WEBVTT - Nick Wright Mailbag: GOAT of GOATs debate, could LeBron James run for president?

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Righting Nick Wright? Episode four eighty three.

0:00:05.760 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>This episode of What's Right with Nick Wright is presented

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to you by boost Mobile. This is our mail bag

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>episode and you can send long listen, you can put

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>questions in the chat, you can reply to us on

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter with questions, and if you want to send long questions,

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you can email us What's Right Mailbag at gmail dot com.

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Again a reminder to you guys, We're gonna have a

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>couple quick, very quick episodes next week where we try

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.239
<v Speaker 1>to hit on all thirty two NFL teams, just kind

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of one minute of team quick stories. As next week

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll be on vacation. But that way something actually shows

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>up in your guys feed, the way you don't miss

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it is to subscribe to the pods. So we have

0:00:49.000 --> 0:00:52.280
<v Speaker 1>some very long and thoughtful emails that I've been waiting

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to, and we also have some quick hitter ones.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just going to start with this from Daryl

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Darryl Wrights. These first few are in response to our

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Goat of Goats segment on TV where I talked about

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 1>how if MESSI, if Argentina were to win the World

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Cup again and be the first team to go back

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>to back in more than sixty years, and Messi were

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>to have all of the records and career that he has,

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>that he would have. You know, an argument that of

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>all the goats, he is the goatist, the goat of

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the goats, Daryl Wrights. Messi cannot be considered the goat

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of all sports as he plays no defense. Yesterday versus Spain,

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the dude stood at midfield ververs seventys from the match.

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>He's literally the James Harden of soccer. Darryl. I say

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this with no due respect. It's one of the worst

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>opinions I've ever heard. The comp is not for Messi

0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>James Harden and being like, why doesn't he get criticized

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>for not playing defense? The comp would be Brandy Moss, Like,

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:02.360
<v Speaker 1>how many is Randy Moss broken up? It's not his position.

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I understand that in soccer everyone's on the field at

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time, but different guys have different roles. It

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is that is no different than one arguing how good

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>was Roder in this World Cup? Look at how few

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:26.919
<v Speaker 1>goals he scored? You? Or maybe a better example would

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>be a killing a goalkeeper for not adding more to

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the offense. It. Messi's a right winger. His job is

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to be the engine of the offense. So unlike I

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>understand you say, oh, James Harden's job is being the

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>engine in the offense. Yes, but in basketball you have

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to guard your position. In soccer, you really don't if

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you're a striker, if you're the position Messi plays, you

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have defensive responsibilities. So that's just I think it's

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:02.639
<v Speaker 1>just fundamentally misunderstanding the sport. Oh more, Goat of All

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Goats conversations, r J and Tyler mentioned that I left

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>out Michael Phelps and that if I was gonna include

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>balt I was gonna include Phelps. I didn't forget Michael Phelps.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I intentionally left Michael Phelps out for two reasons. One

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 1>is my criteria for being in The Goat of All

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Goats discussion was multifaceted. One of them was you have

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to be the undisputed goat of your own sport, which

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is why, sadly, I couldn't include Lebron in the discussion.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 1>He's not the undisputed goat of professional basketball. That was

0:03:52.920 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>just as a for instance, no baseball player made the

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.520
<v Speaker 1>discussion because I don't think there is an undisputed goat

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>amongst baseball player. Another qualifier was you got your goat

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 1>case was graded on a curve that was directly correlated

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to how many people worldwide are playing your sport. It

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:23.799
<v Speaker 1>really hurt Brady's goat of all goat case because American

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:32.239
<v Speaker 1>football is really only played here. It really hurt Wayne

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Gretzky's case because hockey is played by so many fewer

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:45.919
<v Speaker 1>people than sports like basketball, soccer, track and field that Michaelton.

