WEBVTT - The Shroud Of Turin: No Ordinary Bed Sheet

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey, March is tripod month, my friend, and you know

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>what that means. Yes, that means it's time to let

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>people know about your favorite podcasts, just to share the

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 1>sheer joy of podcast listening. That's right, it's t r

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.479
<v Speaker 1>y pod still in nascent industry. A lot of people

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know what podcasts are and helps everybody out if

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>you would go out and just say, hey, family member,

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>who I see it? Thanksgiving once a year? Right, you

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>should try out this thing called a podcast. Here's what

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>they are. Here's a cool show you should try, and

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>here's how to get it. Yeah, and it doesn't have

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to be our show, just any podcast you like in

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>general that you think someone else would like to share it. Yeah,

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So get on board the dry pod train. Welcome to

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know from how stuff works dot com. Hey,

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark. Sitting across

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>from me is Charles W. Chuck Bryant look so sharp today, dude,

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>wrapped in wrapped in my herring bone linen. I thought

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that was an Infinity scarf. You're wearing it like an

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Infinity scarf. That's the second Infinity scarf joke you've made,

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:18.479
<v Speaker 1>although one was live on stage where you, uh, well,

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>immediate at you accidentally made fun of the lady there

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on the first Yeah, some lady was like, well, what's

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the infinity scarves? And I looked over and

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 1>lo and behold she was wearing an infinity scarf. Backpedal

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>from that pretty fast. I don't get why what is

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it called an infinity scarf because it looks as if

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>it never ends. I think it's a scarf that is

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sewn together. It's like a ring. Okay, that's all. Okay,

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not a good name for it for not a

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>great invention, like an infinity pool that never ends, like

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you can swim and swim forever. It looks as if

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I just call him rich person. Pools. Yeah, not like

0:01:56.520 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>my above ground pool in the back the rust nator. Yeah,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the hick right next to the trampoline. Yeah, alright, I

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 1>think we've insulted enough people. Well that was a Simpsons reference.

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Technically they insult and the hick um, Yes we did anyway,

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk Shroud of turin Chuck, are you familiar?

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>What made you pick this the easter? No, it's just timing.

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Although heck, that's great timing. Huh. Seriously, it wasn't it was.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>To be honest, I was listening to an episode of

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>w TF with Mark Marin and he it's an older episode.

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>All of our ideas from Mark man I'm growing in

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 1>a stache. Well I've grown it. I'm just gonna shave

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the beard. Uh. He was interviewing William Friedkin, the director,

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh who. As it turns out, it's quite chatty.

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Did he not stop talking the whole time? He talked

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot. It was a really good interview. Well, yeah,

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's what you want out of an interviewee, yeah, sure, um.

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But he saw all the shroud of turn in person,

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>and he described the experience and I thought, why haven't

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we done one on that? That's pretty important. What was

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>his reaction to it? He he wept. So that's that's

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>actually something that's called Jerusalem syndrome. Yeah. He he was

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>incredibly move and he's not especially well. He talked a

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>lot about Jesus specifically, but said that he's not religious,

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>but he really has a thing for Jesus. But but

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't identify as a Christian, but he really he

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:33.679
<v Speaker 1>just is a big fan of Jesus. Jesus file Sure,

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>which is you know a lot of people like that.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, there's even um Messianic Jews Jews for

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Jesus uh and apparently William Freed Kent I mean bio

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>because of the two categories Bill accounts Jesus the historical figure.

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty stand up guy. Sure, you know, sure? And

0:03:55.840 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, let's just stop dancing around this. Okay,

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not a really just podcast. We're not. Every time

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>we've ever done in religious episode, we've gotten so much

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>blowback from every single thing we've gotten wrong that we're like,

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 1>our structure is not really set up to two podcasts

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>on religion very much. The Shroud of Turn is such

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>an interesting and contentious flash point where science and religion

0:04:24.880 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>meet and butt heads that we just couldn't possibly pretend

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like it doesn't exist. It's too interesting. And I can

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>imagine that William Freakin wept when he saw the Shroud

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of Turn. I would love to see the Shout of

0:04:37.400 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Turn myself. Um, I don't. I have no idea what

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>my reaction would be, but I wouldn't be all that

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>surprised if I did weep when I saw it. Whatever

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the Shout of Turn is, it is probably the most

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>venerated object in the world. Yeah, perhaps it's at least

0:04:58.000 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>among the top two or three. Take of me that, um,

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>and the idea that so many people look at this

0:05:04.839 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 1>thing with love and awe and amazement, that it's somehow

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>abuse it with the very stuff that they that it's

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>venerated for in some weird way. And I can imagine

0:05:17.360 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that even as an atheist you would get hit by that. Well,

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>be to me like looking at a at a great

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>painting or something. Um, not to say that it is

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a painting, even though some people say it is a painting,

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>which we'll get to. But you know what I'm saying, like, uh,

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>just moved by seeing the Mona Lisa, Yeah, or being

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>like I thought I was bigger than that. Yeah, I

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>was a little underwhelmed. Well, but that's the same thing

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that Jerusalem syndrome. Typically happens when you go to a

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>very holy site in your overcome, but it can also

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>happen when you're looking at art as well. All Right,

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it is a fifty if you don't know what it

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is and you're hearing's go on and on about crying

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>t out of Turin, it is a fifty three square

0:05:59.160 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>foot piece of linen rectangle. I think it's about three

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.920
<v Speaker 1>ft by four ft. Yeah, and it is, like I said,

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:12.840
<v Speaker 1>herring bone twill uh, faint brownish image that uh when

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll get into some of the more interesting finer points.

