WEBVTT - Beating the Book: 2022 Week 13 NFL MegaPod Betting Preview

0:00:03.480 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Check it in Man Now Down Man Thursday Morning to

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:18.200
<v Speaker 1>seven First Beating the Book podcast megapod for week number thirteen.

0:00:18.320 --> 0:00:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I got that number right, Week thirteen in the National

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>Football League. It is December Man, six weeks left of

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>regular season action. It's Gil Alexander. That's the voice of

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Parlay, visa host staple on this show in the

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>studio right by me, Hello, Jeffrey, how you doing? Man?

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>You good? I'm good. I think we're tied now. By

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the way, I uh a glacial moving comeback by me. Well,

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>after a twenty and seven start, I believe I've gone

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>one in eight the last three weeks. That'll that'll happen

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>um with a one in eight performance, and then from

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.480
<v Speaker 1>his mom's cork attic in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, wearing a yans

0:00:50.520 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or yellow sweatshirt. It is the very spelt Todd wishing

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of everybody. How you doing, Toddy? Hey? Hey? It's very energetic,

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy all right? And our rotating guests for the week,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>someone who Todd was very rude to a couple of

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>years ago on this show, and it sparked much debate,

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>probably unbelievable. It wasn't rude anyone and let it be stricken.

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>For the record, please edit that out. Gil Ice is

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>off his rocker already, Thank you, O g. In sports betting,

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>using predictive algorithms to uh TO to determine the results

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>or to predict the results, I should say sporting events

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the great dr Bob Bob stole everybody st o l L.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>How you doing? Bob doing all right? Todd? You were

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>not rude to me. I don't even know what he's

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Bob just has to say that, Todd. We

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>all know that he's just being polite. Okay. Gilly has

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>a penchant for a small streak of mischievousness. So I

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know what you're talking about, Bob. Thanks for doing this,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it's good to see you. We never get to

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>see you, so it's good to see you. Very clear camera,

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>well done. Yeah, a new computer, new computer, Bob comes

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to us from Colorado. Is Deon Sander's gonna be the

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 1>coach in Colorado? I hope. So I don't know, right,

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you say, Bob? You should take the South

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Florida job. Oh that's the one he should take. Yeah,

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it's the least pressure of the three that he's been

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>all the talent they have and in the Florida market,

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>which he knows. Yeah. Well, the one thing that is

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>interesting about him is though of course he will make

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the announcement either to overshadow the final rankings or the

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>portal day on Monday, they'll actually put the hats on

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the table, like right, he's got to have all the

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>attention alright. Week thirteen in the NFL UM A couple

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of things here before we get into our best bets

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>dumbbell of the week. Okay, I'm going off the board.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 1>This week, Josh McDaniels pitched the perfect game of making

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:58.399
<v Speaker 1>every wrong decision and got away with it. It's amazing.

0:02:58.480 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>It is incredible that he did everything possibly wrong and

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders still won the game, and they got a

0:03:06.639 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>premature whistle correct, and they got a lucky break on

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jacob's fumble that they called that he forward progress

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and b has terrible goal. But but just start us

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>all in the second half, everything McDaniels did wrong. Fourth

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 1>down and one at the seven kicks the field goal. Okay,

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, sure, why not? Why not do that? Raiders?

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Then in their next possession they punt after honestly, fourth

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and six at the plus forty five in a game

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>where no one's getting stops should have been a considered

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>go for it as well. They fall start doesn't matter,

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>so fourth and eleven, of course you're gonna punt after

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Seattle that great drive Regino got strip sacked, fumbled, Raiders

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>get it back. Then he decides to go for it

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>on fourth and one in his own end and they run.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>The horrible play call of Jacobs has not been stopped

0:03:59.400 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>on a traditional run the whole game. They were on

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the pitch play and he loses four yards okay to Seattle, touchdown.

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Then Raiders go down the field after Seattle get took

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the lead of Raiders go down the field, score touchdown.

0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it ended up working out for him. But in

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a minute fifty four to go and all three of

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>your time outs, I would have gone for two. In

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a game where you could not get stops, I would

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>have gone for two and try to win the game.

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Right there, got away with it all right. You get

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to stop amazingly enough with forty seconds to go in

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>two timeouts in a game again no one stopped anyone.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>You play for overtime? What how do you play for

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>overtime when you get the ball. Yes, I know you

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>got it at your own nine, but they haven't stopped

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you all day when Carr hasn't thrown the ball to them.

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>It was truly remarkable. And then and overtime overtime fourth

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>and two with the plus the already eight. I know

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Carlson's awesome musical usually, but that isn't absolutely go for

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>it because if he misses the kids. Yes, yes, it's

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of like with Dallas where McCarthy goes for it,

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't get it. McCarthy gets crushed for for for

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>going for it. That's an automatic go in a game

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>where again you haven't gotten stops, they somehow get the stops.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Jacob rips off the eight six yard run. And even

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>though McDaniels pitched the perfect game of getting basically every

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>in game decision wrong, the Raiders found a way to

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.640
<v Speaker 1>win it. Amazing. It was incredible. It was an amazing

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Royal Flush had Seattle in game four different times and

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:40.760
<v Speaker 1>got torpedoes somehow had Seattle pre flop fourth and two

0:05:40.760 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>at the Seattle thirty eight, with six twelve left and overtime,

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he pushes the fifty five yard or right Seattle has

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a shore field. All they needed a field goal. They

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>did get the three and out build him out. These

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 1>players bailed him out. I think that's good for dumbbell

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of the week, right, Todd. We don't need any others,

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>do we? All? Right, did you have an in game

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>play you wanted to share with us? A little in

0:06:01.160 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>game thing with you? The Eagles game against the Packers.

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>It was the original line was forty six and a

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>half on the total it was thirteen to seven with

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>six minutes left in the first quarter, so you got

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty one minutes left in the half, and the total

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.679
<v Speaker 1>for the first half was over thirty six and a half,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>which meant only another sixteen and a half more points.

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>I took the over thirty six and a half and

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously came in. But what I get, I guess the

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.799
<v Speaker 1>point that I really want to make about this bet

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is I found and this this this happens in a

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of sports where when a game is going wildly over,

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>very often in the end game, it's better to bet

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that first if it's happening in the first half. I mean,

0:06:45.440 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it's better to bet the first half over and not

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the game over, because in the second half, you might

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:56.039
<v Speaker 1>see massive um adjustments, and very often a huge scoring

0:06:56.120 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>first half leads to a low scoring second half. It

0:06:58.320 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't happen in this particular Eagle game, but in general,

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it's something that happens a lot, like in college football

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and even in the pros that happens a lot. So

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.239
<v Speaker 1>um something to look for if you like an over

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>that's wildly gone crazy early on, play the over in

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the first half on the end game rather than the

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>full game, because you might get torpedoed by the adjustments

0:07:21.240 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>by the defense in the second half. So anyways, it wasn't.

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>It was a pretty easy winner because it was pretty

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:28.840
<v Speaker 1>clear that Green Bay was going to be able to

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>move the ball, and I knew the Eagles weren't going

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to get stopped three the final well over they got

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>over in the first half, or almost over the at

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the half, basically I did. I was way over, but

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 1>then the second half almost went under and it would

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>have gone underhead there not been that, you know, the

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>late field goal nonsense, but very often that's something that

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you see when you have these huge scoring first halfs

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in games that are going way over what they're supposed

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>to be. There's a regression back because the teams, you know,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>spend the whole halftime adjusting for the second half with

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>their defense. Update the records for us, if you will,

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Toddy the records we have Gilly, he's already talked about

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:13.080
<v Speaker 1>his tremendous fall off the cliff to twenty one and fifteen.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>He still leads, though he's still leave thought tohow, I thought,

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm tied with jeff With Jeffrey, well, that's the lead.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Tied for the lead with Jeffrey twenty one and fifteen.

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I am two games back at nineteen and seventeen. We're

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>starting to write the ship with the teasers. You're both

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>five and seven and I'm three, eight and one on

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the teasers. We've been having some winning weeks with the

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>teasers lately. What about the guest chair. The guest chair

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is eighteen and eighteen and eight and four with the teaser.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the mode. The eight and four with the teasers

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.080
<v Speaker 1>for the geesers the most amazing thing. Also, i'd have

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the lead that Marcus Mariota's plinkoat chip went down the

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>right slot. Don't don't be given me. Don't don't start

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>with the if if this happens, you'd have to lead.

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I have about eight of those. You have at least

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>six in the last two weeks on believable how many games,

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and that I've managed to lose from the jaws of victory.

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Now that said, I have one my share of bullshit also, right,

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the most bob. I'm curious. Let's just

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>have this conversation before we get into best bets. It

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is my theory that the plinko nature of the NFL

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>on the side is just getting worse. And when I

0:09:20.720 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>say this to people, um veteran handicappers, they say, well, no, Gil,

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.239
<v Speaker 1>I think you and I even even have this conversation

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>on on text, They're like, no, you know, if you

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 1>can find the percentage of games where Plinko doesn't come in,

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're just not choosing the right games. I just

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like the that it's a higher percentage than ever

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>before of the games that in the end, if I

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>win or lose, it ain't me in the end, it's

0:09:44.320 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>just how the ball bounces. I don't know if there's

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 1>any date on that. I think there might be a

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>little more randomness due to more coaches going for two

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and you feel like Oh, they shouldn't have gone for

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>two and lost because of they missed that two point conversion.

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And there's more of that. But maybe they should have

0:10:04.720 --> 0:10:06.439
<v Speaker 1>gone for two and you're wrong and you should have

0:10:06.480 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>lost the game. I think there's a lot more of

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that where you're losing or winning by a point because

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.679
<v Speaker 1>of two point conversion decisions. I think there's a lot

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>more of that because I've been on a few of

0:10:15.960 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>those this year. That's fair, that's certainly part of it. Again,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you've forgotten how much plink on nous

0:10:22.160 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>there was in the past. No, no, there there was.

