1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:05,080 Speaker 1: Government is using big tech to shut down dissent. They're 2 00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:08,799 Speaker 1: doing it on the biggest podcast platform in the world. 3 00:00:09,320 --> 00:00:13,360 Speaker 1: They're doing it up in America's hat with Canadian truckers. 4 00:00:14,080 --> 00:00:17,320 Speaker 1: We are all we are all at risk here and 5 00:00:17,440 --> 00:00:20,960 Speaker 1: what happens now will have a lot to say about 6 00:00:20,960 --> 00:00:25,239 Speaker 1: the future of free speech in our society. This is 7 00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:35,320 Speaker 1: Verdict with Ted Cruz. Today's episode of Verdict with Ted 8 00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:38,360 Speaker 1: Cruz is brought to you by ip vanish. Did you 9 00:00:38,440 --> 00:00:42,120 Speaker 1: know that browsing online using incognito mode doesn't actually protect 10 00:00:42,120 --> 00:00:44,959 Speaker 1: your privacy? Without added security, you might as well give 11 00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:48,040 Speaker 1: all your private data way to hackers, advertisers, your Internet 12 00:00:48,120 --> 00:00:50,960 Speaker 1: service provider, and who knows who else. Ip Vanish helps 13 00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:53,880 Speaker 1: you securely and privately browse the Internet by encrypting one 14 00:00:53,960 --> 00:00:58,160 Speaker 1: hundred percent of your data. This means that your private messages, passwords, emails, 15 00:00:58,200 --> 00:01:01,320 Speaker 1: browsing history, and other information will be completely protected from 16 00:01:01,360 --> 00:01:04,240 Speaker 1: falling into the wrong hands. Ip Vanish makes you virtually 17 00:01:04,319 --> 00:01:07,720 Speaker 1: invisible online. It's that simple. Just for Verdict listeners, ip 18 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:10,959 Speaker 1: vanish is offering an insane seventy percent off their annual plan. 19 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 1: That's like getting nine months for free. You have to 20 00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:16,120 Speaker 1: go directly to ip vanished dot com slash cactus to 21 00:01:16,160 --> 00:01:19,119 Speaker 1: get this seventy percent off discount. Ip Vanish is super 22 00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:22,119 Speaker 1: easy to use. Just tap one button and you're instantly protected. 23 00:01:22,200 --> 00:01:24,039 Speaker 1: You won't even know it's on. You can use ip 24 00:01:24,200 --> 00:01:26,960 Speaker 1: vanish on your computers, tablets, and phones, whether you're at 25 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:30,480 Speaker 1: home or in public. Don't go online without using ip vanish. 26 00:01:30,520 --> 00:01:33,720 Speaker 1: Don't forget Verdict listeners get seventy percent off the ip 27 00:01:33,880 --> 00:01:36,720 Speaker 1: vanish annual plan. Just go to ip vanished dot com 28 00:01:36,720 --> 00:01:40,440 Speaker 1: slash cactus to claim your discount and secure your online life. 29 00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:45,800 Speaker 1: That's ip va nish dot com slash Cactus. This episode, 30 00:01:45,840 --> 00:01:47,680 Speaker 1: A Verdict with's Head Cruise is brought to you by 31 00:01:47,720 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: Thompson's Cigar. Now, I don't have to tell you that 32 00:01:50,000 --> 00:01:52,560 Speaker 1: the gentleman on this show like cigars. So does my 33 00:01:52,640 --> 00:01:55,240 Speaker 1: husband most times. Actually that's what we do after the show. 34 00:01:55,280 --> 00:01:57,360 Speaker 1: They smoke cigars and we tell ourselves what a great 35 00:01:57,360 --> 00:01:59,280 Speaker 1: show it was. But that's why you've got to check 36 00:01:59,280 --> 00:02:02,600 Speaker 1: out Thompson. Whether you're working from home or just kicking 37 00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:05,320 Speaker 1: back after a week of being essential, there's no better 38 00:02:05,360 --> 00:02:08,160 Speaker 1: way to relax than with a premium cigar. They've got 39 00:02:08,160 --> 00:02:10,720 Speaker 1: the best prices on the biggest brands in the business, 40 00:02:10,880 --> 00:02:14,120 Speaker 1: from Macanudo to Monte Cristo. Or maybe are you looking 41 00:02:14,120 --> 00:02:16,639 Speaker 1: to try new, rare, top rated blends but you don't 42 00:02:16,639 --> 00:02:20,280 Speaker 1: want to splurge on boxes. Well check out Thompson's Cigar Tour, 43 00:02:20,720 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 1: a smattering of five different blends delivered to your doorstep 44 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:26,679 Speaker 1: each month. Now, Michael and my husband have been fans 45 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:29,760 Speaker 1: of Thompson even before they became a partner. No one 46 00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:33,520 Speaker 1: has more selection than Thompson. Their customer service is the best. 47 00:02:33,520 --> 00:02:35,240 Speaker 1: So sit back and take a break from all the 48 00:02:35,240 --> 00:02:38,160 Speaker 1: craziness with a cigar from Thompson Cigar Company. These guys 49 00:02:38,280 --> 00:02:40,839 Speaker 1: rarely do offers, but right now Thompson is offering our 50 00:02:40,880 --> 00:02:44,520 Speaker 1: listeners fifteen percent off orders over seventy five dollars or 51 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:47,919 Speaker 1: twenty percent off orders over ninety nine dollars. To take 52 00:02:47,919 --> 00:02:50,519 Speaker 1: advantage of these incredible savings, simply go to Thompson Cigar 53 00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:53,560 Speaker 1: dot com and use promo code cactus when you are 54 00:02:53,600 --> 00:02:57,239 Speaker 1: ready to check out. That website is Thompson thomps o 55 00:02:57,520 --> 00:03:02,400 Speaker 1: n cigar dot com and use promo code cactus. This 56 00:03:02,480 --> 00:03:04,760 Speaker 1: episode of Verdict is also brought to you by stamps 57 00:03:04,800 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 1: dot Com. Now, I know a lot of you are 58 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:08,400 Speaker 1: small business owners, and if you are, you know that 59 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:11,400 Speaker 1: there's nothing more valuable than your time, so stop wasting 60 00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:13,880 Speaker 1: it on trips to the post office. Stamps dot Com 61 00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:15,600 Speaker 1: makes it easy to mail and ship right from your 62 00:03:15,639 --> 00:03:17,880 Speaker 1: own computer. You can save time and money with stamps 63 00:03:17,880 --> 00:03:20,280 Speaker 1: dot Com. You can send letters and packages for less 64 00:03:20,280 --> 00:03:24,120 Speaker 1: with discounted rates from USPS, UPS and more. Stamps dot 65 00:03:24,160 --> 00:03:26,880 Speaker 1: Com brings the services of the post Office and UPS 66 00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:29,760 Speaker 1: shipping right to your computer. So whether you're an office 67 00:03:29,800 --> 00:03:33,119 Speaker 1: sending invoices, a side hustle, etc. Shop or a full 68 00:03:33,120 --> 00:03:35,560 Speaker 1: blown warehouse shipping out order, stamps dot com will make 69 00:03:35,600 --> 00:03:38,160 Speaker 1: your life easier. All you need is a computer and 70 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:41,680 Speaker 1: a standard printer, no special supplies or equipment. Within minutes, 71 00:03:41,800 --> 00:03:44,480 Speaker 1: you're up and running printing official postage for any letter, 72 00:03:44,840 --> 00:03:47,760 Speaker 1: any package anywhere you want to send, and you'll get 73 00:03:47,800 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 1: exclusive discounts on postage and shipping from USPS and UPS. 74 00:03:51,280 --> 00:03:53,640 Speaker 1: Once your mail is ready, you just schedule a pickup 75 00:03:53,720 --> 00:03:56,240 Speaker 1: or drop it off. No traffic, no lines, there is 76 00:03:56,320 --> 00:03:59,480 Speaker 1: no risk and with our promo code Verdict, you get 77 00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:02,240 Speaker 1: a special offer that includes a four week trial plus 78 00:04:02,240 --> 00:04:05,040 Speaker 1: free postage and a digital scale. No long term commitments 79 00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:07,880 Speaker 1: or contracts. Just go to stamps dot com, click on 80 00:04:07,920 --> 00:04:09,880 Speaker 1: the microphone at the top of the homepage and type 81 00:04:09,920 --> 00:04:14,320 Speaker 1: in Verdict. That's stamps dot Com promo code Verdict. Never 82 00:04:14,360 --> 00:04:16,760 Speaker 1: go to the post office again. Welcome back to Verdict 83 00:04:16,760 --> 00:04:20,520 Speaker 1: with Ted Cruz. I'm Michael Knowles, Senator. They seem like 84 00:04:20,760 --> 00:04:25,599 Speaker 1: very different issues. Canadian truckers and the most popular podcast 85 00:04:25,640 --> 00:04:28,160 Speaker 1: are on the planet except for the week that Verdict launched, 86 00:04:28,160 --> 00:04:31,000 Speaker 1: But will digress. We leave that for a couple of 87 00:04:31,120 --> 00:04:36,000 Speaker 1: years ago. They are deeply connected stories. And actually you 88 00:04:36,120 --> 00:04:37,760 Speaker 1: seem to have played a role in all of this. 89 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:40,440 Speaker 1: You caused a little bit of an international incident, Senator, 90 00:04:40,680 --> 00:04:43,239 Speaker 1: when you got into a Twitter spat with the mayor 91 00:04:43,240 --> 00:04:48,640 Speaker 1: of Vancouver over this trucker protest going on up in Canada. 92 00:04:48,720 --> 00:04:51,280 Speaker 1: Well that's true enough. The Mayor of Vancouver said, you know, 93 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:54,240 Speaker 1: we Canadians don't want you truckers. You guys go home, 94 00:04:54,279 --> 00:04:56,359 Speaker 1: And I had to point out, I said, gosh, you know, 95 00:04:57,360 --> 00:04:59,680 Speaker 1: the Canucks might have a different view if the truckers 96 00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:02,360 Speaker 1: actually did go home and suddenly your shelves were empty. 97 00:05:02,400 --> 00:05:05,200 Speaker 1: I mean, it seems to me two years ago, people 98 00:05:05,240 --> 00:05:09,120 Speaker 1: were waxing eloquent about the great heroes that truckers were, 99 00:05:09,120 --> 00:05:13,080 Speaker 1: and I agree that they make our entire system, our 100 00:05:13,400 --> 00:05:17,640 Speaker 1: economy move forward. But now these leftist politicians are saying, 101 00:05:18,080 --> 00:05:20,479 Speaker 1: to hell with you, truckers. We don't like what you 102 00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:23,400 Speaker 1: have to say. So it's not just the little guy. 103 00:05:23,440 --> 00:05:25,520 Speaker 1: It's not just the working class that is being put 104 00:05:25,560 --> 00:05:30,880 Speaker 1: upon here. It's even one of the most elite, influential 105 00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:34,440 Speaker 1: popular voices in the world. That would be Joe Rogan, 106 00:05:34,560 --> 00:05:39,200 Speaker 1: this podcaster who's got a massive, massive audience, he's politically independent, 107 00:05:39,560 --> 00:05:42,080 Speaker 1: and a big tech is shutting him down. We touched 108 00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:44,599 Speaker 1: on it a little bit. Some aging hippies were trying 109 00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:48,080 Speaker 1: to boot him off of Spotify, but it appears to 110 00:05:48,160 --> 00:05:52,440 Speaker 1: be sort of working well. These two stories are deeply 111 00:05:52,440 --> 00:05:57,919 Speaker 1: interconnected and they represent together the most dire threat to 112 00:05:58,000 --> 00:06:03,240 Speaker 1: free speech. We have Joe Rogan, you have petty government 113 00:06:03,240 --> 00:06:08,280 Speaker 1: authoritarians enlisting their buddies in big tech to silence the 114 00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:13,000 Speaker 1: voice of descent Canadian truckers. You have petty government authoritarians 115 00:06:13,760 --> 00:06:16,080 Speaker 1: enlisting the voice of big tech and the power of 116 00:06:16,160 --> 00:06:20,240 Speaker 1: big tech to silence the voice of descent and both 117 00:06:20,880 --> 00:06:23,719 Speaker 1: look that this would never have happened even a year 118 00:06:23,839 --> 00:06:26,160 Speaker 1: or two or three ago. This is a new phenomenon. 