1 00:00:10,720 --> 00:00:13,640 Speaker 1: What's going on everyone, Haleiol would hear and welcome to 2 00:00:13,720 --> 00:00:17,000 Speaker 1: this week's episode of Playmakers. Since we're just a couple 3 00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:19,720 Speaker 1: of weeks out from the twenty twenty NFL Draft, today's 4 00:00:19,760 --> 00:00:24,000 Speaker 1: guest is Cynthia Freeland. Cynthia is NFL Networks analytics expert 5 00:00:24,040 --> 00:00:27,320 Speaker 1: and every draft season she does her own analytics based 6 00:00:27,360 --> 00:00:30,480 Speaker 1: mock drafts on NFL dot Com. We'll hear from her 7 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:32,840 Speaker 1: on why her mocks are a little different. Who she's 8 00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:35,479 Speaker 1: picking one through five? You, oh yeah? Who she has 9 00:00:35,479 --> 00:00:41,400 Speaker 1: the Chargers selecting with a sixth overall pick. All right, 10 00:00:41,479 --> 00:00:45,120 Speaker 1: let's welcome in NFL Networks analytics expert Cynthia Freeland. Cynthia, 11 00:00:45,120 --> 00:00:47,440 Speaker 1: how are you doing? You know, I'm hanging in there, 12 00:00:47,520 --> 00:00:52,120 Speaker 1: just chilling in the kitchen right now. Okay, welcome to 13 00:00:52,159 --> 00:00:54,320 Speaker 1: the new reality. It's a beautiful kitchen. I do have 14 00:00:54,360 --> 00:00:56,480 Speaker 1: to say that. Thanks. You know, there's a lot going 15 00:00:56,520 --> 00:00:58,680 Speaker 1: on in here right now, but not a lot going 16 00:00:58,680 --> 00:01:00,600 Speaker 1: on right here now except for this. But you know, 17 00:01:00,680 --> 00:01:03,520 Speaker 1: we're good. We're good. So we have you on because 18 00:01:03,520 --> 00:01:05,480 Speaker 1: we're going to run through a mock draft all the 19 00:01:05,480 --> 00:01:08,160 Speaker 1: way through the Chargers pick. You do have mock drafts 20 00:01:08,160 --> 00:01:10,600 Speaker 1: on NFL dot com, but yours are a little different 21 00:01:10,640 --> 00:01:13,320 Speaker 1: because they're analytic space, So how would you describe that? 22 00:01:14,319 --> 00:01:16,440 Speaker 1: So we were trying to show when I talked to 23 00:01:16,480 --> 00:01:18,840 Speaker 1: my editor about what kind of mock is sort of 24 00:01:18,840 --> 00:01:21,520 Speaker 1: missing from the marketplace, and we wanted to look at 25 00:01:21,560 --> 00:01:25,440 Speaker 1: one that only considered how many wins were added by 26 00:01:25,480 --> 00:01:28,720 Speaker 1: adding just one player, and then the wins for twenty twenty, 27 00:01:28,720 --> 00:01:32,160 Speaker 1: because once you got passed out projecting one season, like 28 00:01:32,280 --> 00:01:33,680 Speaker 1: I don't know who's going to be available in the 29 00:01:33,760 --> 00:01:36,440 Speaker 1: draft next year, and it just becomes way too theoretical 30 00:01:36,480 --> 00:01:39,280 Speaker 1: in that regard. So what we did was we took all, right, 31 00:01:39,319 --> 00:01:42,320 Speaker 1: here's here's the game. You have one pick, you're not 32 00:01:42,360 --> 00:01:45,200 Speaker 1: allowed to make any trades, and who adds the most 33 00:01:45,280 --> 00:01:49,600 Speaker 1: wins just adding the one player given the current personnel 34 00:01:49,960 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 1: at the time of writing it. So you know, my 35 00:01:52,400 --> 00:01:55,000 Speaker 1: most recent mock came out about ten days ago, so 36 00:01:55,360 --> 00:01:57,400 Speaker 1: not much has changed in terms of free agency from 37 00:01:57,440 --> 00:02:00,440 Speaker 1: that point, but we had to update it after after 38 00:02:00,480 --> 00:02:02,960 Speaker 1: a free agency got into full swing. So who adds 39 00:02:03,240 --> 00:02:07,200 Speaker 1: the most wins given what we know right now? How 40 00:02:07,240 --> 00:02:09,680 Speaker 1: often do you update them? Given sort of the changes 41 00:02:09,720 --> 00:02:11,720 Speaker 1: the teams are still making at this point, even though 42 00:02:11,720 --> 00:02:14,200 Speaker 1: we're getting closer to the draft now, so I'm about 43 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:16,880 Speaker 1: weekly because I want to write when the draft starts. 