WEBVTT - Week 16 NFL Bets: Nick's Picks

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. CIBO index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>xsp can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot Com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cebo life is better with options, Your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Could be too.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with CBO company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at CBO dot com slash us underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Welcome in episode one oh nine, What's Right with Nick Wright,

0:00:45.200 --> 0:00:52.319
<v Speaker 3>our Week sixteen NFL gambling show, and right as we're

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 3>about to record, we have listen. Today's going to be

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 3>an important episode because we are recording on Thursday, you

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 3>will hear it on Friday. Typically that we don't really

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 3>discuss the Thursday night game because it's not actionable for

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 3>you guys. However, there is a nice symmetry between the

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.760
<v Speaker 3>story of the Prince that was promised in the Jacksonville

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 3>Jaguars who play Thursday Night and Our Picks. Season started

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 3>off with great optimism, had some really nice early moments

0:01:27.520 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 3>and then a deadly cold streak in the middle of

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 3>the year that seemingly left the team for dead, and

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:40.520
<v Speaker 3>then a surge at the end. And are they going

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 3>to sneak into the playoffs? Well, Ryan Tannehill's done for

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:47.960
<v Speaker 3>the year. The Jags control their own destiny. By the

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.040
<v Speaker 3>time you hear this, the Jags will have beaten the

0:01:51.120 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 3>New York Jets on Thursday night. I'm calling my shot,

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 3>much like our picks, written off for dead after some

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 3>disastrous weeks, and then last week, while we did not

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 3>do a show, we did publicly post five picks. And

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 3>if those aren't five perfect picks, I don't know what is.

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 3>We'll start with the one loser, Minnesota minus three and

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 3>a half. Well, they won by three and had the

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 3>greatest comeback in the history of the sport. I had

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:23.280
<v Speaker 3>the guts, the courage to lay three points with the

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Broncos backup quarterback against Arizona, and that was never in doubt.

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Pittsburgh plus three against Carolina, I said on the TV

0:02:32.639 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 3>show the coaching mismatch between Tomlin and Wilkes the Steelers,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 3>I didn't care it was Trubisky, the Steelers getting three points.

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Carolina way overvalued everyone's like, oh, they can make the playoffs. Nonsense,

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 3>total nonsense. They went out right, the Giants plus four

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 3>and a half. They went out right and our right move.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 3>I told you guys, the Bills don't blow people out.

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 3>The Bills were very lucky to win that game. They

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen fumbled for a second consecutive play with the

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.639
<v Speaker 3>Bills down eight, but they recovered it. Credit to the

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Bills for it taking care of business. And I guess

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 3>you could say we got a little lucky not to

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.320
<v Speaker 3>end with a push there because the Bills could have

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 3>run into the end zone. They did and they end

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 3>up kicking the field goal. But regardless, that's a four

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 3>and one week. So our record on the season is

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 3>now thirty six, thirty nine and two, three games under

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 3>five hundred. Much like the Jacksonville Jaguars, as we record

0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>our two games under five hundred, with a chance to

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 3>get hot and be the team no one wants to

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.840
<v Speaker 3>see come the postseason. All we need to Oh, oh

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:45.839
<v Speaker 3>you think I'm drunking, Oh you think the I'm telling

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 3>you right now?

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 4>You think the the feal boys certainly don't want to

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 4>see him sat in?

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's true, and and that's the other thing in

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 3>the C block. In our third segment of today's show,

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 3>we're going to discuss in full uh demands break you know,

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 3>the ten Crack Commandments from Biggie. You're familiar to the song.

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, yeah, I can't let you just school me

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 4>on some Biggie stuff. I'm just gonna say that I

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 4>know what you're talking about, and we're gonna move on

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 4>from it.

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 3>Well, you, no, it's not. I mean, it's just because

0:04:16.800 --> 0:04:18.919
<v Speaker 3>I mean it came out five years before you were born.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 3>But don't get high on your own supply the oh yeah,

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 3>the Scarface Okay, well scarf, yes, so some of it

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 3>from Starface to movie. Yes. Uh. And Demonse broke eight

0:04:33.440 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 3>of the ten Gambling Commandments on Sunday and it led lost,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:43.640
<v Speaker 3>well lost. Now you're breaking the ninth, which is denial,

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.360
<v Speaker 3>which is being in denial about your mistakes, which will

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 3>lead to more of the same mistake And so we

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 3>we will discuss that later. But we are right there

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:58.160
<v Speaker 3>alive for a winning season. Here's an amazing fact before

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>we get to our picks this week. Every week on

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 3>TV I take my three favorite picks from the Gambling

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Show and make them my three television picks, despite being

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 3>thirty six, thirty nine and two on the Gambling Show,

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 3>I am on TV at sixty one percent against the

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 3>spread and over the last six weeks of television picks

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 3>thirteen three and two. So somehow I am kind of

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 3>dancing through the rain drops on TV with the picks.

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>The larger pick sample not quite as good. But they're

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 3>all going to be good this week. I love them all.

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:44.039
<v Speaker 3>We're red hot. We're making money Texas Dolly Doyle Brunson,

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 3>who tails our picks, He's making money. Everyone's making money

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 3>right now, except for my co host Demanse, who got

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 3>crushed on Sunday.

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 2>And we will discuss.

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 3>We will start here first pick of the week, getting

0:05:57.839 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 3>back on that Giants horse Giant plus four at Minnesota.

