WEBVTT - Meta Launches Threads and Musk's Truce with China's Automakers

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed loved Love.

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde, Bloomberg's WORLDEAD quarters in New York.

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Ed Ludlow here in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Coming up Meta, It's taken on Twitter. Threads officially hits

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:36.559
<v Speaker 3>the app store and one of thirty million people as

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 3>signed up already.

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll bring you the details of the launch classes.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 4>Elon musk rapples with competitors to Twitter. He's agreeing to

0:00:43.920 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 4>a truce with China's top auto makers.

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 5>Will have more on the pledge.

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:51.000
<v Speaker 4>Tesla and others have agreed to maintain fair competition in

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 4>the world's biggest ev market.

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 3>And we'll have an exclusive conversation with the CEO of

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Japanese robotics firm. It's Ali driven tell Existence SoftBank maxa

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 3>company and just raising one hundred and seventy million dollars

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 3>for its Series B funning round. Well, that is so

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 3>much coming up. Let's focus on these markets because the

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 3>exuberance on Threads is not being reflected by the lack

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 3>of exuberance in the markets today. We're currently off by

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 3>one point threew percent on the Nasdaq, a pullback. We're

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.200
<v Speaker 3>worried about basically good news being bad news ed. We're

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 3>looking at jobs growth, really strong numbers from the private

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 3>sector when you're looking at ADP, the jobless claim. Still

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 3>looking at the strength here of a labor mark in

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 3>the US, A federal reserve still going to want him

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 3>to be tackling that MSCI Country World Index on the

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>downside as well, and in fact, we seeing Europe's sell

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 3>off hard so too has China, so really a global

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:37.920
<v Speaker 3>risk off field to trade today, and it means that

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 3>money is actually though interestingly, coming out of the bomb market,

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 3>sending yields up some ten basis points on the two

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 3>year we sawt of course that eclipse more than five

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 3>percentage points and an overall yield for two year dead

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 3>at the moment, as we think that the Fed is

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 3>going to have to tackle this really strong market and

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>over all economy here in the United States. Let's move

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 3>on what's happening in terms of the world a bitcoin,

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>because that risk asset have been higher. In fact, we've

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 3>top the thirty one thousand level high at least eight months,

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>but now we come back down to earth a little bit.

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 3>We're off by two tens of percent. We're still above

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 3>that thirty thousand level overall ed.

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, when we.

0:02:10.280 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 4>Look at the public markets, there's not, excuse me, a

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of green to talk about.

0:02:14.639 --> 0:02:15.639
<v Speaker 5>That's how excited I am.

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 4>But Tesla is a downside mover two point two percent.

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 4>We will go to our reporter later in the program

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 4>here on Bloomberg Technology, it's all about agreeing with domestic

0:02:24.680 --> 0:02:28.919
<v Speaker 4>Chinese ev makers to normalize pricing. A very interesting move,

0:02:28.919 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 4>but that stock down in line with the broader market.

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 4>One big name we're watching is Meta Meta formerly known

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 4>as Facebook, and all about threads. It's been really interesting,

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 4>right the open Meta was up more than one point

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 4>three percent. It's kind of chop traded. We're now down

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 4>two tens to one percent. Analysts kind of somewhat bullish

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:50.639
<v Speaker 4>on this move with Threads the headline. As you said, Caroline,

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 4>thirty million users signed up. Let's get more details on

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Threads day one with the Bloomberg Technology editor who literally

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 4>wrote the book on Instagram, Sarah Fryar. Sarah, what do

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 4>we know about Threads day one?

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's just been an incredible amount of enthusiasm. I

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 6>think this is the first time Meta has done a

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 6>covey cut product that people are actually hankering for. Everyone

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 6>was looking for an alternative to Twitter. Given all the

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 6>turbulence from Elon Musk, including over the weekend with rate

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 6>limiting people who are posting on Twitter trying to limit

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 6>the number of tweets they could see. There was a

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 6>lot of searching for an alternative, and Threads is seeming

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 6>to build that critical mass that people need if they

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 6>want to post something that could have impact. And we're

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 6>seeing very high engagement, you know, thirty million users, as

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 6>you said, just blew up overnight. And this is this

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 6>is a really exciting moment in the rivalry between Twitter

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 6>and Meta. I just think, you know, we're a couple

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 6>decades into that now and it's been really incredible to see.

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 6>This is the moment of all the times that Meta

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 6>could have copied Twitter. I don't know that it would

0:04:09.520 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 6>have worked until now.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 3>Mistiming seems to be really painful, probably on Twitter's pot

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 3>as you say, amid the swirling chaos of limitations to

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 3>certain numbers of tweets that you can see, Sarah. To

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 3>that point, Twitter's response Linda and Gakarina. We're going to

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 3>dig into that later in the show has been responding

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 3>to all of this, But ultimately, what does thirty million

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 3>look like in comparison to historical levels of growth.

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 6>Well, it's a big start for a new social media app,

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 6>and I think the reason that it is getting so

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 6>much enthusiasm is because it has that existing connection to

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 6>the Instagram network. Now, that's also been a point of

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 6>frustration for Threads users. People who don't use Instagram, or

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 6>who don't like their Instagram handle, or have an invested

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 6>in that platform, or have a different community there than

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 6>they have on Twitter. They're not exactly excited to copy

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 6>that over to a new app where they want to

0:04:58.839 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 6>build a new identity. However, it has made it a

0:05:01.680 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 6>lot easier for those key users, the celebrities, the public figures,

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 6>the brands, those that use Instagram already for professional reasons

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 6>wanting to pour it over all of that influence to

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 6>an app without having to start from scratch. And that's

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 6>really a big motivator. So if everyone else wants to

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 6>follow those people in Threads becomes the place to do it.

