WEBVTT - Andrew Green - Part 2

0:00:02.080 --> 0:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to another edition of the Frida Egg Podcast.

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>In Part two of our conversation with Andrew Green, we

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>discussed as restoration work at Inverness and Oak Hill, a

0:00:11.720 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>bunker less course he's building, and much more. If you

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:17.159
<v Speaker 1>miss part one, be sure to check it out. And

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>here's Andrew Green.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 2>The fried egg requires a different technique.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 3>What you need to do is actually square the face

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 3>so it'll dig down underneath that bad lie and propel

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 3>that ball right out onto the green.

0:00:34.640 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing. Playing out of a buried lion a

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>bunker is completely different than playing out of a nice

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>clean lion a greenside bunker. You need to be aggressive

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>on any shop, whether it's sitting cleanly for its Frida Egg. Well,

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>we've all faced it.

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 2>The dreaded Friday eggs not to be feared, though it's

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>actually a pretty easy shot to hit.

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>There's very few places that have just like been content

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>with doing nothing well, and some of the best spots

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>end up being the ones that were broke for a

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 1>really long time because they didn't have any money to

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:17.559
<v Speaker 1>do anything.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 2>Philmont in Philadelphia had struggled for a while trying to

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 2>figure out how to keep going and they're kind of

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 2>still working through some of the management stuff. But that

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>golf course, there was some debate whether it was Flynn

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>or who designed it the north especially there, and we

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of uncovered it was Willie Park Junior.

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 3>But because they didn't do.

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 2>A lot along the way, it's so well preserved. You're

0:01:49.360 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 2>exactly right, it's it's pretty amazing times.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:53.880
<v Speaker 1>The best thing is when they're broke.

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, yeah, it's uh.

0:01:57.840 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 3>And look.

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 2>And then you get in circumstances like at oak Hill.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 2>The West course wasn't the championship course, right, so not

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot got done to it, and those greens are spectacular,

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.360
<v Speaker 2>and I mean, I think the kind of the joke

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 2>there is, you know if the West course greens are

0:02:18.960 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 2>on the East course, I mean, wow, right, you know,

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 2>and that's hopefully you know at some point what we're

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:24.240
<v Speaker 2>going to get to do.

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it's got to help that you have like

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that course sitting next to the other one and for

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>people so you're working at oak Hill, yeah, because you

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>can draw off a lot of stuff they did there,

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine there's a lot of common themes on

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:42.959
<v Speaker 1>the same property.

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think we've done that.

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 3>We took.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>It was a good educational tool, right because the members

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.160
<v Speaker 2>innately knew that they liked the West Course and the things.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.600
<v Speaker 2>They couldn't necessarily identify it, but you could walk out

0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.080
<v Speaker 2>and you could start talking them through. Okay, well this

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 2>why you probably like this is because of this. You know,

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.519
<v Speaker 2>that's what that hole over there really needs is a

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>little bit of this flavor. Yeah, it's certainly helped. The

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>big thing on the West Course is most of the

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 2>fairway bunkers got taken out, but the shapes and the

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 2>landforms are still there. But the other cool thing there

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 2>is when you look at Ross's notes, the notes he

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 2>made on the West Course are different from the notes

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:28.959
<v Speaker 2>he made on the East.

0:03:29.720 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>Brilliant.

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 2>You know that he was looking at kind of some

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 2>differentiated styling between the two courses.

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>That's fascinating. That was a course that he spent a

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of time at, right, How can you tell when

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a course that Ross spent a lot of time

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>at versus like I know Inverness is one that he

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>spent a ton of time at, versus one that one

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of his associates did.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Though, So.

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's a couple of things he obviously did a

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>bunch of work right, and he did some whistle stop

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 2>things that seems like maybe just drove a stake in

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 2>the ground and tea here green there, we'll see you

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 2>later kind of thing. Certainly it seems there was some

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>of that. I think his early work is very interesting.

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 2>It's not standardized in any form. And playing Royal Dornick

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>opened my eyes to seeing how he probably saw how

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 2>creative golf holes could be, because that piece of property

0:04:31.760 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 2>at Dornick is amazing. But the things that I could

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 2>see his early work obviously were pretty much all him.

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 2>The one interesting thing is you don't find a lot

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:47.039
<v Speaker 2>of early drawings that were totally done by him. There's

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.840
<v Speaker 2>like most times it's some kind of as built, or

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a club member or an engineer or somebody did a

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 2>representation of what got built. So even here at Inverness,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 2>the nineteen nineteen drawing that I pretty much call an

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 2>as built, we can't find solid evidence that it was

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 2>him or his associate that drew it. It seems to

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 2>be somebody here locally that created that plan. Working at

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Keep Your Country Club in Wilmington, North Carolina. He did

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 2>two versions. One was way early and that drawing that

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 2>they have is kind of an as built crazy. Some

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 2>of the craziest things I've ever seen in my life

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:27.800
<v Speaker 2>on a golf course were part of that drawing. And

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 2>then he's got one from maybe just a little after

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 2>forty with McGovern and it's more of the standardized drawing

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.599
<v Speaker 2>that you would see out of his offices. The coolest stuff,

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 2>the stuff I love spending time on are his handwritten

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>notes when he made psyche visits after he had associates,

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 2>because it blows my mind how quickly it appears. And

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know exactly how long he was, you know,

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't have great records of he arrived on Saturday

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 2>and left on the following Sunday or what, but to

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 2>see how he took those field notes, Like at Oakhill

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 2>there's field notes and the envelope from where he stayed

0:06:10.760 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 2>in the hotel that he put it all together, and

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 2>then he sent it to his office, and the office

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 2>created construction drawings that pretty much followed his notes. There

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 2>were maybe a few little tweaks, but man, those handwritten

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:28.599
<v Speaker 2>notes are spectacular and his hand, his touch with the pencil.

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 2>They're not the most artistic things in the world. It's

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of like have you studied some of Mackenzie's drawings, Right,

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:36.240
<v Speaker 2>They're not the most artistic things in the world, but

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>they really help tell the story of what he was

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:43.520
<v Speaker 2>trying to create. You know, Yeah, they're so cool, They're awesome.

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 2>I could get lost in that stuff.

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Past the Tempo's got the best menu in golf because

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>they put all of his little little catches in the menu.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 2>It's like, well, they've asked me here at Eenverness for

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 2>some of mine from construction, and look, I'm probably a

0:06:58.520 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 2>little embarrassed by how rough some of them are, because

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:04.280
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, I really like to provide field direction

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.159
<v Speaker 2>and help get the guys headed in the right direction

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 2>of what I'm looking for before we even you'll get

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:13.559
<v Speaker 2>on site to work work on the things in the dirt.

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I kind of I call them tpee sketches to try

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 2>to lighten the load that they're not supposed to be

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:22.480
<v Speaker 2>this incredible artistic thing. They're supposed to provide direction and

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>show which way water's supposed to move and where the

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 2>high point is. And you know, but I actually I

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>had somebody draw sketch something up and they send it

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 2>to me, and I was kind of laughing about it,

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 2>and they were like, well, you don't like it, and

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I sent them up one of mackenzie sketches from Augusta

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 2>and I was like, no, I was saying, it looks

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot like this. I was like, it's pretty cool.

0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 2>That stuff's great. I mean, because you just think about

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 2>the day, the limited tools the guys had, you know,

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 2>they're really just soaking it all in and creating these

0:07:56.000 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 2>amazing things without you know, the bulldozer, and uh, it's

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 2>just it's really cool at the craft. You know, it

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.200
<v Speaker 2>was a craft, and that's what I'm trying to do.

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, sometimes I get stuck in technology and in

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 2>the business of it, but man, it was it was

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 2>such a craft to those guys, and even Ross that

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 2>that that worked a lot and traveled a lot. And

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure how he did all the courses or

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 2>obviously if he did all the courses that are assigned

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 2>to him, but the guy was brilliant.

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:32.320
<v Speaker 1>With with Inverness, and you know, you it was a

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>course that was, you know, brilliant ross design. Obviously, tons

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of history, six major championships, some senior opens, you know,

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>just rich history. One of the most historic clubs in

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Midwest. But it was a course that kind of

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>was like a squirrel that you described earlier. So when

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 1>you came here, you know, what were what were kind

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest challenges with this project? And do you

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>feel more pressure when you come to course like Okill

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>or here like Inverness where you have all that history.

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>That was like four questions.

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no, no, I'll start with the pressure part.