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 3>The Vikings are not good. I don't know the Giants

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 3>are good either. Back, I think the Giants are very

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 3>good either. However, the Giants know that they essentially they

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 3>can lock up a wildcard spot with a win this weekend.

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 3>After the big win against Washington Minnesota, I would imagine

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 3>there has to be something of a letdown after the

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 3>biggest comeback in an NFL history and the Vikings a letdown. Yeah, no,

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 3>it's such an emotional comeback victory. Yeah, draining exactly a

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 3>bit of an emotional letdown. Also, the Vikings are in

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 3>a weird spot where they it's not impossible, but it's

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 3>almost impossible for them to get the one seed. They're

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 3>not going to fall to the four line, so they

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 3>are essentially locked into the two or the three. Now,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 3>now you can argue the three is the two is

0:07:03.279 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 3>way more valuable than the three because you would then

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 3>get to host theoretically San Francisco instead of going to

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco. I understand that part of it, but I

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 3>think the Giants defense will be able to give Minnesota

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 3>some measure of trouble. I don't know that the Giants

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 3>are gonna win, but four points this should be two points.

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 3>It's four points. It obviously crosses the key three. So

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I like the Giants plus four is our first pick

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>of the week.

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Doesn't seem a little too easy to you, as you know,

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 4>being that the Giants tend to cover against the spread.

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:36.440
<v Speaker 4>I think they're ten and four against the spread this

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>well this year, yep, and Minnesota never blows up teams.

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, the too easy is a first cousin of be

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>careful right, or where it's like, wait, they're daring you

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 3>to pick this. I really only worry about that. I

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't say only, but that typically is when a favorite

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 3>looks too easy, you know, like when it's like, wait,

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 3>this team should be favored by happen the only favorite

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 3>by three? Those are the ones that scare me. It's

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 3>because the public does not typically bang underdogs, and so

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>if an underdog line, If I like the underdog and

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 3>it seems like the lion's mispriced, those are my favorite bets.

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 3>If I like a favorite and it seems like it's

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 3>way mispriced, those feel trappy, Like wait, what does Vegas

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:27.679
<v Speaker 3>know that I don't know? But the Giants plus four,

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I just think it's I think this is a three

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 3>point game in either direction. Next Cleveland minus three against

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 3>New Orleans. All Right, Deshaun Watson is not going to consistently.

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 3>He's going to get better to a degree. Now, is

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.079
<v Speaker 3>he gonna be worth that money? Is that going to

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:51.760
<v Speaker 3>be a good contract? It doesn't look like it, but

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.720
<v Speaker 3>he's going to be better than he's been. Additionally, the

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Saints are awful and they have the worst coach in

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 3>the NFL, and I'm including that Hackett in that they

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:06.679
<v Speaker 3>have the worst coach in the NFL. The fact that

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:12.079
<v Speaker 3>this is not in Cleveland also is sneaky. Still alive

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:15.040
<v Speaker 3>for the playoffs, They're not in my mind, but Matt

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 3>at six and eight, they're like, if we run the table,

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 3>win some tiebreakers, nine and eight could get us in.

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I think Cleveland will run the hell out of the ball.

0:09:25.000 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 3>I think Miles Garrett will force at least one fumble

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 3>on Andy Dalton or Taysom Hill, whomever the Saints have

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>played quarterback on any given snap. This should be Cleveland.

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 3>I believe minus six it's Cleveland minus three.

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I like Cleveland.

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we have bet on Cleveland once all year,

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:51.319
<v Speaker 3>and I like them in this spot at home. The

0:09:51.360 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 3>only hesitation I have is bad weather, snowy weather. I

0:09:55.880 --> 0:10:01.400
<v Speaker 3>tend to favor underdogs because but this in since Cleveland's

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 3>kind of built for the bad weather, because they will

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 3>just run the football if you let them.

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 2>So you think they'll have like an edge, and.

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I think if the if the conditions are poor,

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 3>they can just hand the ball to Nick Chubb thirty

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 3>five times Nick Chubb and Cream Hunt They're gonna be

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 3>fine with that. So I like Cleveland minus the three. Uh,

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 3>is there something you want to ask about the game?

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Man?

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 4>That over under is probably gonna be the lowest that

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 4>it's been since I've been alive. Maybe really Yeah, because

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 4>of the weather, yeah, and the teams.

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So let me look and see what the total

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.600
<v Speaker 3>in the game is. In the Cleveland game, Oh my god,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 3>that is the That is going to be the lowest

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 3>total in any game in years. In twenty years. The

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 3>totals thirty two and a half. That's an Army Navy total.

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 3>So Navy, Yeah, Army Navy. They play teams, yeah, they

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 3>play and it's a It goes under almost every single year.

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 3>So a total that low, again pushes you towards the

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:09.880
<v Speaker 3>underdog because you're getting points. They don't expect a lot

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 3>of points. I understand that. I'm gonna stay strong with

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Cleveland at Cleveland minus three. That's our second pick of

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the week. Third pick, the Bills don't blow people out.

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Chicago getting eight and a half against Buffalo, it's just

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 3>too many points. And I would imagine again, the weather

0:11:31.840 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a massive factor in any game

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>that's being played in the Northeast this weekend. Also, Josh

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 3>Allen popped up as a limited participant on the Bills

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 3>practice report for the first time since before Thanksgiving. They

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 3>rant listen that Miami game was critical to them. All

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 3>these games are critical because they can't lose and stay

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 3>the one seed. The Miami game was extra critical because

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:02.319
<v Speaker 3>had they lost that one, Miami would be to facto

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 3>half game out of first place in the division and

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo could have fallen all the way to the five line.