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 6>I think we're going to see those issues work out

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 6>of her time, but of course Instagram is going to

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 6>try to deal.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 5>With some of the pain points as they can.

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 3>J Lo Paris Hilton many a funny post coming from

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 3>them already. I'm sure joyous for those that have been

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 3>overseeing the launch. Blomberg, Sarah Fry, thanks for that update. Meanwhile,

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 3>let's just dive into the conversation also, perhaps some of

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the financial drivers that obviously follow success. Just when Enburg

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 3>and Police to say is right here in New York.

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 3>She of course leads coverage of influencer marketing and social

0:05:52.760 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 3>commerce and inside Intelligence you focus on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, Twitter, Facebook,

0:05:57.920 --> 0:06:01.760
<v Speaker 3>Let's focus on threads first, because well, it looks like

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 3>it's going well, what do you think is the monetization

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 3>angle ultimately here for the investors that are listening to us,

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 3>because I've seen already Zuck post about monetization not coming immediately.

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely well, just to put this into perspective, I mean,

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 7>thirty million users is an incredibly strong start. At Insider Intelligence,

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 7>We're expecting Twitter to have about fifty six million users

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 7>in the US by the end of twenty twenty three,

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 7>so that just gives you some context for how many

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.560
<v Speaker 7>people Threads was able to have signed up just overnight.

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 7>In terms of the monetation, monetization ads are metas bread

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 7>and butter, and I would assume that any monetization strategy

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:45.360
<v Speaker 7>for Threads would include advertising. That said, I'm expecting that

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 7>Meta will wait until Threads really reach his scale before

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 7>they bring on any sort of monetization opportunities.

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 3>Zak and self saying, look, we want to get to

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 3>a billion here. How quickly do you think they can

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:56.880
<v Speaker 3>scale to a billion?

0:06:56.920 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 4>And is it really.

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 3>The area, the focus, the number you want to see?

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 7>Well, I mean Meta obviously has a scale, it has

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.359
<v Speaker 7>the resources, and it has the execution strategy to scale Threads.

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 7>I do think, you know, the challenge will be in

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 7>keeping up the momentum that we saw yesterday and that

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 7>continued into this morning. You know, it is a new app,

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 7>and there are very few new new apps that are

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 7>able to keep up that growth rate that Threads has

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 7>seen already. And I also think that you know, Meta

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 7>will have to continue innovating, will have to keep Threads interesting.

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 7>Right now, it's simplicity and it's bare bones. Ux are

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 7>some things that really are attractive to users, especially those

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 7>that are tired of the chaos and the ad hoc

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 7>changes at Twitter. But eventually it is going to have

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 7>to innovate to keep people engaged and on the app.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 3>And as many would say, innovation is elon strong point.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 3>And Lyndia Karino ed brings well the monetization strategy for

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Twitter as well. But you've been tracking ultimately how the

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 3>growth of Threads compares.

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 4>Right, Yeah, and I'm interested, Jasmine in the mechanics of

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 4>how they got Threads off the ground. You have to

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 4>have an Instagram account, and what I did was I

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 4>went through Twitter's S one back in twenty thirteen, and

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 4>they hit thirty million users at the start of twenty ten,

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 4>sort of four years into the.

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 5>Life of the platform.

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 4>This link with Instagram seems to have given them a

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 4>fast start.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 5>What's your assessment of that.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 7>I think it was incredibly smart. It was really easy

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 7>to sign up for Threads. You could port your Instagram account,

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:30.520
<v Speaker 7>you could port your Instagram followers directly onto Threads. I

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 7>think there are some people who don't necessarily want to

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:38.679
<v Speaker 7>transport their Instagram followers their audiences over to this new

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 7>app and want to keep these two separate, but overall

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 7>in order to sort of supercharge the growth. I think

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 7>this was a spot on move from Meta, Jasmin.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 4>What's your experience been using the platform?

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 5>What do you like about it?

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 7>I mean, it's been really easy to use. The user

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 7>interface has been fantastic. It's been fun so far. I

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 7>don't know how long that will last, but for now,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 7>it feels like in early Twitter one point zero with

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 7>an Instagram twist, some more photos and visuals on the platform.

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 7>I haven't left Twitter yet though, I'm still on both,

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 7>which just means that there are more apps now than

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 7>ever to post.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 3>On and we are kind of exhausted by it, Jasmine.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 3>To a certain extent. One group of people who aren't

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 3>going to be exhausted by Threads is Europe, because it's

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 3>not there yet. We understand the regulatory overhang. What do

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 3>you make of that, well, delay, is it opportune for

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 3>Meta to push backing as regulators in Europe?

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's certainly going to be a challenge for Meta.

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 7>I mean, Meta needs to convert one in four Instagram

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 7>users in order to make Threads as big as Twitter

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.640
<v Speaker 7>is worldwide at the end of this year. Europe is

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 7>a really big market for them, and it's going to

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 7>be a challenge. It's going to be an issue if

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 7>it's not able to launch there Now, some of the

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 7>reasons that you know it has delayed the launch of Threads,

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.120
<v Speaker 7>potentially being the DMA, are issues.

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 8>That will affect all of the social apps.

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 7>It's not just Threads, and it's not just Meta, but

0:10:04.280 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 7>it does point to this larger picture of how difficult

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 7>it is really to bring new apps and products to market.

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:12.640
<v Speaker 5>Let's go back to the technology.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 4>There is an algorithmic and machine learning powered part of

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.959
<v Speaker 4>each feed. What is your assessment of which is better

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 4>Twitter or Threads at this point?