119 00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 1: Let's take Joe Rogan, so Jen SAKEI publicly called from 120 00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 1: the White House podium for Spotify to take down his 121 00:06:34,760 --> 00:06:38,360 Speaker 1: episodes for Spotify to silence him. I will say, let 122 00:06:38,360 --> 00:06:40,240 Speaker 1: me start off by saying, I'm pissed off. Look our 123 00:06:40,320 --> 00:06:43,760 Speaker 1: last podcast, we talked about how this pod was the 124 00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:46,320 Speaker 1: first podcast to be mentioned from the White House podium, 125 00:06:46,480 --> 00:06:51,440 Speaker 1: and incomes Joe Rogan and bigfoots us M that's true, Senator, 126 00:06:51,440 --> 00:06:53,480 Speaker 1: we were the first two. We can at least hang 127 00:06:53,520 --> 00:06:56,000 Speaker 1: our hat on that. But yes, Joe Rogan has come in. 128 00:06:56,200 --> 00:06:58,440 Speaker 1: He is now the third podcast to be referenced at 129 00:06:58,440 --> 00:07:01,440 Speaker 1: a White House briefing. Will say in between the two, 130 00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:05,520 Speaker 1: Jen Saki was asked asked about this podcast and her 131 00:07:05,560 --> 00:07:09,840 Speaker 1: comment was she said she is blissfully blissfully not a 132 00:07:09,920 --> 00:07:13,920 Speaker 1: spokesperson for Ted Cruise, which I have to admit. Michael 133 00:07:13,920 --> 00:07:17,440 Speaker 1: I retweeted and just said the bliss is mutual, the 134 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:20,000 Speaker 1: feeling is reciprocated, right. But I will say what we 135 00:07:20,040 --> 00:07:23,080 Speaker 1: did talk about actually setting up Margarita's and kickboxing and 136 00:07:23,120 --> 00:07:27,120 Speaker 1: see if we could recruit her over because she thankfully, 137 00:07:27,120 --> 00:07:29,880 Speaker 1: we're not going to do that. Look stop for a 138 00:07:29,920 --> 00:07:35,200 Speaker 1: second and think about the White House, the executive office 139 00:07:35,520 --> 00:07:38,120 Speaker 1: of the leader of the free World, the most powerful 140 00:07:38,520 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 1: man on planet Earth, calling for a voice of descent 141 00:07:44,600 --> 00:07:48,640 Speaker 1: to be silenced and calling very specifically calling out big Tech, 142 00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:54,680 Speaker 1: calling out the oligarchs and Silicon Valley. Jensaki was very specific, 143 00:07:54,880 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 1: Spotify take down this post. Now. Normally, when you have 144 00:07:59,080 --> 00:08:01,400 Speaker 1: suppression of free beach is a big power in balance, 145 00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:05,200 Speaker 1: and it's powerful people trying to silence weak people. Well, 146 00:08:05,240 --> 00:08:07,480 Speaker 1: here the person they're trying to silence is Joe Rogan. 147 00:08:07,560 --> 00:08:10,280 Speaker 1: Joe Rogan as many things, but not weak. He's got 148 00:08:10,280 --> 00:08:13,600 Speaker 1: one hundred million listeners and viewers. That is a crap 149 00:08:13,640 --> 00:08:18,280 Speaker 1: ton of listeners and viewers. And you know he gets 150 00:08:18,800 --> 00:08:26,320 Speaker 1: more viewers. He's for many episodes. He's ten x or 151 00:08:26,360 --> 00:08:30,679 Speaker 1: a hundred x what CNN is and and the White 152 00:08:30,680 --> 00:08:34,400 Speaker 1: House is terrified of him. CNN is terrified of him, 153 00:08:34,440 --> 00:08:37,480 Speaker 1: the Blue check Marks and Twitter are terrified of him. 154 00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:40,559 Speaker 1: And it's worth worth pausing. Look, you and I are 155 00:08:41,240 --> 00:08:44,560 Speaker 1: unlikely advocates for Joe Rogan. I don't know Joe Rogan 156 00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:48,760 Speaker 1: met the guy. As far as I know, he's not 157 00:08:48,800 --> 00:08:53,320 Speaker 1: a conservative. He endorsed Bernie Friggin Sanders. Generally conservatives don't 158 00:08:53,440 --> 00:08:58,720 Speaker 1: endorse wild eyed socialists. But Rogan. Look, I've really grown 159 00:08:58,720 --> 00:09:04,320 Speaker 1: to admire Rogan because he's demonstrated backbone. He's willing to 160 00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:09,200 Speaker 1: speak out and on COVID he's called bullshit to the 161 00:09:09,600 --> 00:09:14,600 Speaker 1: continued propaganda and the contradictions and the lies coming out 162 00:09:14,679 --> 00:09:17,360 Speaker 1: of Fauci, coming out of the Biden White House, coming 163 00:09:17,360 --> 00:09:22,000 Speaker 1: out of the press, and for those in power, having 164 00:09:22,080 --> 00:09:26,440 Speaker 1: someone willing to dissent with a really big megaphone scares 165 00:09:26,520 --> 00:09:29,200 Speaker 1: them and so they want to destroy them. In the 166 00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:32,160 Speaker 1: important thing to know about Joe Rogan, this is not spontaneous, 167 00:09:32,200 --> 00:09:38,040 Speaker 1: This is not organic. This is an organized assassination of speech. 168 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:42,000 Speaker 1: It started off kind of comical, but then the White 169 00:09:42,040 --> 00:09:44,920 Speaker 1: House chimed in, and then you noticed it started off 170 00:09:44,960 --> 00:09:48,760 Speaker 1: with COVID misinformation because he brought in scientists and doctors 171 00:09:48,760 --> 00:09:52,720 Speaker 1: who had views that differed from the enlightened view of 172 00:09:52,800 --> 00:09:55,840 Speaker 1: doctor Fauci, which changes every week. But whatever it is 173 00:09:55,920 --> 00:09:59,559 Speaker 1: that week is holy scripture and cannot be challenged. Yea, 174 00:10:00,120 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 1: But then you know this kind of hack writer Don Winslow, 175 00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:07,840 Speaker 1: but I've never heard of other than he's loud, obnoxious. 176 00:10:07,840 --> 00:10:12,240 Speaker 1: On Twitter puts out this video, an old video of 177 00:10:12,400 --> 00:10:15,520 Speaker 1: Rogan using the N word, and look, using the N 178 00:10:15,559 --> 00:10:18,920 Speaker 1: word is wrong. Neither you nor I support it. And 179 00:10:19,160 --> 00:10:22,560 Speaker 1: suddenly all of the blue check marks gathered up together 180 00:10:22,800 --> 00:10:25,920 Speaker 1: and Rogan is a racist for having used it. Look, 181 00:10:27,200 --> 00:10:30,000 Speaker 1: that's not a word that should be used in polite society. 182 00:10:30,000 --> 00:10:31,640 Speaker 1: But I will tell you who else is used the 183 00:10:31,960 --> 00:10:38,320 Speaker 1: N word repeatedly. Joe Biden, rappers like crazy Howard Stern. 184 00:10:38,360 --> 00:10:44,960 Speaker 1: They're not castling Howard Stern. Why Because Howard Stern is serviling, 185 00:10:46,320 --> 00:10:49,240 Speaker 1: kissing the behinds of those in power. It's truly a shame. 186 00:10:49,280 --> 00:10:52,719 Speaker 1: Howard Stern started out a rebel, and now he echoes 187 00:10:52,840 --> 00:10:55,640 Speaker 1: the words of the petty tyrants. If you shut up 188 00:10:55,640 --> 00:10:58,920 Speaker 1: and echo what they say, you're okay. If you're Jimmy Kimmel, 189 00:10:59,000 --> 00:11:00,920 Speaker 1: you can dress in black face, you can do whatever 190 00:11:00,960 --> 00:11:04,959 Speaker 1: you want because you're a mouthpiece for the regime. This 191 00:11:05,040 --> 00:11:09,199 Speaker 1: has followed a familiar script, and I guess this also 192 00:11:09,240 --> 00:11:11,679 Speaker 1: ties it to the Canadian trucker protest, which is the 193 00:11:11,720 --> 00:11:15,480 Speaker 1: actual substantive issue that this is about. Is COVID, and 194 00:11:15,520 --> 00:11:18,600 Speaker 1: so Joe Rogan questioned the COVID narrative. He brought on 195 00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:22,040 Speaker 1: very respected, very well known scientists. They question the government's 196 00:11:22,040 --> 00:11:25,600 Speaker 1: COVID narrative, the narrative dujure because as you say, it 197 00:11:25,679 --> 00:11:29,240 Speaker 1: changes all the time, and so what happens. Then they 198 00:11:29,280 --> 00:11:31,840 Speaker 1: try to attack him. It doesn't work. Then the left 199 00:11:31,880 --> 00:11:34,240 Speaker 1: calls him a racist. That is always the next card 200 00:11:34,280 --> 00:11:36,480 Speaker 1: that they play. They pull it out of nowhere, they 201 00:11:36,559 --> 00:11:38,480 Speaker 1: take clips out of context, they do whatever they can. 202 00:11:38,520 --> 00:11:41,440 Speaker 1: They apply a standard unevenly, and they're trying to do that. 203 00:11:41,440 --> 00:11:43,880 Speaker 1: That seems to have weakened him a little bit. He's 204 00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 1: made some concessions. We'll see where it goes. But I 205 00:11:46,480 --> 00:11:48,920 Speaker 1: guess my question on it is what is it about 206 00:11:48,960 --> 00:11:52,120 Speaker 1: this COVID issue? Because I guess what the left would 207 00:11:52,160 --> 00:11:56,920 Speaker 1: say is, Michael Senator, this is about health. People are 208 00:11:56,920 --> 00:11:59,000 Speaker 1: going to die if this information gets out there, and 209 00:11:59,040 --> 00:12:01,400 Speaker 1: that's why we've got to suppress the truckers. It's why 210 00:12:01,480 --> 00:12:03,440 Speaker 1: why we've got to shut up Rogan. Is this a 211 00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:08,040 Speaker 1: unique issue where people are not allowed to dissent? It 212 00:12:08,120 --> 00:12:10,960 Speaker 1: is unique in the following way. It has revealed the 213 00:12:11,000 --> 00:12:15,280 Speaker 1: authoritarianism of these government leaders. They believe they have the 214 00:12:15,320 --> 00:12:17,760 Speaker 1: power to force you to comply, to force you to 215 00:12:17,760 --> 00:12:20,720 Speaker 1: take a vaccine. My body, my choice doesn't matter to 216 00:12:20,760 --> 00:12:23,000 Speaker 1: them anymore. Nope, not your body, not your choice. We're 217 00:12:23,000 --> 00:12:25,440 Speaker 1: going to force you to take a vaccine, to force 218 00:12:25,440 --> 00:12:27,360 Speaker 1: you to wear a mask, to force you to obey, 219 00:12:27,600 --> 00:12:30,559 Speaker 1: and if you don't, they will use the course of 220 00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:32,920 Speaker 1: force of government to shut your business down. You know, 221 00:12:33,000 --> 00:12:36,240 Speaker 1: there's a restaurant here in DC that was shut down 222 00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:39,840 Speaker 1: because they refused to enforce the vaccine mandate. So local 223 00:12:39,880 --> 00:12:41,680 Speaker 1: restaurant said, look, I don't want to like have my 224 00:12:41,720 --> 00:12:45,200 Speaker 1: customers come in demand their papers, you know, intrude on 225 00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:48,040 Speaker 1: their medical business. And so what did DC do. District 226 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:50,520 Speaker 1: of Columbia came in and shut them down. I mean, 227 00:12:50,600 --> 00:12:53,120 Speaker 1: it is arbitrary power. They will shut your business down. 228 00:12:53,520 --> 00:12:55,839 Speaker 1: They will shut your restaurant down. They'll shut your bar down, 229 00:12:55,880 --> 00:12:59,000 Speaker 1: they'll shut your store down. They will fire you if 230 00:12:59,040 --> 00:13:02,640 Speaker 1: your active duty militarius, soldier, sailor airman, marine, a Navy seal, 231 00:13:03,000 --> 00:13:05,320 Speaker 1: they will fire you. If you're a doctor, a nurse, 232 00:13:05,360 --> 00:13:08,080 Speaker 1: they will fire you. If you're a government employee, if 233 00:13:08,080 --> 00:13:10,240 Speaker 1: you're an FBI agent, if you're a border patrol agent. 