WEBVTT - Colin Cowherd Podcast - NFL Week 2 Sharp or Square

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>The volume.

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 2>With so many tools and tabs and never enough time,

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 2>growing a business can feel pretty overwhelming. Between your email

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 2>marketing system, your payment software, your CRM, your content tools,

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:16.959
<v Speaker 2>your email tools, keeping track of everything gets out of

0:00:16.960 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 2>control really fast. You end up spending more time organizing

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 2>documents and data than actually connecting with prospects and customers.

0:00:23.239 --> 0:00:26.320
<v Speaker 2>That's where HubSpot steps in. It's the all in one

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:32.479
<v Speaker 2>customer platform for growing better. With HubSpot, marketers generate better leads, sales,

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 2>builds tighter relationships with customers, and closes more deals, simple

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>as that. And service supports your customers at scale with

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 2>tools like hubspots, AI, Chatbot and knowledge Base. Plus with

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 2>built in AI to answer common customer questions, brainstorm and

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 2>write marketing content, and more so, your teams can say

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 2>goodbye to busy work, meaning your marketers, sales reps and

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>service teams actually have time to do what they were

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 2>hired to do and when they grow, the sky's the limit.

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Grow better faster with hubspots all in one customer places.

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Visit HubSpot dot com to get started today, all right

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 2>time for Sharper Square, Chad Milman, CEEO Action Network. All

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 2>odds provided by DraftKings. So I was a Will Levis

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 2>bonehead play from going two too and one. So I

0:01:19.720 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 2>was overjoyed. I actually thought, I mean, I was wrong

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 2>on the Carolina side, but other than that, I felt

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 2>pretty good about it.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>I could go in.

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 2>An order of importance, but I was thinking about this.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 2>I am above going in order. I just give you

0:01:32.800 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 2>my plays and you dissect them. So let's just start

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 2>with a team that is this close to beating Kansas

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 2>City arrowhead and I think the Chiefs are a better

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:45.760
<v Speaker 2>version of last year's Super Bowl champ Baltimore. I think

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders are bad, and I don't think they're terribly

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 2>well coached. I mean the fact that the only way

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 2>they'll win this physicality, and the Chargers were more physical.

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 2>They beat them at their only game. I think Baltimore's

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.480
<v Speaker 2>really good. I don't think Lamar will run sixteen times

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.680
<v Speaker 2>on average. I think Kansas City brings that out of him.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 2>It's a huge number. I hate doing that. I think

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.799
<v Speaker 2>Baltimore's pissed. I'm going to swallow the eight and a

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>half Sharper square, so.

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 3>It's square, but you're not going to find a ton

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 3>of guys who when they're doing this are excited about

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:24.160
<v Speaker 3>betting the Raiders. You mentioned Carolina, Right, I was on

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Carolina last week too. The wise guys will be on

0:02:27.200 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Carolina again this week at six and a half point underdogs,

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:32.800
<v Speaker 3>in the same way they're going to be on the Raiders,

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 3>which started at nine and a half, got up to ten,

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 3>and then was bet down to nine and a half,

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 3>than nine, and now eight and a half. So it's

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.640
<v Speaker 3>getting closer to a number that I think at some

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 3>point the wise guys will come back in on Baltimore.

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.160
<v Speaker 3>But at this big of a number, they're just betting

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 3>the number, and this early in the season, everything tells

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 3>you that you are playing against the over reaction. Right,

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 3>everyone saw the same thing you did. The Ravens come

0:02:57.680 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 3>within a toenail of tying the chief Yiefs at Arrowhead

0:03:01.800 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 3>in a massive game against the Chiefs team that looks

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:06.799
<v Speaker 3>like he can break every rule of betting that exists

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 3>in the universe. Right, the Raiders people were high on

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.440
<v Speaker 3>they got crushed and they didn't look very good doing it.

0:03:13.480 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>And Antonio Peers made terrible, terrible decisions. I read in

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the Athletic that that decision he made on fourth down

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 3>in his own territory. It was the first time a

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 3>coach had been down and in his own territory in

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 3>the fourth quarter and punted in eight years. It's one

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 3>of the most cowardly calls that has been made in

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the past eight years. And you could see him on camera.

