WEBVTT - We Are All at Risk

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Government is using big tech to shut down dissent. They're

0:00:05.160 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>doing it on the biggest podcast platform in the world.

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>They're doing it up in America's hat with Canadian truckers.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>We are all we are all at risk here and

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens now will have a lot to say about

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:25.239
<v Speaker 1>the future of free speech in our society. This is

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Verdict with Ted Cruz. Today's episode of Verdict with Ted

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Cruz is brought to you by ip vanish. Did you

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>know that browsing online using incognito mode doesn't actually protect

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:44.959
<v Speaker 1>your privacy? Without added security, you might as well give

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>all your private data way to hackers, advertisers, your Internet

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>service provider, and who knows who else. Ip Vanish helps

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>you securely and privately browse the Internet by encrypting one

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent of your data. This means that your private messages, passwords, emails,

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>browsing history, and other information will be completely protected from

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>falling into the wrong hands. Ip Vanish makes you virtually

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>invisible online. It's that simple. Just for Verdict listeners, ip

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>vanish is offering an insane seventy percent off their annual plan.

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>That's like getting nine months for free. You have to

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>go directly to ip vanished dot com slash cactus to

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.119
<v Speaker 1>get this seventy percent off discount. Ip Vanish is super

0:01:19.160 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 1>easy to use. Just tap one button and you're instantly protected.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>You won't even know it's on. You can use ip

0:01:24.200 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 1>vanish on your computers, tablets, and phones, whether you're at

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>home or in public. Don't go online without using ip vanish.

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget Verdict listeners get seventy percent off the ip

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>vanish annual plan. Just go to ip vanished dot com

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>slash cactus to claim your discount and secure your online life.

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>That's ip va nish dot com slash Cactus. This episode,

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>A Verdict with's Head Cruise is brought to you by

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Thompson's Cigar. Now, I don't have to tell you that

0:01:50.000 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the gentleman on this show like cigars. So does my

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>husband most times. Actually that's what we do after the show.

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>They smoke cigars and we tell ourselves what a great

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>show it was. But that's why you've got to check

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>out Thompson. Whether you're working from home or just kicking

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.320
<v Speaker 1>back after a week of being essential, there's no better

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>way to relax than with a premium cigar. They've got

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the best prices on the biggest brands in the business,

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>from Macanudo to Monte Cristo. Or maybe are you looking

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:16.639
<v Speaker 1>to try new, rare, top rated blends but you don't

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>want to splurge on boxes. Well check out Thompson's Cigar Tour,

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a smattering of five different blends delivered to your doorstep

0:02:24.280 --> 0:02:26.679
<v Speaker 1>each month. Now, Michael and my husband have been fans

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of Thompson even before they became a partner. No one

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>has more selection than Thompson. Their customer service is the best.

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So sit back and take a break from all the

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>craziness with a cigar from Thompson Cigar Company. These guys

0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:40.839
<v Speaker 1>rarely do offers, but right now Thompson is offering our

0:02:40.880 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>listeners fifteen percent off orders over seventy five dollars or

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty percent off orders over ninety nine dollars. To take

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:50.519
<v Speaker 1>advantage of these incredible savings, simply go to Thompson Cigar

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com and use promo code cactus when you are

0:02:53.600 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 1>ready to check out. That website is Thompson thomps o

0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>n cigar dot com and use promo code cactus. This

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>episode of Verdict is also brought to you by stamps

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. Now, I know a lot of you are

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>small business owners, and if you are, you know that

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing more valuable than your time, so stop wasting

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>it on trips to the post office. Stamps dot Com

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>makes it easy to mail and ship right from your

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>own computer. You can save time and money with stamps

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>dot Com. You can send letters and packages for less

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>with discounted rates from USPS, UPS and more. Stamps dot

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Com brings the services of the post Office and UPS

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>shipping right to your computer. So whether you're an office

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 1>sending invoices, a side hustle, etc. Shop or a full

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>blown warehouse shipping out order, stamps dot com will make

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>your life easier. All you need is a computer and

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a standard printer, no special supplies or equipment. Within minutes,

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you're up and running printing official postage for any letter,

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>any package anywhere you want to send, and you'll get

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>exclusive discounts on postage and shipping from USPS and UPS.

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Once your mail is ready, you just schedule a pickup

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>or drop it off. No traffic, no lines, there is

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>no risk and with our promo code Verdict, you get

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>a special offer that includes a four week trial plus

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>free postage and a digital scale. No long term commitments

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or contracts. Just go to stamps dot com, click on

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the microphone at the top of the homepage and type

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>in Verdict. That's stamps dot Com promo code Verdict. Never

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>go to the post office again. Welcome back to Verdict

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>with Ted Cruz. I'm Michael Knowles, Senator. They seem like

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>very different issues. Canadian truckers and the most popular podcast

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>are on the planet except for the week that Verdict launched,

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>But will digress. We leave that for a couple of

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago. They are deeply connected stories. And actually you

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>seem to have played a role in all of this.

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>You caused a little bit of an international incident, Senator,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.239
<v Speaker 1>when you got into a Twitter spat with the mayor

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of Vancouver over this trucker protest going on up in Canada.

0:04:48.720 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Well that's true enough. The Mayor of Vancouver said, you know,

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>we Canadians don't want you truckers. You guys go home,

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>And I had to point out, I said, gosh, you know,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the Canucks might have a different view if the truckers

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>actually did go home and suddenly your shelves were empty.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it seems to me two years ago, people

0:05:05.240 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>were waxing eloquent about the great heroes that truckers were,

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and I agree that they make our entire system, our

0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>economy move forward. But now these leftist politicians are saying,

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>to hell with you, truckers. We don't like what you

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>have to say. So it's not just the little guy.

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not just the working class that is being put

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 1>upon here. It's even one of the most elite, influential

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>popular voices in the world. That would be Joe Rogan,

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>this podcaster who's got a massive, massive audience, he's politically independent,

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and a big tech is shutting him down. We touched

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>on it a little bit. Some aging hippies were trying

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to boot him off of Spotify, but it appears to

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>be sort of working well. These two stories are deeply

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>interconnected and they represent together the most dire threat to

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>free speech. We have Joe Rogan, you have petty government

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>authoritarians enlisting their buddies in big tech to silence the

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>voice of descent Canadian truckers. You have petty government authoritarians

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>enlisting the voice of big tech and the power of

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 1>big tech to silence the voice of descent and both

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.719
<v Speaker 1>look that this would never have happened even a year

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>or two or three ago. This is a new phenomenon.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's take Joe Rogan, so Jen SAKEI publicly called from

0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the White House podium for Spotify to take down his

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>episodes for Spotify to silence him. I will say, let

0:06:38.360 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>me start off by saying, I'm pissed off. Look our

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>last podcast, we talked about how this pod was the

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>first podcast to be mentioned from the White House podium,

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and incomes Joe Rogan and bigfoots us M that's true, Senator,

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.480
<v Speaker 1>we were the first two. We can at least hang

0:06:53.520 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>our hat on that. But yes, Joe Rogan has come in.

