WEBVTT - Bureaucracy Disease.  Lanhee Chen Talks to A&G

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>When you're ready to ride Metro, we want you to

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>know we're ready for you. Here are just a few

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the people at Metro to tell you how we're

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>doing our part to keep riders safe. We're cleaning like

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>nevill before, build greatly. You've found hassant, no mask, no

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Metro need one. We have a few extras at Metro.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>We're doing our part to keep the DC area moving.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Find out more at well mata dot com slash doing

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>our part so their guests we have on the show

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on a regular basis where we think we need to

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to this person for longer. There's not enough time here. Well,

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>here's the chance with one of our favorite guests. It's

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>extra large because four hours simply enough. This is Armstrong

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and Getty extra large. Man. I don't know who that is,

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but that guy's got good pipes. Pipes Listen, all who

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>have ears, friends, romans, countrymen. Finally a chance for an

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>extended chat with Lani j Chen, the David and Diane

0:00:58.160 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Stiffy research fellow with the Hoover and Such, also the

0:01:00.880 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>director of Domestic Policy Studies and Lecture in the Public

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Policy Program at Stanford University. So we've been wanting to

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to you for a long time about government and

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff and your knowledge base and uh,

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and not particularly about at the time we're recording this

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the biggest crisis of my lifetime, the coronavirus and everything else,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 1>but some of it fits together. We've been wanting to

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about bureaucracy, disease and a government this size and

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>whether it can react. And I don't know if you

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>saw the breakdown in the Wall Street Journal the other day,

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in all the different ways the c d C and

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the f d A and all different organizations have not

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>reacted to this very well. Too many regulations, too many layers,

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 1>too many rules. Um, is there anything that can be

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 1>done about that? Well, we get better at that, ever,

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>or is that just the product of a growing and

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>growing government. Well, we can get better at it. It's

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>going to require us to take a careful look at

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what needs to be there and what doesn't. So you

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>guys have already hinted it. A few of the challenges

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>we have. One is you just look at healthcare as

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 1>an example. We've got so many different types of bureaucracy

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that are involved. We've got so many different agencies and

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>make no mistake about it. There are functions that those

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:16.760
<v Speaker 1>agencies serve which are important, so we don't want to

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 1>denigrate the functions that they play, but we we do

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>want to think about who actually has authority to do

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>things when something happens. And that's the challenge you have

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:32.399
<v Speaker 1>when you have overlapping responsibilities. You have in healthcare, for example,

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.079
<v Speaker 1>an agency that's designed to approve new drugs and new

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.640
<v Speaker 1>therapeutics as the FDA. You have an agency that's designed

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>to be there to deal with the spread of disease

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 1>and control the spread of disease, that's the CDC. Then

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:49.399
<v Speaker 1>you've got the Department of Health and Human Services, which

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is theoretically over all of them, yet those agencies are

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>expected to operate somewhat independently. And then you have you know,

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>various other small agencies I'm forgetting about as well. So

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we've got to figure out how to streamline all of this,

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to take a sort of holistic approach,

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and someone needs to come along and say, hey, let's

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>stop and let's do this, because what always happens in

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>government is the urgent crowds out the importance. So a

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of steps we need to take and most certainly

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of changes that can be made. I have

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a feeling there are some really fundamental forces at work here.

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Our friend Tim Sandiford likes to talk about how in

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>general and government success is punished. I mean, if you

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>accomplish your goal having used only your budget, you have

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>budget taken away um and and failure is rewarded. You

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>get a bigger budget, you get more people. And there's

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>the question of defending turf every every Well, many bureaucrats

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>want nothing more than budget and people and turf, and

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and if if that's their strongest impulse, then it's going

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>to be really hard to tear it down and rebuild it.

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>You're right so that that mind set is absolutely prevalent

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in lots of parts of the federal government and state government,

0:04:05.080 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and probably even city and local government. But the challenges

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that how these bureaucrats measure success oftentimes is by how

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>much budget they get to your point, how many people

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>they have on their team, how big of a bureaucracy

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>they can create, what kind of process they can create

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>around that bureaucracy. And instead of measuring outcomes, we need

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to be better about measuring outcomes. Our system of government

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>has to determine what is the effective best outcome we

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>want to get to, and then let's optimize for that

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>instead of saying what we really want is a bigger bureaucracy.

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:42.880
<v Speaker 1>We really wanted a new government agency. I mean, I

0:04:42.880 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>think back to how much people like Elizabeth Warren celebrated

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the creation of a government agency during the financial crisis,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and are there important things that that agency could be doing? Sure,

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>protecting consumers, that's an important thing, But did they ever

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 1>stop to ask for a minute, are there ways to

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>get there in the existing structure by making it leaner

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and more efficient, versus, hey, let's just graft a whole

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>new federal agency onto other federal agencies that already exists.

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of thinking, unfortunately, is prevalent in Washington.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And it's not just Democrats and progressives who think that way.

