WEBVTT - How Congress Could Bring ICE to a Store Near You

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media, Welcome back to it could happen here and

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>our Retail Thunderdome. I'm Kevin Foster, and today we're continuing

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 1>our dive into organized retail crime. In the last episode,

0:00:17.320 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I went over the multi year propaganda campaign waged by

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the retail lobby to make organized retail crime into a

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>national crisis, requiring stricter policing and penalties and investment from

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>all levels of government. I recommend listening to that episode

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>before this one. But in short, huge swaths of politicians

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>bought right in spending hundreds of millions at the behest

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of retail giants despite a serious lack of evidence. I

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>also touched on the advancements in surveillance at retail stores.

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Whether we see a rollout of AI powered robots in

0:00:49.440 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the coming years may not matter so much as many

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>industry leaders are already implementing facial recognition technology and creating

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.200
<v Speaker 1>watch lists under the guise of loss prevention, and this

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>surveillance dragnet is a key element in the rising concern

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:08.119
<v Speaker 1>around the Combating Organized Retail Crime Act or CORKA, which

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>passed the House of Representatives in May with resounding bipartisan

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>support in all likelihood CORCO will be signed into law

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>in today's episode is about why that is very bad

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and how it's going to impact the American public, notably immigrants.

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's get right into it. The Combating Organized Retail Crime

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Act has remained in circulation for years, but to get

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it over the finish line, the retail lobby and supporters

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>of the legislation ultimately found a new boogeyman, cargo theft.

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 1>And this is how they've managed to turn a manufactured

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>retail theft story into a national security problem that demands

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>intervention by the Department of Homeland Security. In a nutshell,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the cargo theft narrative has striking similarities to organized retail crime.

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 1>The American Transportation Research Institute says there's between one point

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>eight billion and six point five billion dollars in yearly

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>losses because of cargo theft, but this includes indirect costs,

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 1>a measure of costs across the entire supply chain in

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of the actual value of goods. Cargo net, a

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>nationally coordinated database, placed total cargo theft losses at seven

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.119
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five million across the US and Canada

0:02:20.240 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty five. Despite total physical losses being under

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars, there have been more attempts to dramatically

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>inflate the numbers. Phil Brink, the quote head of fraud

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Media and Education unquote at freight Waves, a trucking logistics

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and news company, estimated the total losses could actually be

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>closer to sixty billion dollars because of under reporting of theft.

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>No clear evidence is provided to back up this assertion

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>other than unnamed experts. If this sounds familiar, it's almost

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the exact same story as the National Retail Federation's fraudulent

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>organized retail crime numbers, where they inflated their stats by

0:02:58.960 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>an order of magnet tude, mostly based on vibes. And

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>while cargo theft did spike in twenty twenty three, a

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>funny little side note is that AI integration into logistics

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>might be a big part of the problem. Reporting in

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the news outlet the Lever indicates that instead of modern

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>day highway robberies, cargo theft is beginning to look more

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>like people simply impersonating trucking companies than fooling faulty new

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>AI logistics systems, and once they're cleared by the AI,

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>they can essentially just pick up the cargo and roll off.

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>So between retail crime and cargo theft, we're essentially operating

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>under two manufactured crises. And yet here's the language. Any

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Combating Organized Retail Crime Act quote. Organized theft groups impact

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the national security of the United States through financing trans

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>national criminal activity and providing profit and proceeds supporting larger

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>criminal goals of the criminal organizations unquote. In other words,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 1>retail crime is now a national security threat and it

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>demands the influence of Homeland Security and ICE. Specifically, CORCA

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>calls for the establishment of a coordination center to combat

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>organize retail and supply chain crime. The DHS Secretary will

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.520
<v Speaker 1>establish the center and it will be run by an

0:04:12.520 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>individual chosen by the Director of ICE. Fantastic in essence,

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>this coordination center will be the hub for federal law

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>enforcement activity and connections between the national and local level

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and the public and private sector. Obviously, ICE deepening its

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>involvement in our day to day lives is something to

0:04:31.000 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about. But here's where it gets really crazy.