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 1>There was always plinko crazy. I mean, as the person

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>who sort of first said that, you know, came up

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>with the plinko as applied to sports betting. I'm certainly,

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly aware of that. But I just feel like,

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and maybe I am a prisoner of the moment. Todd,

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You could be right, but I just feel like it

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 1>has happened in both directions, you know what. I think

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>it's just because we've done a really good, gut job

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of being on games that have been close to the number.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Good job meaning a terrible you know what I mean, Yes, yes, whatever, whatever,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>way you want to phrase it, but a but but

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>but also to hold on hold on the second um

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.120
<v Speaker 1>this lead. No, Jeff, what Todd has to say is

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>more important than what you but but but but this

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>this league is so damn even at this point, these

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.559
<v Speaker 1>teams are so close to each other in ability. Well,

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:13.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what it is. That's why these games are are

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>coming down to and again that's why the Wong Teasers

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>getting annihilated early in the season. We're kind of in

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>retrospect is ridiculous because this league is so bunched together. Well,

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>but but it was the favorite, was the favorite, the

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite coming down. That's why we've all justin. We've taken

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the underdogs the last few weeks, and the underdogs have

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.960
<v Speaker 1>been coming through on teaser like people love teasers. This week, though,

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, you want to start with the best bets,

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's do this. We start with the guest, as always,

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the great doctor Bob, my friend Bob Soul. What is

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>your first best bet, sir? Like the over of the

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Jets Vikings game. Um Gil, who do you think leads

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the NFL in quarterback success rate the last two years?

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 1>Minimum of four games played? Mike White play four games

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he's played five Mike White and he has the highest

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>success rate of any quarterback in the league fifty four

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:12.880
<v Speaker 1>point two compared to Patrick Mahomes fifty three point eight.

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Now success rate, Well, the thing about Mike White is

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>he plays within the system. And that's all the Jets

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>need is someone to play within the system. Take the

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>check down. They have a good defense. They don't need

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Zack Wilson going off script and trying to throw the

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>ball force of all down the field. That hasn't worked

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for them. The thing about Mike White is when he's off,

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he's throwing three interceptions, and that could happen, but UM,

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>that's not necessarily bad for and over. Either interception is

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna be returned for touchdown. UM. So the Jets offense

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly better with Mike White. I'm not anointing them as

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the better offenses in the league, but they're

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>certainly better with Mike White instead of Zack Wilson, who

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 1>has a career success right at a thirty nine percent,

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, which is very low. UM. Jets offenses

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Corey Davis back this week a really good compliment to

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.479
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Wilson. UM. When Davis is out they've struggled offensively

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. Speaking of Wilson, Um Analyjah More

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>both did some damage in this lot last week. I

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>think that's gonna work again. Vikings nickel back Shannon Sulivan

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:15.839
<v Speaker 1>ranks third to last among qualifying nickel backs and yards

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>per route run allowed in the slot, so I think

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that slot game is gonna work. Mike White doesn't mind

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:25.079
<v Speaker 1>throwing those short passes in the slot. UM Jets running

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>backs uh tend to get a lot of balls out

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield, and probably more with White as quarterback.

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are thirtieth in the league and yards per target

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed to running back, so I think it's a good

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>match for the Jets offense. UM Vikings have been playing

0:13:39.320 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>well offensively all year. Getting Howkinson has helped has helped

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit because justin Jefferson now it has a

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>little more room to work. I mean, Hockinson has taken

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that intermediate route in the middle and that opens things

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>up on the outside a little bit. And they've been

0:13:54.240 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>going downfield a lot with Jefferson, which has been working

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>for them. So I think both teams will be able

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to score here. So um I the model pis four

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>points and I think over forty six or less is good.

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>That what is the total we're saying and a half? Uh, Gil,

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that's my number one play as well. Really yeah, I

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>was on that too, but not as my number one play,

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but I have Yeah, that's my number one as well.

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>The Jets offense with Mike White is to me at worst,

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>well not at worst, but it's lee gaverage at this

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>point when with Zach Wilson it was in the bottom

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of the league. The Vikings defense stinks, and every point

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that Bob made leads me to thinking this game is

0:14:39.160 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna go over. There's one other factor to clip. Blakeman's

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:47.280
<v Speaker 1>crew is officiating this game. They are a high defensive,

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>pass in affairs, defensive holding, the legal contact crew, good knowledge.

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>So Sauce Gardner, as great as he's been, it's a

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>very physical corner. DJ Read is a physical corner. The

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Jets are going to get called for penalties they have

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:05.720
<v Speaker 1>not been called for this year in this game, especially

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>when trying to cover Justin Jefferson. It was just the

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>point by Jerry Rice right now. He's been insanely good

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the last month. So I think this is a high

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>scoring game that gets aided by the fact that Minnesota's

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>offense is is good, the Jets offense is now league

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 1>average offense is opposed to a bottom tier offense. Minnesota's

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 1>defense sucks, and the refs are gonna call penalties in

0:15:27.600 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this game. So I think this is thirty one twenty.

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this game is in the fifties. So I'm

0:15:33.120 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with Bob. I'm over forty four and a half? Is

0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that one of yours? That was gonna be my third one?

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>But maybe I'll go with a different one. You don't

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>have to, Okay, I'll decide alright, Um, well you're up.

0:15:45.440 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So what you got first? I'm gonna go with the

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:52.239
<v Speaker 1>New York Football Giants. How many points are getting? Two

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and a half New York Football Giants plus two and

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>a half, just simply for the mere fact that the

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Washington command Indos have won every single game and covered

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe six out of seven games in a row.

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Am I correct about saying that? Let me just check

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.479
<v Speaker 1>that every six out of seven they've covered against at Chicago,

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, at Indianapolis one. All three of those games

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>lost to Minnesota and pushed and you know, getting three

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and then beat Philadelphia, beat Houston and then beat Atlanta

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>in a game that they could have easily lost um

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and would have been nice for me that they depends

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>on You've got that Washington Minnesota because they they won

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>on that line for many yeah, one during the week

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it depended So that makes me better. That would that

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 1>would have made him seven and oh against the spread.

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It's very difficult in the National Football League to go

0:16:46.200 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>seven and oh against the spread. It's just the kind

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of league as we were talking about earlier, that's going

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to go back and forth because the lines are so tight.

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>And now you're going to ask the Redskins, I mean,

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the Commanders to continue this amazing run of football. And granted,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 1>you know they have a good defense. The Taylor Heineke

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 1>is better than you know that other guy. And uh

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and now you're asking, you're you're saying, okay, now you're

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna go on the road and give points. Now. I

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>know the Giants have been overrated. I know the Giants

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>did it with smoke and mirrors. I know all about

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. The Giants aren't good. The Giants aren't good.

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Home team divisional game. I just think you're getting the

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>two and a half points. This game has seventeen sixteen

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>written all over eighteen. Uh you know some ridiculous you

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>know number like that where it gets inside the two

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>and a half. Give me the Giants to shock the

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>world and all the people that will be putting their

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 1>money on the Commanders. And my friend Gilly Ice who

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>thinks the Commanders are going to the Super Bowl with

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>marcol Rippin Heineke. I don't believe I've ever said that. Yes,

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a problem for me. My number two pick is

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the exact same Pickny, So so I'll just get this

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>out of the way before you do two in a row, Gilly,

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the wrong team is favorite in this game.

0:18:08.960 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I know the Giants are the smoking mirrors team. I

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>thought this should have been Giants as the slightest of

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>favorites in this game. At home. Washington has covered all

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>these games in a row. What are we calling interceptible balls?

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Are we calling them itch itches? Heineki is itching all

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.720
<v Speaker 1>over the place recently. It just basically feels like it's

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the good vibe Carson Wentz where the turnovers just aren't happening,

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>but interceptions that should have happened. I t s h itches.

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So you're scoring at home I think I think Heinek

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>is gonna have one of these games. It's coming. It

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 1>may not come this week, but I the fact that

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm on the Giants, my hope is it comes this

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:53.000
<v Speaker 1>week where Heineke is throwing to three interceptions on balls

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that should have been picked the last month plause, I

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>mean five weeks ago, this team was an underdog to

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>freaking Sam Ellinger. I've mean, come on now, it's it's

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>been a little bit of a charmed run for Washington.

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Now Washington plays this is weird scheduling quirk. Remember I

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>was going to bring this at the Giants by week

0:19:10.440 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>and then they get the Giants and land over and two.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>So if Washington wins this game, oh boy, huge advantage.

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>If Washington wins this game, Washington Commanders are gonna make

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. If they lose this game, then that game

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in two weeks is of the utmost importance for both teams.

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But I think the wrong team's favorite here. I'm gonna

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 1>take the Giants plus two and a half. And the

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that Todd and I have agreed on two is

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>very alarming. So far, very alarming. Um My number two

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>pick is the Washington Commanders let me just start there.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>So before the Giants lost these last two games, let

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>me just take you guys down analytics road. The Giants

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>at that point were seven and two. They were five

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and one in games decided by seven points or fewer.

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Their biggest win had had been by eight points. They

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>had been outscored one thirty one to one through the

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>first three quarters of their games. But then they would

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>magically go plus twenty two and point differential in the

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter, which is top five in the league. UM

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>shout out to Bill Barnwell for those numbers. Also also

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Wink Martindale's defense was twenty six and ep a per

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>play outside the red zone, but then magically, when they

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:22.959
<v Speaker 1>got inside the twenty they became the league's the league's

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>best unit. That is, ben don't break, as people like

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>to say, but that's not sustainable. So they've allowed teams

0:20:30.200 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to make it to the red zone third highest rate.