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>There's the videos of him saying, should I be going

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.560
<v Speaker 3>for this right now? So there's a sentiment that people

0:03:41.560 --> 0:03:45.280
<v Speaker 3>are overreacting to the bad coaching, the bad play, and

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 3>the great play by the Ravens.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>So yes, the wise guys are going to be on

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.840
<v Speaker 2>So let me take an underdog. Minnesota at home against

0:03:52.880 --> 0:03:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the forty nine ers San Francisco in a short week,

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 2>played virtually a perfect football game. Even when you're as

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>good as the Niners, that's very hard to do back

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 2>to back. Pretty always feels like he's better at home.

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Minnesota will negate some of the pass rush because they're

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 2>great at left tackle. They're also good at running back,

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 2>tight end, wide receiver, and they can bring a little heat.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I think Minnesota is actually I said this before the season.

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>If they finished fourth, they will be the greatest fourth

0:04:18.160 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 2>place team in the history of the league. They've got

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.159
<v Speaker 2>a lot of good players. They have a brilliant coach,

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 2>really really sharp guy. He reminds me of Kevin Stefanski

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 2>before he started winning Coach of the Year. He's just

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.679
<v Speaker 2>he's operating at a different level. This was at six.

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 2>At one point, I think I take the Vikings five

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 2>and a half. Sharper square wise. Guys are taking the

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Vikings at five and a half. They took him at six.

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 2>They still like the Vikings.

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 3>I got to tell you I was leaning Niners in

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 3>this game, and part of it is Kyle Shanahan is

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 3>so good. You and I have talked about this, like,

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 3>he does not get concerned when he's missing pieces. It

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:55.560
<v Speaker 3>actually I think inspires him to be more creative. And

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 3>he's also been very good on short weeks on the

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 3>road eight and two during his career, one of the

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 3>four best coaches in the past five years on short

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 3>weeks when he's a favorite on the road. That said,

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I think Kevin O'Connell is starting to get a lot

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 3>more credit as a coach than people wanted to give him.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 3>You know, two years ago, three years ago, it was

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 3>Brian Dayball and Kevin O'Connell.

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>They were neck and neck for Rookie of the Year. Coaching.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.719
<v Speaker 3>They both had teams that were excellent in one score

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 3>games they played each other in the playoffs. The Giants

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.680
<v Speaker 3>win in Minnesota, Brian day Ball wins Coach of the Year.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>He's getting more credited as the best coach right and

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 3>Kevin O'Connell had a similar year. And then last year

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 3>did wonders when Kirk Cousins went down and Brian Dayball's

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 3>team is cratering when their top quarterback goes down. Then

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 3>we see what happens last week. A bad quarterback for

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the Giants, a historically bad quarterback in Sam Darnold, and

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 3>he has a Cinderella like first half ten for ten

0:05:51.040 --> 0:05:53.239
<v Speaker 3>on his first ten passes with a touchdown, a ninety

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 3>nine yard touchdown drive that ends with a fourth down

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 3>pass like touchdownass to Jehman Jefferson, Kevin O'Connell is a

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 3>very good coach, and I think that's another reason why

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 3>the why guys are in their vikings.

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 2>So there's two things that I look at with the

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Jets in this heightens when you play a standalone game,

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 2>and the feeling is you're humiliated physically, like the Jets

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 2>were pushed around the field eight straight scoring drives by

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. That is so embarrassing for Robert Sama. That

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 2>was an embarrassing physical performance. Now they go to potentially

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the worst offenses in the league. For a quarterback,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't think him play. I don't think Will Levis

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>can play. I don't think he's fluid enough. I think

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 2>his judgment's bad. This is what I saw on the SEC.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>That's the first part. The second part is San Francisco

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 2>makes everybody. So does Andy Reid and McVeigh. They make

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people look bad. In the Week one,

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:50.839
<v Speaker 2>I think the Jets are actually a pretty good football team.

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.119
<v Speaker 2>When this number got up to four, Now I sound

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 2>like such a square on this, but four is an

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 2>interesting number. Here's how I view four. I like favorites

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>four because the market doesn't want to create force. They'd

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 2>rather you be three to three and a half. When

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 2>the market has to go to four, their signaling okay,

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 2>it is just a better team. This started for the

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Jets for a better team. They're pissed. I don't think

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Will Levis can play. Home Field's never met anything in Nashville.