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>But when photographed the negative images is a very clear

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 1>image of a man, naked man with his arms folded

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>over his groin area, tastefully beard, mustache, shoulder length hair

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>parted in the middle um. And you know, looks like

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.599
<v Speaker 1>that if you grew up in the Southern Baptist church.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Looks like that picture of Jesus hanging on the wall

0:06:39.839 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that I grew up with, or your friend that you

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>went to that three eleven show back in Uh. And

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there are stains in areas on the linen consistent with

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>crucifixion wounds. Yes, well, which we'll get to because it's

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>very important. All of this is I feel like we're

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be teasing this out throughout. Well, let's stop. Let's

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>start at the very beginning of all this. Okay, if

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you're a believer and that the shot of turn is

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate religious artifact, that is to say that Jesus

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Christ was wrapped in it after his Christ buried in

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>it in Jurus, and that is indeed his image when

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he died. He and this is Jesus we're talking about.

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Still not William freaking right, He's still alive, right, is he? Yeah?

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>When Jesus died and was interred or in tombed, I'm sorry,

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>after three days, his apostles went and checked on him

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and they found he wasn't there. He had ascended into heaven.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>This just happened to be what we now celebrate as Easter. Yeah,

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and a boy, really, this is going to come out

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>right around then, isn't it. Yeah? And Easter celebrates the

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>among Christians, the resurrection of Christ. After his death, he

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:01.080
<v Speaker 1>dives Christified on Good Friday. He is found to be

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>have been resurrected up into Heaven on Easter Sunday. Jesus

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there. His body was gone, but according to legend,

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they found shrouds still there, his burial shroud. So the

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>idea is is that his burial shroud was taken out

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of his tomb um and venerated from the get go

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>basically held on to so and moved from uh I

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>guess the from Jerusalem out to where did make its

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>second trip to believe. From there it went straight to

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:41.199
<v Speaker 1>Turkey Constantinople and it was there for several hundred years. Right.

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>It was in the possession of some of the sultan's there. Yeah,

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and then the Crusaders came along and said, we'll be

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>taking that and whatever else we want, and we're going

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to move it to Athens, Greece. And it was there

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>um or actually I don't know if the Crusaders took it.

0:08:57.760 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it'll smuggle out, but crusaders sacked the town. I

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>saw both. Well, the history is a bit murky until

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the mid fourteenth century, right, it is so. And you

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 1>would think that if the Crusaders had taken it, they

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>would have taken it back to Europe because that's where

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>they hailed from. They wouldn't have taken it down to Athens, Greece.

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>But supposedly it's spent several centuries between the Crusades and

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>about the thirteenth century in Greece, and somehow, some way

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>it made its way to France, right, Yeah, a French night,

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is where it gets a little

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>more solid and it's travels. Uh. Jeffroy de Charny de

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Charny Um took it to France about thirty miles outside

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of Paris, and um eventually it mounted it made his

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>way to its final home in Turin, Italy and where

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been there ever since. Yeah, the cathedral of St.

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>John the Baptist is when it landed there, and it's

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>still there and you can go look at I think

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it went on tour for a little while within the

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>last few years, right with van Halen. Uh. Yeah, it

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>was on display as a part of a traveling exhibit.

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Was it traveling or was it just on display? In turn? Now,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it traveled but sprised. But here's what I'm

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>going on is William Friedkin's account. So I'm not sure,

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but I do know that um more people saw it

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in the last like few years than ever before, ever before,

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>very very recent times, because apparently, um, for many centuries

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it was on public display. Yeah, you just have to

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:42.840
<v Speaker 1>go to Turin, go into that church. Uh, and they would,

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, probably ask you a serious questions before you entered,

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>right and as you exited, like what kind of fish

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>is this? That Jesus fish? Come on back? Uh. The

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Catholic Church does not have an official stand on the

0:10:55.960 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 1>authenticity of this shroud. But um, chump, uh Chope, Pope

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>John Paul the Chopster said, you know, we trust science

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 1>basically to keep studying this thing. Yeah. The church, um,

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, used to have an official position on it

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>until I think around and they said, you know what,

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is, we still believe that you Catholics or

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Christians should venerate this thing because at the very least

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it's symbolic of Christ suffering on the cross. Um. But

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we're not gonna say either way. We're the Catholic Church,

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you, good night. I think it's how and transmission.