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Buffalo had Miami last week, huge game. They have Cincinnati

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 3>next week.

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 2>That's interesting, huge game.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.920
<v Speaker 3>So Buffalo right now could be the one, the two,

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 3>or the three. Same with Kansas City, same with Cincinnati,

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 3>so that's a massive game. They are now going to

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 3>be playing in horrific conditions against a Bears team that

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 3>the Bears weakness will They have a lot of them,

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.280
<v Speaker 3>but they can't block for Justin Fields. But he's such

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 3>a magician. He gets out and runs. We saw some

0:12:40.360 --> 0:12:43.960
<v Speaker 3>of the most amazing quarterback runs we've ever seen watching

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:48.679
<v Speaker 3>him this weekend. Their other giant weakness is every aspect

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 3>of their defense, particularly their past defense. In these conditions,

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there's gonna be a lot of passing now.

0:12:56.760 --> 0:13:01.120
<v Speaker 3>Josh Allen is a deadly weapon with his leg. He

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 3>ran so much and got so banged up against the

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 3>bank against the Dolphins. I would imagine if the Bills

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 3>have any sense whatsoever, they are going to try to

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 3>make this a fast game. Hand the ball to their

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:19.520
<v Speaker 3>running backs, keep Josh out of harm's way. That leads

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 3>to a low scoring game. The Bears are going to

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 3>be running the ball that leads to a low scoring game.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 3>The Bears, as they showed last week against the Eagles,

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 3>even when they're down double digits, are not out of it.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 3>From a covering perspective, Getting eight and a half is

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>such a great number to where even if they're down

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:45.280
<v Speaker 3>ten late, if they're down fourteen late, hell fifteen late,

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 3>you're still alive for the cover. And the Bills, aside

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 3>from the Patriots, have they They have not beaten anyone

0:13:55.280 --> 0:14:02.319
<v Speaker 3>by two scores since the first week of October when

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 3>they played the Steelers and beat them thirty five to three.

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 3>That's the other than the again, other than the Patriots,

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 3>who they beat twenty four to ten. So that's a blowout,

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 3>but it's a low scoring blowout. They have not blown

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 3>anyone out in two plus months. Chicago plus eight and

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 3>a half. Next, the Raiders getting two and a half

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 3>at Pittsburgh. This one's pretty simple. Obviously, you'd rather it

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 3>be three, There's no doubt about it. You'd rather it

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 3>be three. But I actually don't know if the three

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 3>is quite as valuable when it's going to again be

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 3>these weather and kicking conditions because you got miss extra points,

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 3>missed field goals. The Raiders are in the same bucket

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 3>as the Browns, where they're still alive thanks to being

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 3>six and eight, where they're not actually alive, but they're

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 3>not going to give up on the season. Steelers, by

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 3>the way, in that same bucket at six and eight.

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 3>I just think this is the Raiders after the win

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:08.400
<v Speaker 3>last week against the Patriots, which what got overshadowed because

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 3>of how the game ended was that the Raiders were

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 3>the far better team. The Raiders outplayed the Patriots soundly

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 3>throughout the game, car through an unfathomably bad pick six

0:15:21.440 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 3>that got the Patriots back in it. The Patriots then

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 3>field goal, field goal, field goal, They all of a

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 3>sudden have a lead, and then the Raiders have a

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 3>magnificent final drive complete a fourth and ten, a great

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 3>ball to kill and Cole in the corner of the

0:15:35.240 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 3>end zone. I don't know if he was in or out,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 3>but they called him in in order to tie the game.

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 3>And then they had the stirring Chandler Jones mush face

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 3>on Mac Jones. The Raiders, I think win this game outright.

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 3>If they don't, this feels like it absolutely could be

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 3>a sixteen to fourteen game where even if they don't win,

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the two and a half is enough to cover. I

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 3>like the Raiders now. Last week I picked the Steelers

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 3>because the coaching edge Tomlin versus Wilkes. There again is

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 3>a pretty significant coaching edge Tomlin versus McDaniel. But I

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>think the Raiders have an overwhelming talent edge in this game.

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 3>The Steelers don't run the ball all that well, and

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 3>this is gonna be a run game. The Raiders plus

0:16:15.840 --> 0:16:20.600
<v Speaker 3>two and a half. And then lastly Miami minus four

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 3>against Green Bay. I think right now this is an

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 3>undervalued Dolphins team and an overvalued Packers team. So the Packers,

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>everyone's given them credit because, oh they're alive and they

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 3>could make the postseason. They're not making the postseason. Oh

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 3>they've they've turned their season around. My question would be this,

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 3>have the Packers turned their season around or have the

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 3>Packers simply gotten to the part of the schedule where

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 3>they get the Bears and then the Rams. I think

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 3>it's more that Miami, on the other hand, I thought

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 3>really played well against Buffalo. I thought they're running. I

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 3>thought they showed you in the Buffalo game. What if

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 3>a team sells out to just stop the pass what

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>they can do on the ground. Miami also is desperate

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 3>for a win, having lost three in a row. They're

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 3>not going to miss the playoffs, but they need another

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 3>win to ensure they don't miss the playoffs. Them being

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 3>favored by only four points at home in what is

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 3>a game that should not be drastically affected by weather

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 3>because it's in Miami is disrespectful to what the Dolphins

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 3>have accomplished throughout the year. I think this should be

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Miami minus six and a half. It's Miami minus four.