0:04:34.640 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The bill states, quote in general, subject to the approval

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>of the director of the Center, information that would otherwise

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>be subject to the limitation on the disclosure of confidential

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>information set forth in Section nineteen oh five of Title

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>eighteen United States Code, may be shared if such disclosure

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>is operationally necessary unquote, putting the legallyese aside. What this

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>means in practice is that ICE can access confidential and

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>proprietary data from retailers, and because operationally necessary is an

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>extremely broad, undefined term, ICE is essentially given full discretion

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>over what data they can collect. If anyone questions them,

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll likely just say, we need to play it safe

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>because organized retail crime is a matter of national security

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that could finance drug and weapons trafficking, harming Americans. So

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>that retail surveillance dragnet I mentioned in Part one, the

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>AI facial recognition, the robots, the customer profiles they say

0:05:32.600 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>can be leveraged to boost customer loyalty, ICE could potentially

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>leverage that data in its immigration crackdown. Imagine a world

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>where ICE knows who is going to witch stores and when.

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>No need for scanning license plates on the streets anymore.

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Now they can just look up your customer profile and

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>head over to Walmart when you're doing your biweekly grocery run.

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Given what we've seen in the past year and a half.

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>ICE will likely try to leverage this heavily. They already

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 1>have facial recognition technology like the mobile Fortify app, which,

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>according to Vanderbilt University's School of Law, is connected to

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:11.160
<v Speaker 1>a database of over two hundred million images. The ACLU

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of Wisconsin states that you may already be in this database,

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>as it's connected to other databases containing federal biometric systems,

0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:22.719
<v Speaker 1>passport and visa records, and state driver's license photos. A

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>depressing little side note, some of this may have been preventable.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>For example, in Oregon, the state police are being sued

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>for sharing data with ICE, even though they and our

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>governor were warned by congress members to close certain loopholes

0:06:36.560 --> 0:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that gave ICE access to DMB records. Now, obviously, grocery

0:06:41.520 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>stores present a significant vulnerability to maintaining our privacy due

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to basic human needs. Nothing is clearly stopping ICE from

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>running face scans out of retail stores and creating a

0:06:53.040 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>new front for their anti immigrant crackdown, and there's already

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>a blueprint for this. The ACLU published an article in

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>January this year about Wegmans using facial recognition and sharing

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>data on quote persons of interest with law enforcement on

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a quote case by case basis. It's unclear how or

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>if retail stores will challenge ICE's access in any way.

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>As of now, many have been fully on board with

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the organized retail theft hype train. On the other hand,

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>on May eleventh this year, a coalition of forty civil

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>rights organizations, including the Immigrant Defender's Law Center in the

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys, sent a letter to

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Congress urging the House not to pass CORKA, highlighting how

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it would massively expand DHS's role in authority in domestic

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement, and the issues don't end there. They also

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>pointed out how CORCA gives DHS influence over local and

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>state law enforcement through the ability to expand certain grant requirements.

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 1>In effect, this coalition sees a pathway for DHS to

0:07:55.720 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>push jurisdictions toward more intrusive data collection and surveillance vi

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>actually if that jurisdiction is receiving federal grants. Additionally, the

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>coalition noted how the Sunset provision for the CORCA Coordination

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Center quote includes no requirement to dismantle data sharing systems,

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>delete collected information, or reverse any entrenched surveillance practices unquote.

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>So these practices could very well be here to stay

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>without some sort of intervention down the line. Good luck

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to us trying to get that. I think, as James

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 1>put it in a conversation we had, it's like trying

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to convince a bunch of the HOA moms that we

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>need to be softer on retail crime. It just doesn't

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>really seem like it's going to happen. And unfortunately, this

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>coalition letter largely fell on deaf ears, with only fifty

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>nine Democrats and one Republican voting against Corka in the House.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I've spoken with many people about this, and there's often

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this question of like do they know? And I'd argue

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>it's their job to know, And this pill is pretty

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>cut and dried power expansion for Ice, it's kind of

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to tell how they wouldn't have seen this coming,

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>especially with progressive groups warning them about it. And by

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>now this coalition has grown to over one hundred and

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty organizations urging the Senate not to pass Corka in

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>spite of this. In the Senate Judiciary Committee, Republican Senator

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Grassley and Democratic Senator Dick Durbin have teamed up

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>to add CORKA as an amendment to the National Defense

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Authorization Act for fiscal year twenty twenty seven. This would

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially just mean entrenching this into our defense policy. And

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:33.480
<v Speaker 1>if that happens, which seems somewhat likely, I suspect it's

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>curtains and CORKA is going through. I highly doubt that

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats are going to hold the line on the

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.280
<v Speaker 1>NDAA for something they clearly either don't care about or

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>don't seem to understand. But what they might care about

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 1>are the products and services that support this podcast. And

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>We're back, and I'm imagining this is starting to sound

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty frightening, and it is to cool the temperature a bit.

