1 00:00:00,600 --> 00:00:04,680 Speaker 1: Please welcome the former US Secretary of State Hillary Rodham 2 00:00:04,680 --> 00:00:08,320 Speaker 1: Clinton and Bloomberg editor in chief John Nicholswaite. 3 00:00:09,000 --> 00:00:10,200 Speaker 2: Thank you so much. 4 00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:14,080 Speaker 3: Throughout this whole event, and indeed throughout my travels in 5 00:00:14,120 --> 00:00:17,239 Speaker 3: Asia over the past ten days, there has been a 6 00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:22,640 Speaker 3: consistent demand, i think, for an authoritative American voice and 7 00:00:22,680 --> 00:00:25,560 Speaker 3: for a sort of vision of how the world might look. 8 00:00:26,360 --> 00:00:30,800 Speaker 3: I'm delighted to say that we are very lucky to 9 00:00:30,840 --> 00:00:33,760 Speaker 3: have former Sectory of State, former Senator, former many things, 10 00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:35,839 Speaker 3: Hillary Roger Clinton with us. 11 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:37,400 Speaker 2: Thank you very much for being here. 12 00:00:41,440 --> 00:00:43,320 Speaker 3: You are, in my experience, the first person to get 13 00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:46,040 Speaker 3: a round of applause before you've even begun at this forum. 14 00:00:46,080 --> 00:00:47,479 Speaker 2: So you are You're already ahead. 15 00:00:47,600 --> 00:00:50,519 Speaker 3: And I should point out you have nobly come at 16 00:00:50,520 --> 00:00:53,440 Speaker 3: a fairly late time in New York, and our idea 17 00:00:53,640 --> 00:00:56,280 Speaker 3: was to do a tour door reason and begin in 18 00:00:56,360 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 3: Asia and gradually head west towards America. 19 00:01:00,920 --> 00:01:01,800 Speaker 2: A sector of state. 20 00:01:02,400 --> 00:01:06,039 Speaker 3: You talked about economic state craft and the importance of 21 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:10,960 Speaker 3: binding together national security with economic policy, and the message 22 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:14,920 Speaker 3: you get here repeatedly is that that message has gone. 23 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:18,840 Speaker 3: There was a time when America come here and talk 24 00:01:18,880 --> 00:01:22,479 Speaker 3: about trade policy. Now when countries around here talk about trade, 25 00:01:22,840 --> 00:01:25,280 Speaker 3: they tend to get pushed away. Do you think that 26 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:30,040 Speaker 3: idea of economic statecraft, particularly in Asia is missing nowadays? 27 00:01:30,880 --> 00:01:36,760 Speaker 1: Well, John, thank you for that question, because I think 28 00:01:36,760 --> 00:01:40,760 Speaker 1: it's a complicated one now. I think there's always room, 29 00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:45,039 Speaker 1: in fact, there's a necessity for economic state craft, but 30 00:01:45,440 --> 00:01:48,000 Speaker 1: the definition of what we mean by that and how 31 00:01:48,000 --> 00:01:53,240 Speaker 1: it's practiced certainly has changed in the last ten to 32 00:01:53,320 --> 00:01:55,960 Speaker 1: fifteen years since I first started using it. 33 00:01:57,120 --> 00:02:01,240 Speaker 4: Because you're absolutely right, post COVID, post. 34 00:02:01,080 --> 00:02:08,240 Speaker 1: The challenges with supply chains, post one now two wars 35 00:02:08,320 --> 00:02:13,400 Speaker 1: that are challenging the global order. What do we mean 36 00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:16,119 Speaker 1: by economic state craft? Well, I think it does mean 37 00:02:16,160 --> 00:02:23,680 Speaker 1: to continue, through diplomacy in any way appropriate to find 38 00:02:24,800 --> 00:02:34,160 Speaker 1: economic connections, networks, agreements that will enable countries to cooperate peacefully, 39 00:02:35,160 --> 00:02:39,960 Speaker 1: to enhance their own economic positions, to find a way 40 00:02:40,120 --> 00:02:43,520 Speaker 1: to satisfy the needs of their own citizens, and to 41 00:02:43,720 --> 00:02:50,320 Speaker 1: add to the global economic output. And it is very 42 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:54,680 Speaker 1: different today than it was. And I think whether we're 43 00:02:54,720 --> 00:03:00,320 Speaker 1: talking about how we create economic state craft around moving 44 00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:03,960 Speaker 1: toward a clean energy system, or we look for ways 45 00:03:04,120 --> 00:03:12,960 Speaker 1: to create more connectivity, both through actual trade and through 46 00:03:13,040 --> 00:03:17,480 Speaker 1: the kind of cooperation that countries need to engage in. 47 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:22,080 Speaker 1: The definition is changing, but the necessity for us to 48 00:03:22,320 --> 00:03:24,959 Speaker 1: practice economic state craft remains. 