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>That's how Pope Ball ended all of his speeches. Um,

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:42.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, let's let's take a little break here. You

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>want to, yeah, and we'll talk a bit about the

0:11:46.320 --> 0:12:10.239
<v Speaker 1>early science the shot turn. So Chuck, we were saying, um,

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the shroud. As far as the Catholics are concerned, the

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>shroud didn't really exist until thirteen fifty three, when Geoffrey

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>de Charnay came up with it. Right, So that's the

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning of its documented existence. That the Shroud of Turn

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>at least goes back on the record to thirteen fifty three,

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 1>which makes it pretty awesome in and of itself, right,

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>And for centuries and centuries people saw it, people looked

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>at it. I'm sure they kissed it and wept over

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it and everything. And then it wasn't until the I

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>think the nineteenth century or at least the twentieth century

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that it was really started to move out of public

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>display and started to be cared for and preserved a

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>little more, I think. And that's when science kind of

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 1>started to come around, specifically starting in right, Yeah, that

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>was the first. Like if you if you look at

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>just the regular image of the shroud of Turin, not

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the negative photographic image, you know, you sort of see

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>an image of a person. But in like you said,

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 1>there was an amateur photographer in Italy name uh Second.

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>That means the second. He had an older sibling. He

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>took a picture. He was first though, No Primo that right.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>If you're seeing Big Night, it's Stanley Tucci movie. Yeah,

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Secondo and Primo. Yeah yeah, man, I won't see that again.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen it since it was out. Have you

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>ever heard um that fam key Jansen? You know, the actress.

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Does her name mean female or girl in Danish idea?

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it might because that means her name is girl.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Jansen that's what her parents named her. If that's what

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that means, all right, Sorry, that's okay. Um. So Secundo

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.840
<v Speaker 1>took this photo. Um, when he was developing it, he

0:13:53.840 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 1>saw the reverse negative and went, wow, Mama Mia. What

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he saw was that much more clear image of a man,

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of the likeness of a of a human being in

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>much more detail. He was accused of forgery, of course,

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.600
<v Speaker 1>out of the gate. Uh, and I think wasn't fully

0:14:14.600 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 1>clear to like the nineteen thirties when more photographers did

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the same thing, and they're like, it's just a negative image.

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Let the guy up, yeah right, like this round. Yeah.

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>So this negative image really kicked off like an even

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>greater interest in the shroud of turn. I think up

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to that point, um, people of science had just been

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, yeah, yeah, sure, that's exactly what it is.

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It looks definitely like a burial shroud. When they saw that,

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>though that that negative, it's really difficult to avoid the

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that it is clearly the image of a man

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>like you described at the beginning. It's not Jesus on toast, No,

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it's nott or on my the wall of the house

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm demoing from, you know, or this grilled cheese. I met. Yeah, Um, no,

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it is, and it's universally recognized as that. It's

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not like it kind of looks like this, it's that's

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that's what that is, so much so that um even

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>skeptics say, well, then it was just a painting or

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>something like that by some artists. But just like that

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>photographed by Secondo pia Um, we've our new techniques and

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>tricks and software that we use as far as photography

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>goes and images goes, is starting to unlock even more

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>weirdness of it too. Right, So if you take the

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>um the lightness and darkness patterns and turn them into

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>like three dimensions, it actually reveals very clearly the three

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>dimensional shape of a face, which is kind of surprising

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>because that would mean that if we're a painting, somebody

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>had to have painted on a face with just the

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.840
<v Speaker 1>right amount of darkness in places where that would have

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>been closest to the cloth, and lighter amounts in places

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that would have been further away from the cloth, so

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>that when you did look at it in this light

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>gradient map, it would appear in in perfect three To mention,

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a bizarre little thing, don't you think for sure. Uh.

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>As far as real study, UM, it took all the

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>way until almost nineteen seventy nine, sixty nine, when scientists

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>could finally I mean for decades people had done um

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>what they call indirect analysis. So basically, you know, I'm

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at it, and I'm thinking about it and I'm

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about it. But as far as actually getting your

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>hands on it, it was nineteen sixty nine when um,

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>like you said that they needed to preserve this thing.

0:16:56.440 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>So they brought in a team of of scientists us

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to say, hey, how do we preserve this thing. We'll

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 1>let you touch it. And they all went, oh, that

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>sounds good to me. Uh so they formed the shroud.

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>We're always laughing about how the acronyms work out perfect.

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>This is not this is not that the Shroud of

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Turn Research Project or stirp Uh. They had five days

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of continuous access in ninety eight hours a day for

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>five days. Yeah, so this is nine years after the

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>first scientists were allowed to touch it. I guess they

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 1>formed this thing and they you know, of course, what

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 1>they did was it and say like all right, well

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll work eight or nine hours a day, kick back

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:43.200
<v Speaker 1>half some dinner and then sleep, get up to start

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>over eight course Italian meals. They split up into teams

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so they could work non stop around the clock. They

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>had thirty three members from all over the spectrum of science,

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:57.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty major research institutions, along with a team of European

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>scientists who observed. I guess they sat there with our

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>arms folded and just like you know, every ten minutes.