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 1>It's important to consider ICE's capacity for enforcement. They've had

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>ways of accessing various surveillance tools for quite some time now.

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:16.319
<v Speaker 1>To some extent, they likely could have done some of

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this stuff with flock cameras or other automated license plate readers.

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think the threat in retail comes more from

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the pre existing infrastructure and the fact that this bill

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>seems to give ICE sweeping access to confidential and proprietary information. Still,

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>there are strategies for resisting this, I won't lie. Many

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of them are time intensive and require consistent community effort,

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but that's the world we're in. For example, in Hillsboro, Oregon,

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>just west of Portland, local mutual aid groups began delivering

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>groceries to immigrant families who are afraid to go outside

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of Operation Black Rows, which was the

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:55.959
<v Speaker 1>massive ice surge last fall in winter. In Los Angeles

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>last summer, similar groups set up community defense corners outside

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>home depot parking lots in an attempt to protect day

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>laborers from ice raids. These usually manifested as just pop

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>up tents with community members water and snacks. Certainly didn't

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:13.600
<v Speaker 1>stop everything, but I know one group in Pasadena that

0:11:13.760 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>was allegedly the last home depot in LA to be raided,

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and they had a consistent community effort for months. In

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.559
<v Speaker 1>terms of shopping, avoiding loyalty programs may end up being necessary,

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>as this is one of the ways that we hand

0:11:26.360 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>over a lot of our data to stores. But shopping

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:32.199
<v Speaker 1>locally or at stores that collect less data will probably

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.679
<v Speaker 1>be the best bet. So Corka clearly has a number

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of ways that it could be abused by ice, but

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to get the full extent of what we're dealing with.

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I got in contact with Laura Conover, who is the

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>district attorney in Pima County, Arizona, which contains Tucson and

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>borders the Mexican state of Sonora. Contrary to Da Stephen

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>featured in the first episode, Conover has actually been an

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>outspoken opponent of Corka. In particular, she has tied CORKA

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Lake and Riley Act, saying cong is just

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 1>compounding mistakes it already made. The Lake and Riley Act

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 1>became law on January twenty ninth, twenty twenty five, passing

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Congress again with a substantial amount of bipartisan support greater

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:16.599
<v Speaker 1>than sixty percent in both chambers. It's a particularly abhorrent

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.439
<v Speaker 1>piece of legislation as a quote requires DHS to detain

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>certain non US nationals who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, shoplifting,

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>assault of a law enforcement officer, or any crime that

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>results in death or serious bodily injury to another person unquote.

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Notice how it says arrested, not charged, not convicted, but

0:12:39.640 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>simply detained for one of the crimes listed, even if

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the individual didn't actually do anything wrong. The law also

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>allows states to sue the federal government for alleged failures

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and immigration enforcement meeting. The federal government can effectively be

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 1>held liable for a number of things, such as if

0:12:57.720 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>an undocumented immigrant causes harm to s state residents, including

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>financial harm greater than one hundred dollars. It's tough to

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>say the extent to which this could be applied, but

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the through line between this and CORKA is pretty clear.