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think it certainly depends. You know, Threads is

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:28.839
<v Speaker 7>very new and I haven't had a lot of time

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 7>to tinker around with it. I think what's really interesting,

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 7>and what I've been thinking a lot about is how

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 7>people are going to be using threads. Are they actually

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 7>going to be using it for the same use cases

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 7>as we were using Twitter or continue to use Twitter,

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 7>meaning keeping up with news and world events. Now, News

0:10:45.360 --> 0:10:47.440
<v Speaker 7>has been somewhat of a source spot for meta on

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 7>its other platforms, Facebook in particular, and I'm not sure

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.800
<v Speaker 7>that you know the Instagram usage translates naturally into news

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 7>and world events the same way that it does on Twitter.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 7>I don't necessarily think that Meta needs to be as

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 7>strong a player in those arenas though, to make Threads

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 7>a real threat to Twitter as it is.

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 4>Insider intelligence principle analyst Jasmine Enburg. Day one of Threads done.

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 4>Let's see what happens next. Let's get out to Japan.

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Tokyo based robotics startup tell Existence has just raised one

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 4>hundred and seventy million dollars for its Series B funding round,

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.040
<v Speaker 4>backed by SoftBank and other big names. Joining us now

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:41.559
<v Speaker 4>for more is the co founder and CEO of Teleexistence,

0:11:41.640 --> 0:11:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Jim Tomioka. In an exclusive interview, Good evening. I suppose

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:49.839
<v Speaker 4>to you, mister Tomyoka, thank you for joining us big

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Series B. What do you need this money for in

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 4>your robotics?

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 9>Brush of all, thank you for having me today.

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 10>So, yeah, we raise one hundred seventy million from a

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 10>source group and the fox on the other.

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 9>Investors, and they mainly we're going to use.

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:11.839
<v Speaker 10>This kepto to extend to the US, the United.

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 4>States folks on an investor. But I'm really interested in

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 4>that relationship. Are they going to help you scale and

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 4>manufacture your robotics correct.

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 10>So right now in Japan, we are in the process

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 10>of defoying the three hundred robots to the convenience clods

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.600
<v Speaker 10>and we see the strong demand in Japan because you.

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 11>Know, we are facing the aging issue, labor shortage, so

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 11>we we aim to increase our manufacturing capacity to result

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 11>next to you, and in order for us to do that,

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:49.000
<v Speaker 11>we think you.

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.680
<v Speaker 12>Know best to work with the Fox from the manufacturer

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.680
<v Speaker 12>Globbo outside Japan Jin.

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 3>What's interesting is demographics an issue in Japan. Here in

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>the US, the labor data show there's a real tightness

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.800
<v Speaker 3>here too. Are you looking at coming to the United

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 3>States to alleviate the labor issues here too?

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:12.079
<v Speaker 12>Yes, so we don't we're not We're not intend to

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 12>take a job from people. But as you said, even

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 12>with the different context, you know, we see there's a

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 12>big gap between the labors necessary and labors.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 9>Who intends to go back to the market.

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 10>So we want to feel that get to solve the

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.080
<v Speaker 10>labor shortages, especially in retail and logistic using our robots.

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 3>Already your partnership with Family March. For example, in Japan,

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 3>across thousands of convenience stores, there are hundreds of thousands

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 3>of convenience stores in the US. I'm sure you can

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:49.239
<v Speaker 3>deploy it. How has the art offgital intelligence mania affected

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 3>the appetite to invest in you? Because these robots are

0:13:52.600 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 3>powered by AI?

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.720
<v Speaker 10>Yes, so you see a fever is a learning control

0:14:02.760 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 10>the Globo. So the current recent a trim obviously you know.

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:15.719
<v Speaker 9>Supported us to raise the firm and do think know

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 9>that AI is pushing.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 12>The boundaries of the Lobo food work only the human.

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 9>Months or every the people's life, so we want to

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 9>do that industry.

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 4>Jin, where did this round value your company?

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 5>What was the valuation?

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:39.680
<v Speaker 10>It's a bit hard to disclose, but I think while

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 10>or two step before Unicorn.

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 4>A unicorn status around. Well, congratulations to you on that.

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 4>What is your point of differentiation? What is it technologically

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 4>that you do differently from the other robotics makers. Caroline

0:14:55.760 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 4>was talking about AI. Do you have a deep foundation

0:14:59.080 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 4>in machine learning?

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 11>Yes, so you know we use the AI machine learning

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 11>to detect every different shape of.

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 12>The products sold in the inconvenience so that we can

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 12>find the optimal grasping point of every different product and

0:15:16.600 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 12>the taking post on.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 9>Top of that, because the current AI is pretty linked.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 12>So our company's goal is to bring bring the robo

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 12>outside practice and try to control.

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 9>Them in people's everyday life.

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 12>For me, in the we try to control able in

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 12>more dynamic environment and the current AI cannot really adapt

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 12>to the environment. So one feature we have really combine

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 12>the air machine learning will be more control mean before

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 12>using the internet to control the level and fix the

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 12>issue if we face. So that that's the combination of

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 12>air and remote controls one feature we have.

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Jen, it's great talking to you. Thank you for bringing

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.080
<v Speaker 3>us the story exclusively. Fascinating to see the robotics in

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the background as well, Tamioko of course tell existence CEO Meanwhile, Ed, well,

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 3>you had some big interviews as well exclusively yesterday.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's been a busy week so far.

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 4>Coming up, Rivian ready to take on more commercial partners

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 4>beyond Amazon. That's after, of course a recent bout of

0:16:17.440 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 4>production success. We'll get to my exclusive interview. There we

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 4>are with the CEO. Next, this is Bloomberg Technology electric

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 4>vehicle maker. Rivian's had a bit of a rebound of late.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 4>The technology fix on its EV pickup and suv helped

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 4>Rivian beat on production in the second quarter, and the

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 4>companies started shipping delivery vans to Europe for its biggest investor, Amazon.

