 4>telling people that they shouldn't be buying bitcoin.

0:33:19.560 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 2>But the way you've just described it them makes it

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 2>sounds like the reason to own it is because it

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:25.960
<v Speaker 2>can be a bubble significantly bigger than the Chilip bubble

0:33:26.000 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 2>ever was, as opposed to because you think it's a

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 2>reasonable asset class.

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I have no problems with bubbles. I just have

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 4>to remind myself to get out at the top. Yeah.

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 2>We don't like to be able to do that it

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 2>at the bottoment out of the top. Thank you so

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 2>much for joining us today, Ed, I really appreciate it.

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I've enjoyed our chat.

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:44.959
<v Speaker 4>Very welcome. Thank you.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to this week's Meren Talks Money.

0:33:52.680 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 2>If you like us, show rate, review, and subscribe wherever

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 2>you listen to podcasts, and keep sending questions or comments

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the merin Money at Bloomberg dot net. You can also

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 2>follow me in John on Twitter or x, I'm Marianess

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 2>w and John is John Underscores Depic. This episode was

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 2>hosted by Meet Marin Zumset Web. It was produced by

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Someersadi and Moses and dun Sound designed by Blake Maples

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and of course special thanks to Eddie or Jenny