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:16.079
<v Speaker 1>Ice could monitor retail locations for thefts and shoplifting through CORCA,

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>then they're essentially liable if they don't seek to detain

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>someone who has stolen more than one hundred dollars worth

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>of merchandise. Conover has specific examples of the ways in

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>which the Lake and Riley Act is burdening local jurisdictions,

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>destroying due process protections, and ultimately how CORKA will very

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>likely make this worse. For example, it was Conover's job

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to prosecute the case of Jessica Corles Duarte, who entered

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the US when she was two years old with her mother,

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>who had fled domestic abuse in Mexico and obtained legal

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>status through the violence against Women Act, Corrales Duarte became

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a DOCTA recipient and she's now thirty two or thirty

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>three based on the articles that I read, and she

0:13:56.559 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>has two children. But in the past years she was

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 1>arrested and charge ars with shoplifting and theft, and her

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:05.840
<v Speaker 1>DACA status has been terminated. She allegedly stole up to

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven hundred dollars in perfume from an Alta beauty

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>location over three days, which put her over the felony

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.480
<v Speaker 1>theft threshold, though this number is disputed by her defense.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>She had no prior criminal record, and Conover said based

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on a taped confession, she likely would have qualified for

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a program where she could pay restitution and get back

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>on her feet. Then ICE came in. They detained Corrales

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Duarte as she was leaving her home for her waitressing job.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>The ensuing months were a disaster. Ice held her at

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the Elloyd Detention Center, about an hour from Tucson, and

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>blocked her from attending many of the court dates for

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>her shoplifting case. According to an article in the Tucson Spotlight,

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>here's da Conover on the situation.

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 2>So, for example, in our case, the result was just

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 2>defendants disappearing into federal cush today and before any normal process.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 2>So you've got a victim who's now totally out of

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 2>luck for any kind of restoration, be that through probation

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 2>or through restitution, which is important, you know. So victim's

0:15:15.320 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 2>rights are violated. The defendant obviously gets no due process.

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, in our experience, they hardly had any contact

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 2>with their attorney, and their attorney was just rendered totally

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 2>ineffective in the local court. So it confounds the entire

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 2>normal criminal justice process. It's like the opposite of collaboration.

0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>So not only are Kerles Duarte's rights violated on multiple levels,

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>but it also actually hurts the property owner because they

0:15:46.320 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>won't receive restitution if someone is deported. It's not clear

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>whether Krales Duarte was involved in some sort of organized

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>retail theft operation, but I want to stress again that

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the people in such a situation who actually do this dealing,

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>commonly referred to as boosters, are often poor, homeless, or

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>struggling in some way themselves. Many of you probably already

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>know this, but undocumented people commit less crime overall than

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>American citizens. An analysis by the National Institute of Justice

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>using data from Texas between twenty twelve and twenty eighteen

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>found that undocumented immigrants had offending rates less than half

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of that of US born citizens. This is in spite

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that the US makes it much harder

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for undocumented people to obtain good paying jobs, which can

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>drive people into poverty and therefore crime. And for all

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of this, conover informed me that Corles Duarte appears to

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>be in process for deportation away from her children. There

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are just more effective and humane ways to deal with this,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like the diversion programs mentioned, which don't need to involve

0:16:48.560 --> 0:16:52.479
<v Speaker 1>the federal government, but instead we're just giving more power tise.

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 2>With Lake and Riley and with Corka. You're talking about

0:16:56.240 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>such a street level, local issue where we have local

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 2>police and prosecutors whose entire purpose is to prosecute local crime,

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and to just give some random federal agency authority over

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 2>that sweeping new authority of that just doesn't make any

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 2>sense operationally, not to mention the particular agency is one

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 2>in which there's bipartisan concern about how recklessly they're being managed.

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>On the note of recklessness, with the expansion of ISIS

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 1>surveillance network comes greater concern over warrantless enforcement, constitutional violations,

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and technological mistakes. The podcast Reveal reported a case of

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Ice scanning the face of a twenty three year old

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>US citizen purely on suspicion, and according to Innovation Law Lab,

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the same seems to have happened to a woman in Oregon,

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>where Ice used a Palaneer developed platform called Elite, which

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.160
<v Speaker 1>without a warrant essentially geofence is an area and creates

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>targets with a quote in imigration nexus. In this case,

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the mobile Fortify app returned two different incorrect names and

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>images for the same woman. Still, Ice has told lawmakers

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a definitive measure of immigration status that effectively supersedes

0:18:15.080 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>other evidence of citizenship, such as a birth certificate. The

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>National Institute of Standards and Technology is also reported that

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.680
<v Speaker 1>facial recognition tech is less accurate on women than men,

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>black people, and other individuals with darker skin. This hull

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>gets much worse when you're not in a controlled environment

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>where you can get a well lit, straight on shot

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of someone's face with no obstruction. Certainly something that isn't

0:18:40.000 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>going to happen under the floodlights of a grocery store. Entryway.