44 00:02:17,560 --> 00:02:20,800 Speaker 1: See to me, this can approximate sort of an opportunity 45 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:23,080 Speaker 1: to analysis that a team could be looking at real 46 00:02:23,120 --> 00:02:25,560 Speaker 1: time during the draft, because of course, you know, look 47 00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:28,680 Speaker 1: not necessarily in the first round, but in subsequent rounds 48 00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:31,200 Speaker 1: you do have kind of a trade off between who, 49 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:33,880 Speaker 1: for example, at the running back position, you know you 50 00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:36,280 Speaker 1: can get into the second or third round and you 51 00:02:36,280 --> 00:02:38,240 Speaker 1: can be like, all right, we can either draft this 52 00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:41,000 Speaker 1: running back or get this free agent running back and 53 00:02:41,120 --> 00:02:44,080 Speaker 1: then draft this linebacker or whatever another need on the team. 54 00:02:44,240 --> 00:02:47,520 Speaker 1: So doing that opportunity analysis real time that can be 55 00:02:47,520 --> 00:02:50,720 Speaker 1: helpful for teams during the actual draft. Again, kind of 56 00:02:50,760 --> 00:02:53,240 Speaker 1: take round one out of it, because you have so 57 00:02:53,320 --> 00:02:56,000 Speaker 1: much invested in round one that you need to get 58 00:02:56,040 --> 00:02:58,640 Speaker 1: that right right Like, so if you're if you're able 59 00:02:58,680 --> 00:03:01,120 Speaker 1: to then go forward and kind do your cost benefit 60 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 1: analysis you real time of those subsequent picks, then you're 61 00:03:05,040 --> 00:03:07,079 Speaker 1: in great shape. So we show it for the first 62 00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:08,720 Speaker 1: round because these are the names that people are the 63 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:11,440 Speaker 1: most familiar with, it's most interesting in terms of team 64 00:03:11,440 --> 00:03:14,200 Speaker 1: needs and what adds the most wins. But in terms 65 00:03:14,200 --> 00:03:18,280 Speaker 1: of actual applications, and every team has an analytics department, 66 00:03:18,480 --> 00:03:21,280 Speaker 1: some function like this, they can do that and it 67 00:03:21,600 --> 00:03:24,200 Speaker 1: becomes a really interesting an interesting thing for them. So 68 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:27,160 Speaker 1: I'm updating mine. You know, as the draft picks go in, 69 00:03:27,240 --> 00:03:29,800 Speaker 1: it slides out. Luckily I write computer code, so it 70 00:03:29,840 --> 00:03:35,040 Speaker 1: all kind of happens automatically. Nerves all right, alert, people'll 71 00:03:35,040 --> 00:03:37,360 Speaker 1: take it though. It's very interesting. It is totally above 72 00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:39,920 Speaker 1: my head. But let's get right into it here. In 73 00:03:39,920 --> 00:03:42,400 Speaker 1: the first round, the Cincinnati Bengals are on the clock 74 00:03:42,440 --> 00:03:45,320 Speaker 1: with the first overall pick. Who are they taken? So 75 00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:47,560 Speaker 1: I do think Joe Burrow will go here. I do 76 00:03:47,680 --> 00:03:50,600 Speaker 1: absolutely because every rumor I've heard, I love Daniel Jeremiah. 