WEBVTT - Tesla's China Approval and Paramount's CEO Ousting

0:00:01.480 --> 0:00:02.200
<v Speaker 1>From Bahard.

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Love Love.

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Heindet Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York and.

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>I made Love Low in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:29.920 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 4>Technology coming up.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Tesla gets some tentative approval for its driving system in China.

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 4>Details ahead plus paramount expected to oustit CEO ahead of

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 4>earning tonight, we'll bring you.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.640
<v Speaker 3>The latest and so far shares they drop after Q

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.519
<v Speaker 3>two guidance disappoints. We're going to discuss all of it

0:00:47.560 --> 0:00:50.559
<v Speaker 3>with the CEO, Anthony Noto. Well, first, let's checking on

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 3>these markets, because we're cautiously up on the nawstack at

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 3>the moment, up three tenths of a percent. We've got

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 3>a big week. You've got the FED, you've got the

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 3>all important claims, we've.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 5>Got jobs data.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Friday, we're seeing the NASDAK still managing to be up

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 3>about forty eight points. Now we're seeing a ten year

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 3>yield actually diving back some four or five basis points.

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 5>Let's call it ahead of the all important Federal Reserve.

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 3>And indeed just where we see this economy, this interest

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 3>rate environment going notably a lot capturing the attention on

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 3>the macro perspective. What's happening in Japan at the moment. Look,

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 3>we've got a holiday period that means some of the

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 3>trading is going to be more muted in Japan, but

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 3>the yen some big volatility over the course of the

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 3>weekend Monday trading, We're down a percentage point on the

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 3>dollar of US as the end the yen goes higher.

0:01:30.720 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Was it Japanese boj intervention? So far they remain mum

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 3>on the subject. We look forward to what's happening in

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 3>terms of another dollar related asset, this one Bitcoin down

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 3>versus the US dollar by about one and a quarter percent.

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 3>Now we're still seeing perhaps a little bit of a

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 3>risk off feel to bitcoin more generally and atf flows

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 3>for sixty eight hundred and fifty nine, and what are

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:51.080
<v Speaker 3>you looking at on the micro the ed.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Well Tesla and Tesla is a big, almost surprise story

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 4>this Monday, the stock up twelve point four percent. It's

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 4>just a few tens percent away from its biggest jump

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 4>since January of twenty twenty two. Very similar gains to

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 4>what we saw April twenty fourth, the day after earnings,

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 4>the story prelim or tentative approval for full self driving

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 4>in China. That's according to a Bloomberg source. Two subsets

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 4>of that a partnership with Baidu on the InCAR mapping

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 4>specifically for the China market, and then also an agreement

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 4>over data and privacy or terms on data and privacy

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 4>that will allow it to move forward with FSD. Big

0:02:33.320 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>reaction in the market. Elon Musk himself went to China

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 4>over the weekend met with Premier Lee Chung, which was

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 4>itself a surprise seven days after he bailed on India.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 4>And there's a lot to unpick in this one, but

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 4>it's a big move higher on the Tesla stock carract.

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we got to digame with none other than Craig

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Shrudelle Bloomberg of course all over this story throughout the

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:55.799
<v Speaker 3>day and indeed well previous night. It was a surprise,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 3>and it looks as though the meeting bore fruit.

0:02:58.520 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 5>What exactly does this mean for.

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 3>The overall robotaxi autonomous vehicle kind of future that elm.

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 6>Pains, Yeah, we have to really separate out robotaxi and

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 6>what Tesla calls full self driving because that nomenclature has

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 6>been a misnomer. It is a driver assistance system. When

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 6>you activate it, you're in control of the vehicle, You're

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 6>responsible for supervising it.

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 7>And if you do get into.

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:30.399
<v Speaker 6>A crash, Tesla has has shown a tendency to turn

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 6>around and blame you the driver. And so there's a

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 6>big difference between this system Tesla calls FSD and this

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 6>robotaxi that Musk has managed to get Wall Street excited about,

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 6>despite the fact that he's been talking about it as

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 6>a concept now, you know, since twenty sixteen at least.

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 6>But this is a big development in the sense that FSD,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 6>for all its shortcomings and the progress that still needs

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 6>to be made for it to be you know, you know,

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 6>more widely used and accept it is bringing in incremental revenue,

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 6>but only in certain markets in the US. This is

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 6>something that Tesla charges eight thousand dollars for or ninety

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 6>nine dollars a month subscription. If it can you know,

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 6>make arrangements to get incremental revenue out of its customers

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 6>in China, it could boost its business there at a

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 6>time it could sorely use.

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.480
<v Speaker 4>A lift Craig is best. I can tell you've been

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 4>logged on your Blue Mog terminal for like twenty seven

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 4>hours straight, coordinating our teams in China, the US, in Europe.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Just to explain the chronology of what happened, there were

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:39.480
<v Speaker 4>multiple stages to arrive at what is a tentative approval

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 4>for FSD.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean we heard rumblings that Musk was maybe

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 6>going to make this trip and you know, lo and behold,

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, Sunday, my time here in London. You know,

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 6>we wake up to this idea that, yes, Musk has landed.

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 6>This was a surprise in the sense that Tesla you know,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 6>doesn't even have a presence at this week's Beijing on show.

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 6>It's a show that got underway last week, but it

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 6>certainly was you know, a timely visit in the sense

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 6>that there are a lot of you know, government officials

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 6>in town for the show. You know, the auto industry

0:05:12.080 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 6>has absolutely been a bright spot for the Chinese economy,

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:19.160
<v Speaker 6>and you know, China's relationship with Tesla has has been

0:05:19.240 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 6>really positive. This is you know, a success story, even

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 6>with the challenges that this company has had lately with

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:28.160
<v Speaker 6>sort of continuing its momentum in.