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean I feel pressure at every place I'm working.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 2>I love the idea that when I'm done, there's a

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 2>sense that it's hard to tell what I've done. I

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.880
<v Speaker 2>think that's a success, you know, if I can check

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 2>that off the list. And you know, sometimes I'm probably

0:09:24.960 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 2>more successful than others. I'm probably my harshest critic. One

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 2>thing I love about like Pinehurst and thinking about the

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 2>way Ross worked there as he was constantly tweaking his stuff.

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, to have that freedom is great because you

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 2>always are seeing something that you know, maybe I could

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 2>tweak here. There the pressure here, at Inverness and at Okill,

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 2>it's just that for me, it's the pressure of and

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 2>it's every club, but it's you know, I want to

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 2>do what's right for the club, and it's it's not

0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 2>just the members of the club. Obviously I want to

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 2>do it's right for them, but I want to do

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.680
<v Speaker 2>what's right for all of that history. And it's so

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.599
<v Speaker 2>hard because the game changes so much. Like, how do

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>you know this whole idea of restoration is restoration exactly

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 2>the way it was? Well, that's all finding good. But

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 2>I can almost show you countless examples of where something

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 2>that was built or drawn one day was changed within

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 2>a number of years, something that changed, you know, like

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.760
<v Speaker 2>you said, the sand lines you know, you said, you

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 2>know they evolve over time. Yeah, absolutely, you know, the

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 2>greens get sand splash out of bunkers and the top

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:36.599
<v Speaker 2>lines change all the time. You know, the guy on

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 2>the mower has a rough night and the skipson area

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 2>now the green starts to get you know, rounded or whatever.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 2>You know, things are constantly changing. So trying to trying

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 2>to respect the history of these clubs, trying to draw.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I love doing the research. I love finding old stuff.

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 2>I found both of these clubs at Inverness and Okill.

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 2>I've found documents that the club didn't even have, people

0:10:59.400 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 2>didn't even know was out there. You know, using that

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:09.079
<v Speaker 2>as inspiration is exciting, it's not you know, I don't

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 2>ever feel like I'm selling myself short when I can

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.719
<v Speaker 2>find a historical document and I can draw something off

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.959
<v Speaker 2>of it to put it back in the ground that

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 2>fits the modern game. You know, it doesn't have to

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 2>be Andrew's design. It can be Andrew's respect of what

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 2>was there. And look, you open yourself up for criticism.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 2>And everybody's a golf course architect, and everybody has an opinion,

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 2>and I certainly understand that, and I listen hopefully maybe

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 2>more or at least on the better than average side

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 2>of most guys that do this. But it's the first

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 2>day we drove a stake at Inverness on the new

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 2>third Green, I was nervous. It's not doing a bunker

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 2>line or you know, a couple bunkers on a golf course.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 2>That's one thing, creating golf holes that hopefully more history

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 2>will be built on. It's very humbling and nerve wracking

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 2>for sure.

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So and this, of course Invernessa got worked on by

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Tom Fazio in the seventies late seventies and kind of altered.

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you built three new golf holes essentially.

0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, three new golf holes, and then we adjusted a

0:12:32.400 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>couple of others.

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so that, I mean, how do you approach building

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>new golf holes on a historic course.

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of a crazy story in that I showed

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 2>up here the first time and I think it was

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 2>August of sixteen, walked the golf course and I was

0:12:50.280 --> 0:12:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean, when I got out of the car, I

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 2>was blown away by the property. And it's it's kind

0:12:59.800 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 2>of like some of these golf courses that maybe you

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.000
<v Speaker 2>respect a little bit more the more you're on them.

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:08.040
<v Speaker 2>But the way Ross put the golf holes, his holes

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>on the property, he just did little things that made

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 2>them different. I mean, you could criticize them that there

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 2>were a lot of repetitive things or things that were

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 2>a little similar, but when you really studied it, you

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 2>see how you know, like the first greens up in

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the air, the tenth greens down in the air, even

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>though they play parallel in at somewhat the same distance.

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 3>You know, those things blew me away.

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 2>And as I was walking the outer part of the property,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I crossed through the fence line out into the farm

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 2>field and saw basically high points and things that I thought, well,

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 2>based on what I've seen and how Ross put golf

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 2>holes on the ground, and identified good tea and green

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 2>locations and kind of connected the dots.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I was like, well that works there.

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 2>And for the new part three third hole, that's a

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 2>long par three.

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Its idea.

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 2>My idea for it was to replicate the original eighth hole,

0:14:06.280 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 2>which was two hundred and nine yards in the nineteen

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 2>twenty US opened up a pretty good golf hole for then, right,

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 2>like a yeah, right, So all of a sudden, I'm

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 2>standing on one high point and I'm taking my rangefinder

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and shooting the next high point and it's two fifty

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'm like, well, well that works pretty well. And

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 2>then walk out and see how with a little bit

0:14:31.920 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 2>of work and keeping the soil all there, I can

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 2>replicate a lot of what was on original eight, even

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 2>though original eight was on a pretty flat piece of ground.

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 3>And then.

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 2>I walked out behind that green location out in this

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>farm field, and you know, it was another high point

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 2>and you could kind of see looking back how a

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 2>golf hole could fit that would come to be the

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 2>new four And walked through the tree line and kind

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 2>of saw how the golf hole would fit the ground

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>really well. Right, without doing a lot of work, it

0:15:07.280 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 2>just would fit. And so when I did my interview

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:16.920
<v Speaker 2>in November. I showed them how I thought that could work.

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 2>I showed the committee here, and originally I had the

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 2>fourth hole as potentially a par five because looking at

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>just the way the yardage is set up and with

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, the two par fives, and you know, did

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 2>that make any sense? I showed that as a potential option.

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 2>As we worked through the process, it became clear and

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 2>clearer that we could represent the original seventh hole, which

0:15:44.600 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 2>was a hard dog leg left that was somewhat short,

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 2>but we could I could build that as that new

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 2>fourth hole, and then everything fell onto the line, the

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 2>green site location, the forward T. You can play the

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 2>forward T and it could you could hit driver try

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 2>to get it on the green almost like Ted Ray

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:05.840
<v Speaker 2>did on the original seventh and twenty. You could go

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 2>way back and have this amazing, really hard golfl you know,

0:16:11.240 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 2>it just it really it just fell into place. It

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>was like it was meant to be.

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It's fine. I Uh. There's a course in Chicago, oak

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Park Country Club, and in the way the creek works

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on that on the fifth hole there, there's really similar

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to the way it works on that hole where you've

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 1>got like you kind of hit into like a low

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with a creek running along the left that cuts across

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the fairway, and you have to kind of make a

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>decision like it's depending on what tea you play. If

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you play back, it's just hit driver as good as

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you can hit it. But if you play up, it's like,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>do I try and fly over the creek? Do I

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>try to lay it short? Do I play it right?

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Do I play it left? Like And it's it's so

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>interesting because it like when I stepped on that, I

0:16:52.840 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>was like, God, this really reminds me of this hole. Yeah,

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's like that's a Ross course and it just

0:16:57.960 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of it does just fit. And that's like my

0:16:59.720 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 1>favorit whole out there, it's a it's a it's a

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>cool hole. Yeah, greens out of this world.

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 2>And it you know, it was like it was it

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 2>was like Ross would have doing his little sketches and

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 2>stuff walking the property. He would have identified kind of

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 2>similar things. And it hopefully people will and it certainly

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 2>appears that way that people will feel like those holes

0:17:24.040 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 2>fit the property better than the old holes you know

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 2>from the seventies. In that we tried to draw on

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 2>all the things that was that were done on the

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 2>original holes and tried to just pull that into what

0:17:36.040 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>we did on the new.

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:42.359
<v Speaker 1>UH with with you. So you've got Now you've got Coioto,

0:17:42.720 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>uh Siota, ok Hill Andverness championship golf courses with championship pedigree.

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how does that compare to when you're doing

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a project for just like a membership play? Do you

0:17:56.400 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is there anything different that goes, you know, with what

0:17:58.880 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 1>you're doing?

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 2>There really isn't other than I'll draw extra center. I'm

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 2>a big believer in drawing center lines from every te

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 2>and evaluating my design for every player. If you read

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>all the great guys, almost every single one of them,

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 2>and you know Thomas McKenzie, Flynn Ross, they all talked

0:18:18.560 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 2>about the best golf courses are capable of. I think

0:18:22.320 --> 0:18:26.119
<v Speaker 2>Ross says it's the first class golfer in the everyday player.

0:18:27.119 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 2>They all talk about it and that, you know, that's

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 2>so important. So I'll draw a center line from every

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 2>t on these championship courses. I'll draw one at three

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. The others I'm not, you know, three hundreds plenty.