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, I can't really say to what extent ICE

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 1>will actually integrate all of these technologies or what capacity

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll have for enforcement, but it seems like the worst

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>case scenario could be a warrantless surveillance frenzy where they

0:18:56.960 --> 0:19:00.320
<v Speaker 1>couldn't care less if they're detaining the right people. The

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>right people as in the individuals that they're actually targeting,

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and I don't actually believe there is a right person

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to be detained. It's all bullshit. But as Corka also

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>calls for local and federal collaboration, cops could very easily

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 1>worsen this problem, and ICE can leverage the Lake and

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Riley Act to ramp up deportations. It's not good. But anyways,

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>here's some ads and we're back to round out this

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>two parter. I'd like to connect some of the dots

0:19:38.280 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>from the first episode to Corka. To do so, I've

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>chatted with James about a concept known as moral turpitude.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Moral turpitude is a vaguely defined concept and there's lots

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of nebulous legal language surrounding it, but in essence, it's

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a crime that is considered morally offensive, and it's important

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to immigration law. Notably included in this definition is larceny

0:20:01.040 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>or theft, and a conviction for one of these crimes

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>can render an immigrant either inadmissible or deportable. Here's some

0:20:07.720 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of the conversation that James and I had.

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.120
<v Speaker 3>An admissibility could be important for someone who was inside

0:20:13.119 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 3>the United States. Let's say they call it e we

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.479
<v Speaker 3>entered without inspection. That means coming into the United States,

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 3>not through a port of entry.

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Right. Let's say they.

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Went over the wall, under the wall, around the wall,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 3>through the river, through the desert, through the mountains, right,

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 3>the many ways that people could enter with that inspection.

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 3>They could then be found inadmissible long after entering the

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 3>United States because they hadn't been admitted, right, they just

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 3>came in. Just imagine, like you want to go to Disneyland.

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 3>It's prohibitively expensive, so you climb over the fence. You

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 3>were not admitted to Disneyland. Yeah, right, So if Disneyland

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 3>found you, they would kick you out. The issue here,

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Let's say if someone has been in the United States

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 3>for a number of years but they are undocumented, if

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:04.040
<v Speaker 3>they are found guilty of a crime including moral turpitude,

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 3>or convicted of a crime involved moral turpitude, and the

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 3>offense carries a maximum sentence of one year or more,

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 3>and the person committed the offense within five years after

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 3>the date of admission, they are then deportable. Now if

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 3>the eweed, if it ended with that inspection, there about

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.800
<v Speaker 3>other reasons it could be deportable, right, Yeah, but I

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 3>did say somebody has a visa. The same is true

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 3>with inadmissibility.

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 3>So, we recently had a Supreme Court ruling about admissibility

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 3>with regard to permanent residents, which kind of brings them

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 3>closer in line to visa holders. But admissibility doesn't just

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 3>mean them giving you the visa. It could also, for example,

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 3>impact you if you went somewhere else and returned to

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 3>the United States. Right, So, a crime evolving moral turpitude

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 3>could then render you in admissible, so you could be

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 3>detained or not admitted to the United States when you

0:21:56.920 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 3>came back. It's also important to get to note that

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 3>some diversion programs. State diversion programs don't count as a

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 3>conviction in terms of federal immigration law if a guilty

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 3>plea is not entered. So if somebody who could previously

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 3>have got into a diversion program ends up not in

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.000
<v Speaker 3>a diversion program. In addition to Corker, right, we have

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 3>all these state sentencing enhancements. Yeah, we see in California, right,

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 3>if that person ends up with a conviction instead of

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 3>being putting a diversion program without entering a plea, that

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 3>is a night and day different in immigration terms. Right,

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 3>it's black and white. One is a conviction for what

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 3>it's probably a crime evolving moral turpitude, because larceny is

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 3>a crime evolving moral turpitude, and I think that's what

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 3>this generally falls under RN. Again, not a lawyer, but

0:22:50.000 --> 0:22:53.400
<v Speaker 3>if that is the case, one of these sentencing enhancements

0:22:53.440 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 3>at a state level results in somebody now having, for

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 3>federal immigration terms, a convict of a crime forming worlds turbitude.