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 4>I traveled to the company's HQ in southern California sit

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 4>down for an exclusive conversation with the founder and CEO, RJ.

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Scarrange.

0:17:03.800 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 13>We have a quad motor set up in our R

0:17:05.640 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 13>one vehicles. It's two motors per axil, so four motors

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 13>per vehicle, and we've just launched a dual motor setup

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 13>which leverages a new motor family, which we call the

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 13>Enduro motor family. And that Enduro is completely built in house,

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 13>the rotor, the stator. Of course, just like on the

0:17:20.040 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 13>launch configuration, we build the inverter in house, the yearboxing house.

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 13>But when we sourced the power semis for the inverter

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 13>in Enduro, we sourced in a really thoughtful way that

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 13>gave us enough capacity and much more confidence around that

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 13>supply chain than some of the challenges we've had on

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 13>the launch configuration.

0:17:36.800 --> 0:17:38.280
<v Speaker 8>And so that not only.

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 13>Provides a high confidence production capacity on the Enduro, but

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:46.840
<v Speaker 13>it also provides risk mitigation on any shortcomings in terms

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 13>of supply on the quad motor.

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 4>The big news of the last five days is that

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 4>you have you're out of the United States. Yeah, a

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 4>small number of Amazon EDVS electric delivery vans are being

0:17:58.400 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 4>shipped to Europe Germany in the instance, Why was that

0:18:01.800 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 4>a significant milestone?

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 13>Well, you know, it's important to get those vehicles are

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 13>Amazon has a lot of business in Europe. But it

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 13>also represents not just turning on production of vehicles that

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 13>get shipped overseas, but all the supporting infrastructure. So we

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 13>have parts distribution capabilities, we have service capabilities, and the

0:18:20.200 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 13>EDED program is really a wonderful way for us to

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 13>open those markets with highly predictable and planned service intervals

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 13>and deliver intervals. So it's the beginnings of us opening

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 13>up the European market for our products.

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 4>As you know, I always ask Twitter, what would you

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 4>ask in this case RJ Scaringe. Lots of people want

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 4>to know about the Amazon relationship. You don't break down

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 4>production by product type are one to and S or eDV,

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 4>but a lot of people want a sense of how

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 4>many bans you're building proportionately to your consumer products.

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 5>What is the main part of the business over if

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 5>you think.

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 13>About over the full year we've guided to roughly twenty

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 13>percent of our production is the commercial vans. You know,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 13>as we think about the business going forward, the consumer

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 13>side of the business will grow disproportionately relative to the

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 13>commercial side, especially as we bring in our next generation products,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 13>with the R two and the R two platform representing

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 13>a significant stuff up and volume and a much lower

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 13>price point, much larger adjustble market with that with that product.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 4>What is the status of the relationship with Amazon? They

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:29.040
<v Speaker 4>have exclusivity, but you would like to sell vans others

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 4>in the future.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 13>I mean, the relationship with Amazon is outstanding. The van

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 13>is loved by the drivers. There's lots of content all

0:19:37.040 --> 0:19:39.720
<v Speaker 13>over the web on just the creature comforts who built

0:19:39.760 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 13>in the ease of use. The operators of the vehicles

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 13>are feeling it, you know, with with the increased efficiency.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 13>So we've we've we've done i think a really nice

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 13>job of capturing that feedback as we went through the

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 13>development process to make sure the van delivered. We're now

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 13>in the final hopeful stages of negotiating allowing us to

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 13>sell the vehicle outside of the Amazon relationship to other

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 13>so that the exclusivity provisions that originally built into the

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 13>contract are accelerating. When we opened that up to Bill

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 13>will sell to not on Amazon.

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 4>My interview Caroline with the Rivian CORJ Scaringe and the company,

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 4>the stock, the factory has a bit of a momentum

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 4>behind it right now.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm sure if it's a smile on his face.

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 3>Does the one question you were going to ask him

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 3>when we talked about it yesterday is whether he's enjoying himself?

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 3>And I mean is he amid some of the turbulence

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 3>he's experienced.

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I did ask him. I mean, it's been

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 4>a really long road for him. He founded the company

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.680
<v Speaker 4>in two thousand and nine. But what was astonishing is

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 4>they kept in stealth mode till twenty nineteen without any leaks.

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 4>Huge IPO twenty twenty one, the biggest since Facebook, and

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 4>then everything kind of went downhill. And he said, with

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 4>a right smile, Yeah, I'm having fun, but it's tough.

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Expectedly tough was the phrase.

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 5>That he used.

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And as you pointed out, of course founder CEOs,

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:55.760
<v Speaker 3>there are few and far between that managed to ride

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 3>out the IPO successfully in that way.

0:20:58.240 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 5>The future, the.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 3>Guidance the area in which now analysts can continue to

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 3>think that there's opportunities in the stock.

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 4>What did you think they didn't restate guidance I asked

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 4>him why they didn't upgrade it, but he said, our

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 4>aim is to outperform our own goals, and you look

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 4>at the numbers, it seems like they'll do that. He's

0:21:15.080 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 4>got more help experience execs with him. You know.

0:21:18.520 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 5>The big question for him is what he's focused on.

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 4>And without teasing too much, I'll have a little piece

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 4>coming next week where we'll dig into RJ. Scarringe the

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.719
<v Speaker 4>person and how he deals with things day to day.

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:31.400
<v Speaker 5>That should be fun.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Wow, it was a great interview. Fascinating backdrop there as well.