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I know it's square. I take the Jets minus three

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, otherwise guys like the Titans and they're kind of

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>holding their nose here. There's a couple things in play,

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 3>and that number four is really important, and I'm glad

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 3>you bring it up, and we'll do that in the

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 3>last part of my soliloquy here. The Jets had were

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>physically dominated totally. Not just that their defense, which is

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 3>supposed to be their strength, as you noted, eh straight

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 3>scoring drives. Their defensive line was destroyed by Shanahan's blocking

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 3>scheme and their run scheme, and they could not get

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 3>to Purty, who's just incredibly nifty in the pocket. Bill

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 3>Callahan showed last week that he can do something really

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 3>interesting with this Titans offensive line from a running perspective.

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, Bill Callahan, who is Brian Callahan's father, legendary

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 3>offensive line coach, left the Browns this past season to

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 3>go work with his son revamp the Titans offensive line.

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>The Titans defense did not give up a touchdown to

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 3>the Bears, right like the Bears were scoring on special

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.840
<v Speaker 3>teams and they were scoring on defense because Will Levis,

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 3>as you said, is a terrible quarterback. The wise guys

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 3>are betting the number here. The four is key teams

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:38.040
<v Speaker 3>that open at four or higher at home in weeks

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 3>one and two sixty percent against the spread the last

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty years, teams that open at four or higher at

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 3>home after losing their last game against the spread, which

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 3>the text with the Titans did sixty four percent since

0:08:52.040 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty one. More stat that is very interesting. The

0:08:56.679 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Jets were dominated on Monday night, and now of a

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 3>defense that was on the field for a ton of

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 3>plays going back short week to be against another really

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 3>physical team. That's what the Titans want to be. Teams

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>with fewer than twenty five minutes of possession in Week

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 3>one six and twenty five against the spread in Week two,

0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 3>that's nineteen percent the jtal So look, I'm with you,

0:09:22.200 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 3>like this isn't going to be one of my five

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 3>best plays because I don't trust Will Levis and it's

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 3>and it's it's becoming clear in this league there is

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 3>such a delta between competent quarterbacking and really good quarterbacking

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 3>and not it's becoming too much of a hindrance for

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 3>teams where despite all these numbers that go back, you're

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:45.839
<v Speaker 3>gonna have to play the quarterback in some situations. And

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 3>this to me is a scary spot. The Wise guys

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 3>aren't scared. They bet the Titans. I'm a little scared.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I want to take Denver plus two and a half

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 2>against the Steelers, and here's what, Thank god, I thought

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 2>it was a really tough spot for both Nicks in

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 2>the opener loud stadium. You don't really know the defense.

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 2>You have to go watch Baltimore. Mike McDonald also, Seattle's

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 2>got elite corners, and you're a rookie. They asked him

0:10:12.920 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 2>to throw forty two times. He had one terrible pick.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 2>He's more mobile and anybody thinks. And I had another

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 2>another ex player who I respect, tell me this week

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 2>he's going to be the best rookie quarterback. He may

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.120
<v Speaker 2>not be the best year two three, four, he's going

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to have the best year. The rest of them have

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 2>defensive coaches. I think Denver wins here. They've always been

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.599
<v Speaker 2>good at home. I think it's a coaching mismatch. I

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 2>think Peyton's a brilliant coach. I like the Steelers as dogs,

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:43.679
<v Speaker 2>not his favorites. Denver plus the point Sharper square.

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent, ding ding ding ding Ding. Wise guys

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 3>love the Broncos. Here's probably going to take a little

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 3>piece of the Broncos on the money line as well.

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 3>Great spot for bow Nicks. I think the Wise guys

0:10:56.480 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 3>they love Seattle. They're really impressed with Seattle's defense, so

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 3>love Mike mcd ronald and what he can do with

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.720
<v Speaker 3>that team. And I think the Wise guys were also

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>really impressed with how much better the Broncos played last

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>year this last week as a team versus what they

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 3>looked like a year ago. And defensively true, but I

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 3>think they were excited about bon Nicks.

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you watch the game back and.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:21.719
<v Speaker 3>We heard this on the favorites from scouts and from

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 3>professionals who all watch a lot of film, bo Nicks

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 3>recognizes he missed some easy throws and that's because he

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 3>was still getting to know the pace of the game.

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 3>They liked the way he was a gamer. They liked

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.640
<v Speaker 3>the way the Broncos stayed in that game. They basically

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.560
<v Speaker 3>made the game a push. They backdoor pushed in that game.

0:11:41.000 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 3>Seattle was a six point favorite, So there's a lot

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>of sentiment that this is the right side. The line

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 3>moved from three to.