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>They were the ones that brought the good espresso. The

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>US led team, We're like, we don't know where you

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 1>get that around here, not the kind of espresso you

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:16.879
<v Speaker 1>spit out into a napkin. Like what was that? It

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>was in Mulholland Drive when a great scene. Um so

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.959
<v Speaker 1>here's what their report said, we need like a bombshell

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:34.639
<v Speaker 1>effect here, okay, uh quote the shroud images that of

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a real human form of a scourged, scourged, crucified man. Yeah,

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>a whip with like, um, several flays on the end

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and and I think it has like um, like rocks

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>or something tied onto the end of the flaz It's

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>just terrible, very bad crucifixion. We we could do a

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 1>podcast on that. Yeah. You know something that I came

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.399
<v Speaker 1>out of this research for me was do you have

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a real s ob to crucify human being,

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the son of God or some criminal criminal

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:12.440
<v Speaker 1>whatever you should The idea that the Romans used to

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>do that is just it makes my ear blow. Torture

0:19:16.320 --> 0:19:22.440
<v Speaker 1>until you die, but it's the worst kind. Yeah. Um.

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>So they continue to say it is not the product

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of an artist. Um. The blood stains are composed of

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 1>hemoglobin and also give a positive test for serum albuman

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and um. Despite this, they said it is a mystery

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>because no combination of physical, chemical, biological or medical circumstances

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>can adequately adequately account for the image. Right. So that's

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>their official report from that first scientific inquiry, Yeah, published

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and these definitely were men of science. But the Stirp

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>team was also um and it's ill today has is

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:05.760
<v Speaker 1>criticized for. Uh. I guess the way it's put is

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>there were a team of scientists believers, like they were

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.439
<v Speaker 1>all legitimate scientists, but they also legitimately believed the shrouded

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>turn was the burial shroud of Christ that had been

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some way or another miraculously imbued with Christ's image upon

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 1>his ascension to Heaven. Yeah, I get the feeling a

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of this research is like, well, let's get a

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.320
<v Speaker 1>team in here to debunk it. Let's get a team

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>in here to verify it, you know, right, And and

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 1>there were skeptics on the Stirp team, but they they

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>apparently didn't have as full access as the believers did,

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and there there was a lot of like infighting and

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>backbiting among the team. But one thing that's universally agreed

0:20:49.760 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>on by the members of the team, skeptics and believers alike,

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>is that the Vatican itself did not try to influence

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.159
<v Speaker 1>the outcome of these tests. At the very least back

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>in ninete yate they were willing to just say, hey,

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:06.400
<v Speaker 1>whatever whatever you find is what you find. Um, we're

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>still gonna love the shroud, no matter what right I thought.

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:10.479
<v Speaker 1>The thing you were going to say was. The one

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>thing they all agreed on was that those sturt t

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>shirts didn't really work out very well. They argued about

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the name a lot, but the sturb team is still

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>their findings are still criticized, and one of the things

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that's very much criticized is the idea that there's no

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 1>artificial pigments on the shroud and that the bloodstains are

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>actually blood for an alternative hypothesis or an alternative um examination.

0:21:35.320 --> 0:21:38.879
<v Speaker 1>There's a guy named Walter mcclun did you did you

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>run into him in the hallways? Very ironic. Well, he's

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>also very dead, so that's odd, but that happened. Should

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have mentioned it was the ghost of Dr McCrone. McCrone,

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>that's so, I'm sorry, that's it. So Walter McCrone was

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>I was like, is this guy you know, is he legit?

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>He's probably the most legitimate scientist of the twentieth century.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Like he he published and edited a u a peer

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>reviewed journal on microscopy and microscopic investigation. It's called scop

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>this with an exclamation point. Um. He uh. It was

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>just he's a legitimate scientist, so let me just say that.

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>And he did some examination of the turn shroud and

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:28.399
<v Speaker 1>he found, no, there's actually no blood on this at all.

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 1>And what you're what what looks to be blood is

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>actually red ochre pigment for million and then a temper

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>temper um binder. Yeah. And this was in the late seventies,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 1>early eighties. And he said, um, basically he could account

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.160
<v Speaker 1>for everything in there as something that would have been

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>in a paint from the fifties, whereas other folks have said, no,

0:22:55.080 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>actually that iron in there, that's old hemoglobin. That's from

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the hemoglobin, and he said, no, it's not. Yeah, he

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>needn't bend. So the idea that that he did find

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:12.359
<v Speaker 1>red ochre and vermilion pigment, you think, okay, well case

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>closed here, Like this is a great example of the

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:20.680
<v Speaker 1>shroud of turin. It is not case closed. It's never

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be case closed. Chemists, molecular biologists, geneticists, you

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>could throw every single scientist that you can possibly think

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of at this thing, and they can find wherever they

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>want to find, And you're gonna have another team who

0:23:35.560 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>finds the other contrary findings. And neither group is going

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to read one another's publications except the most hardcore people

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>carrying out these experience. But people like you and I

0:23:49.440 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>have no idea whether wait, was there blood found on

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>it um? What were the findings about the red ochre.

