WEBVTT - The REIT Stuff

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, the trillions. I'm Joel Webber and I'm Eric Beltierness. Eric,

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot going on in the world, and we're

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about reads. Why are we going to talk

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>about reads? Yeah, because you know, you can just get

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>lost in the news cycle and all the discussions on

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:25.799
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and just sometimes you just end up in the

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Ivory Tower debating these things that are fun to talk about,

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>but I mean maybe aren't practical. And so sometimes you

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>have to just cut away, go into an area, a category,

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>and just roll up your sleeves and dig around and

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>talk about the practicality of a certain area for investors.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>And so UM I thought reats were an interesting one

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because a they're at a cross roads, they're changing dramatically.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>UM And for those who don't know, READS stands for

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>real Estate Investment Trust and it's sort of a way

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy an et F. And then you know, indirectly

0:00:57.960 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>or directly rather I guess own UM properties and they

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>could be anything from like retail properties, malls, storage, industrial infrastructure, hotels, uh,

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:13.559
<v Speaker 1>stuff you wouldn't buy as a regular person typically. And

0:01:13.720 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>also they yield a lot because they have a certain

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>structure where they have to pass on a lot of

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>their income, and so we have rates rising, which is

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a threat to them. But then at the same time

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>rates are still low. And so I thought there's a

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of crossroads going on in the Reek category and

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.399
<v Speaker 1>we could maybe unpack it and talk about, you know,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the pros and cons of all of the different products.

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>You basically get to own real estate without really owning

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>real estate. Yeah, I mean, I guess you basically just

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>click a button and it's you're pulled in with a

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 1>bunch of investors who are common owners of, you know,

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>real estate properties. And one thing I hope to get

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:52.920
<v Speaker 1>out today is to get some visual on what exactly

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 1>you are owning. I mean, I can see the words, Hey,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>now I own residential and hotel reads, but where are

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>these hotels? What do they do? Um? You know, I

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>think that sometimes is lost, but yeah, you do end

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>up owning these things. And to help us wade through

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the category, we're gonna be joined by Kevin Kelly at

0:02:10.520 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Benchmark invest and David our back at World at Greek Group,

0:02:20.320 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>this time on Trillians the Red Stuff. David Kevin, welcome

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>to Trillions. Thanks for having us, Thank you for having us. David,

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with you, Um, why why should

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>we be talking about reads right now? What are these

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>good for? Well? I can tell you right now that

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>this is not going to be a sexy conversation like

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>tt slaw and bitcoin and buzzy t F. But when

0:02:47.720 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>you talk about reads, they provide one thing that is

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>common in times of volatility, and that's safety, dividend income stability,

0:02:58.400 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>high pay at ratio by these companies. You're you're getting

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>almost like an annuity or like a long term bond

0:03:07.360 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 1>when you're buying some of these companies. And as Kevin

0:03:10.280 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>can attest to looking at the long term holdings of

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>some of these companies, you're just going along for the

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>ride and letting these companies do what they do best.

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Let's just take one second, David, to just bring in

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>somebody who knows almost nothing. Explain what a red is

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and why the income is high like that structure that

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I alluded to earlier. Just explain that whole concept. Sure, So,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>as you said to read is a real estate investment trust.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>A real estate investment trust is a shell that you

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>would own a property, a portfolio of real estate, and

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, that's office building's, apartment properties, hotel, self storage.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 1>The list goes on and on with the way that

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a reat is structured of the net income is paid

0:03:55.160 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>out to shareholders in the term of dividends or in

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>the form of dividends, and so as a result, off

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the bat, in fact, many of these guys are paying

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>out monthly dividends, and so right off the bat, you're

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>getting a huge income component because the typical average dividend

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>yield right now, according to a reads around four to

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>four and a half percent, and with the tenure, which

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is its closest benchmark, trading around one point six, let's

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>say right now, you know you still have about three

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred basis points in your pocket that you're being paid

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>by these companies to own this high quality real estate.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>Taking a step further, another really interesting way to play,

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>that's through the preferred stack. And if you played the

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>red preferreds, then you're looking at yields anywhere from where

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>public starch has the lowest let's say a sub three

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.920
<v Speaker 1>or excuse me, a sub four. You know, quality names

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>are yielding around five percent and higher yield stuffs going

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>six to seven and higher, so you know it's there's

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>just a huge buffer there for reachs in your favor

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>And David, can you tell us what you do at

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>a world that Grete group? Sure? So I'm lucky. I've

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 1>extraddle a lot of worlds. I'm an institutional all UH

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 1>sales trader at World Equity Group. I've been in the

0:05:04.560 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>red industry for over twenty years. I got my start

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>at a firm called Green Street Advisors now known as

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Green Street. So for me now World Equity Group, I