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>Two and a half.

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 3>And I will say, you excited about Tomlin Tomlin is

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>the greatest underdog coach possibly in the history of the

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 3>game the past twenty years for sure. Not just great

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.440
<v Speaker 3>as an underdog, great as an underdog winning outright. He

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 3>is just as bad when he is a favorite forty

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 3>one twenty eight and one against spread as a road

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 3>dog in his career thirty two forty and two as

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 3>a road favorite, so it's almost completely flipped right. And

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 3>when he opens as a favorite of three or more

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 3>on the road thirty eight percent against the spread, So

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 3>I would say you're on the right side. Also, we've

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 3>talked about this on the show. You know, we do

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 3>this thing called the Luck Rankings at Action that sort

0:12:24.840 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 3>of takes the noise out of all the games and

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 3>tells you what the expected score would have been based

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 3>on the stats and if you didn't have the flukiness

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 3>and things like that, which there's always regression when there's flukiness.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 3>Broncos are one of the three games that has the

0:12:39.160 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 3>highest sort of delta between lucky and unlucky in the

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Steelers in the and the Broncos.

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:46.560
<v Speaker 1>So we like the Broncos.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 2>Here, I'll give you another underdog. I like Falcons plus

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 2>six and a half. I worry about Kirk cousins immobility.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 2>But I thought Atlanta was at a big coaching disadvantage

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 2>when they faced the Steelers because Arthur Smith knew their

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 2>entire roster and it was Kirk cousins first game back

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 2>off an injury. He was very hesitant, a little like

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>if you looked at Aaron Rodgers passing stats. In the

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>first game he moved, he had twenty one passes, nineteen

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 2>to the left. He was not going to throw blind

0:13:14.679 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 2>behind him. He wanted to see the left side of

0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 2>the field. He didn't want to get hit from behind.

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>And Aaron's great, but that first game back off the accident,

0:13:23.600 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 2>they're all hesitant. Kirk was hesitant. Philadelphia's defense is not good.

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 2>They spend money on it, they drafted. They were giving

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 2>up seven yards of play to green Bay and green

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Bay's good. But young Atlanta's got players. I think they

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 2>play really well. I know Kirk in big standalone games

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 2>isn't great. Six and a half's a ton. I would

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 2>take Atlanta here, sharper.

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Square totally sharp wise guys like the Falcons here. I'm

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 3>a little hesitant personally, haven't really laid into this game yet,

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 3>but there's a lot of factors that go in the

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 3>direction of what you're talking about. I think the biggest

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 3>concern anybody has. It wasn't just that Kirk Cousins was hesitant.

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 3>There were throws where it looked like he didn't want

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 3>to plant off his injured achilles, and so he was

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 3>short hopping throws that looked like he was throwing off

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 3>of one leg. Right, So I think that was the

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:21.000
<v Speaker 3>bigger concern, and maybe after a full game he's a

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 3>little more comfortable, you know. I think that what's interesting

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 3>here is to the Falcons advantage their interior line, especially

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 3>at center and right guard. Those are two of the

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 3>best players at their positions in the NFL. The strength

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>of the Eagles is their interior pressure, not their edges.

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 3>The strength of the Steelers was their edges. So just

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 3>sort of it's not really intuitive, but the way the

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 3>Falcons play might mitigate the Eagles' greatest advantage defensively.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of wise guys are on the on

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons here.

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to take one more underdog Giants plus one

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 2>and a half at the Commanders. Daniel Jones. Actually, this

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 2>is a vomit game that nobody wants to watch, But

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I did think. I do think Brian Davis a really

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 2>good coach, and I thought they were bad in the

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 2>first series. Washington was just outplayed by a better quarterback

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>and a better team. The Giants were awful. It looked

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 2>like they hadn't practiced. They've actually had. Daniel Jones's five

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 2>to one and one against Washington, when he faces a

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 2>team that's his equal, he can compete. There's no way

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm giving any you know, I'm taking any points I

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 2>get in this game. Giants plus one and a half,

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>mostly unwatchable, Sharper Square.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Totally sharp. That is the Corner TV game of the week, Kylin.