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>He is now the third podcast to be referenced at

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a White House briefing. Will say in between the two,

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Jen Saki was asked asked about this podcast and her

0:07:05.560 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>comment was she said she is blissfully blissfully not a

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>spokesperson for Ted Cruise, which I have to admit. Michael

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I retweeted and just said the bliss is mutual, the

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>feeling is reciprocated, right. But I will say what we

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>did talk about actually setting up Margarita's and kickboxing and

0:07:23.120 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>see if we could recruit her over because she thankfully,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to do that. Look stop for a

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>second and think about the White House, the executive office

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of the leader of the free World, the most powerful

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:44.000
<v Speaker 1>man on planet Earth, calling for a voice of descent

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to be silenced and calling very specifically calling out big Tech,

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>calling out the oligarchs and Silicon Valley. Jensaki was very specific,

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Spotify take down this post. Now. Normally, when you have

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>suppression of free beach is a big power in balance,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's powerful people trying to silence weak people. Well,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 1>here the person they're trying to silence is Joe Rogan.

0:08:07.560 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rogan as many things, but not weak. He's got

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>one hundred million listeners and viewers. That is a crap

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>ton of listeners and viewers. And you know he gets

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>more viewers. He's for many episodes. He's ten x or

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.679
<v Speaker 1>a hundred x what CNN is and and the White

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>House is terrified of him. CNN is terrified of him,

0:08:34.440 --> 0:08:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the Blue check Marks and Twitter are terrified of him.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>And it's worth worth pausing. Look, you and I are

0:08:41.240 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>unlikely advocates for Joe Rogan. I don't know Joe Rogan

0:08:44.880 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>met the guy. As far as I know, he's not

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a conservative. He endorsed Bernie Friggin Sanders. Generally conservatives don't

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:58.720
<v Speaker 1>endorse wild eyed socialists. But Rogan. Look, I've really grown

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>to admire Rogan because he's demonstrated backbone. He's willing to

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>speak out and on COVID he's called bullshit to the

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>continued propaganda and the contradictions and the lies coming out

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of Fauci, coming out of the Biden White House, coming

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>out of the press, and for those in power, having

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>someone willing to dissent with a really big megaphone scares

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>them and so they want to destroy them. In the

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:32.160
<v Speaker 1>important thing to know about Joe Rogan, this is not spontaneous,

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>This is not organic. This is an organized assassination of speech.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It started off kind of comical, but then the White

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>House chimed in, and then you noticed it started off

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>with COVID misinformation because he brought in scientists and doctors

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>who had views that differed from the enlightened view of

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor Fauci, which changes every week. But whatever it is

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.559
<v Speaker 1>that week is holy scripture and cannot be challenged. Yea,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>But then you know this kind of hack writer Don Winslow,

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but I've never heard of other than he's loud, obnoxious.

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>On Twitter puts out this video, an old video of

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Rogan using the N word, and look, using the N

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>word is wrong. Neither you nor I support it. And

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>suddenly all of the blue check marks gathered up together

0:10:22.800 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and Rogan is a racist for having used it. Look,

0:10:27.200 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not a word that should be used in polite society.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:31.640
<v Speaker 1>But I will tell you who else is used the

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>N word repeatedly. Joe Biden, rappers like crazy Howard Stern.

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>They're not castling Howard Stern. Why Because Howard Stern is serviling,

0:10:46.320 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>kissing the behinds of those in power. It's truly a shame.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 1>Howard Stern started out a rebel, and now he echoes

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the words of the petty tyrants. If you shut up

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and echo what they say, you're okay. If you're Jimmy Kimmel,

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>you can dress in black face, you can do whatever

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>you want because you're a mouthpiece for the regime. This

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 1>has followed a familiar script, and I guess this also

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>ties it to the Canadian trucker protest, which is the

0:11:11.720 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 1>actual substantive issue that this is about. Is COVID, and

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>so Joe Rogan questioned the COVID narrative. He brought on

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>very respected, very well known scientists. They question the government's

0:11:22.040 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>COVID narrative, the narrative dujure because as you say, it

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>changes all the time, and so what happens. Then they

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>try to attack him. It doesn't work. Then the left

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>calls him a racist. That is always the next card

0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.480
<v Speaker 1>that they play. They pull it out of nowhere, they

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>take clips out of context, they do whatever they can.

0:11:38.520 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>They apply a standard unevenly, and they're trying to do that.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>That seems to have weakened him a little bit. He's

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>made some concessions. We'll see where it goes. But I

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>guess my question on it is what is it about

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>this COVID issue? Because I guess what the left would

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>say is, Michael Senator, this is about health. People are

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>going to die if this information gets out there, and

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that's why we've got to suppress the truckers. It's why

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:03.440
<v Speaker 1>why we've got to shut up Rogan. Is this a

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>unique issue where people are not allowed to dissent? It

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>is unique in the following way. It has revealed the

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>authoritarianism of these government leaders. They believe they have the

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 1>power to force you to comply, to force you to

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:20.720
<v Speaker 1>take a vaccine. My body, my choice doesn't matter to

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>them anymore. Nope, not your body, not your choice. We're

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>going to force you to take a vaccine, to force

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>you to wear a mask, to force you to obey,

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.559
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't, they will use the course of

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>force of government to shut your business down. You know,

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a restaurant here in DC that was shut down

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.840
<v Speaker 1>because they refused to enforce the vaccine mandate. So local

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 1>restaurant said, look, I don't want to like have my

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>customers come in demand their papers, you know, intrude on

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>their medical business. And so what did DC do. District

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of Columbia came in and shut them down. I mean,

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it is arbitrary power. They will shut your business down.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.839
<v Speaker 1>They will shut your restaurant down. They'll shut your bar down,

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>they'll shut your store down. They will fire you if

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>your active duty militarius, soldier, sailor airman, marine, a Navy seal,

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>they will fire you. If you're a doctor, a nurse,

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.080
<v Speaker 1>they will fire you. If you're a government employee, if

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>you're an FBI agent, if you're a border patrol agent.

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>They will fire you. It is force. And these are

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the same guys that during the height of COVID, when

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>it started, we're shutting down playgrounds, we're shutting down churches.

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>We're suing to say, if you sing amazing grace, everyone's

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>going to die. And what COVID is done has revealed

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the arbitrariness, the power. And by the way, you know,

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>some might say, all right, you're exaggerating. Listen, all these

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Democratic politicians know it's crap. We all saw this week

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Stacy Abrams sitting in a classroom full of little kids.