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 3>China marketshare being eroded to none of them byd the

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 3>local competitor. Remind us of the deals that have had

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 3>to be done with Chinese players though ultimately to be

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:41.640
<v Speaker 3>able to get the granting.

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, the key one that that ED flagged is with Baidu.

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 6>And I think this is really interesting because you know,

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk has been on the record for many years

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 6>now saying that Tesla doesn't need maps, that maps are

0:05:54.680 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 6>crutch and you know, so this this is you know,

0:05:58.720 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 6>a U turn if you will, if you and forgive

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 6>a car pun uh. You know from this stance that

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 6>this is not necessary in China. However, in order for

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 6>you to offer these sorts of systems, you need to

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 6>have a partnership with a mapping and navigation company. And

0:06:15.040 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 6>it just so happens that the companies that are able

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 6>to offer those service services are all Chinese.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 7>It's very reminiscent of how China sort of.

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 6>Controlled the battery uh, you know, electric vehicle battery market

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 6>in you know, the more infant years of of the

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 6>EV industry for China, and it really was successful and

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 6>helping sort of build up, you know, world dominating companies

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 6>like c at l UH. They're looking to try and

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 6>replicate that sort of uh, you know pattern with you know,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 6>companies that play a critical role in these driver assistance

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:51.039
<v Speaker 6>systems that may one day be able to support, you know,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 6>fully taking the human driver out of the equation.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 4>And what's so interesting is by do is itself quite

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 4>competent in the domain of at least developing autonomous technology. Look,

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 4>the stock's up twelve percent or more, on track for

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:05.760
<v Speaker 4>his biggest jump since Janney twenty twenty two.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 7>Perceived good news.

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 4>There is some more nuanced view in the markets about

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.559
<v Speaker 4>what Musk's actually doing here, Craig, listen to this elon.

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:15.880
<v Speaker 8>Musk's on an opportunity to go in there and say, look,

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 8>I want to do this because you've seen the clashes

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 8>that have been going on between the US and China.

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 8>He's trying to put a foot on both sides and say, look,

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 8>I've got this technology. And he had the premium brand

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 8>in China, and then all of a sudden, the evs

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 8>in China started to get less expensive and Tesla started

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 8>to lose Sharon.

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 7>He had to drop prices.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 8>So to me, this is a way to say I'm

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:38.239
<v Speaker 8>going to change up this math for myself, but also

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 8>if I can be successful in this, then maybe I

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 8>get to be the outlier.

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 4>That was Sarah Hunt, whose chief market strategies at Alpine

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 4>Saxon Woods earlier on Bloomberg Surveillance. We've got a very

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 4>strong piece on the terminal out now talking about how

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 4>we'll hold on. A week ago, Musk was supposed to

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 4>go to India and he bailed and he's gone straight

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 4>to China. That it shows us the power dynamics and

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 4>must skill in all of this, right, Craig in navigating geopolitics.

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean there's been mutual backscratching here between Elon

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 6>Musk and the CCP for for years now. Let's not

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 6>forget that Tesla was the first you know, international car

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 6>company or foreign car company to you know, be allowed

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 6>to operate in China without having to agree to a

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 6>joint venture with a local manufacturer. There was a huge

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 6>you know wind for Musk and something that he fought

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.800
<v Speaker 6>for for years. And you know, the the construction of

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.079
<v Speaker 6>the plant for Tesla and Shanghai was you know, record time.

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.560
<v Speaker 6>It was extremely time lee in the sense that you know,

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 6>Musk was really ramping up the model three trying to

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 6>bring the model why out and they were able to

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 6>keep that plant running even during you know, the pandemic,

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 6>when you know other plants in China had a really

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 6>difficult time, you know, opening back up from the initial shutdowns.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 6>And so you know, China has very much supported Tesla

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:05.960
<v Speaker 6>when Tesla needed it most. And you know, we're seeing

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 6>US companies pull back a little bit from China, maybe

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 6>at least de risk a little. You know, Apple's a

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.440
<v Speaker 6>good example of doing so. You know, by the way,

0:09:14.559 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 6>in India, I think people were looking at at a

0:09:18.040 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 6>potential investment by Tesla in India as a similar move.

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 6>And it's clear that Musk doesn't see you know, urgency

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 6>to do that.

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Bloomber's cry too l thank you so much, terrific reporting.

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 4>There's another story very close to this one, Sticking with

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 4>autonomous driving, US auto safety regulators are investigating Ford's Blue

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 4>Cruise driver resistance feature after a pair of fatal crashes

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 4>involving the technology. The US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 4>Office of Defect Investigation opened the preliminary evaluation after it

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 4>received notice of two battery electric Mustang Maki SUVs that

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 4>collided with stationary vehicles. Will continue to track that one

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 4>stock down one point six percent car notable.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, coming up ed, Look, I've got to turn our

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 3>attention to another key stock on the move and paramount

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 3>is we understand the company weighing outstaying.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 5>Its own CEO.

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 3>At least the board is ahead of earning tonight, but

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 3>also a notable potential purchase of this business.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 5>We'll bring you more this boombow technology.

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.040
<v Speaker 7>It's time for talking tech and first up.