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bluemot Technology. I'm Caroline Hide in New

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 3>York and.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 4>I'med Ludlow here in San Francisco. Let's get a quit

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 4>check on the markets, Caroline, a lot of red. I'm

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.520
<v Speaker 4>focusing in on the Nasdaq one hundred. We're down about

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 4>a percentage point zero point ninety seven percent. All about

0:21:56.760 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 4>that private hiring data you were talking about earlier in

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology g the idea being the Fed might have

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 4>to be more aggressive on hikes to fight inflation. Higher

0:22:05.640 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 4>rates discount the present value of future cash flows.

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 5>And that's why we.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:12.480
<v Speaker 4>Care about it here on Bloomberg Technology We're down two

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.160
<v Speaker 4>days straight on the Nasdaq one hundred. Not a lot

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 4>of individual movers to the upside. One big drag from

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 4>a points perspective to the downside is Tesla. The news

0:22:22.359 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 4>coming out of China that Tesla, along with a number

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 4>of producers in China's electric vehicle space, committing to maintain

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 4>fair and balanced practices within the market, basically to normalize price.

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:40.119
<v Speaker 4>Total of sixteen automakers, including Tesla, BYD and Neo Signer

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:45.360
<v Speaker 4>pact to rein in quote abnormal pricing in the competitive space. Tesla, though,

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 4>was the only foreign brand in that deal, joining us

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 4>with the latest Bloomberg's David Wells, what do we know

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 4>about this kind of compromised David, between all these auto

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 4>makers in China.

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it was really interesting to read the highlights of

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>this thing. Among them reining in marketing actions, one of

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 2>them was preserving socialist principles or some such. You know,

0:23:10.560 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 2>these are all very vague things that don't set certain

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:16.720
<v Speaker 2>prices or say control pricing, or it's almost as if

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 2>it was written by a bunch of American attorneys who

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 2>wanted to avoid saying price fixing. But it is telling everybody, okay,

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 2>stop dropping prices. And look, the government does have a

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 2>great interest in stability here, in selling more vehicles but

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 2>also keeping preserving the health of the companies, and you

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 2>can't do that if everybody's on this big price bench,

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 2>another price cutting bench, i should say. And another part

0:23:40.640 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 2>of it is consumers really hated this. There were people

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 2>who were essentially rioting at dealerships because they bought a

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 2>car and then they saw the price drop a couple

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 2>of weeks later.

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 9>So you had some.

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Unrest with consumers about this. You have the government wanting

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 2>everyone to stabilize things, and I think everybody felt a

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 2>lot of pressure to just kind of cool it and

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 2>find a floor for prices, and then the price war.

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's interesting the Ministry of Industry and Information

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 3>Technology directed apparently the Automobile Association to basically get these

0:24:10.080 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 3>sixteen players together and to sign along to a non

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 3>binding agreement. But ultimately, how is it for tas they're

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 3>doing business in China.

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.399
<v Speaker 2>I think they've struggled to a degree with everybody in

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 2>the sense that you had this malaise kind of post

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 2>COVID hangover that had depressed vehicle sales, had pressed depressed

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 2>economic activity it's sort of starting to recover, but everybody's

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 2>having a tough time there, and I think that's why

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>you saw some of the price cuts to begin with,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 2>to basically generate some vehicle sales and get people back

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>to dealerships and looking at cars. I think the market

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 2>will recover, but in talking to other automakers who do

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of business there, General Motors, Volkswagen, you know,

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 2>they all kind of say the same thing that it

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:54.239
<v Speaker 2>may not get back to the hugely profitable levels they

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 2>had a few years ago because of increased domestic competition,

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 2>Tesla having to face off with the a really strong

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 2>player like Bid and some others. So I think the

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 2>price levels that we have now, which are down from

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.160
<v Speaker 2>where they were a couple of years ago, I think

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 2>that's here to stay. And I think everybody's really going

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 2>to have to fight it out with a lot of

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 2>serious competition from the Chinese automakers.

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 3>And look, that's something you can spread globally. Elon Musk

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 3>has been cutting prices here in the US and worldwide

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 3>because he's basically said, look, profit is my sacrificial lamb.

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 3>If I'm going to be able to go over market

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 3>share at the moment, Does it feel like that has

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 3>won or can he now in China, for example, depend

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 3>more on new models helping drive forward sales.

0:25:35.320 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, he's going to have to.

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 2>And keep in mind he has cut prices significantly over

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 2>there and in every market. I kind of go back

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 2>to my first economics class in college. Tesla basically had

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 2>a monopoly on evs for most of the past decade,

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 2>and now that's changing. It's changing in Europe too, because

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 2>the European automakers are bringing vehicles out and the European

0:25:55.920 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 2>market tends to be pretty nationalistic in terms of brand loyalty.

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 2>The Chinese market is starting to look more that way,

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:04.359
<v Speaker 2>and there is more competition in the US with Ford

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Handaikia General Motors selling more electric vehicles. The German automakers

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.199
<v Speaker 2>are coming on here too. None of their volumes are

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 2>really big, but if they take ten percent of the

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 2>electric vehicle market this year, they're eating away at Tula's

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 2>market share. And if Elon Musk wants to protect that,

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 2>he's going to have to drop prices, and he has,

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and he's got the margin to do it. Keep in mind,

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 2>he sold very expensive vehicles for a long time. You're

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 2>talking about mid sized sedans and mid sized crossover suv

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 2>selling for sixty seventy thousand dollars. That's all had to

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 2>come down because he doesn't have the only vehicle for

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 2>sale now.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 4>David Welch, another Bloomberg Technology editor, Caroline who literally wrote

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:50.200
<v Speaker 4>the book on GM, The Reinvention of American Icon. We've

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 4>just got sales data from GM. David, how's that ultim

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 4>battery platform in the vehicles that it's attached to going slowly?