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>am trading reads. I am doing corporate access with a partner,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 1>working on management relationships. We're doing new share issuance working

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 1>with some of these reads. Really it kind of spreads

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 1>expansive globe. I also work on a red newsletter at

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Daily Newsletter. UM, there's just so much information that's out there,

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and with you know, a hundred sixty plus publicly traded

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>equity reads, not counting the mortgage side, there's a lot

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of information to digest on a daily basis and won't

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>get through more than that. As we go through this,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and Kevin, I want to bring you into this, UM.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've bumped into you a lot over the past,

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know, eight nine years really, especially at

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg TV studio. You're always in there doing the

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>options segment and whatnot. Before we get into some of

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the E t s Just what are you up to

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>these days? So today, but I'm really up to is

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to give investors access to specific property types and

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>specific exposure, especially in the real estate market. And so

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:12.480
<v Speaker 1>if you look at my what I do on a

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>core level, it's actually look at the real estate universe

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and then delineate which actual companies are are doing on

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>their property type, tenant type, and uh, you know, revenue type.

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And so what we do is we make indexes off

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of that, and then we license those indexes to e

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>t F issuers. And so what you'll see is that

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the top two property type E t F that are

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out there were the index provider to those. You have

0:06:45.360 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>some new um cutting edge kind of indexes that are

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>tracked by E t F s. So but let's do

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>this in order to again keep this high level at

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>least for now. If you look at the re E

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.480
<v Speaker 1>t F category, which has seventy two billion, by the way,

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it is, it's one of the bigger sectors. V n

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Q has half the assets. That's the Vanguard re E

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>t F. It's one of those rare vanguard ETF that's

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest in the category and the most traded. Um

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it's a monster. So, Kevin, why don't you take V

0:07:13.120 --> 0:07:17.400
<v Speaker 1>n Q explain that one and the general you know,

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess broad re E t F that vn Q

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of represents versus some of the newer stuff. Yeah,

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>So the way you should look at the re D

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>t F market is V and Q is the big behemoth.

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And what that does is it gives access to investors

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to own broad based real estate. It owns everything all

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>at once. You're gonna own every publicly traded shopping mall,

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna own every publicly traded UH hotel, you're gonna

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>own every publicly traded apartment company. You're gonna own every

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded office building in the problem with that is,

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, is that property types trade differently. So

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>an office is going to perform differently than a retail

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>shopping center, than a hotel, than a data center. And

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>so what you're getting is you're getting the broad basis

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like owning the all World Index when it comes to

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.680
<v Speaker 1>E t S, right, So you're owning every single country

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and every single company and so that's what V and

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Q does, and really what it's meant to do is

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to give broad based exposure to asset allocators. It's also

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>a passive index. And so if you look at the

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>bigger picture as far as like COVID is an example

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in the work from home trade versus the return to

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>office trade, Let's say V and Q may even though

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still invested in office and hotels and malls in

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>an active situation, an active red e t F guy

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>would have been out of those sectors in the second

0:08:45.800 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 1>quarter of last year and overweight single family rental reads,

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>tower reads, data center reads. The zoom trade basically for

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:57.440
<v Speaker 1>reat land. And so now what we're seeing is the

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>reverse where there's two camps, this zoom trade still being

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>on and then returned off his trade, right some of

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the more aggressive pms that are putting back on the hotels,

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the offices and the retail trade. Just as just as

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a point of clarification, well, and to that end, David,

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>what kind of innovation are we actually really seeing in

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the category if if we've got the V n Q

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's like the big umbrella of everything, like, talk

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>to us about what's been changing and what kind of

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>ETFs are are now at investor's fingertips. Sure absolutely, and frankly,

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to Kevin's credit, he was one of the first guys

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that was out there really finding the niche sectors well

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the curve of some of the other guys

0:09:37.120 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and all let Kevin go more into detail about his two,

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but a couple of other unique plays. Um, you can

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>play the net lease read the net lease reads that

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>would be the guys like your quick service restaurants, the

0:09:49.760 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Burger King's, McDonald's, Starbucks, Jim's drug stores, gas stations, and

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.600
<v Speaker 1>that is run by some guys from a company called

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Fundamental Income. The tick of that e t F is

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>any t L Nancy Edward Tom Larry, the two executives

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that started that came from a company called store Capital,

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>which Warren Buffet and Berkshire Hathaways its largest shareholders. So

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.079
<v Speaker 1>right off the bat, before we even get into net

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>least reads, when Warren Buffett is the largest shareholder of

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one of these net least reads, if there's kind of

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 1>that Berkshire touch to it. Another interesting avenue is a

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>home builder's housing e t F. They housing one hundred

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the homes h O m Z E t F. This

0:10:31.840 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is comprised of residential self storage, lodging, anything home depot lows,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>anything that has to do with the home owner space.