77 00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:52,280 Speaker 1: He does such a great job. Obviously you guys are 78 00:03:52,280 --> 00:03:54,760 Speaker 1: super familiar with him. If he says that's what he's hearing, 79 00:03:54,840 --> 00:03:56,920 Speaker 1: I'm with DJ. But if you were to look at 80 00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:59,120 Speaker 1: the analytics, we're gonna go with Chase Young off the 81 00:03:59,240 --> 00:04:02,640 Speaker 1: edge here because in terms of what the Cincinnati Bengals 82 00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:06,560 Speaker 1: have in their arsenal right now, namely a horrible offensive line, 83 00:04:06,760 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 1: a very bad old line. Adding adding Chase Young to 84 00:04:10,520 --> 00:04:12,800 Speaker 1: add add the pressure on the pass rush. I mean, 85 00:04:13,080 --> 00:04:15,040 Speaker 1: you've got a Bosa on your team at the Chargers. 86 00:04:15,080 --> 00:04:16,560 Speaker 1: You know what it's like when you have good pass 87 00:04:16,640 --> 00:04:19,160 Speaker 1: rushing ability. So in melboting room on the other side 88 00:04:19,200 --> 00:04:21,159 Speaker 1: of seem very helpful. So if you're looking for a 89 00:04:21,200 --> 00:04:23,520 Speaker 1: one year pop, it's gotta be Chase Young for me. 90 00:04:23,560 --> 00:04:25,880 Speaker 1: And that's a spot though I think in reality it'll 91 00:04:25,920 --> 00:04:28,440 Speaker 1: be your bro. When you pick a guy like Chase 92 00:04:28,520 --> 00:04:30,560 Speaker 1: Young and take him first overall, does that mean to 93 00:04:30,600 --> 00:04:33,000 Speaker 1: you he is the best player in this year's draft. 94 00:04:33,320 --> 00:04:35,440 Speaker 1: He is the best player in this year's draft in 95 00:04:35,480 --> 00:04:37,640 Speaker 1: my model for the sake of okay, if you're going 96 00:04:37,680 --> 00:04:42,200 Speaker 1: to project out who independent of team fit, because as 97 00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:46,360 Speaker 1: we know, team fit is absolutely everything. Some positions are 98 00:04:46,440 --> 00:04:50,120 Speaker 1: more dependent on team fit than others. So example, whoever 99 00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:52,960 Speaker 1: is the quarterback for the Bengals, We'll need the Bengals 100 00:04:53,000 --> 00:04:55,320 Speaker 1: to invest in that old line. It doesn't even matter, 101 00:04:55,520 --> 00:04:58,040 Speaker 1: right and right now, if you look in the marketplace, 102 00:04:58,279 --> 00:05:01,360 Speaker 1: you could get a very good free agent quarterbacks if 103 00:05:01,360 --> 00:05:03,920 Speaker 1: we heard of Cam Newton anyone right and put him 104 00:05:03,920 --> 00:05:06,440 Speaker 1: in that spot and then Chase Young proviser about So 105 00:05:06,480 --> 00:05:08,640 Speaker 1: for me, Chase Young is the best is the best, 106 00:05:08,680 --> 00:05:13,719 Speaker 1: like the most sure because he's the most independent. Makes sense, 107 00:05:13,880 --> 00:05:16,880 Speaker 1: all right, Washington Redskins up at number two, So the 108 00:05:16,960 --> 00:05:20,240 Speaker 1: Washington Redskins. All right, I'm gonna make one. I'm going 109 00:05:20,320 --> 00:05:22,880 Speaker 1: to take a liberty here because I don't think that 110 00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:25,760 Speaker 1: Trent Williams will be back. I saw his Instagram feed, 111 00:05:25,760 --> 00:05:28,520 Speaker 1: his Twitter feed. You know, I don't think it's official 112 00:05:28,600 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 1: yet to my knowledge, I have not seen I don't 113 00:05:30,680 --> 00:05:34,880 Speaker 1: know anything about. I'm not in his contract, but I 114 00:05:33,800 --> 00:05:36,799 Speaker 1: do not I do not believe he'll be back, meaning 115 00:05:36,839 --> 00:05:39,719 Speaker 1: I think that they should take the very best potential 116 00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:42,799 Speaker 1: left tackle that's available in the draft. I think they should, 117 00:05:43,080 --> 00:05:46,080 Speaker 1: you know, absolutely fortify that, especially with Dwyane Haskins, who 118 00:05:46,080 --> 00:05:49,160 Speaker 1: they invested in last season. And for me, that means 119 00:05:49,200 --> 00:05:51,880 Speaker 1: Andrew Thomas, who's a tackle that comes out of Georgia. 