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Did he just surmise that it was red ochre pigment

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>because he found all the stuff that makes up red

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.679
<v Speaker 1>ochre pigment, or did he actually find red ochre pigment?

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Like this is the kind of thing that keeps the

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.719
<v Speaker 1>shot of turin a mystery. Well, yeah, I mean there

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.679
<v Speaker 1>have been He's not the only one to have studied

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it was blood. There have been other

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>people that said, who's a Heller and Adler said, oh,

0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's blood, and it's it's a B blood type. Yes,

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we can even tell you that, and then someone else

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>would come along and say it's not blood, or if

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 1>it was, he certainly can't tell the blood type, or

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it's blood from the person who might

0:24:33.320 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>have been wrapped in the shroud, or blood from someone

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>handling it, or animal blood. Yeah, there's a there's a

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>big criticism of that that it was contamination from somebody

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>who was actually analyzing the samples, because well, as we'll

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:50.040
<v Speaker 1>see later on, a lot of people touch this thing

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>over the years, right, and then other skeptics point to

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>it and say, dude, you can see it's not blood.

0:24:54.880 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not blood. Blood turns black or at least such

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>such a dark, deep brown over the years that it

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.719
<v Speaker 1>looks black to the human eye. This looks like blood.

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not what blood looks like once it dries and

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ages on cloth. So there's a lot of different arguments

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>either side but neither one is compelling enough to convince

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the other side that they're correct, correct, And so it

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>just goes on and on, And I read a I

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>think a Skeptics Dictionary post on um the Shroud of Turn,

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and the the guy who wrote it just perfect skeptics

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>fashion was basically said, you know, even if you do

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>prove that this is Jesus's burial shroud, that Jesus Christ

0:25:41.760 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>was buried in this burrel shroud, it doesn't prove that

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>he's the son of God. So it will never be settled. Yeah,

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>that's not the point of the Shroud of Turn. Yeah,

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think anyone's saying that this proves that. Yeah,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I think they're just trying to get Well, they're two

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>big mysteries. One is is it authentic as a shroud?

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Who is it? Or if it's not, how how was

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this thing made? The second thing is called the question

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of questions? Yeah, so, uh, should we take another break?

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll talk about that and some other carbon

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:39.359
<v Speaker 1>fourteen testing and DNA testing right for this? All right?

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Should we start with you? Let's start with carbon test.

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's go chronologically, Uh, late nineteen eighties. I'm a junior

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in high school, Sonny Crockett was coked to the gills,

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>long bangs hanging in my face. I think I'm a skater,

0:26:56.359 --> 0:27:00.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'm really not same here. I tried pretty hard,

0:27:00.960 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 1>but I was never that great. I was okay. I

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>was wearing jams. Sure, you're like a little version of me.

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Did you wear jams? Yeah? Did you ever wear skids

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>or wear those? Like? Past your before? Yeah? Past your tone?

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Kids. They were like pajama pants, clear

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and clear and simple. Definitely not foot but I mean

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>like they were what you would think of his flannel

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>pajama pants, but they were to be worn like pants.

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>They were a weird chat. Not as weird as that

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is the cavaricis, but they were weird. I saw a

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>guy I try not to judge people on their appearance,

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but I saw a guy getting on a Delta flight

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks ago wearing, uh, a pair of oversized

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>baggy fleece batman pajama pants with these huge fuzzy animal

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>slippers and like a Porsche or a Lamborghini T shirt

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and mirrored sunglasses. Oh, how cool. It's like a forty

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>something in year old man. I couldn't figure it out,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and that man was val Kilmer. That might have been

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, carbon fourteen dating. The Vaticans said, go forth

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 1>and date this thing. Um. That's what I kind of

0:28:17.200 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>love about how the Vaticans treated this over the years

0:28:19.800 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of They've always been like, you know, you've got some

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>new scientific methods. Let's bring him in here and we'll

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>talk science. Yea. So they sent it to three different

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 1>labs University of Oxford Radio Carbon Accelerator Unit UH, University

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of Arizona Go Wildcats, and the Swiss Federal Institute of

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Technology probably so uh Yodlers UH. And this is an

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>interesting case because they all three of them found that

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the shroud material that they were given dated between twelve

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty and long, long, long after the Jesus of history lived,

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps not coincidentally, right around the time when the

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 1>shroud first shows up in the documented record. So that

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>combined with the fact that it was much after Jesus time,

0:29:10.520 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 1>led a lot of people in the late eighties to say,

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>case closed. This thing is certainly not the burial cloth

0:29:17.760 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of Jesus. Now, when somebody comes out with um findings

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like this, the other side sets about trying to take

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>it out as much as possible every way they can.