49 00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:27,240 Speaker 2: I just push you on that a bit. 50 00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:32,160 Speaker 3: If you visit any country here, Indonesia, even Singapore or Malaysia, 51 00:03:32,280 --> 00:03:35,200 Speaker 3: all these places, they will all say the same thing. 52 00:03:35,280 --> 00:03:38,680 Speaker 3: What they want with America is a trade deal. When 53 00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:42,360 Speaker 3: they deal with China, they get a whole menu of 54 00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:46,120 Speaker 3: economic possibilities. With America, they really want some kind of 55 00:03:46,240 --> 00:03:47,480 Speaker 3: formal trade alliance. 56 00:03:47,880 --> 00:03:52,240 Speaker 2: But that seems to have gone. Is you saddened by that? Well? 57 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:52,560 Speaker 4: I am. 58 00:03:52,720 --> 00:03:56,840 Speaker 1: I do think that it would be beneficial to the 59 00:03:56,920 --> 00:03:59,840 Speaker 1: United States as well as to the countries you named 60 00:04:00,080 --> 00:04:06,720 Speaker 1: many others, if we could define trade agreements for the 61 00:04:06,720 --> 00:04:10,760 Speaker 1: age in which we find ourselves. That has to take 62 00:04:10,840 --> 00:04:14,520 Speaker 1: into account, particularly in the United States, some of the 63 00:04:14,680 --> 00:04:21,599 Speaker 1: concerns that citizens and businesses, workers unions all have about 64 00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:25,440 Speaker 1: whether trade agreements will really benefit them. We have to 65 00:04:25,480 --> 00:04:28,880 Speaker 1: take into account with many other countries, what really is 66 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:31,960 Speaker 1: the openness on the other side of the agreement. How 67 00:04:32,880 --> 00:04:39,360 Speaker 1: willing will countries be to open their markets to American businesses. 68 00:04:39,400 --> 00:04:43,159 Speaker 1: So I think we need a new era of realistic 69 00:04:43,640 --> 00:04:46,240 Speaker 1: trade agreements that take into account where we are in 70 00:04:46,279 --> 00:04:50,040 Speaker 1: the world today, that understand we have new stresses and pressures, 71 00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:54,320 Speaker 1: and that can make a case, particularly in you know, 72 00:04:54,440 --> 00:04:59,040 Speaker 1: complicated societies like Indonesia, like the United States, that any 73 00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:03,480 Speaker 1: agreement is to benefit not just a very few large 74 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:08,359 Speaker 1: businesses primarily multinational ones, but we'll get into medium sized 75 00:05:08,400 --> 00:05:12,680 Speaker 1: and small businesses, will benefit consumers and workers. We ought 76 00:05:12,680 --> 00:05:15,920 Speaker 1: to be able to make that case, but historically those 77 00:05:16,160 --> 00:05:19,360 Speaker 1: have not been high priorities for many trade agreements. And 78 00:05:19,440 --> 00:05:23,400 Speaker 1: one of the things that happened with the TPP is 79 00:05:23,440 --> 00:05:28,680 Speaker 1: that it did not adequately explain what the benefits would 80 00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:33,839 Speaker 1: be beyond a very relatively small set of sectors and 81 00:05:33,960 --> 00:05:37,440 Speaker 1: businesses within those sectors. So it's up to leaders, both 82 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:40,479 Speaker 1: government and business leaders to make a better case, and 83 00:05:40,560 --> 00:05:43,320 Speaker 1: I think we could do that, but it means adding 84 00:05:43,320 --> 00:05:46,719 Speaker 1: that to the big agenda that many people are already facing. 85 00:05:47,480 --> 00:05:49,800 Speaker 1: And so we have to make a special effort to 86 00:05:49,880 --> 00:05:53,880 Speaker 1: try to begin once again to talk about trade agreements, 87 00:05:54,120 --> 00:05:56,960 Speaker 1: but with an eye from the beginning to make the 88 00:05:57,120 --> 00:06:00,680 Speaker 1: case for those trade agreements, not negotiate behind closed doors, 89 00:06:01,120 --> 00:06:04,520 Speaker 1: then come out and then have people express their disappointments 90 00:06:04,520 --> 00:06:05,200 Speaker 1: and opposition. 91 00:06:07,160 --> 00:06:08,280 Speaker 2: You talked about realism. 92 00:06:08,360 --> 00:06:11,920 Speaker 3: We now have the meeting between President g and Joe 93 00:06:11,960 --> 00:06:14,800 Speaker 3: Biden next week in San Francisco. There was a nice 94 00:06:14,839 --> 00:06:18,440 Speaker 3: line from the Singaporean for a minister here where he said, yes, 95 00:06:18,560 --> 00:06:20,640 Speaker 3: the weather might get a bit better, we might have 96 00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:24,040 Speaker 3: a deal on fentanyl, but the climate generally is getting 97 00:06:24,040 --> 00:06:27,159 Speaker 3: worse between the US and China. Again, I think people 98 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:29,720 Speaker 3: would say it was better when you were around. Is 99 00:06:29,760 --> 00:06:34,040 Speaker 3: there a is there any sign of things getting better 100 00:06:34,120 --> 00:06:35,359 Speaker 3: or are they just going to get worse for a 101 00:06:35,360 --> 00:06:37,720 Speaker 3: while and then maybe stabilize. 