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>That was up to the up to the ninth game

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>of the season when they're seven and two, they had

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>allowed teams to make it to the red zone at

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 1>the third highest rate of a per game basis, but

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>then only allowed those offenses to convert thirty eight point

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>two percent of the time, only the Broncos were better.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>So basically, and will add to that, on first and

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.919
<v Speaker 1>second down, the Giants had been the league's fourth worst

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>defense by e p A per play, and then on

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>third and fourth down, of course, then they morph into

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the third best defense. So okay one more so, despite

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact that opposing offenses had the fifth fewest yards

0:21:02.520 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 1>to go to pick up on third downs, they were

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the third best defense at avoiding conversions timely turnovers as well.

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So the Smoke and Mirrors team, Ladies and Gentlemen is

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 1>not the Washington Commodorees. It is the New York Football Giants.

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:19.760
<v Speaker 1>We agree that they're the smoking Mirrors. We never said both. Really,

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>what I heard more from you as the smoke and

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Mirrors of Washington, not so much New York Giants. So

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 1>we can rewind the tape. We could rewind the tape

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. I believe it's I believe it's my turn

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>number one. Now I believe it's I believe I heard

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>what I heard. Anyway, Tod is shaking his head. He's

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>in dismay, as if he didn't just knock Washington for

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes. I believe it was. I didn't. I just

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>said they covered seven games in a row and the

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>NFL just doesn't happen. But you talked about how they

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>were smoking mirrors and not the deep dive of how

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>smoke and mirrors The New York Football Giants are I'm

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna take as long as Washington is under three points,

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:56.200
<v Speaker 1>which they are taking the Washington football team because here's

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>the other thing. I think they're better almost everywhere in

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.640
<v Speaker 1>every phase of the game. Then the Giants are there.

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>My number two play, my number one play number yes

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it is my number one play is going to sex

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to start it off on the Giants landed summon off.

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>That's how it's tech sound the old people nineteen reporter, Yeah,

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:25.160
<v Speaker 1>what was that? Why the Hivenburgh is coming? Um? Okay,

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is seven against the Rams. Seven. Yeah, I'm I'm

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 1>taking the Seahawks. I don't like laying seven points. I

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>don't like laying seven points on the road. But the

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Rams have nobody. They ain't got no Matthew Stafford, ain't

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.760
<v Speaker 1>got no errold Aaron Donald, they ain't got no Cooper Cup.

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is Jeffrey laid out very nicely. Should have won

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>that game. Against the Raiders this past week. I actually

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:51.920
<v Speaker 1>think if you do your power rankings in the NFL,

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you might actually have the Seattle Seahawks still at ten.

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>They could still be a top ten team by some

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.880
<v Speaker 1>people's rankings. I'm taking them, see Hawks. I don't really

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>feel any need to elaborate. I loved Bryce Perkins in college.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Bet on him a lot um. But he's more of

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a guy that will beat you with the legs that

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he will with the arm um. So they have to

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>be aware of that. Yeah, beat himself there. I like. See,

0:23:15.560 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll give the seven points if I get beat, so

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be it. That's my I got a supporting trend for you, Gil,

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? Do you want to please go? Uh? Pete

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Carroll off consecutive losses, and this is even when his

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>teams were terrible like last year, off consecutive losses, his

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 1>teams are nineteen and four straight up, nineteen three and

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>one against the spreads. Has been the coach Seahawks, whoa

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>even last year when they were terrible, they lose two

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>up and they've covered or win. See. I didn't even

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>know that there's a little team trend for you, not

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that you that I'm basing anything on it, but it's

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 1>it's worth noting it is that the Seahawks, especially after

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a bad defensive performance under Pete Carroll, are more than

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.679
<v Speaker 1>likely to turn things around after two consecutive losses. He

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 1>is a great motivator, he is. That is a motivational spot.

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. That's awesome. I like that that. I don't

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>hurt Pete Carroll to one now to win Coach of

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the Year dropping though after the last couple of weeks.

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>My only concern with Seattle at this point is have

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>they peaked already when you have a team and this

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>is this game, by the way, that you just don't

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think so this game that you just picked us into

0:24:32.000 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>running for the game. I don't want anything to do

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:38.360
<v Speaker 1>with this week. But I'm just curious because they had

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 1>such low expectations going into the year, which were wrong.

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>We were wrong on that, no doubt. But I wonder

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.880
<v Speaker 1>if the magic carpet ride for Geno Smith at some

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>point crashes into the crash so could Seattle still make

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs? Of course, that there are a whole bunch

0:24:56.119 --> 0:24:57.879
<v Speaker 1>of teams that are very similar and that race for

0:24:57.880 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the six and seven seed in the NFC. Right now,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you guys have maybe appropriately so, but I

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>think you guys have muscle memory on Genos and that's

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>bard and possible. And I think every time Geno Smith

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.400
<v Speaker 1>does anything bad in the game, Todd will text, oh,

0:25:09.480 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>here it comes Geno Smith. And by the way, he

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:13.679
<v Speaker 1>does it in that awful voice if you put a

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.959
<v Speaker 1>text in voice mode. And then, and what I think is,

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 1>we forget. And I've said this a couple of times before,

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and I really believe this, we forget. There was a

0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>time in the NFL where guys held a clipboard. And

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I'll use it again from the Washington perspective, whether it

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>was Mark Rippin, whether it was Stan Humphreys, whether it

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:30.639
<v Speaker 1>was Trent Green, they held clipboards for years. And you

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 1>know what, after they held it for years, they were

0:25:32.480 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty awesome at quarterback. And so I think in this case,

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:39.720
<v Speaker 1>in Gino Smith's case, we listen. Would I have predicted it? No,

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:41.639
<v Speaker 1>let me not go that far. I'm not that great.

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>But like, I don't know that we should be that

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>surprised because their defense, their defenses, that's the other concern

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.399
<v Speaker 1>to that defense started. They're playing Bryce Perkins though, So

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>let's go Yeah, it was again this is my mind

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 1>was more a long term thing, like there's seven point favorite.

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>They should win the damn football game on Sunday, and

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>if they don't, then the question I just asked is

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>going to be asked pretty much by everybody they lose

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the football game, Yes, for sure, Jeff. The only thing

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>gil is that this this this stinks of a Pete

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Carroll over conservative offensively game. That is true. Yes, we

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>do not want to make any mistakes here. We will

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:27.159
<v Speaker 1>win this game if we don't turn the ball over.

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I do think they're going to try to run the

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>ball a lot more. It would be good, it could

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>be bad. I mean that has that has served Pete

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Carroll well up until the last couple of weeks. But yes,

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:41.639
<v Speaker 1>there is always it's tod s turn. I already burned

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>my first two. God, wait a second, McLaurin and the

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey fambos, the Giants already Hey, I'm sorry. Anyways, my

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.919
<v Speaker 1>second we're on the spectrum do you think you are?

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm just curious far over to the third sta just curious. Yeah, okay,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>So my second pick is gonna be the Detroit Lions.

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Detroit Lions. How many points.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Am I getting a point in that game? To me?

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Or you? You are getting? You are getting one, although

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>you know it's funny there's some books that have them

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>favored by one. But yes, you're getting I don't know

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.920
<v Speaker 1>how what are what are on my screen in front

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of me. I'm I'm seeing Detroit plaus one. Okay, I'll

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>take pick or we'll give you one Detroit Lions plus.

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I just think that, um, something's going on over there

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the last. First of all, that Buffalo game was eminently

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>winnable by Detroit and not with it seems like not

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>with smoke and mirrors, Like they're really not bad. They

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>can move the ball, their defense, I'm not saying their

0:27:56.119 --> 0:27:59.560
<v Speaker 1>defense is anything great. It's not. But they that Giants game,

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>they were on sixth three, they got to turn over

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>and then they just dominated that late first half early

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:07.400
<v Speaker 1>second half thing where they scored and they scored again

0:28:07.440 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and put that game away. That's something a good team does.

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And that was on the road at the Giants. The

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Bears game. Granted, they got really lucky in the Bears game,

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I will give them that, and then they beat Green

0:28:18.560 --> 0:28:20.399
<v Speaker 1>Bay the week before that, but they hung in against

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Miami the week before that at home, they were ahead

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of Miami in a ridiculous first half. I think the

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>score was like twenty four. Yeah, I mean they were

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>beating Now. Granted before that they had some stinkers, but

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in the last five games in a row, they seem

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to have really figured something out here. Jacksonville. I think

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>there maybe average, slightly above average. I don't know what

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>they are. I granted they beat Baltimore, but what's Baltimore anymore?

0:28:50.160 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You know the Raiders game. Okay, they beat the Raiders

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in the game the Raiders gave them. I don't have

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of faith in Jacksonville going on the road

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and playing amazing. So give me the Detroit Lions. I think.

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>So there's like there's like green shoots of of something

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>good happening in Detroit. Green shoots what, you know, like

0:29:09.360 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>like green shoots when just starting to sprout, you know,

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>something new is starting to You never heard the term

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>green green shoots. Dr bobb Is, I'm sure has heard that.

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>You did not grow up on a farm. Neither did I,

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>So I have no idea what he's talking about. Anyways,

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>green shoots means like, you know, just like something starting

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to sprout over there. God grew up on a farm.

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>The thing about the Lions, I will say this, and

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna be just like completely anecdotal, but they

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>do feel like they are the team that leads the

0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>league in the most have no reason not to win

0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>this game and then finish with a with a with

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a final drive where you're left thinking that was what

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they came up was to try to win again this week,

0:29:52.680 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Campbell was it was an honorable mention for the Dumbbell

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this week. But the way you managed the clock at

0:29:57.960 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of that Buffalo game, they ran an extra

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>play in front of the two mid a warning that

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in essence cost them the game. So you know, the

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>trimp but that was Buffalo. That was against Buffalo. I underlook. Look,

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Detroit has been much better the last five weeks than

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>they were at the beginning of this season. So but again,

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 1>when you're when you're a when you have a coach

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that is not particularly good, you find ways to lose games.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Gas Bell has found ways to lose games. They sure

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 1>they sure have. They sure have. Yeah, for sure. Remember

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe they were a green sprout last week though. Yeah,

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 1>here's my notes on that Detroit game. Fourth and fourth

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and inches at the Buffalo forty seconds left, same Brown

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for seven second and fifteen at the Buffalo forty seven

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen yard past the same brown. Lions have all three

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 1>timeouts waste ten seconds, but apparently was a time out.