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:36.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of really um interesting backwards twisting turning

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>arabesques that that involved logic in a lot of a

0:29:42.080 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of instances. But with this one of the first

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:49.600
<v Speaker 1>ones that came out was well you you guys, the

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 1>sample was tainted somehow. That was a big one. And

0:29:53.240 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>then the scientists have said, well, how how is the

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>sample tainted? And this is where some of the stretching

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>nous comes in sometimes, right, one of the one of

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>them accusations is that the samples retained by contemporary carbon deposits,

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>which threw off the readings of the carbon fourteen. Right. Okay,

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's a very famous thing that I think maybe

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 1>um Walter McCrone came up with. But it shows it's

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>a graph and it shows how much twentieth century carbon

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it would take to to taint the results from the

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth from the forties to the four fourteenth century CE.

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It would take an amount of carbon contamination that weighs

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 1>more than the shroud itself weighs. So that was probably

0:30:45.280 --> 0:30:48.480
<v Speaker 1>not the case. Yeah. Another thing that um, some people

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:50.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of poopooed about this study was they gave them

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>three control fabrics to test alongside um all old stuff

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Egyptian mummy, a medieval Nubian to him in a medieval

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>French investment, ecclesiastical siment, and all the data from those three,

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>from the three different institutions came out the same, whereas

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a span of about a hundred and fifty

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>years on the Shroud of turin between the three, and

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>what they released was the mean of these three. And

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of people said, well, hey, you're your

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>fancy science. Tests nailed these controls, all three of them,

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but there's a big variants in the Shroud of Turrance results,

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so they go back to the your stuff was tainted.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Another criticism that was proposed was that they had taken

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a patch from the medieval era that had been used

0:31:38.640 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>to patch up the shroud, because the shroud actually was

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>in a fire once yea when it was in France,

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I believe still um. It was folded up in a

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>box and the chapel that it was in caught fire,

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and the box caught fire and the shroud miraculously sorry

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't didn't burn. It just kind of got some scorch

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 1>marks and melted a little bit. Still survived. Yeah they

0:32:06.280 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>are um, but they survived this fire. So what the

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>critics of the carbon fourteen test said was that, well,

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you guys chose a part that had been patched up

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 1>around this time during the medieval age. It's so fact though,

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you got it wrong. And then they probably said, well,

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>why did you give a SEP part? Well they didn't.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>The Carbon fourteen reports supposedly says that they specifically avoided

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>any part that showed any stitching or patches or anything

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>like that, that they did not take a sample from that.

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And these were very small samples too. It's not like

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>they cut off the bottom third of it and out

0:32:40.320 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>for testing. Um. Alright, so back to what you described, well,

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you quoted from the description of physicists as the question

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of questions. All right, forget the fact that this could

0:32:56.760 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>be the shroud that Jesus was buried in. Forget all

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this stuff like how was this thing made? Because no

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>one's been able to recreate this, like come up with

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the process that could recreate this thing, because it's got

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:15.479
<v Speaker 1>a weird color and it's just no one can replicate it, right,

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why they're having trouble replicating it is

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the color that's that's tough to replicate.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>They're finding that if you look at the places where

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>it is colored, Um, the thread itself is only just

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit saturated with this color. Yeah, like it

0:33:37.200 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>soaked in a very like thin amount. Right, This is

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:45.360
<v Speaker 1>what's throwing everybody off. Apparently to me, this is the

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:48.680
<v Speaker 1>whole key that the mystery swings on. If you were

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>an artist and you were creating this using pigment, your

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>your paint should just so right through at least one thread.

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>This stuff is literally not deep enough to penetrate and

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>individual fiber, let alone, all the way through like a

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>paint wood point seven micrometers the diameter of an individual fiber.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a very shallow um pigmentation, right, So

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that this is where the big stumbling block is there, Like,

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.479
<v Speaker 1>how would you do this? One of the proposals is that, Um,

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>there's this technique called bab relief. I always thought it

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:27.600
<v Speaker 1>was boss relief until yesterday. But it's like if you

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 1>take an image and you carve it um and this

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually pretty well known in the medieval era. You

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 1>can make it out of metal or um stone, and

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you heat it up and you can scorch an image

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 1>on fabric. The thing is to make a scorch that's

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>as shallow as the shroud of turns images. It would

0:34:49.239 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 1>it would have to occur the shrouded have to lay

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>on the bab relief bust for something like just a

0:34:56.920 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>minute fraction of a second, And no one can figure

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.879
<v Speaker 1>how you would get a good image like you have

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>on the shroud of Turin if you just if the

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 1>the linen just dropped and was pulled off and less

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.920
<v Speaker 1>than a second. No one knows how that could possibly

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 1>be done. Yeah, and that's just one like there have

0:35:15.239 --> 0:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>been many, many attempts to replicate this over the years,

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:24.520
<v Speaker 1>either through science or through people using arts and and

0:35:24.719 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 1>uh materials available in the medieval times, UM something called