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 3>It is the game nobody wants to watch unless you

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 3>are betting it. The wise guys will be on the Giants,

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 3>mainly for the reasons you just said. Dave Ball has

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>basically done incredibly well against the Commanders. Daniel Jones has

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 3>done well against the Commanders. There's always going to be

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>overreaction in Week two, and obviously the wise guys or

0:15:56.400 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the fans are overjoyed with what they saw from Jaden Daniels. Right,

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 3>his Rookie of the Year odds for offense shrink people

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 3>were piling in on him for Rookie of the Year

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 3>because of how he played, and he was dynamic and

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 3>he made decent enough throws, but also the running ability

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 3>that is not a recipe that they can sustain, and

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 3>it also leads to overreaction in the market. So the

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 3>book maker shaded the number a little bit, and really

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 3>this game should be closer to pick. So you're getting

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 3>about a point a half of value because people are

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 3>so against the Giants and they loved what they saw

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 3>from the commanders.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Td Tuddy taking it to the house in for six,

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 2>whatever you call it. Touchdown. One thing's for sure. Tds

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 2>matter more at DraftKings sports Book and official sports betting

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 2>partner of the NFL. On the ground, in the air,

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 2>special teams or defense, they don't care how you score them.

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 2>They want to bet on touchdowns. You want to bet

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 2>on touchdowns. Draftking Sports Book number one place to bet

0:16:57.200 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>on tds. Ready to place your first NFL bet and

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 2>something simple like a player scoring a touchdown? Go to

0:17:02.640 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Draft Kings Sportsbook app Make your bet today, Ready to

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 2>do a touchdown? Dance your own new Draft Kings customers

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Bet five bucks and get two hundred and fifty in

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.360
<v Speaker 2>bonus bets instantly and one month of NFL Plus premium.

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>Download the DraftKings sportsbook app The Coach Colin Again. New

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.719
<v Speaker 2>customers bet five bucks and get two fifty in bonus

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 2>bets and one month of NFL Plus premium only on

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Draft Kings. The Crown is Yours.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.880
<v Speaker 4>Gambling Problem call one eight hundred gambler In New York

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.160
<v Speaker 4>call eight seven seven eight hope and Y, or text

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 4>hope and Y four six seven three six nine In Connecticut.

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.199
<v Speaker 4>Help is available for problem gambling Call eight eight eight

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.040
<v Speaker 4>seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 4>dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill, Casino

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 4>and Resorting Kansas twenty one and over. Agent eligibility varies

0:17:44.119 --> 0:17:47.119
<v Speaker 4>by jurisdiction. Void in New Hampshire, Oregon. In Ontario, bonus

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 4>bets expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance.

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 4>For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG dot

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:56.360
<v Speaker 4>co slash ft ball. NFL Plus Premium offer available only

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 4>to new and former NFL Plus subscribers. Additional NFL Plus

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 4>Premium time at NFL dot com slash terms.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Here's a favorite I like.

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:12.159
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes I feel that you can get ahead of the

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 2>market for about a week to two. It happens more

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:17.680
<v Speaker 2>in college because there's so many games on TV. It's

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 2>harder for bookmakers. Sometimes you just if you're a regional

0:18:20.680 --> 0:18:22.800
<v Speaker 2>better and you follow the PAC twelve. I can remember

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 2>years ago getting on an Oregon State team and they

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 2>I knew their personnel really well, and I watched their

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>games and had a good friend up there, and it happened.

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes it doesn't happen a lot in the pros. I'm

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 2>not so sure. We're not three or four weeks away

0:18:40.040 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 2>from saying CJ. Stroud's the third best quarterback in the league.

0:18:43.000 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 2>I think he's insane. I mean Greg co Sell on

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 2>my show is like he's making throws that almost nobody

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 2>in the planet can make, like Stafford Burrough Mahomes. Yes,

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 2>I think I had somebody that was at Friday's Bears

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 2>practice before the game saying the ball was on the

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 2>ground more than they'd ever seen it. Caylebby's really struggling.

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 2>Romadunze may not play, Keenan Allen may not play. I

0:19:11.160 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 2>think CJ. Stroud is he is really something. I mean

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.359
<v Speaker 2>he is that second game he played I think it

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 2>was Baltimore in his career. I was like, wait a minute,

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 2>this is Baltimore. What is he doing. I think this

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 2>could be ugly. I think the Texans are going to win.

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 2>I thought it would. When I guess the line on this,

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 2>I thought it would be closer to six and a half, seven,

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half. At six, I think i'd take

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 2>the text in Sharper square.

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So look, it's a little bit square.

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 3>The reason it's at six is because it opened at

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 3>six and a half, and the wise guys definitely felt

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.240
<v Speaker 3>that was inflated for exactly the reasons you just said.