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Lion settled for fifty one yard field goal that hooks

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>in with twenty three seconds left and the Bills went down.

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>So that was the thing about that. It was so

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>funny because you and Kelly were on air, because I

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>was talking to Kelly and he was like, we couldn't

0:31:03.920 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>figure out what was going on. I had the benefit

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of audio and couldn't figure out what was going on,

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.040
<v Speaker 1>which was did Dan Campbell just decide not to use

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the time out and then because there was a replay

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>retroactively got one or did he actually call it? We don't.

0:31:21.560 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>We don't know, We don't, Yeah, we don't know, alright, Bob,

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I never thought they were gonna beat Buffalo. I just

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>thought they were going to hang in and they didn't.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>They did. Bob, you've got a snake. Here, you get

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>two and three here, look at that. Um. We were

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>talking a little bit of the Seattle Rams game. I

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>like the under. I took under with the Rams last week.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going under again. Um, A couple of reasons. Obviously,

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams offense right now, can you think of a

0:31:45.680 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>worse offense recently? Maybe two thousand eighteen Arizona Cardinals with

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Josh Rosen at the end of the year. They don't

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>be anti semitic. Don't do that, Bob not on this

0:31:54.400 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>showy Um. You know they're averaging only sixteen point two

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>points per game for the season, and now they don't

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have Cooper Cup and they're at a third string quarterback.

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Alan Robinson was the only other running back who was

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>above zero and expected points added. He's out. So it's

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Perkins averaging two point eight yards per past play

0:32:14.520 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and three replacement level receivers to throw too. Um. And

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>not only are the skill positions horrible, but the Rams

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>are last in the league and past blocking efficiency. So

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:33.120
<v Speaker 1>this offense, uh no, buy the only thing that points

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>toward that helps the over and all. As Aaron Donald

0:32:35.840 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>was out, but I already mentioned that I think this

0:32:38.480 --> 0:32:42.400
<v Speaker 1>is a peak Carroll conservative special. I think they're gonna

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>just let's not make any mistakes, Let's run the ball,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:48.720
<v Speaker 1>let's not you know, throw the ball down the field

0:32:48.760 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 1>too much and cause interceptions. Let's just hang on the ball.

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 1>And I know the Rams run defense is not going

0:32:55.440 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to be as good without Donald, but it's still gonna

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>be decent. I mean, they're good run deep fens. They'm

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna fall apart completely without Donald. And Seattle ranks

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>with thirty thirty one in success rate offensively running the ball.

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>They have a lot They had a lot of big

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plays early in the season in the running game, but

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>success rate is more predictive than you know, the big plays. Uh.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And they have not been able to run the ball

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>recently because people kind of like, oh, let's just avoid

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:25.040
<v Speaker 1>giving up the big run play, and their success right

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 1>running the ball for Seattle is not very good. I

0:33:26.600 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>think they're gonna still try to run the ball a lot,

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and that I don't think it's gonna work um as far.

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Rams have some you know, some matchup

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>some good matchups in the secondary. Uh. Jalen Ramsey is

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:41.320
<v Speaker 1>still a top cornerback. He'll probably shadow metcalf Um. Tyler

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Lockett obviously had a good season, but Troy Hill is

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a good Nipple back. But I think there's some things

0:33:45.720 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>going on that that matchup wise you're gonna help the

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Rams defense even without Donald, and I think part of

0:33:51.080 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it is Pete Carroll playing conservatively. I don't think the Rams,

0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>even though Seattle's defense is terrible, I don't think the

0:33:56.640 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Rams can score more than fourteen points against anybody. So

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I like the under there. Let's number. What number are

0:34:02.840 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we given Bob their time? Yeah, released it earlier in

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the week at forty two, but I'll go under forty one.

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.080
<v Speaker 1>And let's just the only way you los is if

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Perkins there's three picks in his own end, which

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>theoretically could happen, but that that's that's on. Well, the

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>thing is about running quarterbacks. They don't throw a lot

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 1>of picks as they tend to take off and run

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>right right. He didn't last week until the end of

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 1>the to the end of the game where he had Yeah,

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just for people who are new wish to sports betting,

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>newish because we always have to keep that in mind. Well,

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Bob is talking about Bobby will back me up here

0:34:35.360 --> 0:34:38.360
<v Speaker 1>if I say anything wrong. Success rate versus sort of

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>explosive explosive backs with someone who you always prefer in

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 1>terms of predictive uh from the predictive angle. You prefer

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who's getting four or five yards a chunk consistently

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to someone who's getting one yard two yard.

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:54.959
<v Speaker 1>One yard will just make it a bizarrow example, zero

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 1>yards minus one seventy four zero one zero one, because

0:34:59.800 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>that that sort of pollutes the predictive nature of anything.

0:35:05.400 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that correct generally? Oh, Jeff, oh, he said yes,

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess he said, yes, Okay, you're up. No, it's

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Bob again. Oh Bob, you gotta see your snaking Bob

0:35:16.880 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>your next? All right? Um, I don't really have a

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 1>great I like the Raiders. I use them earlier in

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the week in a teaser um and that teaser no

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>longer apply. So I still like the Raiders. The Raiders

0:35:31.080 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 1>here it's one of those situations where the Raiders on

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>expected points added per play our point zero four three

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>higher than the Chargers this year, but they're underdogs at home,

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and the only reason is because their record sucks. When

0:35:47.719 --> 0:35:50.320
<v Speaker 1>you compare the records of the two teams, Charges have

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a better record, I think that the only reason that

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers would be favored is because the win loss

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>records was so different. But on the field, the Raiders

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>have actually played better than the Charges this year. And

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.800
<v Speaker 1>if Corey Lenz Lindsley is out Pro Bowl center for

0:36:06.040 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for the Chargers and he isn't concussion protocol only of

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:13.480
<v Speaker 1>players or that in the first week of the protocol

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.359
<v Speaker 1>actually play, so it's likely that he's out, that makes

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>a big difference. Herbert has been pressured pressured at two

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 1>point five seconds or less pressure of the time this year,

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>which is a league high. When Lindsley is not in

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the game, that goes up to thirty eight percent pressure

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.919
<v Speaker 1>with him the first two and a half seconds. That's

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>not good. Um, you got Max Crosby going up against

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:40.279
<v Speaker 1>the right tackle Pipkins, who's terrible. UM, So I think

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Crosby is gonna be in the backfield the whole time.

0:36:42.520 --> 0:36:44.719
<v Speaker 1>They'll get pressure up the middle of Lindsley doesn't play.

0:36:45.520 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and without Mike Williams, Michaelis might try to play

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>at the high ankle sprain, Probably not if he does play,

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>probably not that effective. I mean last week Herbert had

0:36:56.000 --> 0:36:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a career low three point eight air yards per attempt.

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think they're have to get rid of the

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.359
<v Speaker 1>ball really quickly again. So I don't think they're gonna

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 1>have the explosive plays down the field. I just don't

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's a a good massive for the Charges offensively

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>with the injuries that they have. Um and you're talking

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.879
<v Speaker 1>with Josh Jacobs running for two hundred plus yards last week,

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.839
<v Speaker 1>why not do that again? I mean, the Charges are

0:37:19.920 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>last in the league and yards per run allowed at

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>five point four, so Jacobs should have another good game.

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr is getting more adjusted to his new receiver

0:37:28.960 --> 0:37:31.160
<v Speaker 1>group after the injuries to you know, some top receivers.

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>He's starting to play better with the new guys. I

0:37:33.600 --> 0:37:35.839
<v Speaker 1>think he's averaged seven point nine yards per past play

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, so he's starting to come around

0:37:38.120 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>with the new set of receivers that he's gotten. I

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>think the Raiders are at least as good as the

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Charges should be favored by a couple of points, so

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the one and a half. There, it is

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>one and a half for one. What is he getting, Todd,

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing I'm seeing one and pick and we'll getting down.

0:37:53.840 --> 0:37:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it's mostly it's most actually it's mostly Picked

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>plus one us And that's uh, what what? What? But

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:06.520
<v Speaker 1>one thing I will will will say real quick, the

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a f C playoff race. As ridiculous as this is

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>going to sound, the Raiders are going to have a

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 1>say in it. This game here. They played New England

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.359
<v Speaker 1>in a few weeks. Um. Obviously they had to say

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in the NFC playoff race last week that a f

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>C chase for that seventh seed because I think Cincinnati,

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>even with that absurdist schedule, is going to find a

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>way in that race for the seventh seed between New

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:31.400
<v Speaker 1>England and the Jets, and and l A is going

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to be fascinating to watch the last five weeks NFC

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 1>two by the way, Yeah, both both for sure. Todd,

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 1>You're fine. What do you have left? You have got

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>one leg? One left? I was gonna go with that

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that over forty four the Jets. That that was what

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I originally wanted. But I'm gonna do something different because

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Bob and uh Jeff are both on that already. Um,

0:38:52.560 --> 0:39:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with h very still a lot of confidence. This.

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>That's a great point, boy, this is great. I'm gonna

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>go over in the Dolphins. You need to borrow coin, Todd.