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 2>They only saw about fourteen hundred of them. I'm sorry.

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 2>They sold about fourteen hundred evs in the quarter. And

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 2>it's really it's been a lot of promise and a

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 2>lot of slow ramp up with the Ultium vehicles. They're

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 2>getting their batteries from this plant in Ohio, the ultimam

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 2>plant there, and that's really not going to be ramping

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 2>up a lot until the second half of the year.

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.479
<v Speaker 2>I think they're kind of doing final install of their

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 2>last line this month in July, and GM has been promising,

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 2>promising that you'll see much more of the catalog lyric,

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe the Hummer, the Chevy Silverado electric truck, and the

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Chevy Blazer mid size suv you'll see that really coming

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 2>on in the second quarter, and it's because of that plant.

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>What it all means that is they won't have any

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 2>excuses anymore. In the second half of the year. They're

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 2>really going to have to show that Ultimum is cranking,

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>that they've got the bugs out, that this is the

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 2>right strategy that's spending all this time working on a

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 2>dedicated electric vehicle, battery and platform, retrofitting existing internal combustion vehicles.

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>I Ford did with the Machi and the Lightning that

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:07.360
<v Speaker 2>what GM did is the smart way for the long

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:10.360
<v Speaker 2>term and that we're starting to show results. And they've

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 2>had a lot of different fits and starts, and now

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 2>they really have to get it moving and this is

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'd say third quarter and fourth quarter are

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the ones to watch and see if they're really finally

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 2>executing because they've had serious execution issues with electric vehicles

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 2>at General Motors.

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 3>And then Robber hits a row. David Welch, thank you.

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Let's look at the world of seed investing right now,

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 3>in particular fintech and SaaS. We've got obviously spotlight moment

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 3>and I'm pleased to welcome Cowboy Ventures partner Gillian Williams,

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 3>who's been investing in fintech. She says, before it was cool.

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm pleased to say fintech is cool. Always been cooling

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 3>my heart, jill In. But tell us a little bit

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 3>about the environment with which you are currently writing checks.

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 3>Is it active for you? Seed seems to be an

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 3>area that's been really resilient.

0:28:58.640 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely so, thank you so much for having these. And

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the seed stage market is definitely more resilient, especially compared

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>to the later stage market. But all of it really

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>trickles down, and so while I think this is a

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>great time for new founders and new ideas to be built,

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 1>we still do have to look at what's happening at

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the IPO market, the later stage market, and even get

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>like the series being Series A markets to understand what's

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:26.480
<v Speaker 1>happening at the seed market. It's getting harder for a

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of founders that raised in twenty twenty twenty twenty

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>one to raise their follow on rounds, and so because

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of that, vcs are being to spend more time with

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>their portfolio companies and really just kind of re understand

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what's really happening with the market right now and understand

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>what valuations that we need to be focused on what

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.440
<v Speaker 1>metrics that companies need to hit, because all of that's

0:29:47.440 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>gone through recalibration at this point, and so that's really important,

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and so that really has had a trickle down effect

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what's happening at the seed stage. So

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>overall it's definitely more resilient to what's been happening, but

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it's still or seeing down across the entire market.

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, the one area of resilience, of course, has been

0:30:03.360 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 3>anything that's had artificial intelligence in its name. What portfolio

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 3>companies are leveraging that innately, and what companies are able

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.600
<v Speaker 3>to pivot to start to make the most of this

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 3>sea change in technology.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, I think that it's become definitely a buzzword and

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.040
<v Speaker 1>something that helps you raise a ton of capital at

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this point, and it's something that we are really excited

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about just we think that it's a technology that across

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>all sectors is something that whether it's existing portfolio companies

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>or new companies that we're looking at, should be thinking

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>about because it can really just expedite the use of

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>data and technology in ways that we really haven't thought

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>about before. And so we're really excited about it and

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we have Two of our portfolio companies are really innovating

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in the space. So one actually that's been around for

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a serious c company called AI. They are an

0:31:02.480 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 1>accounting company that applies and integrates AI into the accounting

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>process for enterprise software companies. And so what we are

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>most excited about this is especially using private data, and

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this is something in fintech why areas that are more regulated,

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>like fintech and healthcare will be a little bit slower

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in our minds to adopt AI because you're using a

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of private data and the ability to trade some

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of these language learning models will just take a little

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>bit longer. And so with vic dot Ai, they've been

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>able to do this over the past few years, and

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 1>so they're able to continue innovating a lot faster and

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>being able to apply new use cases and new AI

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>models on top of the data that they've already had

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to continue to improve and make their AI software and

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 1>their platform even more efficient for their customers.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:52.880
<v Speaker 8>So we're really excited about them.

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>And then another one that's actually not in the fintech

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.480
<v Speaker 1>space is called co Rise then the learning development space,

0:31:59.880 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and they provide expert led courses to learners to help

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>them develop their skills and level up. And the founder

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>King from Coursera, and what they're doing is really using

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 1>applying AI to their existing platform to help them scale

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>learner and like learners even more so and apply personalization

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>and support in real time.

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 8>And so that's a great use case of something that wasn't.

0:32:21.160 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Necessarily applying AI and making it even investor in better.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 8>So we're really excited about that.

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Jillian here on Bloomberg Technology and in particular Venture Spotlight.

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Over recent weeks, we've been talking a lot about the

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 4>ideas Cerebral Valley, that the kind of energy and AI

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 4>is here in San Francisco.

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 5>You're joining us from New York.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Where do you see the talent and the opportunity geographically

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 4>in terms of the portfolio companies you have in those

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 4>you're looking to invest in.