234 00:13:10,280 --> 00:13:14,560 Speaker 1: They will fire you. It is force. And these are 235 00:13:14,600 --> 00:13:17,280 Speaker 1: the same guys that during the height of COVID, when 236 00:13:17,280 --> 00:13:21,840 Speaker 1: it started, we're shutting down playgrounds, we're shutting down churches. 237 00:13:21,880 --> 00:13:26,400 Speaker 1: We're suing to say, if you sing amazing grace, everyone's 238 00:13:26,440 --> 00:13:31,920 Speaker 1: going to die. And what COVID is done has revealed 239 00:13:32,160 --> 00:13:37,560 Speaker 1: the arbitrariness, the power. And by the way, you know, 240 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:41,160 Speaker 1: some might say, all right, you're exaggerating. Listen, all these 241 00:13:41,200 --> 00:13:44,280 Speaker 1: Democratic politicians know it's crap. We all saw this week 242 00:13:44,320 --> 00:13:47,240 Speaker 1: Stacy Abrams sitting in a classroom full of little kids. 243 00:13:47,600 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 1: The kids are all masked and she's sitting there grinning 244 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:52,640 Speaker 1: ear to ear with no mask right in front. Why 245 00:13:53,160 --> 00:13:56,240 Speaker 1: because she's a Democratic overlord and the rules don't apply 246 00:13:56,320 --> 00:13:58,880 Speaker 1: to her. They just apply to the little people. In 247 00:13:58,920 --> 00:14:01,440 Speaker 1: this case, it really was little people. It was children. 248 00:14:03,559 --> 00:14:06,080 Speaker 1: And it's all the Democratic politicians, every one of them. 249 00:14:06,120 --> 00:14:11,040 Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom, you know, palling around with Magic Johnson. It's 250 00:14:11,040 --> 00:14:12,640 Speaker 1: pretty cool he gets to hang out with Magic Johnson. 251 00:14:12,679 --> 00:14:17,360 Speaker 1: I'm jealous about that, you know. Eric Garcetti saying saying, oh, 252 00:14:17,440 --> 00:14:19,320 Speaker 1: I held my breath. I had my mask off, but 253 00:14:19,400 --> 00:14:24,880 Speaker 1: I held my breath balogony. But it's the lie is 254 00:14:24,920 --> 00:14:28,160 Speaker 1: so absurd. The person saying it doesn't believe it, the 255 00:14:28,200 --> 00:14:31,680 Speaker 1: person hearing it doesn't believe it. But what it's really about. 256 00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:34,400 Speaker 1: And by the way, Barack Obama this week, he's having 257 00:14:34,440 --> 00:14:38,000 Speaker 1: this massive house built in Hawaii, never mind global warming, 258 00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:41,440 Speaker 1: never mind the environment, and he's standing there with the workers, 259 00:14:42,040 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 1: little working people. The workers are all masks, and there's Obama, 260 00:14:45,520 --> 00:14:49,640 Speaker 1: no masks, supervising the servants. That's the same as Nancy 261 00:14:49,680 --> 00:14:53,160 Speaker 1: Pelosi when she does her fundraisers where the serving people 262 00:14:53,320 --> 00:14:58,640 Speaker 1: must be masked. It's garbage. It is contempt of elitists. 263 00:14:59,200 --> 00:15:01,080 Speaker 1: But the fact that they take their mask of I've 264 00:15:01,120 --> 00:15:04,320 Speaker 1: talked in this pot all the time. Democratic senators remove 265 00:15:04,400 --> 00:15:08,800 Speaker 1: their masks all the time behind closed doors when the 266 00:15:08,840 --> 00:15:11,920 Speaker 1: TV cameras aren't there, boom, the mask comes off. But 267 00:15:11,960 --> 00:15:14,480 Speaker 1: as soon as they come out, they put the mask on. 268 00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:20,720 Speaker 1: This is about power, and Rogan and the truckers are 269 00:15:20,760 --> 00:15:23,680 Speaker 1: threats to it. And I gotta say, look, Rogan in 270 00:15:23,760 --> 00:15:31,040 Speaker 1: the world of speech has a damn powerful megaphone. Spotify 271 00:15:31,200 --> 00:15:33,680 Speaker 1: is paying him one hundred million dollars. One hundred million 272 00:15:33,680 --> 00:15:36,040 Speaker 1: dollars a lot of money Michael, if Spotify offered it 273 00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:38,800 Speaker 1: to you tomorrow one hundred million dollars, shave your head 274 00:15:38,800 --> 00:15:41,840 Speaker 1: and become an m a wrestler. I gotta say, I 275 00:15:41,840 --> 00:15:45,120 Speaker 1: think we'd see Michael Knowles. Yet, you know, dressed in 276 00:15:45,760 --> 00:15:49,080 Speaker 1: a red tights, you going to wrestle. I don't want 277 00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:52,080 Speaker 1: to undercut my negotiation. I would do it for ninety 278 00:15:52,080 --> 00:15:55,720 Speaker 1: five I would, I believe you, and I'd buy tickets 279 00:15:55,760 --> 00:16:00,360 Speaker 1: to it. Well, I guess this is what's so scary. 280 00:16:00,440 --> 00:16:03,240 Speaker 1: Here is Joe Rogan. He's got this huge megaphone, and 281 00:16:03,360 --> 00:16:07,400 Speaker 1: yet they can, at least to some degree, make him concede. 282 00:16:07,440 --> 00:16:10,520 Speaker 1: We were always told that, yes, the government is bad 283 00:16:10,520 --> 00:16:12,560 Speaker 1: and they do lots of bad things, but we've got 284 00:16:12,680 --> 00:16:15,920 Speaker 1: private enterprise, We've got our own private organizations. We can 285 00:16:15,960 --> 00:16:18,480 Speaker 1: do our own work in the culture, fight back, build 286 00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:20,520 Speaker 1: your own Google, all that kind of stuff. And yet 287 00:16:20,520 --> 00:16:22,600 Speaker 1: what we've seen here in the States and with the 288 00:16:22,640 --> 00:16:26,800 Speaker 1: Canadian truckers is you're seeing the government using these these 289 00:16:26,840 --> 00:16:30,160 Speaker 1: private entities. So you've got Spotify as being pressured by 290 00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:32,240 Speaker 1: the White House to boot Rogan or at least to 291 00:16:32,280 --> 00:16:34,400 Speaker 1: censor him. You've got go fund me. There was a 292 00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:36,720 Speaker 1: go fund me set up for these Canadian truckers. A 293 00:16:36,760 --> 00:16:38,880 Speaker 1: lot of people were donating to them, and then go 294 00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:42,080 Speaker 1: fund me under a lot of political pressure, says, whoops, 295 00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:44,720 Speaker 1: never mind, we're going to take that money away from 296 00:16:44,720 --> 00:16:47,280 Speaker 1: the truckers. Well, so, now we don't have the government, 297 00:16:47,280 --> 00:16:49,200 Speaker 1: we don't have the private enterprise. What are we supposed 298 00:16:49,240 --> 00:16:52,200 Speaker 1: to do? So you look at Spotify. They haven't kicked 299 00:16:52,280 --> 00:16:54,320 Speaker 1: Rogan off yet, but the goal is to kick him 300 00:16:54,360 --> 00:16:57,040 Speaker 1: off entirely. That's what the White House called for. They 301 00:16:57,080 --> 00:16:59,640 Speaker 1: have taken down about one hundred episodes of his show. 302 00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:02,160 Speaker 1: So they've decided that you and I we don't get 303 00:17:02,200 --> 00:17:04,800 Speaker 1: to see what he said those episodes. We're too dumb, 304 00:17:04,880 --> 00:17:08,560 Speaker 1: we're too ignorant, we can't listen. That speech is dangerous, 305 00:17:08,600 --> 00:17:11,160 Speaker 1: and so they're going to ban it. I gotta say. 306 00:17:11,240 --> 00:17:14,760 Speaker 1: Rogan responded by apologizing and listen. If if there's one 307 00:17:14,840 --> 00:17:18,840 Speaker 1: lesson Donald Trump has taught us is don't apologize to 308 00:17:18,880 --> 00:17:22,480 Speaker 1: the woke left wing mob, because they're not interested in apology. 309 00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:25,120 Speaker 1: They're not interested in truth, they're not interested in facts. 310 00:17:25,520 --> 00:17:29,239 Speaker 1: Nobody cares in the mob about the substance of what 311 00:17:29,280 --> 00:17:31,240 Speaker 1: was on those hundred episodes. They don't care at all. 312 00:17:31,720 --> 00:17:34,320 Speaker 1: They want to destroy him. You look at the truckers. 313 00:17:34,720 --> 00:17:39,160 Speaker 1: Listen in Canada, the Canadian politicians, you know, the mayor 314 00:17:39,200 --> 00:17:47,800 Speaker 1: of Ottawa was was was reveling in calling for go 315 00:17:47,960 --> 00:17:51,000 Speaker 1: fund me to pull down the site and was bragging 316 00:17:51,040 --> 00:17:54,680 Speaker 1: about it. And go fund me people had given ten 317 00:17:54,760 --> 00:17:57,159 Speaker 1: million dollars to support this. I mean, it was, you know, 318 00:17:57,240 --> 00:18:03,080 Speaker 1: a spontaneous movement. And when the government officials called on 319 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:04,960 Speaker 1: and go fund me, just like the White House did, 320 00:18:05,000 --> 00:18:07,320 Speaker 1: the government officials in Canada call on Go fund me 321 00:18:07,440 --> 00:18:11,679 Speaker 1: stop this. You know, go fund me didn't have one 322 00:18:11,720 --> 00:18:14,080 Speaker 1: hundred billion dollars tied up with the truckers. If they did, 323 00:18:14,080 --> 00:18:16,280 Speaker 1: they might have behaved differently. Spotify has been a little 324 00:18:16,320 --> 00:18:19,000 Speaker 1: bit trying to have their cake and eat it too. Yeah. 325 00:18:19,920 --> 00:18:22,280 Speaker 1: So go fund Me just said, nope, we're taking the money. 326 00:18:22,880 --> 00:18:24,720 Speaker 1: And first they said we're going to give it to 327 00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:27,879 Speaker 1: a bunch of left wing causes that we support. Then 328 00:18:27,920 --> 00:18:30,040 Speaker 1: there was so much outrage they backed off and said, 329 00:18:30,040 --> 00:18:33,440 Speaker 1: oh it, or we'll just refund the money. Look. This weekend, 330 00:18:33,520 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 1: I sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission asking 331 00:18:36,560 --> 00:18:40,480 Speaker 1: the FTC to investigate go fund me for deceptive trade 332 00:18:40,520 --> 00:18:43,720 Speaker 1: practices because if you take ten million dollars, if you 333 00:18:43,880 --> 00:18:47,119 Speaker 1: steal it from people and divert it to a place 334 00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:50,120 Speaker 1: that the consumers who gave it didn't intend it to go, 335 00:18:51,320 --> 00:18:55,520 Speaker 1: that is deception, That is consumer fraud, and it is 336 00:18:56,400 --> 00:19:00,200 Speaker 1: indicative of the arrogance of big tech and the willingness 337 00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:04,280 Speaker 1: for them to act as enforcers for government officials. Now, 338 00:19:04,320 --> 00:19:07,240 Speaker 1: there was a second part of this go fund me story. 