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins and Dolphins. Yeah, that I don't like as much,

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but um, I'm gonna go over forty six and a

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:21.400
<v Speaker 1>half in the Miami Niners game. Um, you know, Miami

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>has been the consummate over team all year. Great offense,

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>defense not so great. Obviously, this could go under if

0:39:29.440 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the Niners shut down the Dolphins. But does anybody really

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:34.800
<v Speaker 1>shut down the Dolphins. I know that my stores. My

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>stores had a big game on him. Believe it was

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday night don er where we held them to

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>sixteen points. We couldn't get the W, but we did

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>hold them to sixteen points in that. But um, you know,

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see a lot of people stopping Miami

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>on offense. They're just so you know, awesome on offense. Um,

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, other than Minnesota, I did did stop them.

0:39:57.560 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>What was that game? With two? I think was too

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>in in the Miami game. I don't think he was.

0:40:01.160 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>That was the first game to his first game back

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>after the concussion was the Pittsburgh game. Okay, right, so

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>too was out for that game. So with two. Uh,

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Miami's offense has been you know, pretty outstanding all year. Obviously,

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>we know all about the receivers, and I think that

0:40:16.880 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the strength of the of the Niners defenses up front

0:40:19.640 --> 0:40:22.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than their secondary. So maybe Miami can move the

0:40:22.920 --> 0:40:26.560
<v Speaker 1>ball on the Niners. And I don't love the Miami

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.680
<v Speaker 1>defense at all, so I think the Niners will move

0:40:29.760 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on them too. So over forty six and a half.

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Usually don't get such a low number on a on

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a Miami game, but it's you know, it's due to

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the Niner defense. Obviously, Um, Kansas City did score forty

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>four points against the Niners. UM. So there have been

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>some times Atlanta scored twenty eight against the Niners. There

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>have been some times where the vaunted Niners defense did

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 1>not show up. So let's hope that happens this week.

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:54.919
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna go over forty six and a half

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Miami Niners game. Good games in the NFL

0:40:58.440 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 1>this week, yes, and we are watching the game I'm

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:05.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna take in Sunday night. Uh, because the NFL didn't

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:08.160
<v Speaker 1>want to didn't want to change on Jerry Jones for

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, brutal, So I'm going I'm going with a

0:41:11.360 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>wishnev here, I'm going under in the Cowboys and the

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Colts at forty four and a half at that, So,

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I look, that's I'm sorry to steal what you've done.

0:41:22.600 --> 0:41:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Probably I think seven times already with the Dallas under

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but Jiff Saturday was also in the running for the

0:41:29.480 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>dumbbell with whatever the hell that wasn't didn't use is

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the first time out until thirty seconds, which, by the way,

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>it should clarify, the timeouts would have gotten used still

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in that time frame. It's just the fact that you

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>rushed your third down play for no reason, not using

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it correctly. As soon as Matt Ryan slid. It should

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have been an immediate time should have been in a

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>meat Ryan who slid too early, and then after the

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.520
<v Speaker 1>game was like, you know, I didn't know, you know,

0:41:57.600 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 1>he should have known where it was. Lucky he's not

0:41:59.880 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 1>a he's not an experienced struner. Gilly something is you've

0:42:03.360 --> 0:42:06.080
<v Speaker 1>got a thirty something very close to you know, old

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>quarterback who just ran when he's something yard, you take

0:42:10.080 --> 0:42:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a breather. Ya, Yeah, definitely it was. But he was

0:42:14.080 --> 0:42:16.200
<v Speaker 1>tired from the week before where he ran for forty

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:21.719
<v Speaker 1>yards against the Raiders two weeks ago. I think two

0:42:21.760 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 1>weeks he was tired even more. My point then two

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks two weeks ago alright, so under forty four and

0:42:28.000 --> 0:42:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a half in Dallas. In Indianapolis on Sunday night in Indianapolis.

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Defense isn't completely terrible. They they have their moments. They've

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:39.160
<v Speaker 1>been good at times this year. This feels like one

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of those where Dallas gets out to like a seventeen

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:43.880
<v Speaker 1>nothing lead and then they just try to take the

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 1>air out of the football the entire second half, and

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan will get sacked by Micah Parsons probably three times.

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:53.160
<v Speaker 1>At least one of them will knock Indianapolis out of

0:42:53.160 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>field goal range in the MANNII Special. So I'll go

0:42:56.120 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>under forty four and a half in indian Dallas total.

0:42:59.040 --> 0:43:01.240
<v Speaker 1>By the way, team to rule for under in the cults.

0:43:01.239 --> 0:43:04.320
<v Speaker 1>If you can get under seventeen and a half, Actually,

0:43:04.440 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 1>that's that's delicious because you know Mattie Guys is going

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to take some sacks. First, all female officiating crew for

0:43:11.120 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the Germany Costa Rica that's coming up. By the way,

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw the Lucaco misses. My god, Lucaco had had

0:43:18.160 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>two expected goals that scored zero. I had under two.

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>So I was very very lucky. Toddy, all right, we

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:27.800
<v Speaker 1>had I had Belgium not to advance at like plus

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.040
<v Speaker 1>four or something, and I wish I had bet more

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 1>money on it. Hold on it. Okay, I'm gonna give

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you my third pick, and I'm gonna let the hate

0:43:35.040 --> 0:43:37.600
<v Speaker 1>wash over me before I do. Let me just ask

0:43:37.680 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Bob a question, because Aaron shots are buddy over at

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Football Outsiders. He has the Minnesota Vikings the nine and

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>two Minnesota Vikings rated twenty second in d v O A.

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Where do you? Where do you have them? I'm gonna

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>have to look this up. Hold on a second. You

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:55.719
<v Speaker 1>get another view of Bob's home as he shifts the

0:43:55.760 --> 0:44:01.520
<v Speaker 1>camera looks it up. Bob used of looking. Yeah, I'm

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>still looking. Okay, Well, well, Bob looks. I'm gonna tell

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you in my Ghoulosh model that Gilly I have him

0:44:06.480 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>down much further. Maybe not twenty two, but I have

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>them down much further than you would be. They're not

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>good on defense, and Kirk Cousins is still the quarterback.

0:44:16.239 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Enough said they're not good on defense. They're really bad

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>on defense. I don't know if I've mentioned the defense. Okay,

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 1>I actually I had the middle of the path, middle

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of the pack. Yeah. Here, I agree with Bob based

0:44:31.320 --> 0:44:33.520
<v Speaker 1>off of what you said on Guessing Lines on Monday,

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised by what you're doing. Yeah, this is

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:37.680
<v Speaker 1>all guessing lines for me when when we guess the

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>lines on Monday, not only me, but Kelly was also

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Kelly biler Was was incredulous at this line. Uh, I

0:44:45.080 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>thought Minnesota would be would be much more of a

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>favorite in this game. There are three point favorite. As

0:44:49.280 --> 0:44:52.719
<v Speaker 1>long as it's three, they're absolutely a pick for me. Um.

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Chris Simms had a very interesting point about Mike White

0:44:56.560 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the other night, which I which I think he's the

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>only like he's the se Us to me to be

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the lone voice saying this, which is all right, I

0:45:04.680 --> 0:45:07.439
<v Speaker 1>got your Mike White. He was awesome through the rain,

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:12.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing bad to say. However, they really, in one respect

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:15.040
<v Speaker 1>did Zach Wilson a disservice because they threw Mike White

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in against the Bears after trading their biggest players on defense.

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>And so Mike White was allowed to play this defense,

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>which would make him look good. Zach Wilson was not

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed to play against this defense, which would have made

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:29.399
<v Speaker 1>him look good. And so here we are, and now

0:45:29.600 --> 0:45:31.359
<v Speaker 1>what he was saying about the Jets in general, he goes, now,

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.560
<v Speaker 1>you can never go back to Zach Wilson, which was

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:38.399
<v Speaker 1>his bigger point. Um, I listen. Obviously we've liked Mike White.

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.640
<v Speaker 1>He did throw five touchdowns at eight picks last year.

0:45:40.680 --> 0:45:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I get it was Oh he threw four of them

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.880
<v Speaker 1>in one game, so that's a little skewed. But uh,

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:48.000
<v Speaker 1>only three points on the vikings here. I'm not ready

0:45:48.040 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to anoint the Jets quite yet, and I like your

0:45:50.600 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 1>point about Sauce. Sauce Gardner for a rookie, has gotten

0:45:53.920 --> 0:45:58.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of leeway playing cornerback. I expect at least

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.239
<v Speaker 1>one or two flags going his way this week. Again,

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the main reason that I was fully planning to go

0:46:05.000 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>head to head on you on multiple games this week,

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and I backed out and went with that over instead

0:46:11.560 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>after seeing the officiating. That concerns me because the Jets

0:46:16.520 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>are significantly more physical than Minnesota at the tots point

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:22.959
<v Speaker 1>because Minnesota's defense is bad that they're not they can't

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:26.400
<v Speaker 1>cover anyone. But I am that's my only concern as

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.520
<v Speaker 1>a Jet fan in this game, that Minnesota is going

0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to get a bunch of points in this game on

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 1>penalties that will get called by this officiating crew that

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:37.440
<v Speaker 1>will not get called by most officiating crews. Yeah, that

0:46:37.520 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is the main reason I did not actually come in

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>here and go head to head with you on the

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Jets with this sauce Gardner. Meet justin Jefferson, and I

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>listened the Vikings. I don't think the world beaters either either.

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:49.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're winning a super Bowl, but they're

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 1>They're essentially the same team they've been. It's just the

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Plinko chip has gone their way this year, and so

0:46:55.000 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I I I'm given the three without compunction here on

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:01.160
<v Speaker 1>the Vikings. Here comes to first push of the year

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>for anyone. Oh yeah, we haven't had push yet. Somehow

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:06.320
<v Speaker 1>our picks have not had a push. That's amazing that

0:47:06.440 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>it's incredible. Wow, it's a good point. Okay, by the way, Gail,

0:47:10.320 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, I just looked it up. I was having

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.960
<v Speaker 1>computer difficulties in the ask. Id the Viking whoa one

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:22.120
<v Speaker 1>one point one point, but but one point six points

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:26.160
<v Speaker 1>worse than an average team that's injury adjusted, twenty one

0:47:26.239 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>point six points worse than an average team. What are

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>your top five, Bob, if I might ask, Well, now

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to go back. I silly me thought they

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 1>were listed, you know, a numerical order that they wouldn't

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:42.600
<v Speaker 1>be that hard to find a numerical order. Uh. Surprisingly,

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the model still likes Baltimore as a top five team.