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>The kids are all masked and she's sitting there grinning

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>ear to ear with no mask right in front. Why

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because she's a Democratic overlord and the rules don't apply

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to her. They just apply to the little people. In

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>this case, it really was little people. It was children.

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's all the Democratic politicians, every one of them.

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Gavin Newsom, you know, palling around with Magic Johnson. It's

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty cool he gets to hang out with Magic Johnson.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm jealous about that, you know. Eric Garcetti saying saying, oh,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I held my breath. I had my mask off, but

0:14:19.400 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I held my breath balogony. But it's the lie is

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>so absurd. The person saying it doesn't believe it, the

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:31.680
<v Speaker 1>person hearing it doesn't believe it. But what it's really about.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Barack Obama this week, he's having

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this massive house built in Hawaii, never mind global warming,

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>never mind the environment, and he's standing there with the workers,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>little working people. The workers are all masks, and there's Obama,

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>no masks, supervising the servants. That's the same as Nancy

0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Pelosi when she does her fundraisers where the serving people

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 1>must be masked. It's garbage. It is contempt of elitists.

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that they take their mask of I've

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>talked in this pot all the time. Democratic senators remove

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>their masks all the time behind closed doors when the

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>TV cameras aren't there, boom, the mask comes off. But

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>as soon as they come out, they put the mask on.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 1>This is about power, and Rogan and the truckers are

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 1>threats to it. And I gotta say, look, Rogan in

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the world of speech has a damn powerful megaphone. Spotify

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>is paying him one hundred million dollars. One hundred million

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>dollars a lot of money Michael, if Spotify offered it

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to you tomorrow one hundred million dollars, shave your head

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and become an m a wrestler. I gotta say, I

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>think we'd see Michael Knowles. Yet, you know, dressed in

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a red tights, you going to wrestle. I don't want

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to undercut my negotiation. I would do it for ninety

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>five I would, I believe you, and I'd buy tickets

0:15:55.760 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to it. Well, I guess this is what's so scary.

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Here is Joe Rogan. He's got this huge megaphone, and

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>yet they can, at least to some degree, make him concede.

0:16:07.440 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We were always told that, yes, the government is bad

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and they do lots of bad things, but we've got

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>private enterprise, We've got our own private organizations. We can

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>do our own work in the culture, fight back, build

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>your own Google, all that kind of stuff. And yet

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen here in the States and with the

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Canadian truckers is you're seeing the government using these these

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>private entities. So you've got Spotify as being pressured by

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the White House to boot Rogan or at least to

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>censor him. You've got go fund me. There was a

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>go fund me set up for these Canadian truckers. A

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were donating to them, and then go

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 1>fund me under a lot of political pressure, says, whoops,

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>never mind, we're going to take that money away from

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the truckers. Well, so, now we don't have the government,

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't have the private enterprise. What are we supposed

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>to do? So you look at Spotify. They haven't kicked

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Rogan off yet, but the goal is to kick him

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>off entirely. That's what the White House called for. They

0:16:57.080 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>have taken down about one hundred episodes of his show.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.160
<v Speaker 1>So they've decided that you and I we don't get

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to see what he said those episodes. We're too dumb,

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>we're too ignorant, we can't listen. That speech is dangerous,

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and so they're going to ban it. I gotta say.

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Rogan responded by apologizing and listen. If if there's one

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>lesson Donald Trump has taught us is don't apologize to

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>the woke left wing mob, because they're not interested in apology.

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 1>They're not interested in truth, they're not interested in facts.

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Nobody cares in the mob about the substance of what

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>was on those hundred episodes. They don't care at all.

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>They want to destroy him. You look at the truckers.

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Listen in Canada, the Canadian politicians, you know, the mayor

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of Ottawa was was was reveling in calling for go

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fund me to pull down the site and was bragging

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>about it. And go fund me people had given ten

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:57.159
<v Speaker 1>million dollars to support this. I mean, it was, you know,

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a spontaneous movement. And when the government officials called on

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 1>and go fund me, just like the White House did,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the government officials in Canada call on Go fund me

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>stop this. You know, go fund me didn't have one

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars tied up with the truckers. If they did,

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they might have behaved differently. Spotify has been a little

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>bit trying to have their cake and eat it too. Yeah.

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So go fund Me just said, nope, we're taking the money.

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And first they said we're going to give it to

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of left wing causes that we support. Then

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>there was so much outrage they backed off and said,

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 1>oh it, or we'll just refund the money. Look. This weekend,

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission asking

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the FTC to investigate go fund me for deceptive trade

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>practices because if you take ten million dollars, if you

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>steal it from people and divert it to a place

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that the consumers who gave it didn't intend it to go,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that is deception, That is consumer fraud, and it is

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 1>indicative of the arrogance of big tech and the willingness

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for them to act as enforcers for government officials. Now,

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>there was a second part of this go fund me story.

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very glad that you are bringing legitimate government

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>power against go fund me. Here. I will never use

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>go fund me again. Obviously, we can't trust it if

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>they're going to take the money away from the causes

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we think we're giving to. Now, Michael, that's not fair.

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>If you want to support Black Lives Matter and TIEF,

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>if you want to support rioters and people that are

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>fire bombing police cars, if you want to support people

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that are taking over police stations and declaring Chad's autonomous zones,

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>go fund me is the site for you. So if

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 1>you want to support Marxists, that's the place to go.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And you don't even need to donate directly to. You

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>can donate to whoever you want. Don't worry, go fund

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>me will redirect your money. You don't even need to

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think about it. So I'm really glad that you are

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:50.160
<v Speaker 1>leading on this issue and getting the government to look

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>into this, this obvious fraud. But there was a second

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>part to the story here, which is that after gofund

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>me took all the money, a bunch of people then

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>got together and started to fund the truckers. Not through

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the government obviously, not even through some private enterprise an

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>organization might go fund me. They did it through bitcoin.

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin is a powerfully revolutionary technology cryptocurrency. I am very

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 1>bullish on bitcoin and on crypto generally. And i gotta

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 1>tell you, the same petty authoritarians who hate Joe Rogan,

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>who hate the Canadian truckers, they hate bitcoin and they

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.359
<v Speaker 1>hate crypto and their sem irony. So I've become a

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 1>very vocal defender of crypto, probably the leading defender, certainly

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the leading defenders in the US Senate. And

0:20:40.760 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting a lot of the bitcoin and crypto folks

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>were Bernie bros, just like Rogan, you know, the kind

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of cool socialists that seem hip. And yet these authoritarians

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.959
<v Speaker 1>hate bitcoin and they hate crypto, and it's for the

0:20:57.040 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>same reason. Why did they hate Joe Rogan because they

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>can't control him. He's not subject to their authoritarian power.

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>Why do they hit bitcoin because they can't control it.