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>One more I want to touch upon is the newest

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>player and Eric, I think I'd love to get your

0:10:43.920 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>comments on that as we go through this. But the first,

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>really the one of the first active read e t

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>s has come to market. UM, there's a couple that

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>are out there, but from the g S excuse me,

0:10:54.600 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>from alps with G S I capitals, the subdvisors the

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>actual ticker r E I t read like I said,

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>which is the act the opposite act of read ets.

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>So there are several different unique rappers to play the

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>E t F space besides I Y R v n Q,

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the big daddies of the sector. One of the reasons

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>we did want to also talk about this was that

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>um my colleague Morgen Varna back last year, UM at

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, she wrote about s r

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>VR and it was interesting. I actually learned a lot

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>from her note and she just really found that these

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 1>towers and data centers, which again are not tended not

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to be in the traditional re E t F s,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we're a real source of return at the time. UM

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:42.679
<v Speaker 1>and you know sr VR has like thirty in those respectively,

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>whereas v n Q is more like eight and and

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and again this parallel you see it everywhere. Every category

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>has a couple of ETFs that are just tip of

0:11:51.840 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the spear. They're going to these places that you're not

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>getting otherwise. Otherwise, why would the launch an e t

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:57.599
<v Speaker 1>F if you can get it in v n Q.

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So talk about the tower day a center angle here

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and what that's what's going on. Yeah, So I think

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.559
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to note that as you know the

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>overall read market has evolved, you've seen new property types.

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And two of those new property types are data centers

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and cell phone towers, and so they're non traditional and

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>they're actually growing pretty significantly because, as you see, we're

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>digitizing our daily lives. And so when the pandemic happened,

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you actually saw two big beneficiaries in the real estate

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>market where you actually had visibility of cash flows, and

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that was the data centers and cell phone towers. Why

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>because everyone was working from home, everyone was doing school

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>from home, and so these two property types were really, uh,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>the the frontline defense for everybody in their daily lives. Right,

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>It's like everyone was using the internet more and more

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and more for personal and professional use. And so when

0:12:57.080 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you look at what s r V, the s r

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>VR in DEX does because it gives you pure play

0:13:03.320 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>access to those property types. And so what we're seeing

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of technology investors are using s r

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:15.800
<v Speaker 1>VR to complement it with their cybersecurity exposure, with their

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>cloud exposure, with their semiconductors, because it does have the

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 1>growth of technology, but with the safety and security of

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>real estate. And so that's why you're seeing a lot

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of adoption with the s r VR index constituents and

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>advisors and investors portfolios. So this brings up an interesting point,

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.440
<v Speaker 1>which is because I'm looking at s r VR and

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a great pitch for it, and I think, you know,

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the returns UM show that, but the yield is really

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>small relative to other re et F s. I have

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 1>one point six percent for a twelve month yield, whereas

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>v n Q is about double that um. Can you

0:13:56.040 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about that trade off? And you

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of free e t P E t F

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:06.439
<v Speaker 1>s are used for income you're making. You're like, you're

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>basically trying to make a whole different case, is that right? Yeah,

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So the reason why you'll see a lower yield on

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that is because the and it's called s r VR

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's it stands for server because computer servers are

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>rendered useless without the mission critical assets that server index provides.

0:14:24.000 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So the whole idea here is when you look at this,

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what are you trying to gain from this exposure? And

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>that's growth. You're not trying to get income. And so

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what really differentiates it from a V and Q

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at what the actual management teams

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are doing on the data center and cell phone tower side,

0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>they're developing right so they're building as much as they

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 1>can right now, and so they're using a lot of

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>their cash and assets to develop and build. So you're

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get a lower yield, but you're going to

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>get higher growth. And that's the nice aspect. If you

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>want income, go get income else where. If you want growth,

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>your your you you you've got it. You've got a

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>perfect portfolio here where you can get that aspect. So

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>David as a watch of this space, and you know

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>someone who gives Kevin a lot of credit for what

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.239
<v Speaker 1>he's done, and especially with s r VR. What perspective

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>do you have on on what what he's been sort

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>of accomplishing there and and the stuff to watch in

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that space. Kevin mentioned about the tower reachs and data

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>center reaches a growth play, and a couple of my

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>favorite statistics goes back to a conference from a couple

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. The former CEO of American Tower, his

0:15:41.320 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>name was Jim Tassel, he left to go to the

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Lockheed Martin. He made a great data point

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's really resonated with me. Knowing that the state

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 1>of points about two years old, just in the back

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of your mind, know that it's gone up. And the

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:58.920
<v Speaker 1>point was, did you know, wait for the dramatic plause,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's only four hours of video posted to YouTube

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>every minute. That's as of a couple of years ago.