120 00:05:52,000 --> 00:05:55,280 Speaker 1: He has I spent a lot of time measuring. There's 121 00:05:55,360 --> 00:05:59,200 Speaker 1: four tackles in this draft that are really projectedy above 122 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,000 Speaker 1: average or and for me, Andrew Thomas happens to be 123 00:06:02,200 --> 00:06:05,040 Speaker 1: the highest rated one of them. So Detroit has the 124 00:06:05,160 --> 00:06:08,160 Speaker 1: number three overall pick. A lot of talk about potentially 125 00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:10,799 Speaker 1: maybe them moving out of that spot, but with no trades. 126 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:13,760 Speaker 1: If they stay at three, who do they take? Okay, 127 00:06:13,800 --> 00:06:16,760 Speaker 1: so I'm with you. I think this spockets traded out. 128 00:06:17,120 --> 00:06:20,000 Speaker 1: I think I actually think. Look I'm from Michigan. I 129 00:06:20,040 --> 00:06:22,560 Speaker 1: think if they don't, right, like, you got to figure 130 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:24,840 Speaker 1: it out because I think their biggest need, especially after 131 00:06:24,920 --> 00:06:28,520 Speaker 1: trading away Darius Slay, their biggest need corner and corner. 132 00:06:28,720 --> 00:06:32,560 Speaker 1: So typically teams they prioritize positions, so it goes you first, 133 00:06:32,640 --> 00:06:34,840 Speaker 1: you have your quarterback obviously, and then you've got your 134 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:37,120 Speaker 1: pass rusher, so that's why the chase young thing, and 135 00:06:37,160 --> 00:06:39,240 Speaker 1: then you got your left tackle, and then it's kind 136 00:06:39,279 --> 00:06:43,039 Speaker 1: of debate receiver or corner. It's six of one, half 137 00:06:43,040 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 1: a dozen of another in terms of what's the next 138 00:06:45,040 --> 00:06:48,120 Speaker 1: most important. So for me, Jeff Acuda out of Ohio 139 00:06:48,240 --> 00:06:51,839 Speaker 1: State this year's cornerback class, which by the way, Charger 140 00:06:51,839 --> 00:06:53,960 Speaker 1: scans don't even need to know one thing about corners 141 00:06:53,960 --> 00:06:57,360 Speaker 1: because you are so stacked at that position. Don't even 142 00:06:57,360 --> 00:07:01,320 Speaker 1: worry about it. What corner, I'm not worry But Jeff 143 00:07:01,360 --> 00:07:04,120 Speaker 1: Okuda is to me by far and away. There's one 144 00:07:04,120 --> 00:07:05,919 Speaker 1: guy who projects to be really good and then the 145 00:07:05,960 --> 00:07:08,800 Speaker 1: rest kind of all down here are on average average 146 00:07:08,839 --> 00:07:11,560 Speaker 1: to maybe like a little above average. But Jeff Okuda 147 00:07:11,720 --> 00:07:14,520 Speaker 1: is absolutely like heads and shoulders, projects to be the 148 00:07:14,560 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 1: best one for me. All Right, some New York Giants 149 00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:19,720 Speaker 1: up at number four. Let me be honest with you, 150 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:23,880 Speaker 1: my favorite player in this whole draft. And I rarely 151 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:27,200 Speaker 1: pick favorites, but some people are harder for me to 152 00:07:27,240 --> 00:07:30,360 Speaker 1: track with computer vision and all of the unbiased metrics 153 00:07:30,360 --> 00:07:32,520 Speaker 1: that I use. And I'm gonna be honest with you 154 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:34,840 Speaker 1: because he was so hard. I spent a lot of 155 00:07:34,880 --> 00:07:38,400 Speaker 1: time looking at Isaiah Simmons, and I think the Giants 156 00:07:38,800 --> 00:07:42,320 Speaker 1: Isaiah Simmons, Oh my gosh, he's just like like, you know, 157 00:07:42,440 --> 00:07:45,280 Speaker 1: Derwin James. He kind of like that, like he has 158 00:07:45,480 