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>It is a system of currency outside of the monopoly

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>control of the US government. And I got to say,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>as I've addressed you know, I spoke at a big

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>cryptoconference in Austin several months ago, and I said, listen,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you need to understand this administration, I believe is going

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to go after you and is going to try to

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>destroy you. And by the way, that's a pattern of authoritarians.

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>China communist China outlawed bitcoin for the exact same reason.

0:21:38.920 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Why does Elizabeth Warren hate bitcoin for the same reason

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that she and China hates bitcoin because neither one of

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>them can control it. And the theme through all of

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this is the power of freedom to be not subject

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to the arbitrary whims of those in government power. Now

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you have convinced me on this. I don't know anything

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>about a crypto. I'm a terrible investor. My investment strategy

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.000
<v Speaker 1>generally is by high sell low, that's whenever I'm involved.

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>But what a lot of listeners probably don't know is

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>that you are much hipper than I am, you have

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>been on this crypto thing for a while. It's true,

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and you did make headlines because well, while crypto was

0:22:21.280 --> 0:22:23.880
<v Speaker 1>collapsing and I was panicked and selling all my crypto,

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>you were apparently buying the dip that that is true.

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So I bought bitcoin. I own bitcoin. I think according

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to the public reports, they're three senators that own bitcoin, Me,

0:22:35.440 --> 0:22:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Cynthia love Us, and Pat Toomey. Um. You know, I'll say,

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Six eight months ago, I didn't know

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot about bitcoin and crypto, and I saw

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that it was growing and developing, and I said, look,

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I need to educate myself. And so I started setting

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>up dinners with people involved in the crypto world and

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>just sitting down and listening to them. And I started

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>off with, you know, all sorts of dumb questions, you know,

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 1>what is it? How does it work? In learning? And

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated stuff. And I certainly I would not hold

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>myself out as an expert today, but I started learning

0:23:09.000 --> 0:23:11.639
<v Speaker 1>and listening to it and being fascinated by by the

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>development of it, by the ability that there's a book

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>actually that Cynthia Loves recommended to me called Layered Money

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>which I read that talks about some of the history

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.159
<v Speaker 1>of the development of money from the beginning. But but

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.919
<v Speaker 1>crypto is the next evolution of it. And I've gotten

0:23:27.600 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>very bullish on crypto, especially bitcoin, and really horrified at

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the efforts of Elizabeth Warren and big government Democrats to

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>crush this growing industry. You know, Texas is becoming an

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>oasis for bitcoin. We're seeing more and more crypto moving

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to Texas, particularly Austin. And so I started several months ago.

0:23:53.640 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually have a weekly by order in for bitcoin

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that every week I just have an automatic buy. You know, look,

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 1>given that there's votility, UM, I'm a fan of dollar

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>cost averaging, which is just having a buy that occurs

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>weekly automatically, so that high or low it averages out. UH.

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And then what I ended up doing, UM, I guess

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago is when bitcoin dropped about

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in half, I said, all right, I don't believe this

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>drop and and so I made a bigger purchase. I

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 1>bought twenty five thousand worth of bitcoin. UM. Under the

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>Senate you have to file a financial disclosure for a

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>purchase over a thousand dollars. So I filed that financial disclosure.

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.679
<v Speaker 1>And you know, usually those financial disclosures don't you know,

0:24:38.720 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe they get a little bip, but they don't, they

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>don't get a whole lot of attention. It actually fascinating, Michael.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>When I filed the financial disclosure, it generated a ton

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of press. And listen, I am bullish on bitcoin. So

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm proud to say I got skin in the game.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe in it, and that's that's that's why I

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>invested in it. But but I think we ought to

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>be encouraging. I want cryptocurrency. I want America to be

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the hub of cryptocurrency globally, and frankly, I want Texas

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the hub of cryptocurrency in America. So I

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>have been convinced by you and by other I mean

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Reagan's favorite economist, George Gilder was really bullish on

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 1>blockchain technology years ago even and said this is kind

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of the future of the Internet. Yeah, And so what

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm convinced on here now is that this would be

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a way to avoid government control. This would be a

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>way to avoid even the control of private businesses that

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>are often working at the behest of the government. Anyway.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>But then my final question to you is this if

0:25:38.280 --> 0:25:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the government was able to clamp down on all these

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>private businesses and build your own Google and all of that,

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and that hasn't worked. We saw it with the truckers,

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing with Rogan two. What is to stop them

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>from clamping down on bitcoin. You've already heard rumblings out

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of the government. What is the likelihood that Biden does that?

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>So look, they may well, and I am quite concerned

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. This ad illustration could kill crypto. When I

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>talked to the conference in Austin, you know, there are

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:06.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks in the crypto world. We're a

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>little bit utopian that they have a view that that

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that that we are inevitable, that that that bitcoin is

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>inherently superior to all other forms of money. I will

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>say one of the things I like about it is

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a potential hedge against inflation. And given this administration

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>spending trillions and driving up trillions in debt, I'm interested

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.119
<v Speaker 1>in the hedge in inflation as they're devaluing the dollar,

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and so I like bitcoin as a hedge against inflation.

0:26:31.640 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But the point I made at this conference is you

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>only need to understand government can destroy You asked how

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>many of you all have heard of napster Um, you know,

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and they all did, and I said, listen, it's easy

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to think we're happily in our sort of Austin, peaceful place.

0:26:50.119 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think Bitcoin is actually where Silicon Valley was

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe fifteen or twenty years ago, which is at a

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:02.200
<v Speaker 1>fork in the road where Silicon Valley could have chosen

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to go towards a libertarian utopia. Leave us alone, let's

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>be entrepreneurs, let's have freedom. Or they could have done

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>what they did, which is to go down the socialist

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>woke path of we exercise power, we are totalitarian, and

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.159
<v Speaker 1>we're hard leftist woke, and unfortunately Silicon Valley took the

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong choice. I think Bitcoin and crypto more generally is

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>at that same fork in the road. I hope that

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>they go the libertarian way. I hope they go the

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>small business leave us alone, let us be entrepreneurs. You know,

0:27:35.760 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that is really potent, So I'm trying to encourage it.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>But absolutely there is a very real and potent threat

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>from the Biden administration that they will go after it,

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that they will try to destroy it. And I'm going

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to fight against that because I think it is a huge,

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.920
<v Speaker 1>huge industry going forward, and I don't want to see

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the idiot politicians in Washington drive it out of America

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and send it overseas. It won't disappear, But Washington is

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>perfectly capable of sending the jobs overseas and sending sending

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that business overseas. I think that would be catastrophic, right,

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And it's especially at a moment where we're dissent against

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the ruling class, the liberal establishment, the regime, whatever you

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:19.520
<v Speaker 1>want to call it, where that is so difficult and

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 1>where people are genuinely persecuted for it. Yes, we have

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>to wield what political power we can. Yes, we need

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:26.719
<v Speaker 1>to wield what market power we can. But if if

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.160
<v Speaker 1>there were an instrument of technology really to be able

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to exercise our rights in our way of life, that's

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>something very hopeful, and so I hope that we can

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>maintain it. We unfortunately so far, are not accepting bitcoin

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in the Verdict store, but I think we really should.