102 00:06:38,080 --> 00:06:41,280 Speaker 1: Well, I'm hoping that more comes out of the meeting. 103 00:06:41,760 --> 00:06:47,000 Speaker 1: It certainly is a confidence building opportunity. There hasn't been 104 00:06:48,200 --> 00:06:52,560 Speaker 1: as much interaction until relatively recently between the Chinese and 105 00:06:52,560 --> 00:06:57,400 Speaker 1: the United States governments. There has been a real chill 106 00:06:58,520 --> 00:07:03,240 Speaker 1: coming from China about out businesses, American businesses, other businesses 107 00:07:03,240 --> 00:07:08,160 Speaker 1: inside China. And then there are of course political pressures 108 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:13,640 Speaker 1: against China within our own political system. So this meeting 109 00:07:13,880 --> 00:07:17,920 Speaker 1: is a terrific opportunity to try to reset the table, 110 00:07:18,000 --> 00:07:21,200 Speaker 1: so to speak, to try to create some opening, but 111 00:07:21,280 --> 00:07:23,280 Speaker 1: it has to be followed up on with a lot 112 00:07:23,360 --> 00:07:27,640 Speaker 1: more interactions. I was very pleased that Secretaries Yellen and 113 00:07:27,760 --> 00:07:31,840 Speaker 1: Raymondo and others have been going to China in recent weeks. 114 00:07:32,680 --> 00:07:36,520 Speaker 1: Nothing substitutes for the effort being made to have those 115 00:07:36,640 --> 00:07:41,680 Speaker 1: kinds of, you know, meetings about strategic and economic concerns. 116 00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:45,520 Speaker 1: I think a lot of what happens in the future 117 00:07:46,640 --> 00:07:50,880 Speaker 1: really depends upon what Chijin Ping's goals are. 118 00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:51,680 Speaker 2: You know. 119 00:07:51,760 --> 00:07:55,119 Speaker 1: Part of the reason it was you know, somewhat more 120 00:07:56,440 --> 00:07:59,400 Speaker 1: positive when I was there and we had a very 121 00:07:59,840 --> 00:08:05,280 Speaker 1: regular set of meetings is because Hu Jintao was a 122 00:08:05,440 --> 00:08:09,680 Speaker 1: Chinese leader who decided he would not stay for life. 123 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:14,880 Speaker 1: He would fulfill his term, he would follow the guidance 124 00:08:14,960 --> 00:08:18,240 Speaker 1: of the Chinese Communist Party. There would be a transition 125 00:08:19,240 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 1: a new group of leaders, you know, some holdovers, but 126 00:08:22,600 --> 00:08:27,280 Speaker 1: you know, other new phases would be in power, and 127 00:08:27,360 --> 00:08:30,560 Speaker 1: so there could be a constant renewing of both the 128 00:08:30,640 --> 00:08:36,400 Speaker 1: Chinese government and through that, the American relationship. Once Hijinping 129 00:08:36,559 --> 00:08:41,080 Speaker 1: decided to stay in office for life, that creates a 130 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:45,560 Speaker 1: lot of you know, challenges within their own system, and 131 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:48,439 Speaker 1: I think we're seeing some of that with the removal 132 00:08:48,600 --> 00:08:52,760 Speaker 1: of top officials, some of the economic problems in the 133 00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:56,600 Speaker 1: Chinese economy. But it also creates a kind of chilling 134 00:08:56,640 --> 00:08:59,560 Speaker 1: effect in terms of relations. I mean, how do you 135 00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 1: deal with somebody who's not going to be held accountable, 136 00:09:02,160 --> 00:09:04,720 Speaker 1: you know, I mean their system of accountability was certainly 137 00:09:04,720 --> 00:09:08,480 Speaker 1: different from ours, but it existed and now it doesn't. 138 00:09:08,640 --> 00:09:11,760 Speaker 1: And so part of what I hope will come out 139 00:09:11,800 --> 00:09:17,679 Speaker 1: of this meeting is an attitude by President she that 140 00:09:18,400 --> 00:09:20,120 Speaker 1: you know, he wants to get back to some kind 141 00:09:20,160 --> 00:09:24,640 Speaker 1: of regular order, that he sees it in China's interest 142 00:09:24,760 --> 00:09:30,920 Speaker 1: to really dig in with the President Biden, develop a 143 00:09:32,240 --> 00:09:37,720 Speaker 1: platform for discussions, for problem solving, look for ways to 144 00:09:37,800 --> 00:09:40,680 Speaker 1: cooperate on whether it's you know, climate change or other 145 00:09:40,760 --> 00:09:44,520 Speaker 1: matters that may be of mutual interest to us. Really 146 00:09:44,679 --> 00:09:47,360 Speaker 1: sending that signal, I think he will find a receptive 147 00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:50,439 Speaker 1: partner with President Biden if that's available. 148 00:09:52,040 --> 00:09:53,600 Speaker 2: That's a very interesting perspective. 