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>Swimming is obviously done by more people than hockey or

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 1>American football, but not nearly as many people. Like I

0:04:56.839 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>know it's gonna sound basic, but in world history, the vast, fast, vast, vast,

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.119
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of people, at some point in their life

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>ran and Bolt's fastest guy to ever lived. The majority

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of people in world history not only did the majority

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:23.720
<v Speaker 1>of them not swim or not not only did the vast, fast,

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.479
<v Speaker 1>vast majority of them not swim, the majority of them

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>never swim. And I don't even know what the numbers

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>are right now, Like, of the eight billion people seven

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half billion people we have, how many of

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>them can actually swim? So that hurts? Phelps at least

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But the real thing that hurts Phelps,

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:43.719
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, is my own personal crusade that we

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>vastly overrate swimming Olympians because of their ability to stack

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>up medals in the same distance race just by doing

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>it in so many different disciplines. Like whenever I hear

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>greatest Olympian ever, and it was Spits, and then it

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>was Phelps, and the or its l deck. It's like, man,

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>do you not think do you honestly think that if

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Bolt had five ways to win a gold medal running

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>one hundred meters, he wouldn't have won five golds in

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>one hundred meters at every Olympics. It's like, all right,

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this one's a sprint, this one you run backwards, this

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>one's side saddle, this one's skipping. He's as fashioned than everybody.

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And so I've always felt that swimmers get a little,

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a little extra oomph that I don't think is fair.

0:06:41.560 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Robert on the Goat of All Goats discussion rights, big

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>fan of yours, and first things first, this week you

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>talked about goat of all goats. Unless I miss that,

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's an obvious one in John Jones

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>he'd be my pick. I feel like it's a perfect

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>fit as MMA's worldwide's based off pure talent. So this

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is where I'm just going to, I guess admit my

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>own knowledge gaps I and so people might say I'm

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>way wrong on this. I always thought John Jones was

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>considered the most talented fighter ever. But not only is

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.679
<v Speaker 1>he not undisputed as the greatest fighter of all time,

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>but I don't even think the majority of people consider

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>him that. And that might be his own demons, it

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>might be his own issues. The Daniel says, he's pretty

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>much he's pretty much the goat. Okay, So like I said,

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I might have my own So this is where my

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>own knowledge gaps on the sport mix in. So maybe

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I should have included it. I just didn't feel as

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>comfortable in the history of that sport. Now fighting does

0:07:55.640 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>have get the huge bump that track and field, which

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is people are doing it from the beginning of time.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Almost everyone in the world can do it to a degree,

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so that helps. That would help his case a ton. Boxing's,

0:08:11.560 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the oldest sports, but there is

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>no undisputed goat. So that's why, like Ali or whomever.

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Because that one. There's big disagreements on who the goat is,

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>but maybe John Jones was a miss by me. All right,

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Rob writes in Nick really enjoyed the Messy retrospective on

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.079
<v Speaker 1>the Thursday Pod. What do you think you're most like

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>to see in your lifetime? A soccer player you regard

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 1>as better than MESSI, A basketball player you consider better

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>than he wrote Jordan, but he met Lebron, A hockey

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>player better than Gretzky, a football player better than Brady,

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>or a baseball player better than Otana. You can answer

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>however you like. There's a good July August question. Thanks

0:08:52.720 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>love the show. I think the most mol likely is

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a football player better than Brady, and the second most

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>likely is a basketball player better than Lebron. Doesn't mean

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you do I have a bet longer career, But it

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>feels like those sports and again this is where I

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>might my hockey knowledge really hurts me here. But it

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:30.439
<v Speaker 1>feels like those sports are just evolving. It's such a

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>fast pace that if I'm lucky enough to be around

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:39.439
<v Speaker 1>for another fifty years, do I think it's likely that

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in fifty years, I mean, in fifty years, the odds

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>are all these guys gets get passed, but Messi has

0:09:49.440 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>really separated himself from the field and there's no one

0:09:54.120 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>that's like pacing to beat him. Mahomes Is. It's gonna