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 1>So now we're going alphabetical. We're a alphabetical order. I'll

0:47:51.200 --> 0:47:56.399
<v Speaker 1>give them to an alphabetical order. Baltimore, Buffalo, Dallas, Kansas City,

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and Philly an alphabetical order, are my top five. Okay,

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>so Baltimore's fifth is what you're saying. They're in the

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>top five. I think they're just find ways to do

0:48:07.480 --> 0:48:11.120
<v Speaker 1>stupid stuff. Okay. Interesting. I think what the modelers are

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:13.640
<v Speaker 1>noticing is the fact that Vikings are bad on defense,

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:16.279
<v Speaker 1>but I think the offense is actually pretty good, and

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that's why I would put I would put them slightly

0:48:18.960 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>more in the you know, mid to late teens than

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>thee But let me ask the follow up questions. So, so,

0:48:24.719 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Kelly at a numbers game, like everybody does. We do

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:29.680
<v Speaker 1>our power rankings this year and this I'm not being

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>prisoner of the moment, and this is factual. This year

0:48:32.880 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 1>we have had the least movement from week to week.

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:38.759
<v Speaker 1>We just do the top ten, the least movement in

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the top ten from week to week in any year

0:48:41.239 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>ever period. Because so many of these teams are actual

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Drek they're not good. The middle of the league is soft,

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>so the Baltimores of the world, like, who hasn't had

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>some combination of Kansas City, Philly and Buffalo as there

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 1>one to three? Who hasn't had the Cowboys. I'm trying

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to think of the Nine, the Ravens, and the you

0:49:03.400 --> 0:49:06.399
<v Speaker 1>know as the next group, and then who hasn't had

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:10.759
<v Speaker 1>like the Bengals, Dolphins or whatever like. Then it gets

0:49:10.800 --> 0:49:13.759
<v Speaker 1>to start getting a little murky. But essentially every other

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:17.239
<v Speaker 1>year that stuff would change all the time. Not this year.

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's twelve teams that you can consider for

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>your top tad and then it really falls off after twelve.

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>I would consider Minnesota one of those quite frankly, but

0:49:27.800 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'm in the minority. Look Minnesota to again.

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Their offense right now is very different because Justin Jefferson

0:49:34.960 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>is playing at a level that is insane how well

0:49:38.880 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 1>he has played the last month. Again, I really again,

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>I was fully ready to come in here have the

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Jets is one of my top three picks today. But again,

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the the officiating in that game, he's going to play

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 1>a role. Sorry about that Washington Atlanta ending, and that

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was so bad soa right is that Heineke down on

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the field. It is oh my, heine keys out. They're

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:05.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to go to the backup. Who even is

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the backup now of Carson Wentz is still there is

0:50:08.000 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's like a shrill in the ear. Okay, let's

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:13.080
<v Speaker 1>do the teaser of the week, Bob. We start with

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>you two favorite two team six point teaser of the week. Yeah.

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I actually released one this week, but no longer qualifies.

0:50:21.520 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I took the Raiders plus whatever it was eight and

0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a half in the Jags plus seven and a half

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:27.840
<v Speaker 1>or eight early in the week, and that is no

0:50:27.920 --> 0:50:31.360
<v Speaker 1>longer available, So I had to uh scramble here, and

0:50:31.480 --> 0:50:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm decided I'm gonna go with New Orleans plus I mean,

0:50:34.280 --> 0:50:36.880
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, New Orleans plus nine and a half with

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the Giants plus eight and a half. And the Giants

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:42.120
<v Speaker 1>have only lost by eight points or more twice and

0:50:42.200 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Washington's only one by more than seven once. Um, that

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 1>seems reasonable. And New Orleans just they just they have

0:50:50.560 --> 0:50:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the same defensive scheme that they've had in recent years

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:54.840
<v Speaker 1>with the new coaches down, so that hasn't changed, and

0:50:54.960 --> 0:50:58.759
<v Speaker 1>that defensive scheme has given Brady some trouble recently. Um,

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:02.799
<v Speaker 1>losing work is huge. He was probably maybe the best

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive tackle in the league, and now he's down. Uh,

0:51:06.440 --> 0:51:11.799
<v Speaker 1>they're they're down four starters now, the Tampa Bay offensive line. Um,

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:14.720
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty easy to scheme against a team down four starters.

0:51:14.800 --> 0:51:17.040
<v Speaker 1>And Brady doesn't like pressure up the middle, and they

0:51:17.080 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't been playing well anyway. So I just think it's

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a fairly close game. I do think the

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Bucks defense will step up in New Orleans. Is not

0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:25.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna light the light the scoreboard on fire. But I

0:51:25.440 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 1>think staying with the nine and a half is fine.

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And like I said, to take the Giants plus eight

0:51:28.440 --> 0:51:29.799
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the other part where you're gonna

0:51:29.800 --> 0:51:30.920
<v Speaker 1>hate me for this. But where do you have a

0:51:30.960 --> 0:51:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bob oh Gil Now I have to go. But

0:51:36.200 --> 0:51:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize this was so difficult for you to find.

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I have to pull it up with my experience. On

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 1>a second. Surprisingly, No, they're not that much better than average.

0:51:48.160 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I still have about two points better than average, which

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:55.919
<v Speaker 1>is puts him in the in that that's reason fourteen range.

0:51:56.040 --> 0:51:58.719
<v Speaker 1>That's in that you know, yeah, because I think they're

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 1>deeps better than it's been. There was another dumb Bell

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of the Week pot potential with Todd Bowls, with the

0:52:04.239 --> 0:52:07.720
<v Speaker 1>way he utilized the clock. I don't even remember the details.

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Do let Brady go down at the end. And also

0:52:10.560 --> 0:52:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that was strange right there, they were like, we'll play

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 1>for the half. Oh, we just completed a past. It's

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:18.640
<v Speaker 1>very very strange, very strange, shocking. The Todd Bowls, who

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>again was not a good head coach with the New

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:22.400
<v Speaker 1>York Jets, is still not a good head coach with

0:52:22.480 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay. Buccanty, He'll always study, He'll always be a

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl champion in the Burgundy and Gold. Alright, Uh, Todd,

0:52:29.080 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you're you're a teaser. I'm gonna go with the Ravens

0:52:33.040 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 1>minus two and a half. I don't really want to

0:52:35.200 --> 0:52:37.880
<v Speaker 1>explain why, but I believe they're playing a guy named Hackett.

0:52:38.320 --> 0:52:40.520
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna take the Ravens minus two and a

0:52:40.640 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 1>half at home and the Bengals plus eight also at

0:52:45.640 --> 0:52:47.919
<v Speaker 1>home against the Chiefs. I think the Bengals are getting

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.600
<v Speaker 1>their house in order and going for a playoff push now.

0:52:51.360 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, while they may not win the game,

0:52:55.239 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they can they can definitely keep it close

0:52:58.160 --> 0:53:01.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Chiefs plus eight. Oh, I guess by the fault,

0:53:01.080 --> 0:53:02.759
<v Speaker 1>I gotta put the Giants eight and a half in

0:53:02.840 --> 0:53:06.200
<v Speaker 1>there since that's one of my picks. And then, uh boy,

0:53:07.320 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the second leg is tough this week because a lot

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of these favorites that are in that range. To tease down,

0:53:14.840 --> 0:53:17.839
<v Speaker 1>here's something that that that is what could possibly could

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:20.760
<v Speaker 1>possibly go wrong with the Shawn Watson's return to Houston.

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:26.839
<v Speaker 1>What could possibly go I'm not doing that, you know. Again,

0:53:26.880 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna I'm gonna upset some of the

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.480
<v Speaker 1>math people here. I'm gonna take Atlanta only the seven

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>here against Pittsburgh. How the Steelers aren't beating anyone by

0:53:34.640 --> 0:53:37.640
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown, so I'll take Atlanta up to seven in

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the second leg. Atlanta was a huge consideration for me.

0:53:40.480 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>In the end, I decided to do something that I

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:46.240
<v Speaker 1>know I'll regret and go Seattle and Baltimore. Oh, teasing

0:53:46.320 --> 0:53:50.880
<v Speaker 1>two favorites now, But that's the total what could possibly

0:53:50.960 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 1>go wrong? That is totally the what could possibly go wrong? Teaser?

0:53:54.760 --> 0:53:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I just again hack it, as Todd said. And

0:53:57.640 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 1>then I have the Seahawks, you know, laying the point,

0:53:59.719 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm it as well. Tease him down to essentially

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>have to beat them, and that that that that Baltimore one.

0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Even though they there's nothing that Denver has shown that

0:54:09.640 --> 0:54:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they should be able to play that game closer than

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the field goal have raven team, Like I said last week,

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:16.399
<v Speaker 1>they scared the crap out of it? Do they really?

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>Do they? In the in the negative way? Yes? No,

0:54:20.239 --> 0:54:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you. But the thing about Hackett, and again

0:54:23.200 --> 0:54:24.719
<v Speaker 1>this is a parably. I didn't I didn't mean for

0:54:24.800 --> 0:54:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this to be the prisoner of the Moment themed show today,

0:54:28.080 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but do you? I mean, who has been worse than

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Hackett through through ten eleven? So we're this is the

0:54:36.400 --> 0:54:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm quantifying all this by the non urban Meyer division.