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 3>They are now inadmissible and in a single conviction, as

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.560
<v Speaker 3>I said before, can make a non citizen deportable if

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 3>it has a possible sentence for a year or more,

0:23:11.359 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 3>which these sentencing enhancements make a lot more likely. Right, Yeah,

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and good luck I guess trying to find some way

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.959
<v Speaker 3>of getting that conviction overturned or like you know, now

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 3>you're fighting against all this lobbying that retailers are doing right,

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.560
<v Speaker 3>and all this propaganda that has been put out there

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 3>that it's going to make it harder and harder for

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 3>people to avoid those convictions in the first place and

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 3>then to get them overturned.

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I don't want to get like to doom and

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>gloom about it, but like, do you worry that there's

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just a combination of factors here that could massively worsen

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>things with at the level? Yeah?

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like every time we make a new law, we're

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.320
<v Speaker 3>giving a new powers to the state, right, and every

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 3>single law is backed up by violence, the matter of

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 3>it's a parking ticket or murder. Right, the state can

0:23:57.200 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 3>lock you up, beat you up, or shoot you up.

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 3>That is the basis on which all laws rest.

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so you don't pay a parking ticket that you

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>don't go to court. Eventually someone's going to turn it,

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 3>but your Dora is going to be a person with

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 3>a gun, right Like that, that is the structure on

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 3>which the state exists to use like the crass Foraburian

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 3>definition of the state. I guess this is a big one.

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 3>We are handing a bunch of tools here to an

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:28.000
<v Speaker 3>entity which is tearing families apart, which is ripping children

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 3>from parents, which is taking grandmothers away from their grandchildren.

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, yeah, I mean what do you Maybe this isn't

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for the episode, but like what do you think people

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 1>should do?

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Like, the answer to this is the same as

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 3>an answer to everything.

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>It's stronger.

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 3>Community is Like, people steal things because they need to

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 3>meet their material needs. Sure, some people also enjoy stealing stuff, right,

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 3>that's the thing that exists, But the vast majority of

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 3>theft is happening because people are not meeting their material needs.

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 3>We need to work out a way to meet each

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.239
<v Speaker 3>other's material needs. And like I was in Minneapolis in January, right,

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:09.520
<v Speaker 3>very hard for me to be hungry in Minneapolis in January.

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.159
<v Speaker 3>Like I'm a vegan, I'm annoying to feed, right, but

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.360
<v Speaker 3>people would constantly bring me fucking food and hot tea.

0:25:17.640 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 3>And like that's not the be all end all, but

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 3>gets us a long way there. Like if your neighbors

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 3>aren't hungry, and I guess to know if your neighbors

0:25:25.600 --> 0:25:28.399
<v Speaker 3>are hungry, you have to know who your neighbors are. Right, So,

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 3>like start by knocking on someone's door, you know, start

0:25:32.280 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 3>by hey, your truck's not working. Let's work it out.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 4>I better.

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 3>I can find a YouTube video we can watch, and

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 3>if you have a bunch of sockets, let's see how

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:44.000
<v Speaker 3>we can fix it. So I know the ending of

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 3>this is sort of bleak, but I just want to

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 3>be honest with you about the possibilities. If I uses

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.480
<v Speaker 3>to take KRKA as far as they can, as Da

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 3>Conover told me, you give them an inch and they

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 3>take a mile, then this will get very bad. Surveillance

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:02.359
<v Speaker 3>capitalism isn't going to aline at immigrants, but that doesn't

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:05.959
<v Speaker 3>really matter either way. Clearly the Democratic Party, given their

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 3>votes support, is not going to stop this. As James said,

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 3>It's going to come down to community. So go find

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 3>your co op grocery store. Get to know your neighbors'

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:17.480
<v Speaker 3>faces before Ice gets to know your face at the

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 3>grocery store.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening.

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 4>It Could Happen Here is a production of cool Zone Media.

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 4>For more podcasts from cool Zone Media, visit our website

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 4>Coolzonemedia dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:36.120
<v Speaker 4>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 4>now find sources for It could Happen here listed directly

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 4>in episode descriptions. Thanks for listening,