0:35:29.320 --> 0:35:33.919
<v Speaker 1>acid pigmentation. There's actually a kind of photography, very very

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>primitive photography. I saw that in medieval times. UM something

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>called dust transfer the bar relief. And then some have

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:48.440
<v Speaker 1>contended it's a Malliard reaction taking place. Okay, well I

0:35:48.480 --> 0:35:50.960
<v Speaker 1>don't really know fully how they explained that, and I

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think it held up. But I mean, that's the

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>reaction in cooking, like when you're browning like a meat,

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know. Well, that actually deepens the mystery

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:06.160
<v Speaker 1>rather than rather than all of it. Other people say

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:10.239
<v Speaker 1>it could have been burial ointments, ultra violet radiation in

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bible, and Matthew says the earth shook, the rocks split,

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and the tombs broke open after the Crucifixion. So geologist said,

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it might have been an earthquake that happened, and maybe

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that threw off the radio carbon dating and maybe there

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 1>was a blast of neutrons. So you say, turned this

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:32.360
<v Speaker 1>image into the fabric. And those are geologists, legitimate geologists,

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 1>but there are also extraordinarily controversial and most people in

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>their fields shunned them, wouldn't even talk to him at

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a cocktail party for Jesus. Basically, they're what they're talking

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 1>about is something called piazzo nuclear fission. And the idea

0:36:46.800 --> 0:36:49.040
<v Speaker 1>is is that, like if you crush a rock, the

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>force of it can actually break the atoms apart, releasing

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:57.440
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of neutrons. And this Italian geologist's idea is

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>that this earthquake that happened when Jesus died um released

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>these neutrons and created this irradiated image of him on

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.359
<v Speaker 1>his burial shroud. And that's if you take that one

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>line from the Bible completely literally and supposed that they

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:17.759
<v Speaker 1>didn't mean, like, you know, in a symbolic way, the

0:37:17.800 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>earth shook. But even if it did, there's no evidence

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>whatsoever that there is such thing as piezzo nuclear fission.

0:37:24.640 --> 0:37:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And then secondly, it even says that it shook when

0:37:27.040 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>he Um was crucified, so he wouldn't have even had

0:37:30.040 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the burial shroud around him at the time. Of holes

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:36.759
<v Speaker 1>in that one in particular Um, but it is, it's

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:39.239
<v Speaker 1>a theory. And that's another thing about the shrouded turn too.

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 1>It's just learning about all the different hypotheses and all

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the different suggestions that people have come up with, and

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>all the holes that they poke in those suggestions that

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:51.239
<v Speaker 1>in and of itself is fascinating to me. Yeah, the

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>physicists a lots that I tried the ultra violet light

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>experiment and he basically said, you know, the the amount

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>of ultra violet light you need exceeds quote exceeds a

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>maximum power release by all ultra violet light sources available today.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So how in the world could someone have done this

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>on purpose in medieval times? So chuck the um carbon

0:38:12.280 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and the fabric analysis. Those are huge, big landmark

0:38:17.760 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>cases one, right, and then I think things just kind

0:38:23.719 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 1>of everybody bickered for the next twelve five years. Yeah,

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of bickering, and um, finally somebody's like, well,

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.960
<v Speaker 1>hey man, we've got this great DNA testing stuff we

0:38:35.000 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>can do. Uh, let's do let's do something. Let's do it.

0:38:38.840 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>To it to the shouted turn with the DNA tests. Yeah,

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.359
<v Speaker 1>and so what they found out, Um, they found out

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:48.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of interesting things that didn't in the end

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:52.800
<v Speaker 1>lead to any sort of verification of fake or authentic

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>at all, but interesting stuff. Nonetheless. One is that this

0:38:56.880 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>thing got around um or at the very least, um

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 1>was touched by a lot of people from all over

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the world, and in return, it touched a lot of

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 1>people around the world. I would say, so, um, you

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 1>know Europe, uh, Middle East, India, Africa had DNA from

0:39:16.320 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks, and it had a lot of

0:39:18.800 --> 0:39:23.000
<v Speaker 1>plant DNA too. They tested both. Yeah, and a lot

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of weird DNA plant DNA showed up on it. Right,

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.719
<v Speaker 1>So you've got like black locust trees from Appalachia and

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>North America. Yeah, that was a little surprising. It's weird.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:41.239
<v Speaker 1>Apparently a very rare Asian pear tree. Um stuff that's

0:39:41.280 --> 0:39:47.320
<v Speaker 1>fun in India. Yeah, um, Mediterranean clover. That makes sense.

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, and so does with the human DNA. They

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:55.719
<v Speaker 1>found the the most the heaviest concentration of DNA was

0:39:55.840 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>from people in the Middle East around where Jesus was buried,

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So that kind of makes sense. Um. But here's the

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.920
<v Speaker 1>one I don't get. They said that the oldest DNA

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>was from India, which they say suggested it could have

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>been manufactured in India because Indians and Europeans didn't like

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of contact back then. But then I

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.800
<v Speaker 1>saw someone trying to refute that in the same article,

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and this is from Life Science by the way, um,

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 1>saying that it could have been uh when it was

0:40:29.000 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>on public display. Is where the Indian DNA came from.

