WEBVTT - What We Can Learn From Struggles Past: Hong Kong

0:00:03.640 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Worst Happenings Here Ever, Bastards pod shit.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm Robert evans Um. This is it could Happen here,

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a daily podcast about the fact that everything seems to

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.319
<v Speaker 1>be falling apart, and wouldn't it be nice if we

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>tried to do something better than the stuff that's falling apart?

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>That seems like a good idea. Huh do you agree

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>with me my my panel for today's episode? Yes, I

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>agree with that general concept. That's Garrison Davis. And who

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:39.599
<v Speaker 1>else is agreeing with me today? That Christopher Wong is?

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that Christopher Wong mildly agreeing, mildly agreeing, mildly agreeing. Wow, well,

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's extra disturbing because you you you you're in charge

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of today's episode. So in brief, when we did our

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>first so you know, if you're new to the show,

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>come back check out the first five episodes of the show.

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:59.279
<v Speaker 1>They're scripted Evergreen kind of layout our philosophy on the

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>crumbling of society and what to do next. But one

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the questions we had is, Okay, it kind of

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like one of the only ways potentially forward without

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>just accepting that everything's going to keep falling apart is

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of big general strike that forces action on

0:01:13.040 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, things like climate that are are we can't

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>really wait on anymore. And of course one of the

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>big questions is, well, all right, you get a bunch

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of people to agree to strike, how do you agree

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>what to do with the strike? How do you agree?

0:01:23.840 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>What like the terms are? You know, how do you

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>how do you put together a list of demands? How

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 1>do you get millions of people to agree to a

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>list of demands and then fight the government in order

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to institute those demands? Um? And I don't know the

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>answer to that question. Um, but there are some people

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world right now who did a version of

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that in Hong Kong. And today we're going to talk

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>with someone who can talk to us about that process

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully kind of give us some insight both and

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>how it worked and what didn't work over there, and

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that might inform us on what we might do here

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>someday in the future. Uh, if you know that, that'd

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be nice. Maybe did I get it right? Chris? Yeah, yeah,

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>this is yeah, that's good enough for that ringing endorsement. Yeah,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>you know. Okay, So so to to to work more

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>of this out. Um, I've brought in j n who

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is a writer, researcher and organizer with a Laosan collective.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Um he's currently be I said of Los Angeles and Jane, Okay,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>do you do you want to talk a little bit

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about what Lauson is and then also talk a bit

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>about how, you know, for people who've sort of forgotten,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>weren't paying attention at the time, how the Hong Kong

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 1>protest started. Yeah. Sure, thanks thanks for having me excited

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to be here and to talk about this kind of

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff because I've been wanting to kind of you know,

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about this and discuss the way things have gone

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.519
<v Speaker 1>with the protests for a while. Um It's been hard

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to find the time, I guess with our cascading crises

0:02:56.919 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. Um, but yeah, so I guess Lao Son.

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll speak briefly about law Song, since you know, I'm

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not speaking on behalf of the collective in this interview,

0:03:05.520 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>but just kind of like, um, talking about how we

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>started and then everything else after that is is kind

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of just my view of things. UM. So Lawson has

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>members with kind of like different leftist orientations, um, from

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, anarchists to more social democratic um, and you know,

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been a kind of a lot to work through,

0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>as you can imagine. But I think it also that

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>also kind of reflects the necessity of our political condition, um,

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:35.240
<v Speaker 1>which is that they're really you know, in my view,

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>there hasn't really been any internationalist groups that focus on

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong from those different perspectives um, at least for

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>me when I was growing up. Um, most of the

0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like radical Hong Kong folks that I knew

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>would tend to just be uh, you know, we would

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>join different we would join other movements and stuff like that.

0:03:54.520 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Like there was never anything that was Hong Kong centered, um.

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>And I guess stuff in the daspora, uh it's pretty conservative.

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, the diasporad folks that I grew up with,

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we're we're pretty conservative. So there wasn't that that kind

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of avenue for organizing, unlike other kind of Asian dasper

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>groups like uh, Philipinos folks have like this kind of

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>very long history of radical das board organizing and I

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>don't really think Hong Kong has had that ever. So

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why law Son is this kind of

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>very broad tent, big umbrella type of organ where we

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>try where we do kind of collect a lot of

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>folks who are you know, progressive, left leaning to to

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:38.559
<v Speaker 1>to otherwise. Um And but I I guess our general

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>orientation is the kind of neither Washington nor Beijing line

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>with with varying degrees of general anti statis um in

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the mix. Um And I think, you know, I'm hopeful

0:04:49.920 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that this is helping to build the foundation for more

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of that in the Hong Kong diaspora and then hopefully

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 1>in the broader Asian dasper as I see it, since

0:04:57.760 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the general divide tends to be kind of

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>like you know, radical Asian folks will be anti U

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 1>s imperiless, which is great, but then specifically do that

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 1>by expressing support for states elsewhere and um, you know

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that can that can take good forms and bad forms

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. So um And I guess just really quick,

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.240
<v Speaker 1>we we do both kind of organizing and writing and translation.

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Those are kind of the three pillars of the group,

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and the bedrock of our work is really

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of aiming to create international solidarity with Left US

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>around the world to kind of amplify left his voices

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong, but then also kind of create nonstate

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:37.719
<v Speaker 1>centered connections across Asia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Yeah,

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>and how do you I mean, I think one of

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the big questions that that keeps coming to me over

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and over again is how do you overcome the how

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>do you overcome the resistance to internationals? And that's caused

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>by kind of I don't know, conspiracism may not be

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly the right way to frame it, but this belief

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that you know, your your struggle for liberation is really

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>just a c I, A OP or whatever like this

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this this, this case of brain worms that keeps that

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I see as a major barrier towards you know, kind

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of functional internationalism in a lot of cases, particularly within

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States. Um, what are some ways in which

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you you've actually seen some luck in combating that? Yeah,

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's that's really the million dollar question, I think,

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>which is, like, you know, I think if we had

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>figured it out, it wouldn't be an issue. Unfortunately, it's

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 1>growing problem growing. So in many ways, from one view

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 1>could say that it's we haven't been very successful in

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>combating that. But I think in some you know, some

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>of the leading groups in that camp you know, the

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>campus I think are very well funded and they have

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 1>very powerful connections. When you say campus, could you explain

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that term briefly, because I don't think it's something and

0:06:49.600 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly that's when we've talked about on the show, and

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of our listeners probably wouldn't be

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:57.559
<v Speaker 1>familiar with that. Yeah. Sure, I mean, I'm sure Chris

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>could speak much more about this. I feel like you

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of your expertise is is kind of explaining these very

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of deep left traditions and whatnot. But I guess

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>my understanding is is just very generally the campus will UM.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like the anti imperialism that UM sees

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the US as the kind of number one enemy and

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.400
<v Speaker 1>everything kind of is is you know, they're the primary

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>contradiction I guess to use some malice terminology UM, and

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>that everything must be subordinated to that, to that cause

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of like being against the U. S empire UM, And

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>usually that requires supporting what they see as uh, you know,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>abbreviate as a as actually existing socialism UH states that

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of use that that are nominally socialists, nominally communist

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and use all the kind of like imagery and

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>trappings of that um to kind of like whole maintain

0:07:54.320 --> 0:07:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that political identity despite the kind of material reality of

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>their politics and economy and all that. So um, Yeah,

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I can tell more about that later maybe, But I

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>think one thing that I've been chatting with a lot

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 1>of my kind of like uh, radical Asian friends, who

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>are you know, I I am very kind of obviously

0:08:15.640 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>against these campus because they are so veriantly against Hong Kong.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know, other folks that I've talked to have

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>have said, you know, they really kind of understand that

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>viewpoint in the sunset. It's a very emotional attachment, right.