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that would be a great way to do it. So, Michael,

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I've actually introduced legislation in Congress to have the Congressional

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 1>store accept bitcoin. Rile. That's one of the pieces of

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:58.120
<v Speaker 1>legislation I've introduced as a way of spreading its acceptance.

0:28:58.160 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, in El Salvador, I spoke with the

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>President of Al Salvador last week El Salvador. It's it's

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>legal currency, it's legal tender in Al Salvador, and it

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is Bitcoin has all sorts of potential, particularly in developing economy,

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>for people to have secure savings. You may not have

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>access to a bank account, but if you have a

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>cell phone, if you have any technology, you can have

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>secure savings that can't be stolen from you. It can

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>also is secure instantaneous transactions. You can transfer it, buy

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and sell. You know, they're massive inefficiencies right now, and

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the transfers of cash that crypto and bitcoin go all around,

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and so it is a generation skipping technology which is potent,

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of the reasons. So I've introduced legislation

0:29:41.040 --> 0:29:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to repeal what the Democrats did putting additional burdens on crypto.

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>And I've also, as I said, I think the Congressional

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>store how to accept it because it helps it helps

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>expand the ability of this industry to grow. And I

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 1>think there's enormous benefit to Texas and the country as

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this industry grows. Well, it's great to know that bitcoin

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is good for developing economies, because if Joe Biden's policies

0:30:09.520 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to destroy our dollar and our jobs, we may

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 1>soon be a developing economy ourselves. Now we have more.

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Just when you think it's over, there is still more.

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Some of you who have gone over and gone to

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Verdict with Ted Cruise dot com slash shop and headed

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>over and subscribe to the Verdict Plus community. Some of

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know about this, but some of you might not

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>know this quite yet. But our friend Liz Wheeler is

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 1>hosting a new series with Senator Cruz, the hardest working

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>man in show business and in politics, and that is

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 1>called Cloak Room. Liz, what are you talking about? Hi?

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Michael Hi? Senator Yes, and Michael, you and I joke.

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>One series is simply not enough for Senator Cruz, so

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>there must be two. I'm so excited. This will be

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:53.480
<v Speaker 1>our second, our second episode in the series. I'm excited

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to introduce it. It's called the Cloak Room. It's on

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Verdict Plus. It is only for Verdict Plus subscribers. You

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>can of course join us ad Verdict with Ted Cruz

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Plus. It's a it's a brand new

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>series with Senator Ted Cruz. It's co hosted by me

0:31:06.320 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Liz Wheeler. Basically, how it's going to work is I'm

0:31:08.800 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>going to pick his brain like I would in a

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy session. It's a behind the scenes peek into the

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>details of what goes on in DC, just like the

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>real cloak Room of the Senate. Today, we're going to

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>talk about Stacy Abrams and that infamous massless photo of

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>her with kids who were wearing masks next to her.

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Plus the proper role, this is the nerdy part, the

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>proper role of public health and the administrative state and

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the separation of powers. Doctor and now leg I said,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you can join us at Verdict with Ted Cruise dot

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 1>com slash plus. I also have a promo code Cloakroom

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 1>for you. If you use this promo code Cloakroom, you'll

0:31:40.000 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>get one month free a one month free trial on

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>your annual subscriptions. It's going to be a good time. Then,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>as I have mentioned before, soon after that, we're going

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to have a series where it is just me and

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Liz and no senator, then a series of Liz and

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the Cactus, and we're just building out a whole universe

0:31:56.800 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>here because as the Left tries to clamped down on us,

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>it's more important than ever to speak out and Liz

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in our beneficence, in our charity, which is a theological virtue.

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>We are not going to keep this episode behind the paywall.

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>In the future of the episodes are going to behind

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the paywall, but right now we have a sneak peek.

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to get out of here. Liz. You

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>take it away with the Cloakroom. Thank you, Michael. I'm

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Liz Wheeler. This is Cloakroom on Verdict plus. Senator. We

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>have a great episode plans today, So let's start with

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this photograph. This is the photograph curd round the country,

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>if you will. It is, of course, Stacy Abrams, gubernatorial

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>candidate for the state of Georgia. She is not wearing

0:32:33.400 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>a mask in this photograph, which is surrounded by school children,

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>very small children with wearing masks on their face. And

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>not only is this a terrible look, she actually is

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>defending this in the wake of all the outrage. So

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>my question to you, leg I said, is purely political.

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Is this photograph going to be the reason that she

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>loses her election? Is this going to disqualify her in

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of her voters. Look, I think this photograph

0:32:54.000 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>has the potential to be something like Terry mcculloff's comment

0:32:57.480 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the Virginia governor's race. He said

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.720
<v Speaker 1>in the debate, he said, parents have no right to

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>say what's taught to their kids in school. And and

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think if there was one sentence that defeated McAuliffe

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and elected Glen Yonken, it was that sentence. It was

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the arrogance that was revealed. It was you know, there's

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>an old line that a gaff as when a politician

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>tells the truth, tells you what they really think. This

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>picture shows you what Stacy Abrams really thinks. And it

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>is I think this picture will play a central role

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in the election. You know, several things are striking. Number one,

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they put the picture out. They were proud of this picture.

0:33:36.480 --> 0:33:38.560
<v Speaker 1>They saw nothing wrong with it. And then suddenly the

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>reaction was so intense they deleted it, and they got

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the school to delete it too. They like tried to

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 1>ban it, tried to erase it, just delete the In fact,

0:33:48.440 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the school person deleted her entire account. But but then

0:33:54.720 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>when everyone naturally criticized the self evident hypocrisy. The Abraham's

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>campaign put out this statement, just snarling with attacks that

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of course people are attacking me because they're racists and

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>it's all about, you know, undermining Black History Month because

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 1>they're all just horrible racist who hate me, completely ignoring

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:21.759
<v Speaker 1>the substance. Also, a campaign put out a statement that well,

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Stacy requested that everyone wear a mask and she just

0:34:24.880 --> 0:34:29.239
<v Speaker 1>took hers off briefly. Well, okay, so that doesn't make

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>it better. Maybe she held her breath like Garcetti did. Indeed,

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I think it's much better. The

0:34:37.320 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>world would be better if democratic politicians held their breath,

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>because it would mean they couldn't talk, so that would

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>be an improvement. Look this picture. I was reading something

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>today that was comparing this, saying, this is the most

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>consequential image of a politician in a room full of

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>kids since George W. Bush was reading a children's story

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to a room full of kids when they came in

0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and told him the news about nine to eleven about

0:35:02.680 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the plane flying into the twin towers. And you know,

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 1>we all remember that that image and know that image,

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think this one likewise, people will remember years

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:17.279
<v Speaker 1>from now this is an image that will define the

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>double standards, the arrogance, the hypocrisy, and it speaks volumes.