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 3>You know, obviously, We've talked about this. I'm from Chicago.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I love the Bears.

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 3>I will have a text chain on Sundays with all

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 3>my guys from Chicago. I can't even respond because they

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.080
<v Speaker 3>come in so fast, and I'm so anxious about all

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the other bets for me, like, I don't want to

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:05.200
<v Speaker 3>talk to anybody, right, forty five texts in the first

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 3>half of that Bears game, we thought the Bears had

0:20:08.400 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 3>already broken. Caleb Williams like he was pushing the ball.

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 3>He wasn't throwing the ball, he was looking at his

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>first read and then taking off. He was inaccurate. He

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 3>was throwing too early on deep passes because he already realized,

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, my offensive line is crap and I

0:20:25.359 --> 0:20:28.439
<v Speaker 3>can't outrun these defensive linemen. So we already looked like

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:30.720
<v Speaker 3>it was over right, like we've seen it as Bear

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 3>stands a thousand times.

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we know that's not the case.

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 3>But you couple that and how bad he looked in

0:20:35.760 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 3>the fact the Bears needed special teams in defense to

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 3>beat the Titans with how good CJ.

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Stroud look. He made a throw.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 3>On a third down, rolling right across his body middle

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 3>of the field, third and nineteen.

0:20:52.000 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Got it.

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 3>It's the kind of throw you can only make if

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 3>you are an other world talent. We had what third

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 3>and eleven, third and twelve to seal the game, and

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 3>he at Nico Collins on a dart where Nico Collins

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 3>caught it with an inch of space before the sideline

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 3>got a knee down. That ends the game, right, Like CJ.

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 3>Shroud is something special, But that's why the line was

0:21:16.560 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 3>too high. So at six it's about where it's supposed

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to be. You're not getting much of an advantage, might

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 3>even be a little bit high still at six and

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 3>a half.

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>The wise guys like it. So you're playing a bad number.

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, a game every week. I want you to teach

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 2>me and the audience a lesson. I don't get the number.

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 2>So the Lions go to overtime, that's not good. Generally,

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.919
<v Speaker 2>I stay away from teams that go to overtime. You know,

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:45.640
<v Speaker 2>seven to ten more plays the Lions. Clearly Baker played

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 2>his best game as a pro. This line is seven

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and a half. I still think without Puka Nakua and

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 2>three backup offensive linemen, the Rams moved the ball up

0:21:57.680 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 2>and down the field in the second half, did everything

0:21:59.800 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 2>then wanted to do. Blake Korham didn't even play Tyler Higbe.

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Their tight end is out.

0:22:04.920 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>They were.

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It was just Cooper Cup, Matt Stafford and McVeigh and backups,

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 2>and they move up and down the field. Baker's got

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 2>legitimate receivers. I don't understand the number. You know to

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:20.600
<v Speaker 2>me before, Why explain how Detroit is seven and a half?

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 2>What's the side here?

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:27.119
<v Speaker 3>Well, look that the Lions, according to a lot of

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 3>power ratings, should be bigger favorites. Like I love the

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Lions in this spot and that is a massive number

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 3>to bet.

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.719
<v Speaker 2>It is a quarterback in Baker, it is.

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, here's the thing.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 3>I think that there's a couple of things going on.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 3>Number One, on the on the Buck side, they are

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 3>getting overvalued because Baker was so good in that opening game, right,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 3>But you were great against a rebuilding team, and the

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 3>expectations for the Bucks for a lot of people were

0:22:59.440 --> 0:23:01.560
<v Speaker 3>kind of low, and from a public point of view,

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 3>they've now exceeded them. And Baker looked unbeatable, but he

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 3>played against the team with a defensive line that is

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 3>basically starting from scratch, against a defense that doesn't have

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 3>great defensive backs, so he could kind of have his way.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 3>The Rams are like their game plan, which they had

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 3>five months to build coming off a playoff game. They

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 3>were so tuned in and they were still losing seventeen

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 3>to three, and they needed a couple penalties to get

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 3>themselves back in a position. And yes, they were moving

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:40.680
<v Speaker 3>the ball up and down the field because their offensive

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 3>line was terrible, but it was really passing the ball

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 3>and what they did the Rams was brilliant. Matthew Stafford

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:51.719
<v Speaker 3>one step drop, first redthrow. Aden Hutchinson was in his

0:23:51.840 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 3>grill every single play, even when Matthew Stafford was throwing

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 3>it with after about a second and a half, right,

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Baker is not that a player. Baker is not as

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 3>sort of efficient with when he drops back and getting

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 3>to his first receiver. And I think the Lions, and

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 3>we saw this in the overtime, they are so physically dominant.

