WEBVTT - Amazon's Erstwhile NYC Site Will Lure In New Money

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penl Podcast. I'm Paul Sweene. You,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits each day

0:00:07.720 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether at the grocery store or

0:00:12.560 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:17.959
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:23.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. Let's go back to the Amazon story.

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure there was a real estate investors and speculators

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and Queens were screaming into their pillows last night as

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>they were trying to process the news that Amazon will

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>not be coming to Long Island City. To get a

0:00:35.120 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>sense of what that means for the local real estate

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>market over in Queens, let's bring on Ken Weissenberg. Ken

0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>is a partner in charge of the real estate services

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>group at Eisner amper Uh. He is in New York City.

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So Ken, you know what does it really mean short

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>term and long term for the Queen's and nyc um

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>real estate market. On a short term basis, the speculation

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that was going on in the Long Island City area

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in terms of people buying up the condos that were

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>available is going to pretty much stop for the time being. Um.

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I think the contracts that were into the two will

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>go through and be completed, but a lot of the

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>other transactions that work that were happening were probably going

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>to slow down or stop for the time being. The

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>overall market in the Long Island City area is continuing

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to show, you know, significant progress and growth. Uh. If

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>you look at the site that Amazon was going to pick,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it's in an opportunity zone. There's huge interest in the

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>real estate community and developing an opportunity zones. The site

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>happens to be basically on the water on the East River. Um,

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a prime for development. I think you'll see a

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>project happen there, whether Amazon, it's Amazon or someone else.

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>In other words, do you think it's not that big

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>of a deal. I think it's a big deal. I mean,

0:01:46.400 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the political ramifications are a big deal to

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>two sides within the Democratic Party have to kind of

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>work things out. But Umland City is going to continue

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to grow. New York City is going to continue to grow.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the number of jobs in New

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 1>York City, Yes, another twenty five thousand jobs would have

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>been great um, the construction jobs, you know, to build

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that that project would have been great, But other things

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>will be built, other jobs will come in. New York

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is out out growing San Francisco as a tech center.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 1>UM in Long Island City is seven minutes from Midtown

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>by subway. So, Ken, are you concerned, however, that what

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:29.600
<v Speaker 1>happened here with Amazon in the city, in a state

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of New York perhaps might send a signal to other

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>corporations considering New York City, New York City that maybe

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>New York is not open for business. I don't think so.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I think this was a UM targeted political campaign UM

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>that ended Amazon. Amazon didn't want to have any controversy

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>around this UM with open arms. And then you know,

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of a lot of a lot

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of pushback from local politicians. But honestly, Ken, I gotta wonder,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if Amazon didn't want local pushback, why didn't they do

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>more groundwork ahead of this. I mean, it seems kind

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of strange that everybody was shocked by this decision on

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the ground, uh, and that Amazon didn't realize that this

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>would be waiting for them. That is kind of strange.

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought that the political politicians would have

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>been lined up, you know, either for against way beforehand. Yeah.

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So here's my question for you, Ken, Um. Focused on

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the real estate sector, you're saying that you don't think

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to have a material effect that there, that

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the area will continue to grow. But we'll put a

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>long term, I mean a short term. It's going to

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>be a shock to the system, because this was a

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>real impetus to grow that that particular section of Long

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Island City could prices decline unreal estate there um from

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the speculative prices that hit recently. Yes, in a long term,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I think they'll come back. I think they'll be just

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>as strong and the growth we will continue. So, Ken,

0:03:56.720 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>does this call into question at all the use of

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>incentive to corporations. Let's just focus on New York City

0:04:02.400 --> 0:04:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that seemed to be one of the areas that received

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pushback. Um. Do you think the city

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and the state will rethink some of the incentives it

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>offers for corporations. Well, this this was quite a prize

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for whoever got the headquarters UM, and we were in

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>competition with almost every major metropolitan area in the country

0:04:21.200 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for the H two q UM for h Q two

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>rather UM so I think I think they had to

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:32.520
<v Speaker 1>put together sweeteners to make make the deal happen. But

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that's been going on so you know decades where they

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.159
<v Speaker 1>have been enticing large corporations to move headquarters with with sweeteners.