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I also thought it is notable, like the Washington Post

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>wrote a story about, you know, Republican outrage over Abrams

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 1>in the picture, and what's interesting is they didn't show

0:35:41.200 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the picture. They had a picture of Stacy Abrams like

0:35:43.200 --> 0:35:46.480
<v Speaker 1>out on the campaign trail smiling. The Washington Post very

0:35:46.520 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 1>deliberately wouldn't show the picture because you actually don't need

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>any commentary. You just need to see the image, and

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it tells you everything you need to know, including the

0:35:56.040 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that if everyone in the picture, the person at

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>greatest from a serious illness of COVID was clearly Stacey Abrams. Yeah,

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.160
<v Speaker 1>she's the one not wearing a mask. The little children.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>The odds are overwhelming. If one of those kids got

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>COVID that there would be few, if any, symptoms, and

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:20.400
<v Speaker 1>it would not be life threatening. But what it reveals

0:36:20.640 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is that neither she nor the other Democratic politicians that

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 1>are insisting the kids be masks. They don't believe in

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. No, they don't. It's worse than hypocrisy, isn't it.

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it's elitism. They actually aren't just violating rules that

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they think apply to themselves. They actually don't believe that

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>their own rules apply to themselves. And this has been

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the reason the Washington Post isn't picturing or

0:36:43.480 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>showing this photograph is because they know it's not a

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican or a Democrat issue anymore among voters, especially parents,

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that parents across the aisle are outraged at how the

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 1>public health establishment has treated their children and continue to

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:56.799
<v Speaker 1>treat their children in school. And that's where I want

0:36:56.840 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to dive into this a little more nerdy, a little

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>more phyllisical aspect of as we've seen up close and

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>personal the last two years, how the public health establishment

0:37:07.200 --> 0:37:10.799
<v Speaker 1>holds so much power over the American public, how much

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:15.719
<v Speaker 1>they influence politicians who issue dictates and mandates and lockdowns

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and masks and vaccines and all of these, all of

0:37:19.239 --> 0:37:23.160
<v Speaker 1>these fairly invasive measures in the name of health, in

0:37:23.200 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the name of public health. And so I want to

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:27.040
<v Speaker 1>talk to you tonight. I want to ask you, from

0:37:27.160 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a philosophical perspective, what is the role or what should

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>be the role of the public health establishment in our country. Well,

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it depends what qualifies for public health establishment and in

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.360
<v Speaker 1>many ways that is functionally doctor Anthony Fauci, and and

0:37:44.719 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>he has become the face of it so much so

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that that on TV he has said, I represent science.

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, it reminds me of Scripture. In the beginning

0:37:54.320 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>was the word I mean? It is this hubers to

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>embody science with which Faucci. Look. Two years ago, Faucci

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>had a pretty good reputation, he was well respected. The arbitrariness,

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the error against the attitude of infallibility, and the obvious

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>contradictions that have come from Fauci. I think you've done

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:27.400
<v Speaker 1>massive and long term damage to the credibility of the CDC,

0:38:27.719 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of the NIH, of the public health establishment. Listen, you

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>want to minimize the spread of disease, lock every person

0:38:34.880 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>on planet Earth in a dungeon and never let them out.

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>You will reduce the spread of disease. They're just or

0:38:40.360 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>other negative consequences, right. Well, that kind of get that

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of gets to my questions. That's why I think

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>that we as a nation, especially the Republican Party and

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:52.640
<v Speaker 1>the Conservative movement, need to analyze, We need to be

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.319
<v Speaker 1>thoughtful about what the proper role of public health is.

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>When public health is defined as you I mean as

0:38:58.600 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the promise that you laid out, as as Fauci, as

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>these government bureaucrats who weren't elected, they were appointed, who

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have the highest salary of all federal employees, including the

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States, And to me, it speaks

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to the administrative state because we could, we could get

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:15.920
<v Speaker 1>rid of Fauci, meaning President Biden could fire him, he

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>could resign. I mean, he's old, He's not going to

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:20.280
<v Speaker 1>be in this position forever. You can replace one bureaucrat

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>with another bureaucrat. But as long as you have this system,

0:39:23.239 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>as we do of these executive agencies that Congress defers

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 1>rulemaking too, I don't see this problem, particularly now that

0:39:31.560 --> 0:39:34.360
<v Speaker 1>they have cemented how they want to handle pandemics or

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:36.800
<v Speaker 1>public health. They know that they can wage this power

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 1>the way that they have. I don't see this going

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 1>away unless we address the administrative state specifically. Yeah, look,

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a very good point. I think the

0:39:44.880 --> 0:39:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration made serious mistakes as COVID broke out, and

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the mistakes was elevating Fauci and deferring to

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:55.960
<v Speaker 1>him for far too long. The Trump administration should have

0:39:56.000 --> 0:40:00.560
<v Speaker 1>fired Fauci the way Fauci and the declared lord's a

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>public health treated is is that they were infallible. Yeah,

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and they did it while being cynically political at the

0:40:08.440 --> 0:40:14.440
<v Speaker 1>same time. That combination is a really toxic brew. It is,

0:40:14.480 --> 0:40:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and especially because if there's a doctor in the private

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>sector who has a terrible opinion or gives you terrible

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.560
<v Speaker 1>medical advice, you just you go somewhere else, you go

0:40:21.600 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to a different practice, you go to a different provider,

0:40:23.800 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and that doctor. I mean, it's a meritocracy, or it's

0:40:25.760 --> 0:40:27.759
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be, and that's not the case when it's

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a government bureaucrat. Again, That's why, that's why I think

0:40:30.800 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that when we're looking at the power of these bureaucrats

0:40:34.880 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and federal agencies, we have to understand the history a

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>little bit. That this idea of the administrative state was introduced,

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least theoretically by Woodrow Wilson. He thought

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 1>that there should be this this class of neutral bureaucrats

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:49.640
<v Speaker 1>that ran our federal government. I personally don't believe that

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there can be someone who is politically neutral. I think

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:55.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone has an opinion. Then LBJ and FDR expanded this

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>administrative state. So now we have this bloated, this bloated apparatus,

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>which a lot of people called the deep state because

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of all these politicos that work there that aren't accountable

0:41:04.960 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to the voter. In my opinion, and I want your

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.400
<v Speaker 1>take as a constitutional lawyer on this. In my opinion,

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the advent of this, or what really caused this to

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:16.960
<v Speaker 1>grow out of control, was when the Supreme Court stopped

0:41:16.960 --> 0:41:20.600
<v Speaker 1>applying the separation of powers doctrine. That, of course, was

0:41:20.640 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>when Congress would delegate their legislative authority to the executive agency.