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>It's like folks for you know, folks let's let's say

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Vietnamese folks who uh their families were refugees and had

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to come to the US because of the Vietnam War,

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>for example. Then you know when when you're the child

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of refugees and you're like, why the hell am I

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>here in America, and then you start to kind of

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like learn about the history and background of what happened,

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>then it makes sense that you would have this kind

0:08:56.000 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of very emotional attachment to a s these actually existing

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>social states UM and those histories and those those radical

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>anti imperial histories and whatnot, despite the fact that you know,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>clearly history has shown that they have either betrayed their

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>own movements or gone down in defeat and whatnot, which,

0:09:16.559 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's two ways to react to that.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.079
<v Speaker 1>One is to kind of continue to cling to the fantasy,

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and then one is to try and figure out what's next. Right,

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>It's like, how can we either revive that or continue

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.079
<v Speaker 1>that in in the ways that makes sense in this world? Right?

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I think, you know, I guess to answer

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the initial question, I think it is a little bit

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>easier to for especially if we're like young, newly radicalized

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:47.119
<v Speaker 1>Asian folks, it's a little bit easier to maintain that fantasy.

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And then, you know, I think the way that media,

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, social media and online media has gone nowadays,

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's becoming distilled into even like the most

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>simple and understand bowl like nuggets of that, so like

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 1>infographics and stuff like that. So I feel like that

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>entire ecosystem uh tries to make it so that people

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>do stay within that fantasy rather than trying to do

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the harder work of like how do we extrapolate this

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>or how do we adapt this to our conditions? Now? Yeah,

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, I can talk about this

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 1>for a little like a brief amount because I don't

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>want to spend Jewish time. Yeah, I'm talking about these people,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know, like I think, like like one way

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 1>to look at them is so camp is um is

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>a thing from from the Cold War. Right. It's basically like, okay,

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you pick you pick one of your like two maybe

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>three camps. If you come an online movement, it's like, okay,

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you're really with the Soviets or with you with the Americans? Right,

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 1>And you know, part part of this happening here is

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like that that's a very easy way to look

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>at the world. And this is this is why it's

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>so easy to sort of like condense it in infographics. Right,

0:10:51.240 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like there's two sides. One of them is good,

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>one of them bad. But you know, this is like

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the thing that's that's sort of the problem here is

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that the Cold War is over, like it's done. It's

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's gone, right, the communist countries are gone. None

0:11:04.960 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff, none of the stuff exists anymore. And

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>so you know, and it's it's very easy particular, particularly

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for for the diaspor to sort of get stuck, suck

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>like back into the politics where well, okay, well well

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>no, no no, no, hold on, there's a new Cold War.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>The Cold War is happening again. It's all the same stuff,

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and you can just sort of like tack all the

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>same symbols back on. But you know, it leads you

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>to down these pasts where you know, and this is

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>like like something Janna I think is dealt with a lot,

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>which is like, you know, when when when the protests

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>started happening in Hong Kong, all these people are like, oh,

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>this is all the CIA, and it's like not at all,

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, it's sort of yees. So it's they

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they they come to see this world in a way

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of purely conspiratorial and purely sort of based

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>in this old Cold War stuff that just doesn't exist anymore. Yeah,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I think part of the problem is that there's been

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>this consistent failure and this isn't even really a left

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:01.439
<v Speaker 1>or right issue. This is like a a a culture

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>issue and kind of how to refer to places that

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>are outside of the US or sort of you know,

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>in the old days, the USSR is influence block. Like

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you have terms like third world and now Global South,

0:12:13.080 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and all of them are really um bad, bad terms

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.439
<v Speaker 1>for kind And I'm We're going to try to have

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Joey I U bon soon. But I've come to like

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>the term the periphery to refer to those states that

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>are kind of outside of or at least kind of

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>mingling influences from those you know, the major power blocks.

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and I but it's it is um it I

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>think has led to this that kind of binary thinking

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of the failure too. I think the complexity of

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the actual global geopolitical situation leads to a failure, leads

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of a rejection of that complexity, in which

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>everything boils down to either pro or anti um socialism

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>or whatever on a lot of people's heads. And I

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>don't think that is a particularly good framework for making

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>good decisions. Yeah, absolutely, And yeah that that piece by

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Joey is really amazing, And yeah, I think, you know,

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason you know, a lot of times

0:13:10.800 --> 0:13:12.320
<v Speaker 1>folks are just kind of like, well, you know, these

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 1>these campus these tankis or whatever, it's just like they

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have no real world impacts, so like just don't bother uh,

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't don't spend too much time arguing with

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>them or whatever. But I guess the part that really

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>bothers me about all that is, I think what you're

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of just saying, Robert, is like it's reducing the

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.600
<v Speaker 1>complexity of places outside the US so much that it's dehumanizing. Right.

0:13:31.720 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just like people in Hong Kong aren't full humans

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to these people because they see it's like the c

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I you can just kind of parachute one or two

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>people in and lead like a two million person march, right,

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>as if Hong Kong people have no political agency of

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>their own or you know, understandings of how complex their

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:55.119
<v Speaker 1>own situation is, right, just this kind of interimperial entanglement

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that they're stuck in. So you know, there's this book

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>called Nothing Ever Dies by Vieton Win that I would

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 1>really recommend folks read, and I wish a lot of

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>these folks would read it too, because you know, his

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about memory in the Vietnam War. But I

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.120
<v Speaker 1>think the thing that really stuck out to me and

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that in that framework that he develops is like, you know,

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone is capable of doing right and wrong, and uh,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the way that we remember things like the

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam War, for example, there are always good and bad

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>sides that people UM each side will deploy those different

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 1>types of memory in order to like villainize others and

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>uh lionize themselves, right. And then so I guess you know,

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>he sees the true task as being able to recognize UM,

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the agency of all of us to do good and

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bad UM, and that that earned him a lot of

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>hate within the Vietnamese community, I think, right, because you're

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:54.440
<v Speaker 1>encouraged to you know, in southern California, you're encouraged to

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be very anti communist in Orange County, that that community,

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's the southern Vietnamese to Aspera. And then uh,

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, people in Vietnam saw him as as still

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like this this compromised person who lives in

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the US. The Vietnamese to Aspera. So it's it's kind

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of like, you know, no way to win there, and

0:15:15.000 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of residents with that in

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the Hong Kong ASPMA as well. I kind of want

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>to move us along if I can to actually talking

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>about UM the five demands and sort of the process

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>by which first off like, how you know, and this

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is a thing that like a lot of people who

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>marched in the streets during the Black Lives Matter protests

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>last year, the uprisings whatever you want to call them, um,

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>we kind of kept running into this wall of well

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>what do we what do we want? And a lot

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of folks were like, well, we want no police. But

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>also a lot of folks were like, well we just

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>want to defund or right, and we just want to

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>reform the police. And even some of those folks were like,

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:03.400
<v Speaker 1>we want to reform the police by giving them more

0:16:03.440 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>money and they'll hopefully kill less people. Like it was,

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it was, um, you know, I'm trying to speak abroad here, right.

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>There were different local kind of movements and organizations that

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>were more specific, but you had this tremendous amount of

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>energy and precedent amount of energy out in the streets. Um,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>but you did not have concerted demands. I think the

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>anchor was pretty concerned. I think everybody was more or

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>less pissed about the right things. But there was not

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>there was at no point did did we come together

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I think in a meaningful way on a big enough

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 1>scale to to force to force into the mainstream of

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>very specific set of demands. Um. And that's not even

0:16:43.480 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>really a criticism, it's just an acknowledgement of the reality, right. Um.

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Whereas in Hong Kong, I think one of the things

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that was really successful was the messaging, the way that

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of the messaging of the movement united around these

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>initially five demands, which I think was very successful. And

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm kind of curious, first off, how did that come about.