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we got a lot of people who

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>are so called conservatives who are up there trying to

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>do many of the same things to create more and

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>more government. Because you get captured, you get captured by

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Washington and the thinking of that place, and you end

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 1>up buying into the same kind of logic about what

0:05:34.680 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take to get something done. I'm so

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>pessimistic that that will ever happen, though. Can you give

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>me an example of it ever happening in world history

0:05:42.480 --> 0:05:47.480
<v Speaker 1>where a giant bureaucracy actually uh shrinks and becomes leaner

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>and meaner and more effective unless it's forced to buy

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a devastating war or maybe a virus. Well, that's exactly

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>what it is, right. There has to be some external

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the fancy political science word is exogenous.

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>There's got to be some kind of external shock or

0:06:03.160 --> 0:06:06.880
<v Speaker 1>external factor that changes how people do business or changes

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>creates the predicate for people to say, you know what,

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 1>this isn't working so well. And I would bet there's been.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean even now right people are saying we need

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to create some kind of commission to go study you

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>know why it is that we didn't have tests or

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus early on. And my thing is, you know, why

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>not take some organ that's already in the government. We

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>have something called the Inspector General's office in each agency.

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 1>Why not have an existing office whose responsibility is to

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>study where things go wrong. Let's have them study it

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and say, really, what about this agency worked and what

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't and not be afraid to put out there. You

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>know what they are parts of this agency that have

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to get cut. There's certain people that have to get cut,

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, maybe there's certain other parts of the agency

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>where we need more people and more funding. So you're

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>suggesting a department of f ups. I could I could

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:02.720
<v Speaker 1>run that. I've got a fair and fair amount of experience.

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 1>That would be I was gonna say that be every

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>agency of the federal government. I mean, if you went

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if you went through and looked at all of the

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ways in which part of the federal government have or

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>have not worked, you would see you would be shocked.

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>If we actually studied it and looked at it, you

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>would be shocked. But we need to be doing that, right.

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>We need to be assessing what's working and what's not,

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but doing it on a regular basis, not just when

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a once in a lifetime global pandemic. Now

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm to answer Jack's question. I know several of the

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Nordic states that a lot of people look to as

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>socialist paradisees have actually scaled way back on government spending

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>since their experiments of the sixties and seventies. That might

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be an example, but the problem anytime you look at

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>those states, is that they are small, they are homogeneous,

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>and and you know it's a limited number of families.

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.240
<v Speaker 1>They all know each other. I mean the countries are

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>almost that small. Yeah, And and they have significant limits

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>on who can come into the country. They have significantly

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean we we talk about having you know, a

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, oh, we need a more open

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>immigration system. I'm all foreign immigration system that tries to

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>get the best and the brightest here to to help

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>our economy and do all that sort of stuff. But

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you talked about these Nordic countries. Neither are not an

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>immigrants paradise, right. They are extremely closed societies. They have

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a a very strong they're guided by a strong sense

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of cultural and national identity. Uh so it's relatively easy

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for them to do the kinds of things that they do.

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:39.239
<v Speaker 1>America is I mean, we are a diverse, messy, beautiful

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>country in that way, and and so it's gonna be

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder for us to do what they do,

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>nor do we want to do what they do. What

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people don't realize is the level of

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>control that has to be exercised by the government, The

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>level of control that has to be exercised by society.

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>It is significant, and culturally in these countries it is

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>more well accepted. A lot of people, for example, use

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Singapore as an example of a country. They have great

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>policy outcomes, a very efficient bureaucracy. They are extremely data

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and results driven, but they are essentially living in a

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>quasi dictatorship, and people there are okay with it because

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a benign dictatorship. Right. That structure would never work

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.959
<v Speaker 1>in America. We have way too many people and we're

0:09:23.040 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>way too independent minded. And that's a good thing. It

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>would help if anybody was ever held to account for

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>any you know, mistakes, whether they were it was incompetence

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>or um, you know, they did it for bad reasons.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>For instance, the c d C clearly misled everybody on

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>whether or not they had the ability to test for

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>this thing. I mean, the articles out there about this.

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I'll bet anybody money nobody loses their job, somebody might

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>get reassigned to a different division. Nobody's ever held to

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.000
<v Speaker 1>account for any screw ups. Well, and I'll tell you

0:09:56.040 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a political overlay here too, right, because it's easy

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>enough to get rid of the person at the top

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>whoever runs the agency political appointee, get rid of them.

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>But when you start to dig into the bureaucracy, there

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>surely are people within the bureaucracy who, to your point,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>did not did not act either appropriately or well enough

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.679
<v Speaker 1>or efficiently in this situation. But the minute you start

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to dig in there, and the minute you start to

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>think about it, you get accused of wanting to attack

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>science or wanting to attack the civil service, when the

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>reality is, we have to be absolutely clear about why

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>mistakes happen, and we cannot be afraid to fix them.