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:40.079
<v Speaker 4>The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal by Alon Musk

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 4>over his so called Twitter sitter, who oversees social media

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 4>posts about Tesla. The Justices, without comment, refused to hear

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.719
<v Speaker 4>contentions from the Tesla CEO on the accord that he

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 4>assigned in twenty eighteen that he says now violates his

0:10:55.760 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 4>constitutional free speech rights. We'll track that one plus. Apple's

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 4>iPad has been hit by the EU's digital dominance crackdown.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.319
<v Speaker 4>The product's been added to a list of big tech

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 4>products and services hit by the new rules. The move

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 4>means Apple has six months to make sure its tablet

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 4>ecosystem complies with a raft of preemptive measures under the

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:19.839
<v Speaker 4>EU's flagship Digital Markets Acts. And the Redstone family and

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:23.720
<v Speaker 4>independent film producer David Ellison have both offered concessions to

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 4>make a possible change in control at Paramount Global more

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 4>appealing to the company's other investors. The Skydance bid was

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 4>described by multiple parties as a best and final offer

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 4>on Sunday. Paramount's board is still undecided about entering a

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 4>deal with Ellison, given the opposition from other investors.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Cara, Well, the board has got a lot to be

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:43.719
<v Speaker 3>considering right now, we understand ed, and we want to

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 3>dig into all of it with the most Chris Peal

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 3>Mary who has been busy throughout the weekend, reporting in

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.199
<v Speaker 3>this out, editing it out. And the board, we understand,

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.920
<v Speaker 3>is also wondering whether it OSTs Bob Backish, the actual

0:11:53.960 --> 0:11:57.360
<v Speaker 3>current CEO of Paramount. Ahead of Well, we know earnings

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.840
<v Speaker 3>are already coming out after the bell today amid this

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 3>sales process.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.959
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, the situation was described to me yesterday is being

0:12:06.080 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 9>very fluid, which I think is an understatement. We're recently

0:12:11.280 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 9>certain the company will announced earnings this afternoon, but beyond that, yes,

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 9>they're expected to say goodbye to their CEO, Bob Beckish,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 9>replacing him on an interim basis with a management committee.

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 9>They're still negotiating to deal with Skydance. It would be

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 9>a change of control of a company and that was

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 9>the best and final offer yesterday, with David Ellison, the

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.839
<v Speaker 9>owner of Guidance, helping his sort of contribution in terms

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 9>of buying Paramount stock at a premium to what it's

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 9>trading out today, sort of apes of shareholders. Redstones also

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 9>are apparently making concessions that would allow the non voting

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 9>shareholders to weigh in on a deal, which is something

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 9>that you know they don't have to do, but is

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 9>sort of best practice in securities law these days.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 7>A whole lot going on.

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 4>You've outlined the sort of mechanics of the deal. I

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 4>think just like reminder audience the rationale on the why

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 4>why are we still spooking about Paramount and somebody buying

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:12.439
<v Speaker 4>it or changing it?

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 7>What's going on?

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 9>Well, the traditional TV business is in trouble. People are

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 9>leaving for streaming services. Advertising has been in decline, although

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 9>they'll see a pickup at Paramount this quarter because of

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 9>the super Bowl, and the streaming business, which is the future,

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 9>is still losing money. The Paramount still although the losses

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 9>are coming down a bit are still going to be

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 9>in the one hundreds of millions of dollars.

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 7>And it's a question whether they'll ever stop.

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 9>And so when your two main businesses like that, the

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 9>movie business has been unprofitable last year, it's a challenge

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.719
<v Speaker 9>to get people back to theaters. So pretty much every

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 9>leg of their business is in some sort of peril

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 9>and that's why this sock is down and why they're

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 9>considering options.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 4>All right, Bluebots, Chris Pam Mary terrific, really appreciate having

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 4>you out down from La.

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So fine out with earnings that well look strong today,

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 3>but the forecast is what people are worrying about. The

0:14:20.120 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 3>shares falling after the fintech company provided second quarter nuance

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 3>here with adjusted net revenue and adjusted ebit DA that

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 3>perhaps fell short of some consensussessments out there. Want to

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.520
<v Speaker 3>dig into that nuance with SOFI CEO Anthony Noto.

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for joining us, Anthony, And.

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Look, we've got to focus on the fact that your

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 3>full year guidance was raised.

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 5>You're feeling positive.

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 3>About the way in which are steering the company. You

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 3>say you're in an inflection point, But why the second

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 3>quarter being below expectations?

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 5>What can you add to what you're seeing here right here,

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 5>right now.

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 10>We had a great first quarter, as we reported twenty

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 10>six percent year of year at growth, and it's in

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 10>line with the transformation that we talked about, which is

0:14:57.240 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 10>our combined tech platform business and our financial service business

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 10>would grow fifty percent or more. It grew fifty four

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 10>percent year of year, and that combined with flat revenue

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 10>for lending, and that was part of the plan, and

0:15:08.720 --> 0:15:13.680
<v Speaker 10>we had our second consecutive quarter of gap positive EPs.

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 10>In addition to growing our book value on a tangible

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 10>basis per share by about sixteen percent sequentially, we also

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 10>guided the full year, as you mentioned above, not just

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 10>our beat, but also above our prior guidance, so that's

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 10>a positive overall outlook.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>We had not given Q two guidance before.

0:15:31.840 --> 0:15:34.200
<v Speaker 10>We typically give the full year and then the current

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 10>quarter that we're in, so at the end of twenty

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.200
<v Speaker 10>four we gave guidance for the full year and Q one,

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 10>not Q two. The analysts are using their own estimates

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 10>for that, and because we're taking a conservative view on lending,

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 10>lending will be down sequentially in Q two, while our

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 10>tech platform revenue and our financial services revenue will continue

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 10>to have strong year year growth, but also strong sequential

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 10>growth and continue profitability as well. So we feel really

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 10>great about the business transformation we've made over the last

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 10>six years. The fact that we can grow revenue twenty

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 10>six percent on flat lending revenue is a real testament

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 10>to the diversity of our business.

0:16:10.280 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 5>Hey, Darison, you can't feel great about the share reaction.

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 10>You know, any given day, it's hard to predict what's

0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 10>going to happen with the shriff. But what I can

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 10>say is the business is doing incredibly well. The strategy

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 10>is working. We're really happy about the trend we do.

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 10>We are taking a conservative you on lending, but that's

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 10>given how uncertain the environment is. If the environment becomes

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 10>more stable, we'll be more aggressive on lending, but right

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 10>now there's no need to and the environment remains as

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.560
<v Speaker 10>uncertain as it has for the last six months.