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that the Packers can stay attached to

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Hill and Waddle all game. And here is an amazing stat.

0:17:48.840 --> 0:17:51.080
<v Speaker 3>How many games this year do you think Aaron Rodgers

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 3>has thrown for three hundred yards?

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 2>One zero?

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 3>How many games this year, is Aaron Rodgers thrown for

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and sixty yards?

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 2>You want to give it a guess?

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 3>No, No, you don't know, Okay, no problem.

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Zero zero, okay, two sixty? Wow?

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 3>To not throw for two sixty. The reason that people

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.680
<v Speaker 3>are like, oh, the Packers, if they get hot, if

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 3>they sneak in, if it's pretending they have the Aaron

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 3>Rodgers that the two years he won League MVP, the

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 3>last two years had a touchdown interception ratio of eighty

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 3>five to nine, eighty five to nine over two years

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 3>such an interception. This year it's twenty three to ten.

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 3>And he hasn't thrown for more than two hundred and

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.720
<v Speaker 3>fifty five yards once all season. So for all those reasons,

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 3>I think Miami is the better team. I think Miami

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 3>is undervalued here. I like Miami minus four and so

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 3>that Miami's the pick. So our five picks for the

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:55.199
<v Speaker 3>week coming off a four and one week where the

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 3>one loss was by a half point. The Giants getting

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:03.200
<v Speaker 3>four in minutes, the Bears getting eight and a half

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 3>at home against Buffalo, Cleveland laying three against New Orleans,

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 3>the Raiders getting two and a half at Pittsburgh, and

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 3>Miami laying four against Green Bay. There's our five picks.

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 3>We have a very interesting second segment coming where we

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 3>put the games in stay aways, be carefuls and perfectly priced.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:28.399
<v Speaker 3>We have five a full five stay away games because

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 3>of quarterback injuries over the course of the last few

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 3>weeks that affect these games. We will discuss all of

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 3>those games next. What's right.

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblast, who defined every expectation

0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:19:56.800 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 5>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.399
<v Speaker 5>relling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.960
<v Speaker 5>including Jarrell Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Tanya, and

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 3>All right, welcome back. In episode one oh nine, Week

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 3>sixteen gambling show, we just gave you our five picks.

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 3>We'll recap them real quick here again. Giants plus four,

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 3>Bears plus eight and a half, Raiders plus two and

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 3>a half, Cleveland minus three, and Miami minus four. We now,

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 3>as we always have you new to the Gambling Show.

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 3>The way we do it is we take all the

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.720
<v Speaker 3>games of the weekend and then we put them in

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:39.679
<v Speaker 3>three categories, the picks we're gonna make, the stay aways,

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the beat carefuls, and the perfectly priced. This is the

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:47.640
<v Speaker 3>most stayaways we've ever had. We have five stay aways

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 3>this week Houston at Tennessee, Seattle at Kansas City, Atlanta

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.960
<v Speaker 3>at Baltimore, Billy Dallas, Denver at the Rams. So we'll

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.960
<v Speaker 3>explain them all quickly, but there's most of them involve

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 3>quarterback questions. So Tennessee is laying three at home against Houston.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Ryan Tannehill is out for the season, so it's Malik

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Willis play. Malik Willis has not shown the ability yet

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:21.400
<v Speaker 3>to be an NFL quarterback. With that said, the Texans

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 3>have not shown the ability yet to win football games.

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 3>And I understand they came this close to being Dallas,

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 3>this even closer to beating the Chiefs. I don't have

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:35.640
<v Speaker 3>a read on if coming that close and losing those

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 3>games is going to be galvanizing for them, Like we're

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 3>that close getting over the hump or if they're gonna

0:21:41.040 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 3>be like it's Christmas, those were our chances. We stink

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 3>we're mailing it in that plus the quarterback issue in

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Tennessee just don't bet on.

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 2>This game, all right.

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 4>So so, knowing the Tannehills out, they did the minus

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 4>three thing, what I want to say is, I think

0:21:59.320 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 4>Tennessee is I don't give it crap about Tanneill not

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 4>being in. I think they're gonna be that team that

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 4>exposed them again for the Houston Texans, and I think

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 4>they're gonna blow them out.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:09.640
<v Speaker 2>And I think the minus three. Hey, I'm not telling

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 2>you guys a bet on it, but I think the

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 2>minus three.

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 3>Is so one of your picks this week if you

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 3>hadn't retired from gambling on Sunday, would be Tennessee minus three. Yeah. Possibly,

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 3>but it sounds like definitely. Yeah, sounds like definitely Tennessee

0:22:23.320 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 3>minus three. Okay. I'm not saying that's a wrong pick.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm simply saying it's too much uncertainty for me for

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 3>that to be on my card. Seattle at Kansas City

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 3>minus ten is a stay away purely for this reason.

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if Kansas here's the deal. There is

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 3>a possibility that Kansas City is not as good as

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 3>I believe they are.

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Here we go.

0:22:55.680 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 3>There is another possibility that Kansas City is doing the

0:23:01.480 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 3>bare minimum it needs to do in these games to

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 3>book a win and to stay healthy. Because one thing

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 3>that is noteworthy is the Chiefs haven't had a player

0:23:16.400 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 3>injured in a game in three weeks. That's almost impossible

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 3>in the NFL. Now, some of that's luck, but also

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 3>some of that is you can coach a certain way

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:31.400
<v Speaker 3>and play call a certain way to minimize injury risk.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.120
<v Speaker 3>It also minimizes explosiveness, and you know what I mean,

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 3>a lot of things, and I do wonder they got

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:42.680
<v Speaker 3>up twenty seven to nothing on Denver and then when

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 3>Uber conservative except for Mahomes, made some big mistakes and

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 3>got away with a win against Houston.