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>be a very, very very long road. But as far

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>as mile markers and accomplishments, mahomes is ahead of Brady's pace.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Wimby had a chance had they won the title, to

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>be ahead of Lebron's pace, which makes you think that

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in the next if it's not him, in the next

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty or somebody does it. Otani's a tough one because

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 1>O'tani's doing. No one is trying to do what Otani's doing.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>People did it one hundred years ago, no one did

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>it forever, and now he's doing it. So I think

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that I think the most likely is Brady. If for

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 1>no other reason, then there's a guy. It's on the board.

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It's on the board. Brady gets passed in ten years.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>It is not on the board. Lebron gets passed in

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>ten years, but he could get passed in twenty, and

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the odds are he does get passed in

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>forty or fifty. I don't know enough about hockey, and

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Messi couldn't bop a past MESSI in ten years. I

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>guess he could. I don't think he will, but I

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:19.040
<v Speaker 1>guess he could. I think it's unlikely, in which case

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like Lemin Jamal, who has it you know, just

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>had the greatest teenage run arguably of any soccer player

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>since Pele. Or it's someone we don't know yet. Today's

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>show is brought to you by representing sponsor hard Rock

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Bet Sportsbook. Some sports fans call this the slow period

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:43.679
<v Speaker 1>until football season, but on hard Rock Bet we call

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>it Baseball season. Full slate almost every day for you

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>to bet on your favorite teams and players, build epics,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>same game parlays, even live bet every inning from first

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>pitch to the final out. However you like to play ball,

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet has you covered. And if you think

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>baseball's too slow, think again. The average first inning lasts

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>just seventeen minutes, making first inning bets one of the fastest,

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>most exciting ways to get in the action. Will there

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>be a run? Will it be a no run? First inning?

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You need party first inning bets for an even bigger

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>potential payday, So if you're ready to step into the

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.640
<v Speaker 1>batter's box, sign up with hard Rock Bet. Today and

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>place a five dollar bet. If it wins, you get

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 1>one hundred fifty dollars in bonus bets on top of

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>your winnings. That's right, extra one hundred fifty dollars in

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>your account. Plus, hard Rock Bet gives you new promos

0:12:32.559 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>every single day, no sweat bets, profit boost, bonus bets

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and more. Open hard Rock Bet now and see what

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you've got today. Sure, hart Rock Bet is Florida's only

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>legal sportsbook, but you don't have to be in Florida

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>to join the party. Hard Rock Bet is also live

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:52.079
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona, Ohio, New Jersey, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, Illinois, Colorado,

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and Michigan, with more states on the way. So download

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>hard Rock Bet and Swing for the Fences.

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Today, offered by the Seminole Tribe of Florida, offered by

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 2>Seminol hard Rock Digital LLC and all other states. Must

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 2>be twenty one plus and physically president in Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan,

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey, Ohio, Tennessee, or Virginia. Play terms and conditions apply.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 2>Concerned about gambling in Florida, call one eight three to

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 2>three play wise in Indiana. If you are somebody you

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 2>know as a gambling problem wants help, call what eight

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:25.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred and nine with it in Arizona, Ohio, Virginia, call

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 2>one eight hundred My reset gambling problem called one eight

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 2>hundred gambler?

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>All right? More goat questions. Alex says, do goats have

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>an obligation to humanity to play? Forever?

0:13:37.559 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Love?

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>It is a long email. Hey, Nick, years ago, you

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Tom Brady's decision to keep playing Layton

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 1>to his career, especially after the reports that his decision

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to play Laton to his career was a major factor

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in his eventual divorce from GZL Bunchin. Let me pause

0:13:57.840 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>this real quick before I get to the rest of

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the email. This take that I did that he's referencing

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>had a lot more resonance than I thought it would

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>at the time. The great Jim Gray, who at least

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>used to do a podcast with Tom Brady, talked to

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>me about this take. I don't want to reveal confidences here,

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>but an NBA superstar who I had no reason to

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>think liked me at all, and I would have thought

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>probably didn't like me even though we hadn't interacted, reached

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 1>out to me like two years after I gave did

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this Tom Brady segment about how he saw it that

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>made him totally reconsider what he thought of me as

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a broadcaster, and had been find my work ever since.