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 4>On rates, mister Noto, good morning, it's ed in San Francisco.

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 4>A lot of the questions I got from our audience

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 4>for you were about the capital you raise and your

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 4>strategy going forward. There was convertible in one queue, a

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 4>lot of interest in that. I actually am not clear why,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 4>but the people want to know, So that's the question.

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think people misunder stand the share count. First,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 10>we did two things in Q one. First, we issued

0:17:04.520 --> 0:17:07.840
<v Speaker 10>a convertible note at one point two five percent interest

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 10>that allowed us to redeem a preferred security that we're

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 10>paying twelve and a half percent interest on. So that

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 10>is going to provide an interest savings for us, and

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 10>we've already noticed all of the holders of that preferred

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:24.199
<v Speaker 10>instrument and so that's being redeemed sooner than expected. We

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 10>also bought back an existing convert that was trading well

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.919
<v Speaker 10>below its face value, and that was a creative to

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 10>book value and it was basically neutral on tangible book

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 10>value per share. So there's some perception that it was diluted.

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 10>It's not dilutied on a tangible book value per share.

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 10>And I think there's just a misunderstanding on what the

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 10>total ending share count will be in the future.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 4>My colleague, a Bloomberg intelligence Herman Chan has a very

0:17:49.600 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 4>clear thesis for you guys. You have a brilliant app,

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 4>strong user interface, one stop shop, and you're targeting young professionals.

0:17:57.560 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 7>That's what they think.

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 4>But the story really is this higher interest rates for

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 4>longer environment narrative. How does that thesis work in that

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 4>rate environment?

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 10>Anthony, Yeah, well, first of all, your colleagues said it

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 10>very well, and so we should consider having them being

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 10>one of our spokespeople. But I'd say is higher for

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 10>longer is going to create challenges for financial institutions.

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:20.719
<v Speaker 1>We are very well capitalized.

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 10>We have a seventeen point one percent risk based capital ratio,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 10>so we have ample cushion or capital ratio relative to

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 10>where we have to operate from a regulatory standpoint, and

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 10>we have plenty of liquidity. That said, as we saw

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 10>today another regional bank was very challenged. We're also benefiting

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 10>from really strong deposit growth. We had our record growth

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 10>and deposits three billion dollars of new deposits, and ninety

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 10>percent of our deposits are from direct deposit customers, which

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 10>means we're their primary account and it's very very sticky.

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 10>But higher for longer we'll put stress on other people's

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 10>balance sheets if they're not hedging appropriately the way we do.

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 10>We hedge our loans once we grant them, we're we

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 10>don't have that interest rate exposure. We can also match

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 10>what we're giving in as an apy to our SOFI

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 10>money members against the loans that we're offering in the

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 10>rates that they have to maintain a very high NIM

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.959
<v Speaker 10>and we've been able to do that consistently. In addition

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.239
<v Speaker 10>to that, with also the tech platform business, which is

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 10>not tied to interest rates. And then in the financial

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 10>services business, we have the invest platform that's growing very nicely,

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 10>good AUM growth, good member growth, and another source of

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 10>verisfied revenue for.

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 5>US where technology show.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.000
<v Speaker 3>We want to go into the specifics of your technology, Anthony,

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 3>but I want to bring our audience that matcro flavor

0:19:34.560 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 3>that you so brilliantly give, because why are you more

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 3>cautious on the US economy? Why are you seeing five

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 3>percent excess of unemployment? Why are you seeing these interest

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 3>rate cuts that you've now basically halved in your expectations

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 3>for twenty twenty four.

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, our balance sheet has grown quite meaningfully. It's about

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 10>a thirty billion dollar bounce sheet now. So as we

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 10>came into twenty twenty four, we had a choice. Could

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 10>we come up with our own expectations for twenty twenty

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 10>could we use consensus expectation. Let's just take up planning

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 10>stance that's really conservative, and the planning stance that we

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 10>took then was that there would only be four rate cuts.

0:20:10.359 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 10>The market was factoring in six rate cuts at the time.

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 10>We also took up planning stance on unemployment that would

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 10>be more than five percent, the market was well below that,

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 10>and we also took a stance on GDP contraction.

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>That was modest.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 10>Well, here we sit today three months later, and the

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.560
<v Speaker 10>market's only factoring in one to two rate cuts. So

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 10>I'm really thankful we took a conservative stance going into

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 10>the air, and I'm really thankful we still have a

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 10>conservative stance. I couldn't feel better about the underlying trends

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 10>of our strategy and execution of our business. But I

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.879
<v Speaker 10>don't think we're an environment where anyone has a really strong,

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 10>high conviction level on where rates will be. There's still

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 10>a debate whether it be any rate cuts whatsoever. So

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 10>we just can't put the business at risk hoping that

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 10>we can figure it out.

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to a conservative point of view.

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 4>With short time, Anthony, you're moving away from this kind

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 4>of trademark student loans and refi business.

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 10>Why, Well, the strategy when I came in twenty eighteen

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 10>was to create a one stop shop for all your

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 10>financial services needs. There was no one providing all the

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 10>products that you need for the big moments in your

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 10>life and all the days in between. So we offer

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:20.359
<v Speaker 10>home loans, student loans, personal loans, in school loans, checking

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 10>and savings called SOFI Money Investing, Insurance, small meat, and

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 10>business loan lead generation in addition to the tech platform business.

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 10>So the strategy was always about building a one stop

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 10>shop for all your financial services needs, and that's actually

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 10>resulted in diversified business that allows us to make choices

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 10>on what we grow versus what we take.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>A conservative view.

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 4>On SOFI CEO Anthony Notto, Great catch up, greats heavy

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:57.120
<v Speaker 4>back on the program. Thank you, Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology.

0:21:57.160 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 4>I love Low in San Francisco.