0:18:41.000 --> 0:18:43.440
<v Speaker 2>You know, guys can hit it farther obviously, and even

0:18:43.480 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 2>guys can hit it more than three to twenty five

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.880
<v Speaker 2>on some of these championships. That's probably the biggest difference

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 2>just from my process. Otherwise, it's trying to make things

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>work and fit on the ground, what's best for the

0:18:55.320 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 2>golf course, and then you know, extreme yardages unfortunately, I

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 2>guess it's good for business, but you know, maybe bad

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 2>for the game.

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 3>With the golf ball.

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 2>But the biggest difference I guess maybe between Okill and

0:19:14.600 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 2>Inverness and Siota is.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>At Okill, the.

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 2>East course is the course that's the championship and the

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>members are playing that every day to have fun, you know,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.399
<v Speaker 2>they're playing it with their guests and to get a

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.360
<v Speaker 2>kind of a change of pace. But if they're out

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 2>to just really enjoy, they're probably playing the West. So

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>that's quite a bit of different dynamic than here at Inverness,

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 2>where people are playing multiple times a week to enjoy

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 2>the game and have fun, you know. So there's maybe

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 2>a little more balance that we really tried to work

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 2>on here and Siota versus you know, Okill, where it's

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 2>a little more that's kind of the championship course.

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 3>But that's also the luxury.

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.560
<v Speaker 2>They have of having the two courses We're still trying

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.679
<v Speaker 2>to make that course more enjoyable for the everyday player,

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 2>building forward, t's widening, short landing zones, doing some of

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>those things, but as far as like bunker depth than things,

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a little more extreme.

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>There between the three of them, say East Course, Iota

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>and Inverness, Like if you could take one thing that

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>each of them do the best and make like, you know,

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>if you were just making a figurative super course, if

0:20:25.400 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you could take one aspect of each's design, which would

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what would be?

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I think what we're seeing at Toyota is some of

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 2>the most unique elements of any golf course I've ever seen.

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 2>When you look at the original construction pictures and you

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 2>look at the Dodo bird from the twenty six open,

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.000
<v Speaker 2>there are things on that drawing and things that are

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 2>represented in the pictures we have that I've never seen anywhere. Now,

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 2>they might be other places and maybe I just haven't

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 2>seen them or experienced it, and that's fine, but there

0:20:56.359 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 2>are elements there that are incredibly unique.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 3>So I would definitely draw that piece from there. O kill.

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 3>It's got to be all the trees, I got it. No,

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm kidding. Uh No.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 2>The property at oak Kill is spectacular. The it's the

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 2>golf holes change directions so gracefully, you know what I mean.

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 2>It's not like a forced switch. It's like they just

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 2>flow from one to the next. And I think that's

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>something that I really love about the East Course and

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 2>the way the property is utilized. We're working on the trees,

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, trying to get to a balance there. They're

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:39.640
<v Speaker 2>gonna be trees at Okill, there's no doubt.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 3>It's not.

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 2>It's not gonna be Oakmont, not even close. But we're

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 2>trying to get the best trees there and at Everness.

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think some of the greens are pretty

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 2>cool in a.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:52.719
<v Speaker 3>Sneaky way, do you know what I mean?

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>There there's a lot of variety to them, and yeah,

0:21:56.680 --> 0:21:59.919
<v Speaker 1>just got neat little corners and yeah, I mean like

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>even that second green, how it's got it's kind of

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>got like depressions on It's like a it's almost like

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a lego, a square lego with like two depressions on

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the corner and two of the corners and the other

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:14.280
<v Speaker 1>corners are raised up a little.

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they're they're really cool.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>It's uh yeah, that greens here are sweet. I think

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>that's That's something I got I came away with is

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like they've got really cool green complexes and now it's

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>got like the yardage. It's like that's I think. I

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think what you can take away from Shinnakok especially is

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>like yardage isn't the chief defense. It's important for with

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>with these with the modern golfer, but green complexes are

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>by far the most important thing.

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 3>No doubt.

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.199
<v Speaker 2>And I think that good greens give you the opportunity

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 2>to set up as hard as you want or is

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>potentially quote unquote as easy as you want.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a variety.

0:22:57.400 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Well yeah, and you can have middle pins that aren't

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>easy exactly and at first, but but you got to

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>be on the right side of them.

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 2>And in some of those interior contours were talked about

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 2>that yesterday I think really helped define that.

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>So we we've talked a lot about Roth. Who who

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>do you think is the most underappreciated architect?

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Well you're gonna love this, I guess, But Flynn has

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:23.640
<v Speaker 2>got to be right.

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 3>He's gotta be wild Bill. Yeah, gosh, he was. He

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 3>was so ahead of his time.

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 2>I'd ask anybody to go find find the the original

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 2>documents not not reproductions, but go find the scans of

0:23:40.080 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 2>his his his essays that he wrote in twenty seven.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 2>You could read every essay he wrote and know more

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 2>in an evening reading those than than spending weeks studying

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 2>other other golf books or what have you. He understood

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 2>the game from so many different perspectives. It's something I'm

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 2>striving to understand and work towards. I actually have a

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 2>quote on the back of my business card about the

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 2>best way to whet the appetite of a player is

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 2>to offer an incentive and provide a reward. And that

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 2>is such a beautiful statement of it's not and he

0:24:25.160 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 2>goes on to say, and it's not requiring you to

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 2>hit this amazing golf shot, but it's basically hit the

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>best golf shot you can make. Yeah, I mean, that's

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 2>what golf's all about, you know. I think I used

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>to use the swing of Ernie L's and a swing

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 2>of Charles Barkley back to back. Okay, there could be

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:48.280
<v Speaker 2>two more different golf swings ever. Okay, but it really

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 2>shows you that each golf swing is different, right, So

0:24:51.720 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 2>each golf game is different. So why do we design

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 2>golf courses to only be played one way makes no sense.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 2>I should be able to play it using my best skill.

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>And if I chicken out, then give me a place

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>to chicken out, and then I'll pay the consequence on

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 2>the next shot. But if I want to hit the

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 2>best shot I can hit, give me a place to

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 2>hit that shot, and then hopefully my next SHOT's easier

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 2>or somehow more advantageous unless I make a bad swing.

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean that that's what it's That is what it's

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 2>all about. And then you read I love to think

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 2>about the guys in Philly, that they're all drinking buddies, right,

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.480
<v Speaker 2>that's like, and that they hung out and there was

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 2>a brotherhood and they talked about how to make the

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 2>game better and more interesting. And if you read every

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 2>single person that went through Philadelphia at some point they

0:25:40.680 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 2>all say the same thing. Mackenzie, Thomas, h Tilling, hass Flynn.

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 2>They all talked about that dynamic of you know, providing

0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 2>options the proper side and the wrong side of a

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 2>fair way, you know, allowing people to experience the game

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the way they're best suited. I love Mackenzie wrote about

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the fourteenth hole at Saint Andrews, and he talked about

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 2>watching a foursome play and that three out of the

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 2>four probably played it the right way, but they all

0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:14.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, he shows the drawing and the lines are

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.239
<v Speaker 2>all over the place round hell and stuff, you know,

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 2>and it's like, yeah, that's awesome. So and I think

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.680
<v Speaker 2>that's where we got off the rails in the late

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 2>nineties and two thousands where everything had to be longer

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and harder and more narrow and trees and weal trees

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe before, but you know that misses the boat.

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that. I think we've seen it with

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the last two US Opens, where like Kopka's won them

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and but like it didn't predetermine the winner, like you

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>had guys with different skills. I mean, Brian Gay was

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.680
<v Speaker 1>in contention on Sunday, like he's the shortest hitter out there,

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but like the golf course allowed him to succeed. And

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>we saw the same thing at Aaron Hills, Like you know,

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 1>Brian Harmon's not short, he's not long though, and he

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>was in everybody, Oh it's Bomber's parent. It's like, well,

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like he could play because he could hit

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>every fairway, you know, and he could you know, a

0:27:11.200 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>golf course that allows you to play to your strength.

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Is like, that's the best. Is like where any type

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.640
<v Speaker 1>of player can win because and they because they are

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do what they do and play their game

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>versus predetermining what your game needs to be at.

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 3>A golf course exactly.

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's I mean, that's what's the great thing about

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:40.159
<v Speaker 1>that Inverness. I was talking to to Zach Boer about

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.159
<v Speaker 1>it is like, I don't feel like it's a course.

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a championship course that I wouldn't mind

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 1>playing every day, and so many championship golf courses, I

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>feel like I just get my ass kicked. I'm like,

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know if I want to go

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.479
<v Speaker 1>back and play that, like you know a lot, like

0:27:57.560 --> 0:27:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and you think about like how you'd split rounds,

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 1>but like this is a place that you can play.

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think Ross, because I think about Pinehurst number

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>two is kind of that way. Seminals that way, Seminal

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>absolutely hard, but it's it's still like you can play it.