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 3>They're playing at home. Dan Campbell is the best coach

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 3>against the spread the past five years, Jared Goff twenty

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 3>six and nine against the spread. Indoors like, this is

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 3>a this is a really good team. I think this

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 3>is the second best roster in the NFC. You could

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.680
<v Speaker 3>argue the Niners are the best. The Lions showed something.

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 3>They're a physically dominant team. It is not about the edges,

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 3>It is not about Dan Campbell and sort of going

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 3>for it. Their offensive defensive line are fierce. So I

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 3>like the Lions there. I think they are going to

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 3>blow this team away.

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I always ask you for a game I missed

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.399
<v Speaker 2>a game you feel strongly about. It's often an unwatchable,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 2>egregiously bad television product. But I already gave you that

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.479
<v Speaker 2>with the Giants in Washington. So what say you?

0:25:04.680 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, look, I do like another favorite.

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:07.919
<v Speaker 3>It's a little chalky for me, but I do like

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys against the Saints. I think, you know, Mike

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:16.719
<v Speaker 3>McCarthy and Dak Prescott, they are juggernauts during the regular season,

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 3>they are juggernauts as big favorites at home.

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I am not a fan of the Saints.

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 3>I think they played a bad Carolina team and got

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 3>in the exact right position. But Dak is a favorite

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 3>at home. Fifteen and nine against the spread. He's a

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 3>good yeah, past three years as a favorite of six

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 3>or more in his career, thirty one, thirteen and one.

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:45.080
<v Speaker 3>That's right, Like, he's just great in this spot. And

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 3>so I like to I am on the side of

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 3>the Cowboys here. I think anything under seven you're getting

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 3>a good number. Here's the game that a lot of

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:56.360
<v Speaker 3>wise guys have been talking about and has had one

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 3>of the biggest moves, and it makes me sick to

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 3>my stomach, but we're going to bet it.

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay Packers.

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 2>What if Malik Willis plays?

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:09.720
<v Speaker 3>I know, I know, I don't know what to tell you,

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 3>but like, that's that's the game everybody is talking about. Look,

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 3>this game was at three and a half. It went

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 3>down to three. Now there's some places where it's two

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 3>and a half. That is not the squares coming in

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and betting on the Packers. That is the wise guys

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:30.600
<v Speaker 3>coming in. And like I think, I think there's a

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 3>couple of things. One the swing, the Packers were in

0:26:35.960 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 3>what's called the look aheadline, so the line that was

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 3>set before last week's games, the Packers were four and

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 3>a half point favorites with Malik Willis, they opened US

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 3>three and a half point underdogs. That's an eight point swing.

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes is worth eight points against the point spread.

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 3>And the way that guy has figured this out is

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.520
<v Speaker 3>they take how much better is he than his backup?

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 3>It's not just about what would the line be if

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:05.719
<v Speaker 3>he's not playing if what would the line be if

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 3>his backup is playing? Right, So, Jordan Love, as good

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 3>as he is, is not an eight point swing kind

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 3>of generator when it comes to quarterback play. So they

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 3>think there was a little bit of inflation in the

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 3>way that they reopen the line from three and a half,

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 3>which is why I got bet down. But also there

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:30.160
<v Speaker 3>are some on the field elements here. Number one, Malik Willis,

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 3>if he knows anybody, it's the cults right. For the

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 3>past couple of years, he's had to prepare for the

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Colts backup quarterbacks when they are playing in their first

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 3>game fifty against the spread the past three seasons. There

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 3>is some sort of overreaction in the market that it

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 3>offers a little bit of value. And then just look

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 3>on the field, like the Colts defensive secondary is in trouble.

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 3>They were not great this past week against the Texans.

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 3>They're banged up. I mentioned the Jets and they're twenty

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 3>five points twenty five minutes of possession. The other team

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.679
<v Speaker 3>that this applies to from the past week the Indianapolis Colts.

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 3>So that's another factor to look at. Matt Lafleor. I

0:28:17.080 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 3>just said, Dan Campbell best coach past five years against spread,

0:28:20.320 --> 0:28:23.919
<v Speaker 3>Matt Lafleur second best spread against the spread.