149 00:09:53,640 --> 00:09:56,160 Speaker 3: I'm going to push you, rush you slightly towards the 150 00:09:56,160 --> 00:09:59,000 Speaker 3: Middle East, which I've seen you've been talking about this week, 151 00:09:59,360 --> 00:10:02,160 Speaker 3: Israel and h I think you are in favor of 152 00:10:02,160 --> 00:10:06,240 Speaker 3: a humanitarian pause or pauses, but you're against the cease fire, 153 00:10:06,320 --> 00:10:10,480 Speaker 3: which many people in this region asking for. You know, 154 00:10:10,520 --> 00:10:14,960 Speaker 3: the numbers of dead arising rapidly, ten thousand according to 155 00:10:14,960 --> 00:10:18,520 Speaker 3: Hamas Italy. But you still got like eighty nine dead 156 00:10:18,559 --> 00:10:21,880 Speaker 3: at the UN which is a gigantic number for United Nations, 157 00:10:22,240 --> 00:10:25,120 Speaker 3: the Red Crescent and so on. Could you perhaps explain 158 00:10:25,160 --> 00:10:27,040 Speaker 3: why you don't want. 159 00:10:26,840 --> 00:10:28,559 Speaker 2: To cease fi well. 160 00:10:28,600 --> 00:10:33,240 Speaker 1: I think there is a difference between a ceasefire which 161 00:10:33,280 --> 00:10:40,600 Speaker 1: would in effect freeze the situation in Hamas's favor. I 162 00:10:40,720 --> 00:10:44,160 Speaker 1: negotiated a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in November of 163 00:10:44,200 --> 00:10:48,600 Speaker 1: twenty twelve, and at that point both parties did not 164 00:10:48,720 --> 00:10:53,959 Speaker 1: want to go any further. The breaching of a pre 165 00:10:54,080 --> 00:10:58,679 Speaker 1: existing ceasefire by Hamas with rockets being sent into Israel 166 00:10:58,960 --> 00:11:01,760 Speaker 1: had not caused a lot of damage. There had not 167 00:11:01,920 --> 00:11:05,400 Speaker 1: been the horrific massacre that we saw on October seventh, 168 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:08,959 Speaker 1: and there also had not been the development of the 169 00:11:09,000 --> 00:11:14,280 Speaker 1: infrastructure of terror that Hamas has built in Gaza. I 170 00:11:14,280 --> 00:11:18,200 Speaker 1: don't know any nation represented at the New Economy Forum 171 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:23,160 Speaker 1: faced with the kind of assault that Israel was faced 172 00:11:23,240 --> 00:11:27,320 Speaker 1: with by Hamas that would not be number one defending 173 00:11:27,360 --> 00:11:32,040 Speaker 1: itself and number two trying to prevent it from happening again, 174 00:11:32,200 --> 00:11:34,880 Speaker 1: because with every other cease fire it did happen again 175 00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:38,239 Speaker 1: until Finally we got to the breach of a ceasefire 176 00:11:38,280 --> 00:11:43,160 Speaker 1: which was in existence on October seventh with the terrible 177 00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:47,880 Speaker 1: attack by Hamas. So a ceasefire if it were possible, 178 00:11:47,920 --> 00:11:50,400 Speaker 1: which frankly, I don't think is possible. I don't think 179 00:11:50,840 --> 00:11:55,320 Speaker 1: you know, Israel is interested in a ceasefire at this point, 180 00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:58,600 Speaker 1: but they are perhaps willing to have what we do 181 00:11:58,679 --> 00:12:02,640 Speaker 1: call humanitarian pause is for the purpose of both getting 182 00:12:02,720 --> 00:12:06,559 Speaker 1: aid in to try to assist the civilians in Gaza, 183 00:12:06,600 --> 00:12:08,720 Speaker 1: but also getting the more than two hundred and forty 184 00:12:08,760 --> 00:12:12,000 Speaker 1: hostages out. You know, these hostages are not just Israeli. 185 00:12:12,040 --> 00:12:14,760 Speaker 1: One of the biggest groups of hostages are workers from 186 00:12:14,800 --> 00:12:18,600 Speaker 1: Thailand who are working on farms in Israel. So there 187 00:12:18,720 --> 00:12:21,840 Speaker 1: is a global dimension to the hostages that a pause 188 00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 1: could perhaps inspire some willingness on the part of Hamas 189 00:12:27,320 --> 00:12:30,680 Speaker 1: to let the hostages go. But a ceasefire that would 190 00:12:30,720 --> 00:12:35,040 Speaker 1: freeze the situation at this point is not something that 191 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:41,360 Speaker 1: is going to, you know, really undermine Hamas's capacity, especially 192 00:12:41,440 --> 00:12:44,280 Speaker 1: with two hundred miles of tunnels that they have constructed 193 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:48,040 Speaker 1: over the last decade, to launch yet another attack on Israel, 194 00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:49,760 Speaker 1: and that would be intolerable and I think it would 195 00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:54,240 Speaker 1: be intolerable for you know, any nation represented at the forum. 196 00:12:55,080 --> 00:12:57,200 Speaker 3: This seemed to be kind of two big theories going 197 00:12:57,240 --> 00:12:59,640 Speaker 3: on about this war. One is that this is the 198 00:12:59,760 --> 00:13:00,640 Speaker 3: end of. 199 00:13:00,440 --> 00:13:01,320 Speaker 2: The peace process. 