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>So that Tom Brady segment that Alec is referencing like

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>had more of an impact than I thought when I

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.840
<v Speaker 1>was doing it in real time, So Alec now recaps

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>it for me. Back to his email, your argument was

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>one I've always thought was really interesting. You said that

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Brady was in such rare territories the greatest football player ever,

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that normal human standards didn't fully apply anymore. A normal

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>person might look at it and say he should have

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:33.000
<v Speaker 1>retired and prioritized keeping his family together. But your point

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was Brady was the only person who could answer a

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>question nobody else could, how far can the greatest quarterback

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of all time actually push the limits of longevity and performance.

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't just playing for another season. He was showing

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>what was possible. He was exploring the outer limits of

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>human performance in football, and because he was the only

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>person capable of doing that, there was almost a greater

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>purpose seeing how far it could go. You called it

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>an obligation to humanity. I believe that seems extreme, but

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe I did call at that. I'm curious how you

0:16:02.160 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>think this philosophy applies to other goats. Lebron is about

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>to start his twenty fourth season. Why shouldn't he try

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>to get to fifty thousand career points if his body

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>allows it? Could Brady have played until forty five? Like

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>he said? Quick note, Brady played to forty six. Brady

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have played to forty six? He asked? Could he maybe

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>have even played to fifty Messi's still playing an absurd

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>level at an age where most players are long retired.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>If he wants to drive for another World Cup in

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty thirty, why not? Tiger keeps coming back even though

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>he's not the same player, and people watch because we

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>want to see if there one more impossible moment left?

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Serena came back after retirement. Could Phelps have kept swimming

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>at some point? Do these athletes become more than just athletes?

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Are they the only people capable of showing us the

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>true limits of what's possible in their sport? It really

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>feels like they have a job that only they can do.

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Do you think the Brady argument applies across the board?

0:16:51.960 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>To guys like Lebron Messi, Tiger Serena. Should these ones

0:16:55.360 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in history athletes keep going until they physically can't anymore

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>because they are unique position to redefine the limits of

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the human mind and body? Or do you think there's

0:17:04.600 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>a point where walking aways the right choice? Would love

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to hear you discuss this all right. I'm super interested

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>in this, Alec because I don't think it just applies

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to sports. And I think I told this story when

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>when I talked about Brady the first time. But one

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons that Brady thing, you know, touched me

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to a degree, was I think there are different levels

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of all of us that are and I'm not trying

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>to put myself in the bucket of Tom Brady, but

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>just follow me here. Anyone that considers themselves elite at something,

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>or a high achiever, or someone with very lofty aspirations,

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>where assuming you have a family, assuming you have a

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>magnificant other children, where it starts to be a delicate

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>balance of what do I owe myself And we'll get

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to the humanity piece of it a moment, but myself

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in seeing how far I can actually push this thing

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>versus what do I owe my family, as far as time, attention,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>all of it, and there's you know, a hunt. There's

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a hundred accurate anecdotes of some of the most successful

0:18:40.200 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>people in the world as they're dying or in their

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 1>old age saying I wish I had spent more time

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>with my family, and you very rarely hear people say

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had, you know, gotten to more meetings.

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I wish I had, you know, run one more company.

0:18:58.400 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Yet in real time it's very difficult for people to

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>make the decision that it seems like we all know

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 1>that at the end of our days we will wish

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we had made because part of what makes someone able

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to achieve at a very high level is a mentality

0:19:18.640 --> 0:19:24.880
<v Speaker 1>that makes them the evaporating finish line that there's always

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>something next to go accomplish. Then there is, so that's

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>your own personal what I want to see, what I

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>can do versus what I owe the people I love.