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 1: some Derwin James or you know, if you're a Giants fan, 159 00:07:47,720 --> 00:07:51,480 Speaker 1: maybe he's more like a Lawrence Taylor. But I actually 160 00:07:51,600 --> 00:07:55,120 Speaker 1: that's what I think they could really benefit from. However, 161 00:07:55,560 --> 00:07:58,080 Speaker 1: they did pick up Blake Martinez in free agency and 162 00:07:58,120 --> 00:08:00,800 Speaker 1: he's really good, and they looked at it get James 163 00:08:00,840 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 1: Bradberry so their corner. So just edging out Isaiah Simmons 164 00:08:04,360 --> 00:08:07,200 Speaker 1: is actually some guy who projects to play right tackle, 165 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:11,840 Speaker 1: protecting Daniel Jones, helping Sae Quon Barkley creating more stability 166 00:08:11,840 --> 00:08:14,440 Speaker 1: along the old line. So for me, Tristan Worth's is 167 00:08:14,440 --> 00:08:17,080 Speaker 1: going to be the next one. He's he projects to 168 00:08:17,080 --> 00:08:20,520 Speaker 1: play right tackle or to succeed the most playing right tackle. 169 00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:23,480 Speaker 1: For me, he's out of Iowa, he's a junior. He's 170 00:08:23,520 --> 00:08:26,800 Speaker 1: you know, look, it's like I said, there are four guys, 171 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:30,080 Speaker 1: four offensive linemen that are tackles that are really projected 172 00:08:30,120 --> 00:08:33,040 Speaker 1: strong in me, just because he fits that right tackle profile. 173 00:08:33,080 --> 00:08:36,000 Speaker 1: So well, that's why he's number two. All right, Miami 174 00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:39,360 Speaker 1: Dolphins up at number five. Well, there he is. Miami Dolphins, 175 00:08:39,400 --> 00:08:41,720 Speaker 1: they get in in my mock, they get Joe Burrow. 176 00:08:41,920 --> 00:08:46,640 Speaker 1: The reason why is that Joe Burrow his quarterback projection 177 00:08:47,440 --> 00:08:51,120 Speaker 1: both under pressure not under pressure. The resume that we 178 00:08:51,160 --> 00:08:54,800 Speaker 1: saw last season, so twenty nineteen with Joe Brady acts 179 00:08:54,880 --> 00:08:59,079 Speaker 1: his coordinator, that resume is nasty. Like I can compare 180 00:08:59,120 --> 00:09:01,040 Speaker 1: that year over year to any of the guys that 181 00:09:01,080 --> 00:09:03,680 Speaker 1: are in my sample, and he just pops, He pops 182 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:07,440 Speaker 1: off the charts. The problem is that the year prior 183 00:09:07,760 --> 00:09:09,920 Speaker 1: so we saw a big jump in his development twenty 184 00:09:09,960 --> 00:09:12,800 Speaker 1: eighteen to twenty nineteen. What that tells me a big 185 00:09:12,800 --> 00:09:16,080 Speaker 1: like bigger than an outsized jump. What that tells me 186 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:18,920 Speaker 1: is that there's a bit more volatility, meaning it does 187 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:21,199 Speaker 1: matter who's playing around him. I mean, look at those 188 00:09:21,200 --> 00:09:23,920 Speaker 1: wide receivers he had, like Justin Jefferson will go in 189 00:09:23,960 --> 00:09:26,160 Speaker 1: the first round, and then the guy who's an underclassman 190 00:09:26,240 --> 00:09:29,680 Speaker 1: can't even be draft eligible, Well, would have gone in 191 00:09:29,679 --> 00:09:32,440 Speaker 1: the first round, might even be better than George Justin Jefferson, 192 00:09:32,600 --> 00:09:34,679 Speaker 1: and then their running back will go high as well. 193 00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:37,839 Speaker 1: So the point is is, well, I am very high 194 00:09:37,880 --> 00:09:40,079 Speaker 1: on Joeber. Let may be clear, every quarterback in the 195 00:09:40,160 --> 00:09:43,080 Speaker 1: national footbiling there's no there's not one single quarterback ever 196 00:09:43,160 --> 00:09:45,360 Speaker 1: in