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>It really did kind of take center stage very quickly,

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I think, and I think some people maybe we're a

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit surprised by that, but um, it did. I

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>think it. You know, it really kind of crystallized around

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 1>because you know, the big protests happened kind of like

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 1>June nine, um, and it was just like millions of

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>people on the street, and you know, the protests were

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so singular in many ways, like it was the biggest

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>political mobilization in Hong Kong history. Um. And that had

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.720
<v Speaker 1>been kind of just like been boiling for the past

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:45.119
<v Speaker 1>like decade before that, And I think it was just

0:17:45.440 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the atmosphere was was kind of like crystallized in the

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>sense that everyone like just everyone was scared of what

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the CCP was going to do next. And I think

0:17:54.800 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that created this kind of common understanding for people to

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>come together very quickly and easily around these uh, these

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>five demands. And you know, on June June twelfth was

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>when there was like the first really big escalation of

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>police brutality um, and people were kind of like, you know,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>police kettled people inside buildings and then tear gas them,

0:18:17.119 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>which was just like the most outrageous thing. And you know,

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Hong Kong's either were formerly not they

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 1>didn't really care much about politics, or they didn't really

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>care much about police violence because you know, that's been

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>going on for a very long time against marginalized people

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong. But I think just the fact that

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I happened to the certain set of protesters, um, non

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>violent protesters at that time, UM, that was one of

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the really big kind of like breaking points. And then

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 1>on June fift there was there was a protester called

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Marco Lung and he had set up on a scaffolding

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>at the top of like a really tall shopping mall

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in this yellow rain code, and he had a banner

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that had some of these demands on the banner. UM.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, eventually he fell off the scaffold

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and died, and that was really kind of like, you know,

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>wake up call to a lot of people about how

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>dire people were feeling about this. So there was a

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of emotion behind it that allowed people to come together,

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>um around these five demands, you know, so like full

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>withdrawal the bill, retraction of the characterization that the protests

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>were riots, anesty for for arrested protesters, establishment of you know,

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>some commission into police abuse, and then uh, Carrie Lamb resigning,

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and universal suffrage. So it was it's a really interesting

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>set of five demands, and I think, I guess to

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>get to your question, I think it runs the gamut

0:19:41.760 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>between like very doable too not so doable, I guess, right, Like, uh,

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the universal suffrage, when I think is like, you know,

0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that's there because that's been the demand from Hong Konger's

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for like a very long time, at least a decade

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>before that. So but then you know, I think that

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not. I don't think anyone I've really thought that

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>was going to happen. The government was never going to

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>concede to that. But uh, you know, the very first amount,

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>full with drawal, of the bill was very doable, and

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it did end up happening very soon after the death

0:20:13.680 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of Marko Lung Right, So, um, I don't know, I

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that helps answer the question a little bit.

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Is just like the five demands, Uh, we're we're very

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>pragmatic in some ways but then also aspirational in other ways,

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and that that gave a lot of different people different

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>avenues to like come into it. And there was I

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>as I understand, there was like an app right, like,

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 1>can we talk a little bit more about like the

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of methods by which I mean it was that

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>more forum actually voting on actions or was that one

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:45.919
<v Speaker 1>of the ways in which demands were kind of arrived

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>at as well? Yeah, so there's it wasn't I mean,

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it was telegram. A lot of people use telegrams, but um,

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you know l I h k G, which is like

0:20:56.680 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a really popular Internet forum. I guess kind of the

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:04.679
<v Speaker 1>equivalent is something like reddit um. And you know, I

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:06.959
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say that they were kind of like the centralized

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>site for where like decisions were like made an issued

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>from there, but it was the kind of most active

0:21:13.400 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>site where people would go to discuss strategy tactics and

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>debate things. Um. And you know, this might get to

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>some later questions about like the role of the right

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 1>wing and all this, but I would say that the

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>overall character of the forum was slightly more you know,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:36.920
<v Speaker 1>right leaning, or at least they were sympathetic to that

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to that position, right. So I think in that way, UM,

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that might be how things eventually, like you know, a

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>year and a half later, started moving more towards the

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:53.880
<v Speaker 1>right um through that forum. Yeah, but there was never like,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, there was never like, oh, okay, we're gonna

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>run a poll and then whatever the decision of this is,

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that's going to side what we do tomorrow. Like, it

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>was never that formalized, um. And you know, it was

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>decentralized in the sense that people would discuss what would

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>be the best tactic and then you could just like

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 1>split off into like affinity groups and then you could

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 1>choose to follow that if you want the next day

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>or or or not right and a lot of times

0:22:20.000 --> 0:22:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it was like people would be making these decisions on

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.959
<v Speaker 1>the fly the day of, at the front lines on

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>those telegram groups and stuff. And how was it that, Um,

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question I'm trying to answer for myself

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is like it seems like, you know, for a movement

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that was in it, you know, it internally had a

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of ideological diversity and a lot of disagreement. It

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.520
<v Speaker 1>seems like there was more of a concerted agreement about

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>goals in Hong Kong UM than I've seen in anything,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:52.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, state side in my life. And I'm

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of wondering how that process of consensus or if

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I or if I'm even kind of approaching it from

0:22:58.200 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the wrong perspective by thinking that there was that white

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a consensus. Maybe that's something that just reached out internationally.

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess. I mean, I can talk a little bit

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about kind of like what decentralization meant in Hong Kong

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and the wider context of like the political culture there,

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>because like I was saying, like the protests in twenty

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen were really singular in the sunset like um, it

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>was like a really big cultural shift from previous political

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>events in Hong Kong. So like occupied, the Occupied Central

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Movement inteen that morphed into the Umbrella movement UM was

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:33.959
<v Speaker 1>this kind of like Sunday nine day occupation of like

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the city. But like most notably the

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>central banking areas. And it was it was like very

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>much led by student protests groups, you know, like Joshua

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Wong and all the all the other people that you

0:23:45.640 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>would have heard of, um. And then also these kind

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of like old guard political parties, and they were the

0:23:51.480 --> 0:23:55.159
<v Speaker 1>ones kind of literally on a stage kind of like issuing, Okay,

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>this is what we should all do. But we've we've

0:23:57.080 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>come to our analysis and these are the best decisions.

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.119
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the the Umbrella Movement was, you know,

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.160
<v Speaker 1>from one perspective, from from just kind of the pragmatic

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 1>perspective of like achieving its goals. Like it just a

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>complete failure, right. It was just seventy nine days occupation

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and they were just like swept away by the police.

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And but you know, I think that the consciousness of

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.120
<v Speaker 1>what happened, which was just like we're gonna sit here

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and then we're gonna have leaders tell us what to do.

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that really kind of affected people when the

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Umbrella Movement collapsed. And you know, in in that five

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>years afterwards, as the CCP was kind of like ramping

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:38.439
<v Speaker 1>up its repression. UM, that's what was kind of like

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the light switch for people was like, we can't replicate

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>this kind of like follow the leaders style thing anymore. Um.

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>And you know the movements before that too was like

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the occupied There was an occupied Central in twelve as well,

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously to coincide with Global occupy. That was

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>also this kind of like we're all just going to

0:24:57.520 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>camp out here at the plaza beneath hsp SEE headquarters,

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and um, there was there was kind of like the

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Occupy Wall Street type of like trying to build consensus

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and decision making there. Um. But I think it was

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so it was like so hemmed in based on the

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>act of occupation. Um. That that's why you know, people

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>also learned from that that just you know, camping out

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>is not really going to do anything in the Hong

0:25:26.280 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>Kong context. Um. And then that's where all this kind

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of like decentralization be water and the fluidity and all

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. That's where that sprang out of. So so

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess if I'm understanding this right, the demands kind

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>of had been like floating around and then you have

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>the sort of political conscious as you have all of

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>this stuff anger crystallizing. And then is it accurate to

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>say that when Marcael young fell from the building, like

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:59.239
<v Speaker 1>holding the signs like that. That's how it's sort of

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>like became officialized, like the sort of the rage around

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that like crystallize it into a thing. They were issued.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the demands like existed before that, but I

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>think the when Marco died, that's when like that gave

0:26:12.760 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who were either kind of like um,

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>either apathetic or they like didn't really agree or you know,

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>they saw no way to like kind of participate in

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what became just kind of like it was just like

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>every you know, eventually everyone had an avenue into this,

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>into the movement. UM. I think that's what crystallized that, right,

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and it made the demands accessible to everyone. So I

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.560
<v Speaker 1>guess I guess the question is just like where did

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they come from? Like who actually like rope them? Yeah? Yeah,

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.199
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would have taken place on the on

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>l I h KG right, And as far as I know,

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>no one, there's no like authorship or ownership over them. UM.