0:54:41.200 --> 0:54:43.920
<v Speaker 1>Uran urban Meyer is his own category because of the

0:54:43.960 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>offer of the field stuff stuff. Tom Seula is up there,

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:53.480
<v Speaker 1>he's up there. In recent memory, I mean Denver has had.

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at the collection of coaches Denver has

0:54:55.760 --> 0:54:58.960
<v Speaker 1>had since Kobe advertised. Fan was better. I mean, Fangio

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>was better, but he was still bad. Fans Joseph was

0:55:02.680 --> 0:55:05.600
<v Speaker 1>not good. I mean it's crazy to Denver again, they

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>have gotten since Peyton Manning retired, haven't been able to

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:10.920
<v Speaker 1>find a quarterback. They are coaching that Kobi at who

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought was always an average coach. Is Bill Parcels

0:55:14.680 --> 0:55:16.600
<v Speaker 1>compared to the last three guys that we've had at

0:55:16.680 --> 0:55:20.799
<v Speaker 1>least four Hackett incidents with the with again with again

0:55:20.800 --> 0:55:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Hall of Famer being your home crowd counted

0:55:24.120 --> 0:55:27.879
<v Speaker 1>down your play clock for you. It's Ron Lynn esque

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Ron Lynn? Oh wow? How about Mike Tyson. Mike Tyson

0:55:33.160 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I always made the playoffs? Ron Lynn was the worst

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:48.239
<v Speaker 1>in game code, so many mistakes. Let's let's throw let's

0:55:48.280 --> 0:55:50.520
<v Speaker 1>throw a fade at the goal line every single time

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and see if that works this time. I mean, they

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:55.960
<v Speaker 1>could not score in the red zone. They made so

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:59.120
<v Speaker 1>many mistakes in decision making. When he was the head

0:55:59.160 --> 0:56:00.960
<v Speaker 1>coach of the Charges were one of the most talented

0:56:00.960 --> 0:56:03.160
<v Speaker 1>teams in the league and just couldn't win. I know

0:56:03.360 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Lynn made the playoffs, Anthony Lynn in the discussion, but

0:56:07.440 --> 0:56:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about Anthony Lynn, right, Anthony Lynn. Yeah, I

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:16.680
<v Speaker 1>mean Anthony Lynn is still probably I mean what hack

0:56:16.760 --> 0:56:20.440
<v Speaker 1>It has done with a roster that again, remember before

0:56:20.560 --> 0:56:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the season, the Denver Broncos by the betting markets, were

0:56:24.320 --> 0:56:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a consensus playoff team which would ended up being obviously

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:32.279
<v Speaker 1>very wrong, but they have gone from potential playoff team

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:35.279
<v Speaker 1>in twelve weeks too. Oh my god, this is an

0:56:35.520 --> 0:56:39.719
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable all time train wreck for that franchise. Anthony. I

0:56:39.760 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 1>will say this about Anthony Lynn. Anthony Lynn was also

0:56:42.120 --> 0:56:45.080
<v Speaker 1>torpedoed by the fact that, like Philip Rivers, would do

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:48.680
<v Speaker 1>some dumb ship at bad times and games. Also, the

0:56:48.760 --> 0:56:51.319
<v Speaker 1>biggest Anthony Lynn thing is the is the punctured lung.

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 1>We would never have gotten Justin Herbert on the field

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:57.760
<v Speaker 1>if a team doctor had not punctured to Rod Taylor's

0:56:57.800 --> 0:57:00.440
<v Speaker 1>long not that soon at least, and not soon. And

0:57:00.560 --> 0:57:02.759
<v Speaker 1>but if you watched Hard Knocks, Anthony Lenn had no

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:05.319
<v Speaker 1>intention ever of playing Justin Herbert, not a year one.

0:57:05.400 --> 0:57:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So like the fact that you can see this guy

0:57:07.239 --> 0:57:11.200
<v Speaker 1>in practice every single day and never consider playing him,

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:13.319
<v Speaker 1>like that's all we're going with the other guy. Even

0:57:13.360 --> 0:57:14.640
<v Speaker 1>at one time with that Hard Knocks, He's like, oh,

0:57:14.640 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>the kid has a pretty good throws a pretty good ball.

0:57:16.440 --> 0:57:20.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, oh my god, no kidding. So that was

0:57:20.360 --> 0:57:22.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of bad. Where do we go to here? Did

0:57:22.880 --> 0:57:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I get my teaser? Yes? I did? Um okay, oh yes,

0:57:27.400 --> 0:57:29.560
<v Speaker 1>we get to the final two questions. By the way,

0:57:29.600 --> 0:57:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we have any Thursday night football thoughts tonight, Bill's Patriots

0:57:32.040 --> 0:57:34.680
<v Speaker 1>real quick. We usually do that. At the time we

0:57:34.800 --> 0:57:39.000
<v Speaker 1>skipped that. All I'll say is, before Dion Dawkins was

0:57:39.160 --> 0:57:42.400
<v Speaker 1>ruled out, I was very much ready to consider Buffalo

0:57:42.560 --> 0:57:47.880
<v Speaker 1>tonight because just has to feel it gets Yeah, if

0:57:47.920 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>it gets the three, I'm probably gonna end up with it.

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 1>This has the feel of what remember last year? The

0:57:54.600 --> 0:57:58.439
<v Speaker 1>first game was that wind ridiculousness where New England had

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Mac throw three passes in New going out tough them.

0:58:01.280 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 1>The second time they played in Foxboro was I think

0:58:04.320 --> 0:58:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it was Week seventeen where we all thought you and

0:58:07.320 --> 0:58:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I both thought New England's gonna win the game. They're

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:10.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna win the af c's Buffalo is gonna have to

0:58:10.840 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>go through the wild card, and Buffalo went there and

0:58:13.320 --> 0:58:15.919
<v Speaker 1>beat the living but Jesus out of him. It would

0:58:15.960 --> 0:58:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not shock me if that happens again tonight. I think

0:58:19.320 --> 0:58:21.480
<v Speaker 1>New England's defense just got fat and happy because they

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:24.200
<v Speaker 1>played Zack Wilson, Sam Alaner, Zack Wilson, New England just

0:58:24.320 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 1>taking money, Bob, What do you make of this game tonight?

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And make it three? Make it three. Um, you know,

0:58:30.760 --> 0:58:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, I don't like to go against

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Belichick after a bad defensive game. It's true, and there

0:58:38.000 --> 0:58:42.000
<v Speaker 1>there's some stats to back it up, um under blotchick.

0:58:42.480 --> 0:58:45.960
<v Speaker 1>When the Patriots have given up more than twenty eight points,

0:58:46.480 --> 0:58:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they are thirty five and ten against and spread the

0:58:48.440 --> 0:58:50.840
<v Speaker 1>next week. And look it up with the post Tom

0:58:50.880 --> 0:58:56.959
<v Speaker 1>Brady era eight no no c Yeah, even in looking

0:58:57.040 --> 0:58:59.479
<v Speaker 1>up this year, even actually any time to get twenty

0:58:59.560 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>seven or more in the last two years, I think

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they're nine and o against the number the next week

0:59:03.480 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in the post Tom Brady era. So the one thing

0:59:06.720 --> 0:59:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that has continued for the pages and when they have

0:59:08.640 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad defensive game, they tend to cover the next week.

0:59:11.720 --> 0:59:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't necessarily be betting on New England here,

0:59:14.680 --> 0:59:17.920
<v Speaker 1>but I'm I'm not gonna bet Buffalo, all right. Feels

0:59:17.960 --> 0:59:20.840
<v Speaker 1>In gave me to me, probably probably Matthew jude On

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 1>against the backup left tackle Skit would would scare me

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:26.480
<v Speaker 1>if I had Buffalo. By the way, if Buffalo, I

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 1>said this on the Numbers game this morning. I have

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>two bets that I made because of the Chris Mortenson

0:59:32.480 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 1>report about Josh Allen's u c L a couple of

0:59:34.520 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago. So I have I have Jets and Dolphins

0:59:37.960 --> 0:59:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a FC East futures, which if they get home, is

0:59:40.080 --> 0:59:43.200
<v Speaker 1>complete luck for me because I thought he'd be out

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen. Turns out he's played and has not been

0:59:45.960 --> 0:59:48.240
<v Speaker 1>as good. So maybe not completely lucky, but I have

0:59:48.320 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 1>like the Jets at twenty one, the Dolphins at five

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to one. If the Bills lose this tonight, they'll be

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>oh and three in the division. That is completely bunched up.

0:59:57.640 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>That will have lost all three divisional road game. That's correct.

1:00:00.600 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>So the Jets and Dolphins coming up the next two weeks,

1:00:03.360 --> 1:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>you're behind an a ball if they lose tonight, that's

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that's big. This ball game tonight. Alright. Final two questions,

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>as they have been for every single episode of the

1:00:12.240 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Megapod since its inception. First, which of the big favorites

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is the most likely to lose? Outright? Your candidates, Cleveland

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Browns and DeShawn Watson the return of the Shawn Watson

1:00:24.160 --> 1:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>seven point favorites on the road against the Houston Texas.

1:00:26.640 --> 1:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about out right here. Baltimore Ravens eight and

1:00:29.040 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorites at home against the Denver Broncos,

1:00:31.960 --> 1:00:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the UH Seattle Seahawks, seven point favorites on the road

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>against the Los Angeles Rams, and the Cowboys Sunday night

1:00:39.800 --> 1:00:42.320
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half point favorites against the Colts. Which

1:00:42.600 --> 1:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of those four, Bob, do you believe is the most

1:00:45.200 --> 1:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>likely to lose? Our right, none of them. But if

1:00:48.440 --> 1:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I had to choose one, I'd say Cleveland because you

1:00:51.440 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 1>just don't know what you're gonna get with Shaun Watson.