200 00:13:01,400 --> 00:13:03,760 Speaker 3: The other, which you've championed, the other is that this 201 00:13:03,880 --> 00:13:07,280 Speaker 3: is if nothing else, this will prompt finally some. 202 00:13:07,200 --> 00:13:11,440 Speaker 2: Move towards the two state solution. Which side of that 203 00:13:11,559 --> 00:13:12,320 Speaker 2: do you fit on? 204 00:13:12,800 --> 00:13:14,840 Speaker 1: Well, I actually try to fit on both, and I'll 205 00:13:14,840 --> 00:13:20,640 Speaker 1: tell you John, I think it's important to have some aspiration, 206 00:13:21,000 --> 00:13:24,320 Speaker 1: some goal that we can look toward. Many of us, 207 00:13:24,600 --> 00:13:27,720 Speaker 1: my husband particularly, worked very hard on trying to get 208 00:13:27,760 --> 00:13:31,439 Speaker 1: a two state solution, and it, frankly, in retrospect, is 209 00:13:31,520 --> 00:13:36,520 Speaker 1: heartbreaking that Yasser Arafat walked away from the deal that 210 00:13:36,559 --> 00:13:40,680 Speaker 1: Bill had broker between Israel and the Palestinian authority back 211 00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:44,600 Speaker 1: in two thousand. There could have been a Palestinian state 212 00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:48,520 Speaker 1: up to ninety seven percent of the land from the 213 00:13:48,600 --> 00:13:52,679 Speaker 1: nineteen forty eight division that would have been in existence 214 00:13:52,720 --> 00:13:55,480 Speaker 1: for twenty three years now. So I think you have 215 00:13:55,600 --> 00:14:00,000 Speaker 1: to create the environment in which there is a chance 216 00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:05,520 Speaker 1: to revitalize the peace process and a potential for a 217 00:14:05,559 --> 00:14:09,120 Speaker 1: two state solution. Hamas is not interested in a two 218 00:14:09,120 --> 00:14:12,160 Speaker 1: state solution. They are dedicated to the destruction of Israel. 219 00:14:12,200 --> 00:14:15,640 Speaker 1: That is in their charter. If you've been watching lots 220 00:14:15,679 --> 00:14:18,480 Speaker 1: of different outlets over the last month, that is what 221 00:14:18,520 --> 00:14:21,000 Speaker 1: the leaders of Hamas say. You know, they want to 222 00:14:21,080 --> 00:14:22,200 Speaker 1: destroy Israel. 223 00:14:22,640 --> 00:14:24,400 Speaker 4: So Hamas is not. 224 00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:27,800 Speaker 1: A partner for any kind of peace or two state solution, 225 00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:32,400 Speaker 1: but the Palestinian authority might one time again be. New 226 00:14:32,480 --> 00:14:36,640 Speaker 1: leadership in Gaza might again be So we have to 227 00:14:36,680 --> 00:14:39,840 Speaker 1: get to a point where that's possible very quickly. 228 00:14:39,880 --> 00:14:43,360 Speaker 3: Do you think that Benuine nasignone who is a partner 229 00:14:43,360 --> 00:14:44,440 Speaker 3: for a two state solution. 230 00:14:45,520 --> 00:14:47,600 Speaker 1: I don't think there is any evidence of that. I 231 00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:51,880 Speaker 1: think the Israeli people will have to decide about his leadership. 232 00:14:51,920 --> 00:14:55,120 Speaker 1: I think there will be investigations about what led up 233 00:14:55,160 --> 00:14:57,880 Speaker 1: to and what happened on October the seventh. But I 234 00:14:57,960 --> 00:15:01,200 Speaker 1: think there needs to be new leadership of the Israelis 235 00:15:01,240 --> 00:15:05,080 Speaker 1: and the Palestinians in order to have any chance at 236 00:15:05,080 --> 00:15:09,160 Speaker 1: some kind of peace deal, especially a two state solution. 237 00:15:10,840 --> 00:15:15,120 Speaker 3: Can I jump a little bit more optimistically towards Europe. 238 00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:19,240 Speaker 3: You've had a series of recent results in Europe. You've 239 00:15:19,240 --> 00:15:23,080 Speaker 3: had in Greece, in Poland, You've had people I suspect 240 00:15:23,120 --> 00:15:26,440 Speaker 3: you would support winning in Britain you're heading towards election 241 00:15:26,640 --> 00:15:29,600 Speaker 3: the place which went through Brexit, Boris and this trust. 242 00:15:29,760 --> 00:15:33,400 Speaker 3: We now have two rather boring men, but they are 243 00:15:34,040 --> 00:15:37,880 Speaker 3: nevertheless within the general field of what people would regard 244 00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:42,400 Speaker 3: as compatible, competitive, normal politics. Do you think there is 245 00:15:42,400 --> 00:15:44,280 Speaker 3: a sign of politics changing at all? 246 00:15:44,960 --> 00:15:45,800 Speaker 4: I certainly hope. 247 00:15:45,840 --> 00:15:48,760 Speaker 1: So I want to make boring popular again, you know, 248 00:15:48,880 --> 00:15:50,840 Speaker 1: I want to get back to people who get up 249 00:15:50,880 --> 00:15:54,520 Speaker 1: every day and do the job. Don't think that they 250 00:15:54,560 --> 00:15:58,880 Speaker 1: are entertainers and performers who need to be outrageous and 251 00:15:59,600 --> 00:16:02,680 Speaker 1: get a lot of attention on social media. So I 252 00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 1: you know, I'm for the I'm. 253 00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:05,440 Speaker 4: For the boring. 