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 1>There is then extra levels to it, right, which is

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>in Brady's case, he had literally there was there was

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 1>nothing left to accomplish. You could just keep accomplishing it. Again,

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the question of inspiring those you love, or, as the

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Alec writes, quoting me, back to me. I guess inspiring

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the world as a whole, and at some point for

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>certain people, does that obligation become greater than everyone's number

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>one in theory obligation, which is to their family. And

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is There is no right way

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>to answer it, but I think it's one of the

0:20:55.320 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 1>most fascinating questions there is. That is are there certain

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly we all understand there are certain jobs that are

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>so important to the world that we expect the people

0:21:19.760 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>who undertake them to put the greater good ahead of

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, themselves and their loved ones. Whether it's you're

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>talking about astronaut, you know, someone who is you know,

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like I have to leave my family for three

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>years to go try to push humanity forward. Folks who

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>you know. There are certain things in the medical field

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 1>field I assume, where you put yourself at massive risk,

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but you're trying to you know, save you know, uncountless lives. Obviously,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>there are people people who put their life online in

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the military, who think that they are you know who,

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Their kids might grow without a father or a mother,

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>but it's for the greater good. We all, we all

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>understand those. Then there's the trickier ones, which is, you're

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in the entertainment business like Tom Brady, you're in sports,

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>but you can just be the greatest in the history

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:35.919
<v Speaker 1>of the world at something. Can that ever trump your

0:22:36.000 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 1>responsibilities as a parent? Obviously, kids are always gonna be

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>taken care of. They're they're gonna have different benefits from

0:22:45.040 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>you being that person. But the benefits that they were

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna have, those are you know, those stop increasing at

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>some point, like the wealth and the fame and the notoriety.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>At some point that's diminishing returns, and it's still just

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>less time with you. And so I think when I

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.040
<v Speaker 1>did this four years ago, I'm in the similar spot

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that I am now, which is I don't have the

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>right answer, but I don't think it's easy. I don't

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's as simple as, oh my god, this guy,

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 1>what was he thinking he put his profession ahead of

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>his family. I think there was a bigger feeling of obligation,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think one of the and now this is

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 1>again I'm mixing metaphors, but I think at one one

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:33.480
<v Speaker 1>of the anecdotes I gave was my dad, my dad

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.479
<v Speaker 1>who's still around and I adore him and is a

0:23:36.520 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>great man. My dad, as you guys have heard me

0:23:39.880 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about, we're in the Kansaity Fire Union for my

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>entire childhood, like for I don't know better part of

0:23:45.880 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty years, and there were hundreds, maybe a thousand, I

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know, hundreds of people relying on him all the time.

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Negotiate the best contract, get us the best benefits, get

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>us the best retirement, get us the best pension, all

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>these things. And again I had and have a great dad,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>but he unquestionably felt like like that was his calling

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and that was his obligation to the world, almost more

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:37.000
<v Speaker 1>so necessarily than go into all of our stuff. And

0:24:37.040 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>not only do I not like resent him for that,

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I get it entirely, I totally get it. And it's

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:50.679
<v Speaker 1>such an interesting thing because I see a lot of

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:56.359
<v Speaker 1>that in how I go about my work while also

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 1>recognizing as I'm doing it, yeah, I'm probably gonna regret this.

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's a fascinating thing. I don't know if that

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 1>was the answer to the question, but that is a

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:17.160
<v Speaker 1>very interesting topic for me. Brian from Zimbabwe writes in Hi,

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick Demonse and What's Right Team, big fan of the

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast and first things first too, so big fan so

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>big of a fan that, even though I'm Zimbabwean and

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.760
<v Speaker 1>have very little interest in the NFL, I still tune

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>into both shows even when the topics are just football related.