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 2>They were taking Kelsey out a lot, It seemed like

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:54.879
<v Speaker 2>taking They were taking Travis Kelsey.

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 3>On a lot out of the game exactly in yes,

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.239
<v Speaker 3>because I and I think that's now They could have

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 3>looked that could have cost him against Houston, But I

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 3>don't think they anticipated Bucker missing the kicks, the two fumbles,

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 3>all those things, right, So my point is against Seattle.

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I just I don't know if the Chiefs right now,

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 3>unless the other team turns the ball over a bunch

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 3>are going to coach to blow people out. But you

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 3>also should not feel comfortable grabbing the ten with a

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Chiefs team that has to win at home against the

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Seattle team that's that's trending downwards. So to me, it's

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:36.960
<v Speaker 3>a stay away.

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead. Okay, I'm gonna play Devil's advocating real quick.

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 4>If you weren't a Chiefs fan, I feel like you'd

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 4>have to definitely bet on this game considering that Pat

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Mahomes never covers big numbers and Seattle is extremely desperate

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 4>at this point of the season.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that there is an argument to be made there

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 3>that I maybe would do that. The flip side, though,

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 3>is the Chiefs haven't covered in three weeks or four weeks,

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 3>depending on where you got the Rams Chiefs line at.

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 3>They're not gonna They're not gonna not cover the rest

0:25:11.280 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 3>of the year. So at some point they're gonna cover

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 3>one of these big numbers. And so I to me,

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm just staying away from it. Atlanta at Baltimore. I'll

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 3>be very quick here. Desmond Ritter it's such an unknown

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>if he can play at this level at all. Baltimore,

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 3>we don't yet know for certain who is playing quarterback,

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 3>so quarterback questions on both sides stay away from the game.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 3>PHILLYOT Dallas. We don't know if Jalen Hurts is playing

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 3>or not as we record here today. I don't think

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 3>he's playing, but there is when they're in. I think

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Minshew's a good backup. But when there is that unknown

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 3>at quarterback, it's a stay away. And Denver at the Rams,

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the I think Russ is playing. They're saying he's playing.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 3>Its concussion protocol, though it's also too horrible. Teams that

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 3>a stay away, like the quarterback questions involving four of

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 3>these five games, so to me, they're just pure stay aways. Okay,

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 3>it makes sense, like that's what that category exists, the

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 3>be careful category. Since he at New England, since he

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 3>laying only three points, Tampa Bay at Arizona, and the

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 3>Chargers at Endy, these are be careful for very simple reasons.

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 3>They are daring you to bet the Bengals. The Patriots

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 3>are a mess. They're coming off the worst loss arguably

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 3>in NFL history. Cincinnati looks like a juggernaut. Right now,

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:44.159
<v Speaker 3>why is it only three points? Now? I understand the

0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 3>weather is a factor there, It's a lot of things

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 3>that could be a factor. The entirety of the general

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 3>public is going to be on Cincinnati. Be careful, demands

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 3>that you love Cincinnati this weekend. Yeah, yeah, I know it.

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. It kind of seems like Vegas is underrating them

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion.

0:27:02.960 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 3>Well I get that, and the last few weeks you'd

0:27:06.480 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 3>have been proven correcked. This to me is a trap,

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 3>and I don't I can't give you any analysis. Of course.

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Listen, the only reason plus three makes sense in New

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 2>England against Cincinnati is it? Is it in New England?

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 2>It's in New England?

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah so, but it is to me, this is eighty

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 3>five percent of the public is going to be on Cincinnati.

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 3>I can't imagine anyone loving New England getting only three points.

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:35.720
<v Speaker 4>You're going to be part of the pubblic that's a

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 4>ten point teaser right there, your teaseer eleven eleven.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:47.199
<v Speaker 3>So you lose the line value. You just you just,

0:27:47.720 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just make all these mistakes. You can lead

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 3>a fit, you know, I will say, you can lead

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 3>a fish to water. That's not what it is. The

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 3>horse to the troughy. You can lead a horse to water,

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 3>you can't make them drink. You can, you know, teacher,

0:28:00.840 --> 0:28:02.640
<v Speaker 3>you can give a man a fish. You gotta teach

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 3>and fish something like that. I've let you down, Son.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 3>Tampa and Arizona. There's the rare game where the public

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 3>I think is gonna be all over the underdog. It's

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 3>incomprehensible at this point that Tampa could blow somebody out.

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 3>But it's trace Mick Sorely starting for the Cardinals. So

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 3>to me, the public's gonna be all over Arizona plus

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 3>seven and a half because Tampa's looks so bad. Be careful.

0:28:29.960 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 3>Arizona could score zero points. No, legitimately, Arizona might score

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 3>zero points. But I'm also not gonna encourage you to

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 3>go out and lay more than a touchdown with the

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Bucks who have looked terrible. Just be careful there. And then, lastly,

0:28:45.640 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 3>in this category, Chargers at Indy. Indy is getting four

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:55.680
<v Speaker 3>and a half. Indy is starting Nick Foles. Here's what

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I'll tell you.