254 00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:09,360 Speaker 1: You know, public servants and government leaders right. 255 00:16:09,240 --> 00:16:14,520 Speaker 3: Now bring back boring on that subject. In your own country, 256 00:16:14,560 --> 00:16:18,040 Speaker 3: that there is been something of a split from the 257 00:16:18,080 --> 00:16:20,600 Speaker 3: point of the Democrats. You have had the big success 258 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:23,600 Speaker 3: in terms of some of the state elections this week, 259 00:16:23,720 --> 00:16:27,720 Speaker 3: with abortion particularly seeming to help Democratic side, but you've 260 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:31,440 Speaker 3: got some pretty bad polls from the battleground states. I 261 00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:33,400 Speaker 3: think you've come out already saying that Joe Biden is 262 00:16:33,400 --> 00:16:35,080 Speaker 3: still the answer. But do you do you want to 263 00:16:35,840 --> 00:16:37,200 Speaker 3: explain that to people here. 264 00:16:37,680 --> 00:16:41,040 Speaker 1: Well, first of all, I'm not a fan of polling 265 00:16:41,560 --> 00:16:44,520 Speaker 1: a year out from an election. I think, to go 266 00:16:44,600 --> 00:16:46,720 Speaker 1: back to what we were just talking about, you know, 267 00:16:46,760 --> 00:16:49,760 Speaker 1: there's a tendency among voters, and particularly I would say, 268 00:16:49,800 --> 00:16:52,960 Speaker 1: among Democratic voters in the United States, to always be 269 00:16:53,040 --> 00:16:55,960 Speaker 1: looking for, you know, the next cool thing, who's the 270 00:16:56,280 --> 00:16:59,840 Speaker 1: you know, the really exciting candidate that we're going to have, 271 00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:04,560 Speaker 1: And so there's a lot of churn about what we 272 00:17:04,680 --> 00:17:07,520 Speaker 1: really are going to look for and end up with. 273 00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:10,480 Speaker 1: But I believe Joe Biden will be the nominee. I 274 00:17:10,560 --> 00:17:15,000 Speaker 1: believe he will be re elected. I believe that both 275 00:17:15,040 --> 00:17:18,119 Speaker 1: on the merits of his record, which is quite remarkable 276 00:17:18,240 --> 00:17:22,560 Speaker 1: given the difficult political environment in our country, but also 277 00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:26,800 Speaker 1: because of the alternative. It still looks likely that Donald 278 00:17:26,840 --> 00:17:29,400 Speaker 1: Trump will be the Republican nominee. I know that's hard 279 00:17:29,440 --> 00:17:32,639 Speaker 1: for people to believe with everything going on, but that 280 00:17:32,800 --> 00:17:36,000 Speaker 1: seems to be the likely outcome, and so there very 281 00:17:36,000 --> 00:17:38,199 Speaker 1: well could be a rematch. And I think in that 282 00:17:38,400 --> 00:17:41,680 Speaker 1: kind of a rematch, as we've seen in the elections 283 00:17:41,840 --> 00:17:46,200 Speaker 1: just yesterday, you know, people are kind of moving away 284 00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:49,720 Speaker 1: from the drama from you know, all of the chaos. 285 00:17:49,760 --> 00:17:53,119 Speaker 1: They want, you know, to just have regular order again. 286 00:17:53,440 --> 00:17:58,199 Speaker 1: And they voted yesterday for people who are standing up 287 00:17:58,240 --> 00:18:02,239 Speaker 1: for issues that are popular, like the right to have 288 00:18:02,320 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 1: women make their own reproductive decisions, for example. But you 289 00:18:06,600 --> 00:18:09,679 Speaker 1: had a governor in Kentucky, a deeply red state, a 290 00:18:09,760 --> 00:18:14,639 Speaker 1: democratic governor get re elected. He made abortion a central issue. 291 00:18:15,000 --> 00:18:19,000 Speaker 1: He made red flag laws so that people who are 292 00:18:19,119 --> 00:18:22,720 Speaker 1: dangerous don't get guns, which seems like a very sensible position. 293 00:18:23,119 --> 00:18:26,080 Speaker 1: He made those really central to his campaign, and he 294 00:18:26,160 --> 00:18:29,280 Speaker 1: won a very big victory. So I think that Joe 295 00:18:29,320 --> 00:18:31,680 Speaker 1: Biden will be the nominee. I think Trump right now 296 00:18:31,720 --> 00:18:33,840 Speaker 1: will be the nominee, and I think Biden will be 297 00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:34,440 Speaker 1: re elected. 298 00:18:35,359 --> 00:18:37,760 Speaker 2: You have vote Democrats and dare to be dull. 299 00:18:38,160 --> 00:18:39,359 Speaker 4: That's right, that's right. 