0:21:58.440 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 5>I'm Caroline hid in New York.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 3>A bit of breaking news that was just occurring regarding

0:22:02.680 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 3>we work.

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 5>We understand it has managed to kind.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:08.760
<v Speaker 3>Of bankruptcy exit deal that actually leaves.

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 5>Out the founder, Adam Newman. Now we understand we work.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Of course, they've gotten all important meeting today in Pril

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty ninth.

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 5>They're cutting an exit deal leaves out Adam Newman.

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 3>Newman himself is objecting saying the deal wrongly hands Hides

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>a sale plan and Newman has offered to buy we Work,

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.119
<v Speaker 3>but it was rejected in favor of a creditor deal.

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Now, remember there's plenty.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 3>Of analysis that has gone into the bankruptcy of we

0:22:33.240 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Work more broadly, and indeed the fact.

0:22:35.320 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 5>That they've basically got a four billion dollar in secure.

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Debt that is a key issue limiting issue here more broadly.

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 3>But it looks as though a deal has been cut,

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 3>but Adam Newman is not involved.

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 5>Let's just get a broader market check for you at

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 5>the moment, because.

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, markets have been tentatively higher and aw's that one

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 3>hundred is still clinging on to gain some twenty seven

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 3>points all important.

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 5>Week the fared we got job Stata.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 3>At the end of the week, the dollar is still

0:22:57.920 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 3>lower US as Japanese and that was a big market move.

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.200
<v Speaker 5>From a macro perspective, is maybe we see some boj

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 5>intervention that has.

0:23:04.440 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 3>So far remained silent from Japan, and it is indeed

0:23:07.960 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 3>some muted amid holiday trading session.

0:23:10.280 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 5>But I'm looking at bitcoin.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Just off by a percentage point as a US dollar

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 3>remains higher versus bitcoin.

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 5>That's how to look at.

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 3>What's happening on individual names. I want to shine like

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 3>what happened in Europe because we've just finished up trading

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.119
<v Speaker 3>in Europe and at US up eighteen percent. And this

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 3>is another kind of beleagued company, but this one is

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 3>a French government potentially stepping in with a bid for

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 3>the IT company's most strategically important businesses. That's after it's

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 3>been forced to raise the amount of cash it needs

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 3>to avoid insolvency itself. It's up more than eighteen percent. Sees,

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I shine a light on what's happening with this particular

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 3>well overall company, the two firms we could see when

0:23:42.119 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 3>it comes to all important views on the coming together

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.160
<v Speaker 3>of SES and intelsat this is we once again think

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 3>about a mergering these satellite businesses. The deal failed in

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.160
<v Speaker 3>previous attempts to combine, but now we see that potentially

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 3>they could be seeing an SES and INTEL revival of

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 3>discussions with Dan some ten percent in that publicly traded

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.880
<v Speaker 3>part of the business. Remember Intersect is private micro Strategy

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 3>up more than a percentage point. Well, he's doing all right,

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 3>Old Michael Saylor on the fact that he's been selling

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:11.879
<v Speaker 3>some shares in the business after it's done particularly well

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 3>amid being sort of a proxy for bitcoin two hundred

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 3>and ninety six. The earnings come after the bell. But

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 3>we want to talk more about crypto, and we want

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 3>to talk more about what's happening in Hong Kong. But

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 3>it's set to list a batch of cryptocurrency ETFs, and

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 3>some China's top asset managers are in final lego preparations

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 3>for Spot bitcoin and EETF to begin trading tomorrow. Loomberg's

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 3>Katie Greifeld joins US for more. You're probably pretty bored

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:38.080
<v Speaker 3>about Spot ETF and what's interesting with Hong Kong is

0:24:38.240 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 3>it looks as though we're also seeing Australia analyze the options.

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.640
<v Speaker 5>This is a theme since the US gone on board.

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 11>It's definitely a theme, this sort of expanding access to

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 11>spark bitcoin ETFs. And it's interesting you take a look

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 11>at Hong Kong sort of following the US blueprint in

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 11>that we have a few war breaking out even before

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 11>the funds have actually launched. Their due to launch on

0:24:57.280 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 11>April thirtieth tomorrow, but we're talking about trio of issuers here.

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.879
<v Speaker 11>We have China AMC, then we have Harvest and Bossera.

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 11>So you had China AMC and Harvest announced their fees,

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:09.480
<v Speaker 11>and just in the past few days Bossara actually came

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:12.119
<v Speaker 11>out and waved their fee. They were going their eventual

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 11>fee is going to be sixty basis points. They're waiving

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 11>that for the first four months or so.

0:25:17.080 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 5>You compare that to Harvest.

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 11>They're also going ahead with a fee waiver, which is

0:25:20.640 --> 0:25:23.680
<v Speaker 11>also very popular in the US. After six months, they're

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 11>going to charge point three percent. So that's your low

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 11>water mark there. And then China AMC it's on the

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.119
<v Speaker 11>high side. It's charging ninety nine basis points, so a

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.959
<v Speaker 11>bit expensive compared to its trio.

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 7>It sort of peers there, but.

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 11>We'll have to see what we saw in the US

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 11>market was even though you had those fees cut into

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 11>the launch. After the launch too, you had a lot

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 11>of reductions as well.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 4>On this program with Metenology, we love covering cities around

0:25:49.680 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 4>the world. Hong Kong is clearly considering this important. But

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 4>in actuality, it's a small market. You know, give us

0:25:58.119 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 4>the numbers.

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 11>It is a that is a important perspective to get

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:03.960
<v Speaker 11>in there. When you take a look at Hong Kong's

0:26:04.000 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 11>total ETF market, the total AUM is about forty seven

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:11.440
<v Speaker 11>billion dollars. Just for some context, you take a look

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 11>at the suite of US spot bitcoin ETFs, they're already

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 11>above that.