339 00:19:07,280 --> 00:19:11,560 Speaker 1: So I'm very glad that you are bringing legitimate government 340 00:19:11,560 --> 00:19:14,240 Speaker 1: power against go fund me. Here. I will never use 341 00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:17,280 Speaker 1: go fund me again. Obviously, we can't trust it if 342 00:19:17,280 --> 00:19:19,359 Speaker 1: they're going to take the money away from the causes 343 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:21,840 Speaker 1: we think we're giving to. Now, Michael, that's not fair. 344 00:19:21,880 --> 00:19:24,240 Speaker 1: If you want to support Black Lives Matter and TIEF, 345 00:19:24,320 --> 00:19:26,280 Speaker 1: if you want to support rioters and people that are 346 00:19:26,280 --> 00:19:28,560 Speaker 1: fire bombing police cars, if you want to support people 347 00:19:28,560 --> 00:19:31,960 Speaker 1: that are taking over police stations and declaring Chad's autonomous zones, 348 00:19:32,119 --> 00:19:35,000 Speaker 1: go fund me is the site for you. So if 349 00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:37,479 Speaker 1: you want to support Marxists, that's the place to go. 350 00:19:37,920 --> 00:19:40,280 Speaker 1: And you don't even need to donate directly to. You 351 00:19:40,280 --> 00:19:42,960 Speaker 1: can donate to whoever you want. Don't worry, go fund 352 00:19:43,000 --> 00:19:45,359 Speaker 1: me will redirect your money. You don't even need to 353 00:19:45,400 --> 00:19:48,120 Speaker 1: think about it. So I'm really glad that you are 354 00:19:48,200 --> 00:19:50,160 Speaker 1: leading on this issue and getting the government to look 355 00:19:50,160 --> 00:19:53,200 Speaker 1: into this, this obvious fraud. But there was a second 356 00:19:53,240 --> 00:19:55,920 Speaker 1: part to the story here, which is that after gofund 357 00:19:55,920 --> 00:19:58,160 Speaker 1: me took all the money, a bunch of people then 358 00:19:58,200 --> 00:20:02,600 Speaker 1: got together and started to fund the truckers. Not through 359 00:20:03,040 --> 00:20:06,959 Speaker 1: the government obviously, not even through some private enterprise an 360 00:20:07,040 --> 00:20:10,240 Speaker 1: organization might go fund me. They did it through bitcoin. 361 00:20:10,400 --> 00:20:16,360 Speaker 1: Bitcoin is a powerfully revolutionary technology cryptocurrency. I am very 362 00:20:16,440 --> 00:20:20,800 Speaker 1: bullish on bitcoin and on crypto generally. And i gotta 363 00:20:20,880 --> 00:20:25,959 Speaker 1: tell you, the same petty authoritarians who hate Joe Rogan, 364 00:20:26,800 --> 00:20:30,800 Speaker 1: who hate the Canadian truckers, they hate bitcoin and they 365 00:20:30,880 --> 00:20:34,359 Speaker 1: hate crypto and their sem irony. So I've become a 366 00:20:34,600 --> 00:20:38,159 Speaker 1: very vocal defender of crypto, probably the leading defender, certainly 367 00:20:38,200 --> 00:20:40,679 Speaker 1: one of the leading defenders in the US Senate. And 368 00:20:40,760 --> 00:20:43,879 Speaker 1: it's interesting a lot of the bitcoin and crypto folks 369 00:20:43,880 --> 00:20:47,880 Speaker 1: were Bernie bros, just like Rogan, you know, the kind 370 00:20:47,880 --> 00:20:53,320 Speaker 1: of cool socialists that seem hip. And yet these authoritarians 371 00:20:53,840 --> 00:20:56,959 Speaker 1: hate bitcoin and they hate crypto, and it's for the 372 00:20:57,040 --> 00:20:59,879 Speaker 1: same reason. Why did they hate Joe Rogan because they 373 00:21:00,040 --> 00:21:05,119 Speaker 1: can't control him. He's not subject to their authoritarian power. 374 00:21:05,480 --> 00:21:09,240 Speaker 1: Why do they hit bitcoin because they can't control it. 375 00:21:09,240 --> 00:21:12,360 Speaker 1: It is a system of currency outside of the monopoly 376 00:21:12,400 --> 00:21:14,960 Speaker 1: control of the US government. And I got to say, 377 00:21:15,000 --> 00:21:17,920 Speaker 1: as I've addressed you know, I spoke at a big 378 00:21:17,920 --> 00:21:21,359 Speaker 1: cryptoconference in Austin several months ago, and I said, listen, 379 00:21:21,400 --> 00:21:25,000 Speaker 1: you need to understand this administration, I believe is going 380 00:21:25,040 --> 00:21:27,280 Speaker 1: to go after you and is going to try to 381 00:21:27,320 --> 00:21:32,920 Speaker 1: destroy you. And by the way, that's a pattern of authoritarians. 382 00:21:33,119 --> 00:21:38,840 Speaker 1: China communist China outlawed bitcoin for the exact same reason. 383 00:21:38,920 --> 00:21:42,119 Speaker 1: Why does Elizabeth Warren hate bitcoin for the same reason 384 00:21:42,160 --> 00:21:45,080 Speaker 1: that she and China hates bitcoin because neither one of 385 00:21:45,119 --> 00:21:49,359 Speaker 1: them can control it. And the theme through all of 386 00:21:49,400 --> 00:21:54,640 Speaker 1: this is the power of freedom to be not subject 387 00:21:54,800 --> 00:21:58,600 Speaker 1: to the arbitrary whims of those in government power. Now 388 00:21:58,640 --> 00:22:01,280 Speaker 1: you have convinced me on this. I don't know anything 389 00:22:01,280 --> 00:22:04,840 Speaker 1: about a crypto. I'm a terrible investor. My investment strategy 390 00:22:04,880 --> 00:22:08,000 Speaker 1: generally is by high sell low, that's whenever I'm involved. 391 00:22:08,160 --> 00:22:10,800 Speaker 1: But what a lot of listeners probably don't know is 392 00:22:10,840 --> 00:22:14,119 Speaker 1: that you are much hipper than I am, you have 393 00:22:14,280 --> 00:22:17,320 Speaker 1: been on this crypto thing for a while. It's true, 394 00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:21,240 Speaker 1: and you did make headlines because well, while crypto was 395 00:22:21,280 --> 00:22:23,880 Speaker 1: collapsing and I was panicked and selling all my crypto, 396 00:22:24,520 --> 00:22:28,240 Speaker 1: you were apparently buying the dip that that is true. 397 00:22:28,280 --> 00:22:31,520 Speaker 1: So I bought bitcoin. I own bitcoin. I think according 398 00:22:31,560 --> 00:22:35,280 Speaker 1: to the public reports, they're three senators that own bitcoin, Me, 399 00:22:35,440 --> 00:22:39,440 Speaker 1: Cynthia love Us, and Pat Toomey. Um. You know, I'll say, 400 00:22:39,480 --> 00:22:41,800 Speaker 1: I don't know. Six eight months ago, I didn't know 401 00:22:41,880 --> 00:22:46,160 Speaker 1: a whole lot about bitcoin and crypto, and I saw 402 00:22:46,240 --> 00:22:48,200 Speaker 1: that it was growing and developing, and I said, look, 403 00:22:48,200 --> 00:22:50,960 Speaker 1: I need to educate myself. And so I started setting 404 00:22:51,080 --> 00:22:55,720 Speaker 1: up dinners with people involved in the crypto world and 405 00:22:56,000 --> 00:22:58,080 Speaker 1: just sitting down and listening to them. And I started 406 00:22:58,080 --> 00:23:00,840 Speaker 1: off with, you know, all sorts of dumb questions, you know, 407 00:23:00,880 --> 00:23:02,480 Speaker 1: what is it? How does it work? In learning? And 408 00:23:02,520 --> 00:23:05,040 Speaker 1: it's complicated stuff. And I certainly I would not hold 409 00:23:05,040 --> 00:23:09,000 Speaker 1: myself out as an expert today, but I started learning 410 00:23:09,000 --> 00:23:11,639 Speaker 1: and listening to it and being fascinated by by the 411 00:23:11,680 --> 00:23:14,280 Speaker 1: development of it, by the ability that there's a book 412 00:23:14,800 --> 00:23:17,720 Speaker 1: actually that Cynthia Loves recommended to me called Layered Money 413 00:23:17,760 --> 00:23:20,919 Speaker 1: which I read that talks about some of the history 414 00:23:20,960 --> 00:23:23,159 Speaker 1: of the development of money from the beginning. But but 415 00:23:23,280 --> 00:23:26,919 Speaker 1: crypto is the next evolution of it. And I've gotten 416 00:23:27,600 --> 00:23:35,960 Speaker 1: very bullish on crypto, especially bitcoin, and really horrified at 417 00:23:36,000 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 1: the efforts of Elizabeth Warren and big government Democrats to 418 00:23:41,359 --> 00:23:46,040 Speaker 1: crush this growing industry. You know, Texas is becoming an 419 00:23:46,080 --> 00:23:49,800 Speaker 1: oasis for bitcoin. We're seeing more and more crypto moving 420 00:23:49,840 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 1: to Texas, particularly Austin. And so I started several months ago. 421 00:23:53,640 --> 00:23:56,720 Speaker 1: I actually have a weekly by order in for bitcoin 422 00:23:56,800 --> 00:23:59,120 Speaker 1: that every week I just have an automatic buy. You know, look, 423 00:23:59,119 --> 00:24:02,320 Speaker 1: given that there's votility, UM, I'm a fan of dollar 424 00:24:02,400 --> 00:24:05,320 Speaker 1: cost averaging, which is just having a buy that occurs 425 00:24:05,400 --> 00:24:10,280 Speaker 1: weekly automatically, so that high or low it averages out. UH. 426 00:24:10,280 --> 00:24:15,000 Speaker 1: And then what I ended up doing, UM, I guess 427 00:24:15,000 --> 00:24:18,280 Speaker 1: a couple of weeks ago is when bitcoin dropped about 428 00:24:18,280 --> 00:24:21,360 Speaker 1: in half, I said, all right, I don't believe this 429 00:24:21,480 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 1: drop and and so I made a bigger purchase. I 430 00:24:24,000 --> 00:24:27,919 Speaker 1: bought twenty five thousand worth of bitcoin. UM. Under the 431 00:24:27,960 --> 00:24:30,600 Speaker 1: Senate you have to file a financial disclosure for a 432 00:24:30,680 --> 00:24:33,960 Speaker 1: purchase over a thousand dollars. So I filed that financial disclosure. 433 00:24:34,560 --> 00:24:38,679 Speaker 1: And you know, usually those financial disclosures don't you know, 434 00:24:38,720 --> 00:24:41,119 Speaker 1: maybe they get a little bip, but they don't, they 435 00:24:41,119 --> 00:24:43,440 Speaker 1: don't get a whole lot of attention. It actually fascinating, Michael. 436 00:24:43,440 --> 00:24:46,800 Speaker 1: When I filed the financial disclosure, it generated a ton 437 00:24:46,800 --> 00:24:50,800 Speaker 1: of press. And listen, I am bullish on bitcoin. So 438 00:24:50,880 --> 00:24:52,760 Speaker 1: I'm proud to say I got skin in the game. 439 00:24:52,800 --> 00:24:54,800 Speaker 1: I believe in it, and that's that's that's why I 440 00:24:54,840 --> 00:24:57,199 Speaker 1: invested in it. But but I think we ought to 441 00:24:57,240 --> 00:25:01,960 Speaker 1: be encouraging. I want cryptocurrency. I want America to be 442 00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:05,800 Speaker 1: the hub of cryptocurrency globally, and frankly, I want Texas 443 00:25:06,320 --> 00:25:09,720 Speaker 1: to be the hub of cryptocurrency in America. So I 444 00:25:10,600 --> 00:25:12,840 Speaker 1: have been convinced by you and by other I mean 445 00:25:13,080 --> 00:25:16,800 Speaker 1: Ronald Reagan's favorite economist, George Gilder was really bullish on 446 00:25:16,880 --> 00:25:20,360 Speaker 1: blockchain technology years ago even and said this is kind 447 00:25:20,359 --> 00:25:22,639 Speaker 1: of the future of the Internet. Yeah, And so what 448 00:25:22,720 --> 00:25:25,119 Speaker 1: I'm convinced on here now is that this would be 449 00:25:25,160 --> 00:25:28,560 Speaker 1: a way to avoid government control. This would be a 450 00:25:28,560 --> 00:25:31,040 Speaker 1: way to avoid even the control of private businesses that 451 00:25:31,119 --> 00:25:33,840 Speaker 1: are often working at the behest of the government. Anyway. 