0:32:49.240 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely so, Cowboy Ventures we are split between.

0:32:53.080 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Palo Alto and New York, so we do have coverage

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>across the US, and for the most part we focus

0:32:59.240 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>on the US.

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 8>Invest In terms of where our portfolio they was split,

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 8>I want to.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Say it's it's around sixty seventy percent West Coast and

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty forty percent East Coast. But that has definitely continued

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to evolve. I mean, I think obviously COVID was a

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 1>huge driver of that, but we continue to see our

0:33:20.440 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>founders kind of first of all, move around even after

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:26.479
<v Speaker 1>we invest the sort of they decide where they want

0:33:26.560 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to live, but also in terms of the talent that

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they are hiring, and this drive for obviously wanting to

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>cultivate and build an incredible culture of their team, but

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 1>also wanting to make sure that they're able to get

0:33:40.280 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the best talent that they can. And so we see

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them maybe the early days, wanting to

0:33:45.280 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>all be together, but at the same time making sure

0:33:49.880 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that they can hire the best people no matter where

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they are. So oftentimes it's split between New York and

0:33:56.520 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bay Area, and so we'll do a lot of

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:01.239
<v Speaker 1>off sites together and making sure they're getting together at

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty regular cadence. And so, especially for me within

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the fintech space, a significant portion of the companies that

0:34:08.600 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I've invested into are on the East Coast.

0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 8>However, we're extremely flexible.

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>We're kind of flying back and forth, and we really

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>take a team approach in terms of our coverage on

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>both coasts.

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 5>Valuations how they look to your.

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Mind, absolutely I think there's As I mentioned earlier on,

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely been every calibration and I think we'll see unfortunately,

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of companies that raise over the past three

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>years have to level sundations are.

0:34:37.120 --> 0:34:38.400
<v Speaker 8>For that next round.

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:42.800
<v Speaker 1>We've had We've seen it with some new companies and

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>even had to have some conversations with some portfolio companies

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:48.959
<v Speaker 1>that you can hit the metrics that you were told

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you needed to hit for that next round, and the

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>problem is that the bar has raised, and so your

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 1>expectation of getting that dream valuation might not be real anymore.

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Especially for the fat trick seer point. How are they

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:07.239
<v Speaker 3>incentivizing their talent? How are they making the most more

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 3>talent coming to the market and have been laid off

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 3>by some of the big tech companies.

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and so I think there's sort of two different ways,

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's something that is kind of continuing to be

0:35:15.480 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>talked about in terms of how you can incentivize the

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>incredible talent that is now out there, because actually it's

0:35:22.120 --> 0:35:24.279
<v Speaker 1>gotten so much easier to bring in talent now.

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 8>A year and a half ago, trying to find great.

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Talent with like it was taking months and you actually

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>have to make decisions so much faster that was problematic

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>because people were making the wrong decisions. I think that's

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>honestly part of the part of the reason why you're

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:41.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing these layoffs grow, and especially with some of the companies,

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Obviously there's sort of runway issues, but also they hired

0:35:45.239 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>too quickly, and so you can't hire the best telling

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>all the time if you're hiring that quickly, and so

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>being able to kind of take your time in terms

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>of hiring is actually a huge benefit. But then also

0:35:56.320 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I've seen some companies where they're actually having conversations, especially

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with their senior execut team or with the talent that

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.319
<v Speaker 1>is that is there key talent that they want to keep,

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.359
<v Speaker 1>especially if say they are to take a down round

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and talk about how they can help make them whole

0:36:14.080 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>or help and really incentivize them or reissue some options

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:22.920
<v Speaker 1>at the new valuation because of the fact that they're

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>stoff may be underwater at this point and so definitely

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is more of an art to it, but people are

0:36:27.880 --> 0:36:30.000
<v Speaker 1>really thinking about how to protect their employees.

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Art and science always in this game. Cowboy Ventures partner

0:36:33.160 --> 0:36:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Jilly Williams, great.

0:36:34.160 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 5>To have you on the show. Come back.

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 8>We hope, thank you so much.

0:36:37.280 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, Ed, we've got some more talking tech.

0:36:40.000 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, let's get some talking tech. First up.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 4>Attacks of spikes significantly in the past six months and

0:36:45.200 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 4>pose a vital risk to India's economic ambitions. That's according

0:36:49.040 --> 0:36:52.920
<v Speaker 4>to a Google Mandian unit. They say industry from manufacturing

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:57.879
<v Speaker 4>to pharmaceuticals are becoming more vulnerable as they digitize operations.

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 4>In China, Ali Barber signed agree meant to work with

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:04.000
<v Speaker 4>its home province to develop AI in the digital economy.

0:37:04.040 --> 0:37:07.800
<v Speaker 4>The development suggests official backing for Ali Barber's efforts against

0:37:07.840 --> 0:37:11.200
<v Speaker 4>the bank drop in recent years of regulatory moves against

0:37:11.600 --> 0:37:15.840
<v Speaker 4>the firm. Plus, Daniel Friedberg, ftx's former chief regulatory officer,

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 4>is now being pulled deeper into the intrigue surrounding his

0:37:19.200 --> 0:37:22.399
<v Speaker 4>former boss, Sam Bankman Freed. In a lawsuit filed last week,

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 4>the new management of FTX accused Friedberg of enabling Bankman

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 4>Freed's alleged crimes and helping to orchestrate a quote wide

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 4>ranging con game to raid billions of customer dollars.

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Going viral. Mark Zuckerberg posted his first tweek more than

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.880
<v Speaker 3>a decade on the day, of course of Meta's Threads launch,

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 3>The founder of Meta, appears to be making a pretty

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.319
<v Speaker 3>obvious jabb at elon Musk, posting a popular Spider Man meme,

0:37:54.680 --> 0:37:58.480
<v Speaker 3>wile Mask responded shortly after with his own retort about Instagram.