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 5>When you put together those.

0:26:16.520 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 11>Dozen are so fun So on the world scale, we're

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 11>talking about a very small market here. When you think

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 11>about the impact to bitcoin, of course, probably not too

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:28.400
<v Speaker 11>meaningful from an influence perspective, but when it comes to sentiment,

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 11>which is what powers bitcoin, it could be meaningful the most.

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 4>Katie Grofel, we love having you on the show with

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 4>your knowledge of spot bitcoin ETF around the world.

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 7>Thank you very much.

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Let's go from crypto back to entertainment with paramounts board

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 4>considering removing CEO Bob Backish, I want to get the

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 4>take in the analysis of Bloomberg Intelligences Geeta Ang and

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 4>Athan and I'm looking at stock right we're up almost

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 4>five percent. I don't know if that's because of the

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.960
<v Speaker 4>news or reports that Backish might be going or that

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 4>the deal as it is is moving along. What do

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 4>you think the catalyst is, Gita.

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 2>I think ed the catalyst for the movement this morning

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 2>is really just based on the sweetening of the Ellison deals.

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.679
<v Speaker 2>So two things happening here. One is that David Ellison,

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>who owns sky Dance Media, is now proposing to buy

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.200
<v Speaker 2>a block of shares at a premium. Is kind of

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 2>making it more palatable for investors. And I think finally

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 2>Sharry Redstone, Sharry Redstone is the one who kind of

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 2>calls all the shots at paramount. She's finally open for

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 2>what is this majority of minority votes, So she is

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 2>letting the non voting shareholders have a say in whether

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 2>this transaction should go through. And that is really critical

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 2>because there has been so much backlash against the sky

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Dance deal because most of these shareholders, the non voting shareholders,

0:27:50.520 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>have basically said that it's going to dilute them and

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.719
<v Speaker 2>it really only benefits, you know, the sky Dance And

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 2>of course Cherry Redstone, one.

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 3>Of those key investors from a non vote perspective, have

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 3>been Arial Investments and John Rodgers and Melodie Hobson had

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 3>been putting out letters saying, look, we are worried about

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 3>the way in which this is being executed, the premium

0:28:11.080 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 3>and then the merge of what's happening with skydowns, but

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 3>also they were troubled by the looming departures of four

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 3>paramount board members. Is all of this looking a little

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.720
<v Speaker 3>bit murky from a governance perspective if you're also seeing

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 3>a board and potentially getting rid of the CEO and

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 3>putting executives in charge while this transition sort of occurs.

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean it's highly, highly unusual, Caroline. We've never

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 2>seen something quite like this before in the media landscape.

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 2>So you have those four, you know, board members who

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 2>kind of suddenly left, and then now you have Bob Bakish,

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.600
<v Speaker 2>who has been the CEO of this company for quite

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 2>a while, I mean ever since Viacom and CBS were emerged.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 2>He's kind of taken a charge and he's kind of,

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, done a fairly good job, although some people

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 2>would would say that, you know, getting into the streaming

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>business was not good idea to begin with. And you

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 2>know that's because, yes, they have seventy million subscribers, they've

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>had some successes, but they've also lost a ton of money.

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 2>They've lost about five billion dollars and a lot of

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 2>people seem to think that, you know, that's because of

0:29:12.960 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of this misstep or was a misstep by Bob

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 2>backersh So, yes, there's a lot of confusion right now. Basically,

0:29:20.080 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 2>definitely getting rid of Bob Backers definitely challenges the status quo.

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 2>But I think what Cherry Redstone is hoping to achieve

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 2>is then get you know, Bob Backers has been very

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>vocal against the deal with sky Dance, so I think

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 2>she's really kind of trying to hasten the process towards

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:35.160
<v Speaker 2>a deal with sky Dance.

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 12>Here.

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 3>Wow, it looks as though it is evolving very quickly

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 3>on the day, and I'm sure we'll be looking for

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 3>your expertise again doing by intelligence analyst Katha Rang and

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Ath and me, thank you so much and all things paramount.

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 5>Mean while coming up, and we're going to take a

0:29:46.600 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 5>look at a new kind.

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 3>Of college call the eye a Founder's Fund. We're on

0:29:51.040 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 3>that and now a venture spotlight. This is really my technology.

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 7>Campus.

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Dot edu is an online alternative to traditional community colleges

0:30:14.640 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 4>that's trying to tackle all kinds of problems, one of

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.080
<v Speaker 4>them being student loan debt in the United States, and

0:30:20.120 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 4>it caught the attention of Founder's Fund, which just led

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 4>a new twenty three million dollar extension round in the platform.

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 7>Disclaimer.

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Beta, the venture capital arm of Bloomberg LP is

0:30:30.320 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 4>also an investor in campus dot Edu. Here to discuss

0:30:33.800 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 4>is founder's fund partner Tray Stevens, who led the round,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 4>and campus dot edu founder and chancellor. Today or Youurinda today,

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to start with you. I actually have been

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 4>through the mechanics of how this works. You know, you

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 4>sign up, you may be eligible for federal funding grants,

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 4>but you basically pay seven to seven a half thousand

0:30:51.840 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 4>dollars for the course, and you're also bringing an employment

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 4>opportunity for very talented professors, which raises the question, why

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 4>do you need twenty three million more dollars?

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, thanks for having me. Look, I think if you

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.720
<v Speaker 12>look at the faculty at these elite universities Princeton, UCLA,

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:11.080
<v Speaker 12>and Stanford, a lot of them are looking for gigwork.

0:31:11.320 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 12>That's what we do at Campus is we allow them

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 12>to teach. We bring access to people who had never

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:19.840
<v Speaker 12>had access to this quality of education before. And then, yes,

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 12>as you pointed out, the federal government does actually pay

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 12>for a lot of the tuition with the grants.