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of.

0:28:26.160 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 3>Indicators here that are leading people to bet the Packers.

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 3>To hold your nose, bet the number kind of thing.

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 3>If you can get the three, I wouldn't say take

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 3>it at two.

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>And a half.

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Chad Millman, c CEO Action Network All Odds provided by DraftKings.

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 2>He's an Oxford, Mississippi now Celebrannial Friend's new book right, Thompson.

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 2>So it's supposed to be a bourbon town. That's what

0:28:50.240 --> 0:28:51.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a bourbon drinker. It's supposed to be a

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 2>bourbon town. Can you validate that or verify that.

0:28:55.400 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I can validate that I did have a bunch of

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>bourbons last night. I'll tell you a funny story. I

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 3>got back to my hotel. We were a bunch of

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 3>us were at Right's house hanging out. And you know

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 3>you've interviewed Right.

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>He is the.

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Quintessential Southern personality, great voice, drips accent like and he

0:29:16.000 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 3>is a Mississippian and he's got this town wired. And

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 3>so we're hanging out his house and starts with barbecue dinner,

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 3>and then it's a few drinks, and then it's a

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 3>few more drinks, and then it's like after midnight and

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 3>we're still sitting in the same place, and it's beautiful

0:29:30.560 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 3>outside and we're sitting on bourbons. And I get back

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:34.959
<v Speaker 3>to my hotel and you know how in hotels, like

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 3>there's eight different lights and eight different light switches. You're

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 3>not used to like the layout right, maddening. And so

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 3>when I take out my contacts, I'm legally blind, Like

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 3>I can't see anything.

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I need to feel the room.

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 3>And I realized I took out my contacts and I

0:29:50.960 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 3>hadn't turned off all the lights. So I had to

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 3>get like nose to the wall to find the light switches.

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Found the light switch for the hallway, found the light

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.920
<v Speaker 3>switch for the light behind it TV, found the light

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 3>switch for the bathroom. Like felt around and got to

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 3>the desk lights the you know, the side table lights

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 3>by the bed. Could not find the light switch for

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 3>the overhead light. Like, I'm in the wall, cannot find out.

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 3>I go back to all the other light switches. I'm

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 3>putting them up and down. Cannot find it. I had

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 3>to do the most embarrassing thing. I called the front desk.

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I know, Oxford's a crazy town. I promise

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.479
<v Speaker 3>you I'm not so far gone. I'm gonna forget this.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 3>In the morning, I cannot find the light switch for

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 3>my overhead light. And he goes, Okay, what do you

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 3>want me to do? I'm like, do you have any

0:30:38.720 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 3>idea where the light switches are.

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>In my room? He goes, what room are you in?

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.320
<v Speaker 3>I go three twenty five? He goes, all right, let

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 3>me think about it. He goes now, and I don't

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:50.960
<v Speaker 3>have anything down here that maps it. I was about

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 3>to see it him again. It's after midnight. There's only

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 3>one guy in the desk. He can't leave, but I'm

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 3>about to see him. Any chance you can come up

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 3>to my room and check out where the lights are.

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 3>And then as I was about to say it, I'm like,

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 3>that's the most sketchy thing that you could possibly say

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 3>after midnight to a god work in the front desk.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>I put the I said, you know what, I'll figure

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it out.

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.480
<v Speaker 3>I put the phone down and I say to myself,

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, I'm just I'm just gonna have to sleep

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 3>with the light on, like I don't know what else

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 3>to do. And then I gave myself a new Rockney.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, Milman, you're gonna find this light switch. You

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.520
<v Speaker 3>can find this light switch again. I'm hands on the wall,

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 3>feeling it around, feeling around. Finally I get to the thermostat.

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 3>It is directly next to the thermostat. It looks like

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 3>the thermostat found the light switch, turned it off. Felt

0:31:39.400 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 3>full relief. Tripped on my way to the bed because

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 3>I couldn't see anything anymore. But I did find that

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 3>light switch. And I didn't insult anybody on the way.

0:31:48.280 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's that would have been a woman at the

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 2>front desk. That's a lawsuit.

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I come.

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 3>Burn spread clearly. It's so good I cannot find a

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 3>light scratch.

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 2>All right, I'm gonna bounce back.

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Good seeing anybody, good, seeing you too, brother, I'll see

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you later.

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 2>The volume