300 00:18:39,400 --> 00:18:42,720 Speaker 1: It's the new cool thing, John, you know, just get 301 00:18:42,760 --> 00:18:46,160 Speaker 1: out there and show your dullness, but get the job done. 302 00:18:46,200 --> 00:18:47,879 Speaker 4: Be productive and dull. 303 00:18:49,560 --> 00:18:52,040 Speaker 3: One area just I lost you once there is one 304 00:18:52,040 --> 00:18:54,560 Speaker 3: then that are slightly more amusing one. But on the 305 00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:57,359 Speaker 3: serious side, you look at things like Ukraine at the moment, 306 00:18:57,359 --> 00:19:00,840 Speaker 3: there is definitely a strategy among the maas enemies you 307 00:19:00,840 --> 00:19:05,000 Speaker 3: could see putin waiting perhaps for Trump trying to dig 308 00:19:05,040 --> 00:19:08,840 Speaker 3: in and wait. But also I think also counting on Congress, 309 00:19:08,880 --> 00:19:12,160 Speaker 3: where you feel that Congress feels over extended. It's got 310 00:19:12,440 --> 00:19:15,560 Speaker 3: the border, it's got Spotenningham in Israel. Do you worry 311 00:19:15,600 --> 00:19:19,280 Speaker 3: about America feeling as if it's over extended and unable 312 00:19:19,359 --> 00:19:22,520 Speaker 3: to carry out the kind of global policies that you 313 00:19:22,640 --> 00:19:23,159 Speaker 3: believed in. 314 00:19:23,800 --> 00:19:26,400 Speaker 1: Well up until now, the Biden administration has done quite 315 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:30,119 Speaker 1: a remarkable job. I mean, they put together a coalition 316 00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:32,760 Speaker 1: to support Ukraine, which I think many people would have 317 00:19:32,800 --> 00:19:37,880 Speaker 1: thought unlikely when Biden took office. So I do think 318 00:19:37,960 --> 00:19:42,040 Speaker 1: the legislative agenda that Biden got passed is also another 319 00:19:42,280 --> 00:19:46,080 Speaker 1: very strong indicator of being able to get things done. 320 00:19:46,720 --> 00:19:50,199 Speaker 1: I do agree with you that it is going to 321 00:19:50,200 --> 00:19:54,920 Speaker 1: be challenging in the Congress to get more funding for Ukraine, 322 00:19:55,040 --> 00:19:58,960 Speaker 1: to provide the funding Israel needs to provide the kind 323 00:19:58,960 --> 00:20:02,720 Speaker 1: of support that is required to keep our alliances strong 324 00:20:02,760 --> 00:20:03,959 Speaker 1: around the world. 325 00:20:04,359 --> 00:20:05,679 Speaker 4: But at the end of the day, I think the 326 00:20:05,680 --> 00:20:06,560 Speaker 4: president will get that. 327 00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:10,040 Speaker 1: And I also think there's an opportunity for the President 328 00:20:10,080 --> 00:20:13,080 Speaker 1: because the Republicans in the Senate have said, you know, 329 00:20:13,160 --> 00:20:14,920 Speaker 1: we're on board with all of this, but we want 330 00:20:14,960 --> 00:20:17,360 Speaker 1: to make some changes at the border. I think that, 331 00:20:17,440 --> 00:20:20,080 Speaker 1: you know, the Democrats should negotiate to see what kinds 332 00:20:20,080 --> 00:20:24,760 Speaker 1: of changes would be palatable for the Democrats in order 333 00:20:24,840 --> 00:20:27,560 Speaker 1: to secure the border, in order to make it clear 334 00:20:27,880 --> 00:20:31,359 Speaker 1: that you know, Democrats want a secure border and a 335 00:20:31,480 --> 00:20:35,919 Speaker 1: humane system for people who are trying to enter the 336 00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:38,919 Speaker 1: United States, but we want it to be orderly. So 337 00:20:39,119 --> 00:20:43,040 Speaker 1: I think there's going to be a lot of tough negotiation. 338 00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:44,199 Speaker 4: At the end. I think the president will get what 339 00:20:44,280 --> 00:20:44,720 Speaker 4: he needs. 340 00:20:45,680 --> 00:20:48,080 Speaker 3: There's one quick thing on Ukraine, because you mentioned it. 341 00:20:48,119 --> 00:20:51,719 Speaker 3: Do you think there is any hope of persuading China 342 00:20:51,800 --> 00:20:54,680 Speaker 3: to come in and help on that? So far, China 343 00:20:54,720 --> 00:20:57,800 Speaker 3: has had an effect on that Putin in terms of 344 00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:00,399 Speaker 3: saying don't use nuclear weapons or saying that are off 345 00:21:00,480 --> 00:21:03,639 Speaker 3: the ground. Is there any room of persuading them to 346 00:21:03,760 --> 00:21:06,160 Speaker 3: kind of push him into something closer to a ceasepy 347 00:21:06,359 --> 00:21:07,080 Speaker 3: there as well. 348 00:21:08,359 --> 00:21:09,880 Speaker 4: I don't know the answer to that, John. 349 00:21:09,960 --> 00:21:13,919 Speaker 1: I think China has played an important role in trying 350 00:21:13,960 --> 00:21:20,000 Speaker 1: to send a message to Putin not to over you know, stretch, 351 00:21:20,080 --> 00:21:24,399 Speaker 1: particularly when it comes to tactical nuclear weapons. But I 352 00:21:24,400 --> 00:21:28,520 Speaker 1: think China's also been surprised at how difficult it has 353 00:21:28,600 --> 00:21:32,880 Speaker 1: been for the Russian military to achieve their military objectives. 