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So think about how that number has only increased. As

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Kevinist stated, we're digesting this content on our phones, are tablets,

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>every single way that we can more and more. We're

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>doing this conversation by way of a zoom. There's that

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>demand for bandwidth. If you go read the Tower and

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Data Center transcripts. One more thing to add is their

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>growth is not here domestically, Their growth is overseas. These

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>guys are making a huge push in the Indias and

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Africa's and Europe's that some of these countries aren't even

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>on three G technology yet in the same breath, these

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>companies are working on the next six G evolution. What

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? As far as does that mean it's

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be real time while I'm watching this movie, it's

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>almost like I'm watching a live event. I don't know,

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>but our content is only going up and up that

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we're using this and so again, the datas and towers

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>is an income play. Necessarily, it is a growing sector.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, you ask anybody in the industry, I

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know the answer to this. But if you say,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>what what ending of development are we in and the

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>towers and datas, my gut tells me a lot of God,

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you we're still in the early ending

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 1>stages of the tower and data center, please not the

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>not the later innings. Yeah, And I think that case

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is made pretty effectively. Um and that that would be

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like Kevin, You're you're almost making a pitch

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>for a theme etf for a new industry. Whereas I

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:33.720
<v Speaker 1>want to bring it back real quick to just general

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>read E t f s that are a little more traditional,

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like van Q and the Schwab and I shares um

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>read E t f s David, How sensitive are they too? Rates?

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>The tenure is rising? Um? Is this? What about timing wise?

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Would you wait for the rates to rise a little

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>more um as an entry point? How do you work

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>in rates to your decision on investing in reads traditional

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:05.360
<v Speaker 1>ones traditionally, I honestly don't know if it's that much

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.159
<v Speaker 1>of an event against some of these reads, the big

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the big cap guys, the SMP five names, They've been

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:13.640
<v Speaker 1>around for so long and have dealt with so much

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>volatility and interest rates, and I don't think it impacts

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>them so much. Eric, to be quite honest, you know

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one point six tenuere environment. You know, if they went

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to three percent, yeah we got some problems and we're

0:18:25.560 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna be freaking out. But if you remember back last

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 1>year when everybody was talking about the tend to yield

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>curve and version and everybody was all freaking out about that.

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Obviously again with COVID all the other hiccups that are

0:18:36.720 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 1>in the market, but you know, really what happens is

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.719
<v Speaker 1>reads bounced back pretty quickly. That trade, the COVID trade

0:18:43.800 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>for the reach sector disappeared in about a month. Looking

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 1>at the prefers and everything that that windows shrunk in

0:18:50.720 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>about a month. So really, I think in the grand

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things right now, I think the reads are

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>shaking off the interest rate concerns in the grand scheme

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 1>of things. I have a couple of thoughts on that,

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's there's stats that people should really

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.400
<v Speaker 1>be aware of. And the first one comes from nay

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Read and they've actually looked at a rising interest rate

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.880
<v Speaker 1>environment and how did broad based reats perform And according

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 1>to the research, fifty four percent of the time when

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>rates are rising, reats outperformed the SMP five hundred and

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:23.399
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's pretty significant. And the question you

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>need to ask is why, And it's because rents rose

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:31.479
<v Speaker 1>faster than rates, and so you want to focus on

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>rising rents, not rising rates, and that's the most important thing.

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 1>So if the economy is getting better, you're gonna see

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>rents go up faster than rates do and that is

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>a huge tail win for for reats in general. Okay,

0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so let's keep talking about that. Because here we are,

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>vaccination is happening, at least in the US at a

0:19:50.760 --> 0:19:53.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty rapid clip. We could we could actually be uh

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>in a version of of normal again before long. So

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.160
<v Speaker 1>what does the read industry look like post COVID, especially

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:03.600
<v Speaker 1>like in regards to things like malls, now that we've

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>we've all transitioned to this this world where everything can

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of go remote, Like, what roll could the read

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:12.919
<v Speaker 1>industry kind of look like post COVID? I think the

0:20:12.960 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>read industry is going to do exceptionally well post COVID

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>for several reasons. One is their actual structure. So we

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 1>taught touch base on it before. But what they're gonna

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>do is come out of this pandemic leaner and meaner. Right,

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So they're gonna have stronger balance sheets. Uh they've done,

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>They've basically right sized uh their entire portfolios. There's been

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of asset dispositions. They can work with state,

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>local municipalities to do some redevelopment. And so what I

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>think is going to happen is post pandemic, what you

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>will see is you will see a lot of reads

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>be opportunistic because they have most of them are investment grade.

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 1>They've got great balance sheets, so they're gonna be able

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>to buy a lot of the distressed assets. Why, because

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>of their financial flexibility, they can issue read preferred airs,

0:21:00.560 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>they can actually issue shares into the secondary market and

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>raise money. And so what's nice about it is they

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>are known entities. The management teams are are very well known.