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 3>There's a lot of room.

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I think that's one of the brilliant things

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:18.520
<v Speaker 1>about Ross that goes underrated is that his really hard

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 1>courses were still really playable.

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:22.160
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, It's.

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.360
<v Speaker 2>It just shows again that kind of craft thing that

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 2>there's a little more thought put into it than just

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 2>I need eighteen holes, I need par seventy two, I

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 2>need seven thousand yards. You know, it's not good golf

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 2>doesn't fit a recipe like that. You know, It's how

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 2>cool can I get from the starting point to the

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 2>endpoint and present problems to the player and provide lots

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.640
<v Speaker 2>of options? I mean, when I'm designing for the everyday player,

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 2>when I'm designing for the average player, I'm really trying

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 2>to think about how many different options can I give

0:28:58.960 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 2>give the guys.

0:29:01.200 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 3>To play?

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Who'd be your mount Rushmore of golf.

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Architecture, Man, I've got to go Ross and Flynn right

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 2>right off the top. I'm doing a lot of Ross work,

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 2>and I've really grown a greater appreciation for everything he's done.

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I love George Thomas.

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 3>He might be.

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 2>The greatest listener of any golf architect ever. And I'd

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>love to meet him because I'd love to know. You know,

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 2>if you look at his life and how kind of.

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Privileged I guess it was, was he arrogant?

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 2>It certainly doesn't appear to be right I mean he

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>he If you read his forward in Golf Architecture in America,

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 3>I've made a list. I don't know.

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe Shackelford picked it up a riv this

0:29:56.320 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 2>year or whatever. I made a list of all the

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 2>people he thanked. In all of those people, you could

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>see almost a heartfelt appreciation that they helped him understand

0:30:04.840 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 2>the game better.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:07.719
<v Speaker 3>It was.

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:11.600
<v Speaker 2>He was the greatest listener, I think, and because he listened,

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:12.360
<v Speaker 2>it made him.

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 3>A better architect.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 2>So there's three, So what one more? It's got to

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 2>be Mackenzie then Mac, doctor Mac.

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he's on everybody I know.

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:27.200
<v Speaker 2>And maybe I'm cliche because those are my four guys.

0:30:27.440 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Thomas and Flynn don't get on money.

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.959
<v Speaker 3>Okay, you know, fair, fair enough, regular question all.

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I mean mackenzie. Anybody that has like, arguably

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the greatest golf course on four continentss it's pretty good,

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>not bad? Right, Yeah, it's okay.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 2>He was a good listener too. I think he was

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.040
<v Speaker 2>an educated guy that.

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 3>Man.

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 2>If you read Spirit of Saint Andrew's right, he talks

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 2>about how he even related a lot of what he

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 2>learned and golf to medicine and the camouflage and all

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 2>of those different lives that he that he lived. And

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 2>maybe that goes back to my thing of I'm trying

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:09.000
<v Speaker 2>to appreciate more outside of my little channel to make

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 2>me a better architect.

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>So something I always am fascinated by is like, even

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>on places with spectacular ground but have like flat areas

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>or just flat courses. Do you ever think to really

0:31:28.080 --> 0:31:30.959
<v Speaker 1>appreciate architect you have to see their work on like

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>their horse sight.

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 2>It certainly adds an element, right, yeah, how do you

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 2>how do you mess up pebble Beach?

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 3>Right? It was Jack's first first course, Jack Neville.

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Some might say, well, yeah, right, right, right, whatever. Yeah,

0:31:50.120 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 2>But that's where people ask about Seminole, whether it's overrated, underrated,

0:31:55.200 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 2>you know kind of thing, right you.

0:31:57.360 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Kind of what's your thought?

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.320
<v Speaker 2>I haven't listened this year with you're do you have

0:32:02.360 --> 0:32:03.720
<v Speaker 2>you ever shared that perspective?

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of people say it's under overrated.

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, and I I'm falling on the other side, but

0:32:11.600 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 2>I'll let you go.

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>You know a lot of people say it's overrated, right

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:19.400
<v Speaker 1>generally At that point I kind of stopped listening because,

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>like The thing about seminole is like if you don't

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>know how to play golf, like it will expose the

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>crap out of you. Like you have to play proper

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>golf and like it. I mean there's so many ways,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>but like when you get in a bad position like issue,

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is like something that's happened with

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>golf is like people are pre determined feel like, Okay,

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>like I hit a shot into a bad spot, I

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>should still be able to hit it at a flag.

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>And like at seminole, if you're in a bad spot,

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:55.959
<v Speaker 1>you need to get it back into a good spot.

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Like it could be chipping it just short of the green.

0:32:59.360 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 1>It could be like it could be hitting it to

0:33:02.080 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like just somewhere on the green that you're not that

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you're putting up hill like but like it's sneaky, right,

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.440
<v Speaker 1>you have to play. And I think this is what

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>happens in USGA events, And I think this is one

0:33:13.960 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of the issues that they have with like players with

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>fair and not fair is like if you're not in

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.959
<v Speaker 1>the right position, you you can't hit at flags at

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>really good spots like right, like and that's like what

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>was driving me nuts. These people are like, well, like,

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, that was really unfair. It's like, well, like

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>he was shortsighted in a bunker to a green that

0:33:36.600 --> 0:33:40.120
<v Speaker 1>runs away like that was. If that was water, he'd

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be out.

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, So I can't I think it's Flynn that wrote No,

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 2>it's Thomas. I think he wrote in that section on

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:49.480
<v Speaker 2>strategy talks about if a player tries and more than

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 2>him lies and fails under the test, you know, he's

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 2>worse off than the guy that knows he can't hit

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 2>that shot and lays back.

0:33:56.720 --> 0:33:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.000
<v Speaker 2>So you know that's golf, right, you know, you take

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 2>the challenge. If you miss it, then you got to

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 2>pay the penalty, whether that's short siding yourself in a

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 2>bad spot in a bunker, you know.

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's like.

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>That where you have no chance really of getting up

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and down, but you have a chance to make it.

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>You have a chance to hit an unbelievable shot and

0:34:19.040 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>make three. Still sure and water you're hitting four.

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:25.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Water is an awful hazard.

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Unless I mean with variety. I really like like meandering creeks.

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh way.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, when I say water way different from a creak

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 2>than a pond. And the only time a pond is

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 2>is even remotely a decent hazard I think is on

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:40.440
<v Speaker 2>more of like a k pole or something where you

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 2>can kind of bite off as much as you want

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 2>to chew. It's still not great.

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But the penalty for a pond is too much. That's

0:34:47.560 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's the problem is, Like you know, no matter what

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 1>it takes away, I feel like a pond takes away

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the heroic play recovery.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, golf is a game of recovery.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>That's where all the fun.

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely use your skill to get out of trouble. And

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.359
<v Speaker 2>that's what we were talking yesterday about trees. Right, It's

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 2>a totally different mindset if you're hitting a punch out

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:10.839
<v Speaker 2>of a tree, even though I did that a couple

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:15.360
<v Speaker 2>of times yesterday with poor success, but versus having maybe

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 2>a difficult lie that I think I can get it

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 2>all the way to the green. But taking that risk

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and I don't execute, I'm probably going to be in

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 2>more trouble than if I just punched it out in

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the fair way and paid the penalty.

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I hit it pretty good yesterday, and all my problems

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>came from just being in the rough with no trees

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:37.120
<v Speaker 1>in my way. And I think the two times I

0:35:37.160 --> 0:35:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was in the trees, I got I made par because

0:35:39.239 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I just hit it to the front part of the green,

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>so it came out of sin and yeah and got away.

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>It like had like pretty simple up and downs. But

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the two the couple times I got in trouble were

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>when I was like in thick rough and I tried

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>to hit like on one par five, I tried to

0:35:54.320 --> 0:35:56.919
<v Speaker 1>hit three iron and it just like hooded it over

0:35:57.000 --> 0:35:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and I, you know, hit into a creek. It's like,

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, like that, but that doesn't happen if there's

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a tree in my way and I'm just punching it

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>out right.

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 2>And then you know the water, Yeah, you don't have

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 2>any of that opportunity.

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Right none.

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:13.640
<v Speaker 1>What happens is they just play away from it.

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, and then that plays into the golfer IQ. Most

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 2>of the holes I am replacing at Inverness and Oakhill

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 2>are holes that have a pond, because if you didn't know,

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 2>to have a great championship par three, you have to

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:33.759
<v Speaker 2>have water a pond. Did you know that was in

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 2>the rules of architecture. I'm kidding, I mean you got

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 2>to have a signature hole.