452 00:25:34,119 --> 00:25:38,160 Speaker 1: But then my final question to you is this if 453 00:25:38,280 --> 00:25:41,120 Speaker 1: the government was able to clamp down on all these 454 00:25:41,160 --> 00:25:43,560 Speaker 1: private businesses and build your own Google and all of that, 455 00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:45,600 Speaker 1: and that hasn't worked. We saw it with the truckers, 456 00:25:45,680 --> 00:25:49,440 Speaker 1: we're seeing with Rogan two. What is to stop them 457 00:25:49,640 --> 00:25:52,320 Speaker 1: from clamping down on bitcoin. You've already heard rumblings out 458 00:25:52,359 --> 00:25:54,679 Speaker 1: of the government. What is the likelihood that Biden does that? 459 00:25:55,280 --> 00:25:59,080 Speaker 1: So look, they may well, and I am quite concerned 460 00:25:59,119 --> 00:26:01,760 Speaker 1: about it. This ad illustration could kill crypto. When I 461 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:04,520 Speaker 1: talked to the conference in Austin, you know, there are 462 00:26:04,560 --> 00:26:06,920 Speaker 1: a lot of folks in the crypto world. We're a 463 00:26:06,960 --> 00:26:09,879 Speaker 1: little bit utopian that they have a view that that 464 00:26:09,760 --> 00:26:14,080 Speaker 1: that that we are inevitable, that that that bitcoin is 465 00:26:14,119 --> 00:26:16,640 Speaker 1: inherently superior to all other forms of money. I will 466 00:26:16,680 --> 00:26:18,399 Speaker 1: say one of the things I like about it is 467 00:26:18,400 --> 00:26:22,520 Speaker 1: it's a potential hedge against inflation. And given this administration 468 00:26:22,640 --> 00:26:25,840 Speaker 1: spending trillions and driving up trillions in debt, I'm interested 469 00:26:25,840 --> 00:26:28,119 Speaker 1: in the hedge in inflation as they're devaluing the dollar, 470 00:26:28,200 --> 00:26:31,560 Speaker 1: and so I like bitcoin as a hedge against inflation. 471 00:26:31,640 --> 00:26:33,600 Speaker 1: But the point I made at this conference is you 472 00:26:33,680 --> 00:26:37,800 Speaker 1: only need to understand government can destroy You asked how 473 00:26:37,840 --> 00:26:42,840 Speaker 1: many of you all have heard of napster Um, you know, 474 00:26:42,880 --> 00:26:45,560 Speaker 1: and they all did, and I said, listen, it's easy 475 00:26:45,640 --> 00:26:50,120 Speaker 1: to think we're happily in our sort of Austin, peaceful place. 476 00:26:50,119 --> 00:26:54,800 Speaker 1: And I think Bitcoin is actually where Silicon Valley was 477 00:26:55,560 --> 00:26:58,800 Speaker 1: maybe fifteen or twenty years ago, which is at a 478 00:26:58,800 --> 00:27:02,200 Speaker 1: fork in the road where Silicon Valley could have chosen 479 00:27:02,280 --> 00:27:06,240 Speaker 1: to go towards a libertarian utopia. Leave us alone, let's 480 00:27:06,280 --> 00:27:10,000 Speaker 1: be entrepreneurs, let's have freedom. Or they could have done 481 00:27:10,000 --> 00:27:12,159 Speaker 1: what they did, which is to go down the socialist 482 00:27:12,200 --> 00:27:16,800 Speaker 1: woke path of we exercise power, we are totalitarian, and 483 00:27:16,840 --> 00:27:20,159 Speaker 1: we're hard leftist woke, and unfortunately Silicon Valley took the 484 00:27:20,160 --> 00:27:24,280 Speaker 1: wrong choice. I think Bitcoin and crypto more generally is 485 00:27:24,320 --> 00:27:27,080 Speaker 1: at that same fork in the road. I hope that 486 00:27:27,240 --> 00:27:30,280 Speaker 1: they go the libertarian way. I hope they go the 487 00:27:30,400 --> 00:27:35,600 Speaker 1: small business leave us alone, let us be entrepreneurs. You know, 488 00:27:35,760 --> 00:27:38,760 Speaker 1: that is really potent, So I'm trying to encourage it. 489 00:27:38,800 --> 00:27:42,720 Speaker 1: But absolutely there is a very real and potent threat 490 00:27:42,760 --> 00:27:45,720 Speaker 1: from the Biden administration that they will go after it, 491 00:27:45,760 --> 00:27:48,280 Speaker 1: that they will try to destroy it. And I'm going 492 00:27:48,320 --> 00:27:51,040 Speaker 1: to fight against that because I think it is a huge, 493 00:27:51,600 --> 00:27:54,920 Speaker 1: huge industry going forward, and I don't want to see 494 00:27:54,920 --> 00:27:59,120 Speaker 1: the idiot politicians in Washington drive it out of America 495 00:27:59,119 --> 00:28:03,080 Speaker 1: and send it overseas. It won't disappear, But Washington is 496 00:28:03,119 --> 00:28:07,080 Speaker 1: perfectly capable of sending the jobs overseas and sending sending 497 00:28:07,119 --> 00:28:10,160 Speaker 1: that business overseas. I think that would be catastrophic, right, 498 00:28:10,200 --> 00:28:14,000 Speaker 1: And it's especially at a moment where we're dissent against 499 00:28:14,040 --> 00:28:16,760 Speaker 1: the ruling class, the liberal establishment, the regime, whatever you 500 00:28:16,800 --> 00:28:19,520 Speaker 1: want to call it, where that is so difficult and 501 00:28:19,520 --> 00:28:22,960 Speaker 1: where people are genuinely persecuted for it. Yes, we have 502 00:28:23,000 --> 00:28:24,879 Speaker 1: to wield what political power we can. Yes, we need 503 00:28:24,920 --> 00:28:26,719 Speaker 1: to wield what market power we can. But if if 504 00:28:26,800 --> 00:28:30,160 Speaker 1: there were an instrument of technology really to be able 505 00:28:30,160 --> 00:28:32,320 Speaker 1: to exercise our rights in our way of life, that's 506 00:28:32,359 --> 00:28:34,760 Speaker 1: something very hopeful, and so I hope that we can 507 00:28:35,160 --> 00:28:39,800 Speaker 1: maintain it. We unfortunately so far, are not accepting bitcoin 508 00:28:40,080 --> 00:28:42,720 Speaker 1: in the Verdict store, but I think we really should. 509 00:28:42,760 --> 00:28:44,760 Speaker 1: I think that would be a great way to do it. So, Michael, 510 00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:49,440 Speaker 1: I've actually introduced legislation in Congress to have the Congressional 511 00:28:49,520 --> 00:28:52,080 Speaker 1: store accept bitcoin. Rile. That's one of the pieces of 512 00:28:52,240 --> 00:28:58,120 Speaker 1: legislation I've introduced as a way of spreading its acceptance. 513 00:28:58,160 --> 00:29:00,160 Speaker 1: By the way, in El Salvador, I spoke with the 514 00:29:00,200 --> 00:29:03,600 Speaker 1: President of Al Salvador last week El Salvador. It's it's 515 00:29:03,720 --> 00:29:07,040 Speaker 1: legal currency, it's legal tender in Al Salvador, and it 516 00:29:07,160 --> 00:29:11,200 Speaker 1: is Bitcoin has all sorts of potential, particularly in developing economy, 517 00:29:11,640 --> 00:29:13,880 Speaker 1: for people to have secure savings. You may not have 518 00:29:13,880 --> 00:29:15,720 Speaker 1: access to a bank account, but if you have a 519 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:17,520 Speaker 1: cell phone, if you have any technology, you can have 520 00:29:17,600 --> 00:29:20,960 Speaker 1: secure savings that can't be stolen from you. It can 521 00:29:21,040 --> 00:29:25,440 Speaker 1: also is secure instantaneous transactions. You can transfer it, buy 522 00:29:25,520 --> 00:29:29,200 Speaker 1: and sell. You know, they're massive inefficiencies right now, and 523 00:29:29,240 --> 00:29:32,320 Speaker 1: the transfers of cash that crypto and bitcoin go all around, 524 00:29:32,400 --> 00:29:37,840 Speaker 1: and so it is a generation skipping technology which is potent, 525 00:29:37,880 --> 00:29:40,880 Speaker 1: and that's one of the reasons. So I've introduced legislation 526 00:29:41,040 --> 00:29:45,720 Speaker 1: to repeal what the Democrats did putting additional burdens on crypto. 527 00:29:45,800 --> 00:29:48,960 Speaker 1: And I've also, as I said, I think the Congressional 528 00:29:49,000 --> 00:29:54,440 Speaker 1: store how to accept it because it helps it helps 529 00:29:54,720 --> 00:29:57,640 Speaker 1: expand the ability of this industry to grow. And I 530 00:29:57,680 --> 00:30:01,520 Speaker 1: think there's enormous benefit to Texas and the country as 531 00:30:01,560 --> 00:30:05,960 Speaker 1: this industry grows. Well, it's great to know that bitcoin 532 00:30:06,080 --> 00:30:09,480 Speaker 1: is good for developing economies, because if Joe Biden's policies 533 00:30:09,520 --> 00:30:12,880 Speaker 1: continue to destroy our dollar and our jobs, we may 534 00:30:12,920 --> 00:30:16,840 Speaker 1: soon be a developing economy ourselves. Now we have more. 535 00:30:17,400 --> 00:30:19,320 Speaker 1: Just when you think it's over, there is still more. 536 00:30:19,960 --> 00:30:22,080 Speaker 1: Some of you who have gone over and gone to 537 00:30:22,160 --> 00:30:24,640 Speaker 1: Verdict with Ted Cruise dot com slash shop and headed 538 00:30:24,640 --> 00:30:27,160 Speaker 1: over and subscribe to the Verdict Plus community. Some of 539 00:30:27,160 --> 00:30:28,880 Speaker 1: you know about this, but some of you might not 540 00:30:29,720 --> 00:30:32,480 Speaker 1: know this quite yet. But our friend Liz Wheeler is 541 00:30:32,520 --> 00:30:36,280 Speaker 1: hosting a new series with Senator Cruz, the hardest working 542 00:30:36,280 --> 00:30:39,440 Speaker 1: man in show business and in politics, and that is 543 00:30:39,480 --> 00:30:42,720 Speaker 1: called Cloak Room. Liz, what are you talking about? Hi? 544 00:30:42,840 --> 00:30:45,440 Speaker 1: Michael Hi? Senator Yes, and Michael, you and I joke. 545 00:30:45,640 --> 00:30:48,120 Speaker 1: One series is simply not enough for Senator Cruz, so 546 00:30:48,200 --> 00:30:51,240 Speaker 1: there must be two. I'm so excited. This will be 547 00:30:51,280 --> 00:30:53,480 Speaker 1: our second, our second episode in the series. I'm excited 548 00:30:53,480 --> 00:30:55,640 Speaker 1: to introduce it. It's called the Cloak Room. It's on 549 00:30:55,760 --> 00:30:59,120 Speaker 1: Verdict Plus. It is only for Verdict Plus subscribers. You 550 00:30:59,120 --> 00:31:01,080 Speaker 1: can of course join us ad Verdict with Ted Cruz 551 00:31:01,200 --> 00:31:04,040 Speaker 1: dot com slash Plus. It's a it's a brand new 552 00:31:04,120 --> 00:31:06,200 Speaker 1: series with Senator Ted Cruz. It's co hosted by me 553 00:31:06,320 --> 00:31:08,760 Speaker 1: Liz Wheeler. Basically, how it's going to work is I'm 554 00:31:08,800 --> 00:31:10,480 Speaker 1: going to pick his brain like I would in a 555 00:31:10,520 --> 00:31:13,520 Speaker 1: strategy session. It's a behind the scenes peek into the 556 00:31:13,560 --> 00:31:15,760 Speaker 1: details of what goes on in DC, just like the 557 00:31:15,800 --> 00:31:18,320 Speaker 1: real cloak Room of the Senate. Today, we're going to 558 00:31:18,320 --> 00:31:21,800 Speaker 1: talk about Stacy Abrams and that infamous massless photo of 559 00:31:21,800 --> 00:31:24,600 Speaker 1: her with kids who were wearing masks next to her. 560 00:31:24,800 --> 00:31:26,640 Speaker 1: Plus the proper role, this is the nerdy part, the 561 00:31:26,640 --> 00:31:29,600 Speaker 1: proper role of public health and the administrative state and 562 00:31:29,640 --> 00:31:32,280 Speaker 1: the separation of powers. Doctor and now leg I said, 563 00:31:32,280 --> 00:31:34,000 Speaker 1: you can join us at Verdict with Ted Cruise dot 564 00:31:34,040 --> 00:31:37,360 Speaker 1: com slash plus. I also have a promo code Cloakroom 565 00:31:37,520 --> 00:31:39,960 Speaker 1: for you. If you use this promo code Cloakroom, you'll 566 00:31:40,000 --> 00:31:42,280 Speaker 1: get one month free a one month free trial on 567 00:31:42,320 --> 00:31:45,880 Speaker 1: your annual subscriptions. It's going to be a good time. Then, 568 00:31:46,120 --> 00:31:48,600 Speaker 1: as I have mentioned before, soon after that, we're going 569 00:31:48,640 --> 00:31:51,520 Speaker 1: to have a series where it is just me and 570 00:31:51,640 --> 00:31:53,880 Speaker 1: Liz and no senator, then a series of Liz and 571 00:31:53,920 --> 00:31:56,760 Speaker 1: the Cactus, and we're just building out a whole universe 572 00:31:56,800 --> 00:32:00,800 Speaker 1: here because as the Left tries to clamped down on us, 573 00:32:00,880 --> 00:32:02,800 Speaker 1: it's more important than ever to speak out and Liz 574 00:32:03,120 --> 00:32:07,240 Speaker 1: in our beneficence, in our charity, which is a theological virtue. 