0:04:40.760 --> 0:04:45.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that will continue. UM. Maybe you know, maybe

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the package was too sweet under the current economic climate,

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>UM and political climate. But you know, even without the

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>packages that they put together, there was you know, large

0:04:56.279 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>incentives under under existing law that they could have benefited from.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>One thing that I'm wondering is how much of a

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 1>pressure the subway system in New York affected this. In

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:09.239
<v Speaker 1>other words, that train line that went to Long Island

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>City is already very crowded that if Amazon was going

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to come, it would strain the infrastructure more than it

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>would help it in the short term, and in the

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>long term that could make the city less appealing. What

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>do you say to that and sort of what will

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this do to efforts to upgrade the subway system. When

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you look at the overall infrastructure for New York, the

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure has been in place probably longer than any other

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 1>major major metropolitan area in the United States, UM, and

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it does need refresh and continue rebuild. The first major

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 1>project in the subway system in fifty years was the

0:05:43.240 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Second Avenue subway line, and that's been going on for

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 1>thirty years and not finished yet. Uh. They do need

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:53.839
<v Speaker 1>to put significant investment into the infrastructure of New York

0:05:53.839 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>City and the major metropolitan areas around the country. That's

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:01.039
<v Speaker 1>more of a federal UM and say combined program, and

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:03.599
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to see that happen. UM. A lot of

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.280
<v Speaker 1>it will be done with private partner you know, public

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 1>private partnerships, like what's going on at the airport's right now.

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>So can as New York City in particular continues to

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>try to attract a new corporate citizens and they've had

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>some tremendous success with technology companies, with Google having a

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>big presence in Lower Manhattan, Facebook as well. UM. Talk

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to me about how the city positions its cost of

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>living challenges to some of these corporations and how that

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>gets balanced, because you know, that has to be a

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>big challenge for New York cities that attracts corporations. Our

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>rent is cheaper than San Francisco, not by much, but

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a little cheaper than San Francisco. UM. I think

0:06:44.000 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>the city is is and and state have to address.

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 1>You know that the housing need for affordable housing for

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the workforce. Workforce meaning UM policeman, teachers, UM office workers,

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:02.480
<v Speaker 1>UM young lawyers and accountants. The prices of Manhattan are

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>basically pushing people out. UM. You're seeing development happening in

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the outer boroughs. Brooklyn and Queens are seeing a tremendous

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>amount of development interests. The Bronx is atreading to see

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>significant development interests and certain companies are developing in the

0:07:20.600 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>transit hubs in the suburbs. So that's going to take

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>some sub of the pressure off New York City. But

0:07:25.120 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>that also requires infrastructure because people have to be on

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on accessible and clean, safe transit. Ken Weisenberg, thank you

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Ken Weisenberg, partner in

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:39.200
<v Speaker 1>charge of the real estate services group at Eisner Amper

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York. Talking about the potential ramifications of Amazon

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>withdrawing from the Long Island City site for its headquarters

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to project a HQ two UH seems to be a

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>growing feeling that in the short run it might have

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>an issue, it might have an impact on prices over

0:07:57.240 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>the long term, a little bit more optimism New York

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and in terms of its tech growth yeah, we've we've

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>already seen a lot of tech coming as I mentioned before.

0:08:06.200 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, Facebook and Alphabet is here, and of course

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Cornell has their big tech center UH in the city

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, so up and we've seen news reports about

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 1>how you know, New York is adding more tech jobs

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>than than San Francisco. So it certainly has a strong

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>foundation there. But you have to wonder about the political

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>support of you know, making tech even a bigger part

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of the New York City corporate scene. When you think

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>about the twenty seven billion dollars of economic value added

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 1>over or created over twenty five year period by this Walmart,

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean by the Amazon move against the three billion

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>dollars in subsidies. That seems like favorable economics. Yet that

0:08:43.160 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>perhaps wasn't enough. Let's find out a little bit more

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>about what is expected to come from this declaration of

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>an emergency. And Edgar Tennis joining us now congressional reporter

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, joining us from One Studios in Washington,

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.800
<v Speaker 1>d c uh and thank you so much for being

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:14.720
<v Speaker 1>with us. So talk about what the precedent is for

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>declaring a state of emergency, a national emergency to divert

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>funds away from other projects towards something that the president

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>would like to see. Well, that's that's an interesting question.

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of two different questions because declaring a national

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>emergency is not unheard of. Barack Obama declared a national

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>emergency to combat the swine flu. George George W. Bush

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>declared and a national emergency after nine eleven, So declaring

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a national emergency happens from time to time. But yours

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the second part of your question, to shift funds from

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 1>one part of the budget to another part is unprecedented.