0:36:39.600 --> 0:36:41.760
<v Speaker 3>A signature hole. They're all signature holes.

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I was watching a new course flyover and they had

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>something about a signature hole and that's when I when

0:36:50.160 --> 0:36:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I closed the window.

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah you know, I mean the golfer IQ thing again.

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, they should they should all be good.

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.280
<v Speaker 1>It's I think, like so like when I think about Inverness,

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I could pick out like one

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 1>hole that's a standout hole. And I think with like

0:37:08.800 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>mass public perception of golf courses like that, there's a

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of golf courses like that. And I think one

0:37:16.760 --> 0:37:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of the things is like when there's not one hole

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody can always go back to they have a problem.

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But like the greatness of Inverness is the sum of

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>all its part?

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, not. I watch.

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 2>I'll watch how other golf courses are represented. And it's

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 2>amazing to me sometimes that you'll see only pictures of

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 2>one golf hole from that course. Right, it's like the

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:41.240
<v Speaker 2>money shot.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>But it's like the Instagram what like you know what

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Instagram and Twitter and like the photo the camera phone.

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:51.040
<v Speaker 2>Right, everybody that goes to that golf course, they only

0:37:51.080 --> 0:37:53.840
<v Speaker 2>take a picture of one hole. Yeah you know, yeah

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 2>that that does kind of tell you. Yeah, I think

0:37:58.560 --> 0:38:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Inverness the star, you know, the greens complexes and how

0:38:02.080 --> 0:38:06.239
<v Speaker 2>that those greens set on the property give it that

0:38:06.280 --> 0:38:08.920
<v Speaker 2>opportunity to have a lot of different different kinds of

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:09.839
<v Speaker 2>golf shots.

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 1>One thing when I go to classic courses that I

0:38:12.719 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>like just nerd out about and people like I'll play

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:18.359
<v Speaker 1>with people and they're like, I'll point something out and

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:22.120
<v Speaker 1>talk to them about, like like how greens like stack

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>on each other at so many really good old school courses,

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Like that's something I nerd out about and people will

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 1>look at me like, God, this guy's your front hinge, right,

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>So what's what's the thing that you that you really

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:36.760
<v Speaker 1>nerd out about?

0:38:38.120 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 2>I think you know this is coming. But the hummock

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 2>is my thing, man, I love it. So you know,

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 2>chocolate drops, dragons, teeth mounds, whatever.

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 3>You want to call them.

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 2>The creative ways that the old guys use the extra

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:59.759
<v Speaker 2>dirt that they couldn't afford to haul away, like just

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 2>those little grading things. And even if it's not just

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 2>a hummock, but the grass face where you saw they

0:39:07.440 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of just stopped cutting because they needed they had

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.960
<v Speaker 2>enough dirt. You know those things. I mean they're very simple,

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 2>but they're so cool and they show the golf course

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 2>has some aging character and I love I love the

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 2>way that presents a hazard to the player, and it

0:39:27.280 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 2>really speaks to this idea of using your talent to recover.

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.600
<v Speaker 2>And you know, the better player can get really upset

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 2>that they just missed the shot and now the balls

0:39:37.719 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 2>way below the feet or above their feet or you

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 2>know downhill a pill lie, right, it really messes with

0:39:42.719 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 2>their mind. But the higher handicapped player would much rather

0:39:47.960 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 2>be in a difficult lie than in a bunker.

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 3>So it's just it's it's so cool.

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And and you're going to see if you look at

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 2>my work anywhere that I could find.

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 3>A sense that they were there. You're going to find

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 3>a couple. You know.

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I try not to overdo it, and I really do

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 2>try not to have the same solution to every problem

0:40:09.280 --> 0:40:10.880
<v Speaker 2>no matter where the course is. You know, I always

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 2>want it to be different. But boy, if I can

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 2>find some cool grading like that that's just off the

0:40:18.200 --> 0:40:20.600
<v Speaker 2>beaten path, or you know old bunker faces that are

0:40:20.680 --> 0:40:24.440
<v Speaker 2>hidden under trees or something, I really nerd out on

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:25.440
<v Speaker 2>that stuff.

0:40:26.600 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>You're building a bunker list course.

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:40:28.960 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 2>So for an Arundo County and Maryland, Eisenhower Golf Course

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 2>plays a bunch of golf. A lot of older guys

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 2>play it. When we started talking about it, it was

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 2>it needs a lot of TLC. It's kind of in

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 2>this model of you know, the course that was built

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of in the heyday and now it's kind of

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:56.959
<v Speaker 2>lived its life and it needs reinvigorated. And the concern was, Okay,

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 2>we do something like a bunkerless golf course, is that

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:00.880
<v Speaker 2>going to turn away the public? Are we going to

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:02.760
<v Speaker 2>break what's not really broken?

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:03.720
<v Speaker 3>The place?

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Tons of people play it. And the thing that drove

0:41:10.000 --> 0:41:14.320
<v Speaker 2>me to doing it was that for those older guys

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 2>and ladies, bunkers are they're just they're like, you know,

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 2>they're infuriating sometimes. You know, it's not that hard of

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 2>a golf shop, but it is for a lot of

0:41:22.960 --> 0:41:25.480
<v Speaker 2>those players. And then you got to build them, and

0:41:25.520 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 2>you got to maintain them. And if you build bunkers,

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna be replacing them every let's say, fifteen years.

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 2>If you're going to just keep up, you're gonna have

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 2>to do major reconstruction just because that's the life they live, right,

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:43.120
<v Speaker 2>You can, they can last longer, but they really decline.

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 2>So we're gonna save potential money up front we're gonna

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:48.280
<v Speaker 2>save maintenance dollars.

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, sand.

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 2>It's been proven that bunker maintenance dollar for dollar, square

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 2>foot for square foot is more money spent on bunkers

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:59.440
<v Speaker 2>than greens. That's crazy, you know. And again, golfer IQ,

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 2>what our clients request of you know, they want a

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:08.720
<v Speaker 2>perfect lie in bunkers. It's just reality. It's bunkers are hazard,

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.359
<v Speaker 2>no doubt. But in the United States, most of our

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 2>clients have been conditioned to having at least somewhat of

0:42:15.400 --> 0:42:17.720
<v Speaker 2>a consistent set of bunkers.

0:42:17.719 --> 0:42:19.160
<v Speaker 3>That's what they're striving for.

0:42:19.480 --> 0:42:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And look, that's good for business for me, okay,

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:25.919
<v Speaker 2>but they are hazard. But when you add all those

0:42:25.920 --> 0:42:29.920
<v Speaker 2>things up, when you take that element out, how can

0:42:29.960 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 2>you create exciting golf and fund golf and not dumbing

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:38.400
<v Speaker 2>something down, not making it boring, but do without bunkers

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and you.

0:42:39.480 --> 0:42:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Could almost get more bold without bunkers than with bunkers.

0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Exactly.

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because look, now you don't have to worry about

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.960
<v Speaker 2>draining water into sand that would wash out and destroy

0:42:52.000 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 2>a bunker, which in the UK that's not really an

0:42:54.760 --> 0:42:57.920
<v Speaker 2>issue because of the way they're designing the sand. You know,

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.000
<v Speaker 2>that's not an issue. The United States, especially the East Coast,

0:43:01.120 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 2>huge issue. Some are thunderstorm white sand destroyed. If water

0:43:05.680 --> 0:43:07.520
<v Speaker 2>is running into a bunker, well, now I don't have

0:43:07.560 --> 0:43:10.080
<v Speaker 2>to worry about that. So now greens that maybe would

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 2>only fall back to front can fall three hundred and

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:17.960
<v Speaker 2>sixty degrees because there's no water running off that putting

0:43:18.000 --> 0:43:22.439
<v Speaker 2>surface into sand or something we're trying to protect from

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:28.799
<v Speaker 2>a maintenance standpoint. So the property at Eisenhower is spectacular.

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 2>It might be one of the best pieces of golfing

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 2>ground in that little piece. And the routing we're going

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to leave some pretty well intact, is good. There's variety,

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 2>the wholes change direction. But because the greens sit on

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:46.799
<v Speaker 2>good spots and the tea set and good spots, we

0:43:46.920 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 2>left most of the routing intact. And we're gonna use

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 2>short grass, we're gonna use hummocks, and there's gonna be

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:59.359
<v Speaker 2>different questions and solutions for each hole. But without sand,

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 2>I think the critical thing is can we get enough

0:44:01.800 --> 0:44:06.920
<v Speaker 2>definition and enough whole presentation to make the golfer excited

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Because sand we kind of eat with our eyes. When

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.800
<v Speaker 2>you play golf and sand, it's such a stark contrast

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 2>that it's it's the eye candy, but you know, there's

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 2>other ways to do it. And I've said a couple

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 2>of times, you know, maybe it's my ego that I

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:22.240
<v Speaker 2>think I can.