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I'd love a shout out to Zimbabwe one of these days.

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>You got it right now. Your show really does have

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a global audience. Thank you. My mailbag topic is is

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>there anything wrong with being a doubter? I think it's

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>unfair to act like doubting a team or players some

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>cardinal sin. Most times, in fact, doubt is the most

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>logical stance, like sorry, I didn't immediately believe jokicher brunting

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:56.639
<v Speaker 1>could be number one options on championship winners when the

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>history of the sports says you're typical. Your best player

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.679
<v Speaker 1>typically needs to be he's good on defensive end or

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 1>not be a small guard. I've seen a lot of

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>comments from Knicks fans Nuggets fans. It's that are telling

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Nick stay on that side or clowning in for not

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>immediately ranking their team's players high enough. Even though what

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we all presumably wants people want sports and sports pundits

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 1>is for people to continually update their positions as more

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>information comes in, which is something I've seen Nick do

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot. Yes, it's great if you're a true believer

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.399
<v Speaker 1>from day one, but I think it's I don't think

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a crime to wait until the person has proven

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>something before believing in them. All right, great email, Brian.

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to hedge on this a bit, and

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to defend some of the people who attack

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:43.440
<v Speaker 1>me about Jokich. Not so much, Bronze. I do not

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think there is anything wrong with having the all believe

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it when I see it stance. If you do have

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that stance, you obviously don't get the same level of

0:26:56.080 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>bragging rights as someone that says I knew it all along,

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I believed all along, you were late to the party.

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that is that's typically how this goes. I

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>also think it is totally fair for if you were

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>very vocal and very loud in your skepticism that when

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 1>if you do finally come around, people are giving you

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a little shit for it. So that's me with Jokic.

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I was one of the biggest Jokic skeptics, and then

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I did fully come around, and people still hold it

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:46.760
<v Speaker 1>against me to a degree. I think that's fair because

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>I was one of the loudest yokic skeptics. That's a

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:55.720
<v Speaker 1>separate bucket than Brunson. Where my opinion on Brunson was very,

0:27:55.840 --> 0:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>very mainstream when the nickt signed him. Nice player, maybe

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a bit, probably a bit of an overplay pay and

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>obviously is not ever going to be the best player

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on a champion. I was vocal in that, but it

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was that was the mainstream opinion. We just all were wrong.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing about the Brunston that bothers me

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit when people try to throw that old clip

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in my face is while I was in the mainstream,

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>then I came around far quicker than the majority of people.

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I didn't wait to see them win the championship. I

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>put them in Club Superstar a couple of years ago,

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>where I think people can get in trouble, and where

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I do think, you know, not being they're not allowed

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to change their opinions, so to speak. Where I think

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that's fair is if you definitively say a guy will

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>never win or will never do something, and then they

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>do it. I don't think with Joker, as harsh as

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I was and skeptical as I was, I don't think

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I ever said it was impossible or he never would.

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>If you do that and then they prove you wrong,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>you just kind of got to eat it. That's at

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 1>least where I stand on it. Boost Mobile's proving that

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to overpay for great wireless unlike the

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.680
<v Speaker 1>savings with the twenty dollars a month forever Unlimited plan

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>permanent price with no contracts and no price heights. You

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>can keep your phone and your number, but you save

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>up to six hundred dollars a year compared to the

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>major carrier. Stop over, bang and switch to a fair

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.520
<v Speaker 1>price at boostmobile dot com today based on average annual

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>single line payment of AT and T, Verizon and T

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Mobile customers, compared to twelve months on the boost Mobile

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Unlimited Plan as of January twenty twenty six. For full

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>off for details, visit boost mobile dot com. All Right,

0:29:54.400 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>one more email, It says from Connor about Lebron's but

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not really. Dear Nick. I've been a fan of yours

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 1>since the first time I saw you go undisputed and

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>debate skip Wow. That's ten years ago. I think your