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's where we're going to run into a real

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>constitutional challenge because according to Article one of the Constitution,

0:09:56.840 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 1>it's Congress that has the power of the purse, and

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>there's an appropriation process that goes through Congress. And what

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the president is trying to do with this declaration is

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>divert taxpayer money to his priority outside the regular appropriation process,

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's gonna be challenged on constitutional grounds, clearly, um

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I think, Lisa. The issue here is we know his

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:21.079
<v Speaker 1>intention is to uh continue to fund the board of Wall.

0:10:21.120 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>The question is what type of uh I think? Uh

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I think challenge will he received various members of Congress

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:29.559
<v Speaker 1>and over what time frame. Well, I will say this,

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to see how he's going to try to

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>cast this as a win, and it will be interesting

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to see President Trump's tone. I was interested in the

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal opinion article that came out today from

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the editorial board talking about how signing declaring a national

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>emergency is a problem and is actually basically how he

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>painted himself into a corner. Kind of interesting the Wall

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal editorial page, usually a conservative place with his

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>conservative opinions, but really highlighting this fissure in the Republican

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>party over declaring a national emergency? Will this give a

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 1>precedent to the Democrats to do the same if there

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is a Democratic president? Also trying to figure out what

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>kinds of lawsuits this exposes the Trump administration to not

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>only from opponents of some of these funding read diversions,

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but also frankly, the residents that would have to exit

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 1>their homes due to eminent domain in order to allow

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>this wall to be built. So a lot of issues here.

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>This is going to get tied up in the courts

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for a while. Uh. Also a question of where the

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>money is going to come from, and you know what

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>projects will have to be jeopardized as a result of that.

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>But that said, there still is a core of President

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump supporters who would like to see the wall. He

0:11:46.559 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>has made this a campaign speech issue, he has made

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 1>this one of the hallmarks of his tenure, and he

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to go down without this victory, even if

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just on paper. Yeah, it could be a puperic victory,

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but clearly looks President Trump and the administration is going

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to fight very hard for this. We do have Anna

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Edgerton back Coggression, reporter for Bloomberg News, calling from our

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety nine one studio in Washington, d C. Anna,

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks for coming back up. I guess the question here

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>now is just kind of next steps. How does this

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 1>play out in your opinion there? So, there are two

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>things that we're looking for from the democratically led House

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to Representatives. The first is a legal challenge. I spoke

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.559
<v Speaker 1>with Jerry Nadler, he's the Democrat in charge of the

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Judiciary Committee, and he said that the House Council will

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>pursue legal challenges to this. The other avenue to challenge

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this is a joint resolution that would start in the

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives. So, uh, Nadler has already said that

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>he is going to put question this, this National Emergency

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>declaration in a resolution now that's privileged, so that means

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>it will go through the Judiciary Committee, it will go

0:12:51.040 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>put on the floor of the House. It will probably

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 1>pass a Democratic House, and within fifteen days it has

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to be voted in the Senate. So it's not up

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, whether or not

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to put it on the floor. So it's gonna be

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to see if all Democrats vote against this

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>National Emergency declaration and some Republicans who have kind of

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>constitutional qualms with this um, it could pass because it

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>only needs to be one votes. If it's privilege, it

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to get past the filibuster. I think it's

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>interesting though, Mitch McConnell supports declaration of a national emergency,

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen this, uh, just the leadership of the

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Republicans seems to be behind President Trump. What can you

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>draw from that? That was a really interesting development, and

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>he almost kind of used that as a way to

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>encourage some of his hesitant members to vote for the

0:13:44.240 --> 0:13:46.959
<v Speaker 1>spending bill yesterday, to say, you know, there will be

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>wall money coming from elsewhere, the President will declare a

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>national emergency. I think this is a political calculation from

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell. He knows that this is a very strong

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>campaign promise from the President and in order to kind

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of keep that core base with them, they need to

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>do more than they were allowed to do under the

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>normal appropriations process and divided government. So it definitely looks

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like a kind of a a political move the McConnell

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>might not like, but kind of weighing what's at stake,

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>it felt like he had to so, and what's the

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.480
<v Speaker 1>sense of where the rank and file Republican Party, particularly

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in the in the Senate, where are they falling down

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>on this issue? Are they really willing to go uh

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and stand behind the president on this. It's pretty divided

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>right now and senators yesterday we're a little wary to

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of get ahead of their skis before the national

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>declaration is the emergency declaration is actually declared, and also

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to see which pots of money will be tapped for this.