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 4>One of the learnings from researching and reading into this

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 4>is that some of our brightest academics and teachers are

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 4>pretty poorly paid in this country. Trey, I know you,

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.240
<v Speaker 4>I know where you invest thematically specific founders that you back.

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 4>This one's really interesting why you focused on education, but

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 4>this is a very specific case study in education.

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, well, I wouldn't say that we are focused on education.

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 7>We don't do a whole lot at all and tech.

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:51.720
<v Speaker 1>That's what I founders figned.

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, Peter is kind of known as having this anti

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 13>higher education perspective in which led to the tor Fellowship,

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 13>which is the fellowship that he offers to students to

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 13>drop out of college and pursue something entrepreneurial. And so

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 13>I think what this really kind of hit that I

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 13>haven't seen a lot in ED tech is.

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 7>This idea that we don't need to have.

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 13>A bunch of students going into massive debt. The average

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 13>student in the United States that's going into higher ED

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 13>has debt over twenty thousand. I had debt over one

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 13>hundred thousand dollars coming out of college, and there's just

0:32:24.360 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 13>no reason for this. And so I think what today

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 13>and the team at campus is doing is really exciting

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 13>because it's a way of bridging that out to make

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 13>it possible for kids that want to go to school

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 13>after they finish high school and do that at much

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 13>lower costs and in exit their college experience without any

0:32:41.720 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 13>debt Tadai.

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Therefore, we go back to the why the need of funds.

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 3>You've got clear demand coming from students, You've got clear

0:32:48.840 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 3>supply coming.

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 5>From the professors.

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Perhaps a bit of a bottleneck when it comes to

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 3>the coaches that you want to there be to be

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:56.640
<v Speaker 3>mentoring and stimulating and advising.

0:32:57.000 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 5>But where will the funds be put to work? Is

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 5>this about mark share capture right now?

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah? Look, Caroline, the opportunity is just so big. If

0:33:04.920 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 12>you look at student loans in this country, it's perhaps

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.800
<v Speaker 12>past two trillion dollars. So to actually solve this and

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:14.840
<v Speaker 12>create a world class quality education and scale that up

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 12>to lots of people, it's going to require lots of investment.

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 12>And we give students a lot of wrap around support

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 12>that most community colleges just can't afford to offer. So

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 12>every student forgets a laptop. You know, about a third

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:26.959
<v Speaker 12>of our students we do an internet speed test. If

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 12>your internet's too slow, will actually get you internet at home?

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 12>We pare them with success coaches who play the role

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:34.760
<v Speaker 12>like my mother played for me. When I was in college,

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:36.600
<v Speaker 12>like making sure I'm showing up for class on time

0:33:36.640 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 12>and getting my assignments in and that's a key part

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 12>of like what a lot of young people are going

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 12>to need to be successful today. So I'm very grateful

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.160
<v Speaker 12>for Trey and you know, the team at Founders Fund,

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 12>because this is a big mission, but it's going to

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:47.360
<v Speaker 12>require funding.

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Tree, why did you take the call or the

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 3>email or the introduction in whatever way if you had

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:56.280
<v Speaker 3>not that focused on education, as you've clearly articulated, Why

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:59.960
<v Speaker 3>this one when there are some other online competitors out there?

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 13>The important thing for us, as it is with all companies,

0:34:04.680 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 13>is that we are founder base first and foremost, so

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 13>less than investing in categories or you know, specific types

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 13>of companies, We're really interested in investing in the top

0:34:14.400 --> 0:34:16.839
<v Speaker 13>founders that are doing the most interesting things, the most

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 13>novel concepts. And so when I originally met today, you know,

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.560
<v Speaker 13>not generally being interested in ed tech, I was blown

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 13>away by his vision for what the company was going

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 13>to be doing, and ultimately just decided to bring other

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 13>people from the Fund in front of him, saying like

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 13>this guy is different than the other founders that we've

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 13>seen in the ed tech space. We should really be

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.560
<v Speaker 13>open to learning from him and getting excited about the

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 13>thing that he has so much passion for.

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so today you dropped a reference to the sort

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.760
<v Speaker 4>of gig economy earlier in the conversation. So I'm thinking

0:34:45.880 --> 0:34:48.880
<v Speaker 4>uber or you know there are other gig economy platforms

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 4>out there to do food delivery, et cetera. How's that

0:34:51.440 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 4>business going to play out in practice? You know, Trey

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.760
<v Speaker 4>investing founders, he backs those founders. He's also an investor

0:34:58.120 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 4>who needs to see a return in the future.

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.360
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So look the way it works with campus. If

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 12>you're a professor at Princeton UCLA Moorhouse, you have your

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.279
<v Speaker 12>your on campus job, has an office. You love it.

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.400
<v Speaker 12>You get to meet with students. But oftentimes you're an

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 12>adjunct professor. I used to think adjuncts meant like Michelle

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 12>Obama teaches that Georgetown for fun to give.

0:35:17.360 --> 0:35:18.680
<v Speaker 7>Back saying a guest or whatever.

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>That's that's really rare.

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 12>The most adjuncts are actually recent grad school graduates to

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 12>earning forty to forty five grand a year. That's what

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 12>we do is you can actually teach in addition to

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 12>your on campus job on campus campus dot edu and

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 12>we pay about double the national average wage, so it's

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 12>about eight thousand dollars per class. So just simplicity of math.

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 12>You know, four academic quarters a year. If you teach

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 12>three classes a quarter with us, you're making an additional

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 12>ninety six thousand dollars an annual income. And you're doing

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 12>it doing what you're great at and what you love doing,

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.360
<v Speaker 12>teaching these students who are super ambitious, like super talented.