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>They've been around for a long time, so they have

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a huge advantage to take uh to to to be

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>opportunistic going forward. And same question to you, David, like,

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>what what do you think post COVID reats are gonna

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.480
<v Speaker 1>look like? Yeah, I echo a lot of what Kevin said,

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, going back to the housing crisis or the

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis wo nine, twelve thirteen. For some of these guys,

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:40.440
<v Speaker 1>reachs traditionally learn from historical events. So from the O

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Way oh nine financial crisis, a lot of the reds

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 1>decided to go less leverage equals the better position. They

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>diversified their tenant base, they just became stronger and stronger

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to combat the you know, financial pitfalls that were thrown

0:21:54.960 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>at them. So to answer your question post COVID, I

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of folks are going to continue to leaner.

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>Meter if you were having troubles before COVID, You're probably

0:22:04.480 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to survive after COVID. A lot of these

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>guys could go back and read their transcripts. They had said,

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>we've spent this period developing, improving, managing our relationships, growing

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>our tenant base. They're trying to get, you know, stronger

0:22:18.440 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 1>relationships with their existing tenants. You know, traditionally you think about,

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:23.479
<v Speaker 1>let's use a net least read as an example. If

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 1>they do a deal with the Dollar general, it's not

0:22:25.800 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>just one property that they're talking about. You're talking net

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>least properties so that they're dealing with. So I think

0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it's just going to improve relationships across the specter um.

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.200
<v Speaker 1>But then you're also going to see newer plays come out,

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 1>like as we're seeing with the growth of cannabis as

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>an example, there's several cannabis replays that are out there.

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Um are ready to see a whole slew of new

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>red et s come to market. I don't know. I

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>leave that to my my friendly Bloomberg read e t

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>F analysts, My Bloomberg ETF analysts answer that question. But

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that the reefs, you know, there's an expression

0:23:00.440 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and trading volatility equals opportunity. And I think that really

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>holds true for the read guys right now that they're

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, look at Simon Property Group is a prime example.

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Simon Property Group has been extremely active during COVID. They

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>acquired authentic brands, Lucky Jeans, Brooke Brothers, Oh, and they

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.880
<v Speaker 1>bought another mall, Rate and Tommins Centers and so where

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>people said, oh, the mall is dead, the mall is dead.

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>David Simon and the team are like, no, it's not.

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Look what we're doing here. Let me come in here

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>with this idea and bring it back to the beginning.

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 1>We talked about everybody likes investing in real estate. I

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>think you know, they got their house, they like to

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>see it go up minus like the late two thousand's

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>which I bought a condo in two thousand six. Remember

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage agent was like, oh, yeah, this will double,

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>like it was that normal that your property would double

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.879
<v Speaker 1>in every year. Um, and it's I sold it for

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the same price like fifteen years later because I bought

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>it right anyway, that win, didn't you. Yeah, I mean

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>my wife just wanted to get rid of it. I

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:02.679
<v Speaker 1>was like, it's it might still go up, and we

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>just we cut the dead weight. But anyway, my story aside,

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I do like real estate, like owning something physical. This

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 1>just trying to explain to me, you know, and institutions

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>are known for implying the Yale model, which is about

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>buying less liquid assets, which could be actual real estate

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>where they go in on a land deal or farmland

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>or something. These are equities. How much of that thing

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:30.520
<v Speaker 1>where you own physical property is water water down as

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:33.719
<v Speaker 1>you go through the equity, the public equity system, and

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>now I own it through a reat. Just can you

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>explain that difference between owning it in a public equity

0:24:40.119 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>versus like the real deal. Sure, I'm going to push

0:24:42.920 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>back at you a little bit because to use the

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.639
<v Speaker 1>single family rentals as an example. You know, several of

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the big saw side firms, the JP Morgan's of the world,

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the Goldman Sachses of the World, Bank of America all

0:24:55.800 --> 0:25:01.040
<v Speaker 1>last year announcing single family rental um partner ships that

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>they're launching their own single family rental platforms to compete

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>against the invitation homes in the American homes for rent,

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the public and trade of reads that are out there.

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>So there are guys that are sinking direct money into

0:25:11.480 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>real estate away from the reach structure. But when I

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>buy a share of Boston properties, you're buying a share

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of high quality real estate across New York, San Francisco,

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>across the country. Do I necessarily can I walk into

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 1>the GM building and say, I'm a shareholder, let me

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>up to this top four? No, But in the same breath,

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you know your own. There's only one New York City,

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>there's only one, you know, GM building. They're not going

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to tear it down anytime soon. The last time I recall,

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that building is worth a couple billion with a B dollars.

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>And so therefore I can say I have a tangible stake.