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, the politics have become so toxic

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 1>and so part of it in our country that any

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>effort to do that is seen, Oh, well, you're you're

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>just You're just a trumper. You're just somebody out there

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.640
<v Speaker 1>who you know, wants to try and advance a conservative

0:10:52.640 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>policy agenda. Look, I'm just trying to say, let's figure

0:10:55.920 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>out what went wrong and let's fix it. I don't

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>care who's responsible for it. Let's get to the to

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the core of responsibility and let's fix the problem. But

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to have that conversation given the politics of

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now. Well, I agree with you,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>completely that there are plenty of Republicans who want to

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>grow the government, just different parts of the government. Um,

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But it seems to me it is mostly voters on

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the left who seem to have this knee jerk defense

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>of government and government programs and and maybe it's because

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>of the lefty voters affection for unions or something like that.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>But it boggles the mind of a lot of us

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that so many people have as much faith as they

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:41.199
<v Speaker 1>do in government bureaucracies and don't see the the waste

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and the abuse, and the transigence and and and the

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. I have you ever done a study

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>of that, I mean, really gone into people's worldview why

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>some are so charitable towards government, you know, misfunction. Yeah,

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>I haven't studied it myself. Health, but I will say

0:12:00.960 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that that people who look at this generally conclude a

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. So the first is that the belief

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 1>in government is born out of a mistrust of the

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 1>private sector or a belief that civil society, nonprofit institutions, churches,

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:22.680
<v Speaker 1>charitable institutions UH in addition to the private sector, are

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>incapable or fundamentally have their UH incentives misaligned In a way,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and so government is in a much better place to

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do it. I mean. A perfect example of this are

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>all of the people on the left who have embraced

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>single payer health care, who have embraced Medicare for all,

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And what do you always hear them saying? You get

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>them saying we cannot trust the insurance companies. We cannot

0:12:45.640 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 1>trust private sector entities to deal with our health care system.

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 1>We cannot trust doctors who are who are out there

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>for their own profit, in their own gain. We have

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to socialize all of this because government knows better. It

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is just a It goes to a misunderstanding of what

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>has made America great. Not I mean not to get

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>this political. I don't. I don't mean to put it

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 1>in the Trump fame, but literally, what has made America

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>great over these years has been the existence of a

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>system that has lifted more people out of poverty and

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>more people out of a lack of opportunity than any

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>other economics, a system in the history of mankind, and

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of saying we don't want that system. Instead, we

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>want to go to a system where government controls the

0:13:32.040 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>means of production, government controls how resources are allocated. And

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's born out of a genuine belief guys,

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that that works better than the private sector. And that's

0:13:43.200 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>why I think a lot of people on the left

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 1>do have a instinctive answer for everything, which is, well,

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>if only the government would get involved, and only the

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>government would be in charge, if only you bureaucrats and

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>people who are quote dispassionate arbiters would be involved. I've

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>heard this over and over again, but but it just

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 1>blies a understanding of of really what is made America prosperous,

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of human nature. I don't know what their

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>world experiences that has led them to believe this, because

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 1>my world experience has led me a different direction. Well,

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the it's the world experience that leads people like

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders to say we need a Cuban style education system, right.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is a It is either a misapprehension

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of history or a wilful, deliberate effort to subvert an

0:14:35.880 --> 0:14:41.640
<v Speaker 1>understanding of history in favor of of of a particular agenda.

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the only thing that can explain it.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Either you just don't don't know the history, don't understand it,

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 1>or don't want to. Oh yeah, it's wishful thinking. It's

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a no, I'm sure we can get it right this time.

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure this will work. That I think is just ridiculous.

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder if it's this fundamental. A lot of

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>these questions comes down to the difference between people who

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:07.480
<v Speaker 1>believe there should be equality of outcome versus those of

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>us who believe there should be equality of opportunity, and

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and and if you know, because you're never going to

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>get equality of outcome out of the private sector, out

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>or out of any natural function of life. But why

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>why is that? Just as simple as you have you

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>been to the post office? Have you been to FedEx?

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>Have you noticed how they bust their acid fed x

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to make sure you're a happy customer because you're a

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>happy paying customer. Have you noticed how at the post

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>office you regularly run into place They don't care if

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you never come back. It doesn't make any difference to them.

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, they prefer you did leave. That means eloquent.

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Is Lincoln's Gettysburg address and shorter? We only experience you need,

0:15:45.280 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Yeah? Well right, And so this is also

0:15:50.640 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like the d m V, the perfect example of that. Right,

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Why do people pay for triple A, ton't have to

0:15:55.440 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>wait in the line of the d m V. Right,

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and and not that not that the triple A is

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a is a paragon of efficiency and effectiveness, but compared

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to the d m V and en sure does look

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>like it, right, I mean so so so it's a

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:11.160
<v Speaker 1>great point, which is, if we believe in a society

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>where resources have to be distributed equally, if we believe

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in equality of outcome, the folks who are in favor

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of socialism or in favor of a communist system, you know,

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>they've got it right. That probably is the only way

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to ensure the exact equivalent distribution of goods. And it

0:16:29.760 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that there are some on the left

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 1>now who are more openly embracing that point of view,

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>who are saying, look, actually, yeah, we we we we

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>do need equality of outcome as opposed Yeah, I mean,

0:16:43.800 --> 0:16:47.479
<v Speaker 1>whereas if you look at if you look at at

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the history of our country, and you look at what

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the founders and what great political theorists over the years

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have talked about, what you see is is a is

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a coherence around wanting to have to ensure that people

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have the same shot at success which is why you

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>put in place rules. Right, the only reason we have

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 1>laws and regulate that the only reason, one of the

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest reasons you have laws and regulation is to make

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>sure that people are playing by the same rules. And

0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>are we angry when people don't play by those rules? Absolutely?