575 00:32:07,640 --> 00:32:10,680 Speaker 1: We are not going to keep this episode behind the paywall. 576 00:32:10,720 --> 00:32:12,280 Speaker 1: In the future of the episodes are going to behind 577 00:32:12,320 --> 00:32:14,000 Speaker 1: the paywall, but right now we have a sneak peek. 578 00:32:14,080 --> 00:32:16,080 Speaker 1: So I'm going to get out of here. Liz. You 579 00:32:16,160 --> 00:32:18,280 Speaker 1: take it away with the Cloakroom. Thank you, Michael. I'm 580 00:32:18,280 --> 00:32:21,720 Speaker 1: Liz Wheeler. This is Cloakroom on Verdict plus. Senator. We 581 00:32:21,800 --> 00:32:25,520 Speaker 1: have a great episode plans today, So let's start with 582 00:32:25,520 --> 00:32:28,000 Speaker 1: this photograph. This is the photograph curd round the country, 583 00:32:28,080 --> 00:32:30,920 Speaker 1: if you will. It is, of course, Stacy Abrams, gubernatorial 584 00:32:30,920 --> 00:32:33,400 Speaker 1: candidate for the state of Georgia. She is not wearing 585 00:32:33,400 --> 00:32:36,280 Speaker 1: a mask in this photograph, which is surrounded by school children, 586 00:32:36,440 --> 00:32:39,560 Speaker 1: very small children with wearing masks on their face. And 587 00:32:39,720 --> 00:32:42,160 Speaker 1: not only is this a terrible look, she actually is 588 00:32:42,200 --> 00:32:44,600 Speaker 1: defending this in the wake of all the outrage. So 589 00:32:44,640 --> 00:32:46,480 Speaker 1: my question to you, leg I said, is purely political. 590 00:32:46,800 --> 00:32:48,560 Speaker 1: Is this photograph going to be the reason that she 591 00:32:48,720 --> 00:32:51,520 Speaker 1: loses her election? Is this going to disqualify her in 592 00:32:51,560 --> 00:32:53,920 Speaker 1: the eyes of her voters. Look, I think this photograph 593 00:32:54,000 --> 00:32:57,400 Speaker 1: has the potential to be something like Terry mcculloff's comment 594 00:32:57,480 --> 00:33:00,560 Speaker 1: at the end of the Virginia governor's race. He said 595 00:33:00,560 --> 00:33:02,720 Speaker 1: in the debate, he said, parents have no right to 596 00:33:02,760 --> 00:33:05,360 Speaker 1: say what's taught to their kids in school. And and 597 00:33:05,760 --> 00:33:09,040 Speaker 1: I think if there was one sentence that defeated McAuliffe 598 00:33:09,040 --> 00:33:11,480 Speaker 1: and elected Glen Yonken, it was that sentence. It was 599 00:33:11,520 --> 00:33:14,800 Speaker 1: the arrogance that was revealed. It was you know, there's 600 00:33:14,800 --> 00:33:17,400 Speaker 1: an old line that a gaff as when a politician 601 00:33:17,440 --> 00:33:20,440 Speaker 1: tells the truth, tells you what they really think. This 602 00:33:20,520 --> 00:33:23,720 Speaker 1: picture shows you what Stacy Abrams really thinks. And it 603 00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:27,080 Speaker 1: is I think this picture will play a central role 604 00:33:27,080 --> 00:33:31,560 Speaker 1: in the election. You know, several things are striking. Number one, 605 00:33:33,880 --> 00:33:36,440 Speaker 1: they put the picture out. They were proud of this picture. 606 00:33:36,480 --> 00:33:38,560 Speaker 1: They saw nothing wrong with it. And then suddenly the 607 00:33:38,600 --> 00:33:42,800 Speaker 1: reaction was so intense they deleted it, and they got 608 00:33:42,800 --> 00:33:45,120 Speaker 1: the school to delete it too. They like tried to 609 00:33:45,200 --> 00:33:48,440 Speaker 1: ban it, tried to erase it, just delete the In fact, 610 00:33:48,440 --> 00:33:53,040 Speaker 1: the school person deleted her entire account. But but then 611 00:33:54,720 --> 00:34:01,000 Speaker 1: when everyone naturally criticized the self evident hypocrisy. The Abraham's 612 00:34:01,080 --> 00:34:06,040 Speaker 1: campaign put out this statement, just snarling with attacks that 613 00:34:06,160 --> 00:34:09,640 Speaker 1: of course people are attacking me because they're racists and 614 00:34:09,760 --> 00:34:13,319 Speaker 1: it's all about, you know, undermining Black History Month because 615 00:34:13,360 --> 00:34:18,680 Speaker 1: they're all just horrible racist who hate me, completely ignoring 616 00:34:18,680 --> 00:34:21,759 Speaker 1: the substance. Also, a campaign put out a statement that well, 617 00:34:21,800 --> 00:34:24,839 Speaker 1: Stacy requested that everyone wear a mask and she just 618 00:34:24,880 --> 00:34:29,239 Speaker 1: took hers off briefly. Well, okay, so that doesn't make 619 00:34:29,280 --> 00:34:34,359 Speaker 1: it better. Maybe she held her breath like Garcetti did. Indeed, 620 00:34:34,480 --> 00:34:37,279 Speaker 1: And by the way, I think it's much better. The 621 00:34:37,320 --> 00:34:39,919 Speaker 1: world would be better if democratic politicians held their breath, 622 00:34:39,960 --> 00:34:41,960 Speaker 1: because it would mean they couldn't talk, so that would 623 00:34:42,000 --> 00:34:46,680 Speaker 1: be an improvement. Look this picture. I was reading something 624 00:34:46,719 --> 00:34:50,120 Speaker 1: today that was comparing this, saying, this is the most 625 00:34:50,239 --> 00:34:53,880 Speaker 1: consequential image of a politician in a room full of 626 00:34:53,960 --> 00:34:57,920 Speaker 1: kids since George W. Bush was reading a children's story 627 00:34:57,920 --> 00:35:00,440 Speaker 1: to a room full of kids when they came in 628 00:35:00,480 --> 00:35:02,680 Speaker 1: and told him the news about nine to eleven about 629 00:35:02,680 --> 00:35:06,040 Speaker 1: the plane flying into the twin towers. And you know, 630 00:35:06,080 --> 00:35:09,800 Speaker 1: we all remember that that image and know that image, 631 00:35:09,800 --> 00:35:13,520 Speaker 1: and I think this one likewise, people will remember years 632 00:35:13,560 --> 00:35:17,279 Speaker 1: from now this is an image that will define the 633 00:35:17,400 --> 00:35:25,680 Speaker 1: double standards, the arrogance, the hypocrisy, and it speaks volumes. 634 00:35:25,680 --> 00:35:28,720 Speaker 1: I also thought it is notable, like the Washington Post 635 00:35:28,760 --> 00:35:37,400 Speaker 1: wrote a story about, you know, Republican outrage over Abrams 636 00:35:37,400 --> 00:35:41,160 Speaker 1: in the picture, and what's interesting is they didn't show 637 00:35:41,200 --> 00:35:43,200 Speaker 1: the picture. They had a picture of Stacy Abrams like 638 00:35:43,200 --> 00:35:46,480 Speaker 1: out on the campaign trail smiling. The Washington Post very 639 00:35:46,520 --> 00:35:49,000 Speaker 1: deliberately wouldn't show the picture because you actually don't need 640 00:35:49,040 --> 00:35:52,759 Speaker 1: any commentary. You just need to see the image, and 641 00:35:52,880 --> 00:35:56,040 Speaker 1: it tells you everything you need to know, including the 642 00:35:56,040 --> 00:35:59,080 Speaker 1: fact that if everyone in the picture, the person at 643 00:35:59,239 --> 00:36:04,239 Speaker 1: greatest from a serious illness of COVID was clearly Stacey Abrams. Yeah, 644 00:36:04,320 --> 00:36:07,160 Speaker 1: she's the one not wearing a mask. The little children. 645 00:36:08,440 --> 00:36:11,040 Speaker 1: The odds are overwhelming. If one of those kids got 646 00:36:11,120 --> 00:36:14,680 Speaker 1: COVID that there would be few, if any, symptoms, and 647 00:36:14,719 --> 00:36:20,400 Speaker 1: it would not be life threatening. But what it reveals 648 00:36:20,640 --> 00:36:25,440 Speaker 1: is that neither she nor the other Democratic politicians that 649 00:36:25,480 --> 00:36:28,799 Speaker 1: are insisting the kids be masks. They don't believe in 650 00:36:28,840 --> 00:36:32,240 Speaker 1: this stuff. No, they don't. It's worse than hypocrisy, isn't it. 651 00:36:31,960 --> 00:36:35,040 Speaker 1: It's it's elitism. They actually aren't just violating rules that 652 00:36:35,080 --> 00:36:37,680 Speaker 1: they think apply to themselves. They actually don't believe that 653 00:36:37,719 --> 00:36:40,000 Speaker 1: their own rules apply to themselves. And this has been 654 00:36:40,080 --> 00:36:43,440 Speaker 1: This is the reason the Washington Post isn't picturing or 655 00:36:43,480 --> 00:36:45,520 Speaker 1: showing this photograph is because they know it's not a 656 00:36:45,560 --> 00:36:48,560 Speaker 1: Republican or a Democrat issue anymore among voters, especially parents, 657 00:36:48,880 --> 00:36:51,200 Speaker 1: that parents across the aisle are outraged at how the 658 00:36:51,200 --> 00:36:54,719 Speaker 1: public health establishment has treated their children and continue to 659 00:36:54,719 --> 00:36:56,799 Speaker 1: treat their children in school. And that's where I want 660 00:36:56,840 --> 00:36:59,480 Speaker 1: to dive into this a little more nerdy, a little 661 00:36:59,520 --> 00:37:02,960 Speaker 1: more phyllisical aspect of as we've seen up close and 662 00:37:03,000 --> 00:37:05,920 Speaker 1: personal the last two years, how the public health establishment 663 00:37:07,200 --> 00:37:10,799 Speaker 1: holds so much power over the American public, how much 664 00:37:10,880 --> 00:37:15,719 Speaker 1: they influence politicians who issue dictates and mandates and lockdowns 665 00:37:15,719 --> 00:37:19,200 Speaker 1: and masks and vaccines and all of these, all of 666 00:37:19,239 --> 00:37:23,160 Speaker 1: these fairly invasive measures in the name of health, in 667 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:24,840 Speaker 1: the name of public health. And so I want to 668 00:37:24,840 --> 00:37:27,040 Speaker 1: talk to you tonight. I want to ask you, from 669 00:37:27,160 --> 00:37:31,920 Speaker 1: a philosophical perspective, what is the role or what should 670 00:37:32,000 --> 00:37:36,600 Speaker 1: be the role of the public health establishment in our country. Well, 671 00:37:36,880 --> 00:37:40,200 Speaker 1: it depends what qualifies for public health establishment and in 672 00:37:40,239 --> 00:37:44,360 Speaker 1: many ways that is functionally doctor Anthony Fauci, and and 673 00:37:44,719 --> 00:37:46,640 Speaker 1: he has become the face of it so much so 674 00:37:46,840 --> 00:37:51,360 Speaker 1: that that on TV he has said, I represent science. 