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 3>I want to focus on another found you back when

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:56.359
<v Speaker 3>it comes to neurallink eil mask today he we led

0:35:56.360 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 3>the show with the fact that in his other company, Tesla,

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 3>he's deepening thaie with China. He's bringing his driver assistance

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 3>program over there to of course one of the key

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.320
<v Speaker 3>markets for him. How do you sit at the moment

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 3>with founders, with just us more broadly seeing still some

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 3>relationship with China at the time that also you're seeing

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 3>some distancing.

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:19.040
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, I mean, there's definitely always a good reason to

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 13>have nuance. There's a lot of different stakes are that

0:36:25.360 --> 0:36:28.640
<v Speaker 13>need to be taken into consideration when you look at

0:36:29.160 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 13>interacting with the Chinese market versus interacting with the Chinese

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 13>government versus interacting with government control over things that are

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 13>impacting US consumers, And so I think obviously diplomacy is

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 13>critical in all these scenarios. Elon is doing what Elon

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:47.720
<v Speaker 13>needs to do for the companies that he has operating

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:48.399
<v Speaker 13>in country there.

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 3>What about, well, TikTok being the other key piece of

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 3>news when it comes to how that affects the consumer,

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.280
<v Speaker 3>a relationship of using what is a Chinese held business

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 3>here in the United States, a ban or diverst What did.

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:01.319
<v Speaker 5>You make of that? How worried are you.

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 3>About the use of TikTok for at least another nine months?

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm very concerned.

0:37:07.120 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 13>I've been very public and expressing my concerns around the

0:37:10.000 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 13>use of TikTok domestically. You know, during the Cold War,

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:16.360
<v Speaker 13>we never would have allowed for a Russian company to

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 13>buy The New York Times. I think having some sense

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:24.399
<v Speaker 13>for adversary control of key pathways for information into our

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 13>into our populace is super critical. And TikTok has demonstrated

0:37:28.800 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 13>time and time again that they are not willing to

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 13>be transparent. They're not willing to share with us the

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 13>important information that we would need to know to have

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 13>a level of confidence and their ability to support those

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.280
<v Speaker 13>technologies being deployed in the United States.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.879
<v Speaker 3>We've got to think about the AI cut well, all

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 3>encompassing narrative here ed a little bit when we were

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.520
<v Speaker 3>talking about Elon and Tesla, you referenced by do of

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 3>course big stakes and AI there we've also got TikTok

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 3>owned by byte Dance.

0:37:55.640 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 5>That China's got its own interest in all of this

0:37:57.719 --> 0:37:58.320
<v Speaker 5>at the moment.

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:01.279
<v Speaker 4>Ed for me, that's the story, right, that all the

0:38:01.320 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 4>stories we talk about, be it Tesla in China, TikTok,

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 4>China is working on these technologies itself, you know, particularly

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 4>in the context of generative AI or building large language models.

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 4>We spent twelve months saying, well, China is also doing this.

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 4>The question of someone like you and your industry is

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 4>how do you get the balance right between being collaborative

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.000
<v Speaker 4>and also putting us interest first. That's basically what I

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 4>think it comes down to for you.

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that's right.

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 13>You know that the CCP is very different than the

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.680
<v Speaker 13>Chinese people or the Chinese market. These things are not

0:38:33.840 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 13>always intrinsically connected. I think that the thing that we're

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 13>constantly trying to balance not only inside of our portfolio,

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 13>but also with what we're doing at ANDROL, which is

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 13>a portfolio company of founders fund that I started back

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:49.160
<v Speaker 13>in twenty seventeen, you know, is to really figure out

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 13>where we need to not only develop but also sustained

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 13>strategic advantage so that we are able to set the

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 13>rules of engagement for how those technologies are like actually

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 13>in the field and the moment we no longer have

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:05.320
<v Speaker 13>control of the technology, that's when we lose control of

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 13>the ability to regulate and you know, keep those technologies

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 13>inside the bounds of law.

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad you took us to andre and Defense Tech.

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:15.840
<v Speaker 4>There have been several columnentches written about you and your

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 4>place and leadership in investing in defense technology. What I

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 4>want to ask you is, if you're seeing science that

0:39:22.280 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 4>the US government, the top level of government is now

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:27.560
<v Speaker 4>sort of hand in hand with silicon value, that you

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:29.879
<v Speaker 4>guys do it really well, So go and do it.

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 7>I guess the.

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Working with the government's really hard. I don't know how

0:39:36.080 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>else to say that. You know, before I.

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:41.400
<v Speaker 13>Joined found respond ten years ago, I was, you know,

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:44.560
<v Speaker 13>doing sales at Palenteer, where I spent the prior six

0:39:44.640 --> 0:39:47.160
<v Speaker 13>years of my career. And you know, no matter what

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.160
<v Speaker 13>we tried, it was like every single iteration of our

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 13>sales strategy was just you know, not working, going too slow,

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 13>running into roadblocks. Eventually we figured out a model that worked.

0:39:58.800 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 13>The same could be said for Space. It took them

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:02.759
<v Speaker 13>years and years and years to figure out how to

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 13>do this. And the reality is like going into this

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 13>industry blind, like you know, two nineteen year olds working

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 13>in a garage. Very different than starting a software as

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 13>a service company.

0:40:13.200 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 4>As doctor Carr put it to me, a few weeks

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.879
<v Speaker 4>to go, end the PowerPoint No more Powerpoints founder fun

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Trey Stevens. Great to have you back on the show, Caroc.

0:40:21.120 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 5>It really was a great discussion.

0:40:22.680 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 3>And that does it for this well wind edition of

0:40:24.920 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Technology.

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:28.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there is so much in the newsflow. It's a

0:40:29.040 --> 0:40:31.560
<v Speaker 4>huge earnings week. Great guests on the show, recap on

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 4>the podcast, Apple, Spotify, iHeart, and the Bloomberg platforms from

0:40:35.280 --> 0:40:36.479
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco and New York.

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:37.840
<v Speaker 7>This is Bloomberg Technology.