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 1>People are anonymous on that forum, right, So in that way,

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's like somewhat like four Chad like UM. And yeah,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was definitely voting on all h KG

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 1>UM and I would assume at some point that happened

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:21.120
<v Speaker 1>to bring the five demands together. So there's another thing

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:26.479
<v Speaker 1>I think that that watching it from the outside was

0:27:26.560 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>really interesting about the protest that like very much did

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 1>that does not happen in the US. Which was the

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>way that the sort of more militant factions who are

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>willing to fight the police for like main developed and

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>maintained like a working relationship with the not the very

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>nonviolent factions. And it might understanding it was to sort

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of solidifies after the storm of the Legislative Council. Um,

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.159
<v Speaker 1>could you talk about that a bit more and like

0:27:55.320 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 1>is that actually like is that what happened? And how

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>how did that actually happen? Because that seems like a

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>very important moment. It just hasn't happened in the US. Yeah,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I mean, the way that that happened,

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think was just so um like there were so

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 1>many factors, um, that enabled that to happen. Because yeah,

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.879
<v Speaker 1>for the longest time, like in those previous movements, especially

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the Umbrella um, the Umbrella movement, and then in SI

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>there was something called the Fishball riots, which was like, um,

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, police were police and government officials were trying

0:28:29.640 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to like clear out street vendors because of like licensing

0:28:33.280 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>issues or whatever. And then you know, just a whole

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 1>bunch of kind of like radical folks. They're kind of

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:43.760
<v Speaker 1>like independence leaning uh folks, politicians and stuff. Um, you know,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of flat back on that, and it became violent.

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that was that was when the one

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>of the protest luminaries, Edward Luang was was he came

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>up with that that that kind of slogan, the free

0:28:57.000 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong Revolution of our time slogan. That's when he

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was in prison and after that the fish Ball riots.

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 1>But um, so there had been this kind of like

0:29:05.800 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 1>push and pull or like tension between the moderates and

0:29:08.760 --> 0:29:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the um violent militant factions for quite some time. And

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>so I think a lot of people saw the Umbrella

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>movement and it's it's kind of non success as being

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 1>attributed to the moderates, right, and so there was I

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>think there was a general mood that things had to change. Um.

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But then I think the fact that I would say

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>again the overarching thing that enabled people to come together

0:29:34.320 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>was this kind of everything has to be against like

0:29:37.600 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we we had to put everything we have against the CCP. Right, So, um,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of kind of like power struggle

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and like um divisiveness uh during the Umbrella movement of

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>people trying to like um, have their view you know,

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>their political analysis or their strategies and tactics take precedence,

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people saw that as just kind

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of like pointless squabbling or like divisiveness that the government

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:08.200
<v Speaker 1>was able to use to like um, you know, defeat

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the movement. Right. So I think all those things informed

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>what was having there. And then there were two kind

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of like overriding philosophies in the movement. So one was

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>like the idea of like having no big stage, that's

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what it was called, and so that was like not

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>taking any uh, not having protest leaders, not having people

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>make the decisions up top. And the second thing was

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this idiom like called brothers climbing the mountain um, which

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>basically means like we're all climbing the same mountain of

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>trying to defeat the CCP. It doesn't matter how we're

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 1>doing it. So there was this really kind of like, uh,

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the question of method uh and means was really kind

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of put into the backseat. It was all just kind

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of about the end goal UM. And you know, there

0:30:54.800 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>was that kind of related idiom of like not cutting Matt,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>which means like even if you have different and those

0:31:00.440 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>with folks in terms of like how you choose to

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:06.719
<v Speaker 1>go about contributing to the movement, uh, you never severed

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>ties with people over this, and so those are the

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>two kind of overwriting philosophies in the movement. And I

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think it was definitely very helpful in in keeping this

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like movement unity, but it definitely had its

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>drawbacks eventually in terms of like decentralization. I can talk

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:25.959
<v Speaker 1>more about that later or I can talk about it now.

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Yeah, no, sorry, I was yeah, I'm

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm I would like that. So, you know, in terms

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>of decentralization, I think it was it was just kind

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of like in the right place at the right time

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.959
<v Speaker 1>for for Hong Kongers. I think, you know, they were

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>very fed up with with all the ways that things

0:31:43.600 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>had gone before, and so a lot of people were

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:48.719
<v Speaker 1>more open to trying this out. And I think the

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know, there was a lot of fear

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 1>around surveillance UM and and whatnot at the time in

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.719
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong, and obviously it's gotten much worse, but you know,

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>so everyone there was never really the kind of that

0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>overriding fear in the umbrella movement or the occupy movements

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of like having to stay anonymous or whatever, Whereas here,

0:32:09.720 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess the fact that it just went hand in

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 1>hand with UM taking more militant actions that a lot

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of people kind of. I think the really interesting part

0:32:18.160 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>is is so much of the what happened in decentralized

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>decentralizing UM, you know, the political culture in Hong Kong

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 1>was that it adopted a lot of leftist tactics UM

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously like black block and stuff without you know,

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the word leftism or leftist in Hong Kong

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is like it's like you don't touch it, right because

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's there's no way to dissociate it from from the

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.920
<v Speaker 1>CCP and Hong Kong's minds, which is it's very topsy turvy, right,

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>because there's nothing leftist about the CCP as it stands

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. But it's it's very hard to convince folks

0:32:55.320 --> 0:32:58.200
<v Speaker 1>there of that. And so it's very interesting the way

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that people were able to adopt like the tactic and

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>strategies without any of the ideological underpinnings to it. UM.

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, the no big stage and the

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>brothers Climbing Mountain um. That eventually became a way to

0:33:14.320 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>shut down dissent, right because any time people wanted to

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 1>have like principal debate, principled debate or two talk strategy

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>or to question the way things were going, then that

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, that philosophy would be kind of trotted out

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and you would be you could be accused of like

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>undermining movement unity and whatnot. And you know, I think

0:33:38.680 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>people were so fearful of either being accused of that

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>or of or or of causing that, right, Like, I

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone wanted the movement to fragment, right, but um,

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>people were so averse to doing that, that those two

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>philosophies really became a way to silence UM any other

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>thing other than what is dominant in the movement. And

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that eventually became you know, the exclusionary, xenophobic like pro

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Trump thing, you know, in the tail end of after

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 1>COVID and a lot of stuff. So that's how I

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:19.840
<v Speaker 1>see it going down. Yeah, yeah, and it is this, UM,

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I think there's this problem. You saw versions of it

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in Ukraine too, where As the as a movement kind

0:34:26.000 --> 0:34:30.839
<v Speaker 1>of predicated on confronting the government goes on and as

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the clashes get more violent, kind of the right wing

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:38.600
<v Speaker 1>UM picks up influence because those kind of folks tend

0:34:38.600 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more prepared for the for the fighting. Yeah, exactly.

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.359
<v Speaker 1>And I mean there's never been any kind of like,

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, there there's no kind of conclusiveness about

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the ideology of the front liners, like the more militant

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>folks UM, but I think there's there's kind of a

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>general sense that a lot of the front liners were

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>UM a little bit more if not right wing, then

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they were more sympathetic to the to that right because

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:14.640
<v Speaker 1>if they were fired up enough to like, you know,

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>do that kind of street fighting, then likely their their

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:21.520
<v Speaker 1>view of China is like, you know, along the more

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of xenophobic and uh nativist wavelength. One of the

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>struggles I think is that um, you know, for the

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of for the goals as they were kind of

0:35:34.160 --> 0:35:36.400
<v Speaker 1>hallucidated of the Hong Kong movement, that could have worked,

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>but it also like you know that that would have

0:35:40.760 --> 0:35:43.160
<v Speaker 1>eventually provided a problem when it came to the whole

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>figuring out what to do next? Thing? Right, Like, there's

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>only there's there's kind of a limited extent to which

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:53.600
<v Speaker 1>those tendencies can potentially coexist. Um, And it is one

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>of those things you have to think about, like if

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you happen to get a broad movement, you know what.

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Like again looking at Ukraine, Um, there there's been this

0:36:02.640 --> 0:36:05.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of very awkward compromise with the far right, which

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>is a minority party, but like that compromise has led

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to some very ugly things happening over there, including like

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the arming of a kind of a militant neo Nazi movement,

0:36:15.320 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>which is like yeah, and I don't know, like when

0:36:18.680 --> 0:36:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you're there in the moment and you're just trying to

0:36:21.600 --> 0:36:23.960
<v Speaker 1>deal with the state, Um, I don't know how you

0:36:24.160 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>entirely avoid that, right because you need frontliners and if

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those folks believe fucked up ship but they're

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>going up against the cops, like, what are you going

0:36:31.719 --> 0:36:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to do? Exactly? And I mean, I guess it's I

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's any small coincidence that you know, those

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>those kind of like fascist Ukrainian people showed up at

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Hong Kong protests, right, Um, And you know, I

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of the front liners who like took

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>photos with them and stuff, had no idea who the

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.719
<v Speaker 1>hell they were, right, They're just like hey, Like I

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>think that the overriding sentiment was like anyone who's who's

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:58.319
<v Speaker 1>going to like show us support? Is that's good for

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.399
<v Speaker 1>us because we want this a global visibility to put

0:37:01.440 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>pressure on China. That was just how basic it was

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and very understandable. And you know, so obviously those images

0:37:08.920 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>were trotted out all over uh you know, Twitter and

0:37:11.719 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff to show Okay, well Hong kongers or fascist and

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and whatnot. But yeah, I think it's it's much more complex,

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Like you were saying, it's just like when when you're there,

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you do. It's like, you're not gonna stop

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:25.120
<v Speaker 1>front liners while they're fighting the cops to like have

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:28.160
<v Speaker 1>principal debate, right, And at some point it's just like,

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>when is that going to happen? And I think the

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>l I h KG as a as an internet forum,

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, in some ways it could make that

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 1>very possible, but in other ways, I think it makes

0:37:40.520 --> 0:37:43.239
<v Speaker 1>it much more difficult, right, because you're you're having these

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>discussions with anonymous people who don't you know, Obviously, if

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you're anonymous on a forum, it it kind of like

0:37:48.800 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>gets rid of so many uh boundaries of like accountability

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and um, how you would treat each other with respect

0:37:56.880 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>in a debate about your shared goals and of right. So,

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think decentralization was very important to Hong

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Kong in that moment. But I think the right wing folks,

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, who are a very small minority, I think

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:18.760
<v Speaker 1>they were able to instrumentalize those two philosophies very well

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.879
<v Speaker 1>and manipulated very well to like position themselves as like

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the true inheritors of the movement by you know, forcing

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 1>through this idea that they were the ones that were

0:38:28.760 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>protecting these kind of like secret principles of like unity

0:38:33.040 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>movement unity and no splitting and and all that stuff, right.

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think what I've heard from from

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>leftist folks over there is that, you know, obviously the

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>left is very marginalized in Hong Kong, but what I've

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>heard from leftist folks is that just like no one

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>had the means, either the means or the heart to

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>fight back against that, because I think the conditions just

0:38:56.640 --> 0:39:00.880
<v Speaker 1>weren't right. You know, the people were living in such

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:04.840
<v Speaker 1>like everyone felt like they were steeped in this daily

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of like extremity, that everything was just like crisis mode. UM,

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and to ask people to slow down or to like

0:39:12.080 --> 0:39:17.880
<v Speaker 1>take non extreme measures became extremely difficult. UM. And I

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>can totally understand that. Yeah, I mean that's something UM.

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's something we've seen in Portland to just

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:27.439
<v Speaker 1>this UM. Not with the right wing so much, because

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.319
<v Speaker 1>there's obviously has never been really any collaboration between right

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and left in the but but with this kind of UM.

0:39:33.600 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>If what you're suggesting isn't more extreme than what's been

0:39:36.239 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 1>done before, UM, then why would we listen to it?

0:39:39.400 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, this UM, which is I think a product

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>of trauma as much as anything else. And I don't

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>know like that I think is one of the things

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to solve if you're actually going to like win, UM,

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 1>which obviously you know, winning is a separate matter altogether,

0:39:56.320 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 1>like we've got. I think there's a lot of lessons

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in what happened in Hong Kong, UM. And one of

0:40:02.040 --> 0:40:05.160
<v Speaker 1>those lessons is that it's pretty easy for the state

0:40:05.239 --> 0:40:08.839
<v Speaker 1>to win. Yeah. And I forgot to mention this before

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:10.479
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about the five demands. But I guess,

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:12.279
<v Speaker 1>just just to jump back really quickly, I mean, there

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was that there was a sixth demand, right, and um,

0:40:16.040 --> 0:40:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you know that that cropped up around October two one,

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like a cop shot a teenager with the live round

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the cropped up for obvious reasons because

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:29.200
<v Speaker 1>of that um in in protest chance all over the place.

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>But that never crystallized into like a quote unquote official thing,

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.319
<v Speaker 1>right because I think there was still that kind of

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>barrier to the idea of police abolish and uh for

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks, I guess, and because it's the

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the first time, you know, this is the only

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 1>or I guess this is the time in Hong Kong

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>where the most people have had the most anti police

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>sentiment in its history. Right Yeah, Um, like people kind

0:40:58.160 --> 0:41:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of like disapprove of, you know, how the police conducted

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 1>themselves or whatever during the protests. So, um, it's I

0:41:05.560 --> 0:41:07.880
<v Speaker 1>think it's a start. I think it's a good place

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for to like plant the seeds of abolition. But I

0:41:10.520 --> 0:41:13.640
<v Speaker 1>think that that kind of shows the dynamics of like

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what became official and then what became what couldn't become

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:22.400
<v Speaker 1>official in terms of those demands. Um, and I you know,

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>because I'm I'm assuming on l I h KG. It's

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 1>like a closed forum, so you can't you can't join

0:41:28.560 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and discuss if you don't have like a university address

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. So that's why I wasn't on there Hong

0:41:33.760 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Kong University address. Um. There was tons of debate there

0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 1>about you know, this idea of police abolition, but I

0:41:41.280 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think it eventually. Also, this is kind of a similar

0:41:44.320 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>thing between the abolished the police or defund the police

0:41:47.760 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>debate here, which is like a lot of people saw

0:41:51.040 --> 0:41:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the sixth demand as reform, like we should just like

0:41:54.480 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>fire every single cop and then rehire like the entire force, right,

0:42:01.080 --> 0:42:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and they thought we just need to clean house. That's

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>like the bad Apples thing, right, And then other people

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>saw that as more like we need to actually confront

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the practice of policing, practice and concept of policing. So, um,

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess because there was that divisiveness over what abolition means,

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>abolition or reform, then yeah, that's why it never took

0:42:22.280 --> 0:42:37.040
<v Speaker 1>root as something official. I guess. There is one thing,

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 1>which is that you know, we saw some of this

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>like spread to the US. But the way that I

0:42:46.640 --> 0:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>guess could you talk a bit about how this sort

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of like the how the like street fighting tactics spread

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:55.839
<v Speaker 1>because I know, I mean but both both how they

0:42:55.920 --> 0:42:58.239
<v Speaker 1>developed inside the movement then, you know, because after that,

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I remember there are these protests Indonesia in

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, and like those people were also you know,

0:43:04.920 --> 0:43:09.120
<v Speaker 1>they were doing the like water stuff and that formulas

0:43:09.239 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>or to spread really quickly. But I'm exciting and I

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.239
<v Speaker 1>know also that like there there I saw some of

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:17.920
<v Speaker 1>these like they had these like really detailed infographics on

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like like you know, this is this is how you

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>form people on a line. This is everyone's roles, is

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>what equipment you need? So how did that stuff like

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 1>appear And was it just spreading a telegram or yeah?