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Are we angry when there's croniasm, Yes, and we should be.

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>But but the answer has always been, let's give people

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a fair shot to compete and then let's see what happens.

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And that, by necessity, is going to mean that we're

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 1>going to have differences in outcome and and and is

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it sad that there are differences in outcome? I don't

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.360
<v Speaker 1>know that it's sad. I think it's reality. I think

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:37.199
<v Speaker 1>it's the reality of the system we have, and I

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:41.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's the best economic system that mankind has ever seen. Yeah,

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. You know, I have two kids. If

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>one of them ends up making twice as much money

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as the other one, I don't I'm not going to

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.719
<v Speaker 1>feel like that's sad for the one who makes less.

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just that the direction they went with the talents

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 1>they had in life decisions, right, Yeah, And I mean

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know that that that you know should when should

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>government act? Right, And the answer is, there are times

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 1>when government has to act because the uh, you know,

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>because the rules aren't fair. Okay, sure, government should act

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to change the rules to make sure they're fair. Uh.

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 1>In times when the system gets overburdened by some things

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't expected, and we expect our government to

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>step in. Why with the coronavirus situation, government steps in

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and says, Okay, we're gonna put in place some regulations

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to help keep people safe. That makes sense. But the

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>notion that in the everyday functioning, what we really need

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>is more government, I just fundamentally disagree with that notion.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And I just think history suggests that that will not

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>lead and not lead us to a great place. Well,

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to the question of bureaucracy and dysfunction

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and bloat in transigence and all that. There obviously need

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to be a new There needs to be a new

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>set of incentives and disincentives laid over government or sprayed

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>into the buildings or something some sort of fumigation. Um.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>What just on a basic level, if you were you know,

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 1>president or advisor to a president and and that president decided,

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>and my god, I'd vote for him for a third term.

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>If they did this, they said, listen, my main mission

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to make is to make the federal government lean.

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And mean, what sort of incentives and disincentives would you suggest?

0:19:26.840 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>What would that look like? Yeah, you know, I always

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's great to go back to first principles. So

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you start with the basic question, which is what do

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>we want government to do and where we where do

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>we want it to act? And set out a set

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of priorities and goals and figure out how to assess

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>success against those goals, figure out how you need to

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>staff a team to reach those goals. And then take

0:19:53.560 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a look at the reality and see what you have

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and compare X with Y, and I guarantee you they'll

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>look nothing alike when you're talking about the US government. Yeah,

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they they're not. You know, you're not going to see

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a similarity between what's needed and what actually exists. And

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>then go out there and actually begin to make those changes.

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And now part of the challenges, you know, we got

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of rules in place about civil service protections

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and who can and can't be fired. And I understand

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>we got all of that, and that part of it

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>might be we need to take a serious look at

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 1>civil service rules. Yes they are we really promoting the

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>best in the bright Yeah, that's that That's probably an

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>easy question. An I'm with FDR on that question. That's

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>one of the few questions i'm with him on. He

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>believed it was an athema to efficient. When you're ready

0:20:41.840 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>to ride Metro, we want you to know we're ready

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for you. Here are just a few of the people

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>at Metro to tell you how we're doing our part

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep riders safe. We're cleaning like Nevil before half

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>builded greatly. You're a found han sanitizing, no mask, no

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Metro need one. We have a few extras at Metro.

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>We're doing our part to keep the DC area moving.

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Find out more at well mata dot com slash doing

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>our part for all your foodies out there. I'm unwrapping

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a McDonald steak, egg and cheese bagel. Look at this

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>steak and the juice running down the side. Get a

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit on a wrapper here, m and then the

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>fluffy egg and real cheese folded over the side, looking

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 1>just so good. Mmm mmm, griled onions and about a

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>bagel too. Thumbs up. A McDonald steak, egg and cheese

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>bagel for breakfast. Love it m more bump up. I

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>participate in McDonald's government governance. But anyway, and I'll tell

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you another challenge we have, which is beyond the civil

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>service rules, we have public sector employee unions in the

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>United States, which to me, uh, you know, I think

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>you talk. We can have a conversation about unions and

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and the good that they've done in our society. And

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 1>surely there was a point at which they were being

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>very productive and important. And I think in the private sector,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I can understand the desire to represent a set of

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>workers and have that relationship be governed by a set

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>of rules. But why is it that we have such

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge role for public sector unions. We are essentially

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 1>saying that we have developed a system so that the

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>people who are working for the government can bargain against

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the government. You've got people who are in there essentially

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>represented with interests that are that are adverse to the

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>taxpayer interests. That to me makes no sense at all.

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>The power and the scope and the reach of public

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>sector unions is has reached a point of the US.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 1>But we've got to address it well, particularly because in California,

0:22:48.240 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is a great example of this that the diffuse interests

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of the voters are are are not nearly as powerful

0:22:55.720 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 1>in the actual hearing rooms as the union representatives. And

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>so you have the best and brightest and smartest there

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in the hearing room arguing like crazy for one point

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>of view, and then there's just this vague no you know,

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the voters really want to get their

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>pocketbooks protected, and there's just an imbalance. And then as

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>it gets even worse in California, you have union lawyers

0:23:19.640 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>supported by the government unions, the public employee unions, winning

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the offices and then negotiating with the people they replaced

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for the public employee union deals. It's just it's it's

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 1>mobbed up. Yeah, well that's I mean, this is exactly

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the challenge you you've identified it, which is that you

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>get this incestuous system that comes into place and it's

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>not clear who's actually representing the interests of the representative right,

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>because you have public officials who get captured by interests

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 1>like like the public sector unions. So if public sector

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.720
<v Speaker 1>unions are a huge donor to Democrats in California for

0:23:59.760 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>state wide office, what do you end up with you

0:24:02.520 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>end up with statewide office holders who are remarkably uh

0:24:07.320 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>responsive the union bosses, but not particularly responsive to the taxpayer.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>And that to me is a huge problem, right when

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about people who are supposed to When you

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>ask who is supposed to protect the interests of taxpayers,

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the answer is the people who are the people who

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>are elected by taxpayers, but they're not doing their job.

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a big problem here. We have a system

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that essentially is perpetuating itself. And to get back to

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the original issue, you guys raise around bureaucratic bloat and

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 1>around why it is that our bureaucracy doesn't function better.

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.360
<v Speaker 1>The answer is because no one's holding them to account,

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly no one that's supposed to be holding them to account.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>We send the same old people in California, for example,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>back to Sacramento. But you can go to any state capital,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 1>or you can even go to Congress and see this.

0:24:53.080 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>We send the same people back over and over again,

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and they are insistent on preserving the status quo, which

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>clearly is not working. I got a question out of nowhere, um,

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.680
<v Speaker 1>and we have this opportunity with the podcast to ask

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>you this. I like asking smart people this question because

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I like to read, but I want to read the

0:25:10.640 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>right stuff. What are a couple of your favorite, like

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>all time books? Um, to make a person smarter about

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.720
<v Speaker 1>all this sort of stuff, government, society, culture or whatever.

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's funny my my kids make fun of

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>me because they say I don't read that much, because

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>they don't want to see me reading books, because I'm

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>always reading, you know, news or stuff that comes up online.

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm always have to tell my son, I'm staring at

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>my phone. I'm reading a book. I just want you

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to know that because you know, because I grew up.

0:25:37.080 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see your parents reading books, and you're

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna maybe become a reader. They see me staring at

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>my phone. I could be on Facebook, I could be

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>playing candy, but I'm I'm I'm reading. But anyway, back

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to your book. Yeah, I you know, um, there are

0:25:50.800 --> 0:25:53.680
<v Speaker 1>pieces of fiction over the years that have been very

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.640
<v Speaker 1>influential in my life. And I'll tell you I don't

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 1>want to freak anyone out, but my favorite book growing

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>up was a book called four by George Orwell, which

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody you know, hopefully everybody's read, right, And the reason

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>why it's so important to have read that book is

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>because it gives you a sense of just how overwhelming

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.360
<v Speaker 1>government can be. And I, by the way, people will

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>will I often get the question, how did you become

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>a conservative or how did you decide that you were

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>conservatively disposed? And a lot of it has to come

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>with reading that book and reading more and more about

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>societies where where government does play a big rule. And

0:26:32.600 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>uh so that book was actually quite influential. So four

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 1>is one. It's not it's not a particularly tough read,

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's a really important read. Uh and

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>uh and it's one that's been influential well. And it's

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.359
<v Speaker 1>fairly depressing too, So if you're feeling overly cheery that

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a good one. Yes, yes, no, no, no, I

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree. Um. I've also recent I'll just say recently,

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten quite a to a theologian named Dallas Willard, who, uh,

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 1>you guys may or may not be familiar with him,

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>but he's somebody who you know is a is a

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>theologian who has been very influential in uh in a

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:18.719
<v Speaker 1>certain line of a Protestant thinking, in particular now Presbyterian thinking.

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Uh And and he has had a whole bunch of

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>really interesting books over the years. Some of them are

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>quite dense. He's quite a dense writer. But one that

0:27:28.240 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>I've really enjoyed recently is called Life Without Lack, which

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 1>talks about, uh, you know, essentially, how to lead life

0:27:35.119 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>fully and how to feel full when we can oftentimes

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 1>look around us and think, gosh, I'm missing that, or

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have this, I don't have that or the other.