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But with there was one really interesting response from Mike

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Simpson that I wanted to highlight. He said that he

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>does think the president has pretty broad legal authority to

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>do this the way that the National Emergency Statute is written.

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:01.800
<v Speaker 1>But he does worry about the precedent, and he said,

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do think the president has legal to

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>do this. Maybe it's the best course of action since

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't get Wall money any other way. But the

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>next time we have a democratic president, we could have

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a healthcare national emergency that gets us Medicare for all.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>We could have a climate emergency that gets us the

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Green New Deal. So, you know, kind of opening this

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>up as an acceptable practice really kind of changes the

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>way to two bridges of government interact. We're speaking with

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Anna Edgerton, uh congressional reporter for Bloomberg News as we

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>await President Trump to make comments after his expected signing

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of the bill to stave off another government shutdown, as

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>well as a declaration of a national emergency, which he's

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>also expected to do. And I'd love to get your sense,

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>just going forward, where would the money actually come from.

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a sense of the projects that

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>could get delayed, postponed, not happen as a result of

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>money diverted to the Wall. Should this happen? Yeah, My

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>colleague Margaret's talent reported yesterday that the president has identified

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>eight billion dollars, almost eight billion dollars that could be

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>directed for this purpose, and the kind of pots of

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>money we're looking at our unobligated funds that could come

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:22.000
<v Speaker 1>from military accounts, although speaking with Jerry Nadler, a Democratic

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>chair of the Judiciary Committee yesterday, he said, you can't

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>use military money for this purpose because military money can

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>only be directed to military uses, and by law, the

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>military can't enforce domestic law, so that could be one snag.

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>We could also see money being moved from UH funds

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to rebuild an air base in Florida that was damaged

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>by the hurricane, and also in Campbell June in North

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Carolina that was damaged by the floods. So there are

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a few different things that the president's looking at, but um,

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>we expect that to be clear pretty much before the

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>beginning of next week. So Anna, Obviously, this border wall

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 1>is a arguably the foundational element of the Trump presidency,

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.679
<v Speaker 1>at least to this point. But is there any sense

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know, fatigue as setting in within the administration

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that maybe it's just not worth it. Too many roadblocks

0:17:15.920 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>here and it doesn't seem to be a clear path

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to get this funding. I don't know if there's I mean,

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a kind of a constant fatigue in

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the administration just because it's just, you know, kind of happens.

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>It's such a high frequency. But there's certainly as a

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of political concern that the more the president kind

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of sacrifices or puts himselves out there to pursue this

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>one priority, the more damage she could be doing in

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>other areas. Like for example, the government shut down, you know,

0:17:47.680 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>was supported by those who really really want to build

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a border wall, but it really made the president's approval

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>ratings take a hit, and you kind of see him

0:17:57.080 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>compensating for that a little bit. There was an really

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>interesting peace in political last week kind of highlighting the

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>overt embrace of pro life priorities and kind of really

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:11.680
<v Speaker 1>attacking the state laws that have been in the news

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.880
<v Speaker 1>recently about abortion. And that's the president trying to shore

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 1>up his evangelical basis. So even as he pursues the

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>wall and does everything he can, maybe even you know,

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 1>using some of his political capital to do that, he's

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to kind of shore up his coalition and other

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>areas as well, and adgertain we will please be speaking

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>with you soon. Well, lots of news coming out of Washington,

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:48.120
<v Speaker 1>d c is. We just listened to President Trump's press

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>conference about the government funding UH for border security, talking

0:18:53.359 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>about China trade. It's got a sense of how a

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of these geopolitical issues are impacting the US and

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 1>global credit market. We bring in Michael Temple. Michael's a

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>director of Corporate Credit US and portfolio manager for a

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Mundy Pioneer. A Mundy Pioneer has approximately eighty billion dollars

0:19:09.720 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>under management. Michael joins us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Broker studio. Michael, thanks for being with us. UM A

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:21.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of geopolitical noise out there, news out there, whether

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it is China, whether it is the US government shutdown,

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Brexit. How does that factor into your analysis

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of the credit markets? Well, you know, I think it's

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a top down factor that we have to think about.