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.239
<v Speaker 1>The judicial brands used to not allow that, but then

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>they stopped and they did allow Congress, and now look

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>what we have. So i'd love to hear your take

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>on that and how we reverse that. So you're exactly right.

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 1>It got exacerbated by a decision from the Supreme Court

0:41:41.440 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that was called the Chevron decision, where they created something

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's called Chevron deference, which the courts now will defer

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to the judgment of an agency even if the statute,

0:41:53.040 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>even if the law doesn't require that outcome. If the

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:58.799
<v Speaker 1>expert agency has an outcome, they will defer to it.

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>If there's any ambiguity in the statue. I think there

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:03.880
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of folks and I would count myself

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>among them who think Chevron was a mistake, that it

0:42:06.120 --> 0:42:09.319
<v Speaker 1>contributed to the growth of the regulatory state. And you've

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of things at play here. Number One,

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>elected politicians like to shift power to the executive branch

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 1>because they can avoid responsibility. They can pass a vague

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:24.439
<v Speaker 1>in general law, and then when the agency does something bad,

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they can say to their voters, Hey, it's not me

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>that did it. It's it's it's it's the EPA that

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:30.840
<v Speaker 1>did it. It's it's it's the agency. It's OSHA that

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 1>did it. But secondly, there's a problem that we've seen

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that's called regulatory capture. And this is a notion from economics,

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:42.360
<v Speaker 1>where you have regulators that are regulating in particular industry

0:42:42.400 --> 0:42:45.719
<v Speaker 1>who become captured by it. They have a revolving door

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 1>where people come from the agency to the to the

0:42:48.680 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 1>private sector that they're regulating, and back again, and they

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:56.839
<v Speaker 1>end up following the interests of the giant companies in

0:42:56.880 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>that industry. So you see it in the aviation world

0:43:00.280 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>with the FAA and a company like Boeing, and you

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the seven thirty seven macs where there was

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 1>an instance the FAA was not remotely effective enough and

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 1>ensuring the safety of the seven thirty seven macs. With

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>respect to COVID. You look at the FDA and just

0:43:15.560 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 1>how in bad the FDA is With Big Pharma. I've

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 1>seen some data with ivermectin and hydroxy chloroquine that have

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:27.080
<v Speaker 1>suggested good results, particularly in the developing world. But both

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of those drugs are incredibly cheap. Both of those drugs

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>are you can get for pennies, whereas Big Pharma if

0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the treatments they're pushing their thousands of dollars.

0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>And I do think there is a real question of

0:43:41.280 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>agency capture. Why is it that the agency favors treatments

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that cost thousands of dollars versus treatments that cost pennies,

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And particularly in the weird politicized world where the fact

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 1>that Trump said hydroxychloric and good caused half the country

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:04.279
<v Speaker 1>to say it must be bad if Trump likes it,

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:06.759
<v Speaker 1>which is a really weird way to make medical or

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.080
<v Speaker 1>scientific decisions. Yeah, so that's well, that's science if you're

0:44:10.120 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 1>defining science as doctor fauci here, So get a little bit,

0:44:13.760 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>get a little bit nerdier if you can on the

0:44:16.760 --> 0:44:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Chevron deference here, I don't understand, Senator, why so many

0:44:22.120 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>in the judiciary, and this is not just the Supreme Court,

0:44:24.360 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>this is this is all levels. Why there's such deference

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to precedent for the sake of precedent when precedent is

0:44:30.480 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 1>so clearly unconstitutional. Now, you know, you and I have

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>talked about Dobbs versus Jackson Women's Health, we talked about

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Roe v. Wade, We've talked about decisions that are obviously

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:42.600
<v Speaker 1>unconstitutional that the left, there are judicial activists who actually

0:44:42.640 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want to overturn a demonstrably wrong and unconstitutional decision

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.879
<v Speaker 1>just because it's been quote unquote settled for decades. So

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't understand that jurisprudence, if you want to call

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it a jurisprudence. But how do we undo the Chevron

0:44:57.719 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>deference because it is incorrect and right Congress is never

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:04.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna do anything about it because it makes their jobs easier,

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>not to be responsible for what they legislate. So there's

0:45:07.640 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>a doctrine courts follow that's called starry decisis that is

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>respect for precedent. It's following precedent and look stary decisis

0:45:16.040 --> 0:45:21.040
<v Speaker 1>makes sense and that you want predictability in a legal system.

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you look at how laws are structured,

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a tension between rules and standards. Rules are clear

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.040
<v Speaker 1>bright lines where you know which side you fall on them. Now,

0:45:33.080 --> 0:45:35.880
<v Speaker 1>they have the advantage of predictability. They have the advantage

0:45:35.920 --> 0:45:42.319
<v Speaker 1>that xante beforehand, you can know where you will be afterwards.

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 1>The downside of clear bright line rules is sometimes that

0:45:46.160 --> 0:45:48.800
<v Speaker 1>are unfair. Sometimes a line where result in a particular

0:45:48.840 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 1>case where you say, well, gosh, that rule resulted in

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:55.240
<v Speaker 1>an unfairness for this particular person because of some weird circumstances.

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, standards where things are flexible. They

0:45:59.480 --> 0:46:02.120
<v Speaker 1>can spawn to, oh, if it's unfair to do this here,

0:46:02.160 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 1>let's not do it here. If it's fair to do

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:05.600
<v Speaker 1>it there, let's do it there, so you can respond

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to the exigencies of the circumstance. But the problem with

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:12.400
<v Speaker 1>standards is they're unpredictable. It's hard to predict on the

0:46:12.400 --> 0:46:17.120
<v Speaker 1>front end what the answer will be stared is scisis

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is a structural rule that you want players in our society,

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 1>whether individuals, whether people looking at the civil law, where

0:46:25.920 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the people looking at the criminal law where their companies

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>to be able to predict the outcome. And so if

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, all right, there is this precedent, so the

0:46:34.160 --> 0:46:36.600
<v Speaker 1>courts will follow this precedent, then you could order your

0:46:36.600 --> 0:46:39.719
<v Speaker 1>behavior accordingly and say, okay, here's what the law is.

0:46:39.760 --> 0:46:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You can go to your lawyers ask what the law is,

0:46:41.680 --> 0:46:43.799
<v Speaker 1>and you can know what it is that that has

0:46:43.840 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>an advantage. You want stability. You don't want the law

0:46:47.440 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 1>changing willy nilly. But the scisis is not absolute. There

0:46:54.840 --> 0:46:57.759
<v Speaker 1>are times when precedents are wrong and precedents are overturned,

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:02.759
<v Speaker 1>and the courts have laid out rules for when precedents

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>sho should be overturned, and the rules look to things

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:11.840
<v Speaker 1>like have there been has the law been settled, have

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:17.120
<v Speaker 1>people had reliance interest on it? Has the law proven administrable?