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Uh and and and and so that one in particular

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 1>has has stuck out recently. But and you know, he

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 1>got my attention with that one because I'm in that

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>world a lot, and I don't know that name, so

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll check that out. Yeah, we appreciate the recommendation. Hey,

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>if I can just circle back to orwell real quickly.

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Um And in comment that, I was probably twelve when

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I read Animal Farms somehow or other, I think I

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 1>came across it. There was a neat illustration of a

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.080
<v Speaker 1>pig on the front, and so I thought a story

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 1>about pigs, but talking pigs. Um. It was like a

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>religious awakening for me. I mean it just I still

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>can feel the electricity, um that ran through my veins

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>as I read this thing. And I wondered if you

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 1>read a Brave New World. Of course, Yeah, I had

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a feeling you had I think about you know, it's

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a it's a classic question who got it more right

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>or Well or Huxley. I think China is a pretty

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>good example of a regime taking just enough from more

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Well and just enough from Huxley. You know, the point

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of Brave New World is that people weren't really oppressed

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 1>so much as they were drugged and amused into apathy

0:28:55.240 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and cooperation. Um that there's you know, it takes both

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>to oppress a society unless you're going to go full on,

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, oppressive regime. Yeah, that is a that is

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>an amazing observation. Actually, and let me tell you why

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:15.479
<v Speaker 1>China is a great, great example of what you're talking about.

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>The the thing that is most noticeable to me about

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>where China is now. And you know, we'll put coronavirus

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>aside for a minute, because I think coronavirus was was

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a blip in terms of where

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>China is going were broadly, but the story that they've

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>told people, and I think this is a story that

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>people genuinely believe that economic prosperity and the listing of

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>people out of poverty in China is enough to justify

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the oppression the government has put in place. In other words,

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the deal that the Chinese government has with people is

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>this deal. You can be a little bit more prosperous,

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and you can have food on your table, and you

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>can have a society that looks modern and has all

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the comforts of modern society. But the only way you

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>can have that is if you're willing to deal with

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:12.320
<v Speaker 1>what the government has put in place in terms of

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>rules and regulations and requirements. And in China, those rules

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>include things like constant monitoring. They include things like, um,

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the government being able to see and know what you're

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>doing all the time. They include things like not being

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>able to access a lot of the internet right And

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>people have been willing to take that deal, and they

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like, well, you know, my government is taken care

0:30:36.600 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>of me. I'm doing a little bit better now, and

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>so maybe they're right. The only way that I can

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>be this way is if they have complete control over

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>over every part of my life. And I think it's

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a really good observation that it's it is a it

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is a mix in some ways between the four World

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and the Brave New World world, because it because it's

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this deal that that and these government is put in place.

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>One question on the news of the day that I

0:31:03.880 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>hope doesn't age poorly. I don't think it will when

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:08.280
<v Speaker 1>people hear this in the future. We're right in the

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>midst of the biggest stimulus bill in the history of

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the world. I don't know what's gonna end up being

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>somewhere close to two trillion dollars. Should we be horrified

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that people are stuffing in all kinds of of things

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that have nothing to do with coronavirus and business, or

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>should we just accept it as just part of the

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:31.239
<v Speaker 1>way the system works. I don't think we should accept it.

0:31:31.480 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be willing to call it out.

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we should be willing to say that this

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is not an opportunity to jam in there your pet project.

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>This is not an opportunity to say, hey, you know what,

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should put restrictions on what kinds of people

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 1>can be named to the board of directors of companies.

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I've seen that that's something you know that Elizabeth Lawn wants.

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is not an opportunity to get every

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>straight cat and dog in this is an opportunity to

0:31:57.680 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure it goes back to the original conversation we're having, guys,

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>which is what's our goal. What are we trying to

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:04.520
<v Speaker 1>do here? Who are we trying to help? Let's help

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>those people, and then let's get out. Let's stop talking

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 1>about the rest of this stuff, because this is what

0:32:09.640 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>always ends up happening. And then you've got people on

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the outside who are self proclaimed fiscal conservatives saying, hey,

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>three trillion, four trillion, we need more stimulus. Now, it

0:32:20.160 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>just does not make any sense to me that you

0:32:22.480 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>would that you would have a UM. People never want

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to waste the crisis. I guess as rama Manuel has said,

0:32:30.120 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's precisely what you're seeing here. But it doesn't

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>make it right. Well, I thought there were crisis is

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.239
<v Speaker 1>big enough that you wouldn't have time to think about that.

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>But maybe I was wrong. Yeah, you underestimated people. Uh. Hey,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe it or not, these things are not scripted.

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna ask jack Um, do you have more

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>on that you want to talk about or can I

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>ask on here a little bit about his his gig

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>at Stanford. Um the uh, it's a truism at this

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>point that American universities lean way way left. And you

0:32:57.280 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of attitudes among college kids that I

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>find at uh you given what you believe? Are you

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just a pariah at Stanford? Do you have to run

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:08.040
<v Speaker 1>from doorway to doorway and and fend off blows? Or

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>how how are the youngsters these days? Are they open

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to uh hearing opposing viewpoints? What's what's a snapshot of

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the college experience for you these days? Yeah? You know,

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for me at least, it's pretty um, it's always a

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty good set of experiences, because what I find is that, well,

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the students. I mean, the students clearly

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are very left and they have some very out there

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>points of view. But if they're going to come and

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>take a class of mind, they understand that they're probably

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be introduced to some concepts that other members

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>of the faculty won't introduce them to, and some come

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>seeking that out. So I end up with with some

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.720
<v Speaker 1>students in my classes who are deliberately looking for that

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 1>alternative point of view. I have some who are looking

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>for a good argument, which I'm always happy to have.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I have some who just come because they're curious in

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the subject matter, but aren't particularly politically inclined one way

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>or the other. And and so I end up with

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.400
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good diversity of students that I end up

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 1>with pretty good conversation in my classes. In particular. More broadly,

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I will say the challenge I have that I see

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:19.160
<v Speaker 1>on campus is not so much with the students. It's

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>with the other faculty, and that there are a number

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of folks around the university who are an important positions,

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 1>who you know, who deal with students all the time,

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.120
<v Speaker 1>who have a very strong point of view and don't

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>believe that any alternative point of view holds any any merit. Now,

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not speaking about everybody there. Lord, how can you

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:42.120
<v Speaker 1>get to a to a position of education at that

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 1>level and have that attitude. Well, they're they're they're so

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>deeply steeped and they're so good at what they do

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that they don't necessarily believe that there's any alternate possibility

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>an explanation right there. That they've been in what they're

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>doing for so long that they just subscribe to that

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 1>point of view, and they automatically. I mean, what bothers

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>me is not so much people have strongly held believes

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for that. What bothers me is when they

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.560
<v Speaker 1>when they say, look, you feel differently from me, and

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ascribe bad intentions to you that essentially,

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to say, the reason that you disagree with

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 1>me is because you don't believe in science, or you're

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a bad person just in general or right correct, or

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you're heartless, or yeah, you're a racist. Sure, I mean

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what which which I always find humorous when when you know,

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:34.360
<v Speaker 1>when when I hear that, but I you know, that's

0:35:34.440 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that's where it's a little bit tougher for me. And

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that is something I see I'm seeing

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>more and more of on campus, which is people who

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 1>are so deeply set in their views that they're unwilling

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to consider that there might be an alternative. Sorry, no, no,

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 1>I as to say, I've I've I've got a lot

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of colleagues who are are quite left and as I said,

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:56.839
<v Speaker 1>we're willing to entertain the alternative, and we have great conversations.

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>But it's the ones who are so set in their

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 1>views that those are the one that I find more difficult.

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:05.239
<v Speaker 1>I read a contemporary wise person say the other day,

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>and I have a feeling this wisdom goes back to

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Greeks or beyond that. When you lose your

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>capacity to say, but I might be wrong, you've lost

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly important part of your humanity, and that's those

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>people scare me. Yeah. Well, I mean, this is the

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>problem with with with American colleges and universities more broadly,

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>is that you do have a lot of people. I

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:30.800
<v Speaker 1>mean just look at Twitter, right that back and forth

0:36:30.840 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you see over Twitter on on on things, and you've

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>got people who are absolutely a hundred percent convinced that

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.399
<v Speaker 1>they are right and and and they will never be wrong. Now,

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in some areas, if they're talking about something they've researched

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>for their whole life, I believe that they're probably right.

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:50.640
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to questions around uh, you know

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 1>what the best way is for society to move forward,

0:36:53.560 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>or questions about where we are politically, those get a

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:00.600
<v Speaker 1>little grayer for me. And I'm more been happy to

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:02.520
<v Speaker 1>admit that I may not know the right answer. If

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I can a lot of situations, I probably don't know

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the right answer, and I'm doing my best to guess.

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But I always try to tell people that, and I

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>always try to say, look, I believe very well. I

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>could could be right, could be wrong, and you're right.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>I think when we lose our capacity to do that,

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it's a sad thing. It's a very sad day. You

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.719
<v Speaker 1>know the problem with smug contemptuousness is that it's kind

0:37:21.719 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of fun, all right, it's a good time, and if

0:37:24.160 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you're surrounded by other people who agree with you, can

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:28.040
<v Speaker 1>they can feel really good? Oh yeah, it can snowball

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:33.120
<v Speaker 1>too until you can't stop yourself. Yeah, yeah, absolutely. Well,

0:37:33.160 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe someday we can talk about the future of college education,

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>because that is a really interesting topic to all of us,

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 1>particularly as I pay for my third kid to get

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 1>through that process. And this is not the classic sitcom

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 1>level humor about you know, writing checks. It's the idea

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that the dissemination of knowledge costs, you know, thirty to

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty dollars per year and you have to go to

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a big place with brick buildings seem is fairly ridiculous

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>to me at this point in history. Not that there

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>is no role for you know, a socratic seminar type thing,

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and intellectual leadership by a learned human and directing learning.