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>How it might affect um consumer confidence, how it might

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>affect business confidence, and whether or not at the margin

0:19:39.880 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's going to create a slower economic activity, either in

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the US or overseas. So if you look at the

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>bottom up, you see companies that still have pretty high leverage,

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:51.480
<v Speaker 1>even though there's some d leveraging going on. You see

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:54.760
<v Speaker 1>YO bond yields that have come down dramatically more than

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>five percent returns so far this year. Are we out

0:19:57.760 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of the woods with respect to another credit crisis or

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>could we see another one? Well? I think a lot

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 1>of it depends on whether or not the slowdown that

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing globally, in particular in Europe and you just

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>heard about China, whether or not that ends up causing

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>a much more rapid deceleration of growth in the US.

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>If it does, then we're going to revisit this problem

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>sometime in the near future. If it doesn't, if the

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>fedbacking away causes an improvement and confidence and the economy

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is fine, then uh, I think we've probably seen seen

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:33.360
<v Speaker 1>this for the last time for a while. Okay, So,

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:37.080
<v Speaker 1>if the economy does slow materially in the US, what

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>will be the epicenter of the next credit crisis? Well,

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a good question. A lot of people

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>are looking at the US credit markets as the point

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of a problem, and of course everybody looks back to

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the last cycle when bank loans are doing really poorly

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and had enormous defaults in the US I actually don't

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's necessarily going to be the U S as

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the epicenter. I think it's going to be overseas UM. Clearly,

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>growth is a lot slower in Europe right now, and

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing a number of countries in recession. So could

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you see defaults and increasing problems in Europe that ultimately

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>cycle back to the US. And what about China? What

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:23.959
<v Speaker 1>if China cannot reinvigorate growth with its current stimulus program, um,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>then we can start to see problems coming out of China.

0:21:27.600 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So if if the FED is on the sidelines, which

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it appears to be, does that imply that we're in

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a trading range here, if at least for the short term.

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>I think so. You know, you've seen a tremendous rebound

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in credit spreads. So the question will be, now that

0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the Feds off the table, what will be the next

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:48.639
<v Speaker 1>factor that could potentially either cause credit what credit spreads

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to tighten or widen? UM. I think now the market

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be focused on the um earnings growth.

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I coined a phrase fed up with

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. I think the market's done trying to figure

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>out what the FED is going to do. The FED

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is basically said, we're on hold for some period of time,

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:06.719
<v Speaker 1>so everyone's going to be focusing on different things. So

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is the market fed up with the Fed? They are

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 1>for right now. Next week though, the Federal meet, and

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure everybody will be laser focused on them once again,

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>im parsing every word of FED speak. Michael Temple, thank

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. Michael Temple, director

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>of Corporate Credit US and portfolio manager for a Moondy

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Pioneer which oversees eighty billion dollars. Definitely interesting to think

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>are we out of the woods of the FED is

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on hold? People still want to know that what they're

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>going to do with their balance sheet, and certainly there

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of discussion about whether we have seen

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the last rate hike of the credit cycle. Amazon dot

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>Com project scuttled in Long Island City raises a lot

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of questions about the municipal bond market and frankly, infrastructure

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to all using those funds. Focus on MUTIS is brought

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to you by Build American Mutual BAM Green Star Bonds

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>finance projects that were protect and restore the environment with

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 1>more renewable energy and efficient transportation and buildings visit build

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>America dot com, slash green Star BAM Building America joining

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:22.040
<v Speaker 1>us as he does to talk munis every week. Joe Maisak,

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:25.159
<v Speaker 1>editor for The bloom Brief, focused on the muni bond market.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>So I want to start there with Amazon, the idea

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, there was all of this activity that

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was supposed to be coming there a lot of money

0:23:33.280 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>from tax revenues, albeit not the extra three billion dollars

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of tax breaks that they did get. Are there any

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>projects that you know of that have actually been scuttled

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:45.120
<v Speaker 1>or seriously called into question by Amazon's exit from Long

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Island City? Uh, just from the Amazon effect or nationally,

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think there's been any you know,

0:23:55.920 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>New York projects that people have decided, no, forget about it,

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 1>let's not do it. But I guess that then on

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 1>a national level, has it been anything, uh, any movement

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with respect to cities cities uh and sort of inviting

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 1>businesses in with with the potential for rebates and things

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 1>like that. No, this is the way it's done, you know,

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the providing these tax subsidies, and it's not cash, it's

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's kind of a tax cut. If you

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>will over a period of years is an acceptable way

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and it has been an acceptable way of doing business

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>now for decades. I want to say, and you know,

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to go away because of Fox

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Con in Wisconsin. We've had some very good coverage to

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that this week, much bigger disaster than this Amazon business.