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Granted's one share of the GM building. Um so I

0:25:55.240 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>think that they're you know, there's that name association. A

0:25:58.640 --> 0:26:02.399
<v Speaker 1>great other examples the Empire State Building, Empire State Realty Trust.

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>If I own Empire State Realty Trust, I own the

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Empire State Building. That's a historical landmark. There's only one

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Empire State Building. You're not going to tear it down

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>and rebuild it. And they always say they're not growing

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.120
<v Speaker 1>more land. One other interesting play eric one other name

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to mention too is a company called Safehold and the

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>ticker of that is s a FE. The only reason

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.280
<v Speaker 1>why I mentioned that is they are a ground lease

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>rate that they're selling points a little bit about what

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about, that you're owning a ninety nine year

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:33.880
<v Speaker 1>ground lease of let's say the GM building as an example,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just going to go in and buy the underlying

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.920
<v Speaker 1>land of the property and let the building owner focus

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.679
<v Speaker 1>on owning the building. So there's a couple of unique

0:26:41.680 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>ways to actually play the actual property structure. Eric, if

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I could, I want to answer your question you were taught.

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I think at the core of your question was how

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>much dilution is there from actually owning a property versus

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>owning a reet and so where's the dilution in that?

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:04.159
<v Speaker 1>And the answer is reates are exactly what they sound like.

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's a real estate investment trust. So it's an accumulation

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>of properties. It's just like an e t F so

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>E t F S is an accumulation of securities and

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>then it trades sort of at its net asset value.

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>The same thing holds true for real estate investment trust.

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just an accumulation of properties and then what those

0:27:24.000 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 1>properties are valued at on the exchange and so you know,

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>obviously they do have some debt that's associated with it

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on their balance sheets, but you're an actual shareholder in

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.360
<v Speaker 1>every single one of those properties that they own, So

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you're owning equity in those actual buildings that they own.

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>So it is a portfolio of real estate that you own,

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and so there really isn't much dilution. UH. You just

0:27:48.440 --> 0:27:51.360
<v Speaker 1>have hired these management teams to run, own and operate

0:27:51.440 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 1>these buildings or properties that that that are in the reade.

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I find really interesting here is like

0:28:04.920 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>because of what you've been able to do and others

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in this space, it's like you can be you know,

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>we talked about thematic ETFs a lot, Like basically it

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>sounds like there's like hyper focus focused UH strategies that

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you can basically get into as an investor. So so

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>because the space has not only that, but then you

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>know the V and Q s that have a little

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of everything in it. Like as like a as

0:28:27.600 --> 0:28:29.719
<v Speaker 1>an investor who does might not know this space, Like

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 1>what are the questions that you need to be asking

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>when you when you get into this stuff. Yeah, so

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important thing to know is what

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is what are the drivers of the Z T F

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>S right, and so we talked about s R v R.

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a play on you know, every device being connected

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to the internet. When I look at the other uh,

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the other one, which is I N D S, it's

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>industrial real estate. Well, well, what is the driver of that?

0:28:55.560 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It's e commerce? Right. The Amazon CFO said himself he

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>needs fifty percent more real estate than he has today

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>just to meet current demand. So it owns all the

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>distribution centers that get you your package in a day

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>or less. So say David was to buy something from

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Lows and it gets delivered to him in two hours, right,

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>it's coming from the distribution center. So so so e

0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>commerce is driving that. If you look at another one,

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>homes we mentioned earlier, it's the consumer that's driving it

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:27.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's based off of you know, um, the consumer

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>owning homes. So it's home builders and owns some some

0:29:32.720 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>residential reads. And so you have to look at the

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>drivers behind it. Right, So broad based real estate will

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be sort of a play on the economy. That's why

0:29:41.360 --> 0:29:44.959
<v Speaker 1>when you saw in the first quarter of you know,

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>broad based real estate I think was down some twenty

0:29:48.720 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>one cent right, So it's sold often sentiment with the

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>market because it was a reflection of the economy. So

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what you really need to look at. Where are

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the drivers of this going forward? So you know, I

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>anice to pay, there's gonna be a hotel et F

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>coming out within the next month. What it's going to

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>be the drivers of that. It's gonna be the reopening.

0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>That's that's really what's gonna drive it, right, It's not

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna it's you know, initially it's going to be that,

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>but then it's also going to be focused on businesses

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>going back to conventions and consumers actually going out and

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>do doing leisure vacations. So it's it's the fundamental underpinnings

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of that that you need to look at the drivers.

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's how you play these quote unquote themes within

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>real estate. Um, real quick, you know, you just sort

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of hinted at a at a new filing and I

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>think in generally you have a lot of liberty and

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.160
<v Speaker 1>being able to talk about the e t f s

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that your index is track. Um, you're kind of like

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Dave Portnoy of the Reeds, and you bring up a

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>good point because Portnoy is the from the index company

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of the new buzzy TF and there was a lot

0:30:55.120 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of people questioning how he could be so dramatically bold

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with marketing the E T s because all either other

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>E T fishers were like, I could never say that,

0:31:04.240 --> 0:31:07.239
<v Speaker 1>compliance would hammer me. And he found this kind of

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>not a loophole, but it's just the way it is.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>The index maker can say a lot more. And that's

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>what you are. You just talked about that difference between

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the index maker and the e T f person. Yeah,

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great point to bring up, because

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the important thing to note is you cannot directly invest

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in an index. And so that's that's the caveat that

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.360
<v Speaker 1>every index maker comes out there with and saying, hey,

0:31:27.400 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a this is a portfolio. You actually can

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>invest in this. You would need to invest in a

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>product that seeks to track the performance of this index.

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what he's really, uh, you know, hinging

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>his hat on is is saying, hey, listen, I'm talking

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 1>about this portfolio. You can invest in it. There is

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a product that does track it, but you know, it's

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 1>up to those guys. And so the important thing to

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>note is that there are hundreds of thousands of millions

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of billions of indexes out there. Bloomberg's got tons of them.

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>They don't have products that track them. You can go

0:31:57.240 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>out there, Eric and talk your heart's content and hype up,

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>but no one can invest in him because the product

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't track it. So I kind of laid the groundwork

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for Dave Portoy, which is great because now he's testing

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the thesis of of sort of what we can and

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 1>cannot say, and so I'll let him be the trail

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>blazer on that front. But you know, my my position

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is I'm trying to provide investment intelligence to people out there.

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to get let them know about, you know,

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>different ways to think about investing and and and how

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>they can do it. A lot of times they talk

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>about the constituents within the portfolios. So hey, I say, hey,

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 1>here's here's the difference between American Tower and Crown Castle

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>and Server. Here's the difference between pro Logists and Duke Realty.

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And so I can go out there and talk about

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 1>individual constituents and how they how they how how they

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>actually differentiate from each other, and why they serve a

0:32:51.040 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>purpose within the overall index itself. So, you know, I

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:59.240
<v Speaker 1>think eventually the sec will come around and come up

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>with rules due to the fact that I think people

0:33:02.240 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>are going it's all. It always just takes a couple

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of people to ruin it for everybody else, uh, in

0:33:09.320 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>certain things, so well, you know, to be honest, I

0:33:13.400 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think the e t F fishers aren't allowed to like

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>they should be allowed to say more. I think somehow

0:33:17.320 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>there's a happy medium there. I hope it doesn't get

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>overly ruined. I do think though, you're going to see

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>more job postings from index issues or index companies for

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>communications people. Well, you know, the important thing is that

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>index providers are kind it's kind of you kind of

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:37.040
<v Speaker 1>have these reverse roles in that E t f issuers

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>tend to be the ones at the forefront, forward thinking

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and they've got they they they are the ones that

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>that would be able to push and say great things

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and and do a lot of quote unquote hype as

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Portnoy does. But the index providers are kind of slow

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and steady. They're kind of archaic people, right, They're coming

0:33:52.480 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>up with no they're like the lab. Yeah, they're coming

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>up with classifics like the science lab. Yeah. Absolutely, that's

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.440
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying. I could see them hiring even see

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the E t F fishure. We're saying, hey, let's take

0:34:02.400 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this person here, like our Kevin Kelly, and we'll just

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:09.319
<v Speaker 1>send them over to sele Active. Yeah yeah, and they'll

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>just and they'll just be able to say everything we

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.399
<v Speaker 1>can't there you go. Yeah, I've had I've had other

0:34:13.400 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 1>issuers come to me and say, hey, can we hire you?

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we'll do this index together. And but

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you can go around with our wholesalers and talk about

0:34:22.280 --> 0:34:23.759
<v Speaker 1>it and do the whole thing. And so you talk

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about the index, our wholesaler talks about this and and

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and it'll be great. So you're actually kind of seeing

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing requests from issuers to have an index sales person

0:34:33.280 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>with So I think that's that's where you're going. And

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. But but the but the big you

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>have to think about it. I am the drop in

0:34:42.719 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 1>an ocean. Where are all the indexes at there at

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>you know smp M, s c I and you know

0:34:49.320 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>NASDAC and all the big ones. So they don't really

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>specialize in that, so they may they may move towards that,

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>or what I think you will see happen is the

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>big E T F companies will actually move away from

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 1>those guys and come up with their their own index

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>provider or use different providers like myself. Hey David, as

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we start to wrap here, I want to bring it

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>back to you and investors, um, since you know you're

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 1>talking to institutional investors a lot, how are we supposed

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.640
<v Speaker 1>to think about how reats fit into the portfolio of

0:35:19.680 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the future. You know, there's a ton of talk about

0:35:22.400 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty forty and sort of the forty not being what

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 1>it used to be. Like, talk to us about how

0:35:27.840 --> 0:35:31.160
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors and maybe what retail investors can learn from

0:35:31.200 --> 0:35:33.160
<v Speaker 1>them in terms of how we should think about how

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>reats fit into portfolios going forward. Certainly, and and so

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:40.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously you know there's the rededicated community to dedicated institutional

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.560
<v Speaker 1>re investors, the Cone and Steers as of the world Brookfield.

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have obviously huge, huge stakes their portfolios

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.719
<v Speaker 1>tied up in real estate. From an average retail investor,

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>let's say the typical advisors recommend anywhere from five to

0:35:54.960 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fifteen percent of your portfolio should be involved in reach

0:35:58.120 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>real estate. And that's for that did and income and safety.

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>It's the you know, call it the counter hedge and

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the tech and volatility. Traditionally, reads are a safe haven

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>during times of volatility. So really it's anywhere from I

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 1>would say five or fiftcent from an institutional perspective, again

0:36:13.600 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>because of a hedge from the law of the other

0:36:15.760 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 1>crazy volatility names. You know, it's definitely it definitely needs

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to have a presence that's there. But think about it. Obviously,

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, Reads faced a real tough time during COVID.

0:36:25.040 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the guys did cut their dividends. They

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 1>have come back, a lot of the guys are trying

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to get back to higher dividend structure. Remember, they have

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to pay out their net income in the form of dividends.

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So think about it. Most of these management teams, if

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>not all, these management teams have executives that own huge

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>steaks directly in their companies because they're getting paid so

0:36:44.000 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>much dividend income on the backside of it that they

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>have what they call skin in the game, and so

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they want to make sure that as a company continues

0:36:51.440 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to perform, they continue to perform and play along with

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>those returns as well. So I feel like it's just

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to grow and grow. Um, you know,

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's again, a momentum player is it's not necessarily

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>geared towards a momentum guy. It's where a long term

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>holding type of growth play. Okay, come to that point

0:37:11.760 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>in the program where I have to ask you both

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for your favorite ticker. And it can't be one that

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you have yourself. Can't be s r VR so Kevin favorite.

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I know you're in you're an index marketing mode, but

0:37:26.160 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 1>let's just take that hat off and just be an

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>E t F industry favorite TAT guy favorite et F

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:36.399
<v Speaker 1>ticker that is not your own, you know what, so

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and and this is outside of of reeds obviously, so,

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.839
<v Speaker 1>uh my favorite, I actually hate to say it. It's

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>got to be Hack. I love that ticker. I just

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>love It's just it's so raw, like if you think

0:37:52.200 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>about it like hack, like it's got like a negative connotation,

0:37:56.400 --> 0:37:59.319
<v Speaker 1>but it crushed it when it launched. So you've got

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to you've got to you've got a word that you

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.240
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what that means, right, and you tell anybody

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>it's also it's a verb and it now and the

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>E t F is trying to stop what the word is.

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:17.800
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing is, it's just it's very multidimensional. I agree,

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:22.719
<v Speaker 1>amazing ticker. It's my favorite one of Let me preface

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that for those that don't know. One of my favorite

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.600
<v Speaker 1>pastimes and I can't wait to get back out there

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is going to see the rock band Fish and so

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to med favor, I'm gonna go Toke is probably my

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>favorite E T F ticker that's out there. That's also

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a good one. Also a verb. I'm telling you verbs

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are the way to go and and and out on

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that one. So we got a two for both. Yeah,

0:38:50.239 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 1>to be selfish, I do want to say the fact

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>that the R E I T ticker was available and yeah,

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>that's weird. That's amazing to me. That is amazing because

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's probably what the launched or et F launched. What

0:39:07.080 --> 0:39:09.240
<v Speaker 1>were people thinking? Why were they? Was it too obvious?

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten more foam various folks asking me how did

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>how did they get this ticker? How is that possible?

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:18.760
<v Speaker 1>And my answers, I don't know. But it's the steel

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of the century that they finally release the REET ticker.

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:24.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, Kevin David, thank you so so much for

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:35.280
<v Speaker 1>joining us on Trillions. Thanks, thank you, thanks for listening

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to Trillions. Until next time, You can find us on

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:41.759
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcast, Spotify, and

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever else you like to listen. We'd love to hear

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:50.719
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Faltunas, and you can find David at

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Daily Beat, and you can find Kevin at Kevin R.

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Kelly Underscore. This episode of Trillions was produced by Magnus Hendrickson.

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Levy is the head of Bloomberg Podcast. Bye