0:44:22.160 --> 0:44:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Do this really well.

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:26.399
<v Speaker 2>That's probably the case, but I also think it's a

0:44:26.440 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 2>great way to have another different golf experience. Again, why

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 2>does everything have to be the same.

0:44:34.160 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>It's there's this. I've talked to you a lot about

0:44:38.040 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this the last few days. It's my current like obsession

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is Langford Moreau and this golf course there's in Kanka Key.

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like an hour and twenty minutes from me, but

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like I go play there like a lot now because

0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it's cheap and it's unbelievable and it's just like super overgrown.

0:44:57.560 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>The greens are like there's one hole that got change,

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>but then there's like it's bunkerless except for like three

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:08.680
<v Speaker 1>bunkers that were built probably in nineteen seventy. Right, maybe

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst bunkers I've ever seen in my

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:13.880
<v Speaker 1>life is one of them. Like it's just like just

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>like scraped it and put sand on it.

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but it's so bold.

0:45:18.600 --> 0:45:23.280
<v Speaker 1>The greens are like unbelievable, and it's all grass hollows,

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's I mean, if you get in one of them,

0:45:26.080 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's way worse than being in the sand, right,

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's still super cool.

0:45:32.040 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 2>Well that's you know, think about the best bunkerless golf

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:39.080
<v Speaker 2>holes you played. Most of them are pretty interesting. They

0:45:39.080 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 2>aren't boring unless it's, you know, something that's been dumbed

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 2>down or lost to time because of maintenance or neglect.

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Most bunkerless golf holes that were designed in that for

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 2>that purpose are pretty interesting.

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 3>They're pretty good.

0:45:55.600 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 4>So we'll see fourteen and Augusta doesn't stink. No eat

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 4>green at Augusta, Yeah, doesn't stink. You know, there is

0:46:04.640 --> 0:46:07.640
<v Speaker 4>the fair we bunker on eat but yeah, that.

0:46:07.320 --> 0:46:10.480
<v Speaker 1>That green's really cool. There's a lot of cool bunker

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 1>less holes around golf. When you when you start developing

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a master plan, how how much research do you do before?

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Like if you if you had to put an estimate.

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:27.440
<v Speaker 3>On ours every hour? I can. I can do it.

0:46:28.160 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Uh, I get sucked in, you know, I'll find myself.

0:46:33.200 --> 0:46:35.600
<v Speaker 2>My wife and I we kind of joke around. It

0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:38.279
<v Speaker 2>used to infuriate her that I'd be working or doing

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 2>research while we're supposed to be spending time together. Even

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 2>though she might be cross stitching, or you know, maybe

0:46:45.560 --> 0:46:49.400
<v Speaker 2>texting a friend or whatever. You know, I will spend

0:46:50.239 --> 0:46:54.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of my quote unquote free time doing research

0:46:55.680 --> 0:46:59.040
<v Speaker 2>when I'm when I'm beginning a master plan. I know

0:46:59.080 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of guys that do great work

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 2>and finding documents and have tremendous tools, and maybe I

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 2>should utilize some of those guys more. But I feel

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 2>a real sense of pride and I like finding information,

0:47:11.719 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 2>even on a golf course that doesn't have a tremendous

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:17.919
<v Speaker 2>amount of history but has some history. I love being

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:21.319
<v Speaker 2>able to draw my own conclusions, like sometimes when you

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:26.000
<v Speaker 2>read books that have been put together by historians and

0:47:26.040 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 2>they're trying to draw conclusions. You know, we were talking

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 2>yesterday about caddies reading your putts, right, he said, yeah,

0:47:32.160 --> 0:47:34.840
<v Speaker 2>it's all feel it's like that in research. I feel

0:47:34.880 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 2>the same way. It's like there's such a pride factor

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:41.440
<v Speaker 2>in doing the research, finding the documents, connecting the dots yourself.

0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Like, but you learn so much too along the way,

0:47:46.400 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>exactly like, and it might not help you write that moment,

0:47:49.440 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but like at some point five years from then, you.

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I can't tell you how many pictures I cut and

0:47:56.120 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 2>paste or screen grabs of something I find that really

0:48:00.200 --> 0:48:01.840
<v Speaker 2>wasn't what I was looking for, but I want to

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:04.120
<v Speaker 2>make sure I have it for something down the road.

0:48:04.280 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So do you like label it to have like a yeah.

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:09.319
<v Speaker 3>Probably could be more organized. Maybe I need somebody that

0:48:09.440 --> 0:48:10.440
<v Speaker 3>would help me organize.

0:48:10.480 --> 0:48:14.440
<v Speaker 1>But I know my desktop is just all screen grab.

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:19.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but it's you know, it's so good. You know

0:48:19.239 --> 0:48:21.800
<v Speaker 2>I have one. I think I shared some pictures on Twitter,

0:48:21.920 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 2>like Augusta. Anytime I come across something cool there, I clip.

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:28.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just because it's been my experience, like an Augusta.

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a really good place to speak to the public

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 2>about golf IQ because they all almost everybody can picture

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:39.439
<v Speaker 2>a golf hole right, they've seen eighteen they know it right,

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:41.520
<v Speaker 2>and whether there's I mean, we could get in. We

0:48:41.520 --> 0:48:44.040
<v Speaker 2>could spend a whole podcast talking about the changes and

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:48.879
<v Speaker 2>what's good and bad and all that stuff. But when

0:48:48.880 --> 0:48:50.840
<v Speaker 2>you're starting to talk to a group of people that

0:48:51.000 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 2>really only know the course they play, having that ability

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to go to something that they understand outside of their

0:48:58.719 --> 0:49:00.720
<v Speaker 2>little window really helps.

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:02.279
<v Speaker 3>So I'll do.

0:49:03.960 --> 0:49:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's ridiculous the amount of space I have between

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 2>my computer, my tablet, dropbox, external hard drives of stuff

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I've just clipped from years of just looking at stuff.

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the old stuff is so cool. It's

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>i mean, just it and it's got to be so

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>helpful when you come to a project like Oak Hill

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 1>or Inverness where you've had like a rich championship history,

0:49:31.719 --> 0:49:35.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, like where you've got all these old photos.

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.000
<v Speaker 2>It makes a huge difference. I mean here at Inverness,

0:49:37.880 --> 0:49:41.000
<v Speaker 2>S P. Jermaine wrote a book before the thirty one

0:49:41.120 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 2>open and did hand sketches of every hole and put

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:49.400
<v Speaker 2>pictures and descriptions and the golf course that evolved, you know,

0:49:49.440 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 2>since we're all first put it on the ground to

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that point. But it was a great way to understand

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:55.919
<v Speaker 2>how the golf course was playing, how the golf course

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 2>had evolved, the tweaks they needed to make to make

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:04.200
<v Speaker 2>it better. And there's great pictures from twenty even ads.

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:07.399
<v Speaker 2>This is maybe a secret, don't tell anybody.

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 3>You're telling everybody.

0:50:09.480 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Is ads are the greatest place to find hidden documentation.

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, when you're on the journey looking through this

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 2>old stuff, pay attention to the ads. An amazing story

0:50:22.520 --> 0:50:26.600
<v Speaker 2>at Siota started the project, had a wonderful dinner with

0:50:26.640 --> 0:50:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the board, and it's really right now, it's really is

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 2>a research project at the moment. There's no set that deadlines,

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:36.280
<v Speaker 2>scope anything. It's really a research project right at this moment.

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:39.759
<v Speaker 2>But we were hanging out in the lobby and there's

0:50:39.800 --> 0:50:43.640
<v Speaker 2>a trophy cabinet and there was a program from the

0:50:43.640 --> 0:50:47.840
<v Speaker 2>thirty one Ryder Cup and I was like, oh, that's awesome.

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen that. I didn't see it in any

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:52.920
<v Speaker 2>of their documentation. Ornything in the club historian, who's a

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:56.759
<v Speaker 2>great guy and a wonderful searcher of documentation, he's like, oh,

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.760
<v Speaker 2>there's nothing really in there. It's like, let's take a look.

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:02.759
<v Speaker 2>So they go get the key and we take it

0:51:02.800 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 2>out and start to flip through. Well in hidden in

0:51:04.880 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 2>the ad space was a picture of every Green's complex

0:51:09.840 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 2>and they didn't know it was there, you know. So

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 2>it's it's the places you least expect to find that

0:51:16.160 --> 0:51:20.160
<v Speaker 2>information is sometimes where you find the best stuff. So

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 2>sorry if I've given away one of my secrets.