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.080
<v Speaker 1>sports sakes are brilliant. I would like to share a

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>take with you that I hope you will love. Here

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it is Lebron should go to the Spurs. He would

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>be an excellent addition to a team that seemed to

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>only play Wimby in four guards, and his ability to

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>play the forward position and be surrounded by young athletic

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 1>wing talent com I with his knowledge of the game,

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>passing abilities abilities still be a number two scoring option

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I think would lead to a title. However, that's only

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:36.160
<v Speaker 1>part one. Here's my windhorse moment he rights. If Lebron

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 1>goes to San Antonio and wins a title, then he

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>will have won a title for four different states Florida, Ohio, California,

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and Texas. Those are four of the most four of

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the five most populous and largest delegate counting states in

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.840
<v Speaker 1>America in the general election. Lebron has shown to be

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>politically active and has taken a lot of care of

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>his community and Acron. Having built the I promise school

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>him any other initiatives. If you ever thought of something

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.280
<v Speaker 1>greater than team ownership, he could definitely consider a run

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>for president on a generic progressive populist platform. I know

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party would welcome his fame, and I genuinely

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 1>think he could win four hundred of the five hundred

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and thirty eight delegates in the general. If he just

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 1>won the states he won the title in, that would

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be one forty one of the two seventy necessary to

0:31:28.640 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>carry him to the White House. I hope you enjoyed

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>this take, and if you did, please use it as

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>your own. I won't use it as my own, but

0:31:34.440 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I do love it. I won't tell anyone I gave

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you that take. Keep making great content, and someday I'll

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 1>stop by trinis. Thank you so much from connor Um Listen.

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I love the Galaxy Brain version of it. I sadly

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think we'll ever like I think someone getting four

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:58.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred delegates. I don't think we're that country anymore. However, uh,

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think we might be a country of celebrity presidents,

0:32:05.720 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>not every cycle, but maybe every other cycle. And so

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Bron Steph. If we're talking about guys who I think

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>would run as Democrats, Bron Steph, Mark Cuban, I think all,

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 1>if they wanted to do it, are viable. I think,

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't. I don't know as politics, but

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I I think this is gonna sound so crazy. I think,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>like Brad Pitt, Matthew McConaughey, if they wanted to would

0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>be viable. I do love the idea that if Lebron

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do it, him deciding. You know, Texas people

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about flipping Texas forever. It's it hasn't happened.

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>It hasn't happened. If I win a title for a

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:11.960
<v Speaker 1>team in Texas, does that put me over the top? Thing?

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this the the cities and even these red states

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>are Democrat already. So a lot of the Spurs fans

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 1>live in San Antonio, They're already voting Democrat. It's the

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>outlying areas that really give you a trouble if you're

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:30.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to win a Democratic nomination. But I love that idea.

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's a very I don't it's not going

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen, but it is. I shouldn't say it's not

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. Who the hell knows? And what celebrities. The

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>only celebrity that I could see, like sports related celebrity

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that I could see maybe running for president on the

0:33:52.280 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Republican side, I think it's Dana White. I think he's

0:33:56.120 --> 0:34:08.839
<v Speaker 1>the only one. But that's a fun email. And you know,

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time, I've talked about this before, but

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>once upon a time, my entire career plan was to

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>do sports, build a big enough name for myself in sports,

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:29.839
<v Speaker 1>to then switch over to either political commentary or run

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>for office. And I softened on that over the last decade,

0:34:40.719 --> 0:34:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and my wife is adamantly opposed to it, so it's

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>been tabled. But here's what here, here's the commitment I'll

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>make to you, the audience. If all of a sudden,

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>forget sports figures, but sports media figures start actually getting

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>on debate stages, I'll find my way up there. NFL

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>shows next week. Hope you enjoyed the mailbag. Thank you

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to Boost, thank you to hard Rock, thank you to Volume,

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Blue Dock. Talk to you us soon.

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll right