WEBVTT - Are we condemned to repeat history?

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuffworks

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Hey, are welcome to stuff to Blow your Mind.

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert lamp and I'm Christian Seger. You know, Christian.

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>It seems that we should be able to look at

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 1>where we've been in the past and therefore extrapolate, predict,

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>even simulate where we're going in the future. Right, it does.

0:00:30.920 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It does seem that way, And I think that that

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe is a product of like the last century of

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.519
<v Speaker 1>our uh scientific thinking. Does that make sense? Yeah, well,

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's definitely one line in particular that we're

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're often referring to and uh and in generally

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 1>misquoting I think a lot of the times, and that

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>comes from a philosopher, Georgia Santayana, who said, quote, those

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>That would of course tend to imply, Hey, if you

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>can remember the past, then you can avoid these pitfalls

0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in the future. That there's some uh, there's some system

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that can be employed that even though we're we're strapped

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to this linear existence just hurdling through time into the future. Um,

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>if we have some concept of the road that we've traveled,

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.319
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a better idea about the road to come right. Yeah,

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and so of bring it back around to our nerdiness. Uh.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 1>In our fandom for Stephen King and the newly popular

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Dark Tower Universe. Uh, there's a quote from King here

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that he used in the stand under the Guise of

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Randall flag. Life was such a wheel that no man

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>could stand upon it for long, and it always, at

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the end came around to the same place again. Uh.

0:01:47.480 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a terrifying concept though, right, And at the

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>same time it is an idea that seems to fill

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people with purpose because they can say, ah,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>hold on, wait, I've got it figured out, and I

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>can predict what's going to happen next. And in fact,

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we had a listener right into us about this very idea.

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Her name is Allison, and she wrote us and said

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>she was wondering if we would do a show about

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this is something that's been mentioned a lot on the

0:02:13.360 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>internet lately and apparent eighty year cycle of political social

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>upheaval in our world. And she said she was horrified

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>and intrigued the first time that she heard about it,

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and so she started looking into this. Uh. And she

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>said that she's heard about the idea in general, but

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>that this the whole like seventy to eighty year cycle

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as a devastating shake up, whether it's via war, war

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>or turmoil, was kind of new, right, and she wanted

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to know if we could do some research on it

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and see what we came up with and provide some

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>perspective on it. And interestingly, because I have also heard

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about this in the last couple of months, Um, we

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>did the research and it turns out that the one

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that's making the rounds is not the one that is

0:02:57.360 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>being academically researched. There's like a little bit of uh

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:05.840
<v Speaker 1>confabulation going on here between two different uh specific theories

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and one is more well, I guess we can describe

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>them as the fifty year theory and the eighty year theory. Yes, yeah, okay, yeah,

0:03:13.000 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and these this is this is this is getting into

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a realm of what is known as cleo dynamics, that

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>is cl i o dynamics. Yeah. So this is a

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:28.240
<v Speaker 1>field where scientists are attempting to find meaningful patterns in history.

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.800
<v Speaker 1>And it was named by a guy named Peter Turch.

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>And we're gonna talk a lot about him today after Cleo,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Greek muse of history. I have been having

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the hardest time remembering this name trying. You came up

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 1>with a good idea earlier picture Cleo as miss Cleo

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the psychic. Uh. The other one I'm thinking is like

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>letters to Cleo Dynamics, Like, I gotta figure out a

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>way to remember this because it's been hard for me.

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, there's been a swell of efforts to apply

0:03:56.600 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>scientific methods to history by identifying in audeling broad social forces.

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And one argument in favor of this is that historians

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are too qualitative and that they point to samples of

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>cases from observations that Cleo Dynamics wants to use tools

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>like nonlinear mathematics and simulations that can model the interactions

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of millions of people at once. Now, I want to

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>be clear about this upfront. It's criticized by traditional historians.

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>They usually believe that there are countless variables interacting within

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a society that lead to violence and social unrest, and

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>they don't think that there's any one unified theory or

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>general law to history. So so what are we talking

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.320
<v Speaker 1>about here? Then, Well, we're looking at decades or even

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.599
<v Speaker 1>century long periods of population expansion, followed by long periods

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of stagnation and decline price dynamics mirroring population oscillations, strong

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>expansionist phases followed by state failure socio political instead of

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>build pity and territory loss, repeated back and forth swings

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in demographic, economic, social, and political structures. Uh, just to

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>give you an idea of what what kind of patterns

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here when we're when you're imagining, say

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>the the Cleo dynamics weather person standing in front of

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:21.160
<v Speaker 1>green screen, like these are the kind of movements they

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 1>would be talking about her chart. That's a perfect analogy. Yeah. Now,

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>an example I came across was in the work of

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:30.480
<v Speaker 1>two and two individuals, one of whom of which we're

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about in greater depth, Peter Turchin and

0:05:34.320 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Sergey A. Nevadov, And they have a book titled Secular

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Cycles in which they looked at England, France, and Russia

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>throughout both the medieval and early modern periods and they

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>closely observed cycles of inequality. So, uh, Nevodov has a

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>great rundown of cleo dynamics and economic inequality as well.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>In Ian magazine and a couple of other publications. I'll

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>try to include a link to this on the landing

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>page for the episode. But he says that in this case,

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the cycles break down to this, you have expansion, stagnation, crisis, disintegration,

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of a life cycle of a story arc for

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>for civilization. Right. However, uh Nfidov is quick to point

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 1>out that we're not talking about rigid clockwork here, So

0:06:19.279 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>these cycles don't occur in a machine. They occur in

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 1>a chaotic system in which a great number of variables

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 1>play apart. So in a way it is it is

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot like the weather. The weather is a system.

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.600
<v Speaker 1>We know what what's factors influence the movements of atmosphere

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>and weather patterns, but there's so many it's ultimately such

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a chaotic system it becomes difficult to make um. You know,

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>long term predictions, even short term predictions are are are

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>open to uh to misinterpretation. And does anybody who's checked

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the weather channel or their weather app on their phone

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and gone outside and its raining. It's not that a

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>meteorologist doesn't know what they're taught king about. It's that

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the the system is just that complex and difficult to

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:08.800
<v Speaker 1>simulate even with the with our most complicated simulation systems.

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So the idea here's the human cultures and civilizations. Also

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that they're bumping up against each other, they're influencing each other.

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, there are so many factors that make it

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.680
<v Speaker 1>complex and it's it's again, it's not as simple as

0:07:21.720 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just you know, running a computer versus computer game inside

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of of a closed system. Still, he maintains that complex

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>interactions do add up to a general rhythm. So if

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>you kind of take a god's eye view of everything,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is that, yes, you will see patterns

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>emerge and then you can extract late that to the future.

0:07:42.800 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>So Cleo dynamics then is about observing these trends, observing

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>these cycles, this ebb and flow, and then predicting them

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in the future. And you have a note here about

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Mercy a eliads book The Terror of History, which I

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>remember reading in grad school. Yeah, and of the Eternal Return,

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, he involved in myth studies. Yeah yeah, So

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he talks about this concept of the terror of history

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in which humanity has abandoned a cyclical mythic view of

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>time that we used to have in favor of a

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>purely linear existence. We're forced to see history for what

0:08:15.440 --> 0:08:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it is, a senseless stream of blunders, atrocity, collapsed ideals

0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of fallen states, ruined megaprojects, and just sort of failure

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in general. Um, it sounds like the greatest setting for

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a role playing game. Yeah, but not one to live in.

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>It's what it is, legitimately worth thinking about when you're

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>when you're toying with, you know, dungeons and dragons, histories,

0:08:37.640 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, or thinking about stuff like Game of Thrones. Yeah. Yeah,

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason why all of these, like fantasy worlds

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>that are built from the ground up, have ruinous histories

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to them that that they kind of look back on

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>in wonder. Yeah. So here's a quote from the myth

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of the Eternal Return. Ileoti says, quote, in our day,

0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:00.080
<v Speaker 1>when historical pressure no longer allows any escape, how and

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>man tolerate the catastrophes and horrors of history, from collective

0:09:04.160 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>deportations and massacres to atomic bombings, if beyond them he

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>can glimpse no sign, no transistorical meaning, if they are

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>only the blind play of economic, social, or political forces,

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>or even worse, only the result of the liberties that

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a minority takes and exercises it directly on the stage

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of universal history. So Eliade says that for the longest

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 1>humans were able to place everything within a metahistorical framework.

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh so, yeah, something fell apart because it was the

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>end of a decade an age. It was the punishment

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:42.079
<v Speaker 1>of God, et cetera. Now, Cleo dynamics stands in an

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting place by comparison, because they are, in a way

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 1>attempting to resurrect a cyclical view of history. There they're

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:55.160
<v Speaker 1>turning not to divine mechanics, however, or the imagined astrological

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>influence of the spheres. Uh, but rather to a modeling

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>of history sort of fluid dynamics based on cultural evolution,

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>macro sociology, economics, and other factors. Plus in a refreshingly

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>optimistic humanist twist that I really like. It also opens

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the door for control over those cycles, right Yeah, And

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's absolutely crucial to keep in mind with

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 1>all of this. It's not just another version of Oh,

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>humanity is screwed. And here's why. There's the potential for

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 1>self awareness. Here, there's the potential for change. Right. So,

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the general methodology that's being used in these studies at

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>least at least church and studies is to focus on

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>four main variables that are measured in several ways, and

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and Robert you just mentioned many of these. He boils

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>them down pretty quickly to population numbers, social structure, state strength,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and political instability. And then he says, the way to

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>measure these is actually through proxies that are connected to

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>these things that you can measure quantitatively. So he looks,

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>for instance, at social structure, He looks at the quantitative

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>data on life expectancy and wealth in a quality, and

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 1>that's one of his measurement points. So who's this Peter

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Churching guy that that like has just come out of

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:09.200
<v Speaker 1>nowhere with the cleo dynamics At least it seems like that, right,

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.439
<v Speaker 1>He's actually been doing it for a while. He's an

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:15.319
<v Speaker 1>ecologist and evolutionary biologist and a mathematician out of the

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>University of Connecticut and stores he studies population dynamics and

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>takes mathematical techniques that he used to use to track

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>predator pray cycles in forest ecosystems, and then he applies

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>those to human history. Now, Turchen looks at historical records

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of economic activity, demographic trends, and outbursts of violence in

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and he argues history is not just

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>one damn thing after another. His main research questions are essentially,

0:11:47.400 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>first of all, what general mechanisms explain the collapse of

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>historical empires? And then how did large scale states and

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>empires evolved in the first place. So this is some

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty big heavy stuff when it comes to anthropology. Now,

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:07.119
<v Speaker 1>church and first conceived of Cleo dynamics in nineteen seven

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>when he felt that all major ecological questions about population

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>dynamics had been answered, so he turned to that's a

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>direct quote from him. That's not me. I don't I

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know necessarily that they have all been answered. But

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>he turned to history. And actually his father had previously

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>looked into us. His father was Valentine Church and a

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>computer scientist, and he had written dissident writings about the

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>origins of totalitarianism that got him exiled from the Soviet

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Union in nineteen seventies seven. Now, the younger Church and

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>he recognizes that this kind of search for patterns in history,

0:12:42.320 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>this is not a new thing, right. Obviously, we're all

0:12:44.440 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>familiar with the idea of there being a cyclical nature

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to history. I remember learning about this in like, uh,

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>probably like a junior high history class. Well, I mean

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just basically pattern recognition in history class. Right, Oh,

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>an empire rye is and then it falls, you know,

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.440
<v Speaker 1>you have you're gonna end up with some sort of

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>horrible emperor ruler and then then there's a revolution that happens.

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Like you just you just began to recognize the same

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>patterns within these different stories. Yeah, that was the way

0:13:13.960 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it was framed to us when I was like whatever,

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 1>twelve maybe thirteen years old. They're essentially like war happens,

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>then like there's peace, then there's war, then there's peace,

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 1>then there's war, and they happen in these like they

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>actually were able to this elementary school tape teacher was

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:29.959
<v Speaker 1>able to map it out for us, you know. And

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>that's essentially what he's doing, but with just like a

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>broader set of data points, right. And he's really currently

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>focused on coordinating something called the c CHAT Global History

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Data Bank, And this is a database of history and

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 1>cultural evolution that is hoped to be used to empirically

0:13:49.160 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 1>test out theoretical predictions from Cleo dynamics. So they're essentially

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>housing as much data as they possibly can gather to

0:13:57.280 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>run these predictive models against. So there are a couple

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of moments of other Cleo dynamics though too rite and

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to confuse Urchin with too many of

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the other folks that are involved in this. And we

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't even gotten to the actual purported eighty year cycle

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that is making the rounds right now. What we're really

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>talking about with Urchin is the fifty year and then

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred year cycles. But uh, there's actually and you

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and I both found this. There's a peer reviewed journal

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>on Cleo dynamics and it's open access, meaning anybody out

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>there can get get it, and you can share it

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and reuse it under a Creative Commons attribution. You'll find

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:37.560
<v Speaker 1>lots of different articles about cleo dynamic views of history.

0:14:37.960 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You try to include a link to that on the

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>landing page for this episode is stuff to about your

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>mind dot com. Yeah, so here's a couple of people.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Uh they they have been doing similar work to church In,

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:52.239
<v Speaker 1>but they're not, you know, part of his necessary research projects.

0:14:52.240 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So you've got Claudio sea Offee Reveala, who is a

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>computer social scientist in Virginia, UH. They're trying to use

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>cleo dynamics by running simulations on computer models. Specifically, his

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>team is looking at the Rift Valley region of East

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Africa and the effects of modern climate change there. And

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>so they've seen that there was a drought there and

0:15:13.640 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 1>then subsequently labor specialization and vulnerability emerged spontaneously. So they

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hope to be able to predict the flow of refugees

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and identify potential conflict hot spots in the region using

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>using these Cleo dynamic methods. Another guy, Jack Goldstone, is

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>the director of the Center for Global Policy at George

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Mason University. He's also a member of the Political Instability

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Task Force, which is funded by the CIA to forecast

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>events outside of the United States. He's tried finding patterns

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in past revolutions and he projects that Egypt will actually

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>have a few more years of struggle and another five

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to ten years of rebuilding its institutions before it can

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>regain stability. Now this is in reference to the Arab

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Spring Revolution of uh That might be a little bit this.

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>The information here might have been written closer to that

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>date than to our present date. So I take those

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>those numbers with a grain of salt. Goldstone, though, thinks

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that cleo dynamics is only useful for looking at broad

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>trends and not useful for predicting unique events, so he

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be clear about that. I think that's important

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to note. And when we get into criticism later, you

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>do find that it's not necessarily the situation where people

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are like cleo dynamics is awesome or Cleo dynamics is

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>is trash. It's a lot a lot of times it's

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>a discussion about to what extent these kinds of exercises

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>are useful or accurate. Right, Yeah. So another person who

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 1>felt the same way is Herbert Gentis, and this is

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a retired economist working out of U mass Ammerst, who

0:16:56.800 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>also doubts that cleo dynamics can be used to predict

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 1>specific events, but he does think the patterns and causal

0:17:04.320 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>connections within it can reveal lessons for policymakers. So he's

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>essentially arguing this is something that people who are constructing

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.720
<v Speaker 1>policy in our government should be paying attention to. And

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the last person here I have here is Harvey Whitehouse,

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>who is an anthropologist at the University of Oxford, and

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:27.199
<v Speaker 1>he oversees the construction of a database on rituals, social structures,

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and conflict around the globe. Now, he believes this research

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>can complement the approach of Cleo dynamics by shedding light

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on the triggers of political violence. In his argument, this

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 1>violence happens when individuals strongly identify with a political group,

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and that identification is cemented through what he calls rituals.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.399
<v Speaker 1>And these can be frightening and painful. And the reason

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>why is the more frightening and painful they are, the

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>stronger the shared memories they create. Are This sounds very

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>familiar to us. We are you know, we're trying to

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.199
<v Speaker 1>keep this episode evergreen, but we were actually recording this

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the weekend after the riot events in Charlottesville, Virginia and

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>uh where you know, there were collisions between I guess

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.199
<v Speaker 1>white nationalist protesters and counter protesters and there was a

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>woman killed by a car that drove into a number

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>of the participants in this. Uh, it's it was super upsetting.

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>It's still super upsetting. And as I'm reading about cleo

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>dynamics and these applications of it, it seems to be

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>like a moment that will obviously join this data set,

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>which sounds sounds somewhat unemotional, right because these are like

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>real people that it's affecting. But it also makes me

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>wonder like, how can this How could could we have

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>predicted events like this? Or can we trace back why

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>events like this are happening? Yeah, exactly, because again, it's

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not just about knowing where we're going. It's

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it's about being able to take control of it, being

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.720
<v Speaker 1>able to sort of take control of the wheel to

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent. Alright, let's take a break, and when

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we come back, let's jump into this fifty year cycle,

0:19:15.440 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 1>this fifty year scale. Alright, we're back. So yeah, So

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Turchen is actually the one who came up with the

0:19:25.720 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>fifty year scale, and this is the one that's getting

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 1>conflated with the eighty year scale that's making the rounds

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>on the internet right now. Uh, And we'll explain all

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>that later, but let's talk about what he actually means

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>with this fifty year scale. So the theory goes, he

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>calls this the father and Son's scale. The theory goes

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that every fifty years there's a moment of violent upheaval

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, and he looks at this as

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>beginning in eighteen seventy with the Civil War, then in

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>nineteen twenty there was violence over labor and race. Then

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>again in nineteen seventy we had the Vietnam War and

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the Civil rights movement. So he's our you doing that

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty is around when we're going to have our next

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:07.359
<v Speaker 1>cycle and basically saying everybody needs to prepare themselves. We're

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna go through another moment of turmoil. You know, I, UM,

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to criticize this this because obviously there

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are a number of issues going on, but I mean

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.919
<v Speaker 1>instantly you think to yourself, oh, I'm glad there was

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that stretch of a relative peace between ninety uh and

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the and the nineteen seventy Um, you know obviously that's

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>when we had the World War two Great War. Yeah, yeah, yeah, exactly.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>He's not tracking events like that because they aren't, I guess,

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.920
<v Speaker 1>specifically within the borders of the United States. So that's

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting But you're making a really interesting counter argument here,

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.240
<v Speaker 1>which is like, what's the then diagram of overlap of

0:20:44.280 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 1>global events on top of this right? Right? And then

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you I guess you can also say two are you

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>have these key moments generationally where you have all these

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 1>factors coming together and opening us up for the potential

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.199
<v Speaker 1>for unrest. But I guess there's also going to be

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this um, this possibility for cascading effects, and I imagine

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you could apply that to to the you know, the

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>decades to follow. He sort of addresses that, and I'll

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>get to that in the future, because he calls that's

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 1>part of his two hundred year scale. But let's wrap

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>up the fifty year scale. Yeah, Actually, that's a good

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a good times you're going to have like two

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>different bruds of cicadas emerging at the same time exactly.

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>So he argues all of this in a published article

0:21:27.040 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 1>in a July issue of the Journal of Peace Research,

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and he believes the model that he presents there suggests

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:39.359
<v Speaker 1>that violence will be even worse because of quote demographic

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>variables such as wages, standards of living, and a number

0:21:43.800 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of measures of intra elite confrontation. Now, his reasoning for

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>all of this is that there's a period of sustained

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:57.439
<v Speaker 1>explosive violence, and then that is usually followed and maintained

0:21:57.480 --> 0:22:00.879
<v Speaker 1>as peace for around twenty to thirty years until a

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>new generation arises and this generation hasn't experienced any of

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the horrors of the previous generations. So church And thinks

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>that this cycle occurs every two generations, or every forty

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to sixty years. So that's why he places its smack

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in the middle there with a fifty year cycle. This

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is why he calls it the father's and son's cycle,

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a little gendered. But the idea here is

0:22:23.080 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>that the father responds violently to perceived social justice, and

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>then their son lives with that legacy of conflict and abstains.

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:36.200
<v Speaker 1>But with the third generation, the cycle begins again. Now

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 1>church And compares this to a forest fire, and he

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>says it will burn out until underbrush accumulates, and then

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the cycle recommences again. Okay, I can definitely follow that. Yeah.

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I like looking at my life and how my lifespan

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>has played against the cycles that he's outlining. I can

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>see this, you know, Like I was born just after

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the Civil Rights movement, just after Vietnam. I learned from

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>my parents that those events were catastrophic and that it

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>was you know, essentially I learned to try to be

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 1>peaceful as as he's arguing here, and then I think

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing like the generation maybe two generations behind you

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and I are they didn't they didn't have those lessons, right,

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 1>and so subsequently they're sort of feeling the pressures of economy.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Really is what it comes down to with Turchin's arguments

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>upon themselves and then looking for a scapegoat. Yeah, I mean,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I have thought a lot in the past about what

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it means to be entering into an age in which

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>there are no uh, you know, fewer and then ultimately

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>no firsthand accounts of the Second World War, you know. Yeah, yeah, absolutely,

0:23:49.800 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that totally ties into this. Yeah. So he also identifies

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>the cause as get this political entrepreneurs who are trying

0:23:58.960 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to get power. There are people who are already in

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the elite, but they want to overturn the political order

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to better suit themselves. Does this sound familiar anybody? And

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>he says that this subsequently has a historical precedent of

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>leading to revolution. But hold on a second. You're probably

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>saying to yourself, wait a minute, there was no peak

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in the eighteen twenties. If this fits a fifty year model,

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>If I go back to the eighteen twenties, there wasn't

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>any upheaval, then why and he says, actually, that's because

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the social variables like wages and employment were excellent at

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that time. So he's looking at and he's thinking that

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>our current polarization here in the United States and the

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>current amount of inequality we're experiencing will reach a peak

0:24:49.119 --> 0:24:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in our discourse and political class will become even more

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 1>fragmented than it already is right now. In addition, he

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>finds uh things that are indicators are corruption increase and

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>political cooperation unraveling. Right before there are these big periods

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of instability or violence that are imminent. And again this

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.640
<v Speaker 1>sounds eerily familiar. I guess I should try to place

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this too. So the article was written in twelve. He

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>started talking about this stuff back, and what would I say? So,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been talking about this for a while now,

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and now here we are in seventeen and we're experiencing

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the things that he predicted. I'm not

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>saying that that necessarily means for I agree with his

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:37.040
<v Speaker 1>prediction or I agree with this model, but it is

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of scary how a lot of this is playing out.

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>So remember that other CLEO dynamic speaker I mentioned earlier,

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Harvey white House. He says that if Turchin's prediction of

0:25:47.720 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>unrest in the United States is correct, we can actually

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 1>expect to see an increase in tightly knit groups who

0:25:56.280 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>use rituals with a threatening quality. But these ritual is

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>also promised great rewards for their members. And again I

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have to remind us we're recording this a couple of

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>days after Charlottesville, and that describes that to a t

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is a group with a threatening quality that's promising great

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 1>rewards to its members. What's the great reward in that case?

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:21.959
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, well, I think that talking about greatness. They

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:25.440
<v Speaker 1>so I've told a lot of people about this. Their

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Vice actually made a video on the ground there. It's

0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>about like minutes long. It's super upsetting, but I highly

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>recommend watching it to sort of get a first hand

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 1>account of what's going on there. When you when you

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>watch the people in these groups talking about why they're there,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is about it comes down to

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>a cultural reclamation of the country and economic like they

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like something's been taken away from them that they deserve,

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that's what the groups are sort

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of promising. It's like, if you part us have paid

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in this you will reap rewards in the end. Okay,

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So there's talking about like the return of say jobs,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.719
<v Speaker 1>uh so you know, manufacturing jobs in particular, that may

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>not actually be coming back. Then they're talking about like

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a cultural focus that that either you know,

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:24.719
<v Speaker 1>previously was in place or is misremembered as being um,

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, more central than it was. Yeah, exactly. In fact,

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like there's there's an idea along these lines. So remember

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that eighteen twenties example. That's sort of like if we can,

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>as a entire society and with our government get it

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.400
<v Speaker 1>together and try to pull together are for instance, make

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>our wages better and make sure everybody is employed, that

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>would be something that could stave this off. But basically

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the argument is like there's so much chaos going on

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with all of this, this complex system at work right

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.200
<v Speaker 1>now that people like church and doubt that that's possible

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:07.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Now. Church And also identifies three kinds

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.679
<v Speaker 1>of violence that he said leads to these upheavals. He

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.119
<v Speaker 1>calls these group on group violence. This is when you

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>see riots in modern day America, just like what we

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:19.720
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about. There's groups against individuals and his

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>his example of this is lynchings. And then there's individuals

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>against groups, which we refer to as rampage killings. And

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Urchin makes a point that we could identify a person

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>killing a group by themselves as terrorism, except he needs

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to make a specific here in America. When this violence

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is an American on American, we tend not to talk

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about it in terms of terrorism. So his examples are

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the Dark Knight shooting in Aurora or Timothy McVeigh. These

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>are usually rampage attacks that are directed in institutions like

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 1>education or government and church, and says they've grown by

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>a factor of twenty in the last generation. So this

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is actually I have to provide a personal note aside here.

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>This is why I find it really troubling when I

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:15.200
<v Speaker 1>see a positive reaction to violence against white supremacists or

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>white nationalists. We're talking about the like punching Nazis thing. Yeah,

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of this on the internet. There was

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this right after that one I don't

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>remember this guy's name, but that that one guy who's

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like a leader of one of these groups got punched

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in the head earlier this year, and everybody was sort

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of with schaden freud laughing at him, and then, uh,

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, after this weekend, there's just an increase of

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric from people who are friends and family with that

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are saying like, yeah, this is great, let's get them,

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. And and the rhetoric of using violence really

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>troubles me, and especially because it comes right back to

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>what Church and saying. He's saying, if you allowed these

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>three types of violence to grow, it's going to lead

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to this up evil where it's going to be even worse.

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And I for and I makes the world go blind,

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 1>right exactly. So you actually have something here that's a

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 1>quote of hope after that maybe ten minutes of dour

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>research prediction. Well, yeah, I have a couple of quotes here.

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>The first one is from Sergey A and Nephidoff, who

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned earlier, one of the co authors with the Church,

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and and he said in his Ian magazine piece quote,

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.480
<v Speaker 1>we are rapidly approaching a historical cusp in with the

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.320
<v Speaker 1>US will be particularly vulnerable to violent upheaval. This prediction

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is not a prophecy. I don't believe the disaster is preordained,

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>no matter what we do. On the contrary, if we

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 1>understand the causes we have a chance to prevent it

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>from happening. But the first thing we have to do

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>is reverse the trend of ever growing inequality. And then

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 1>church In himself said, the descent is not inevitable. We

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>can avoid the worst, perhaps by switching to a less

0:30:54.120 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 1>harrowing track, perhaps by redesigning the roller coaster altogether. Yeah,

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I um, I don't know if I a hundred percent

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to Turchan's version of Cleo dynamics, but it does

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:11.000
<v Speaker 1>seem a lot more grounded and quantitative data to me

0:31:11.120 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>than than other sort of predictive factors. I've talked about

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>on the show before about how my father thought the

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>world was gonna end like two years ago, and he

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>was like absolutely certain that there were It was exactly

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>like this, but it also like included historical events tied

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>into religious predictions, and he was certain the world was

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna end. This is also like, uh, when we thought

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 1>like the Mayan predictions were gonna come true right or

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>well not weak, but you know, there there was a

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about about that, like, oh, is is

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the world going to end in twelve because the mind's

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>predicted it. It's on these calendars. Yeah, I mean and

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>of course this comes back to weather forecasts again. You know,

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't rain on Wednesday, but they were saying it

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>was gonna gonna rain on Wednesday back when I checked

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the weather on a Sunday. That doesn't mean the the

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>forecast was not based on scientific principles and and uh

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>an x up to patterns, but they're just too many

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>factors to properly chart. So and and to throw another

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>wrench into the works, this is where Turchands starts talking

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 1>about the two hundred years scale, and you alluded to

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this earlier with the paper you referenced. He calls this

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the secular cycle um and he talks about how there's

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.960
<v Speaker 1>these two types of cycles. It's the fifty year wave

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that we were just talking about. Then there's a longer

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>term oscillation that repeats every two hundred to three hundred years,

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and depending on how these land, they can augment or

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>suppress those fifty year peaks. So his examples are the

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Roman Empire, medieval France, and ancient China, with societies swinging

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>between peace and conflict every one hundred to one hundred

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and fifty years. And he sees the United States as

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a similar society to these previous empires, so he's predicting

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that it will follow the same route. Now, he and

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 1>his associates, like I said, they call this the secular cycle.

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>They say it starts out first with an egalitarian society

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:04.600
<v Speaker 1>where supply and demand for labor is roughly balanced out.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>But then what happens is as the population grows, labor

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>begins to outstrip demands. Subsequently, you get elite classes that form.

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>This allows living standards for the poor to fall. Society

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.760
<v Speaker 1>becomes top heavy with elites who start fighting for power,

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and then political instability ensues and leads subsequently to collapse.

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>So his example of this, actually going back to that

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:33.160
<v Speaker 1>other example earlier, is the Egyptian Uprising of eleven. He says,

0:33:33.720 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>you saw an interaction of the two cycles. They're explaining

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>events uh in Egypt, So he said, it seems like

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Egypt's economy was growing and that poverty levels were low,

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>so you would have assumed that there would be stability.

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>But he argues that in a decade leading up to

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>the revolution, the country actually saw four times its amount

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of graduates come out with no employment prospects. So for

0:33:57.480 --> 0:33:59.320
<v Speaker 1>church and it ultimately boils down. This is kind of

0:33:59.320 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>like a Marxist prediction, right, like it's based on economic factors,

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>how many workers you have, how many jobs are available,

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>how much money they've spent on education, so on. Alright,

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>on that note, let's take one more break, and when

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>we come back, we'll we'll discuss clear dynamics a little

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>bit more and then get into some of the some

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of the criticisms and critiques. Thank alright, we're back. So

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>turch And he's actually taken the models of Cleo dynamics

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and applied them as well to models of religious growth. Now,

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.200
<v Speaker 1>one model he looks at here is linear. He says,

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>as believers start seeing the light quote unquote, the religion

0:34:40.000 --> 0:34:42.440
<v Speaker 1>will start to grow, right. But then he's got another model,

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and he says religion can grow like a contagion sometime,

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:50.319
<v Speaker 1>where converts increase exponentially. And so what he says is

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>he's he's mapped conversions for Islam in medieval Iran and

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Spain and found that the data fits the contagion model

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>more closely than it does the linear model. There. Likewise,

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 1>he argues that there's models that explain the expansion of

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Christianity in the first century a d. And Mormonism here

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US since World War Two, so that's also

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:16.600
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting. Again, I don't know, I feel like you'd

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>really have to drill down deep to determine, like how

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:24.479
<v Speaker 1>methodologically sound this is, um, But there is, like we said,

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like there's this growing group of academics who are writing

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>about it and researching it and accumulating data to try

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to see if it if it pans out, you know.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 1>In researching all of this, I am, once again, in

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 1>my life, um disappointed that I have not read Isaac

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>Asimov's The Foundation books, because I know that what I

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>know of the books without getting into deep because I

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:48.719
<v Speaker 1>don't want to spoil myself, is that it does concern

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>predictive models of the future and uh and and does

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, in great depth because it's Isaac Asimov,

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>So of course, of course you put a lot of

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 1>time into it. But sadly I have not. I have

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>not read those and did not have time to read

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>them before this recording. But I would love to hear

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>from anyone out there who has read the Foundation series

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and and and has related inside on this topic. Yeah,

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious if if those asthma seems like the kind

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>of guy who would explore through fiction like the arguments

0:36:16.400 --> 0:36:19.359
<v Speaker 1>against these kind of predictive models, right, because one thing

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that people are concerned about is if you apply these

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>predictive models and then you start using them on a

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:29.280
<v Speaker 1>policy level through government, then what happens when the predictive

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>model says things are going to get dire in in

0:36:32.960 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the government suddenly becomes like really dictatorial trying to make

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that that that negative outcome doesn't happen. Right, So

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.799
<v Speaker 1>so you can get like a minority report kind of situation. Yeah,

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like envisioning. Okay, you're you're predicting the weather.

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>You're basing it on the natural state of the atmosphere

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>and weather patterns, and of course you're factoring and human

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.960
<v Speaker 1>influence on the weather pattering patterns. But if you reach

0:36:59.040 --> 0:37:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the point where they humans can can and are intentionally

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.719
<v Speaker 1>altering the weather, so like you know, I guess like

0:37:05.760 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 1>blasting tornadoes out of the sky or turning off her

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:12.719
<v Speaker 1>acnes or diverting them, then you're you're having to factor

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>intentional human interaction, uh into the overall simulation and forecast

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 1>for the atmosphere. Yeah, wow, that's true. So that would

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 1>really that would be another factor added on to cleo dynamics.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Then is trying to figure out outside of the predictive models,

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>then what the influence of humans using the predictive models

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:38.120
<v Speaker 1>upon the actual events would do to change the predictions.

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I think so yeah. I mean, if you have individuals

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>who understand how it was working and are manipulating it,

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:45.880
<v Speaker 1>then they have to factor that in. It's kind of like,

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>if you have one wizard in the world who can

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>bend uh natural law to their will, then that's one thing.

0:37:53.400 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>But then what if you have two wizards? Now it

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 1>seems like that that just doubles the complexity of the scenario. Well,

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>there is another wizard here, but he's not Churching and

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.040
<v Speaker 1>so his name is Charles Hughes Smith and he writes

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for Business Insider. I don't know necessarily that he considers

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>himself a cleo dynamicist. Is that what you would refer

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to them as damn dynamos dynamo? Yeah? Maybe? Uh so Smith.

0:38:22.680 --> 0:38:25.160
<v Speaker 1>He's written about this in like I said, Business Insider,

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in his own books. He has a website that's full

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff. To the all of his theories, he

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.720
<v Speaker 1>argues there are other reasons why we're looking at seeing

0:38:33.760 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>trouble somewhere between, he says, or two, so we can

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.319
<v Speaker 1>put it off a couple of years. That's how he's frying.

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to get all the Avatar sequels in before

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that four or five movies. Man can't reme better start

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:50.800
<v Speaker 1>cranking those out. So Smith says, there's four grand cycles.

0:38:50.880 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 1>And let me be clear. That eighty year cycle that

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about that's floating around right now, that

0:38:57.480 --> 0:39:00.799
<v Speaker 1>is one of these four grand cycles. Now that that

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 1>first one is it's a generational cycle of eighty years,

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>that's every four generations, and it is said to lead

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to nation changing social, political, and economic upheaval. This is

0:39:12.960 --> 0:39:16.560
<v Speaker 1>referenced in a book called The Fourth Turning by Willem

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Strauss or William Strauss and Neil how And it also

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>argues that after eighty years, there are few humans who

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 1>can actually recall the last crisis. So your example of

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>World War two there, now, this is the one that

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that's currently making the rounds uh. It's part of Hughes

0:39:33.040 --> 0:39:35.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing. His other cycles included here that we're

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit peak oil, where there will be a depletion

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>of the global economy's reliance on fossil fuels, that credit

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:46.320
<v Speaker 1>expansion and contraction will transition from a bubble to a collapse,

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's subsequently going to lead to a global depression.

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.919
<v Speaker 1>And I have to say from other articles, like all

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:59.239
<v Speaker 1>of this doesn't really seem to be quantitatively mapped the

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>same way that Hurchin and other cleo dynamos are. This

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to be more based on him citing other books

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>and he that includes Churchen's work. He does cite urchins work,

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:17.239
<v Speaker 1>but he's providing observational, qualitative examples. And the last, the

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>last factor he throws in here is a hundred years

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 1>cycle of price inflation that is met by a stagnation

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>of wages. So this this seems a little bit closer

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to what Churchens talking about here that leads to shortages, famine,

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and crisis. He says this is because humanity is a

0:40:33.320 --> 0:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>species tries to expand into every ecological niche when food

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:42.479
<v Speaker 1>and energy supplies are rising, and so this he calls

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a hundred years cycle of rising prices for food, energy,

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and water. Uh And and Smith's argument is essentially, the

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>government might be able to deal with any one of

0:40:53.480 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 1>these things, but four of these things at once might

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>prove to be too much for any institution of human beings.

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:03.879
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know where I really fall in terms

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of these arguments, Like, if you apply traditional syllogistic logic

0:41:09.000 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to these arguments, do they do they still hold up?

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Does the evidence for these claims actually warrant a connection

0:41:14.840 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>between them? I'm not sure about that, So I want

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to throw that out there. This is just we're accumulating

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and presenting to you the variations on these cyclical theories.

0:41:25.680 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, let's let's get into some of the

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the arguments against cleo dynamics, some of the critiques of

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:34.600
<v Speaker 1>cleo dynamics. So the weekend, you know, maybe wave this

0:41:34.640 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 1>out a little bit, right, So some people are arguing

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 1>that the mathematical models may simply be a case of

0:41:40.840 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing patterns in random data. So so once again the hindsight,

0:41:45.480 --> 0:41:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah exactly. Uh. And then also the data set that

0:41:48.600 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Turchin is working with has been criticized for being too

0:41:51.400 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>short because it only covers a period from seventeen eighty

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to So maybe cleo dynamics does work, but humanity probably

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 1>needs to back up another couple of centuries of good

0:42:01.680 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 1>record keeping before we can actually apply it in any sense. Also,

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:11.560
<v Speaker 1>historians in general argue that cleo dynamics weakness is that

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:15.359
<v Speaker 1>when it attempts to make predictions based on trends when

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>historical information availability is usually patchy at best. Right, So

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>our records are preserved or destroyed based on chance, for instance,

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 1>our palam sess episode, right, uh, and knowledge tends to

0:42:28.160 --> 0:42:32.920
<v Speaker 1>pool around narrow subject areas. The example that immediately comes

0:42:32.920 --> 0:42:35.279
<v Speaker 1>to mind for me on this, pop culture wise is

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:41.160
<v Speaker 1>The Strain. I've started watching The Strain again. Oh man, well,

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually I'm watching season three. I haven't hit the

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>final season yet, but yeah, they've got that book the

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Lumen that is like the book of all the answers

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>on how to deal with these vampires translates to how

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:57.279
<v Speaker 1>to kill vampire basically, yeah, yeah, And it's like they're

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:01.160
<v Speaker 1>facing in the world of the Strain, this this total

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>upheaval as vampires start taking over the world and killing

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 1>off the human race. But the only record of how

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to deal with this is in this one book that

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>takes what two seasons to find ye, and then they

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>find it and it takes another season to translate it.

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think that's like, you know, that's obviously

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.920
<v Speaker 1>a fictional example. But to be fair, you know, our

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>record keeping is hasn't been that great until recently. Yeah,

0:43:27.680 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 1>actually a recent by the time it's published, as it

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>will be a recent episode. But Joe and I did

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>an episode on Greek Fire, the Byzantine secret weapon, so

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:40.279
<v Speaker 1>secret in fact that that it's a mystery regarding exactly

0:43:40.360 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what it entailed in terms of formula and the system

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of deployment. Yeah, you just have to go under King's landing.

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 1>That's where it's Okay, that's that's true, alright. So I

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the you know, hindsight is because again that's one

0:43:53.560 --> 0:43:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of the criticisms here, that it's one thing to inflict

0:43:55.719 --> 0:43:58.879
<v Speaker 1>cyclical order on the past, because historians have been doing

0:43:58.920 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>this for ages. Right, Even our systems of the system

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of years or classification of the ages and empires are

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>boiling down of of the past into narratives is ultimately

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a form of this UM. And then plus there's always

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the potential impact of unforeseen events that buck perceived patterns.

0:44:17.760 --> 0:44:20.839
<v Speaker 1>So we've talked a lot about outside context events um

0:44:21.360 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the terminology coined by Ian and Banks before, but there's

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 1>also a similar notion explored in black swan theory. So

0:44:30.520 --> 0:44:33.000
<v Speaker 1>this was this is an idea that came from an

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:37.360
<v Speaker 1>seem Nicholas Taleb and he he uh he takes this

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to the name of this black swan theory from the

0:44:39.520 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that before the discovery of Australia, scientific observation suggested

0:44:44.760 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that all swans were white. Huh okay, there was no

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>such thing as a black swan as there uh was

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:53.239
<v Speaker 1>a you know, no more than there was a green

0:44:53.320 --> 0:44:56.320
<v Speaker 1>or a purple one. But then the European explorers discovered

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the world down under and they discovered black swans, so

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>that which was you know, possible but but had not

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:08.839
<v Speaker 1>been observed yet, became reality. So the black swan here

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 1>was an outlier existing beyond the realm of reasonable expectation.

0:45:14.160 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But the human mind depends on pattern recognition, so to

0:45:17.760 --> 0:45:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Leb writes in his Black Swan book that we humans

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>uh think up explanations for an outlier's occurrence after we

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>encounter it to make it explainable and predictable. So, you know,

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:31.919
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is that we were looking back in time,

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at history, and we're just reinterpreting black swan

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 1>events as being something that could have been predicted and foreseen,

0:45:39.200 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>and therefore thinking they will be foreseen uh perceived, perceivable,

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and predictable in our future. But by their very nature,

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:49.880
<v Speaker 1>outliers are unpredictable, and according to to to leave Uh,

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this implies the inability to predict the course of history,

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 1>given how much outliers um have impacted our past, such

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:02.600
<v Speaker 1>as he brings up the nineteen eighty seven market crash,

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the demise of the Soviet block, uh, the September eleven

0:46:06.920 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>two one terrorist attacks. How these drastically informed the shape

0:46:10.719 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of human events. But we're not necessarily predictable. Now that's,

0:46:15.680 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, you can get into a whole argument about

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:20.319
<v Speaker 1>to what degree these were predictable, But that's kind of

0:46:20.320 --> 0:46:22.359
<v Speaker 1>playing into his argument to saying that again you look

0:46:22.400 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>back hindsight. It's one thing to look back and say, no,

0:46:25.760 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>this was predictable, look at these patterns, but are you

0:46:28.000 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>just informing? Are you are you just enforcing a pattern

0:46:31.440 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on the past. Now, all of this being said, I

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:36.240
<v Speaker 1>want to stress what I restress what I said earlier

0:46:36.320 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>is that there you don't see a lot of people saying, oh,

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:42.319
<v Speaker 1>cleo dynamics, who just is just all crap? Just throw

0:46:42.360 --> 0:46:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it all out the generally, your argument is, I don't

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>think that these models are as precise as you would

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 1>want them to be, or that we can predict the

0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 1>future as well as as the proponents of cleo dynamics

0:46:55.600 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>are claiming. Right, Yeah, And also like this isn't a

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>again bringing it back to minority report, It's not like

0:47:03.040 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>if we get cleo dynamics just right, we're gonna have

0:47:05.640 --> 0:47:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of psychics in a bathtub that tell us

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you know when crimes are going to be committed, Like

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:13.239
<v Speaker 1>and even that, as we've seen in that Philip K.

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Dick story, is fraught with peril. Right, So where does

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:19.399
<v Speaker 1>that leave us at the end here? Well, I think

0:47:19.440 --> 0:47:22.560
<v Speaker 1>what we have to ask, and I'm asking you too, listeners,

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is this a valid scientific method? Like like, is cleo

0:47:26.920 --> 0:47:31.080
<v Speaker 1>dynamics something we should be continuing to look into? And

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>like should we be following what's going on in this journal? Uh?

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:38.720
<v Speaker 1>And then how does you know somebody like a smith

0:47:38.800 --> 0:47:41.360
<v Speaker 1>for instance, like how did his predictions which don't seem

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to be as as grounded in data sets? How do

0:47:44.280 --> 0:47:47.240
<v Speaker 1>how do those play together with it? So I'm curious

0:47:47.280 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>about that. But then also many of you, like myself

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are probably wondering during these events of turmoil we're experiencing, now,

0:47:54.520 --> 0:47:59.160
<v Speaker 1>how do we prevent this violence? Right? Well, Urchen, he says,

0:47:59.760 --> 0:48:02.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm right, this is how I think we can

0:48:02.160 --> 0:48:05.960
<v Speaker 1>help things. He argues, first of all, inequality is almost

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 1>always a bad thing for societies, So he says, to

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>prevent violence, we have to learn from history, and to

0:48:13.200 --> 0:48:16.399
<v Speaker 1>do that, we need to create more jobs for our

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:23.279
<v Speaker 1>graduates while acting decisively to reduce inequality. But others are

0:48:23.400 --> 0:48:27.680
<v Speaker 1>arguing maybe a revolution, maybe uprisings, These are for the

0:48:27.760 --> 0:48:32.240
<v Speaker 1>best because they can remedy social stresses. For example, people

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:34.520
<v Speaker 1>look back at the Civil rights movement and they say,

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>was that a bad thing? What came out of the

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:42.239
<v Speaker 1>Civil rights movement is quote good, right, But there were

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly violent upheaval and turmoil during that period of time

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:49.480
<v Speaker 1>as well. I guess it depends on what what uprising

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at, because certainly, you know, it's one thing

0:48:52.160 --> 0:48:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, the civil rights movement was it

0:48:55.440 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>was a positive movement, but nobody wants an uprising, say

0:48:58.320 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>like the kind we see in the hands tail Yeah exactly,

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think to like when you're talking about it

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in those terms, like it's sort of like talking about

0:49:05.600 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>a fever burning and illness out of your body, right,

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know. I don't know. I try to

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:14.280
<v Speaker 1>as much as possible. I try to fall back on

0:49:14.080 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>non violence and so any ways in which we can

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:21.359
<v Speaker 1>try to avoid that. Look, I'm gonna be supportive of

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:23.479
<v Speaker 1>So I look at this and I see what turch

0:49:23.560 --> 0:49:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and saying. It doesn't sound illogical to me. It sounds like, yeah, sure,

0:49:28.640 --> 0:49:31.360
<v Speaker 1>if there were more jobs available for graduates in this country,

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that would be great. I don't I don't know how

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that, right, And then how do you reduce

0:49:36.160 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>inequality across a broad band? You know, I mean, it's

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:43.759
<v Speaker 1>something we've been working on for decades. Now. We get

0:49:43.800 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>into some of those wicked problems, right exactly. Yeah, So

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:48.520
<v Speaker 1>if you don't know what we're speaking of there, we

0:49:48.560 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>have another episode similar to this one actually kind of

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:56.480
<v Speaker 1>looking at broader sociological issues about a theory called wicked problems.

0:49:56.520 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>If you go to stuff to Blow your Mind dot com,

0:49:58.200 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>type in Wicked Problems that episode of them up, or

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you can find it on any of your podcast readers. Yeah,

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>but it does get into a lot of a lot

0:50:05.040 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of the similar territory here, So I would highly recommend

0:50:07.719 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that episode if you found this episode of very thought,

0:50:10.719 --> 0:50:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's try to uh on the landing page for this episode,

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.879
<v Speaker 1>let's try to link back to Wicked Problems. Okay, So

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>I asked you that question. Do you think it's a

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 1>valid scientific method? If you do, If you don't, there's

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:23.640
<v Speaker 1>ways to let us know. We're on social media. You

0:50:23.680 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>can talk to us about Cleo Dynamics on Facebook, Twitter, Tumbler,

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram. We also have our Facebook discussion module up

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>where if you want to have just like a closed

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:40.399
<v Speaker 1>conversation with people who are like fans of the podcast. Specifically,

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a closed group on Facebook. Uh, try to join

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:45.359
<v Speaker 1>us over there. You can find the link to that

0:50:45.400 --> 0:50:48.239
<v Speaker 1>on our Facebook page. Right. Yeah, And you know, I

0:50:48.360 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>just in all of this, I do want to stress

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that I think there is optimism in this topic. Um,

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, the very fact that people are doing this

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>research lends to optimism. So I would I would encourage

0:50:58.960 --> 0:51:02.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone to take the optimist excite of this because for starters,

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:05.839
<v Speaker 1>optimism is a place of action. You can you can

0:51:05.880 --> 0:51:09.440
<v Speaker 1>act out of optimism. Uh, It's often very difficult to

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:12.879
<v Speaker 1>act in any constructive way out of a state of pessimism.

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 1>So so yeah, take take this as you know, individuals

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:20.000
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to use the best tools available to

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:23.000
<v Speaker 1>us to figure out where we're going, and how how

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:24.799
<v Speaker 1>to get to the places we want to go, how

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:27.799
<v Speaker 1>to avoid all the strife, you know, and and and

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:30.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe even get to that point where we eventually have

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 1>some sort of a post scarcity society and will be

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>arguably largely immune to some of these societal pitfalls. Exactly.

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you said that perfectly, all right, And uh yeah, finally,

0:51:44.760 --> 0:51:46.480
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in touch with us directly,

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>then you know which email addressed to turn to. That

0:51:49.160 --> 0:52:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is blow the mind at how stuff works dot com.

0:52:00.960 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, visit

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:27.480
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com.