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Old ads are cool. I feel like advertising it might

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>be making a renaissance, but the old ads are so

0:51:31.280 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 1>much better than like the I mean, I think nothing

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:37.760
<v Speaker 1>really good happened from like nineteen seventy to nineteen ninety.

0:51:37.760 --> 0:51:39.160
<v Speaker 1>From a creative sense.

0:51:39.880 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you know.

0:51:41.360 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 2>We technology is a wonderful thing, but when you use

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:51.760
<v Speaker 2>it as a crutch to eliminate the creativity or the craft,

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that's where it gets dangerous. And I think

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 2>that's really where you see the golf architects that are

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 2>popular now and do good work, not just popular, but

0:52:01.600 --> 0:52:02.360
<v Speaker 2>doing good work.

0:52:02.880 --> 0:52:03.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, they have.

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 2>More of that respect of the craft, and they're not

0:52:08.239 --> 0:52:13.360
<v Speaker 2>relying on, you know, every modern convenience to create golf.

0:52:14.320 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 3>If you know what I mean.

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>You know what you're saying, You're ready for overrated, underrated.

0:52:19.840 --> 0:52:20.480
<v Speaker 3>We'll give it a go.

0:52:21.400 --> 0:52:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Long par threes.

0:52:25.440 --> 0:52:27.480
<v Speaker 2>They're underrated in the fact that there should be more

0:52:27.520 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 2>of them, but they're really hard to create for the

0:52:30.680 --> 0:52:33.720
<v Speaker 2>tour pro right. We spoke about that a little bit yesterday.

0:52:34.440 --> 0:52:36.680
<v Speaker 2>You know what's the greatest long part three that they

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:40.960
<v Speaker 2>play on somewhat of a regular basis, you know, maybe

0:52:41.040 --> 0:52:44.719
<v Speaker 2>eight at Oakmont? Is that a great hole?

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:46.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, it's long.

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean so my theory is that the short

0:52:53.640 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>part four is now the long part three.

0:52:56.040 --> 0:52:56.239
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:52:56.280 --> 0:53:01.319
<v Speaker 2>But the cool thing about a part three is that

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:05.040
<v Speaker 2>at least at that upper echelon from a long distance,

0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:07.560
<v Speaker 2>is you feel compelled to hit the longest club even

0:53:07.600 --> 0:53:09.759
<v Speaker 2>though it might not be the best play, you know,

0:53:09.840 --> 0:53:10.160
<v Speaker 2>if you.

0:53:10.239 --> 0:53:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Because it's because of par. It's the one thing what

0:53:12.920 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>par does.

0:53:13.719 --> 0:53:17.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's a mind kind of a mind screw, right,

0:53:20.360 --> 0:53:24.840
<v Speaker 2>And I think on on short short four's the the

0:53:24.880 --> 0:53:27.680
<v Speaker 2>guy that is trying to overpower it. Will you know,

0:53:27.719 --> 0:53:30.200
<v Speaker 2>always pull the big club and go for the heroic shot.

0:53:30.239 --> 0:53:34.399
<v Speaker 2>And there's a cool risk reward to that, and there's

0:53:34.400 --> 0:53:36.319
<v Speaker 2>course management of laying back. But when you have the

0:53:36.360 --> 0:53:41.160
<v Speaker 2>par three, everybody's pulling a club to try to get there.

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and it's always the front, always open.

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:45.880
<v Speaker 3>So co that's it.

0:53:46.160 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean long par threes are so there's like

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:55.080
<v Speaker 1>eight at Olympia Fields North like two eighty. But it's

0:53:55.560 --> 0:53:58.319
<v Speaker 1>it almost people like it goes back to like this

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>fair and unfair. People think it's like unfair. It's like

0:54:01.920 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what what what is fair and unfair? Because so pointless

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:08.600
<v Speaker 1>like so what it's like it's a really hardhole. If

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>you make a three, you pick up some shots on people. Right,

0:54:12.760 --> 0:54:15.400
<v Speaker 1>par is really good in a long par three.

0:54:16.040 --> 0:54:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And I think putting the ball in the peg.

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:25.359
<v Speaker 2>From a par three standpoint, I really would love for

0:54:25.400 --> 0:54:28.959
<v Speaker 2>you to play really a good short, a good long

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 2>in two in the middle. I mean ideally, sometimes the

0:54:33.600 --> 0:54:34.880
<v Speaker 2>property gives you what it gives you.

0:54:35.680 --> 0:54:38.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what's the brilliance of the McDonald and

0:54:38.600 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Rainer template par three is is each of them were

0:54:41.280 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like uniquely different, especially like it's too bad, like the

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:47.920
<v Speaker 1>Barritz hole doesn't play like it should with modern technology,

0:54:48.400 --> 0:54:50.839
<v Speaker 1>and like, you know, if you had a Burritz at

0:54:50.840 --> 0:54:54.480
<v Speaker 1>two eighty, a ri Dan at two thirty and Eden

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:57.279
<v Speaker 1>at one ninety, and a short at one fifty.

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.120
<v Speaker 3>Like, oh, that's a pretty good mix, right.

0:54:59.120 --> 0:55:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that tests every single type of shot. You got

0:55:01.800 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>to hit your you got to hit a wedge, you

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:06.759
<v Speaker 1>got to hit a mid iron, you got to hit

0:55:06.760 --> 0:55:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a long iron, and you got to hit like a

0:55:08.440 --> 0:55:09.960
<v Speaker 1>driver three would yeah.

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:13.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the things you know I was trying

0:55:13.960 --> 0:55:16.800
<v Speaker 2>to do here at Inverness was to replicate the shots

0:55:16.800 --> 0:55:18.799
<v Speaker 2>that were hitting the twenty open. So we made the

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:22.080
<v Speaker 2>long part three at like two seventy nine. It's long,

0:55:22.800 --> 0:55:24.839
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I've gotten some feedback of you know

0:55:24.920 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 2>that that's that's maybe not the direction the game should

0:55:29.040 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 2>be going. But listen, I just move up a right

0:55:32.760 --> 0:55:39.280
<v Speaker 2>for sure, that's awesome. Yeah right, but you know, I

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the game of golf, the history of golf, has been

0:55:41.400 --> 0:55:46.080
<v Speaker 2>that on those holes, the problem involves swinging a long club.

0:55:47.360 --> 0:55:49.480
<v Speaker 3>In making a golf shot. Yeah.

0:55:49.960 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 2>So you know, it's a shame that the golf ball

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 2>and technology and how the great skill level of these

0:55:56.280 --> 0:56:00.879
<v Speaker 2>guys has made that long three tough tough to find

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:02.399
<v Speaker 2>the best way to do it.

0:56:02.920 --> 0:56:05.799
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like the par fives are like that

0:56:05.920 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in some sense. But with a par five people feel

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:12.760
<v Speaker 1>like they can miss a long shot, more so because

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you can still get up and down.

0:56:13.920 --> 0:56:16.000
<v Speaker 2>For Berdie, I think one of the things you see

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 2>in post war designs, the par fives, which should have

0:56:20.080 --> 0:56:24.200
<v Speaker 2>the most strategy, probably have the least, you know, especially

0:56:24.239 --> 0:56:28.439
<v Speaker 2>some of the there is a lot of and maybe

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:30.520
<v Speaker 2>it's not some of the best architects of that era,

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 2>but a lot of golf you see, it's like mindless

0:56:33.120 --> 0:56:35.680
<v Speaker 2>par fives. Right, you hit as far as you can.

0:56:36.239 --> 0:56:41.880
<v Speaker 1>The layup, that's where there's no thought, right none. That

0:56:41.960 --> 0:56:45.760
<v Speaker 1>is My next overrated underrated was long par fives.

0:56:45.880 --> 0:56:51.840
<v Speaker 2>Okay, again, I think it encourages you to play different shots.

0:56:52.160 --> 0:56:57.360
<v Speaker 2>So being able to hit whatever you want off the

0:56:57.360 --> 0:56:59.560
<v Speaker 2>t if you don't feel comfortable hitting driver that day,

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:03.040
<v Speaker 2>you can throttle back and hit three wood or whatever

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:07.040
<v Speaker 2>or hybrid. Now on a long five, you got to

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:09.520
<v Speaker 2>make a decision. You can't continue to let off. You

0:57:09.640 --> 0:57:13.239
<v Speaker 2>got to either go again with the same stick or

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, really have three demanding shots. It makes you

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:19.800
<v Speaker 2>make a choice, which makes it interesting, makes you think.

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:23.560
<v Speaker 2>So I guess I'm underrated there too.