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the.

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Chargers are excellent. I think argers are dangerous. I think

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 3>the Chargers are gonna win. I also think Nick Foles

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 3>might be the best quarterback Yeaholis, Yeah, that they've had

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 3>all year. Honestly, God Alnger was a joke. Matt Ryan

0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 3>is melting in front of us. I think I think

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 3>that this feels like the all the entire public is

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 3>going to be on the Chargers. I of course, would

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 3>never encourage anyone to bet on Jeff Saturday. Four and

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 3>a half is such a weird number. Be careful here,

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 3>I just just be careful. The Chargers absolutely could blow

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 3>them out. It also could be that Nick Foles is

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 3>dealing on that beat up Chargers defense. Be careful and then, lastly,

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 3>perfectly priced will be very quick here. Detroit at Carolina

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 3>and Washington and San Francisco. Detroit being favored by just

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 3>about a field goal at Carolina feels right. Detroit is

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 3>not as dominant on the road as they are at home.

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 3>Carolina is no good, however. Carolina on the flip side, though,

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.239
<v Speaker 3>is they do control their own playoff destiny if they

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 3>were to win out they go to the postseason. Detroit

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 3>to me is maybe slightly overvalued by the public right now,

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 3>but they are red hot. It should be Detroit minus

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 3>just about three on the road. That's perfectly priced. And

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Washington at San Francisco. Washington's desperate. San Francisco's the most

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 3>talented roster in the league. They're at home. They have

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:33.680
<v Speaker 3>a rookie quarterback. You can't favor brock Purty by more

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 3>than a touchdown against any live team. Washington's a very

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 3>live team. So I think the line is exactly where

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 3>I thought it should be. San Francisco favored by a touchdown.

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:46.840
<v Speaker 3>That feels to me like a twenty to thirteen game.

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 3>So there it is. There's our We gave you our

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>five picks. We broke down the other games. We will

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 3>tell a Demons gambling story. We would find out if

0:30:56.080 --> 0:30:59.240
<v Speaker 3>we have any teasers. We will give you our right

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 3>move of the week. All that's next, What's right? All right?

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back in final segment, Episode one oh nine, Week

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>sixteen Gambling Show. Our five picks this week are the

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Giants plus four, Chicago plus eight and a half, Cleveland

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 3>minus three, Vegas plus two and a half, and Miami

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 3>minus four. Our right move this week, which we got

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 3>correct last week, has not been great over the course

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 3>of the season, but that's okay, is going to be

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 3>Chicago getting the eight and a half points. So Chicago

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 3>plus eight and a half. The Bills have in the

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 3>last two and a half months have one win of

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 3>more than a one score of more than seven or

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 3>eight points. I don't think they're gonna get their second

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 3>in what's going to be terrible weather against a bad

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 3>but frisky Bears team. We like the Bears plus eight

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 3>and a half. Demonse, you're about to come on camera,

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:55.520
<v Speaker 3>go like this, buddy, You got a little fuzz from

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 3>your shirt in your eyebrow, actually believe it or not.

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 3>Now it's on your eyelid, but you're fine. So it's

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 3>still there. If you want to clean that off the

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:05.840
<v Speaker 3>other side of your face, I'm just trying to help

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 3>you out there you go, still there's still I'm just

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 3>trying to help you. It's still there right there on

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 3>the side of your face. And so here's the deal.

0:32:14.240 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 3>We don't have an exotic this week. Okay, demonte had

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 3>an exotic this weekend. There's a ten point teaser, five

0:32:24.680 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 3>team ten point teaser, and he lost it because he

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 3>had the Cowboys catching five. He teased across zero, didn't

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.760
<v Speaker 3>get to the key numbers, made all these errors as

0:32:39.800 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 3>if I've taught you nothing and lost in a heartbreaking

0:32:46.080 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 3>fashion a pick six in overtime to lose by a.

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>Point, she just gets tackled. Man, they kicked the field goal.

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 2>I win.

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 3>I know, and you probably dreamt about it and it

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 3>kept you up at night. But here's the real problem.

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 3>Without getting too into Demonday's business, it was not a

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 3>one unit bet. It was not a two unit bet.

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 3>It was a twenty unit bet.

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 2>The biggest bet of it.

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 3>It was twenty units. I know what your typical bet

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 3>size is. I know what that bet was. And now,

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 3>and as much as I'd love to, I can't live

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 3>your life for you. But I am telling you this

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 3>is now a fork in the road moment for you

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 3>because the problem with making a twenty unit bet, and

0:33:42.240 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 3>we've all been there, is it has a long tail

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 3>that affects you weeks and weeks down the road. And

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 3>here's what I mean. Your if you had won it,

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 3>that would probably in the long run cost you more

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 3>because that would then be you would trick yourself in

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:16.759
<v Speaker 3>saying that's my new typical bet size. You might say

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 3>you wouldn't, but you would. That's what everyone does. Because

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 3>the problem is, and this is where even losing it

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 3>can hurt you. Is Now, if you play this weekend

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:39.320
<v Speaker 3>and you go back to your typical bet size, winning

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 3>will feel like losing. It will be oh, yeah, great,

0:34:47.760 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 3>I won.

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:49.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah whooped? You do not.

0:34:49.400 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 3>I only need to win fifteen more of these to

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:54.680
<v Speaker 3>get back that one bet, and it's gonna be sitting

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 3>in the back of your head. There's gonna I'm gonna

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:01.360
<v Speaker 3>get even on that. I'm gonna get even on that,

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:05.919
<v Speaker 3>and I'm going to find the perfect five team ten

0:35:06.040 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 3>point teaser. Here's one other thing, and then I'll let

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 3>you talk. Demanse got mad at me this weekend briefly

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 3>when I was trying to talk through what had happened.

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:19.800
<v Speaker 3>When I was like, so, what was the bet? I

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 3>went through it, I'm like, yeah, man, that's a lot

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:26.840
<v Speaker 3>of money on a long shot. Demonte goes long shot. Huh.

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 3>I'm like, well, it was plus one forty, so if

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 3>it's plus money, it is something of a long shot.

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 3>So now the floor is yours with your thoughts.

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:41.759
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna do it again, but I'm not gonna do

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 4>the five hundred thing. What I'm going to do is

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 4>and I don't think you're a you're not taking into

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 4>account what my parlays are. First of all, if I

0:35:49.680 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 4>hit one of my parlays, then I did make the

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 4>money back because they're all like fifteen sixteen bucks to win,

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 4>like four or five whatever.

0:35:57.520 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 3>Those are very very hard to hit.

0:35:58.719 --> 0:35:59.320
<v Speaker 2>But go ahead.

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:01.959
<v Speaker 4>So I think, what I'm not gonna I'm not betting

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 4>this weekend. I'm not betting the next weekend. I'm actually

0:36:04.040 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 4>done betting for a little bit of time. But when

0:36:06.800 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 4>I do get back to betting, what I'm going to

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.400
<v Speaker 4>do is I'm going to do that same ten eleven

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 4>have very many points, users I'm gonna bet one hundred

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 4>on that, and then I'm gonna do my regular parlays

0:36:19.400 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 4>and it's going to be I know, I missed this one,

0:36:22.200 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 4>but it was pretty sure fire it by one point.

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 4>All right, Cool, I'm gonna do the one hundred to

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 4>cover me, and I'm still gonna do the same parlays,

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 4>so I'll lose like one to fifty at the most.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I you know, here's the thing. I'd love to

0:36:39.680 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 3>say that you know you're grown man. You're on your

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 3>own on this. Unfortunately, though this does impact me, for

0:36:53.440 --> 0:36:59.839
<v Speaker 3>it's not your fault. But as you saw, you got

0:36:59.880 --> 0:37:04.399
<v Speaker 3>a small glimpse of this the other night. Let's just say,

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 3>your mother is nonplussed with me with you starting the

0:37:10.520 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 3>sports bet. And it came up the other day when

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:20.239
<v Speaker 3>I messed with your mom about something, and she was like, oh, yeah,

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:24.319
<v Speaker 3>well you've got him gambling, so and so.

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:27.200
<v Speaker 2>All right, so let me let me say this.

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 4>With that little thing, the little last week's or last

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 4>Sunday's stint.

0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 2>I feel like overall I've been pretty respect like.

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.719
<v Speaker 4>I feel like with the five hundred thing, I didn't

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 4>double down, I didn't try to bet again.

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:43.799
<v Speaker 3>I was and I'll be honest you, Okay, So now

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:46.279
<v Speaker 3>I have to you're right about that, and now I

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 3>have to admit something to you. So you looked at

0:37:49.960 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 3>my bank against Hold on a second, just wait a

0:37:52.680 --> 0:37:55.719
<v Speaker 3>second here, Just wait a second here. I did not

0:37:55.920 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 3>that day. I did not the next day, however, yesterday

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.000
<v Speaker 3>or the day before yesterday, I don't remember which I

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:08.480
<v Speaker 3>had to send you money for. Yeah, because demanse uh

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 3>paid a bill for me, or paid, I say, paid

0:38:12.880 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 3>the lady who comes and cleans our house once a week.

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 3>I was gone and I hadn't paid her. So I

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 3>asked demanse to go to the ATM and get money

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 3>and to give her extra money because it was Christmas.

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 3>So I had to log into the online banking to

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.359
<v Speaker 3>transfer you that money back because I didn't want to forget.

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 3>And I will admit when I was there scrolling through

0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 3>the transit, I didn't even scroll. Here's the thing. I

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.920
<v Speaker 3>don't know if this is better or worse. I didn't

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 3>scroll through your transactions because I felt that would have

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:52.680
<v Speaker 3>been too invasive. What I did do searched, Yes, exactly right,

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:56.280
<v Speaker 3>that is exact, and I'm gonna tell you I saw

0:38:56.320 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 3>something moderately. I was here's the thing. I typed in

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Fate and I searched, and I saw every every FanDuel thing.

0:39:10.200 --> 0:39:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Then I typed in all the other betting apps and

0:39:12.680 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 3>I saw, okay, we're in the clear. What I didn't

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 3>see was that on FanDuel in particular, that they've ever

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:26.759
<v Speaker 3>sent you money. So that was a little disappointing though,

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 3>because because I.

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:31.760
<v Speaker 4>Could actually find that for you if I've cashed out, okay,

0:39:31.760 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 4>so you d me twice, but I've never cashed on

0:39:34.600 --> 0:39:37.480
<v Speaker 4>like a huge amount I cashed out the time I've

0:39:37.520 --> 0:39:40.600
<v Speaker 4>cashed out twice. Every okay, the time after the Lions game,

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:42.200
<v Speaker 4>that little parlay that okay, you.