675 00:37:52,239 --> 00:37:54,200 Speaker 1: You know, it reminds me of Scripture. In the beginning 676 00:37:54,320 --> 00:38:00,279 Speaker 1: was the word I mean? It is this hubers to 677 00:38:00,440 --> 00:38:05,080 Speaker 1: embody science with which Faucci. Look. Two years ago, Faucci 678 00:38:05,120 --> 00:38:11,759 Speaker 1: had a pretty good reputation, he was well respected. The arbitrariness, 679 00:38:11,880 --> 00:38:16,960 Speaker 1: the error against the attitude of infallibility, and the obvious 680 00:38:17,000 --> 00:38:22,520 Speaker 1: contradictions that have come from Fauci. I think you've done 681 00:38:22,719 --> 00:38:27,400 Speaker 1: massive and long term damage to the credibility of the CDC, 682 00:38:27,719 --> 00:38:32,040 Speaker 1: of the NIH, of the public health establishment. Listen, you 683 00:38:32,040 --> 00:38:34,840 Speaker 1: want to minimize the spread of disease, lock every person 684 00:38:34,880 --> 00:38:37,759 Speaker 1: on planet Earth in a dungeon and never let them out. 685 00:38:37,840 --> 00:38:40,279 Speaker 1: You will reduce the spread of disease. They're just or 686 00:38:40,360 --> 00:38:45,120 Speaker 1: other negative consequences, right. Well, that kind of get that 687 00:38:45,200 --> 00:38:47,600 Speaker 1: kind of gets to my questions. That's why I think 688 00:38:47,600 --> 00:38:49,719 Speaker 1: that we as a nation, especially the Republican Party and 689 00:38:49,719 --> 00:38:52,640 Speaker 1: the Conservative movement, need to analyze, We need to be 690 00:38:52,680 --> 00:38:55,319 Speaker 1: thoughtful about what the proper role of public health is. 691 00:38:55,320 --> 00:38:58,600 Speaker 1: When public health is defined as you I mean as 692 00:38:58,600 --> 00:39:01,400 Speaker 1: the promise that you laid out, as as Fauci, as 693 00:39:01,680 --> 00:39:04,960 Speaker 1: these government bureaucrats who weren't elected, they were appointed, who 694 00:39:04,960 --> 00:39:07,840 Speaker 1: have the highest salary of all federal employees, including the 695 00:39:07,880 --> 00:39:10,800 Speaker 1: President of the United States, And to me, it speaks 696 00:39:10,800 --> 00:39:13,520 Speaker 1: to the administrative state because we could, we could get 697 00:39:13,560 --> 00:39:15,920 Speaker 1: rid of Fauci, meaning President Biden could fire him, he 698 00:39:15,920 --> 00:39:17,600 Speaker 1: could resign. I mean, he's old, He's not going to 699 00:39:17,640 --> 00:39:20,280 Speaker 1: be in this position forever. You can replace one bureaucrat 700 00:39:20,520 --> 00:39:23,200 Speaker 1: with another bureaucrat. But as long as you have this system, 701 00:39:23,239 --> 00:39:27,400 Speaker 1: as we do of these executive agencies that Congress defers 702 00:39:27,560 --> 00:39:31,520 Speaker 1: rulemaking too, I don't see this problem, particularly now that 703 00:39:31,560 --> 00:39:34,360 Speaker 1: they have cemented how they want to handle pandemics or 704 00:39:34,360 --> 00:39:36,800 Speaker 1: public health. They know that they can wage this power 705 00:39:36,880 --> 00:39:38,719 Speaker 1: the way that they have. I don't see this going 706 00:39:38,719 --> 00:39:43,040 Speaker 1: away unless we address the administrative state specifically. Yeah, look, 707 00:39:43,040 --> 00:39:44,880 Speaker 1: I think it's a very good point. I think the 708 00:39:44,880 --> 00:39:48,840 Speaker 1: Trump administration made serious mistakes as COVID broke out, and 709 00:39:48,960 --> 00:39:52,600 Speaker 1: one of the mistakes was elevating Fauci and deferring to 710 00:39:52,680 --> 00:39:55,960 Speaker 1: him for far too long. The Trump administration should have 711 00:39:56,000 --> 00:40:00,560 Speaker 1: fired Fauci the way Fauci and the declared lord's a 712 00:40:00,600 --> 00:40:05,360 Speaker 1: public health treated is is that they were infallible. Yeah, 713 00:40:05,400 --> 00:40:08,400 Speaker 1: and they did it while being cynically political at the 714 00:40:08,440 --> 00:40:14,440 Speaker 1: same time. That combination is a really toxic brew. It is, 715 00:40:14,480 --> 00:40:16,720 Speaker 1: and especially because if there's a doctor in the private 716 00:40:16,760 --> 00:40:19,279 Speaker 1: sector who has a terrible opinion or gives you terrible 717 00:40:19,320 --> 00:40:21,560 Speaker 1: medical advice, you just you go somewhere else, you go 718 00:40:21,600 --> 00:40:23,440 Speaker 1: to a different practice, you go to a different provider, 719 00:40:23,800 --> 00:40:25,719 Speaker 1: and that doctor. I mean, it's a meritocracy, or it's 720 00:40:25,760 --> 00:40:27,759 Speaker 1: supposed to be, and that's not the case when it's 721 00:40:27,760 --> 00:40:30,680 Speaker 1: a government bureaucrat. Again, That's why, that's why I think 722 00:40:30,800 --> 00:40:34,880 Speaker 1: that when we're looking at the power of these bureaucrats 723 00:40:34,880 --> 00:40:37,000 Speaker 1: and federal agencies, we have to understand the history a 724 00:40:37,040 --> 00:40:40,719 Speaker 1: little bit. That this idea of the administrative state was introduced, 725 00:40:40,760 --> 00:40:44,360 Speaker 1: you know, at least theoretically by Woodrow Wilson. He thought 726 00:40:44,360 --> 00:40:47,319 Speaker 1: that there should be this this class of neutral bureaucrats 727 00:40:47,320 --> 00:40:49,640 Speaker 1: that ran our federal government. I personally don't believe that 728 00:40:49,680 --> 00:40:51,600 Speaker 1: there can be someone who is politically neutral. I think 729 00:40:51,600 --> 00:40:55,200 Speaker 1: everyone has an opinion. Then LBJ and FDR expanded this 730 00:40:55,239 --> 00:40:59,000 Speaker 1: administrative state. So now we have this bloated, this bloated apparatus, 731 00:40:59,040 --> 00:41:01,960 Speaker 1: which a lot of people called the deep state because 732 00:41:01,960 --> 00:41:04,960 Speaker 1: of all these politicos that work there that aren't accountable 733 00:41:04,960 --> 00:41:07,560 Speaker 1: to the voter. In my opinion, and I want your 734 00:41:07,600 --> 00:41:10,400 Speaker 1: take as a constitutional lawyer on this. In my opinion, 735 00:41:10,760 --> 00:41:14,040 Speaker 1: the advent of this, or what really caused this to 736 00:41:14,120 --> 00:41:16,960 Speaker 1: grow out of control, was when the Supreme Court stopped 737 00:41:16,960 --> 00:41:20,600 Speaker 1: applying the separation of powers doctrine. That, of course, was 738 00:41:20,640 --> 00:41:27,520 Speaker 1: when Congress would delegate their legislative authority to the executive agency. 739 00:41:27,920 --> 00:41:30,239 Speaker 1: The judicial brands used to not allow that, but then 740 00:41:30,320 --> 00:41:32,839 Speaker 1: they stopped and they did allow Congress, and now look 741 00:41:32,840 --> 00:41:35,160 Speaker 1: what we have. So i'd love to hear your take 742 00:41:35,160 --> 00:41:38,520 Speaker 1: on that and how we reverse that. So you're exactly right. 743 00:41:38,560 --> 00:41:41,360 Speaker 1: It got exacerbated by a decision from the Supreme Court 744 00:41:41,440 --> 00:41:43,839 Speaker 1: that was called the Chevron decision, where they created something 745 00:41:43,880 --> 00:41:49,040 Speaker 1: that's called Chevron deference, which the courts now will defer 746 00:41:49,200 --> 00:41:53,000 Speaker 1: to the judgment of an agency even if the statute, 747 00:41:53,040 --> 00:41:55,640 Speaker 1: even if the law doesn't require that outcome. If the 748 00:41:55,680 --> 00:41:58,799 Speaker 1: expert agency has an outcome, they will defer to it. 749 00:41:58,840 --> 00:42:02,160 Speaker 1: If there's any ambiguity in the statue. I think there 750 00:42:02,200 --> 00:42:03,880 Speaker 1: are a lot of folks and I would count myself 751 00:42:03,920 --> 00:42:06,040 Speaker 1: among them who think Chevron was a mistake, that it 752 00:42:06,120 --> 00:42:09,319 Speaker 1: contributed to the growth of the regulatory state. And you've 753 00:42:09,360 --> 00:42:11,680 Speaker 1: got a couple of things at play here. Number One, 754 00:42:12,880 --> 00:42:18,000 Speaker 1: elected politicians like to shift power to the executive branch 755 00:42:18,000 --> 00:42:21,360 Speaker 1: because they can avoid responsibility. They can pass a vague 756 00:42:21,360 --> 00:42:24,439 Speaker 1: in general law, and then when the agency does something bad, 757 00:42:24,480 --> 00:42:26,080 Speaker 1: they can say to their voters, Hey, it's not me 758 00:42:26,160 --> 00:42:28,319 Speaker 1: that did it. It's it's it's it's the EPA that 759 00:42:28,360 --> 00:42:30,840 Speaker 1: did it. It's it's it's the agency. It's OSHA that 760 00:42:30,920 --> 00:42:34,680 Speaker 1: did it. But secondly, there's a problem that we've seen 761 00:42:34,800 --> 00:42:38,680 Speaker 1: that's called regulatory capture. And this is a notion from economics, 762 00:42:38,719 --> 00:42:42,360 Speaker 1: where you have regulators that are regulating in particular industry 763 00:42:42,400 --> 00:42:45,719 Speaker 1: who become captured by it. They have a revolving door 764 00:42:45,800 --> 00:42:48,520 Speaker 1: where people come from the agency to the to the 765 00:42:48,680 --> 00:42:51,839 Speaker 1: private sector that they're regulating, and back again, and they 766 00:42:51,920 --> 00:42:56,839 Speaker 1: end up following the interests of the giant companies in 767 00:42:56,880 --> 00:43:00,239 Speaker 1: that industry. So you see it in the aviation world 768 00:43:00,280 --> 00:43:02,680 Speaker 1: with the FAA and a company like Boeing, and you 769 00:43:02,680 --> 00:43:04,640 Speaker 1: look at the seven thirty seven macs where there was 770 00:43:04,680 --> 00:43:09,080 Speaker 1: an instance the FAA was not remotely effective enough and 771 00:43:09,200 --> 00:43:12,239 Speaker 1: ensuring the safety of the seven thirty seven macs. With 772 00:43:12,280 --> 00:43:15,440 Speaker 1: respect to COVID. You look at the FDA and just 773 00:43:15,560 --> 00:43:18,600 Speaker 1: how in bad the FDA is With Big Pharma. I've 774 00:43:18,640 --> 00:43:22,120 Speaker 1: seen some data with ivermectin and hydroxy chloroquine that have 775 00:43:22,239 --> 00:43:27,080 Speaker 1: suggested good results, particularly in the developing world. But both 776 00:43:27,080 --> 00:43:30,000 Speaker 1: of those drugs are incredibly cheap. Both of those drugs 777 00:43:30,080 --> 00:43:34,279 Speaker 1: are you can get for pennies, whereas Big Pharma if 778 00:43:34,320 --> 00:43:38,160 Speaker 1: you look at the treatments they're pushing their thousands of dollars. 779 00:43:38,200 --> 00:43:41,200 Speaker 1: And I do think there is a real question of 780 00:43:41,280 --> 00:43:46,400 Speaker 1: agency capture. Why is it that the agency favors treatments 781 00:43:46,440 --> 00:43:49,440 Speaker 1: that cost thousands of dollars versus treatments that cost pennies, 782 00:43:50,960 --> 00:43:57,560 Speaker 1: And particularly in the weird politicized world where the fact 783 00:43:57,719 --> 00:44:02,160 Speaker 1: that Trump said hydroxychloric and good caused half the country 784 00:44:02,160 --> 00:44:04,279 Speaker 1: to say it must be bad if Trump likes it, 785 00:44:04,320 --> 00:44:06,759 Speaker 1: which is a really weird way to make medical or 786 00:44:06,800 --> 00:44:10,080 Speaker 1: scientific decisions. Yeah, so that's well, that's science if you're 787 00:44:10,120 --> 00:44:13,680 Speaker 1: defining science as doctor fauci here, So get a little bit, 788 00:44:13,760 --> 00:44:16,600 Speaker 1: get a little bit nerdier if you can on the 789 00:44:16,760 --> 00:44:22,040 Speaker 1: Chevron deference here, I don't understand, Senator, why so many 790 00:44:22,120 --> 00:44:24,279 Speaker 1: in the judiciary, and this is not just the Supreme Court, 791 00:44:24,360 --> 00:44:27,400 Speaker 1: this is this is all levels. Why there's such deference 792 00:44:27,480 --> 00:44:30,440 Speaker 1: to precedent for the sake of precedent when precedent is 793 00:44:30,480 --> 00:44:33,480 Speaker 1: so clearly unconstitutional. Now, you know, you and I have 794 00:44:33,520 --> 00:44:36,239 Speaker 1: talked about Dobbs versus Jackson Women's Health, we talked about 795 00:44:36,560 --> 00:44:38,720 Speaker 1: Roe v. Wade, We've talked about decisions that are obviously 796 00:44:38,840 --> 00:44:42,600 Speaker 1: unconstitutional that the left, there are judicial activists who actually 797 00:44:42,640 --> 00:44:47,000 Speaker 1: don't want to overturn a demonstrably wrong and unconstitutional decision 798 00:44:47,040 --> 00:44:50,879 Speaker 1: just because it's been quote unquote settled for decades. So 799 00:44:51,239 --> 00:44:54,319 Speaker 1: I don't understand that jurisprudence, if you want to call 800 00:44:54,360 --> 00:44:57,640 Speaker 1: it a jurisprudence. But how do we undo the Chevron 801 00:44:57,719 --> 00:45:01,279 Speaker 1: deference because it is incorrect and right Congress is never 802 00:45:01,320 --> 00:45:04,240 Speaker 1: gonna do anything about it because it makes their jobs easier, 803 00:45:04,440 --> 00:45:07,640 Speaker 1: not to be responsible for what they legislate. So there's 804 00:45:07,640 --> 00:45:11,200 Speaker 1: a doctrine courts follow that's called starry decisis that is 805 00:45:11,480 --> 00:45:16,040 Speaker 1: respect for precedent. It's following precedent and look stary decisis 806 00:45:16,040 --> 00:45:21,040 Speaker 1: makes sense and that you want predictability in a legal system. 