0:57:25.200 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I think TV people hate long par fives. They think

0:57:28.960 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they it's boring, but it's like, yeah, that's what like

0:57:33.960 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>every par five was was like you have to hit

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:39.640
<v Speaker 1>three really good shots. And that's why it's always the

0:57:39.720 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 1>number one handicap hole is because like for a higher

0:57:42.800 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 1>handicap hitting three really good shots it's like really hard

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:48.720
<v Speaker 1>to do, and for a good player it's pretty.

0:57:48.400 --> 0:57:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Simple, no doubt about it.

0:57:50.280 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and look, it's I would I would say it's

0:57:54.080 --> 0:57:57.120
<v Speaker 2>probably only boring for the guy not standing over the ball, right,

0:57:57.280 --> 0:57:59.720
<v Speaker 2>you got to make exactly good decisions, good swings.

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that's I.

0:58:01.280 --> 0:58:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Was thinking about. TV kind of hurts a lot of

0:58:05.200 --> 0:58:09.120
<v Speaker 1>things with golf. It hurts conditioning with the brown. It

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hurts like design in a sense because you know, like

0:58:13.600 --> 0:58:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a long part five, really good long, really good long

0:58:16.400 --> 0:58:20.480
<v Speaker 1>part fives are almost like like they aren't given the

0:58:20.800 --> 0:58:23.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of praise they should be, because it's almost the

0:58:23.360 --> 0:58:26.000
<v Speaker 1>hardshold of design it is.

0:58:26.080 --> 0:58:29.280
<v Speaker 2>And and then it goes back to what's a long

0:58:29.400 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 2>five for which player?

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:58:32.520 --> 0:58:34.600
<v Speaker 2>And trying to make it a long five for everybody?

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:37.760
<v Speaker 2>It can be tough.

0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:44.640
<v Speaker 1>That's last overrated, underrated A W.

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Tilling? Hast you set me up.

0:58:51.000 --> 0:58:55.840
<v Speaker 2>So I'll go underrated again? I guess because I think

0:58:55.880 --> 0:58:56.840
<v Speaker 2>he's a smart man.

0:58:56.960 --> 0:59:02.440
<v Speaker 3>I think he gets it, gives you more leoy, Is

0:59:02.440 --> 0:59:04.000
<v Speaker 3>that right? All right?

0:59:06.600 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I think why that is is I think from a

0:59:10.240 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 2>human perspective, we always want to package things. We always

0:59:12.640 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 2>want to put neat bows, you know, like Donald Ross.

0:59:15.880 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of times you think these flat

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:20.240
<v Speaker 2>bottom bunkers with grass faces and they look like bathtubs.

0:59:20.520 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 2>But when you study his work, there was way more

0:59:23.040 --> 0:59:26.120
<v Speaker 2>to it than that. I think Tilling has you. The

0:59:26.160 --> 0:59:28.280
<v Speaker 2>same can be said that, you know, you might want

0:59:28.280 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 2>to find two or three things that really were his

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:33.320
<v Speaker 2>calling cards, but when you look at the number of

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 2>courses he did, and and some of the things he

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 2>did very creative, and I think he's probably one step

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 2>behind Thomas in in listening and learning from what he

0:59:43.920 --> 0:59:48.960
<v Speaker 2>saw and experienced, and especially in Philadelphia. And I think

0:59:48.960 --> 0:59:52.000
<v Speaker 2>he gets an incredibly bad rep by some people about

0:59:52.040 --> 0:59:53.160
<v Speaker 2>his later life and.

0:59:53.080 --> 0:59:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Some of his struggles.

0:59:54.080 --> 0:59:57.080
<v Speaker 2>And we talked a little bit about his time with

0:59:57.120 --> 1:00:00.240
<v Speaker 2>the PGA, some of the things he wrote about out.

1:00:00.320 --> 1:00:01.640
<v Speaker 2>I think some of the things he wrote about are

1:00:01.680 --> 1:00:07.800
<v Speaker 2>incredibly brilliant, look like everything you could find fault maybe

1:00:07.840 --> 1:00:10.880
<v Speaker 2>with with a statement or two anywhere.

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:12.160
<v Speaker 3>But I think.

1:00:14.320 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 2>He may have done a disservice to some clubs at

1:00:16.520 --> 1:00:23.720
<v Speaker 2>that time in eliminating hard to maintain features. And I

1:00:23.720 --> 1:00:25.960
<v Speaker 2>don't know if I only use dumbing down, but you know,

1:00:26.360 --> 1:00:29.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe changing the fabric of some of the courses in

1:00:29.360 --> 1:00:32.240
<v Speaker 2>some of those recommendations. But look, he was really trying

1:00:32.280 --> 1:00:35.720
<v Speaker 2>to make the game survive and make good decisions and

1:00:35.960 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 2>make uh, make golf as good as it could be

1:00:38.520 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 2>during a very challenging time.

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:43.760
<v Speaker 3>And we talked a little yesterday.

1:00:43.800 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 2>I think some historians or golfers would say his article

1:00:47.400 --> 1:00:51.040
<v Speaker 2>that he wrote about early American golf versus what he

1:00:51.160 --> 1:00:53.440
<v Speaker 2>considered modern golf or and I kind of put in

1:00:53.480 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 2>the Philadelphia school where he talked about, you know, the

1:00:56.920 --> 1:00:58.560
<v Speaker 2>duffer zone that he had to you had to carry

1:00:58.560 --> 1:01:01.040
<v Speaker 2>bunkers off the tee, and then you had to maybe

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:03.880
<v Speaker 2>carry another set of bunkers, and then the greens heavily guarded,

1:01:04.680 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know that versus having a good fairway bunker,

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:14.120
<v Speaker 2>a good green side bunker, an angled approach and hitting

1:01:14.120 --> 1:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>good golf shots but leaving space for the higher handicap

1:01:17.120 --> 1:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>golfer to play. I think it's brilliant and often I

1:01:24.600 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>use that. I'll show those that article to a group

1:01:28.320 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>and I'll say, look at how okay, this is just

1:01:30.840 --> 1:01:34.560
<v Speaker 2>a very simple way to explain strategy visually. And then

1:01:34.600 --> 1:01:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I'll show the first hole at Shannakok that maybe is

1:01:39.840 --> 1:01:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the most underrated hole on the golf course, but it

1:01:43.720 --> 1:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>might express that strategy more than anything. Because the more

1:01:48.800 --> 1:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>you risk you take off the tee, the more right

1:01:51.840 --> 1:01:54.680
<v Speaker 2>you aim, or the more you challenge that fairway bunker,

1:01:55.000 --> 1:01:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the better your angle is into the green, and the

1:01:57.800 --> 1:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>more you play away from that bunker. Now you got

1:02:01.160 --> 1:02:03.400
<v Speaker 2>to carry the left green side boker.

1:02:03.880 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and long, it's just dead and it usually plays

1:02:06.760 --> 1:02:10.160
<v Speaker 1>down wind and it's like a really really hard little

1:02:10.200 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>web shot.

1:02:12.120 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean I birdied the hole.

1:02:14.360 --> 1:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Okay, just saying Tiger made a triple Yeah right, I'm

1:02:19.520 --> 1:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>probably better than Tiger right now.

1:02:21.040 --> 1:02:21.480
<v Speaker 3>You could be.

1:02:21.720 --> 1:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but yeah that that hole is awesome and there's

1:02:25.200 --> 1:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>so much space.

1:02:26.640 --> 1:02:29.640
<v Speaker 2>Right and there's probably more. There was more, you know,

1:02:29.880 --> 1:02:30.400
<v Speaker 2>years ago.

1:02:33.280 --> 1:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, thanks for coming on, thanks for having

1:02:36.960 --> 1:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>me find you on Twitter.

1:02:39.120 --> 1:02:41.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah green g C a green GCA.

1:02:41.480 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>That's me, not really super active.

1:02:45.000 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 3>But well, look important. Thanks.

1:02:48.360 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, good stuff when you put it.

1:02:50.360 --> 1:02:54.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, I try to you know, quality over quantity maybe,

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>and I got a lot going on, so you know, it's.

1:02:56.800 --> 1:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>A good it's a good problem to have when you're busy.

1:02:59.600 --> 1:03:01.080
<v Speaker 3>It is very blessed.

1:03:01.160 --> 1:03:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I think people can probably figure out when I'm busy

1:03:03.400 --> 1:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and when I'm home.

1:03:05.520 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I think you can probably see that for me too.

1:03:09.720 --> 1:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, we're excited to uh see you. Keep

1:03:14.240 --> 1:03:15.439
<v Speaker 1>going and we'll talk to you soon.

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Awesome.

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks Cindy, you've been listening to the fried Egg podcast.

1:03:20.000 --> 1:03:21.560
<v Speaker 3>We do the digging for you.