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that's all incredibly important, But I just it's

0:38:14.200 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 1>become something ridiculous, partly because of the flood of government money.

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But again, maybe that's a for another time. And we

0:38:19.480 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't even touch on the presidential campaign, which seems to

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 1>be completely on hold, at least at the time we're

0:38:24.520 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>recording this in the middle of the comic virus thing

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.000
<v Speaker 1>going on. But uh, Joe Biden, it's it's gotta be

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>good news for Joe Biden, right that he gets to

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:36.840
<v Speaker 1>hunker down and not have to talk very much. I

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.799
<v Speaker 1>think it's good news, but it's not going to be

0:38:39.880 --> 0:38:43.080
<v Speaker 1>good news, uh once we once a couple of weeks passes,

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.560
<v Speaker 1>because people are going to forget about it, right, And

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I think staying out of the public light, being able

0:38:49.320 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to kind of prepare a message or you know, rest

0:38:51.880 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 1>or do whatever he wants to do. I don't know.

0:38:53.880 --> 0:38:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I think those are positives. But I think you're seeing

0:38:58.320 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of consternation from his camp that he

0:39:01.080 --> 0:39:04.279
<v Speaker 1>can't get more involved in this coronavirus conversation. Right. He's

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 1>trying to get out there, and we've seen as a

0:39:06.280 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit as we record this, where he's trying to

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.920
<v Speaker 1>get out and and and appear almost like the shadow

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.680
<v Speaker 1>president who's got his own ideas and got his own thoughts.

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:17.960
<v Speaker 1>It just it's just not been effective. He just has

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>not been able to put himself into the conversation. And

0:39:22.040 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that while it's nice to be able to

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 1>lay low for a little bit, once this continues to

0:39:28.200 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>go on, as we drag into April and May, he's

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>going to want to figure out ways to get into

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the limelight. And I think that's going to be something

0:39:35.320 --> 0:39:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna want to do because it's easy to forget

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:41.640
<v Speaker 1>we've got a presidential campaign what we do. Yeah, it's

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>funny how the universe it seems cycle after cycle says no,

0:39:46.000 --> 0:39:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the election is going to be about this, and it's

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>almost like you're on some sort of game show. What

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>was that cooking show where they told you the last

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>second the secret ingredient you had to Yeah, it's very

0:39:56.280 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>much like the Iron Chef. McCain and Obama were set

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:00.920
<v Speaker 1>up to be an argument about the Iraq War, than

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the crisis happens and it's got nothing to do with

0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>it anymore. Yeah. Yeah, it seems to happen every time

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot he it's always stimulating. We don't want to

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>steal too much of your time. But I hope we

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>can do it again. Absolutely thankful guys, our pleasure. A

0:40:15.000 --> 0:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>little too smart for my taste, Yeah, oh yeah, I'll

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>ask him to dumb it down next time. Well, we

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>covered so much ground. I have a feeling he could

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:29.600
<v Speaker 1>go deep quite a few of the I'm sure, Oh yeah,

0:40:29.719 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>especially when I asked him a question. But uh, stop it. Um,

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I would love to. I could maintain, I think, a

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>lifelong interest in the question of how do you rearrange

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.759
<v Speaker 1>incentives and disincentives to make government perform more efficiently? I

0:40:45.760 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 1>couldn't because I'm too pessimistic about it. I just I

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.239
<v Speaker 1>just can't imagine. Well, I would die better, No, no

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:54.120
<v Speaker 1>question about that. I just just from being in in

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>private bureaucracies, big companies and seeing the government. It just

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:03.200
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen it go the other way. It just

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it grows and grows and gets more centralized and gets

0:41:07.440 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>thicker and slower, less responsive. Yeah. I'm thinking about the

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 1>trends in media with a lot of consolidation and and

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and thinning the workforce and the rest of it. But

0:41:19.600 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure it's that's not the model we're looking for.

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:28.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's that's starvation, not stuff about increasing efficiency, reforming

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 1>the rules of civil service. If you don't start there,

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.000
<v Speaker 1>then that I'm walking out of the room, because if

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that's not on the table, it'll never happened until people

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.720
<v Speaker 1>can lose their jobs. Well, and serious reform of public

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.799
<v Speaker 1>employee union rules too. Yeah, if we don't have those two,

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we have nothing nothing. You're right, it's an excellent point,

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 1>extra large. When you're ready to ride Metro, we want

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.359
<v Speaker 1>you to know we're ready for you. Here are just

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a few of the people at Metro to tell you

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:00.320
<v Speaker 1>how we're doing our part to keep riders safe. Cleaning

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 1>like noble before, but half built a great clean You've

0:42:03.680 --> 0:42:07.520
<v Speaker 1>found half sanitizer stations all over the Metro. No mask,

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 1>no Metro need one. We have a few extras at Metro.

0:42:11.719 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 1>We're doing our part to keep the d C area moving.

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Find out more at WEMTA dot com slash doing our

0:42:17.160 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 1>part