807 00:45:21,840 --> 00:45:24,400 Speaker 1: You know, if you look at how laws are structured, 808 00:45:24,440 --> 00:45:29,840 Speaker 1: there's a tension between rules and standards. Rules are clear 809 00:45:29,960 --> 00:45:33,040 Speaker 1: bright lines where you know which side you fall on them. Now, 810 00:45:33,080 --> 00:45:35,880 Speaker 1: they have the advantage of predictability. They have the advantage 811 00:45:35,920 --> 00:45:42,319 Speaker 1: that xante beforehand, you can know where you will be afterwards. 812 00:45:43,280 --> 00:45:46,120 Speaker 1: The downside of clear bright line rules is sometimes that 813 00:45:46,160 --> 00:45:48,800 Speaker 1: are unfair. Sometimes a line where result in a particular 814 00:45:48,840 --> 00:45:51,759 Speaker 1: case where you say, well, gosh, that rule resulted in 815 00:45:51,760 --> 00:45:55,240 Speaker 1: an unfairness for this particular person because of some weird circumstances. 816 00:45:55,560 --> 00:45:59,399 Speaker 1: On the other hand, standards where things are flexible. They 817 00:45:59,480 --> 00:46:02,120 Speaker 1: can spawn to, oh, if it's unfair to do this here, 818 00:46:02,160 --> 00:46:03,560 Speaker 1: let's not do it here. If it's fair to do 819 00:46:03,600 --> 00:46:05,600 Speaker 1: it there, let's do it there, so you can respond 820 00:46:05,840 --> 00:46:09,799 Speaker 1: to the exigencies of the circumstance. But the problem with 821 00:46:09,880 --> 00:46:12,400 Speaker 1: standards is they're unpredictable. It's hard to predict on the 822 00:46:12,400 --> 00:46:17,120 Speaker 1: front end what the answer will be stared is scisis 823 00:46:17,520 --> 00:46:22,440 Speaker 1: is a structural rule that you want players in our society, 824 00:46:22,480 --> 00:46:25,920 Speaker 1: whether individuals, whether people looking at the civil law, where 825 00:46:25,920 --> 00:46:28,000 Speaker 1: the people looking at the criminal law where their companies 826 00:46:28,360 --> 00:46:31,120 Speaker 1: to be able to predict the outcome. And so if 827 00:46:31,200 --> 00:46:34,120 Speaker 1: you know, all right, there is this precedent, so the 828 00:46:34,160 --> 00:46:36,600 Speaker 1: courts will follow this precedent, then you could order your 829 00:46:36,600 --> 00:46:39,719 Speaker 1: behavior accordingly and say, okay, here's what the law is. 830 00:46:39,760 --> 00:46:41,640 Speaker 1: You can go to your lawyers ask what the law is, 831 00:46:41,680 --> 00:46:43,799 Speaker 1: and you can know what it is that that has 832 00:46:43,840 --> 00:46:46,520 Speaker 1: an advantage. You want stability. You don't want the law 833 00:46:47,440 --> 00:46:54,799 Speaker 1: changing willy nilly. But the scisis is not absolute. There 834 00:46:54,840 --> 00:46:57,759 Speaker 1: are times when precedents are wrong and precedents are overturned, 835 00:46:58,480 --> 00:47:02,759 Speaker 1: and the courts have laid out rules for when precedents 836 00:47:02,760 --> 00:47:06,080 Speaker 1: sho should be overturned, and the rules look to things 837 00:47:06,160 --> 00:47:11,840 Speaker 1: like have there been has the law been settled, have 838 00:47:11,960 --> 00:47:17,120 Speaker 1: people had reliance interest on it? Has the law proven administrable? 839 00:47:17,320 --> 00:47:19,680 Speaker 1: As it proven Sometimes there's a bad decision that just 840 00:47:20,000 --> 00:47:22,840 Speaker 1: produces chaos and the courts say, okay, this didn't work. 841 00:47:23,560 --> 00:47:29,000 Speaker 1: The courts also are more willing to follow starry descisis 842 00:47:29,120 --> 00:47:33,840 Speaker 1: for a statutory question than they are for a constitutional question. 843 00:47:33,960 --> 00:47:36,640 Speaker 1: Now why is that? Because a statutory question, which is 844 00:47:36,640 --> 00:47:39,359 Speaker 1: the interpretation of a federal law passed by Congress, sign 845 00:47:39,360 --> 00:47:42,120 Speaker 1: a law by the president. If the courts get it wrong, 846 00:47:42,880 --> 00:47:45,560 Speaker 1: Congress can change the statute, and it does that sometimes. 847 00:47:45,280 --> 00:47:47,799 Speaker 1: So if there's a statutory question, the courts get it wrong, 848 00:47:49,280 --> 00:47:51,640 Speaker 1: Congress has the ability to fix it. So there's a 849 00:47:51,800 --> 00:47:55,440 Speaker 1: higher protection for starry descisis in that instance because you 850 00:47:55,560 --> 00:47:58,040 Speaker 1: want the predictability even if the court got it wrong. 851 00:47:58,480 --> 00:48:04,560 Speaker 1: With respect to the Constitution, there's more of a view 852 00:48:04,719 --> 00:48:10,000 Speaker 1: that a constitutional decision, if it is wrong, can be revisited. So, 853 00:48:10,120 --> 00:48:15,880 Speaker 1: for example, the most famous overturning of a precedent was 854 00:48:15,920 --> 00:48:20,719 Speaker 1: Plessy versus Ferguson, which upheld separate but equal and upheld 855 00:48:20,760 --> 00:48:24,800 Speaker 1: the discrimination in schools, and Brown versus Board of Education 856 00:48:24,960 --> 00:48:29,080 Speaker 1: overturned Plessy. That was the right thing to do. That 857 00:48:30,160 --> 00:48:34,360 Speaker 1: Brown was the right decision. Plessy was wrong. During the 858 00:48:34,480 --> 00:48:37,560 Speaker 1: argument in Dobbs, you had the Supreme Court justices asking 859 00:48:37,719 --> 00:48:40,440 Speaker 1: the Council, well, okay, look here are all the decisions 860 00:48:40,480 --> 00:48:44,520 Speaker 1: we've overruled, and they listed some big ones. Why doesn't 861 00:48:44,600 --> 00:48:49,520 Speaker 1: Row meet that standard? But how willing a justice is 862 00:48:49,600 --> 00:48:52,879 Speaker 1: to overrule precedent? That varies justice by justice? I will say, 863 00:48:52,880 --> 00:48:55,560 Speaker 1: By the way, as a final point on this, the 864 00:48:55,680 --> 00:48:59,040 Speaker 1: liberals it's not that they're devoted to start descisists. They 865 00:48:59,040 --> 00:49:02,400 Speaker 1: don't believe in started to at all. They're devoted to 866 00:49:02,480 --> 00:49:05,440 Speaker 1: left wing outcomes yep. So they want star decisis to 867 00:49:05,440 --> 00:49:08,560 Speaker 1: be followed for left wing decisions. So Row versus Way 868 00:49:08,719 --> 00:49:11,799 Speaker 1: for them, star decisis is critically important because they support Row. 869 00:49:12,800 --> 00:49:15,120 Speaker 1: They don't want star decisis. When it comes to Heller, 870 00:49:15,200 --> 00:49:18,279 Speaker 1: which is the court's decision upholding the Second Amendment right 871 00:49:18,280 --> 00:49:20,879 Speaker 1: to keep in bear arms, the Liberals would immediately over 872 00:49:20,960 --> 00:49:24,040 Speaker 1: rule Heller. They don't want stary decisis. When it comes 873 00:49:24,080 --> 00:49:26,840 Speaker 1: to Citizens United, which protects our political speech and the 874 00:49:26,920 --> 00:49:30,960 Speaker 1: right to engage and and and criticize politicians. They disagree 875 00:49:31,000 --> 00:49:35,160 Speaker 1: with Citizens United, they would overturn it. So, particularly for 876 00:49:35,320 --> 00:49:39,600 Speaker 1: the left, when it comes to stary decisis, that is 877 00:49:40,040 --> 00:49:45,440 Speaker 1: usually an excuse for whatever policy outcome they want, because 878 00:49:45,440 --> 00:49:48,760 Speaker 1: the left views the courts as really very little different 879 00:49:48,840 --> 00:49:53,359 Speaker 1: from a super legislature enacting the policy they agree with. 880 00:49:53,880 --> 00:49:55,880 Speaker 1: Right and so we have to get to it. We 881 00:49:56,480 --> 00:49:58,080 Speaker 1: don't have to. We want to get to a really 882 00:49:58,080 --> 00:50:02,160 Speaker 1: funny question from the verdict usum subscribe or pool here 883 00:50:02,160 --> 00:50:03,520 Speaker 1: in just a second. But let me ask you a 884 00:50:03,600 --> 00:50:06,400 Speaker 1: very quick yes or no question. Is there a possibility 885 00:50:06,440 --> 00:50:09,200 Speaker 1: that Chevron deference, that Chevron could be overturned at the 886 00:50:09,239 --> 00:50:12,600 Speaker 1: Supreme Court level? So yes, I think there's a good possibility, 887 00:50:13,040 --> 00:50:15,520 Speaker 1: especially deal Gorse, which has been quite critical of chevron 888 00:50:15,880 --> 00:50:17,880 Speaker 1: a deference, and it's it's a doctrine that has come 889 00:50:17,960 --> 00:50:19,960 Speaker 1: under more and more criticism. I think I think there's 890 00:50:19,960 --> 00:50:23,080 Speaker 1: a real possibility Chevron's overturn because the Left, as they 891 00:50:23,120 --> 00:50:27,280 Speaker 1: have the past decade, has overshots. They've overshot on their abuse, 892 00:50:27,320 --> 00:50:29,680 Speaker 1: and the American people want to reject it. Okay, this 893 00:50:29,760 --> 00:50:31,759 Speaker 1: is a really funny question. I saw this one. It's 894 00:50:31,800 --> 00:50:33,640 Speaker 1: not a it's not a policy question at all. This 895 00:50:33,719 --> 00:50:37,040 Speaker 1: is from Paul on the Verdict plus Community. Paul says, 896 00:50:37,400 --> 00:50:40,680 Speaker 1: is Ted short for Theodore, is Liz short for Elizabeth? 897 00:50:40,680 --> 00:50:45,000 Speaker 1: And is Michael short from Michael Angelo. Ooh, I like that, 898 00:50:46,600 --> 00:50:48,680 Speaker 1: So I'll address my piece of it at least. So 899 00:50:48,719 --> 00:50:52,919 Speaker 1: Ted is actually not short for theater Theodore. My full 900 00:50:53,000 --> 00:50:55,839 Speaker 1: name is Raphael Edward Cruz. Raphael is after my father, 901 00:50:55,960 --> 00:50:59,960 Speaker 1: RAPHAELBM and Evil Cruz, who's Cuban. My mental name Edward. 902 00:51:00,120 --> 00:51:03,000 Speaker 1: It is after my grandfather, my mother's father, who was 903 00:51:03,120 --> 00:51:07,360 Speaker 1: Edward Dara. So sometimes people refer to me as Eduardo. No, 904 00:51:07,560 --> 00:51:10,200 Speaker 1: he was Irish and Italian. He was not. Actually he 905 00:51:10,280 --> 00:51:14,200 Speaker 1: was Irish. My grandmother's Irish and Italian. Um it was 906 00:51:14,360 --> 00:51:16,319 Speaker 1: Edward and Ted is a nickname for Edward, and so 907 00:51:16,400 --> 00:51:18,759 Speaker 1: that's that's where Ted comes from. And Liz is short 908 00:51:18,800 --> 00:51:21,000 Speaker 1: for Elizabeth. I will answer on behalf of Michael and 909 00:51:21,040 --> 00:51:22,919 Speaker 1: say that it's not short for my clangel. It's short 910 00:51:22,960 --> 00:51:27,600 Speaker 1: for Saint Michael. Kidding, obviously kidding. This actually will be 911 00:51:27,600 --> 00:51:29,680 Speaker 1: a test to see if Michael does watch this series, 912 00:51:29,719 --> 00:51:31,560 Speaker 1: because if he does, you know whole comment on it. 913 00:51:31,960 --> 00:51:34,799 Speaker 1: If you are not already a subscriber over on Verdict Plus, 914 00:51:34,800 --> 00:51:37,480 Speaker 1: please join us at Verdict with Ted Cruise dot com 915 00:51:37,520 --> 00:51:39,319 Speaker 1: Slash Plus. I have a promo code for you. The 916 00:51:39,360 --> 00:51:42,120 Speaker 1: promo code is, of course, Cloakroom. If you use this 917 00:51:42,160 --> 00:51:44,120 Speaker 1: promo code, you will get one month free on your 918 00:51:44,160 --> 00:51:46,759 Speaker 1: annual subscription. So go to Verdict with Ted Cruise dot 919 00:51:46,760 --> 00:51:51,760 Speaker 1: com Slash Plus and use promo code Cloakroom. I'm Liz Wheeler. 920 00:51:51,920 --> 00:52:03,080 Speaker 1: This is the Cloakroom on Verdict Plus. This episode of 921 00:52:03,239 --> 00:52:06,200 Speaker 1: Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought to you by Jobs, 922 00:52:06,239 --> 00:52:10,000 Speaker 1: Freedom and Security Pack, a political action committee dedicated to 923 00:52:10,040 --> 00:52:14,759 Speaker 1: supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates across the country. In 924 00:52:14,800 --> 00:52:18,160 Speaker 1: twenty twenty two, Jobs, Freedom, and Security Pack plans to 925 00:52:18,200 --> 00:52:21,480 Speaker 1: donate to conservative candidates running for Congress and help the 926 00:52:21,560 --> 00:52:23,720 Speaker 1: Republican Party across the nation.