the history of the national football including Andrew Luck 197 00:09:45,360 --> 00:09:48,880 Speaker 1: who is probably the highest regarded draft you know, draft 198 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:52,040 Speaker 1: eligiblequart everybody needs a system around them to help them. 199 00:09:52,080 --> 00:09:55,040 Speaker 1: So for me, even and the Dolphins, they got to 200 00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:57,160 Speaker 1: work in their system a little bit, especially that old line. 201 00:09:57,280 --> 00:09:59,720 Speaker 1: But to me, their biggest opportunity right here is to 202 00:09:59,760 --> 00:10:03,000 Speaker 1: pick Joe Brow all right, and then number six here 203 00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:06,400 Speaker 1: we go the Los Angeles Chargers. Who are they selecting. 204 00:10:07,200 --> 00:10:13,000 Speaker 1: So my model likes things that are known, right, And 205 00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:15,720 Speaker 1: what we know about Tyrod Taylor is that we saw 206 00:10:15,840 --> 00:10:20,520 Speaker 1: in Buffalo. We saw in Cleveland he has very consistent traits. 207 00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:24,520 Speaker 1: He's not a prone quarterback. He's not a quarterback who 208 00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:28,080 Speaker 1: he executes what is asked of him at a high 209 00:10:28,280 --> 00:10:31,800 Speaker 1: level on a consistent rate. Right, at a consistent rate. 210 00:10:32,080 --> 00:10:36,920 Speaker 1: So I have a smart pairing would be him and Tuah. 211 00:10:37,400 --> 00:10:40,920 Speaker 1: Now Tuah is polarizing for some people because of the 212 00:10:40,960 --> 00:10:43,880 Speaker 1: injury and we have you know, it feels like there's 213 00:10:44,080 --> 00:10:49,120 Speaker 1: unclear medical on him. But to me, I can only 214 00:10:49,120 --> 00:10:51,480 Speaker 1: go with what I know, and if he says he's 215 00:10:51,520 --> 00:10:53,520 Speaker 1: better than I got to believe him. Right, I'm not 216 00:10:53,600 --> 00:10:56,560 Speaker 1: a doctor. I don't know. So for me, Tuah is 217 00:10:56,600 --> 00:11:00,080 Speaker 1: that that kind of they actually have some traits that 218 00:11:00,120 --> 00:11:03,960 Speaker 1: would help each other two up. At his best is 219 00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:06,959 Speaker 1: has that quick passing of it. We saw he was 220 00:11:07,080 --> 00:11:10,280 Speaker 1: like a good blend of like quick passing and then 221 00:11:10,360 --> 00:11:14,840 Speaker 1: like strategic deep target, which is really think about it, 222 00:11:14,960 --> 00:11:18,840 Speaker 1: quick passing Austin Eckler, any of your tight ends, and 223 00:11:18,880 --> 00:11:21,760 Speaker 1: then the deep strategic plays. I mean, you've obviously got 224 00:11:21,760 --> 00:11:25,000 Speaker 1: there's that one guy, you know, number thirteen with Keenan 225 00:11:25,040 --> 00:11:27,160 Speaker 1: Allen in those strategic and obviously Keenan Allen on the 226 00:11:27,200 --> 00:11:29,880 Speaker 1: slot he's a nic hair matchup all over the field. 227 00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:32,559 Speaker 1: So but if you think about being able to use 228 00:11:32,600 --> 00:11:37,160 Speaker 1: that strategically, and two is mobile, and so is Tyrod. Again, 229 00:11:37,520 --> 00:11:41,160 Speaker 1: the injury is something to absolutely take into consideration. But 230 00:11:41,200 --> 00:11:45,720 Speaker 1: I'm kind of asserting that to the best of our knowledge, 231 00:11:45,840 --> 00:11:48,040 Speaker 1: there is, there is what. That's what we're going with. 232 00:11:48,040 --> 00:11:50,600 Speaker 1: Cynthia Freeland picking too a tongue of Viloa to go 233 00:11:50,640 --> 00:11:52,800 Speaker 1: to the Bolts. Cynthia, thank you so much for joining 234 00:11:52,800 --> 00:11:54,719 Speaker 1: me on this mock draft today. We really appreciate it. 235 00:11:54,800 --> 00:11:57,679 Speaker 1: Thank you for having me stay safe,