0:43:32.000 --> 0:43:34.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, And I think that's one of the

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 1>ways I guess this kind of connects actually to the

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>very first question was, which is like how do we

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>confront or like try and deal with this the campus,

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>which is like one of the ways we tried to

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.239
<v Speaker 1>approach it through lou Song was just kind of like

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>this exchange of tactics actually is something that we can

0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:55.399
<v Speaker 1>share transnationally. Um, because obviously states are collaborating in terms

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of exchanging strategies and weapons and ammunitions and a lot

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. So we should be kind of collaborating in

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the same way. And I think that's something that Hong

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Kong had to offer the world, um, in terms of

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>how that actually happened. Um, it's kind of interesting, right

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>because I was saying earlier how I feel like a

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:14.279
<v Speaker 1>lot of the protesters adopted black block without adopting any

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of the ideology. Um. And then maybe it was I

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:20.240
<v Speaker 1>think that's seeing that similarity for a lot of folks online,

0:44:20.239 --> 0:44:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Like I think it was, it was all like viral videos, right, Um,

0:44:23.920 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that people would just encounter on their timelines without any

0:44:27.600 --> 0:44:29.719
<v Speaker 1>real context of like what the hell was happening in

0:44:29.760 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. Uh. You know, seeing seeing like clearly young

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.520
<v Speaker 1>young kids like putting out tear gas canisters with pylons

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and water and stuff is just like that's something immediately

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:44.799
<v Speaker 1>that you learned within thirty seconds that you don't have

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:46.719
<v Speaker 1>to like I don't agree with their aims or I

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:49.440
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with any of that. And um, you know,

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>using the umbrellas to block out security cameras and and

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.560
<v Speaker 1>all that, and and tear gas and stuff is just

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>like these things are so portable visually, and like we

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>were saying before in terms of infographics, where there's drawbacks

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to that, I think it's like the thirty second clip

0:45:03.840 --> 0:45:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on like TikTok or or Twitter or whatever happens to be.

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like that is the flip side of how social

0:45:09.520 --> 0:45:12.000
<v Speaker 1>media is actually fucking amazing, right, because it's just like

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you're getting this instant kind of political education and also

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like street fighting education. Um, just like that and without

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>without actually seeking it out, right, because I think that's

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the key part. Um. People who might be predisposed to

0:45:27.920 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 1>being against what Hong Kong is trying to do or

0:45:31.160 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>what they stand for, and that type of thing, um,

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, Falselier or otherwise, UM might just that that

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>might just like be retweeted onto their timeline. And I

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's the kind of beautiful thing about Twitter

0:45:43.600 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that I really love. UM. And I'm pretty sure that's

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.320
<v Speaker 1>how it spread. I don't you know. Laosan tried to

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 1>put on these these formal exchanges where we would talk

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:56.839
<v Speaker 1>more about that, UM, but I'm pretty sure that at

0:45:56.840 --> 0:46:00.879
<v Speaker 1>all it was mostly all just viral. Yeah. Yeah, even

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media was picking up stuff up and show sharing

0:46:04.200 --> 0:46:07.919
<v Speaker 1>those videos because they want the clicks and they want them. Yeah,

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I think they're really hitting on something there with the

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:13.040
<v Speaker 1>spread of visual information, because that's that's something we definitely

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:15.839
<v Speaker 1>saw last year in the States is a lot of

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>people who were newer to protesting picking up on the

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>visual cues that they saw from Hong Kong coverage and

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:28.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to replicate it um And for a lot of

0:46:28.560 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>the time it didn't actually work out that well. Like

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 1>like remember like the first few weeks in Portland, we

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:37.000
<v Speaker 1>would see people like carrying around pylons but not knowing

0:46:37.120 --> 0:46:38.839
<v Speaker 1>no what, not really knowing what to do with them,

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 1>just because they saw people do this before online. And

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:44.320
<v Speaker 1>then after a while we started to see them slowly

0:46:44.360 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 1>figure out how to actually extinguish tear gas canisters loafing

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 1>with like leafblowers and stuff. We see it like they

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>first used the rhetoric, they first used kind of the aesthetics,

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and then slowly they learned the actual practical skills um.

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Because you can't just learn something by watching, you have

0:47:00.239 --> 0:47:02.239
<v Speaker 1>to also kind of do it. I mean it's it's

0:47:02.320 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it's trickier. You sometimes can, but you generally kind of

0:47:06.280 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have to practice skill as well. We saw that a

0:47:08.400 --> 0:47:11.279
<v Speaker 1>lot and one thing that people never really learned how

0:47:11.320 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to do well, but they kept the rhetoric of it

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>is the whole like b water thing. That's something that

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>no one really figured out, at least here in Portland.

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.439
<v Speaker 1>It was like it would get chanted a lot, people

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>would say it, but like it didn't actually do You

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't actually doing anything. Um. And I think that it's

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:31.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that. It's kind of the flip side

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of having something so reliant on like info graphics and

0:47:35.200 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>just like viral footage, is that you'll think you're prepared

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:40.880
<v Speaker 1>for something because you've seen it, and then when you're

0:47:40.920 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>actually doing the thing, you're like, oh, this is actually

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:46.120
<v Speaker 1>a very different than sitting in my bed scrolling through Twitter.

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 1>Of this is like it's a whole it's a whole

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>different thing. Um. But still it's it's still like incredibly useful.

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Right to have to have that base knowledge in the

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:57.400
<v Speaker 1>first place, is it's very useful, but you have to remember,

0:47:57.480 --> 0:48:00.840
<v Speaker 1>like you you can't just think that you can watch

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it and then go do it immediately. And I was wondering,

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:06.280
<v Speaker 1>like from from your perspective, when you saw stuff happening

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:09.359
<v Speaker 1>in the States last year, and we saw a lot

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of you know, like a lot of like aesthetic mirrors

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Hong Kong protests. Were there anything, Was there

0:48:15.600 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 1>anything that you think people really succeeded in or was

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>there stuff that you think people kind of tried to

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.200
<v Speaker 1>replicate but kind of failed at. I mean, that's a

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:26.120
<v Speaker 1>really good point, and I think that kind of gets

0:48:26.200 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to what Chris was asking as well, in terms of

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 1>just like I feel like there had to be also

0:48:30.760 --> 0:48:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the strategic exchange to match the visual exchange in terms

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of just like actually knowing how to get into formation

0:48:40.280 --> 0:48:43.880
<v Speaker 1>because it's just like, um, yeah, like the with the

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:46.040
<v Speaker 1>putting up the tear gas, with the pylons, it's just

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.439
<v Speaker 1>like you actually had to have like three or four

0:48:48.480 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 1>dedicated people, like one person to hold a pilot, one

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 1>person to have the water, one person to like you know,

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>all these different things that really do need to be coordinated,

0:48:56.200 --> 0:49:00.239
<v Speaker 1>and then also, like you said, practiced before you get

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:05.759
<v Speaker 1>it right, and um, I don't know. I mean there

0:49:06.000 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I think just so many of the tactics, like you know,

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>stopping tear gas with umbrellas is not super effective, right,

0:49:13.600 --> 0:49:15.759
<v Speaker 1>because it's just like First of all, the rounds are

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>extremely you know, they move very fast and they're very hot.

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And then there it's also not going to actually shield

0:49:21.040 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>very much from you, right. So, um, I think visually

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:27.320
<v Speaker 1>it was very striking and it it's very helpful in

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:30.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of surveillance. Um. But that was something that happened

0:49:30.800 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 1>in Hong Kong and also happened over here that I

0:49:33.719 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>saw that I was just like, um, that's not super useful. Um.

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:44.319
<v Speaker 1>But I think I have been encouraging people to to

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 1>bring those out more still, umbrellas and stuff, because I've

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:49.640
<v Speaker 1>heard in Toronto at least that the cops are like

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:55.320
<v Speaker 1>using surveillance drones. Yeah, umbrellas are great against cameras, and

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:57.919
<v Speaker 1>they do have a lot of advantages compared to hard

0:49:57.920 --> 0:50:00.440
<v Speaker 1>shields in a lot of situations, but of course when

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:03.080
<v Speaker 1>you're facing like heavy munition fire, then they're they're not

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>as useful. Yeah. And I saw, you know, like I

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 1>saw a lot of inventiveness with the heavier shields in

0:50:08.920 --> 0:50:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong in terms of like using plastic barricades. But

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>then you know that was that that's not super portable, right,

0:50:15.080 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 1>So then I saw a lot of people making them

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 1>out of like those floating you know, those things that

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>helps you float and swim because they're super light, but

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 1>then they also reflect chair gats very well, the canisters. So, um,

0:50:28.920 --> 0:50:31.280
<v Speaker 1>I didn't see so much of that in the US.

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I saw people use more like big wooden boards and

0:50:34.480 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>like you know, uh street signs and stuff like that,

0:50:38.040 --> 0:50:40.840
<v Speaker 1>and um so that was maybe that's just a difference

0:50:40.880 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like what material is available to you

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. But um, I think the emphasis on mobility

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:50.320
<v Speaker 1>was a lot more in Hong Kong rather than the US,

0:50:50.440 --> 0:50:53.080
<v Speaker 1>where it was just like the actual emphasis was on

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:56.800
<v Speaker 1>luring police to a location and then being able to

0:50:56.880 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 1>quickly run away so that they're stretched so thin, right,

0:50:59.800 --> 0:51:02.279
<v Speaker 1>Like that was that was a water touch. But yeah,

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that the States did not do that at all. You know, well,

0:51:05.160 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I I would say, like, okay, I don't think the

0:51:07.200 --> 0:51:09.600
<v Speaker 1>people who like said be water did that at all.

0:51:10.040 --> 0:51:13.120
<v Speaker 1>But like I remember, like in the beginning in Chicago,

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:15.239
<v Speaker 1>before anyone was coordinating anything, it was just a bunch

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of people running around like that actually did happen, Like

0:51:17.680 --> 0:51:19.440
<v Speaker 1>like that was, yeah, the police like in Chicago collapse

0:51:19.440 --> 0:51:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and the reason they collapse was that there's like you know,

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there's just six hundred people just on every street corner.

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 1>There were absolutely fu cities where that did happen, and um,

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>but generally from my experience of at least on parts

0:51:35.600 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of the West Coast, there was a lot of a lot,

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of chanting about the water while you stand

0:51:40.239 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in front of a police station for six hours. And

0:51:42.880 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 1>there were definitely actions where people did that, you know,

0:51:46.200 --> 0:51:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and would would go and and and you know, get

0:51:49.040 --> 0:51:51.359
<v Speaker 1>away with some mischief because they were willing to move

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:53.920
<v Speaker 1>quickly and not stick around. But yeah, there was a

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:58.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of chanting be water while repeatedly heading back to

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the same police station. Um. You know, I wonder about that,

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like because because it seems like once this it seemed

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:08.680
<v Speaker 1>like like once you were in because at the very

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>early stages in the US, like my impression of it was,

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it was just like it caught everyone off guard and

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it was just a bunch of rent and people and

0:52:15.280 --> 0:52:18.439
<v Speaker 1>it's like they seemed so just like do it. Maybe

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:21.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe just by the fact that they were very coordinated

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and so it was it was just centralized, just sort

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:28.319
<v Speaker 1>of just by the nature of the fact that it

0:52:28.400 --> 0:52:30.720
<v Speaker 1>was just a bunch of red and people. But then

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:33.719
<v Speaker 1>when you started getting these sort of like you had.

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 1>We had another phase in Chicago that was it was

0:52:37.400 --> 0:52:39.160
<v Speaker 1>like it worked really well, but it was there's there's

0:52:39.160 --> 0:52:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like a bunch of anti statute protests and it was

0:52:40.880 --> 0:52:42.520
<v Speaker 1>like the anti statue people would they were just like

0:52:42.600 --> 0:52:45.880
<v Speaker 1>surround like a statue and they would just throw things

0:52:45.920 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at it. And that was very much more similar to Portland.

0:52:48.680 --> 0:52:51.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess, so I don't know. Part of me is

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:56.200
<v Speaker 1>wondering whether it was like there's something about the organizational

0:52:56.200 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 1>structure that in the States where that were people that

0:53:02.239 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that like heavily favors getting a bunch of people to

0:53:05.000 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 1>go to one place and sitting there in a way

0:53:06.719 --> 0:53:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that didn't happen in Hong Kong. I think it was

0:53:09.560 --> 0:53:12.400
<v Speaker 1>that you there was a certain point in the protests

0:53:12.400 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>in a number of US cities where you still had

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:18.080
<v Speaker 1>intense interest in people being out in the streets, but

0:53:18.440 --> 0:53:23.320
<v Speaker 1>you hadn't had Number One, there wasn't necessarily a concerted,

0:53:23.360 --> 0:53:27.279
<v Speaker 1>agreed upon list of demands, but also there wasn't a

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:29.640
<v Speaker 1>clear understanding of how to achieve them, Like you know,

0:53:29.719 --> 0:53:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in Portland, there was a point where the hardcore folks,

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the folks showing up every night pretty much we're all

0:53:34.520 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in agreement that like, yeah, we don't want any more cops.

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But there was also not a white agreement. I'm like, well,

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:41.839
<v Speaker 1>how do we what's the path to that? Is? It?

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Is it showing up and trying to make their lives

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:47.040
<v Speaker 1>miserable every night? Like? Is it? There was kind of

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a there was a there was a point at which

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>their motivation to be on the streets was there, but

0:53:53.920 --> 0:53:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the understanding of like how to achieve the goals was not,

0:53:57.840 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>and so folks were, um. You would see kind of

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the same thing being done a few times without without

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it necessarily making making progress, and eventually, you know, people

0:54:09.840 --> 0:54:12.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't move on. But it was this this thing of like,

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I think what you need if you're going to actually

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:23.200
<v Speaker 1>forced through significant changes is um a continually evolving understanding

0:54:23.239 --> 0:54:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of your goals and methods UM. And that's it's a

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:29.320
<v Speaker 1>really hard like I'm saying, this is what's necessary, I

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:30.919
<v Speaker 1>have no idea how to do that when you've got

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:33.600
<v Speaker 1>this very decentralized, large group of people out in the streets,

0:54:33.880 --> 0:54:36.879
<v Speaker 1>you don't have you know, leaders or a central organization.

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 1>In fact, having those things is going to endanger people

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in the movement because that stuff always gets infiltrated, you know,

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:45.279
<v Speaker 1>or or winds up to be in some other way problematic.

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of I'm acknowledging this as a problem,

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want that to be like I'm pointing

0:54:50.520 --> 0:54:53.080
<v Speaker 1>at like activists in Portland or activists and wherever and saying,

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you dummies didn't figure that. No one's figured it out.

0:54:55.080 --> 0:54:57.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't know like nobody knows how to do this

0:54:57.160 --> 0:55:00.360
<v Speaker 1>yet because it hasn't been done. Um, but that's clearly

0:55:00.360 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 1>where I think you can see. That's where the problem

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:06.920
<v Speaker 1>is is that you you get these situations where there's motivation,

0:55:07.000 --> 0:55:08.799
<v Speaker 1>people are willing to be out in the streets, but

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:13.240
<v Speaker 1>there's also not outside of being angry and in the streets,

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 1>there's not necessarily clear understanding of like, well, how okay,

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:20.040
<v Speaker 1>how do we what what are we trying to achieve specifically?

0:55:20.120 --> 0:55:22.360
<v Speaker 1>And how were we achieving it? Like how are we

0:55:22.400 --> 0:55:25.359
<v Speaker 1>furthering that Golden Night? Yeah? Well I'm not sure if

0:55:25.520 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because eventually, you know, street fighting I don't

0:55:29.040 --> 0:55:31.000
<v Speaker 1>not really like lost its luster, but people were just

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:33.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of like what is this doing in Hong Kong

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.600
<v Speaker 1>as well, And um, it's you know, eventually it stopped

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:39.319
<v Speaker 1>because all the all the kids were doing it were

0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like traumatized or bodily you know, exhaustion or mental exhaustion

0:55:44.000 --> 0:55:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and all those different things where they were all arrested. Right,

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so you know, there's it just kind of petered out

0:55:49.680 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like that. And I think the problem was that, you know,

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:55.920
<v Speaker 1>it was very anti CCP for for most of it,

0:55:55.960 --> 0:55:58.360
<v Speaker 1>but then I think eventually it became just so anti

0:55:58.440 --> 0:56:02.560
<v Speaker 1>police that um it. I think a lot of people

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:06.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of eventually lost sight of what yeah, like you're

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>saying the goal was, or what what's the best way

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>to achieve what we want? And if it was just

0:56:11.760 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>continually attacking the police on the street, then it wasn't

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:17.560
<v Speaker 1>going to accomplish that what I mean, No, no, no, yeah, yeah.

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:19.879
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want any of this to come as

0:56:19.920 --> 0:56:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like criticisms. It's more just like a well this, this

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it, you know, like they're still cops, right,

0:56:27.239 --> 0:56:29.000
<v Speaker 1>like if that's if that is the goal and for

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some people, right for the broader tens of millions of

0:56:31.480 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Americans in the streets, there was never that kind of

0:56:33.480 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>a consensus. It was much more muddled, but the dedicated activists,

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a consensus, but it also didn't it ain't

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:41.920
<v Speaker 1>done yet, So I think there is like there's a

0:56:41.920 --> 0:56:45.279
<v Speaker 1>continuing question everybody needs to be asking themselves, just like, well,

0:56:45.480 --> 0:56:46.840
<v Speaker 1>how do we get from A to B, you know,

0:56:47.160 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>um or A to Z as the case maybe? Is

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:53.839
<v Speaker 1>there is there any uma places that people can go

0:56:54.000 --> 0:56:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to learn more about this type of stuff online or

0:56:56.680 --> 0:57:00.640
<v Speaker 1>any any like resources that you you would like to share. Yeah,

0:57:00.760 --> 0:57:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, of course, uh, you know, plug loss on

0:57:03.400 --> 0:57:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in terms of our website, you can go to las

0:57:06.080 --> 0:57:08.840
<v Speaker 1>h K and then all of our social media stuff

0:57:08.840 --> 0:57:11.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. UM, I don't know. Yeah, if folks are

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:16.680
<v Speaker 1>more interested in We're trying to put together a uh

0:57:16.840 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of non status anti militarist coalition soon UM, and

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:24.440
<v Speaker 1>our first event is going to be hopefully in a

0:57:24.520 --> 0:57:28.400
<v Speaker 1>month or so UM to try and provide some solutions

0:57:28.440 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to um what we see as kind of like anti

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:34.480
<v Speaker 1>war activism that is, like it's just about kind of

0:57:34.480 --> 0:57:37.920
<v Speaker 1>marching from from A to B and then holding PSL

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:41.080
<v Speaker 1>signs and answer coalition signs and stuff like that. So

0:57:41.720 --> 0:57:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess I'll just pre plug that for now and

0:57:44.000 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on that. Great. Yeah, and thank you

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:49.680
<v Speaker 1>so much, for coming on and talking with us. Yes,

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Yeah, thanks for the invite. Happy to be

0:57:56.240 --> 0:57:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this has been it could happen here talking about a

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:02.880
<v Speaker 1>place where it did in fact happen and then yeah

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it did, it didn't happen enough. Yeah, and it didn't

0:58:06.320 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 1>happen enough here either, And a lot of questions in common,

0:58:10.000 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I hope nobody thinks when we say, like we're

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:15.400
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about how to you know, potentially come

0:58:15.440 --> 0:58:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to agreements about a list of demands and even general

0:58:18.200 --> 0:58:21.160
<v Speaker 1>strike that we're saying like here's the solution to this.

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Um I I've said a couple of times. I think

0:58:24.080 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem confronting as getting a mass movement to agree

0:58:29.320 --> 0:58:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on a list of demands and then take mass concerted

0:58:31.840 --> 0:58:35.920
<v Speaker 1>action to force them, like is a is a a

0:58:36.040 --> 0:58:41.680
<v Speaker 1>cultural task, probably exceeding in difficulty the moon landing. Um

0:58:41.720 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>So no, like we're not we're not coming here trying

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to say like here, but like here's what everyone needs

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to do. It's more of like, well, this is a

0:58:48.440 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>question we all need to be asking ourselves, and I

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:53.680
<v Speaker 1>think our role in that is to be asking that

0:58:53.800 --> 0:58:56.720
<v Speaker 1>question of some people who have spent a lot of

0:58:56.760 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>time trying to practically ask that question another part of

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:05.480
<v Speaker 1>the world and learning what we can from that example,

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:08.440
<v Speaker 1>because we don't have a tremendous amount of time, so

0:59:08.480 --> 0:59:12.960
<v Speaker 1>we should probably be studying. Yeah. You can find us

0:59:13.040 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Happened Here pod and cool Zone Media.

0:59:16.200 --> 0:59:19.280
<v Speaker 1>You can listen to other episodes of it Could Happen

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Here um five days a week, Monday through Friday on

0:59:23.440 --> 0:59:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this feed and other podcasts. You know where to find

0:59:26.680 --> 0:59:28.960
<v Speaker 1>them behind the Bastards source you're ever that kind of stuff.

0:59:29.360 --> 0:59:31.919
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening. We will We will be back

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:34.240
<v Speaker 1>in the next in the next day or after the weekend,

0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 1>whenever this airs allegedly. Allegedly it Could Happen Here is

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a production of cool Zone Media. For more podcasts from

0:59:49.080 --> 0:59:52.320
<v Speaker 1>cool Zone Media, visit our website cool zone media dot com,

0:59:52.440 --> 0:59:54.360
<v Speaker 1>or check us out on the I Heart Radio app,

0:59:54.400 --> 0:59:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to podcasts. You can

0:59:57.840 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 1>find sources for It Could Happen Here updated a month

1:00:00.080 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Lee at cool zone Media dot com slash sources. Thanks

1:00:02.880 --> 1:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for listening.