0:47:17.320 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>As it proven Sometimes there's a bad decision that just

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.840
<v Speaker 1>produces chaos and the courts say, okay, this didn't work.

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>The courts also are more willing to follow starry descisis

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for a statutory question than they are for a constitutional question.

0:47:33.960 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Now why is that? Because a statutory question, which is

0:47:36.640 --> 0:47:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the interpretation of a federal law passed by Congress, sign

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a law by the president. If the courts get it wrong,

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Congress can change the statute, and it does that sometimes.

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>So if there's a statutory question, the courts get it wrong,

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Congress has the ability to fix it. So there's a

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>higher protection for starry descisis in that instance because you

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:58.040
<v Speaker 1>want the predictability even if the court got it wrong.

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:04.560
<v Speaker 1>With respect to the Constitution, there's more of a view

0:48:04.719 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that a constitutional decision, if it is wrong, can be revisited. So,

0:48:10.120 --> 0:48:15.880
<v Speaker 1>for example, the most famous overturning of a precedent was

0:48:15.920 --> 0:48:20.719
<v Speaker 1>Plessy versus Ferguson, which upheld separate but equal and upheld

0:48:20.760 --> 0:48:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the discrimination in schools, and Brown versus Board of Education

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>overturned Plessy. That was the right thing to do. That

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Brown was the right decision. Plessy was wrong. During the

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:37.560
<v Speaker 1>argument in Dobbs, you had the Supreme Court justices asking

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>the Council, well, okay, look here are all the decisions

0:48:40.480 --> 0:48:44.520
<v Speaker 1>we've overruled, and they listed some big ones. Why doesn't

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Row meet that standard? But how willing a justice is

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.879
<v Speaker 1>to overrule precedent? That varies justice by justice? I will say,

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:55.560
<v Speaker 1>By the way, as a final point on this, the

0:48:55.680 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>liberals it's not that they're devoted to start descisists. They

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in started to at all. They're devoted to

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>left wing outcomes yep. So they want star decisis to

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be followed for left wing decisions. So Row versus Way

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.799
<v Speaker 1>for them, star decisis is critically important because they support Row.

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>They don't want star decisis. When it comes to Heller,

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:18.279
<v Speaker 1>which is the court's decision upholding the Second Amendment right

0:49:18.280 --> 0:49:20.879
<v Speaker 1>to keep in bear arms, the Liberals would immediately over

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>rule Heller. They don't want stary decisis. When it comes

0:49:24.080 --> 0:49:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to Citizens United, which protects our political speech and the

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:30.960
<v Speaker 1>right to engage and and and criticize politicians. They disagree

0:49:31.000 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>with Citizens United, they would overturn it. So, particularly for

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the left, when it comes to stary decisis, that is

0:49:40.040 --> 0:49:45.440
<v Speaker 1>usually an excuse for whatever policy outcome they want, because

0:49:45.440 --> 0:49:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the left views the courts as really very little different

0:49:48.840 --> 0:49:53.359
<v Speaker 1>from a super legislature enacting the policy they agree with.

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Right and so we have to get to it. We

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:58.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have to. We want to get to a really

0:49:58.080 --> 0:50:02.160
<v Speaker 1>funny question from the verdict usum subscribe or pool here

0:50:02.160 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in just a second. But let me ask you a

0:50:03.600 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>very quick yes or no question. Is there a possibility

0:50:06.440 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that Chevron deference, that Chevron could be overturned at the

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court level? So yes, I think there's a good possibility,

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 1>especially deal Gorse, which has been quite critical of chevron

0:50:15.880 --> 0:50:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a deference, and it's it's a doctrine that has come

0:50:17.960 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 1>under more and more criticism. I think I think there's

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a real possibility Chevron's overturn because the Left, as they

0:50:23.120 --> 0:50:27.280
<v Speaker 1>have the past decade, has overshots. They've overshot on their abuse,

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and the American people want to reject it. Okay, this

0:50:29.760 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>is a really funny question. I saw this one. It's

0:50:31.800 --> 0:50:33.640
<v Speaker 1>not a it's not a policy question at all. This

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is from Paul on the Verdict plus Community. Paul says,

0:50:37.400 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is Ted short for Theodore, is Liz short for Elizabeth?

0:50:40.680 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And is Michael short from Michael Angelo. Ooh, I like that,

0:50:46.600 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 1>So I'll address my piece of it at least. So

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:52.919
<v Speaker 1>Ted is actually not short for theater Theodore. My full

0:50:53.000 --> 0:50:55.839
<v Speaker 1>name is Raphael Edward Cruz. Raphael is after my father,

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:59.960
<v Speaker 1>RAPHAELBM and Evil Cruz, who's Cuban. My mental name Edward.

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>It is after my grandfather, my mother's father, who was

0:51:03.120 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Edward Dara. So sometimes people refer to me as Eduardo. No,

0:51:07.560 --> 0:51:10.200
<v Speaker 1>he was Irish and Italian. He was not. Actually he

0:51:10.280 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was Irish. My grandmother's Irish and Italian. Um it was

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Edward and Ted is a nickname for Edward, and so

0:51:16.400 --> 0:51:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that's that's where Ted comes from. And Liz is short

0:51:18.800 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>for Elizabeth. I will answer on behalf of Michael and

0:51:21.040 --> 0:51:22.919
<v Speaker 1>say that it's not short for my clangel. It's short

0:51:22.960 --> 0:51:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for Saint Michael. Kidding, obviously kidding. This actually will be

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 1>a test to see if Michael does watch this series,

0:51:29.719 --> 0:51:31.560
<v Speaker 1>because if he does, you know whole comment on it.

0:51:31.960 --> 0:51:34.799
<v Speaker 1>If you are not already a subscriber over on Verdict Plus,

0:51:34.800 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>please join us at Verdict with Ted Cruise dot com

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>Slash Plus. I have a promo code for you. The

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:42.120
<v Speaker 1>promo code is, of course, Cloakroom. If you use this

0:51:42.160 --> 0:51:44.120
<v Speaker 1>promo code, you will get one month free on your

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.759
<v Speaker 1>annual subscription. So go to Verdict with Ted Cruise dot

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:51.760
<v Speaker 1>com Slash Plus and use promo code Cloakroom. I'm Liz Wheeler.

0:51:51.920 --> 0:52:03.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Cloakroom on Verdict Plus. This episode of

0:52:03.239 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought to you by Jobs,

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Freedom and Security Pack, a political action committee dedicated to

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:14.759
<v Speaker 1>supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty two, Jobs, Freedom, and Security Pack plans to

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:21.480
<v Speaker 1>donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Republican Party across the nation.