1:00:53.560 --> 1:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I would think it's a big Nick Chubb game. That's

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>what I would imagine. Yeah, but it is. It is Hughes,

1:01:00.280 --> 1:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so I certainly don't see losing, So I guess I

1:01:03.080 --> 1:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>guess Cleveland would be the one. It is the Houston Texans,

1:01:05.760 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>as handicapper. Some handicappers like to say it is the

1:01:08.560 --> 1:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Houston Texans super Bowl going up against the Shawn Watson.

1:01:12.680 --> 1:01:16.280
<v Speaker 1>So there is that little element, Todd, It's the same

1:01:16.320 --> 1:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>one I have. Who knows what you're going to get

1:01:18.600 --> 1:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>from this team with Now, I don't know what the

1:01:21.640 --> 1:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>massage capabilities are in that stadium, but I don't know.

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>I think who knows what you're gonna get? It's first

1:01:28.320 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>started seven hundred days serving eleven games suspension for alleged

1:01:31.640 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>sexual right there on the screen there, what'd you say?

1:01:36.840 --> 1:01:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I said, he knows where the massage room is in Houston,

1:01:39.280 --> 1:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that's right, not from the road team locker room. He

1:01:43.600 --> 1:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>knows you're the home team locker room. Jeffrey Baltimore Ravens

1:01:48.680 --> 1:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to the Hack had led Broncos because that defense is good.

1:01:53.400 --> 1:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>There's again what Bob said is right. I don't think

1:01:57.320 --> 1:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>any of these big favorites lose. But there's just there.

1:02:01.560 --> 1:02:03.760
<v Speaker 1>As I said last week, and it proved out perfectly

1:02:03.760 --> 1:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>because the way the Ravens blew that game to Jacksonville,

1:02:06.440 --> 1:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of what they've been the whole year. There's

1:02:08.880 --> 1:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>something wrong with the Ravens. I just can't I just

1:02:11.560 --> 1:02:14.840
<v Speaker 1>can't put my finger on one. I think it's Baltimore

1:02:15.800 --> 1:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>as bad as here's the thing. You have to deduct

1:02:19.000 --> 1:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>two points for Hackett. I mean, look, Baltimore co winness

1:02:21.200 --> 1:02:24.360
<v Speaker 1>gave one to six very easily. But since I asked

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the question, I think the answer is Baltimore, all right,

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>And then we live in a bizarro world and you

1:02:29.120 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>must better side Bob on every single one of these games.

1:02:32.080 --> 1:02:34.560
<v Speaker 1>But you are allowed one free pass. What is the game?

1:02:34.600 --> 1:02:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You want? No part of Baltimore, Denver. There you go, Baltimore.

1:02:40.920 --> 1:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I was good, Baltimore. Bobby look good without the classes.

1:02:43.000 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Bob Bob stole everybody without the glasses.

1:02:45.800 --> 1:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. You're very welcome, Todd. We'll give me one

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:52.960
<v Speaker 1>part of I don't want the Eagles Titans game. I

1:02:55.360 --> 1:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want because I feel like they're starting to

1:02:57.800 --> 1:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>have some little cracks in the armor. And also, you

1:03:01.080 --> 1:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>know Rabel can pull something out of his tough us.

1:03:03.800 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, did the Titans have enough

1:03:06.920 --> 1:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>talent to stay in this game? So I'm gonna stick

1:03:09.880 --> 1:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>away from that because the Sirianni annoy you as much

1:03:12.840 --> 1:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>as he annoys me. By the way, I think I'm

1:03:14.520 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>on an island with us. Yeah, there are some people

1:03:17.040 --> 1:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter that are with you. I love the guy,

1:03:19.960 --> 1:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>but I I can see why he rubs people. They're

1:03:22.680 --> 1:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>all like great games though this weekend, Todd, just mentioning

1:03:25.440 --> 1:03:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Titans and the Eagles. Actually tonight between the Bills and

1:03:28.520 --> 1:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots is Awesomehin Washington, the Giants and then the

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Jets and the Vikings, And of course what you just

1:03:36.160 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>said really might be the best of the bunch, right,

1:03:38.360 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins Niner. That's the Cincinnati Cincinnati Kansas City is awesome

1:03:42.280 --> 1:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>too on paper, and this is gonna be awesome, which

1:03:45.240 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>means the best game of the week is gonna be Uh,

1:03:48.120 --> 1:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be Jacksonville Detroit. UM. By answer to your

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>question is Green Bay and Chicago? I have they both suck?

1:03:56.400 --> 1:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>We have no idea who's playing quarterback for either team? No,

1:03:59.440 --> 1:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>thank you? I got one Monday night football? Okay, Tampa

1:04:03.480 --> 1:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Bay New Orleans. I want like that game. I would

1:04:06.280 --> 1:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>want no part of. By the way, why isn't Jamis playing?

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Are we just done with He's never playing again? Forget that?

1:04:12.680 --> 1:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Forget that question? Why is Andy Dalton still playing? I

1:04:15.760 --> 1:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>don't care if you play Jamis or Taysom Hill some

1:04:18.960 --> 1:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>more question play somewhat other than that. I just, by

1:04:21.720 --> 1:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the way, I fast forward to Monday night. I can't

1:04:24.000 --> 1:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>imagine being interested in this football game, like I just

1:04:26.800 --> 1:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can't imagine a matchup that I will be less interested in.

1:04:30.320 --> 1:04:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably in game it, but I won't know part

1:04:32.320 --> 1:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. Pre flop. We've done all we can do.

1:04:35.200 --> 1:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Mega Pod Week thirteen, National Football League, Uh, Jeff Parlay

1:04:38.840 --> 1:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and Todd before we leave, Before we leave, Heaven's sakes,

1:04:42.480 --> 1:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a thirty two yard field goal set up here for

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. It's gone, upset Todd. When you were a child,

1:04:54.200 --> 1:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>did your mom like, was there their episodes like this

1:04:56.520 --> 1:04:58.120
<v Speaker 1>where your mom was just like, we've got to make

1:04:58.240 --> 1:05:01.280
<v Speaker 1>him an Orthodox Jew immediately? Is that? Was that how

1:05:01.320 --> 1:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that happened? Or did you just wear you're born into it? Yeah?

1:05:04.360 --> 1:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, I can't wait now. Uh. And of

1:05:08.200 --> 1:05:10.760
<v Speaker 1>course our guests kind enough to join us on the

1:05:10.800 --> 1:05:14.600
<v Speaker 1>megapod every year. And Bob a masked by Kelly to say,

1:05:14.720 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>will you be on a numbers game at your standard

1:05:16.480 --> 1:05:21.280
<v Speaker 1>slot tomorrow, Mountain, Yes, Yes I will. We celebrating a

1:05:21.400 --> 1:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>five and two on the season win totals that I

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>gave out on your show before the season started. College

1:05:27.040 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>football season win totals. Last year, you were like a

1:05:30.080 --> 1:05:33.560
<v Speaker 1>million in zero. Weren't you like last year zero? Yeah?

1:05:34.120 --> 1:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>This year I ended up eight and three, nearly got

1:05:38.720 --> 1:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the nine and two with East Carolina. I needed East

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Carolina to lose, and Temple needed one yard and two

1:05:44.520 --> 1:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>downs pretty much ice that game and didn't do it.

1:05:47.000 --> 1:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So basically the East I got the ball back and

1:05:48.840 --> 1:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>scored to win and off went nine into but eight

1:05:52.280 --> 1:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and three. Would you say that college football season win totals?

1:05:55.800 --> 1:05:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Now officially, if you had to say one thing you

1:05:58.360 --> 1:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>do better than anything, is that your bread and butter? Now, well,

1:06:01.480 --> 1:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm fifty five and twenty three on those gilts, So yeah,

1:06:04.400 --> 1:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there's your answer. Jeez, good god. But that's the beauty

1:06:08.920 --> 1:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of season long, right, you can overcome negative variants, although

1:06:11.520 --> 1:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>in college football it's harder to overcome negative variants than

1:06:13.680 --> 1:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>any sport, right because there's only Yeah, I just spent

1:06:16.400 --> 1:06:18.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time working on my team ratings in

1:06:18.920 --> 1:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the all season, so that you do, I've seen it

1:06:21.680 --> 1:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>with my own eyes. He does indeed hardest working man

1:06:24.720 --> 1:06:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in sports handicapping Dr Bob at d r Bob Sports

1:06:28.240 --> 1:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, Dr bob sports dot com for all that

1:06:31.400 --> 1:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>he does. And by the way, Carl Sack greatest NBA

1:06:34.440 --> 1:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>handicapper out there as well. In the Dr Bob fold

1:06:38.000 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>give Carl and I started to his season too. He's

1:06:41.120 --> 1:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>had a couple of unlucky outcomes here, the last couple

1:06:43.480 --> 1:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>of ones, like he's still thirteen and three years. The

1:06:47.960 --> 1:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Spurs let all game last night, then they end up

1:06:49.920 --> 1:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>losing they had to push. Yeah. That pushed the other

1:06:52.000 --> 1:06:54.840
<v Speaker 1>night with Atlanta, that's the ball, yes, and then and

1:06:54.920 --> 1:06:56.400
<v Speaker 1>then they had to foul the end. They made both

1:06:56.480 --> 1:06:59.120
<v Speaker 1>free throws, the push. Philly made both free throws the push.

1:06:59.160 --> 1:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, it looked like a winner the whole way.

1:07:01.280 --> 1:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>He's awesome three and one if I'm correct, even with those, yeah,

1:07:05.640 --> 1:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>he's incredible, even with the yeah, a couple of rough

1:07:07.960 --> 1:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>ones lately. Thank you, Bob, appreciate it, Thank you Todd,

1:07:11.680 --> 1:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Jeffrey. Good luck with all your bets this

1:07:13.880 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>weekend and the week thirteen in the National Football League