354 00:21:33,080 --> 00:21:37,120 Speaker 1: I think that's caused China to do some serious evaluation 355 00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:39,080 Speaker 1: internally about their own military. 356 00:21:39,119 --> 00:21:40,080 Speaker 4: I think that's part. 357 00:21:39,920 --> 00:21:42,359 Speaker 1: Of what we may be seeing with some of the 358 00:21:42,440 --> 00:21:46,199 Speaker 1: changes in military leadership, with the assessment that you know, 359 00:21:46,240 --> 00:21:50,520 Speaker 1: everybody thought the Russian military was very effective it turned 360 00:21:50,520 --> 00:21:51,159 Speaker 1: out not to be. 361 00:21:51,280 --> 00:21:52,800 Speaker 4: What are the lessons we can learn? 362 00:21:53,320 --> 00:21:57,320 Speaker 1: I think the more important, you know, decision right now 363 00:21:57,480 --> 00:22:01,960 Speaker 1: is for the United States, Europe and and other like 364 00:22:02,000 --> 00:22:06,280 Speaker 1: minded countries to continue supporting Ukraine, support them with the 365 00:22:06,280 --> 00:22:11,480 Speaker 1: military equipment they need in order to you know, hold 366 00:22:11,480 --> 00:22:14,640 Speaker 1: the line and push back as much as they can. 367 00:22:15,119 --> 00:22:19,200 Speaker 1: You know, the more equipment that we can provide Ukraine, 368 00:22:19,240 --> 00:22:21,720 Speaker 1: the more they can defend themselves and try to take 369 00:22:21,760 --> 00:22:26,280 Speaker 1: back the territory that has been seized since twenty twenty two. 370 00:22:26,720 --> 00:22:28,800 Speaker 1: That should be our objective. That's what we should be 371 00:22:28,840 --> 00:22:29,399 Speaker 1: focused on. 372 00:22:29,640 --> 00:22:30,440 Speaker 4: But you said. 373 00:22:30,200 --> 00:22:33,480 Speaker 1: Something earlier, which I think is absolutely right. I mean, 374 00:22:33,760 --> 00:22:35,840 Speaker 1: I think Putin is waiting to see whether Trump can 375 00:22:35,840 --> 00:22:38,959 Speaker 1: come back. I think you know the fact that Trump 376 00:22:39,000 --> 00:22:42,760 Speaker 1: said when he was president before that he would pull 377 00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:45,800 Speaker 1: the United States out of NATO is like the fulfillment 378 00:22:45,880 --> 00:22:49,160 Speaker 1: of Putin's dreams. And so if he can figure out 379 00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:53,680 Speaker 1: how to hold this in a frozen conflict position and 380 00:22:53,800 --> 00:22:57,800 Speaker 1: not lose any more ground to the Ukrainians and wait 381 00:22:57,880 --> 00:23:00,359 Speaker 1: to see whether there's some opportunity in fact, probably probably 382 00:23:00,359 --> 00:23:04,640 Speaker 1: try to help Trump in the election as he has before, 383 00:23:05,119 --> 00:23:07,760 Speaker 1: then I think, you know, there may be you know, 384 00:23:08,080 --> 00:23:12,720 Speaker 1: a kind of stalemate for a while, and the West cannot. 385 00:23:13,000 --> 00:23:14,920 Speaker 4: Be discouraged by that. We have to. 386 00:23:14,960 --> 00:23:17,960 Speaker 1: Keep you know, supporting the Ukrainians to push as far 387 00:23:18,000 --> 00:23:19,160 Speaker 1: as they can push. 388 00:23:20,400 --> 00:23:23,199 Speaker 3: On one very last thing on the I mentioned the Republicans. 389 00:23:23,240 --> 00:23:25,920 Speaker 3: On the Republican side, you will have noticed how much 390 00:23:26,000 --> 00:23:29,280 Speaker 3: traction Nicky Hayley has been getting as a woman who 391 00:23:29,359 --> 00:23:32,720 Speaker 3: was the American ambassador the UN. Do you think that 392 00:23:32,720 --> 00:23:34,879 Speaker 3: if Biden was to stumble, that might be room for 393 00:23:34,920 --> 00:23:38,480 Speaker 3: another woman with slightly more foreign policy experience. 394 00:23:38,800 --> 00:23:41,080 Speaker 1: Well, I don't know the answer to that, but I 395 00:23:42,119 --> 00:23:46,479 Speaker 1: hope Biden doesn't stumble. I hope that he goes all 396 00:23:46,520 --> 00:23:48,720 Speaker 1: the way to you know, the finish line, because I 397 00:23:48,760 --> 00:23:52,160 Speaker 1: think he's earned it, he deserves it, and you know, honestly, 398 00:23:52,800 --> 00:23:56,520 Speaker 1: the only real argument or complaint is that he's old 399 00:23:56,640 --> 00:24:02,040 Speaker 1: and And you know what, I think everybody who's his 400 00:24:02,160 --> 00:24:06,320 Speaker 1: age would be very happy if they were as productive 401 00:24:06,359 --> 00:24:08,720 Speaker 1: as he is and has gotten as much done as 402 00:24:08,760 --> 00:24:12,879 Speaker 1: he has and traveled the schedule he's traveled, So you know, 403 00:24:13,320 --> 00:24:16,400 Speaker 1: I'm going to continue to support him, and I think 404 00:24:16,400 --> 00:24:19,480 Speaker 1: he's our best candidate for twenty twenty four. 405 00:24:20,520 --> 00:24:22,960 Speaker 3: That was an imaccurate answer on which to finish. We 406 00:24:23,000 --> 00:24:26,560 Speaker 3: are very grateful for you staying up and doing Thanks. 407 00:24:26,720 --> 00:24:28,400 Speaker 3: Thank you very much, Thank you, Don