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 3>Did cash that out. Okay, so maybe it just didn't

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 3>show up on that so you have cashed out something

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 3>definitely okay. All right, well then in that case you

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:54.759
<v Speaker 3>are right that you have not been Yeah. That was

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 3>total deposits to FanDuel over the course of the season

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:03.799
<v Speaker 3>is about one thousand bucks. Half of that being made

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 3>at two in the morning Sunday morning for a five

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 3>team ten point parlay is not or ten point teaser

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 3>is not ideal bank roll management. But but I was

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:21.359
<v Speaker 3>relieved and thrilled because I knew you told me how

0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:24.320
<v Speaker 3>much the bet was for, right, so I knew it

0:40:24.360 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 3>was that. I was legit nervous that I was gonna

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 3>see an instant another deposit, like.

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:34.719
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, no, we're not making the dream come.

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.440
<v Speaker 3>Try Okay, all right, you know what, Okay, then you're fine.

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:41.479
<v Speaker 3>So demonte By the way, this week only has one pick.

0:40:41.520 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 3>I think your one pick that you love is Tennessee

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:46.440
<v Speaker 3>minus three with Malik.

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Willis no what I'm going to start.

0:40:49.200 --> 0:40:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing the teasers, I'm doing the having any points

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:54.879
<v Speaker 4>you No, No, I won't. I'm not saying that I'm

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 4>gonna bet it on. I understand, but it's going to

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.719
<v Speaker 4>be my imaginary You know, all.

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Listen, since we're not doing an exotic this week, I

0:41:03.239 --> 0:41:05.319
<v Speaker 3>just because it applies to you, and then we'll move on.

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 3>The show's gone too long. That just reminder America. With teasers,

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:19.360
<v Speaker 3>you want to avoid teasing across zero because you're giving

0:41:19.440 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 3>up a point there because the game essentially never lands

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 3>on zero. That's first point. Second point. You want to

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:32.760
<v Speaker 3>make sure, depending on your betting outfit that you use,

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:38.759
<v Speaker 3>do pushes reduce the teaser or do pushes lose? So

0:41:39.120 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 3>on some ten point teasers, you tease it and say

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 3>games of pick them, and you tease it up to

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 3>plus ten. If that team loses by ten, it doesn't

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 3>just reduce, meaning go from a five team teaser to

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.239
<v Speaker 3>a four team teaser like it would with You're Out.

0:41:54.400 --> 0:41:57.760
<v Speaker 3>You gotta check that. And you want to make sure

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:03.360
<v Speaker 3>you're teasing across key numbers. You want to get actual

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 3>value in what you're teasing, and you want to consider

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 3>teasing underdogs. Everyone thinks of teasing. Oh I'm gonna tease

0:42:13.160 --> 0:42:15.360
<v Speaker 3>a seven point favorite down to a pick them, so

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 3>be it. But you also have to consider teasing a

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 3>two and a half point underdog up to nine and

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 3>a half. So you get it through the three, the six,

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 3>the seven, the eight. Those are things if you're gonna

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.759
<v Speaker 3>do teasers, and let's not do teasers of more than

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 3>three teams America. These five team teasers are hard. You

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:39.439
<v Speaker 3>need to be correct on five separate events. One other

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:43.359
<v Speaker 3>note that I don't really encourage, but I will ad

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.399
<v Speaker 3>for you, but for the audience. Also, keep in mind

0:42:46.440 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 3>with teasers, you're allowed to tease the total. I don't

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 3>do that, but you are allowed to tease. Like right now,

0:42:52.880 --> 0:42:55.040
<v Speaker 3>that that game that we said at a thirty two

0:42:55.040 --> 0:42:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and a half point total, you theoretically whatever, if you

0:42:58.800 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 3>theoretically could tease it to over twenty two and a

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:05.000
<v Speaker 3>half points, you know what I mean. You could move

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the total ten points if you wanted to. But I

0:43:08.080 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 3>don't encourage that. All right, what's the offer this week?

0:43:10.600 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 4>This week's offer is called the Saint Nick because it'd

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 4>be your ultimate Christmas present. So first off, we got

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.280
<v Speaker 4>Luca and Lebron to go over their points on Christmas

0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:21.800
<v Speaker 4>or their point totals on Christmas, and.

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:23.480
<v Speaker 2>JAG's money line against the Jets.

0:43:23.480 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 4>You love that Chie used to cover minus ten versus Seattle, Seattle,

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:28.920
<v Speaker 4>and this is a plus twelve ninety.

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:34.520
<v Speaker 3>Luca and Lebron both go over their point props the

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 3>Jags money line, which will have already happened by the

0:43:37.160 --> 0:43:39.760
<v Speaker 3>time people hear this because it's Thursday night game again

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:41.920
<v Speaker 3>City minus ten and plus thirteen hundred.

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, what go ahead.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:47.200
<v Speaker 4>I think JAG's money line is cool. Luca and Lebron

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 4>going over their point total on Christmas, the Chiefs covering

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:52.640
<v Speaker 4>the minus ten a little sketch.

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's why it's thirteen to one. It's a long shot.

0:43:56.760 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Let's put twenty units on it. I'll take that offer.

0:44:02.400 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it. Start it off tonight. I take that offer.

0:44:05.480 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 3>There it is, and I'll make that actual bet. Uh.

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 3>And you can have five percent of it. So you

0:44:12.520 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 3>can have five percent of it so we can root

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.279
<v Speaker 3>for all that together. All right, good show. We'll talk

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 3>to you guys Monday. What's right,