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 1>That's where all this DNA could have come from. Well yeah,

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>but they said that the oldest DNA was from India.

0:40:38.040 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So again it's just like every time someone uncovers something

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that's just another little mystery to it. It It seems like

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 1>unless you go back to the carbon dating and those

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.800
<v Speaker 1>scientists are like, now this has stood up to scrutiny

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Yeah. And I actually saw a BBC

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:58.560
<v Speaker 1>um little documentary on the uh, the shot of Turn,

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and they went in physic it did somebody who was

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:04.760
<v Speaker 1>there at at Oxford when they did the carbon dating,

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and they were like no, he was his mind seemed

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 1>wide open at the very least, but he was definitely

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.919
<v Speaker 1>like no, it was all legitimate and I've never heard

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 1>an objection to it that that panned out. You know, Um,

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else, Well, I think you can probably

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>sit here for hours and hours, yeah, in hours, but

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not going if you if it has floated your boat.

0:41:32.040 --> 0:41:33.880
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of stuff for you to go read. You

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>can start with a couple of great articles that we used,

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 1>um one from nat GEO, Why is shoud of Turn?

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Secrets continue to elude science? That was great and live science,

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like you said, article called is it a fake DNA

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>testing deepens mystery, shout of Turn and plenty of other stuff.

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Go check out um Walter mccrone's site as well. He's

0:41:56.239 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>got his own site on the shutter Turn. Yeah. Oh

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it's by the way, I mentioned him and in this

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:03.879
<v Speaker 1>meant to mention this send anology. It's what it's called

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:06.799
<v Speaker 1>the Official Study of the Shroud. Really, it has its

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:10.840
<v Speaker 1>own ology s I N D O N i'll apology.

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 1>We all know how to spell that O L O

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>G I E r Uh. Well, if you want to

0:42:16.880 --> 0:42:19.040
<v Speaker 1>know more about the shild, like we said, go start

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:22.839
<v Speaker 1>searching and welcome to the rabbit hole. So see the thing?

0:42:23.680 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah in person? Why not? I totally would if I

0:42:26.120 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>was in your turn. There's steamers that go to Italy.

0:42:29.280 --> 0:42:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Still uh. And since we said Italy, it's time for listener.

0:42:37.320 --> 0:42:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this divorce upcoming. Hey, guys, my wife

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:43.759
<v Speaker 1>Jade and I are huge fans of the show and

0:42:43.760 --> 0:42:46.279
<v Speaker 1>listen almost every night before bed. But we don't like

0:42:46.360 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>each other. We have our favorite s Y s G moments.

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:52.239
<v Speaker 1>But when that made us both laugh like crazy was

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Chuck's nerd gasm towards the end of the Action Figures episode.

0:42:56.640 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>We rewound the podcast and listen to that part so

0:42:59.080 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 1>often I'd decided to take a clip. Uh, make a

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.719
<v Speaker 1>clip of it and said it as my alarm clock tone. Uh.

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Sound files attached. It's very short, but played on a

0:43:07.880 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>loop fifteen to twenty times at seven thirty am, and

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>you will get the full effect. Now we wake up

0:43:13.280 --> 0:43:16.440
<v Speaker 1>to your voices as well as falling asleep to them. Uh.

0:43:16.880 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 1>Long and may you're a great show. Continued David. Uh,

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 1>he didn't leave his wife's name, but David and oh

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>yeah Jade uh in Newcastle, England. And let's just play

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this really quick. He's played like five times to get

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the full effect. Let's hear it, go go go go go. Wow.

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 1>That would wake me up. I sit pulled up right

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and be like not a Cain. Yeah, that's a yeah.

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Good luck with the divorce. Thanks sorry Jade and David.

0:43:52.360 --> 0:43:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Jade and David. You could also bring them together,

0:43:55.160 --> 0:44:00.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, right in opposition against us. Okay, Uh, thanks

0:44:00.360 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Dad and David and Jade or Dade that's your couple

0:44:03.680 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>name now and Javid? Um, yeah, either one's good. Uh.

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:10.200
<v Speaker 1>If you want to get in touch with this like

0:44:10.440 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Jade and David did, yeah, you can tweet to us

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at s Y s K podcast or I'm also at

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh um Clark Chucks at Charles W. Chuck Bryant and

0:44:19.480 --> 0:44:22.760
<v Speaker 1>at stuff you Should Know on Facebook dot com. Uh.

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:24.799
<v Speaker 1>You can send us an email stuff podcast at how

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Stuff Works dot com and has always joined us at

0:44:27.200 --> 0:44:29.359
<v Speaker 1>a home on the web. Stuff you Should Know dot

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>com for more on this and thousands of other topics.

0:44:36.880 --> 0:44:48.719
<v Speaker 1>Is It How stuff Works dot com