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:48.160
<v Speaker 1>And of course the Amazon business, Uh, that's not going away.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Every once in a while you'll hear about a city

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:57.280
<v Speaker 1>rejecting the idea of subsidies for a sports stadium, but otherwise, now, yeah,

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that's what I want to go to, Joe. I mean,

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the subsidies issues. Will was one of the issues that

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I think some of the folks that came out against

0:25:03.720 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon deal cited, Um, you know, why should New

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.919
<v Speaker 1>York City provide three billion dollars of subsidies to the

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the biggest company in the world, the wealthiest

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>person in the world. But that is a key part

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of how these deals are done. Do you see any

0:25:16.640 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>change to that, man? You know, I I have I

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>have two words for municipalities out there who all of

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a sudden decide that, yeah, they're not going to play

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the subsidy game anymore, and that is Brooklyn Dodgers Brooklyn.

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn's heart was ripped out for decades when the Dodgers left.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>In theory, I mean, arguably you could say they never

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>recovered it, never recovered. The Dodgers should still be in Brooklyn. However,

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the game wasn't played, and this is what happens. So fine,

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know you're happy now? I mean I want to

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>ask some of these politicians, particularly generous, I guess, uh,

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you're happy now. You're not getting these jobs, You're not

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:09.040
<v Speaker 1>getting this revenue. Huh what was the trade? Three billion

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>for billion and probably higher? Yeah. Well, I think this

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely will will cause some soul searching among a variety

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of different New Year political figures. I do want to

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>shift gears a little bit from one coast to another.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>California scaling back its plans for a high speed rail line.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>What's the deal here? And uh, you know, are there

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>any financing plans or expectations that are going to be

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>affected by this? Well, the state of voters approved ten

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars for high speed rail in California, and that money,

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:47.919
<v Speaker 1>those bonds will be sold, some of them already have

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 1>been sold, and they will use that authorization on a

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 1>much scaled back, so you're not getting Los Angeles to

0:26:56.280 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, You're getting more like a central valley. Uh

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh link if you will. Um. Yeah, it's

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 1>very disheartening. I mean, I think the whole, the whole

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>high speed rail thing. You know, sometimes I almost wonder

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that this is really more of a federal project than

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>anything else. Yeah. I think in the state of California

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that loves the automobile, I'm not sure how embrace the

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>train would be, but they could certainly use some help

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>with the congestion there. So Joe in Florida, you have

0:27:27.840 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>the that's no longer called bright Line. They cancel the

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 1>cancel the I p O and said, well, we have

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>other sources of money. It's a railroad game is very

0:27:38.520 --> 0:27:41.680
<v Speaker 1>difficult to It's a very difficult game costly. So let's

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>go to another area that seems to be doing a

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit better from a municipal bomb perspective. And that's

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>my favorite muni bond topic, which is Puerto Rico. Puerto

0:27:48.920 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Rico had a good week last week with the senior

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>secured bonds. What are next steps for Puerto Ricos that

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>tries to dig out from this bankruptcy. Man, they gotta

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>di on the on on whether or not they're going

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>to go through this repudiation of six billion dollars. I

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 1>imagine this is something that has to be decided in

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>court over perhaps the rest of this year. But you know, we'll,

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we'll certainly see how they move along, because

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>the geos are next. That's the next logical thing, and

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think there's seventeen billion in geos. They want to

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>repudiate six billion that were sold because they thought that

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.800
<v Speaker 1>those bonds ran into the debt limit on the common volt.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Joe Mesac, thank you so much for being with us

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>as always. Joe masak uh He is editor of the

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Brief, focused onymous of the bond market, checking out

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 1>all things in the muni world, which has been hot recently,

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>especially as a number of Congress members talk about a

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>possible revival of an infrastructure deal. Thanks for listening to

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Penl podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>abram Wohits. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abram woits one

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.