0:37:58.840 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 3>This comes just two weeks so after Musks zuckerbern cage

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 3>fight was first discussed. Yeah, to become a real one

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 3>for now ed a figurative one and taking place on

0:38:09.280 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 3>the various stage.

0:38:10.080 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 5>Social media platforms.

0:38:11.920 --> 0:38:14.799
<v Speaker 4>It's like the most accurate use of that meme ever seen.

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:18.240
<v Speaker 4>It's episode nineteen B of the nineteen sixty seven animated

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 4>Spider Man. The title of that episode is double Identity.

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:24.719
<v Speaker 4>And Zuck's point is they're the same thing. I mean,

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 4>Threads and Twitter, to all intents and purposes, Carro, they're

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 4>the same.

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and are you enjoying it?

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:33.600
<v Speaker 4>I am enjoying it, And I think we better get

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 4>into like the momentum behind this, bringing Aasha counts from

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Technology. You wrote in the Tech Daily Instagram's Twitter

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:41.960
<v Speaker 4>copycat meets pent up demand.

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 5>What's the evidence for that?

0:38:44.680 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 14>Well, thirty million people being on threads in less than

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 14>twenty four hours is pretty crazy, I don't. I mean,

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 14>we've seen other Twitter alternatives pop up. I don't think

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 14>that they had that sort of growth within twenty four hours,

0:38:56.440 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 14>so it's pretty impressive phenomenal growth.

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:02.280
<v Speaker 3>How about the in which we're starting to see things

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:05.600
<v Speaker 3>that are popular on Twitter, like polls, like hashtags and

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 3>all that sort of good stuff.

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 5>Will that eventually creep in to threads? Do you think?

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 9>You know?

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.240
<v Speaker 14>I would imagine it's still early. So both Adam Asri,

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 14>who is head of Instagram, and then Mark Zuckerberg himself

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:18.480
<v Speaker 14>have been posting on thread and saying, you know, it's

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 14>still early. We're still planning to add features. I imagine

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 14>maybe they wanted to roll it out now take advantage

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 14>of kind of like where Twitter has been over the

0:39:26.719 --> 0:39:29.520
<v Speaker 14>past several months that aret elon Musk, it's been struggling

0:39:29.560 --> 0:39:31.799
<v Speaker 14>a bit. There's been things like great limits and people

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 14>were not able to get into their Twitter count, and

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 14>it was all sorts of things happening. And so it's

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 14>a good time, I think for Threads to come out,

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 14>and I think that's evidenced by the amount of people

0:39:42.320 --> 0:39:43.520
<v Speaker 14>that have signed up in such a short time.

0:39:43.680 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 4>Caroline makes a really good point on the functionality. There

0:39:46.080 --> 0:39:49.120
<v Speaker 4>are clearly ux differences I was number one hundred and

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:51.720
<v Speaker 4>thirty two thousand and nine to sign up on threads.

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.880
<v Speaker 4>What are your takes on the platform? What of the

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 4>feedback that users have been giving you.

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's a mix.

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 14>I think some people are really excited I did just

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 14>to have another place to go because maybe they were

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:04.919
<v Speaker 14>unhappy with some of the changes on Twitter. Some people

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:07.520
<v Speaker 14>are like, well, my Instagram friends are very different than

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 14>my Twitter friends, and I don't know if it's gonna

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 14>be the same vibe. But I think generally people seem

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.840
<v Speaker 14>to be optimistic. And yes, it's still early and the

0:40:15.880 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 14>features are not there yet, but it does have a

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 14>lot of the same field of Twitter, and people are

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 14>posting and I'm seeing some of the similar conversations that

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:22.919
<v Speaker 14>I might see on Twitter.

0:40:23.040 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 5>So we'll see what happens next.

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.360
<v Speaker 3>I've seen some fun memes that I could respond to

0:40:26.480 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 3>that brag by ed about which number he was on

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 3>the partaking on the threads, but Asia Ultimately, at the moment,

0:40:33.840 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 3>all we've heard from Nindi Akarino, we've heard her speak

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 3>out about that you know Twitter is you cannot duplicate it. Ultimately,

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:42.279
<v Speaker 3>what do you think the comeback has to be from

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:42.839
<v Speaker 3>Twitter right now.

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 14>I mean they say that you can't duplicate it. We

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 14>do see thirty million people on threads time will tell.

0:40:52.719 --> 0:40:55.839
<v Speaker 14>She didn't name threads by name, but she was kind

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 14>of hinting at some competition there. And I think Twitter

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.520
<v Speaker 14>has road ahead to try to give back advertisers, clean

0:41:02.600 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 14>up content on the platform, maybe removing those rate limits.

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.680
<v Speaker 14>I know that they were temporary, but making some of

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 14>those changes that benefit users. I think that's going to

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 14>be the key.

0:41:11.320 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I wonder how Malsden and Blue Sky are doing today

0:41:13.680 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 3>as well. I have a feeling a few more invitations

0:41:15.560 --> 0:41:17.239
<v Speaker 3>and suddenly being sent out. I finally got my one

0:41:17.280 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 3>for Blue Sky. Anyway, Asha counts, thanks so much. And

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 3>that does it for this edition of Bloembag Technology yet.

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, real mega show, so much to recap. Check out

0:41:25.239 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 4>the podcast where you get your podcasts. In just a

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 4>few minutes time, Karen and I taking to Twitter spaces

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:32.120
<v Speaker 4>to talk threads.

0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 5>This is Bloomberg Technology